Differential Activity of Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and MPDL3280A according to the Tumor Expression of Programmed Death-Ligand-1 (PD-L1): Sensitivity Analysis of Trials in Melanoma, Lung and Genitourinary Cancers

Do immune checkpoint inhibitors need new studies methodology?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have widely reshaped the treatment paradigm of advanced cancer patients. Although multiple studies are currently evaluating these drugs as monotherapies or in combination, the choice of the most accurate statistical methods, endpoints and clinical trial designs to estimate the benefit of ICI remains an unsolved methodological issue. Considering the unconventional patterns of response or progression [i.e., pseudoprogression, hyperprogression (HPD)] observed with ICI, the application in clinical trials of novel response assessment tools (i.e., iRECIST) able to capture delayed benefit of immunotherapies and/or to quantify tumor dynamics and kinetics over time is an unmet clinical need. In addition, the proportional hazard model and the conventional measures of survival [i.e., median overall or progression free survival (PFS) and hazard ratios (HR)] might usually result inadequate in the estimation of the long-term benefit observed with ICI. For this reason, innovative methodologies such as milestone analysis, restricted mean survival time (RMST), parametric models (i.e., Weibull distribution, weighted log rank test), should be systematically investigated in clinical trials in order to adequately quantify the fraction of patients who are "cured", represented by the tails of the survival curves. Regarding predictive biomarkers, in particular PD-L1 expression, the integration and harmonization of the existing assays are urgently needed to provide clinicians with reliable diagnostic tests and to improve patient selection for immunotherapy. Finally, developing original and high-quality study designs, such as adaptive or basket biomarker enriched clinical trials, included in large collaborative platforms with multiple active sites and cross-sector collaboration, represents the successful strategy to optimally assess the benefit of ICI in the next future.

Immunotherapy in the Asiatic population: any differences from Caucasian population?

As "Immunotherapy age" is coming, immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) therapies have shown favorable clinical benefits and low toxicity profiles in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While it is a pity that there is a little clear clinical trials evidence about immunotherapy among Asian population. Moreover, since there is an ethnic difference for targeted therapy, what about immunotherapy? Which factors may associate with ethnic differences from Caucasian population to Asiatic population? In this review, we supposed that the characteristics of the much higher proportion of EGFR mutation, hepatitis B virus infection and unexpected immune-related toxicity among Asian patients should be considered.

Immune Checkpoint PD-1/PD-L1: Is There Life Beyond Antibodies?

The PD-1/PD-L1 interaction has emerged as a significant target in cancer immunotherapy. Current medications include monoclonal antibodies, which have shown impressive clinical results in the treatment of several types of tumors. The cocrystal structure of human PD-1 and PD-L1 is expected to be a valuable starting point for the design of novel inhibitors, along with the recent crystal structures with monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, and macrocycles.

High IDO-1 expression in tumor endothelial cells is associated with response to immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Nivolumab belongs to the standard therapy in the second‐line setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although deep and long‐lasting responses are seen in some patients, the majority of patients will further progress. PD‐L1 is still under critical evaluation as a predictive biomarker. Thus, more accurate biomarkers are clearly warranted. Here, we investigated for the first time the predictive role of IDO‐1, a negative immune‐regulatory molecule, on clear cell RCC tissues of 15 patients undergoing nivolumab therapy. IDO‐1 and other immune inhibitory molecules (PD‐L1, PD‐L2, FOXP3) as well as immune cell subsets (CD3, CD4 and CD8) were measured on formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded sections of RCC specimens by immunohistochemistry. IDO‐1 was predominantly expressed in tumor endothelial cells, and was totally absent from tumor cells itself. IDO‐1 overexpression (>10%) could be detected more frequently in responders (100%, n = 6/6) compared to non‐responders (33.3%, n = 3/9; P = .028), resulting in a better progression‐free survival during immunotherapy (IDO‐1 ≤ 10% vs >10%, median: 3.5 vs not estimated (NE) months, P = .01 by log‐rank test). In addition, IDO‐1 was positively correlated with CD8⁺ T cell expression (r_s = .691, P = .006). PD‐L1 expression on tumor cells was negative in 13 (86.7%) of 15 patients, irrespective of therapeutic response (responders vs non‐responders: 83.3% vs 88.9%). No differences were noticed in the PD‐L1 expression on tumor‐infiltrating immune cells (PD‐L1 < 1% in 66.7% of both responders and non‐responders). In contrast to PD‐L1, these results suggest that IDO‐1 may be a more promising predictive biomarker for response to immune‐based cancer therapy in mRCC.

Implementation of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Mechanisms of tumor immune surveillance and immune escape have been recently elucidated and led to the development of a new therapeutic field in oncology, that of immunotherapy. Immunotherapy aims to reactivate the immune system against cancer. Neoplasias like non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are of particular interest and clinical studies with immunotherapeutic agents have shown significant survival benefit. Several agents have gained corresponding regulatory approvals. In particular, nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab have been approved for second-line treatment of NSCLC, pembrolizumab is the only immune checkpoint inhibitor that has been approved in the first-line treatment and durvalumab is approved in the locally advanced disease. In this review, we aim to present the implementation of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. We will discuss not only the approved regimens but also the future perspectives, the serious adverse events such as hyperprogression and the possible predictive markers that will aid the selection of the patients that will benefit from immunotherapy.

The anti-PD-1 era - an opportunity to enhance radiotherapy for patients with bladder cancer

An urgent need exists to improve the outcomes of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and especially of those with metastatic disease. Treatments that enhance antitumour immune responses - such as immune-checkpoint inhibition - provide an opportunity to do this. Despite initial success, durable response rates in patients with advanced-stage MIBC treated with novel inhibitory antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its endogenous ligand programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) remain low. Radiotherapy is part of the management of bladder cancer in many patients. Evidence that radiotherapy has immunogenic properties is now available, but radiotherapy-induced immune responses are often negated by immunosuppression within the tumour microenvironment. Anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies might enhance radiotherapy-induced antitumour immunity. This effect has been demonstrated in preclinical models of bladder cancer, and clinical trials involving this approach are currently recruiting. Combination treatment strategies provide an exciting opportunity for urological oncologists to not only improve the chances of cure in patients undergoing radical treatment for MIBC, but also to increase long-term response rates in those with metastatic disease.

