1
|
Nobel T, Sewell M, Boerner T, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Gerdes H, Gray K, Nishimura M, Park BJ, Shah P, Sihag S, Jones DR, Molena D. Treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with a history of bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:337-342. [PMID: 38583881 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationship among obesity, bariatric surgery, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is complex, given that some bariatric procedures are thought to be associated with increased incidence of reflux and Barrett's esophagus. Previous bariatric surgery may complicate the use of the stomach as a conduit for esophagectomy. In this study, we presented our experience with patients who developed EAC after bariatric surgery and described the challenges encountered and the techniques used. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify all patients at our institution who were treated for EAC after previously undergoing bariatric surgery. RESULTS In total, 19 patients underwent resection with curative intent for EAC after bariatric surgery, including 10 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy. The median age at diagnosis of EAC was 63 years; patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy were younger (median age, 56 years). The median time from bariatric surgery to EAC was 7 years. Most patients had a body mass index (BMI) score of >30 kg/m2 at the time of diagnosis of EAC; approximately 40% had class III obesity (BMI score > 40 kg/m2). Six patients (32%) had known Barrett's esophagus before undergoing a reflux-increasing bariatric procedure. Sleeve gastrectomy patients underwent esophagectomy with gastric conduit, colonic interposition, or esophagojejunostomy. Only 1 patient had an anastomotic leak (after esophagojejunostomy). CONCLUSION Endoscopy should be required both before (for treatment selection) and after all bariatric surgical procedures. Resection of EAC after bariatric surgery requires a highly individualized approach but is safe and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Nobel
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Marisa Sewell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Thomas Boerner
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Manjit S Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Matthew J Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Hans Gerdes
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Katherine Gray
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Makoto Nishimura
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Pari Shah
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dunne EG, Fick CN, Isbell JM, Chaft JE, Altorki N, Park BJ, Spicer J, Forde PM, Gomez D, Iyengar P, Harpole DH, Stinchcombe TE, Liberman M, Bott MJ, Adusumilli PS, Huang J, Rocco G, Jones DR. The Emerging Role of Immunotherapy in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2024:S0003-4975(24)00080-8. [PMID: 38316378 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite surgical resection, long-term survival of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor. Adjuvant chemotherapy, the standard of care for locally advanced NSCLC, provides a marginal 5.4% benefit in survival. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a significant survival benefit in some patients with advanced NSCLC and are being evaluated for perioperative use in resectable NSCLC. METHODS We conducted a literature search using the PubMed online database to identify clinical trials of immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC and studies analyzing biomarkers and immune priming strategies. RESULTS Building on previous phase I and II trials, randomized phase III trials have shown efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab, perioperative pembrolizumab, adjuvant atezolizumab, and adjuvant pembrolizumab in the treatment of NSCLC with improvement of event-free/disease-free survival of 24% to 42%, leading to United States Food and Drug Administration approval of these drugs in the treatment of resectable NSCLC. Three additional phase III trials have also recently reported the use of immunotherapy both before and after surgery, with pathologic complete response rates of 17% to 25%, significantly better than chemotherapy alone. Perioperative ICI therapy has comparable perioperative morbidity to chemotherapy alone and does not impair surgical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative immunotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy, is safe and improves outcomes in patients with resectable NSCLC. Questions regarding patient selection, the need for adjuvant ICI therapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the duration of perioperative immunotherapy remain to be answered by future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth G Dunne
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cameron N Fick
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James M Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jamie E Chaft
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nasser Altorki
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan Spicer
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Patrick M Forde
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Puneeth Iyengar
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David H Harpole
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Thomas E Stinchcombe
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Moishe Liberman
