Prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation using combination lamivudine and hepatitis B immune globulin

Hepatitis B core antibody-positive grafts: recipient's risk

The transmission of hepatitis B virus infection through hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive liver grafts in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative recipients has been established. The mandatory use of immunosuppression in transplant patients favors reactivation of latent virus that may be present in grafts from HBsAg-negative anti-HBc-positive donors. With the persistent organ donor scarcity, the use of these grafts cannot be avoided, especially in urgent cases and in areas where the prevalence of the hepatitis B virus is high, as in Asia. The recognition of posttransplant de novo hepatitis B from core antibody-positive liver donors has, therefore, led to modifications in graft allocation policies and the introduction of strategies for prophylaxis. The risk of developing this type of new-onset hepatitis B virus infection in liver transplant recipients and the various approaches to minimize this risk are reviewed. The peculiar implications of using core antibody-positive grafts in the context of living donor liver transplantation in Asia are discussed.

Prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the leading cause of end-stage liver disease in Asia. The results of liver transplantation in these patients have significantly improved to a level comparable to those of other recipients as a result of the rapid evolution in the strategies of prevention and treatment of recurrent hepatitis B over the past decade. Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and lamivudine, either alone or in combination, are effective in preventing reinfection, but the most cost-effective dosing regimen with optimum efficacy without the prohibitive cost remains to be determined, an issue that is particularly relevant to liver transplant centers with serious financial constraints in Asia. The idea of active immunization is attractive, but the results have been conflicting to date. The newer nucleoside analogs appear most promising, and a combination of two or more antiviral agents is likely to represent the future strategy of choice in the prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation.

Recent advances in liver transplantation

Advances in liver transplantation continue to evolve but are hampered by continued increasing shortages in donor organs. This has resulted in a high incidence of patients dying while on the United Network for Organ Sharing waiting list. Indeed, we continue to assess ways of expanding the donor pool by using marginal donors, living donor liver transplantation, split liver transplantation, domino transplantation, and hepatic support systems to prolong survival long enough for the patient to undergo liver transplantation. Changes in the liver allocation policy to reduce the number of people dying while waiting for an organ are discussed. Implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation system should help alleviate the problem of increasing deaths of patients while on the waiting list. Recurrent disease, particularly recurrent hepatitis C, continues to be a major problem, and effective therapy is needed to prevent both progression of hepatitis C and recurrence in the graft and avoid retransplantation. The use of pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin holds promise for improving the success in overcoming recurrent hepatitis C. Finally, advances in immunosuppression have reduced the incidence of acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection. However, these therapies have been fraught with metabolic complications that are now affecting quality of life and long-term survival. Tailoring immunosuppressive regimens to the individual patient is discussed.

Conversion from intravenous to intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine is safe and cost-effective in patients receiving long-term prophylaxis to prevent hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation was previously frequent and associated with significant allograft failure and mortality. Recurrence rates of hepatitis B were improved with the use of passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin, and later, lamivudine monotherapy. Combination prophylaxis with intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin and lamivudine substantially decreased rates of hepatitis B recurrence, but intravenous administration of hepatitis B immune globulin was expensive and associated with significant adverse effects. In the current study, 59 patients receiving primary liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B infection were prospectively followed up after converting from intravenous to intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine. All patients tolerated intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin well. At a median follow-up of 511 days after conversion to intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin, 58 of 59 patients (98.3%) were hepatitis B surface antigen-negative. Twenty-one patients (35.6%) required a median of one supplemental intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin infusion to maintain therapeutic antibody levels. Economic analysis showed an average cost-effectiveness ratio for combination intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin plus lamivudine of $52,600 per recurrence prevented, which was far below the cost of lamivudine monotherapy and of intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin alone or in combination with lamivudine. These results suggest that intramuscular administration of hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine offers a safe, effective, and cost-effective approach to preventing hepatitis B recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Development of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen after liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B

Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have a defective HBV-specific immune response, and the spontaneous development of antibody against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) after liver transplantation has not been observed. We report the spontaneous production of anti-HBs in 21 of 50 (42%) patients receiving lamivudine monoprophylaxis after liver transplantation. Seroconversion to anti-HBs status (>10 mIU/mL) was found at a median of 8 days (range, 1 to 43 days) after transplantation. In each case, serial serum samples showed a >100% increase in antibody titer as compared with that of day 7 after transplantation in the absence of any blood product transfusion. The anti-HBs titer increased to a maximum within 3 months, and the peak titer was <100 mIU/mL in 10 patients, 100 to 1000 mIU/mL in 5 patients, and >1,000 mIU/mL in 6 patients. In 12 patients, anti-HBs disappeared from serum at a median of 201 days (range, 24 to 414 days), whereas the other 9 patients remained positive for anti-HBs at a median of 221 days (range, 94 to 1,025 days) after transplantation. Patients in whom anti-HBs in serum developed had a more rapid clearance of serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (log rank test, P =.011). Using logistic regression analysis, the only predictor of anti-HBs production was an HBV-immune donor (odds ratio, 18.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.2 to 112.4; P =.001). In conclusion, patients who undergo liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B using lamivudine prophylaxis may develop anti-HBs spontaneously. The antibody is likely to be of donor origin, suggesting the possibility of adoptive immunity transfer through a liver graft.

Hepatitis B: progress in the last 15 years

1. Patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B without effective prophylaxis have a high risk for recurrent infection and severe graft damage, leading to death or re-OLT. 2. Long-term prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) significantly reduces the risk for hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence and increases survival. Patients with detectable HBV DNA at the time of OLT have a high risk for recurrence despite HBIg prophylaxis. 3. Lamivudine (LAM) therapy for patients with decompensated HBV cirrhosis before OLT results in inhibition of viral replication and clinical improvement. Its efficacy is limited by the frequent emergence of LAM-resistant YMDD mutations. The ideal length of therapy with LAM pre-OLT has not yet been defined. 4. Prophylaxis of HBV recurrence with LAM monotherapy is not recommended because of the reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen after OLT in approximately 50% of patients. 5. LAM is the best available treatment for patients with established recurrent hepatitis B. Long-term therapy is associated with the emergence of drug-resistant mutants in up to 60% of patients. Severe hepatitis and liver failure have been described among liver transplant recipients with YMDD mutations. 6. Combination therapy with HBIg and LAM prevents HBV recurrence in 90% to 100% of patients who undergo OLT for hepatitis B. The optimal HBIg protocol in the LAM era is yet to be defined. 7. Preliminary studies suggest that adefovir dipivoxil inhibits HBV replication in patients infected with LAM-resistant HBV strains. 8. Fifteen years ago, hepatitis B was regarded as a relative or absolute contraindication for OLT. Today, hepatitis B is a universally accepted indication for OLT.

