Agonist-selective mechanisms of GPCR desensitization

Opioid receptor internalization contributes to dermorphin-mediated antinociception

Microinjection of opioids into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) produces antinociception in part by binding to mu-opioid receptors (MOPrs). Although both high and low efficacy agonists produce antinociception, low efficacy agonists such as morphine produce limited MOPr internalization suggesting that MOPr internalization and signaling leading to antinociception are independent. This hypothesis was tested in awake, behaving rats using DERM-A594, a fluorescently labeled dermorphin analog, and internalization blockers. Microinjection of DERM-A594 into the vlPAG produced both antinociception and internalization of DERM-A594. Administration of the irreversible opioid receptor antagonist beta-chlornaltrexamine (beta-CNA) prior to DERM-A594 microinjection reduced both the antinociceptive effect and the number of DERM-A594 labeled cells demonstrating that both effects are opioid receptor-mediated. Pretreatment with the internalization blockers dynamin dominant-negative inhibitory peptide (dynamin-DN) and concanavalinA (ConA) attenuated both DERM-A594 internalization and antinociception. Microinjection of dynamin-DN and ConA also decreased the antinociceptive potency of the unlabeled opioid agonist dermorphin when microinjected into the vlPAG as demonstrated by rightward shifts in the dose-response curves. In contrast, administration of dynamin-DN had no effect on the antinociceptive effect of microinjecting the GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline into the vlPAG. The finding that dermorphin-induced antinociception is attenuated by blocking receptor internalization indicates that key parts of opioid receptor-mediated signaling depend on internalization.

Electrophysiological effects of neuropeptide S on rat ventromedial hypothalamic neurons in vitro

The newly identified neuropeptide S (NPS) is a ligand for a previously orphan G protein-coupled GPR 154 receptor, now named the NPS receptor (NPSR). Previous studies have shown that NPS induces hyperlocomotion, increases arousal and suppresses anxiety-like behaviors via NPSR. Although NPS also inhibits food intake, nothing is known about the neuronal mechanisms underlying this action. Anatomical studies show that NPSRs are expressed abundantly in the dorsomedial part of the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMH), a satiety center for food intake. Hence, we examined the electrophysiological effects of NPS on rat VMH neurons in vitro. NPS predominantly depolarized the VMH neurons, and the effects were postsynaptic and dose-dependent. Membrane resistance was significantly decreased during the depolarization, suggesting an opening of some ionic channels. The NPS-induced depolarization was significantly attenuated in Ca(2+)-free, NiCl(2)-containing and mibefradil-containing TTX ACSFs, but it did not disappear. The NPS-induced depolarization was also attenuated in low-Na(+) TTX ACSF, and completely abolished in Ca(2+)-free/low-Na(+) TTX ACSF. Pretreatment with 30 microM KB-R7943, an inhibitor of forward-mode Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger, did not have any significant effect on the NPS-induced depolarization in Ca(2+)-free TTX ACSF. These results suggest that NPS depolarizes VMH neurons via activations of R- and T-type Ca(2+) channels and nonselective cation channels, and that VMH neurons might be involved in the cellular process through which NPS participates in the regulation of food intake and energy homeostasis.

Glutamate differently modulates metabotropic glutamate receptors in neuronal and glial cells

Glutamate is an excitatory neurotransmitter implicated in learning and memory processes, but at high concentrations it acts as an excitotoxin causing degeneration and neuronal death. The aim of this work was to determine the excitotoxic effect of glutamate and the regulation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR) during excitotoxicity in neurons and C6 glioma cells. Results show that glutamate causes excitotoxic damage only in cortical neurons. Loss of cell viability in neurons was glutamate concentration- and time-dependent. Total mGluR levels were significantly reduced in these cells when exposed to glutamate. However, in C6 cells, which have been used as a model of glial cells, these receptors were regulated in a biphasic manner, decreased after 6 h, and increased after 24/48 h of treatment. Results show a cell dependent mGluR regulation by glutamate exposure which could mediate the vulnerability or not to glutamate mediated excitotoxicity.

