Significant activity of paclitaxel in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium: a phase II trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Current Status and Perspectives in Cancer Chemotherapy

New anticancer drugs with novel structures including paclitaxel, docetaxel, ilinotecan and gemcitabine have shown significant activity against various solid tumors in phase II trials. Phase II trials of combination regimens containing these drugs are currently in progress. Some combinations such as paclitaxel pluscisplatin in ovarian cancer have shown superiority over the past standard regimen. Not surprisingly, several analogues of these drugs have been developed and currently phase II trials are in progress. ET-743 may has some hope to become thefirst anticancer drug from a marine product. Oral chemotherapy is useful for treatment of outpatients. A combination regimen of UFT plus oral leucovorin has shown equivalent activity to 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer, and capecitabine has shown superior activity and less toxicity than 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Monoclonal antibody therapy has been successful in patients with breast cancer overexpressing HER2 and in patients with B-cell lymphoma. Currently clinical trials of 17-1A for colorectal cancer and HUM195 for acute myelogeneous leukemia are in progress. Recently presented results of angiogenesis inhibitors are discussed.

A phase II trial of methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in the treatment of invasive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma generates high response rates but is associated with poor overall survival. The current study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a new combination of active drugs in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with muscle invasive or metastatic urothelial carcinoma were enrolled. Fifteen patients (63%) had metastatic disease whereas 9 patients had T2-T4 disease. Three patients were unevaluable for response because of significant toxicity. Patients were treated every 28 days with methotrexate, 60 mg/m(2), intravenously (i.v.) on Day 1; cisplatin, 25 mg/m(2)/day, by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 2-6; 5-flurouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m(2)/day by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 3-6; and leucovorin, 500 mg/m(2)/day, by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 2-6. Dosage in subsequent cycles was adjusted according to toxicity.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 81 months (range, 53-97+ months). The overall response rate (complete response + partial response) for all 24 patients was 63% (95% confidence interval, 41-81%). The median survival was 65 months in the patients with muscle invasive disease and 17 months in the patients with metastatic disease. The duration of response in patients with metastatic disease was 6 months (range, 4-19 months). Toxicity was significant, with 82% of patients experiencing Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 63% experiencing Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. However, only three patients developed febrile neutropenia and gastrointestinal and neurologic toxicity was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin represents an active regimen in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma with a moderate toxicity profile. As new drugs are found to treat urothelial carcinoma, further studies will be needed to evaluate the role of traditional agents such as 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in new combination chemotherapeutic regimens.

Long-term survival in metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma and prognostic factors predicting outcome of therapy

PURPOSE

The variation in reported survival of patients with metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) treated with systemic chemotherapy may be a consequence of pretreatment patient characteristics. We hypothesized that a prognostic factor-based model of survival among patients treated with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin chemotherapy could account for such differences and help guide clinical trial design and interpretation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A database of 203 patients with unresectable or metastatic TCC was retrospectively subjected to a multivariate regression analysis to determine which patient characteristics had independent prognostic significance for survival. Patients were assigned to three risk categories depending on the number of unfavorable characteristics. Patient selection in phase II studies was addressed by developing a table of expected median survival for patient cohorts that had varying proportions of patients from the three risk categories.

RESULTS

Two factors had independent prognosis: Karnofsky performance status (KPS) less than 80% and visceral (lung, liver, or bone) metastasis. Median survival times for patients who had zero, one, or two risk factors were 33, 13.4, and 9.3 months, respectively (P =.0001). The median survival time of patient cohorts could vary from 9 to 26 months simply by altering the proportion of patients from different risk categories.

CONCLUSION

The presence of baseline KPS less than 80% or visceral metastasis has an impact on survival. Reporting the proportion of patients with zero, one, and two risk factors will facilitate understanding of the relevance of the median survival in phase II trials. Phase III trials should stratify patients according to the number of risk factors to avoid imbalance in treatment arms.

