Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer

Evaluation of bladder dose in intensity-modulated radiation therapy of the prostate

Day-to-day variation in bladder and rectal filling affects prostate location and positioning accuracy. Systems using ultrasonic localization or gold seed placement are most often used to help correct for these changes. At some institutions, patients are instructed to empty their rectum and fill their bladders prior to treatment in an attempt to standardize the prostate location, displace small bowel out of the radiation field, and move some of the bladder wall away from the high-dose area. Although instructed to come to treatment with a full bladder, it is presumed that there is variability in bladder filling each day of treatment, depending on the amount of fluids consumed and time to treatment. We have reviewed daily bladder volumes on a subset of 5 prostate patients, all of them prescribed to receive 7560 cGy in 42 fractions, and have evaluated the dosimetric consequences of bladder volume changes from full to two-third or one-third filling. All of these patients' positions were verified daily with ultrasonic localization. Those measurements have been used to help analyze the actual treated bladder volumes for comparison with the treatment plan. We find that, in general, maximum filling only occurred on the initial simulation/image acquisition day and was typically smaller on all the following treatment days. Based on our dose-volume model, we estimate that average bladder daily doses were 8-50% higher than predicted by the initial intensity-modulation radiation therapy (IMRT) plan.

Approaching clinical problems in prostate cancer radiotherapy using the number needed to treat (NNT) technique

The goals of this article are to review the application of the number needed to treat (NNT) concept to selected clinical problems in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Particular emphasis will be placed on (1) comparison of radiotherapy with other treatment options for early-stage disease, (2) the role of hormone therapy in addition to radiotherapy over a spectrum of disease presentation, and (3) systematic comparison of adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in the post-prostatectomy setting. Limitations of NNT calculations based on non-randomized comparisons also are discussed.

Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated, conformal, and four-field pelvic radiotherapy boost plans for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective planning study

Purpose

To evaluate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) as an alternative to conformal radiotherapy (CRT) or 4-field box boost (4FB) in women with gynecologic malignancies who are unsuitable for brachytherapy for technical or medical reasons.

Methods

Dosimetric and toxicity information was analyzed for 12 patients with cervical (8), endometrial (2) or vaginal (2) cancer previously treated with external beam pelvic radiotherapy and a CRT boost. Optimized IMRT boost treatment plans were then developed for each of the 12 patients and compared to CRT and 4FB plans. The plans were compared in terms of dose conformality and critical normal tissue avoidance.

Results

The median planning target volume (PTV) was 151 cm³ (range 58–512 cm³). The median overlap of the contoured rectum with the PTV was 15 (1–56) %, and 11 (4–35) % for the bladder. Two of the 12 patients, both with large PTVs and large overlap of the contoured rectum and PTV, developed grade 3 rectal bleeding. The dose conformity was significantly improved with IMRT over CRT and 4FB (p ≤ 0.001 for both). IMRT also yielded an overall improvement in the rectal and bladder dose-volume distributions relative to CRT and 4FB. The volume of rectum that received the highest doses (>66% of the prescription) was reduced by 22% (p < 0.001) with IMRT relative to 4FB, and the bladder volume was reduced by 19% (p < 0.001). This was at the expense of an increase in the volume of these organs receiving doses in the lowest range (<33%).

Conclusion

These results indicate that IMRT can improve target coverage and reduce dose to critical structures in gynecologic patients receiving an external beam radiotherapy boost. This dosimetric advantage will be integrated with other patient and treatment-specific factors, particularly internal tumor movement during fractionated radiotherapy, in the context of a future image-guided radiation therapy study.

Recommendations for treatment with IMRT for prostate and head-neck cancer. Axencia de Avaliación de Tecnoloxías Sanitarias de Galicia

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is an advanced form of radiotherapy for the treatment of cancer that allows, on one hand, to administer a more homogeneous dose to the patients on the volume to irradiate (which would increase the local control of the disease), and on the other hand, to diminish the toxicity in the organs at risk. This type of treatment is based on imaging techniques, on computer dosimetry programs, and on more precise immobilization accessories. Before delivering IMRT it is necessary to establish a protocol that includes the different phases of the treatment process, that is, the obtaining of anatomical data, beam definition, calculation, dose distribution, and treatment performance and control. In this article we present the basic standards for the IMRT treatment for prostate and head-neck cancer agreed upon a consensus meeting. The follow-up of the recommendations settled down in this document will help in the establishment of a standardized clinical practice -assuring the quality- and a better evaluation of the results of the clinical intervention.

Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Aims and background

The development and use of new radiotherapy techniques, especially 3D conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy, has allowed the safe application of high doses of external beam radiotherapy without increasing toxicity. The aim of this analysis was to describe the acute and when possible late toxicity and the feasibility on using intensity-modulated radiotherapy into our routine work.

Patients and methods

From June 2003 to December 2004, 60 patients with prostate cancer underwent high dose (80 Gy) radiotherapy treatment with intensity-modulated radiotherapy at the University of Florence. In the current analysis, we included patients without clinical or radiographic evidence of distant disease at the time of the first evaluation in the radiotherapy unit.

Results

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatments were delivered successfully without any interruption or technical problem. High-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy was well tolerated acutely. Four patients (10%) developed grade 1 late rectal toxicity after completion of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 8 patients (20%) developed grade 1 late urinary symptoms.

Conclusions

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is the approach of choice for high-dose radiotherapy delivery. No patient had severe toxicity (grade 3) despite the high dose delivered. From a cost-benefit point of view, our experience shows that delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy requires only minor corrections to the ordinary activity schedule.

Dose-Response in Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Results of the Dutch Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing 68 Gy of Radiotherapy With 78 Gy

Purpose

To determine whether a dose of 78 Gy improves outcome compared with a conventional dose of 68 Gy for prostate cancer patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Patients and Methods

Between June 1997 and February 2003, stage T1b-4 prostate cancer patients were enrolled onto a multicenter randomized trial comparing 68 Gy with 78 Gy. Patients were stratified by institution, age, (neo)adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT), and treatment group. Four treatment groups (with specific radiation volumes) were defined based on the probability of seminal vesicle involvement. The primary end point was freedom from failure (FFF). Failure was defined as clinical failure or biochemical failure, according to the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology definition. Other end points were freedom from clinical failure (FFCF), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

Results

Median follow-up time was 51 months. Of the 669 enrolled patients, 664 were included in the analysis. HT was prescribed for 143 patients. FFF was significantly better in the 78-Gy arm compared with the 68-Gy arm (5-year FFF rate, 64% v 54%, respectively), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.74 (P = .02). No significant differences in FFCF or OS were seen between the treatment arms. There was no difference in late genitourinary toxicity of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer grade 2 or more and a slightly higher nonsignificant incidence of late gastrointestinal toxicity of grade 2 or more.

Conclusion

This multicenter randomized trial shows a significantly improved FFF in prostate cancer patients treated with a higher dose of radiotherapy.

