1
|
Riedinger CJ, Barrington DA, Nagel CI, Khadraoui WK, Haight PJ, Tubbs C, Backes FJ, Cohn DE, O'Malley DM, Copeland LJ, Chambers LM. Cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy and dostarlimab for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 183:78-84. [PMID: 38554477 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The combination of dostarlimab with carboplatin and paclitaxel has demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in primary advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). However, prior studies have not found immunotherapy to be cost-effective, or cost-effective only in specific subgroups, of recurrent endometrial cancer. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of combination therapy compared to chemotherapy alone. METHOD A partitioned survival model was developed to compare the cost and effectiveness of dostarlimab in combination with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Clinical data was derived from the RUBY trial and drug costs from average sale prices. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was compared to a set willingness to pay (WTP) of $100,000/QALY to determine cost-effectiveness. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the dostarlimab combination incurred an additional cost of $308,430 but provided an additional 5.67 QALYs compared to chemotherapy alone. The ICER was $54,406/QALY. The dostarlimab combination was cost-effective compared to chemotherapy alone irrespective of MMR expression, with an ICER of $32,287/QALY for MMR deficient (MMRd) EC and $85,744/QALY for MMR proficient (MMRp) EC. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the combination was cost-effective in 98.2% of iterations at the current WTP threshold. CONCLUSIONS Despite the higher cost, adding dostarlimab to platinum chemotherapy significantly improves QALYs, rendering this regimen cost-effective relative to chemotherapy alone for treating primary advanced or recurrent EC. Combination therapy is a cost-effective approach for this patient population compared to chemotherapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney J Riedinger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, USA.
| | - David A Barrington
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Women's Services and The Ochsner Cancer Institute, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Christa I Nagel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, USA
| | - Wafa K Khadraoui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, USA
| | - Paulina J Haight
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, USA
| | - Crystal Tubbs
- Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, USA
| | - Floor J Backes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, USA
| | - David E Cohn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, USA
| | - David M O'Malley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, USA
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, USA
| | - Laura M Chambers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Levine MD, Wang H, Sriram B, Khan A, Senter L, McLaughlin EM, Bixel KL, Chambers LM, Cohn DE, Copeland LJ, Cosgrove CM, Nagel CI, O'Malley DM, Backes FJ. Does the choice of platinum doublet matter? A study to evaluate the impact of platinum doublet choice for treatment of platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer recurrence on the development of future PARP inhibitor and platinum resistance. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 182:51-56. [PMID: 38262238 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of a platinum doublet for the treatment of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) recurrence is well established. The impact of the non‑platinum chemotherapy used as part of a platinum doublet on PARP inhibitor (PARPi) and platinum sensitivity it not known. We aimed to describe oncologic outcomes in cases of recurrent EOC receiving PARPi as maintenance therapy based on preceding platinum doublet. METHODS Retrospective study of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer treated with platinum doublet followed by maintenance PARPi from 1/1/2015 and 1/1/2022. Comparisons were made between patients receiving carboplatin + pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (CD) versus other platinum doublets (OPDs). Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier and univariate survival analyses were performed. RESULTS 100 patients received PARPi maintenance following a platinum doublet chemotherapy regimen for platinum-sensitive recurrence. 25/100 (25%) received CD and 75/100 (75%) received OPDs. Comparing CD and OPDs, median progression-free survival was 8 versus 7 months (p = 0.26), median time to platinum resistance was 15 versus 13 months (p = 0.54), median OS was 64 versus 90 months (p = 0.28), and median OS from starting PARPi was 25 versus 26 months (p = 0.90), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Using pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as part of a platinum doublet preceding maintenance PARPi for platinum-sensitive recurrence does not seem to hasten PARPi resistance or platinum resistance compared to OPDs. Although there was a non-significant trend towards increased OS among patients who received a platinum doublet other than CD prior to PARPi, the OS from PARPi start was similar between groups. Given the retrospective nature of this study and small study population, further research is needed to evaluate if the choice of platinum doublet preceding PARPi maintenance impacts PARPi resistance, platinum resistance and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica D Levine
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
| | - Heather Wang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Bhargavi Sriram
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Ambar Khan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Eric M McLaughlin
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Kristin L Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Laura M Chambers
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Christa I Nagel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Floor J Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sinnott JA, Torkashvand E, Meade CE, Salani R, Vetter MH, Hall B, Skolnick R, Bixel KL, Cohn DE, Cosgrove CM, Copeland LJ, Hebert C, Felix AS. Changes in prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes among women with incident endometrial cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2024:10.1007/s11764-024-01536-z. [PMID: 38265703 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01536-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We examined associations between patient and treatment characteristics with longitudinally collected patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to provide a data-informed description of the experiences of women undergoing treatment for endometrial cancer. METHODS We administered National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaires at the preoperative visit and at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles were assessed. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear mixed models were used to examine associations between patient characteristics and PRO measures at baseline and through time. RESULTS Of 187 women enrolled, 174 (93%) and 103 (69%) completed the 6- and 12-month questionnaires, respectively. Anxiety was substantially elevated at baseline (half of one population-level standard deviation) and returned to general population mean levels at 6 and 12 months. Younger age, Medicaid/None/Self-pay insurance, prevalent diabetes, and current smoking were associated with higher symptom burden on multiple PRO measures across the three time points. Women with aggressive histology, higher disease stage, or those with adjuvant treatment had worse fatigue at 6 months, which normalized by 12 months. CONCLUSIONS We observed a high symptom burden at endometrial cancer diagnosis, with most PRO measures returning to general population means by 1 year. Information on risk factor-PRO associations can be used during the clinical visit to inform supportive service referral. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS These findings can inform clinicians' discussions with endometrial cancer survivors regarding expected symptom trajectory following diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Sinnott
- Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University College of Arts and Sciences, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Elaheh Torkashvand
- Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, 1841 Neil Avenue, 304 Cunz Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Caitlin E Meade
- Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, 1841 Neil Avenue, 304 Cunz Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Ritu Salani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Monica Hagan Vetter
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Baptist Health Medicine Group, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Bobbie Hall
- Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, 1841 Neil Avenue, 304 Cunz Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | | | - Kristin L Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Courtney Hebert
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ashley S Felix
- Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, 1841 Neil Avenue, 304 Cunz Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haight PJ, Kistenfeger Q, Riedinger CJ, Khadraoui W, Backes FJ, Bixel KL, Copeland LJ, Cohn DE, Cosgrove CM, O'Malley DM, Nagel CI, Spakowicz DJ, Chambers LM. The impact of antibiotic and proton pump inhibitor use at the time of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy on survival in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 178:14-22. [PMID: 37741201 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the impact of antibiotic (ABX) and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (PC) for endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS A retrospective, single-institution cohort study of EC patients treated with ≥four cycles of adjuvant PC following surgical staging from 2014 to 2020. Demographics and clinicopathologic features, including ABX and PPI use, were compared using χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed, and survival outcomes were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS Of 325 patients, 95 (29%) received ABX, and 80 (24.6%) received PPI. ABX were associated with decreased 3-year PFS (49.9% vs. 66%; p = 0.0237) but not 3-year OS (68.9% vs. 79.9%; p = 0.0649). ABX targeting gram-positive bacteria were associated with decreased 3-year PFS (21.2% vs. 66.0% vs. 55.4%; p = 0.0038) and 3-year OS (36.5% vs. 79.9% vs. 75.6%; p = 0.0014) compared to no ABX and other ABX, respectively. PPI use was associated with decreased 3-year PFS (46.9% vs. 66.0%; p = 0.0001) and 3-year OS (60.7% vs. 81.9%; p = 0.0041) compared to no PPI. On multivariable regression analysis controlling for confounders including stage, histology, grade, radiation, and co-morbidities, PPI use was independently associated with worse PFS (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.25-3.08; p = 0.0041) and OS (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.01-4.18, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION In this retrospective cohort study, we demonstrate that PPI use is independently associated with worse PFS and OS in patients with EC treated with PC. ABX use was associated with worse PFS on univariate analysis only. There is an unmet need to understand how PPI, ABX, and, potentially, the microbiome impact the effectiveness of chemotherapy in EC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina J Haight
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
| | - Quinn Kistenfeger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Courtney J Riedinger
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Wafa Khadraoui
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Floor J Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Kristin L Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Christa I Nagel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Daniel J Spakowicz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America; Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Laura M Chambers
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pignata S, Bookman M, Sehouli J, Miller A, Penson RT, Taskiran C, Anderson C, Hietanen S, Myers T, Madry R, Willmott L, Lortholary A, Thomes-Pepin J, Aghajanian C, McCourt C, Stuckey A, Wu X, Nishio S, Copeland LJ, He Y, Molinero L, Patel S, Lin YG, Khor VK, Moore KN. Overall survival and patient-reported outcome results from the placebo-controlled randomized phase III IMagyn050/GOG 3015/ENGOT-OV39 trial of atezolizumab for newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 177:20-31. [PMID: 37625235 PMCID: PMC10986425 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact on overall survival (OS) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of combining atezolizumab with standard therapy for newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer. METHODS The placebo-controlled double-blind randomized phase III IMagyn050/GOG 3015/ENGOT-OV39 trial (NCT03038100) assigned eligible patients to 3-weekly atezolizumab 1200 mg or placebo for 22 cycles with platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Coprimary endpoints were progression-free survival (already reported) and OS in the PD-L1-positive and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations, tested hierarchically. Prespecified PRO analyses focused on disease-related abdominal pain and bloating symptoms (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-OV28), functioning, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (QLQ-C30). RESULTS After 38 months' median follow-up, the OS hazard ratio in the PD-L1-positive population was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.66-1.06; p = 0.13); median OS was not estimable with atezolizumab versus 49.2 months with placebo. The hazard ratio for OS in the ITT population was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.78-1.09; median 50.5 versus 46.6 months, respectively). At week 9, similar proportions of patients in both arms of the neoadjuvant cohort showed ≥10-point improvement from baseline in abdominal pain and bloating, functioning, and HRQoL. In the primary surgery cohort, similar proportions of patients in each arm had improved, stable, or worsened physical and role function and HRQoL from baseline over time. Neither cohort showed differences between arms in treatment-related symptoms or overall side-effect bother. CONCLUSIONS Incorporation of atezolizumab into standard therapy for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer does not significantly improve efficacy or impose additional treatment burden for patients. CLINICALTRIALS gov registration: NCT03038100.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Pignata
- Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO) and Istituto Nazionale Tumori Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Michael Bookman
- Gynecologic Oncology Group Foundation (GOG-F) and Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe (AGO Study Group), Nord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie (North-Eastern German Society of Gynaecologic Oncology; NOGGO) and Charité-Medical University of Berlin (Campus Virchow Klinikum), Berlin, Germany.
| | - Austin Miller
- GOG-F and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| | | | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Turkish Society of Gynecologic Oncology (TRSGO) and Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; Vehbi Koç Vakfı American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | | - Sakari Hietanen
- Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology (NSGO), Copenhagen, Denmark and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
| | - Tashanna Myers
- GOG-F and Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA.
| | - Radoslaw Madry
- Department of Oncology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
| | | | - Alain Lortholary
- Groupe d'Investigateurs National des Etudes des Cancers Ovariens et du sein (GINECO) and Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France.
| | | | - Carol Aghajanian
- GOG-F and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Carolyn McCourt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Ashley Stuckey
- The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Xiaohua Wu
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
| | - Shin Nishio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Yvette He
- Global Data Operations, Functional Service Provider, Parexel International, Chengdu, China.