Functionally selective cannabinoid receptor signalling: therapeutic implications and opportunities

The CB(1) and CB(2) cannabinoid receptors are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) recognized by a variety of endogenous ligands and activating multiple signalling pathways. This multiplicity of ligands and intracellular transduction mechanisms supports a complex control of physiological functions by the endocannabinoid system, but requires a finely tuned regulation of the signalling events triggered on receptor activation. Here we review the diverse signalling pathways activated by the cannabinoid receptors and discuss the mechanisms allowing for specificity in the associated functional responses triggered by endogenous or exogenous ligands. At variance with the classical concept that all agonists at a given GPCR induce a similar repertoire of downstream events in all tissues, we also summarize the experimental evidence supporting the existence of functional selectivity and protean agonism at cannabinoid receptors. By placing emphasis on the ligand- or constitutive activity-dependent specifications of receptor-G protein coupling, these concepts explain how distinct cannabinoid ligands may activate specific downstream mediators. Finally, although both the diversity and specificity in cannabinoid signalling are now established in vitro, few data are available from in vivo studies. Therefore, we conclude this review by examining the experimental evidence supporting the physiological relevance of this complexity in the cannabinoid system. The ability to selectively manipulate physiological functions, through activation of defined signalling cascades, will in all likelihood help in the development of efficacious and safe cannabinoid-based therapeutics for a variety of indications.

Agonist-selective dynamic compartmentalization of human Mu opioid receptor as revealed by resolutive FRAP analysis

Techniques for analyzing the membrane diffusion of molecules are the most promising methods for investigating the compartmentalization of G-protein-coupled receptors, particularly as relevant to receptor signaling processes. Here, we report fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) measurements performed at variable spot radius for human mu opioid (hMOP) receptors on SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells in the presence of ligands. Although an antagonist did not affect the behavior of the receptors compared with the basal state, two different agonists, DAMGO and morphine, caused markedly different changes to receptor diffusion. Like receptors in the absence of ligand, receptors bound to morphine exhibited diffusion confined to joined semipermeable domains, but with smaller domain size and diffusion coefficient. This effect was inhibited by pertussis toxin, strongly suggesting that this dynamic behavior is associated with early steps of signaling. In the presence of DAMGO, half of the receptors displayed free long-range diffusion and the other half were confined to smaller isolated domains. Hypertonic sucrose buffer suppressed this effect, which we attribute to receptor entry into clathrin-coated pits. It is likely that the observation of distinct receptor dynamics in the presence of DAMGO and morphine involves the agonist-selective phosphorylation of the receptor.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors: zooming in on ligand-induced intracellular trafficking and its functional implications

Regulatory processes including receptor phosphorylation and intracellular trafficking, also referred to as receptor internalization, are important processes to terminate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. Compelling evidence now indicates that internalization of a receptor is not necessarily the endpoint of signaling, but can also be the beginning of the activation of intracellular signaling pathways. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors, which are activated by the endogenous phospholipid S1P, belong to the family of GPCRs. Interestingly, there is evidence indicating differential intracellular trafficking of one of the S1P receptor subtypes, the S1P1 receptor, upon agonist activation by either S1P or the synthetic agonist FTY720-P. Moreover, the differential effect of FTY720-P on S1P1 receptor regulation has been suggested to be the mechanism of action of this drug, which is now in Phase III clinical trials for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. It is thus of importance to get a good insight into the regulation of S1P receptors. This review therefore gives a detailed overview about the current state of knowledge on S1P receptor internalization and its functional implications, including some data on nuclear signaling of S1P receptors.

Deletion of the distal COOH-terminus of the A2B adenosine receptor switches internalization to an arrestin- and clathrin-independent pathway and inhibits recycling

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We have investigated the effect of deletions of a postsynaptic density, disc large and zo-1 protein (PDZ) motif at the end of the COOH-terminus of the rat A(2B) adenosine receptor on intracellular trafficking following long-term exposure to the agonist 5'-(N-ethylcarboxamido)-adenosine.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The trafficking of the wild type A(2B) adenosine receptor and deletion mutants expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells was studied using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in combination with immunofluorescence microscopy.

KEY RESULTS

The wild type A(2B) adenosine receptor and deletion mutants were all extensively internalized following prolonged treatment with NECA. The intracellular compartment through which the Gln(325)-stop receptor mutant, which lacks the Type II PDZ motif found in the wild type receptor initially trafficked was not the same as the wild type receptor. Expression of dominant negative mutants of arrestin-2, dynamin or Eps-15 inhibited internalization of wild type and Leu(330)-stop receptors, whereas only dominant negative mutant dynamin inhibited agonist-induced internalization of Gln(325)-stop, Ser(326)-stop and Phe(328)-stop receptors. Following internalization, the wild type A(2B) adenosine receptor recycled rapidly to the cell surface, whereas the Gln(325)-stop receptor did not recycle.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Deletion of the COOH-terminus of the A(2B) adenosine receptor beyond Leu(330) switches internalization from an arrestin- and clathrin-dependent pathway to one that is dynamin dependent but arrestin and clathrin independent. The presence of a Type II PDZ motif appears to be essential for arrestin- and clathrin-dependent internalization, as well as recycling of the A(2B) adenosine receptor following prolonged agonist addition.

