Baseline Metabolic Tumor Volume Predicts Outcome in High-Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma: A Pooled Analysis of Three Multicenter Studies

18F-FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of patients with lymphoma

The aim of this work was to review the current recommendations for staging and response assessment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in routine clinical practice after chemotherapy and/or stem cell transplantation. A five-point scale (5-PS) from the First International Workshop on PET in Lymphoma in Deauville, France, in 2009, was recommended as the standard tool to score imaging to assess treatment response in patients with lymphoma using ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. Following the recommendations of the 11th and 12th International Conferences on Malignant Lymphoma held in Lugano (Switzerland), in 2011 and 2013, respectively, a consensus (the so-called Lugano Classification) was reached regarding the use of PET/CT for staging and response assessment in FDG-avid lymphomas. As a result, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was formally incorporated into standard staging for FDG-avid lymphomas. A bone marrow biopsy is no longer indicated for the routine staging of HL and most diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. PET/CT will be used to assess response in FDG-avid histologies using the 5-point scale. The recent introduction of biological agents with immune mechanisms requires flexibility in interpretations of the Lugano criteria due to tumour flare or a pseudo-progression effect produced by these agents. Provisional criteria have been proposed (Lymphoma Response to Immunomodulatory Therapy Criteria) with the introduction of the term 'Indeterminate Response' in order to identify this phenomenon until confirmed as flare/pseudoprogression or true progression. All these recommendations will improve evaluations of patients with lymphoma, and allow comparison of results from clinical practice and trials.

FDG-PET Scan: a new Paradigm for Follicular Lymphoma Management

In the present review, the reader will be led to the most relevant observations that prompted oncologists and haematologist to consider FDG-PET/CT as a new paradigm for FL management in clinical practice. The role of functional imaging in lymphoma staging, restaging, prognostication, and metabolic tumour volume computing will be reviewed in detail. Moreover, a special focus will be addressed to technical and practical aspects of PET scan reporting, which have been set during the last decade to ensure the reproducibility of the therapeutic results. Finally, the predictive role of PET/CT on long-term treatment outcome will be compared with another well-known prognosticator as minimal residual disease (MRD) detection by Immunoglobulin gene rearrangement assessment.

When to treat patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Follicular lymphoma is the most common indolent lymphoma and remains incurable for the majority of patients despite recent major advances. The disease is typically initially chemosensitive, however relapse is inevitable. In contrast to the frontline setting, studies addressing the optimal timing of initiating second line therapy have not been performed and subsequently practice varies considerably. Areas covered: In the review, we consider the available literature regarding timing of therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma and consider key insights from FL biology to provide guidance on when to treat patients with relapsed disease. Expert commentary: We recommend re-biopsy at time of relapse, immediate treatment of patients with histologic transformation. Treatment for those with recurrent follicular lymphoma may be safely delayed in the absence of bulk, compressive or constitutional symptoms, cytopenias related to lymphoma or steady progression. Patients with localized relapse may be considered for radiotherapy if the involved field would result in minimal toxicity.

Systemic Front Line Therapy of Follicular Lymphoma: When, to Whom and How

The natural history of follicular lymphoma is usually characterized by an indolent course with a high response rate to the first line therapy followed by recurrent relapses, with a time to next treatment becoming shorter after each subsequent treatment line. More than 80% of patients have advanced stage disease at diagnosis. The time of initiation and the nature of the treatment is mainly conditioned by symptoms, tumor burden, lymphoma grading, co-morbidities and patients preference. A number of clinical and biological factors have been determined to be prognostic in this disease, but the majority of them could not show to be predictive of response to treatment, and therefore can’t be used to guide the treatment choice. CD20 expression is the only predictive factor recognized in the treatment of FL and justifies the use of “naked” or “conjugated” anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies as a single agent or in combination with chemo- or targeted therapy. Nevertheless, as this marker is almost universally found in FL, it has little role in the choice of treatment. The outcome of patients with FL improved significantly in the last years, mainly due to the widespread use of rituximab, autologous and allogeneic transplantation in young and fit relapsed patients, the introduction of new drugs and the improvement in diagnostic accuracy and management of side effects. Agents as new monoclonal antibodies, immuno-modulating drugs, and target therapy have recently been developed and approved for the relapsed setting, while studies to evaluate their role in first line treatment are still ongoing. Here we report our considerations on first line treatment approach and on the potential factors which could help in the choice of therapy.

Baseline Total Metabolic Tumor Volume Measured with Fixed or Different Adaptive Thresholding Methods Equally Predicts Outcome in Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma

The purpose of this study was to compare in a large series of peripheral T cell lymphoma, as a model of diffuse disease, the prognostic value of baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) measured on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT with adaptive thresholding methods with TMTV measured with a fixed 41% SUV_max threshold method.

METHODS

One hundred six patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma, staged with PET/CT, were enrolled from 5 Lymphoma Study Association centers. In this series, TMTV computed with the 41% SUV_max threshold is a strong predictor of outcome. On a dedicated workstation, we measured the TMTV with 4 adaptive thresholding methods based on characteristic image parameters: Daisne (Da) modified, based on signal-to-background ratio; Nestle (Ns), based on tumor and background intensities; Fit, including a 3-dimensional geometric model based on spatial resolution (Fit); and Black (Bl), based on mean SUV_max The TMTV values obtained with each adaptive method were compared with those obtained with the 41% SUV_max method. Their respective prognostic impacts on outcome prediction were compared using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

The median value of TMTV_41%, TMTV_Da, TMTV_Ns, TMTV_Fit, and TMTV_Bl were, respectively, 231 cm³ (range, 5-3,824), 175 cm³ (range, 8-3,510), 198 cm³ (range, 3-3,934), 175 cm³ (range, 8-3,512), and 333 cm³ (range, 3-5,113). The intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent, from 0.972 to 0.988, for TMTV_Da, TMTV_Fit, and TMTV_Ns, and less good for TMTV_Bl (0.856). The mean differences obtained from the Bland-Altman plots were 48.5, 47.2, 19.5, and -253.3 cm³, respectively. Except for Black, there was no significant difference within the methods between the ROC curves (P > 0.4) for progression-free survival and overall survival. Survival curves with the ROC optimal cutoff for each method separated the same groups of low-risk (volume ≤ cutoff) from high-risk patients (volume > cutoff), with similar 2-y progression-free survival (range, 66%-72% vs. 26%-29%; hazard ratio, 3.7-4.1) and 2-y overall survival (79%-83% vs. 50%-53%; hazard ratio, 3.0-3.5).

CONCLUSION

The prognostic value of TMTV remained quite similar whatever the methods, adaptive or 41% SUV_max, supporting its use as a strong prognosticator in lymphoma. However, for implementation of TMTV in clinical trials 1 single method easily applicable in a multicentric PET review must be selected and kept all along the trial.