Seizure incidence in psychopharmacological clinical trials: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) summary basis of approval reports

Brazilian version of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E)

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) and to assess its psychometric properties.

METHODS

This study involved 98 outpatients who underwent psychopathological evaluation with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus Version, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D), and a Portuguese version of the NDDI-E.

RESULTS

The NDDI-E was easily understood and quickly administered to most of the patients. At a cutoff score >15, NDDI-E had a sensitivity of 81.5%, a specificity of 83.1%, and a negative predictive value of 92.2% for diagnosis of major depression. Internal consistency reliability of the NDDI-E was 0.79, and there was also a positive correlation between the NDDI-E and the HAM-D (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Brazilian-Portuguese version of NDDI-E can be used as a practical screening tool to improve recognition of depression in Brazilian people with epilepsy.

Depression in epilepsy: why aren't we treating?

Depression is a common and largely untreated comorbidity in patients with epilepsy. Our aim was to examine physician attitudes that may contribute to this treatment gap. We surveyed primary care physicians, neurologists, and psychiatrists chosen from the Ohio State Medical Board registry on the topics of depression in epilepsy, seizures with antidepressant use, and comfort in treating depression in epilepsy. Our data identified fear of increased seizure frequency with antidepressant use as a significant barrier to treatment. There was a clear inverse relationship between the estimated risk of antidepressant-induced seizures and comfort treating depression in epilepsy (P = 0.02), with 52% of primary care physicians identifying this as a reason for not treating depression in this population. Further education of community physicians and neurologists regarding the importance of treating depression in patients with epilepsy and research into the use of antidepressants in this population are indicated.

Subcutaneous olanzapine for hyperactive or mixed delirium in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary study

CONTEXT

Oral olanzapine is effective in controlling agitation in patients with delirium, but often, parenteral administration is necessary. Intramuscular (IM) olanzapine is approved for managing agitation in schizophrenia, but this route is inappropriate for terminally ill patients.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous (SC) olanzapine in the management of hyperactive or mixed delirium in patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective open-label study in patients with advanced cancer who had agitated delirium (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale [RASS] score ≥+1) that had not responded to a 10mg or higher dose of parenteral haloperidol over 24 hours. Patients received olanzapine 5mg SC every eight hours for three days and continued haloperidol for breakthrough agitation. For patients requiring more than 8mg of rescue haloperidol daily, the olanzapine dose was increased to 10mg SC every eight hours. Injection site, systemic toxicity, and efficacy (RASS score <+1 and total haloperidol dose <8mg per 24 hours on the last study day) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients received at least one olanzapine injection, and 15 (63%) completed the study. Median age of evaluable patients was 58 years (range 49-79), and 67% were males. No injection site toxicity was observed after 167 injections. Probable systemic toxic effects were observed in four patients (severe hypotension [blood pressure <90/50mmHg], paradoxical agitation, diabetes insipidus, and seizure). Efficacy was achieved in nine (37.5%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IM olanzapine is well tolerated subcutaneously. Further research is needed to evaluate its efficacy in controlling agitated delirium.

MELAS with recurrent complex partial seizures, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, psychosis, and behavioral disturbances: case analysis with literature review

Mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and strokelike episodes (MELAS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder associated with polygenetic, maternally inherited, mitochondrial DNA mutations. MELAS has multisystem presentation including neurological, muscular, endocrine, auditory, visual, cardiac, psychiatric, renal, gastrointestinal and dermatological symptoms. Clinical course and prognosis are variable, often leading to cognitive decline, disability, and premature death. Both convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) are reported with MELAS. This report illustrates a case of MELAS with recurrent complex partial seizures, NCSE, confusion, aggressive behaviors, hallucinations, and paranoid delusions. Rapid video/EEG confirmation of diagnosis and aggressive antiepileptic drug intervention are required. Further education of medical professionals regarding this disorder, its appropriate management, and the significance of NCSE is indicated to avoid delay of treatment.