The effect of protein kinase C and G protein-coupled receptor kinase inhibition on tolerance induced by mu-opioid agonists of different efficacy

Differences in the mechanisms underlying tolerance and mu-opioid receptor desensitization resulting from exposure to opioid agonists of different efficacy have been suggested previously. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of protein kinase C (PKC) and G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) inhibition on antinociceptive tolerance in vivo to opioid agonists of different efficacy. A rapid (8-h) tolerance-induction model was used where each opioid was repeatedly administered to naive mice. Animals were then challenged with the opioid after injection of a kinase inhibitor to determine its effects on the level of tolerance. Tolerance to meperidine, morphine, or fentanyl was fully reversed by the PKC inhibitor 12-(2-cyanoethyl)-6,7,12,13-tetrahydro-13-methyl-5-oxo-5H-indolo(2,3-a)pyrrolo(3,4-c)carbazole (Gö6976). However, in vivo tolerance to [d-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) was not reversed by PKC inhibition. The novel small-molecule GRK inhibitors beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 inhibitor and 2-(8-[(dimethylamino) methyl]-6,7,8,9-tetrahydropyridol[1,2-a]indol-3-yl)-3-(1-methylindol-3-yl)maleimide (Ro 32-0432) did not reverse the tolerance to meperidine, fentanyl, or morphine but did reverse the tolerance to DAMGO. To correlate GRK-dependent DAMGO-induced tolerance with mu-opioid receptor desensitization, we used in vitro whole-cell patch-clamp recording from mouse locus coeruleus neurons and observed that the GRK inhibitors reduced DAMGO-induced desensitization of mu-opioid receptors, whereas the PKC inhibitor had no effect. These results suggest that tolerance induced by low- and moderate-efficacy mu-opioid receptor agonists is dependent on PKC, whereas tolerance induced by the high-efficacy agonist DAMGO is dependent on GRK.

Role of CRF receptor signaling in stress vulnerability, anxiety, and depression

Markers of hyperactive central corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) systems and CRF-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified in patients with anxiety and depressive disorders. Designing more effective antagonists may now be guided by data showing that small molecules bind to transmembrane domains. Specifically, CRF(1) receptor antagonists have been developed as novel anxiolytic and antidepressant treatments. Because CRF(1) receptors become rapidly desensitized by G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) and beta-arrestin mechanisms in the presence of high agonist concentrations, neuronal hypersecretion of synaptic CRF alone may be insufficient to account for excessive central CRF neurotransmission in stress-induced affective pathophysiology. In addition to desensitizing receptor function, GRK phosphorylation and beta-arrestin binding can shift a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) to signal selectively via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK-MAPK) or Akt pathways independent of G proteins. Also, Epac-dependent CRF(1) receptor signaling via the ERK-MAPK pathway has been found to potentiate brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-stimulated TrkB signaling. Thus, genetic or acquired abnormalities in GRK and beta-arrestin function may be involved in the pathophysiology of stress-induced anxiety and depression.

The KDEL receptor: new functions for an old protein

The KDEL receptor is a seven-transmembrane-domain protein that was first described about 20 years ago. Its well-known function is to retrotransport chaperones from the Golgi complex to the endoplasmic reticulum. Recent studies, however, have suggested that the KDEL receptor has additional functions. Indeed, we have demonstrated that chaperone-bound KDEL receptor triggers the activation of Src family kinases on the Golgi complex. This activity is essential in the regulation of Golgi-to-plasma membrane transport. However, the identification of different KDEL receptor interactors that are inconsistent with these established functions opens the possibility of further receptor activities.

Reduced ligand affinity leads to an impaired function of the adenosine A2A receptor of human granulocytes in sepsis

The enhanced release of reactive oxygen species by excessively activated polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN) is a key step in the pathogenesis of sepsis. Potent action of adenosine in inhibiting cytotoxic PMN functions has been documented. Recent data, however provide evidence that in sepsis a diminished capability of adenosine to inhibit the generation of oxygen radicals by PMN occurs. Here, we investigated the underlying mechanisms in an in vitro sepsis model and in PMN of sepsis patients. We report that lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-incubation of human PMN elicited the same increase in the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) of adenosine as observed in patients with septic shock. Coupling to adenylyl cyclase was impaired as well, as indicated by a decreased potency of adenosine to stimulate cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation. Ligand-binding studies conducted with native, LPS-stimulated PMN, and with PMN of sepsis patients revealed that, despite an increased adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) expression, the receptor function declines due to a diminished ligand-binding affinity most likely caused by allosteric modulators within the inflammatory environment. A(2A)R function obviously is highly dependent upon the cellular environment and thus, further functional characterization of A(2A)R responses in sepsis may be a promising approach to develop new adenosine or A(2A)R agonists based therapeutic strategies.

