Comparative Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Oral Direct Thrombin and Factor Xa Inhibitors in Development

An adaptive-design dose-ranging study of PD 0348292, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, for thromboprophylaxis after total knee replacement surgery

BACKGROUND

PD 0348292 is an oral, selective, direct and reversible factor Xa inhibitor. This was an adaptive dose-ranging study evaluating a 100-fold PD 0348292 dose range in subjects undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of a dose range of PD 0348292 relative to enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

METHODS

Extensive dose-response modeling and trial simulations were used to select the PD 0348292 dose range for the Phase 2 study. Subjects were randomized to a blinded PD 0348292 dose (0.1 mg qd to 10 mg qd) or open-label enoxaparin (30 mg bid) for 6-14 days after TKR surgery. Efficacy was assessed by mandatory bilateral venography. Results were analyzed using a dose-response modeling approach.

RESULTS

Observed VTE frequency ranged from 1.4-37.1% across PD 0348292 doses and was 18.1% for enoxaparin. The PD 0348292 dose-response relationship for VTE was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The dose of PD 0348292 equivalent to enoxaparin 30 mg bid for VTE prevention was estimated to be 1.16 mg (95% CI = 0.56 mg, 2.41 mg) qd. Total bleeding ranged from 4.9% to 13.8% across PD 0348292 doses and was 6.3% with enoxaparin. The dose-response relationship for total bleeding was not statistically significant (P = 0.2464). Overall, PD 0348292 and enoxaparin were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Characterization of the dose-response relationship for VTE and bleeding using an adaptive Phase 2 study design provided a strong quantitative basis for Phase 3 dose selection.

Novel oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis after orthopaedic surgery

The direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, and the selective factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, are new oral anticoagulants that are approved in many countries for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty. All have a rapid onset of action, a low potential for food and drug interactions and a predictable anticoagulant effect that obviates the need for routine coagulation monitoring. These agents offer a convenient alternative to conventional anticoagulant drug regimens, including parenteral low-molecular-weight heparins and fondaparinux, and oral adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonists, for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in this surgical setting. This review summarizes the pharmacology, clinical trial results, bleeding risk and practical use of these new oral anticoagulants in clinical orthopaedic practice. Potential issues to be considered when using these oral anticoagulants include renal impairment, potential drug interactions, neuraxial anaesthesia and management of bleeding.

New oral anticoagulants: comparative pharmacology with vitamin K antagonists

New oral anticoagulants (OACs) that directly inhibit Factor Xa (FXa) or thrombin have been developed for the long-term prevention of thromboembolic disorders. These novel agents provide numerous benefits over older vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) due to major pharmacological differences. VKAs are economical and very well characterized, but have important limitations that can outweigh these advantages, such as slow onset of action, narrow therapeutic window and unpredictable anticoagulant effect. VKA-associated dietary precautions, monitoring and dosing adjustments to maintain international normalized ratio (INR) within therapeutic range, and bridging therapy, are inconvenient for patients, expensive, and may result in inappropriate use of VKA therapy. This may lead to increased bleeding risk or reduced anticoagulation and increased risk of thrombotic events. The new OACs have rapid onset of action, low potential for food and drug interactions, and predictable anticoagulant effect that removes the need for routine monitoring. FXa inhibitors, e.g. rivaroxaban and apixaban, are potent, oral direct inhibitors of prothrombinase-bound, clot-associated or free FXa. Both agents have a rapid onset of action, a wide therapeutic window, little or no interaction with food and other drugs, minimal inter-patient variability, and display similar pharmacokinetics in different patient populations. Since both are substrates, co-administration of rivaroxaban and apixaban with strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and permeability glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors and inducers can result in substantial changes in plasma concentrations due to altered clearance rates; consequently, their concomitant use is contraindicated and caution is required when used concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inducers. Although parenteral oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), such as argatroban and bivalirudin, have been on the market for years, DTIs such as dabigatran are novel synthetic thrombin antagonists. Dabigatran etexilate is a low-molecular-weight non-active pro-drug that is administered orally and converted rapidly to its active form, dabigatran--a potent, competitive and reversible DTI. Dabigatran has an advantage over the indirect thrombin inhibitors, unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin, in that it inhibits free and fibrin-bound thrombin. The reversible binding of dabigatran may provide safer and more predictable anticoagulant treatment than seen with irreversible, non-covalent thrombin inhibitors, e.g. hirudin. Dabigatran shows a very low potential for drug-drug interactions. However, co-administration of dabigatran etexilate with other anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents can increase the bleeding risk. Although the new agents are pharmacologically better than VKAs--particularly in terms of fixed dosing, rapid onset of action, no INR monitoring and lower risk of drug interactions--there are some differences between them: the bioavailability of dabigatran is lower than rivaroxaban and apixaban, and so the dabigatran dosage required is higher; lower protein binding of dabigatran reduces the variability related to albuminaemia. The risk of metabolic drug-drug interactions also appears to differ between OACs: VKAs > rivaroxaban > apixaban > dabigatran. The convenience of the new OACs has translated into improvements in efficacy and safety as shown in phase III randomized trials. The new anticoagulants so far offer the greatest promise and opportunity for the replacement of VKAs.

Apixaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor: single dose safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and food effect in healthy subjects

Aims

To evaluate apixaban single dose safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and assess the effect of food on apixaban pharmacokinetics.

Methods

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending-dose, first-in-human study assessed apixaban safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy subjects randomized to oral apixaban (n = 43; 0.5–2.5 mg as solution or 5–50 mg as tablets) or placebo (n = 14) under fasted conditions. An open label, randomized, two treatment crossover study investigated apixaban pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in healthy subjects (n = 21) administered apixaban 10 mg in fasted and fed states. Both studies measured apixaban plasma concentration, international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT) or a modified PT (mPT).

Results

In the single ascending-dose study increases in apixaban exposure appeared dose-proportional. Median t_max occurred 1.5–3.3 h following oral administration. Mean terminal half-life ranged between 3.6 and 6.8 h following administration of solution doses ≤2.5 mg and between 11.1 and 26.8 h for tablet doses ≥5 mg. Concentration-related changes in pharmacodynamic assessments were observed. After a 50 mg dose, peak aPTT, INR and mPT increased by 1.2-, 1.6- and 2.9-fold, respectively, from baseline. In the food effect study: 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios of apixaban C_max and AUC in a fed vs. fasted state were within the predefined no effect (80–125%) range. Apixaban half-life was approximately 11.5 h. The effect of apixaban on INR, PT and aPTT was comparable following fed and fasted administration.

Conclusions

Single doses of apixaban were well tolerated with a predictable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile and a half-life of approximately 12 h. Apixaban can be administered with or without food.

Rivaroxaban and other novel oral anticoagulants: pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects, specific patient populations and relevance of coagulation monitoring

Unlike traditional anticoagulants, the more recently developed agents rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban target specific factors in the coagulation cascade to attenuate thrombosis. Rivaroxaban and apixaban directly inhibit Factor Xa, whereas dabigatran directly inhibits thrombin. All three drugs exhibit predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics that allow for fixed oral doses in a variety of settings. The population pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban, and also dabigatran, have been evaluated in a series of models using patient data from phase II and III clinical studies. These models point towards a consistent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, even when extreme demographic factors are taken into account, meaning that doses rarely need to be adjusted. The exception is in certain patients with renal impairment, for whom pharmacokinetic modelling provided the rationale for reduced doses as part of some regimens. Although not routinely required, the ability to measure plasma concentrations of these agents could be advantageous in emergency situations, such as overdose. Specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics must be taken into account when selecting an appropriate assay for monitoring. The anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays now available are likely to provide the most appropriate means of determining plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban, and specific assays for dabigatran are in development.

Managing New Oral Anticoagulants in the Perioperative and Intensive Care Unit Setting

Managing patients in the perioperative setting receiving novel oral anticoagulation agents for thromboprophylaxis or stroke prevention with atrial fibrillation is an important consideration for clinicians. The novel oral anticoagulation agents include direct Factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban, and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. In elective surgery, discontinuing their use is important, but renal function must also be considered because elimination is highly dependent on renal elimination. If bleeding occurs in patients who have received these agents, common principles of bleeding management as with any anticoagulant (including the known principles for warfarin) should be considered. This review summarizes the available data regarding the management of bleeding with novel oral anticoagulation agents. Hemodialysis is a therapeutic option for dabigatran-related bleeding, while in vitro studies showed that prothrombin complex concentrates are reported to be useful for rivaroxaban-related bleeding. Additional clinical studies are needed to determine the best method for reversal of the novel oral anticoagulation agents when bleeding occurs.

Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: concepts and controversies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the commonest cardiac rhythm disorder worldwide, affecting 1% of the general population. It is estimated that up to 16 million people in the US will suffer from the arrhythmia by 2050. AF is an independent stroke risk factor and associated with more severe strokes. For six decades, warfarin has been the only truly effective therapy to protect against stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation. Despite the proven worth of warfarin, its limitations have seen reluctance amongst physicians and patients to utilise this efficacious agent. This has meant that substantial numbers of patients are either unprotected against stroke or suboptimally protected with antiplatelet therapy.

Contemporary well-validated stroke risk factor schemes (CHA₂DS₂-VASc) now permit rapid but comprehensive evaluation of a patient’s risk for thromboembolism, allowing better identification of low-risk patients who do not require antithrombotic therapy, and whilst for those with ≥1 stroke risk factors require formal oral anticoagulation. Aspirin has been proven to be inferior to anticoagulation, and is not free of bleeding risk. We also have simple scores to easily evaluate a patient’s risk of haemorrhage (e.g. HAS-BLED).

The emergence of new oral anticoagulants should further improve stroke prevention in AF, and they successfully negotiate many of the hurdles to oral anticoagulation generated by warfarin’s limitations. Monitoring, reversal, and perioperative management are areas which require further investigation to enhance our ability to safely and effectively utilise the new agents.