| | - Luciana Molinero
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Sheetal Patel
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Yvonne G Lin
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Victor K Khor
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- GOG-F and Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Morton M, McLaughlin EM, Calo CA, Lightfoot M, Bixel KL, Cohn DE, Cosgrove CM, Copeland LJ, O'Malley DM, Nagel CI, Chambers LM. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes diagnoses in the perioperative and survivorship periods following surgical management of endometrial cancer: An opportunity for screening and intervention? Gynecol Oncol 2023; 177:46-52. [PMID: 37639902 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) diagnoses during the peri-operative and survivorship periods in patients following surgical management of endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS An IRB-approved, retrospective single-institution cohort study was performed in patients who underwent surgical management of EC from 2014 to 2020. The perioperative period was defined as the 30 days before and after surgery. T2DM diagnoses occurring during survivorship were recorded. T2DM diagnoses were defined by a HgbA1c ≥6.5% or a random blood glucose ≥200 mg/dL. Sequelae of peri-operative T2DM and predictors of future T2DM were examined utilizing univariate analysis. RESULTS Of 519 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 37 (7.1%) were diagnosed with T2DM in the perioperative period. Patients diagnosed with T2DM in the perioperative period had significantly higher BMI (p = 0.006) compared to no T2DM, but there were no significant differences in age (p = 0.20), ethnicity/race (p > 0.05) or ECOG score (p = 0.19). The rates of intraoperative complications between groups did not significantly differ, except for vascular complications (p = 0.005), and the incidence of any postoperative complication was higher in the perioperative T2DM group (p = 0.01). With a median follow-up of 29 months [range 11.6-49.0 months], an additional 18.3% (n = 88) of the cohort met diagnostic criteria for T2DM. BMI (p < 0.001), perioperative glucose (p < 0.001), and HgbA1c (p = 0.002) demonstrate risk for a T2DM diagnosis during survivorship. CONCLUSION(S) In this retrospective cohort of EC patients, 25.4% were diagnosed with T2DM, with the majority diagnosed in the survivorship period. Surgical management and subsequent surveillance of EC presents an opportunity to diagnose at-risk patients with T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Morton
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Starling Loving Hall, M210, 320 W. 10(th) Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| | - Eric M McLaughlin
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Corinne A Calo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, OhioHealth, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Michelle Lightfoot
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristin L Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Starling Loving Hall, M210, 320 W. 10(th) Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Starling Loving Hall, M210, 320 W. 10(th) Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Starling Loving Hall, M210, 320 W. 10(th) Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Starling Loving Hall, M210, 320 W. 10(th) Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Starling Loving Hall, M210, 320 W. 10(th) Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Christa I Nagel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Starling Loving Hall, M210, 320 W. 10(th) Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Laura M Chambers
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Starling Loving Hall, M210, 320 W. 10(th) Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pothuri B, Blank SV, Myers TK, Hines JF, Randall LM, O'Cearbhaill RE, Slomovitz BM, Eskander RN, Alvarez Secord A, Coleman RL, Walker JL, Monk BJ, Moore KN, O'Malley DM, Copeland LJ, Herzog TJ. Inclusion, diversity, equity, and access (IDEA) in gynecologic cancer clinical trials: A joint statement from GOG foundation and Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO). Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:278-287. [PMID: 37315373 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- B Pothuri
- NYU Langone Health and Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - S V Blank
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, New York, MY, USA
| | - T K Myers
- University of Massachusetts-Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - J F Hines
- University of Connecticut Health System, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - L M Randall
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - R E O'Cearbhaill
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - R N Eskander
- University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - A Alvarez Secord
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - R L Coleman
- Texas Oncology, US Oncology Network, The Woodlands, TX, USA
| | - J L Walker
- Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - B J Monk
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - K N Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - D M O'Malley
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbus, OH, USA
| | - L J Copeland
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbus, OH, USA
| | - T J Herzog
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mirza MR, Chase DM, Slomovitz BM, dePont Christensen R, Novák Z, Black D, Gilbert L, Sharma S, Valabrega G, Landrum LM, Hanker LC, Stuckey A, Boere I, Gold MA, Auranen A, Pothuri B, Cibula D, McCourt C, Raspagliesi F, Shahin MS, Gill SE, Monk BJ, Buscema J, Herzog TJ, Copeland LJ, Tian M, He Z, Stevens S, Zografos E, Coleman RL, Powell MA. Dostarlimab for Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:2145-2158. [PMID: 36972026 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2216334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 132.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dostarlimab is an immune-checkpoint inhibitor that targets the programmed cell death 1 receptor. The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy may have synergistic effects in the treatment of endometrial cancer. METHODS We conducted a phase 3, global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible patients with primary advanced stage III or IV or first recurrent endometrial cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either dostarlimab (500 mg) or placebo, plus carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 5 mg per milliliter per minute) and paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter of body-surface area), every 3 weeks (six cycles), followed by dostarlimab (1000 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 3 years. The primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS Of the 494 patients who underwent randomization, 118 (23.9%) had mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR), microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. In the dMMR-MSI-H population, estimated progression-free survival at 24 months was 61.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.3 to 73.4) in the dostarlimab group and 15.7% (95% CI, 7.2 to 27.0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.50; P<0.001). In the overall population, progression-free survival at 24 months was 36.1% (95% CI, 29.3 to 42.9) in the dostarlimab group and 18.1% (95% CI, 13.0 to 23.9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.80; P<0.001). Overall survival at 24 months was 71.3% (95% CI, 64.5 to 77.1) with dostarlimab and 56.0% (95% CI, 48.9 to 62.5) with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.87). The most common adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment were nausea (53.9% of the patients in the dostarlimab group and 45.9% of those in the placebo group), alopecia (53.5% and 50.0%), and fatigue (51.9% and 54.5%). Severe and serious adverse events were more frequent in the dostarlimab group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel significantly increased progression-free survival among patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, with a substantial benefit in the dMMR-MSI-H population. (Funded by GSK; RUBY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03981796.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansoor R Mirza
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Dana M Chase
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Brian M Slomovitz
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - René dePont Christensen
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Zoltán Novák
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Destin Black
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Lucy Gilbert
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Sudarshan Sharma
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Giorgio Valabrega
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Lisa M Landrum
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Lars C Hanker
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Ashley Stuckey
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Ingrid Boere
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Michael A Gold
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Annika Auranen
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Bhavana Pothuri
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - David Cibula
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Carolyn McCourt
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Mark S Shahin
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Sarah E Gill
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Bradley J Monk
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Joseph Buscema
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Thomas J Herzog
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Larry J Copeland
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Min Tian
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Zangdong He
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Shadi Stevens
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Eleftherios Zografos
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Robert L Coleman
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| | - Matthew A Powell
- From the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology-Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Odense (R.C.) - all in Denmark; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (D.M.C.); the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami Beach (B.M.S.); the Department of Gynecology, Hungarian National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (Z.N.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, and Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport (D.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AMITA Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL (S.S.); the University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin (G.V.), and the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Milano, University of Milan, Milan (F.R.) - both in Italy; Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (L.C.H.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (A.S.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (I.B.); Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa (M.A.G.); Tays Cancer Center and FICAN Mid, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (A.A.); New York University Langone Health, New York (B.P.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (D.C.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (C.M.) and National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (M.A.P.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove (M.S.S.), and GSK, Collegeville (M.T., Z.H.) - both in Pennsylvania; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, GA (S.E.G.); HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tucson (J.B.); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati (T.J.H.), and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hillard (L.J.C.); GSK, London (S.S., E.Z.); and US Oncology Research, the Woodlands, TX (R.L.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Levine MD, Barrington DA, Meade CE, Lammers SM, McLaughlin EM, Suarez AA, Backes FJ, Copeland LJ, O'Malley DM, Cosgrove CM, Cohn DE, Nagel CI, Felix AS, Bixel KL. Glassy cell carcinoma of the cervix: Findings from a combined National Cancer Database analysis and single institution review of treatment patterns and outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 173:15-21. [PMID: 37037083 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe stage, treatment patterns, and survival for glassy cell carcinoma of the cervix (GCCC), a poorly understood rare tumor. METHODS Clinical data and survival were compared between GCCC and more common histologic types using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2017. A retrospective review of GCCC cases at our institution from 2012 to 2020 was simultaneously performed with staging updated according to 2018 FIGO staging. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed, and outcomes compared to historical references. RESULTS 143/89,001 (0.16%) NCDB cervical cancer cases were GCCC. Compared to other histologies, GCCC cases were younger, with 74.8% diagnosed before age 50. Stage distribution was similar. Stage I cases were less commonly treated with surgery alone (19/69, 27%). 79.4% of locally advanced (stage II-IVA) cases were treated with definitive chemoradiation. GCCC demonstrated worse OS for early-stage and locally-advanced disease. No survival differences were observed for patients with stage IVB disease. Our institutional review identified 14 GCCC cases. Median age at diagnosis was 34 years. All nine early-stage cases underwent radical hysterectomy. Adjuvant radiation was given for cases meeting Sedlis criteria (4/9, 44%). All five advanced stage cases were stage IIIC and received definitive chemoradiation. Recurrence rate was 0% (0/9) for early-stage and 60% (3/5) for advanced-stage cases. 3-year PFS was 100% for early-stage and 40% for advanced-stage. 3-year OS was 100% for early-stage and 60% for advanced-stage GCCC. CONCLUSIONS GCCC presents at earlier ages than other cervical cancer histologic types. Although NCDB showed worse OS, our more contemporary institutional review, which incorporates updated staging and newer treatment modalities found outcomes more similar to historical references of more common histologic subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica D Levine
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David A Barrington
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Caitlin E Meade
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Sydney M Lammers
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Eric M McLaughlin
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Adrian A Suarez
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Floor J Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Christa I Nagel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Ashley S Felix
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Kristin L Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Santin AD, Vergote I, González-Martín A, Moore K, Oaknin A, Romero I, Diab S, Copeland LJ, Monk BJ, Coleman RL, Herzog TJ, Siegel J, Kasten L, Schlicker A, Schulz A, Köchert K, Walter AO, Childs BH, Elbi C, Bulat I. Safety and activity of anti-mesothelin antibody-drug conjugate anetumab ravtansine in combination with pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: multicenter, phase Ib dose escalation and expansion study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:562-570. [PMID: 36564099 PMCID: PMC10086500 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Anetumab ravtansine is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of a fully human anti-mesothelin monoclonal antibody conjugated to cytotoxic maytansinoid tubulin inhibitor DM4. Mesothelin is highly expressed in ovarian cancer. This phase Ib study determines the safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor activity of anetumab ravtansine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in mesothelin-expressing platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. METHODS Anetumab ravtansine (5.5 or 6.5 mg/kg) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m2) were administered intravenously every 3 weeks to 65 patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Mesothelin expression was assessed by central immunohistochemistry. Adverse events, tumor response (RECIST 1.1), and progression-free survival were determined. Biomarker samples were assessed by ELISA and next-generation sequencing. RESULTS In dose escalation, nine patients received anetumab ravtansine across two doses (5.5 or 6.5 mg/kg). The maximum tolerated dose of anetumab ravtansine was 6.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks and no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. In dose expansion, 56 patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were nausea (47.7%), decreased appetite (43.1%), fatigue (38.5%), diarrhea (32.3%), and corneal disorder (29.2%). In all treated patients the objective response rate was 27.7% (95% CI 17.3% to 40.2%), including one complete (1.5%) and 17 partial responses (26.2%), with median duration of response of 7.6 (95% CI 3.3 to 10.2) months and median progression-free survival of 5.0 (95% CI 3.2 to 6.0) months. In an exploratory analysis of a sub-set of patients (n=19) with high mesothelin expression who received ≤3 prior lines of systemic therapy, the objective response rate was 42.1% (95% CI 20.3% to 66.5%) with a median duration of response of 8.3 (95% CI 4.1 to 12.0) months and median progression-free survival of 8.5 (95% CI 4.0 to 11.4) months. CONCLUSIONS Anetumab ravtansine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin showed tolerability and promising clinical activity. These results established the dose schedule and the mesothelin-positive target population of this combination for a phase III study in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02751918.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ignace Vergote
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Kathleen Moore
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma, OK, USA
| | - Ana Oaknin
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Sami Diab
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Bradley J Monk
- HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cem Elbi
- Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Whippany, NJ, USA
| | - Iurie Bulat
- ARENSIA Exploratory Medicine, Institute of Oncology Unit, Chisinau, Moldova
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Piver RN, Wagner VM, Levine MD, Backes FJ, Chambers LJ, Cohn DE, Copeland LJ, Cosgrove CM, Nagel CI, O'Malley DM, Bixel KL. Use of the Khorana score to predict venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing chemotherapy for uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2023; 46:101156. [PMID: 36910448 PMCID: PMC9995928 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Gynecologic cancers are associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The Khorana score is a validated tool to assess risk of VTE in cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if the Khorana score can be used as a risk stratification tool for VTE in patients with uterine cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer receiving chemotherapy over a 4-year period was conducted. The patients were stratified based on their Khorana score as well as their chemotherapy sequence, neoadjuvant or definitive versus adjuvant. Results A total of 276 patients were included: 40 received neoadjuvant or definitive, 236 adjuvant chemotherapy. Most patients had advanced stage disease (64.5%). 18 (6.5%) patients developed VTE within 180 days of initiating chemotherapy. High Khorana score was associated with a non-significant increase in VTE (K ≥ 2 OR 1.17, CI 0.40-3.39, K ≥ 3 OR 1.69, CI 0.61-4.69) but had poor predictive accuracy based on area under the curve (K ≥ 2 0.51, K ≥ 3 0.55). The VTE rate was higher in the neoadjuvant/definitive chemotherapy group to adjuvant (12.5% vs 5.5%, p = 0.11). While the former group had a higher average Khorana score (2.35 vs 1.93, p = 0.0048), this was not predictive of VTE. Conclusions While validated in other cancer types, the Khorana score was found to be a poor predictor of VTE in patients with uterine cancer. The use of the Khorana score to guide routine thromboprophylaxis in these patients should be used with caution and further investigation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael N Piver
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Vincent M Wagner
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Monica D Levine
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Floor J Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Laura J Chambers
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Christa I Nagel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kristin L Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Levine MD, O'Malley DM, Haight PJ, Senter L, Wagner V, Bixel KL, Cohn DE, Copeland LJ, Cosgrove CM, McLaughlin EM, Backes FJ. Recurrence rate in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Is there a role for upfront maintenance with PARP inhibitors in stages I and II? Gynecol Oncol Rep 2023; 46:101173. [PMID: 37082521 PMCID: PMC10111944 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the recurrence rate and survival among early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer cases considering homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. Methods Single institution retrospective study of stage I/II EOC patients from 2017 to 2020. HRD was defined as evidence of germline or somatic BRCA mutation, or loss of heterozygosity (LOH)/genomic instability (GIS) as determined by companion diagnostic tests. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. Results 89 stage I/II cases were included. 4/89 (4.5%) had a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, 8 (9%) were germline negative but had a somatic BRCA mutation, and 8 (9%) were BRCA wild-type but had evidence of LOH/GIS on somatic testing; these 20/89 (22%) cases comprised the HRD group. The remaining tumors were confirmed homologous recombination proficient (HRP, 35/89, 39%) or homologous recombination unknown (HRU, 34/89, 38%). The overall recurrence rate was 33/89 (37%). There were more recurrences among HRD cases (14/20, 70%) compared to HRP/HRU cases (19/69, 27.5%, p = 0.0012). Median Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) was 35 months for HRD cases and 225 months for HRP/HRU cases (p = 0.001). At 2 years, there were 60% HRD cases and 88% HRP/HRU cases recurrence-free. At 5 years there were 29% HRD and 69% HRP/HRU cases recurrence-free (p = 0.001). Conclusions Despite a high rate of complete surgical staging and six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence rate was high in this early-stage cohort. Higher recurrence rates were seen in the HRD group, however these data are likely biased by the clinical practice of tumor testing primarily at the time of recurrence rather than the upfront setting. RFS was significantly lower for HRD cases.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lightfoot MDS, Felix AS, Calo CA, Hosmer-Quint JT, Taylor KL, Brown MB, Salani R, Copeland LJ, O'Malley DM, Bixel KL, Cohn DE, Fowler JM, Backes FJ, Cosgrove CM. Less is more: clinical utility of postoperative laboratory testing following minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 228:59.e1-59.e13. [PMID: 35931127 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the increasing rates of same-day discharge following minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer, the need for and value of routine postoperative testing is unclear. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine whether routine postoperative laboratory testing following minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer leads to clinically significant changes in postoperative care. STUDY DESIGN This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer by a gynecologic oncologist between June 2014 and June 2017. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, operative and postoperative data, and pathologic findings were manually extracted from the patients' medical records. The financial burden of laboratory testing was computed using hospital-level cost data. RESULTS Of the 649 women included in the analysis, most (91.4%) were White, with a mean age of 61 years, and mean body mass index of 38.0 kg/m2. The most common comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (31.9%, n=207), chronic pulmonary disease (7.9%, n=51), and congestive heart failure (3.2%, n=21). Median operative time was 151 minutes (range, 61-278), and median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range, 10-1500). Most patients (68.6%, n=445) underwent lymphadenectomy. All patients had postoperative laboratory tests ordered: 100% complete blood count, 99.7% chemistry, 62.9% magnesium, 46.8% phosphate, 37.4% calcium, and 1.2% liver function tests. Twenty-six patients (4.0%) had a change in management owing to postoperative laboratory test results. Of these 26 women, 88% experienced a change in clinical status that would have otherwise prompted testing. Only 3 (0.5% of entire cohort) were asymptomatic: 1 received a blood transfusion for asymptomatic anemia, and the other 2, who did not carry a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, had interventions for hyperglycemia. On univariable analysis, peripheral and cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus with end-organ damage, and a Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥3 were associated with increased odds of change in management; these were not significant on multivariable analysis. Routine postoperative laboratory evaluation in this cohort increased hospital costs by $292,000. CONCLUSION Routine postoperative laboratory tests are unlikely to lead to significant changes in management for women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer, and may increase cost without providing a discernible clinical benefit. In the setting of strict postoperative guidelines, laboratory tests should be ordered when clinically indicated rather than as part of routine postoperative management for women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle D S Lightfoot
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH.