Regulation of oxytocin receptor responsiveness by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 6 in human myometrial smooth muscle

Oxytocin plays an important role in the progression, timing, and modulation of uterine contraction during labor and is widely used as an uterotonic agent. We investigated the mechanisms regulating oxytocin receptor (OTR) signaling in human primary myometrial smooth muscle cells and the ULTR cell-line. Oxytocin produced concentration-dependent increases in both total [(3)H]inositol phosphate accumulation and intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)); however, responses were greater and more reproducible in the ULTR cell line. Assessment of phospholipase C activity in single cells revealed that the OTR desensitizes rapidly (within 5 min) in the presence of oxytocin (100 nm). To characterize OTR desensitization further, cells were stimulated with a maximally effective concentration of oxytocin (100 nm, 30 sec) followed by a variable washout period and a second identical application of oxytocin. This brief exposure to oxytocin caused a marked decrease (>70%) in OTR responsiveness to rechallenge and was fully reversed by increasing the time period between agonist challenges. To assess involvement of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) in OTR desensitization, cells were transfected with small interfering RNAs to cause specific > or =75% knockdown of GRKs 2, 3, 5, or 6. In both primary myometrial and ULTR cells, knockdown of GRK6 largely prevented oxytocin-induced OTR desensitization; in contrast, selective depletion of GRKs 2, 3, or 5 was without effect. These data indicate that GRK6 recruitment is a cardinal effector of OTR responsiveness and provide mechanistic insight into the likely in vivo regulation of OTR signaling in uterine smooth muscle.

Proteases display biased agonism at protease-activated receptors: location matters!

Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that transmit cellular responses begun by the actions of extracellular proteases. The activation of a PAR occurs by a unique mechanism whereby the extracellular N-terminal segment of the inactive receptor undergoes proteolytic cleavage, resulting in irreversible activation--unlike most GPCRs that are reversibly activated. PARs mediate cellular responses to coagulant proteases in various cell types localized within the vasculature. Additionally, PARs are expressed in other cell types and respond to a plethora of proteases. Recent studies have revealed that different proteases elicit distinct responses through the activation of the same PAR. This phenomenon appears to involve stabilization of distinct active PAR conformations that facilitates selectively coupling to different effectors and is localized to caveolae, a subtype of lipid rafts.

Optical measurement of mGluR1 conformational changes reveals fast activation, slow deactivation, and sensitization

Metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) activation has been extensively studied under steady-state conditions. However, at central synapses, mGluRs are exposed to brief submillisecond glutamate transients and may not reach steady-state. The lack of information on the kinetics of mGluR activation impairs accurate predictions of their operation during synaptic transmission. Here, we report experiments designed to investigate mGluR kinetics in real-time. We inserted either CFP or YFP into the second intracellular loop of mGluR1beta. When these constructs were coexpressed in PC12 cells, glutamate application induced a conformational change that could be monitored, using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), with an EC(50) of 7.5 microM. The FRET response was mimicked by the agonist DHPG, abolished by the competitive antagonist MCPG, and partially inhibited by mGluR1-selective allosteric modulators. These results suggest that the FRET response reports active conformations of mGluR1 dimers. The solution exchange at the cell membrane was optimized for voltage-clamped cells by recording the current induced by co-application of 30 mM potassium. When glutamate was applied at increasing concentrations up to 2 mM, the activation time course decreased to a minimum of approximately 10 ms, whereas the deactivation time course remained constant (approximately 50 ms). During long-lasting applications, no desensitization was observed. In contrast, we observed a robust sensitization of the FRET response that developed over approximately 400 ms. Activation, deactivation, and sensitization time courses and amplitudes were used to derive a kinetic scheme and rate constants, from which we inferred the EC(50) and frequency dependence of mGluR1 activation under non-steady-state conditions, as occurs during synaptic transmission.

