Top advances of the year: Cervical cancer

The year 2023 was an extraordinary year for the further development and expansion of novel treatments for all patients with cervical cancer, ranging from early stage to later stage and metastatic or recurrent disease. Individuals with early-stage disease will benefit from less invasive surgery with subsequent improvement in quality of life. The effectiveness of immunotherapy has been demonstrated in upfront, locally advanced cervical cancer and confirmed in advanced metastatic disease. Induction chemotherapy will play a role in some patients with locally advanced disease, particularly those in low resource areas of the world. Novel therapeutics including antibody-drug conjugates have shown efficacy even in pretreated patients. As we continue to explore innovative therapeutics in this space, however, we must also continue to improve the diversity of clinical trial accrual to allow for generalizable results. At the same time, we must focus on eradicating this disease with appropriate screening and vaccination.

Metastatic Uterine Leiomyosarcoma presenting as small bowel intussusception at two independent visits

•Metastatic disease to the small bowel may present with intussusception.•Clinical decision making for malignant bowel obstruction is difficult and individual specific.•Malignant bowel obstruction due to metastatic year has an average life expectancy of less than 200 days.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy for metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer (BEATcc): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The GOG240 trial established bevacizumab with chemotherapy as standard first-line therapy for metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. In the BEATcc trial (ENGOT-Cx10-GEICO 68-C-JGOG1084-GOG-3030), we aimed to evaluate the addition of an immune checkpoint inhibitor to this standard backbone.

METHODS

In this investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, patients from 92 sites in Europe, Japan, and the USA with metastatic (stage IVB), persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer that was measurable, previously untreated, and not amenable to curative surgery or radiation were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive standard therapy (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or carboplatin area under the curve of 5, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, all on day 1 of every 3-week cycle) with or without atezolizumab 1200 mg. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal, or death. Stratification factors were previous concomitant chemoradiation (yes vs no), histology (squamous cell carcinoma vs adenocarcinoma including adenosquamous carcinoma), and platinum backbone (cisplatin vs carboplatin). Dual primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 and overall survival analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03556839, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 8, 2018, and Aug 20, 2021, 410 of 519 patients assessed for eligibility were enrolled. Median progression-free survival was 13·7 months (95% CI 12·3-16·6) with atezolizumab and 10·4 months (9·7-11·7) with standard therapy (hazard ratio [HR]=0·62 [95% CI 0·49-0·78]; p<0·0001); at the interim overall survival analysis, median overall survival was 32·1 months (95% CI 25·3-36·8) versus 22·8 months (20·3-28·0), respectively (HR 0·68 [95% CI 0·52-0·88]; p=0·0046). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 79% of patients in the experimental group and in 75% of patients in the standard group. Grade 1-2 diarrhoea, arthralgia, pyrexia, and rash were increased with atezolizumab.

INTERPRETATION

Adding atezolizumab to a standard bevacizumab plus platinum regimen for metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer significantly improves progression-free and overall survival and should be considered as a new first-line therapy option.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Tisotumab Vedotin in Combination With Carboplatin, Pembrolizumab, or Bevacizumab in Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Results From the innovaTV 205/GOG-3024/ENGOT-cx8 Study

PURPOSE

Tissue factor is highly expressed in cervical carcinoma and can be targeted by tisotumab vedotin (TV), an antibody-drug conjugate. This phase Ib/II study evaluated TV in combination with bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, or carboplatin for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC).

METHODS

This open-label, multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03786081) included dose-escalation arms that assessed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and identified the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of TV in combination with bevacizumab (arm A), pembrolizumab (arm B), or carboplatin (arm C). The dose-expansion arms evaluated TV antitumor activity and safety at RP2D in combination with carboplatin as first-line (1L) treatment (arm D) or with pembrolizumab as 1L (arm E) or second-/third-line (2L/3L) treatment (arm F). The primary end point of dose expansion was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were enrolled. In dose escalation (n = 41), no DLTs were observed; the RP2D was TV 2 mg/kg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 once every 3 weeks, pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 once every 3 weeks, or carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 once every 3 weeks. In dose expansion (n = 101), the ORR was 54.5% (n/N, 18/33; 95% CI, 36.4 to 71.9) with 1L TV + carboplatin (arm D), 40.6% (n/N, 13/32; 95% CI, 23.7 to 59.4) with 1L TV + pembrolizumab (arm E), and 35.3% (12/34; 19.7 to 53.5) with 2L/3L TV + pembrolizumab (arm F). The median duration of response was 8.6 months, not reached, and 14.1 months, in arms D, E, and F, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (≥15%) were anemia, diarrhea, nausea, and thrombocytopenia in arm D and anemia in arm F (none ≥15%, arm E).

CONCLUSION

TV in combination with bevacizumab, carboplatin, or pembrolizumab demonstrated manageable safety and encouraging antitumor activity in treatment-naive and previously treated r/mCC.

Cervical cancer treatment update: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology clinical practice statement

Cervical cancer is the most commonly diagnosed gynecologic cancer worldwide. Although the incidence has declined with increased screening and higher uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in high-income countries, this disease remains the second highest cause of cancer mortality among women in low- and middle-income countries. In this clinical practice statement, we describe therapies for cervical cancer by treatment setting, as well as quality of life, financial toxicity, and disparities associated with this disease. In addition to chemotherapy and radiation, therapeutic strategies for cervical cancer include immune checkpoint blockade, antiangiogenics, and antibody-drug conjugates. Optimal treatment for recurrent cervical cancer remains an area of unmet need, necessitating further exploration of rational and innovative treatment approaches, including cell and immune-based therapies. Importantly, development of effective therapies for cervical cancer must incorporate strategies to ensure universal equitable access to HPV vaccination, screening, and treatment. Important consequences of the disease and treatment that impact quality of life must also be addressed. Patients with cervical cancer are at increased risk for financial toxicity, which can lead to downstream detrimental effects on physical, financial, and career outcomes. Underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in gynecologic oncology clinical trials highlights the urgent need for collaborative and focused initiatives to bridge the significant divide and alleviate inequalities in the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer.

Niraparib and dostarlimab for the treatment of recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: results of a Phase II study (MOONSTONE/GOG-3032)

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the efficacy, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the treatment regimen of dostarlimab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor, combined with niraparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, in patients with BRCA wild type (BRCAwt) recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) who had previously received bevacizumab treatment.

METHODS

This Phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study, conducted in the USA, enrolled patients with recurrent PROC to receive niraparib and dostarlimab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (up to 3 years). A preplanned interim futility analysis was performed after the first 41 patients had undergone ≥1 radiographic evaluation (approximately 9 weeks from the first treatment).

RESULTS

The prespecified interim futility criterion was met and the study was therefore terminated. For the 41 patients assessed, the objective response rate (ORR) was 7.3% (95% confidence interval: 1.5-19.9); no patients achieved a complete response, 3 patients (7.3%) achieved a partial response (duration of response; 3.0, 3.8, and 9.2 months, respectively), and 9 patients (22.0%) had stable disease. In total, 39 patients (95.1%) experienced a treatment-related adverse event, but no new safety issues were observed. HRQoL, assessed using FOSI, or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian Symptom Index scores, worsened over time compared with baseline scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The study was terminated due to the observed ORR at the interim futility analysis. This highlights a need for effective therapies in treating patients with recurrent BRCAwt PROC.

