Evaluation of a Balloon Implant for Simultaneous Magnetic Nanoparticle Hyperthermia and High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy of Brain Tumor Resection Cavities

Previous work has reported the design of a novel thermobrachytherapy (TBT) balloon implant to deliver magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) hyperthermia and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy simultaneously after brain tumor resection, thereby maximizing their synergistic effect. This paper presents an evaluation of the robustness of the balloon device, compatibility of its heat and radiation delivery components, as well as thermal and radiation dosimetry of the TBT balloon. TBT balloon devices with 1 and 3 cm diameter were evaluated when placed in an external magnetic field with a maximal strength of 8.1 kA/m at 133 kHz. The MNP solution (nanofluid) in the balloon absorbs energy, thereby generating heat, while an HDR source travels to the center of the balloon via a catheter to deliver the radiation dose. A 3D-printed human skull model was filled with brain-tissue-equivalent gel for in-phantom heating and radiation measurements around four 3 cm balloons. For the in vivo experiments, a 1 cm diameter balloon was surgically implanted in the brains of three living pigs (40-50 kg). The durability and robustness of TBT balloon implants, as well as the compatibility of their heat and radiation delivery components, were demonstrated in laboratory studies. The presence of the nanofluid, magnetic field, and heating up to 77 °C did not affect the radiation dose significantly. Thermal mapping and 2D infrared images demonstrated spherically symmetric heating in phantom as well as in brain tissue. In vivo pig experiments showed the ability to heat well-perfused brain tissue to hyperthermic levels (≥40 °C) at a 5 mm distance from the 60 °C balloon surface.

Hyperthermic Enhancement of Immunotherapy: Findings of In Vitro Modeling

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Despite advancement in understanding and manipulation of immune checkpoint molecules in immunotherapeutic design, limitations in treatment efficacy persist. Strategies to enhance effectiveness include use of multiple immunotherapeutic agents or combination with radiation therapy. Prior studies have also shown potential for hyperthermia to augment response to both of these therapeutic modalities. We hypothesized that in vitro assessment of moderate hyperthermia effects on the anti-tumor immune response will aid in development of targeted strategies that best combine hyperthermia with other immune manipulating therapies.

MATERIALS/METHODS

To understand the consequences of temperature on carcinogenic phenotypes in vitro, B16-F10 melanoma cells were grown at 37°C or 41°C and biochemical profiles including protein expression were evaluated. Impact of hyperthermia on cell migration and proliferation were also assessed as were changes in the immune milieu including cytokine expression in response to heat. Data obtained was used to define ongoing in vivo experiments in which B16-F10 cells are implanted into C57BL/6 mice, grown to palpable tumors than treated with infrared radiation in combination with either anti-PDL1, anti-PD-1, or IL-15. Future studies based on these initial in vivo studies will explore integration of radiotherapy with hyperthermia and immunotherapy.

RESULTS

B16-F10 cells grown at 41°C decreased cell migration by 70% in 24 hours, and decreased proliferation by 62% at 48 hours and 94% at 72 hours. To assess biochemical orchestrations exemplified by these data, protein expression profiles were evaluated. Expression of pERK and ERK decreased by 86% and 50% and caspase-3 increased by 31% at 41°C. Activation of sphingomyelinase and caspase-3 both rely on caspase-8. Sphingomyelinase activation results in CD95 receptor translocation, leading to cell death initiation in melanoma cells. Cell stress can induce death pathways and the heat shock protein response simultaneously. Of note, Hsp70 has an established role in fostering a tumor specific immune response. Thus, we investigated inducible hsp70 expression. Hsp70 expression increased by 188% at 41°C vs. 37°C. To evaluate the immune milieu, cytokine array data from conditioned media showed that at 41°C, TNFa expression was increased and IL-4 expression was decreased, suggesting a proinflammatory shift in cytokine profiles at hyperthermic temperatures. In support of our data, hyperthermia-induced TNFa apoptotic responses have been reported. In direct relation to clinical practice, we observed that hyperthermic potentiation decreased PDL1 expression in B16-F10 by 35%.

CONCLUSION

Our work to date supports the hypothesis that hyperthermia can enhance immunotherapy via several mechanisms. In vivo study of the ability of hyperthermia to augment immune modulating therapies such as checkpoint blockade and radiation therapy is warranted.

ACR-ARS Practice Parameter on Informed Consent Radiation Oncology

OBJECTIVES

Consent is a communication process between the patient and a health care provider, in which both parties have the opportunity to ask questions and exchange information relevant to the patient's diagnosis and treatment. The process of informed consent is designed to protect a patient's autonomy in their medical decision-making in the context of an asymmetric relationship with the health care system. A proper consent process assures a patient's individual autonomy, reduces the opportunity for abusive conduct or conflicts of interest, and raises trust levels among participants. This document was developed as an educational tool to facilitate these goals.

METHODS

This practice parameter was produced according to the process described under the heading "The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards" on the ACR website ( https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards ) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the ARS. Committee members were charged with reviewing the prior version of the informed consent practice parameter published in 2017 and recommending additions, modifications, or deletions. The committee met through remote access and subsequently through an online exchange to facilitate the development of the revised document. Focus was given on identifying new considerations and challenges with informed consent given the evolution of the practice of radiation oncology in part driven by the COVID-19 pandemic and other external factors.

RESULTS

A review of the practice parameter published in 2017 confirmed the ongoing relevance of recommendations made at that time. In addition, the evolution of the practice of radiation oncology since the publication of the prior document resulted in the need for new topics to be addressed. These topics include remote consent either through telehealth or telephone and with the patient or their health care proxy.

CONCLUSIONS

Informed consent is an essential process in the care of radiation oncology patients. This practice parameter serves as an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in optimizing this process for the benefit of all involved parties.

Predictors of Interest in Radiation Oncology: The Effect of Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Other Diversity Measures

Purpose

The presence of women and people underrepresented in medicine (URiM) continues to be lower in radiation oncology (RO) than within the United States population, medical school graduates, and oncology fellowship applicants. The objective of this study was to identify demographics of matriculating medical students who are inclined to consider pursuing a residency in RO and identify barriers to entry that students may perceive before medical school training.

Methods and Materials

A survey of incoming medical students at New York Medical College was distributed via e-mail and assessed demographic background information, interest in and awareness of oncologic subspecialties, and perceived barriers to RO.