| | - Ashley S Felix
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH
| | - Corinne A Calo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Melissa B Brown
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Ritu Salani
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Kristin L Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Jeffrey M Fowler
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Floor J Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Copeland LJ, Brady MF, Burger RA, Rodgers WH, Huang HQ, Cella D, O'Malley DM, Street DG, Tewari KS, Bender DP, Morris RT, Lowery WJ, Miller DS, Dewdney SB, Spirtos NM, Lele SB, Guntupalli S, Ueland FR, Glaser GE, Mannel RS, DiSaia PJ. Phase III Randomized Trial of Maintenance Taxanes Versus Surveillance in Women With Advanced Ovarian/Tubal/Peritoneal Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group 0212:NRG Oncology Study. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:4119-4128. [PMID: 35759733 PMCID: PMC9746779 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare taxane maintenance chemotherapy, paclitaxel (P) and paclitaxel poliglumex (PP), with surveillance (S) in women with ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube (O/PC/FT) cancer who attained clinical complete response after first-line platinum-taxane therapy. METHODS Women diagnosed with O/PC/FT cancer who attained clinical complete response after first-line platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to S or maintenance, P 135 mg/m2 once every 28 days for 12 cycles, or PP at the same dose and schedule. Overall survival (OS) was the primary efficacy end point. RESULTS Between March 2005 and January 2014, 1,157 individuals were enrolled. Grade 2 or worse GI adverse events were more frequent among those treated with taxane (PP: 20%, P: 27% v S: 11%). Grade 2 or worse neurologic adverse events occurred more often with taxane treatment (PP: 46%, P: 36% v S: 14%). At the fourth scheduled interim analysis, both taxane regimens passed the OS futility boundary and the Data Monitoring Committee approved an early release of results. With a median follow-up of 8.1 years, 653 deaths were reported; none were attributed to the study treatment. Median survival durations were 58.3, 56.8, and 60.0 months for S, P, and PP, respectively. Relative to S, the hazard of death for P was 1.091 (95% CI, 0.911 to 1.31; P = .343) and for PP, it was 1.033 (95% CI, 0.862 to 1.24; P = .725). The median times to first progression or death (PFS) were 13.4, 18.9, and 16.3 months for S, P, and PP, respectively. Hazard ratio = 0.801; 95% CI, 0.684 to 0.938; P = .006 for P and hazard ratio = 0.854; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.00; P = .055 for PP. CONCLUSION Maintenance therapy with P and PP did not improve OS among patients with newly diagnosed O/tubal/peritoneal cancer, but may modestly increase PFS. GI and neurologic toxicities were more frequent in the taxane treatment arms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark F. Brady
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | | | | | - Helen Q. Huang
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - William J. Lowery
- Murtha Cancer Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - David S. Miller
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chan JK, Tian C, Kesterson JP, Richardson MT, Lin K, Tewari KS, Herzog T, Kapp DS, Monk BJ, Casablanca Y, Hanjani P, Wenham RM, Walker J, McNally L, Copeland LJ, Robertson S, Lentz S, Spirtos NM, Bell JG. The clinical and prognostic significance of pre-chemotherapy serum CA-125 in high-risk early stage ovarian cancer: An NRG/GOG ancillary study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:429-435. [PMID: 36244828 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical and prognostic significance of CA-125 trends prior to, during, and after chemotherapy in high-risk early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients. METHODS All patients were enrolled in a phase III randomized trial (GOG 157) following upfront surgery for grade 3 stage IA/IB, stage IC, or stage II disease, and had been treated with either three or six cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 350 patients, the median pre-chemotherapy CA-125 was 65 (IQR: 31-129). 71% of Whites had an elevated CA-125 compared to 47% of non-Whites (p = 0.006). Following the first cycle of chemotherapy, 74% of those with elevated CA-125 had normalization. Those who had normalization of CA-125 after 1 cycle had significantly better 5-year RFS (81% vs. 65%, p = 0.003) and OS (87% vs. 75%, p = 0.009) compared to those who did not normalize (defined as ≤35 U/mL). The pattern of CA-125 change following chemotherapy cycle 1, from normal to normal vs. elevated to normal vs. elevated to elevated had corresponding RFS of 87% vs. 80% vs. 68% (p = 0.013), and OS of 92% vs. 88% vs. 77% (p = 0.009). However, the percent decline (p = 0.993) and absolute nadir normal value of CA-125 (0-10 vs. 11-35 U/mL) were not predictive of outcome (p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS Normal baseline CA125 and normalization of this biomarker after the first cycle of chemotherapy were associated with better survival in high-risk early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John K Chan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, California Pacific Medical Center, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.
| | - Chunqiao Tian
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Joshua P Kesterson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Penn State Health Milton Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, United States of America
| | - Michael T Richardson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Ken Lin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Krishnansu S Tewari
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, United States of America
| | - Thomas Herzog
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
| | - Daniel S Kapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Bradley J Monk
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine at St. Joseph's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, MD, United States of America
| | - Parviz Hanjani
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Memorial Hospital- Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington, PA, United States of America
| | - Robert M Wenham
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center Institute and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Joan Walker
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America
| | - Leah McNally
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center. Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, OH, United States of America
| | - Sharon Robertson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Indiana University Hospital/Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, IN, United States of America
| | - Samuel Lentz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, NC, United States of America
| | - Nick M Spirtos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, LV, United States of America
| | - Jeffery G Bell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
You B, Purdy C, Copeland LJ, Swisher EM, Bookman MA, Fleming G, Coleman R, Randall LM, Tewari KS, Monk BJ, Mannel RS, Walker JL, Cappuccini F, Cohn D, Muzaffar M, Mutch D, Wahner-Hendrickson A, Martin L, Colomban O, Burger RA. Identification of Patients With Ovarian Cancer Experiencing the Highest Benefit From Bevacizumab in the First-Line Setting on the Basis of Their Tumor-Intrinsic Chemosensitivity (KELIM): The GOG-0218 Validation Study. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3965-3974. [PMID: 36252167 PMCID: PMC9746742 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients with high-grade ovarian cancer, predictors of bevacizumab efficacy in first-line setting are needed. In the ICON-7 trial, a poor tumor intrinsic chemosensitivity (defined by unfavorable modeled cancer antigen-125 [CA-125] ELIMination rate constant K [KELIM] score) was a predictive biomarker. Only the patients with high-risk disease (suboptimally resected stage III, or stage IV) exhibiting unfavorable KELIM score < 1.0 had overall survival (OS) benefit from bevacizumab (median: 29.7 v 20.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.78). An external validation study in the GOG-0218 trial was performed. METHODS In GOG-0218, 1,873 patients were treated with carboplatin-paclitaxel ± concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab/placebo. Patient KELIM values were calculated with CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days by the Lyon University team. The association between KELIM score (favorable ≥ 1.0, or unfavorable < 1.0) and bevacizumab benefit for progression-free survival (PFS)/OS was independently assessed by NGR-GOG using univariate/multivariate analyses. RESULTS KELIM was assessable in 1,662 patients with ≥ 3 CA-125 available values. An unfavorable KELIM score was associated with bevacizumab benefit compared with placebo (PFS: HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82; OS: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.03), whereas a favorable KELIM was not (PFS: HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.17; OS: HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.39). The highest benefit was observed in patients with a high-risk disease exhibiting unfavorable KELIM, for PFS (median: 9.1 v 5.6 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.78), and for OS (median: 35.1 v 29.1 months; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97). CONCLUSION This GOG-0218 trial investigation validates ICON-7 findings about the association between poor tumor chemosensitivity and benefit from concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab, suggesting that bevacizumab may mainly be effective in patients with poorly chemosensitive disease. Bevacizumab may be prioritized in patients with a high-risk and poorly chemosensitive disease to improve their PFS/OS (patient KELIM score calculator available on the Biomarker Kinetics website).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit You
- Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, EMR UCBL/HCL 3738, Lyon, France GINECO, Paris, France
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, GINECO-GINEGEPS, Lyon, France
| | - Christopher Purdy
- Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Department, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | - Elizabeth M. Swisher
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Ob/Gyn, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael A. Bookman
- Director, Gynecologic Oncology Therapeutics, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Gini Fleming
- Hematology and Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert Coleman
- Chief Scientific Officer, US Oncology Research, The Woodlands, TX
| | - Leslie M. Randall
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
| | | | - Bradley J. Monk
- HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | | | - David Cohn
- The Ohio State University, James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | | | - David Mutch
- Washington University School of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO
| | | | - Lainie Martin
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Mersana Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA
| | - Olivier Colomban
- Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, EMR UCBL/HCL 3738, Lyon, France GINECO, Paris, France
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, GINECO-GINEGEPS, Lyon, France
| | - Robert A. Burger
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Mersana Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Riedinger CJ, Patterson JM, Backes FJ, O'Malley D, Bixel KL, Copeland LJ, Cohn DE, Goodfellow PJ, Cosgrove CM. The contemporary presentation and diagnosis of endometrial cancer recurrence: When, where, and how? Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:174-180. [PMID: 36154763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine patients with confirmed endometrial cancer recurrence; evaluate patterns, presentation, and mode of diagnosis. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review of women with endometrial cancer diagnosis between 2014 and 2020. Disease recurrences were evaluated. Medical records were reviewed focusing on presentation at time of recurrence. Relationships were assessed using χ2, Fisher's exact test, t-test, and Wilcoxon test. The Kaplan-Meier product limit was used to estimate survival. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the impact of covariates. RESULTS Endometrial cancer recurrence was identified in 201 (11.7%) patients. Sixty percent (120/201) of patients presented with symptoms. Pain was the most common presenting symptom (23.4%, 47/201) and bleeding was reported in <14% (28/201). Patients with symptomatic presentation were less likely to be able to receive treatment for their recurrent disease (76.7% vs 91.3%, p = 0.005). Asymptomatic pelvic exam diagnosed recurrence in 13.4% (27/201) and was more common in patients initially diagnosed with early-stage disease (66.7% vs 34.5% p = 0.001) of endometrioid histology (66.7% vs 36.8%, p = 0.003) without prior adjuvant therapy (48.2% vs 17.9%, p = 0.001). More than1/3 of diagnoses were made by providers outside of the oncologic care team. CONCLUSION The majority of women with recurrent endometrial cancer were symptomatic and pain is a common complaint associated with disease recurrence. Patients with symptomatic presentation of disease recurrence were less likely to receive treatment for recurrent disease but this did not result in an overall survival (OS) difference. Given the rising mortality rate of endometrial cancer further work is needed to develop multidisciplinary surveillance strategies that will enable meaningful treatment of disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney J Riedinger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