Effect of bladder filling on doses to prostate and organs at risk: a treatment planning study

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate effects of bladder filling on dose–volume distributions for bladder, rectum, planning target volume (PTV), and prostate in radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Patients (n=21) were scanned with a full bladder, and after 1 hour, having been allowed to void, with an empty bladder. Radiotherapy plans were generated using a four‐field box technique and dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions. First, plans obtained for full‐ and empty‐bladder scans were compared. Second, situations in which a patient was planned on full bladder but was treated on empty bladder, and vice versa, were simulated, assuming that patients were aligned to external tattoos. Doses to the prostate [equivalent uniform dose (EUD)], bladder and rectum [effective dose (Deff)], and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were compared. Dose to the small bowel was examined. Mean bladder volume was 354.3 cm³ when full and 118.2 cm³ when empty. Median prostate EUD was 70 Gy for plans based on full‐ and empty‐bladder scans alike. The median rectal Deff was 55.6 Gy for full‐bladder anatomy and 56.8 Gy for empty‐bladder anatomy, and the corresponding bladder Deff was 29.0 Gy and 49.3 Gy respectively. In 1 patient, part of the small bowel (7.5 cm³) received more than 50 Gy with full‐bladder anatomy, and in 6 patients, part (2.5 cm3−30 cm3) received more than 50 Gy with empty‐bladder anatomy. Bladder filling had no significant impact on prostate EUD or rectal Deff. A minimal volume of the small bowel received more than 50 Gy in both groups, which is below dose tolerance. The bladder Deff was higher with empty‐bladder anatomy; however, the predicted complication rates were clinically insignificant. When the multileaf collimator pattern was applied in reverse, substantial underdosing of the planning target volume (PTV) was observed, particularly for patients with prostate shifts in excess of 0.5 cm in any one direction. However, the prostate shifts showed no correlation with bladder filling, and therefore the PTV underdosing also cannot be related to bladder filling. For some patients, bladder dose–volume constraints were not fulfilled in the worst‐case scenario—that is, when a patient planned with full bladder consistently arrived for treatment with an empty bladder.

PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Kn, 87.53.Tf

Adverse effect of a distended rectum in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The retrospective planning study for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of prostate cancer evaluated whether proximal rectum and supra-anal rectum/anal canal should be delineated as separated organs-at-risk (OARs) to achieve optimal dose distributions to the anorectal region.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For 10 patients with localized prostate cancer IMRT plans were generated with the rectum and anal canal as separated OARs (Rec-sep) and as one single OAR (Rec-tot). Two different treatment planning systems (TPS) were utilized. Influence on dose distributions to target and OARs was analyzed.

RESULTS

Results from both TPS showed significantly increased doses to the distal rectum/anal canal for plans Rec-tot compared with Rec-sep in case of a distended rectum in the planning CT study: doses were increased by up to mean 31% (P = 0.02) and 18% (P = 0.03), respectively, in both TPS. For the patient with the largest rectum, the maximum dose increase was 61%. No significant differences in doses to target, bladder, femoral head and proximal rectum were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with a distended rectum in the planning CT, delineation of separated OARs for proximal rectum and distal rectum/anal canal resulted in superior dose distributions to the anorectal region and therefore, we recommend this as standard procedure for IMRT planning of prostate cancer.

Radiation therapy for prostate cancer and erectile (dys)function: the role of imaging

Incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) after radiotherapy reported in the literature varies from 7 to 72% after external-beam radiotherapy to 5-51% after brachytherapy. Most of these studies are retrospective, the definition of ED is variable and sexual functioning is frequently assessed by asking only one question. Already in the 1980's it was suggested that post-radiation ED was attributable to vascular damage. The most reliable method to assess vasculogenic ED is the use of the Doppler ultrasound. More recently, many studies have assessed the relationship between radiation dose and volume of the penile bulb and post-radiation ED, though the outcome is controversial. The penile structures and the neurovascular bundles are best seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Therefore the use of a computer tomography scan/MRI image fusion can result in reducing the planning target volume and consequently the radiation dose to the penile bulb and bodies. If radiation induces vascular damage that causes ED, any means of reducing the dose to the pelvic vascular structures would likely decrease ED, therefore new radiation techniques such as the intensity modulated radiation therapy or the implant of fiducial markers can help decrease the margins and therefore ED.

Sexual function after external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: What do we know?

Quality of life in general and sexual functioning in particular have become very important in cancer patients. Due to modern surgical techniques, improved quality of drugs for chemotherapy and very modern radiation techniques, more patients can be successfully treated without largely compromising sexual functioning. One can assume that because of the life-threatening nature of cancer, sexual activity is not important to patients and their partners, but this is not true. Prostate cancer has become the most common non-skin malignant neoplasm in older men in Western countries. In this paper, we discuss the various methods used to evaluate erectile and sexual dysfunction and the definition of potency. Data on the etiology of erectile dysfunction after external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer is reviewed, and the literature is been summarized. Patients should be offered sexual counseling and informed about the availability of effective treatments for erectile dysfunction, such as sildenafil, intracavernosal injection, and vacuum devices. Cancer affects quality of life and sexual function. The challenge for oncologists is to address this with compassion.

[Evaluation of setup error and adequate setup margins in patients with prostate cancer treated by IMRT and fixed in the prone position using a set of immobilization devices]

PURPOSE

Positional reproducibility in patients with prostate cancer fixed in the prone position with a set of immobilization devices for external-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was evaluated. In addition, the adequacy of our positional error reduction strategy and current planning target volume (PTV) margins was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Systematic error was corrected by the positional correction that we executed at the first stage of irradiation. The setup margin that we had calculated was 1.1 mm in the L-R direction, 1.3 mm in the A-P direction, and 2.7 mm in the C-C direction.

CONCLUSION

We determined that the effectiveness of the method of correcting the error margin and the setup accuracy of the fixed method were well maintained.

Comparison of treatment volumes and techniques in prostate cancer radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

To compare dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for 3 target volumes (group 1, prostate + seminal vesicles + pelvic lymph nodes; group 2, prostate + seminal vesicles; group 3, prostate only) to determine the difference in dose to normal structures (rectum, bladder, and femoral heads) while controlling for target dose using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) versus intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS

Ten patients with localized prostate cancer were randomly selected. 3DCRT and IMRT planning were done to deliver 75.6 Gy to the prostate, 50.4 Gy to the pelvic nodes, and 55.8 Gy to the seminal vesicles at a standard fractionation of 1.8 Gy. An additional plan delivering 75.6 Gy to the seminal vesicles using IMRT was run. DVHs were compared for 3DCRT and IMRT.

RESULTS

In all 3 groups, the percent rectum receiving > or =70 Gy, > or =60 Gy, and > or =40 Gy was significantly less for IMRT than for 3DCRT. Increasing target volumes, as necessary for pelvic nodal irradiation, overall did not result in higher rectal doses for IMRT. With 3DCRT, however, larger target volumes did increase the amount of rectum irradiated. Similar results were obtained for the femoral heads whereas results for the bladder were mixed.

CONCLUSION

When compared with 3DCRT, IMRT delivered equivalent or higher doses to the target volume with greater sparing of critical organs. Because dose-volume parameters have been shown to relate to toxicity, IMRT would appear to be the favored technique for prostate cancer radiation, particularly with regard to nodal treatment.

Evaluation of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) technologies and their impact on the outcomes of hypofractionated prostate cancer treatments: A radiobiologic analysis

PURPOSE

To quantify the mitigation of geometric uncertainties achieved with the application of various patient setup techniques during the delivery of hypofractionated prostate cancer treatments, using tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five prostate cancer patients with approximately 16 treatment CT studies, taken during the course of their radiation therapy (77 total), were analyzed. All patients were planned twice with an 18 MV six-field conformal technique, with 10- and 5-mm margin sizes, with various hypofractionation schedules (5 to 35 fractions). Subsequently, four clinically relevant patient setup techniques (laser guided and image guided) were simulated to deliver such schedules.

RESULTS

As hypothesized, the impact of geometric uncertainties on clinical outcomes increased with more hypofractionated schedules. However, the absolute gain in TCP due to hypofractionation (up to 21.8% increase) was significantly higher compared with the losses due to geometric uncertainties (up to 8.6% decrease).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that, although the impact of geometric uncertainties on the treatment outcomes increases as the number of fractions decrease, the reduction in TCP due to the uncertainties does not significantly offset the expected theoretical gain in TCP by hypofractionation.