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Matthew J Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Choe JK, Byun AJ, Robinson E, Drake L, Tan KS, McAleer EP, Schaffer WL, Liu JE, Chen LL, Buchholz T, Yohannes-Tomicich J, Yarmohammadi H, Ziv E, Solomon SB, Huang J, Park BJ, Jones DR, Adusumilli PS. Management of Pericardial Effusion in Patients With Solid Tumor: An Algorithmic, Multidisciplinary Approach Results in Reduced Mortality After Paradoxical Hemodynamic Instability. Ann Surg 2024; 279:147-153. [PMID: 37800338 PMCID: PMC11010720 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study compared outcomes in patients with solid tumor treated for pericardial effusion with surgical drainage versus interventional radiology (IR) percutaneous drainage and compared incidence of paradoxical hemodynamic instability (PHI) between cohorts. BACKGROUND Patients with advanced-stage solid malignancies may develop large pericardial effusions requiring intervention. PHI is a fatal and underreported complication that occurs following pericardial effusion drainage. METHODS Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients with solid tumors who underwent s urgical drainage or IR percutaneous drainage for pericardial effusion from 2010 to 2020. RESULTS Among 447 patients, 243 were treated with surgical drainage, of which 27 (11%) developed PHI, compared with 7 of 204 patients (3%) who were treated with IR percutaneous drainage ( P =0.002); overall incidence of PHI decreased during the study period. Rates of reintervention (30-day: 1% vs 4%; 90-day: 4% vs 6%, P =0.7) and mortality (30-day: 21% vs 17%, P =0.3; 90-day: 39% vs 37%, P =0.7) were not different between patients treated with surgical drainage and IR percutaneous drainage. For both interventions, OS was shorter among patients with PHI than among patients without PHI (surgical drainage, median [95% confidence interval] OS, 0.89 mo [0.33-2.1] vs 6.5 mo [5.0-8.9], P <0.001; IR percutaneous drainage, 3.7 mo [0.23-6.8] vs 5.0 mo [4.0-8.1], P =0.044). CONCLUSIONS With a coordinated multidisciplinary approach focusing on prompt clinical and echocardiographic evaluation, triage with bias toward IR percutaneous drainage than surgical drainage and postintervention intensive care resulted in lower incidence of PHI and improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie K Choe
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alexander J Byun
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Eric Robinson
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Lauren Drake
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Eileen P McAleer
- Cardiology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Wendy L Schaffer
- Cardiology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jennifer E Liu
- Cardiology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Leon L Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Tara Buchholz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joanna Yohannes-Tomicich
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Etay Ziv
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Angelis P, Tan KS, Chudgar NP, Dycoco J, Adusumilli PS, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Downey RJ, Huang J, Isbell JM, Molena D, Park BJ, Rusch VW, Sihag S, Jones DR, Rocco G. Operative Time is Associated With Postoperative Complications After Pulmonary Lobectomy. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1259-e1266. [PMID: 36066195 PMCID: PMC9985664 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between operative time and postoperative outcomes. BACKGROUND The association between operative time and morbidity after pulmonary lobectomy has not been characterized fully. METHODS Patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy for primary lung cancer at our institution from 2010 to 2018 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria included clinical stage ≥IIb disease, conversion to thoracotomy, and previous ipsilateral lung treatment. Operative time was measured from incision to closure. Relationships between operative time and outcomes were quantified using multivariable mixed-effects models with surgeon-level random effects. RESULTS In total, 1651 patients were included. The median age was 68 years (interquartile range, 61-74), and 63% of patients were women. Median operative time was 3.2 hours (interquartile range, 2.7-3.8) for all cases, 3.0 hours for open procedures, 3.3 hours for video-assisted thoracoscopies, and 3.3 hours for robotic procedures ( P =0.0002). Overall, 488 patients (30%) experienced a complication; 77 patients (5%) had a major complication (grade ≥3), and 5 patients (0.3%) died within 30 days of discharge. On multivariable analysis, operative time was associated with higher odds of any complication [odds ratio per hour, 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.20-1.57; P <0.0001] and major complication (odds ratio per hour, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.21-1.64; P <0.0001). Operative time was also associated with longer hospital length of stay (β, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14; P =0.001). CONCLUSIONS Longer operative time was associated with worse outcomes in patients who underwent lobectomy. Operative time is a potential risk factor to consider in the perioperative phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo de Angelis
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Neel P. Chudgar