PD-L2 Expression in Human Tumors: Relevance to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Cancer

Purpose: Tumor-associated PD-L1 expression is predictive of clinical response to PD-1-directed immunotherapy. However, PD-L1-negative patients may also respond to PD-1 checkpoint blockade, suggesting that other PD-1 ligands may be relevant to the clinical activity of these therapies. The prevalence of PD-L2, the other known ligand of PD-1, and its relationship to response to anti-PD-1 therapy were evaluated.Experimental Design: PD-L2 expression was assessed in archival tumor tissue from seven indications using a novel immunohistochemical assay. In addition, relationships between clinical response and PD-L2 status were evaluated in tumor tissues from patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with recurrent or metastatic disease, treated with pembrolizumab.Results: PD-L2 expression was observed in all tumor types and present in stromal, tumor, and endothelial cells. The prevalence and distribution of PD-L2 correlated significantly with PD-L1 (P = 0.0012-<0.0001); however, PD-L2 was detected in the absence of PD-L1 in some tumor types. Both PD-L1 and PD-L2 positivity significantly predicted clinical response to pembrolizumab on combined tumor, stromal and immune cells, with PD-L2 predictive independent of PD-L1. Response was greater in patients positive for both PD-L1 and PD-L2 (27.5%) than those positive only for PD-L1 (11.4%). PD-L2 status was also a significant predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) with pembrolizumab independent of PD-L1 status. Longer median times for PFS and overall survival were observed for PD-L2-positive than PD-L2-negative patients.Conclusions: Clinical response to pembrolizumab in patients with HNSCC may be related partly to blockade of PD-1/PD-L2 interactions. Therapy targeting both PD-1 ligands may provide clinical benefit in these patients. Clin Cancer Res; 23(12); 3158-67. ©2017 AACR.

Regulation and Function of the PD-L1 Checkpoint

Expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is frequently observed in human cancers. Binding of PD-L1 to its receptor PD-1 on activated T cells inhibits anti-tumor immunity by counteracting T cell-activating signals. Antibody-based PD-1-PD-L1 inhibitors can induce durable tumor remissions in patients with diverse advanced cancers, and thus expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells and other cells in the tumor microenviroment is of major clinical relevance. Here we review the roles of the PD-1-PD-L1 axis in cancer, focusing on recent findings on the mechanisms that regulate PD-L1 expression at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and protein level. We place this knowledge in the context of observations in the clinic and discuss how it may inform the design of more precise and effective cancer immune checkpoint therapies.

Immuno-PET Imaging of 89Zr Labeled Anti-PD-L1 Domain Antibody

Recently, various immuno-PET tracers based on monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), engineered scaffold proteins, and peptides were developed to target either programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), showing promise in assessment of immune checkpoints. We sought to develop an immunotherapeutic agent based PET probe that enables real-time assessment of PD-L1 expression and evaluation of antibody drug biodistribution to select eligible candidates for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies. KN035, a 79.6 kDa size anti-PD-L1 domain antibody under analysis in clinical trials, was used to develop the immuno-PET probe, ⁸⁹Zr-Df-KN035. Immuno-PET studies were performed to monitor PD-L1 levels in nude mice bearing LN229 xenografts with positive expression for PD-L1, and to evaluate the whole-body biodistribution in healthy non-human primates (NHPs). LN229 xenografts were markedly visualized from 24 h after injection of ⁸⁹Zr-Df-KN035, with elevated accumulation persisting for up to 120 h. Tumor radioactivity was notably reduced in the presence of excess KN035. Mouse ex vivo biodistribution studies performed at 24 and 120 h revealed tumor-to-muscle ratios as high as 5.64 ± 0.65 and 7.70 ± 1.37, respectively. In the NHP model, PET imaging demonstrated low background. The liver and kidney showed moderate accumulation with the highest SUV_mean value of 1.15 ± 0.15 and 2.13 ± 0.10 at 72 h, respectively. The spleen, lymph nodes, and salivary glands were also slightly visualized. In conclusion, ⁸⁹Zr-Df-KN035, a novel anti-PD-L1 domain antibody-based probe, shows the feasibility of noninvasive in vivo evaluation of PD-L1 expression. This work further provides a template for immunotherapeutic agent based imaging to evaluate human PD-L1 expression and to augment our understanding of therapeutic agent biodistribution, leading to better therapeutic strategies in the future.

Distinct predictive biomarker candidates for response to anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

While immune checkpoint blockade has greatly improved clinical outcomes in diseases such as melanoma, there remains a need for predictive biomarkers to determine who will likely benefit most from which therapy. To date, most biomarkers of response have been identified in the tumors themselves. Biomarkers that could be assessed from peripheral blood would be even more desirable, because of ease of access and reproducibility of sampling.

METHODS

We used mass cytometry (CyTOF) to comprehensively profile peripheral blood of melanoma patients, in order to find predictive biomarkers of response to anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 therapy. Using a panel of ~ 40 surface and intracellular markers, we performed in-depth phenotypic and functional immune profiling to identify potential predictive biomarker candidates.

RESULTS

Immune profiling of baseline peripheral blood samples using CyTOF revealed that anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapies have distinct sets of candidate biomarkers. The distribution of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ memory/non-memory cells and other memory subsets was different between responders and non-responders to anti-CTLA-4 therapy. In anti-PD-1 (but not anti-CTLA-4) treated patients, we discovered differences in CD69 and MIP-1β expressing NK cells between responders and non-responders. Finally, multivariate analysis was used to develop a model for the prediction of response.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 have distinct predictive biomarker candidates. CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ memory T cell subsets play an important role in response to anti-CTLA-4, and are potential biomarker candidates. For anti-PD-1 therapy, NK cell subsets (but not memory T cell subsets) correlated with clinical response to therapy. These functionally active NK cell subsets likely play a critical role in the anti-tumor response triggered by anti-PD-1.

High PDL1 mRNA expression predicts better survival of stage pT1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Checkpoint inhibition has emerged as new therapeutic option in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic role of PD1 and PDL1 expression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and establish an objective measuring method using RNA quantification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPE) of patients with stage pT1 NMIBC who underwent transurethral resection of the bladder. mRNA expression of PD1, PDL1 and CD3 was measured by single step RT-qPCR and correlated to clinicopathological parameters, recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and carcinoma-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

We have analyzed 334 patients with NMIBC at stage pT1 for mRNA analysis. Data from 296 patients (79% male, median age: 72 years) could be used. Spearman correlation revealed significant associations between mRNA expressions of PD1/PDL1 (ρ: 0.6024, p < 0.0001), CD3/PDL1 (ρ: 0.5728, p < 0.0001) and CD3/PD1 (ρ: 0.7005, p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that high PDL1 mRNA expression (≥ 33.83) is a favorable prognostic factor with regard to better RFS (p = 0.0018), PFS (p = 0.021) and CSS (p = 0.012). Multivariate Cox-regression analysis proved PDL1 expression to be an independent prognosticator for RFS [HR 0.48 (0.31-0.72), p = 0.0005], PFS [HR 0.45 (0.24-0.80), p = 0.0059] and CSS [HR 0.31 (0.13-0.67), p = 0.0021].