| | - Jenna M Patterson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Floor J Backes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David O'Malley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Kristin L Bixel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David E Cohn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Paul J Goodfellow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
You B, Purdy C, Swisher EM, Bookman MA, Fleming GF, Coleman RL, Randall LM, Tewari KS, Monk BJ, Mannel RS, Walker JL, Cappuccini F, Copeland LJ, Muzaffar M, Mutch DG, Wahner Hendrickson AE, Martin LP, Colomban O, Burger RA. Identification of patients with ovarian cancer who are experiencing the highest benefit from bevacizumab in first-line setting based on their tumor intrinsic chemosensitivity (KELIM): GOG-0218 validation study. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.5553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5553 Background: In patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in first-line setting, predictive factors of bevacizumab efficacy are needed, for selecting patients. In ICON-7 trial, a poor tumor intrisic chemosensitivity (defined by unfavorable modeled CA-125 kinetic ELIMination rate constant KELIM) was a predictive biomarker. Among patients with high-risk diseases, only those with unfavorable KELIM had survival benefit from bevacizumab (mOS: 29.7 vs 20.6 months, HR = 0.78)(Colomban. JNCI CS 2020). The objective was to perform an external validation in GOG-0218 trial (NCT00262847). Methods: In GOG-0218, 1,873 patients were treated with carboplatin-paclitaxel +/- concurrent bevacizumab/placebo followed by a 15 month maintenance. Patient KELIM values were estimated with longitudinal CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days. The association between KELIM score (categorized as favorable ≥ 1, or unfavorable < 1) and efficacy of bevacizumab (bevacizumab-concurrent + maintenance, vs placebo) for PFS and OS was assessed using univariate/multivariate analyses, in a Training set with 2/3 patients managed the investigators, and then a Validation set with all patients, managed by NGR-GOG. Results: KELIM was assessable in 1,662 patients with ≥ 3 CA-125 available values. In both sets, the patients with unfavorable KELIM derived benefit from bevacizumab compared to placebo (Training: PFS, HR = 0.65 [0.54-0.80]; OS, HR = 0.80 [0.65-0.99]; Validation: PFS, HR = 0.69 [0.59-0.82]; OS, HR = 0.87 [0.73-1.03]), whilst those with favorable KELIM had no benefit from bevacizumab (Training: PFS, HR = 0.96 [0.75-1.23]; OS, HR = 1.05 [0.80-1.37]; Validation, PFS, HR = 0.96 [0.79-1.17]; OS HR = 1.11 [0.89-1.84]). The highest benefit was observed in patients with high-risk diseases (stage IV or sub-optimally resected stage III) characterized by unfavorable KELIM, for PFS (Learning (n = 276): mPFS: 9.0 vs 5.2 months, HR = 0.61 [0.48-0.78]; Validation (n = 433): mPFS: 9.1 vs 5.6 months, HR = 0.64 [0.53-0.78]), and for OS (Learning (n = 278): mOS: 38.9 vs 27.9 months, HR = 0.72 [0.56-0.93], Validation set (n = 438): mOS: 35.1 vs 29.1 months, HR = 0.79 [0.65-0.97]). Conclusions: This validation analysis of GOG-0218 trial confirms the outcomes of ICON-7 trial about the association between poor tumor chemosensitivity and benefit from concurrent + maintenance bevacizumab, suggesting that bevacizumab is mainly effective in patients with poorly chemosensitive diseases. No benefit was found in patients with favorable KELIM. The patients who derived the highest benefit from bevacizumab in PFS and OS (OS absolute benefit ̃ 6 to 9 months) were those with high-risk diseases (stage IV, or incompletely resected stage III) associated with an unfavorable KELIM score (calculator on https://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/CA-125).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit You
- Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Krishnansu Sujata Tewari
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, CA
| | - Bradley J. Monk
- GOG Foundation, Creighton University, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Joan L. Walker
- The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Fabio Cappuccini
- University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange County, CA
| | - Larry J. Copeland
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | - Lainie P. Martin
- University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Robert Allen Burger
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bixel KL, Leitao MM, Chase DM, Quick A, Lim PC, Eskander RN, Gotlieb WH, LoCoco S, Martino MA, McCormick C, Myers TKN, Tewari KS, Slomovitz BM, Walker JL, Copeland LJ, Monk BJ, Randall LM. ROCC/GOG-3043: A randomized non-inferiority trial of robotic versus open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps5605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS5605 Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with improved perioperative safety outcomes, but, in 2018, the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, a non-inferiority study comparing laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer, reported significantly worse disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS) in the MIS group. Criticisms of the LACC trial include lack of proper preoperative imaging and assessment, use of transcervical uterine manipulators, and lack of proper tumor containment leading to peritoneal contamination. Subsequent retrospective studies have reported conflicting results. Given the potential benefit of MIS, the ROCC trial seeks to address the limitations of the LACC trial. Methods: ROCC is a multi-center, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial. The primary objective is to determine whether robotic-assisted (RBT) radical hysterectomy is not inferior to abdominal (OPEN) approach with respect to 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives include DSS, OS, patterns of recurrence, peri- and postoperative complications, long-term morbidity, impact on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and development of lower extremity lymphedema (LEL). Key inclusion criteria include patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of FIGO 2018 stage IA2-IB2. All patients must have a preoperative pelvic MRI confirming that the cervical tumor is < 4 cm in size, no obvious evidence of extracervical extension and no nodal or other regional metastasis. Intraoperatively, the use of transcervical uterine manipulators is not allowed and specific detailed surgical techniques for proper tumor containment is required. Photographic evidence of specimen with tumor contained is mandated. We estimate the 3-year DFS to be 92% in the control (OPEN) arm. If the DFS does not differ by more than 7% and the one-sided 95% CI does not cross the non-inferiority boundary, then the RBT arm will be deemed non-inferior. 840 patients will be enrolled (420 per arm, 89 events total), which provides 90% power to exclude an absolute decrease in DFS by 7% (HR < = 1.375) with a log-rank test for non-inferiority with a one-sided alpha of 0.05. The primary analysis will be conducted in all randomized patients (ITT). Given the LACC findings of worse oncologic outcomes with MIS, a formal DSMC will conduct periodic reviews of safety including two planned formal interim analyses for futility (harm) after accrual of 370 and 640 patients using an aggressive Lan-DeMets beta-spending function similar to a Pocock boundary. Results of this trial may be practice changing and will either support or refute the findings of the LACC trial. The study is currently activating sites for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04831580.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Leigh Bixel
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Dana Meredith Chase
- Creighton University School of Medicine at St Joseph's Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Allison Quick
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - Peter C Lim
- Center of Hope at Renown Regional Medical Center, Reno, NE
| | | | - Walter H. Gotlieb
- Surgical Oncology McGill University-SMBD Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Krishnansu Sujata Tewari
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, CA
| | | | - Joan L. Walker
- The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Larry J. Copeland
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - Bradley J. Monk
- GOG Foundation, Creighton University, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Leslie M. Randall
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Olawaiye A, Monk BJ, Herzog TJ, Copeland LJ, Coleman RL, Moore KN, Randall LM, Slomovitz BM, O'Malley DM, Eskander RN, Pothuri B, Van Gorp T, Pignata S, Nicum S, Tudor IC, Nguyen DD, Lorusso D. ROSELLA: A phase 3 study of relacorilant in combination with nab-paclitaxel versus investigator’s choice in advanced, platinum-resistant, high-grade epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian-tube cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps5620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS5620 Background: Chemotherapy resistance is a major concern in the treatment of advanced platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. One mechanism of resistance is driven by cortisol, which can suppress the apoptotic pathways that chemotherapy agents rely upon, eg, suppression of BCL2 and FOXO3a pathways. Preclinical and clinical data indicate that glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonism may reverse the anti-apoptotic effects of cortisol, thereby restoring the efficacy of cytotoxic agents. Relacorilant is a selective GR modulator that has shown promise in overcoming resistance when combined with taxanes (particularly nab-paclitaxel) in preclinical models (Greenstein & Hunt 2021) and early-phase clinical studies (Munster et al. 2019) in various solid tumors. A randomized, controlled phase 2 study of relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel found clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR) without increased side effect burden in patients with recurrent, platinum-refractory and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (Colombo et al. 2021). The aim of this phase 3 study is to confirm these phase 2 findings in a larger patient population. Methods: ROSELLA (EudraCT 2022-000662-18, NCT pending) is a phase 3, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, multicenter study of relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel compared to investigator’s choice of chemotherapy agents in patients with confirmed high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. The trial is being conducted at multiple sites in North America and Europe and has a planned enrollment of 360 patients. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either relacorilant (150 mg the day before, day of, and day after nab-paclitaxel infusion) + nab-paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, topotecan, or nab-paclitaxel). Randomization is stratified by prior lines of therapy (1 vs > 1), region of world (North America vs Europe), and prior bevacizumab (yes/no). Adult female patients with platinum-resistant disease (progression within 6 months of completion of platinum-containing therapy), excluding patients with primary platinum refractory disease, who have received 1–3 lines of prior systemic anticancer therapy and at least 1 prior line of platinum therapy are being enrolled. Life expectancy ≥3 months, adequate organ function, and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 are required. The primary study endpoint is PFS by blinded independent central review. Key secondary endpoints include overall survival, PFS by investigator, overall response rate, best overall response, DOR, clinical benefit rate, safety, quality of life, CA-125, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics. Clinical trial information: 2022-000662-18.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bradley J. Monk
- GOG Foundation, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | | | - Kathleen N. Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma HSC, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Leslie M. Randall
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Brian M. Slomovitz
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Florida International University, Miami Beach, FL
| | - David M. O'Malley
- The Ohio State University, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Bhavana Pothuri
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, Ney York, NY
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Shibani Nicum
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Domenica Lorusso
- Catholic University of Sacred Heart and Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pothuri B, Eskander RN, Randall LM, O'Malley DM, Slomovitz B, Moore KN, Herzog TJ, Coleman RL, Copeland LJ, Monk BJ. Practice changing cervical cancer clinical trials. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 165:410-412. [PMID: 35461731 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavana Pothuri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America.