Preliminary results of simultaneous radiochemotherapy with paclitaxel for urinary bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel (Taxol) has been shown to be effective in metastatic bladder cancer as single agent and in combination with other cytotoxic drugs. Its efficacy seems to be comparable to cisplatin. We have used paclitaxel as alternative to cisplatin in selected patients with simultaneous radiochemotherapy. The objective of this article is to summarize the preliminary results with regard to feasibility and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 10/97 through 10/98 7 patients with locally advanced or recurrent urothelial bladder cancer were treated with radiotherapy and simultaneous paclitaxel + cisplatin. All patients had macroscopic irresectable residual tumor after transurethral surgery or cystectomy. Paclitaxel was given twice weekly in a daily dosage of 25 through 35 mg/m2 as 1-hour-infusion. Cisplatin was given in a dosage of 25 mg/m2 daily on days 1 to 5.

RESULTS

All patients completed the scheduled therapy regimen. The acute toxicity consisted mainly of enteritis (Grade I to II CTC). As severe toxicity, 1 severe skin reaction in the groins (Grade III) after 20 Gy and 1 Grade-III enteritis were noted. Both patients with severe complications recovered within 4 weeks after treatment. Hematological toxicity was mild to moderate in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This report suggests that paclitaxel is a promising agent for simultaneous radiochemotherapy protocols. The clinical value remains to be better defined especially the question whether paclitaxel may improve the results if used as alternative to standard cisplatin. At the moment paclitaxel offers at least an attractive alternative to cisplatin in patients with impaired renal function.

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin, an active regimen in advanced urothelial cancer: a phase II trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine (2', 2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) plus cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with measurable advanced transitional-cell carcinoma who had received no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were scheduled to receive gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) over 1 hour on day 2 of a 28-day cycle. Prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease was allowed if this was completed more than 1 year before study entry.

RESULTS

There were six complete responses and 10 partial responses in 28 assessable patients, for an overall response rate of 16 of 28 (57%). The response rate on an intent-to-treat basis was 16 of 31 patients (52%). The median survival is 13.2 months, with 18 patients still alive at this time. Toxicity was primarily hematologic, with 12 of 31 patients (39%) having > or = grade 3 granulocytopenia and 17 of 31 (55%) having > or = grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Two patients had febrile neutropenia. All patients required a dose modification of gemcitabine at some point in their therapy; the primary reason was thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is an active regimen for the treatment of urothelial cancer.

A Phase II study of paclitaxel and ifosfamide for patients with advanced refractory carcinoma of the urothelium

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium has limitations, and new therapies need to be evaluated.

METHODS

Ifosfamide 1.0 gm/m2 on Days 1-4 and paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on Day 4 were administered to 26 patients with locally unresectable or metastatic TCC. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles; dose escalation was dependent on whether Grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred.

RESULTS

There were 24 males and 2 females, with a median age of 66 years and a median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0. The median number of cycles administered was 3. Twelve patients had Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities, including 1 patient who died of a gastrointestinal hemorrhage while pancytopenic. There were no episodes of neutropenic fever. Two patients each had a complete response (CR) that lasted 5 and 28 months, respectively (response rate: 15%; 95% CI: 2-45%), among the 13 patients who had received prior chemotherapy. Of the 13 patients without prior chemotherapy, there were 3 with complete responses and 1 with a partial response ranging from 8 to 25+ months (RR: 30.7%; 95% CI: 9-61%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ifosfamide and paclitaxel is well tolerated and can produce objective responses in patients who are chemonaïve or have had prior therapy. For previously untreated patients, the addition of ifosfamide does not appear to result in a better response rate than single agent paclitaxel; and for previously treated patients, the addition of paclitaxel does not appear to result in a better response rate than single agent ifosfamide.

Long-term follow-up results of a Pilot Phase II study of multidrug chemotherapy (MVP-CAB) in patients with advanced urothelial cancer

BACKGROUND

To determine the long-term effects and toxicity of multidrug chemotherapy for advanced urothelial cancer.

