Quantitative analysis of the complex between p21ras and the Ras-binding domain of the human Raf-1 protein kinase

Ras caught in another affair: the exchange factors for Ral

The Ral guanine nucleotide exchange factors are direct targets of Ras, providing a mechanism for Ral activation by extracellular signals. In addition, Ral can be activated by a Ras-independent pathway. Ral guanine nucleotide exchange factors contribute to cellular transformation induced by oncogenic Ras through an Erk-independent mechanism which may involve activation of transcription.

Raf-1 is involved in the regulation of the interaction between guanine nucleotide exchange factor and Ha-ras. Evidences for a function of Raf-1 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase upstream to Ras

The observation that activated c-Ha-Ras p21 interacts with diverse protein ligands suggests the existence of mechanisms that regulate multiple interactions with Ras. This work studies the influence of the Ras effector c-Raf-1 on the action of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) on Ha-Ras in vitro. Purified GEFs (the catalytic domain of yeast Sdc25p and the full-length and catalytic domain of mouse CDC25Mm) and the Ras binding domains (RBDs) of Raf-1 (Raf (1-149) and Raf (51-131)) were used. Our results show that not only the intrinsic GTP/GTP exchange on Ha-Ras but also the GEF-stimulated exchange is inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by the RBDs of Raf. Conversely, the scintillation proximity assay, which monitors the effect of GEF on the Ras.Raf complex, showed that the binding of Raf and GEF to Ha-Ras.GTP is mutually exclusive. The various GEFs used yielded comparable results. It is noteworthy that under more physiological conditions mimicking the cellular GDP/GTP ratio, Raf enhances the GEF-stimulated GDP/GTP exchange on Ha-Ras, in agreement with the sequestration of Ras.GTP by Raf. Consistent with our results, the GEF-stimulated exchange of Ha-Ras.GTP was also inhibited by another effector of Ras, the RBD (amino acid residues 133-314) of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p110alpha. Our data show that Raf-1 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase can influence the upstream activation of Ha-Ras. The interference between Ras effectors and GEF could be a regulatory mechanism to promote the activity of Ha-Ras in the cell.

RNA aptamers that specifically bind to the Ras-binding domain of Raf-1

RNA aptamers that bind to the Ras-binding domain (RBD) of a proto-oncogene product, Raf-1, were isolated from a pool of random sequences using a glutathione S-transferase-fused RBD (GST-RBD). The RNA molecules bind to the GST-RBD, but not to GST, with dissociation constants of about 300 nM. In contrast, these RNA aptamers do not bind to the Ras-binding domain of the RGL protein, which is also known to be activated by Ras. The aptamers actually compete with Ras for binding to the Raf-1 RBD. The anti-Raf-1 aptamers may be used to specifically inhibit the Ras-Raf interaction in the complicated signaling network in mammalian cells.

The RafC1 cysteine-rich domain contains multiple distinct regulatory epitopes which control Ras-dependent Raf activation

Activation of c-Raf-1 (referred to as Raf) by Ras is a pivotal step in mitogenic signaling. Raf activation is initiated by binding of Ras to the regulatory N terminus of Raf. While Ras binding to residues 51 to 131 is well understood, the role of the RafC1 cysteine-rich domain comprising residues 139 to 184 has remained elusive. To resolve the function of the RafC1 domain, we have performed an exhaustive surface scanning mutagenesis. In our study, we defined a high-resolution map of multiple distinct functional epitopes within RafC1 that are required for both negative control of the kinase and the positive function of the protein. Activating mutations in three different epitopes enhanced Ras-dependent Raf activation, while only some of these mutations markedly increased Raf basal activity. One contiguous inhibitory epitope consisting of S177, T182, and M183 clearly contributed to Ras-Raf binding energy and represents the putative Ras binding site of the RafC1 domain. The effects of all RafC1 mutations on Ras binding and Raf activation were independent of Ras lipid modification. The inhibitory mutation L160A is localized to a position analogous to the phorbol ester binding site in the protein kinase C C1 domain, suggesting a function in cofactor binding. Complete inhibition of Ras-dependent Raf activation was achieved by combining mutations K144A and L160A, which clearly demonstrates an absolute requirement for correct RafC1 function in Ras-dependent Raf activation.

Molecular role for the Rab binding platform of guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor in endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport

Guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) regulates the recycling of Rab GTPases involved in vesicle targeting and fusion. We have analyzed the requirement for conserved amino acid residues in the binding of Rab1A and the function of GDI in transport of cargo between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi apparatus. Using a new approach to monitor GDI-Rab interactions based on the change in fluorescence associated with the release of methylanthraniloyl guanosine di(tri)phosphate-GDP (mGDP) from Rab, we show that residues previously implicated in the binding of the synapse-specific Rab3A, including Gln-236, Arg-240, and Thr-248, are essential for the binding of Rab1A. Mutation of each of these residues has potent effects on the ability of GDI to remove Rab1A from membranes and inhibit ER to Golgi transport in vitro. Given the sequence divergence between Rab1A and 3A (35% identity), these residues are proposed to play a general role in GDI function in the cell. In contrast, several other residues found within or flanking the Rab-binding region were found to have differential effects in the recognition and recycling of Rab1A and 3A, and therefore direct selective interaction of GDI with individual Rab proteins. Intriguingly, mutation of one residue, Arg-70, led to a reduction of Rab1A binding, failed to extract Rab1A from membranes in vitro, yet bound membranes tightly and potently inhibited ER to Golgi transport. These results provide evidence that novel membrane-associated factor(s) mediate Rab-independent GDI interaction with membranes.