Factors associated with viral breakthrough in lamivudine monoprophylaxis of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation

This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with viral breakthrough among liver transplant recipients who receive lamivudine monoprophylaxis. Consecutive patients receiving liver transplantation for HBV-related liver disease from June 1999 to October 2000 were studied. All patients received lamivudine 100 mg daily pre- and post-transplant. Serum samples were collected before lamivudine treatment, before liver transplantation, and then every 3-6 months after liver transplantation. Lamivudine-resistant mutations at the YMDD motif of HBV P gene were detected by direct sequencing and HBV DNA was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Ten patients, 7 males and 3 females, aged 50.5 +/- 7.9 years, were studied. Three patients had fulminant hepatitis and 7 patients had end-stage cirrhosis before liver transplantation. Lamivudine was started at 4.5 (range 0-40) weeks before liver transplantation. The median post-transplant follow-up was 16 (range 12-23) months. Four patients developed YMDD mutations 10.5 (0-16) months after transplantation with relapse of viraemia (median 1,294, range 51-3,135 MEq/ml). All patients who developed YMDD mutants had end-stage liver cirrhosis, and HBV DNA were detectable on the day of liver transplantation (median 0.62, range 0.086-1.63 MEq/ml). On the contrary, all 3 patients transplanted for fulminant hepatitis did not have YMDD mutation. Among the 3 end-stage cirrhotic patients who had negative HBV DNA before liver transplantation, none developed YMDD mutation. In conclusion, patients transplanted for fulminant hepatitis B and cirrhotic patients in whom HBV DNA could be rendered PCR negative before liver transplantation are unlikely to develop YMDD mutation on lamivudine monoprophylaxis.

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C

1. Treatment of established recurrent hepatitis C with interferon-alpha monotherapy does not achieve sustained virologic response (SVR). 2. Treatment of established recurrent hepatitis C with combination interferon plus ribavirin achieves SVR rates of 17% to 27%, but dropout rates approach 30%. 3. Pretransplant prophylaxis against recurrent hepatitis C with combination interferon plus ribavirin is poorly tolerated in patients with decompensated hepatitis C cirrhosis. 4. Posttransplant prophylaxis with combination interferon plus ribavirin prevents both recurrent viremia and hepatitis in 15% to 20% of patients, but dropout rates approach 50%. 5. Hepatitis C virus genotype is the best predictor of response to antiviral prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent hepatitis C. 6. Interferon-alpha therapy is not associated with an increased risk of allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients. 7. Ribavirin therapy is associated with increased hemolysis in liver transplant recipients. 8. Preliminary data suggest pegylated interferon monotherapy will have similar efficacy but better tolerability than combination interferon plus ribavirin. 9. In a recent study, posttransplant immunoprophylaxis with polyclonal hepatitis C immunoglobulin had no effect on recurrent viremia or hepatitis.

A preliminary benefit-risk assessment of lamivudine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major public health problem worldwide. Until recently, interferon (IFN)-alpha was the only approved drug for the treatment of chronic HBV infection. The recent registration of lamivudine, a dideoxycytidine analogue that inhibits both the HIV and HBV reverse transcriptases, has provided new perspectives for the treatment of chronic HBV infection. Lamivudine treatment for 12 months leads to a control of viral replication during therapy in the majority of the patients and to sustained anti-hepatitis B e (anti-HBe) seroconversion in 16 to 22% of the patients, associated with a biochemical and histological response. Further studies showed that extended lamivudine therapy increases the rate of anti-HBe seroconversion. However, long-term therapy is associated with the progressive emergence of drug resistant mutants. In most cases these mutants are not associated with a deterioration of the liver disease within the available follow-up. In the remaining patients and in particular settings such as liver transplantation, a severe exacerbation of the liver disease is observed and that requires add-on therapy. Lamivudine treatment of patients infected with a pre-core mutant also showed beneficial effect with the control of viral replication, and a biochemical and histological response in approximately 60% of the patients at 1 year. These patients face the same problem of drug resistant mutants, and the optimal duration of lamivudine treatment still needs to be determined in this clinical situation. Moreover, lamivudine therapy is the only therapeutic option in decompensated cirrhotic patients to allow liver transplantation, and in liver transplant patients with HBV recurrence following transplantation. Adverse effects of lamivudine therapy are comparable to those observed in placebo-treated patients. ALT flares have been observed mainly in relation to the re-occurrence of viral replication due to the rebound of viral replication after therapy withdrawal, or to the emergence of drug resistance mutants. Therefore, lamivudine provides a new treatment alternative for patients with chronic HBV infection. For each patient, its indication has to be weighed against the risk of developing viral resistance but also against the risk of natural history of the disease.

Evolving experience of hepatitis B virus prophylaxis in liver transplantation

Passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) is important to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for chronic HBV cirrhosis. With availability of lamivudine (3TC), the use of combination prophylaxis with long-term HBIG/3TC has been shown to prevent short-term HBV recurrence. This report compares HBV recurrence rates between groups receiving no/short-term HBIG, long-term HBIG alone, or HBIG/3TC prophylaxis, and describes HBIG requirements during the first 6 and 12 months in the latter two groups. This study involved patients undergoing OLT at the University of Tennessee-Memphis between May 1990 and July 2001. During this period, 388 liver transplants were performed at our center. All hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive recipients (n = 27) were included in this retrospective analysis. The groups were similar with regard to pre-transplant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, weight, and pre-transplant diagnosis. Owing to the retrospective study design, median follow-up was longer for the no-prophylaxis (5.6 years) and the HBIG-alone (6.0 years) groups compared to the HBIG/3TC group (4.2 years). Patient survival was 50% in the no-prophylaxis and 71% in the HBIG-alone groups compared to 100% in the HBIG/3TC group (P = 0.09). When censored for death with a functioning graft, graft survival was 50% in the no-prophylaxis and 86% in the HBIG-alone group compared to 100% in the HBIG/3TC group (P = 0.07). The overall incidence of HBV recurrence in the no-prophylaxis era was 100% and 21% in the HBIG-alone era compared to 0% in the HBIG/3TC era (P < 0.001), despite similar mean and median HBIG trough titers in the HBIG-alone and HBIG/3TC groups. The incidence of HBV recurrence in HBV DNA-positive recipients was 100% in the no-prophylaxis era, 30% in the HBIG-alone era, and 0% in the HBIG/3TC era (P < 0.001). Recipients in the HBIG-alone group had a nearly two-fold increase in HBIG requirement at 6 and 12 months in order to maintain similar HBIG trough titers post-transplant compared to recipients in the HBIG/3TC group despite similar pre-transplant HBV serology. This increased HBIG requirement in the HBIG-alone group resulted in a marked increase in the mean overall cost of HBV prophylaxis in this group ($47,367 US dollars at 6 months; $84,280 US dollars at 12 months) compared to the HBIG/3TC group ($25,931 US dollars at 6 months; $49,599 US dollars at 12 months). These data demonstrate an improvement in patient and graft survival rates in the group receiving combination HBIG/3TC prophylaxis compared to the HBIG-alone and no-prophylaxis groups. There was a significant reduction in HBV recurrence in the group receiving combination HBIG/3TC when compared to the groups receiving HBIG alone or no prophylaxis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the addition of 3TC to the long-term HBIG regimen led to elimination of the disparity previously described in HBV recurrence rates between HBV DNA-positive and HBV DNA-negative recipients. Importantly, our data demonstrates a complete lack of HBV recurrence in the HBIG/3TC group at a median follow-up of 4.2 years. Additionally, the data show that the addition of 3TC to the post-operative prophylaxis regimen resulted in a reduction in the requirement of HBIG at 6 and 12 months, which markedly reduced the overall cost of post-transplant HBV prophylaxis.

