Clinical events after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: correlation with hemodynamic findings

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: an update

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) have been used in the treatment of complications of portal hypertension. TIPS is used for the control of acute variceal bleeding and for the prevention of vericeal rebleeding when pharmacologic therapy and endoscopic therapy have failed. Patients with refractory ascites with adequate hepatic reserve and renal function who fail to respond to large volume paracentesis may be reasonable candidates for TIPS. Promising indications for TIPS are Budd-Chiari syndrome uncontrolled by medical therapy, severe portal hypertensive gastropathy, refractory hepatic hydrothorax, and hepatorenal syndrome. TIPS cannot be recommended for preoperative portal decompression solely to facilitate liver transplantation. Special care should be taken to insure proper placement of the stent to avoid increasing the technical difficulty of the transplantation procedure. The major limiting factors for TIPS success are shunt dysfunction and hepatic encephalopathy. Because shunt stenosis is the most important cause of recurrent complications of portal hypertension, a surveillance program to monitor shunt patency is mandatory. The MELD score may be useful in predicting post-TIPS survival, and also in counseling patients and their families.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting versus paracentesis plus albumin for refractory ascites in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been shown to be more effective than repeated paracentesis plus albumin in the control of refractory ascites. However, its effect on survival and healthcare costs is still uncertain.

METHODS

Seventy patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites were randomly assigned to TIPS (35 patients) or repeated paracentesis plus intravenous albumin (35 patients). The primary endpoint was survival without liver transplantation. Secondary endpoints were complications of cirrhosis and costs.

RESULTS

Twenty patients treated with TIPS and 18 treated with paracentesis died during the study period, whereas 7 patients in each group underwent liver transplantation (mean follow-up 282 +/- 43 vs. 325 +/- 61 days, respectively). The probability of survival without liver transplantation was 41% at 1 year and 26% at 2 years in the TIPS group, as compared with 35% and 30% in the paracentesis group (P = 0.51). In a multivariate analysis, only baseline blood urea nitrogen levels and Child-Pugh score were independently associated with survival. Recurrence of ascites and development of hepatorenal syndrome were lower in the TIPS group compared with the paracentesis group, whereas the frequency of severe hepatic encephalopathy was greater in the TIPS group. The calculated costs were higher in the TIPS group than in the paracentesis group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with refractory ascites, TIPS lowers the rate of ascites recurrence and the risk of developing hepatorenal syndrome. However, TIPS does not improve survival and is associated with an increased frequency of severe encephalopathy and higher costs compared with repeated paracentesis plus albumin.

Renal failure in cirrhotic patients: role of terlipressin in clinical approach to hepatorenal syndrome type 2

OBJECTIVES

Renal failure secondary to hepatorenal syndrome or to organic renal disease occurs frequently in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. The present prospective study investigates the usefulness of terlipressin in both the diagnostic and the therapeutic approach to cirrhotics with renal failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients were studied: 11 with hepatorenal syndrome type 2 (group 1) and five with organic renal disease (group 2). All received terlipressin (1 mg/4 h intravenously) for 7 days. Subsequently, 12 patients (nine from group 1 and three from group 2) underwent a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

RESULTS

Terlipressin significantly improved renal function (serum creatinine, 1.8 +/- 0.8 versus 2.4 +/- 0.9 mg/dl; blood creatinine clearance, 53 +/- 8 versus 21.3 +/- 8.7 ml/min; P < 0.05) in group 1 [8/11 patients (73%) versus 1/5 (20%) of group 2; P < 0.05]. The only patient in group 2 who responded to terlipressin had a mixed renal dysfunction. Renal function improved significantly after transjugular portosystemic shunt in all patients who responded to terlipressin.

CONCLUSIONS

Terlipressin administration significantly improves renal function in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome type 2 but not in organic kidney failure. By providing the critical information that a patient's kidney function is (or is not) reversible, a trial with terlipressin may be useful when selecting cirrhotic patients with renal failure as candidates for a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or liver transplantation.

Nitric oxide and portal hypertension

In liver cirrhosis, an increase in hepatic resistance is the initial phenomenon leading to portal hypertension. This is primarily due to the structural distortion of the intrahepatic microcirculation caused by cirrhosis. However, similar to other vascular conditions, architectural changes in the liver are associated with a deficient nitric oxide (NO) production, which results in an increased vascular tone with a further increase in hepatic resistance and portal pressure. New therapeutic strategies are being developed to selectively provide the liver with NO, overcoming the deleterious effects of systemic vasodilators. On the other hand, a strikingly opposite process occurs in splanchnic arterial circulation, where NO production is increased. This results in splanchnic vasodilatation and subsequent increase in portal inflow, which contributes to portal hypertension. Systemic blockade of NO in portal hypertension attenuates the hyperdynamic circulation, but its effects increasing hepatic resistance may offset the benefit of reducing portal inflow, thus preventing an effective reduction of portal pressure. Moreover, it cannot be ruled out that NO blockade may have a deleterious action on cirrhosis progression, which raises caution about their use in patients with cirrhosis.