A Phase III Study of Pafolacianine Injection (OTL38) for Intraoperative Imaging of Folate Receptor-Positive Ovarian Cancer (Study 006)

PURPOSE

The adjunctive use of intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) is gaining acceptance as a potential means to improve outcomes for surgical resection of targetable tumors. This confirmatory study examined the use of pafolacianine for real-time detection of folate receptor-positive ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This phase III, open-label, 11-center study included subjects with known or suspected ovarian cancer, scheduled to undergo cytoreductive surgery. The objectives were to confirm safety and efficacy of pafolacianine (0.025 mg/kg IV), given ≥ 1 hour before intraoperative near-infrared imaging to detect macroscopic lesions not detected by palpation and normal white light.

RESULTS

From March 2018 through April 2020, 150 patients received a single infusion of pafolacianine (safety analysis set); 109 patients with folate receptor-positive ovarian cancer comprised the full analysis set for efficacy. In 33.0% of patients (95% CI, 24.3 to 42.7; P < .001), pafolacianine with near-infrared imaging identified additional cancer on tissue not planned for resection and not detected by white light assessment and palpation, exceeding the prespecified threshold of 10%. Among patients who underwent interval debulking surgery, the rate was 39.7% (95% CI, 27.0 to 53.4; P < .001). The sensitivity to detect ovarian cancer was 83%, and the patient false-positive rate was 24.8%. Investigators reported achieving complete R0 resection in 62.4% (68 of 109) of patients. Drug-related adverse events were reported by 30% of patients (45 of 150) and most commonly included nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. No drug-related serious adverse events or deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

This phase III study of pafolacianine met its primary efficacy end point, identifying additional cancers not otherwise identified or planned for resection. Pafolacianine may offer an important real-time adjunct to current surgical approaches for ovarian cancer.

Identification of Patients With Ovarian Cancer Experiencing the Highest Benefit From Bevacizumab in the First-Line Setting on the Basis of Their Tumor-Intrinsic Chemosensitivity (KELIM): The GOG-0218 Validation Study

PURPOSE

In patients with high-grade ovarian cancer, predictors of bevacizumab efficacy in first-line setting are needed. In the ICON-7 trial, a poor tumor intrinsic chemosensitivity (defined by unfavorable modeled cancer antigen-125 [CA-125] ELIMination rate constant K [KELIM] score) was a predictive biomarker. Only the patients with high-risk disease (suboptimally resected stage III, or stage IV) exhibiting unfavorable KELIM score < 1.0 had overall survival (OS) benefit from bevacizumab (median: 29.7 v 20.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.78). An external validation study in the GOG-0218 trial was performed.

METHODS

In GOG-0218, 1,873 patients were treated with carboplatin-paclitaxel ± concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab/placebo. Patient KELIM values were calculated with CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days by the Lyon University team. The association between KELIM score (favorable ≥ 1.0, or unfavorable < 1.0) and bevacizumab benefit for progression-free survival (PFS)/OS was independently assessed by NGR-GOG using univariate/multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

KELIM was assessable in 1,662 patients with ≥ 3 CA-125 available values. An unfavorable KELIM score was associated with bevacizumab benefit compared with placebo (PFS: HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82; OS: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.03), whereas a favorable KELIM was not (PFS: HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.17; OS: HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.39). The highest benefit was observed in patients with a high-risk disease exhibiting unfavorable KELIM, for PFS (median: 9.1 v 5.6 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.78), and for OS (median: 35.1 v 29.1 months; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97).

CONCLUSION

This GOG-0218 trial investigation validates ICON-7 findings about the association between poor tumor chemosensitivity and benefit from concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab, suggesting that bevacizumab may mainly be effective in patients with poorly chemosensitive disease. Bevacizumab may be prioritized in patients with a high-risk and poorly chemosensitive disease to improve their PFS/OS (patient KELIM score calculator available on the Biomarker Kinetics website).

Identification of patients with ovarian cancer who are experiencing the highest benefit from bevacizumab in first-line setting based on their tumor intrinsic chemosensitivity (KELIM): GOG-0218 validation study

5553

Background: In patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in first-line setting, predictive factors of bevacizumab efficacy are needed, for selecting patients. In ICON-7 trial, a poor tumor intrisic chemosensitivity (defined by unfavorable modeled CA-125 kinetic ELIMination rate constant KELIM) was a predictive biomarker. Among patients with high-risk diseases, only those with unfavorable KELIM had survival benefit from bevacizumab (mOS: 29.7 vs 20.6 months, HR = 0.78)(Colomban. JNCI CS 2020). The objective was to perform an external validation in GOG-0218 trial (NCT00262847). Methods: In GOG-0218, 1,873 patients were treated with carboplatin-paclitaxel +/- concurrent bevacizumab/placebo followed by a 15 month maintenance. Patient KELIM values were estimated with longitudinal CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days. The association between KELIM score (categorized as favorable ≥ 1, or unfavorable < 1) and efficacy of bevacizumab (bevacizumab-concurrent + maintenance, vs placebo) for PFS and OS was assessed using univariate/multivariate analyses, in a Training set with 2/3 patients managed the investigators, and then a Validation set with all patients, managed by NGR-GOG. Results: KELIM was assessable in 1,662 patients with ≥ 3 CA-125 available values. In both sets, the patients with unfavorable KELIM derived benefit from bevacizumab compared to placebo (Training: PFS, HR = 0.65 [0.54-0.80]; OS, HR = 0.80 [0.65-0.99]; Validation: PFS, HR = 0.69 [0.59-0.82]; OS, HR = 0.87 [0.73-1.03]), whilst those with favorable KELIM had no benefit from bevacizumab (Training: PFS, HR = 0.96 [0.75-1.23]; OS, HR = 1.05 [0.80-1.37]; Validation, PFS, HR = 0.96 [0.79-1.17]; OS HR = 1.11 [0.89-1.84]). The highest benefit was observed in patients with high-risk diseases (stage IV or sub-optimally resected stage III) characterized by unfavorable KELIM, for PFS (Learning (n = 276): mPFS: 9.0 vs 5.2 months, HR = 0.61 [0.48-0.78]; Validation (n = 433): mPFS: 9.1 vs 5.6 months, HR = 0.64 [0.53-0.78]), and for OS (Learning (n = 278): mOS: 38.9 vs 27.9 months, HR = 0.72 [0.56-0.93], Validation set (n = 438): mOS: 35.1 vs 29.1 months, HR = 0.79 [0.65-0.97]). Conclusions: This validation analysis of GOG-0218 trial confirms the outcomes of ICON-7 trial about the association between poor tumor chemosensitivity and benefit from concurrent + maintenance bevacizumab, suggesting that bevacizumab is mainly effective in patients with poorly chemosensitive diseases. No benefit was found in patients with favorable KELIM. The patients who derived the highest benefit from bevacizumab in PFS and OS (OS absolute benefit ̃ 6 to 9 months) were those with high-risk diseases (stage IV, or incompletely resected stage III) associated with an unfavorable KELIM score (calculator on https://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/CA-125).