| | - Ramez N Eskander
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Leslie M Randall
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology and Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - David M O'Malley
- The Ohio State University and the James Cancer Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Brian Slomovitz
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, United States of America
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America
| | - Thomas J Herzog
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati Health, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
| | | | - Larry J Copeland
- The Ohio State University and the James Cancer Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Bradley J Monk
- Arizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Powell MA, Filiaci VL, Hensley ML, Huang HQ, Moore KN, Tewari KS, Copeland LJ, Secord AA, Mutch DG, Santin A, Warshal DP, Spirtos NM, DiSilvestro PA, Ioffe OB, Miller DS. Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel and Ifosfamide in Patients With Carcinosarcoma of the Uterus or Ovary: An NRG Oncology Trial. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:968-977. [PMID: 35007153 PMCID: PMC8937015 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This phase III randomized trial (NCT00954174) tested the null hypothesis that paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) is inferior to paclitaxel and ifosfamide (PI) for treating uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults with chemotherapy-naïve UCS or ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) were randomly assigned to PC or PI with 3-week cycles for 6-10 cycles. With 264 events in patients with UCS, the power for an overall survival (OS) hybrid noninferiority design was 80% for a null hazard ratio (HR) of 1.2 against a 13% greater death rate on PI with a type I error of 5% for a one-tailed test. RESULTS The study enrolled 536 patients with UCS and 101 patients with OCS, with 449 and 90 eligible, respectively. Primary analysis was on patients with UCS, distributed as follows: 40% stage I, 6% stage II, 31% stage III, 15% stage IV, and 8% recurrent. Among eligible patients with UCS, PC was assigned to 228 and PI to 221. PC was not inferior to PI. The median OS was 37 versus 29 months (HR = 0.87; 90% CI, 0.70 to 1.075; P < .01 for noninferiority, P > .1 for superiority). The median progression-free survival was 16 versus 12 months (HR = 0.73; P = < 0.01 for noninferiority, P < .01 for superiority). Toxicities were similar, except that more patients in the PC arm had hematologic toxicity and more patients in the PI arm had confusion and genitourinary hemorrhage. Among 90 eligible patients with OCS, those in the PC arm had longer OS (30 v 25 months) and progression-free survival (15 v 10 months) than those in the PI arm, but with limited precision, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION PC was not inferior to the active regimen PI and should be standard treatment for UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A. Powell
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
- Matthew A. Powell, MD, The Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Mailstop 8064-37-905, St Louis, MO 63110; e-mail:
| | - Virginia L. Filiaci
- NRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | - Helen Q. Huang
- NRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Kathleen N. Moore
- The Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | | | | | | | | | - Alessandro Santin
- Yale University, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | - Olga B. Ioffe
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Slomovitz BM, Filiaci VL, Walker JL, Taub MC, Finkelstein KA, Moroney JW, Fleury AC, Muller CY, Holman LL, Copeland LJ, Miller DS, Coleman RL. A randomized phase II trial of everolimus and letrozole or hormonal therapy in women with advanced, persistent or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A GOG Foundation study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 164:481-491. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Revised: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
24
|
Cosgrove CM, Backes FJ, O'Malley D, Bixel KL, Suarez AA, Fowler JM, Copeland LJ, Goodfellow PJ, Cohn DE. Endometrial Cancer: Who Lives, Who Dies, Can We Improve Their Story? Oncologist 2021; 26:1044-1051. [PMID: 34402130 PMCID: PMC8649025 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer in the U.S. The objective of this cohort study was to characterize the clinical and pathologic features that are associated with endometrial cancer-specific death for women cared for at a single National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS This is a retrospective cohort from 2014 to 2017 including all women who had a hysterectomy for EC. Charts were reviewed for clinical and pathologic data, focusing on survival outcomes. RESULTS Seven hundred seventy-one patients with EC underwent hysterectomy with 760 informative for outcomes. Seventy-six (10%) deaths were related to their EC; 62 women died from recurrent EC. Nonendometrioid histology and advanced stage were predictors of recurrence and EC death. Among patients with endometrioid ECs, mismatch repair status was significantly associated with EC-specific survival (relative risk = 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-10.3; p < .0001). Most patients with EC who recurred died of their disease 62/83 (74.7%). Nearly half of the patients that recurred (27/62) had no additional therapy at the time of recurrence. Overall survival was significantly longer for those women who had additional treatment at the time of recurrence; however, the improvement in overall survival with therapy at recurrence was largely attributable to effects in those women who were adjuvant therapy naïve. CONCLUSION Although there is benefit of treatment at the time of recurrence for treatment-naïve women; only approximately half of patients were able to receive therapy. There is an urgent need for continued efforts for more effective EC therapy in both the front-line and recurrent setting as well as early identification of cancer diagnosis and recurrence. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Approximately 10% of patients died of their endometrial cancer. Most deaths were from recurrent disease; however, almost 20% of endometrial cancer deaths were within 120 days of surgery. Although treatment at the time of recurrence improves overall survival, only approximately half of patients will receive therapy at the time of recurrence. Traditional prognostic features like histology and stage remain important to predict risk of recurrence, and newer biomarkers, such as mismatch repair status, may improve risk stratification and targeted therapy. There remains an urgent need for improved therapy and early detection of diagnosis and recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey M. Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer HospitalColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Floor J. Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer HospitalColumbusOhioUSA
| | - David O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer HospitalColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Kristin L. Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer HospitalColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Adrian A. Suarez
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Jeffrey M. Fowler
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer HospitalColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Larry J. Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer HospitalColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Paul J. Goodfellow
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer HospitalColumbusOhioUSA
| | - David E. Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer HospitalColumbusOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Backes FJ, Wei L, Chen M, Hill K, Dzwigalski K, Poi M, Phelps M, Salani R, Copeland LJ, Fowler JM, Cohn DE, Bixel K, Cosgrove C, Hays J, O'Malley D. Phase I evaluation of lenvatinib and weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent endometrial, ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal Cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:619-625. [PMID: 34272090 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and describe toxicities associated with lenvatinib and weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent endometrial and platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS Using a 3 + 3 design patients were given weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV day 1, 8, 15 and oral levantinib daily on a 28-day cycle. Lenvatinib dose levels were 8 mg, 12 mg, 16 mg, 20 mg. Toxicities were recorded using CTCAE v4.03 and response was determined with imaging after cycle 2, then every 3rd cycle, using RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS 26 patients were enrolled; 19 with ovarian cancer (14 high grade serous, 1 low grade serous, 2 clear cell, 1 endometrioid, and 1 carcinosarcoma), and 7 with endometrial cancer (3 serous, and 4 endometrioid). The MTD was established at lenvatinib 16 mg and weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2. Toxicities (all grades) occurring in ≥25% of patients included anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, mucositis, nausea, diarrhea, anorexia, hypertension, fatigue, proteinuria, epistaxis, hoarseness. Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response and PFS; 15 (65%) had a partial response, 7 (30%) stable, 1 (4%) progressive disease with an objective response rate of 65%; 71% in ovarian and 50% in endometrial cancer. Median progression free survival (PFS) is 12.4 months; 14.0 months in endometrial cancer, 7.2 months in ovarian cancer; 54% had a PFS > 6 months. The median duration of response for PR patients (n = 15) was 10.9 months. CONCLUSIONS The regimen was tolerable with manageable side effects. Encouraging activity was observed in endometrial and ovarian cancer, and warrants further development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor J Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.
| | - Lai Wei
- Center of Biostatistics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Min Chen
- Division of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Kasey Hill
- Comprehensive Cancer Canter, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Kyle Dzwigalski
- Comprehensive Cancer Canter, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Ming Poi
- Division of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Mitch Phelps
- Division of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Ritu Salani
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Jeffrey M Fowler
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Kristin Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Casey Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - John Hays
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - David O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Haight PJ, Castaneda AV, Savage JM, Copeland LJ. Cervical carcinoma with histologic components of sarcomatoid carcinoma and multiple basaloid variants: A case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2021; 37:100797. [PMID: 34124329 PMCID: PMC8173268 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Basaloid cervical tumors are well-documented histologic variants and rarely exist in pure forms. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the cervix is not yet classified as a histologic variant by the WHO. Squamous cell, basaloid and sarcomatoid carcinoma within a single cervical specimen is rare.
Cervical cancer with co-existing pathologic components of squamous cell carcinoma, basaloid morphology and sarcomatoid carcinoma is rare, with limited reports in the literature. Here we present a patient who underwent a modified radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer, with final pathology specimen demonstrating multiple histologic variants including basal carcinoma, adenoid cystic-like areas, basaloid squamous cell carcinoma and areas of high-grade transformation to sarcomatoid carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina J Haight
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, M210 Starling Loving Hall, 320 W 10 Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Antonio V Castaneda
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, M210 Starling Loving Hall, 320 W 10 Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Johanna M Savage
- Division of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, S305E Rhodes Hall, 410 W 10 Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, M210 Starling Loving Hall, 320 W 10 Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wagner V, Levine M, Piver R, Backes FJ, Cohn DE, Copeland LJ, Cosgrove C, Fowler J, O'Malley DM, Bixel KL. Use of Khorana score to predict VTE in patients undergoing chemotherapy for uterine cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5589 Background: Gynecologic cancers are associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The Khorana score is a clinically-validated tool to assess risk of VTE in cancer patients (using disease site, BMI and blood counts). Recent ASCO clinical practice guidelines have recommended patients with a Khorana score of 2 or greater be offered pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis during systemic chemotherapy. For women with uterine cancer, the utility of the Khorana score is still unknown. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed from January 2016 to January 2020. All patients with uterine cancer were screened. Patients receiving chemotherapy, both neoadjuvant (NACT) and adjuvant (ACT), were included. VTE was evaluated for 12 months following the first cycle of chemotherapy. The Khorana score was calculated for each patient using both a high risk score of ≥2 and ≥3 and the patients were stratified based on NACT vs ACT. Logistic regression and chi-square were used to evaluate the prognostic utility of the Khorana score as well as other clinico-pathologic criteria on development of VTE. Results: A total of 265 patients were included. The majority of patients were obese (160, 60.4%) and 60 years or older (188, 70.9%). The most common histology was endometrioid (107, 40.4%) followed by serous (71, 26.8%) and the majority were advanced-stage (169, 63.8%). Most women underwent hysterectomy during treatment (243, 91.7%) followed by ACT (228, 86.0%). 14% (37) had NACT. 24 patients developed VTE (9.1%), which was higher, but not statistically different, with NACT vs ACT (13.5% vs 8.3%, p = 0.35). Demographics including age, race and BMI nor pathologic data including histology, grade or stage significantly correlated with development of VTE. Similarly, treatment factors including undergoing hysterectomy and radiation treatment were not statistically significant in regards to VTE. The proportion of patients with high Khorana score (both ≥2 and ≥3) was similar between groups. In the whole cohort, high Khorana score (defined either as ≥2 or ≥3) did not significantly predict VTE; however, the model using ≥3 was more predictive (OR 1.154, 95%CI 0.402-2.907, p = 0.7326). In the NACT cohort, neither model was predictive of VTE (both with OR < 1). In the ACT group, Khorana ≥3 was a better prediction model, but was still not statistically significant (OR 1.557, 95%CI 0.480-4.343, p = 0.4213). Conclusions: Although validated in other cancer types, the Khorana score was found to be a poor predictor of VTE in this population. A defined high risk Khorana score of ≥3 (per the original validation study) better predicted VTE than a score of ≥2 (per guidelines). Independent of the Khorana score, demographic and pathologic data were poor predictors of VTE. At this time, use of the Khorana score to guide routine thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing chemotherapy for uterine cancer should be used with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Wagner
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - Monica Levine
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - Rachael Piver
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - David E. Cohn
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - Larry J. Copeland
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - Casey Cosgrove
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - Jeffery Fowler
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - David M. O'Malley
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - Kristin Leigh Bixel
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Monk BJ, Coleman RL, Herzog TJ, Moore KN, O'Malley DM, Randall LM, Slomovitz BM, Eskander R, Pothuri B, Reese LL, Mannel RS, Copeland LJ. The GOG partners: A program for industry sponsored clinical trials in gynecologic oncology within the GOG foundation. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:203-209. [PMID: 33722417 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The GOG Foundation, Inc. (GOG-F) is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization with the purpose of promoting excellence in the quality and integrity of clinical and basic scientific research in the field of gynecologic malignancies. GOG Partners (GOG-P) is a program of the GOG-F and is positioned alongside NRG Oncology under the GOG-F organizational umbrella. GOG-P operates outside of the federally funded NCI NRG Oncology, a key distinguishing feature. By functioning as a site management organization (SMO), GOG-P provides an additional platform for clinical trial development, mentorship opportunities, patient accrual, and site infrastructure support yielding an expanded gynecologic oncology clinical trials infrastructure in the US. GOG-P has a consistent track record of conducting high quality clinical trials that lead to bringing novel FDA approved treatments for gynecologic cancer. This manuscript summarizes the history and organizational structure of the GOG-P. In addition, we outline the other key supportive programs within the GOG-F that help support the GOG-P effort to perform transformative gynecologic cancer research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J Monk
- Arizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona College of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ,USA
| | | | - Thomas J Herzog
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - David M O'Malley
- Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University,Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Leslie M Randall
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Brian M Slomovitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Ramez Eskander
- Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Bhavana Pothuri
- NYU Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, NY, New York, USA
| | | | - Robert S Mannel
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University,Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Boitano TKL, Chi DS, Copeland LJ, Straughn JM. Standing on the shoulders of giants: Mentorship advice from leaders in the field. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:339-341. [PMID: 33516530 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
This commentary is presenting opinions and advice on mentorship in the field of gynecologic oncology. Eleven academic gynecologic oncologists from across the country were interviewed and their thoughts about mentorship were recorded with recurring themes and ideas described in this commentary. Trust, respect, and mutual agreement on expectations were all described as vital to a functioning mentor/mentee relationship. Mentorship is critical for fellows and junior faculty to expand and uphold the standards of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa K L Boitano
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - J Michael Straughn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vetter MH, Smrz SA, Copeland LJ, Cohn DE. Chemotherapy directly followed by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition as an alternative to surgery in patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer: a potential management strategy in the era of coronavirus disease 2019. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223:469-470. [PMID: 32454030 PMCID: PMC7255324 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
31
|
Vetter MH, Smith B, Benedict J, Hade EM, Bixel K, Copeland LJ, Cohn DE, Fowler JM, O'Malley D, Salani R, Backes FJ. Preoperative predictors of endometrial cancer at time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or complex atypical hyperplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222:60.e1-60.e7. [PMID: 31401259 PMCID: PMC7201377 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, also known as complex atypical hyperplasia, is a precancerous lesion of the endometrium associated with a 40% risk of concurrent endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy. Although a majority of endometrial cancers diagnosed at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia are low risk and low stage, approximately 10% of patients ultimately diagnosed with endometrial cancers will have high-risk disease that would warrant lymph node assessment to guide adjuvant therapy decisions. Given these risks, some physicians choose to refer patients to a gynecologic oncologist for definitive management. Currently, few data exist regarding preoperative factors that can predict the presence of concurrent endometrial cancer in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Identification of these factors may assist in the preoperative triaging of patients to general gynecology or gynecologic oncology. OBJECTIVE To determine whether preoperative factors can predict the presence of concurrent endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia; and to describe the ability of preoperative characteristics to predict which patients may be at a higher risk for lymph node involvement requiring lymph node assessment at the time of hysterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing hysterectomy for pathologically confirmed endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia from January 2004 to December 2015. Patient demographics, imaging, pathology, and outcomes were recorded. The "Mayo criteria" were used to determine patients requiring lymphadenectomy. Unadjusted associations between covariates and progression to endometrial cancer were estimated by 2-sample t-tests for continuous covariates and by logistic regression for categorical covariates. A multivariable model for endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy was developed using logistic regression with 5-fold cross-validation. RESULTS Of the 1055 charts reviewed, 169 patients were eligible and included. Of these patients, 87 (51.5%) had a final diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/other benign disease, whereas 82 (48.5%) were ultimately diagnosed with endometrial cancer. No medical comorbidities were found to be strongly associated with concurrent endometrial cancer. Patients with endometrial cancer had a thicker average endometrial stripe compared to the patients with no endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy (15.7 mm; standard deviation, 9.5) versus 12.5 mm; standard deviation, 6.4; P = .01). An endometrial stripe of ≥2 cm was associated with 4.0 times the odds of concurrent endometrial cancer (95% confidence interval, 1.5-10.0), controlling for age. In all, 87% of endometrial cancer cases were stage T1a (Nx or N0). Approximately 44% of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and an endometrial stripe of ≥2 cm met the "Mayo criteria" for indicated lymphadenectomy compared to 22% of endometrial cancer patients with an endometrial stripe of <2 cm. CONCLUSION Endometrial stripe thickness and age were the strongest predictors of concurrent endometrial cancer at time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Referral to a gynecologic oncologist may be especially warranted in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia patients with an endometrial stripe of ≥2 cm given the increased rate of concurrent cancer and potential need for lymph node assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Hagan Vetter
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Blair Smith
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO
| | - Jason Benedict
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Erinn M Hade
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Kristin Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Jeffrey M Fowler
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - David O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Ritu Salani
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Floor J Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vergote I, Coleman RL, Pignata S, Bookman MA, Marth C, Herzog TJ, Gonzalez-Martin A, Copeland LJ. Joint ENGOT and GOG Foundation requirements for trials with industry partners. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 154:255-258. [PMID: 31331494 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ignace Vergote
- ENGOT/BGOG and University Hospital Leuven, Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium, European Union.