Acute Unstable Depressive Syndrome (AUDS) is associated more frequently with epilepsy than major depression

Background

Depressive disorders are frequent in epilepsy and associated with reduced seizure control. Almost 50% of interictal depressive disorders have to be classified as atypical depressions according to DSM-4 criteria. Research has mainly focused on depressive symptoms in defined populations with epilepsy (e.g., patients admitted to tertiary epilepsy centers). We have chosen the opposite approach. We hypothesized that it is possible to define by clinical means a subgroup of psychiatric patients with higher than expected prevalence of epilepsy and seizures. We hypothesized further that these patients present with an Acute Unstable Depressive Syndrome (AUDS) that does not meet DSM-IV criteria of a Major Depressive Episode (MDE). In a previous publication we have documented that AUDS patients indeed have more often a history of epileptic seizures and abnormal EEG recordings than MDE patients (Vaaler et al. 2009). This study aimed to further classify the differences of depressive symptoms at admittance and follow-up of patients with AUDS and MDE.

Methods

16 AUDS patients and 16 age- and sex-matched MDE patients were assessed using the Symptomatic Organic Mental Disorder Assessment Scale (SOMAS), the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Mini-Mental State Test (MMST), at day 2, day 4-6, day 14-16 and 3 months after admittance to a psychiatric emergency unit. Life events were assessed with The Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS) and The Life Experience Survey (LES). We also screened for medication serum levels and illicit drug metabolites in urine.

Results

AUDS patients had significantly higher SOMAS scores (average score at admission 6.6 ± 0.8), reflecting increased symptom fluctuation and motor agitation, and decreased insight and concern compared to MDE patients (2.9 ± 0.7; p < 0.001). Degree of mood depression, cognition, life events, drug abuse and medication did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusions

AUDS patients present with rapidly fluctuating mood symptoms, motor agitation and relative lack of insight and concern. Seizures, epilepsy and EEG abnormalities are overrepresented in AUDS patients compared to MDE patients. We suggest that the study of AUDS patients may offer a new approach to better understanding epilepsy and its association with depressive disorders.

Trial registration

NCT00201474

Psychiatric comorbidity and use of psychotropic drugs in epilepsy patients

OBJECTIVES

Although epilepsy is associated with a high rate of psychiatric comorbidity, clinicians may withhold treatment with psychotropic drugs for fear of worsening seizures. We have assessed the occurrence of psychiatric disorders in a cohort of epilepsy patients and used the results to discuss this important topic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Based on a questionnaire we made a survey of psychiatric symptoms in 167 adult patients referred to a tertial epilepsy center. The mean age was 42 years, and 72% had active epilepsy.

RESULTS

Forty three patients (26%) had a psychiatric disorder, and 22 patients (13%) used psychotropic drugs. The most frequent diagnoses were mood disorders and anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the general population, people with epilepsy have an increased risk of developing psychiatric disorders. Patients with uncontrolled seizures are most vulnerable. These disorders appear to be under-diagnosed and under-treated, and the fear that psychotropic drugs can cause seizure exacerbation is probably overstated.

Psychiatric concerns in pediatric epilepsy

Pediatric epilepsy is a common, chronic, and challenging physical illness for children and their families. This article provides a medical overview and discusses the cognitive functioning and psychosocial adjustment as well as the psychiatric management for children and adolescents with pediatric epilepsy. The management of these children involves establishing a collaborative health care approach, evaluating academic functioning, considering psychotherapy, and managing psychopharmacologic treatment. A thorough understanding of the biopsychosocial concerns in pediatric epilepsy can enable medical providers and mental health clinicians to promote resiliency and adaptation in children and their families facing troubling seizure disorders.

Use of lamotrigine in a patient with a clozapine-related seizure

Seizures can be a serious adverse effect of clozapine, often a last-resort antipsychotic with unique efficacy for some patients. Several anticonvulsants have been reported to be useful in preventing further clozapine-induced seizures and permitting continued treatment with this medication. The authors describe the first reported successful use of lamotrigine for this purpose.