Improvement of radiotherapy treatment delivery accuracy using an electronic portal imaging device

Reliable application of advanced external beam techniques for the treatment of patients with cancer, such as intensity modulated radiotherapy, requires an adequate quality assurance programme for the verification of the dose delivery. Accurate patient positioning is mandatory because of the steep dose gradients outside the tumour volume. Owing to the increased complexity of the treatment planning and delivery techniques, verification of the dose delivery before and during the actual patient treatment is equally important. For this purpose, a quality assurance programme has been established in our clinic that is primarily based on measurements with electronic portal imaging devices. To minimise systematic set-up errors, the patient positioning is measured in the first few treatment fractions and a set-up correction is applied in the subsequent ones. Before the first treatment fraction, portal dose measurements are performed for each treatment field with the electronic portal imaging device to verify that the planned fluence distribution is correctly delivered at the treatment unit. Dosimetric measurements are also performed during patient treatment to derive the actually delivered fluence maps. By combining this information with knowledge on the patient set-up, the delivered 3-D dose distribution to both the tumour and sensitive organs may be assessed. However, for the highest accuracy, exact knowledge on the (internal) patient geometry during treatment, e.g. using a cone-beam CT, is required.

Intensity-modulated versus conventional pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Analysis of acute toxicity

OBJECTIVES

To provide a single-institution analysis of the influence of pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT) on acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity.

METHODS

The records of 610 consecutive patients with prostate cancer receiving RT were reviewed. Of these 610 patients, 49 had received a prostate boost preceded by pelvic RT (PRT), 15 intensity-modulated PRT (IM-PRT), and 34 four-field PRT (4F-PRT). The dosimetric endpoints for the bladder, rectum, and target for the PRT plans were compared using the paired t test; similar dosimetric analyses were done for the composite plans. Acute GU and GI toxicity were compared using the chi-square test. Ordered logit regression analyses were performed using all major treatment factors as covariates.

RESULTS

The bladder and rectum dosimetric endpoints were improved for IM-PRT compared with 4F-PRT for the PRT portion of the treatment plan (P = 0.06 and P = 0.03, respectively) and for the composite treatment plan (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively), at the expense of greater target inhomogeneity in the PRT portion of the treatment plan (P < 0.01). GU toxicity was significantly lower in the IM-PRT group (P < 0.001), and GI toxicity was similar in both groups (P = 0.637). The regression analyses showed that intensity-modulated RT for the pelvic portion of treatment was the only factor significantly predicting for GU toxicity (P = 0.05); no major treatment factor reached significance in predicting GI toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 4F-PRT, the use of IM-PRT improved dosimetric outcomes, was not associated with a reduction in acute GI toxicity, and was associated with a reduction in acute GU toxicity in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Radiotherapeutic techniques for prostate cancer, dose escalation and brachytherapy

There is evidence to confirm a dose-response relationship in prostate cancer. The relative benefit is dependent on the clinical prognostic risk factors (T stage, Gleason score and presenting prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) being more favourable for intermediate-risk patients. Refinement of prognostic groups and clinical threshold parameters is ongoing. Escalation of dose in prostate radiotherapy using conventional techniques is limited by rectal tolerance. Substantial advances have been made in radiotherapy practice, such as the development of conformal radiotherapy (CFRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Randomised data support the value of CFRT in reducing rectal toxicity. IMRT can permit higher-dose escalation while still respecting known rectal tolerance thresholds. Brachytherapy is a recognised alternative for low-risk prostate cancer subgroups. New radiotherapeutic strategies for prostate cancer include pelvic nodal irradiation, exploiting the presumed low alpha/beta ratio in prostate cancer for hypofractionation and combining external beam with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boosts. New image-guided methodologies will enhance the therapeutic ratio of any radiotherapy technique or dose escalation programme by enabling more reliable and accurate treatment delivery for improved patient outcomes.

Cancer of the prostate

Prostate carcinoma, with about 190,000 new cases occurring each year (15% of all cancers in men), is the most frequent cancer among men in northern and western Europe. Causes of the disease are essentially unknown, although hormonal factors are involved, and diet may exert an indirect influence; some genes, potentially involved in hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) have been identified. A suspect of prostate cancer may derive from elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) finding. For a definitive diagnosis, however, a positive prostate biopsy is requested. Treatment strategy is defined according to initial PSA stage, and grade of the disease and age and general conditions of the patient. In localized disease, watchful waiting is indicated as primary option in patients with well or moderately differentiated tumours and a life expectancy <10 years, while radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy (with or without hormone-therapy) could be appropriate choices in the remaining cases. Hormone-therapy is the treatment of choice, combined with radiotherapy, for locally advanced or bulky disease and is effective, but not curative, in 80-85% of the cases of advanced disease. Patients who develop a hormone-refractory prostate cancer disease (HRPC) have to be evaluated for chemotherapy because of the recent demonstration of improved overall survival (2-2.5 months) and quality of life with docetaxel in more than 1,600 cases.

Systematic review of the effect of radiation dose on tumor control and morbidity in the treatment of prostate cancer by 3D-CRT

PURPOSE

A higher radiation dose is believed to result in a larger probability of tumor control and a higher risk of side effects. To make an evidence-based choice of dose, the relation between dose and outcome needs to be known. This study focuses on the dose-response relation for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review was carried out on the literature from 1990 to 2003. From the selected studies, the radiation dose, the associated 5-year survival, 5-year bNED (biochemical no evidence of disease), acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) morbidity Grade 2 or more, and sexual dysfunction were extracted. With logistic regression models, the relation between dose and outcome was described.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies met our criteria, describing 87 subgroups and involving up to 3000 patients per outcome measure. Between the (equivalent) dose of 70 and 80 Gy, various models estimated an increase in 5-year survival (ranging from 10% to 11%), 5-year bNED for low-risk patients (5-7%), late GI complications (12-16%), late GU complications (8-10%), and erectile dysfunction (19-24%). Only for the overall 5-year bNED, results were inconclusive (range, 0-18%).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest a relationship between dose and outcome measures, including survival. However, the strength of these conclusions is limited by the sometimes small number of studies, the incompleteness of the data, and above all, the correlational nature of the data. Unambiguous proof for the dose-response relationships can, therefore, only be obtained by conducting randomized trials.

Acute genitourinary toxicity after high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: Second analysis to determine the correlation between the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy and the severity of acute genitourinary toxicity

PURPOSE

We have been treating localized prostate cancer with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) at our institution. We recently reported the existence of a correlation between the severity of acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity and the urethral radiation dose in HDR brachytherapy by using different fractionation schema. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the urethral dose in the development of acute GU toxicity more closely than in previous studies. For this purpose, we conducted an analysis of patients who had undergone HDR brachytherapy with a fixed fractionation schema combined with hypofractionated EBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Among the patients with localized prostate cancer who were treated by 192-iridium HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT at Gunma University Hospital between August 2000 and November 2004, we analyzed 67 patients who were treated by HDR brachytherapy with the fractionation schema of 9 Gy x two times combined with hypofractionated EBRT. Hypofractionated EBRT was administered at a fraction dose of 3 Gy three times weekly, and a total dose of 51 Gy was delivered to the prostate gland and seminal vesicles using the four-field technique. No elective pelvic irradiation was performed. After the completion of EBRT, all the patients additionally received transrectal ultrasonography-guided HDR brachytherapy. The planning target volume was defined as the prostate gland with a 5-mm margin all around, and the planning was conducted based on computed tomography images. The tumor stage was T1c in 13 patients, T2 in 31 patients, and T3 in 23 patients. The Gleason score was 2-6 in 12 patients, 7 in 34 patients, and 8-10 in 21 patients. Androgen ablation was performed in all the patients. The median follow-up duration was 11 months (range 3-24 months). The toxicities were graded based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity criteria.