Role of protein kinase C and mu-opioid receptor (MOPr) desensitization in tolerance to morphine in rat locus coeruleus neurons

In morphine tolerance a key question that remains to be answered is whether μ-opioid receptor (MOPr) desensitization contributes to morphine tolerance, and if so by what cellular mechanisms. Here we demonstrate that MOPr desensitization can be observed in single rat brainstem locus coeruleus (LC) neurons following either prolonged (> 4 h) exposure to morphine in vitro or following treatment of animals with morphine in vivo for 3 days. Analysis of receptor function by an operational model indicated that with either treatment morphine could induce a profound degree (70–80%) of loss of receptor function. Ongoing PKC activity in the MOPr-expressing neurons themselves, primarily by PKCα, was required to maintain morphine-induced MOPr desensitization, because exposure to PKC inhibitors for only the last 30–50 min of exposure to morphine reduced the MOPr desensitization that was induced both in vitro and in vivo. The presence of morphine was also required for maintenance of desensitization, as washout of morphine for > 2 h reversed MOPr desensitization. MOPr desensitization was homologous, as there was no change in α₂-adrenoceptor or ORL1 receptor function. These results demonstrate that prolonged morphine treatment induces extensive homologous desensitization of MOPrs in mature neurons, that this desensitization has a significant PKC-dependent component and that this desensitization underlies the maintenance of morphine tolerance.

GPR119 is essential for oleoylethanolamide-induced glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from the intestinal enteroendocrine L-cell

OBJECTIVE

Intestinal L-cells secrete the incretin glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in response to ingestion of nutrients, especially long-chain fatty acids. The Galphas-coupled receptor GPR119 binds the long-chain fatty acid derivate oleoylethanolamide (OEA), and GPR119 agonists enhance GLP-1 secretion. We therefore hypothesized that OEA stimulates GLP-1 release through a GPR119-dependent mechanism.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Murine (m) GLUTag, human (h) NCI-H716, and primary fetal rat intestinal L-cell models were used for RT-PCR and for cAMP and GLP-1 radioimmunoassay. Anesthetized rats received intravenous or intraileal OEA, and plasma bioactive GLP-1, insulin, and glucose levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or glucose analyzer.

RESULTS

GPR119 messenger RNA was detected in all L-cell models. OEA treatment (10 micromol/l) of mGLUTag cells increased cAMP levels (P < 0.05) and GLP-1 secretion (P < 0.001) in all models, with desensitization of the secretory response at higher concentrations. GLP-1 secretion was further enhanced by prevention of OEA degradation using the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor, URB597 (P < 0.05-0.001 vs. OEA alone), and was abolished by H89-induced inhibition of protein kinase A. OEA-induced cAMP levels and GLP-1 secretion were significantly reduced in mGLUTag cells transfected with GPR119-specific small interfering RNA (P < 0.05). Application of OEA (10 micromol/l) directly into the rat ileum, but not intravenously, increased plasma bioactive GLP-1 levels in euglycemic animals by 1.5-fold (P < 0.05) and insulin levels by 3.9-fold (P < 0.01) but only in the presence of hyperglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of these studies demonstrate, for the first time, that OEA increases GLP-1 secretion from intestinal L-cells through activation of the novel GPR119 fatty acid derivate receptor in vitro and in vivo.

Involvement of PKC alpha and G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 in agonist-selective desensitization of mu-opioid receptors in mature brain neurons

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The ability of an agonist to induce desensitization of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) depends upon the agonist used. Furthermore, previous data suggest that the intracellular mechanisms underlying desensitization may be agonist-specific. We investigated the mechanisms underlying MOR desensitization, in adult mammalian neurons, caused by morphine (a partial agonist in this system) and DAMGO (a high-efficacy agonist).

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

MOR function was measured in locus coeruleus neurons, by using whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology, in rat and mouse brain slices (both wild-type and protein kinase C (PKC)alpha knockout mice). Specific isoforms of PKC were inhibited by using inhibitors of the receptors for activated C-kinase (RACK), and in vivo viral-mediated gene-transfer was used to transfect neurons with dominant negative mutants (DNMs) of specific G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs).

KEY RESULTS

Morphine-induced desensitization was attenuated by using RACK inhibitors that inhibit PKCalpha, but not by other isoform-specific inhibitors. Further, the PKC component of morphine-induced desensitization was absent in locus coeruleus neurons from PKCalpha knockout mice. The PKC-enhanced morphine-induced desensitization was not affected by over-expression of a GRK2 dominant negative mutant (GRK2 DNM). In contrast, DAMGO-induced MOR desensitization was independent of PKC activity but was reduced by over-expression of the GRK2 DNM but not by that of a GRK6 DNM.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

In mature mammalian neurons, different MOR agonists can induce MOR desensitization by different mechanisms, morphine by a PKCalpha-mediated, heterologous mechanism and DAMGO by a GRK-mediated, homologous mechanism. These data represent functional selectivity at the level of receptor desensitization.