Preoperative depressive symptoms predict postoperative seizure outcome in temporal and frontal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Recent research has pointed to the possibility of a bidirectional relationship between seizure frequency in epilepsy and depressive symptoms. The study described here investigated the relationship between preoperative depressive symptomatology and postoperative seizure outcome in a sample of patients with temporal (TLE) and frontal (FLE) lobe epilepsy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data from 115 eligible patients with TLE (N=97) and FLE (N=18) and resections limited to one cortical lobe who were evaluated preoperatively and 1year after epilepsy surgery with respect to depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI) and seizure outcome. The latter was assessed in terms of actual total seizure frequency as well as a dichotomous variable (seizure free vs. not seizure free) for the 1-year outcome. Repeated-measures analyses of variance and regression analyses were applied.

RESULTS

Seizure-free patients had significantly lower BDI scores preoperatively as well as postoperatively than patients who were not seizure free. In the regression analyses, the preoperative BDI score was a significant predictor of postoperative seizure frequency as well as seizure freedom. When only patients with TLE were analyzed, the results for the association between preoperative BDI and postoperative seizure frequency and seizure freedom remained consistent.

CONCLUSION

The present results provide evidence for a statistical bidirectionality of the relationship between depressive symptoms and postoperative seizure status in a mixed sample of patients with TLE and FLE. Possible reasons for this bidirectional association include an underlying common pathology in both depression and epilepsy, for example, structural changes or functional alterations in neurotransmitter systems.

Early life stress as an influence on limbic epilepsy: an hypothesis whose time has come?

The pathogenesis of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), the most prevalent form of refractory focal epilepsy in adults, is thought to begin in early life, even though seizures may not commence until adolescence or adulthood. Amongst the range of early life factors implicated in MTLE causation (febrile seizures, traumatic brain injury, etc.), stress may be one important contributor. Early life stress is an a priori agent deserving study because of the large amount of neuroscientific data showing enduring effects on structure and function in hippocampus and amygdala, the key structures involved in MTLE. An emerging body of evidence directly tests hypotheses concerning early life stress and limbic epilepsy: early life stressors, such as maternal separation, have been shown to aggravate epileptogenesis in both status epilepticus and kindling models of limbic epilepsy. In addition to elucidating its influence on limbic epileptogenesis itself, the study of early life stress has the potential to shed light on the psychiatric disorder that accompanies MTLE. For many years, psychiatric comorbidity was viewed as an effect of epilepsy, mediated psychologically and/or neurobiologically. An alternative – or complementary – perspective is that of shared causation. Early life stress, implicated in the pathogenesis of several psychiatric disorders, may be one such causal factor. This paper aims to critically review the body of experimental evidence linking early life stress and epilepsy; to discuss the direct studies examining early life stress effects in current models of limbic seizures/epilepsy; and to suggest priorities for future research.

Effects of quetiapine on monoamine, GABA, and glutamate release in rat prefrontal cortex

INTRODUCTION

The atypical antipsychotic drug, quetiapine (QTP), is effective in schizophrenia and mood disorders, but induces seizures compared to typical antipsychotics.

METHODS

To explore the mechanisms of action of QTP, we determined its effects on extracellular levels of norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and glutamate in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) using microdialysis, and neuronal firing in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), locus coeruleus (LC), dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), and mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (MTN) by telemetry in freely moving rats.

RESULTS

QTP (10 and 30 mg/kg, i.p.) activated neuronal firing in the VTA, LC, and MTN without affecting that in the DRN. QTP increased extracellular levels of norepinephrine, dopamine, and glutamate without affecting serotonin or GABA levels in the mPFC. The stimulatory effects of QTP on norepinephrine and dopamine were mediated by positive alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)/glutamatergic and negative GABA-mediated NMDA/glutamatergic regulation.

DISCUSSION

The dopaminergic terminal projecting from the VTA received inhibitory GABA-mediated NMDA/glutamatergic regulation, but not stimulatory AMPA/glutamatergic regulation. However, both dopaminergic and noradrenergic terminals from the LC received stimulatory AMPA/glutamatergic regulation from the MTN, but not inhibitory GABA-mediated NMDA/glutamatergic regulation. These findings correlating neuronal activities in nuclei with neurotransmitter release suggested that the effects of QTP on neurotransmission in the mPFC depend on activated neuronal projections located outside the mPFC. Furthermore, positive interaction between LC and MTN afferents are potentially important in the pharmacological mechanisms of neurotransmitter regulation by QTP and hint at mechanisms underlying the atypical profile of this drug for treatment of schizophrenia and as a mood stabilizer and proconvulsive agent.