RESULTS

The main symptoms of acute GU toxicity were dysuria and increase in the urinary frequency or nocturia. The grade distribution of acute GU toxicity in the patients was as follows: Grade 0-1, 42 patients (63%); Grade 2-3, 25 patients (37%). The urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy was determined using the following dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters: V30 (percentage of the urethral volume receiving 30% of the prescribed radiation dose), V80, V90, V100, V110, V120, V130, and V150. In addition, the D5 (dose covering 5% of the urethral volume), D10, D20, and D50 of the urethra were also estimated. The V30-V150 values in the patients with Grade 2-3 acute GU toxicity were significantly higher than those in patients with Grade 0-1 toxicity. The D10 and D20, but not D5 and D50, values were also significantly higher in the patients with Grade 2-3 acute GU toxicity than in those with Grade 0-1 toxicity. Regarding the influence of the number of needles implanted, there was no correlation between the number of needles implanted and the severity of acute GU toxicity or the V30-V150 values and D5-D50 values.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT is feasible for localized prostate cancer, when considered from the viewpoint of acute toxicity. However, because the urethral dose was closely associated with the grade of severity of the acute GU toxicity, the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy must be kept low to reduce the severity of acute GU toxicity.

Acute genitourinary toxicity after high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: Correlation between the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy and the severity of acute genitourinary toxicity

PURPOSE

Several investigations have revealed that the alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer is atypically low, and that hypofractionation or high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy regimens using appropriate radiation doses may be expected to yield tumor control and late sequelae rates that are better or at least as favorable as those achieved with conventional radiation therapy. In this setting, we attempted treating localized prostate cancer patients with HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using this approach, with special emphasis on the relationship between the severity of acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity and the urethral dose calculated from the dose-volume histogram (DVH) of HDR brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between September 2000 and December 2003, 70 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated by iridium-192 HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT at the Gunma University Hospital. Hypofractionated EBRT was administered in fraction doses of 3 Gy, three times per week; a total dose of 51 Gy was delivered to the prostate gland and the seminal vesicles using the four-field technique. No elective pelvic irradiation was performed. After the completion of EBRT, all the patients additionally received transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided HDR brachytherapy. The fraction size and the number of fractions in HDR brachytherapy were prospectively changed, whereas the total radiation dose for EBRT was fixed at 51 Gy. The fractionation in HDR brachytherapy was as follows: 5 Gy x 5, 7 Gy x 3, 9 Gy x 2, administered twice per day, although the biologic effective dose (BED) for HDR brachytherapy combined with EBRT, assuming that the alpha/beta ratio is 3, was almost equal to 138 in each fractionation group. The planning target volume was defined as the prostate gland with 5-mm margin all around, and the planning was conducted based on computed tomography images. The number of patients in each fractionation group was as follows: 13 in the 5-Gy group; 19 in the 7-Gy group, and 38 in the 9-Gy group. The tumor stage was T1 in 10 patients, T2 in 36 patients, and T3 in 24 patients. The Gleason score was 2-6 in 11 patients, 7 in 34 patients, and 8-10 in 25 patients. Androgen ablation was performed in all the patients. The median follow-up duration was 14 months (range 3-42 months). The toxicities were graded based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity criteria.

RESULTS

The main symptoms of acute GU toxicity were dysuria and increase in urinary frequency or nocturia. The grade distribution of acute GU toxicity in the patients was as follows: Grade 0-1, 39 patients (56%), and Grade 2-4, 31 patients (44%). One patient who developed acute urinary obstruction was classified as having Grade 4 toxicity. Comparison of the distribution of the grade of acute GU toxicity among the different fractionation groups revealed no statistically significant differences among the groups. The urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy was evaluated using the following DVH parameters: V30 (percentage of the urethral volume receiving 30% of the prescribed radiation dose), V80, V90, V100, V110, V120, V130, and V150. The V30-110 values in the patients with Grade 2-4 acute GU toxicity were significantly higher than those in patients with Grade 0-1 toxicity. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the V120-150 values between patients with Grade 0-1 and Grade 2-4 toxicity. Regarding the influence of the number of needles implanted for the radiation therapy, patients with 11 needles or less showed a significantly higher incidence of Grade 2-4 acute GU toxicity compared with those with 12 needles or more (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT is feasible for localized prostate cancer when considered from the viewpoint of acute toxicity. Increase in the fraction dose or reduction in the number of fractions in HDR brachytherapy did not affect the severity of acute GU toxicity, and the volume of urethra receiving an equal or lower radiation dose than the prescribed dose was more closely associated with the grade severity of acute GU toxicity than that receiving a higher than the prescribed dose.

Long-term androgen deprivation increases Grade 2 and higher late morbidity in prostate cancer patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To determine whether the use of androgen deprivation (AD) increases late morbidity when combined with high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between May 1989 and November 1998, 1,204 patients were treated for prostate cancer with 3D-CRT to a median dose of 74 Gy. Patients were evaluated every 3-6 months. No AD was given to 945 patients, whereas 140 and 119 patients, respectively, received short-term AD (STAD; < or =6 months) and long-term AD (LTAD; > 6 months). Radiation morbidity was graded according to the Fox Chase modification of the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force late morbidity scale. Covariates in the multivariate analysis (MVA) included age, history of diabetes mellitus, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, T category, RT field size, total RT dose, use of rectal shielding, and AD status (no AD vs. STAD vs. LTAD).

RESULTS

The only independent predictor for Grade 2 or higher genitourinary (GU) morbidity in the MVA was the use of AD (p = 0.0065). The 5-year risk of Grade 2 or higher GU morbidity was 8% for no AD, 8% for STAD, and 14% for LTAD (p = 0.02). Independent predictors of Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal (GI) morbidity in the MVA were the use of AD (p = 0.0079), higher total radiation dose (p < 0.0001), the lack of a rectal shield (p = 0.0003), and older age (p = 0.0009). The 5-year actuarial risk of Grade 2 or higher GI morbidity was 17% for no AD vs. 18% for STAD and 26% for LTAD (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LTAD seems to significantly increase the risk of both GU and GI morbidity for patients treated with 3D-CRT.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: A point of view

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate (CaP) is treated by surgery or irradiation, or both, with the type of treatment determined largely by local resources and referral patterns. Although the techniques employed by surgeons and radiation oncologists have improved and the morbidities associated with each have declined, for neither are they negligible. Epidemiologic data suggest that between 81% and 85% of men with CaP die of other causes, and a recent survey of untreated men arrived at a similar figure of 83%. Clinical reports, based upon postoperative tumor volume and grade, show that at least 5% of prostatectomies are unnecessary but the extent to which the other 95% benefit from this procedure is unclear. Some sense of these benefits is provided by a randomized, prospective clinical trial that compared prostatectomy with watchful waiting, and found only a 6% gain in overall survival after 8 years. These data call into question the promotion of highly complex and expensive radiation therapy equipment for the treatment of CaP when the prospects for increased life expectancies are at best small and unlikely to be distinguishable from results achieved by surgery, conventional external beam, or radioactive-seed implants.

The efficacy of conventional external beam, three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, particle beam radiation, and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

Technologic advances in radiation treatment planning and delivery have generated popular interest in the different radiation therapy techniques used in treating patients with localized prostate cancer. Throughout the past decade, high-energy (> 4 MV) linear accelerators have largely replaced Cobalt machines in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) delivery. Conventional EBRT has been used to treat prostate cancer successfully since the 1950s. By switching to computed tomography-based planning, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy provides better relative conformality of dose than does conventional EBRT. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has further refined dose conformality by spreading the low-dose region to a larger volume. However, the potential long-term risks of larger volumes of normal tissues receiving low doses of radiation in IMRT are unknown. Particle-beam radiation therapy offers unique dose distributions and characteristics with higher relative biologic effect and linear energy transfer. Transperineal prostate brachytherapy offers the shortest treatment time with equivalent efficacy without significant risk of radiation exposure. The addition of hormonal therapy to radiation therapy has been shown to improve the outcome of radiation therapy.