Ras isoforms vary in their ability to activate Raf-1 and phosphoinositide 3-kinase

Ha-, N-, and Ki-Ras are ubiquitously expressed in mammalian cells and can all interact with the same set of effector proteins. We show here, however, that in vivo there are marked quantitative differences in the ability of Ki- and Ha-Ras to activate Raf-1 and phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Thus, Ki-Ras both recruits Raf-1 to the plasma membrane more efficiently than Ha-Ras and is a more potent activator of membrane-recruited Raf-1 than Ha-Ras. In contrast, Ha-Ras is a more potent activator of phosphoinositide 3-kinase than Ki-Ras. Interestingly, the ability of Ha-Ras to recruit Raf-1 to the plasma membrane is significantly increased when the Ha-Ras hypervariable region is shortened so that the spacing of the Ha-Ras GTPase domains from the inner surface of the plasma membrane mimicks that of Ki-Ras. Importantly, these data show for the first time that the activation of different Ras isoforms can have distinct biochemical consequences for the cell. The mutation of specific Ras isoforms in different human tumors can, therefore, also be rationalized.

Byr4 and Cdc16 form a two-component GTPase-activating protein for the Spg1 GTPase that controls septation in fission yeast

BACKGROUND

Spatial and temporal control of cytokinesis ensures the accurate transmission of genetic material and the correct development of multicellular organisms. An excellent model system in which to study cytokinesis is Schizosaccharomyces pombe because there are similarities between cytokinesis in S. pombe and mammals and because genes involved in S. pombe cytokinesis have been characterized. In particular, formation of the septum is positively regulated by the Spg1 GTPase and its effector, the Cdc7 kinase. Septation is negatively regulated by Cdc16, a protein similar to GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for Ypt GTPases, and by Byr4, a protein of unknown biochemical function. This study investigates the relationship between Byr4, Cdc16, and Spg1.

RESULTS

Genetic interactions were observed between byr4, cdc16, and spg1 mutants. Byr4 bound to Cdc16 and Spg1 in yeast two-hybrid assays and in coprecipitations in vitro and in yeast. Byr4 inhibited the dissociation and hydrolysis of GTP bound to Spg1, but when Byr4 and Cdc16 were combined together they displayed Spg1GAP activity in vitro; Cdc16 alone had no detectable GAP activity. The binding of Byr4 to Spg1 and the Byr4-Cdc16 Spg1GAP activity were specific because Byr4 and Cdc16 did not bind to or affect the GTPase activities of the seven known S pombe Ypt family GTPase.

CONCLUSIONS

Byr4 and Cdc16 form a two-component GAP for the Spg1 GTPase. Byr4 and Cdc16 appear to negatively regulate septation in S. pombe by modulating the nucleotide state of Spg1 possibly in a spatially or temporally controlled manner.

Transforming growth factor-beta1-induced activation of the Raf-MEK-MAPK signaling pathway in rat lung fibroblasts via a PKC-dependent mechanism

In fibroblasts transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) regulates cell proliferation and turnover of macromolecular components of the extracellular matrix. Here, intracellular signaling events in growth-inhibited embryonic rat lung fibroblasts (RFL-6) upon stimulation with TGF-beta1 were investigated. TGF-beta1 rapidly induced the activation of c-Raf-1, MEK-1, and MAPK p42 and p44. The activation of this pathway by TGF-beta1 did not depend on autocrine platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) or basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). Inhibition of the binding of growth factors to their tyrosine kinase receptors did not affect MAPK activation by TGF-beta1. Ras activation by TGF-beta1 was significantly lower compared to the activation by PDGF or bFGF. The intracellular transduction of the TGF-beta1 signal was completely suppressed by depletion or inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC). It is shown that calcium-dependent isoforms of PKC are required for MAPK activation by TGF-beta1.

The Cdc42/Rac interactive binding region motif of the Wiskott Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) is necessary but not sufficient for tight binding to Cdc42 and structure formation

Wiskott Aldrich syndrome is a rare hereditary disease that affects cell morphology and signal transduction in hematopoietic cells. Different size fragments of the Wiskott Aldrich syndrome protein, W4, W7 and W13, were expressed in Escherichia coli or obtained from proteolysis. All contain the GTPase binding domain (GBD), also called Cdc42/Rac interactive binding region (CRIB), found in many putative downstream effectors of Rac and Cdc42. We have developed assays to measure the binding interaction between these fragments and Cdc42 employing fluorescent N-methylanthraniloyl-guanine nucleotide analogues. The fragments bind with submicromolar affinities in a GTP-dependent manner, with the largest fragment having the highest affinity, showing that the GBD/CRIB motif is necessary but not sufficient for tight binding. Rate constants for the interaction with W13 have been determined via surface plasmon resonance, and the equilibrium dissociation constant obtained from their ratio agrees with the value obtained by fluorescence measurements. Far UV circular dichroism spectra show significant secondary structure only for W13, supported by fluorescence studies using intrinsic protein fluorescence and quenching by acrylamide. Proton and 15N NMR measurements show that the GBD/CRIB motif has no apparent secondary structure and that the region C-terminal to the GBD/CRIB region is alpha-helical. The binding of Cdc42 induces a structural rearrangement of residues in the GBD/CRIB motif, or alternatively, the Wiskott Aldrich syndrome protein fragments have an ensemble of conformations, one of which is stabilized by Cdc42 binding. Thus, in contrast to Ras effectors, which have no conserved sequence elements but a defined domain structure with ubiquitin topology, Rac/Cdc42 effectors have a highly conserved binding region but no defined domain structure in the absence of the GTP-binding protein. Deviating from common belief GBD/CRIB is neither a structural domain nor sufficient for tight binding as regions outside this motif are necessary for structure formation and tight interaction with Rho/Rac proteins.