Results

Students of the incoming class of 2026 had a complete response rate of 72% (155 complete responses and 8 incomplete responses of 214 class members). Two-thirds of participants had prior awareness of RO, and half have considered pursuing an oncologic subspecialty, but less than one-fourth have ever previously considered a career in RO. Students responded that they need more education, clinical exposure, and mentorship to increase their chance of choosing RO. Male participants had 3.4 times the odds of having an acquaintance in the community tell them about the specialty and also had significantly greater interest in using advanced technologies. There were no URiM participants who had personal relationships with an RO physician compared with 6 (4.5%) non-URiM participants. The average response to "What is the likelihood that you will pursue a career in RO?" showed no significant difference between genders.

Conclusions

All races and ethnicities scored a similar likelihood of pursuing a career in RO, which differs greatly from the current RO workforce. Responses emphasized the importance of education, mentorship, and exposure to RO. This study demonstrates the need for support of female and URiM students during medical school.

Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019

PURPOSE

Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider).

RESULTS

Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing-initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing-was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches.

CONCLUSION

This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.

Hyperthermia and immunotherapy: clinical opportunities

Hyperthermia holds great promise to advance immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer. Multiple trials have demonstrated benefit with the addition of hyperthermia to radiation or chemotherapy in the treatment of wide-ranging malignancies. Similarly, pre-clinical studies have demonstrated the ability of hyperthermia to enhance each of the 8 steps in the cancer-immunotherapy cycle including stimulation of tumor-specific immunity. While there has been an extensive recent focus on augmenting immunotherapy with radiation, surprisingly to date, there have been no clinical trials assessing the combination of hyperthermia with immunotherapy. The study of hyperthermia with immunotherapy is particularly compelling when considered in the context of a new treatment paradigm for this anti-neoplastic modality. Novel concepts include ease of treatment including elicitation of the tumor-specific response of not requiring whole tumor heating, potentially shorter treatment time, better treatment tolerance as opposed to other multi-agent approaches to immunotherapy and the ability to apply heat repeatedly with immunotherapies, unlike ionizing radiation. Several questions remained with regard to clinical integration which can be readily addressed with thoughtful clinical trial design building upon lessons learned at the bench and from clinical trials combining radiation and immunotherapy. Examples of promising avenues for clinical investigation of hyperthermia and immunotherapy including melanoma, bladder, and head and neck cancers are reviewed. In summary, there is a present convergence of factors in oncology that compel further investigation of the integration of hyperthermia with immunotherapy for the benefit of cancer patients.

A phase IB clinical trial of 15 Gy HDR brachytherapy followed by hypofractionated/SBRT in the management of intermediate-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is commonly administered as a boost to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Our purpose was to compare toxicity with increasingly hypofractionated EBRT in combination with a single 15 Gy HDR boost for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-two men were enrolled on this phase IB clinical trial to one of three EBRT dose cohorts: 10 fractions, seven fractions, or five fractions. Patients were followed prospectively for safety, efficacy, and health-related quality of life (Expanded Prostate Index Composite). Efficacy was assessed biochemically using the Phoenix definition.

RESULTS

With a median follow up of 36 months, the biochemical disease-free survival was 95.5%. One man developed metastatic disease at 5 years. There was no significant minimally important difference in EPIC PRO for either urinary, bowel, or sexual domains. There was one acute Grade 3 GI and GU toxicity, but no late Grade 3 GU or GI toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Fifteen gray HDR brachytherapy followed by a five fraction SBRT approach results in high disease control rates and low toxicity similar to previously reported HDR protocols with significant improvement in patient convenience and resource savings. While mature results with longer follow up are awaited, this treatment approach may be considered a safe and effective option for men with intermediate-risk disease.

Abstract OT2-03-02: A pilot trial of hyperthermia in combination with olaparib in breast cancer patients with chest wall recurrences

Background: Chest wall recurrences represent a significant source of morbidity for breast cancer patients causing symptoms including bleeding, ulceration, infection and pain. Approximately 5 to 10% of breast cancer patients undergoing a mastectomy will have a chest wall or nodal recurrence within ten years after surgery. Loco-regional recurrence isolated to the chest wall occurs in 50 to 70% of these patients and only one third of these patients having synchronous metastases. After radiation, patients with unresectable isolated loco-regional breast cancer have very few treatment options. Hyperthermia, temperature elevation to 40° to 45°C for 60 minutes, is a potent radiotherapy and chemotherapy sensitizer without significant toxicity. Additionally, superficial hyperthermia can improve the complete response and local control in breast cancer patients with chest wall disease. Chest wall hyperthermia induces degradation of the BRCA2 protein, thereby leading to defective homologous recombination DNA repair, and sensitization to PARP-1 inhibitors. Krawczyk and colleagues (2017) showed that mild hyperthermia innately sensitizes homologous recombination proficient tumor cells to treatment with a PARP-1 inhibitor in pre-clinical models. Olaparib, is an oral targeted therapy that is an inhibitor of the poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) and is currently approved for treatment for patients with metastatic ovarian cancer and metastatic breast cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Our hypothesis is that the combination of olaparib and chest wall hyperthermia will be a safe and tolerable combination for breast cancer patients with chest wall metastases. Trial Design: In this novel dose-escalation pilot trial, breast cancer patients with chest wall recurrences will be treated with olaparib at the appropriate dose level, concurrently with chest wall hyperthermia involving heating the skin to 43 ° Celsius for 1 hour. We plan to treat patients first with olaparib given twice a day in tablet form at the appropriate dose level for one week and then add hyperthermia twice a week for 3 weeks, for a total duration of 4 weeks of treatment. Eligibility criteria: Female breast cancer patients regardless of ER/PR/HER2 status who have chest wall recurrences greater than 2 cm are eligible for this study. Patients are eligible after any line of therapy and if they have wild-type germ-line BRCA1 or BRCA2 status. Specific Aims: We will evaluate the safety and determine the maximum tolerated dose of the combination of olaparib and chest wall hyperthermia. We will assess the local progression free survival, one-year progression free survival, overall response and quality of life scores for these patients. We plan to obtain skin biopsies to evaluate biomarkers of homologous recombination deficiency including BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51 as well as γH2AX as an indicator of DNA damage. Statistical Methods: A 3+3 dose-escalation design will be used to determine the MTD of olaparib in combination with hyperthermia. We will initially enroll 3 subjects at each dose level. If one of the three experiences that level of toxicity, we will accrue 3 more subjects at that dose. If at any time there are two or more dose-limiting toxicities (in the 3-6 subjects) on a given dose, we will terminate accrual to the trial. No patient will be treated at a higher dose until the 3 or 6 patients have completed their 30 day toxicity evaluation period at the current dose. The survival endpoints of PFS and local PFS will be analyzed using log-rank test with Kaplan-Meier curves, as well as Cox proportional hazard models. Present Accrual and target accrual: Target accrual is 12 patients in the next two years. This study opened in May of 2019 at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, PA with full support from AstraZeneca. Clinical trial information: NCT03955640

Citation Format: Saveri Bhattacharya, Matthew Schiewer, Rita C. Murphy, Pramila Rani Anne, Nicole Simone, Voichita Bar Ad, Maysa Abu Khalaf, Daniel P. Silver, Rebecca Jaslow, Frederick M. Fellin, Allison M. Zibelli, Ana Maria Lopez, Adam Berger, Theodore N. Tsangaris, Melissa A. Lazar, Alliric I. Willis, Paul Stauffer, Mark D. Hurwitz. A pilot trial of hyperthermia in combination with olaparib in breast cancer patients with chest wall recurrences [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-03-02.