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joseph Dycoco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Prasad S. Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Manjit S. Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew J. Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert J. Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James M. Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McLaughlin K, Tan KS, Dycoco J, Chen MF, Chaft JE, Mankuzhy NP, Rimner A, Aly RG, Fanaroff RE, Travis WD, Bilsky M, Bains M, Downey R, Huang J, Isbell JM, Molena D, Park BJ, Jones DR, Rusch VW. Superior sulcus non-small cell lung cancers (Pancoast tumors): Current outcomes after multidisciplinary management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:1477-1487.e8. [PMID: 37611845 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, Pancoast tumors still present surgical and oncologic challenges. To optimize outcomes, we used a multidisciplinary care paradigm with medical and radiation oncology, and involvement of spine neurosurgery for most T3 and all T4 tumors. Spine neurosurgery permitted resection of transverse process for T3 and vertebral body resection for T4 tumors. METHODS Retrospective analysis of single institution, prospective database of patients undergoing resection for cT3 4M0 Pancoast tumors. Patients were grouped as cT3 with combined resection with spine neurosurgery (T3 Neuro), cT3 without spine neurosurgery (T3 NoNeuro), and cT4. Overall survival, progression-free survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and compared between groups using log-rank test. Cumulative incidence of local-regional and distant recurrence were compared using Gray test. P value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS From 2000 to 2021, 155 patients underwent surgery: median age was 58 years, and 81 were (52%) men. Most patients received neoadjuvant platinum-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (n = 127 [82%]). Operations were 48 cT3 Neuro, 41 cT3 NoNeuro, 66 cT4. R0 resection was achieved in 49 (94%) cT3 NoNeuro, 35 (85%) cT3 Neuro, and 57 (86%) cT4 patients (P = .4). Complete or major pathologic response occurred in 71 (55%) patients. Lower local-regional cumulative incidence was seen in cT3 Neuro versus cT3 NoNeuro (P = .05) and after major pathologic response. Overall survival and progression-free survival were associated with complete response, pathologic stage, and nodal status but not cT category. CONCLUSIONS This treatment paradigm was associated with a high frequency of R0 resection, complete response, and major pathologic response. cT3 and cT4 tumors had similar outcomes. Novel therapies are needed to improve complete response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin McLaughlin
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kay See Tan
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joe Dycoco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Monica F Chen
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jamie E Chaft
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nikhil P Mankuzhy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rania G Aly
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rachel E Fanaroff
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - William D Travis
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mark Bilsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Manjit Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James M Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vanstraelen S, Bains MS, Dycoco J, Adusumilli PS, Bott MJ, Downey RJ, Huang J, Isbell JM, Molena D, Park BJ, Rusch VW, Sihag S, Allen RJ, Cordeiro PG, Coriddi MR, Dayan JH, Disa JJ, Matros E, McCarthy CM, Nelson JA, Stern C, Shahzad F, Mehrara B, Jones DR, Rocco G. Biologic versus synthetic prosthesis for chest wall reconstruction: a matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 64:ezad348. [PMID: 37846030 PMCID: PMC11032705 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes between biologic and synthetic reconstructions after chest wall resection in a matched cohort. METHODS All patients who underwent reconstruction after full-thickness chest wall resection from 2000 to 2022 were reviewed and stratified by prosthesis type (biologic or synthetic). Biologic prostheses were of biologic origin or were fully absorbable and incorporable. Integer matching was performed to reduce confounding. The study end point was surgical site complications requiring reoperation. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify associated risk factors. RESULTS In total, 438 patients underwent prosthetic chest wall reconstruction (unmatched: biologic, n = 49; synthetic, n = 389; matched: biologic, n = 46; synthetic, n = 46). After matching, the median (interquartile range) defect size was 83 cm2 (50-142) for the biologic group and 90 cm2 (48-146) for the synthetic group (P = 0.97). Myocutaneous flaps were used in 33% of biologic reconstructions (n = 15) and 33% of synthetic reconstructions (n = 15) in the matched cohort (P = 0.99). The incidence of surgical site complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between biologic and synthetic reconstructions in the unmatched (3 [6%] vs 29 [7%]; P = 0.99) and matched (2 [4%] vs 4 [9%]; P = 0.68) cohorts. On the multivariable analysis, operative time [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.01; P = 0.006] and operative blood loss (aOR = 1.00, 95% CI, 1.00-1.00]; P = 0.012) were associated with higher rates of surgical site complications requiring reoperation; microvascular free flaps (aOR = 0.03, 95% CI, 0.00-0.42; P = 0.024) were associated with lower rates. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of surgical site complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between biologic and synthetic prostheses in chest wall reconstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn Vanstraelen
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Manjit S Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joe Dycoco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew J Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James M Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Allen
- Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter G Cordeiro
- Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelle R Coriddi
- Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph H Dayan
- Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph J Disa
- Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan Matros
- Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Colleen M McCarthy
- Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carrie Stern
- Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Farooq Shahzad
- Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Babak Mehrara
- Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dunne EG, Fick CN, Tan KS, Toumbacaris N, Mastrogiacomo B, Adusumilli PS, Rocco G, Molena D, Huang J, Park BJ, Bott MJ, Rusch VR, Sihag S, Isbell JM, Chaft JE, Li BT, Gomez D, Rimner A, Bains MS, Jones DR. Lung resection after initial nonoperative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023:S0022-5223(23)01116-9. [PMID: 38042400 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.11.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The study objectives were to assess the outcomes of lung resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with nonoperative treatment and to identify prognostic factors associated with survival. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery (2010-2022) after initial nonoperative treatment at a single institution were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Exclusion criteria included metachronous cancer, planned neoadjuvant therapy, and surgery for diagnostic or palliative indications. Cox models were constructed for overall survival and event-free survival. Survival of patients with stage IV disease was compared with survival of a nonstudy cohort who did not undergo surgery. RESULTS In total, 120 patients met the inclusion criteria. Initial clinical stage was early stage in 16%, locoregionally advanced in 25%, and metastatic in 59% of patients. The indication for surgery was recurrence in 18%, local persistent disease in 23%, oligoprogression in 22%, and local control of oligometastatic disease in 38% of patients. Grade 3 or greater complications occurred in 5% of patients; 90-day mortality was 3%. Three-year event-free survival and overall survival were 39% and 73%, respectively. Male sex and lymphovascular invasion were associated with shorter event-free survival and overall survival; younger age and prior radiation therapy were associated with shorter overall survival. Patients with stage IV disease who received salvage lung resection had better overall survival than similar patients who received subsequent systemic therapy and no surgery. CONCLUSIONS In this selected, heterogeneous population, lung resection after initial nonoperative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer was safe. Surgery as local consolidative therapy was associated with encouraging outcomes and should be considered for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth G Dunne
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Cameron N Fick
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicolas Toumbacaris
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brooke Mastrogiacomo
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew J Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie R Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James M Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jamie E Chaft
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bob T Li
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Manjit S Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Adhikari G, Carlin N, Choi JJ, Choi S, Ezeribe AC, França LE, Ha C, Hahn IS, Hollick SJ, Jeon EJ, Jo JH, Joo HW, Kang WG, Kauer M, Kim BH, Kim HJ, Kim J, Kim KW, Kim SH, Kim SK, Kim WK, Kim YD, Kim YH, Ko YJ, Lee DH, Lee EK, Lee H, Lee HS, Lee HY, Lee IS, Lee J, Lee JY, Lee MH, Lee SH, Lee SM, Lee YJ, Leonard DS, Luan NT, Manzato BB, Maruyama RH, Neal RJ, Nikkel JA, Olsen SL, Park BJ, Park HK, Park HS, Park KS, Park SD, Pitta RLC, Prihtiadi H, Ra SJ, Rott C, Shin KA, Cavalcante DFFS, Scarff A, Spooner NJC, Thompson WG, Yang L, Yu GH. Search for Boosted Dark Matter in COSINE-100. Phys Rev Lett 2023; 131:201802. [PMID: 38039466 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.131.201802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
We search for energetic electron recoil signals induced by boosted dark matter (BDM) from the galactic center using the COSINE-100 array of NaI(Tl) crystal detectors at the Yangyang Underground Laboratory. The signal would be an excess of events with energies above 4 MeV over the well-understood background. Because no excess of events are observed in a 97.7 kg·yr exposure, we set limits on BDM interactions under a variety of hypotheses. Notably, we explored the dark photon parameter space, leading to competitive limits compared to direct dark photon search experiments, particularly for dark photon masses below 4 MeV and considering the invisible decay mode. Furthermore, by comparing our results with a previous BDM search conducted by the Super-Kamionkande experiment, we found that the COSINE-100 detector has advantages in searching for low-mass dark matter. This analysis demonstrates the potential of the COSINE-100 detector to search for MeV electron recoil signals produced by the dark sector particle interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Adhikari
- Department of Physics and Wright Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - N Carlin
- Physics Institute, University of São Paulo, 05508-090, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - J J Choi
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - S Choi
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - A C Ezeribe
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
| | - L E França
- Physics Institute, University of São Paulo, 05508-090, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - C Ha
- Department of Physics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06973, Republic of Korea
| | - I S Hahn
- Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
- Center for Exotic Nuclear Studies, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - S J Hollick
- Department of Physics and Wright Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - E J Jeon
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - J H Jo
- Department of Physics and Wright Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - H W Joo
