Acid-suppressive medication use and the risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia

Proton pump inhibitors and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis of 11 international studies

BACKGROUND

Concerns have been raised about the risk of fractures with acid-suppressive medications, such as proton pump inhibitors and histamine(2)-receptor antagonists.

METHODS

This meta-analysis evaluated the association between proton pump inhibitor or histamine(2)-receptor antagonist use and fractures. We performed a systematic search of published literature (1970 to October 10, 2010) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other sources. Ten publications reporting 11 studies were considered eligible for analysis.

RESULTS

All studies were observational case-control or cohort studies and primarily evaluated older adults. The summary effect estimate for risk of hip fracture increased modestly among individuals taking proton pump inhibitors (relative risk [RR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.43). There also was an increase in spine (RR 1.56, 95% CI, 1.31-1.85) and any-site fractures (RR 1.16, 95% CI, 1.04-1.30) among proton pump inhibitor users. These findings were similar in both men and women and after stratification by duration of use. In contrast, histamine(2)-receptor antagonist use was not significantly associated with increased risk of hip fracture (RR 1.12, 95% CI, 0.97-1.30).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis of observational studies, proton pump inhibitors modestly increased the risk of hip, spine, and any-site fractures, whereas histamine(2)-receptor antagonists were not associated with fracture risk. The possibility of residual confounding cannot be excluded. Further skeletal evaluation should be considered for patients who are taking proton pump inhibitors and also at risk for osteoporotic fracture.

Review of proton pump inhibitors for the initial treatment of heartburn: is there a dose ceiling effect?

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in clinical practice. However, concerns have been expressed about their long-term use, particularly with regard to bone health, Clostridium difficile infections, and drug interactions with platelet aggregation inhibitors. There has been limited guidance for clinicians concerning appropriate dose selection of PPIs for the initial treatment of heartburn. This review explored whether published clinical trials provide evidence of a ceiling above which higher PPI doses do not provide additional clinical benefit over the lowest approved dose. All articles of randomized, controlled clinical trials in nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in which the effects of two or more doses of the same PPI on symptomatic relief of heartburn were quantified as a study endpoint were identified and analyzed through PubMed searches up to the end of September 2010. The majority of trials evaluated provided no evidence that higher PPI doses were superior to the lowest approved dose for the initial treatment of heartburn. There were no clinically relevant findings with respect to dose dependence and safety outcomes in these studies. Efficacy outcomes from the trials suggest there may be a dose ceiling effect and highlight the need for further research on the use of the lowest effective PPI doses as an appropriate strategy in the initial treatment of uncomplicated heartburn. Observational studies and some meta-analyses have suggested that long-term PPI pharmacotherapy might be associated with safety concerns, which necessitate the periodic evaluation of therapeutic benefit in terms of symptom resolution and regimen tolerability. However, evidence to date suggests that use of the lowest effective dose for the indication is not associated with significant adverse events, particularly in the short term. Clinical practice suggests that patients requiring long-term treatment should be maintained on the lowest dose necessary to control symptoms, and monitored for potentially confounding factors that may lead to safety concerns.

Prevalence and appropriateness of drug prescriptions for peptic ulcer and gastro-esophageal reflux disease in a cohort of hospitalized elderly

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are among the most commonly prescribed medicines and their overuse is widespread in both primary and secondary care. Inappropriate prescription is of particular concern among elderly patients, who have often multiple comorbidities and need many drugs.

METHODS

We evaluate the appropriateness of drugs for peptic ulcer or gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) in a sample of elderly patients (65 years old or older) at admission and discharge in 38 internal medicine wards between January 2008 and December 2008, according to the presence of specific conditions or gastro-toxic drug combinations.

