Primary and metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas in the ovaries: incidence in routine practice with a new approach to improve intraoperative diagnosis

Height, age at menarche, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that the hormonal changes of adolescence influence ovarian cancer risk particularly in younger women. We investigated this possibility by examining the relationship between ovarian cancer and adult height and age at menarche as both factors reflect pubertal hormonal levels.

METHODS

Participants were a population-based sample of women with incident ovarian cancer (n=794) and control women randomly selected from the Australian Electoral Roll (n=855). The women provided comprehensive reproductive and lifestyle data during a standard interview.

RESULTS

Although neither height nor age at menarche was significantly related to the risk of ovarian cancer overall, increasing height was associated with increasing risk of the subgroup of mucinous borderline ovarian cancer (odds ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-19.1 for women>or=175 cm compared with women <160 cm, Ptrend=0.02). Similarly, later age at menarche was associated with increasing risk of mucinous borderline cancers (odds ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-11.4 for those with age at menarche>or=14 years compared with those <12 years, Ptrend=0.003). Women with mucinous borderline cancers were significantly younger than the women diagnosed with invasive cancers (mean 44 versus 57 years; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Development of mucinous borderline ovarian cancers, predominantly diagnosed in women ages under 50 years, seems to be associated with age at menarche and attained adult height. These results are consistent with our original hypothesis that pubertal levels of reproductive hormones and insulin-like growth factor-I influence ovarian cancer risk in younger women.

Aggressive behavior of stage I ovarian mucinous tumors lacking extensive infiltrative invasion: a report of four cases and review of the literature

Previous studies have indicated that mucinous carcinomas of the ovary associated with extraovarian spread at the time of presentation or follow-up almost always have extensive infiltrative invasion within the primary tumor. We present four cases of stage I ovarian mucinous tumors that lacked extensive infiltrative invasion but were associated with an unexpectedly aggressive behavior. The patients were 18, 20, 41, and 45 years of age at presentation. All four of them presented with an abdominal mass or increased abdominal girth. The tumors were all stage Ia, 17 to 37 centimeters in maximal dimension, and typically multicystic with solid areas. The number of blocks per centimeter of tumor diameter was 0.65, 0.88, 0.92, and 1.0 in the four tumors, respectively, a degree of sampling within that recommended in previous studies. Clinical findings supported that they were primary tumors rather than metastatic from an occult primary tumor. On microscopic examination, the tumors all contained foci of intraepithelial carcinoma and foci of invasion as follows: expansile invasion only (two cases), expansile invasion and microinvasive carcinoma (one case), and microinvasive carcinoma only (one case). The expansile invasion was extensive in each of the three cases in which it was present. On follow-up, each patient experienced recurrent disease 7 months to 4.5 years after diagnosis, including hematogenous spread to lung and/or bone and liver in three patients. Three of four patients developed intraperitoneal spread. Three of four patients died of disease, and one patient is alive with persistent disease. Although ovarian mucinous tumors with only expansile invasion or only microinvasive carcinoma are usually associated with an excellent prognosis, this study indicates that these tumors can rarely behave in an aggressive fashion with hematogenous spread and a fatal outcome. Some of these tumors may have contained unsampled foci of infiltrative invasion. Although the optimum level of sampling in mucinous tumors remains to be determined, we recommend additional sampling of tumors in which the initial sections reveal intraepithelial carcinoma, microinvasive carcinoma, expansile invasion, or combinations thereof.

Metastatic neoplasms involving the ovary: a review with an emphasis on morphological and immunohistochemical features

The ovary is a common site of metastatic tumour. In many cases of ovarian metastasis there is a known history of malignancy but in other cases the ovarian tumour is the first manifestation of disease. In this review metastatic colorectal, appendiceal, gastric, breast, pancreatic and biliary tract, hepatocellular, renal, transitional and cervical carcinomas and metastatic malignant melanoma involving the ovary are discussed, as is the issue of synchronous ovarian and endometrial carcinomas. Peritoneal tumours, including primary peritoneal carcinoma, mesothelioma and intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumour, involving the ovary are also discussed, together with a variety of other rare, metastatic ovarian neoplasms. Many metastatic adenocarcinomas involving the ovary, especially those exhibiting mucinous differentiation, closely mimic primary ovarian adenocarcinomas with morphologically bland areas simulating benign and borderline cystadenoma. This is referred to as a maturation phenomenon. In recent years immunohistochemistry, especially but not exclusively differential cytokeratin (CK7 and CK20) staining, has been widely used as an aid to distinguish between a primary and secondary ovarian adenocarcinoma. While immunohistochemistry undoubtedly has a valuable role to play and is paramount in diagnosis in some cases, the results must be interepreted with caution, especially in mucinous tumours, and within the relevant clinical context. We feel the significance of differential cytokeratin staining is not always understood by histopathologists and this can result in erroneous interpretation. We critically discuss the value of immunohistochemistry and associated pitfalls with each tumour type described.