Functional consequences of monoglucosylation of Ha-Ras at effector domain amino acid threonine 35

Monoglucosylation of low molecular mass GTPases is an important post-translational modification by which microbes interfere with eukaryotic cell signaling. Ha-Ras is monoglucosylated at effector domain amino acid threonine 35 by Clostridium sordellii lethal toxin, resulting in a blockade of the downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. To understand the molecular consequences of this modification, effects of glucosylation on each step of the GTPase cycle of Ras were analyzed. Whereas nucleotide binding was not significantly altered, intrinsic GTPase activity was markedly decreased, and GTPase stimulation by the GTPase-activating protein p120(GAP) and neurofibromin NF-1 was completely blocked, caused by failure to bind to glucosylated Ras. Guanine nucleotide exchange factor (Cdc25)-catalyzed GTP loading was decreased, but not completely inhibited. A dominant-negative property of modified Ras to sequester exchange factor was not detectable. However, the crucial step in downstream signaling, Ras-effector coupling, was completely blocked. The Kd for the interaction between Ras.GTP and the Ras-binding domain of Raf was 15 nM, whereas glucosylation increased the Kd to >1 mM. Because the affinity of Ras.GDP for Raf (Kd = 22 microM) is too low to allow functional interaction, a glucose moiety at threonine 35 of Ras seems to block completely the interaction with Raf. The net effect of lethal toxin-catalyzed glucosylation of Ras is the complete blockade of Ras downstream signaling.

Modulation of Ins(2,4,5)P3-stimulated Ca2+ mobilization by ins(1,3,4, 5)P4: enhancement by activated G-proteins, and evidence for the involvement of a GAP1 protein, a putative Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 receptor

We have previously shown that addition of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 to permeabilized L1210 cells increases the amount of Ca2+ mobilized by a submaximal concentration of Ins(2,4,5)P3, and we suggested that, in doing this, Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 is not working via an InsP3 receptor but indirectly via an InsP4 receptor [Loomis-Husselbee, Cullen, Dreikhausen, Irvine and Dawson (1996) Biochem. J. 314, 811-816]. Here we have investigated whether this effect might be mediated by GAP1(IP4BP), recently identified as a putative receptor for Ins(1,3, 4,5)P4. GAP1(IP4BP) is a protein that interacts with one or more monomeric G-proteins, so we sought evidence for involvement of monomeric G-proteins in the effects of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 in permeabilized L1210 cells. Guanosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate (GTP[S]) enhanced the effect of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 on Ins(2,4, 5)P3-stimulated Ca2+ mobilization, but had no effect on the action of Ins(2,4,5)P3 alone. A specific enhancement of only the action of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 was also seen with GTP[S]-loaded R-Ras or Rap1a (two G-proteins known to interact with GAP1(IP4BP)), whereas H-Ras was inactive at similar concentrations. Guanosine 5'-[beta-thio]diphosphate (GDP[S]) did not alter the action of either Ins(2,4,5)P3 or Ins(1,3,4,5)P4. Finally, the addition of exogenous GAP1(IP4BP), purified from platelets, markedly enhanced the effect of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4, and again, the amount of Ca2+ mobilized by Ins(2,4,5)P3 alone was unaltered. We conclude that the increase in Ins(2,4,5)P3-stimulated Ca2+ mobilization by Ins(1,3,4, 5)P4 may be mediated by GAP1(IP4BP) or a closely related protein (such as GAP1(m)), and if so, the action of the GAP1 is not solely to regulate GTP loading of a G-protein, but rather it acts with a G-protein to cause its effect.

Electrostatic contributions to protein-protein binding affinities: application to Rap/Raf interaction

The challenge of evaluating absolute binding free energies of protein-protein complexes is addressed using the scaled Protein Dipoles Langevin Dipoles (PDLD/S) model in combination with the Linear Response Approximation (LRA). This is done by taking the complex between Rap1A (Rap) and the p21ras binding domain of c-Raf (Raf-RBD) (Nassar et al., Nature 375:554-560, 1995) as a model system. Several formulations and different thermodynamic cycles are explored taking advantage of the LRA method and considering the protein reorganization during complex formation. The performance of different approximations is examined by comparing the calculated and observed absolute binding energies for the native complex and some of its mutants. The evaluation of the contributions of individual residues to the binding free energy, which is referred to here as group contributions is also examined. Special attention is paid to the role of the "dielectric constant," epsilon(in) which is in fact a scaling factor that represents the contributions that are treated implicitly. It is found that explicit consideration of protein relaxation is crucial for obtaining reasonable results with small values of epsilon(in), but it is also found that such a treatment of protein-protein interactions is very challenging and does not always give stable results. This indicates that more advanced explicit calculations should be based on experimentally determined structures of both the complex and the isolated proteins. Nevertheless, it is demonstrated that the qualitative trend of the effect of mutations can be reproduced by considering the effect of protein reorganization implicitly, using epsilon(in) approximately 25 for ionized residues and epsilon(in) approximately 4 for polar residues. Thus, it is concluded that an explicit treatment of solvent relaxation (which is common to current continuum models) does not provide sufficient compensation for turning off the charges of ionized residues on the interaction surface of the Raf-RBD/Rap complex. Representing the missing contribution by large epsilon(in) can, of course, reproduce the observed effect of ionized residues, but now the contribution of uncharged residues will be largely underestimated. Regardless of these conceptual problems, it is established that a very simple nonrelaxed approach, where the relaxation of both the protein and the solvent are considered implicitly, can provide an effective qualitative way for evaluating group contributions, using large and small values for epsilon(in) of ionized and neutral residues, respectively. As much as the actual system studied is concerned we find that more residues than generally assumed play a role in Raf-RBD/Rap interaction. This includes residues that are not located at the protein-protein interaction surface. These residues contribute to the binding energy through direct charge-charge interaction without leading to drastic structural changes. The overall contribution of the surface residues is quite significant since Raf and Rap are positively and negatively charged, respectively, and their charges are distributed along the interaction site between the two proteins.