RESULTS

Among 1155 patients eligible for the analysis, 466 (40.3%) were treated with drugs for GERD or peptic ulcer were at hospital admission and 647 (56.0%) at discharge; 62.4% of patients receiving a drug for peptic ulcer or GERD at admission and 63.2% at discharge were inappropriately treated. Among these, the number of other drugs prescribed was associated with greater use of drugs for peptic ulcer or GERD, even after adjustment for age, sex and number of diagnoses at admission (OR 95% CI=1.26 (1.18-1.34), p=.0001) or discharge (OR 95% CI=1.11 (1.05-1.18), p=0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of inappropriate prescription of drugs for peptic ulcer or GERD remained almost the same at admission and discharge. Inappropriate use of these drugs is related to the concomitant use of other drugs. Careful assessment of clinical conditions and stricter adherence to evidence-based guidelines are essential for a rational and cost-effective use of drugs for peptic ulcer or GERD.

TNF-α antagonist use and risk of hospitalization for infection in a national cohort of veterans with rheumatoid arthritis

Medications used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may confer an increased risk of infection. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of veterans with RA followed in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs health care system from October 1998 through September 2005. Risk of hospitalization for infection associated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists therapy was measured using an extension of Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for demographic characteristics, comorbid illnesses, and other medications used to treat RA. A total of 20,814 patients met inclusion criteria, including 3796 patients who received infliximab, etanercept, or adalimumab. Among the study cohort, 1465 patients (7.0%) were hospitalized at least once for infection. There were 1889 hospitalizations for infection. The most common hospitalized infections were pneumonia, bronchitis, and cellulitis. Age and several comorbid medical conditions were associated with hospitalization for infection. Prednisone (hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.88-2.43) and TNF-α antagonist use (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.50) were associated with hospitalization for infection, while the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than TNF-α antagonists was not. Compared to etanercept, infliximab was associated with risk for hospitalization for infection (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.14-2.00), while adalimumab use was not (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.68-1.33). In all treatment groups, rate of hospitalization for infection was highest in the first 8 months of therapy. We conclude that patients with RA who are treated with TNF-α antagonists are at higher risk for hospitalization for infection than those treated with other DMARDs. Prednisone use is also a risk factor for hospitalization for infection.

Acid-suppressive medication use and the risk for nosocomial gastrointestinal tract bleeding

BACKGROUND

Acid-suppressive medications are increasingly prescribed for noncritically ill hospitalized patients, although the incidence of nosocomial gastrointestinal (GI) tract bleeding (GI bleeding) and magnitude of potential benefit from this practice are unknown. We aimed to define the incidence of nosocomial GI bleeding outside of the intensive care unit and examine the association between acid-suppressive medication use and this complication.

METHODS

We conducted a pharmacoepidemiologic cohort study of patients admitted to an academic medical center from 2004 through 2007, at least 18 years of age, and hospitalized for 3 or more days. Admissions with a primary diagnosis of GI bleeding were excluded. Acid-suppressive medication use was defined as any order for a proton pump inhibitor or histamine-2-receptor antagonist. The main outcome measure was nosocomial GI bleeding. A propensity matched generalized estimating equation was used to control for confounders.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 78,394 admissions (median age, 56 years; 41% men). Acid-suppressive medication was ordered in 59% of admissions, and nosocomial GI bleeding occurred in 224 admissions (0.29%). After matching on the propensity score, the adjusted odds ratio for nosocomial GI bleeding in the group exposed to acid-suppressive medication relative to the unexposed group was 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.93). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 episode of nosocomial GI bleeding was 770.

CONCLUSIONS

Nosocomial GI bleeding outside of the intensive care unit was rare. Despite a protective effect of acid-suppressive medication, the number needed to treat to prevent 1 case of nosocomial GI bleeding was relatively high, supporting the recommendation against routine use of prophylactic acid-suppressive medication in noncritically ill hospitalized patients.

Risk factors for mortality in cirrhotic patients with sepsis

BACKGROUND

Patients with cirrhosis and sepsis had increased mortality.

AIM

Determine factors associated with increased in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients admitted for sepsis.