[Characteristics of bleeding from esophageal-gastric varices in patients with HIV infection]

AIMS

Coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatotropic viruses (hepatitis B and C) is frequent because the routes of infection are similar. Liver disease appears earlier in these patients and progression to cirrhosis and its complications is faster. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and clinical characteristics of bleeding from esophageal-gastric varices in patients with HIV.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 258 consecutive episodes of bleeding from esophageal-gastric varices in cirrhotic patients between January 1996 and January 2001, of which 20 episodes occurred in patients with HIV (7.8%).

RESULTS

The mean age was significantly lower in patients with HIV infection and all presented hepatitis C infection. The hepatic venous pressure gradient was higher in patients with HIV (22.8 3.4 mmHg vs 19.6 5,4 mmHg; p = 0.05). No differences in the severity of liver disease (Child-Pugh), transfusion requirements, treatment performed, initial hemostasis, early recurrence, or rescue treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase I (DPPI) were found. The development of complications (bacterial infections, hepatic encephalopathy and ascites), hospital stay and mortality were also similar. Mortality was not influenced by HIV stage. Bleeding from esophageal-gastric varices in patients with HIV infection has a similar form of presentation and clinical course with treatment to that in non-cirrhotic patients, despite a higher degree of portal hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of HIV infection should not modify diagnostic or therapeutic attitudes to bleeding from esophageal-gastric varices.

TIPS versus drug therapy in preventing variceal rebleeding in advanced cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial

Prevention of variceal rebleeding is mandatory in cirrhotic patients. We compared the efficacy, safety, and cost of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) versus pharmacologic therapy in preventing variceal rebleeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis. A total of 91 Child-Pugh class B/C cirrhotic patients surviving their first episode of variceal bleeding were randomized to receive TIPS (n = 47) or drug therapy (propranolol + isosorbide-5-mononitrate) (n = 44) to prevent variceal rebleeding. Mean follow-up was 15 months. Rebleeding occurred in 6 (13%) TIPS-treated patients versus 17 (39%) drug-treated patients (P =.007). The 2-year rebleeding probability was 13% versus 49% (P =.01). A similar number of reinterventions were required in the 2 groups; these were mainly angioplasty +/- restenting in the TIPS group (90 of 98) and endoscopic therapy for rebleeding in the medical group (45 of 62) (not significant). Encephalopathy was more frequent in TIPS than in drug-treated patients (38% vs. 14%, P =.007). Child-Pugh class improved more frequently in drug-treated than in TIPS-treated patients (72% vs. 45%; P =.04). The 2-year survival probability was identical (72%). The identified cost of therapy was double for TIPS-treated patients. In summary, medical therapy was less effective than TIPS in preventing rebleeding. However, it caused less encephalopathy, identical survival, and more frequent improvement in Child-Pugh class with lower costs than TIPS in high-risk cirrhotic patients. This suggests that TIPS should not be used as a first-line treatment, but as a rescue for failures of medical/endoscopic treatments (first-option therapies).

TIPS is a useful long-term derivative therapy for patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome uncontrolled by medical therapy

Patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) may require treatment with portal decompressive surgery or liver transplantation. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) represents a new treatment alternative, but its long-term effect on BCS outcome has not been evaluated. Twenty-one patients with BCS consecutively admitted to our unit were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 4 +/- 3 years. Seven patients had nonprogressive forms and were successfully controlled with medical therapy; 1 case, with a short-length hepatic vein stenosis was successfully treated by angioplasty. All 8 patients are alive and asymptomatic. The remaining 13 patients, had a TIPS because of clinical deterioration (in one of them, because early TIPS thrombosis a successful side-to-side portacaval shunt [SSPCS] was performed) followed by an improvement in clinical condition. However, a patient with fulminant liver failure before TIPS insertion, died 4 months later and another patient with cirrhosis at diagnosis had liver transplantation 2 years later. The remaining 11 patients are alive and free of ascites. In 3 of these patients TIPS is patent after 3, 6, and 12 months. The remaining 8 patients developed late TIPS dysfunction. In two of these cases, after angioplasty and restenting, TIPS is patent after a follow-up of 9 and 80 months. In 5 other patients, recurring TIPS occlusion was not further corrected because no signs of portal hypertension were present. In conclusion, in patients with BCS uncontrolled with medical therapy, TIPS is a highly effective technique that is associated with long-term survival.

How much reduction in portal pressure is necessary to prevent variceal rebleeding? A longitudinal study in 225 patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

OBJECTIVES

This longitudinal study determines the risk of rebleeding in relation to the reduction of the portosystemic pressure gradient in patients with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for variceal bleeding.