Fluoride activation of the Rho family GTP-binding protein Cdc42Hs

Aluminum tetrafluoride (AlF4-) activation of heterotrimeric G-protein alpha-subunits is a well established aspect of the biochemistry of these proteins; however, until recently it has been thought that AlF4- does not mediate effects on the Ras superfamily of low molecular weight GTP-binding proteins. Recent work demonstrating aluminum fluoride-induced complex formation between Ras and its GTPase-activating proteins (RasGAP and NF1) has provided important insights into the mechanism of GAP-stimulated GTP hydrolysis. We have characterized the AlF4--induced complex formation between the GDP-bound form of the Rho subfamily G-protein Cdc42Hs and a limit functional domain of the Cdc42-GAP using a variety of biochemical techniques. Our results indicate that the apparent affinity of GAP for the AlF4--mediated complex is similar to the affinity observed for the activated (GTP-bound) form of Cdc42 and that beryllium (Be) can replace aluminum in mediating fluoride-induced complex formation. Additionally, the AlF4--induced interaction is weakened significantly by the catalytically compromised GAP(R305A) mutant, indicating that this arginine is critical in transition state stabilization. Unlike Ras, we find that AlF4- and BeF3- mediate complex formation between Cdc42Hs.GDP and downstream target/effector molecules, indicating that there are important differences in the mechanism of effector binding between the Ras and Rho subfamily G-proteins.

Evidence for a high affinity, saturable, prenylation-dependent p21Ha-ras binding site in plasma membranes

Oncogenic p21ras proteins can only exert their stimulation of cellular proliferation when plasma membrane-associated. This membrane association has an absolute requirement for post-translational modification with isoprenoids. The mechanism by which isoprenoids participate in the specific association of p21ras with plasma membranes is the subject of this report. We present in vitro evidence for a plasma membrane binding protein for p21(ras) that can recognize the isoprenoid substituent and, therefore, may facilitate the localization of p21ras.

Discrimination of amino acids mediating Ras binding from noninteracting residues affecting raf activation by double mutant analysis

The contribution of residues outside the Ras binding domain of Raf (RafRBD) to Ras-Raf interaction and Ras-dependent Raf activation has remained unresolved. Here, we utilize a double mutant approach to identify complementary interacting amino acids that are involved in Ras-Raf interaction and activation. Biochemical analysis demonstrates that Raf-Arg59 and Raf-Arg67 from RafRBD are interacting residues complementary to Ras-Glu37 located in the Ras effector region. Raf-Arg59 and Raf-Arg67 also mediate interaction with Ras-Glu37 in Ras-dependent Raf activation. The characteristics observed here can be used as criteria for a role of residues from other regions of Raf in Ras-Raf interaction and activation. We developed a quantitative two-hybrid system as a tool to investigate the effect of point mutations on protein-protein interactions that elude biochemical analysis of bacterially expressed proteins. This assay shows that Raf-Ser257 in the RafCR2 domain does not contribute to Ras-Raf interaction and that the Raf-S257L mutation does not restore Raf binding to Ras-E37G. Yet, Raf-S257L displays high constitutive kinase activity and further activation by Ras-G12V/E37G is still impaired as compared with activation by Ras-G12V. This strongly suggests that the RafCR2 domain is an independent domain involved in the control of Raf activity and a common mechanism for constitutively activating mutants may be the interference with the inactive ground state of the kinase.

Identification and characterization of mutations in Ha-Ras that selectively decrease binding to cRaf-1

The oncoprotein Ras transforms cells by binding to one or more effector proteins. Effector proteins have been identified by their ability to bind to Ras in the GTP but not GDP form, and by their requirement for the Ras effector domain for binding. The best understood Ras effectors are serine/threonine kinases of the Raf family, but other candidate Ras effectors, including a Ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3 kinase) have also been identified. To investigate the mechanism of binding of cRaf-1 to Ras, and to investigate the roles of other candidate Ras effectors in transformation, we have isolated and characterized mutants of activated Ras with decreased binding to cRaf-1 relative to other candidate effectors. Examination of these mutants indicates that surface-exposed residues of Ras outside the minimal effector domain interact differentially with cRaf-1 and other Ras-binding proteins, and that fibroblast transformation correlates with cRaf-1 binding and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation. Furthermore, activation of PI3 kinase can occur in the absence of significant MAP kinase activation, suggesting that PI3 kinase activation is a primary effect of Ras.

Ras-binding domains: predicting function versus folding

Ras interacts with a number of effector molecules to achieve its prolific signalling. Based on iterative sequence profile and motif searches of databases a novel family of Ras-binding domains was recently identified (Ponting and Benjamin, Trends Biochem. Sci. 21: 422-425, 1996). Among them the rat unconventional myosin and Rho-GTPase-activating protein myr 5 was predicted to contain a Ras-binding domain at its N-terminus. Here we report that direct binding experiments between the proposed Ras-binding domain of myr 5 and Ras failed to demonstrate any interaction. Molecular modelling suggests that this domain in myr 5 adopts a similar folding topology as the Ras-binding domain of Raf kinase. However, unlike the Ras-binding domain of Raf kinase, the myr 5 domain lacks the positive surface charges necessary for binding the negatively charged Ras contact site. This result exemplifies the functional diversity of similar structures and suggests that the identified Ras-binding motif does not reliably predict Ras-binding domains.