METHODS

All cirrhotic patients admitted from 2004 to 2007 for sepsis were identified from hospital electronic database. Patients were included if they had liver cirrhosis and sepsis, defined as identified sources of infection, and at least one of fever, altered total white cell count, or raised C-reactive protein. Baseline characteristics, investigations, infections, and outcomes were collected. Main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 205 admissions in 153 patients were included. In-hospital mortality rate was 24.4%. In predicting in-hospital death, area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for Child-Pugh score was 0.934, with optimum cut-off at 10 and above, while for model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 0.751, with optimum cut-off at 17 and above. Four factors were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality on multivariate analysis: presence of >1 site of infection, pneumonia, Child's C status, and MELD score 17 and above. In-hospital mortality rate increased with more factors: 0% with no factor, 7% with one factor, 21% with two factors, 87% with three factors, and 100% with four factors. The mortality of those with <3 risk factors was significantly lower than those with three or more risk factors (7 vs. 91%, p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Septic cirrhotic patients with pneumonia, >1 site of infection, Child's C cirrhosis, and high MELD score had a high mortality risk.

Prospective, randomized comparison of lansoprazole suspension, and intermittent intravenous famotidine on gastric pH and acid production in critically ill neurosurgical patients

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of studies comparing stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) agents in high-risk neurosurgical patients.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized study, critically ill neurosurgical patients received lansoprazole 30 mg suspension via NG/NJ tube daily or famotidine 20 mg IV q12 h for SUP. Gastric pH and residual volumes were recorded for 3 days and adverse events for 7 days after admission.

RESULTS

There were 51 patients randomized to lansoprazole (n = 28) or famotidine (n = 23) who received SUP for ≥ 3 days. All patients had at least two risk factors for SRMD, and 75% had a baseline GCS < 9. On day 1 of therapy, more famotidine patients had a gastric pH ≥ 4 at least 80% of the time as compared to lansoprazole patients (74 vs. 36%, P = 0.01, respectively); however, there was no difference on days 2 and 3. Enteral feedings on day 1 predicted a pH ≥ 4 (P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the percentages of time gastric residual volumes < 28 ml (P = NS). Heme-positive aspirates were present in 18-39% of patients (P = NS); one patient receiving famotidine met the criteria for overt bleeding. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 17% in the famotidine group and 4% in the lansoprazole group (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Neurosurgery ICU patients receiving famotidine for SUP achieved a gastric pH ≥ 4 more often than lansoprazole-treated patients, but only on day 1 of the 3-day study period. Both agents were equally effective in reducing gastric acid production. There was no difference in the incidence of mucosal damage and thrombocytopenia.

Pantoprazole for the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the preventive effect of proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who are at high risk for GI bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 665 patients with ACS who had one or more of the following risk factors for GI bleeding: 75 years of age or older, history of peptic ulcer disease, history of GI bleeding, cardiogenic shock, and chronic renal dysfunction (serum creatinine, >2 mg/dL). Patients were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg of pantoprazole or placebo twice daily for 7 days, in addition to standard treatment of ACS. The primary end point was the occurrence of GI bleeding during hospitalization.

RESULTS

During a median time of hospitalization of 12 days, 12 (3.6%) of 332 patients in the placebo group had an occurrence of GI bleeding, as compared with 4 (1.2%) of the 333 patients in the pantoprazole group (P = .046, Fisher exact test). The log-rank test showed a significant difference between the 2 groups in the time to the occurrence of GI bleeding (P = .015). Major GI bleeding occurred in 5 (1.5%) patients in the placebo group but only in 1 (0.3%) in the pantoprazole group (P = .12). Pneumonia developed in 22 (6.6%) patients in the placebo group and 24 (7.2%) in the pantoprazole group (χ(2) = 0.077, P = .88). The 30-day mortality was 10.2% (34/332) in the placebo group and 10.5% (35/333) in the pantoprazole group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ACS who are at high risk for GI hemorrhage, prophylactic treatment with pantoprazole could reduce the risk of GI bleeding with no significant effects on the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia and 30-day mortality.

