1
|
Ehmann S, Lam C, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Grisham RN, Tew WP, O'Cearbhaill RE, Long Roche K, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Chi DS, Gardner GJ. Secondary cytoreductive surgery and oncologic outcomes in the era of targeted maintenance therapy for recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 186:104-109. [PMID: 38640773 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare oncologic outcomes of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) before and after FDA approval of Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and bevacizumab maintenance therapies for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PS-ROC). METHODS Patients who underwent SCS for first recurrence of PS-ROC from 1/1/2013-1/1/2020 were identified. Exclusion criteria included prior chemotherapy for recurrence, bowel obstruction procedures, and palliative surgery. Data were dichotomized pre/post 1/2017, relative to FDA approval of PARPi and bevacizumab maintenance for ROC. Second progression-free survival (PFS2), the primary endpoint, was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Overall, 245 patients underwent SCS-131 (53%) pre- and 114 (47%) post-approval. Most patients had high-grade serous tumors (83% and 90%, respectively; p = 0.13). Deleterious BRCA1/2 alterations were identified in 27% (32/120) and 28% (32/113) of tested patients, respectively (p = 0.88). Disease-free intervals pre- and post-approval were: 6-12 months, 16% and 18%; 12-30 months, 56% and 59%; and >30 months, 28% and 24%, respectively (p = 0.73). Overall, 85% and 86% of patients, respectively, achieved complete gross resection (CGR; p > 0.99). PARPi maintenance use increased from 3.8% to 27% (p < 0.001) following approval, and bevacizumab from 1.5% to 12% (p < 0.001). Median PFS2 was 19 and 20.1 months, respectively. In the post group, 1-year PFS2 rate was 84.5% (95% CI, 75.7-90.4%) for patients with CGR vs 56.2% (95% CI, 29.5-76.2%) for those with residual disease; 3-year PFS2 rates were 31.3% (95% CI, 21.6-41.4%) and 12.5% (95% CI, 2.1-32.8%), respectively (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS CGR during SCS is associated with improved PFS2 compared to suboptimal resection. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to elucidate the role of SCS as more therapeutics become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Ehmann
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Clarissa Lam
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - William P Tew
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Woo S, Andrieu PC, Abu-Rustum NR, Broach V, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Chi DS, Aviki E, Ellis A, Carayon P, Hricak H, Vargas HA. Bridging Communication Gaps Between Radiologists, Referring Physicians, and Patients Through Standardized Structured Cancer Imaging Reporting: The Experience with Female Pelvic MRI Assessment Using O-RADS and a Simulated Cohort Patient Group. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:1388-1397. [PMID: 37661555 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate whether implementing structured reporting based on Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women with sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses improves communication between radiologists, referrers, and patients/caregivers and enhances diagnostic performance for determining adnexal malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed prospectively issued MRI reports in 2019-2022 performed for characterizing adnexal masses before and after implementing O-RADS MRI; 56 patients/caregivers and nine gynecologic oncologists ("referrers") were surveyed about report interpretability/clarity/satisfaction; responses for pre- and post-implementation reports were compared using Fisher's exact and Chi-squared tests. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS A total of 123 reports from before and 119 reports from after O-RADS MRI implementation were included. Survey response rates were 35.7% (20/56) for patients/caregivers and 66.7% (6/9) for referrers. For patients/caregivers, O-RADS MRI reports were clearer (p < 0.001) and more satisfactory (p < 0.001) than unstructured reports, but interpretability did not differ significantly (p = 0.14), as 28.0% (28/100) of postimplementation and 38.0% (38/100) of preimplementation reports were considered difficult to interpret. For referrers, O-RADS MRI reports were clearer, more satisfactory, and easier to interpret (p < 0.001); only 1.3% (1/77) were considered difficult to interpret. For differentiating benign from malignant adnexal lesions, O-RADS MRI showed area under the curve of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.99), sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.58-0.95), and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96). Diagnostic performance of reports before implementation could not be calculated due to many different phrases used to describe the likelihood of malignancy. CONCLUSION Implementing standardized structured reporting using O-RADS MRI for characterizing adnexal masses improved clarity and satisfaction for patients/caregivers and referrers. Interpretability improved for referrers but remained limited for patients/caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungmin Woo
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065 (S.W., P.C.A., H.H.); Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 660 1st Avenue, New York, NY, 10016 (S.W., H.A.V.).
| | - Pamela Causa Andrieu
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065 (S.W., P.C.A., H.H.)
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (N.R.A.-R., V.B., O.Z., Y.S., D.S.C.)
| | - Vance Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (N.R.A.-R., V.B., O.Z., Y.S., D.S.C.)
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (N.R.A.-R., V.B., O.Z., Y.S., D.S.C.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (O.Z.)
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (N.R.A.-R., V.B., O.Z., Y.S., D.S.C.)
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (N.R.A.-R., V.B., O.Z., Y.S., D.S.C.)
| | - Emeline Aviki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York (E.A.)
| | - Annie Ellis
- Patient Family Advisory Council for Quality (PFACQ), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.E.)
| | - Pascale Carayon
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin (P.C.)
| | - Hedvig Hricak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065 (S.W., P.C.A., H.H.)
| | - Hebert A Vargas
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 660 1st Avenue, New York, NY, 10016 (S.W., H.A.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brown S, Kokosis G, Graziano FD, Haran O, Smith-Montes E, Zivanovic O, Ariyan CE, Coit DG, Coriddi M, Mehrara BJ, Dayan JH. Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction with Vascularized Omentum Lymph Node Transplant: Reducing the Risk of Both Painful Contracture and Lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2024; 12:e5747. [PMID: 38645629 PMCID: PMC11029981 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Patients undergoing extensive lymph node dissection and radiation are at high risk for not only lymphedema but also painful contracture. In a standard lymphadenectomy, immediate lymphatic reconstruction using a lymphovenous bypass is effective in reconstructing the lymphatic defect. However, a more aggressive nodal clearance leaves the patient with a large cavity and skeletonized neurovascular structures, often resulting in severe contracture, pain, cosmetic deformity, and venous stricture. Adjuvant radiotherapy to the nodal bed can lead to severe and permanent disability despite physical therapy. Typically, these patients are referred to us after the fact, where surgery will rarely restore the patient to normal function. In an effort to avoid lymphedema and contracture, we have been reconstructing both the lymphatic and soft tissue defect during lymphadenectomy, using vascularized omentum lymphatic transplant (VOLT). A total of 13 patients underwent immediate reconstruction with VOLT at the time of axillary (n = 8; 61.5%) or groin (n = 5; 38.5%) dissection. No postoperative complications were observed. The mean follow-up time was 15.1 ± 12.5 months. Only one lower extremity patient developed mild lymphedema (11% volume differential), with excellent scores in validated patient-reported outcomes. All patients maintained full range of motion with no pain. None of the 13 patients required a compression garment. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction with VOLT is a promising procedure for minimizing the risk of lymphedema and contracture in the highest risk patients undergoing particularly extensive lymph node dissection and radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stav Brown
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - George Kokosis
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, RUSH Medical College, Chicago, Ill
| | - Francis D. Graziano
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Oriana Haran
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Elizabeth Smith-Montes
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Charlotte E. Ariyan
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Daniel G. Coit
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Michelle Coriddi
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Babak J. Mehrara
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Joseph H. Dayan
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sia TY, Wan V, Finlan M, Zhou QC, Iasonos A, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Chi DS, Long Roche K, Jewell E, Tew WP, O'Cearbhaill RE, Cohen S, Makker V, Liu YL, Friedman CF, Kyi C, Zamarin D, Gardner G. Procedural interventions for oligoprogression during treatment with immune checkpoint blockade in gynecologic malignancies: a case series. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:594-601. [PMID: 38296517 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of performing procedural interventions, defined as surgical resection, tumor ablation, or targeted radiation therapy, for oligoprogressive disease among patients with gynecologic malignancies who are treated with immune checkpoint blockade. METHODS Patients with gynecologic cancers treated with immune checkpoint blockade between January 2013 and October 2021 who underwent procedural interventions including surgical resection, interventional radiology ablation, or radiation therapy for oligoprogressive disease were identified. Procedures performed before immune checkpoint therapy initiation or ≥6 months after therapy completion were excluded. Long immunotherapy duration prior to intervention was defined as ≥6 months. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated from procedure date until disease progression or death, respectively. RESULTS During the study period, 886 patients met inclusion criteria and received immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Of these, 34 patients underwent procedural interventions for oligoprogressive disease; 7 underwent surgical resection, 3 underwent interventional radiology ablation, and 24 underwent radiation therapy interventions. Primary disease sites included uterus (71%), ovary (24%), and cervix (6%). Sites of oligoprogression included abdomen/pelvis (26%), bone (21%), lung (18%), distant lymph node (18%), brain (9%), liver (6%), and vagina (3%). Most tumors (76%) did not exhibit microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiency. Approximately half (53%) of the patients had long immune checkpoint therapy duration prior to intervention. Median progression-free survival following the procedure was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.1-9.9), and median overall survival was 21.7 months (95% CI, 14.9-not estimable). Long versus short immune checkpoint therapy duration prior to procedure and length of immune checkpoint therapy had no effect on progression-free or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Procedural interventions for patients with oligoprogression on immune checkpoint blockade therapy are feasible and demonstrate favorable outcomes. With expanding use of immune checkpoint therapy, it is important to investigate combined modalities to maximize therapeutic benefit for patients with gynecologic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Y Sia
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vivian Wan
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Michael Finlan
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Qin C Zhou
- Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth Jewell
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - William P Tew
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Seth Cohen
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ying L Liu
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Claire F Friedman
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chrisann Kyi
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dmitriy Zamarin
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ginger Gardner
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leitao MM, Iasonos A, Tomberlin M, Moukarzel LA, Price H, Bennetti G, Ramesh B, Chi DS, Long Roche K, Sonoda Y, Al-Niami A, Mueller JJ, Gardner GJ, Broach V, Jewell EL, Kim S, Feinberg J, Abu-Rustum NR, Zivanovic O. ARIA II: a randomized controlled trial of near-infrared Angiography during RectosIgmoid resection and Anastomosis in women with ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2024-005395. [PMID: 38514101 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer with extensive metastatic disease involving pelvic structures often requires rectosigmoid resection for complete gross resection; however, it is associated with increased surgical morbidity. There are limited data, and none in ovarian cancer, on near-infrared assessment of perfusion in rectosigmoid resections with anastomosis. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To compare the rate of pelvic complications (pelvic abscesses, anastomotic leaks, and infections) within 30 days of surgery with and without near-infrared assessment of perfusion at time of rectosigmoid resection and re-anastomosis in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. STUDY HYPOTHESIS We hypothesize the use of near-infrared technology (intravenous indocyanine green and endoscopic near-infrared fluorescence imaging), compared with standard intra-operative assessment, to evaluate anastomotic perfusion at time of rectosigmoid resection and re-anastomosis will result in lower rates of post-operative pelvic complications. TRIAL DESIGN This is a planned multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients who undergo rectosigmoid resection as part of their ovarian cytoreductive surgery will be randomized 1:1 to standard assessment of anastomosis with the surgeon's usual technique (control arm) or assessment with near-infrared angiography using indocyanine green and endoscopic fluorescence imaging (experimental arm). Randomization will occur after rectosigmoid resection has been completed and the surgeon declares their plan to create a diverting ostomy. Randomization will be stratified by plan for diverting ostomy. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA Main inclusion criteria include patients with primary or recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are scheduled for cytoreductive surgery with suspected need for low-anterior rectosigmoid resection. PRIMARY ENDPOINT Rate of 30-day post-operative pelvic complications. SAMPLE SIZE 310 (155 per arm) ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Q2 2027 and Q4 2027, respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04878094.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario M Leitao