Serous and mucinous borderline (low malignant potential) tumors of the ovary

The prognosis for stage I serous borderline ovarian tumors (SBOTs) is thought to be excellent, despite rare, late recurrences. The behavior of advanced-stage SBOTs primarily depends on the invasiveness vs noninvasiveness of associated extraovarian implants. Pelvic and abdominal lymph node involvement and foci of microinvasion do not seem to adversely affect prognosis. Serous tumors with a micropapillary and/or cribriform growth pattern seem to be more frequently bilateral and exophytic and manifest at an advanced stage with a higher incidence of invasive implants than typical SBOTs. Molecular data suggest that such tumors may represent an intermediate stage in the typical SBOT-invasive low-grade serous carcinoma progression. Limited experience with endocervical (müllerian)-type mucinous borderline tumors shows a possible relation to SBOTs in clinicopathologic features and biologic behavior Intestinal-type mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (I-MBOTs) and well-differentiated mucinous carcinomas manifest at stage I in most cases; the prognosis is excellent. Mucinous tumors associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei are almost always secondary to similar tumors of the appendix or other gastrointestinal sites and should not be diagnosed as high-stage I-MBOTs. Rare primary ovarian mucinous tumors associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei are those arising in mature cystic teratomas. Advanced-stage ovarian mucinous carcinomas typically show frank, infiltrative-type invasion; the prognosis is poor.

Diagnostic challenge of secondary (metastatic) ovarian tumors simulating primary endometrioid and mucinous neoplasms

Secondary (metastatic) neoplasms to the ovary often cause diagnostic problems, especially those tumors that produce large, symptomatic ovarian tumors that masquerade clinically and pathologically as primary ovarian tumors of surface epithelial type. Most of these tumors arise from organs of the digestive system. Except for typical Krukenberg tumors, which usually originate in the stomach and generally are easily recognized, the most diagnostically problematic secondary ovarian tumors are those that originate in the large intestine, appendix, and pancreas. Metastases from these sites typically produce histologic patterns resembling primary ovarian endometrioid carcinoma or mucinous epithelial neoplasms of borderline and malignant types. This review focuses on the diagnostic challenge of distinguishing these secondary ovarian tumors from primary ovarian neoplasms. Studies on useful or potentially applicable immunohistochemical stains are also detailed.

An expression-based site of origin diagnostic method designed for clinical application to cancer of unknown origin

Gene expression profiling offers a promising new technique for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. We have applied this technology to build a clinically robust site of origin classifier with the ultimate aim of applying it to determine the origin of cancer of unknown primary (CUP). A single cDNA microarray platform was used to profile 229 primary and metastatic tumors representing 14 tumor types and multiple histologic subtypes. This data set was subsequently used for training and validation of a support vector machine (SVM) classifier, demonstrating 89% accuracy using a 13-class model. Further, we show the translation of a five-class classifier to a quantitative PCR-based platform. Selecting 79 optimal gene markers, we generated a quantitative-PCR low-density array, allowing the assay of both fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. Data generated using both quantitative PCR and microarray were subsequently used to train and validate a cross-platform SVM model with high prediction accuracy. Finally, we applied our SVM classifiers to 13 cases of CUP. We show that the microarray SVM classifier was capable of making high confidence predictions in 11 of 13 cases. These predictions were supported by comprehensive review of the patients' clinical histories.