Phase I Trial of Weekly Cabazitaxel with Concurrent Intensity Modulated Radiation and Androgen Deprivation Therapy for the Treatment of High-Risk Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Cabazitaxel has been demonstrated to improve the overall survival for men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose for concurrent cabazitaxel with androgen deprivation and intensity modulated radiation therapy in men with high-risk prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty men were enrolled in this institutuional review board-approved phase I clinical trial using a 3 + 3 design. Patients were followed prospectively for safety, efficacy, and health-related quality of life (Expanded Prostate Index Composite). Efficacy was assessed biochemically using the Phoenix definition.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 56 months, the maximum tolerated dose of concurrent cabazitaxel was 6 mg/m². The 5-year biochemical disease-free survival was 73%, despite 75% of patients having very high risk prostate cancer per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Four patients were unable to complete chemotherapy owing to dose-limiting toxicities (eg, rectal bleeding, diarrhea, and elevated transaminase). There was no significant minimally important difference in Expanded Prostate Index Composite patient-reported outcomes for either the urinary or bowel domains; however, there was a significant decrease in the sexual domain.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first clinical trial of prostate cancer to report on the combination of cabazitaxel and radiation therapy. The maximum tolerated dose of concurrent cabazitaxel with radiation and androgen deprivation therapy was determined to be 6 mg/m². Despite the aggressive nature of the disease, robust biochemical control was observed.

Feasibility of removable balloon implant for simultaneous magnetic nanoparticle heating and HDR brachytherapy of brain tumor resection cavities

AIM

Hyperthermia (HT) has been shown to improve clinical response to radiation therapy (RT) for cancer. Synergism is dramatically enhanced if HT and RT are combined simultaneously, but appropriate technology to apply treatments together does not exist. This study investigates the feasibility of delivering HT with RT to a 5-10mm annular rim of at-risk tissue around a tumor resection cavity using a temporary thermobrachytherapy (TBT) balloon implant.

METHODS

A balloon catheter was designed to deliver radiation from High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy concurrent with HT delivered by filling the balloon with magnetic nanoparticles (MNP) and immersing it in a radiofrequency magnetic field. Temperature distributions in brain around the TBT balloon were simulated with temperature dependent brain blood perfusion using numerical modeling. A magnetic induction system was constructed and used to produce rapid heating (>0.2°C/s) of MNP-filled balloons in brain tissue-equivalent phantoms by absorbing 0.5 W/ml from a 5.7 kA/m field at 133 kHz.

RESULTS

Simulated treatment plans demonstrate the ability to heat at-risk tissue around a brain tumor resection cavity between 40-48°C for 2-5cm diameter balloons. Experimental thermal dosimetry verifies the expected rapid and spherically symmetric heating of brain phantom around the MNP-filled balloon at a magnetic field strength that has proven safe in previous clinical studies.

CONCLUSIONS

These preclinical results demonstrate the feasibility of using a TBT balloon to deliver heat simultaneously with HDR brachytherapy to tumor bed around a brain tumor resection cavity, with significantly improved uniformity of heating over previous multi-catheter interstitial approaches. Considered along with results of previous clinical thermobrachytherapy trials, this new capability is expected to improve both survival and quality of life in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Quality assurance guidelines for interstitial hyperthermia

Quality assurance (QA) guidelines are essential to provide uniform execution of clinical hyperthermia treatments and trials. This document outlines the clinical and technical consequences of the specific properties of interstitial heat delivery and specifies recommendations for hyperthermia administration with interstitial techniques. Interstitial hyperthermia aims at tumor temperatures in the 40-44 °C range as an adjunct to radiation or chemotherapy. The clinical part of this document imparts specific clinical experience of interstitial heat delivery to various tumor sites as well as recommended interstitial hyperthermia workflow and procedures. The second part describes technical requirements for quality assurance of current interstitial heating equipment including electromagnetic (radiative and capacitive) and ultrasound heating techniques. Detailed instructions are provided on characterization and documentation of the performance of interstitial hyperthermia applicators to achieve reproducible hyperthermia treatments of uniform high quality. Output power and consequent temperature rise are the key parameters for characterization of applicator performance in these QA guidelines. These characteristics determine the specific maximum tumor size and depth that can be heated adequately. The guidelines were developed by the ESHO Technical Committee with participation of senior STM members and members of the Atzelsberg Circle.

Long-term outcomes of partial prostate treatment with magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Partial prostate treatment has emerged as a potential method for treating patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer while minimizing toxicity. The authors previously demonstrated poor rates of biochemical disease control for patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) intermediate-risk disease using partial gland treatment with brachytherapy. The objective of the current study was to estimate the rates of distant metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) for this cohort.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2007, a total of 354 men with clinical T1c disease, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level < 15 ng/mL, and Gleason grade ≤3 + 4 prostate cancer underwent partial prostate treatment with brachytherapy to the peripheral zone under 0.5-Tesla magnetic resonance guidance. The cumulative incidences of metastasis and PCSM for the NCCN very low-risk, low-risk, and intermediate-risk groups were estimated. Fine and Gray competing risk regression was used to evaluate clinical factors associated with time to metastasis.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients developed metastases at a median of 11.0 years (interquartile range, 6.9-13.9 years). The 12-year metastasis rates for patients with very low-risk, low-risk, and intermediate-risk disease were 0.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.1%-4.4%), 8.7% (95% CI, 3.4%-17.2%), and 15.7% (95% CI, 5.7%-30.2%), respectively, and the 12-year PCSM estimates were 1.6% (95% CI, 0.1%-7.6%), 1.4% (95% CI, 0.1%-6.8%), and 8.2% (95% CI, 1.9%-20.7%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, NCCN risk category (low risk: hazard ratio, 6.34 [95% CI, 1.18-34.06; P = .03] and intermediate risk: hazard ratio, 6.98 [95% CI, 1.23-39.73; P = .03]) was found to be significantly associated with the time to metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial prostate treatment with brachytherapy may be associated with higher rates of distant metastasis and PCSM for patients with intermediate-risk disease after long-term follow-up. Treatment of less than the full gland may not be appropriate for this cohort.