METHODS

Forty patients with metastatic urothelial cancer were treated with a new combination chemotherapy, MVP-CAB (methotrexate, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, bleomycin and cisplatin every 28 days). Of the 40 patients, 26 had not undergone prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy; the remaining 14 patients had undergone prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The clinical response rate to MVP-CAB therapy for all 40 patients was 63% [complete response (CR), six patients; partial response (PR), 19 patients]. The median duration of the effects was 22 and 13 months in the patients with CR and PR, respectively. The clinical response rate for the 26 patients without prior chemotherapy was 77% (CR, four patients; PR, 16 patients). The rate for the 14 patients with prior chemotherapy was 36% (CR, two patients; PR, three patients). The response rate according to metastatic site was highest for the liver (80%), followed by the lymph nodes (74%) and lungs (67%). The effect on bone metastasis was poor (22%). There was good compliance with the MVP-CAB chemotherapy regimen and toxicity was tolerable. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 42.5, 10 and 5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MVP-CAB combination chemotherapy was found to be effective for the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer, especially for liver metastasis.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic transitional cell cancer of the urinary tract

OBJECTIVES

The combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) is currently considered the most effective chemotherapy for metastatic transitional cell cancer (TCC) of the urinary tract, but because of its considerable toxicity, alternative regimens appear very interesting. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic TCC.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients (8 women, 24 men; mean age 67.03 years, range 50 to 79) with metastatic TCC of the bladder or upper urinary tract were included in the study. Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) was given as a 3-hour intravenous infusion, carboplatin was dosed to an area under the plasma concentration curve of 5 mg/m/min calculated according to the Calvert formula [(creatinine clearance + 25) x 5] as a 30-minute intravenous infusion immediately after paclitaxel. Response evaluation was performed after every 2 cycles and additional therapy depended on response. The maximum number of cycles was 6.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 13.1 months (range 2 to 28), 23 of 32 patients responded to treatment (response rate 71.9%), with 31.3% complete remission (CR) (10 of 32) and 40.6% partial remission (PR) (13 of 32). Four patients (12.5%) had stable disease, and 5 patients (15.6%) showed progression. These results compare well with the outcome after MVAC. Toxicity was mainly characterized by neurotoxicity grade 3 and 4 in 9.4%, grade 3 and 4 leukopenia in 37.5%, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 3.1% of the patients. No nephrotoxicity was observed, but all patients developed alopecia. Time to progression after CR was a mean of 7.0 months (range 4 to 13) and after PR a mean of 5.9 months (range 2 to 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel/carboplatin is an effective therapy for metastatic TCC, with low toxicity.

Gemcitabine and other new chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of metastatic bladder cancer

An improved quality of life secondary to reduced chemotherapy toxicity is an important end point in the treatment of all patients with metastatic cancer. In this review, we have demonstrated that gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin combinations appear to have a reduced toxicity profile compared with MVAC. Phase II studies with gemcitabine and cisplatin have shown good response rates that are possibly equivalent to MVAC, and a Phase III trial is now completed. Similar data have been reported for the paclitaxel/carboplatin combination and a Phase III trial comparing that combination with MVAC is planned. For patients with TCC who are in mild renal failure or who have significant underlying medical conditions, gemcitabine can also be considered as a reasonable single agent therapy. Complete responses can be seen, even in patients who are older than the age of 70. Moore et al., for example, demonstrated near complete responses to gemcitabine monotherapy in 4 patients older than 80 years of age. In conclusion, chemotherapy options for patients with metastatic bladder cancer have changed significantly with the addition of gemcitabine and other drugs to the armentarium. The integration of gemcitabine into the initial chemotherapy plan for these patients is still being developed. It is clear that this agent should be included in the management discussions of all patients with metastatic bladder cancer.

A randomized trial comparing methotrexate and vinblastine (MV) with cisplatin, methotrexate and vinblastine (CMV) in advanced transitional cell carcinoma: results and a report on prognostic factors in a Medical Research Council study. MRC Advanced Bladder Cancer Working Party