| | - Robert L Coleman
- GOG-F and Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sandro Pignata
- ENGOT/MITO Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale Napoli, Italy
| | - Michael A Bookman
- GOG-F and Gynecologic Oncology Therapeutics, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Christian Marth
- ENGOT/A-AGO and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Thomas J Herzog
- GOG-F and Gynecologic Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Larry J Copeland
- GOG-F and Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and JamesCare Gynecologic Oncology at Mill Run, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Vergote I, Coleman RL, Pignata S, Bookman MA, Marth C, Herzog TJ, Gonzalez Martin A, Copeland LJ. Joint ENGOT and GOG Foundation requirements for trials with industry partners. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:1094-1097. [PMID: 31320391 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ignace Vergote
- ENGOT/BGOG and University Hospital Leuven, Gynaecological Oncology Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium, European Union
| | - Robert L Coleman
- GOG-F and Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sandro Pignata
- ENGOT/MITO Gynaecological Oncology, National Cancer Institute Napels, Naples, Italy
| | - Michael A Bookman
- GOG-F and Gynecologic Oncology Therapeutics, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Christian Marth
- ENGOT/A-AGO and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Thomas J Herzog
- GOG-F and Gynecologic Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Larry J Copeland
- GOG-F and Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and JamesCare Gynecologic Oncology at Mill Run, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tewari KS, Burger RA, Enserro D, Norquist BM, Swisher EM, Brady MF, Bookman MA, Fleming GF, Huang H, Homesley HD, Fowler JM, Greer BE, Boente M, Liang SX, Ye C, Bais C, Randall LM, Chan JK, Ferriss JS, Coleman RL, Aghajanian C, Herzog TJ, DiSaia PJ, Copeland LJ, Mannel RS, Birrer MJ, Monk BJ. Final Overall Survival of a Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:2317-2328. [PMID: 31216226 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 246] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We report the final, protocol-specified analysis of overall survival (OS) in GOG-0218, a phase III, randomized trial of bevacizumab in women with newly diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma. METHODS A total of 1,873 women with incompletely resected stage III to IV disease were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to six 21-day cycles of intravenous carboplatin (area under the concentration v time curve 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) versus chemotherapy plus concurrent bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, cycles 2 to 6) versus chemotherapy plus concurrent and maintenance bevacizumab (cycles 2 to 22). Inclusion criteria included a Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and no history of clinically significant vascular events or evidence of intestinal obstruction. OS was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. A total of 1,195 serum and/or tumor specimens were sequenced for BRCA1/2 and damaging mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Intratumoral microvessel density was studied using CD31 immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Median follow-up was 102.9 months. Relative to control (n = 625), for patients receiving bevacizumab-concurrent (n = 625), the hazard ratio (HR) of death was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.94 to 1.20); for bevacizumab-concurrent plus maintenance (n = 623), the HR was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.09). Disease-specific survival was not improved in any arm. No survival advantage was observed after censoring patients who received bevacizumab at crossover or as second line. Median OS for stage IV bevacizumab-concurrent plus maintenance was 42.8 v 32.6 months for stage IV control (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.95). Relative to wild type, the HR for death for BRCA1/2 mutated carcinomas was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.73), and for non-BRCA1/2 HRR, the HR was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.85). BRCA1/2, HRR, and CD31 were not predictive of bevacizumab activity. CONCLUSION No survival differences were observed for patients who received bevacizumab compared with chemotherapy alone. Testing for BRCA1/2 mutations and homologous recombination deficiency is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert A Burger
- University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John K Chan
- California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA
| | - J Stuart Ferriss
- Dell Seton Medical Center at The University of Texas, Austin, TX
| | | | | | | | - Philip J DiSaia
- University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, CA
| | | | - Robert S Mannel
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | | | - Bradley J Monk
- University of Arizona and Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Powell MA, Filiaci VL, Hensley ML, Huang HQ, Moore KN, Tewari KS, Copeland LJ, Secord AA, Mutch DG, Santin A, Richards W, Warshal DP, Spirtos NM, Disilverstro P, Ioffe O, Miller DS. A randomized phase 3 trial of paclitaxel (P) plus carboplatin (C) versus paclitaxel plus ifosfamide (I) in chemotherapy-naive patients with stage I-IV, persistent or recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus or ovary: An NRG Oncology trial. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.5500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5500 Background: Gynecologic carcinosarcomas (CS) are rare yet aggressive epithelial malignancies for which optimal therapy is debated. PI was shown to be superior to I. PC demonstrated compelling phase 2 activity with improved safety and convenience. Methods: Main inclusion: ≥18 y; chemotherapy naïve stage I-IVB or recurrent uterine (U) or ovarian (O) CS. Treatment randomised 1:1 to PC (P 175mg/m2 with C: AUC 6 or 5 if prior RT on D1) or PI (P: 135 mg/m2; I 1.6 g/m2 D1-3; G-CSF support with dose escalation & de-escalation based on nadir counts) q21days for 6-10 cycles. Quality of life (QOL) (FACT-En TOI) and neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale) administered at 4 timepoints. A stratified log-rank test compared primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) from entry between treatment groups for non-inferiority (NI) of PC to PI. With 264 events, power was 80% for a null hazard ratio of 1.2 against a 13% greater death rate on PI when type I error is limited to 5% for a one-tail test. NCT00954174. Results: 637 pts accrued with a median follow-up of 61 months. The primary (U, n = 536) and secondary (O, n = 101) cohorts are analyzed separately and included 449 and 90 pts eligible pts, respectively. For the U cohort:PC and PI were randomly assigned to 228 and 221 eligible pts. Stage distribution: I (40%), II (6%), III (31%), IV (15%) and recurrent (8%). The study met its primary objective withPC not inferior to PI (intention-to-treat analysis;Median OS 37 vs. 29 mo, HR = 0.87; 90% CI = 0.70 to 1.075; p < 0.01 for NI, p > 0.1 for superiority (S)).PFS (median on PC 16mo vs PI 12mo; HR = 0.73; p = < 0.01 for NI, p < 0.01 for S). Toxicity (grade 1/2/3/4/5: PC 1/8/40/48/2%; PI 1/32/39/25/1%). Most of increase toxicity for PC was hematologic with G-CSF rarely used (N = 6). Confusion and genitourinary hemorrhage were significantly worse with PI. Both groups had decline in QOL and neurotoxicity scores. Similar trends were noted for the O cohort (OS: PC 30mo vs PI 25mo; and PFS: 15 mo vs 10 respectively). Conclusions: PC was not inferior to PI for OS with longer PFS and similar QOL and neurotoxicity. These results establish a new standard regimen for women with CS. Clinical trial information: NCT00954174.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A. Powell
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Martee Leigh Hensley
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - Kathleen N. Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
| | | | | | | | - David G Mutch
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David S. Miller
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hutchcraft ML, Smith B, McLaughlin EM, Hade EM, Backes FJ, O'Malley DM, Cohn DE, Fowler JM, Copeland LJ, Salani R. Conization pathologic features as a predictor of intermediate and high risk features on radical hysterectomy specimens in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:255-258. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
37
|
Rose PG, Java JJ, Salani R, Geller MA, Alvarez A, Tewari KS, Bender DP, Mutch DG, Friedlander ML, Van Le L, Method MW, Hamilton CA, Lee RB, Wenham RM, Guntupalli SR, Markman M, Muggia FM, Armstrong DK, Bookman MA, Burger RA, Copeland LJ. Nomogram for Predicting Individual Survival After Recurrence of Advanced-Stage, High-Grade Ovarian Carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133:245-254. [PMID: 30633128 PMCID: PMC6551603 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze clinical prognostic factors for survival after recurrence of high-grade, advanced-stage ovarian-peritoneal-tubal carcinoma and to develop a nomogram to predict individual survival after recurrence. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients treated in multicenter Gynecologic Oncology Group protocols for stage III and IV ovarian-peritoneal-tubal carcinoma who underwent primary debulking surgery, received chemotherapy with paclitaxel and a platinum compound, and subsequently developed recurrence. Prognostic factors affecting survival were identified and used to develop a nomogram, which was both internally and externally validated. RESULTS There were 4,739 patients included in this analysis, of whom, 84% had stage III and 16% had stage IV ovarian carcinoma. At a median follow-up of 88.8 months (95% CI 86.2-92.0 months), the vast majority of patients (89.4%) had died. The median survival after recurrence was 21.4 months (95% CI 20.5-21.9 months). Time to recurrence after initial chemotherapy, clear cell or mucinous histology, performance status, stage IV disease, and age were significant variables used to develop a nomogram for survival after recurrence, which had a concordance index of 0.67. The time to recurrence alone accounted for 85% of the prognostic information. Similar results were found for patients who underwent second look laparotomy and had a complete pathologic response or received intraperitoneal chemotherapy. CONCLUSION For individuals with advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma who recur after standard first-line therapy, estimated survivals after recurrence are closely related to the time to recurrence after chemotherapy and prognostic variables can be used to predict subsequent survival. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinialTrials.gov, NCT00002568, NCT00837993, NCT00002717, NCT01074398, and NCT00011986.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Rose
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH;
| | - James J Java
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY;
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David G Mutch
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO;
| | | | | | - Michael W Method
- Community Health Network and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN;
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert A Burger
- University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA:
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
ElNaggar AC, Hade EM, O'Malley DM, Liang MI, Copeland LJ, Fowler JM, Salani R, Backes FJ, Cohn DE. Time to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: Compliance with ovarian cancer quality indicators at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 151:501-505. [PMID: 30282591 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2018] [Revised: 09/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess compliance with, and outcomes related to, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology quality measure in ovarian cancer to administer chemotherapy within 42 days of cytoreductive surgery in patients with epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer. METHODS Institutional ovarian cancer database was evaluated for compliance with the quality measure to administer chemotherapy within 42 days of cytoreductive surgery. The influence of chemotherapy timing on the risk of death was evaluated, and factors related to the timing of chemotherapy after surgery was assessed. RESULTS Of 668 patients with epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer who underwent surgical treatment for their disease (primary or interval), 635 met criteria for administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (with stages IA/IB, grade 2 or 3 disease; stage IC or more advanced stage disease). Compliance to administer chemotherapy within 42 days was 59.1%. The adjusted risk of death was not strongly associated with time to chemotherapy within 42 days (aHR: 0.80; 0.61, 1.05) and this did not differ by primary or interval debulking surgery. CONCLUSIONS In this prospectively maintained database, 59.1% of patients received chemotherapy within 42 days of surgery. The time to chemotherapy interval of within 42 days was not strongly associated with improved survival, particularly when age, stage of disease, insurance enrollment and surgical characteristics were taken into account. Further, the relationship between time to chemotherapy interval of within 42 days and survival did not vary by patients who received primary versus interval debulking surgery or had no residual disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam C ElNaggar
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
| | - Erinn M Hade
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics at The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Margaret I Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey M Fowler
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Ritu Salani
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Floor J Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Friedlander M, Chan JK, Java J, Armstrong DK, Markman M, Herzog TJ, Monk BJ, Backes FJ, Secord AA, Bonebrake AJ, Rose PG, Tewari KS, Mannel RS, Lentz SS, Geller MA, Copeland LJ. Characterization and predictors of long term (≥ 10 years) survivors in NRG/GOG randomized clinical trials of intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy in stage III ovarian cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.5556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Friedlander
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Jim Java
- Genomics Research Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | | | - Thomas J. Herzog
- University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Bradley J. Monk
- University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Burger RA, Enserro D, Tewari KS, Brady MF, Bookman MA, Fleming GF, Huang HQ, Homesley HD, Fowler J, Boente M, Randall LM, Chan JK, Ferris JS, DiSaia PJ, Copeland LJ, Mannel RS, Birrer MJ, Monk BJ. Final overall survival (OS) analysis of an international randomized trial evaluating bevacizumab (BEV) in the primary treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: A NRG oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.5517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Allen Burger
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Mark F. Brady
- NRG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael J. Birrer
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL
| | - Bradley J. Monk