The virological and clinical significance of mutations in the overlapping envelope and polymerase genes of hepatitis B virus

The potential for hepatitis B virus (HBV) to alter its genome is considerable. This occurs because the virus utilizes a reverse transcription step in replicating the viral genome. Like human immunodeficiency virus, the reverse transcriptase of HBV is error prone and as a consequence of specific selection pressures within a host a population of viral quasispecies emerges. HBV mutants with survival advantages over the wild type virus appear within the selective in vivo environment. Some of these viruses include HBV vaccine escape and anti-viral resistant mutants that have changes in the envelope (S) and polymerase genes, respectively. In addition, the genome of HBV is organised in to overlapping reading frames. The S gene is completely overlapped by the polymerase gene. As a consequence, mutations in the S gene may produce changes in the overlapping polymerase gene. Similarly, mutations in the polymerase gene may produce changes in the S gene. The virological and clinical significance of such overlapping mutations is unclear. However, we have shown that certain mutations in either the S or polymerase gene produce functionally significant changes in the respective overlapping gene. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B carriers with long-term lamivudine (LMV) results in the selection of HBV mutants that are resistant to this nucleoside analogue. The polymerase mutations associated with LMV resistance produce changes in the overlapping S gene and in its envelope protein (hepatitis B small antigen, HBsAg) that results in a reduced antigenicity of the HBsAg protein. The selection of vaccine escape mutants by HBV vaccination or hepatitis B immune globulin is associated with changes in the S gene that are accompanied by mutations in the fingers sub-domain of the polymerase protein. When combined with polymerase mutations that are associated with resistance to LMV the changes within the fingers sub-domain of the viral enzyme behave as compensatory mutations that are able to restore the replication of LMV resistant HBV. The ability to change a viral protein by mutations in an overlapping but unrelated viral gene may produce HBV mutants with altered antigenicity and/or replication and a natural history that may be distinctly different to wild type HBV.

Approach to the management of allograft recipients following the detection of hepatitis B virus in the prospective organ donor

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a highly infectious blood-borne pathogen that can be transmitted by a solid organ allograft and result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in the management of HBV infection prompt a reappraisal of the approach to the management of allograft recipients from cadaver donors previously exposed to HBV, because of the on-going shortage of organ donors. This report reviews current knowledge regarding the risk of HBV transmission by an organ from cadaver donors testing positive for markers of HBV infection and makes recommendations for the evaluation, treatment, and surveillance of the allograft recipients.

Restoration of replication phenotype of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus mutants by compensatory changes in the "fingers" subdomain of the viral polymerase selected as a consequence of mutations in the overlapping S gene

The introduction of lamivudine (LMV) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection has been an important advance in the management of this disease. However, the long-term efficacy of LMV may become limited by the emergence of antiviral-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutants. The two most common LMV-resistant mutants produce changes in the viral polymerase protein (rt) of rtM204I and rtL180M/M204V (previously rtM550I and rtL526M/M550V). A number of studies have demonstrated that these HBV mutants appear to be replication impaired, both in vitro and in vivo. The detection and selection of compensatory mutations in the polymerase protein that restore the replication phenotype of these HBV mutants have been poorly described to date. The effects of mutations in the fingers subdomain of the viral polymerase protein arising as a consequence of vaccine and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) selected changes in the overlapping envelope gene (S), and a determinant of the hepatitis Bs antigen (HBsAg) were analyzed in vitro. The LMV-resistant HBV mutants rtM204I and rtL180M/M204V produced substantially weaker HBV DNA replicative intermediate signals by Southern blot analysis and less total intracellular HBV DNA by real-time PCR compared to wild-type virus. The viral polymerase protein of these mutants produced little detectable radiolabeled HBV DNA in an endogenous polymerase assay. In contrast, the HBV a determinant HBIg/vaccine escape mutants sP120T, sT123N, sG145R, and sD144E/G145R (that produce rtT128N, Q130P, rtW153Q, and rtG153E respectively) yielded as much virus as wild-type HBV while the sM133L (rtY141S) mutant was replication impaired. Two of these mutants, rtT128N and rtW153Q, when introduced into a replication-competent HBV vector containing the rtL180M/M204V polymerase mutation restored the replication phenotype of this LMV-resistant mutant. These viruses produced levels of intracellular HBV DNA as determined by Southern blot and real-time PCR that were comparable to those of wild-type HBV, indicating that the changes in the fingers subdomain were able to compensate for the reduced replication of the LMV-resistant mutations. Since these viruses carry mutations in the a determinant of HBsAg that may potentially decrease the ability of anti-HBs antibody to neutralize these viruses, these HBV mutants also have the potential to behave as vaccine escape mutants.

Nucleoside analogues for chronic hepatitis B: antiviral efficacy and viral resistance

Nucleoside analogues have been recently introduced in the management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. They mainly act by inhibition of HBV polymerase activity resulting in decrease of viral replication. They are administered orally, and most of them have an excellent tolerance and safety profile. Lamivudine is the only nucleoside analogue licensed for chronic hepatitis B. It has potent activity against HBV, and a 12-month course achieves clearance of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) in 20-30% of HBeAg-positive patients and both biochemical and virological remission in more than 65-70% of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients. Famciclovir and ganciclovir are less effective, whereas other nucleoside or nucleotide analogues, such as adefovir, entecavir, and emtricitabine, are currently under evaluation. Prolonged effective antiviral therapy is required for eradication of chronic HBV infection, but long-term treatment with nucleoside analogues has been found to be associated with progressively increasing rates of viral resistance because of emergence of resistant HBV mutant strains. Virological breakthroughs usually develop after the first 6 months of lamivudine monotherapy, and their rate ranges between 15% and 30% at 12 months and exceeds 50% after 3 yr of therapy. Resistant HBV mutant strains harbor point mutations in the HBV polymerase gene and predominantly in the well-conserved YMDD motif. Although resistant HBV strains may have impaired replication capacity compared with the wild HBV, their clinical significance has not been completely clarified yet. No significant biochemical or clinical event may develop in some cases, whereas severe biochemical breakthroughs with or without deterioration of liver function may develop in others. To date, there is no proven effective therapy for the resistant HBV mutant strains, although adefovir and entecavir seem to be interesting candidates.

Liver transplantation in the UK

INTRODUCTION

This paper provides a review of the practice of liver transplantation with the main emphasis on UK practice and indications for transplantation.

REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT

This section reviews the process of referral and assessment of patients with liver disease with reference to UK practice.