Transitional cell carcinomas may arise at any site within the urinary tract and are a source of considerable morbidity and mortality. In particular, patients with metastatic disease have a poor prognosis, with less than 5% alive at 5 years. A multicentre randomized trial comparing methotrexate and vinblastine (MV) with cisplatin, methotrexate and vinblastine (CMV) in advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma was conducted in the UK. From April 1991 to June 1995, 214 patients were entered by 16 centres, 108 randomized to CMV and 106 to MV. A total of 204 patients have died. The hazard ratio (relative risk of dying) was 0.68 (95% CI 0.51-0.90, P-value = 0.0065) in favour of CMV. This translates to an absolute improvement in 1-year survival of 13%, 16% in MV and 29% in CMV. The median survival for CMV and MV was 7 months and 4.5 months respectively. Two hundred and eight patients objectively progressed or died. The hazard ratio was 0.55 (95% CI 0.41-0.73, P-value = 0.0001) in favour of CMV. Two hundred and nine patients symptomatically progressed or died. The hazard ratio was 0.48 (95% CI 0.36-0.64, P-value = 0.0001) in favour of CMV. The most important pretreatment factors influencing overall survival were WHO performance status and extent of disease. These two factors were used to derive a prognostic index which could be used to categorize patients into three prognostic groups. We conclude that the addition of cisplatin to methotrexate and vinblastine should be considered in patients with transitional cell carcinoma, taking into account the increased toxicity.

[Chemotherapy for urothelial infiltrating tumors]

Since 1985, the gold standard regimen for metastatic tumours of the urothelial tract is a combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (M-VAC protocol). Randomised studies have shown the superiority of the M-VAC regimen over cisplatin alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. The limited gain in survival shows that, although chemosensitive, metastatic tumours cannot be cured by the available drug combinations. Amongst new cytotoxic drugs in development, paclitaxel and gemcitabine are likely to be involved in the standard regimen of the future. The studies published to date do not support the routine use of chemotherapy in the neo-adjuvant or adjuvant setting for the management of early stage urothelial tumours.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: results of a phase II trial

The present phase II trial was undertaken to assess the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Twenty patients (age range 50-79 years; inclusion criteria: WHO performance status 0-2, no previous cytotoxic treatment) with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium were recruited and received cytotoxic treatment with paclitaxel at a dosage of 175 mg m(-2) administered over a 3-h infusion and carboplatin given at an AUC of 5 mg ml(-1) min (according to creatinine clearance) administered every 21 days. A total of 65% of patients achieved remissions (CR+PR), with CR occurring in 40% of patients. A further 15% of patients experienced stable disease. Remissions occurred after 2.4 +/- 0.8 (mean +/- standard deviation; range two to four) treatment cycles. The mean duration of responses (CR+PR) was 8.5 +/- 5.5 months. After a mean observation period of 11.4 +/- 4.8 months, 16 patients (80%) are alive. Toxicity included alopecia of WHO grade 3 in all patients, leucopenia of WHO grades 1 and 2 in ten patients, grade 3 in eight and grade 4 in two patients and, finally, severe thrombocytopenia grade 3 in only three patients. Non-haematological toxicity consisted of polyneuropathy of WHO grade 1 in 13 patients and grade 2 in five patients. We thus conclude that a combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin at the given dosage and schedule constitutes an active, well-tolerated first-line cytotoxic treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

Treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and impaired renal function with single-agent docetaxel

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and impaired renal function.

METHODS

Eleven consecutive patients previously untreated for metastatic disease with renal impairment (median serum creatinine level of 2.6 mg/dL) were treated with intravenous docetaxel 100 mg/m2 for 1 hour every 21 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered at a dose of 5 microg/kg/day subcutaneously from days 5 to 14.

RESULTS

Five of 11 patients achieved a partial response, with time to progression of responding patients ranging from 5 to 22 months or more. The median overall survival rate was 11 months. Renal function improved in 5 of 8 patients with tumor-related renal impairment. Toxicity was primarily hematologic, with 5 patients developing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia; nonhematologic toxicities were manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data indicate that single-agent docetaxel therapy may represent an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and renal insufficiency precluding cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

Phase I trial of paclitaxel and gemcitabine administered every two weeks in patients with refractory solid tumors

PURPOSE

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine possess broad spectra of clinical activity, distinct mechanisms of cytotoxicity, and are differentially affected by mutations in cell-cycle regulatory proteins, such as bcl-2. This phase I trial was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of paclitaxel and gemcitabine when both drugs were given together on a once-every-two-week schedule in patients with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 37 patients were treated at nine different dose levels ranging from paclitaxel 75-175 mg/m2 administered over three hours followed by gemcitabinc 1500-3500 mg/m2 administered over 30-60 minutes. Both drugs were administered on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. Dose escalation was performed in a stepwise manner in which the dose of one drug was escalated while the dose of the other drug was kept constant.