Use of proton pump inhibitors and H2 blockers and risk of pneumonia in older adults: a population-based case-control study

PURPOSE

To examine whether use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2 blockers is associated with increased pneumonia risk.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based, nested case-control study within Group Health, an integrated healthcare delivery system. Among community-dwelling, immunocompetent adults aged 65-94, we identified presumptive cases of ambulatory and hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia in 2000-2003 from ICD-9 codes and validated them by medical record review (N = 1125). Controls were selected, matched to cases on age, sex, and calendar year (N = 2235). Current PPI or H2 blocker use was ascertained from computerized pharmacy records. Comorbid illnesses and other characteristics were ascertained by medical record review. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to examine the association between medication use and pneumonia risk. We conducted sensitivity analyses using only administrative and pharmacy data to assess how these results differed from our primary results.

RESULTS

The prevalence of PPI or H2 blocker use was 21% (241/1125) for pneumonia cases and 16% (350/2235) for controls (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% CI 0.86-1.24, compared to nonuse). No increased risk was seen for recent initiation. The prevalence of PPI use was 12% (132/1125) for cases and 7% (160/2235) for controls (adjusted OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.88-1.44). Analyses using only administrative and pharmacy data yielded risk estimates farther from the null (adjusted OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.17-1.49, for current PPI use versus nonuse).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of PPIs and H2 blockers is not associated with increased pneumonia risk in older adults. The increased risk observed in some prior studies may reflect confounding.

Use of acid-suppressive drugs and risk of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have yielded inconsistent findings about the association between the use of acid-suppressive drugs and the risk of pneumonia. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize this association.

METHODS

We searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Embase and the Cochrane Library) from inception to Aug. 28, 2009. Two evaluators independently extracted data. Because of heterogeneity, we used random-effects meta-analysis to obtain pooled estimates of effect.

RESULTS

We identified 31 studies: five case-control studies, three cohort studies and 23 randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis of the eight observational studies showed that the overall risk of pneumonia was higher among people using proton pump inhibitors (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.46, I(2) 90.5%) and histamine(2) receptor antagonists (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.36, I(2) 0.0%). In the randomized controlled trials, use of histamine(2) receptor antagonists was associated with an elevated risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia (relative risk 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.48, I(2) 30.6%).

INTERPRETATION

Use of a proton pump inhibitor or histamine(2) receptor antagonist may be associated with an increased risk of both community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Given these potential adverse effects, clinicians should use caution in prescribing acid-suppressive drugs for patients at risk.

Why do physicians prescribe stress ulcer prophylaxis to general medicine patients?

BACKGROUND

Little is known about why physicians prescribe inappropriate stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) among nonintensive care unit (ICU) hospitalized patients without supporting evidence. This study seeks to understand which factors influence physician prescribing behavior regarding SUP.

DESIGN

We designed a cross sectional web-based survey to assess physicians' knowledge, beliefs, and behavior surrounding the prescribing of SUP for non-ICU patients. The survey was emailed to internal medicine residents and hospitalists at a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. Clinically relevant bivariable associations were examined in logistic regression to determine whether these associations remained after adjustment for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine percent of physicians reported prescribing SUP to ≥25% of patients. In multivariable analyses, the following factors were associated with higher level of prescribing (≥25%) of SUP: fear of gastrointestinal bleeding (OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.07, 7.28) and of the legal repercussions of not prescribing SUP (OR = 3.02, 95% CI 1.07, 8.56), whereas knowledge of SUP indications (OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.20, 0.74) and concern about side effects (OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.09, 0.61) were associated with low prescribing behavior. Level of training was not associated with prescribing rate. Less than half of respondents were able to identify a single side effect of proton pump inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSION

Fear of legal repercussions and ignorance of the side effects of acid suppressive therapy were strongly associated with inappropriate prescribing of SUP. Educating physicians about the adverse effects of acid suppression therapy and about existing national guidelines might reduce inappropriate prescribing.