METHODS

The study included 225 patients in whom a TIPS revision was indicated by the endoscopic finding of varices with a high risk for rebleeding (n = 167) or a recent variceal rebleed (n = 58). The portosystemic pressure gradient was determined before and after TIPS placement and at revision performed after a mean of 10 +/- 15 months.

RESULTS

The portosystemic pressure gradient at revision approached the index pressure gradient before TIPS implantation (23.1 +/- 5.5 mm Hg) by 8.4 +/- 31%. Rebleeding was inversely correlated with the reduction in index pressure gradient found at revision. Thus, 80% of rebleedings occurred with pressure gradients close to the index pressure gradient (< 25% reduction) or with gradients equal to or greater than the index pressure gradient. In contrast, only one patient (0.4%) and three patients (1.3%) rebled with a pressure gradient of < 12 mm Hg or a reduction of the index pressure gradient by > 50%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis of rebleeding, which included the 225 patients at risk, showed a probability of rebleeding of 18%, 7%, and 1% for a reduction of the index pressure gradient by 0%, 25-50%, and > 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most rebleedings occurred with pressure gradients similar to the index-pressure gradient measured at first bleeding. Accordingly, a graded reduction by 25-50% sufficiently prevents rebleeding. It can be assumed that, in comparison with the widely used threshold value of 12 mm Hg, a reduction by 25-50% may have a favorable benefit-to-risk ratio with respect to shunt-induced hepatic encephalopathy and liver failure. It should therefore be a goal in the decompressive treatment of portal hypertension and maintained during follow-up of patients with variceal bleeding.

Clinical management of ascites and its complications

Development of ascites is a poor prognostic sign with a 1 year mortality rate of up to 50%. Cirrhotic patients who develop ascites should therefore be evaluated for liver transplantation. Even though current therapies of ascites are not associated with a survival benefit, the elimination of ascites will improve quality of life and prevent the development of lethal complications such as SBP and HRS. Therapy of ascites should be directed at correcting the pathophysiologic abnormalities that lead to ascites formation, namely sodium retention, reduced effective arterial blood volume, and sinusoidal hypertension.

Assessment of portal hypertension in humans

Patients suspected of having portal hypertension (either by clinical history, physical examination, or previous diagnosis) should undergo ultrasonography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Ultrasonography, preferably using the duplex technique, can disclose the patency of the portal venous system, the presence of signs of portal hypertension (splenomegaly, portocollateral vessels, repermeabilization of the umbilical vein, and so forth) and provide additional information about liver, biliary, or pancreatic diseases that may be the cause of portal hypertension. Endoscopy can assess the presence and size of gastroesophageal varices, the appearance of the variceal wall, and the presence and severity of portal hypertensive gastropathy. Patients showing a patent portal vein should have hepatic vein catheterization to evaluate the presence of presinusoidal, sinusoidal, or postsinusoidal portal hypertension. Patients in whom presinusoidal portal hypertension is suspected (those having esophageal varices with an HVPG below 10 mm Hg) should have liver biopsy and percutaneous transhepatic measurement of portal pressure. In sinusoidal portal hypertension, the results of endoscopy and HVPG measurement are decisive for the therapeutic management of the patients. The authors' results indicate that, before starting prophylactic therapy with beta-blockers, all patients should undergo at least an hepatic vein catheterization to assess HVPG; it would be preferable to have a variceal pressure measurement also. These measurements must be repeated 3 to 4 weeks after the final dose of therapy has been reached to assess the risk of variceal bleeding or rebleeding.

Effects of different octreotide dosages on splanchnic hemodynamics and glucagon in patients with TIPS

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of octreotide in patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt in relation to plasma levels of octreotide and glucagon and the correlation between portal pressure and noninvasive Doppler parameters.

METHODS

In 15 fasting patients, we i.v. administered isotonic sodium chloride followed by octreotide 25 microg/h and 100 microg/h, each over 1 h. We measured portal pressure (PP) directly and portal vein blood flow velocity by Doppler ultrasound simultaneously and calculated portal vascular resistance (PVR) and portal venous flow (PVF). Blood samples were taken for glucagon and octreotide (mean +/- SE).

RESULTS

Octreotide reduced PP (120': -7.7+/-2.2%, p < 0.01 vs baseline; 180': - 11.4+/-2.1%, p < 0.01 vs baseline) and PVF (120': -21.7+/-31.7%, p < 0.01 vs baseline; 180': -11.6+/-18.1%, p < 0.05 vs baseline). Glucagon decreased with the increase in octreotide levels and showed a correlation with the decrease in PP and with PVF. In patients with a high PVR, we found a close inverse correlation between PP and portal vein blood flow velocity (r = -0.83, p = 0.03) as well as Cl (r = 0.81, p = 0.05), whereas poor correlation was found in patients with low PVR.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide caused a dose-related, moderate but sustained reduction in PP in patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt. PVR seems to be an important parameter that influences the efficacy of octreotide and the relation between PP and noninvasive Doppler parameters.