Decision Support and Shared Decision Making About Active Surveillance Versus Active Treatment Among Men Diagnosed with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: a Pilot Study

This study aimed to explore the effects of a decision support intervention (DSI) and shared decision making (SDM) on knowledge, perceptions about treatment, and treatment choice among men diagnosed with localized low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). At a multidisciplinary clinic visit, 30 consenting men with localized low-risk PCa completed a baseline survey, had a nurse-mediated online DS session to clarify preference for active surveillance (AS) or active treatment (AT), and met with clinicians for SDM. Participants also completed a follow-up survey at 30 days. We assessed change in treatment knowledge, decisional conflict, and perceptions and identified predictors of AS. At follow-up, participants exhibited increased knowledge (p < 0.001), decreased decisional conflict (p < 0.001), and more favorable perceptions of AS (p = 0.001). Furthermore, 25 of the 30 participants (83 %) initiated AS. Increased family and clinician support predicted this choice (p < 0.001). DSI/SDM prepared patients to make an informed decision. Perceived support of the decision facilitated patient choice of AS.

Role of Genetic Testing for Inherited Prostate Cancer Risk: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2017

Purpose Guidelines are limited for genetic testing for prostate cancer (PCA). The goal of this conference was to develop an expert consensus-driven working framework for comprehensive genetic evaluation of inherited PCA in the multigene testing era addressing genetic counseling, testing, and genetically informed management. Methods An expert consensus conference was convened including key stakeholders to address genetic counseling and testing, PCA screening, and management informed by evidence review. Results Consensus was strong that patients should engage in shared decision making for genetic testing. There was strong consensus to test HOXB13 for suspected hereditary PCA, BRCA1/2 for suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and DNA mismatch repair genes for suspected Lynch syndrome. There was strong consensus to factor BRCA2 mutations into PCA screening discussions. BRCA2 achieved moderate consensus for factoring into early-stage management discussion, with stronger consensus in high-risk/advanced and metastatic setting. Agreement was moderate to test all men with metastatic castration-resistant PCA, regardless of family history, with stronger agreement to test BRCA1/2 and moderate agreement to test ATM to inform prognosis and targeted therapy. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary consensus statement to address a genetic evaluation framework for inherited PCA in the multigene testing era. Future research should focus on developing a working definition of familial PCA for clinical genetic testing, expanding understanding of genetic contribution to aggressive PCA, exploring clinical use of genetic testing for PCA management, genetic testing of African American males, and addressing the value framework of genetic evaluation and testing men at risk for PCA-a clinically heterogeneous disease.

Adjuvant radiation therapy, androgen deprivation, and docetaxel for high-risk prostate cancer postprostatectomy: Results of NRG Oncology/RTOG study 0621

BACKGROUND

Phase 3 trials have demonstrated a benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) for men who have adverse factors at radical prostatectomy (RP). However, some patients have a high risk of progression despite ART. The role of systemic therapy with ART in this high-risk group remains to be defined.

METHODS

Patients who had either a post-RP prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir > 0.2 ng/mL and a Gleason score ≥7 or a PSA nadir ≤0.2 ng/mL, a Gleason score ≥8, and a pathologic tumor (pT) classification ≥ pT3 received 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) plus radiotherapy and 6 cycles of docetaxel. The primary objective was to assess whether the addition of ADT and docetaxel to ART resulted in a freedom from progression (FFP) rate ≥ 70% compared with an expected rate of 50%. Multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to model associations between factors and outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 74 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 4.4 years. The pathologic tumor classification was pT2 in 4% of patients, pT3 in 95%, and pT4 in 1%. The Gleason score was 7 in 18% of patients and ≥8 in 82%. Post-RP PSA levels were ≤0.2 ng/mL in 53% of patients and >0.2 ng/mL in 47%. The 3-year FFP rate was 73% (95% confidence interval, 61%-83%), and the 3-year cumulative incidence of biochemical, distant, and local failure was 26%, 7%, and 0%, respectively. In multivariate models, postprostatectomy PSA nadir was associated with 3-year FFP, Gleason score, and PSA with biochemical failure. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was common; however, only 3 episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred. Late toxicities were not impacted by the addition of systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined ADT, docetaxel, and ART for men with high-risk prostate cancer after prostatectomy exceeded the prespecified study endpoint of 70% 3-year FFP. Phase 3 trials assessing combined local and systemic therapies for these high-risk patients are warranted. Cancer 2017;123:2489-96. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Quality assurance guidelines for superficial hyperthermia clinical trials: I. Clinical requirements

Quality assurance guidelines are essential to provide uniform execution of clinical trials and treatment in the application of hyperthermia. This document provides definitions for a good hyperthermia treatment and identifies the clinical conditions where a certain hyperthermia system can or cannot adequately heat the tumour volume. It also provides brief description of the characteristics and performance of the current electromagnetic (radiative and capacitive), ultrasound and infra-red heating techniques. This information helps to select the appropriate heating technique for the specific tumour location and size, and appropriate settings of the water bolus and thermometry. Finally, requirements of staff training and documentation are provided. The guidelines in this document focus on the clinical application and are complemented with a second, more technical quality assurance document providing instructions and procedure to determine essential parameters that describe heating properties of the applicator for superficial hyperthermia. Both sets of guidelines were developed by the ESHO Technical Committee with participation of senior STM members and members of the Atzelsberg Circle.

Potential Impact on Clinical Decision Making via a Genome-Wide Expression Profiling: A Case Report

Management of men with prostate cancer is fraught with uncertainty as physicians and patients balance efficacy with potential toxicity and diminished quality of life. Utilization of genomics as a prognostic biomarker has improved the informed decision-making process by enabling more rationale treatment choices. Recently investigations have begun to determine whether genomic information from tumor transcriptome data can be used to impact clinical decision-making beyond prognosis. Here we discuss the potential of genomics to alter management of a patient who presented with high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma. We suggest that this information help selecting patients for advanced imaging, chemotherapies, or clinical trial.

Feasibility of brachytherapy as monotherapy for high-volume, low-risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine whether patients with high-volume, low-risk prostate cancer are suitable candidates for ultrasound-guided brachytherapy, monotherapy alone, without supplemental external beam radiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study cohort comprised 200 consecutive patients who received ultrasound.guided monotherapy from November 02, 1998 to March 26, 2010. Real.time intraoperative treatment planning was performed for all patients. 145. Gy with I125 was prescribed to the prostate with no margin. The primary endpoint was time to prostate-specific antigen. (PSA) failure using the phoenix definition. Cox multivariable regression analysis was used to determine the factors significantly associated with time to PSA failure.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 59 months (range 1.2-146.8 months). The median PSA was 5.0 ng/ml. For the overall cohort, both 5- and 8-year PSA failure-free survival was 92.3% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 86.5-95.7%). Low-risk patients per the NCCN criteria had 5- and 8-year PSA failure-free survival of 93.6%. On cox multivariable analysis, only baseline PSA (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.02-1.65], P = 0.036) was associated with outcome. Among patients with Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that patients with a high number of cores positive for cancer can be adequately treated with modern brachytherapy as monotherapy and be spared the additional morbidity and cost of supplemental external beam radiation or androgen deprivation therapy.