Invasion patterns in stage I endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas: a clinicopathologic analysis emphasizing favorable outcomes in carcinomas without destructive stromal invasion and the occasional malignant course of carcinomas with limited destructive stromal invasion

Stage I, low-grade endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas have an excellent prognosis. Published data have suggested that destructive stromal invasion, a relatively uncommon finding in these tumors, is a poor prognostic factor. We investigated this by studying all FIGO stage I, grades 1 and 2 (of 3) endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas that were surgically staged at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1980 to 2000. We undertook a careful review of all available slides using current diagnostic criteria and correlated histopathologic indices with clinical outcome data. Cases studied included 13 endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (stage IA, eight; stage IC, five) and six intestinal mucinous ovarian carcinomas (stage IA, three; stage IC, three). All of the tumors contained areas of expansile invasion, greater than that acceptable for microinvasion, and were thus diagnosed as carcinomas instead of borderline tumors. Nevertheless, nearly all demonstrated borderline tumor (noninvasive) components. Six tumors contained at least one focus of destructive stromal invasion (two endometrioid and four mucinous ovarian carcinomas). Four additional cases showed a focus suspicious for but not diagnostic of destructive invasion ('indeterminate for destructive invasion') (two endometrioid and two mucinous ovarian carcinomas). Follow-up data were available for 17 patients. The median follow-up was 81 months (range, 9-161 months). In all, 14 patients were alive with no evidence of disease (expansile invasion alone, eight; destructive stromal invasion, four; and indeterminate for destructive invasion, two). Three patients died of their disease (destructive stromal invasion, two; and indeterminate for destructive invasion, one). The size, number, and nuclear grade of destructive stromal invasion foci did not appear to have an impact on survival in this relatively limited number of patients. Outcome data in patients with stage I, low-grade endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas without destructive stromal invasion indicate that these tumors have a very limited malignant potential. The literature has not documented recurrences in this setting when the staging has been complete, the sampling adequate, and the cytologic features no more than grade 2, and metastasis to the ovary has been excluded. In contrast, carcinomas harboring even limited foci of destructive stromal invasion, although frequently cured surgically, can pursue a malignant clinical course.

WWOX protein expression varies among ovarian carcinoma histotypes and correlates with less favorable outcome

Background

The putative tumor suppressor WWOX gene spans the common chromosomal fragile site 16D (FRA16D) at chromosome area 16q23.3-24.1. This region is a frequent target for loss of heterozygosity and chromosomal rearrangement in ovarian, breast, hepatocellular, prostate carcinomas and other neoplasias. The goal of these studies was to evaluate WWOX protein expression levels in ovarian carcinomas to determine if they correlated with clinico-pathological parameters, thus providing additional support for WWOX functioning as a tumor suppressor.

Methods

We performed WWOX protein expression analyses by means of immunobloting and immunohistochemistry on normal ovaries and specific human ovarian carcinoma Tissue Microarrays (n = 444). Univariate analysis of clinical-pathological parameters based on WWOX staining was determined by χ² test with Yates' correction. The basic significance level was fixed at p < 0.05.

Results

Immunoblotting analysis from normal ovarian samples demonstrated consistently strong WWOX expression while 37% ovarian carcinomas showed reduced or undetectable WWOX protein expression levels. The immunohistochemistry of normal human ovarian tissue sections confirmed strong WWOX expression in ovarian surface epithelial cells and in epithelial inclusion cysts within the cortex. Out of 444 ovarian carcinoma samples analyzed 30% of tumors showed lack of or barely detectable WWOX expression. The remaining ovarian carcinomas (70%) stained moderately to strongly positive for this protein. The two histotypes showing significant loss of WWOX expression were of the Mucinous (70%) and Clear Cell (42%) types. Reduced WWOX expression demonstrated a significant association with clinical Stage IV (FIGO) (p = 0.007), negative Progesterone Receptor (PR) status (p = 0.008) and shorter overall survival (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

These data indicate that WWOX protein expression is highly variable among ovarian carcinoma histotypes. It was also observed that subsets of ovarian tumors demonstrated loss of WWOX expression and is potentially associated with patient outcome.

Her-2/neu expression and amplification in early stage ovarian surface epithelial neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to examine Her-2/neu gene amplification and protein overexpression in a spectrum of ovarian neoplasms using both immunohistochemical (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques that are FDA approved. This study is focused on early stage tumors including both carcinomas and borderline tumors.