Disassembly of RanGTP-karyopherin beta complex, an intermediate in nuclear protein import

We previously showed that RanGTP forms a 1:1 complex with karyopherin beta that renders RanGTP inaccessible to RanGAP (Floer, M., and Blobel, G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5313-5316) and karyopherin beta functionally inactive (Rexach, M., and Blobel, G. (1995) Cell 83, 683-692). Recycling of both factors for another round of function requires dissociation of the RanGTP-karyopherin beta complex. Here we show using BIAcoreTM, a solution binding assay, and GTP hydrolysis and exchange assays, with yeast proteins, that karyopherin beta and RanGTP are recycled efficiently in a reaction that involves karyopherin alpha, RanBP1, RanGAP, and the C terminus of the nucleoporin Nup1. We find that karyopherin alpha first releases RanGTP from karyopherin beta in a reaction that does not require GTP hydrolysis. The released RanGTP is then sequestered by RanBP1, and the newly formed karyopherin alphabeta binds to the C terminus of Nup1. Finally, RanGTP is converted to RanGDP via nucleotide hydrolysis when RanGAP is present. Conversion of RanGTP to RanGDP can also occur via nucleotide exchange in the presence of RanGEF, an excess of GDP, and if RanBP1 is absent. Additional nucleoporin domains that bind karyopherin alphabeta stimulate recycling of karyopherin beta and Ran in a manner similar to the C terminus of Nup1.

Mss4 does not function as an exchange factor for Rab in endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport

Mss4 and its yeast homologue, Dss4, have been proposed to function as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for a subset of Rab proteins in the secretory pathway. We have previously shown that Rab1A mutants defective in GTP-binding potently inhibit endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport, presumably by sequestering an unknown GEF regulating its function. We now demonstrate that these mutants stably associate with Mss4 both in vivo and in vitro and that Mss4 effectively neutralizes the inhibitory activity of the Rab1A mutants. An equivalent Rab3A mutant (Rab3A[N135I]), a Rab protein specifically involved in regulated secretion at the cell surface, associates with Mss4 as efficiently as the Rab1A[N124I] mutant. Although Rab3A[N135I] prevents the ability of Mss4 to neutralize the inhibitory effects of Rab1A mutants on transport, it has no effect on Rab1 function or endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport. Furthermore, quantitative immunodepletion of Mss4 fails to inhibit transport in vitro. We conclude that Mss4 and its yeast homologue, Dss4, are not GEFs mediating activation of Rab, but rather, they interact with the transient guanine nucleotide-free state, defining a new class of Ras-superfamily GTPase effectors that function as guanine nucleotide-free chaperones (GFCs).

Interaction of activated Ras with Raf-1 alone may be sufficient for transformation of rat2 cells

v-H-ras effector mutants have been assessed for transforming activity and for the ability of the encoded proteins to interact with Raf-1-, B-Raf-, byr2-, ralGDS-, and CDC25-encoded proteins in the yeast two-hybrid system. Transformation was assessed in rat2 cells as well as in a mutant cell line, rv68BUR, that affords a more sensitive transformation assay. Selected mutant Ras proteins were also examined for their ability to interact with an amino-terminal fragment of Raf-1 in vitro. Finally, possible cooperation between different v-H-ras effector mutants and between effector mutants and overexpressed Raf-1 was assessed. Ras transforming activity was shown to correlate best with the ability of the encoded protein to interact with Raf-1. No evidence for cooperation between v-H-ras effector mutants was found. Signaling through the Raf1-MEK-mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade may be the only effector pathway contributing to RAS transformation in these cells.

Characterization of the structural difference between active and inactive forms of the Ras protein by chemical modification followed by mass spectrometric peptide mapping

Ras is one of the guanosine triphosphate (GTP) binding proteins that plays a significant role in signaling events of cell growth and differentiation. It can exist in two states: guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-bound from (Ras.GDP; inactive) and GTP-bound form (Ras.GTP; active). This paper discusses the difference in tertiary structure between the active and inactive forms using the combination of chemical modification and mass spectrometry. This difference can be clearly recognized in the presence of a target protein. Raf-1 RBD (Raf-1 Ras-binding domain), as differing glycinamidation of carboxyl groups. It was possible to observe the difference between these two states using several hundred picomoles of sample. While it is true that it is difficult to obtain the whole picture of a protein by the combination of chemical modification and mass spectrometry, it is a promising approach for the characterization of surface structure using very small amounts of sample.

The complexity of Raf-1 regulation

The activation of the serine/threonine kinase Raf-1 is proving to be an intricate multistep process. Recent advances in elucidating how Raf-1 becomes activated in response to signaling events have emphasized the role of phosphorylation and protein interactions in Raf-1 regulation. The picture clearly emerging is that Raf-1 activity can be regulated by multiple mechanisms.

R-Ras can activate the phosphoinositide 3-kinase but not the MAP kinase arm of the Ras effector pathways

BACKGROUND

The small GTPase R-Ras displays a less potent transforming activity than the closely related Ras oncogene products. Although R-Ras has been reported to interact with c-Raf1 and Ral-GDS in vitro, the pathways by which it exerts its effects on cellular proliferation are not known.