Australia-wide comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy prostate plans*

The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of Australian centres to produce high-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) prostate plans, and to compare the planning parameters and resultant dose distributions. Five Australian radiation therapy departments were invited to participate. Each centre received an identical 5 mm-slice CT data set complete with contours of the prostate, seminal vesicles, rectum, bladder, femoral heads and body outline. The planning team was asked to produce the best plan possible, using published Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre prescription and dose constraints. Three centres submitted plans for evaluation. All plans covered the planning target volume adequately; however, only one plan met all the critical organ dose constraints. Although the planning parameters, beam arrangements and planning systems were different for each centre, the resulting plans were similar. In Australia, IMRT for prostate cancer is in the early stages of implementation, with routine use limited to a few centres.

Opacity transfer function optimization for volume-rendered computed tomography images of the prostate

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The selection of an opacity transfer function is essential for volume visualization. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the pelvis were used to determine an optimal opacity transfer function for use in radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

On sample datasets (a mathematical phantom and a patient pelvis CT scan), standard viewing orientations were selected to render the prostate. Opacity functions were selected via (1) trapezoidal manual selection, (2) trapezoidal semiautomatic selection, and (3) histogram volume-based selection. Using an established metric, the errors using each of these methods were computed.

RESULTS

Trapezoidal manual opacity function optimization resulted in visually acceptable images, but the errors were considerable (6.3-9.1 voxel units). These errors could be reduced with the use of trapezoidal semiautomatic selection (4.9-6.2 voxel units) or with histogram volume-based selection (4.8-7.9 voxel units). As each visualization algorithm focused on enhancing the boundary of the prostate using a different approach, the scene information was considerably different using the three techniques.

CONCLUSION

Improved volume visualization of soft tissue interfaces was achieved using automated optimal opacity function determination, compared with manual selection.

Evidence-based review of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: An ASTRO outcomes initiative

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the evidence to determine the efficacy and effectiveness of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for localized prostate cancer; provide a clear presentation of the key clinical outcome questions related to the use of 3D-CRT in the treatment of localized prostate cancer that may be answered by a formal literature review; and provide concise information on whether 3D-CRT improves the clinical outcomes in the treatment of localized prostate cancer compared with conventional RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a systematic review of the literature through a structured process developed by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology's Outcomes Committee that involved the creation of a multidisciplinary task force, development of clinical outcome questions, a formal literature review and data abstraction, data review, and outside peer review.

RESULTS

Seven key clinical questions were identified. The results and task force conclusions of the literature review for each question are reported.

CONCLUSION

The technological goals of reducing morbidity with 3D-CRT have been achieved. Randomized trials and follow-up of completed trials remain necessary to address these clinical outcomes specifically with regard to patient subsets and the use of hormonal therapy.

Radiation Injury to the Liver After Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Patients with Mesothelioma: An Unusual CT Appearance

OBJECTIVE

We sought to report the unusual distribution of radiation-induced injury to the liver in patients with mesothelioma after extrapleural pneumonectomy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

CONCLUSION

Abnormal hepatic enhancement after extrapleural pneumonectomy and IMRT is common in patients with mesothelioma. Knowledge of the early occurrence and typical location and appearance of IMRT-induced injury can be useful in preventing misinterpretation as metastatic disease or recurrent tumor.

Methodology for biologically-based treatment planning for combined low-dose-rate (permanent implant) and high-dose-rate (fractionated) treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The combination of permanent low-dose-rate interstitial implantation (LDR-BRT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) has been used in the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. While a high radiation dose is delivered to the prostate in this setting, the actual biologic dose equivalence compared to monotherapy is not commonly invoked. We describe methodology for obtaining the fused dosimetry of this combined treatment and assigning a dose equivalence which in turn can be used to develop desired normal tissue and target constraints for biologic-based treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients treated with this regimen initially receive an I-125 implant prescribed to 110 Gy followed, 2 months later, by 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions using intensity-modulated external beam radiotherapy. Ab initio methodology is described, using clinically derived biologic parameters (alpha, beta, potential doubling time for prostate cancer cells [T(pot)], cell loss factor), for calculating tumor control probability isoeffective doses for the combined LDR and conventional fraction EBRT treatment regimen. As no such formalism exists for assessing rectal or urethral toxicity, we make use of semi-empirical expressions proposed for describing urethral and rectal complication probabilities for specific treatment situations (LDR and fractionation, respectively) and utilize the notion of isoeffective dose to extend these results to combined LDR-EBRT regimens.

RESULTS

The application to treatment planning of the methodology described in this study is illustrated with real-patient data. We evaluate the effect of changing LDR and EBRT prescription doses (in a manner that remains isoeffective with 81 Gy EBRT alone or with 144 Gy LDR monotherapy) on rectal and urethral complication probabilities, and suggest that it should be possible to improve the therapeutic ratio by exploiting joint LDR-EBRT planning.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe new methodology for biologically based treatment planning for patients who receive combined low-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Using relevant mathematical tools, we demonstrate the feasibility of fusing dose distributions from each treatment for this combined regimen, which can then be expressed as isoeffective dose distributions. Based on this information, dose constraints for the rectum and urethra are described which could be used for planning such combination regimens.

Analysis of acute toxicity with use of transabdominal ultrasonography for prostate positioning during intensity-modulated radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the effects of the B-mode ultrasound acquisition and targeting (BAT) system for positioning of patients with prostate cancer receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy on acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity.

METHODS

The records of 50 consecutive patients treated using the BAT system were reviewed. Additionally, a comparison (no-BAT) group (ie, a group without a BAT study) treated in a similar manner was identified. The no-BAT group consisted of 49 patients treated immediately before the BAT group. For the two groups, the target definitions and dose prescriptions were identical, the treatment plan acceptance criteria were identical, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy was used for all patients. The daily BAT movements were charted in each of the three principal directions. Acute toxicity was scored for all patients according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group GI and GU acute toxicity scales.

RESULTS

The GU toxicity rates for the BAT versus no-BAT groups were grade 0 in 20% versus 14%; grade 1 in 38% versus 47%; grade 2 in 38% versus 39%; and grade 3 in 4% versus 0%, respectively (P = 0.284). The corresponding GI toxicity rates were grade 0 in 42% versus 27%; grade 1 in 28% versus 29%; and grade 2 in 30% versus 45% (P = 0.040). The incidence of GU and GI toxicity did not correlate with the directions or size of the BAT moves. Regression analysis revealed that for acute GI toxicity, the only variable reaching statistical significance was BAT use; no variable, including BAT use, reached statistical significance for acute GU toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the BAT system did not change the rate of acute GU toxicity but did reduce the rate of acute GI toxicity.

Impact of knee support and shape of tabletop on rectum and prostate position

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of different tabletops with or without a knee support on the position of the rectum, prostate, and bulb of the penis; and to evaluate the effect of these patient-positioning devices on treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 10 male volunteers, five MRI scans were made in four different positions: on a flat tabletop with knee support, on a flat tabletop without knee support, on a rounded tabletop with knee support, and on a rounded tabletop without knee support. The fifth scan was in the same position as the first. With image registration, the position differences of the rectum, prostate, and bulb of the penis were measured at several points in a sagittal plane through the central axis of the prostate. A planning target volume was generated from the delineated prostates with a margin of 10 mm in three dimensions. A three-field treatment plan with a prescribed dose of 78 Gy to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements point was automatically generated from each planning target volume. Dose-volume histograms were calculated for all rectal walls.