Prognostic value of hepatocyte proliferative activity after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

OBJECTIVES

Previous data indicated that the proliferating cell nuclear antigen-labeling index (PCNA-LI) reflects the liver functional reserve in human liver cirrhosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the hepatocyte proliferative activity as a marker for the outcome of patients after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

METHODS

Twenty-eight consecutive patients were electively treated with TIPS for recurrent variceal bleeding (n = 14), refractory ascites (n = 12), or hydrothorax (n = 2). PCNA immunostaining was analyzed on methanol-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver biopsies.

RESULTS

After TIPS, six patients died within the first 3 months, eight other patients died later, two were transplanted, and 12 were alive at the time of analysis. Early death occurred in patients with refractory ascites (5/12) and/or in Child C patients (3/6). Among the evaluated variables, there was a statistical trend for the PCNA-LI to be lower in patients who died early after TIPS than in those having long term survival (1.55% vs 2.65%, p = 0.07). After TIPS insertion, the probability of remaining alive during the first 6 months of follow-up was significantly higher in patients with a preprocedural PCNA-LI > 2.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCNA-LI measured on liver biopsy before the TIPS procedure might be a pre-TIPS marker to discriminate those patients for whom TIPS is likely to be beneficial.

Portal hypertension

Portal hypertension is the main complication of cirrhosis and is responsible for its most common complications: variceal hemorrhage, ascites, and portosystemic encephalopathy. Portal hypertension is the result of increased intrahepatic resistance and increased portal venous inflow, which in turn is the result of splanchnic vasodilatation. Vasodilatation (splanchnic and systemic) and hyperdynamic circulation are hemodynamic abnormalities typical of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Gastroesophageal varices result almost solely from portal hypertension, although the hyperdynamic circulation contributes to variceal growth and hemorrhage. Ascites results from sinusoidal hypertension and sodium retention, which is, in turn, secondary to vasodilatation and activation of neurohumoral systems. The hepatorenal syndrome represents the result of extreme vasodilatation with an extreme decrease in effective blood volume that leads to maximal activation of vasoconstrictive systems, renal vasoconstriction, and renal failure. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is a potentially lethal infection of ascites that occurs in the absence of a local source of infection. Portosystemic encephalopathy is a consequence of both portal hypertension (shunting of blood through portosystemic collaterals) and hepatic insufficiency that result in the accumulation of neurotoxins in the brain. This paper reviews the recent advances in the pathophysiology and management of the complications of portal hypertension.

Prevention of rebleeding from oesophageal-gastric varices

Endoscopic sclerotherapy or ligation and/or drugs are the standard treatments for the prevention of variceal rebleeding. Failure of this treatment indicates the need for rescue transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation. The current practice to use endoscopic treatment as first-line and TIPS as second-line treatment is, however, not based on evidence since, in unselected patients, both treatments have a comparable survival. In addition, the timing for a change from endoscopic treatment to TIPS is not exactly defined. According to the randomized studies available a change may be recommended when uncontrolled rebleeding or more than two rebleedings within a time interval of 6-12 months indicate failure of the endoscopic treatment. This regimen may be reconsidered when future developments improve outcome of one or the other treatment. In this regard the TIPS treatment has a potential of improvement if further reduction of the rate of rebleeding can be achieved with less stenosis, and/or reduced encephalopathy.

Hepatic encephalopathy

In the last decade, a significant amount of research has been devoted to the pathogenesis and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Non-invasive neuroimaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy have become important research tools. The search for a suitable animal model of HE associated with cirrhosis is still ongoing. Moreover, consensus terminology and diagnostic criteria for HE in humans are badly needed.

Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt formation on portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastric circulation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) and gastric hemodynamics.

METHODS

A total of 16 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertensive gastropathy were prospectively studied. Of these, 12 patients underwent TIPS for esophageal varices and four for refractory ascites. Gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF) was assessed by laser Doppler flowmeter, and total blood flow (TBF) in submucosa and mucosa by near-infrared endoscopy. Portal venous pressure was obtained by a transducer during the TIPS procedure. The severity of portal hypertensive gastropathy was classified as none, mild, or severe. The examinations were performed before and 2 wk after the procedure.

RESULTS

TIPS significantly reduced portal venous pressure. PHG improved in all four patients with severe PHG and in five of 12 patients with mild PHG after treatment. Gastric mucosal blood flow increased from 49.0 to 55.6 ml/min/100 g after TIPS. In contrast, TBF decreased from 0.35/s to 0.27/s after treatment. Liver function tests showed no significant changes before and after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

It is considered that TIPS may have a beneficial effect on PHG at least for a short time. The mechanism by which PHG improves may be closely related to the improvement of the injured gastric perfusion in cirrhotic patients with PHG.