DONOR ORGANS

The practice of brainstem death and cadaveric organ donation is peculiar to individual countries and rates of donation and potential areas of improvement are addressed.

OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE

The technical innovations that have led to liver transplantation becoming a semi-elective procedure are reviewed. Specific emphasis is made to the role of liver reduction and splitting and living related liver transplantation and how this impacts on UK practice are reviewed. The complications of liver transplan-tation are also reviewed with reference to our own unit. Immunosuppression:The evolution of immunosuppression and its impact on liver transplantation are reviewed with some reference to future protocols.

RETRANSPLANTATION

The role of retransplantation is reviewed.

OUTCOME AND SURVIVAL

The results of liver transplantation are reviewed with specific emphasis on our own experience.

FUTURE

The future of liver transplantation is addressed.

Increasing applicability of liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis B-related liver disease

Liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis B has been under discussion for 20 years because of inferior results without reinfection prophylaxis; therefore, we analyzed our overall experience with liver transplantation in hepatitis B patients with immunoprophylaxis, particularly the influence of the available antiviral treatment in different periods. From 1988 to 2000, 228 liver transplants in 206 hepatitis B patients were performed. Indications were acute liver failure (10%), hepatitis B virus (HBV) cirrhosis alone (67%) or with hepatitis D virus (HDV) (13%), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection (7%). All patients received long-term immunoprophylaxis (anti-HBs > 100 U/L). HBV DNA-positive patients were treated before and after surgery with famciclovir or lamivudine since 1993 and 1996, respectively. Since 1993, antivirals also were used for HBV reinfection. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 91%, 81%, and 73%. In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (60% 5-year survival, P <.01) or HBV reinfection (69% 5-year survival, P <.01) survival was significantly impaired. Those with HDV or HCV coinfection had a slightly better survival than with HBV monoinfection (P >.05, not significant). Preoperative positive HBV DNA (hybridization-assay) test results were associated with a slightly impaired patient survival (78% 5-year survival, P >.05, not significant versus DNA-negative). Preoperative positive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) predicted significantly worse survival (P <.05 versus negative HBeAg). Graft loss caused by reinfection was most frequent before the availability of antiviral drugs. Two-year patient survival increased from 85% in era I (1988-1993) to 94% in era III (1997-2000, P <.05). The 2-year recurrence rates in these 2 periods were 42% and 8% (P <.05). In conclusion, excellent long-term results can be achieved in hepatitis B patients after liver transplantation with modern strategies, and survival rates are similar to other indications. Based on our experience, hepatitis B patients, including those with active viral replication, should not be excluded from liver transplantation.

Preliminary results: outcome of liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus varies by hepatitis B virus genotype

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a leading cause of liver failure throughout the world. HBV has seven different genotypes based on variations within the viral nucleotide sequence. Initially, patients who underwent liver transplantation for HBV had high recurrence rates and poor survival. Recently, improved outcomes have been reported when patients are administered hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) infusions to maintain high serum hepatitis B surface antibody titers after transplantation. Unfortunately, recurrence rates are still high in patients with active pretransplant HBV replication. The aims of this study are to evaluate the impact of HBV genotype on pretransplantation HBV replication and posttransplantation HBV recurrence rate, morbidity, and mortality. Sera from 22 patients who underwent transplantation for HBV at our center were tested for HBV genotype by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique using monoclonal antibodies to the pre-S2 region. All patients were administered HBIg after transplantation; 5 patients were administered both lamivudine and HBIg. HBV genotypes were distributed as follows: genotype A (10 patients), genotype C (6 patients), genotype D (5 patients), and genotype E (1 patient). Pretransplantation HBV replication was most common with genotype A (80%), whereas less so with genotypes C (33%) and D (40%). Nine patients (41%) developed recurrent HBV infection: genotype A (2 patients; 20%), genotype C (3 patients; 50%), and genotype D (4 patients; 80%). Mortality was greatest with genotype D (40%). Our data suggest that patients with genotype A have the lowest risk for HBV recurrence despite having the highest rate of pretransplantation HBV viral replication. Patients with genotype D appear to have the highest risk for HBV recurrence and mortality. Additional larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Safe use of livers from donors with positive hepatitis B core antibody

Thirty-five patients received liver transplants using liver donors who had positive test results for the hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb). In the same time frame, 195 patients received HBcAb-negative liver donors. Mean follow up for patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors was 25 months. All patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors were monitored for recurrence of hepatitis B (HBV) with HBV DNA assays. There was no de novo HBV in recipients of HBcAb-negative grafts. In the group of patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors, 4 of 35 patients died within 3 months after transplant with no evidence of HBV recurrence at time of death. Four patients were transplanted for HBV-related disease and were postoperatively placed on lamivudine and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). HBV recurrence was seen in one of these patients. Of the remaining 27 patients, three of three mismatched patients (HBcAb-positive donor to HBcAb-negative recipient) developed de novo HBV (100%). Of 24 matched patients (HBcAb-positive donor to HBcAb-positive recipient), only two (7%) developed recurrent HBV allograft reinfection. All de novo and recurrent HBV infections were successfully managed with HBIG and lamivudine therapy. Survival for this subgroup of patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors for non-HBV-related liver disease was 100%. We conclude that the judicious use of HBcAb-positive donors is reasonably safe and associated with low morbidity and mortality, with the appropriate follow-up protocols. Additionally, lamivudine use can be reserved for those cases with de novo or recurrent HBV in the liver allograft, or, selectively, as prophylaxis in those recipients patients who are naïve to HBV and receive an HBcAb-positive donor.

Transplantation of livers from hbc Ab positive donors into HBc Ab negative recipients: a strategy and preliminary results

Here we describe a strategy for using livers from hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positive donors in anti-HBc negative recipients and report our preliminary results. Adult anti-HBc negative recipients were immunized against hepatitis B virus (HBV) prior to transplantation. Liver biopsies from anti-HBc positive, HBs Ag negative donors were performed at the time of procurement to rule out acute hepatitis or chronic liver disease. Donor serum and liver samples were collected for HBV DNA analysis by PCR. Recipients were given HBIG (10000 units, i.v.) during the anhepatic phase of transplantation. Patients were treated with lamivudine (150 mg) beginning on postoperative day (POD) 1. If HBV DNA was not detected in either donor liver or serum by PCR, recipient antiviral therapy was stopped. If donor liver and serum were positive for HBV DNA by PCR, the recipient was maintained on combination lamivudine and HBIG therapy. If HBV DNA was detected in donor liver but not in donor serum, the patient was managed on lamivudine therapy alone. Between February 1999 and June 2000, six anti-HBc negative recipients received liver transplants from anti-HBc positive donors. PCR analysis of serum from the six donors was negative for HBV DNA in each, while donor liver PCR analysis was positive in five of six for HBV DNA. Accordingly, all patients were given HBIG in the anhepatic phase of transplantation and five of six were maintained on daily lamivudine therapy. Follow-up periods have ranged from 2 to 18 months. There has been no emergence of de novo hepatitis B. Serial serum HBs Ag and HBV DNA assays have all proven negative. Moreover, while on lamivudine therapy, 2 patients now have undetectable HBV DNA in hepatic allograft biopsies by PCR analysis. Our strategy for using livers from anti-HBc donors has yielded promising initial results. De novo hepatitis B has not occurred and our data suggest residual hepatitis B virus may be eradicated in recipients maintained on lamivudine therapy.