Hepatoid Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Background: Hepatoid carcinoma (HC) is a rare extrahepatic malignancy that shares many morphological and serological features with hepatocellular carcinoma. HC has been reported to arise from several organs that are derived from the foregut endoderm, including the stomach, gallbladder, and pancreas. We present a case of an elderly man with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head with duodenal invasion, presenting with pancreatitis and a gastrointestinal bleed. With only 23 reported cases at the time of our literature search, we discuss the presentation, histopathology, and management of such a rare disease.

Case presentation: A 71-year-old man presented initially with abdominal pain and was treated conservatively for pancreatitis. Four months later, he presented with melena and anemia. His examination was noncontributory. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a friable ampulla of Vater, and a CT scan of the abdomen showed a 4.5 cm pancreatic head mass. Fine needle aspirate revealed an epithelioid neoplasm with hepatoid morphology. Serum α-fetoprotein was normal. Surgical resection confirmed hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with positive lymphadenopathy and negative margins. There was no radiographical or gross evidence of distant spread. Observation and adjuvant gemcitabine were discussed as possible options. The patient elected to receive care closer to home and will continue surveillance imaging.

Conclusion: With only 23 reported cases, pancreatic HC represents a rare entity within gastrointestinal oncology. There is no clear postoperative adjuvant standard therapy for this likely heterogeneous group of tumors. Although surgical resection is the mainstay of upfront treatment, metastatic disease to the lymph nodes or liver portends a poor prognosis and may warrant treatment such as transarterial embolization, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy.

International consensus on use of focused ultrasound for painful bone metastases: Current status and future directions

Focused ultrasound surgery (FUS), in particular magnetic resonance guided FUS (MRgFUS), is an emerging non-invasive thermal treatment modality in oncology that has recently proven to be effective for the palliation of metastatic bone pain. A consensus panel of internationally recognised experts in focused ultrasound critically reviewed all available data and developed consensus statements to increase awareness, accelerate the development, acceptance and adoption of FUS as a treatment for painful bone metastases and provide guidance towards broader application in oncology. In this review, evidence-based consensus statements are provided for (1) current treatment goals, (2) current indications, (3) technical considerations, (4) future directions including research priorities, and (5) economic and logistical considerations.

Is robotic arm stereotactic body radiation therapy “virtual high dose ratebrachytherapy” for prostate cancer? An analysis of comparative effectiveness using published data [corrected]

High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) monotherapy and robotic arm (i.e., CyberKnife) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are emerging technologies that have become popular treatment options for prostate cancer. Proponents of both HDR-BT monotherapy and robotic arm SBRT claim that these modalities are as efficacious as intensity-modulated radiation therapy in treating prostate cancer. Moreover, proponents of robotic arm SBRT believe it is more effective than HDR-BT monotherapy because SBRT is non-invasive, touting it as 'virtual HDR-BT.' We perform a comparative effective analysis of the two technologies. The tumor control rates and toxicities of HDR-BT monotherapy and robotic arm SBRT are promising. However, at present, it would be inappropriate to state that HDR-BT monotherapy and robotic arm SBRT are as efficacious or effective as other treatment modalities for prostate cancer, which have stronger foundations of evidence. Studies reporting on these technologies have relatively short follow-up time, few patients and are largely retrospective.

A paradigm shift from anatomic to functional and molecular imaging in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer

Approximately a third of men with localized prostate cancer who are treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or radical prostatectomy (RP) develop biochemical failure (BF). Presumably, BF will progress to distant metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality in some patients over subsequent years. Accurate detection of recurrent disease is important because it allows for appropriate treatment selection (e.g., local vs systemic therapy) and early delivery of therapy (e.g., salvage EBRT), which affect patient outcome. In this article, we discuss the paradigm shift in imaging technology in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. First, we discuss the commonly used morphological and anatomical imaging modalities and their role in the post-RP and post-EBRT settings of BF. Second, we discuss the accuracy of functional and molecular imaging techniques, many of which are under investigation. Further studies are needed to establish the role of imaging techniques for detection of cancer recurrence and clinical decision-making.

Do theoretical potential and advanced technology justify the use of high-dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer?

Low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), involving implantation of radioactive seeds into the prostate, is an established monotherapy for most low-risk and select intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients. High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is an advanced technology theorized to be more advantageous than LDR-BT from a radiobiological and radiophysics perspective, to the patient himself, and in terms of resource allocation. Studies of HDR-BT monotherapy have encouraging results in terms of biochemical control, patient survival, treatment toxicity and erectile preservation. However, there are still certain limitations that preclude recommending HDR-BT monotherapy for prostate cancer outside the setting of a clinical trial. HDR-BT monotherapy should be considered experimental at present.

Combining theoretical potential and advanced technology in high-dose rate brachytherapy boost therapy for prostate cancer

External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with brachytherapy (BT) is an attractive treatment option for select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Either low- or high-dose rate BT may be combined with EBRT ('LDR-BT boost,' 'HDR-BT boost,' respectively). HDR-BT boost has potential theoretical benefits over LDR-BT boost or external beam radiation therapy monotherapy in terms of radiobiology, radiophysics and patient convenience. Based on prospective studies in this review, freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) rates at 5 years for low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients have generally been 85-100%, 68-97%, 63-85%, respectively; late Radiotherapy and Oncology Group Grades 3 and 4 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities are seen in <8% of patients. HDR-BT boost is now a relatively well-established treatment modality for certain intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer patients, though limitations exist in drawing conclusions from the currently published studies.

Large prostate gland size is not a contraindication to low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Prostate volume greater than 50cc is traditionally a relative contraindication to prostate seed implantation (PSI), but there is little consensus regarding prostate size and clinical outcomes. We report biochemical control and toxicity after low-dose-rate PSI and compare outcomes according to the prostate size.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 429 men who underwent low-dose-rate PSI between 1998 and 2009 were evaluated. Median followup was 38.7 months. Patients were classified by prostate volume into small, medium, and large subgroups. Differences were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Pearson's χ(2) tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate effect of prostate size on outcomes.