ROCC/GOG-3043: A randomized non-inferiority trial of robotic versus open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer

TPS5605

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with improved perioperative safety outcomes, but, in 2018, the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, a non-inferiority study comparing laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer, reported significantly worse disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS) in the MIS group. Criticisms of the LACC trial include lack of proper preoperative imaging and assessment, use of transcervical uterine manipulators, and lack of proper tumor containment leading to peritoneal contamination. Subsequent retrospective studies have reported conflicting results. Given the potential benefit of MIS, the ROCC trial seeks to address the limitations of the LACC trial. Methods: ROCC is a multi-center, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial. The primary objective is to determine whether robotic-assisted (RBT) radical hysterectomy is not inferior to abdominal (OPEN) approach with respect to 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives include DSS, OS, patterns of recurrence, peri- and postoperative complications, long-term morbidity, impact on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and development of lower extremity lymphedema (LEL). Key inclusion criteria include patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of FIGO 2018 stage IA2-IB2. All patients must have a preoperative pelvic MRI confirming that the cervical tumor is < 4 cm in size, no obvious evidence of extracervical extension and no nodal or other regional metastasis. Intraoperatively, the use of transcervical uterine manipulators is not allowed and specific detailed surgical techniques for proper tumor containment is required. Photographic evidence of specimen with tumor contained is mandated. We estimate the 3-year DFS to be 92% in the control (OPEN) arm. If the DFS does not differ by more than 7% and the one-sided 95% CI does not cross the non-inferiority boundary, then the RBT arm will be deemed non-inferior. 840 patients will be enrolled (420 per arm, 89 events total), which provides 90% power to exclude an absolute decrease in DFS by 7% (HR < = 1.375) with a log-rank test for non-inferiority with a one-sided alpha of 0.05. The primary analysis will be conducted in all randomized patients (ITT). Given the LACC findings of worse oncologic outcomes with MIS, a formal DSMC will conduct periodic reviews of safety including two planned formal interim analyses for futility (harm) after accrual of 370 and 640 patients using an aggressive Lan-DeMets beta-spending function similar to a Pocock boundary. Results of this trial may be practice changing and will either support or refute the findings of the LACC trial. The study is currently activating sites for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04831580.

ROSELLA: A phase 3 study of relacorilant in combination with nab-paclitaxel versus investigator’s choice in advanced, platinum-resistant, high-grade epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian-tube cancer

TPS5620

Background: Chemotherapy resistance is a major concern in the treatment of advanced platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. One mechanism of resistance is driven by cortisol, which can suppress the apoptotic pathways that chemotherapy agents rely upon, eg, suppression of BCL2 and FOXO3a pathways. Preclinical and clinical data indicate that glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonism may reverse the anti-apoptotic effects of cortisol, thereby restoring the efficacy of cytotoxic agents. Relacorilant is a selective GR modulator that has shown promise in overcoming resistance when combined with taxanes (particularly nab-paclitaxel) in preclinical models (Greenstein & Hunt 2021) and early-phase clinical studies (Munster et al. 2019) in various solid tumors. A randomized, controlled phase 2 study of relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel found clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR) without increased side effect burden in patients with recurrent, platinum-refractory and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (Colombo et al. 2021). The aim of this phase 3 study is to confirm these phase 2 findings in a larger patient population. Methods: ROSELLA (EudraCT 2022-000662-18, NCT pending) is a phase 3, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, multicenter study of relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel compared to investigator’s choice of chemotherapy agents in patients with confirmed high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. The trial is being conducted at multiple sites in North America and Europe and has a planned enrollment of 360 patients. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either relacorilant (150 mg the day before, day of, and day after nab-paclitaxel infusion) + nab-paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, topotecan, or nab-paclitaxel). Randomization is stratified by prior lines of therapy (1 vs > 1), region of world (North America vs Europe), and prior bevacizumab (yes/no). Adult female patients with platinum-resistant disease (progression within 6 months of completion of platinum-containing therapy), excluding patients with primary platinum refractory disease, who have received 1–3 lines of prior systemic anticancer therapy and at least 1 prior line of platinum therapy are being enrolled. Life expectancy ≥3 months, adequate organ function, and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 are required. The primary study endpoint is PFS by blinded independent central review. Key secondary endpoints include overall survival, PFS by investigator, overall response rate, best overall response, DOR, clinical benefit rate, safety, quality of life, CA-125, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics. Clinical trial information: 2022-000662-18.

MOONSTONE/GOG-3032: Interim analysis of a phase 2 study of niraparib + dostarlimab in patients (pts) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC)

5573

Background: PROC is poorly responsive to anticancer therapy. PARP inhibitors such as niraparib may increase neoantigen load and synergize with anti-PD-1 agents. TOPACIO reported a preliminary objective response rate (ORR: 18%) and disease control rate (DCR: 65%) to niraparib + pembrolizumab in pts with OC of any BRCA status. MOONSTONE sought to determine efficacy in pts without BRCA mutation ( BRCAm). Methods: In this phase 2 open-label, single-arm study, eligible pts received 1–3 prior lines of therapy including platinum, taxane, and bevacizumab, had RECIST v1.1 radiographic progression within 6 mo of last platinum line and had no known germline BRCAm. Pts were treated with niraparib 300/200 mg PO daily (based on weight/platelets) and 500 mg dostarlimab IV Q3W (cycles 1–4) followed by 1000 mg Q6W until disease progression, toxicity or consent withdrawal. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive status was determined by Ventana SP263 assay using visually-estimated combined positive score ≥5%. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), DCR, and safety. Futility was prespecified as ≤5 responses in the first 40 pts. Results: At interim analysis (data cutoff Oct 6, 2021), 41 pts were enrolled; median age was 65.0 y (range 35–77). At baseline, 8 (20%)/22 (54%)/11 (27%) pts had received 1/2/3 prior lines of therapy, respectively; 26 (63%) pts had primary resistance to platinum therapy and 15 (37%) were sensitive to first platinum treatment. Overall, tumors were PD-L1+/PD-L1–/unknown in 13 (32%)/25 (61%)/3 (7%), respectively. Efficacy results are shown in the Table. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 95% of pts, most commonly nausea (56%), fatigue (34%), vomiting (32%), and anemia (29%). Conclusions: PROC remains difficult to treat; the ORR observed with niraparib + dostarlimab did not reach the threshold for 2nd-stage accrual in this cohort of pts with PROC, no known BRCAm, and prior bevacizumab treatment. PD-L1 status did not predict response; HRD testing is in process. Although DCR was 29%, futility was declared based on low ORR. The safety of the combination was similar to the safety profile of each monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03955471. [Table: see text]

Cervical cancer – times… they are a changing A report from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology Journal Club

In January 2021, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Clinical Practice and Education Committees launched a “Journal Club” webinar series to invite national experts to discuss literature pertaining to common clinical scenarios encountered by the members of SGO. On December 13, 2021, SGO hosted its third journal club focused on the use of immunotherapy in cervical cancer. Charles A. Leath, III from the O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer at the University of Alabama and Leslie M. Randall from Massey Cancer Center at Virginia Commonwealth University discussed the recently published KEYNOTE-826 trial (Colombo et al., 2021) and Jyoti Mayadev from the University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center discussed GOG-9929 (Mayadev et al., 2020). Renata Urban from the University of Washington and Christine S. Walsh from the University of Colorado served as moderators. The following is a report of the journal club presentation.