RESULTS

Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at dose level 9: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3500 mg/m2 in the form of grade 4 neutropenia lasting for > or = 5 days (one patient) and grade 3 elevation of alanine aminotransferase (AST/SGPT) (one patient). An analysis of delivered dose intensity (DI) over the first three cycles revealed that higher dosages of both drugs were delivered at dose level 7, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3000 mg/m2 dose level, than at the MTD, dose level 8, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3500 mg/m2. Partial responses were confirmed in two patients with transitional cell carcinoma (one of the bladder, one of the renal pelvis) and in one patient with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine is a promising drug combination that can be administered safely and repetitively on an every-other-week schedule. Using this drug administration schedule, the recommended phase II dose is paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3000 mg/m2.

Carboplatin-based versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the treatment of surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The carboplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimen M-CAVI (methotrexate, carboplatin, and vinblastine) is active against bladder carcinoma and can be administered to patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin or doxorubicin. The authors designed a randomized study to evaluate whether M-CAVI offers a therapeutic advantage over the cisplatin-based regimen M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in the treatment of patients with surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma were enrolled on a randomized trial comparing M-CAVI, which consists of carboplatin (300 mg/m2 on Day 2, adjusted using Calvert's formula for an area under the curve of 5), methotrexate (30 mg/m2 on Days 1, 15, and 22), and vinblastine (3 mg/m2 on Days 2, 15, and 22) administered every 28 days, versus standard M-VAC. The eligibility criteria included histologically proven bladder carcinoma, surgically incurable disease, and no prior chemotherapy. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.

RESULTS

From January 1989 to January 1994, 47 assessable patients were included. Seventeen patients had lymph node disease and 30 had distant metastatic disease. Twenty-three patients were randomized to receive M-CAVI and 24 to receive M-VAC. Patient characteristics in the two groups were similar. Overall response rates were 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20-62%) for M-CAVI and 52% (95% CI, 30-73%) for M-VAC (P = 0.3), with 3 complete responses observed among patients treated with M-VAC and none among those in the M-CAVI group. M-VAC was associated with more gastrointestinal toxicity, stomatitis, alopecia, and Grade 4 neutropenia than M-CAVI. One toxicity-related death occurred in the M-VAC group. There was a statistically significant difference in median disease-related survival time favoring M-VAC (16 months; range, 6 to 22+) versus M-CAVI (9 months; range, 6 to 14+) (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

M-CAVI is less toxic but less active than M-VAC in the treatment of patients with advanced bladder carcinoma. Carboplatin-based regimens in which carboplatin is administered at the dose range used in the current study should be reserved for patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin treatment. Further research is required to assess the impact of high dose carboplatin in the treatment of this disease.

Systemic chemotherapy of transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium

Although the incidence of bladder cancer has increased in recent years, survival has also improved. Chemotherapy has made a substantial impact on this disease and now is used in patients with advanced or metastatic disease as well as in select patients with high-risk muscle invasive disease. While cisplatin remains the most active single antineoplastic agent, several other agents including methotrexate, vinblastine, and Adriamycin (doxorubicin) have important activity. More recently, paclitaxel and gemcitabine have shown promising activity in bladder cancer. Multidrug combination therapy has provided more frequent and durable responses than single agent therapy. Regimens containing cisplatin and methotrexate have been shown to be most effective in the treatment of advanced disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy regimes typically have included cisplatin or cisplatin and methotrexate combinations. However, studies have been limited and further prospective trials are required to determine the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Multiple studies have investigated neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and methotrexate combinations or anthracycline-based regimens, but study results are mixed. Further trials will be required to define the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer.

5-Fluorouracil, interferon-alpha-2b and cisplatin (FAP) for advanced urothelial cancer. A phase II study. Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the FAP combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced urothelial cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with histologically confirmed advanced urothelial cancer, with measurable disease and without previous chemotherapy entered the study; all 34 are evaluable. The 28 males and 6 females had a median age of 65 (19-75) and a median ECOG performance status of 1 (0-2). Twenty-eight patients had bladder cancer, four had renal pelvic cancer and two ureteral cancer. Thirty patients had transitional cell carcinoma and four mixed, mostly of grade 3. Sites of disease included lymph nodes (18), bladder (9), liver (9), pelvic mass (9), lung (7), etc. The treatment plan was as follows: 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 continuous infusion D1-D5 and D22-D26; interferon-alpha-2b 5 million i.u./m2 D1-D5 followed by 3x/week and then D22-D26; cisplatin 25 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15, D22. Cycles were repeated every 36 days.