Novel oral anticoagulants: clinical pharmacology, indications and practical considerations

BACKGROUND

Novel oral anticoagulants are approved in several indications: rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip or knee replacement surgery, and edoxaban for hip or knee replacement surgery and hip fracture surgery (in Japan only); rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and prevention of recurrent DVT and PE; and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. These agents overcome some limitations of traditional anticoagulants, are suggested to have no requirement for routine coagulation monitoring, and are administered orally. Rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran have different pharmacological characteristics, and guidance is needed on optimum doses and dosing intervals and the effects of renal or hepatic impairment, age, food, and other drugs. Dabigatran has stricter prescribing advice than rivaroxaban or apixaban for patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment. All three drugs have restrictions on use in patients with hepatic impairment. Apixaban requires twice-daily dosing in all indications, whereas rivaroxaban and dabigatran are dosed once- or twice-daily depending on indication. Although head-to-head comparisons are lacking, the novel oral anticoagulants may show favorable cost-benefit relations compared with traditional vitamin K antagonists or no therapy.

AIM

This review summarizes the pharmacology of rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, and the indications for which they are approved. Issues regarding the optimization of the use of these anticoagulants for the management of thromboembolic disorders will also be discussed.

New oral anticoagulants in the treatment of pulmonary embolism: efficacy, bleeding risk, and monitoring

Anticoagulation therapy is mandatory in patients with pulmonary embolism to prevent significant morbidity and mortality. The mainstay of therapy has been vitamin-K antagonist therapy bridged with parenteral anticoagulants. The recent approval of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs: apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) has generated significant interest in their role in managing venous thromboembolism, especially pulmonary embolism due to their improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, predictable anticoagulant response, and lack of required efficacy monitoring. This paper addresses the available literature, on-going clinical trials, highlights critical points, and discusses potential advantages and disadvantages of the new oral anticoagulants in patients with pulmonary embolism.

New oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation increases with age, augmenting the risk of embolic stroke in elderly individuals. Clinical practice guidelines recommend the long-term use of oral anticoagulation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation to reduce risk of stroke. Until recently, vitamin K antagonists (eg, warfarin) were the only oral anticoagulants available, but using warfarin in elderly patients can be challenging. Newer oral anticoagulants may offer specific benefits and increased convenience for elderly patients, because they have predictable pharmacologic profiles, a rapid onset of action, a wide therapeutic window, no requirement for routine coagulation monitoring, and fewer and better-defined food and drug interactions compared with warfarin. This review highlights the benefits and challenges of warfarin use in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and discusses potential efficacy and safety benefits for newer oral agents in these patients. The potential for increased rates of major bleeding in the elderly, particularly those with numerous concomitant medications or renal impairment, also is discussed. Practical considerations for the use of long-term anticoagulation in elderly patients also are discussed.

Pharmacoeconomic implications of thromboprophylaxis with new oral anticoagulants after total hip or knee replacement in the USA

INTRODUCTION

Adequate thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement (THR or TKR) is essential to reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and its associated complications. Although effective, traditional anticoagulants are associated with a considerable economic burden, particularly when used outside the hospital setting. This article explores whether newer oral anticoagulants can reduce costs of VTE prophylaxis and therapy.

AREAS COVERED

Cost associated with vitamin K antagonists; indirect costs associated with complicated or inconvenient anticoagulation regimens, non-adherence and associated complications; potential of the newer oral anticoagulants, including direct thrombin inhibitors and direct factor Xa inhibitors, to produce indirect cost savings after THR or TKR through a potential reduction in VTE rates and administration and monitoring costs.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of new anticoagulants for VTE prophylaxis after THR or TKR can result in direct and indirect cost savings through improved efficacy by reducing VTE rates and decreased drug administration and monitoring costs compared with traditional anticoagulants. Future research will need to focus on cost analyses driven by clinical outcomes measured on the performance of these agents in actual clinical practice.

Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism with new oral anticoagulants: a practical update for clinicians

Traditional anticoagulants, such as warfarin and enoxaparin, have several limitations, including parenteral administration, need for laboratory monitoring, and ongoing dose adjustment, which may limit optimal patient care. Newer oral anticoagulants, such as direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g., dabigatran etexilate) and direct factor Xa inhibitors (e.g., rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), have been developed to overcome these drawbacks, and thereby improve patient care. Several of these agents have been approved for use in the prevention and treatment of venous and/or systemic thromboembolism. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the available clinical trial data for these new oral anticoagulants in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and a practical update for clinicians.

The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip and total knee arthroplasty

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication after total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Currently used methods of VTE prophylaxis after these procedures have important limitations, including parenteral administration, and unpredictable plasma levels requiring frequent monitoring and dose adjustment leading to decreased patient compliance with recommended guidelines. New oral anticoagulants have been demonstrated in clinical trials to be equally efficacious to enoxaparin and allow for fixed dosing without the need for monitoring. Rivaroxaban is one of the new oral anticoagulants and is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that has demonstrated superior efficacy to that of enoxaparin. However, the data also suggest that rivaroxaban has an increased risk of bleeding compared to enoxaparin. This paper reviews the available data on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for VTE prophylaxis after total hip and total knee arthroplasty.