Relationship between pre-TIPS liver perfusion by the portal vein and the incidence of post-TIPS chronic hepatic encephalopathy

OBJECTIVE

In the present study we evaluated the predictive value of pretransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) portal perfusion as assessed by Doppler ultrasonography for the onset of chronic encephalopathy after TIPS.

METHODS

A total of 231 cirrhotic patients were followed-up prospectively after TIPS placement. The pattern of intrahepatic portal flow was assessed before TIPS. Patients were divided into two groups according to Doppler findings. Group 1 comprised patients with prograde portal flow (n = 200), whereas group 2 comprised those with loss of portal perfusion (hepatofugal or back-and-forth flow or portal vein thrombosis; n = 31). The presence of chronic encephalopathy during a median follow-up of 32 months was prospectively recorded. The prognostic value of the following parameters for the onset of chronic recurrent encephalopathy after TIPS was evaluated: age, presence of encephalopathy before TIPS, alcoholism, Pugh score, and loss of portal perfusion before TIPS. The independent prognostic value of each variable was tested with a multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in terms of age, incidence of prior episodes of hepatic encephalopathy, and portacaval gradient before and after the procedure; however, liver failure was more severe in patients in group 2 (Pugh score: 9.2 +/- 1.9 vs 10.3 +/- 1.7). The 3-yr survival was identical for both groups; 25% of the 200 patients in group 1 developed chronic encephalopathy as compared to 6% of the 31 patients in group 2 (p = 0.03). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that loss of portal perfusion and age >65 yr were the only independent predictors of the onset of post-TIPS chronic encephalopathy (odds ratios 0.24 and 1.98, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Cirrhotic patients with loss of portal perfusion before TIPS were protected against post-TIPS chronic hepatic encephalopathy despite a more severe liver dysfunction at baseline. The only other independent predictive factor for the onset of this complication was age.

Variceal bleeding and portal hypertensive gastropathy

Cirrhosis can be the end stage of any chronic liver disease. At the time of diagnosis of cirrhosis varices are present in about 60% of decompensated and 30% of compensated patients. The risk factors for the first episode of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients are the severity of liver dysfunction, large size of varices and the presence of endoscopic red colour signs but only one-third of patients who have variceal haemorrhage have the above risk factors. Recent interest has been directed at identifying haemodynamic factors that may reflect the pathophysiological changes which lead to variceal bleeding, e.g. it has been confirmed that no bleeding occurs if HVPG falls below 12 mmHg and also a hypothesis has been put forward in which bacterial infection is considered a trigger for bleeding. Pharmacological treatment with beta-blockers is safe, effective and is the standard long-term treatment for the prevention of recurrence of variceal bleeding. Combination of beta-blockers with isosorbide-5-mononitrate needs further testing in randomized controlled trials. The use of haemodynamic targets for reduction in HVPG response needs further study, and surrogate markers of pressure response need evaluation. If endoscopic treatment is chosen, variceal ligation is the modality of choice. The combination of simultaneous variceal ligation and sclerotherapy does not offer any benefit. However, the use of additional sclerotherapy for the complete eradication of small varices after variceal ligation needs to be evaluated. The results of current prospective randomized controlled trials comparing variceal ligation with pharmacological treatment are awaited with great interest. Finally, the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for the secondary prevention of variceal bleeding is not substantiated by current data, as survival is not improved and because of its worse cost-benefit profile compared to other treatments. In contrast, there still is a role for the selective surgical shunts in the modern management of portal hypertension. The ideal patients should be well compensated cirrhotics, who have had troublesome bleeding - either who have failed at least one other modality of therapy (drugs or ligation), have bled from gastric varices despite medical or endoscopic therapy, or live far from suitable medical services. Recently, ligation has been compared to beta-blockers for primary prophylaxis but so far there is no good evidence to recommend banding for primary prophylaxis, if beta-blockers can be given.

Medical treatment of portal hypertension

In this chapter we give a quick review of the rationale for treatment of portal hypertension. The different scenarios for treatment of variceal bleeding will be discussed-that is, primary and secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding as well as the treatment of the acute bleeding episode. The role of the pharmacological, endoscopic and derivative treatments in each one of these scenarios will be discussed. Particular attention will be devoted to the potential role of the combination therapy of beta-blockers with isosorbide-5-mononitrate for preventing re-bleeding and to the best approach to patients with intolerance or contraindications to beta-blockers. We also give a rational review of the data comparing sclerotherapy against ligation as well as the potential role of the latter on primary prophylaxis.

Esophageal varices. II. TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) and surgical therapy

The role of surgery in the prevention and treatment of variceal hemorrhage is reviewed. Types of available surgery, their physiologic basis, and literature supporting their use are discussed in the context of the natural history of variceal hemorrhage. The evolution of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as a treatment modality for variceal hemorrhage is reviewed. The effects of TIPS on portal and systemic hemodynamics and clinical usefulness in the management of variceal hemorrhage are discussed. A treatment algorithm for the integrated use of the various treatments is provided.