Critical care: advances and future perspectives

Intensive care offers a standard of monitoring, intervention, and organ support that cannot be readily delivered in a general ward. Its expansion in the past few decades, including the creation of emergency and outreach teams, emphasises that intensive care has an increasingly prominent role within the hospital. Although outcomes are clearly improving, intensive care remains a nascent specialty in which we are still learning how to harness a powerful ability to manipulate physiology, biochemistry, and immunology to achieve best outcomes for the patient. The results of many multicentre studies have not lent support to, or have even confounded, expectations, drawing attention to several issues related to patient heterogeneity, trial design, and elucidation of underlying pathophysiological processes. However, these results have generated constructive introspection and reappraisal of treatments and management strategies that have benefited the patient. In addition to the medical, financial, and logistical challenges in the future, exciting opportunities will arise as new developments in diagnostic tests, therapeutic interventions, and technology are used to exploit an increasing awareness of how critical illness should be managed.

The safety of drugs used in acid-related disorders and functional gastrointestinal disorders

Medicines are frequently used in the management of acid-related disorders and functional gastrointestinal disorders. With the exception of complicated peptic ulcer disease, these disorders are not associated with appreciable mortality. Drug treatments have consequently been held to the highest standards of safety. Some medicines have been withdrawn or restricted based on assessments and perceptions of risk. However, the risk of serious toxicity is low for most of the agents discussed in this article. Assessments are made of the safety and adverse-event profiles of certain drug classes and, where appropriate, individual medicines. For conditions with a low risk of mortality or serious morbidity, clinicians need to balance the risks of potential adverse events with the anticipated benefits of a successful outcome of specific drug treatment.

An analytical approach to characterize morbidity profile dissimilarity between distinct cohorts using electronic medical records

We describe a two-stage analytical approach for characterizing morbidity profile dissimilarity among patient cohorts using electronic medical records. We capture morbidities using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-9) codes. In the first stage of the approach separate logistic regression analyses for ICD-9 sections (e.g., "hypertensive disease" or "appendicitis") are conducted, and the odds ratios that describe adjusted differences in prevalence between two cohorts are displayed graphically. In the second stage, the results from ICD-9 section analyses are combined into a general morbidity dissimilarity index (MDI). For illustration, we examine nine cohorts of patients representing six phenotypes (or controls) derived from five institutions, each a participant in the electronic MEdical REcords and GEnomics (eMERGE) network. The phenotypes studied include type II diabetes and type II diabetes controls, peripheral arterial disease and peripheral arterial disease controls, normal cardiac conduction as measured by electrocardiography, and senile cataracts.

Pharmacotherapy and the risk for community-acquired pneumonia

Background

Some forms of pharmacotherapy are shown to increase the risk of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The purpose of this study is to investigate whether pharmacotherapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPI), inhaled corticosteroids, and atypical antipsychotics was associated with the increased risk for CAP in hospitalized older adults with the adjustment of known risk factors (such as smoking status and serum albumin levels).

Methods

A retrospective case-control study of adults aged 65 years or older at a rural community hospital during 2004 and 2006 was conducted. Cases (N = 194) were those with radiographic evidence of pneumonia on admission. The controls were patients without the discharge diagnosis of pneumonia or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (N = 952). Patients with gastric tube feeding, ventilator support, requiring hemodialysis, metastatic diseases or active lung cancers were excluded.

Results

Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the current use of inhaled corticosteroids (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.56-5.35) and atypical antipsychotics (AOR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.23-4.15) was an independent risk factor for CAP after adjusting for confounders, including age, serum albumin levels, sex, smoking status, a history of congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, and COPD, the current use of PPI, β2 agonist and anticholinergic bronchodilators, antibiotic(s), iron supplement, narcotics, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The crude OR and the AOR of PPI use for CAP was 1.41 [95% CI = 1.03 - 1.93] and 1.18 [95% CI = 0.80 - 1.74] after adjusting for the above confounders, respectively. Lower serum albumin levels independently increased the risk of CAP 1.89- fold by decreasing a gram per deciliter (AOR = 2.89, 95% CI = 2.01 - 4.16).

Conclusion

Our study reaffirmed that the use of inhaled corticosteroids and atypical antipsychotics was both associated with an increased risk for CAP in hospitalized older adults of a rural community. No association was found between current PPI use and the risk for CAP in this patient population of our study.