Practical guidelines for the use of new generation antipsychotic drugs (except clozapine) in adult individuals with intellectual disabilities

New generation antipsychotic (NGA) drugs introduced to the US market after clozapine (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone) are frequently used in individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, there is very limited research to fully establish evidence-based or personalized medicine approaches for their use in this population. These guidelines take a pragmatic approach to establishing frameworks for their use by utilizing the prescribing information and reviewing the available literature on other relevant neuropsychiatric disorders. In the absence of expert consensus guidance and well-controlled comparison trials, we present a set of guidelines to inform initiation, dosing and monitoring of use in adults. Further, in these guidelines we provide practical information on drug-drug interactions and adverse drug reactions, and a brief review of discontinuation syndromes, potential for abuse, use during pregnancy and cost considerations. We also provide drug utilization review forms for each NGA to facilitate implementation of these guidelines, these guidelines provide a practical and necessary resource for practitioners treating psychiatric disorders and challenging behaviors in adult individuals with ID.

Health, wealth, and culture as predominant factors in psychosocial morbidity

Depression is the most common psychological morbidity in epilepsy, yet this comorbidity is not well understood. Possible explanations for this comorbidity include recurrence of premorbid depression, increased risk for severe epilepsy due to a history of depression, shared risk factors for depression and epilepsy, AED-induced depression in vulnerable individuals, and coping styles in the face of stressors linked to epilepsy. Preexisting vulnerability to depression may contribute to each of these explanations. Vulnerability may arise from the influence of common risk factors, family history of depression, a history of depression before initiation of relevant AEDs, or coping styles and may reflect allostatic load. These exposures may precede the occurrence of epilepsy or follow the onset of epilepsy, in both cases increasing the risk for depression in prevalent epilepsy. Their careful evaluation is vital to identifying people at greatest risk for depression in epilepsy and for informing interventions to prevent the occurrence of this disabling epilepsy comorbidity.

Psychiatric issues in epilepsy: the complex relation of mood, anxiety disorders, and epilepsy

The comorbid psychiatric disorders in patients with epilepsy have been neglected for a long time. And yet, epidemiological studies have demonstrated a relatively high prevalence of mood, anxiety, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders. Furthermore, the relation between psychiatric disorders and epilepsy is complex, as illustrated by the relation between mood disorders and epilepsy. The aim of this article is to summarize the most relevant data on the complex relation between mood disorders and epilepsy, which extends to anxiety disorders and which can be explained by the existence of common pathogenic mechanisms shared by these three conditions. The significance of such a relation is not only theoretical, but has a marked impact on the response to pharmacological and surgical treatment of seizure disorders.

Don't be afraid to treat depression in patients with epilepsy!

Major depression and related depressive disorders are highly prevalent in the general population and even more so in patients with epilepsy. Yet depression in these patients remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. This is particularly worrisome as depression has greater negative impact on quality of life than seizure frequency. Additionally, depression is associated with poorer seizure control, and the risk of suicide in patients with epilepsy is greatly increased. Reluctance to treat depression results from the traditional belief that antidepressants should be restricted in epilepsy because of a supposed decrease in seizure threshold. However, there is growing evidence that many antidepressants rather have anticonvulsant effects. Experimental studies show that in critical brain regions such as the frontal lobes and the limbic system enforced serotonergic circuits increase seizure threshold. Clinical data suggest that modern antidepressants may reduce seizure frequency in patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Here we review the concept that selective reuptake inhibitors of serotonin (SSRIs) have a positive effect on the mood disorder as well as on epilepsy. When adhering to the usual precautions, treatment with SSRIs in patients with epilepsy and depression is safe and should not be withheld.

[Pharmacotherapy in bipolar disorders during childhood and adolescence]

OBJECTIVE

Bipolar disorders during childhood and adolescence are rare, but serious and highly recurrent disorders, often associated with negative outcome. Pharmacotherapy, including Lithium, other mood stabilizers and typical antipsychotic agents, is the first-line treatment in bipolar disorders and often necessary for many months or years.