RESULTS

Both Ras and R-Ras interact with phosphoinositide (PI) 3-kinase in vitro, and induce elevation of the levels of PI 3-kinase lipid products in intact cells. Unlike Ras, R-Ras does not activate Raf or mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase in cells. In co-transfection assays, the serine/threonine protein kinase PKB (or Akt) is effectively stimulated by R-Ras, Ras, mutants of Ras that activate PI 3-kinase but not other effectors, and activated forms of PI 3-kinase. Ras and R-Ras stimulate PKB/Akt through a non-autocrine mechanism that involves PI 3-kinase. The constitutive activation of PI 3-kinase alone is sufficient to activate PKB/Akt, but not the MAP kinase ERK or the stress-activated protein kinase, Jun N-terminal kinase. Transformation assays in fibroblasts suggest that PKB/Akt and Raf are part of distinct oncogenic signalling pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the Raf-MAP kinase and PI 3-kinase-PKB/Akt pathways are activated by Ras, but only the PI 3-kinase-PKB/Akt pathway is activated by R-Ras. PI 3-kinase, and downstream targets such as PKB/Akt, are likely to be essential mediators of transformation induced by R-Ras. PI 3-kinase, as well as Raf, is thus implicated also in Ras transformation.

An intact Raf zinc finger is required for optimal binding to processed Ras and for ras-dependent Raf activation in situ

The function of the c-Raf-1 zinc finger domain in the activation of the Raf kinase was examined by the creation of variant zinc finger structures. Mutation of Raf Cys 165 and Cys 168 to Ser strongly inhibits the Ras-dependent activation of c-Raf-1 by epidermal growth factor (EGF). Deletion of the Raf zinc finger and replacement with a homologous zinc finger from protein kinase C gamma (PKC gamma) (to give gamma/Raf) also abrogates EGF-induced activation but enables a vigorous phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-induced activation. PMA activation of gamma/Raf does not require endogenous Ras or PKCs and probably occurs through a PMA-induced recruitment of gamma/Raf to the plasma membrane. The impaired ability of EGF to activate the Raf zinc finger variants in situ is attributable, at least in part, to a major decrement in their binding to Ras-GTP; both Raf zinc finger variants exhibit decreased association with Ras (V12) in situ upon coexpression in COS cells, as well as diminished binding in vitro to immobilized, processed COS recombinant Ras(V12)-GTP. In contrast, Raf binding to unprocessed COS or prokaryotic recombinant Ras-GTP is unaffected by Raf zinc finger mutation. Thus, the Raf zinc finger contributes an important component to the overall binding to Ras-GTP in situ, through an interaction between the zinc finger and an epitope on Ras, distinct from the effector loop, that is present only on prenylated Ras.

Cell cycle-dependent activation of Ras

BACKGROUND

Ras proteins play an essential role in the transduction of signals from a wide range of cell-surface receptors to the nucleus. These signals may promote cellular proliferation or differentiation, depending on the cell background. It is well established that Ras plays an important role in the transduction of mitogenic signals from activated growth-factor receptors, leading to cell-cycle entry. However, important questions remain as to whether Ras controls signalling events during cell-cycle progression and, if so, at which point in the cell-cycle it is activated.

RESULTS

To address these questions we have developed a novel, functional assay for the detection of cellular activated Ras. Using this assay, we found that Ras was activated in HeLa cells, following release from mitosis, and in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, following serum-stimulated cell-cycle entry. In each case, peak Ras activation occurred in mid-G1 phase. Ras activation in HeLa cells at mid-G1 phase was dependent on RNA and protein synthesis and was not associated with tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc proteins and their binding to Grb2. Significantly, activation of Ras and the extracellular-signal regulated (ERK) sub-group of mitogen-activated protein kinases were not temporally correlated during G1-phase progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Activation of Ras during mid-G1 phase appears to differ in many respects from its rapid activation by growth factors, suggesting a novel mechanism of regulation that may be intrinsic to cell-cycle progression. Furthermore, the temporal dissociation between Ras and ERK activation suggests that Ras targets alternate effector pathways during G1-phase progression.

The dominant negative effects of H-Ras harboring a Gly to Ala mutation at position 60

v-H-Ras harboring the Gly-60 to Ala mutation (G60A) lacks the ability to induce germinal vesicle breakdown in Xenopus oocytes. Moreover, this mutant is capable of inhibiting the activity of v-H-Ras to induce oocyte germinal vesicle breakdown when co-injected. The duration and the extent of inhibition depends on the molar ratio of v-H-Ras(G60A) to v-H-Ras. The inhibition is not due to a general toxicity of v-H-Ras(G60A) to oocytes because oocytes injected with v-H-Ras(G60A) can be readily induced to mature by other mitogenic agents, such as insulin, insulin-like growth factor 1, insulin-like growth factor 2, and phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C. The dominant negative effect of v-H-Ras(G60A) requires proper membrane attachment of v-H-Ras(G60A). By using a competition assay, it was concluded that the dominant negative phenotype of v-H-Ras(G60A) resulted from sequestering H-Ras downstream effector(s). Raf-1 was identified as one of the sequestered targets.

Ras/Rap effector specificity determined by charge reversal

Members of the Ras subfamily of small GTP-binding proteins have been shown to be promiscuous towards a variety of putative effector molecules such as the protein kinase c-Raf and the Ral-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor (Ral-GEF). To address the question of specificity of interactions we have introduced the mutations E30D and K31E into Rap and show biochemically, by X-ray structure analysis and by transfection in vivo that the identical core effector region of Ras and Rap (residues 32-40) is responsible for molecular recognition, but that residues outside this region are responsible for the specificity of the interaction. The major determinant for the switch in specificity is the opposite charge of residue 31--Lys in Rap, Glu in Ras--which creates a favourable complementary interface for the Ras-Raf interaction.