Effect of lamivudine treatment on survival of 309 North American patients awaiting liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B

The primary aim of this study is to determine whether treatment with lamivudine improved pre-liver transplantation (pre-LT) and LT-free survival of patients awaiting LT for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis. Data from 162 lamivudine-treated and 147 untreated transplant candidates managed at 20 North American transplant centers between 1996 and 1998 were collected and compared. Lamivudine-treated patients were more likely to be men, hepatitis B e antigen positive, HBV DNA positive, and have lower serum albumin levels at listing (P <.05). Actuarial pre-LT and LT-free survival were similar in lamivudine-treated and untreated patients. Using Cox regression analysis, the only significant predictor of pre-LT patient survival was the modified Child-Turcotte-Pugh (mCTP) score, whereas significant predictors of LT-free survival included ethnic background, lamivudine treatment, indication for LT, baseline serum alanine aminotransferase level, and baseline mCTP score. Lamivudine had no apparent effect on liver disease severity in patients undergoing LT, but appeared to improve disease severity in patients still awaiting LT. Breakthrough infection was noted in 11% of lamivudine-treated patients. We conclude that lamivudine therapy is not associated with improved pre-LT or LT-free survival in LT candidates with chronic hepatitis B. However, a subset of patients with less advanced liver failure may derive clinical benefit from lamivudine therapy, thus delaying the need for LT. In the absence of prospective, randomized, controlled trials of lamivudine in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, careful selection of patients and optimal timing of treatment are needed to balance the risk versus benefit of lamivudine therapy in LT candidates.

New era of liver transplantation for hepatitis B: a 17-year single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the variables affecting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) outcome for hepatitis B virus (HBV) in a large patient cohort over a 17-year period.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Historically, OLT for chronic HBV infection has been associated with aggressive reinfection and poor survival results. More recently, OLT outcome has been improved with the routine use of antiviral therapy with either hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) or lamivudine; however, HBV recurrence remains common. The authors studied the factors affecting HBV recurrence and outcome of transplantation, including the effects of combination viral prophylaxis with HBIg and lamivudine.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 166 OLT recipients for chronic HBV over a 17-year period at a single center was performed. Median follow-up was 29 months. HBV recurrence was defined by HBsAg seropositivity after OLT. HBIg monotherapy was used in 28 (17%) patients, lamivudine monotherapy in 20 (12%), and HBIg and lamivudine combination in 89 (54%); 29 (17%) did not receive any HBV prophylaxis. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was present in 43 patients (26%) and urgent United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status was assigned to 27 patients (16%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors that affected OLT outcome.

RESULTS

Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 85.8%, 73.6%, and 71.8%, respectively. As expected, HBV recurrence-free survival rates were significantly lower than overall survival rates (76.4%, 58.7%, and 48.3%). When compared with a nontreated cohort, OLT recipients receiving combination viral prophylaxis with HBIg and lamivudine showed markedly reduced HBV recurrence rates and significantly improved 1- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates. By univariate estimates, patient survival was reduced in the presence of HCC, in the Asian population, and urgent candidates by UNOS classification. Graft loss rates were significantly increased in urgent OLT candidates, Asians, patients with pretransplant positive DNA, and in the presence of HCC. Factors that were significant by univariate analysis or thought to be clinically relevant were subjected to multivariate analysis. By multivariate estimates, urgent UNOS or presence of HCC adversely affected patient and graft survival rates, whereas combination prophylactic therapy strongly predicted improved patient and graft survival rates as well as recurrence-free survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthotopic liver transplantation for HBV under combination viral prophylaxis results in survival rates equivalent to other indications. Pretransplant viral replication, UNOS status, and the presence of HCC are all sensitive markers for posttransplantation outcome. Viral prophylactic therapy has effectively reduced HBV recurrence and prolonged survival outcomes. The combination of HBIg and lamivudine is the prophylactic regimen of choice.

Immunisations in solid-organ transplant recipients

Solid-organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of various infectious diseases, some of which are vaccine preventable mmunisations are among the most efficient interventions available. Solid-organ tranplant recipients would greatly benefit from effective immunisations, provided the recommendations are based on a careful risk-benefit analysis in which the effectiveness of the vaccine is weighed against possible adverse reactions, including graft rejection. In this review, we summarise the data from studies on relevant immunisations in solid-organ transplant recipients. The major issues are the immunogenicity and safety of immunisations, the factors associated with poor immune response, and recommendations for immunisation schemes.

Clinical evaluation (phase I) of a combination of two human monoclonal antibodies to HBV: safety and antiviral properties

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with interferon alfa and lamivudine is characterized by lack of viral clearance, loss of response, or emergence of drug-resistant mutants. Thus, new and multiple drug approaches are needed. We have developed two fully human monoclonal antibodies, directed against different epitopes of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) that bind to all major HBV subtypes. A phase I clinical study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a mixture of these two monoclonal antibodies, HBV-AB(XTL). A total of 27 chronic HBV patients were enrolled. In part A of the study 15 patients in 5 cohorts received a single intravenous infusion of antibodies with doses ranging from 0.26 mg (260 IU) to 40 mg (40,000 IU). All patients completed 16 weeks of follow-up. In the second part of the study (part B), 12 patients in 4 cohorts received 4 weekly infusions of 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg each of HBV-AB(XTL) and were followed for 4 additional weeks. Administration of antibodies was well tolerated. Patients administered doses at an Ab:Ag molar ratio of 1:2 to 1:20 showed a rapid and significant decrease in HBsAg to undetectable levels, with a corresponding reduction of HBV-DNA levels. In part B, HBV-AB(XTL) induced a significant reduction in both HBsAg and HBV-DNA levels repeatedly after administration. In conclusion, these data suggest that HBV-AB(XTL) binds HBV particles and reduces serum viral titers and HBsAg levels. HBV-AB(XTL) could be combined with other monotherapies that are currently used to treat HBV carriers.

