Aprotinin during coronary-artery bypass grafting and risk of death

Aprotinin in primary cardiac surgery: operative outcome of propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Some recent multicenter series have questioned the safety of aprotinin in primary cardiac operations. We report a large, single-center experience with aprotinin therapy in primary cardiac operations and discuss the limitations and potential confounders of current treatment strategies.

METHODS

We compared myocardial infarction, neurologic events, renal insufficiency, and operative death after first-time coronary or valve procedures, or both, in 3334 patients treated with full-dose aprotinin with 3417 patients not treated with aprotinin who underwent operation between March 1998 and January 2007. Further analysis was performed for 341 propensity score-matched pairs.

RESULTS

There were substantial differences between the groups. Aprotinin patients were higher risk on account of older age, unstable symptoms, poor ejection fraction, preoperative hemodynamic support, emergency/urgent operations, and combined coronary/valve operations. Postoperative bleeding and blood product transfusion were considerably reduced in aprotinin patients, as was median duration of mechanical ventilation. Aprotinin was neither a predictor of postoperative myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency, neurologic dysfunction, or operative death. Achieving parity between the groups by propensity score matching eliminated the elevated rates of postoperative renal insufficiency, neurologic dysfunction, and operative death observed in aprotinin patients in the unmatched comparison. These adverse outcomes were evenly distributed between matched groups. Conversely, blood transfusion had univariate associations with all adverse outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Full-dose aprotinin use was not associated with myocardial infarction, neurologic dysfunction, renal insufficiency, or death after coronary or valve operations. We observed less postoperative bleeding and blood product transfusion, and early extubation with the use of aprotinin.

Aprotinin exacerbates left ventricular dysfunction after ischemia/reperfusion in mice lacking tumor necrosis factor receptor I

Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor with diverse biological effects; until recently, it was utilized in the context of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). It has been hypothesized that a signaling pathway modulated by aprotinin in the context of I/R is the tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor (TNFR) pathway. An intact mouse model of I/R (30 min ischemia and 60 min reperfusion) was used and left ventricular (LV) peak + maximal rate of left ventricular (LV) peak pressure (dP/dt) was measured in wild-type mice (WT, C57BL/6; n = 10), WT mice with aprotinin (4 mL/kg; n = 10), transgenic mice devoid of the TNFRI (TNFRI-null; n = 10), and TNFRI-null with aprotinin (n=10). Following I/R, LV peak + dP/dt decreased in both WT groups, but remained similar to baseline values in the TNFRI-null group. In contrast, aprotinin caused a marked reduction in LV peak + dP/dt in the TNFRI-null group following I/R. Soluble plasma TNF levels increased in the WT and TNFRI-null mice with I/R and was reduced with aprotinin. Soluble TNFRI and TNFRII levels, indicative of TNF activation, increased in the WT mice following I/R and remained elevated with aprotinin. Soluble TNFRII levels were increased in the TNFRI-null mice following I/R and remained elevated with aprotinin. The new and unique findings of this study were twofold. First, aprotinin failed to improve LV function after I/R despite a reduction in circulating TNF levels. Second, genetic ablation of TNFRI uncovered a negative inotropic effect of aprotinin. These findings demonstrate that complex biological pathways and interactions are affected with broad spectrum serine protease inhibition, which are relevant to myocardial function in the context of I/R.

A comparison of aprotinin and lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Antifibrinolytic agents are commonly used during cardiac surgery to minimize bleeding and to reduce exposure to blood products. We sought to determine whether aprotinin was superior to either tranexamic acid or aminocaproic acid in decreasing massive postoperative bleeding and other clinically important consequences.

METHODS

In this multicenter, blinded trial, we randomly assigned 2331 high-risk cardiac surgical patients to one of three groups: 781 received aprotinin, 770 received tranexamic acid, and 780 received aminocaproic acid. The primary outcome was massive postoperative bleeding. Secondary outcomes included death from any cause at 30 days.

RESULTS

The trial was terminated early because of a higher rate of death in patients receiving aprotinin. A total of 74 patients (9.5%) in the aprotinin group had massive bleeding, as compared with 93 (12.1%) in the tranexamic acid group and 94 (12.1%) in the aminocaproic acid group (relative risk in the aprotinin group for both comparisons, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 1.05). At 30 days, the rate of death from any cause was 6.0% in the aprotinin group, as compared with 3.9% in the tranexamic acid group (relative risk, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.99 to 2.42) and 4.0% in the aminocaproic acid group (relative risk, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.36). The relative risk of death in the aprotinin group, as compared with that in both groups receiving lysine analogues, was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.06 to 2.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the possibility of a modest reduction in the risk of massive bleeding, the strong and consistent negative mortality trend associated with aprotinin, as compared with the lysine analogues, precludes its use in high-risk cardiac surgery. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN15166455 [controlled-trials.com].).

Recent Publications on Medications and Pharmacy

Hospital Pharmacy presents this feature to keep pharmacists abreast of new publications in the medical/pharmacy literature. Articles of interest will be abstracted monthly regarding a broad scope of topics. Suggestions or comments may be addressed to: Jacyntha Sterling, Drug Information Specialist at Saint Francis Hospital, 6161 S Yale Ave., Tulsa, OK 74136 or e-mail: jasterling@saintfrancis.com .