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Morgan Tomberlin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lea A Moukarzel
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hannah Price
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gabrielle Bennetti
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bhavani Ramesh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ahmed Al-Niami
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vance Broach
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sarah Kim
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jacqueline Feinberg
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fotopoulou C, Eriksson AG, Baiocchi G, Zivanovic O. Surgery for gynecological cancers in the era of personalized medicine: a novel paradigm. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:351. [PMID: 38438173 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ane Gerda Eriksson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, OSLO, Oslo, Norway
| | - Glauco Baiocchi
- Gynecologic Oncology, ACCamargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Manning-Geist B, Obermair A, Broach VA, Leitao MM, Zivanovic O, Abu-Rustum NR. Update on near infrared imaging technology: indocyanine green and near infrared technology in the treatment of gynecologic cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:416-420. [PMID: 38438171 PMCID: PMC10962647 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Beryl Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andreas Obermair
- University of Queensland Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Vance A Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Praiss AM, White C, Iasonos A, Selenica P, Zivanovic O, Chi DS, Abu-Rustum NR, Weigelt B, Aghajanian C, Girshman J, Park KJ, Grisham RN. Mesonephric and mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas of gynecologic origin: A single-center experience with molecular characterization, treatment, and oncologic outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 182:32-38. [PMID: 38246044 PMCID: PMC10960687 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mesonephric (MA) and mesonephric-like (MLA) adenocarcinomas are rare cancers, and data on clinical behavior and response to therapy are limited. We sought to report molecular features, treatment, and outcomes of MA/MLA from a single institution. METHODS Patients with MA (cervix) or MLA (uterus, ovary, other) treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) from 1/2008-12/2021 underwent pathologic re-review. For patients with initial treatment at MSK, progression-free survival (PFS1) was calculated as time from initial surgery to progression or death; second PFS (PFS2) was calculated as time from start of treatment for recurrence to subsequent progression or death. Overall survival (OS) was calculated for all patients. Images were retrospectively reviewed to determine treatment response. Somatic genetic alterations were assessed by clinical tumor-normal sequencing (MSK-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets [MSK-IMPACT]). RESULTS Of 81 patients with confirmed gynecologic MA/MLA, 36 received initial treatment at MSK. Sites of origin included cervix (n = 9, 11%), uterus (n = 42, 52%), ovary (n = 28, 35%), and other (n = 2, 2%). Of the 36 patients who received initial treatment at MSK, 20 (56%) recurred; median PFS1 was 33 months (95% CI: 17-not evaluable), median PFS2 was 8.3 months (95% CI: 6.9-14), and median OS was 87 months (95% CI: 58.2-not evaluable). Twenty-six of the 36 patients underwent MSK-IMPACT testing, and 25 (96%) harbored MAPK pathway alterations. CONCLUSION Most patients diagnosed with early-stage disease ultimately recurred. Somatic MAPK signaling pathway mutations appear to be highly prevalent in MA/MLA, and therapeutics that target this pathway are worthy of further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M Praiss
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charlie White
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Girshman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kay J Park
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kahn RM, Ma X, Gordhandas S, Yeoshoua E, Ellis RJ, Zhang X, Aviki EM, Abu-Rustum NR, Gardner GJ, Sonoda Y, Zivanovic O, Long Roche K, Jewell E, Boerner T, Chi DS. Regionalizing ovarian cancer cytoreduction to high-volume centers and the impact on patient travel in New York State. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 182:141-147. [PMID: 38262237 PMCID: PMC10960664 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the theoretical impact of regionalizing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer (OC) to high-volume facilities on patient travel. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with OC who underwent cytoreduction between 1/1/2004-12/31/2018 from the New York State Cancer Registry and Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. Hospitals were stratified by low-volume (<21 cytoreductive surgical procedures for OC annually) and high-volume centers (≥21 procedures annually). A simulation was performed; outcomes of interest were driving distance and time between the centroid of the patient's residence zip code and the treating facility zip code. RESULTS Overall, 60,493 patients met inclusion criteria. Between 2004 and 2018, 210 facilities were performing cytoreductive surgery for OC in New York; 159 facilities (75.7%) met low-volume and 51 (24.3%) met high-volume criteria. Overall, 10,514 patients (17.4%) were treated at low-volume and 49,979 (82.6%) at high-volume facilities. In 2004, 78.2% of patients were treated at high-volume facilities, which increased to 84.6% in 2018 (P < .0001). Median travel distance and time for patients treated at high-volume centers was 12.2 miles (IQR, 5.6-25.5) and 23.0 min (IQR, 15.2-37.0), and 8.2 miles (IQR, 3.7-15.9) and 16.8 min (IQR, 12.4-26.0) for patients treated at low-volume centers. If cytoreductive surgery was centralized to high-volume centers, median distance and time traveled for patients originally treated at low-volume centers would be 11.2 miles (IQR, 3.8-32.3; P < .001) and 20.2 min (IQR, 13.6-43.0; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Centralizing cytoreductive surgery for OC to high-volume centers in New York would increase patient travel burden by negligible amounts of distance and time for most patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan M Kahn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xiaoyue Ma
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sushmita Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Effi Yeoshoua
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryan J Ellis
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xiuling Zhang
- New York State Cancer Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Emeline M Aviki
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Boerner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vinsensia M, Schaub R, Meixner E, Hoegen P, Arians N, Forster T, Hoeltgen L, Köhler C, Uzun-Lang K, Batista V, König L, Zivanovic O, Hennigs A, Golatta M, Heil J, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Incidence and Risk Assessment of Capsular Contracture in Breast Cancer Patients following Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy and Implant-Based Reconstruction. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:265. [PMID: 38254756 PMCID: PMC10813520 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Our study aims to identify the risk factors and dosimetry characteristics associated with capsular contracture. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 118 women with breast cancer who underwent PMRT following an IBR between 2010 and 2022. Patients were treated with PMRT of 50.0-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions. Capsular contracture was categorized according to the Baker Classification for Reconstructed Breasts. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 22 months, the incidence of clinically relevant capsular contracture (Baker III-IV) was 22.9%. Overall, capsular contracture (Baker I-IV) occurred in 56 patients (47.5%) after a median of 9 months after PMRT. The rate of reconstruction failure/implant loss was 25.4%. In the univariate analysis, postoperative complications (prolonged pain, prolonged wound healing, seroma and swelling) and regional nodal involvement were associated with higher rates of capsular contracture (p = 0.017, OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2-5.3 and p = 0.031, respectively). None of the analyzed dosimetric factors or the implant position were associated with a higher risk for capsular contracture. CONCLUSION Postoperative complications and regional nodal involvement were associated with an increased risk of capsular contracture following breast reconstruction and PMRT, while none of the analyzed dosimetric factors were linked to a higher incidence. Additional studies are needed to identify further potential risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Vinsensia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Riccarda Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clara Köhler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Uzun-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vania Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg Klinik St. Elisabeth, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andre Hennigs
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg Klinik St. Elisabeth, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg Klinik St. Elisabeth, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg Klinik St. Elisabeth, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bhatt A, Glehen O, Zivanovic O, Brennan D, Nadeau C, Van Driel W, Bakrin N. The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8115-8137. [PMID: 37561343 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13932-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM We report the results of an international consensus on hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) regimens for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) performed with the following goals: To define the indications for HIPEC To identify the most suitable HIPEC regimens for each indication in EOC To identify areas of future research on HIPEC To provide recommendations for some aspects of perioperative care for HIPEC METHODS: The Delphi technique was used with two rounds of voting. There were three categories of questions: evidence-based recommendations [using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system with the patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) method], an opinion survey, and research recommendations. RESULTS Seventy-three (67.5%) of 108 invited experts responded in round I, and 68 (62.9%) in round II. Consensus was achieved for 34/38 (94.7%) questions. However, a strong positive consensus that would lead to inclusion in routine care was reached for only 6/38 (15.7%) questions. HIPEC in addition to interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) received a strong positive recommendation that merits inclusion in routine care. Single-agent cisplatin was the only drug recommended for routine care, and OVHIPEC-1 was the most preferred regimen. The panel recommended performing HIPEC for a minimum of 60 min with a recommended minimum intraabdominal temperature of 41°C. Nephroprotection with sodium thiosulfate should be used for cisplatin HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS The results of this consensus should guide clinical decisions on indications of HIPEC and the choice and various parameters of HIPEC regimens and could fill current knowledge gaps. These outcomes should be the basis for designing future clinical trials on HIPEC in EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, KD Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier, Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donal Brennan
- UCD Gynaecological Oncology Group, UCD School of Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cedric Nadeau
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, Cedex, France
| | - Willemien Van Driel
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier, Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Praiss AM, Hirani R, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR, Leitao MM, Long Roche K, Broach V, Gardner GJ, Chi DS, Zivanovic O. Impact of postoperative morbidity on outcomes in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing intestinal surgery at the time of primary or interval cytoreductive surgery: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 179:169-179. [PMID: 37992548 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of short-term postoperative complications on oncologic outcomes for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) or interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) with intestinal resection. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed for patients with ovarian cancer who underwent PCS or ICS with at least one intestinal resection at our institution from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2020. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed for the PCS and ICS cohorts separately. Short-term complications within 30 days of surgery (surgical secondary events [SSEs]) were graded by a validated institutional SSE system. RESULTS Among 437 patients who underwent intestinal resections during PCS (n = 289) or ICS (n = 148), 183 (42%) had one, 180 (41%) had two, and 74 (17%) had three intestinal resections. Six (1.4%) of 437 patients experienced an anastomotic leak postoperatively. There were no perioperative deaths. There was no difference in PFS and OS for patients who underwent PCS with any SSE vs. no SSE within 30 days of surgery (HR, 1.05; 95% CI: 0.76-1.47; p = 0.75 and HR, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.49-1.26; p = 0.32, respectively). There was no difference in PFS and OS for patients who underwent ICS with any SSE vs. no SSE within 30 days of surgery (HR, 1.43; 95% CI: 0.99-2.07; p = 0.055 and HR. 1.18; 95% CI: 0.72-1.93; p = 0.52, respectively. CONCLUSION Short-term postoperative morbidity for patients who underwent intestinal surgery during primary surgical management for advanced ovarian cancer did not impact oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M Praiss