METHOD

A computerized medline-search (Pubmed) was made for prospective studies and reviews of bipolar disorder in this age-group published during the last 10 years, which were then reviewed for their relevance.

RESULTS

Despite the widespread use of substances whose efficacy for adults is well-established, there is a substantial lack of empirical data regarding the efficacy and safety in the treatment of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents. Placebo-controlled studies are very rare, and the interpretation of the existing data is complicated by the diagnostic controversy about bipolar disorder in children. Side-effects are more common in children and adolescents than in adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy may be favoured in cases of severe and psychotic bipolar disorder. Needed are more placebo-controlled studies and long-term studies on the efficacy and safety of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotic agents in the treatment of children and adolescents with bipolar disorder.

Medical complications of psychiatric treatment

Psychiatric medications are frequently an essential component of care for critically ill patients. Their use may lead to medical complications, however, as a result of (1) direct toxicity from psychotropic medications, (2) drug-drug interactions, or (3) intoxication or withdrawal states. These complications may be a nuisance (eg, dry mouth and nausea) or serious and life-threatening (eg, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and cardiac arrhythmias). This article addresses the most important medical complications (organized by organ systems) of psychiatric treatment.

Stress, the hippocampus, and epilepsy

Stress is among the most frequently self-reported precipitants of seizures in patients with epilepsy. This review considers how important stress mediators like corticotropin-releasing hormone, corticosteroids, and neurosteroids could contribute to this phenomenon. Cellular effects of stress mediators in the rodent hippocampus are highlighted. Overall, corticosterone--with other stress hormones--rapidly enhances CA1/CA3 hippocampal activity shortly after stress. At the same time, corticosterone starts gene-mediated events, which enhance calcium influx several hours later. This later effect serves to normalize activity but also imposes a risk for neuronal injury if and when neurons are concurrently strongly depolarized, for example, during epileptic activity. In the dentate gyrus, stress-induced elevations in corticosteroid level are less effective in changing membrane properties such as calcium influx; here, enhanced inhibitory tone mediated through neurosteroid effects on gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors might dominate. Under conditions of repetitive stress (e.g., caused from experiencing repetitive and unpredictable seizures) and/or early life stress, hormonal influences on the inhibitory tone, however, are diminished; instead, enhanced calcium influx and increased excitation become more important. In agreement, perinatal stress and elevated steroid levels accelerate epileptogenesis and lower seizure threshold in various animal models for epilepsy. It will be interesting to examine how curtailing the effects of stress in adults, for example, by brief treatment with antiglucocorticoids, may be beneficial to the treatment of epilepsy.

Postictal psychosis in partial epilepsy: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

Divergent findings among prior studies on correlates of risk for postictal psychosis (PIP) suggest the value of a controlled study involving a relatively large number of patients.

METHODS

The study population consisted of a consecutive series of 59 patients with partial epilepsy and a history of PIP, and 94 control patients with partial epilepsy and no history of PIP evaluated as inpatients with video-electroencephalography. The groups did not differ significantly regarding demographic features. Exact tests yielded a subset of variables and a tentative interpretation that were evaluated further utilizing principal components analysis and logistic regression.

RESULTS

PIP was associated with extratemporal versus temporal (p = 0.036) or undetermined (p = 0.001) localization of seizure onset, bilateral interictal epileptiform activity (p = 0.017), secondary generalization (p = 0.049), and history of encephalitis (p = 0.018). Interictal slow activity was more frequently absent in control patients (p = 0.045). PIP was associated with family histories of psychiatric disorders (p = 0.007) and epilepsy (p = 0.042), which themselves were significantly intercorrelated (r = 0.225; p = 0.006). Age of onset or duration of epilepsy and lateralized electroencephalographic or magnetic resonance imaging asymmetries did not differ significantly between control and PIP groups. The analysis indicated four underlying domains of risk for PIP: ambiguous/extratemporal localization, family neuropsychiatric history, abnormal interictal electroencephalographic activity, and encephalitis. Each unit increase on a simple additive scale composed of 9 dichotomous independent variables multiplied the odds ratio for PIP by 1.71 (95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.15; p < 0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

PIP in partial epilepsy is associated with relatively broadly and bilaterally distributed epileptogenic networks, genetic determinants of psychiatric disorders and seizures, and encephalitis.