METHODS

FDA-approved IHC and FISH for Her-2/neu were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from 79 ovarian neoplasms representing a broad spectrum of tumor types as well as four normal ovaries. All tumors were either stage I or stage II. Tumor and normal tissue were studied collectively using a tissue microarray (TMA). HercepTest (DAKO) and PathVysion Her-2/neu probe kit (Vysis Inc.) were used for IHC and FISH analysis.

RESULTS

FISH analysis of serous carcinomas demonstrated Her-2/neu gene amplification in 3 (18%) of 17 cases. Two of three cases showing Her-2/neu gene amplification were scored 1+ using IHC, while the remaining case was scored as 0. Analysis of endometrioid carcinomas demonstrated Her-2/neu amplification using FISH in 1 of 10 (10%) cases. IHC in this case was scored 2+ (positive). None of the remaining 44 tumors, including clear cell carcinoma (n = 12), transitional cell carcinoma (n = 1), mixed epithelial carcinoma (n = 7), carcinoma not otherwise specified (n = 1), and 31 borderline tumors (mucinous, n = 17; endometrioid, n = 7; serous, n = 7), showed Her-2/neu gene amplification or protein overexpression. Normal ovaries were negative as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Amplification of Her-2/neu in early stage ovarian neoplasms is infrequent, 6.7% overall. Due to the limited number of informative cases, we were unable to determine the clinical significance of Her-2/neu amplification in this study. Her-2/neu amplification was restricted to carcinomas and was not encountered in ovarian borderline tumors.

Use of novel immunohistochemical markers expressed in colonic adenocarcinoma to distinguish primary ovarian tumors from metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Distinguishing primary ovarian carcinoma, particularly endometrioid and mucinous subtypes, from metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the ovary is often difficult on histologic examination alone. Recently, three immunohistochemical markers CDX2, a homeobox gene encoding an intestine-specific transcription factor; alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR/P504S), a mitochondrial and peroxisomal enzyme with fairly restricted expression in selective tumors and beta-catenin, an adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutation product resulting in activation of the Wnt pathway, have been reported to have specific and sensitive expression in colorectal carcinomas. We evaluated a panel consisting of antibodies to CDX2, beta-catenin and P504S in 23 primary ovarian adenocarcinomas (13 mucinous and 10 endometrioid) and compared the findings to 22 metastatic colorectal adenocarcinomas (seven mucinous and 15 nonmucinous tumors with endometrioid-like morphology hereafter referred to as pseudo-endometrioid) to the ovary stained with the same panel. Twenty (91%) metastatic tumors expressed at least two markers and seven (32%) expressed all three. In contrast, only three (13%) primary ovarian tumors expressed at least two markers and none expressed all three. Strong (2+, 3+) and diffuse (>40%) expression for CDX2 was noted in 21 (95%) metastatic tumors and five (22%) primary ovarian tumors (three mucinous, two endometrioid). P504S was similarly expressed in seven (32%) metastatic and none of the primary ovarian carcinomas. Nuclear expression of beta-catenin was noted in 13 (59%) metastatic tumors and in eight cases (36%), it was diffuse and strong. In contrast, four (19%) primary tumors showed nuclear expression of this protein with only one (5%) case expressing it in a diffuse pattern. Immunohistochemical expression of gene products and enzymes of colorectal carcinogenesis in some primary ovarian carcinomas suggest that the morphologic similarities between colorectal and mucinous/endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary extends to the genetic level, although differences in the level of expression exist between these tumors. Diffuse expression of all three markers (CDX2, beta-catenin and P504S) in a tumor in the ovary was found to be virtually diagnostic of metastasis from a colorectal primary in this study.