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rahim Hirani
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vance Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bhatt A, Glehen O, Zivanovic O, Brennan D, Nadeau C, van Driel W, Bakrin N. ASO Visual Abstract: The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8174-8175. [PMID: 37659975 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14232-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, KD Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier, Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donal Brennan
- UCD Gynaecological Oncology Group, UCD School of Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cedric Nadeau
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, Cedex, France
| | - Willemien van Driel
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier, Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lim YH, Dagher C, Abu-Rustum NR, Mueller JJ, Sonoda Y, Zivanovic O, Broach V, Leitao MM. Oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of apparent early-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 179:152-157. [PMID: 37980770 PMCID: PMC10872455 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with clinically uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging with robot-assisted (RA) versus conventional laparoscopy. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with newly diagnosed, uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancer who were treated and had primary surgery at our institution between 1/1/2009-1/1/2018. Clinicopathologic, surgical, and survival data were collected. Appropriate statistical methods were applied. RESULTS Of 1728 patients identified, 1389 (80.4%) underwent RA and 339 (19.6%) conventional laparoscopy. At diagnosis, median age was 60 years (range, 24-92) and median BMI was 30.2 kg/m2 (range, 15.1-71.5). In the RA group, patients had longer operative time (170 vs 152 min, P < .001), lower conversion rate to laparotomy (0.6% vs 4.7%, P < .001), and a higher proportion had a BMI > 40 kg/m2 (17.2% vs 11.5%, P = .01) and same-day discharge (19.2% vs 5.3%, P < .001). Overall, 93% (RA) and 90% (conventional) of patients underwent lymph node assessment (P = .1). Comparing the RA versus conventional groups, final surgical stage on pathology (P = .6), median follow-up (55.7 vs 52.9 months, P = .4), and rates of perioperative complications (9.9% vs 7.7%, P = .6), recurrence (9.5% vs 7.4%, P = .3), 5-year PFS (88.5% vs 91.0%, P = .3), and 5-year OS (92.5% vs 92.4%, P = .7) were not significantly different. No significant increase in risk of recurrence (HR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.8-1.9, P = .3) or poorer OS outcomes (HR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.6-1.4, P = .7) were observed in the RA group. CONCLUSION In uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancers, surgical staging using RA laparoscopy was not associated with adverse survival outcomes compared to conventional laparoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Hui Lim
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christian Dagher
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vance Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sia TY, Maio A, Kemel YM, Arora KS, Gordhandas SB, Kahn RM, Salo-Mullen EE, Sheehan MA, Tejada PR, Bandlamudi C, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Grisham RN, O'Cearbhaill RE, Tew WP, Roche KL, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Gardner GJ, Chi DS, Latham AJ, Carlo MI, Murciano-Goroff YR, Will M, Walsh MF, Robson ME, Mandelker DL, Berger MF, Abu-Rustum NR, Brown CL, Offit K, Hamilton JG, Aghajanian C, Weigelt B, Stadler ZK, Liu YL. Germline Pathogenic Variants and Genetic Counseling by Ancestry in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300137. [PMID: 37738546 PMCID: PMC10861001 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate rates of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs) and genetic counseling by ancestry in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS Patients with pathologically confirmed EOC who underwent clinical tumor-normal sequencing from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, inclusive of germline analysis of ≥76 genes were included. Patients with newly identified PVs were referred for Clinical Genetics Service (CGS) counseling. Ancestry groups were defined using self-reported race/ethnicity and Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) heritage. Genetic ancestry was inferred computationally using validated algorithms. Logistic regression models were built. RESULTS Of 1,266 patients, self-reported ancestry (AJ, 17%; Asian, 10%; Black/African American, 5.4%; Hispanic, 6.2%; non-Hispanic White, 57%; other, 0.16%; unknown, 4.0%) correlated with genetic ancestry (AJ ancestry, 18%; admixed, 10%; African, 4%; East Asian [EAS], 6%; European, 56%; Native American, 0.2%; South Asian [SAS], 4%; unknown, 2%). Germline PVs were observed in 313 (25%) patients, including 195 (15%) with PVs in EOC-associated genes. Those with PVs were younger at diagnosis (59 v 62 years; P < .001) and more likely to have high-grade serous ovarian cancer (83% v 72%; P = .009). PV prevalence varied between ancestry groups (P < .001), with highest rates in the AJ (39.9%) and Asian (26.5%) groups and similar rates (>10%) across other ancestry groups. Use of genetic ancestry demonstrated similar findings and further characterized high rates of PV in EAS/SAS groups. Younger age, high-grade serous histology, and self-reported AJ or Asian ancestry were associated with PV in an EOC-associated gene. Rates of CGS counseling for newly identified PVs were high (80%) across ancestry groups. CONCLUSION Rates of PV, particularly in EOC-associated genes, were high regardless of ancestry, with similar rates of counseling between groups, emphasizing the importance of universal genetic testing in all patients with EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Y. Sia
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anna Maio
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yelena M. Kemel
- Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kanika S. Arora
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sushmita B. Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ryan M. Kahn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Erin E. Salo-Mullen
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Margaret A. Sheehan
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Prince Rainier Tejada
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Chaitanya Bandlamudi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rachel N. Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Roisin E. O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - William P. Tew
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ginger J. Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Dennis S. Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Alicia J. Latham
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Maria I. Carlo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Yonina R. Murciano-Goroff
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Marie Will
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Michael F. Walsh
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mark E. Robson
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Diana L. Mandelker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael F. Berger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Carol L. Brown
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Jada G. Hamilton
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ying L. Liu
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Macuks R, Yildirim Y, Mancari R, Achimas-Cadariu P, Madhuri TK, Ortega E, Mallmann M, Zivanovic O, Zapardiel I. Prognostic factors in undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: a subanalysis of the SARCUT study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308:981-988. [PMID: 37193821 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07057-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic factors related to the recurrence rate and overall survival of patients with undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. METHODS An international multicenter study involving 43 international centers, the SARCUT study, collected 966 uterine sarcoma cases; among them 39 cases corresponded to undifferentiated uterine sarcoma and where included in the present subanalysis. The risk factors related to the oncological outcomes where analyzed. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 63 (range 14-85) years. Seventeen (43.5%) patients presented FIGO stage I. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 15.3% and 12-months disease-free survival (DFS) 41%. FIGO stage I was significantly associated with a better prognosis. In addition, patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy showed significant longer disease-free survival compared to those without adjuvant radiotherapy (20.5 vs. 4.0 months, respectively; p = 0.04) and longer overall survival (34.7 vs. 18.2 months, respectively; p = 0.05). Chemotherapy administration was associated with shorter DFS (HR 4.41, 95% CI 1.35-14.43, p = 0.014). Persistent disease after primary treatment (HR = 6.86, 95% CI 1.51-31.09, p = 0.012) and FIGO stage IV (HR 4.12, 95%CI 1.37-12.44, p = 0.011) showed significant worse prognosis for OS. CONCLUSION FIGO stage seems to be the most important prognostic factor in patients with undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Adjuvant radiotherapy seems to be significantly associated also to a better disease-free and overall survival. On the contrary, the role of chemotherapy administration remains unclear since was associated to a shorted DFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronalds Macuks
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema Street 16, RigaRiga, 1007, Latvia.
| | | | - Rosanna Mancari
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Michael Mallmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sia TY, Manning-Geist BL, Ehmann S, Lavery JA, Luardo C, Praiss A, Iasonos A, Sonoda Y, Grisham RN, Liu YL, Broach V, Zivanovic O, Long Roche K, Gardner GJ, Chi DS. Leave it in the past - primary treatment modality for high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer is not associated with secondary cytoreduction outcomes: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 176:69-75. [PMID: 37454565 PMCID: PMC10530358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare outcomes of patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who underwent secondary cytoreduction surgery (SCS) after up-front treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS). METHODS Patients with high-grade EOC who underwent SCS from 2/1/2004-10/31/2021 were classified by up-front treatment. Clinical and treatment characteristics were compared between cohorts. Progression-free survival (PFS2) and overall survival (OS2) following SCS were compared using a Cox model adjusted for stage, age at SCS, and number of years between end of chemotherapy and SCS. RESULTS Of 374 patients, 62 (17%) underwent NACT-IDS and 312 (83%) PDS. Justification for NACT was disease extent (n = 57, 92%), comorbidities (n = 3, 5%), and thromboembolism (n = 2, 3%). The NACT-IDS cohort had a higher median age at SCS (64 years [IQR: 56-70] vs 59 years [IQR: 53-66]; P = .03), higher proportion of stage III/IV disease (100% vs 81%; P < .001), and shorter median interval between end of chemotherapy and SCS (1.5 years [IQR: 1.1-2.3] vs 1.9 years [IQR: 1.3-3.1]; P = .01). Achievement of complete gross resection at SCS did not differ between NACT-IDS and PDS (84% vs 88%; P = .18). PFS2 (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.83-1.71) and OS2 (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.57-1.63) did not vary by primary treatment modality after adjusting for clinically relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS Despite more extensive disease at presentation, patients with high-grade EOC who recur after NACT-IDS seem to have similar surgical and survival outcomes after SCS compared to patients who recur after PDS, suggesting that prior NACT-IDS should not preclude SCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Y Sia
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Beryl L Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Sarah Ehmann
- Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Carrie Luardo
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Aaron Praiss
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Ying L Liu
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Vance Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Feinberg J, Zivanovic O, Hannon M, McCready T, Desai P, Kim SH, Aviki EM, Mueller JJ, Jewell EL, Roche KL, Gardner GJ, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Brown CL, Abu-Rustum NR, Cracchiolo JR, Leitao MM, Broach V. Patient-reported symptoms after minimally invasive hysterectomy and association with postoperative complications. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 175:163-168. [PMID: 37390597 PMCID: PMC10939506 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe patient-reported postoperative symptoms and to evaluate the use of digital symptom tracking and alerts to detect postoperative complications. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a minimally invasive hysterectomy and enrolled in our Recovery Tracker program from 4/5/17-12/31/21. The Recovery Tracker is an at-home virtual tool used to track patient-reported postoperative symptoms for 10 days. Predefined thresholds for "red" and "yellow" alerts are based on symptom severity and timing. Data on patient demographics, surgery, and postoperative course were collected to evaluate the association of alerts with complications and compare outcomes of patients who did/did not enroll in the program. RESULTS Of 2362 eligible patients, 1694 (71.7%) enrolled in the Recovery Tracker program. Pain was the most severe symptom, followed by fatigue. Eighty-seven patients experienced 102 complications (5.1% complication rate) and 32 experienced 39 grade ≥ 2 complications (1.9% severe complication rate). Excluding complications that occurred prior to Recovery Tracker use, 1673 patients experienced 28 grade ≥ 2 complications. Of 345 patients (20.6%) who triggered a red alert, 13 (3.8%) had a grade ≥ 2 complication. Of 1328 patients (79.4%) with no red alerts, 15 (1.13%) had a grade ≥ 2 complication. Relative risk of a grade ≥ 2 complication if a red alert was triggered was 3.25 (95% CI: 1.6-6.9, P = .002). Rate of severe complications was significantly higher among patients who did not use the tool (3.3% vs 1.9%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS The Recovery Tracker tool may assist in early identification of postoperative symptoms after minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Feinberg