RESULTS

The shape of the tabletop did not affect the rectum and prostate position. Addition of a knee support shifted the anterior and posterior rectal walls dorsally. For the anterior rectal wall, the maximum dorsal shift was 9.9 mm (standard error of the mean [SEM] 1.7 mm) at the top of the prostate. For the posterior rectal wall, the maximum dorsal shift was 10.2 mm (SEM 1.5 mm) at the middle of the prostate. Therefore, the rectal filling was pushed caudally when a knee support was added. The knee support caused a rotation of the prostate around the left-right axis at the apex (i.e., a dorsal rotation) by 5.6 degrees (SEM 0.8 degrees ) and shifts in the caudal and dorsal directions of 2.6 mm (SEM 0.4 cm) and 1.4 mm (SEM 0.6 mm), respectively. The position of the bulb of the penis was not influenced by the use of a knee support or rounded tabletop. The volume of the rectal wall receiving the same dose range (e.g., 40-75 Gy) was reduced by 3.5% (SEM 0.9%) when a knee support was added. No significant differences were observed between the first and fifth scan (flat tabletop with knee support) for all measured points, thereby excluding time trends.

CONCLUSIONS

The rectum and prostate were significantly shifted dorsally by the use of a knee support. The rectum shifted more than the prostate, resulting in a dose benefit compared with irradiation without knee support. The shape of the tabletop did not influence the rectum or prostate position.

Radiotherapy in prostate cancer treatment

Prostate cancer is a complex disease, with many controversial aspects of management in almost all stages of disease. The natural history of this tumor is variable and is influenced by multiple prognostic factors. Radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy are standard treatment options for disease limited to the prostate. The data in literature does not provide clear- cut evidence for the superiority of any treatment. Neo- adjuvant or adjuvant hormonal therapy improves local control and survival in locally advanced disease. The patients treated with radiotherapy would have a relatively long life expectancy, not great risk factors for radiation toxicity and a preference for radiotherapy. The advantages of radiotherapy are that it has a significant potential for cure, it is well tolerated in the majority of men especially when the modern techniques of conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulated therapy are used and it is non-invasive therapeutic options with no anesthesia risk. Expected complications like radiation cystitis, impotence and proctitis are registered in about 1% of patients.

Combined modality treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for locally advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This is a retrospective review of our experience using high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

During the study period, we recommended external beam radiotherapy (45 Gy) and HDR boost (18 Gy in three fractions) combined with hormonal therapy (HT) for 2 months before and during radiotherapy to patients with at least one of the following risk features: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen>10, Gleason score (GS)>or=7, and clinical T3 disease. Additional HT for 2 years after radiotherapy was recommended for patients with GS>7. To patients whose risk of positive nodes exceeded 15%, we recommended whole pelvic radiotherapy. We administered HDR via single implant, and all fractions were given within 24h.

RESULTS

This report is based on our initial 64 patients treated with HDR boost. The median follow-up was 50 months (range 25-68 months). The 4-year estimates of overall and disease-free survival were 98% and 92%, respectively. One patient experienced late grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy is an effective means of delivering conformal prostate radiotherapy, and may be used with whole pelvic radiotherapy and HT.

Choix des contraintes et amélioration dosimétrique d’une radiothérapie conformationnelle du cancer de la prostate modulée en intensité pendant une partie du traitement

PURPOSE

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is based on a methodology called inverse planning. Starting from dosimetric objectives, constraints of optimization are fixed and given to the inverse planning system, which in turn calculates the modulated intensity to apply to each beam. Since the algorithms allow the constraints to be violated, the results of optimization may differ from the initial dosimetric objectives. Consequently, the user is compelled to adapt the choice of the constraints according to the type of modulation and until satisfactory results are found. The purpose of this work is to present our experience in the choice of these constraints for prostate cancer treatments, as we moved from conformal radiotherapy to IMRT. Treatments were performed with a Varian 23EX linac and calculations were realized with the Varian CadPlan-Helios planning system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The approach used for the first 12 patients treated at institut Curie with IMRT from June 2002 was analysed. The treatment always consisted of a combination of conformal radiotherapy with and without intensity modulation.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Results showed that, a larger fraction of the treatment performed with IMRT induced a better sparing of the organs at risk for the same homogeneous dose distribution to the target volume. Apart from the dose-volume constraint for the rectum, a fixed set of constraints, slightly more restrictive than the dosimetric objectives, could be used for all patients. Compared with conformal radiotherapy, the conformation factor for IMRT increased up to 16%. A specific study was undertaken in view of treatments completely performed with IMRT. The optimal technique consisted in performing separated IMRT plans for the two target volumes, the prostate volume and the prostate plus seminal vesicles volume respectively. Another satisfactory possibility was to define new constraints on two separated planning target volumes, prostate and seminal vesicles. This last approach is now routinely implemented for our IMRT patients.

Do differences in target volume definition in prostate cancer lead to clinically relevant differences in normal tissue toxicity?

PURPOSE

Many studies have described the quantitated differences between clinicians in target volume definition in prostate cancer. However, few studies have looked at the clinical effects of this. We aimed to assess the relevance and sequelae of such differences.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five experienced radiation oncologists were given the clinical details of 5 patients with early-stage prostate cancer and asked to define the clinical target volume, consisting of the prostate and seminal vesicles (CTV1) and the prostate alone (CTV2), on specified planning CT scans of the pelvis. Planning target volumes (PTV1) were generated by automatic expansion of the CTV1 by a 1-cm margin. The PTV2 was defined as the CTV2. The rectum and bladder were defined by a single experienced clinician for each plan without knowledge of the involved clinician marking the CTVs. The Pinnacle planning system was used to generate the plans, using four-field conformal radiotherapy, to deliver 64 Gy in 32 fractions to the PTV1 followed by a boost of 10 Gy to the PTV2 (Medical Research Council RT01 trial protocol). Dose-volume histograms were generated for the whole bladder and rectum for each plan and the volume receiving a specific percentage of the dose (e.g., V(90)) calculated for 74 Gy, followed by estimates of normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) for the bladder and rectum.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were found in the CTV1 and CTV2 and, consequently, the PTV1 among the 5 clinicians (p < 0.0005). Most of the discrepancies occurred at the delineation of the prostatic apex and seminal vesicles, with the smallest variance noted at the rectum-prostate and bladder-prostate interfaces. No statistically significant differences were found among clinicians for the rectal V(90), V(85), V(80), V(70), or V(50) or for the bladder V(85), V(80), V(70), or V(50). A difference was noted among consultants for the bladder V(90) (p = 0.015), although no correlation was found between the bladder V(90) and the size of the outlined volumes. No statistically significant differences were found between the estimates of bladder (p = 0.1) and rectal (p = 0.09) NTCPs.

CONCLUSION

The statistically significant difference in outlined volumes of the CTV1, CTV2, and PTV1 among the 5 clinicians is in keeping with the findings of previous studies. However, the interclinician variability did not result in clinically relevant outcomes with respect to the irradiated volume of rectum and bladder or NTCP. This may have been because the outlined areas in which interclinician differences were smallest (the rectal-prostate and prostate-bladder interfaces) are the areas that have the greatest effect on normal tissue toxicity. For the areas in which the interclinician correlation was lowest (the prostatic apex and distal seminal vesicles), the effects on normal tissue toxicity are smallest. The results of this study suggest that interclinician outlining differences in prostate cancer may have less clinical relevance than was previously thought.

Conformal radiotherapy of urinary bladder cancer

Recent advances in radiotherapy (RT) are founded on the enhanced tumour visualisation capabilities of new imaging modalities and the precise deposition of individualised radiation dose distributions made possible with the new systems for RT planning and delivery. These techniques have a large potential to also improve the results of RT of urinary bladder cancer. Major challenges to take full advantage of these advances in the management of bladder cancer are to control, and, as far as possible, reduce bladder motion, and to reliably account for the related intestine and rectum motion. If these obstacles are overcome, it should be possible in the near future to offer selected patients with muscle invading bladder cancer an organ-sparing, yet effective combined-modality treatment as an alternative to radical surgery.