- University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Tewari KS, Sill MW, Penson RT, Huang H, Ramondetta LM, Landrum LM, Oaknin A, Reid TJ, Leitao MM, Michael HE, DiSaia PJ, Copeland LJ, Creasman WT, Stehman FB, Brady MF, Burger RA, Thigpen JT, Birrer MJ, Waggoner SE, Moore DH, Look KY, Koh WJ, Monk BJ. Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240). Lancet 2017; 390:1654-1663. [PMID: 28756902 PMCID: PMC5714293 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31607-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 349] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2017] [Revised: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND On Aug 14, 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the antiangiogenesis drug bevacizumab for women with advanced cervical cancer on the basis of improved overall survival (OS) after the second interim analysis (in 2012) of 271 deaths in the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 240 trial. In this study, we report the prespecified final analysis of the primary objectives, OS and adverse events. METHODS In this randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical carcinoma from 81 centres in the USA, Canada, and Spain. Inclusion criteria included a GOG performance status score of 0 or 1; adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function; adequately anticoagulated thromboembolism; a urine protein to creatinine ratio of less than 1; and measurable disease. Patients who had received chemotherapy for recurrence and those with non-healing wounds or active bleeding conditions were ineligible. We randomly allocated patients 1:1:1:1 (blocking used; block size of four) to intravenous chemotherapy of either cisplatin (50 mg/m2 on day 1 or 2) plus paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 or 175 mg/m2 on day 1) or topotecan (0·75 mg/m2 on days 1-3) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 on day 1) with or without intravenous bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on day 1) in 21 day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, voluntary withdrawal by the patient, or complete response. We stratified randomisation by GOG performance status (0 vs 1), previous radiosensitising platinum-based chemotherapy, and disease status (recurrent or persistent vs metastatic). We gave treatment open label. Primary outcomes were OS (analysed in the intention-to-treat population) and adverse events (analysed in all patients who received treatment and submitted adverse event information), assessed at the second interim and final analysis by the masked Data and Safety Monitoring Board. The cutoff for final analysis was 450 patients with 346 deaths. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00803062. FINDINGS Between April 6, 2009, and Jan 3, 2012, we enrolled 452 patients (225 [50%] in the two chemotherapy-alone groups and 227 [50%] in the two chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups). By March 7, 2014, 348 deaths had occurred, meeting the prespecified cutoff for final analysis. The chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups continued to show significant improvement in OS compared with the chemotherapy-alone groups: 16·8 months in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups versus 13·3 months in the chemotherapy-alone groups (hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·62-0·95]; p=0·007). Final OS among patients not receiving previous pelvic radiotherapy was 24·5 months versus 16·8 months (0·64 [0·37-1·10]; p=0·11). Postprogression OS was not significantly different between the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (8·4 months) and chemotherapy-alone groups (7·1 months; 0·83 [0·66-1·05]; p=0·06). Fistula (any grade) occurred in 32 (15%) of 220 patients in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (all previously irradiated) versus three (1%) of 220 in the chemotherapy-alone groups (all previously irradiated). Grade 3 fistula developed in 13 (6%) versus one (<1%). No fistulas resulted in surgical emergencies, sepsis, or death. INTERPRETATION The benefit conferred by incorporation of bevacizumab is sustained with extended follow-up as evidenced by the overall survival curves remaining separated. After progression while receiving bevacizumab, we did not observe a negative rebound effect (ie, shorter survival after bevacizumab is stopped than after chemotherapy alone is stopped). These findings represent proof-of-concept of the efficacy and tolerability of antiangiogenesis therapy in advanced cervical cancer. FUNDING National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishnansu S Tewari
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
| | - Michael W Sill
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Helen Huang
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Lisa M Landrum
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Ana Oaknin
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Thomas J Reid
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Women's Cancer Center at Kettering, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helen E Michael
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Philip J DiSaia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | | | - William T Creasman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Mark F Brady
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Robert A Burger
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J Tate Thigpen
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | | | - Steven E Waggoner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Wui-Jin Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bradley J Monk
- Arizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona College of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine at St Joseph's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cosgrove CM, Cohn DE, Hampel H, Frankel WL, Jones D, McElroy JP, Suarez AA, Zhao W, Chen W, Salani R, Copeland LJ, O'Malley DM, Fowler JM, Yilmaz A, Chassen AS, Pearlman R, Goodfellow PJ, Backes FJ. Epigenetic silencing of MLH1 in endometrial cancers is associated with larger tumor volume, increased rate of lymph node positivity and reduced recurrence-free survival. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 146:588-595. [PMID: 28709704 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Revised: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the relationship between mismatch repair (MMR) classification and clinicopathologic features including tumor volume, and explore outcomes by MMR class in a contemporary cohort. METHODS Single institution cohort evaluating MMR classification for endometrial cancers (EC). MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC)±microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and reflex MLH1 methylation testing was performed. Tumors with MMR abnormalities by IHC or MSI and MLH1 methylation were classified as epigenetic MMR deficiency while those without MLH1 methylation were classified as probable MMR mutations. Clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS 466 endometrial cancers were classified; 75% as MMR proficient, 20% epigenetic MMR defects, and 5% as probable MMR mutations. Epigenetic MMR defects were associated with advanced stage, higher grade, presence of lymphovascular space invasion, and older age. MMR class was significantly associated with tumor volume, an association not previously reported. The epigenetic MMR defect tumors median volume was 10,220mm3 compared to 3321mm3 and 2,846mm3, for MMR proficient and probable MMR mutations respectively (P<0.0001). Higher tumor volume was associated with lymph node involvement. Endometrioid EC cases with epigenetic MMR defects had significantly reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS). Among advanced stage (III/IV) endometrioid EC the epigenetic MMR defect group was more likely to recur compared to the MMR proficient group (47.7% vs 3.4%) despite receiving similar adjuvant therapy. In contrast, there was no difference in the number of early stage recurrences for the different MMR classes. CONCLUSIONS MMR testing that includes MLH1 methylation analysis defines a subset of tumors that have worse prognostic features and reduced RFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey M Cosgrove
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - David E Cohn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Heather Hampel
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Wendy L Frankel
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Dan Jones
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Joseph P McElroy
- The Ohio State University, College of Medicine Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, Columbus, United States
| | - Adrian A Suarez
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Weiqiang Zhao
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Ritu Salani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - David M O'Malley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Jeffrey M Fowler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Ahmet Yilmaz
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Alexis S Chassen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Rachel Pearlman
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| | - Paul J Goodfellow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States.
| | - Floor J Backes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rose PG, Java JJ, Morgan MA, Alvarez-Secord A, Kesterson JP, Stehman FB, Warshal DP, Creasman WT, Hanjani P, Morris RT, Copeland LJ. Disease extent at secondary cytoreductive surgery is predictive of progression-free and overall survival in advanced stage ovarian cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 143:511-515. [PMID: 27692669 PMCID: PMC5720165 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Revised: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 09/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE GOG 152 was a randomized trial of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in patients with suboptimal residual disease (residual tumor nodule >1cm in greatest diameter) following primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer. The current analysis was undertaken to evaluate the impact of disease findings at SCS on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS Among the 550 patients enrolled on GOG-152, two-hundred-sixteen patients were randomly assigned following 3cycles of cisplatin and paclitaxel to receive SCS. In 15 patients (7%) surgery was declined or contraindicated. In the remaining 201 patients the operative and pathology reports were utilized to classify their disease status at the beginning of SCS as; no gross disease/microscopically negative N=40 (19.9%), no gross disease/microscopically positive N=8 (4.0%), and gross disease N=153 (76.1%). RESULTS The median PFS for patients with no gross disease/microscopically negative was 16.1months, no gross disease/microscopically positive was 13.5months and for gross disease was 11.7months, P=0.002. The median OS for patients with no gross disease/microscopically negative was 51.5months, no gross disease/microscopically positive was 42.6months and for gross disease was 34.9months, P=0.018. CONCLUSION Although as previously reported SCS did not change PFS or OS, for those who underwent the procedure, their operative and pathologic findings were predictive of PFS and OS. Surgical/pathological residual disease is a biomarker of response to chemotherapy and predictive of PFS and OS.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/pathology
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/surgery
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Cisplatin/administration & dosage
- Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
- Disease-Free Survival
- Female
- Humans
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Staging
- Neoplasm, Residual
- Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/pathology
- Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/surgery
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery
- Paclitaxel/administration & dosage
- Prognosis
- Reoperation
- Survival Rate
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Rose
- Dept. of OB/GYN, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44109, United States.
| | - James J Java
- NRG Oncology Statistics & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States.
| | - Mark A Morgan
- Dept. of OB/GYN, University of Pennsylvania Hospital System, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
| | - Angeles Alvarez-Secord
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
| | - Joshua P Kesterson
- Dept. of GYN/Oncology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
| | - Frederick B Stehman
- Section of Gyn Onc, Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
| | - David P Warshal
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cooper Health, Camden, NJ 08103, United States.
| | - William T Creasman
- Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
| | - Parviz Hanjani
- Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, PA 19001, United States.
| | - Robert T Morris
- Dept. of Oncology, Wayne State University Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, United States.
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Dept. of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Garcia-Soto AE, Java JJ, Nieves Neira W, Pearson JM, Cohn DE, Lele SB, Tewari KS, Walker JL, Alvarez Secord A, Armstrong DK, Copeland LJ. Does time interval between surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration in advanced ovarian cancer carry a prognostic impact? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study ancillary study. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 143:484-489. [PMID: 27726923 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Revised: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the relationship of the time from surgery to intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy (TSIC) initiation with survival of patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients using ancillary data from cooperative group clinical trials. METHODS Data from 420 patients with stage III EOC treated with IP chemotherapy under GOG-0114 and 172 were reviewed. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate independent prognostic factors and estimate their covariate-adjusted effects on PFS and OS. RESULTS The median TSIC was 62.5days (interquartile range 28-83). The median TSIC was longer for patients in GOG-0114 vs those in GOG-172 (83 vs 26days, p<0.001). TSIC was significantly associated (p=0.049) with PFS: each 10% increase in TSIC (days) decreases the risk of progression by 3%. TSIC was not significantly associated with OS in this model. In a linear regression model, gross residual disease was significantly associated with shorter TSIC (R2 -0.141, 95%CI -0.217, -0.064, p<0.001). When only data from GOG-172 were considered, no statistical significant association was found between TSIC and PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS In this ancillary data study, TSIC was not associated with improved OS in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. TSIC was significantly associated with PFS for the entire cohort, suggesting increase in PFS with longer TSIC. However, this was not found when only data from GOG 172 or GOG 114 were analyzed separately. Hence, the relationship between IP chemotherapy initiation and time from surgery needs to be studied further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlene E Garcia-Soto
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of OB-GYN, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
| | - James J Java
- NRG Statistics and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
| | - Wilberto Nieves Neira
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of OB-GYN, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
| | - J Matthew Pearson
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of OB-GYN, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
| | - David E Cohn
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
| | - Shashikant B Lele
- Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
| | - Krishnansu S Tewari
- Obstetrics-Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, United States.