Antithrombotics for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: an update

Nurses and nurse practitioners play an integral role in initiating and managing antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Since the advent of warfarin in the 1950s, there have been few changes in this field until recently. Warfarin has been used for decades and has well-demonstrated efficacy. However, it also has well-known drawbacks, including an unpredictable dose response, need for anticoagulation monitoring, frequent dose adjustments, and many drug and food interactions. A new generation of anticoagulants, which includes direct thrombin inhibitors and selective Factor Xa inhibitors, shows the potential to significantly improve options for antithrombotic prophylaxis and to positively affect patient outcomes. The objective of this review is to update nurses on the new oral anticoagulants, other recent developments, such as improved risk-assessment techniques, and the role of over-the-counter products, including aspirin.

Implications of new anticoagulants in primary practice

BACKGROUND

Effective prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders remain suboptimal in many healthcare systems, partly owing to limitations of traditional anticoagulants. New oral anticoagulants have been developed and among these, rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran etexilate are in the most advanced stage of clinical development.

METHOD

A literature search using the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed to identify English-language publications. The search was performed up to 31 December 2011 with the terms rivaroxaban OR Xarelto, apixaban OR Eliquis and dabigatran OR Pradaxa. Ongoing, completed and published phase III randomised controlled trials were selected as the primary source of information for the clinical development programme of each drug.

RESULTS

The new oral agents demonstrate several advantages over traditional anticoagulants, including administration at fixed doses and no requirement for routine coagulation monitoring On the basis of phase III clinical trials, rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran etexilate have been approved in many countries for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip and knee replacement surgery. Dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban have also been approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Europe and the US. In addition, rivaroxaban has been approved in Europe for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Approval of these agents and postapproval monitoring of their safety and efficacy will have implications for primary care.

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran etexilate offer the possibility of simplified prevention and treatment strategies for thromboembolic disorders in the outpatient setting.

Postoperatives Management der Gerinnung

<b><i>Hintergrund: </i></b>Das Gerinnungsmanagement in der postoperativen Phase stellt eine komplexe Herausforderung dar. Einerseits führt eine bereits präoperativ vorbestehende oder intraoperativ erworbene Beeinträchtigung der Blutgerinnung zu einem erhöhten Risiko für Nachblutungen. Andererseits sind Patienten in der postoperativen Phase einem erhöhten Risiko für thromboembolische Komplikationen ausgesetzt. Zudem drängen vermehrt neue orale Antikoagulanzien und Thrombozytenaggregationshemmer auf den Markt, für deren perioperativen Einsatz noch wenig Erfahrung besteht. <b><i>Methode: </i></b>Literaturübersicht. <b><i>Ergebnisse: </i></b>Das postoperative Gerinnungsmanagement sollte individualisiert nach einer Diagnostik mit klassischen Gerinnungstests und Point-of-Care(POC)-Diagnoseverfahren erfolgen. Verglichen mit dem intraoperativen Gerinnungsmanagement bestehen Unterschiede. <b><i>Schlussfolgerungen: </i></b>Das Ziel des postoperativen Gerinnungsmanagements ist eine Gerinnungsaktivität, die eine suffiziente Wundheilung zulässt, ohne thromboembolische Ereignisse zu begünstigen. Im Falle einer postoperativen Blutung sollte zur Diagnostik neben den klassischen Gerinnungstests auf viskoelastische POC-Verfahren zurückgegriffen werden. Neben der bedarfsadaptierten Substitution von Gerinnungsfaktoren ist die Aufrechterhaltung der Rahmenbedingungen der Gerinnung von entscheidender Bedeutung (Normothermie, physiologischer pH-Wert, Normokalziämie). Die Fortführung einer bestehenden Antikoagulation mit neuen oralen Antikoagulanzien ist eine Einzelfallentscheidung. Für ihren perioperativen Einsatz gib es noch keine Leitlinien.

Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors

Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, have been the mainstay of oral anticoagulation for many decades. Although effective, warfarin has numerous limitations, including a variable dose requirement from patient to patient because of differences in dietary vitamin K intake, common genetic polymorphisms, and multiple drug interactions that affect its pharmacodynamics and metabolism. Consequently, warfarin requires frequent monitoring to ensure that a therapeutic anticoagulant effect has been achieved because excessive anticoagulation can lead to bleeding, and because insufficient anticoagulation can result in thrombosis. Such monitoring is burdensome for patients and physicians and is costly for the health care system. These limitations have prompted the development of new oral anticoagulants that target either factor Xa or thrombin. Although the path to the development of these drugs has been long, the new drugs are at least as effective and safe as warfarin, but they streamline clinical care because they can be administered in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. This article focuses on rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, the oral factor Xa inhibitors in the most advanced stages of development. After 20 years of discovery research, these agents are already licensed for several indications. Thus, the long path to finding replacements for warfarin has finally reached fruition. Therefore, development of the oral factor Xa inhibitors represents a translational science success story.

New prospective for the management of low-risk pulmonary embolism: prognostic assessment, early discharge, and single-drug therapy with new oral anticoagulants

Patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) can be stratified into two different prognostic categories, based on the presence or absence of shock or sustained arterial hypotension. Some patients with normotensive PE have a low risk of early mortality, defined as <1% at 30 days or during hospital stay. In this paper, we will discuss the new prospective for the optimal management of low-risk PE: prognostic assessment, early discharge, and single-drug therapy with new oral anticoagulants. Several parameters have been proposed and investigated to identify low-risk PE: clinical prediction rules, imaging tests, and laboratory markers of right ventricular dysfunction or injury. Moreover, outpatient management has been suggested for low-risk PE: it may lead to a decrease in unnecessary hospitalizations, acquired infections, death, and costs and to an improvement in health-related quality of life. Finally, the main characteristics of new oral anticoagulant drugs and the most recent published data on phase III trials on PE suggest that the single-drug therapy is a possible suitable option. Oral administration, predictable anticoagulant responses, and few drug-drug interactions of direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors may further simplify PE home therapy avoiding administration of low-molecular-weight heparin.