Clozapine use in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Although the role of clozapine is well established for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, it is rarely used in pediatric populations, mainly due to its potentially serious adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize practical aspects of use of clozapine in treating children with schizophrenia and management of associated adverse effects.

METHODS

Available studies in the literature using clozapine in the pediatric population are summarized and the NIMH experience in treating refractory childhood-onset schizophrenia cases with clozapine is discussed.

CONCLUSION

Despite a higher incidence of adverse effects in children, clozapine appears to be a uniquely beneficial second-line agent for treating children with refractory schizophrenia.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions of psychotropic drugs with antiepileptic drugs

Co-morbid psychiatric disorders are relatively frequent in patients with epilepsy. The prevalence rates of mood and anxiety disorders, psychotic disorders and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder have been found to be significantly higher in patients with epilepsy than in the general population. While co-morbid psychiatric disorders have frequently been considered as complications of the seizure disorder, there is an increasing body of literature that points to a complex relationship between psychiatric and seizure disorders. Because of this, it is crucial that clinicians consider the presence of co-morbid psychiatric disorders when planning the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Having a clear understanding of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic drugs and psychotropic drugs is of the essence to avert unnecessary adverse events and loss of efficacy of psychotropic drugs. This chapter provides a practical review on the use of psychotropic drugs for the treatment of these psychiatric co-morbidities in patients with epilepsy.

Psychiatric aspects of epilepsy

Patients who have epilepsy face many challenges resulting from their illness and have frequent psychiatric comorbidities. Recognition of these disorders is increasing and is having a positive impact on patients' quality of life. Recent recommendations about a new classification system for psychiatric disorders related specifically to epilepsy and based on the relationship of symptoms to seizures, antiepileptic medications, and EEG changes should further research and treatment. Especially insofar psychiatric syndromes specific to epilepsy can be identified, correlation of clinical phenomena with relatively well-understood pathophysiology in epilepsy will allow advances in the understanding of psychiatric illness. This progress should move the treatment of patients who have epilepsy toward a comprehensive biopsychosocial model that focuses on the whole person rather than simply on the disease process.

Escitalopram therapy for major depression and anxiety disorders

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that escitalopram is efficacious in a range of mood and anxiety disorders, but the individual trials are insufficiently large to allow a full exploration of its tolerability.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the tolerability and safety of escitalopram through analysis of all randomized controlled clinical trials in major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders.

METHODS

Analyses of tolerability were based on data from all available randomized, double-blind, controlled studies completed by December 2006 in which escitalopram was compared with placebo or active compounds (citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine). Adverse events (AEs) that occurred more frequently with escitalopram than with placebo were listed, and tolerability and safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

Nausea was the only AE with an incidence greater than or equal to 10% and 5 percentage points greater than with placebo during short-term treatment. In general, AEs were mild to moderate in severity. AEs related to sexual dysfunction were similarly frequent with escitalopram and citalopram, but were higher with paroxetine. No suicide occurred among escitalopram-treated patients, and there were no significant differences between escitalopram and placebo in incidence of suicidal behavior, measured by self-harm and suicidal thoughts. The 8 week withdrawal rate due to AEs was higher with escitalopram than with placebo (7.3% vs 2.8%; p < 0.001) but lower than with paroxetine (6.6% vs 9.0%; p < 0.01) or venlafaxine (6.1% vs 13.2%; p < 0.01) (Fisher's Exact test, 2 tailed). Compared with paroxetine, escitalopram resulted in significantly fewer discontinuation symptoms (average increase in Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms Scale of 1.6 vs 3.9; p < 0.01). There were no clinically relevant changes in clinical laboratory values in patients treated with escitalopram. Mean weight change after 6 months of treatment with escitalopram (0.58 +/- 2.63 kg) was similar to that with placebo (0.15 +/- 2.33 kg). The incidence of cardiovascular events was similar to that with placebo. The risk of AEs was no higher in special patient populations, such as the elderly (> or =65 y of age) or those with hepatic dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on data from randomized controlled trials involving more than 4000 escitalopram-treated patients, escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) is safe and well tolerated in short- and long-term treatment.