RESULTS

The median number of cycles administered was 3 (1-6). The relative dose intensities for 5-fluorouracil, interferon and cisplatin were 76%, 71% and 75%, respectively. Twenty-two of 34 patients (65%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 46% to 80%) had objective responses, including six complete clinical responses (CR) (18%, 95% CI, 7% to 35%) and 16 partial responses (PR) (47%, 95% CI, 30% to 65%). Three patients had stable disease and seven progressed. Two patients discontinued treatment after the first cycle because of toxicity. The median survival is 15.30 months (1.40-37.60), the median time to progression 11.60 months (4.13-37.60), and the median survival of complete responders 20.75+ months (8+ to 38+). The only significant hematologic toxicity was the grade 3-4 neutropenia in 44%. Non-hematologic toxic effects were unremarkable.

CONCLUSION

The FAP combination as first-line chemotherapy is highly active in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer, and has limited toxicity. Further phase III studies are in progress to compare FAP and M-VAC.

Phase II study of paclitaxel in pretreated patients with locally advanced/metastatic cancer of the bladder and ureter

Fourteen patients with previously treated, locally advanced/metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder or ureter received paclitaxel at a dose of 200 mg m-2 administered as a 3-h infusion every 21 days. The activity of paclitaxel in this group of patients was modest. The response rates were one partial response (PR) (7%) and three stable disease (SD). There were two early deaths.

Metastatic bladder cancer: advances in treatment

At present, a combination of cisplatin, methotrexate, vinblastine and doxorubicin is the most widely used chemotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer. However, long-term follow-up shows that this combination may have little effect on survival. In addition, this regimen is toxic. New agents are needed which combine efficacy with good safety profiles. Agents which have been investigated include gallium nitrate, interferon-alpha and paclitaxel both as single agents and in combination with established cytotoxic drugs. A number of studies have been conducted in bladder cancer with the novel nucleoside analogue, gemcitabine. Response rates of up to 33% have been recorded in two phase II studies. Gemcitabine was well tolerated in both studies with few of the side-effects normally associated with cytotoxic drugs. A third study is ongoing.

New approaches in the treatment of metastatic transitional-cell cancer of the bladder

In recent years, chemotherapy of metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder has advanced from the use of individual therapeutic agents, which has effected only rare responses, to the development of multi-agent regimens, which have greatly improved both partial and complete response rates, resulting in improved local care, palliation, and; perhaps, survival. However, because of the limited duration of response, frequent recurrences, and the significant proportion of patients with refractory disease, there have been only modest overall gains in long-term disease-free survival. These shortcomings have prompted investigation of alternative approaches to current combination chemotherapy regimens, including the use of hematopoietic growth factors and novel single-agent, multi-agent, and gene therapy protocols.

The development and clinical utility of the taxane class of antimicrotubule chemotherapy agents

The taxane class of antimicrotubule anticancer agents is perhaps the most important addition to the chemotherapeutic armamentarium against cancer over the past several decades. After only a brief period, the taxanes have not only demonstrated a unique ability to palliate the symptoms of many types of advanced cancers, including carcinoma of the ovary, lung, head and neck, bladder, and esophagus, they have also demonstrated effectiveness in the initial therapy of earlier stages of cancer, a setting in which any new therapy is likely to make its greatest impact. The challenge now facing investigators is to develop strategies to maximize therapeutic benefits with the taxanes in the early stages, as well as the advanced stages, of many cancers. This review describes the preclinical features and clinical results of the two major taxanes, paclitaxel (Taxol, Bristol-Myers Squibb) and docetaxel (Taxotere, Rhone-Poulenc Rhorer).