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Hannon
- Patient-Reported Outcomes Center, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Taylor McCready
- Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Priyanka Desai
- Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah H Kim
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emeline M Aviki
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol L Brown
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer R Cracchiolo
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vance Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Manning-Geist BL, Kahn R, Nemirovsky D, Girshman J, Laibangyang A, Gordhandas S, Iasonos A, Chui MH, Roche KL, Zivanovic O, Chi DS, Aghajanian C, Grisham RN. Chemotherapy response in low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma at a comprehensive cancer center: Readdressing the roles of platinum and cytotoxic therapies. Cancer 2023; 129:2004-2012. [PMID: 36951509 PMCID: PMC10682957 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on platinum sensitivity of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) in the upfront setting is lacking, and there is limited and contradictory information on chemotherapy responses in recurrent disease. METHODS Patients with LGSOC seen at a comprehensive cancer center from January 1, 1998 to September 30, 2021 were identified from institutional databases. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and to second- to fifth-line regimens was retrospectively characterized by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Wilcoxon rank-sum and two-tailed Fisher exact tests were employed. RESULTS Of 50 patients, 12 received platinum doublets for suboptimal residual disease and 11 as NACT. Of 12 patients with suboptimal residual disease, seven (58%) achieved objective responses (five partial responses [PRs] and two complete responses); of the 11 patients who underwent NACT, one (9%) achieved a PR (p = .027). The 15 remaining patients had stable disease on first-line platinum chemotherapy. Of 44 patients who recurred, 20 had RECIST-evaluable responses to second-line and 27 to third-line chemotherapy. Objective response rates to platinum-based chemotherapy were 22% (two of nine) in the second line and 10% (one of 10) in the third. In second and third lines, highest response rates were observed with nonplatinum chemotherapy with bevacizumab, at 100% (two of two) and 30% (three of 10), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Primary platinum-based chemotherapy has moderate activity in LGSOC and minimal activity in the recurrent setting, suggesting standard definitions of platinum sensitivity may not apply in LGSOC. In the second and third lines, nonplatinum chemotherapy/bevacizumab elicited the highest response rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beryl L. Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ryan Kahn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David Nemirovsky
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey Girshman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anya Laibangyang
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of OB/GYN, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT
| | - Sushmita Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - M. Herman Chui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Dennis S. Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Rachel N. Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gregory SN, Ryan CE, Hernandez JM, Sonke GS, Aronson SL, Zivanovic O, van Driel WJ. Primary Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) (OVHIPEC-2). Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1950-1952. [PMID: 36581719 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12957-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie N Gregory
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Carrie E Ryan
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hernandez
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Lot Aronson
- Department of Gynecology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Willemien J van Driel
- Department of Gynecology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Praiss AM, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Moukarzel L, Dessources K, Soldan K, Su K, Sonoda Y, Roche KL, Gardner GJ, Troso-Sandoval T, Tew WP, Grisham RN, Chi DS, O'Cearbhaill RE, Zivanovic O. Morbidity after secondary cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: An analysis of a randomized phase II trial. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 171:23-30. [PMID: 36804618 PMCID: PMC10206782 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess postoperative complications after secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), we conducted an exploratory analysis of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer enrolled in a randomized phase II trial. METHODS Complications occurring within 30 days of surgery were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0; only hemoglobin and platelet levels were assessed. Patients were grouped by CTCAE grade ≥ 3 and < 3 complications. RESULTS Among 83 eligible patients, 33 (40%) had grade ≥ 3 complications and 50 (60%) had grade < 3 complications; anemia and abdominal infections were the most common. There were no perioperative mortalities. Time to initiation of postoperative chemotherapy for patients with grade ≥ 3 and grade < 3 events was 34 days (range, 18-60) and 31 days (range, 21-43), respectively (P = .017). Median progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between patients with grade ≥ 3 and grade < 3 complications (11.2 months [95% CI: 9.3-14.4] vs 14.9 months [95% CI: 11.3-16.5], respectively; P = .186), nor did median overall survival (OS) (46.9 months [95% CI: 34-NE] vs 68.2 months [95% CI: 52.1-NE], respectively; P = .053). CONCLUSION Postoperative complications following SCS with or without HIPEC were associated with slight delays in chemotherapy initiation but did not significantly impact oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M Praiss
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Qin Zhou
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Lea Moukarzel
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kimberly Dessources
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Krysten Soldan
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Katy Su
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Tiffany Troso-Sandoval
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - William P Tew
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Brennan DJ, Driel WJV, Zivanovic O. The necessity to adhere to evidence-based indications for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:851-852. [PMID: 36898700 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Donal J Brennan
- UCD Gynaecological Oncology Group, UCD School of Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Willemien J van Driel
- Department of Gynaecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Liu YL, Manning-Geist BL, Knezevic A, Deng L, Bromberg M, Funt SA, Meisel JL, Zivanovic O, Roche KL, Sonoda Y, Gardner GJ, Grisham RN, O'Cearbhaill RE, Tew WP, Abu-Rustum NR, Chi DS, Aghajanian C, Feldman DR. Predicting outcomes in female germ cell tumors using a modified International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification system to guide management. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:93-101. [PMID: 36669327 PMCID: PMC10023473 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We previously developed preoperative and pre-chemotherapy modified versions of the male International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic model and assessed it in female patients with germ cell tumors (GCTs). We sought to validate these modified IGCCCG (mIGCCCG) models in a new cohort. METHODS We queried institutional databases for female patients with GCTs treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 1/1/1990-6/1/2020. The mIGCCCG model classifies patients with non-dysgerminomas as good, intermediate, or poor risk based on tumor markers using male IGCCCG cutoffs and absence/presence of non-pulmonary/peritoneal visceral metastasis. In dysgerminomas, good- and intermediate-risk groups are defined by absence/presence of non-pulmonary/peritoneal visceral metastasis. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated for each group in the validation and combined original and validation cohorts. Associations between individual clinical factors and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Among 183 female patients with GCTs, clinical characteristics and outcomes were similar between the original (n = 93) and validation (n = 90) cohorts. In multivariable models, higher stage, older age, and non-dysgerminoma histology predicted worse PFS and OS (p < 0.05). Among 162 patients who received chemotherapy, preoperative and pre-chemotherapy mIGCCCG models were significantly associated with PFS and OS (p < 0.001 for all groups). With the preoperative model, 3-year PFS rates were 94%, 76%, and 50% in the good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients, respectively; OS rates were 96%, 86%, and 52%, respectively. Even within stage groups, mIGCCCG risk classifications were associated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS A female-specific mIGCCCG risk model effectively stratifies patients and should be incorporated into clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying L Liu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Beryl L Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Knezevic
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luxue Deng
- Atlantic Health Systems, Morristown, NJ, USA
| | - Maria Bromberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel A Funt
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jane L Meisel
- Department of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - William P Tew
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Darren R Feldman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kahn RM, McMinn E, Yeoshoua E, Boerner T, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Long Roche K, Zivanovic O, Gardner GJ, Sonoda Y, O'Cearbhaill RE, Grisham RN, Tew W, Jones D, Huang J, Park BJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Chi DS. Intrathoracic surgery as part of primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: Going to the next level - A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center study. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:46-53. [PMID: 36621269 PMCID: PMC10023324 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated the feasibility, safety, and survival outcomes of intrathoracic cytoreduction during primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS We conducted a database review of patients with stage IIIB-IV ovarian (including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal) carcinoma who underwent PDS at our institution from 01/01/2006-9/30/2021. Patients who underwent intrathoracic cytoreduction as part of primary treatment were included. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or surgery for reasons other than cytoreduction were excluded. RESULTS Among 178 patients identified for inclusion, complete gross resection (CGR) in the abdomen and thorax was achieved in 131 (74%); 45 (25%) had optimal cytoreduction, and 2 (1%) had suboptimal cytoreduction. Thirty-one patients (17%) had at least one grade ≥ 3 complication; 8 were possibly related to intrathoracic cytoreduction. There were no deaths within 30 days following surgery. Median length of follow-up among survivors was 53.4 months. Among all patients, the median PFS was 33.6 months (95% CI: 24.7-61.9) and the 3-year PFS rate was 48.9% (95% CI: 41.2%-56.2%). Median OS was 81.3 months (95% CI: 68.9-103). When stratified by residual disease status, median PFS was 51.8 months when CGR was achieved versus 16.7 months with residual disease (HR: 2.17; P < .001) and median OS was 97.6 months when CGR was achieved versus 65.9 months with residual disease (HR: 2.05; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS Intrathoracic cytoreduction during PDS for advanced ovarian cancer is both safe and feasible. CGR can be achieved in patients with intrathoracic disease if properly selected, and could significantly improve both PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan M Kahn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Erin McMinn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Effi Yeoshoua
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Thomas Boerner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - William Tew
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - David Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Praiss AM, Moukarzel LA, Zivanovic O. Is there a role for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 35:21-26. [PMID: 36595646 PMCID: PMC10091236 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Our objective is to provide a history, rationale, and review of the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of ovarian cancer. RECENT FINDINGS In the last decade, there has been an increase in the literature regarding HIPEC in the treatment of ovarian cancer. The rationale for HIPEC extends from earlier trials demonstrating improved survival using intraperitoneal chemotherapy. HIPEC provides a one-time opportunity for intraperitoneal chemotherapy at the time of cytoreduction and with the addition of hyperthermia. Cisplatin HIPEC has been demonstrated to have a survival benefit when used in the interval cytoreductive setting. In terms of safety, nephroprotection remains a key concern when administering HIPEC. Sodium thiosulfate provides nephroprotection and should be considered when performing HIPEC. Various institutions have created multidisciplinary protocols for administering HIPEC, which include operating room staff, nursing, anesthesia, pharmacy, and surgical teams. SUMMARY HIPEC has a role in the treatment paradigm of ovarian cancer. Currently, HIPEC is approved in the interval cytoreductive surgery setting. Further trials are needed to understand the appropriate timing, chemotherapeutic agents, and protocolization of HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M. Praiss
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lea A. Moukarzel