Management of viral hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major global health concern and is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The natural history and clinical outcomes of chronic HBV infection are determined by the viral replication cycle and the host immune responses. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B is directed at interrupting the natural history by suppressing HBV replication before development of any significant irreversible liver cell damage. Effective antiviral therapies should be followed by sustained suppression of HBV-DNA, normalization of transaminases levels and a stable stage of HBeAg seroconversion with persistence of circulating anti-HBeAg antibodies. Two major classes of antiviral therapeutic agents that have been approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis B are immunomodulating agents (i.e. interferon) and the nucleoside analogs (i.e. lamivudine). A 4-6 month course of interferon-alpha has resulted in improvement of survival in 20%-30% of patients with chronic hepatitis B who had elevated serum ALT levels without hepatic decompensation. Interferon-alpha therapy is associated with HBeAg seroconversion; normalization of ALT levels, reduced hepatic inflammation, and possibly reduced disease progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon can also be used with caution in patients with early compensated cirrhosis. A 12-month course of lamivudine has been shown to be well tolerated and effective. Lamivudine can be used in decompensated cirrhosis and immunosuppressed patients and for prevention of recurrent HBV infection after liver transplantation. The response rates after 3 years of lamivudine therapy account for 40-65%. A major problem of antiviral treatment is the emergence of drug resistance conferred by mutations in the YMDD motif of HBV reverse transcriptase. The prevalence of YMDD mutations increases with longer durations of antiviral therapies and this has been detected in 20% of immunocompetent patients receiving lamivudine per year. Contentious issues remain when to stop the treatment if HBeAg seroconversion does not occur. Many new immunomodulatory therapies and antiviral agents are in various stages of clinical development and have shown some promise. Among newer HBV antivirals, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, emtricitabine, DAPD and clevudine appear to be at least as potent as lamivudine in suppressing HBV replication. In vitro studies have shown that YMDD mutations confer cross-resistance between lamivudine and emtricitabine. However, adefovir, dipivoxil, lobucavir, DAPD and possibly clevudine suppress replications of both YMDD mutants and wild types of HBV. Immunomodulatory approaches for treatment of chronic hepatitis B are conceptually attractive, but newer agents used to date (thymosin-alpha, interleukin-12, therapeutic vaccines) have not demonstrated sufficient efficacy for widespread use. Combinations of an immunomodulatory agent and nucleoside analog may improve the therapeutic efficacy and reduce the emergence of drug resistance. Nevertheless, combinations of interferon and lamivudine therapies do not confer such additional benefits. The next challenge for HBV treatment is to use antivirals in combination and/or in cyclical therapy to minimize the emergence of drug resistance and increase efficacy, particularly to achieve sustainable post-treatment suppression of HBV. Randomized prospective control trials of combined antiviral therapies given simultaneously or sequentially are needed to establish safe and effective combined regimens that can be recommended for future treatment strategies.

Treatment of hepatitis B and C following liver transplantation

Advanced liver disease from hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) worldwide. Our understanding of recurrent liver disease related to HBV and HCV in the setting of OLT has evolved rapidly in the past decade. Recurrent viral hepatitis may lead to graft failure, death, or the need for retransplantation. Until about a decade ago, HBV was considered a contraindication to OLT due to its frequent recurrence and development of associated liver disease. Medical therapy with hepatitis B immune globulin and nucleoside analogues has diminished the risk of HBV recurrence and led to improvement in patient and graft survival. Consequently, OLT is now considered to be the standard of care in patients with end-stage liver disease related to HBV. HCV recurrence after OLT is almost universal. Although short-term survival in patients undergoing OLT for HCV is similar to survival for those transplanted for other indications, recurrent HCV may have an impact on long-term patient and graft survival. A specific and effective therapy has not been defined for recurrent HCV following transplantation, but the combination of interferon and ribavirin appears promising. Optimal strategies to eradicate these viruses or to slow disease progression are continually being investigated in light of the disparity between supply and demand in a diminishing organ pool for OLT candidates.

A concise update on the status of liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus: the challenges in 2002

Significant improvements in both patient and graft survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver failure have been made during the last decade. Recurrence of HBV infection has decreased, even in high-risk patients. Despite ongoing progress, challenges remain for the next millennium, including the determination of cost-effective dosing strategies, treatment of HBV infection in liver transplant recipients, and ramifications of the use of new antiviral agents, specifically, the appearance of resistant strains. This review summarizes the relevant history of OLT for chronic viral hepatitis B, details accepted preventive and therapeutic treatments, and discusses ongoing experimental trials. Emphasis also is placed on new approaches in transplantation as they impact on the care of HBV-infected patients.

Chronic Hepatitis B

All patients who test positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) should be evaluated to determine the activity and severity of the infection. Assessment includes tests of disease activity (aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase), tests of liver function (bilirubin, albumin, prothrombin time), and tests of replication status (hepatitis B early antigen, antibody to HBe, HBV DNA titer, and hepatitis D virus antibody). An ultrasound is recommended to assess for signs of cirrhosis and to exclude focal lesions in the liver. In patients with abnormal liver enzyme levels (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase), a liver biopsy is recommended to assess the stage of disease (amount of fibrosis) and to determine the urgency and need for antiviral therapy. Interferon alfa and lamivudine are the two antiviral therapies currently available. There are pros and cons associated with the use of either drug. Individualization of therapy, based upon factors such as patient comorbidities, response to prior therapies, and stage of disease, is recommended. Patients with abnormal liver enzyme levels, indices of active viral replication (positive HBV DNA, with or without positive HBeAg), and compensated liver disease are candidates for treatment with interferon or lamivudine. For patients with abnormal liver enzyme levels, indices of active viral replication (positive HBV DNA, with or without positive HBeAg), and decompensated liver disease, the treatment of choice is lamivudine. Concurrently, these patients should be considered for liver transplantation referral. There are a number of new antiviral agents currently under evaluation in clinical trials. Combination therapy for chronic HBV infection is anticipated. The use of two or more anti-HBV drugs can be expected to enhance efficacy and reduce the likelihood of drug resistance.

Occurrence and clinical outcome of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation

Lamivudine treatment of hepatitis B after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is often accompanied by fast viral-resistance formation. Although no clinical data are available, in vitro data indicate that lamivudine-resistant reinfection has a mild course because of defective viral replication. Between 1996 and 1999, a total of 34 patients were treated with lamivudine because of hepatitis B recurrence after OLT. All patients developed reinfection despite long-term passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin, diagnosed by positive hepatitis B surface antigen and positive hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA. Before treatment with lamivudine, 21 of these patients underwent a course of famciclovir and developed resistance. Monthly laboratory tests and sequential liver biopsies were performed during the follow-up period. Nineteen of 34 patients (56%) developed lamivudine resistance during the follow-up period of 12 to 49 months. One- and 3-year graft survival rates after the diagnosis of lamivudine resistance were 89% and 66%, respectively. In most cases, lamivudine resistance was associated with high viral replication (3,012 +/- 574 pg/mL 1 month after the diagnosis of lamivudine resistance); however, liver enzyme levels were only moderately elevated (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 45 +/- 16 U/L). Only 3 patients (15%) showed a rapid increase in ALT level to more than 500 U/L within 3 months after resistance developed. All other patients had mildly elevated liver enzyme levels during the first 6 to 8 months after lamivudine resistance. In the later course, liver enzyme levels increased in most patients. Fourteen patients with elevated transaminase levels were switched to lamivudine plus interferon alfa (n = 8) or lamivudine plus famciclovir therapy (n = 6). This combination was successful in most cases, decreasing HBV DNA and liver enzyme levels. Four patients with lamivudine resistance died during follow-up, only 1 patient because of HBV reinfection. In addition, 2 patients underwent retransplantation because of hepatitis B cirrhosis of the first graft. Compared with historic courses of wild-type recurrence, lamivudine-resistant reinfection is characterized by a milder clinical course. Fulminant cases were not observed; however, in three cases, chronic liver failure developed. The combination of different antivirals diminished viral replication after lamivudine resistance. In the future, new antiviral agents, such as adefovir, might further expand therapeutic options.