CONCLUSION

High mRNA expression of PDL1 predicts improved RFS, PFS and CSS of pT1 NMIBC. Following prospective validation, this objective measurement of PD-L1 might help stratify patients with NMIBC for immunotherapy and identify patients who might benefit from early cystectomy.

Accelerating Therapeutic Development through Innovative Trial Design in Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Current trial design is challenged by the advancement of technologies that have enabled deeper understanding of the molecular drivers of colorectal cancer (CRC). The speed of trial testing and the ability to test larger volumes of promising novel agents in the face of smaller populations identified by molecular profiling are challenges posed to clinical studies. Master protocols that utilize umbrella designs are equipped to deal with potential biomarker and matched treatments simultaneously. Although complex in nature, they increase trial efficiency by utilizing shared screening platforms, test multiple treatments together, and simplify regulatory submission and reporting under a common protocol. Emerging technologies such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may help speed up adjuvant trials. These studies have been traditionally slow to complete due to low event rates and the high numbers needed to recruit. ctDNA used as a surrogate for minimal residual disease (MRD) and as an early marker of relapse may help counter some of these factors that deter innovation in this setting. Finally, in the era of precision medicine, surgery should not be forgotten as the only potentially curative option to date in metastatic disease. Five-year overall survival following resection of liver metastasis exceeds what can be achieved with chemotherapy alone in selected cases. Surgical advances have lowered morbidity and allow for greater resection volumes and repeated interventions. Although historically challenging, a well-designed randomized surgical intervention trial would greatly facilitate moving single-institution guidelines reported by case series into wider clinical practice.

Genomics of NSCLC patients both affirm PD-L1 expression and predict their clinical responses to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy

Background

Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a co-stimulatory and immune checkpoint protein. PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) is a hallmark of adaptive resistance and its expression is often used to predict the outcome of Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 immunotherapy treatments. However, clinical benefits do not occur in all patients and new approaches are needed to assist in selecting patients for PD-1 or PD-L1 immunotherapies. Here, we hypothesized that patient tumor cell genomics influenced cell signaling and expression of PD-L1, chemokines, and immunosuppressive molecules and these profiles could be used to predict patient clinical responses.

Methods

We used a recent dataset from NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab. Deleterious gene mutational profiles in patient exomes were identified and annotated into a cancer network to create NSCLC patient-specific predictive computational simulation models. Validation checks were performed on the cancer network, simulation model predictions, and PD-1 match rates between patient-specific predicted and clinical responses.

Results

Expression profiles of these 24 chemokines and immunosuppressive molecules were used to identify patients who would or would not respond to PD-1 immunotherapy. PD-L1 expression alone was not sufficient to predict which patients would or would not respond to PD-1 immunotherapy. Adding chemokine and immunosuppressive molecule expression profiles allowed patient models to achieve a greater than 85.0% predictive correlation among predicted and reported patient clinical responses.

Conclusions

Our results suggested that chemokine and immunosuppressive molecule expression profiles can be used to accurately predict clinical responses thus differentiating among patients who would and would not benefit from PD-1 or PD-L1 immunotherapies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4134-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies for treatment of advanced or refractory cancers: a meta-analysis

Purpose

To systematically evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of current anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies for treatment of patients with advanced or refractory cancer.

Results

Fifty-one trials including 6,800 patients were included. The overall response rates for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were 29% (95% CI: 1.53−2.41), 21% (95% CI: 17%−25%) and 21% (95% CI: 16%−27%) respectively. While the overall adverse effects rate for melanoma, NSCLC, RCC were 16% (95% CI: 6%−28%), 11% (95% CI: 8%−14%) and 20% (95% CI: 11%−32%) respectively. Tumor PD-L1 expression and patient smoking status might serve as biomarkers to predict response of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody treatment. Compared to tumors with negative PD-L1 expression, tumors with positive PD-L1 expression had a significantly higher clinical response rate (41.4% versus 26.5%) with RR = 1.92 (95% CI: 1.53−2.41, P < 0.001). Smoker patients also showed a significantly higher response rate (33.7%) than patients who never smoked (4.2%) with RR = 6.02 (95% CI: 1.22−29.75, P = 0.028). Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab were associated with significantly increased response rate (RR = 2.89, 95% CI: 2.46−3.40, P < 0.001), reduced death risk (HR= 0.53; 95% CI: 0.48−0.57; P < 0.001), and decreased adverse effect rate (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.30−0.80, P = 0.004) compared with other therapies.

Experimental Design

Clinical trials reporting response or safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies for advanced or refractory cancer patients published before January 31th 2016 were searched in PubMed and EMBASE database. Meta-analyses using random effects models were used to calculate the overall estimate.

Conclusions

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have high response rates and low adverse effect rates for advanced or refractory cancers.

Development of a general method for quantifying IgG-based therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in human plasma using protein G purification coupled with a two internal standard calibration strategy using LC-MS/MS

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs have generated much interest in recent years for treating various diseases. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) represents a high percentage of mAb drugs that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). To facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, we developed a general liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to quantify the concentration of IgG-based mAbs in human plasma. Three IgG-based drugs (bevacizumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab) were selected to demonstrate our method. Protein G beads were used for sample pretreatment due to their universal ability to trap IgG-based drugs. Surrogate peptides that were obtained after trypsin digestion were quantified by using LC-MS/MS. To calibrate sample preparation errors and matrix effects that occur during LC-MS/MS analysis, we used two internal standards (IS) method that include the IgG-based drug-IS tocilizumab and post-column infused IS. Using two internal standards was found to effectively improve quantification accuracy, which was within 15% for all mAb drugs that were tested at three different concentrations. This general method was validated in term of its precision, accuracy, linearity and sensitivity for 3 demonstration mAb drugs. The successful application of the method to clinical samples demonstrated its' applicability in clinical analysis. It is anticipated that this general method could be applied to other mAb-based drugs for use in precision medicine and clinical studies.