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kahn R, Filippova O, Gordhandas S, An A, Straubhar AM, Zivanovic O, Gardner GJ, O'Cearbhaill RE, Tew WP, Grisham RN, Sonoda Y, Long Roche K, Abu-Rustum NR, Chi DS. Ten-year conditional probability of survival for patients with ovarian cancer: A new metric tailored to Long-term survivors. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 169:85-90. [PMID: 36521353 PMCID: PMC10364188 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We assessed a conditional probability of survival (CPS) model to determine the probability of living 10 years after ovarian cancer diagnosis after having already survived 5 years. METHODS We identified patients newly diagnosed with high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer from 1/1/2001-12/31/2009 and treated at our institution. Patients with <3 years follow-up were excluded. CPS was defined as the probability of surviving additional years (y) based on the condition a patient had already survived a given time (x): S(x + y)/S(x). Confidence intervals were estimated using a variation of Greenwood's formula. RESULTS Of 916 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 473 (52%) were diagnosed from 2001 to 2005 and 443 (48%) from 2006 to 2009. Median age at diagnosis was 60 years (range, 25-95). The conventional 10-year OS rate for all patients was 29% (95% CI: 26%-32%)-75% (95% CI: 68%-82%) for stage I/II disease, 22% (95% CI: 19%-26%) for stage III, and 6.9% (95% CI: 3.9%-12%) for stage IV. For patients <65 years, the 10-year CPS for 5-year survivors was 65% (95% CI: 59%-70%); for those ≥65 years, it was 48% (95% CI: 38%-57%). For patients <65 years, the 10-year CPS for 5-year survivors by stage was: stage I/II, 89% (95% CI: 81%-94%); stage III, 58% (95% CI: 50%-66%); and stage IV, 26% (95% CI: 12%-42%). For patients ≥65 years, rates by stage were 78% (95% CI: 53%-91%), 42% (95% CI: 30%-53%), and 29% (95% CI: 7%-56%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS For long-term survivors with high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer, CPS provides better prediction of survival than conventional methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Kahn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Olga Filippova
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Sushmita Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Anjile An
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Alli M Straubhar
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - William P Tew
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ehmann S, Shay K, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Sonoda Y, Gardner GJ, Long Roche K, Zammarrelli WA, Yeoushoua E, O'Cearbhaill RE, Zivanovic O, Chi DS. Outcomes and long-term follow-up by treatment type for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer managed at a tertiary cancer center: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 169:118-124. [PMID: 36565685 PMCID: PMC9928799 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess long-term outcomes of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer by treatment type. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IV ovarian cancer who underwent primary treatment at our tertiary cancer center from 01/01/2015-12/31/2015 were included. We reviewed electronic medical records for clinicopathological, treatment, and survival characteristics. RESULTS Of 153 patients, 88 (58%) had stage III and 65 (42%) stage IV disease. Median follow-up was 65.8 months (range, 3.6-75.3). Eighty-nine patients (58%) underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS), 50 (33%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS), and 14 (9%) received chemotherapy alone, without surgery (NSx). Median PFS to first recurrence was 26.2 months (range, 20.1-36.2), 13.5 months (range, 12-15.1), and 4.2 months (range, 1.1-5.8) in the PDS, IDS, and NSx groups, respectively (P < .001). At first recurrence/progression, 80 patients (72.7%) were treated with chemotherapy, 28 (25.5%) underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by chemotherapy, and 2 (1.8%) received no treatment. Seven patients (4.6%) underwent palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction. Overall, 62.7% received 1-3 lines of chemotherapy. The 5-year OS rates were 53.2% (95% CI: 44.7%-61%) for the entire cohort, 71.5% (95% CI: 60.2%-80%) for the PDS group, 35.2% (95% CI: 22.2-48.5%) for the IDS group, and 7.9% (95% CI: 0.5%-29.9%) for the NSx group. CONCLUSION The longitudinal treatment modalities and outcomes of patients with advanced ovarian cancer described here can be useful for patient counseling, long-term planning, and future comparison studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Ehmann
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kelly Shay
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - William A Zammarrelli
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Effi Yeoushoua
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ashley CW, Selenica P, Patel J, Wu M, Nincevic J, Lakhman Y, Zhou Q, Shah RH, Berger MF, Da Cruz Paula A, Brown DN, Marra A, Iasonos A, Momeni-Boroujeni A, Alektiar KM, Roche KL, Zivanovic O, Mueller JJ, Zamarin D, Broach VA, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM, Friedman CF, Jewell E, Reis-Filho JS, Ellenson LH, Aghajanian C, Abu-Rustum NR, Cadoo K, Weigelt B. High-Sensitivity Mutation Analysis of Cell-Free DNA for Disease Monitoring in Endometrial Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:410-421. [PMID: 36007103 PMCID: PMC9852004 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to determine whether sequencing analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in patients with prospectively accrued endometrial cancer captures the mutational repertoire of the primary lesion and allows for disease monitoring. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Peripheral blood was prospectively collected from 44 newly diagnosed patients with endometrial cancer over a 24-month period (i.e., baseline, postsurgery, every 6 months after). DNA from the primary endometrial cancers was subjected to targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 468 cancer-related genes, and cfDNA to a high-depth NGS assay of 129 genes with molecular barcoding. Sequencing data were analyzed using validated bioinformatics methods. RESULTS cfDNA levels correlated with surgical stage in endometrial cancers, with higher levels of cfDNA being present in advanced-stage disease. Mutations in cfDNA at baseline were detected preoperatively in 8 of 36 (22%) patients with sequencing data, all of whom were diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, high tumor volume, and/or aggressive histologic type. Of the 38 somatic mutations identified in the primary tumors also present in the cfDNA assay, 35 (92%) and 38 (100%) were detected at baseline and follow-up, respectively. In 6 patients with recurrent disease, changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fraction/variant allele fractions in cfDNA during follow-up closely mirrored disease progression and therapy response, with a lead time over clinically detected recurrence in two cases. The presence of ctDNA at baseline (P < 0.001) or postsurgery (P = 0.014) was significantly associated with reduced progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS cfDNA sequencing analysis in patients with endometrial cancer at diagnosis has prognostic value, and serial postsurgery cfDNA analysis enables disease and treatment response monitoring. See related commentary by Grant et al., p. 305.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles W. Ashley
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Current address: Department of OB/GYN, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juber Patel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelle Wu
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Josip Nincevic
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yulia Lakhman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronak H Shah
- Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnaud Da Cruz Paula
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David N Brown
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antonio Marra
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amir Momeni-Boroujeni
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaled M. Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J. Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dmitriy Zamarin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vance A Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M. Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claire F. Friedman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jorge S. Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lora H Ellenson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karen Cadoo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Current address: HOPe Directorate, St. James’s Hospital Dublin, Trinity College Dublin, Trinitiy St. James’s Cancer Institute
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mueller JJ, Rios-Doria E, Park KJ, Broach VA, Alektiar KM, Jewell EL, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR, Leitao MM, Gardner GJ. Sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial hyperplasia: A practice to preserve or abandon? Gynecol Oncol 2023; 168:1-7. [PMID: 36334496 PMCID: PMC10184678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare outcomes of patients with premalignant endometrial pathology undergoing hysterectomy with or without sentinel lymph node (SLN) removal. Outcomes of interest included surgical adverse events (AEs), cancer status on final pathology, postoperative treatment, and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular risk profiles. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with premalignant pathology on preoperative endometrial biopsy who underwent hysterectomy with or without SLN mapping/excision at our institution from 01/01/2017-12/31/2021. Clinical, pathologic, surgical, and TCGA profiling data were abstracted. Appropriate statistical tests were used. RESULTS Of 221 patients identified, 161 (73%) underwent hysterectomy with SLN excision and 60 (27%) underwent hysterectomy without SLN excision. Median age and body mass index were similar between groups. Median operative time was 130 min for those who underwent SLN mapping/excision versus 136 min for those who did not (p = 0.6). Thirty-day postoperative AE rates were 9% (n = 15/161) and 13% (n = 8/60), respectively (p = 0.9). Ninety-eight (44%) of 221 patients had grade 1-2 endometrioid endometrial cancer on final pathology (4 [4%] were stage IB or higher). Ten (10%) of 98 patients, all within the SLN group, received adjuvant treatment. Among all patients, of 33 (15%) with TCGA molecular classification data, 27 (82%) had copy number-low, 3 (9%) microsatellite instability-high, 2 (6%) POLE-ultramutated, and 1 (3%) copy number-high disease. CONCLUSIONS SLN assessment appears safe, detects a small number of occult nodal metastases for those upstaged, and provides additional staging information that can guide adjuvant treatment. SLN mapping should be discussed in preoperative counseling and offered using a shared decision-making approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Eric Rios-Doria
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kay J Park
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vance A Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaled M Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Moukarzel LA, Nguyen N, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Schiavone MB, Ramesh B, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR, Mueller JJ, Long Roche K, Jewell EL, Broach V, Zivanovic O, Leitao MM. Association of bowel preparation with surgical-site infection in gynecologic oncology surgery: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 168:100-106. [PMID: 36423444 PMCID: PMC9797441 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between bowel preparation and surgical-site infection (SSI) incidence following colorectal resection during gynecologic oncology surgery. METHODS This post-hoc analysis used data from a randomized controlled trial of patients enrolled from 03/01/2016-08/20/2019 with presumed gynecologic malignancy investigating negative-pressure wound therapy among those requiring laparotomy. Patients were treated preoperatively without bowel preparation, oral antibiotic bowel preparation (OABP), or OABP plus mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) per surgeon preference. Univariate and multivariable analyses with stepwise model selection for SSI were performed for confirmed gynecologic malignancies requiring colorectal resection. RESULTS Of 161 cases, 15 (9%) had no preparation, 39 (24%) OABP only, and 107 (66%) OABP+MBP. The overall SSI rate was 19% (n = 31)-53% (n = 8/15) in the no preparation, 21% (n = 8/39) in the OABP alone, and 14% (n = 15/107) in the OABP+MBP groups (P = 0.003). The difference between OABP and OABP+MBP was non-significant (P = 0.44). The median length of stay was 9 (range, 6-12), 6 (range, 5-8), and 7 days (range, 6-10), respectively (P = 0.045). The overall complication rate (34%; n = 54) did not significantly vary by preparation type (P = 0.23). On univariate logistic regression analysis, OABP (OR, 0.23; 95% CI: 0.06-0.80) and OABP+MBP (OR, 0.14; 95% CI: 0.04-0.45) were associated with decreased SSI risk compared to no preparation (P = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, both methods of preparation retained a significant impact on SSI rates (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION Bowel preparation is associated with reduced SSI incidence and is beneficial for patients undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery with anticipated colorectal resection. Further investigation is needed to determine whether OABP alone is sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea A Moukarzel
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nguyen Nguyen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Metropolitan Methodist Hospital, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Bhavani Ramesh