Posttransplantation care: role of the primary care physician versus transplant center

1. Forty percent of transplant centers expect the primary care physician to be the primary physician; 40% have both a primary care physician and a hepatologist manage the patient. 2. Transplant centers expect primary care physicians to provide general preventive medicine, physical examinations, vaccinations, and, rarely, management of hypertension, renal dysfunction, and diabetes. 3. A high percentage of primary care physicians feel comfortable caring and managing the overall health care of a long-term liver transplant patient. 4. Primary care physicians feel at most ease managing preventive care, annual physical examinations, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, bone disease, and vaccinations. 5. Primary care physicians should be aware of the common medical conditions of the liver transplant patient of hypertension, diabetes, obesity, hyperlipidemia, and recurrent disease. 6. Common medical conditions for both the transplant centers and primary care physicians are hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, malignancy, bone disease, pregnancy, vaccination, infectious prophylaxis, and headaches.

Favorable outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation in a patient with subacute liver failure due to the emergence of a hepatitis B YMDD escape mutant virus

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with end-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis B infection in whom a YMDD escape hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutant has emerged under lamivudine treatment are generally denied liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

We report the case of a male patient who was started on prophylactic treatment with lamivudine in the context of recurrent episodes of HBV reactivation during high dose immunosuppressive therapy for relapsing severe pulmonary sarcoidosis.

RESULTS

Following the emergence of a YMDD escape mutant virus under lamivudine treatment, he developed subacute liver failure requiring liver transplantation. The patient was treated with a combination of intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) which was started perioperatively and also continued lamivudine after OLT. Twelve months after OLT, there was no evidence of HBV reinfection of the liver graft with the use of HBIG and lamivudine.

CONCLUSIONS

This observation suggests that emergence of the YMDD mutation is not a contra-indication to OLT, providing adequate immunoprophylaxis using HBIG and lamivudine combination therapy.

Hepatitis B and C in the liver transplant recipient: current understanding and treatment

1. Liver disease related to chronic viral hepatitis is the leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) worldwide. 2. The natural history of hepatitis B virus infection has been dramatically modified, and outcome has improved substantially in the last decade with the use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine. 3. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence, defined by histological injury, is almost universal, and a subset of patients (20% to 30%) develops allograft cirrhosis by the fifth year post-OLT. 4. Unfortunately, antiviral therapy for hepatitis C post-OLT, even when initiated preemptively before the development of histological recurrence in the first few weeks post-OLT, has failed to alter the natural history of HCV disease recurrence. 5. HCV-related allograft cirrhosis is associated with a high rate of decompensation and mortality.

Late hepatic allograft dysfunction

1. Lifelong monitoring of graft function, immunosuppressive levels, and screening for drug toxicity is required in all liver recipients. 2. Late hepatic allograft dysfunction is common and is caused by a variety of etiologies including rejection, infection, biliary/vascular abnormalities, recurrence of disease, and drug hepatotoxicity. 3. In all patients with late hepatic allograft dysfunction, liver biopsy should be performed to assess for the presence of rejection, and to thus avoid excessive use of bolus corticosteroid therapy and guide appropriate immunosuppressive management. 4. Recurrence of disease is the most common cause of late hepatic allograft dysfunction. 5. Hepatitis C universally reinfects the hepatic allograft, and is associated with decreased patient and graft survival and leads to the recurrence of cirrhosis in 28% of patients within 5 years of transplantation. 6. Major advances have been made in preventing recurrence of hepatitis B by the use of hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine therapy. 7. Autoimmune liver diseases such as primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis have a recurrence rate of approximately 20% to 30%. 8. In patients developing recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis, steroid withdrawal is the most common cause. 9. Recurrent hepatocellular cancer can be markedly reduced if strict guidelines are adhered to in selecting patients. 10. Drug hepatotoxicity must always be considered in the differential diagnosis of late hepatic allograft dysfunction.

Preoperative antiviral treatment and postoperative prophylaxis in HBV-DNA positive patients undergoing liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite passive immunoprophylaxis a significant number of patients, especially if hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is positive prior to transplantation, develop HBV recurrence. This number might be reduced by lowering viral replication pretransplant with antiviral agents and by postoperative combination of antiviral agents and passive immunoprophylaxis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 74 HBV-DNA positive patients who underwent liver transplantation between 9/88 and 4/00 were analyzed retrospectively. Before lamivudine or famciclovir were available, in total 40 patients did not receive any preoperative antiviral therapy. Since 11/93, 17 patients were treated with famciclovir 1500 mg daily, after 4/96 17 patients with lamivudine 150 mg daily prior liver transplantation. Posttransplant all patients received passive immunoprophylaxis aiming at a titer of more than 100 U/liter. In the 34 patients with preoperative antiviral therapy an additional prophylaxis with the respective antiviral agent was applied.

RESULTS

Under preoperative famciclovir and lamivudine 30 and 71% of patients became HBV-DNA negative, respectively. Actuarial reinfection rate 2 years after liver transplantation was 48% without antiviral prophylaxis, which was not statistically different from 55% under perioperative famciclovir therapy. In contrast only 18% developed HBV recurrence under perioperative lamivudine treatment. During both antiviral regimens neither pre nor posttransplant severe side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative application of famciclovir is not recommendable, whereas lamivudine seems to lower recurrence rates significantly. Whether the observed effect is due to pre- or postoperative application remains to be addressed in further studies. In addition the long-term course has to be awaited.

Liver transplantation in the UK

INTRODUCTION

This paper provides a review of the practice of liver transplantation with the main emphasis on UK practice and indications for transplantation.

REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT

This section reviews the process of referral and assessment of patients with liver disease with reference to UK practice.

DONOR ORGANS

The practice of brainstem death and cadaveric organ donation is peculiar to individual countries and rates of donation and potential areas of improvement are addressed.

OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE

The technical innovations that have led to liver transplantation becoming a semi-elective procedure are reviewed. Specific emphasis is made to the role of liver reduction and splitting and living related liver transplantation and how this impacts on UK practice are reviewed. The complications of liver transplan-tation are also reviewed with reference to our own unit. Immunosuppression:The evolution of immunosuppression and its impact on liver transplantation are reviewed with some reference to future protocols.

RETRANSPLANTATION

The role of retransplantation is reviewed.

OUTCOME AND SURVIVAL

The results of liver transplantation are reviewed with specific emphasis on our own experience.

FUTURE

The future of liver transplantation is addressed.