Phase II study of the safety and efficacy of the anti-PD-1 antibody balstilimab in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

This phase II clinical trial evaluated the safety and antitumor activity of balstilimab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with previously-treated, recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients were 18 years or older with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer and who had relapsed after a prior platinum-based treatment regimen for advanced disease. Balstilimab was administered intravenously at 3 mg/kg once every two weeks, for up to 24 months. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR, RECIST v1.1) as assessed by an independent review committee.

RESULTS

At data cutoff, 161 women (median age, 53 years [range 25-81]) were enrolled and treated with balstilimab. Of these, 140 had measurable disease at baseline and one prior line of platinum-based therapy in the metastatic, persistent, or recurrent setting; these patients were included in the efficacy analyses. The ORR was 15% (95% CI, 10.0%-21.8%) and included 5 patients with a complete response and 16 with a partial response. The median duration of response was 15.4 months. In patients with PD-L1-positive tumors the ORR was 20%, however patients with PD-L1-negative tumors also responded to balstilimab (ORR, 7.9%). Responses were not restricted to tumors of squamous cell histology, and an ORR of 12.5% was seen in the subset of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma. The disease control rate was 49.3% (95% CI, 41.1%-57.5%). Immune-mediated enterocolitis (3.1%) and diarrhea (1.9%) were the most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Balstilimab demonstrated meaningful and durable clinical activity, with manageable safety, in patients with previously-treated, recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer.

RaPiDS (GOG-3028): randomized Phase II study of balstilimab alone or in combination with zalifrelimab in cervical cancer

Balstilimab (anti-programmed death 1) and zalifrelimab (anti-CTLA-4) are two new checkpoint inhibitors that have emerged as promising investigational agents for the treatment of cervical cancer, particularly in the setting of previously-treated, recurrent/metastatic disease. Here we describe the rationale and design of RaPiDS (NCT03894215), a two-arm Phase II study evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of balstilimab administered alone or in combination with zalifrelimab in patients with advanced cervical cancer who progressed after first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point is objective response rate, and key secondary objectives include safety, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life outcomes.

Phase 3, randomized, single-dose, open-label study to investigate the safety and efficacy of pafolacianine sodium injection (OTL38) for intraoperative imaging of folate receptor positive ovarian cancer

5503

Background: Pafolacianine sodium is under investigation as an adjunct to visual inspection and palpation by providing intra-operative imaging of folate receptor positive (FR+) ovarian cancer. Since complete resection (R0) is the strongest predictor of overall survival, methods to enhance detection of lesions are expected to benefit patient outcomes. Methods: For this phase 3, randomized, multicenter, single dose, open-label pivotal trial (NCT03180307), patients with ovarian cancer who were scheduled to undergo cytoreductive surgery were recruited from 11 sites in the US and Netherlands from March 2018 through April 2020. The study objectives were to confirm efficacy and safety of pafolacianine sodium (0.025 mg/kg i.v., ≥1 h prior to imaging) in combination with intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging to detect additional lesions not detected by palpation and normal white light alone. Results: Pafolacianine sodium was administered to 150 total patients (safety analysis set); 109 patients comprised the full analysis set for efficacy analyses. Patients had primarily serous adenocarcinoma (n = 72; 68.6%) and advanced stage disease (n = 83; 76.1%). In 33% of patients (36 of 109), NIRF imaging with pafolacianine sodium identified additional lesions that were not planned for resection and were not detected by normal white light and palpation ( P < 0.001, 95% CI [0.243, 0.427]). Among patients who underwent interval debulking surgery, the rate was higher, at 39.7% of patients (23 of 58; 95% CI [0.270, 0.534]). At the individual lesion level, the accuracy of pafolacianine sodium with NIRF to detect ovarian cancer is reflected by sensitivity of 83% (95% CI [73.9, 89.4]) and a false positive rate of 32.7% (95% CI [25.6, 40.7]). Investigators reported achieving complete resection (R0) in 62.4% (68 of 109) of patients. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 30% of patients (45 out of 150). The most frequently reported drug-related AEs were nausea (18.0%), vomiting (5.3%), and abdominal pain (4.7%). Infusion reactions at the time of the procedure were mostly (96%) mild or moderate in severity; 89% resolved within 24 hours of onset. No drug-related serious AEs or deaths were reported. Conclusions: This phase 3 trial of pafolacianine sodium with NIRF imaging met its primary endpoint, intraoperatively identifying additional cancer not planned for resection in a statistically significant number of patients. Therefore, pafolacianine sodium may offer a novel real-time adjunct to current surgical imaging practice in ovarian cancer surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT03180307.

Tisotumab vedotin versus investigator’s choice chemotherapy in second- or third-line recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (innovaTV 301/ENGOT-cx12/GOG 3057, trial in progress)

TPS5596

Background: Doublet chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus either platinum or topotecan) with bevacizumab (if eligible) is recommended for first-line treatment of recurrent (not amenable to curative therapy) or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC; Tewari 2014). In the second-line setting, there are limited data for currently available treatment options. Tisotumab vedotin (TV) is an investigational antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a tissue factor (TF)-directed human monoclonal antibody covalently linked to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) via a protease-cleavable linker. TV is directed to cells expressing TF and releases MMAE upon internalization, resulting in cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death. TV has anti-tumor activity on multiple tumor types and kills tumor cells by direct cytotoxicity, bystander cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, and in a manner consistent with immunogenic cell death. In a recent phase 2 pivotal trial (innovaTV 204), TV demonstrated a clinically meaningful objective response rate (ORR) of 24% and median duration of response (DOR) of 8.3 months, as well as a manageable and tolerable safety profile with most adverse events being mild to moderate, in r/mCC patients with disease progression on or after chemotherapy. These findings support further investigation of TV in patients with r/mCC who progress on available first-line treatment options. Methods: The innovaTV 301 trial (NCT04697628) is a global, randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of TV in patients with previously treated r/mCC. Eligible patients must be ≥18 years, have r/mCC, and have experienced disease progression after receiving 1-2 prior lines of therapy (either standard of care systemic chemotherapy doublet or platinum-based therapy [if eligible; paclitaxel+cisplatin+bevacizumab, paclitaxel+carboplatin+bevacizumab, or paclitaxel+topotecan/nogitecan+bevacizumab]). Approximately 482 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive 21-day cycles of either TV (2.0 mg/kg IV once every 3 weeks) or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy: topotecan (1 or 1.25 mg/m2 IV; Day 1 [D1] to D5 of each cycle), vinorelbine (30 mg/m2 IV; D1 and D8 of each cycle), gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 IV; D1 and D8 of each cycle), irinotecan (100 or 125 mg/m2 IV; weekly for 28days, then every 42 days), or pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 IV, D1 of each cycle). The primary endpoint of this trial is overall survival. Key secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, ORR, time to response, DOR, safety, and quality of life outcomes. The study is currently enrolling and will have sites open in the US, EU, Japan, Latin America, Taiwan, Singapore, and South Korea. Clinical trial information: NCT04697628.