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vance Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Manning-Geist BL, Gordhandas SB, Hodgson A, Zhou QC, Iasonos A, Chi DS, Ellenson L, Aghajanian C, Abu-Rustum NR, Leitao MM, Roche KL, Rubinstein MM, Sonoda Y, Alektiar K, Weigelt B, Zivanovic O, Grisham RN. Management of patients with early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma: risk stratification and fertility conservation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:1576-1582. [PMID: 36368707 PMCID: PMC9822864 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to describe clinicopathologic and treatment factors associated with oncologic outcomes in patients with early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma undergoing complete staging and in a sub-set of these patients undergoing fertility-conserving surgery. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma initially treated at our institution from January 1, 1996 to March 31, 2020. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test. Survival-associated variables were identified by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Of 182 patients, mismatch repair and p53 protein expression were assessed by immunohistochemistry on 82 and 66 samples, respectively. There were no significant differences in progression-free survival or overall survival between mismatch repair-deficient (n=6, including 4 patients with Lynch syndrome; 7.3%) and mismatch repair-proficient patients, whereas aberrant p53 expression (n=3; 4.5%) was associated with worse progression-free (p<0.001) and overall survival (p=0.01). Patients with stage IA/IC1 disease had a 95% 5-year overall survival rate (95% CI 88% to 98%); patients with stage IC2/IC3 disease had a similar 5-year overall survival rate (76%; 95% CI 54% to 88%) to that of patients with stage IIA/IIB disease (82%; 95% CI 54% to 94%). There was no difference in 5-year overall survival in patients with stage IA/IC1 undergoing chemotherapy versus observation (94% vs 100%). Nine patients underwent fertility-sparing surgery and none experienced recurrence. Of five patients who pursued fertility, all had successful pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS In patients with completely staged ovarian clear cell carcinoma, those with stage IA/IC1 disease have an excellent prognosis, regardless of chemotherapy. Aberrant p53 expression may portend worse outcomes. Additional investigation is warranted on the safety of fertility conservation in patients with stage IA/IC1 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beryl L. Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sushmita B. Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anjelica Hodgson
- Gynecologic Pathology Service, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Qin C. Zhou
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Dennis S. Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lora Ellenson
- Gynecologic Pathology Service, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M. Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria M. Rubinstein
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaled Alektiar
- External Beam Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy Services, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Gynecologic Pathology Service, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N. Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vázquez-García I, Uhlitz F, Ceglia N, Lim JLP, Wu M, Mohibullah N, Niyazov J, Ruiz AEB, Boehm KM, Bojilova V, Fong CJ, Funnell T, Grewal D, Havasov E, Leung S, Pasha A, Patel DM, Pourmaleki M, Rusk N, Shi H, Vanguri R, Williams MJ, Zhang AW, Broach V, Chi DS, Da Cruz Paula A, Gardner GJ, Kim SH, Lennon M, Long Roche K, Sonoda Y, Zivanovic O, Kundra R, Viale A, Derakhshan FN, Geneslaw L, Issa Bhaloo S, Maroldi A, Nunez R, Pareja F, Stylianou A, Vahdatinia M, Bykov Y, Grisham RN, Liu YL, Lakhman Y, Nikolovski I, Kelly D, Gao J, Schietinger A, Hollmann TJ, Bakhoum SF, Soslow RA, Ellenson LH, Abu-Rustum NR, Aghajanian C, Friedman CF, McPherson A, Weigelt B, Zamarin D, Shah SP. Ovarian cancer mutational processes drive site-specific immune evasion. Nature 2022; 612:778-786. [PMID: 36517593 PMCID: PMC9771812 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05496-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is an archetypal cancer of genomic instability1-4 patterned by distinct mutational processes5,6, tumour heterogeneity7-9 and intraperitoneal spread7,8,10. Immunotherapies have had limited efficacy in HGSOC11-13, highlighting an unmet need to assess how mutational processes and the anatomical sites of tumour foci determine the immunological states of the tumour microenvironment. Here we carried out an integrative analysis of whole-genome sequencing, single-cell RNA sequencing, digital histopathology and multiplexed immunofluorescence of 160 tumour sites from 42 treatment-naive patients with HGSOC. Homologous recombination-deficient HRD-Dup (BRCA1 mutant-like) and HRD-Del (BRCA2 mutant-like) tumours harboured inflammatory signalling and ongoing immunoediting, reflected in loss of HLA diversity and tumour infiltration with highly differentiated dysfunctional CD8+ T cells. By contrast, foldback-inversion-bearing tumours exhibited elevated immunosuppressive TGFβ signalling and immune exclusion, with predominantly naive/stem-like and memory T cells. Phenotypic state associations were specific to anatomical sites, highlighting compositional, topological and functional differences between adnexal tumours and distal peritoneal foci. Our findings implicate anatomical sites and mutational processes as determinants of evolutionary phenotypic divergence and immune resistance mechanisms in HGSOC. Our study provides a multi-omic cellular phenotype data substrate from which to develop and interpret future personalized immunotherapeutic approaches and early detection research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Vázquez-García
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Florian Uhlitz
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Ceglia
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamie L P Lim
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelle Wu
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neeman Mohibullah
- Integrated Genomics Operation, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juliana Niyazov
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arvin Eric B Ruiz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin M Boehm
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Viktoria Bojilova
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher J Fong
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tyler Funnell
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diljot Grewal
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eliyahu Havasov
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samantha Leung
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arfath Pasha
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Druv M Patel
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maryam Pourmaleki
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole Rusk
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hongyu Shi
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rami Vanguri
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc J Williams
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Allen W Zhang
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vance Broach
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnaud Da Cruz Paula
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah H Kim
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Lennon
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ritika Kundra
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Agnes Viale
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fatemeh N Derakhshan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luke Geneslaw
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shirin Issa Bhaloo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ana Maroldi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rahelly Nunez
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fresia Pareja
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anthe Stylianou
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mahsa Vahdatinia
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yonina Bykov
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ying L Liu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yulia Lakhman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ines Nikolovski
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Kelly
- Department of Information Systems, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jianjiong Gao
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Schietinger
- Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Travis J Hollmann
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Samuel F Bakhoum
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert A Soslow
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lora H Ellenson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claire F Friedman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew McPherson
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dmitriy Zamarin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Sohrab P Shah
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rios-Doria E, Filippova OT, Straubhar AM, Chi A, Awowole I, Sandhu J, Broach V, Mueller JJ, Gardner GJ, Jewell EL, Zivanovic O, Leitao MM, Long Roche K, Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y. A modern-day experience with Brunschwig's operation: Outcomes associated with pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:277-282. [PMID: 36064678 PMCID: PMC10204127 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate postoperative and oncologic outcomes associated with pelvic exenteration for non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies. METHODS This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies at our institution from 1/1/2010-12/31/2019. Palliative exenteration cases were excluded from survival analysis. Postoperative complications were early (≤30 days) or late (31-180 days). Complications were graded using a validated institutional scale. Major complications were considered grade ≥ 3. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. RESULTS Of 100 patients identified, 89 underwent pelvic exenteration for recurrent disease, 5 for palliation, 5 for primary disease, and 1 for persistent disease. Thirty percent had cervical, 27% vulvar, 24% uterine, and 19% vaginal cancer. Sixty-two percent underwent total, 30% anterior, and 8% posterior exenteration. No deaths occurred intraoperatively or within 30 days of surgery. Six patients died after 30 days. Ninety-seven experienced a perioperative complication-49 early, 1 late, and 47 both. Fifty experienced a major complication-22 (44%) early, 19 (38%) late, and 9 (18%) both. No variables were statistically associated with complication development. The 3-year progression-free survival rate was 61.0%; the 3-year overall survival rate was 61.6%. Of 58 surviving patients, 16 (28%) and 4 (7%) were alive after 5 and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSION The overall complication rate for pelvic exenteration remains high. No variables demonstrated association with complication development as the rate was nearly 100%. The low rate of perioperative mortality is likely due to improved perioperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Rios-Doria
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olga T Filippova
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alli M Straubhar
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ibraheem Awowole
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Perinatology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ife, Nigeria
| | - Jaspreet Sandhu
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vance Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Manning-Geist B, Gordhandas S, Liu YL, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Da Cruz Paula A, Mandelker D, Roche KL, Zivanovic O, Maio A, Kemel Y, Chi DS, O’Cearbhaill RE, Aghajanian C, Weigelt B, Chui MH, Grisham RN. MAPK Pathway Genetic Alterations Are Associated with Prolonged Overall Survival in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:4456-4465. [PMID: 35443055 PMCID: PMC9582036 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-4183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize the somatic mutational landscape, investigate associations between genetic alterations and clinical outcomes, and determine the prevalence of pathogenic germline mutations in low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients with LGSC tumors who underwent panel-based sequencing of up to 505 genes were identified. Data on somatic and germline mutations; copy-number alterations; and clinicopathologic features, including age at diagnosis, platinum sensitivity, and overall survival (OS), were collected. RESULTS Following central pathology rereview, 119 patients with LGSC were identified for analysis. Of these, 110 (92%) had advanced-stage disease (stages III/IV). Somatic KRAS (33%), NRAS (11%), EIF1AX (10%), and BRAF (11%) alterations were the most common; MAPK pathway alterations were found in 60% (n = 71) of LGSCs. KRAS mutations were significantly associated with age at diagnosis more than 50 years (P = 0.02) and platinum-sensitive disease (P = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, MAPK pathway alterations (P = 0.02) and platinum sensitivity (P = 0.005) were significantly associated with improved OS. Seventy-nine patients (66%) underwent germline genetic testing; seven pathogenic germline mutations were identified: MUTYH (n = 2), BAP1 (n = 1), RB1 (n = 1), CHEK2 (n = 1), APC (n = 1), and FANCA (n = 1). There were no germline BRCA1/2 mutations. One germline MUTYH-associated LGSC harbored loss-of-heterozygosity at the MUTYH locus, and the patient with the germline BAP1 mutation also harbored a somatic BAP1 frameshift mutation. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that MAPK pathway alterations in LGSC, including KRAS mutations, are independently associated with platinum sensitivity and prolonged survival. Germline data, which were limited, identified few pathogenic germline mutations in patients with LGSC. See related commentary by Veneziani and Oza, p. 4357.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beryl Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sushmita Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ying L. Liu
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnaud Da Cruz Paula
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diana Mandelker
- Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Maio
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yelena Kemel
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S. Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin E. O’Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Herman Chui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N. Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gordhandas S, Schlappe BA, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Leitao MM, Park KJ, de Brot L, Alektiar KM, Sabbatini PJ, Aghajanian CA, Friedman C, Zivanovic O, O'Cearbhaill RE. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of metastasis. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 43:101058. [PMID: 35967833 PMCID: PMC9365998 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
A two-tier system (limited- or extensive-stage) has been used for small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix. Concordance probability estimates found that the 2018 FIGO staging system predicted outcome better than the two-tier system. 38% of patients had metastases at initial diagnosis, and an additional 38% at subsequent recurrence. 38 patients (60%) had brain imaging: 1 (3%) had brain metastasis at diagnosis and 8 (21%) at subsequent recurrence. Providers should have a low threshold for brain imaging in patients with advanced disease or neurologic symptoms.