Clinical and Molecular Predictors of PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) associated with a strong expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1⁺ in > 5% of cells) have not been well elucidated. Expression of PD-L1 is a poor prognostic factor, but NSCLCs with higher levels of PD-L1 have greater benefit when treated with immunotherapy. We have performed a systematic review to synthesize the available evidence regarding clinicopathologic and molecular variables associated with PD-L1 expression in NSCLC. PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles assessing predictors of PD-L1 expression in > 5% cells. Data were reported as odds ratio (OR) of events. Fifty-two studies (for a total of 5066 PD-L1⁺ out of 13,279 NSCLC patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Factors associated with PD-L1 expression were: smoking status (OR 5.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-10.4; P < .001), male gender (OR 4.8; 95% CI 3.2-7.2; P < .001), adenocarcinoma histology (OR 2.75; 95% CI, 1.5-4.8; P < .001), Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild type (OR 4.83; 95% CI, 2.1-11.1; P < .001), ALK mutation negative (OR 388.6; 95% CI, 222.5-678.7; P < .001), ROS mutation negative (OR 1904.8; 95% CI, 630-5757; P < .001), and KRAS wild type (OR 19.8; 95% CI, 7.6-51.6; P < .001). Conversely higher pT stages (OR 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.7; P = .01), pN+ stages (OR 0.29; 95% CI, 0.17-0.5; P < .001) are inversely associated with PD-L1 expression in > 5% cells. Expression of PD-L1 is more common in male smokers, with adenocarcinoma histology and not carriers of EGFR/ALK/ROS/KRAS mutations. These data could be useful to screening of PD-L1 expression and to select patients for immunotherapy.

Comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of PD-L1 shows scarce expression in castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

We aimed to analyze the frequency and distribution of PD-L1 expression in specimens from prostate cancer (PC) patients using two different anti-PD-L1 antibodies (E1L3N, SP263).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PD-L1 immunohistochemistry was performed in a tissue microarray consisting of 82 castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) specimens, 70 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) specimens, 96 localized PC cases, and 3 PC cell lines, using two different antibodies (clones E1L3N, and SP263). Staining images for CD4, CD8, PD-L1, and PanCK of a single PD-L1 positive case were compared, using a newly developed dot-wise correlation method for digital images to objectively test for co-expression.

RESULTS

Depending on the antibody used, in tumor cells (TC) only five (E1L3N: 6%) and three (SP263: 3.7%) samples were positive. In infiltrating immune cells (IC) 12 (SP263: 14.6%) and 8 (E1L3N: 9.9%) specimens showed PD-L1 expression. Two PC cell lines (PC3, LnCaP) also displayed membranous immunoreactivity. All localized PCs or BPH samples tested were negative. Dot-wise digital correlation of expression patterns revealed a moderate positive correlation between PD-L1 and PanCK expression, whereas both PanCK and PD-L1 showed a weak negative Pearson correlation coefficient between CD4 and CD8.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 was not expressed in localized PC or BPH, and was only found in a minority of CRPC tumors and infiltrating immune cells. Protein expression maps and systematic dot-wise comparison could be a useful objective way to describe the relationship between immuno- and tumor-related proteins in the future, without the need to develop multiplex staining methods.

E3 ubiquitin ligases Cbl-b and c-Cbl downregulate PD-L1 in EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies have demonstrated prominent clinical effects in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, limited understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of PD-L1 has become one of the biggest challenges for further improving efficacy. In this study, we observed that in wild-type EFGR cell lines A549 and H460, the ubiquitin ligases Cbl-b and c-Cbl inhibit PD-L1 by inactivating STAT, AKT, and ERK signaling. MiR-181a and miR-940 were screened and validated to target Cbl-b and c-Cbl, respectively. Furthermore, in NSCLC tissues, the expression of Cbl-b/c-Cbl is negatively correlated with PD-L1 expression. Taken together, these findings indicated a new regulatory mechanism for PD-L1 in wild-type EGFR NSCLC cell lines by Cbl-b and c-Cbl.

Radiotherapy and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combinations in lung cancer: building better translational research platforms

Despite the unheralded success of immune checkpoint blockade in delivering durable responses for some patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the majority of patients do not respond. PD-L1 tumour expression and pre-existing tumour T-cell infiltration have been correlated with improved clinical outcomes to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1. However, patients with tumours that are negative for PD-L1 expression can also respond to treatment. Strategies to combine other treatment modalities like radiotherapy (RT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors are being investigated as means of improving the response rates to PD-1/PD-L1 antibody blockade. RT induces immunogenic changes in cancer cells, can adaptively upregulate tumour cell PD-L1 expression and can improve the efficacy of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy. How we design future clinical trials in NSCLC also depends on practical considerations of delivering these treatment combinations, such as RT dose, fractionation and field volume, as well as scheduling with immune checkpoint blockade. Here, we review reasons for resistance to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 and how RT may be utilised in combination with these drugs to enhance their effect by building better translational research platforms.

Cholangiocarcinoma - evolving concepts and therapeutic strategies

Cholangiocarcinoma is a disease entity comprising diverse epithelial tumours with features of cholangiocyte differentiation: cholangiocarcinomas are categorized according to anatomical location as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), or distal (dCCA). Each subtype has a distinct epidemiology, biology, prognosis, and strategy for clinical management. The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma, particularly iCCA, has increased globally over the past few decades. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of potentially curative treatment for all three disease subtypes, whereas liver transplantation after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is restricted to a subset of patients with early stage pCCA. For patients with advanced-stage or unresectable disease, locoregional and systemic chemotherapeutics are the primary treatment options. Improvements in external-beam radiation therapy have facilitated the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Moreover, advances in comprehensive whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing have defined the genetic landscape of each cholangiocarcinoma subtype. Accordingly, promising molecular targets for precision medicine have been identified, and are being evaluated in clinical trials, including those exploring immunotherapy. Biomarker-driven trials, in which patients are stratified according to anatomical cholangiocarcinoma subtype and genetic aberrations, will be essential in the development of targeted therapies. Targeting the rich tumour stroma of cholangiocarcinoma in conjunction with targeted therapies might also be useful. Herein, we review the evolving developments in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma.