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in the Management of Prostate Cancer

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is gaining widespread use in the radiation therapy community. Prostate cancer is the ideal target for IMRT due to the growing body of literature supporting dose escalation and normal tissue limitations. The need for dose escalation and the limits of conventional radiation therapy necessitate precise patient and prostate localization as well as advanced treatment delivery. The treatment of prostate cancer has been dramatically altered by the introduction of technology that can focus on the target while avoiding normal tissue. IMRT is evolving as the treatment of the future for prostate cancer.

A treatment planning study comparing HDR and AGIMRT for cervical cancer

The customization of brachytherapy dose distributions for gynecologic malignancies is limited by the spatial positioning of the applicators. We tested the hypothesis that applicator-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (AGIMRT) has the potential to deliver highly conformal dose distributions to cervical tumors, representing improvement over distributions obtained with intracavitary brachytherapy. A commercial three-dimensional (3-D) treatment planning system was used to create plans for ten cervical cancer patients treated at our institution. Dose distributions of conventionally designed high dose rate (HDR) plans were compared against those of AGIMRT. Tumor delineation was based on a previously published binary threshold technique, using image intensity on positron emission tomography (PET) scans. AGIMRT treatment schedules were designed using two fraction sizes: 6.5 Gy, to directly reproduce the HDR fractionation, and 1.8 Gy, to simulate traditional external beam fractionation. The average minimum tumor dose was significantly greater for the AGIMRT dose distributions than for the HDR distributions (64.2 Gy vs 33.6 Gy; p = 0.005). The mean percent tumor volume at the prescription dose was higher for the AGIMRT plans (90.0% vs 58.2%; p = 0.005). Using AGIMRT, the mean percent volume at the tolerance limit was decreased for the bladder (6.1% vs 16.6%; p = 0.047) but increased for the rectum (4.1% vs 2.2%; p = 0.646). Our study suggests that there may be conceptual and dosimetric advantages to replacing HDR with AGIMRT for patients with large-volume cervical tumors. This investigation is being expanded using sequential PET images to model tumor regression and compare brachytherapy and AGIMRT throughout the course of therapy.

Biological effective dose for comparison and combination of external beam and low-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy prostate cancer treatment plans

We report a methodology for comparing and combining dose information from external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and interstitial brachytherapy (IB) components of prostate cancer treatment using the biological effective dose (BED). On a prototype early-stage prostate cancer patient treated with EBRT and low-dose rate I-125 brachytherapy, a 3-dimensional dose distribution was calculated for each of the EBRT and IB portions of treatment. For each component of treatment, the BED was calculated on a point-by-point basis to produce a BED distribution. These individual BED distributions could then be summed for combined therapies. BED dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the prostate, urethra, rectum, and bladder were produced and compared for various combinations of EBRT and IB. Transformation to BED enabled computation of the relative contribution of each modality to the prostate dose, as the relative weighting of EBRT and IB was varied. The BED-DVHs of the prostate and urethra demonstrated dramatically increased inhomogeneity with the introduction of even a small component of IB. However, increasing the IB portion relative to the EBRT component resulted in lower dose to the surrounding normal structures, as evidenced by the BED-DVHs of the bladder and rectum. Conformal EBRT and low-dose rate IB conventional dose distributions were successfully transformed to the common "language" of BED distributions for comparison and for merging prostate cancer radiation treatment plans. The results of this analysis can assist physicians in quantitatively determining the best combination and weighting of radiation treatment modalities for individual patients.

Functional Anatomic Imaging in Radiation Therapy Planning

Improvements in techniques for the delivery of curative radiation have paralleled the advances in three-dimensional imaging devices, specifically, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. These modalities supply the high-resolution image data which, when transferred to radiotherapy computers, allows the construction of a "virtual patient" and calculation of radiation dose that can be delivered within a three-dimensional volume. Although anatomic methods have long been the main stay of cancer imaging, it now clear that functional imaging, provided by positron emission tomography and other nuclear medicine techniques, provides additional critical information regarding tumor biologic activity. The additional step of fusion of functional and anatomic images further refines radiation treatment planning.

Extra-target doses in children receiving multileaf collimator (MLC) based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)

PURPOSE

To investigate the extra-target doses using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen children underwent multileaf collimator (MLC)-based IMRT. Treatment site was head and neck or brain in eight (Group I), trunk in two (Group II), and abdomen/pelvis in three (Group III). Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were placed at the thyroid gland, breast, and testis. A control group of seven children received conventional RT and TLD measurements.

RESULTS

For the eight Group I children, the median dose equivalent measurements during the course of IMRT to the thyroid, breast, and testis were 348 mSv, 110 mSv, and 30 mSv, respectively. For the two Group II patients, the measurements to the thyroid ranged from 1,525 to 2,449 mSv while for the testis was 62 mSv. For the Group III patients, the median dose equivalent measurements to the thyroid, breast, and testis were 182 mSv, 406 mSv, and 159 mSv. The median dose equivalent measurements to the thyroid, breast, and testis for Group I children were 300 mSv, 120 mSv, and 75 mSv. The Group II conventional patient had a measurement of 180 mSv, 80 mSv, and 80 mSv to the thyroid, breast, and testis. For the Group III conventional cases, the median dose equivalent measurements were 192 mSv, 496 mSv, and 434 mSv.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was seen in the thyroid and breast doses of children receiving MLC-based IMRT compared to conventional RT for the treatment of head and neck/brain and abdominal/pelvic tumors.

[Pilot study of conformal intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer]

PURPOSE

- To report our experience on treatment planning and acute toxicity in 16 patients suffering from clinically localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

- Between March 2001 and October 2002, 16 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with IMRT. Treatment planning included an inverse-planning approach, and the desired beam intensity profiles were delivered by dynamic multileaf collimation. All patients received the entire treatment course with IMRT to a prescribed dose of 78 Gy. All IMRT treatment plans were compared with a theoretical conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). Acute lower gastro-intestinal (GI) and genito-urinary (GU) toxicity was evaluated in all patients and graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (CTCAE v. 3.0). A relationship between dose volume and clinical toxicity was evaluated.

RESULTS

- Ninety-five percent of the PTV2 received more than 76 Gy using IMRT or 3D-CRT with no difference between both methods. The dose-volume histogram mean obtained for the PTV2 was not different between IMRT and 3D-CRT. IMRT improved homogeneity of the delivered dose to the PTV2 as compared with 3D-CRT (7.5 vs 9%, respectively). Ninety-five percent of the PTV1 received 5 Gy more using IMRT with protection of the bladder and the rectum walls. The benefit was considered below 75 and 70 Gy for the wall of the bladder and the rectum, respectively. Grade 2 GI and GU toxicity was observed in four (25%) and five (31%) patients, respectively. No grade 3 toxicity was observed. There was a trend towards a relationship between the mean rectal dose and acute rectal toxicity but without statistical significant difference (P =0.09).

CONCLUSION

- Dose escalation with IMRT is feasible with no grade 3 or higher acute GI or GU toxicity. Examination of a larger cohort and longer-term follow-up are warranted in the future.

Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate

INTRODUCTION

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has introduced novel dosimetry that often features increased dose heterogeneity to target and normal structures. This raises questions of the biologic effects of IMRT compared to conventional treatment. We compared dosimetry and radiobiologic model predictions of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for prostate cancer patients planned for IMRT as opposed to standardized three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Segmented multileaf collimator IMRT treatment plans for 32 prostate cancer patients were compared to 3DCRT plans for the same patients. Twenty-two received local-field irradiation (LFI), and 10 received extended-field irradiation (EFI) that included pelvic lymph nodes. For LFI, IMRT was planned for delivery of 2 Gy minimum dose to the prostate (> or =99% volume coverage) for 35 fractions. The 3DCRT plans, characterized by more homogenous dose to the target, were designed according to a different protocol to deliver 2 Gy to the center of the prostate for 37 fractions. Mean total dose from 35 fractions of IMRT was equal to mean total dose from 37 fractions of 3DCRT. For EFI, both IMRT and 3DCRT were planned for 2 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50 Gy to prostate and pelvic lymph nodes, followed by 2 Gy per fraction to 20 Gy to the prostate alone. Treatment dose for EFI-IMRT was defined as minimum dose to the target, whereas for EFI-3DCRT, it was defined as dose to the center of the prostate. TCP was calculated for the prostate in the linear-quadratic model for two choices of alpha/beta. NTCP was calculated with the Lyman model for organs at risk, using Kutcher-Burman dose-volume histogram reduction with Emami parameters.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Dose to the prostate, expressed as mean +/- standard deviation, was 74.7 +/- 1.1 Gy for IMRT vs. 74.6 +/- 0.3 Gy for 3D for the LFI plans, and 74.8 +/- 0.6 Gy for IMRT vs. 71.5 +/- 0.6 Gy for 3D for the EFI plans. For the studied protocols, TCP was greater for IMRT than for 3D across the full range of target sensitivity, for both localized- and extended-field irradiation. For LFI, this was due to the smaller number of fractions (35 vs. 37) used for IMRT, and for EFI, this was due to the greater mean dose for IMRT, compared to 3D. For all organs, mean NTCP tended to be lower for IMRT than for 3D, although NTCP values were very small for both 3D and IMRT. Differences were statistically significant for rectum (LFI and EFI), bladder (EFI), and bowel (EFI). For both LFI and EFI, the calculated NTCPs qualitatively agreed with early published clinical data comparing genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications of IMRT and 3D. Present calculations support the hypothesis that accurately delivered IMRT for prostate cancer can limit dose to normal tissue by reducing treatment margins relative to conventional 3D planning, to allow a reduction in complication rate spanning several sensitive structures while maintaining or increasing tumor control probability.

Comparison of conformal and intensity-modulated techniques for simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy of upper esophageal carcinoma

AIM: To compare intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with conformal radiotherapy (CRT) by investigating the dose profiles of primary tumors, electively treated regions, and the doses to organs at risk.

METHODS: CRT and IMRT plans were designed for five patients with upper esophageal carcinoma. For each patient, target volumes for primary lesions (67.2 Gy) and electively treated regions (50.4 Gy) were predefined. An experienced planner manually designed one CRT plan. Four IMRT plans were generated with the same dose-volume constraints, but with different beam arrangements. Indices including dose distributions, dose volume histograms (DVHs) and conformity index were compared.

RESULTS: The plans with three intensity-modulated beams were discarded because the doses to spinal cord were lager than the tolerable dose 45Gy, and the dose on areas near the skin was up to 50Gy. When the number of intensity beams increased to five, IMRT plans were better than CRT plans in terms of the dose conformity and homogeneity of targets and the dose to OARs. The dose distributions changed little when the beam number increased from five to seven and nine.

CONCLUSION: IMRT is superior to CRT for the treatment of upper esophageal carcinoma with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Five equispaced coplanar intensity-modulated beams can produce desirable dose distributions. The primary tumor can get higher equivalent dose by SIB technique. The SIB-IMRT technique shortens the total treatment time, and is an easier, more efficient, and perhaps a less error-prone way in delivering IMRT.

Recent advances in light ion radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

The fast development of energy- and intensity-modulated radiation therapy during the last two decades using photon and electron beams has when implemented resulted in a considerable improvement of radiation therapy, particularly if combined with radiobiologically based treatment optimization techniques. This has made intensity-modulated electron and photon beams as powerful as today's uniform dose proton therapy. To be able to cure also the most advanced hypoxic and radiation-resistant tumors of complex local spread, intensity-modulated light ion beams are really the ultimate tool and in clinical practice 2 to 3 times less expensive per patient treated than proton therapy. This development and the recent development of advanced tumor diagnostics based on PET-CT imaging of the tumor cell density open the field for new powerful radiobiologically based treatment optimization methods. The ultimate step is to use the unique radiobiologic and dose distributional advantages of light ion beams for truly optimized bioeffect planning where the integral three-dimensional dose delivery and tumor cell survival can be monitored by PET-CT imaging and corrected by biologically based adaptive therapy optimization methods.

PURPOSE

The main purpose of the present paper is to discuss the principal areas of development of therapy optimization, by considering the therapy chain from tumor diagnostics and the use of three-dimensional predictive assay to biologically based treatment optimization with special focus on the rapid clinical development of advanced light ion therapy.

METHODS

Besides the "classical" approaches using low ionization density hydrogen ions (protons, but also possibly deuterons and tritium nuclei) and high ionization density carbon ions, two new approaches will be discussed. In the first one, lithium or beryllium or boron ions, which induce the least detrimental biologic effect to normal tissues for a given biologic effect in a small volume of the tumor, will be key particles. In the second approach, referred patients will be given a high-dose, high-precision "boost" treatment with carbon or oxygen ions during 1 week preceding the final treatment with conventional radiation in the referring hospital. The rationale behind these approaches is to minimize the high ionization density dose to the normal-tissue stroma outside but sometimes also inside the tumor bed and to ensure a more uniform and optimal biologic effectiveness in the tumor, also on the microscopic scale. The present discussion indicates that BIologically Optimized predictive Assay based light ion Radiation Therapy (Bio-Art) is really the ultimate way to perform high-precision radiation therapy using checkpoints of the integral dose delivery and the tumor response and, based on this information, perform compensating corrections of the dose delivery. By using biologically optimized scanned high-energy photon or ion beams, it is possible to measure in vivo the three-dimensional dose delivery using the same PET-CT camera that was used for diagnosing the tumor spread. This method thus opens up the door for truly three-dimensional biologically optimized adaptive radiation therapy, where the measured dose delivery to the true target tissues can be used to fine-adjust the incoming beams, so that possible errors in the integral therapy process are eliminated toward the end of the treatment. Interestingly enough, practically all major error sources--such as organ motion, treatment planning errors, patient setup errors, and dose delivery problems due to gantry, multileaf, or scanning beam errors--can be corrected for in this way.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Radiobiologically optimized dose delivery using intensity and radiation quality modulation based on high-resolution PET-CT or Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI)-based tumor and normal-tissue imaging is probably the ultimate development of radiation therapy, taking the unique physical and biologic advantages of light ions fully into account in truly patient-individualized curative treatment schedules. Using recently available biologically based treatment ilable biologically based treatment optimization algorithms, it is possible to improve the treatment outcome for advanced tumors by as much as 10-40%. The adaptive radiotherapy process based both on three-dimensional tumor cell survival and dose delivery monitoring has the potential of percent accuracy in tumor response and dose delivery monitoring, using two-dimensional, narrow high-energy photon beam scanning and three-dimensional (11)C Bragg peak scanning for radiation quality and intensity-modulated dose delivery. There is no doubt that the future of radiation therapy is very promising, and gradually more and more patients may not even need advanced surgery. Instead, they could be cured by biologically optimized electron, photon, or light ion therapy, where the densely ionizing Bragg peak is placed solely in the gross tumor, and a lower ionization density is used in microscopically invasive tumor volumes.

Clinical use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: part II

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a novel conformal radiotherapy technique which is gaining increasingly widespread use. This second clinical article aims to summarize the published data pertaining to prostate cancer, pelvic irradiation, gynaecological and breast cancer. Prostate cancer patients represent the largest group treated to date. The main indication has been radiation dose escalation within acceptable normal tissue late toxicity. Phase II data are promising, but no randomized clinical trial data are available to support its use. Pelvic IMRT aims to deliver radical radiation doses to pelvic lymph nodes while sparing the bowel and bladder. Indications for breast IMRT data are reviewed, and current data presented. Further data from randomized trials are required to confirm the anticipated benefits of IMRT in patients.