Acute management of bleeding in patients on novel oral anticoagulants

Novel oral anticoagulants that directly inhibit thrombin (dabigatran) or factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban) are currently available for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after orthopaedic surgery, treatment of acute VTE, and prevention of arterial thromboembolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. These agents offer advantages over VKAs, including rapid onset, shorter half-lives, fewer drug interactions, and lack of need for routine monitoring. However, there are no established agents to reverse their anticoagulant effect. We review the risk of bleeding with the novel oral anticoagulants and the limitations of conventional coagulation assays for measuring anticoagulant effect. We provide an approach to the management of patients with bleeding complications with evidence for various interventions for reversal, where available.

Novel direct-acting anticoagulants for risk reduction in ACS

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a devastating adverse cardiovascular event with a massive burden on patient morbility and mortality, as well as the economy. Approximately 1.2 million people are hospitalized annually for ACS in the United States, with direct medical costs estimated at $150 billion in 2009. Rehospitalization is common, often as the result of recurrence of the initial event or complications of ACS or its therapy. Thrombosis is central to the pathogenesis of ACS. The current standard of care includes dual antiplatelet therapy, which reduces platelet activation and aggregation, integral steps for forming a thrombus. However, antiplatelet therapy does not prevent continued thrombin generation or the deposition of fibrin in the clot and residual risk of a recurrent event remains high. New oral anticoagulants offer a mechanism of action that is different from and complementary to that of antiplatelet agents. The ATLAS ACS-TIMI 51 (Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 51) trial, using rivaroxaban, is the first trial of the new oral anticoagulants to show a benefit when added to antiplatelet therapy in reducing ACS events and mortality. While there was more major bleeding with the addition of rivaroxaban, fatal bleeding was not increased. These agents, if added to the current standard of care, might substantially reduce the high clinical and economic consequences of ACS.

[New advances in anticoagulation: is it time to forget about heparin and vitamin K antagonists? Yes]

For the last 60 years, heparin and vitamin K antagonists have been the cornerstone of anticoagulation. Nowadays, the new anticoagulants, such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, show potential advantages over classical treatments. These agents inhibit specific coagulation factors and are administered orally at fixed doses. Furthermore, heparin and vitamin K antagonists have a fast onset of action, short-duration and predictable therapeutic effects. No interactions with foods have been described, although some drug-drug interactions have been reported. At the moment, no antidotes are available. However, due to the short half-life of these agents, antidotes are less essential. The new anticoagulants are at least as effective and safe as traditional treatments in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after orthopedic surgery, as well as in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have also been shown to be effective in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. Due to their properties, these drugs could gradually replace heparin and especially vitamin K antagonists. Hopefully, many of our patients will be able to discontinue classical anticoagulant treatment and others will never begin it.

Apixaban: a novel oral inhibitor of factor Xa

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of apixaban are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Apixaban is an oral, direct, selective factor Xa inhibitor with a rapid onset of action. It has a plasma elimination half-life of 12 hours and has been administered in a twice-daily dosing regimen in clinical trials without the need for anticoagulation monitoring or dosage adjustment. Apixaban has multiple elimination pathways, and its pharmacokinetics is not substantially altered by patient age, sex, race, or ethnicity. The results of three Phase III trials indicated that apixaban was similar to or more effective than enoxaparin for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement, with similar or lower rates of bleeding. Two Phase III trials found that apixaban was more effective for stroke prevention than either aspirin or warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), with a similar (versus aspirin) or improved (versus warfarin) safety profile. A Phase III trial evaluating apixaban plus antiplatelet monotherapy or dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome ended early due to clear evidence of a clinically important increase in bleeding among patients randomized to apixaban without any meaningful reduction in ischemic events. The adverse-event profiles for apixaban and comparators have been similar in studies conducted to date.

CONCLUSION

Apixaban, a new anticoagulant, appears to offer an efficacy and safety profile comparable with that of enoxaparin for preventing VTE after orthopedic surgery, with the advantage of oral administration. In patients with AF, apixaban is more effective than either warfarin or aspirin for stroke prevention, with an acceptable safety profile.

The role of anticoagulation clinics in the era of new oral anticoagulants

Anticoagulation Clinics (ACs) are services specialized in management of patients on anticoagulant treatment. At present, ACs manage patients chiefly on antivitamin K antagonists (AVKs), but patient population has already changed in the last few years, because of an increase of treatments with other anticoagulant drugs, which require different management systems. The strong increase in the number of patients at AC, mainly on long-term treatment, has determined the development of web management, through telemedicine systems, improving the quality of life and maintaining the same clinical quality levels. New oral anticoagulants (NOAs) have shown to be as effective as AVK antagonists in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism in addition to VTE prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery, when administered at a fixed dose, but patient adherence and compliance are crucial for good quality treatment. At present, lacking data from the real world, an oversimplification of treatment with NOAs could cause unjustified risks for patients and also a possible future underuse of good drugs. For these reasons the vigilance must be high and ACs can have a crucial role in defining which is the best management for NOA patients and how to do it, as it happened for AVKs.