Safety and Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Treatment-Naive and Chemotherapy-Refractory Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors show significant clinical activity in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, there is a relative lack of data on comparative efficacy of these drugs in the first-line setting versus chemotherapy-treated patients. We compared the efficacy and toxicity of these drugs in these 2 distinct groups of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed-Medline, EMBASE, Scopus) and major conference proceedings were systematically searched for all phase I to III clinical trials in NSCLC using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) data were collected and combined using DerSimonian and Laird random effects model meta-analysis. The I² statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Seventeen distinct trials (8 with treatment-naive patients [n = 937]; 14 with chemotherapy-treated patients [n = 3620]; 5 with separate treatment-naive and previously treated arms) were included. Treatment-naive patients had a statistically significant higher ORR (30.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 22.70-38.2) than patients previously treated with chemotherapy (ORR, 20.1%; 95% CI, 17.5-22.9; P = .02). No significant differences in PFS were observed between the 2 groups. Treatment-naive patients had statistically significant higher rates of all grade pneumonitis compared with previously treated patients (4.9%; 95% CI, 3.4-6.7 vs. 3.0%; 95% CI, 2.0-4.1; P = .04); however, no significant differences in any other immune-related adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy for advanced NSCLC has a significantly higher ORR and a higher rate of immune-mediated pneumonitis when used in the first-line setting compared with chemotherapy treated patients.

Combined SEP and anti-PD-L1 antibody produces a synergistic antitumor effect in B16-F10 melanoma-bearing mice

The increased PD-L1 induces poorer prognosis in melanoma. The treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have a low response rate. The combination immunotherapies are the encouraging drug development strategy to receive maximal therapeutic benefit. In this study, we investigated the enhanced antitumor and immunomodulatory activity of combined SEP and αPD-L1 in B16-F10 melanoma-bearing mice. The results shown that combined SEP and αPD-L1 presented significant synergistic antitumor effects, increased the frequency of CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells in spleen and tumor, cytotoxic activity of CTL in spleen, and IL-2 and IFN-γ levels in splenocytes and tumor. The combination treatment also produced synergistic increase in P-ERK1/2 level in spleen. Immunohistochemistry shown that SEP induced the PD-L1 expression in melanoma tissue possibly by promoting IFN-γ excretion, which led to the synergistic anti-tumor effects of aPD-L1 and SEP. Furthermore, in the purified T lymphocyte from the naive mice, the combination of SEP and αPD-L1 had more potent than SEP or αPD-L1 in promoting T lymphocyte proliferation and cytokines secretion including IL-2 and IFN-γ, at least partially by activating MEK/ERK pathway. Our study provides the scientific basis for a clinical trial that would involve combination of anti-PD-L1 mAb and SEP for sustained melanoma control.

Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: A New Age in Cancer Treatment

The management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has changed dramatically in the last 10 years with an increase in the understanding of the biology and with the development of new and multiple treatments. Chemotherapy being the first systemic treatment used in the setting of advanced disease, proving benefit for patients over palliative care. With the identification of oncogenic drivers, innovative targeted therapies were developed and tested, leading to important changes in the management of certain patients and giving to some of them the possibility to be treated in first line with oral inhibitors. Immunotherapy was then explored as a potential option, with promising results, and data of impact in important endpoints in lung cancer treatments. This chapter explores the different CTLA-4 inhibitors that have been investigated in NSCLC: ipilimumab and tremelimumab, as well as the different immune checkpoint inhibitors: anti PD-1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab, BMS-936559) medications. It also analyzes the different studies that have been developed for NSCLC with these medications, the evidence obtained, and the possible role in the management of patients. Immunotherapy has definitely changed the paradigm on NSCLC treatment, and the future is promising for the benefit of patients.

Immunological classification of renal cell carcinoma patients based on phenotypic analysis of immune check-point molecules

OBJECTIVES

To clarify comprehensive immunological signature patterns of tumour tissue-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with renal cell carcinoma and show its clinical significance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated the surface marker expressions of tumour tissue-infiltrating lymphocytes quantitatively and classified them based on their functional populations. We extracted 109 sets of tumour tissue-infiltrating lymphocytes from 80 patients who underwent surgical resection of renal cell carcinoma, of which 44 tumour tissue-infiltrating lymphocytes were multiply extracted from 15 patients. Each tumour tissue-infiltrating lymphocyte was characterised on the basis of functional T-cell populations using ten surface marker expressions measured by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

All sets of the tumour tissue-infiltrating lymphocytes were classified into three groups, which correlated significantly with Fuhrman grade (OR 0.253, 95% CI 0.094-0.678, P = 0.006). Importantly, both overall metastasis-free survival (HR 0.449, 95% CI 0.243-0.832, P = 0.011) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.475, 95% CI 0.238-0.948, P = 0.035) of the patients with the higher marker expressions were significantly inferior to those of the patients with the lower marker expressions by multivariate analysis. Six specific genes for this classification identified by microarray analysis verified our results using the TCGA KIRC data set. In addition, we discovered the presence of intra-tumoural diversity in the classification of 3 (20%) of the 15 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the presence of classable diversity in the immunological signature of tumour tissue-infiltrating lymphocytes correlated with prognosis and tumour aggressiveness that was observed even within individual tumours in some patients with renal cell carcinoma.

The changing face of clinical trials in the personalized medicine and immuno-oncology era: report from the international congress on clinical trials in Oncology & Hemato-Oncology (ICTO 2017)

In the past decade, the oncology community has witnessed major advances in the understanding of cancer biology and major breakthroughs in several different therapeutic areas, from solid tumors to hematological malignancies; moreover, the advent of effective immunotherapy approaches, such as immune-checkpoint blockade, is revolutionizing treatment algorithms in almost all oncology disease areas. As knowledge evolves and new weapons emerge in the “war against cancer”, clinical and translational research need to adapt to a rapidly changing environment to effectively translate novel concepts into sustainable and accessible therapeutic options for cancer patients.

With this in mind, translational cancer researchers, oncology professionals, treatment experts, CRO and industry leaders, as well as patient representatives gathered in London, 16-17 March 2017, for The International Congress on Clinical Trials in Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (ICTO2017), to discuss the changing face of oncology clinical trials in the new era of personalized medicine and immuno-oncology. A wide range of topics, including clinical trial design in immuno-oncology, biomarker-oriented drug development paths, statistical design and endpoint selection, challenges in the design and conduct of personalized medicine clinical trials, risk-based monitoring, financing and reimbursement, as well as best operational practices, were discussed in an open, highly interactive format, favoring networking among all relevant stakeholders. The most relevant data, approaches and issues emerged and discussed during the conference are summarized in this report.