RESULTS

Patient pretreatment factors were balanced between groups except for age (p=0.001). The 10-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure for all patients treated with PSI was 96.3% with no statistically significant difference between large vs. small/medium prostate size (90% vs. 96.6%, p=0.47). In a multivariate analysis, plan type (hazard ratio [HR]=0.25, p=0.03), dose to 90% of the gland (D90: HR=0.98, p=0.02), volume receiving 200Gy (V200: HR=0.98, p=0.026), and biologic effective dose (HR=0.99, p=0.045), but not prostate size (HR=2.27, p=0.17) were significantly associated with freedom from biochemical failure. Prostate size was not significantly associated with time to maximum American Urologic Association score.

CONCLUSION

In men with large prostates, the PSI provides biochemical control and temporal changes in genitourinary toxicity that are comparable with men having smaller glands. Accurate dose optimization and delivery of PSI provides the best clinical outcomes regardless of gland size.

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for patients with painful bone metastases: phase III trial results

Background

Pain due to bone metastases is a common cause of cancer-related morbidity, with few options available for patients refractory to medical therapies and who do not respond to radiation therapy. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS), a noninvasive method of thermal tissue ablation for palliation of pain due to bone metastases.

Methods

Patients with painful bone metastases were randomly assigned 3:1 to receive MRgFUS sonication or placebo. The primary endpoint was improvement in self-reported pain score without increase of pain medication 3 months after treatment and was analyzed by Fisher’s exact test. Components of the response composite, Numerical Rating Scale for pain (NRS) and morphine equivalent daily dose intake, were analyzed by t test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, respectively. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-QoL), a measure of functional interference of pain on quality of life, was compared between MRgFUS and placebo by t test. Statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

One hundred forty-seven subjects were enrolled, with 112 and 35 randomly assigned to MRgFUS and placebo treatments, respectively. Response rate for the primary endpoint was 64.3% in the MRgFUS arm and 20.0% in the placebo arm (P < .001). MRgFUS was also superior to placebo at 3 months on the secondary endpoints assessing worst score NRS (P < .001) and the BPI-QoL (P < .001). The most common treatment-related adverse event (AE) was sonication pain, which occurred in 32.1% of MRgFUS patients. Two patients had pathological fractures, one patient had third-degree skin burn, and one patient suffered from neuropathy. Overall 60.3% of all AEs resolved on the treatment day.

Conclusions

This multicenter phase III trial demonstrated that MRgFUS is a safe and effective, noninvasive treatment for alleviating pain resulting from bone metastases in patients that have failed standard treatments.

The quality frontier

ABSTRACT: 

Quality is gaining increased attention in medicine including oncology. This heightened focus on quality is long overdue, as noted by the Institute of Medicine over a decade ago. Unfortunately, medical practice including the numerous disciplines of oncology continues to fall short of its ‘quality frontier’, an analogous concept to the productivity frontier in business. Diverse but inter-related forces including culture, transparency, personalized medicine, economics and informatics are together driving the practice of oncology closer to its quality frontier. Examples of initial progress in relation to each of these forces are reviewed and their implications for future impact on quality discussed.

Updated results of magnetic resonance imaging guided partial prostate brachytherapy for favorable risk prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy

PURPOSE

We report updated results of magnetic resonance imaging guided partial prostate brachytherapy and propose a definition of biochemical failure following focal therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1997 to 2007, 318 men with cT1c, prostate specific antigen less than 15 ng/ml, Gleason 3 + 4 or less prostate cancer received magnetic resonance imaging guided brachytherapy in which only the peripheral zone was targeted. To exclude benign prostate specific antigen increases due to prostatic hyperplasia, we investigated the usefulness of defining prostate specific antigen failure as nadir +2 with prostate specific antigen velocity greater than 0.75 ng/ml per year. Cox regression was used to determine the factors associated with prostate specific antigen failure.

RESULTS

Median followup was 5.1 years (maximum 12.1). While 36 patients met the nadir +2 criteria, 16 of 17 biopsy proven local recurrences were among the 26 men who also had a prostate specific antigen velocity greater than 0.75 ng/ml per year (16 of 26 vs 1 of 10, p = 0.008). Using the nadir +2 definition, prostate specific antigen failure-free survival for low risk cases at 5 and 8 years was 95.1% (91.0-97.3) and 80.4% (70.7-87.1), respectively. This rate improved to 95.6% (91.6-97.7) and 90.0% (82.6-94.3) using nadir +2 with prostate specific antigen velocity greater than 0.75 ng/ml per year. For intermediate risk cases survival was 73.0% (55.0-84.8) at 5 years and 66.4% (44.8-81.1) at 8 years (the same values as using nadir +2 with prostate specific antigen velocity greater than 0.75 ng/ml per year).

CONCLUSIONS

Requiring a prostate specific antigen velocity greater than 0.75 ng/ml per year in addition to nadir +2 appears to better predict clinical failure after therapies that target less than the whole gland. Further followup will determine whether magnetic resonance imaging guided brachytherapy targeting the peripheral zone produces comparable cancer control to whole gland treatment in men with low risk disease. However, at this time it does not appear adequate for men with even favorable intermediate risk disease.

Long-term results of MRI-guided partial prostate brachytherapy for favorable-risk prostate cancer: Implications for focal therapy

114

Background: To report long-term results of MRI-guided partial prostate brachytherapy and propose a definition of biochemical failure following focal therapy

Methods: From 1997-2007, 318 men with cT1c, PSA < 15, Gleason ≤ 3 + 4 prostate cancer received MRI-guided brachtherapy in which only the peripheral zone was targeted. To exclude benign PSA increases due to prostatic hyperplasia, PSA failure was defined as nadir + 2 with PSA velocity >0.75 ng/mL/year. Cox multivariable analysis was used to determine factors associated with PSA failure.

Results: After a median follow-up of 5.1 years (interquartile range: 2.8 to 7.3, maximum 12.1), 26 men failed. While 36 patients met nadir+2 criteria, all eight biopsy-proven local recurrences were among the 26 men who also had a PSA velocity >0.75 ng/mL/year. On multivariable analysis, having intermediate vs. low-risk disease (adjusted HR: 4.4 [95%CI: 1.3-5.5], p<0.001) was the only factor significantly associated with an increased risk of PSA failure. PSA failure-free survival at 5 and 8 years was 95.6% and 90.0% for low risk, and was 73.0% and 66.4% for intermediate risk, respectively.

Conclusions: MRI-guided brachytherapy targeting the peripheral zone produced comparable cancer control rates to whole-gland treatment in men with PSA-detected low-risk disease, but may not be adequate for men with “favorable” intermediate-risk disease. Requiring a PSA velocity>0.75 in addition to nadir+2 may be a more appropriate way to define biochemical failure after therapies that target less than the whole gland.