Prolonged RXFP1 and RXFP2 signaling can be explained by poor internalization and a lack of beta-arrestin recruitment

Relaxin induces sustained physiological responses, which brings into question the deactivation processes typical of most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) for its receptor, relaxin family peptide receptor 1 (RXFP1). Here, we examined relaxin-dependent phosphorylation of RXFP1 and the related insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) receptor, RXFP2, as well as the capacity of these receptors to recruit beta-arrestins and internalize in response to ligand stimulation. We confirmed in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293T cells, expressing RXFP1 or RXFP2, that both receptors elicit prolonged cAMP responses up to 6 h after stimulation. Receptors immunoprecipitated from (32)P metabolically labeled cells were used to investigate the agonist-specific phosphorylation. Rapid and robust receptor phosphorylation was not observed for either RXFP1 or RXFP2, although some (32)P-incorporation was observed at 30 min; however, this was not statistically significant. In accord with this result, RXFP1 and RXFP2 demonstrated poor internalization in response to relaxin or INSL3, as compared with the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT(1)R), which undergoes rapid and robust phosphorylation and internalization in response to angiotensin II. Additionally, coexpression of GPCR kinases has no effect on the rate of internalization for either RXFP1 or RXFP2. Confocal microscopy was used to follow the trafficking of green fluorescent protein-labeled beta-arrestins after receptor activation. Neither RXFP1 nor RXFP2 activation results in recruitment of beta-arrestins to the cell surface, whereas AT(1)R rapidly recruits both beta-arrestins-1 and -2. The apparent lack of classical regulation for RXFP1 and RXFP2 provides the molecular basis for the prolonged signaling and physiological actions of relaxin and related peptides.

Receptor reserve reflects differential intrinsic efficacy associated with opioid diastereomers

Structure-activity relationships built around receptor binding or cell-based assays are designed to reveal physiochemical differences between ligands. We hypothesized that agonist receptor reserve may provide a unique approach to distinguish structurally-related agonists exhibiting similar functional characteristics. An intracellular calcium activation assay in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells expressing cloned human mu-opioid receptors was developed. We examined two isomers exhibiting indistinguishable receptor binding and in vitro potency profiles. Oxymorphone, a clinically-available congener of codeine has at least two active diastereomeric metabolites (6alpha- and 6beta-oxymorphols) found to be similar for mu-opioid receptor binding affinity (K(d) = 15 versus 14 nM) and calcium activation (EC(50) = 22 versus 14 nM). Calcium activation was then inhibited in CHO cells in a concentration-dependent manner using the irreversible mu-opioid receptor antagonist, beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA). Under these conditions, approximately 10-fold greater receptor reserve was found for 6alpha-oxymorphol compared to 6beta-oxymorphol. This difference between the oxymorphols corresponded to a rank order of intrinsic efficacy (Emax): DAMGO > oxymorphone = 6alpha-oxymorphol = oxycodone > 6beta-oxymorphol. In addition, 6alpha-oxymorphol exhibited greater relative potency than the 6beta-oxymorphol in mouse tail-flick, hot-plate and phenylquinone writhing antinociceptive assays, regardless of route of administration. Thus the beta-FNA/calcium model provides a novel, cell-based approach to distinguish structurally related mu-opioid agonists, and in the specific case of the oxymorphols, receptor reserve differences provided a means to bridge functional in vitro and in vivo models.

Selective desensitization of the 5-HT4 receptor-mediated response in pig atrium but not in stomach

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The time dependency of the effect of 5-HT(4) receptor agonists depends on many specific regulatory mechanisms, which vary between tissues. This has important implications with regard to the effects of endogenous 5-HT, as well as to the clinical use of 5-HT(4) receptor agonists, and might contribute to tissue selectivity of agonists.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The progression and desensitization of 5-HT(4) receptor-mediated responses were evaluated in an organ bath set-up using two, clinically relevant, porcine in vitro models: gastric cholinergic neurotransmission and atrial contractility.