Co-expression of PD-L1 and p-AKT is associated with poor prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma via PD-1/PD-L1 axis activating intracellular AKT/mTOR pathway in tumor cells

Programmed death-1 (PD-1) /programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) engagement usually leads to diminished antitumor T-cell responses, which mediates the immune escape of tumor cells. However, little is known whether PD-1/PD-L1 could directly activates intracellular oncogenic signaling pathways in tumor cells. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether intracellular AKT/mTOR signaling could be directly activated by PD-1/PD-L1 during the malignant progression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Detection of the expression of PD-L1 and p-AKT by immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed that both proteins were overexpressed in 54% and 48% DLBCL cases, respectively. Spearman test showed that PD-L1 expression was correlated with p-AKT expression (R=0.244, χ²=5.962; P=0.017) and the expression of PD-L1 and p-AKT were also correlated with clinic-pathological characteristics. In addition, survival analysis showed that DLBCL patients who co-expressed PD-L1 and p-AKT had significantly poorer outcome than patients with single positive or both negative expression (P<0.05). In vitro, total PD-L1 and membrane PD-L1 (mPD-L1) proteins were overexpressed in five DLBCL cell lines by western blot and flow cytometry. We observed that AKT/mTOR pathway was activated in DLBCL cells after stimulated with human recombination PD-1/Fc. Taken together, these results suggested that the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies and AKT/mTOR inhibitor might be a promising and novel therapeutic approach for DLBCL in the future.

Emergence of High-Avidity Melan-A–Specific Clonotypes as a Reflection of Anti–PD-1 Clinical Efficacy

Therapeutic strategies using anti–PD-1–blocking antibodies reported unparalleled effectiveness for melanoma immunotherapy, but deciphering immune responses modulated by anti–PD-1 treatment remains a crucial issue. Here, we analyzed the composition and functions of the large Melan-A–specific T-cell repertoire in the peripheral blood of 9 melanoma patients before and after 2 months of treatment with anti–PD-1. We observed amplification of Melan-A–specific Vß subfamilies undetectable before therapy (thereafter called emerging Vß subfamilies) in responding patients, with a predominant expansion in patients with a complete response. These emerging Vß subfamilies displayed a higher functional avidity for their cognate antigen than Vß subfamilies not amplified upon anti–PD-1 therapy and could be identified by a sustained coexpression of PD-1 and TIGIT receptors. Thus, in addition to the emergence of neoantigen-specific T cells previously documented upon anti–PD-1 therapy, our work describes the emergence of high-avidity Melan-A–specific clonotypes as a surrogate marker of treatment efficacy. Cancer Res; 77(24); 7083–93. ©2017 AACR.

The prevalence and clinicopathological features of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression: a pooled analysis of literatures

Background & Aims

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been recognized as a critical and promising target in therapies that direct immune escape of cancers. However, its association with aggressive clinicopathological features in solid tumors remains unclear. We investigated this question by synthesizing published articles.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies. Outcomes of interest included age, gender, tumor size, tumor size, lymph node metastasis and tumor cell differentiation.

Results

A total of 61 studies involving 17 types of malignancies were included. The overall expression rate of PD-L1 was 44.5% (95% CI, 37.5% to 51.6 %). Patients with regional lymph node metastases (OR 1.38; P < 0.01), large size tumor (OR 1.89; P < 0.01) or poor differentiated tumors (OR 1.71; P < 0.01) were associated with higher PD-L1 expression rate. However, no significant association was observed between young and elder patients (OR 1.04; P = 0.58), or male and female patients (OR 1.13; P = 0.06). A numerically higher PD-L1 expression rate was detected in polyclonal antibodies (57.2%) than monoclonal antibodies (39.6%). In addition, the PD-L1 expression rate reported by studies from Asian areas (52.3%) was numerically higher than those from non-Asian areas, namely Caucasians (32.7%).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis indicated that patients with larger tumors, regional lymph node metastases, or poor-differentiated tumors were associated with a higher PD-L1 expression rate; in addition the expression rate of PD-L1 in Asians might be higher than that of Caucasians. This information might be useful in screening candidates for relevant tests and treatments.

Predictive Performance of Four Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Assay Systems on Nivolumab Response in Previously Treated Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Nivolumab has demonstrated efficacy against metastatic NSCLC. Four programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay systems are available for identification of responders among patients with NSCLC, and these assays show some differing characteristics. Accordingly, in this study, we evaluated the ability of these assays to identify responders to nivolumab therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC, who received nivolumab between January 2016 and September 2016. Specimens were stained using four PD-L1 IHC assays (28-8, 22C3, SP142, and SP263). We classified patients as having test results that were strongly positive (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥50%), weakly positive (TPS 1%-49%), or negative (TPS <1%).

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients with NSCLC and their specimens were analyzed. Analytical comparisons demonstrated good concordance of PD-L1-stained tumor cells among the 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 assays (weighted κ coefficient 0.64-0.71), whereas the SP142 assay showed lower concordance with other assays (weighted κ coefficient 0.39-0.55). Progression-free survival in patients showing strongly positive PD-L1 staining classified by 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 assays was significantly longer than that in patients with a negative result for PD-L1 staining. Predictive performance of response to nivolumab, as assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis, was also equivalent among the 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 assays (area under the curve 0.75-0.82), whereas the SP142 assay exhibited lower predictive performance (area under the curve 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

The 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 PD-L1 IHC assays showed equivalent predictive performance, whereas the SP142 assay showed lower predictive performance.

Current markers and their value in the era of immuno-oncology

Immunotherapy in urothelial cancer is a quickly evolving field as new agents are being investigated in multiple clinical trials and various clinical settings. The purpose of this review is to provide an insight into the mechanism of these treatments, potential targets to evaluate treatment response and to give an update on the current status of clinical trials. Urothelial cancer is a polyclonal disease with a substantial tumor heterogeneity and a high mutational load which may be beneficial as this may trigger a stronger T-cell mediated immune response. PD-1 expression has been shown to correlate with stage, grade, progression and poorer survival but it appears challenging to be utilized as a predictor for treatment response in urothelial cancer. Another important concept is immune cell (IC) infiltration, which is a reflection of the activated immune response within the target tissue. Marker genes may represent signaling pathways involved in T-cell recognition and lysis of T-cells. The complexity of the tumor and host interaction requires multiple concepts to be integrated into a future model to assess treatment response. We have evaluated multiple biomarker approaches currently investigated in clinical trials in urothelial cancer.