Apixaban: a review of its use in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after knee or hip replacement surgery

Apixaban (Eliquis™) is an orally active and selective direct inhibitor of factor Xa indicated for twice-daily use in the EU for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adults who have had knee or hip replacement surgery. In this article, the pharmacological, clinical efficacy and tolerability data relevant to the use of apixaban in this indication are reviewed. Oral apixaban is a generally effective and well tolerated thromboprophylactic agent for use after major orthopaedic surgery. In the large, randomized, double-blind, phase III, noninferiority trials known as ADVANCE-2 and -3, apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily initiated after surgery was generally more effective in preventing VTE in patients undergoing knee or hip replacement surgery than subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium initiated before surgery at the EU recommended dosage of 40 mg once daily, with apixaban conferring this benefit without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding. However, when the same apixaban regimen was compared with the US recommended dosage regimen of subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium (30 mg twice daily, initiated after surgery) in patients undergoing knee replacement surgery in the similarly designed ADVANCE-1 trial, the thromboprophylactic efficacy of apixaban did not meet primary endpoint noninferiority criteria, although apixaban was associated with fewer major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeds (composite endpoint) than this enoxaparin sodium regimen. Additional comparative efficacy and tolerability data are required to definitively position apixaban with respect to other anticoagulants, including rivaroxaban and dabigatran etexilate. In the meantime, currently available clinical data indicate that apixaban is an emerging option for the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing knee or hip replacement surgery.

Phase III studies on novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a look beyond the excellent results

In this overview we address the three phase III studies that compared new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) with warfarin in the setting of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Strengths and weaknesses of the studies were examined in detail through indirect comparison. We analyze and comment the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the characteristics of randomized patients, the primary efficacy and safety end points and side effects. All new oral anticoagulants resulted in being non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists in reducing stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban were superior to vitamin K antagonists. Importantly, new oral anticoagulants significantly reduced hemorrhagic stroke in all three studies. Major differences among new oral anticoagulants include the way they are eliminated and side effects. Both dabigatran and apixaban were tested in low- to moderate-risk patients (mean CHADS2 [Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke] score = 2.1-2.2) whereas rivaroxaban was tested in high-risk patients (mean CHADS2 score = 3.48) and at variance with dabigatran and apixaban was administered once daily. Apixaban significantly reduced mortality from any cause. The choice of a new oral anticoagulant should take into account these and other differences between the new drugs.

Differences in intraprocedural ACTs with standardized heparin dosing during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients treated with dabigatran vs. patients on uninterrupted warfarin

PURPOSE

Effective intraprocedural anticoagulation for catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is critical to minimize the risk of cerebral thromboembolism. The effect of dabigatran on anticoagulation with heparin during the procedure is unknown. This study compares heparin anticoagulation in patients treated with dabigatran vs. patients on uninterrupted warfarin.

METHODS

Seventy-six consecutive patients (24 dabigatran and 52 warfarin) subjected to a standard intraprocedural heparin protocol were included. Heparin administration and rapidity and degree of anticoagulation were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Despite greater administration of heparin (52.5 ± 22.0 vs. 33.2 ± 10.1 units kg(-1) h(-1); p < 0.001), the mean (320.3 ± 19.5 s) and peak (358.8 ± 28.6 s) activated clotting time (ACT) for the dabigatran group were significantly lower than for the warfarin group (mean, 362.9 ± 35.9 and peak, 410.4 ± 49.7; p < 0.001). The time from initial heparin bolus to first ACT of ≥300 s in the dabigatran group was more than twice that observed in the warfarin group (45.0 ± 30.4 vs. 20.9 ± 14.5 min; p < 0.001). The time to first ACT of ≥350 s was similarly prolonged (109.1 ± 60.0 vs. 55.2 ± 51.1 min; p < 0.001) in the dabigatran group, with eight patients (33 %) failing to reach this target. Outcome differences persisted following analysis using linear models and Cox proportional hazard regression with adjustment for propensity scores.

CONCLUSION

A standard intraprocedural heparin protocol results in delayed and lower levels of anticoagulation as measured by the ACT for patients treated with dabigatran compared with those on uninterrupted warfarin.

Characterisation of exposure versus response of edoxaban in patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery

Edoxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor approved for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Japan. The objectives of this analysis were to characterise the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of edoxaban and the relationships between edoxaban exposure and clinical outcomes in a phase IIb study of surgical patients following total hip replacement (THR). A total of 1,795 subjects from a phase IIb study, 10 phase I studies, and three phase IIa studies were included in the PK analysis. The exposure-response analysis included data from surgical patients assigned to edoxaban in the phase IIb study. Edoxaban disposition in healthy and post-surgical patients was well-described with a linear, two-compartment model. Creatinine clearance was significantly correlated with edoxaban clearance and the rate of oral absorption was affected by surgery. The probability of a post-operative VTE was significantly correlated with steady-state metrics of edoxaban exposure estimated for each subject by Bayesian post-hoc methods with age and gender being the significant and expected covariates. The incidence of bleeding was low in these studies and hence no exposure-response relationship could be identified. These analyses suggest that edoxaban has a predictable anticoagulant effect in this patient population leading to dose-proportional reduction in incidence of VTE with low incidence of bleeding.