KEY RESULTS

Exposure of gastric tissue to 5-HT or to the selective 5-HT(4) receptor agonists prucalopride and M0003 results in a sustained non-transient effect during exposure; after washout, the response to a subsequent challenge with 5-HT shows no clear desensitization. Incubation of left atrial tissue with 5-HT resulted in a transient response, leading after washout to a marked desensitization of the subsequent response to 5-HT. The selective 5-HT(4) receptor agonists prucalopride and M0003 induce only very weak atrial responses whereas they are very effective in desensitizing the atrial response to 5-HT. The observations also suggest that the properties of prucalopride and M0003 to bind to and/or activate the 5-HT(4) receptor differ from those of 5-HT. This difference might have contributed to the observed desensitization.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The high potency of prucalopride and M0003 in desensitizing the response to 5-HT together with their low efficacy in the atrium emphasizes the cardiac safety of this class of 5-HT(4) receptor agonists.

Modulation of opioid receptor function by protein-protein interactions

Opioid receptors, MORP, DORP and KORP, belong to the family A of G protein coupled receptors (GPCR), and have been found to modulate a large number of physiological functions, including mood, stress, appetite, nociception and immune responses. Exogenously applied opioid alkaloids produce analgesia, hedonia and addiction. Addiction is linked to alterations in function and responsiveness of all three opioid receptors in the brain. Over the last few years, a large number of studies identified protein-protein interactions that play an essential role in opioid receptor function and responsiveness. Here, we summarize interactions shown to affect receptor biogenesis and trafficking, as well as those affecting signal transduction events following receptor activation. This article also examines protein interactions modulating the rate of receptor endocytosis and degradation, events that play a major role in opiate analgesia. Like several other GPCRs, opioid receptors may form homo or heterodimers. The last part of this review summarizes recent knowledge on proteins known to affect opioid receptor dimerization.

Ribosomal S6 kinase 2 directly phosphorylates the 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A (5-HT2A) serotonin receptor, thereby modulating 5-HT2A signaling

The 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A (5-HT(2A)) receptor is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily (GPCR) and plays a key role in transducing a variety of cellular signals elicited by 5-hydroxytryptamine in both peripheral and central tissues. Despite its broad physiological importance, our current understanding of 5-HT(2A) receptor regulation is incomplete. We recently reported the novel finding that the multifunctional ERK effector ribosomal S6 kinase 2 (RSK2) physically interacts with the 5-HT(2A) receptor third intracellular (i3) loop and modulates receptor signaling (Sheffler, D. J., Kroeze, W. K., Garcia, B. G., Deutch, A. Y., Hufeisen, S. J., Leahy, P., Bruning, J. C., and Roth, B. L. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 4717-4722). We report here that RSK2 directly phosphorylates the 5-HT(2A) receptor i3 loop at the conserved residue Ser-314, thereby modulating 5-HT(2A) receptor signaling. Furthermore, these studies led to the discovery that RSK2 is required for epidermal growth factor-mediated heterologous desensitization of the 5-HT(2A) receptor. We arrived at these conclusions via multiple lines of evidence, including in vitro kinase experiments, tandem mass spectrometry, and site-directed mutagenesis. Our findings were further validated using phospho-specific Western blot analysis, metabolic labeling studies, and whole-cell signaling experiments. These results support a novel regulatory mechanism in which a downstream effector of the ERK/MAPK pathway directly interacts with, phosphorylates, and modulates signaling of the 5-HT(2A) serotonin receptor. To our knowledge, these findings are the first to demonstrate that a downstream member of the ERK/MAPK cascade phosphorylates a GPCR as well as mediates cross-talk between a growth factor and a GPCR.

Capsaicin inhibits the in vitro binding of peptides selective for mu- and kappa-opioid, and nociceptin-receptors

Capsaicin inhibited the equilibrium specific binding of endogenous opioid-like peptide ligands such as endomorphin-1, nociceptin, and dynorphin((1-17)) in rat brain membrane preparations. We studied the in vitro effect of capsaicin (1-10 microM) on homologous and heterologous competitive binding of opioid ligands, using unlabeled synthetic peptides and the following tritiated compounds: [(3)H]endomorphin-1, [(3)H]endomorphin-2, [(3)H]nociceptin((1-17)) and [(3)H]dynorphin((1-17)). Capsaicin-dependent inhibition was also observed in [(35)S]GTPgammaS stimulation assays in the presence of certain opioid peptides. The inhibition of opioid binding was further investigated using other synthetic and natural mu-opioid ligands such as [D-Ala(2),(NMe)Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO), morphine and naloxone. The decrease in opioid ligand affinity upon capsaicin treatments was most apparent with endomorphin-1, followed by nociceptin and dynorphin. The binding of other investigated opioids were not affected in the presence of capsaicin. In [(3)H]endomorphin-1 binding assays, capsazepine antagonized the inhibitory effect of capsaicin in rat brain membranes suggesting the involvement of TRPV1 receptors. In Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing mu-opioid receptors, but lacking vanilloid receptors, the inhibition by capsaicin on the binding of [(3)H]endomorphin-1 was not present. It is concluded that the inhibitory effect of capsaicin on the receptor binding affinity of endogenous opioid peptides in brain membrane preparations seems not to be a direct effect, it is rather a negative feedback interaction with opioid receptors.