In vitro investigations of new therapeutic agents on bladder tumor cell lines

In this study sensitivity of human transitional cancer cells to the anticancer agent paclitaxel, an antimicrotubular drug, and to gallium nitrate, a group IIIa metal, was compared to that of the standard MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) drugs. The reduction of cell proliferation was evaluated after 48 h of incubation of six different cell lines with each agent using the mean transit time (MTT) assay. We investigated both monolayers and spheroids. Paclitaxel showed significantly higher growth inhibitory effects on monolayers than vinblastine, both agents targeting the antimicrotubular apparatus. This could not be reproduced on spheroids, where a survival fraction of 50% was observed even at high concentrations (10 microM). High concentrations of gallium nitrate were needed to achieve sufficient toxicity. These concentrations are beyond the concentration achievable by systemic application. Our findings suggest that paclitaxel may be a clinically useful agent for systemic and intravesical use in bladder cancer.

Phase II trial of oral piritrexim in advanced, previously treated transitional cell cancer of bladder

Oral piritrexim (PTX), a second generation antimetabolite, has been shown to be an active agent against methotrexate refractory transitional cell cancer (TCC) of the bladder in phase I trials. We conducted a phase II trial of this drug in patients with TCC of the bladder who failed a first line chemotherapy regimen.

METHODS

Oral PTX was started at the dose of 25 mg three times per day for 5 days weekly for 3 weeks followed by one week of rest. If this was tolerated the dose was increased to 50 mg three times a day. Patients were monitored for response rate and toxicity.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were entered into the trial. Two patients did not complete the required 2 courses of treatment to be evaluable. There were 13 evaluable patients. Among the 13 no one achieved a complete response (CR), however, there were 3 partial responses (PRs = RR: 23%) and 5 stable diseases (SDs). The responses lasted 2, 8 and 14 months. The major dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Two patients died on treatment. One death was due to neutropenic fever and the cause of death in the second patient is thought to be a cerebral vascular accident (CVA).

CONCLUSION

PTX is an active drug in the treatment of TCC of the bladder. Bone marrow suppression is the most common dose-limiting toxicity. In view of the observed responses and toxicities in this study and other studies, we suggest that the role of PTX be further investigated in the following clinical settings: 1. Palliative initial treatment in patients with TCC of the bladder who are not candidates for more aggressive chemotherapy. 2. As first line chemotherapy in combination with other active drugs.

Paclitaxel in advanced urothelial carcinoma: its role in patients with renal insufficiency and as salvage therapy

PURPOSE

We evaluated the role of paclitaxel in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and renal insufficiency or as second line therapy for metastatic disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma received 175 to 250 mg./m2. paclitaxel intravenously as a 24-hour infusion. Six patients had renal insufficiency with a median serum creatinine of 2.25 mg./dl. (range 1.9 to 3.2) and 3 with normal renal function were treated after disease progression following 1 to 2 prior chemotherapy regimens.

RESULTS

Of 9 patients 5 (56%) achieved a partial response, including 4 of 6 with renal insufficiency. Toxicity was primarily hematological with 4 patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. There was no adverse impact on renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel as a single agent represents an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium and renal insufficiency precluding cisplatin or gallium nitrate based chemotherapy. Additionally, paclitaxel appears to be effective in patients in whom prior cisplatin based therapy failed.

Systemic Therapy for Invasive Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is one of the most common malignancies in Western society. In the United States, approximately 10,000 of these patients present with invasive disease, and more progress from superficial bladder cancer. METHODS: The authors review the literature on systemic treatment for both localized and metastatic bladder cancer, and they include their experience in defining approaches to various stages of disease. RESULTS: Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is the most effective systemic approach for advanced bladder cancers, although few patients are cured. Neoadjuvant, perspective, and adjuvant trials, as well as concurrent chemoradiation studies, are in progress to attempt to demonstrate better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of systemic chemotherapy and definitive local therapy may have a useful role in the management of locally advanced bladder cancers, but optimal schedules and true survival benefit have not been established.

Bladder cancer. Current diagnostic methods and treatment options

The incidence of bladder cancer has grown over the years, presumably in part because of increasing exposure to carcinogenic agents in modern-day life. Drs Badalament and Schervish outline the latest diagnostic and staging methods for the disease and summarize treatment options for superficial, invasive, and metastatic cancers, including discussion of various methods for urinary diversion following cystectomy.