Formation of a transition-state analog of the Ras GTPase reaction by Ras-GDP, tetrafluoroaluminate, and GTPase-activating proteins

Unlike the alpha subunits of heterotrimeric guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding proteins, Ras-related GTP-binding proteins have hitherto been considered not to bind or become activated by tetrafluoroaluminate (AIF4-). However, the product of the proto-oncogene ras in its guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-bound form interacted with AIF4 - in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of either of the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-activating proteins (GAPs) p120GAP and neurofibromin. Neither oncogenic Ras nor a GAP mutant without catalytic activity produced such a complex. Together with the finding that the Ras-binding domain of the protein kinase c-Raf, whose binding site on Ras overlaps that of the GAPs, did not induce formation of such a complex, this result suggests that GAP and neurofibromin stabilize the transition state of the GTPase reaction of Ras.

p120 Ras GTPase-activating protein interacts with Ras-GTP through specific conserved residues

Previous structural studies of RasGAP have failed to clearly localize sites of Ras interaction to individual amino acids. Hypothesizing that sites of interaction with Ras-GTP would be conserved, 11 of the most highly conserved amino acid residues of RasGAP were changed by mutation. Each mutant protein was purified as a glutathione S-transferase catalytic domain fusion and analyzed for protein stability, Ras GTPase stimulating activity, affinity for Ras-GTP, and when possible, secondary structure. The majority of conserved positions were found to be important structurally but with no direct role in Ras interactions. However, Arg786, Lys831, and Arg925 were observed to be essential for binding to Ras-GTP but not for protein structure. RasGAP residues 890-902 (block 3A) were observed to be homologous to residues 1540-1552 of the yeast adenylyl cyclase with amino acid substitutions in both regions resulting in increased affinity for Ras. This is the first example of a conserved Ras interaction motif in distinct Ras effector proteins. Our data are supportive of a model for GAP/Ras-GTP association in which the conserved, positively charged Arg786, Lys831, and Arg925 residues form salt bridges with the conserved, negatively charged residues in the Ras effector loop.

Ras, Rap, and Rac small GTP-binding proteins are targets for Clostridium sordellii lethal toxin glucosylation

Lethal toxin (LT) from Clostridium sordellii is one of the high molecular mass clostridial cytotoxins. On cultured cells, it causes a rounding of cell bodies and a disruption of actin stress fibers. We demonstrate that LT is a glucosyltransferase that uses UDP-Glc as a cofactor to covalently modify 21-kDa proteins both in vitro and in vivo. LT glucosylates Ras, Rap, and Rac. In Ras, threonine at position 35 was identified as the target amino acid glucosylated by LT. Other related members of the Ras GTPase superfamily, including RhoA, Cdc42, and Rab6, were not modified by LT. Incubation of serum-starved Swiss 3T3 cells with LT prevents the epidermal growth factor-induced phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK1 and ERK2, indicating that the toxin blocks Ras function in vivo. We also demonstrate that LT acts inside the cell and that the glucosylation reaction is required to observe its dramatic effect on cell morphology. LT is thus a powerful tool to inhibit Ras function in vivo.

Ras effectors

The search for proteins which interact with the active GTP-bound form of Ras in order to transmit signals for proliferation, differentiation and oncogenesis has been a long one. Now there are several strong candidates for Ras effectors that include protein kinases, lipid kinases and guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Structural information on how one Ras-binding domain in an effector interacts with Ras.GTP has recently been obtained. Recent data show that transformation by Ras oncoproteins requires the activation of several signal transduction pathways, including those which transmit signals via members of the Rho family of GTPases.

Equilibrium and kinetic measurements reveal rapidly reversible binding of Ras to Raf

Raf is a serine/threonine kinase that binds through its amino-terminal regulatory domain to the GTP form of Ras and thereby activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. In this study, we have characterized the interaction of the Ras-binding domain of Raf with Ras using equilibrium binding methods (scintillation proximity assay and fluorescence anisotropy), rather than with more widely used nonequilibrium procedures (such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and affinity precipitation). Initial studies using glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins with either residues 1-257 or 1-190 of Raf showed that although it was possible to detect Ras binding using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or affinity precipitation, it was substoichiometric; under equilibrium conditions with only a small excess of Raf almost no binding was detected. This difference was probably due to the presence of a high percentage of inactive Raf protein. Further studies used protein containing residues 51-131 of Raf, which expressed in Escherichia coli as a stable glutathione S-transferase fusion. With this protein, binding with Ras could readily be measured under equilibrium conditions. The catalytic domain of neurofibromin inhibited binding of Ras to Raf, and Raf inhibited the binding of Ras to neurofibromin showing that Raf and neurofibromin cannot be bound simultaneously to Ras. The affinities of interaction of neurofibromin and Raf with Harvey-RasLeu-61 were similar. The rate constant for dissociation of Raf from Ras was estimated to be >1 min-1, suggesting that Ras, Raf, and neurofibromin may be in rapid equilibrium in the cell. In contrast to previous reports, under equilibrium conditions there was no evidence for a difference in affinity between the minimal Ras binding domain of Raf (residues 51-131) and a region containing an additional 16 carboxyl-terminal amino acids, suggesting that residues 132-147 do not form a critical binding determinant.