Uplift (ENGOT-ov67): A pivotal cohort to evaluate XMT-1536 (upifitamab rilsodotin), a NaPi2b-directed antibody drug conjugate for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

TPS5607

Background: XMT-1536 (upifitamab rilsodotin), is a first-in-class Dolaflexin ADC targeting NaPi2b, a sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein, broadly expressed in solid tumors such as serous epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) and non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma. XMT-1536 uses the Dolaflexin platform to deliver approximately 10 DolaLock auristatin payload molecules per antibody and is being evaluated in a Phase I study (NCT03319628). Observation of preliminary antitumor activity was reported in the ovarian cancer expansion cohort, including in patients previously treated with bevacizumab and PARPi (Tolcher et al, ASCO 2019; Richardson et al, ASCO 2019; Hamilton et al, ESMO 2020). Updated data on the OC cohort included 31 patients with higher NaPi2b expression as of December 2020 (Mersana Therapeutics, 2021). In these patients, the ORR was 32% and the DCR was 74%. Complete responses were observed in 2 patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, both of whom had received prior treatment with bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors. Platinum resistant ovarian cancer remains a serious unmet medical need as treatment options are limited and response rates to these treatments are low. Based on the favorable safety and efficacy profile of XMT-1536, UPLIFT was designed as a Phase 2 single-arm registrational cohort of patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancer as part of the ongoing Phase I FIH dose escalation and expansion study to accelerate development and provide a streamlined pathway to regulatory review. Methods: The UPLIFT cohort is enrolling patients with platinum resistant high grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer with up to 4 prior lines of therapy. The RP2D of XMT-1536 was determined to be 43 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 4 weeks (q4w) and will be the dose evaluated in the UPLIFT cohort. UPLIFT will enroll approximately 180 patients with platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer to obtain approximately 100 patients with higher NaPi2b expression. Prior bevacizumab is required for those patients with 1 or 2 prior lines of therapy. Tumor samples (fresh or archived) will be collected prior to enrollment for retrospective tumor tissue evaluation of NaPi2b expression. The primary objective is assessment of confirmed objective response rate to XMT-1536 as assessed by Investigator in patients with higher NaPi2b expression. Secondary endpoints include confirmed objective response rate regardless of NaPi2b expression, duration of response, and adverse events. Correlative aims include assessing blood and tissue biomarkers for association with clinical benefit. This study is being conducted in collaboration with ENGOT and GOG. Patients will be enrolled globally. Clinical trial information: NCT03319628.

The GOG partners: A program for industry sponsored clinical trials in gynecologic oncology within the GOG foundation

The GOG Foundation, Inc. (GOG-F) is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization with the purpose of promoting excellence in the quality and integrity of clinical and basic scientific research in the field of gynecologic malignancies. GOG Partners (GOG-P) is a program of the GOG-F and is positioned alongside NRG Oncology under the GOG-F organizational umbrella. GOG-P operates outside of the federally funded NCI NRG Oncology, a key distinguishing feature. By functioning as a site management organization (SMO), GOG-P provides an additional platform for clinical trial development, mentorship opportunities, patient accrual, and site infrastructure support yielding an expanded gynecologic oncology clinical trials infrastructure in the US. GOG-P has a consistent track record of conducting high quality clinical trials that lead to bringing novel FDA approved treatments for gynecologic cancer. This manuscript summarizes the history and organizational structure of the GOG-P. In addition, we outline the other key supportive programs within the GOG-F that help support the GOG-P effort to perform transformative gynecologic cancer research.

Expanding Our Impact in Cervical Cancer Treatment: Novel Immunotherapies, Radiation Innovations, and Consideration of Rare Histologies

Cervical cancer is a socially and scientifically distinguishable disease. Its pathogenesis, sexual transmission of high-risk HPV to a metaplastic portion of the uterine cervix, makes cervical cancer preventable by safe and effective HPV vaccines commercially available since 2006. Despite this, cervical cancer remains the deadliest gynecologic cancer in the world. Regrettably, global incidence and mortality rates disproportionately affect populations where women are marginalized, where HIV infection is endemic, and where access to preventive vaccination and screening for preinvasive disease are limited. In the United States, cervical cancer incidence has gradually declined over the last 25 years, but mortality rates remain both constant and disparately higher among communities of color because of the adverse roles that racism and poverty play in outcome. Until these conditions improve and widespread prevention is possible, treatment innovations are warranted. The last standard-of-care treatment changes occurred in 1999 for locally advanced disease and in 2014 for metastatic and recurrent disease. The viral and immunologic nature of HPV-induced cervical cancer creates opportunities for both radiation and immunotherapy to improve outcomes. With the advent of T cell-directed therapy, immune checkpoint inhibition, and techniques to increase the therapeutic window of radiation treatment, an overdue wave of innovation is currently emerging in cervical cancer treatment. The purpose of this review is to describe the contemporary developmental therapeutic landscape for cervical cancer that applies to most tumors and to discuss notable rare histologic subtypes that will not be adequately addressed with these treatment innovations.

Incidence Rates of Gynecologic Cancers in the U.S. Active Duty Military Population

INTRODUCTION

Despite an increasing number of female service members, incidence rates of gynecologic cancers (other than cervical cancer) have not been previously documented in the U.S. active duty military population. This study sought to determine the incidence rates of all gynecologic, including peritoneal, malignancies in the U.S. Active Duty population compared to the general US population as reported in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gynecologic cancers diagnosed in U.S. Active Duty women aged 20-59 between 2004 and 2013 were retrospectively ascertained. Cancer cases were identified in both the Automated Central Tumor Registry and the Military Health System Data Repository. All cases in Automated Central Tumor Registry plus cases recorded in Military Health System Data Repository, but not duplicative of Automated Central Tumor Registry cases, were included. Age-specific and age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated in military and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cases.

RESULTS

In U.S. Active Duty women, 327 incident cases of gynecologic cancer were identified. There were 110 cases of cervical cancer, 40 cases of endometrial cancer, 152 cases of ovarian cancer, and 25 other gynecologic malignancies. Of the 327 cases, 154 were ascertained from the Automated Central Tumor Registry database and the remainder from Military Health System Data Repository claims data. The age-adjusted rate of all gynecologic cancers for U.S. Active Duty women was 49.17 per 105 (95%CI 37.58, 65.12), while the age-adjusted rate for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results -18 was 42.09 per 105 (95%CI 41.83, 42.35). The kappa coefficient assessing the overlap between the data sources was -0.1937. Though insufficient in numbers for statistical analysis, the observed proportion of ovarian to cervical cancer cases in active duty women < 45 years of age was substantially greater than in the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

U.S. Active Duty women exhibited a similar age-adjusted rate of gynecologic cancer as the general US population. There was suboptimal overlap between the Automated Central Tumor Registry and Military Health System Data Repository databases, indicating the necessity of using both databases in order to obtain reliable data in the active duty population. This study is the current best estimate of a baseline rate of gynecologic cancer in U.S. active duty military women. This rate might change over time as women's roles and exposures in recent and future military conflicts evolve.