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in acral lentiginous melanoma: a study of a large cohort of cases from Latin America

PURPOSE

Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is a poor prognosis subtype and is the most prevalent in non-Caucasian populations. The presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been associated with poor prognosis in melanoma. A large cohort of ALM cases was studied to determine status of TIL and its association with outcome.

METHODS

All patients with cutaneous melanoma presenting from 2005 to 2012 at Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas in Peru were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathological information was obtained from the medical charts. A prospective evaluation of TIL was performed. Analysis of association between ALM and clinicopathological features including TIL as well as survival analysis compared the outcome of ALM to whole group and extremity NALM was performed.

RESULTS

537 ALM from a total of 824 cutaneous melanoma cases were studied. Older age (p = 0.022), higher Breslow (p = 0.008) and ulceration (p < 0.001) were found to be more frequent in ALM. Acral had worse overall survival (OS) compared with the whole group (p = 0.04). Clinical stage (CS) I-II patients had a median OS of 5.3 (95% CI 4.3-6.2) for ALM and 9.2 (95% CI 5.0-7.0) for extremity NALM (p = 0.016). Grade 0 (absence of TIL), I, II and III were found in 7.5, 34.5, 32.1, and 25.9%, respectively. Lower TIL grade was associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.003), higher Breslow (p = 0.001), higher Clark level (p = 0.007), higher CS (p = 0.002), extremity location (p = 0.048), histological subtype ALM (p = 0.024) and better OS (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ALM is highly prevalent in Peru and carries poor outcome. Lower TIL levels were associated with poor outcome and ALM.

DNA double-strand break repair pathway regulates PD-L1 expression in cancer cells

Accumulating evidence suggests that exogenous cellular stress induces PD-L1 upregulation in cancer. A DNA double-strand break (DSB) is the most critical type of genotoxic stress, but the involvement of DSB repair in PD-L1 expression has not been investigated. Here we show that PD-L1 expression in cancer cells is upregulated in response to DSBs. This upregulation requires ATM/ATR/Chk1 kinases. Using an siRNA library targeting DSB repair genes, we discover that BRCA2 depletion enhances Chk1-dependent PD-L1 upregulation after X-rays or PARP inhibition. In addition, we show that Ku70/80 depletion substantially enhances PD-L1 upregulation after X-rays. The upregulation by Ku80 depletion requires Chk1 activation following DNA end-resection by Exonuclease 1. DSBs activate STAT1 and STAT3 signalling, and IRF1 is required for DSB-dependent PD-L1 upregulation. Thus, our findings reveal the involvement of DSB repair in PD-L1 expression and provide mechanistic insight into how PD-L1 expression is regulated after DSBs.

Integration of genomics and histology revises diagnosis and enables effective therapy of refractory cancer of unknown primary with PDL1 amplification

Identification of the tissue of origin in cancer of unknown primary (CUP) poses a diagnostic challenge and is critical for directing site-specific therapy. Currently, clinical decision-making in patients with CUP primarily relies on histopathology and clinical features. Comprehensive molecular profiling has the potential to contribute to diagnostic categorization and, most importantly, guide CUP therapy through identification of actionable lesions. We here report the case of an advanced-stage malignancy initially mimicking poorly differentiated soft-tissue sarcoma that did not respond to multiagent chemotherapy. Molecular profiling within a clinical whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing program revealed a heterozygous, highly amplified KRAS G12S mutation, compound-heterozygous TP53 mutation/deletion, high mutational load, and focal high-level amplification of Chromosomes 9p (including PDL1 [CD274] and JAK2) and 10p (including GATA3). Integrated analysis of molecular data and histopathology provided a rationale for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with pembrolizumab, which resulted in rapid clinical improvement and a lasting partial remission. Histopathological analyses ruled out sarcoma and established the diagnosis of a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Although neither histopathology nor molecular data were able to pinpoint the tissue of origin, our analyses established several differential diagnoses including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We analyzed 157 TNBC samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas, revealing PDL1 copy number gains coinciding with excessive PDL1 mRNA expression in 24% of cases. Collectively, these results illustrate the impact of multidimensional tumor profiling in cases with nondescript histology and immunophenotype, show the predictive potential of PDL1 amplification for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and suggest a targeted therapeutic strategy in Chromosome 9p24.1/PDL1-amplified cancers.

Imaging PD-L1 Expression with ImmunoPET

High sensitivity imaging tools could provide a more holistic view of target antigen expression to improve the identification of patients who might benefit from cancer immunotherapy. We developed for immunoPET a novel recombinant human IgG1 (termed C4) that potently binds an extracellular epitope on human and mouse PD-L1 and radiolabeled the antibody with zirconium-89. Small animal PET/CT studies showed that ⁸⁹Zr-C4 detected antigen levels on a patient derived xenograft (PDX) established from a non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient before an 8-month response to anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4 therapy. Importantly, the concentration of antigen is beneath the detection limit of previously developed anti-PD-L1 radiotracers, including radiolabeled atezolizumab. We also show that ⁸⁹Zr-C4 can specifically detect antigen in human NSCLC and prostate cancer models endogenously expressing a broad range of PD-L1. ⁸⁹Zr-C4 detects mouse PD-L1 expression changes in immunocompetent mice, suggesting that endogenous PD-1/2 will not confound human imaging. Lastly, we found that ⁸⁹Zr-C4 could detect acute changes in tumor expression of PD-L1 due to standard of care chemotherapies. In summary, we present evidence that low levels of PD-L1 in clinically relevant cancer models can be imaged with immunoPET using a novel recombinant human antibody.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma and HIV Infection

Introduction:

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors increases the overall survival of patients with metastatic melanoma regardless of their oncogene addicted mutations. However, no data is available from clinical trials of effective therapies in subgroups of melanoma patients that carry chronic infective diseases such as HIV. Evidences suggest a key role of the immune checkpoint molecules as a mechanism of immune escape not only from melanoma but also from HIV host immune response.

Conclusion:

In this article, firstly, we will describe the role of the immune checkpoint molecules in HIV chronic infection. Secondly, we will summarize the most relevant clinical evidences utilizing immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma patients. Lastly, we will discuss the potential implications as well as the potential applications of immune checkpoint molecule-based immunotherapy in patients with melanoma and HIV infection.

Patterns of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 expression in pediatric solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Significant antitumor effects have been observed in a variety of malignancies via blockade of immune checkpoints. Interaction of programmed death 1 (PD-1) with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 suppresses T-cell function and restricts immune-mediated tumor killing. We examined expression of these proteins in children with solid tumors, as expression may serve as biomarkers of response to this class of drugs.