The nuclear transport factor karyopherin beta binds stoichiometrically to Ran-GTP and inhibits the Ran GTPase activating protein

The heterodimeric karyopherin functions in targeting a nuclear localization sequence (NLS)-containing protein to the nuclear pore complex followed by Ran-GTP and p10-mediated translocation of the NLS protein into the nucleoplasm. It was shown recently that Ran-GTP dissociated the karyopherin heterodimer and, in doing so, associated with karyopherin beta (Rexach, M., and Blobel, G. (1995) Cell 83, 683-692). We show here, using all recombinant yeast proteins expressed in Escherichia coli, that karyopherin beta binds to Ran-GTP and inhibits GTP hydrolysis stimulated by RanGAP (the Ran-specific GTPase activating protein). Inhibition of RanGAP-stimulated GTP hydrolysis by karyopherin beta was dependent on karyopherin beta concentration relative to Ran-GTP. Complete inhibition of RanGAP was observed at karyopherin beta concentrations that were equimolar to Ran-GTP. In gel filtration experiments, we found Ran-GTP and karyopherin beta to form a stoichiometric complex. Ran-GDP bound only weakly to karyopherin beta. We propose that stoichiometric complex formation between karyopherin beta and Ran-GTP renders Ran-GTP inaccessible to RanGAP.

Ras-induced activation of Raf-1 is dependent on tyrosine phosphorylation

Although Rafs play a central role in signal transduction, the mechanism(s) by which they become activated is poorly understood. Raf-1 activation is dependent on the protein's ability to bind Ras, but Ras binding is insufficient to activate Raf-1 tyrosine phosphorylation to this Ras-induced activation, in the absence of an over-expressed tyrosine kinase. We demonstrate that Raf-1 purified form Sf9 cells coinfected with baculovirus Ras but not Src could be inactivated by protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP-1B. 14-3-3 and Hsp90 proteins blocked both the tyrosine dephosphorylation and inactivation of Raf-1, suggesting that Raf-1 activity is phosphotyrosine dependent. In Ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells, a minority of Raf-1 protein was membrane associated, but essentially all Raf-1 activity and Raf-1 phosphotyrosine fractionated with plasma membranes. Thus, the tyrosine-phosphorylated and active pool of Raf-1 constitute a membrane-localized subfraction which could also be inactivated with PTP-1B. By contrast, B-Raf has aspartic acid residues at positions homologous to those of the phosphorylated tyrosines (at 340 and 341) of Raf-1 and displays a high basal level of activity. B-Raf was not detectably tyrosine phosphorylated, membrane localized, or further activated upon Ras transformation, even though B-Raf has been shown to bind to Ras in vitro. We conclude that tyrosine phosphorylation is an essential component of the mechanism by which Ras activates Raf-1 kinase activity and that steady-state activated Ras is insufficient to activate B-Raf in vivo.

Quantitative structure-activity analysis correlating Ras/Raf interaction in vitro to Raf activation in vivo

Binding of Ras to c-Raf-1 is a pivotal step of many mitogenic signalling pathways. Based on the recent crystal structure of the complex of Rap1A with the Ras-binding domain of Raf, mutations were introduced in c-Raf-1 and their effects on Ras/Raf binding affinity in vitro and Ras/Raf regulated gene expression in vivo were analysed. Our data reveal an empirical semilogarithmic correlation between dissociation constants and Raf-induced gene activity. The functional epitope that primarily determines binding affinity consists of residues Gln 66, Lys 84 and Arg 89 in Raf. This quantitative structure-activity investigation may provide a general approach to correlate structure-guided biochemical analysis with biological function of protein-protein interactions.

Regulatory GTPases

The past year has witnessed a tremendous increase in our understanding of the structures and interactions of the GTPases. The highlights include crystal structures of G alpha subunits, as well as the first complex between a GTPase (Rap1A) and an effector molecule (c-Raf1 Ras-binding domain). In the field of elongation factors (EFs), three very important structures have been determined: EF-G, the ternary complex of EF-Tu.GTP with aminoacyl-tRNA, and the EF-Tu.EF-Ts complex.

Ras-effector interactions, the problem of specificity

Ras plays the role of a molecular switch in many cellular signalling pathways. The Raf-kinase has been identified as the direct target molecule of Ras in mammalian cells. However, in recent reports other proteins have been characterised as putative Ras effectors which have neither a functional nor a structural relationship to each other. In addition it has been shown that also other members of the Ras family like Rap and R-Ras can interact with some of these proteins. To address the problem of specificity and of biological relevance of the interactions, they have to be carefully quantified and the cellular localisation of the proteins involved taken into account.

How Ras works: structure of a Rap-Raf complex

The three-dimensional structure of the complex between Rap and the 'Ras-binding domain' of Raf could be the prototype for a G protein-effector interaction.

The 2.2 A crystal structure of the Ras-binding domain of the serine/threonine kinase c-Raf1 in complex with Rap1A and a GTP analogue

The X-ray crystal structure of the complex between the Ras-related protein Rap1A in the GTP-analogue (GppNHp) form and the Ras-binding domain (RBD) of the Ras effector molecule c-Raf1, a Ser/Thr-specific protein kinase, has been solved to a resolution of 2.2 A. It shows that RBD has the ubiquitin superfold and that the structure of Rap1A is very similar to that of Ras. The interaction between the two proteins is mediated by an apparent central antiparallel beta-sheet formed by strands B1-B2 from RBD and strands beta 2-beta 3 from Rap1A. Complex formation is mediated by main-chain and side-chain interactions of the so-called effector residues in the switch I region of Rap1A.