Niraparib in the treatment of previously treated advanced ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer

Homologous recombination deficiency is a critical biologic feature of ovarian cancer. This weakness in DNA damage repair relies on functional poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, orally available and initially approved for maintenance therapy in women with ovarian cancer by the US FDA in 2017 and by the EMA in 2017 for the same indication. Ovarian cancer represents the most lethal of gynecologic malignancies. The efficacy of niraparib has changed the landscape of ovarian cancer treatment, but overall survival data is still to come. This review summarizes the data regarding niraparib mechanism of action, toxicities, single agent efficacy and novel combinations in ovarian cancer.

Circulating Tumor Cells In Advanced Cervical Cancer: NRG Oncology-Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 240 (NCT 00803062)

To isolate circulating tumor cells (CTC) from women with advanced cervical cancer and estimate the impact of CTCs and treatment on overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 7.5 mL of whole blood was drawn pre-cycle 1 and 36 days post-cycle 1 from patients enrolled on Gynecologic Oncology Group 0240, the phase III randomized trial that led directly to regulatory approval of the antiangiogenesis drug, bevacizumab, in women with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. CTCs (defined as anti-cytokeratin⁺/anti-CD45^- cells) were isolated from the buffy coat layer using an anti-EpCAM antibody-conjugated ferrofluid and rare earth magnet, and counted using a semiautomated fluorescence microscope. The median pre-cycle 1 CTC count was 7 CTCs/7.5 mL whole blood (range, 0-18) and, at 36 days posttreatment, was 4 (range, 0-17). The greater the declination in CTCs between time points studied, the lower the risk of death [HR, 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.95)]. Among patients with high (≥ median) pretreatment CTCs, bevacizumab treatment was associated with a reduction in the hazard of death (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.32-1.03) and PFS (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.96). This effect was not observed with low (< median) CTCs. CTCs can be isolated from women with advanced cervical cancer and may have prognostic significance. A survival benefit conferred by bevacizumab among patients with high pretreatment CTCs may reflect increased tumor neovascularization and concomitant vulnerability to VEGF inhibition. These data support studying CTC capture as a potential predictive biomarker.

Bevacizumab plus fosbretabulin in recurrent ovarian cancer: Overall survival and exploratory analyses of a randomized phase II NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship between tumor size and response to combined anti-vascular targeted therapy using the anti-angiogenesis inhibitor, bevacizumab, and the tubulin-binding vascular disrupting agent, fosbretabulin.

METHODS

An exploratory, post-hoc analysis of the randomized phase II trial, Gynecologic Oncology Group-0186I, was performed. One hundred and seven patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma, treated with up to 3 prior regimens, were randomized to bevacizumab 15 mg/kg body weight with or without intravenous fosbretabulin 60 mg/m² body surface area every 21 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary analysis favored the combination (HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.47-1.00; p = .049) [Monk BJ, et al. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:2279-86]. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the treatment effect in various subpopulations.

RESULTS

With extended follow-up, the median PFS for bevacizumab plus fosbretabulin was 7.6  months as compared to 4.8  months with bevacizumab alone (HR 0.74; 90% CI, 0.54-1.02). Overall survival was similar in the experimental and control arms (25.2 vs 24.4 mos, respectively, HR 0.85; 90% CI, 0.59-1.22; p = .461). Eighty-one patients had measurable disease and median tumor size was 5.7  cm. In the ≤5.7  cm subgroup, the HR for progression or death was 0.77 (90% CI 0.45-1.31). Patients with tumors >5.7  cm (n = 40) had a HR for progression or death of 0.55; 90% CI, 0.32-0.96; p = .075).

CONCLUSIONS

Although no significant survival benefit was observed, the trend showing a reduced HR for progression or death with increasing tumor size when fosbretabulin is added to bevacizumab compared to bevacizumab alone warrants further study.

ENGOT-cx11/KEYNOTE-A18: A phase III, randomized, double-blind study of pembrolizumab with chemoradiotherapy in patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer

TPS6096

Background: High-risk locally advanced cervical cancer has a poor prognosis, and more than half of patients recur in 2 y. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. The immunostimulatory activity of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab (pembro) may be enhanced by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). After the KEYNOTE-158 study, in which pembro showed durable antitumor activity, pembro monotherapy was approved for patients with PD-L1–positive recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who progressed during or after chemotherapy. ENGOT-cx11/KEYNOTE-A18 (NCT04221945) is a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating pembro with concurrent CRT for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: Approximately 980 patients with high-risk (FIGO 2014 stage IB2-IIB with node-positive disease or stage III-IVA), locally advanced, histologically confirmed cervical cancer who have not received systemic therapy, immunotherapy, definitive surgery, or radiation will be randomized 1:1 to receive either 5 cycles of pembro 200 mg every 3 wk (Q3W) + CRT followed by 15 cycles of pembro 400 mg Q6W or 5 cycles of placebo Q3W + CRT followed by 15 cycles of placebo Q6W. The CRT regimen includes 5 cycles (with optional 6th dose) of cisplatin 40 mg/m2 Q1W + EBRT followed by brachytherapy. Randomization is stratified by planned EBRT type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT] vs non-IMRT or non-VMAT), cancer stage at screening (stage IB2-IIB vs III-IVA), and planned total radiotherapy dose. Treatment will continue until the patient has received 20 cycles of pembro (5 cycles 200 mg Q3W, 15 cycles 400 mg Q6W) vs placebo (~2 y) or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoints are PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. Secondary endpoints are PFS at 2 y, OS at 3 y, complete response at 12 wk, ORR, PFS and OS in PD-L1–positive patients, EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CX24, and safety. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04221945.

Prevalence and predictors of HIV screening in invasive cervical cancer: a 10 year cohort study

BACKGROUND

Invasive cervical carcinoma is associated with a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence of >0.1%, and screening is recommended and cost-effective for cancer populations exceeding this threshold. HIV status is also prognostic for cancer-specific survival, but compliance with HIV screening is poor in the USA and abroad.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to describe HIV screening practices in a US comprehensive cancer center. To guide quality improvement, we identify characteristics which may predict compliance with screening.

STUDY DESIGN

Women treated for invasive cervical cancer from January 2007 to December 2017 were identified by local cancer registry and billing data. We assessed age, race, ethnicity, insurance status, histology, stage, pregnancy, drug use, and HIV testing status. Univariate logistical regression was performed to assess predictors of completed HIV screening.

RESULTS

Of 492 eligible women, the cumulative screening rate was 7.6%. Race, ethnicity, histology, and funding source were not predictive of screening. Every 5 year increase in age was associated with a lower chance of screening (OR 0.86, p=0.015), as was earlier stage at diagnosis (OR 0.43, p=0.017). Pregnancy during, or antecedent to, invasive cervical cancer diagnosis was significantly more predictive of screening compliance (OR 10.57, p=0.0007). Only 8/492 (1.6%) women in the cohort were active or former drug users, but within this group HIV screening was performed more frequently (OR 22.7, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Despite US and international recommendations for HIV screening in AIDS-defining cancers, compliance remains low. In our centers, factors including earlier age, advanced stage, active pregnancy at diagnosis, and any drug use history were predictive of greater compliance with screening. These data will inform a tailored intervention to improve compliance with HIV screening in our population.