| | - Joan L Walker
- Gynecologic Oncology, Peggy and Charles Stephenson Oklahoma Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
| | | | - Deborah K Armstrong
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cohn DE, Castellon-Larios K, Huffman L, Salani R, Fowler JM, Copeland LJ, O'Malley DM, Backes FJ, Eisenhauer EL, Abdel-Rasoul M, Puente EG, Bergese SD. A Prospective, Comparative Study for the Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Robotic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Staging of Endometrial Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016; 23:429-34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2015] [Revised: 01/04/2016] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
46
|
Billingsley CC, Cansino C, O'Malley DM, Cohn DE, Fowler JM, Copeland LJ, Backes FJ, Salani R. Survival outcomes of obese patients in type II endometrial cancer: Defining the prognostic impact of increasing BMI. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 140:405-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2015] [Revised: 01/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
47
|
Liang MI, ElNaggar AC, Nekkanti S, O'Malley DM, Hade EM, Copeland LJ, Fowler JM, Salani R, Backes FJ, Cohn DE. Setting the bar: compliance with ovarian cancer quality indicators at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Gynecol Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.07.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
48
|
Peterlongo P, Chang-Claude J, Moysich KB, Rudolph A, Schmutzler RK, Simard J, Soucy P, Eeles RA, Easton DF, Hamann U, Wilkening S, Chen B, Rookus MA, Schmidt MK, van der Baan FH, Spurdle AB, Walker LC, Lose F, Maia AT, Montagna M, Matricardi L, Lubinski J, Jakubowska A, Gómez Garcia EB, Olopade OI, Nussbaum RL, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM, Rebbeck TR, Arun BK, Karlan BY, Orsulic S, Lester J, Chung WK, Miron A, Southey MC, Goldgar DE, Buys SS, Janavicius R, Dorfling CM, van Rensburg EJ, Ding YC, Neuhausen SL, Hansen TVO, Gerdes AM, Ejlertsen B, Jønson L, Osorio A, Martínez-Bouzas C, Benitez J, Conway EE, Blazer KR, Weitzel JN, Manoukian S, Peissel B, Zaffaroni D, Scuvera G, Barile M, Ficarazzi F, Mariette F, Fortuzzi S, Viel A, Giannini G, Papi L, Martayan A, Tibiletti MG, Radice P, Vratimos A, Fostira F, Garber JE, Donaldson A, Brewer C, Foo C, Evans DGR, Frost D, Eccles D, Brady A, Cook J, Tischkowitz M, Adlard J, Barwell J, Walker L, Izatt L, Side LE, Kennedy MJ, Rogers MT, Porteous ME, Morrison PJ, Platte R, Davidson R, Hodgson SV, Ellis S, Cole T, Godwin AK, Claes K, Van Maerken T, Meindl A, Gehrig A, Sutter C, Engel C, Niederacher D, Steinemann D, Plendl H, Kast K, Rhiem K, Ditsch N, Arnold N, Varon-Mateeva R, Wappenschmidt B, Wang-Gohrke S, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Buecher B, Delnatte C, Houdayer C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Damiola F, Coupier I, Barjhoux L, Venat-Bouvet L, Golmard L, Boutry-Kryza N, Sinilnikova OM, Caron O, Pujol P, Mazoyer S, Belotti M, Piedmonte M, Friedlander ML, Rodriguez GC, Copeland LJ, de la Hoya M, Segura PP, Nevanlinna H, Aittomäki K, van Os TAM, Meijers-Heijboer HEJ, van der Hout AH, Vreeswijk MPG, Hoogerbrugge N, Ausems MGEM, van Doorn HC, Collée JM, Olah E, Diez O, Blanco I, Lazaro C, Brunet J, Feliubadalo L, Cybulski C, Gronwald J, Durda K, Jaworska-Bieniek K, Sukiennicki G, Arason A, Chiquette J, Teixeira MR, Olswold C, Couch FJ, Lindor NM, Wang X, Szabo CI, Offit K, Corines M, Jacobs L, Robson ME, Zhang L, Joseph V, Berger A, Singer CF, Rappaport C, Kaulich DG, Pfeiler G, Tea MKM, Phelan CM, Greene MH, Mai PL, Rennert G, Mulligan AM, Glendon G, Tchatchou S, Andrulis IL, Toland AE, Bojesen A, Pedersen IS, Thomassen M, Jensen UB, Laitman Y, Rantala J, von Wachenfeldt A, Ehrencrona H, Askmalm MS, Borg Å, Kuchenbaecker KB, McGuffog L, Barrowdale D, Healey S, Lee A, Pharoah PDP, Chenevix-Trench G, Antoniou AC, Friedman E. Candidate genetic modifiers for breast and ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015; 24:308-16. [PMID: 25336561 PMCID: PMC4294951 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. The incomplete penetrance coupled with the variable age at diagnosis in carriers of the same mutation suggests the existence of genetic and nongenetic modifying factors. In this study, we evaluated the putative role of variants in many candidate modifier genes. METHODS Genotyping data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers, for known variants (n = 3,248) located within or around 445 candidate genes, were available through the iCOGS custom-designed array. Breast and ovarian cancer association analysis was performed within a retrospective cohort approach. RESULTS The observed P values of association ranged between 0.005 and 1.000. None of the variants was significantly associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, after multiple testing adjustments. CONCLUSION There is little evidence that any of the evaluated candidate variants act as modifiers of breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. IMPACT Genome-wide association studies have been more successful at identifying genetic modifiers of BRCA1/2 penetrance than candidate gene studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Peterlongo
- IFOM, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy. Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy.
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Anja Rudolph
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Germany. Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Germany. Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Germany, on behalf of the German Consortium of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC)
| | - Jacques Simard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Center and Laval University, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Penny Soucy
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Center and Laval University, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Rosalind A Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Wilkening
- Genomic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bowang Chen
- Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matti A Rookus
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Logan C Walker
- Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Felicity Lose
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ana-Teresa Maia
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Medicine, Gambelas Campus, University of Algarve, Portugal
| | - Marco Montagna
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Laura Matricardi
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Olufunmilayo I Olopade
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics, Department of Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert L Nussbaum
- Department of Medicine and Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, Pennsylvania
| | - Banu K Arun
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jenny Lester
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Alex Miron
- Department of Genetics and Genomics at Case Western Reserve Medical School, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - David E Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Ramunas Janavicius
- Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Hematology, Oncology, and Transfusion Medicine Center, Dept. of Molecular and Regenerative Medicine; State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | | | - Yuan Chun Ding
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Thomas V O Hansen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Jønson
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ana Osorio
- Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain. Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Martínez-Bouzas
- Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, Cruces Hospital Barakaldo, 48903-Barakaldo-Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Javier Benitez
- Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain. Human Genetics Group and Genotyping Unit, Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Edye E Conway
- Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, care of City of Hope Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network, Duarte, California
| | | | - Jeffrey N Weitzel
- Clinical Cancer Genetics, City of Hope, Duarte, California (for the City of Hope Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network)
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Bernard Peissel
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Zaffaroni
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Giulietta Scuvera
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Barile
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Filomena Ficarazzi
- IFOM, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy. Cogentech Cancer Genetic Test Laboratory, Milan, Italy
| | - Frederique Mariette
- IFOM, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy. Cogentech Cancer Genetic Test Laboratory, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Fortuzzi
- IFOM, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy. Cogentech Cancer Genetic Test Laboratory, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Viel
- Division of Experimental Oncology 1, CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute, Aviano (PN), Italy
| | | | - Laura Papi
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Aline Martayan
- Unit of Genetic Counseling, Medical Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Tibiletti
- UO Anatomia Patologica Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Polo Universitario Varese, Italy
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Athanassios Vratimos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research "Demokritos", Aghia Paraskevi Attikis, Athens, Greece
| | - Florentia Fostira
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research "Demokritos", Aghia Paraskevi Attikis, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Alan Donaldson
- Clinical Genetics Department, St. Michael's Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Carole Brewer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Foo
- Cheshire & Merseyside Clinical Genetics Service, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - D Gareth R Evans
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Diana Eccles
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy-Galton Centre, Harrow, United Kingdom
| | - Jackie Cook
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Clinical Genetics, East Anglian Regional Genetics Service, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Julian Adlard
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Julian Barwell
- Leicestershire Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Walker
- Oxford Regional Genetics Service, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy E Side
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - M John Kennedy
- Academic Unit of Clinical and Molecular Oncology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mark T Rogers
- All Wales Medical Genetics Services, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Mary E Porteous
- South East of Scotland Regional Genetics Service, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick J Morrison
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University of Belfast, Department of Medical Genetics, Belfast HSC Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Radka Platte
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rosemarie Davidson
- West of Scotland Regional Genetics Service, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Shirley V Hodgson
- Medical Genetics Unit, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Ellis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Trevor Cole
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital Healthcare NHS Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Kathleen Claes
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tom Van Maerken
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Tumor Genetics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany
| | - Andrea Gehrig
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Hansjoerg Plendl
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein/University Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Germany. Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Germany. Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Arnold
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein/University Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Germany. Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Germany. Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Shan Wang-Gohrke
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets
- INSERM U946, Fondation Jean Dausset, Paris, France. Service de Génétique, Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Bruno Buecher
- Institut Curie, Department of Tumour Biology, Paris, France
| | | | - Claude Houdayer
- Institut Curie, Department of Tumour Biology, Paris, France. Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Institut Curie, Department of Tumour Biology, Paris, France. Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France. Institut Curie, INSERM U830, Paris, France
| | - Francesca Damiola
- INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Université Lyon 1, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Isabelle Coupier
- Unité d'Oncogénétique, CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France. Unité d'Oncogénétique, CRLCC Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Laure Barjhoux
- Unité d'Oncogénétique, CRLCC Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Laurence Venat-Bouvet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren, Limoges, France
| | - Lisa Golmard
- Institut Curie, Department of Tumour Biology, Paris, France
| | - Nadia Boutry-Kryza
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon - Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Olga M Sinilnikova
- INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Université Lyon 1, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France. Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon - Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. IFOM, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy
| | - Olivier Caron
- Consultation de Génétique, Département de Médecine, Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Pascal Pujol
- Unité d'Oncogénétique, CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France. INSERM 896, CRCM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Sylvie Mazoyer
- INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Université Lyon 1, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Muriel Belotti
- Institut Curie, Department of Tumour Biology, Paris, France
| | - Marion Piedmonte
- Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Michael L Friedlander
- Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), Coordinating Centre, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Gustavo C Rodriguez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Ohio State University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hilliard, Ohio
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pedro Perez Segura
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Theo A M van Os
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Annemarie H van der Hout
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike P G Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Helena C van Doorn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Edith Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Orland Diez
- Oncogenetics Group, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Blanco
- Genetic Counseling Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, IDIBELL-Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Conxi Lazaro
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, IDIBELL-Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Brunet
- Genetic Counseling Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, IDIBGI-Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
| | | | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Durda
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Grzegorz Sukiennicki
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Adalgeir Arason
- BMC, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. Department of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Jocelyne Chiquette
- Unité de Recherche en Santé des Populations, Centre des Maladies du Sein Deschênes-Fabia, Centre de Recherche FRSQ du Centre Hospitalier Affilié Universitaire de Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), Porto University, Porto, Portugal. Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Curtis Olswold
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnessotta
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, and Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnessotta
| | | | - Xianshu Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnessotta
| | - Csilla I Szabo
- National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Research Laboratory, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marina Corines
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lauren Jacobs
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mark E Robson
- Clinical Genetics Research Laboratory, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Liying Zhang
- Diagnostic Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vijai Joseph
- Clinical Genetics Research Laboratory, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andreas Berger
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christine Rappaport
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Georg Pfeiler
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Muy-Kheng M Tea
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Catherine M Phelan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Mark H Greene
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Phuong L Mai
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Gad Rennert
- Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gord Glendon
- Ontario Cancer Genetics Network: Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandrine Tchatchou
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Departments of Molecular Genetics and Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amanda Ewart Toland
- Division of Human Cancer Genetics, Departments of Internal Medicine and Molecular Virology, Immunology, and Medical Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Anders Bojesen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Inge Sokilde Pedersen
- Section of Molecular Diagnostics, Department of Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Uffe Birk Jensen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Johanna Rantala
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Hans Ehrencrona
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Marie Stenmark Askmalm
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Åke Borg
- Department of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karoline B Kuchenbaecker
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Barrowdale
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sue Healey
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Andrew Lee
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Eisenhauer EL, Zanagnolo V, Cohn DE, Salani R, O'Malley DM, Sutton G, Callahan MJ, Cobb B, Fowler JM, Copeland LJ. A phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin and bevacizumab for the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 134:262-6. [PMID: 24910452 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2014] [Revised: 05/27/2014] [Accepted: 05/30/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The doublet gemcitabine and carboplatin is effective for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, while multi-agent chemotherapy with bevacizumab may add additional benefit. This phase II study tested the efficacy and safety of a biweekly gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab combination in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or tubal cancer (ROC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients received concurrent gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), carboplatin area under the curve 3, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 every 28 days for six cycles or up to 24 cycles if clinical benefit occurred. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST, and safety; the secondary end points were objective response rates and overall survival. RESULTS Overall, 45 patients were enrolled. The median PFS was 13.3 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 15.3). The objective response rate was 69%. Grade 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (27%) and thrombocytopenia (2%). Grades 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicities included fatigue (18%), pain (9%), and nausea/vomiting (4%). There were 2 episodes of cerebrovascular accidents, 2 noted DVTs, and no episodes of bowel perforation. Median OS was 36.1 months (95% CI, 26.7 to 45.5). CONCLUSION Biweekly gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab were an effective regimen in recurrent ovarian cancer, with comparable toxicity to recently reported day 1 gemcitabine, carboplatin, bevacizumab, and day 8 gemcitabine. Response rate and PFS are improved from reported outcomes of the gemcitabine carboplatin doublet. The degree to which biweekly dosing may present a more rationale schedule for this triplet should be evaluated further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric L Eisenhauer
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Vanna Zanagnolo
- Division of Gynaecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ritu Salani
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Gregory Sutton
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, St. Vincent Indianapolis Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Michael J Callahan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, St. Vincent Indianapolis Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Bobbi Cobb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Fowler
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Larry J Copeland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Billingsley CC, Jacobson S, Crafton S, Crim A, Li Q, Hade E, Cohn DE, Fowler J, Copeland LJ, Salani R, Backes FJ, O'Malley DM. Evaluation of the hematologic safety of same day versus standard administration of pegfilgrastim in gynecology oncology patients undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.5569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarah Crafton
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Aleia Crim
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Quan Li
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Erinn Hade
- The Ohio State University Center for Biostatistics, Columbus, OH
| | - David E. Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Jeffrey Fowler
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hilliard, OH
| | | | | | | | - David M. O'Malley
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Dept of OB/GYN, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|