Objectives To describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNCC) and determine the staging system most predictive of outcome—the two-tier (limited-stage [LS] vs. extensive-stage [ES]) or International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. Methods Patients with SCNCC evaluated at our institution from 1/1/1990–6/30/2021 were included. Medical records were reviewed for variables of interest. Appropriate statistical tests were performed to determine associations. Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method. Concordance probability estimates (CPEs) were calculated to evaluate the prediction probability of the staging systems. Results Of 63 patients, 41 had LS and 22 ES SCNCC. Patients with ES disease were significantly older than those with LS disease (median, 54 and 37 years, respectively; p < 0.001). Smoking status, race, and history of HPV were not associated with stage or outcomes. Forty-eight patients had metastatic disease (24 [50%] at initial diagnosis). The most common first sites of metastasis were lung (n = 20/48, 42%), lymph nodes (n = 19/48, 40%), and liver (n = 13/48, 27%). Nine patients had brain metastasis (8 symptomatic at recurrence; 1 asymptomatic at initial diagnosis). Both staging systems were associated with progression-free and overall survival. Adjusted CPE found the FIGO staging system was more predictive of outcomes than the two-tier staging system. Conclusions Providers should have a low threshold to obtain brain imaging for patients with SCNCC, especially in the presence of visceral metastases. FIGO staging should be used to classify SCNCC. Further research is necessary to understand prognostic factors of this rare disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushmita Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brooke A. Schlappe
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Currently at: Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M. Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kay J. Park
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Louise de Brot
- A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Anatomic Pathology Department, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Kaled M. Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul J. Sabbatini
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol A. Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claire Friedman
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Corresponding author: Gynecology Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275, York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kahn R, Boerner T, An A, Gardner G, Roche KL, Sonoda Y, Zivanovic O, Grisham R, Abu-Rustum N, Chi D. A preoperative tool for estimating the risk of blood transfusion over an ovarian cancer debulking surgery (113). Gynecol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(22)01339-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
37
|
Moukarzel L, Nguyen N, Zhou Q, Ramesh B, Chi D, Sonoda Y, Brown A, Abu-Rustum N, Mueller J, Roche KL, Jewell E, Broach V, Zivanovic O, Leitao M. The impact of bowel preparation on surgical site infection rates in gynecologic oncology surgery, post-hoc analysis from a randomized controlled trial (550). Gynecol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(22)01771-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
38
|
Kahn R, Filippova O, Straubhar A, An A, Zivanovic O, Gardner G, O’Cearbhaill R, Tew W, Sonoda Y, Roche KL, Chi D. Ten-year conditional probability of survival for patients with ovarian cancer: A new metric for the new millennium (480). Gynecol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(22)01701-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
39
|
Ehmann S, Lam C, Zhou Q, Grisham R, Roche KL, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Chi D, Gardner G. Oncologic outcomes of secondary cytoreductive surgery in the era of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors maintenance (549). Gynecol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(22)01770-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
40
|
Mueller J, Rios-Doria E, Park K, Broach V, Jewell E, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum N, Leitao M, Gardner G. Sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial hyperplasia: A practice to preserve or abandon? (117). Gynecol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(22)01343-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
41
|
Vázquez-García I, Uhlitz F, Ceglia N, Lim JL, Wu M, Mohibullah N, Ruiz AEB, Boehm KM, Bojilova V, Fong CJ, Funnell T, Grewal D, Havasov E, Leung S, Pasha A, Patel DM, Pourmaleki M, Rusk N, Shi H, Vanguri R, Williams MJ, Zhang AW, Broach V, Chi DS, Paula ADC, Gardner GJ, Kim SH, Lennon M, Roche KL, Sonoda Y, Zivanovic O, Kundra R, Viale A, Bykov Y, Derakhshan FN, Geneslaw L, Maroldi A, Schietinger A, Hollmann TJ, Bakhoum SF, Soslow RA, Ellenson LH, Abu-Rustum N, Aghajanian C, Friedman CF, McPherson A, Weigelt B, Zamarin D, Shah SP. Abstract 2553: Immune and malignant cell phenotypes of ovarian cancer are determined by distinct mutational processes. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-2553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is an archetypal cancer of genomic instability patterned by distinct mutational processes, a high degree of tumor heterogeneity and intraperitoneal spread. As immunotherapies have thus far proven ineffective in this disease, we sought to establish the determinants of immune recognition, avoidance and evasion in disease natural history to gain insight into the co-evolutionary processes underlying malignant progression and host immunity. Accordingly we linked mutational processes and anatomic sites of tumor foci as determinants of tumor microenvironment (TME) cellular phenotypes within and between patients using genome-based stratification of homologous recombination proficient (HRP) and deficient (HRD) disease subtypes, and profiling single cell phenotypes from ~1 million cells including cancer cells, T cells, myeloid cells and fibroblasts derived from single cell RNA sequencing, and in situ spatial profiling of histopathology, cancer cell, T cell and macrophage states of 160 tumor sites obtained from 42 treatment-naive patients. Mutational processes in HRD-Dup (BRCA1 mutant-like) tumors were associated with cancer cell-intrinsic JAK/STAT signaling and predominance of highly-differentiated dysfunctional CD8+ T cells in the TME; HRD-Del (BRCA2 mutant-like) tumors were associated with cancer cell-intrinsic NF-κB and TNFα signaling and expansion of M2-type macrophages; and foldback inversion (FBI, HRP) tumors were associated with cancer cell-intrinsic TGFβ signaling and overall immune exclusion, with a predominance of naive/central memory-like T cells. Increased neoantigen burden and HLA loss of heterozygosity (LOH) were defining genomic features of the HRD, but not FBI tumors. These mechanisms of escape from immune predation, with distinct signalling activity and losses of HLA allelic diversity in HRD tumors, connect evolutionary selection with immunological phenotypic states. Multi-region sampling revealed substantial spatial variation, highlighting site-specific properties of the ovary and fallopian tube as putative “immune-privileged” sites. These results establish that in patients with widespread intraperitoneal disease, the local properties of organ sites may determine malignant cell selection and immune pruning. Furthermore, we observed that spatial cellular topology is a major determinant of tumor-immune interactions by in situ protein measurements, revealing ubiquitous PD1-PDL1 interactions in HRD tumors. Together, our findings yield mechanistic insights for how distinct mutational processes in HGSOC lead to diverse patterns of within- and between- patient variation in immune resistance, which can be exploited to optimize future immuno-therapeutic treatment strategies.
Citation Format: Ignacio Vázquez-García, Florian Uhlitz, Nicholas Ceglia, Jamie L. Lim, Michelle Wu, Neeman Mohibullah, Arvin Eric B. Ruiz, Kevin M. Boehm, Viktoria Bojilova, Christopher J. Fong, Tyler Funnell, Diljot Grewal, Eliyahu Havasov, Samantha Leung, Arfath Pasha, Druv M. Patel, Maryam Pourmaleki, Nicole Rusk, Hongyu Shi, Rami Vanguri, Marc J. Williams, Allen W. Zhang, Vance Broach, Dennis S. Chi, Arnaud Da Cruz Paula, Ginger J. Gardner, Sarah H. Kim, Matthew Lennon, Kara Long Roche, Yukio Sonoda, Oliver Zivanovic, Ritika Kundra, Agnes Viale, Yonina Bykov, Fatemeh N. Derakhshan, Luke Geneslaw, Ana Maroldi, Andrea Schietinger, Travis J. Hollmann, Samuel F. Bakhoum, Robert A. Soslow, Lora H. Ellenson, Nadeem Abu-Rustum, Carol Aghajanian, Claire F. Friedman, Andrew McPherson, Britta Weigelt, MSK SPECTRUM Consortium, Dmitriy Zamarin, Sohrab P. Shah. Immune and malignant cell phenotypes of ovarian cancer are determined by distinct mutational processes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2553.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jamie L. Lim
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michelle Wu
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tyler Funnell
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Diljot Grewal
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Arfath Pasha
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Druv M. Patel
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Nicole Rusk
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hongyu Shi
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rami Vanguri
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Vance Broach
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Dennis S. Chi
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Sarah H. Kim
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Yukio Sonoda
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Ritika Kundra
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Agnes Viale
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yonina Bykov
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Luke Geneslaw
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ana Maroldi
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Aviki EM, Manning-Geist BL, Sokolowski SS, Newman T, Blinder VS, Chino F, Doyle SM, Liebhaber A, Gordhandas SB, Brown CL, Broach V, Chi DS, Jewell EL, Leitao MM, Long Roche K, Mueller JJ, Sonoda Y, Zivanovic O, Gardner GJ, Abu-Rustum NR. Risk factors for financial toxicity in patients with gynecologic cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:817.e1-817.e9. [PMID: 34902319 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cost of cancer care is high and rising. Evidence of increased patient cost burden is prevalent in the medical literature and has been defined as "financial toxicity," the financial hardship and financial concerns experienced by patients because of a disease and its related treatments. With targeted therapies and growing out-of-pocket costs, patient financial toxicity is a growing concern among patients with gynecologic cancer. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the prevalence of financial toxicity and identify its risk factors in patients with gynecologic cancer treated at a large cancer center using objective data. STUDY DESIGN Using institutional databases, we identified patients with gynecologic cancer treated from January 2016 to December 2018. Patients with a preinvasive disease were excluded. Financial toxicity was defined according to institutionally derived metrics as the presence of ≥1 of the following: ≥2 bills sent to collections, application or granting of a payment plan, settlement, bankruptcy, financial assistance program enrollment, or a finance-related social work visit. Clinical characteristics were gathered using a 2-year look-back from the time of the first financial toxicity event or a randomly selected treatment date for those not experiencing toxicity. Risk factors were assessed using chi-squared tests. All significant variables on univariate analysis were included in the logistic regression model. RESULTS Of the 4655 patients included in the analysis, 1155 (25%) experienced financial toxicity. In the univariate analysis, cervical cancer (35%), stage 3 or 4 disease (24% and 30%, respectively), younger age (35% for age <30 years), nonpartnered marital status (31%), Black (45%) or Hispanic (37%) race and ethnicity, self-pay (48%) or commercial insurance (30%), clinical trial participation (31%), more imaging studies (39% for ≥9), ≥1 emergency department visit (36%), longer inpatient stays (36% for ≥20 days), and more outpatient clinician visits (41% for ≥20 visits) were significantly associated with financial toxicity (P<.01). In multivariate analysis, younger age, nonpartnered marital status, Black and Hispanic race and ethnicity, commercial insurance, more imaging studies, and more outpatient physician visits were significantly associated with financial toxicity. CONCLUSION Financial toxicity is an increasing problem for patients with gynecologic cancer. Our analysis, using objective measures of financial toxicity, has suggested that demographic factors and healthcare utilization metrics may be used to proactively identify at-risk patients for financial toxicity.
Collapse
|
43
|
Penn CA, Carballo EV, Walsh CS, Zivanovic O, Kim KH. Cost-effectiveness of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at primary cytoreduction of epithelial ovarian cancer based on residual disease status. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 41:101009. [PMID: 35652061 PMCID: PMC9149186 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Evaluation of cost-effectiveness of HIPEC at primary cytoreduction surgery (PCS) until results of OVHIPEC-2 are available. Total costs for PCS were $32,169 compared to $38,405 for PCS plus HIPEC. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $7,854/life year survived (LYS) for all patients. HIPEC + PCS appears cost effective regardless of residual disease status at the time of surgery.
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin when used at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been shown to provide a survival advantage compared to interval cytoreduction alone for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in a cost-effective manner. A recent large multi-center retrospective cohort study showed a survival advantage with HIPEC given during primary debulking surgery compared to surgery alone. While there is an ongoing randomized controlled trial examining HIPEC at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) before chemotherapy (OVHIPEC-2), there is currently no study of this practice in the United States or cost data to inform incorporation of this practice. To help guide the use of HIPEC in the upfront setting until the results of the OVHIPEC-2 are available in 2026, a decision-analytic cost-effectiveness model of the US healthcare sector was developed for patients undergoing PCS with or without HIPEC. Effectiveness inputs were extracted from a Chinese retrospective cohort study of 425 patients who underwent PCS with HIPEC and 159 patients who underwent PCS alone. We found incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER) of $9,789 per life year saved (LYS) for optimal PCS, $18,164/LYS for suboptimal PCS, and $7,854/LYS for all patients. Our findings provide preliminary data to support that HIPEC at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery can be considered cost-effective regardless of residual disease status when using a standard willingness to pay threshold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney A. Penn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Corresponding author.
| | - Erica V. Carballo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christine S. Walsh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth H. Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Moukarzel LA, Zivanovic O. Updates to the Literature on Anastomotic Leaks After Rectosigmoid Resection for Gynecologic Malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:4670-4672. [PMID: 35583692 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11823-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lea A Moukarzel
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sia TY, Manning-Geist B, Gordhandas S, Murali R, Marra A, Liu YL, Friedman CF, Hollmann TJ, Zivanovic O, Chi DS, Weigelt B, Konner JA, Zamarin D. Treatment of ovarian clear cell carcinoma with immune checkpoint blockade: a case series. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:1017-1024. [PMID: 35545291 PMCID: PMC9356988 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although immune checkpoint blockade has demonstrated limited effectiveness against ovarian cancer, subset analyses from completed trials suggest possible superior efficacy in the clear cell carcinoma subtype. OBJECTIVE To describe the outcomes of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint blockade. METHODS This was a single-institution, retrospective case series of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma treated with a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor with or without concomitant cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibition between January 2016 and June 2021. Demographic variables, tumor microenvironment, molecular data, and clinical outcomes were examined. Time to treatment failure was defined as the number of days between start of treatment and next line of treatment or death. RESULTS A total of 16 eligible patients were analyzed. The median treatment duration was 56 days (range 14-574); median time to treatment failure was 99 days (range 27-1568). The reason for discontinuation was disease progression in 88% of cases. Four patients (25%) experienced durable clinical benefit (time to treatment failure ≥180 days). One patient was treated twice with combined immune checkpoint blockade and experienced a complete response each time. All 12 patients who underwent clinical tumor-normal molecular profiling had microsatellite-stable disease, and all but one had low tumor mutation burden. Multiplex immunofluorescence analysis available from pre-treatment biopsies of two patients with clinical benefit demonstrated abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes expressing PD-1. CONCLUSION Our study suggests a potential role for immune checkpoint blockade in patients with clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Identification of genetic and microenvironmental biomarkers predictive of response will be key to guide therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Y Sia
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beryl Manning-Geist
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sushmita Gordhandas
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rajmohan Murali
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Antonio Marra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ying L Liu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Claire F Friedman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Travis J Hollmann
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jason A Konner
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dmitriy Zamarin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA .,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Manning-Geist BL, Cowan RA, Schlappe B, Braxton K, Sonoda Y, Long Roche K, Leitao Jr MM, Chi DS, Zivanovic O, Abu-Rustum NR, Mueller JJ. Assessment of wound perfusion with near-infrared angiography: A prospective feasibility study. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 40:100940. [PMID: 35169608 PMCID: PMC8829563 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
There are no validated technologies for skin perfusion assessment at time of laparotomy closure. This prospective non-randomized study failed to demonstrate feasibility of skin perfusion measurement using NIR angiography. Successful subjective perfusion assessment with NIR angiography suggests an ongoing role for investigation of this technology.