Final Overall Survival of a Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE

We report the final, protocol-specified analysis of overall survival (OS) in GOG-0218, a phase III, randomized trial of bevacizumab in women with newly diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 1,873 women with incompletely resected stage III to IV disease were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to six 21-day cycles of intravenous carboplatin (area under the concentration v time curve 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) versus chemotherapy plus concurrent bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, cycles 2 to 6) versus chemotherapy plus concurrent and maintenance bevacizumab (cycles 2 to 22). Inclusion criteria included a Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and no history of clinically significant vascular events or evidence of intestinal obstruction. OS was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. A total of 1,195 serum and/or tumor specimens were sequenced for BRCA1/2 and damaging mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Intratumoral microvessel density was studied using CD31 immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 102.9 months. Relative to control (n = 625), for patients receiving bevacizumab-concurrent (n = 625), the hazard ratio (HR) of death was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.94 to 1.20); for bevacizumab-concurrent plus maintenance (n = 623), the HR was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.09). Disease-specific survival was not improved in any arm. No survival advantage was observed after censoring patients who received bevacizumab at crossover or as second line. Median OS for stage IV bevacizumab-concurrent plus maintenance was 42.8 v 32.6 months for stage IV control (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.95). Relative to wild type, the HR for death for BRCA1/2 mutated carcinomas was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.73), and for non-BRCA1/2 HRR, the HR was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.85). BRCA1/2, HRR, and CD31 were not predictive of bevacizumab activity.

CONCLUSION

No survival differences were observed for patients who received bevacizumab compared with chemotherapy alone. Testing for BRCA1/2 mutations and homologous recombination deficiency is essential.

BEATcc (ENGOT-Cx10/GEICO 68-C/GOG3030/JGOG1084): A randomized, open label, phase III study of cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy with bevacizumab (CTx plus B) with or without atezolizumab (Atz) as first-line treatment for metastatic, persistent, or recurrent (m/r) carcinoma of the cervix (CCx)

TPS5594

Background: The combination of CTx plus B is first line treatment for most patients (pts) with m/r CCx not amenable for local therapy based on GOG240 results. GOG240 regimen showed an improvement in overall survival (OS) compared to CTx alone: 16.8 vs. 13.3 months (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.95, p = 0.007). However, further improvement in first line therapy outcomes is an unmet need. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors are breakthrough therapies in several tumor types, and their development in CCx is supported by a strong scientific rationale. Human papillomavirus infection (HPV) causes more than 90% of CCx cases. PD-L1 is a HPV biomarker and is found frequently up-regulated in CCx. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab (Pb) (anti-PD-1 antibodies) have shown response rates of 26.3% and 14.3%, respectively, in pretreated m/r CCx. This has led to the recent FDA approval of Pb in pretreated PD-L1+ m/r CCx. The BEATcc trial (NCT03556839) evaluates the addition of the anti-PD-L1 agent Atz to GOG240 regimen as first line treatment for m/r CCx, following the synergistic rationale between anti-VEGF agents and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Methods: Eligible pts: m/r CC with adequate organ function. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to either Arm A (control): C 50 mg/m2 + Tx 175mg/m2 + B 15 mg/kg (CTx plus B) i.v. D1 Q3W or Arm B (experimental): CTx plus B + Atz 1200 mg i.v. D1 Q3W. Stratification factors: prior chemo-radiation, histology and Chemotherapy backbone (CTx vs carboplatin-Tx). Treatment is planned until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Pts with a complete response after ≥6 cycles or those with unacceptable CTx toxicity may be allowed to continue only on biologics therapy. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee will analyze the safety of the first 12 pts in the experimental arm completing 2 treatment cycles. The primary endpoint is OS. The study started enrolling in October 2018 and will enroll approximately 404 pts across Europe, Japan, and the US. Clinical trial information: NCT03556839.

Ovarian Cancer Maintenance: Practice-Changing Data Calls for Changing Practice

Staying current on the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape in oncology is challenging for clinicians. This commentary discusses exciting practice‐changing data specific to ovarian cancer.

Rapid progression of disease in two cases of undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma, a rare histopathologic diagnosis, has a poor prognosis with high risk of progression during or shortly after completion of adjuvant treatment. We present two cases of undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: one in a postmenopausal female who experienced recurrent disease immediately after completion of adjuvant treatment and one in a premenopausal female who experienced disease progression while receiving adjuvant treatment. These cases exemplify the aggressive behavior of undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma and suggest the need for a more effective treatment in the upfront setting than the current standard of care for endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.

The Evolving Landscape of Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

The treatment of women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is aggressive surgical cytoreduction and a combination of platinum plus taxane chemotherapy. The timing and extent of surgery has direct implications on the selection of subsequent treatment as well as the prognosis of patients with EOC. Frontline chemotherapeutic regimens have evolved through a series of large multi-institutional randomized clinical trials that focused on targeted agents as maintenance therapy. On June 13, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved adding bevacizumab to adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy followed by maintenance based on the results of Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 218. Maintenance olaparib was FDA-approved on December 19, 2018, for frontline maintenance among those with advanced EOC who respond to frontline chemotherapy and harbor a germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. This was based on the results of SOLO-1. Despite a strong rationale and extensive study, intraperitoneal chemotherapy has not been adopted in clinical practice. Alternatively, heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy has shown promise as a more tolerable and technically feasible method of regional therapy, but widespread application will require more evidence. Significant strides have also been made in understanding the biology of EOC, resulting in a personalized approach to first-line therapy. One approach calls for recognizing differences in histologic subtypes and molecular alterations, which may open up alternative therapeutic interventions.

It's time to warm up to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer

The peritoneal spread of ovarian cancer makes it a potential target for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Intraperitoneal delivery exposes the tumor to concentrations of cytotoxic drugs much greater than with intravenous delivery, and in vitro studies have also shown that combining hyperthermia and platinum leads to an additive cytotoxic effect. Pharmacokinetic analyses have confirmed very high concentrations of cytotoxic drugs in the peritoneal cavity, with minimal systemic exposure and toxicity. The majority of historical data evaluating HIPEC in ovarian cancer are based on retrospective research, which included heterogeneous groups of patients and drugs used for HIPEC. Recent publications on the findings of prospective studies, including the first randomized trial in which the only difference in intervention was the addition of HIPEC with cisplatin to interval debulking surgery in stage III patients, have shown a benefit in favor of HIPEC. Yet, a recent prospective study from Korea did not find a benefit. Opponents of HIPEC have cited higher rates of complications with this approach, yet most of the serious adverse events observed are likely related to the surgery itself, and are comparable to the rates reported in studies evaluating cytoreductive surgery without HIPEC. Findings from a recent randomized controlled trial showed no delays in initiation or completion of postoperative chemotherapy in patients treated with HIPEC. A growing body of evidence is indicating that it might be time to seriously consider HIPEC as a complementary treatment at the time of cytoreductive surgery for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer in the setting of an experienced center. Yet, more research is needed to identify the population of patients who gain the most benefit from this therapy.