Impact of race on prostate cancer selection and cause-specific mortality: A SEER database analysis

248

Background: The objective of this study was to assess relationships between race, treatment, and cause-specific mortality for prostate cancer.

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database yielded 328,151 prostate cancer patients diagnosed between 1990–2007 including 5,129 Japanese-American, 50,717 Black-American, and 282,305 White-American men. Japanese-American men were selected as they have the lowest incidence of prostate cancer and best treatment outcomes. Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis was used to assess association of race with prostate-cancer specific mortality before and after adjusting for age, health, and treatment. To assess impact of race on treatment selection, we compared mean incidence of treatment type [external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy, and surgery] by race using one-way ANOVA and post-testing with Bonferroni correction.

Results: Race significantly impacted survival after prostate cancer treatment. Blacks had the highest (HR= 1.198; 95% CI: 1.159 to 1.239, p< .001) and Japanese the lowest (HR= .618; 95% CI: .560 to .682, p< .001) mortality hazard compared to Whites. Tumor grade was the strongest predictor of survival (p< .001). Treatment was also significant: Brachytherapy had the lowest mortality hazard for radiation treatments and surgery was associated with lower mortality hazard compared to no surgery. 37.8%, 44.1%, and 29.1% of Blacks, Whites, and Japanese-Americans underwent surgery (p< .05), 27.3%, 23.8%, and 38.2% of Blacks, Whites, and Japanese-Americans underwent EBRT, (p< .05), and 4.9%, 6.7%, and 4.7% of Blacks, Whites, and Japanese-Americans underwent brachytherapy, with Whites significantly different from the other groups( p<.05).

Conclusions: SEER database analysis revealed race impacts prostate cancer survival. Treatment selection for prostate cancer differs among racial groups and race is associated with differential treatment outcomes. Comparisons between treatments must be viewed with caution as confounding variables likely exist not accounted for in the SEER database. Future research on race, treatment, and socioeconomic impact on cancer-specific mortality is warranted.

Combination external beam radiation and brachytherapy boost with androgen deprivation for treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of CALGB 99809

BACKGROUND

Combined transperineal prostate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is widely used for treatment of prostate cancer. Long-term efficacy and toxicity results of a multicenter phase 2 trial assessing combination of EBRT and transperineal prostate brachytherapy boost with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for intermediate-risk prostate cancer are presented.

METHODS

Intermediate-risk patients per Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center/National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria received 6 months of ADT, and 45 grays (Gy) EBRT to the prostate and seminal vesicles, followed by transperineal prostate brachytherapy with I125 (100 Gy) or Pd103 (90 Gy). Toxicity was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2 and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late radiation morbidity scoring systems. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as time from enrollment to progression (biochemical, local, distant, or prostate cancer death). In addition to the protocol definition of biochemical failure (3 consecutive prostate-specific antigen rises>1.0 ng/mL after 18 months from treatment start), the 1997 American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus and Phoenix definitions were also assessed in defining DFS. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DFS and overall survival.

RESULTS

Sixty-one of 63 enrolled patients were eligible. Median follow-up was 73 months. Late grade 2 and 3 toxicity, excluding sexual dysfunction, occurred in 20% and 3% of patients. Six-year DFS applying the protocol definition, 1997 ASTRO consensus, and Phoenix definitions was 87.1%, 75.1%, and 84.9%. Six deaths occurred; only 1 was attributed to prostate cancer. Six-year overall survival was 96.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cooperative setting, combination of EBRT and transperineal prostate brachytherapy boost plus ADT resulted in excellent DFS with acceptable late toxicity for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Combined hyperthermia and radiotherapy for the treatment of cancer

Radiotherapy is used to treat approximately 50% of all cancer patients, with varying success. Radiation therapy has become an integral part of modern treatment strategies for many types of cancer in recent decades, but is associated with a risk of long-term adverse effects. Of these side effects, cardiac complications are particularly relevant since they not only adversely affect quality of life but can also be potentially life-threatening. The dose of ionizing radiation that can be given to the tumor is determined by the sensitivity of the surrounding normal tissues. Strategies to improve radiotherapy therefore aim to increase the effect on the tumor or to decrease the effects on normal tissues, which must be achieved without sensitizing the normal tissues in the first approach and without protecting the tumor in the second approach. Hyperthermia is a potent sensitizer of cell killing by ionizing radiation (IR), which can be attributed to the fact that heat is a pleiotropic damaging agent, affecting multiple cell components to varying degrees by altering protein structures, thus influencing the DNA damage response. Hyperthermia induces heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70; HSPA1A) synthesis and enhances telomerase activity. HSPA1A expression is associated with radioresistance. Inactivation of HSPA1A and telomerase increases residual DNA DSBs post IR exposure, which correlates with increased cell killing, supporting the role of HSPA1A and telomerase in IR-induced DNA damage repair. Thus, hyperthermia influences several molecular parameters involved in sensitizing tumor cells to radiation and can enhance the potential of targeted radiotherapy. Therapy-inducible vectors are useful for conditional expression of therapeutic genes in gene therapy, which is based on the control of gene expression by conventional treatment modalities. The understanding of the molecular response of cells and tissues to ionizing radiation has lead to a new appreciation of the exploitable genetic alterations in tumors and the development of treatments combining pharmacological interventions with ionizing radiation that more specifically target either tumor or normal tissue, leading to improvements in efficacy.

Hyperthermia combined with radiation for the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term results from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute study 94-153

BACKGROUND

The authors present long-term results from a phase 2 study that assessed the efficacy of transrectal ultrasound hyperthermia plus radiation with or without androgen suppression for the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.

METHODS

Patients with clinical T2b-T3bN0M0 disease (according to 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] criteria) received radiation plus 2 transrectal ultrasound hyperthermia treatments. After the first 4 patients, 6 months of androgen suppression were allowed. The study was designed to assess absolute improvement in the 2-year disease-free survival rate compared with the short-term androgen suppression arm in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study 92-02.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients received a total of 72 hyperthermia treatments. The mean cumulative equivalent minutes (CEM) T₉₀ 43°C was 8.4 minutes. According to the 1992 AJCC classification, there were 19 patients with T2b tumors, 8 patients with T2c tumors, 5 patients with T3a tumors, and 5 patients with T3b tumors. The median Gleason score was 7 (range, 6-9), and the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 13.3 ng/mL (range, 2-65 ng/mL). Thirty-three patients received androgen suppression. At a median follow-up of 70 months (range, 18-110 months), the 7-year overall survival rate was 94%, and 61% of patients remained failure free (according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition for failure free survival). The absolute rate of disease-free survival at 2 years, which was the primary study endpoint, improved significantly (84%) compared with a rate of 64% for similar patients on the 4-month androgen suppression arm of RTOG 92-02. When Phoenix criteria (PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL) were used to define biochemical failure, 89% of patients were failure free at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperthermia combined with radiation for the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer appeared to be promising. The current results indicated that further study of hyperthermia for the treatment of prostate cancer with optimal radiation and systemic therapy is warranted.