Utility of CDX-2 in distinguishing between primary and secondary (intestinal) mucinous ovarian carcinoma: an immunohistochemical comparison of 43 cases

Primary and secondary mucinous tumors can involve the ovaries and have similar histologic appearances. The differential diagnosis is important for surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment and for the prognosis, but often it is extremely difficult. This article discusses an immunohistochemical panel that includes carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20, CA125, CA19.9, and a new marker, CDX-2, for the distinction between primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas and metastatic (intestinal) ovarian tumors. Forty-three cases representing primary and secondary ovarian tumors were considered and consisted of 14 primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas (PMOCs) and 29 secondary (intestinal) ovarian tumors (SIOTs). Fisher exact test was performed to evaluate the reliability of the respective antibodies to discriminate between PMOCs and SIOTs. CDX-2 was diffusely positive in all SIOTs and was expressed focally in 3 cases (21.42%) of PMOCs. CK7 was diffusely positive in 13 cases (44.82%) of SIOTs and in 13 cases (92.85%) of PMOCs. CK20 was diffusely positive in 17 cases (58.62%) of SIOTs and in 6 cases (42.85%) of PMOCs. CEA was diffusely positive in 28 cases (96.55%) of SlOTs and in 12 cases (85.71%) of PMOCs. CA 19.9 was positive in all SIOTs and in 12 cases (85.71%) of PMOCs. CA125 was positive in 3 cases (10.34%) of SIOTs and in 4 cases (28.57%) of PMOCs. CK7 and especially CDX-2, a specific and sensitive marker, can aid pathologists in making a differential diagnosis (P = 0.003 and P < 0.0005, respectively), whereas CEA, CK20, CA125, and CA 19.9 markers are not high enough to distinguish between primary and secondary mucinous ovarian tumors.

Borderline ovarian tumors: diverse contemporary viewpoints on terminology and diagnostic criteria with illustrative images

The National Cancer Institute sponsored a Borderline Ovarian Tumor Workshop held in August 2003 in Bethesda, MD. This report was developed from discussions at the Workshop. The participants acknowledged several areas of disagreement on basic terminology issues and agreed that a glossary with example images would help clarify many commonly misunderstood issues. This report defines terminology used in the pathological description of borderline tumors and their variants, and illustrates examples of each of the most common entities. It also addresses controversial aspects of the definitions and issues involving specimen handling and reporting. For those issues where there is disagreement, the terminology and diagnostic approaches reflecting the differing views are presented.

Metastatic duodenal carcinoma simulating primary mucinous tumor of the ovary

CASE REPORT

We report a case of metastatic duodenal carcinoma simulating a primary ovarian mucinous tumor, occurring in a 53-year-old woman who had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy for duodenal adenocarcinoma approximately 18 months previously. The surgically removed bilateral ovaries revealed multicystic tumors. Histological examination showed they closely mimicked primary ovarian mucinous tumors. Immunohistochemical examination using cytokeratin 7 and 20, and CA125 indicated that the bilateral ovarian tumors were metastasis from duodenal carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Duodenal carcinoma can be a rare primary focus of metastatic tumor simulating primary ovarian neoplasm.

The histologic type and stage distribution of ovarian carcinomas of surface epithelial origin

Advances over the past decade suggest a need to reassess the distribution of ovarian surface epithelial tumors. A series of 220 consecutive invasive ovarian carcinomas, including carcinosarcomas and peritoneal carcinomas, was reviewed. Notable findings include: 7% of tumors were carcinosarcomas; 22% of cases of peritoneal serous carcinomatosis were of peritoneal origin; <3% of cases were mucinous carcinomas; and only one malignant Brenner tumor (0.5%) and no pure transitional cell carcinomas were identified. If peritoneal carcinomas, carcinosarcomas, and mixed carcinomas with a serous component are combined with serous carcinomas, this group accounts for 78% of all cases and 87% of advanced stage cases, suggesting a greater uniformity to epithelial ovarian cancer than previously appreciated.

Mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: Points of general agreement and persistent controversies regarding nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and behavior

This report focuses on the borderline category of ovarian mucinous tumors and summarizes the points of general agreement and persistent controversies identified by experts in the field who participated in the Borderline Ovarian Tumor Workshop held in Bethesda, MD, in August 2003. Points of agreement and persistent controversies regarding nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and behavior are addressed for the following ovarian mucinous tumor categories: mucinous borderline ovarian tumor (M-BOT; synonymously referred to as atypical proliferative mucinous tumor of ovary or mucinous ovarian tumor of low malignant potential), M-BOT with intraepithelial carcinoma, and M-BOT with microinvasion. The morphologic spectrum of M-BOTs with regard to distinction from mucinous cystadenoma and the confluent glandular/expansile type of invasive mucinous carcinoma is also addressed. Non-ovarian mucinous tumors, including the secondary ovarian mucinous tumors associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei and metastatic mucinous carcinomas with a deceptive pattern of invasion, are recognized as tumors that can simulate primary M-BOTs. Improved classification of these mucinous tumors has clarifed the behavior of true M-BOTs by excluding these simulators from the M-BOT category.