METHODS

Sections cut from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks were processed and evaluated for PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as by mRNA expression. A semiquantitative 0-5 IHC scoring system (0 = negative to 5 = very high) was applied, with scores incorporating combined prevalence of tumor cell and nontumor cell labeling. Expression profiling was performed using the NanoString nCounter™ system. Data analysis was performed using quantile normalization. All quantile-normalized data underwent subsequent log10 transformation.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four FFPE blocks were included in the analysis. PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 IHC were not evaluable in 8, 0, and 12 blocks, respectively. PD-1, PDL-1, and PDL-2 expression was negative to moderate by both IHC (range 0-3) and mRNA expression (range 0-2.62). Correlation between IHC score and mRNA expression was poor for all three tested proteins (PD-1, r² = 0.06; PDL-1, r² = 0.007; and PDL-2, r² = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Expression of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 is low in pediatric solid tumors. At low levels of expression, IHC score and mRNA expression correlate poorly. Current and planned clinical trials will determine whether this low level of expression predicts limited response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Programmed Cell Death 1 (PD-1) Ligand (PD-L1) Expression in Solid Tumors As a Predictive Biomarker of Benefit From PD-1/PD-L1 Axis Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Drugs targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway show significant clinical activity across several tumor types. However, a majority of patients do not respond to these agents. Use of biomarker assays to predict response to these agents is an active area of research; however, the predictive value of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays is largely inconsistent across clinical trials. In this meta-analysis of clinical trials of PD-1/PD-L1-targeted agents, we evaluate the predictive value of a tumor and tumor-infiltrating immune cell PD-L1 IHC assay as a biomarker for objective response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

METHODS

We searched databases (PubMed, Medline, ASCO abstracts, European Society for Medical Oncology abstracts, and Scopus) up until December 2016 for clinical trials using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with reported PD-L1 biomarker data. Objective response rates (primary end point) from all phase I to III trials investigating nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab in advanced solid tumors were collected. Odds ratios (ORs) for response in PD-L1-positive patients compared with PD-L1-negative patients were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model to combine trials. We performed meta-analysis as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Forty-one distinct trials with 6,664 patients were identified. PD-L1 expression was predictive of favorable response across all tumor types (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.85 to 2.75; P < .001), with the significantly largest effect observed in non-small-cell lung cancer (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.99 to 3.17; P < .001). A subgroup analysis across all non-small-cell lung cancer trials using nivolumab and Dako clone 28-8 (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) IHC antibody assay yielded a significantly higher objective response rate in patients with tumor PD-L1 expression even at the minimum cutoff value of 1% (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.03 to 4.57).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis shows that tumor and tumor-infiltrating immune cell PD-L1 overexpression based on IHC is associated with significantly higher response rates to PD-1/PD-L1 axis inhibitors across a range of malignant solid tumors.

Response rate as a potential surrogate for survival and efficacy in patients treated with novel immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-regression of randomised prospective studies

INTRODUCTION

To assess the role of the tumour response rate (RR) after immune checkpoint inhibitors-based therapy as a potential surrogate end-point of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with solid tumours, we performed a trial-based meta-regression of randomised studies comparing different immune checkpoint inhibitors-based treatments.

METHODS

The systematic literature search included the electronic databases and the proceedings of oncologic meetings. Treatment effects on PFS and OS were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs); treatment effects on RR were expressed as odds ratios (ORs). A weighted regression analysis was performed on log-transformed treatment effect estimates to test the association between treatment effects on the surrogate outcome and treatment effects on the clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty-four trials, for a total of 11,894 patients, were included in the analysis. Using the complete set of data, the regression of either the log(HR) for PFS or the log(HR) for OS on the log(OR) for RR demonstrated weak associations (R² = 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.77; P = 0.001; and R² = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.02-0.76; P = 0.01, respectively). The pre-planned analyses stratifying trials according to different type of disease and different mechanism of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors showed a very weak association of the RR with the OS for non-small cell lung cancer indicated and a modest association of the RR with the PFS for cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 checkpoint inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

The results of the trial-based meta-regression analysis indicated a weak correlation between RR and OS, supporting future investigations to assess the surrogacy of RR in the patient treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Comparison of the toxicity profile of PD-1 versus PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are effective therapies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, the authors performed a systematic review investigating differences in the toxicities of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was performed of public databases (MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica dataBASE [EMBASE], and Cochrane) and conference proceedings for trials using PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) in patients with NSCLC. A formal systematic analysis was conducted with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 2.2). Clinical and demographic characteristics, response, and toxicity data were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies reported between 2013 and 2016 were eligible for analysis. The total number of patients evaluated for toxicities was 3284 patients in the PD-1 group and 2460 patients in the PD-L1 group. The baseline patient characteristics of the 2 groups were similar, although there was a trend toward increased squamous histology in the group treated with PD-L1 (32% vs 25%; P = .6). There was no difference in response rate noted between PD-1 (19%) and PD-L1 (18.6%) inhibitors (P = .17). The incidence of overall adverse events (AEs) was comparable between the PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors (64% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 63%-66%] vs 66% [95% CI, 65%-69%]; P = .8). Fatigue was the most frequently reported AE with both classes of drugs. Patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors were found to have a slightly increased rate of immune-related AEs (16% [95% CI, 14%-17%] vs 11% [95% CI, 10%-13%]; P = .07) and pneumonitis (4% [95% CI, 3%-5%] vs 2% [95% CI, 1%-3%]; P = .01) compared with patients who received PD-L1 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review involving 5744 patients with NSCLC, the toxicity and efficacy profiles of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors appear to be similar. Cancer 2018;124:271-7. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Combination immunotherapy strategies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Does biological rationale meet clinical needs?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as one of the main new therapeutic options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Even though they demonstrated superiority towards standard chemotherapy in different disease settings, the response rates do not exceed 45% in highly molecularly selected patients. This is related to known limitations of the available biomarkers, as well to the complex and dynamic nature of tumor microenvironment. The study of the different strategies adopted by tumor cells to escape the immune system lays the basis of the new combination strategies. This review focuses on analyzing the biological rationale and early clinical data available concerning therapeutic strategies combining ICIs together, ICIs with different regimens and schedules of standard chemotherapy, ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, ICIs with antiangiogenic agents and ICs with radiotherapy.