Benchmark for time in therapeutic range in venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The percentage of time within the target INR range 2.0 to 3.0 (TTR) in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists varies considerably among efficacy-studies of novel anticoagulants. In order to properly asses the quality of anticoagulant control in upcoming cost-effectiveness studies and real life registries this systematic review reports a benchmark of TTR for different treatment durations in patients with venous thromboembolism and discusses ways to calculate TTR.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched for studies published between January 1990 and May 2012. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reporting the TTR in patients with objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were eligible. Duplicate reports, studies only reporting INR during initial treatment or with VKA treatment less than 3 months were excluded. Three authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data independently. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion between the reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed by calculating a weighted mean, based on the number of participants in each included study, for each time-period in which the TTR was measured since the confirmation of the diagnosis of VTE.

RESULTS

Forty studies were included (26064 patients). The weighted means of TTR were 54.0% in the first month since the start of treatment, 55.6% in months 1 to 3, 60.0% in months 2 to 3, 60.0% in the months 1 to 6+ and 75.2% in months 4 to 12+. Five studies reported TTR in classes. The INR in these studies was ≥ 67% of time in therapeutic range in 72.0% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Reported quality of VKA treatment is highly dependent on the time-period since the start of treatment, with TTR ranging from approximately 56% in studies including the 1(st) month to 75% in studies excluding the first 3 months.

A guidance pathway for the selection of novel anticoagulants in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists has served as the primary treatment for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolization in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) for decades. Over the past several years, multiple novel oral anticoagulants targeting key mediators of coagulation, including thrombin and factor Xa, have been developed. Specifically, agents targeting thrombin (dabigatran) and factor Xa (apixaban and rivaroxaban) have either reached late stages of clinical development (apixaban) or have received approval (dabigatran, rivaroxaban) by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in patients with nonvalvular AF. The promising results derived from large-scale clinical trials with these agents compared to warfarin expand the available therapeutic options for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolization in this rapidly increasing patient population. Here we present a general guidance pathway for the initiation and selection of oral anticoagulants in patients with AF.

Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

New orally administered anticoagulants will simplify stroke-prevention strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Novel anticoagulants, such as dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, and rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF. In addition, the factor Xa inhibitor apixaban has been reported to be as effective as warfarin in a large, randomized clinical trial, and the efficacy of edoxaban is being assessed in a phase III warfarin comparison trial. This review discusses the limitations of vitamin K antagonist therapy for patients with AF and establishes the need for alternative, effective anticoagulation with an improved benefit–risk ratio for the prevention of stroke. Novel anticoagulants have the potential to provide convenient, effective stroke prophylaxis without many of the issues inherent in the use of traditional agents.

Rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation

Warfarin is the traditional therapeutic option available to manage thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation. The hemorrhagic risk with warfarin depends mainly on the international normalized ratio (INR). Data from randomized controlled trials show that patients have a therapeutic INR (2.00-3.00) only 61%-68% of the time while taking warfarin, and this target is sometimes hard to establish. Many compounds have been developed in order to optimize the profile of oral anticoagulants. We focus on one of them, rivaroxaban, comparing it with novel alternatives, ie, dabigatran and apixaban. The indication for rivaroxaban in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation was evaluated in ROCKET-AF (Rivaroxaban-once daily, Oral, direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation). In this trial, rivaroxaban was associated with a 12% reduction in the incidence of the primary endpoint compared with warfarin (hazard ratio 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.03; P < 0.001 for noninferiority and P = 0.12 for superiority). However, patients remained in the therapeutic range for INR only 55% of the time, which is less than that in RE-LY (the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy, 64%) and in the ARISTOTLE trial (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation, 66%). This shorter time spent in the therapeutic range has been one of the main criticisms of the ROCKET-AF trial, but could actually reflect what happens in real life. In addition, rivaroxaban exhibits good pharmacokinetic and pharmacoeconomic properties. Novel anticoagulants are a viable and commercially available alternative to vitamin K antagonists nowadays for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in atrial fibrillation. Rivaroxaban is an attractive alternative, but the true picture of this novel compound in atrial fibrillation will only become available with more widespread use.