Proton pump inhibitors for prophylaxis of nosocomial upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding: effect of standardized guidelines on prescribing practice

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently prescribed for prophylaxis of nosocomial upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Some inpatients receiving PPIs may have no risk factors for nosocomial upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, and PPIs may be continued unnecessarily at hospital discharge. We aimed to assess the effect of standardized guidelines on PPI prescribing practices.

METHODS

Guidelines for PPI use were implemented on the medical service at a tertiary center. We reviewed PPI use among inpatient admissions during the month before implementation of guidelines and then prospectively evaluated PPI use among admissions during the month after implementation of guidelines.

RESULTS

Among an overall cohort of 942 patients, 48% were prescribed PPIs while inpatients, and 41% were prescribed PPIs at hospital discharge. Univariate predictors of inpatient PPI use included age, length of hospital stay, history of gastroesophageal reflux disease or upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, and outpatient PPI, aspirin, or glucocorticoid use. Among patients not on an outpatient regimen of PPIs at admission, implementation of guidelines resulted in lower rates of inpatient PPI use (27% before vs 16% after, P = .001) and PPI prescription at discharge (16% before vs 10% after, P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Introduction of standardized guidelines resulted in lower rates of PPI use among a subset of inpatients and reduced the rate of PPI prescriptions at discharge.

[Current problems in the prevention and treatment of infections in patients with cirrhosis]

Infections in patients with cirrhosis are a common complication causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Bacterial translocation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of many infections in cirrhosis. In turn, infections are involved in the pathogenesis of many episodes of decompensated cirrhosis, such as esophageal variceal bleeding, renal insufficiency, the hemodynamic alterations of cirrhosis, and hepatic encephalopathy. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is currently the most frequent infection in cirrhosis. Mortality from this entity has recently decreased due to early diagnosis, the use of appropriate antibiotic therapy, and albumin administration. However, infections due to multiresistant microorganisms have recently increased, leading to greater mortality. Primary prophylaxis with quinolones is effective in preventing infections and is associated with lower mortality in a selected population of patients with liver cirrhosis.

The efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors vs histamine-2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis among critical care patients: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors in comparison with histamine-2 receptor antagonists for stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis among critical care patients.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled trials that directly compare proton pump inhibitors with histamine-2 receptor antagonists in prevention of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding in intensive care unit patients published before May 30, 2008.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment, and extracted data. The primary outcome was the incidence of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and the secondary outcome measures were the incidence of pneumonia and intensive care unit mortality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The random effect model was used to estimate the pooled risk difference between two treatment arms irrespective of drug, dosage, and route of administration.

RESULTS

We identified seven randomized, controlled trials with a total of 936 patients for planned comparison. The overall pooled risk difference (95% confidence interval; p value; I statistics) of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding comparing proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine-2 receptor antagonists was -0.04 (95% confidence interval, -0.09-0.01; p = .08; I = 66%). In the sensitivity analysis, removing the Levy study significantly reduced the heterogeneity (from I = 66% to I = 26%) and shifted the overall risk difference closer to the null (pooled risk difference, -0.02; 95% confidence interval, -0.05-0.01; p = .19). There was no difference between proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists therapy in the risk of pneumonia and intensive care unit mortality, with pooled risk differences of 0.00 (95% confidence interval, -0.04-0.05; p = .86; I = 0%) and 0.02 (95% confidence interval, -0.04-0.08; p = .50; I = 0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis did not find strong evidence that proton pump inhibitors were different from histamine-2 receptor antagonists in terms of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis, pneumonia, and mortality among patients admitted to intensive care units. Because of limited trial data, future well-designed and powerful randomized, clinical trials are warranted.

Gurgling breath sounds may predict hospital-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether gurgling sounds heard during speech or quiet breathing, with or without a stethoscope over the glottis, predict hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP).