Technology Insight: Combined external-beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy in the management of prostate cancer

External-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with brachytherapy is an attractive treatment option for selected patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. This therapeutic strategy offers dosimetric coverage if local-regional microscopic disease is present and provides a highly conformal boost of radiation to the prostate and immediate surrounding tissues. Either low-dose-rate (LDR) permanent brachytherapy or high-dose-rate (HDR) temporary brachytherapy can be combined with EBRT; such combined-modality therapy (CMT) is typically used to treat patients with intermediate-risk to high-risk, clinically localized disease. Controversy persists with regard to indications for CMT, choice of LDR or HDR boost, isotope selection for LDR, and integration of EBRT and brachytherapy. Initial findings from prospective, multicenter trials of CMT support the feasibility of this strategy. Updated results from these trials as well as those of ongoing and new phase III trials should help to define the role of CMT in the management of prostate cancer. In the meantime, long-term expectations for outcomes of CMT are based largely on the experience of single institutions, which demonstrate that CMT with EBRT and either LDR or HDR brachytherapy can provide freedom from disease recurrence with acceptable toxicity.

Radical prostatectomy for high-grade prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Patients with high-grade clinically localized disease often have disease beyond the prostate and, if so, are unlikely to benefit from radical prostatectomy in the long-term. The objective of this study was to assess whether use of other known prognostic factors could be helpful in defining which men with Gleason 8 to 10 prostate cancer are most likely to benefit from surgical management.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on men with biopsy Gleason 8 to 10 prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy at two major university centers. No patients received hormonal therapy as part of initial treatment or adjuvant radiation therapy. Surgery was performed using a retropubic approach, and lymph node dissection was performed in all patients. Risk groups were defined based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value and percent positive biopsy cores (%PBC). A Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to assess for differences in pretreatment prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for each group, and then comparisons between groups were performed using log-rank analysis to assess for differences in 5-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure.

RESULTS

Radical prostatectomy was performed on 196 patients between 1987 and 2002, of whom 168 had sufficient data for analysis. Median follow-up was 18 months (range, 1 to 130 months), with 31 patients at risk for more than 5 years. Patients with a PSA value of less than 10 ng/mL and %PBC of less than 50% had a 5-year actuarial biochemical control rate of 67% versus 23% for all other patients (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

PSA value and %PBC are useful in selecting patients with high-grade prostate cancer most likely to benefit by radical prostatectomy.

Perineural invasion associated with increased cancer-specific mortality after external beam radiation therapy for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To identify an association between perineural invasion (PNI) and cancer-specific survival in patients with prostate cancer after standard-dose external beam radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 517 consecutive patients who underwent RT (median dose, 70.5 Gy) between 1989 and 2003 for low-risk or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were studied. A genitourinary pathologist (AAR) scored presence or absence of PNI on all prostate needle-biopsy specimens. A Cox regression multivariable analysis was performed to assess whether the presence of PNI was associated with risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality after RT when the recognized risk-group variables were factored into the model. Estimates of cancer-specific mortality were made using a cumulative incidence method. Comparisons of survival were made using a two-tailed log-rank test.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 84 patients (16%) have died, 15 of 84 (18%) from prostate cancer. PNI was the only significant predictor of prostate cancer-specific mortality after RT (p=0.012). The estimated prostate cancer-specific mortality was 14% at 8 years for PNI+ patients vs. 5% for PNI- patients (p=0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer who have PNI on prostate needle biopsy have a significantly higher rate of prostate cancer-specific mortality after standard-dose radiation therapy than patients without PNI. Although this analysis is retrospective, this association argues for consideration of the use of more aggressive therapy, such as hormonal therapy with RT or dose escalation, in these select patients.

Hyperthermia combined with radiation in treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer is associated with a favourable toxicity profile

PURPOSE

Hyperthermia is used to treat several pelvic tumours. An important step in establishing a broader role for hyperthermia in treatment of prostate cancer is verification of an acceptable toxicity profile. In this report, short- and long-term toxicity profiles of a completed phase II trial of transrectal ultrasound hyperthermia combined with radiation in treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer are presented.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-seven patients enrolled on a phase II study of external beam radiation +/- androgen suppression with two transrectal ultrasound hyperthermia treatments were assessed for short- and long-term toxicity. Prostatic and anterior rectal wall temperatures were monitored. Rectal wall temperatures were limited to 40 degrees C (19 patients), 41 degrees C (three patients) and 42 degrees C (15 patients). Univariate logistic regression was used to estimate the log hazard of developing NCI CTC Grade 2 toxicity based on temperature parameters. Hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals, p-values for statistical significance of each parameter and proportion of variability explained for each of the parameters were calculated.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 42 months. Both short- and long-term GI toxicity were limited to grade 2 or less. Acute grade 2 proctitis was greater for patients with allowable rectal wall temperature of >40 degrees C. Eleven of 18 patients in this group had acute grade 2 proctitis vs three of 19 patients with rectal wall temperatures limited to 40 degrees C (p = 0.004). Long-term grade 2 GI and GU toxicity occurred in 5% and 19% of patients. No late grade 3 or greater toxicity occurred. Late GI and GU toxicity were not associated with the allowable rectal wall temperature.

CONCLUSION

Transrectal ultrasound hyperthermia combined with radiation for treatment of advanced clinically localized prostate cancer is safe and well tolerated.

Evidence-based review of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: An ASTRO outcomes initiative

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the evidence to determine the efficacy and effectiveness of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for localized prostate cancer; provide a clear presentation of the key clinical outcome questions related to the use of 3D-CRT in the treatment of localized prostate cancer that may be answered by a formal literature review; and provide concise information on whether 3D-CRT improves the clinical outcomes in the treatment of localized prostate cancer compared with conventional RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a systematic review of the literature through a structured process developed by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology's Outcomes Committee that involved the creation of a multidisciplinary task force, development of clinical outcome questions, a formal literature review and data abstraction, data review, and outside peer review.

RESULTS

Seven key clinical questions were identified. The results and task force conclusions of the literature review for each question are reported.

CONCLUSION

The technological goals of reducing morbidity with 3D-CRT have been achieved. Randomized trials and follow-up of completed trials remain necessary to address these clinical outcomes specifically with regard to patient subsets and the use of hormonal therapy.