The effects of direct factor Xa inhibitor (Rivaroxaban) on the human osteoblastic cell line SaOS2

Thromboprophylaxis reduces the risk of surgery-related deep vein thrombosis, but anticoagulants were associated with systemic osteoporosis, a known risk factor for poor fracture healing. Rivaroxaban (XARELTO(®)) is a novel anticoagulant with specific ability to inhibit factor Xa, a serine endopeptidase, which plays a key role in coagulation. This study investigated the direct effects of rivaroxaban on bone biology using an in vitro cell culture model from the human female osteoblastic cell line SaOS2. Cells at subconfluence were treated for 24 hr with different concentrations of rivaroxaban and analyzed for DNA synthesis and creatine kinase- and alkaline phosphatase-specific activities, and were treated 21 days for analyzing mineralization. Rivaroxaban (0.01-50 μg/ml) dose-dependently inhibited up to 60% DNA synthesis of the cells. Creatine kinase-specific activity was also inhibited dose-dependently to a similar extent by the same concentrations. Alkaline phosphatase-specific activity was dose-dependently inhibited but only up to 30%. Cell mineralization was unaffected by 10 μg/ml rivaroxaban. This model demonstrated a significant rivaroxaban-induced reduction in osteoblastic cell growth and energy metabolism, and slight inhibition of the osteoblastic marker, alkaline phosphatase, while osteoblastic mineralization was unaffected. These findings might indicate that rivaroxaban inhibits the first stage of bone formation but does not affect later stages (i.e., bone mineralization).

In situ crosslinkable heparin-containing poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for sustained anticoagulant release

Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is widely used in anticoagulation therapies and for the prevention of thrombosis. LMWH is administered by subcutaneous injection usually once or twice per day. This frequent and invasive delivery modality leads to compliance issues for individuals on prolonged therapeutic courses, particularly pediatric patients. Here, we report a long-term delivery method for LMWH via subcutaneous injection of long-lasting hydrogels. LMWH is modified with reactive maleimide groups so that it can be crosslinked into continuous networks with four-arm thiolated poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG-SH). Maleimide-modified LMWH (Mal-LMWH) retains bioactivity as indicated by prolonged coagulation time. Hydrogels comprising PEG-SH and Mal-LMWH degrade via hydrolysis, releasing bioactive LMWH by first-order kinetics with little initial burst release. Separately dissolved Mal-LMWH and PEG-SH solutions were co-injected subcutaneously in New Zealand White rabbits. The injected solutions successfully formed hydrogels in situ and released LMWH as measured via chromogenic assays on plasma samples, with accumulation of LMWH occurring at day 2 and rising to near-therapeutic dose equivalency by day 5. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using LMWH-containing, crosslinked hydrogels for sustained and controlled release of anticoagulants.

Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

New oral anticoagulants, including apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, have been developed as alternatives to warfarin, the standard oral anticoagulation therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants to those of warfarin in patients with AF. The published research was systematically searched for randomized controlled trials of >1 year in duration that compared new oral anticoagulants to warfarin in patients with AF. Random-effects models were used to pool efficacy and safety data across randomized controlled trials. Three studies, including 44,563 patients, were identified. Patients randomized to new oral anticoagulants had a decreased risk for all-cause stroke and systemic embolism (relative risk [RR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 0.92), ischemic and unidentified stroke (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99), hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.68), all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95), and vascular mortality (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98). Randomization to a new oral anticoagulant was associated with a lower risk for intracranial bleeding (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.66). Data regarding the risks for major bleeding (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.09) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.72) were inconclusive. In conclusion, the new oral anticoagulants are more efficacious than warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with AF. With a decreased risk for intracranial bleeding, they appear to have a favorable safety profile, making them promising alternatives to warfarin.

The promise of novel direct oral anticoagulants

The standard effective treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism includes unfractionated and low-molecular weight heparin as well as warfarin, which have major disadvantages. In recent years, new anticoagulants have been developed in an attempt to overcome the known limitations of established treatment and develop improved therapies. This chapter reviews pharmacological properties of the new anticoagulants, the most recent trials assessing their safety and efficacy as well as potential advantages and disadvantages of using these novel drugs in real life.

Dabigatran etexilate: a review of its use for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement surgery

Dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa®, Pradax™, Prazaxa®) is indicated for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events in adults who have undergone elective total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of oral dabigatran etexilate in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery, as well as summarizing its pharmacological properties and results of a cost-utility analysis. The discussion of clinical trial data focuses on comparative trials with the EU approved dosage regimen of once-daily subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium 40 mg. Dabigatran etexilate is an oral prodrug of the potent, rapidly acting, reversible, competitive inhibitor of thrombin, dabigatran. Dabigatran has predictable and consistent anticoagulant effects and does not require routine coagulation monitoring or dose titration. In the large, randomized, double-blind, phase III, noninferiority trials, RE-MODEL, RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II, oral dabigatran etexilate, at dosages of 150 and 220 mg once daily, initiated postoperatively was shown to be noninferior to subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium 40 mg once daily (initiated prior to surgery) with regard to the incidence of the composite of total VTE events and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TKR or THR surgery. In general, oral dabigatran etexilate was well tolerated in clinical trials of patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. There were no significant between-group differences in bleeding complications, including major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding or minor bleeding between the dabigatran etexilate or enoxaparin sodium groups. In addition, a cost-utility analysis from the perspective of the UK National Health Service indicated that dabigatran etexilate 220 mg once daily is dominant (i.e. more effective and less costly) to enoxaparin sodium 40 mg once daily in patients undergoing THR or TKR. Additional head-to-head comparisons would be beneficial to more definitively position dabigatran etexilate relative to other available oral treatment options for VTE prophylaxis, such as rivaroxaban and apixaban. In the meantime, dabigatran etexilate offers a convenient, effective and generally well tolerated treatment option for the prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing TKR and THR surgery.