Predictive value of the variceal pressure response to continued pharmacological therapy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Noninvasive measurements of variceal pressure adequately reflect the hemodynamic effects of propranolol on portal hypertension. However, the prognostic value of variceal pressure responses during continued propranolol therapy has not been evaluated, and it is unclear whether this may substitute invasive measurements of portal pressure response. Fifty-five portal hypertensive patients with cirrhosis were studied before and at 4 months of continued propranolol therapy. Variceal pressure was measured using an endoscopic pressure gauge. Portal pressure was evaluated as the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Over a 28 +/- 11 month follow-up, 16 patients experienced variceal bleeding. Baseline characteristics were similar in bleeders and nonbleeders. At 4 months, reduction in variceal pressure was less marked in bleeders than in nonbleeders (5% +/- 20% vs. -15% +/- 24%; P =.03). A fall in variceal pressure 20% or greater of baseline was an independent predictor of absence of variceal bleeding; which occurred in 5% of patients with a 20% or greater fall in variceal pressure versus 42% of patients with less than a 20% reduction (P =.004). The HVPG response had similar independent prognostic value (decrease > or =20%: 6% bleeding; decrease <20%: 45% bleeding; P =.004) but identified different patients. Achieving a 20% decrease in either variceal pressure or HVPG was highly sensitive (85%) and specific (93%) identifying patients not bleeding on follow-up. Endoscopic measurements of variceal pressure response to continued pharmacotherapy provide useful prognostic information on the risk of variceal bleeding. As with HVPG response, a fall in variceal pressure of 20% or greater is associated with a very low risk of variceal bleeding. The combination of both parameters allows almost optimal prognostication.

Complications of cirrhosis. I. Portal hypertension

Increased resistance to portal blood flow is the primary factor in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension, and is mainly determined by the morphological changes occurring in chronic liver diseases. This is aggravated by a dynamic component, due to the active-reversible- contraction of different elements of the porto-hepatic bed. A decreased synthesis of NO in the intrahepatic circulation is the main determinant of this dynamic component. This provides a rationale for the use of vasodilators to reduce intrahepatic resistance and portal pressure. Another factor contributing to aggravate the portal hypertension is a significant increase in portal blood flow, caused by arteriolar splanchnic vasodilation and hyperkinetic circulation. Splanchnic arteriolar vasodilation is a multifactorial phenomenon, which may involve local (endothelial) mechanisms as well as neurogenic and humoral pathways. Most pharmacological treatments have been aimed at correcting the increased portal blood inflow by the use of splanchnic vasoconstrictors, such as beta-blockers, vasopressin derivatives and somatostatin. Several studies have demonstrated that changes in the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) during maintenance therapy are useful to identify those patients who are going to have a variceal bleeding or rebleeding. The wide individual variation in the HVPG response to pharmacological treatment makes it desirable to schedule follow-up measurements of HVPG during pharmacological therapy. A priority for research in the forthcoming years is to develop accurate non-invasive methods to assess prognosis, which can be used to substitute or as surrogate indicators of the HVPG response. In the clinical management of portal hypertension, beta-blockers are at present the only accepted treatment for the prevention of variceal bleeding. Whether the association of isosorbide-5-mononitrate will improve the high efficacy of beta-blockers is questionable. The efficacy of more aggressive techniques, such as endoscopic band ligation, should be further tested against beta-blockers in patients with a high risk of bleeding. In the treatment of acute variceal bleeding, administration of somatostatin or terlipressin is an established therapy. It may be used alone or, preferably, as an initial treatment before sclerotherapy or endoscopic band ligation. No more than two sessions of endoscopic treatment should be used to control the bleeding. If the bleeding is not easily controlled, other alternatives such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) or derivative surgery should be considered, the former being the best in patients with poor liver function. Recent studies suggest that early measurement of HVPG during variceal bleeding may be used as a guide for therapeutic decisions in the treatment of patients with acute variceal bleeding. Those patients with a high HVPG have a high risk of poor evolution, and may be candidates for more intensive and aggressive therapy, such as surgery or TIPS. Those with lower HVPG have a very high probability of an uneventful evolution, and may thus be managed more conservatively using medical and endoscopic treatments. Pharmacological agents (propranolol or nadolol), endoscopic treatment (preferably banding ligation) or surgery can be used to prevent rebleeding. A pending task for the new millennium is to assess whether the early treatment of asymptomatic, compensated cirrhotic patients with portal pressure reducing agents can prevent the development of esophageal varices and of other complications of portal hypertension.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS): a decade later

Since the introduction of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) 10 years ago, it has been used increasingly in the management of portal hypertension and its complications. TIPS is now considered the procedure of choice for management of refractory variceal bleeding. Its role in the management of refractory ascites, hepatic hydrothorax, hepatorenal syndrome, and hepatopulmonary syndrome still awaits further prospective studies. The two main complications of TIPS are hepatic encephalopathy and shunt malfunction. Generally, TIPS stenosis or occlusion is a major drawback requiring routine surveillance of TIPS with doppler ultrasound. Venography with balloon dilation of the stent or placement of serial or parallel stents may be required in some cases. Promising modalities of preventing TIPS malfunction (e.g., brachy-therapy, covered stents, or anti-platelet derived growth factor) are currently being investigated.