Implementation of a multidisciplinary palliative and supportive care education lecture series

144

Background: Nationwide surveys of residents including those in oncologic specialties reveal that trainees perceive their palliative and supportive care (PSC) educational curriculum as inadequate. For residents, PSC education varies from none at all to an organized department lecture series given by Palliative Medicine physicians. There have been no published experiences of institutional wide PSC lecture series open to all residents, fellows, and medical students. Methods: We piloted a monthly palliative care lecture series from August 2016 to June 2017 at UC Irvine. 12 physicians from 9 clinical departments provided monthly lectures on management of physical symptoms, psychosocial issues, cultural considerations, spiritual needs, care coordination, ethical/legal issues, communication/goals of care, and advance care planning. Lectures were advertised in advance to program directors and emails were sent the week prior to all trainees. At the end of each lecture, attendees were given a voluntary survey that consisted of 10 questions on self-perceived competency in PSC skills and 4 questions on attitudes toward PSC. Results: 143 (45 medical students, 98 residents) responses were received. Most residents (90.8%) and medical students (84.4%) viewed palliative care as an important competency. Only 16 responses from heme/onc, radiation, and gynecology oncology residents and fellows were received, comprising 11.2% of total responses. Residents characterized themselves as “not at all/minimally/somewhat confident” in their ability to care for patients with PSC issues in the following areas: management of opioids (44.2%), fatigue (82.7%), anorexia (79.6%), depression (65.3%), and prognostication (75.5%) Medical students characterized themselves as “not at all/minimally/somewhat confident” in the following areas: management of opioids (79.3%), fatigue (86.7%), anorexia (91.1%), depression (71.1%), and prognostication (91.1%). Conclusions: These findings suggest a need to further improve domains of palliative care training in residency programs and identify innovative ways to increase participation of residents and fellows from all oncologic specialties.

Multi-disciplinary summit on genetics services for women with gynecologic cancers: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology White Paper

OBJECTIVE

To assess current practice, advise minimum standards, and identify educational gaps relevant to genetic screening, counseling, and testing of women affected by gynecologic cancers.

METHODS

The Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) organized a multidisciplinary summit that included representatives from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Society Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC), and patient advocacy groups, BrightPink and Facing our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE). Three subject areas were discussed: care delivery models for genetic testing, barriers to genetic testing, and educational opportunities for providers of genetic testing.

RESULTS

The group endorsed current SGO, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and NSGC genetic testing guidelines for women affected with ovarian, tubal, peritoneal cancers, or DNA mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer. Three main areas of unmet need were identified: timely and universal genetic testing for women with ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers; education regarding minimum standards for genetic counseling and testing; and barriers to implementation of testing of both affected individuals as well as cascade testing of family members. Consensus building among all stakeholders resulted in an action plan to address gaps in education of gynecologic oncology providers and delivery of cancer genetics care.

Shared decision-making in ovarian cancer

5549

Background: The value of shared decision-making in ovarian cancer is relatively unexplored. The goal of this study was to test a new decision aid, Patient Centered Outcome Aid (PCOA), that facilitates shared decision-making and helps ovarian cancer patients assimilate information and identify quality of life (QOL), toxicity and survival trade-offs between IP/IV therapy and IV therapy alone, based on their preferences and personal clinical characteristics. Methods: Participants were randomized to either PCOA (N=64) or usual care (N=59). Patient characteristics, QOL and shared decision-making data were collected at baseline and treatment initiation. Primary outcomes included satisfaction with treatment decision and decisional regret. Comparisons were made using t-tests and multivariate methods, adjusting for patient covariates. Multivariate linear models were used to investigate predictors of the primary outcomes. Results: Although satisfaction and decisional regret did not differ significantly by arm at any time point, the majority of PCOA patients indicated that the aid helped them understand treatment options and side effects. Notably, low shared decision-making and low QOL, were significant predictors of low satisfaction at treatment initiation (multiple r=0.76), six months (multiple r=0.48) and nine months (r=0.58). They were also significant predictors of decisional regret (multiple r=0.48 and 0.36 at 6 and 9 months). Patient covariates including age, stage, treatment and neoadjuvant status were not associated with differences in satisfaction or decisional regret. Conclusions: There were no clinically meaningful differences in satisfaction with the treatment decision, or decisional regret between the study arms. The absence of a difference may reflect the high degree of shared decision-making in both arms and greater disease severity in PCOA patients, who were more likely to report low baseline QOL and declining QOL over time. Both shared decision-making and quality of life were robust, independent predictors of satisfaction with the treatment decision over time. This implies that women who perceive themselves as less engaged in the decision process, and report poor QOL may benefit from a decision aid, in addition to physician counseling. Clinical trial information: NCT02259699.

The genetic prediction of risk for gynecologic cancers

Salient to the intent of personalized medicine, hereditary cancer syndromes present significant opportunities in the treatment and prevention of some gynecologic cancers. Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and DNA mismatch repair genes: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 are important causal agents in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and Lynch syndromes. Though they only account for an estimated 10-18% of ovarian, tubal, peritoneal, and endometrial cancer cases, inherited cancers are imminently preventable if mutation carriers are identified in a timely manner. Population level screening is currently impractical due to low prevalence of disease, cost of testing, and ethical issues associated with testing, so diagnosis of these mutations is limited. Being affected by one of the heritable gynecologic malignancies is a logical entry point into the genetic counseling and testing pipeline for the patient and her family members. Thus, gynecologic cancer providers are uniquely positioned to diagnose germline mutations that can inform prognosis and treatment for their patients in addition to enabling prevention for patients' cancer-unaffected blood relatives, or "previvors". The purpose of this review is to describe our current perspective on testing for and implications of heritable cancer syndromes in the women with ovarian, tubal, peritoneal, and endometrial cancers.

Socioeconomic status as a predictor of adherence to treatment guidelines for early-stage ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the impact of socioeconomic status and other demographic variables on adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network ovarian cancer treatment guidelines among patients with stage I/II disease.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage I/II epithelial ovarian cancer between 1/1/96-12/31/06 were identified from the California Cancer Registry. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate differences in surgical procedures, chemotherapy regimens, and overall adherence to the NCCN guidelines according to increasing SES quintiles (SES-1 to SES-5).

RESULTS

A total of 5445 stage I and II patients were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 54.0years (range=18-99years); 72.5% of patients had stage I disease, while 27.5% had stage II disease. With a median follow-up time of 5years, the 5-year ovarian cancer-specific survival for all patients was 82.7% (SE=0.6%). Overall, 23.7% of patients received care that was adherent to the NCCN guidelines. Compared to patients in the highest SES quintile (SES-5), patients in the lowest SES quintile (SES-1) were significantly less likely to receive proper surgery (27.3% vs 47.9%, p<0.001) or chemotherapy (42.4% vs 53.6%, p<0.001). There were statistically significant trends between increasing SES and the likelihood of overall treatment plan adherence to the NCCN guidelines: SES-1=16.4%, SES-2=19.0%, SES-3=22.4%, SES-4=24.2% and SES-5=31.6% (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that compared to SES-5, decreasing SES was independently predictive of a higher risk of non-standard overall care.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, low SES is a significant and independent predictor of deviation from the NCCN guidelines for surgery, chemotherapy, and overall treatment.