METHODS

All patients admitted to the respiratory or general medicine ward of a 350-bed community teaching hospital were eligible. Patients were examined each day, and those who had upper airway gurgling, heard with or without the stethoscope, during breathing or speech at any point during admission were noted. Assuming an overall incidence of HAP (>48 h after admission) of 5% to 10% and estimated incidence of 30% to 50% in patients with gurgle, 20 patients with gurgle and 60 patients without gurgle, matched on the same day and ward of admission, were included in the study. Demographic, physiologic, and outcome variables were compared using univariate and multivariate techniques to ascertain whether gurgling is independently associated with HAP, rate of transfer to ICU, and inhospital mortality.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with gurgle were compared with 60 patients without gurgle. Patients with gurgle were older (78.5 vs 65.2 y; P < .001), more likely to reside in nursing homes (75% vs 6%; P < .001), and were more likely to have dementia (70% vs 13%; P < .001). In multivariate analysis, dementia (odds ratio [OR] = 23.4; 95% CI, 4.2-131.9) and recent (within 24 h) treatment with opiates (OR = 14.7; 95% CI, 2.2-97.5) emerged as the only statistically significant independent predictors of gurgling. HAP occurred in 55% of patients with gurgle compared with 1.7% of patients without gurgle (P < .001), and 50% of patients with vs 3.3% of patients without gurgle required transfer to ICU (P < .001). After adjustment for age, Charlson score, dementia, opiate administration, and stroke, gurgling emerged as the sole independent predictor of HAP (OR = 140.1; 95% CI, 5.6-3,529.4) and ICU transfer (OR = 35.1; 95% CI, 4.1-303.7). Gurgling did not predict mortality; the Charlson comorbidity index was the only significant predictor of inhospital death.

CONCLUSIONS

Gurgling sounds heard during quiet breathing or speech are independently associated with HAP.

PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations

MOTIVATION

Emergence of genetic data coupled to longitudinal electronic medical records (EMRs) offers the possibility of phenome-wide association scans (PheWAS) for disease-gene associations. We propose a novel method to scan phenomic data for genetic associations using International Classification of Disease (ICD9) billing codes, which are available in most EMR systems. We have developed a code translation table to automatically define 776 different disease populations and their controls using prevalent ICD9 codes derived from EMR data. As a proof of concept of this algorithm, we genotyped the first 6005 European-Americans accrued into BioVU, Vanderbilt's DNA biobank, at five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with previously reported disease associations: atrial fibrillation, Crohn's disease, carotid artery stenosis, coronary artery disease, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. The PheWAS software generated cases and control populations across all ICD9 code groups for each of these five SNPs, and disease-SNP associations were analyzed. The primary outcome of this study was replication of seven previously known SNP-disease associations for these SNPs.

RESULTS

Four of seven known SNP-disease associations using the PheWAS algorithm were replicated with P-values between 2.8 x 10(-6) and 0.011. The PheWAS algorithm also identified 19 previously unknown statistical associations between these SNPs and diseases at P < 0.01. This study indicates that PheWAS analysis is a feasible method to investigate SNP-disease associations. Further evaluation is needed to determine the validity of these associations and the appropriate statistical thresholds for clinical significance.

AVAILABILITY

The PheWAS software and code translation table are freely available at http://knowledgemap.mc.vanderbilt.edu/research.

Pneumonia and influenza – specific considerations in care homes

This review provides an update on current evidence surrounding epidemiology, treatment and prevention of lower respiratory tract infection, with special reference to pneumonia and influenza, in care home residents. The care home sector is growing and provides a unique ecological niche for infections, housing frail older people with multiple co-morbidities and frequent contact with healthcare services. There are therefore considerations in the epidemiology and management of these conditions that are specific to care homes. Opportunities for prevention, in the form of vaccination strategies and improving oral hygiene, may reduce the burden of these diseases in the future. Work is needed to research these infections specifically in the care home setting, and this article highlights current gaps in our knowledge.