Wedged hepatic venous pressure adequately reflects portal pressure in hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis

Wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) is equivalent to portal venous pressure in patients with alcoholic liver diseases. However, it may underestimate portal pressure in nonalcoholics, which is important because hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a frequent cause of chronic liver disease. We investigated the agreement between directly measured portal pressure and WHVP in alcoholic and HCV-related liver diseases. Seventy-one patients with liver disease resulting from HCV infection (n = 32), alcohol (n = 25), or both (n = 14) underwent simultaneous measurements of WHVP (by hepatic vein catheterization) and portal pressure (by direct puncture). In 9 patients, measurements were repeated 20 minutes after acute iv propranolol administration. WHVP showed an excellent agreement with portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis resulting from either HCV, alcohol or both (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.94, 0.93, and 0.97, respectively; P <.001). A discrepancy of >/=5 mm Hg was observed in 7 cases. WHVP underestimated portal pressure in only 1 case and exceeded portal pressure by >/=5 mm Hg in 6 patients. The WHVP response to propranolol closely and significantly correlated with changes in portal pressure (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.87; P <.004). The simple and safe measurement of WHVP accurately reflects portal pressure in alcoholic and HCV-related liver disease. This technique also allows us to accurately assess the portal pressure response to propranolol in both alcoholic and HCV-related cirrhosis.

Prognostic value of early measurements of portal pressure in acute variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Variceal bleeding is the most important complication of portal hypertension. However, the relationship between the increase in portal pressure and the outcome of variceal bleeding has not been well defined.

METHODS

We measured the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of 65 cirrhotic patients with acute variceal hemorrhage, early after admission (20.6 +/- 15.6 hours).

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients had a poor evolution (failure to control bleeding or early variceal rebleeding), and 42 had an uneventful evolution. The only variable associated with outcome was the HVPG, which was higher in patients with a poor evolution (23.7 +/- 6.1 vs. 19.2 +/- 3.3 mm Hg; P < 0.0004). This was confirmed by multivariate analysis. HVPG was >/=20 mm Hg in 19 of 23 patients with poor evolution vs. 12 of 42 patients with uneventful evolution (P < 0.0001). An initial HVPG of >/=20 mm Hg was associated with a significantly longer intensive care unit stay (7 +/- 5 vs. 4 +/- 2 days; P < 0.02), longer hospital stay (19 +/- 10 vs. 14 +/- 6 days; P < 0.02), greater transfusion requirements (9.0 +/- 7.7 vs. 4.7 +/- 3.2 UU; P < 0.007), and a worse actuarial probability of survival (1-year mortality, 64% vs. 20%; P < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Early measurement of HVPG in cirrhotic patients during acute variceal bleeding provides useful prognostic information on the evolution of the bleeding episode and long-term survival.

Decision-analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus distal splenorenal shunt for portal hypertension

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and surgical distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) are treatments for complications of portal hypertension. TIPS is widely used because it is relatively easy to place. Because TIPS may malfunction over time, it is unclear whether TIPS is superior to DSRS in patients with Child's class A cirrhosis who enjoy a longer survival. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of TIPS to DSRS for portal hypertension in Child's class A cirrhosis. A decision analysis model was used to evaluate the number of procedures, life expectancy, and costs over the first 2 years in patients with Child's class A cirrhosis who underwent a TIPS or DSRS. Patients who received TIPS survived 1.96 years, required 1.7 procedures, and incurred $41,685 in costs. Patients who underwent a DSRS survived 1.86 years, required 1.0 procedure, and incurred $26,951 in costs. The cost-effectiveness of TIPS compared with DSRS was $147,340 per life-year saved. Adjusting the rate of TIPS dysfunction, 1-year survival, or the number of ultrasounds to detect TIPS dysfunction did not change the results. In patients with Child's class A cirrhosis, DSRS is a more cost-effective treatment than TIPS. Until the results of a randomized controlled trial comparing TIPS with DSRS are available, TIPS should be regarded as experimental and prohibitively expensive in Child's class A cirrhosis.