Update on chronic viral hepatitis

Many recent and significant advances in the field of chronic viral hepatitis, including therapy, suggest that an update on chronic hepatitis is timely. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection remains a significant worldwide cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, despite the wide availability of a long established and effective vaccine. Transmission occurs via perinatal, sexual, and parenteral routes (particularly intravenous drug abuse and although blood products still carry a risk, this is now extremely low in Western countries). Only a minority of infected adult cases develop chronic hepatitis but in children under 1 year, 90% develop chronic hepatitis. The clinical spectrum of chronic liver injury ranges from mild inflammation to end stage liver cirrhosis. Interferon alfa has been the mainstay of treatment for patients with active disease but nucleoside analogues (lamivudine and adefovir) are now available with similar efficacy. Patients with end stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma can be offered transplantation but infection in the graft is commonplace. The combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and newer antiviral drugs reduce the incidence and severity of graft infection significantly. The hepatitis C virus epidemic of the latter half of the 20th century now affects more than 1% of populations worldwide. This RNA virus is spread parenterally and is becoming the leading indication for liver transplantation. The majority of patients develop chronic hepatitis, which may be progressive, evolving to significant liver disease (cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma) in about 20% cases after decades. Treatment with the combination of interferon alfa and ribavirin is successful in up to 40% cases. Liver transplantation is a therapeutic option for some but graft infection is universal and often complicated by progressive liver fibrosis. A vaccine remains a remote prospect so that prevention is crucial. Hepatitis D virus infection occurs on a background of hepatitis B virus infection and can also cause liver damage. The response to antiviral therapy is poor. The newer "hepatitis" viruses G and TT do not cause significant liver injury.

Prevention of fungal and hepatitis virus infections in liver transplantation

Invasive fungal infections, especially those caused by Candida albicans, and recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after transplantation are common complications in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Candida species account for >50% of all invasive fungal infections, which occur in 10%--15% of OLT recipients. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of invasive fungal infections are unique to each type of organism. Fluconazole is effective and safe in the prevention of Candida infection after OLT. Preventive measures against Aspergillus or Cryptococcus remain ill defined. Both HBV and HCV recur almost universally after OLT in infected individuals. The natural course of HBV and HCV, leading to end-stage liver damage, is accelerated. In OLT patients, administration of immunoglobulin with high titers against HBV, alone and/or in combination with lamivudine, immediately after transplantation reduces the recurrence of HBV. The combination of interferon and ribavirin is mildly effective in OLT patients who have evidence of recurrent hepatitis, and additional alternatives are being evaluated.

Transmission of hepatitis B infection from hepatitis B core antibody--positive liver allografts is prevented by lamivudine therapy

Donor shortage has led to the use of hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)--positive (anti-HBc(+)) liver allografts for patients in need of relatively urgent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Because anti-HBc(+) allografts transmit hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection at a high rate, effective prophylaxis is required. We assessed the effectiveness of lamivudine in preventing HBV transmission by anti-HBc(+) allografts. Between March 1996 and March 2000 at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Los Angeles, CA), 15 of 169 patients (8.9%) received liver allografts from anti-HBc(+) donors. Six patients were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)(+) (group 1), and 9 patients were HBsAg negative (HBsAg(-); group 2) before OLT. All patients were administered lamivudine, 100 or 150 mg/d, orally after OLT. Patients who were HBsAg(+) before OLT also were administered hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) prophylaxis. Hepatitis B serological tests were performed on all patients, and HBV DNA was determined in liver tissues in 10 patients. All 15 patients remained HBsAg(-) at their last follow-up 2 to 40 months (mean, 17 months) post-OLT. All patients in group 1 had antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) titers greater than 250 mIU/mL post-OLT (mean follow-up, 20 months; range, 7 to 40 months). Of the 2 patients in group 1 who underwent liver biopsy after OLT, 1 patient had detectable hepatic HBV DNA despite being anti-HBs(+) and HBsAg(-). Among the patients in group 2, none acquired anti-HBc or HBsAg. Hepatic HBV DNA was undetectable in the 7 patients in group 2 who underwent liver biopsy after OLT. Anti-HBc(+) allografts can be safely used in patients who undergo OLT for chronic hepatitis B and susceptible transplant recipients if prophylaxis with combination HBIG and lamivudine or lamividine alone is administered after OLT, respectively. However, more data are needed to determine the efficacy of lamivudine monotherapy in preventing transmission of HBV infection from anti-HBc(+) liver allografts to susceptible recipients.

Lamivudine and low-dose hepatitis B immune globulin for prophylaxis of hepatitis B reinfection after liver transplantation possible role of mutations in the YMDD motif prior to transplantation as a risk factor for reinfection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Reinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) after liver transplantation (OLT) is associated with an unfavourable clinical course. Lamivudine/hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) combination treatment reduces reinfection rates. However, it is unclear at what time point lamivudine should be started and which HBIG doses are sufficient.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients receiving combination treatment were studied. Lamivudine was started up to 16.5 months before OLT and continued thereafter. HBIG was started intraoperatively and continued according to anti-HBs-titers. Median follow-up after OLT was 20 months.

RESULTS

Eleven patients received lamivudine pretreatment for >2 (median 6) months due to initial HBV-DNA-positivity (median 749 pg/ml). After initial lamivudine response HBV-DNA increased in two of them to concentrations above 10 pg/ml prior to OLT. Both had developed mutations in the YMDD motif and suffered from HBV reinfection 13 and 75 days postoperatively. Individual HBIG consumption was highly variable (range 787-4,766 lU/month). Twenty-two percent of anti-HBs titers measured before HBIG administration were below 100 IU/l.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined reinfection prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIG is effective in patients with controlled viral replication at the time of OLT. However, pretransplantation lamivudine resistance is a risk factor for reinfection. Low dose HBIG maintenance therapy individualized according to anti-HBs-titers appears to be tenable.

Randomized trial of lamivudine versus hepatitis B immunoglobulin for long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B after liver transplantation requires further optimization. In a randomized trial we investigated a regimen where the initially given hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) is replaced by long-term lamivudine treatment.

METHODS

Twenty-four liver transplant recipients (all HBsAg-positive/HBV DNA-negative before transplantation), who had received HBIg for at least 6 months without HBV recurrence, were randomized to receive lamivudine (n = 12) or HBIg (n = 12) for 52 weeks. The efficacy criteria involved seronegativity for HBsAg and undetectable HBsAg/ HBcAg in the liver.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of 24 patients completed the study without hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence (11 on HBIg, ten on lamivudine), while three patients became HBsAg-positive. Amongst those without HBV recurrence HBV DNA was detectable only by polymerase chain reaction, intermittently in serum and lymphocytes, and in liver specimens from six of eight patients receiving HBIg and five of seven receiving lamivudine. YMDD variant was found in four cases with no viral antigen expression. Eight patients continued lamivudine after the study and during an additional 6-22 months remained HBsAg-negative with normal graft function.

CONCLUSIONS

Substitution of HBIg with lamivudine is effective for prevention of HBV recurrence in low-risk liver transplant recipients and offers a convenient and cost-effective alternative for long-term HBV prophylaxis.