Current Concepts in the Prevention and Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common causes of infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Efforts to prevent VAP have focused on both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies. Two of the more controversial pharmacologic approaches included selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) and decontamination of the oropharynx using topical antimicrobials or antiseptics including chlorhexidine (CHX). Additionally, avoidance of pharmacotherapy-related risk factors is hypothesized to reduce VAP rates. Successful treatment of VAP is becoming increasingly difficult in the era of antibiotic resistance. Utilization of local antibiograms, implementation of standardized treatment pathways, and optimization of pharmacodynamic-based dosing offer methods to improve empiric therapy selections. De-escalation of therapy should be a constant focus in an attempt to reduce overall antibiotic consumption and the selection pressure on ICU flora, thus minimizing the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance in the ICU.

Applying principles of physics to the airway to help explain the relationship between asthma and gastroesophageal reflux

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and asthma have been linked, but the true nature of this relationship is incompletely understood. Most of the literature examining this association has implicated GER as the factor contributing to asthma. GER has also been linked to conditions of the upper airway like sinusitis and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and once again, usually presumed to be the causative factor. While GER seems to be capable of exacerbating airway disease, mounting evidence suggests that airway obstruction is a risk factor for developing GER. This article examines the principles of physics that predict what should occur given the anatomy of the airway and the esophagus, and provides multiple examples of disease associations that appear to support the hypothesis that airway obstruction is a significant risk factor for development of gastroesophageal reflux.

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the New Millennium!

Clinical trials conducted in the latter part of the past millennium suggested that bleeding from gastric stress ulceration was an important cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and that treatment with acid-suppressive therapy reduced the risk of clinically significant bleeding. Stress ulcer prophylaxis therefore became regarded as the standard of care in all ICU patients. However, more recent clinical trials have demonstrated that the risk of clinically significant bleeding is extremely low (about 1%) and not altered by the use of acid-suppressive therapy. Furthermore, a critical review of the “historical” clinical trials, as well as the data from experimental and more recent clinical trials, suggests that enteral feeding (gastric) is at least as effective as acid-suppressive therapy in the prevention of gastric stress ulceration and is the prophylactic measure of choice in most ICU patients.

A clinical guide to using intravenous proton-pump inhibitors in reflux and peptic ulcers

Intravenous (IV) proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are potent gastric acid suppressing agents, and their use is popular in clinical practice. Both IV and oral PPIs have similarly short half-lives, and their effects on acid secretion are similar, thus their dosing and dosage intervals appear to be interchangeable. The possible exception is when sustained high pHs are required to promote clot stabilization in bleeding peptic ulcers. Continuous infusion appears to be the only form of administration that reliably achieves these high target pHs. IV PPI is indicated in the treatment of high-risk peptic ulcers, complicated gastroesophageal reflux, stress-induced ulcer prophylaxis, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and whenever it is impossible or impractical to give oral therapy. The widespread use of PPIs has been controversial. IV PPIs have been linked to the development of nosocomial pneumonia in the intensive care setting and to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients. This review discusses the use of IV PPI in different clinical scenarios, its controversies, and issues of appropriate use.

Potential anti-inflammatory effects of proton pump inhibitors: a review and discussion of the clinical implications

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are potent blockers of gastric acid secretion, and are widely regarded as the agents of choice for the treatment of acid-peptic disorders. For patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms of uncertain etiology, improvement with PPI therapy is considered prima facie evidence of a pathogenetic role for acid-peptic disease. In addition to anti-secretory effects, however, PPIs have been found to have anti-oxidant properties and direct effects on neutrophils, monocytes, endothelial, and epithelial cells that might prevent inflammation. Those anti-inflammatory effects of the PPIs might influence a variety of inflammatory disorders, both peptic and non-peptic, within and outside of the gastrointestinal tract. The purpose of this report is to review the mechanisms whereby PPIs might exert anti-inflammatory effects exclusive of gastric acid inhibition, to discuss the clinical implications of those effects, and to emphasize that a clinical response to PPIs should not be construed as proof for an underlying acid-peptic disorder.

Recent Publications on Medications and Pharmacy

Hospital Pharmacy presents this feature to keep pharmacists abreast of new publications in the medical/pharmacy literature. Articles of interest regarding a broad scope of topics are abstracted monthly.