Objective To assess the feasibility of quantitatively measuring skin perfusion before and after suture or staple skin closure of vertical laparotomies using indocyanine green (ICG) uptake with near-infrared angiography. Methods This was a prospective, non-randomized feasibility study of patients undergoing surgery with a gynecologic oncology service from 2/2018–8/2019. Feasibility was defined as the ability to quantitatively measure ICG uptake adjacent to the wound at the time of skin closure in ≥ 80% of patients. Patients were assigned suture or staple skin closure in a sequential, non-randomized fashion. Skin perfusion was recorded using a near-infrared imaging system after ICG injection and measured by video analysis at predefined points before and after skin closure. Clinicodemographic, pre- and intraoperative details, and surgical secondary events were recorded. Results Of 20 participants, 10 were assigned staple closure and 10 suture closure. Two patients (10%) achieved objective quantification of ICG fluorescence before and after laparotomy closure, failing the predefined feasibility threshold of ≥ 80%. Reasons for failed quantification included overexposure (12), insufficient ICG signal uptake (6), and insufficient video quality (2). Near-infrared angiography wound perfusion was subjectively appreciated intraoperatively in 85% (17/20) of patients before and after wound closure. Conclusions Objective assessment of laparotomy skin closure with near-infrared angiography–measured perfusion did not meet the pre-specified feasibility threshold. Adjustments to the protocol to minimize overexposure may be warranted. The ability to subjectively appreciate ICG perfusion with near-infrared angiography suggests a possible role for near-infrared angiography in the real-time intraoperative assessment of wound perfusion, particularly in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jennifer J. Mueller
- Corresponding author at: Gynecology Service, Department of Surgerym, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Carter J, Abu-Rustum NR, Saban S, Chen LY, Vickers AJ, Tin AL, Billanti G, Connors NA, Broach V, Brown CL, Chi DS, Gardner GJ, Goldfrank DJ, Jewell EL, Leitao MM, Long Roche KC, Mueller JJ, Sonoda Y, Zivanovic O. Gynecologic Survivorship Tool: Development, Implementation, and Symptom Outcomes. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2022; 6:e2100154. [PMID: 35239413 PMCID: PMC8920469 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the development and implementation of a new digital health clinical tool (Gynecologic Survivorship Tool [GST]) for symptom management of women surgically treated for gynecologic cancer; to assess its feasibility; and to conduct a retrospective review of the data. MATERIALS AND METHODS The GST was developed on the basis of a comprehensive review of the literature, multidisciplinary expert opinion, and feedback from women with a history of gynecologic cancer. It is composed of 17 questions addressing six main categories-gynecologic health (abnormal bleeding/pain), lymphedema, vaginal/vulvar dryness, sexual health, menopause (hot flushes/sleep difficulties), and bowel/urinary issues. An electronic version using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Engage platform was piloted in two clinics for patients with endometrial or cervical cancer. Health information was generated into clinical summaries and identified concerns for actionable response. Associations of symptom and survey time point were assessed by longitudinal models using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS From January 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020, 3,357 GST assessments were assigned to 1,405 patients, with a 71% completion rate (90% within 5 minutes). Sixty-eight percent were performed at home via a patient portal, 32% at follow-ups using a clinic iPad. The most common symptoms were bowel problems, swelling/fluid, pain during examination, vaginal or vulvar dryness, and vaginal bleeding. Implementation challenges included improving patient compliance and ensuring that reports were reviewed by all clinical teams. We developed screening e-mails detailing patients whose assessments were due, planned training sessions for multidisciplinary teams, and incorporated feedback on methods for reviewing symptoms reports. CONCLUSION The GST demonstrated feasibility, a high completion rate, and minimal time commitment. It was an effective electronic reporting mechanism for patients, enabling the medical team to develop specific strategies for alleviating bothersome symptoms during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne Carter
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY,Jeanne Carter, PhD, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave, Floor 7, New York, NY 10022; e-mail:
| | - Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sally Saban
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ling Y. Chen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J. Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amy L. Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gabriela Billanti
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicole A. Connors
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Vance Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Carol L. Brown
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Dennis S. Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ginger J. Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Deborah J. Goldfrank
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Elizabeth L. Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mario M. Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Kara C. Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Jennifer J. Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Moukarzel LA, Ferrando L, Dopeso H, Stylianou A, Basili T, Pareja F, Da Cruz Paula A, Zoppoli G, Abu-Rustum NR, Reis-Filho JS, Long Roche K, Tew WP, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Zamarin D, Aghajanian C, O'Cearbhaill RE, Zivanovic O, Weigelt B. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with carboplatin induces distinct transcriptomic changes in ovarian tumor and normal tissues. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 165:239-247. [PMID: 35292180 PMCID: PMC9064951 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with carboplatin on the transcriptomic profiles of normal and ovarian cancer (OC) tissues. METHODS Normal and tumor samples from four OCs were prospectively collected pre- and immediately post-HIPEC treatment and subjected to RNA-sequencing. Differential gene expression, gene ontology enrichment and pathway analyses were performed. Heat shock protein and immune-response protein expression was assessed using protein arrays and western blotting. RESULTS RNA-sequencing revealed 4231 and 322 genes significantly differentially expressed between pre- and post-treatment normal and OC tissues, respectively (both adjusted p-value <0.05). Gene enrichment analyses demonstrated that the most significantly upregulated genes in normal tissues played a role in immune as well as heat shock response (both adjusted p < 0.001). In contrast, HIPEC induced an increased expression of primarily heat shock response and protein folding-related genes in tumor tissues (both adjusted p < 0.001). HIPEC-induced heat shock protein (HSP) expression changes, including in HSP90, HSP40, HSP60, and HSP70, were also observed at the protein level in both normal and tumor tissues. CONCLUSIONS HIPEC with carboplatin resulted in an upregulation of heat shock-related genes in both normal and tumor tissue, with an additional immune response gene induction in normal and protein folding in tumor tissue. The findings of our exploratory study provide evidence to suggest that HIPEC administration may suffice to induce gene expression changes in residual tumor cells and raises a biological basis for the consideration of combinatorial treatments with HSP inhibitors.
Collapse
|
49
|
Feinberg J, Carthew K, Webster E, Chang K, McNeil N, Chi DS, Roche KL, Gardner GJ, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y. Ovarian cancer recurrence detection may not require in-person physical examination: an MSK team ovary study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:159-164. [PMID: 34969828 PMCID: PMC8825707 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Given the inconvenience and financial burden of frequent ovarian cancer surveillance and the risks of in-person visits due to COVID-19, which have led to the acceleration of telehealth adaptation, we sought to assess the role of in-person physical examination for the detection of ovarian cancer recurrence among patients enrolled in a routine surveillance program. METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients initially seen from January 2015 to December 2017 who experienced ovarian cancer recurrence during first clinical remission. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were performed to compare differences in detection methods and in patient and disease characteristics. RESULTS Among 147 patients who met our inclusion criteria, there were no recurrences detected by physical examination alone. Forty-six (31%) patients had recurrence first detected by tumor marker, 81 (55%) by radiographic scan, 17 (12%) by presentation of new symptoms, and 3 (2%) by biopsies taken during non-oncological surgery. One hundred and eleven patients (75%) had multiple positive findings at the time of recurrence. Of all 147 patients, 48 (33%) had symptoms, 21 (14%) had physical examination findings, 106 (72%) had increases in tumor markers, and 141 (96%) had changes on imaging. CONCLUSIONS In-person physical examination was not a primary means of detection for ovarian cancer recurrence for any patient. Substituting in-person visits for virtual visits that include patient-reported symptoms, alongside a regular surveillance protocol that includes tumor marker testing and imaging, may be a suitable approach for the detection of ovarian cancer recurrence while also reducing patient inconvenience and risks to health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Feinberg
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karen Carthew
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emily Webster
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kaity Chang
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nita McNeil
- Department of Surgery, Quality & Safety Division, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Vanguri R, Benhamida J, Young JH, Li Y, Zivanovic O, Chi D, Snyder A, Hollmann TJ, Mager KL. Understanding the impact of chemotherapy on the immune landscape of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 39:100926. [PMID: 35146104 PMCID: PMC8801989 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces heterogeneous changes in the tumor microenvironment. Macrophages are a significant component of the TME PD-L1 expression enriched in a subset of patients. Alteration in T cell ratios after chemotherapy indicate patient subsets favorable to checkpoint modulation in the recurrent setting.
Objectives We quantitatively characterized the change in temporospatial expression of repressive and stimulatory checkpoints across immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment in a cohort of high grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOC) using matched samples before and after neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods Using retrospectively collected matched tissue samples from 9 patients, cell populations were assessed using multiplex immunofluorescence using the Vectra Multispectral Imaging System (Perkin Elmer). We used multiple panels to assess: tumor (AE1/AE3), T cells (CD3, CD8, FOXP3), macrophages (CD68) as well as immune checkpoints (C3aR, PD-1, PD-L1, LAG3, IDO, ICOS, GITR). IHC staining was performed for folate receptor status. Changes in immune cell populations as well as intensities of associated repressive and stimulatory proteins were assessed pre- to post-treatment. Results We observed a consistently high pre-treatment stromal macrophage population which is reduced post-chemotherapy with post-treatment enrichment in macrophage PD-L1 expression. While inhibitory checkpoint expression on T cells was heterogeneous post-chemotherapy, we observed a change in the ThICOS+:Treg ratio which resulted in ThICOS+ cells outnumbering Treg cells post-treatment. Spatial analysis revealed the proximity of Treg cells to ThICOS+ T cells decreased post-treatment. We also observed upward shifts in Teff:Treg T cell ratios with retention of immune checkpoints PD-1, LAG3 and GITR. Conclusions In this unique dataset of pre and post matched chemotherapy treated HGSOC patients, we observed changes in immune cell subsets expressing repressive or stimulatory proteins resulting in immune compositions more favorable to checkpoint modulations, suggesting novel therapeutic strategies in the recurrent setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami Vanguri
- Computational Oncology Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamal Benhamida
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan H. Young
- School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA
| | - Yanyun Li
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexandra Snyder
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Travis J. Hollmann
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine L. Mager
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Corresponding authors at: Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
| |
Collapse
|