Portal hypertension

Cirrhosis represents the end stage of any chronic liver disease. Two major syndromes result from cirrhosis: portal hypertension and hepatic insufficiency. Additionally, vasodilatation and the hyperdynamic circulation are hemodynamic abnormalities typical of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Complications of cirrhosis occur as a consequence of a combination of these factors. Gastroesophageal varices result almost solely from portal hypertension, although the hyperdynamic circulation contributes to variceal growth and hemorrhage. Ascites results from sinusoidal hypertension and sodium retention, which is, in turn, secondary to vasodilatation and activation of neurohumoral systems. Hyponatremia and the hepatorenal syndrome result from water retention and renal vasoconstriction, respectively, both of which are also consequences of peripheral vasodilatation. Vasodilatation that occurs in the pulmonary circulation leads to the hepatopulmonary syndrome. Another complication of cirrhosis, portosystemic encephalopathy, is a consequence of both portal hypertension (shunting of blood through portosystemic collaterals) and hepatic insufficiency. This paper reviews the recent advances in the pathophysiology and management of the complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: short-term and long-term effects on hepatic and systemic hemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis

The aim of this prospective, nonrandomized study was to assess the short- and long-term effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on hepatic and systemic hemodynamics and on gastroesophageal collateral flow in patients with cirrhosis and failure of chronic sclerotherapy. Cardiac output (CO), free and wedged pulmonary artery pressure (FPAP and WPAP), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), azygos venous blood flow (AzVBF), and the relative (portal minus vena cava) pressure in the portal vein (rel.PP) were determined immediately before, 30 minutes, 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after TIPS implantation in 21 patients with alcoholic and biliary cirrhosis with repeated bleeding from esophageal varices despite chronic sclerotherapy. TIPS was inserted when patients were in a stable hemodynamic condition. Palmaz stents were dilated to a 10-mm to 14-mm diameter until gastroesophageal collaterals were no longer visible on direct splenoportography. Relative portal pressure decreased from 21 +/- 5 mm Hg to 11 +/- 5 mm Hg 30 minutes after the procedure (P <.001). CO increased from 7.1 +/- 1.5 L/min at baseline to 8.9 +/- 2.0 L/min (P <.005) at 30 minutes, 8.2 +/- 2.0 L/min (P <. 01) at 1 week, and 8.0 +/- 2.0 L/min (P <.01) at 3 months after TIPS, and returned to 7.2 +/- 1.3 L/min (ns) after 1 year. Before TIPS, SVR was 990 +/- 285 dyne. sec. cm-5 and decreased to 856 +/- 252 dyne. sec. cm-5 (P <.05) and 866 +/- 267 dyne. sec. cm-5 (P <.05) at 30 minutes and 1 week after the procedure, and increased again to 903 +/- 208 dyne. sec. cm-5 (ns) and 1,016 +/- 260 dyne. sec. cm-5 (ns) at 3 months and 1 year, respectively. AzVBF continuously decreased from 474 +/- 138 mL/min before TIPS to 335 +/- 116 mL/min, 289 +/- 147 mL/min, 318 +/- 157 mL/min, and 250 +/- 104 mL/min (all P <.005) at 30 minutes, 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after TIPS. Portal decompression after TIPS is associated with a significant increase of CO for at least 3 months, which is only partly explained by a transient decrease of SVR. After 1 year, CO had returned to baseline levels. Despite an immediate decrease in portal pressure, the reduction of blood flow through gastroesophageal collaterals is delayed and not complete before 1 year after TIPS. In contrast to previous short-term observations, TIPS does not seem to cause long-term aggravation of the hyperkinetic circulation in patients with cirrhosis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in hepatorenal syndrome: effects on renal function and vasoactive systems

Little information exists on the effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in the management of cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). The current study was aimed to prospectively evaluate the effects of TIPS on renal function and vasoactive systems in patients with type I HRS. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (inulin clearance), renal plasma flow (RPF) (para-aminohippurate clearance), plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone (ALDO), norepinephrine (NE), and endothelin (ET) were determined in baseline conditions and at different time intervals after TIPS in 7 patients with type I HRS. TIPS induced a marked reduction of portal pressure gradient (PPG) (20 +/- 1 to 10 +/- 1 mm Hg; P < .05). Renal function improved in 6 of the 7 patients. Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) decreased from 5 +/- 0.8 and 109 +/- 7 to 1.8 +/- 0.4 mg/dL and 56 +/- 11 mg/dL, respectively (P < .05 for both), and GFR and RPF increased from 9 +/- 4 and 103 +/- 33 to 27 +/- 7 mL/min and 233 +/- 40 mL/min, respectively (P < .05 for both), 30 days after TIPS. These beneficial effects on renal function were associated with a significant (P < .05) reduction of PRA (18 +/- 5 to 3 +/- 1 ng/mL x h), ALDO (279 +/- 58 to 99 +/- 56 ng/dL), and NE (1,257 +/- 187 to 612 +/- 197 pg/mL). ET did not change significantly (28 +/- 8 to 27 +/- 11 pg/mL). Mean survival was 4.7 +/- 2 months (0.3-17 months). Three patients remained alive more than 3 months after TIPS insertion. In conclusion, TIPS improves renal function and reduces the activity of the renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems in cirrhotic patients with type I HRS. Nevertheless, the efficacy of TIPS in the management of these patients should be confirmed in controlled investigations.