Addictive drugs modulate GIRK-channel signaling by regulating RGS proteins

Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are strong modulators of G-protein-mediated pathways in the nervous system. One function of RGS proteins is to accelerate the activation-deactivation kinetics of G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels. The opening of GIRK channels reduces the firing rates of neurons. Recent studies indicate that RGS proteins also modulate the coupling efficiency between gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptors and GIRK channels in dopamine neurons of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), the initial target for addictive drugs in the brain reward pathway. Chronic drug exposure can dynamically regulate the expression levels of RGS. Functional and behavioral studies now reveal that levels of RGS2 protein, through selective association with GIRK3, critically determine whether GABA(B) agonists are excitatory or inhibitory in the VTA. The regulation of RGS protein in the reward pathway might underlie adaptation to different types of addictive drugs.

Morphine desensitization, internalization, and down-regulation of the mu opioid receptor is facilitated by serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine2A receptor coactivation

Analysis of the distribution of mRNA encoding the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT(2A) receptor and the mu opioid peptide receptor in rat brain demonstrated their coexpression in neurons in several distinct regions. These regions included the periaqueductal gray, an area that plays an important role in morphine-induced analgesia but also in the development of tolerance to morphine. To explore potential cross-regulation between these G protein-coupled receptors, the human mu opioid peptide receptor was expressed stably and constitutively in Flp-In T-REx human embryonic kidney 293 cells that harbored the human 5-HT(2A) receptor at the inducible Flp-In locus. In the absence of the 5-HT(2A) receptor, pretreatment with the enkephalin agonist [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin but not with the alkaloid agonist morphine produced desensitization, internalization, and down-regulation of the mu opioid peptide receptor. Induction of 5-HT(2A) receptor expression in these cells resulted in up-regulation of mu opioid peptide receptor levels that was blocked by both a 5-HT(2A) receptor inverse agonist and selective inhibition of signaling via Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) G proteins. After induction of the 5-HT(2A) receptor, coaddition of 5-HT with morphine now also resulted in desensitization, receptor internalization, and down-regulation of the mu opioid peptide receptor. It has been argued that enhancement of mu opioid peptide receptor internalization in response to morphine would limit the development of tolerance without limiting analgesia. These data suggest that selective activation of the 5-HT(2A) receptor in concert with treatment with morphine might achieve this aim.

Opioid receptors: from binding sites to visible molecules in vivo

Opioid drugs such as heroin interact directly with opioid receptors whilst other addictive drugs, including marijuana, alcohol and nicotine indirectly activate endogenous opioid systems to contribute to their rewarding properties. The opioid system therefore plays a key role in addiction neurobiology and continues to be a primary focus for NIDA-supported research. Opioid receptors and their peptide ligands, the endorphins and enkephalins, form an extensive heterogeneous network throughout the central and peripheral nervous system. In addition to reward, opioid drugs regulate many functions such that opioid receptors are targets of choice in several physiological, neurological and psychiatric disorders. Because of the multiplicity and diversity of ligands and receptors, opioid receptors have served as an optimal model for G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) research. The isolation of opioid receptor genes opened the way to molecular manipulations of the receptors, both in artificial systems and in vivo, contributing to our current understanding of the diversity of opioid receptor biology at the behavioral, cellular and molecular levels. This review will briefly summarize some aspects of current knowledge that has accumulated since the very early characterization of opioid receptor genes. Importantly, we will identify a number of research directions that are likely to develop during the next decade.

Regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signalling: focus on the cardiovascular system and regulator of G protein signalling proteins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in many biological processes. Therefore, GPCR function is tightly controlled both at receptor level and at the level of signalling components. Well-known mechanisms by which GPCR function can be regulated comprise desensitization/resensitization processes and GPCR up- and downregulation. GPCR function can also be regulated by several proteins that directly interact with the receptor and thereby modulate receptor activity. An additional mechanism by which receptor signalling is regulated involves an emerging class of proteins, the so-called regulators of G protein signalling (RGS). In this review we will describe some of these control mechanisms in more detail with some specific examples in the cardiovascular system. In addition, we will provide an overview on RGS proteins and the involvement of RGS proteins in cardiovascular function.