Current challenges and opportunities for research on borderline ovarian tumors

This article summarizes key issues for future research on borderline ovarian tumors that emerged at a National Cancer Institute-sponsored Borderline Ovarian Tumor Workshop held in August 2003 in Bethesda, MD. Limitations in existing research and opportunities for future advances have been highlighted. The application of new molecular techniques in combination with improved study designs holds promise for elucidating the pathogenesis of these tumors and revealing the source of the extra-ovarian lesions ("implants") with which they are frequently associated. Clarification of the etiology of borderline tumors and the pathogenesis of their associated implants is critical for improving pathological diagnosis, revising the classification system of ovarian neoplasms, and developing optimal, evidence-based clinical management algorithms.

CDX-2 immunostaining in primary and secondary ovarian carcinomas

AIMS

To assess the value of homeobox protein CDX-2 expression in the distinction between primary ovarian carcinomas and carcinomas metastatic to the ovary.

METHODS

CDX-2 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 120 serous, 68 endometrioid, 24 clear cell, and 16 mucinous carcinomas of the ovary. In addition, CDX-2 immunoreactivity was investigated in 20 metastases from adenocarcinomas to the ovary (15 of colorectal, two of gastric, one of appendiceal, one of pancreatic, and one of cervical origin) and their corresponding primary tumours.

RESULTS

Almost all of the primary ovarian carcinomas lacked immunoreactivity for CDX-2. In contrast, 14 of the 16 metastases to the ovary from intestinal primaries showed CDX-2 immunoexpression.

CONCLUSION

CDX-2 is a useful marker for differentiating primary ovarian carcinoma from carcinomas metastatic to the ovary.

Clinicopathologic analysis of early-stage sporadic ovarian carcinoma

The reported experience with early-stage (FIGO stage I/II) ovarian carcinoma (OC) is limited given that the majority of women with OC are diagnosed at an advanced stage. There has not been an extensive review of these tumors, and since the pathologic criteria differentiating invasive and borderline tumors have evolved over time, the issue of whether a proportion of these tumors should be reclassified has not been addressed. We identified patients with stage I/II invasive OC who underwent primary surgical management at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1980 to 2000. Patients known to have a BRCA mutation or a family history of breast/ovarian cancer were excluded. Hematoxylin and eosin slide review, blinded to clinical outcomes, using current diagnostic criteria for ovarian carcinomas and borderline ovarian tumors, was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were estimated and compared. Hematoxylin and eosin slides were reviewed for 140 of the 145 patients identified. The diagnosis was changed to borderline (low malignant potential) in 41 cases (29.3%). Twenty-nine (70.7%) of 41 changes in diagnosis involved endometrioid and mucinous tumors. This was attributable to the application of recently revised criteria for distinguishing borderline tumors from carcinomas. None of the originally diagnosed clear cell carcinomas was reclassified as borderline. The distribution of histologic subtypes among the 94 carcinomas included 26 serous (27.7%), 25 clear cell (26.6%), 22 endometrioid (23.4%), 10 mixed (10.6%), 6 mucinous (6.4%), 2 malignant Brenner (2.1%), and 3 adenocarcinomas, not otherwise specified (3.2%). Adjuvant therapy was given to 84 (89.4%) of the 94 patients with carcinomas. The 5-year PFS and DSS were significantly greater for the group of cases that was reclassified as borderline (4.5% vs. 26.2% progressed [P = 0.006]; 4.5% vs. 25.6% died [P = 0.003]). The 5-year PFS and DSS were significantly worse for carcinomas with a TP53 mutation (22.6% vs. 41.2% progressed [P = 0.04]; 21.7% vs. 24.7% died [P = 0.04]). There were no statistically significant differences in outcome between stages I versus II, tumor grades, clear cell histology versus other, and stage IC preoperative versus intraoperative rupture. We concluded that a large number of cases originally diagnosed as early-stage sporadic OC were borderline tumors. Clear cell histology does not confer a worse prognosis compared with other histologies. The presence of a TP53 mutation was an adverse prognostic indicator.

Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary

Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the ovary is a recently recognized subtype of ovarian surface epithelial-stromal cancer, and studies of its morphology are few. As a result, the criteria for its diagnosis and spectrum of its morphology are not clearly established. One hundred consecutive consultation cases of ovarian carcinoma with a pure or partial transitional cell pattern (excluding malignant Brenner tumor) diagnosed between 1989 and 2001 were evaluated for the frequency of various pathologic features and the relation of TCC to other surface epithelial-stromal carcinomas. The women were 33 to 94 years of age (mean, 56 years). A total of 47 tumors were stage I, 21 stage II, 31 stage III, and 1 stage IV; 13% of the stage I tumors and 41% of tumors of all stages were bilateral. The tumors ranged from 3.0 to 30 cm in greatest dimension (mean, 10 cm); 60% of them were solid and cystic, 24% solid, and 16% cystic. TCC was the exclusive or predominant component in 93% of the tumors and showed undulating (93%), diffuse (57%), insular (55%), and trabecular (43%) patterns. In four tumors with an insular growth, the pattern focally mimicked a Brenner tumor. Necrosis was present in 57% of the cases. Features that were seen in the tumors that in aggregate produced a relatively consistent appearance were "punched out" microspaces (87%), often the size of Call-Exner bodies, large cystic spaces (73%), and large blunt papillae (63%). Features that were sometimes seen, usually as a focal finding, included slit-like fenestrations (49%), bizarre giant cells (35%), small filiform papillae (18%), gland-like tubules (17%), squamous differentiation (13%), and psammoma bodies (4%). In 23 cases, TCC was a component of a mixed epithelial carcinoma, the additional components being serous adenocarcinoma in 16, endometrioid in 5, mucinous in 1, and clear cell carcinoma in 1. The tumor cells of the TCC component often were relatively monomorphic; 6% of the tumors were grade 1, 43% grade 2, and 51% grade 3. The nuclei were oblong or round and often had large single nucleoli (69%) or longitudinal grooves (48%). The cytoplasm was typically pale and granular but was rarely strikingly clear or oxyphilic. TCC of the ovary usually occurs in pure form but is also common as a component of a surface epithelial carcinoma of mixed cell type. In either situation, TCC has a constellation of architectural and cytologic features that readily distinguish it in most cases from other types of ovarian cancer. Recognition of these features will lead to a more consistent diagnosis of this tumor and aid in determining whether it has distinctive clinical features, particularly with regard to its behavior.

Survival among women with borderline ovarian tumors and ovarian carcinoma: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Serous and mucinous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (LMP-S and LMP-M, respectively) are noninvasive tumors that portend excellent survival when confined to the ovary. Comparison of the survival for women with LMP tumors staged as distant with women who have carcinoma may have important implications for diagnostic terminology and clinical management.

METHODS

The authors compared relative survival rates among patients diagnosed with ovarian tumors during the period 1988-1999 (with follow-up through 2000) by histologic type, disease stage, tumor grade (for carcinomas), and patient age, using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.

RESULTS

The overall relative survival rate at 10 years (+/- 1.96 standard errors) was 96.9% +/- 2.3% for women with LMP-S tumors, 30.4% +/- 1.7% for women with serous carcinoma (CA-S); 94.0% +/- 3.1% for women with LMP-M tumors, and 64.7% +/- 3.4% for women with mucinous carcinoma (CA-M). The survival rate at 10 years for women with distant-stage LMP-S tumors was 89.9% +/- 5.3%, compared with 96.1% +/- 8.6% for women with well differentiated, localized CA-S. The survival rate for women with distant-stage LMP-M tumors at 5 years was 85.5% +/- 9.0%, compared with 95.5% +/- 3.4% for women with well differentiated, localized CA-M (data for 10 years were limited). Mucinous ovarian neoplasms were associated with an excess of second malignancies of the digestive tract.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative survival among women with distant-stage LMP tumors was not 100% and resembled the survival of women who had carcinoma exhibiting favorable prognostic features (localized stage). Future studies of women with high-stage LMP tumors are required to clarify the pathogenesis of extraovarian lesions and their implications for management and prognosis.