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - W G Kang
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - M Kauer
- Department of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - B H Kim
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - H J Kim
- Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
| | - J Kim
- Department of Physics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06973, Republic of Korea
| | - K W Kim
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - S H Kim
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - S K Kim
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - W K Kim
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - Y D Kim
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
- Department of Physics, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
| | - Y H Kim
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
- Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - Y J Ko
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - D H Lee
- Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
| | - E K Lee
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - H Lee
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - H S Lee
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - H Y Lee
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - I S Lee
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - J Lee
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - J Y Lee
- Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
| | - M H Lee
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - S H Lee
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - S M Lee
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Y J Lee
- Department of Physics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06973, Republic of Korea
| | - D S Leonard
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - N T Luan
- Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
| | - B B Manzato
- Physics Institute, University of São Paulo, 05508-090, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - R H Maruyama
- Department of Physics and Wright Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - R J Neal
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
| | - J A Nikkel
- Department of Physics and Wright Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - S L Olsen
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - B J Park
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - H K Park
- Department of Accelerator Science, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Republic of Korea
| | - H S Park
- Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - K S Park
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - S D Park
- Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
| | - R L C Pitta
- Physics Institute, University of São Paulo, 05508-090, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - H Prihtiadi
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - S J Ra
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - C Rott
- Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA
| | - K A Shin
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - D F F S Cavalcante
- Physics Institute, University of São Paulo, 05508-090, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A Scarff
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
| | - N J C Spooner
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
| | - W G Thompson
- Department of Physics and Wright Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - L Yang
- Department of Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - G H Yu
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boerner T, Carr R, Hsu M, Tan KS, Sigel C, Tang L, Harrington C, Ku GY, Ilson DH, Janjigian YY, Wu AJ, Sihag S, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Isbell JM, Park BJ, Jones DR, Molena D. Prognostic value of circumferential radial margin involvement in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a case series. Int J Surg 2023; 109:3251-3261. [PMID: 37549056 PMCID: PMC10651231 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residual tumor at the proximal or distal margin after esophagectomy is associated with worse survival outcomes; however, the significance of the circumferential resection margin (CRM) remains controversial. In this study, we sought to evaluate the prognostic significance of the CRM in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified patients who underwent esophagectomy for pathologic T3 esophageal cancer from 2000 to 2019. Patients were divided into three groups: CRM- (residual tumor >1 mm from the CRM), CRM-close (residual tumor >0 to 1 mm from the CRM), and CRM+ (residual tumor at the surgical CRM). CRM was also categorized and analyzed per the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) and College of American Pathologists (CAP) classifications. RESULTS Of the 519 patients included, 351 (68%) had CRM-, 132 (25%) had CRM-close, and 36 (7%) had CRM+. CRM+ was associated with shorter disease-free survival [DFS; CRM+ vs. CRM-: hazard ratio (HR), 1.53 [95% CI, 1.03-2.28]; P =0.034] and overall survival (OS; CRM+ vs. CRM-: HR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.32-2.95]; P <0.001). Survival was not significantly different between CRM-close and CRM-. After adjustment for potential confounders, CAP+ was associated with poor oncologic outcomes (CAP+ vs. CAP-: DFS: HR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.00-2.17]; P =0.050; OS: HR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.30-2.86]; P =0.001); RCP+ was not (RCP+ vs. RCP-: DFS: HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.97-1.52]; P =0.10; OS: HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.96-1.54]; P =0.11). CONCLUSION CRM status has critical prognostic significance for patients undergoing esophagectomy: CRM+ was associated with worse outcomes, and outcomes between CRM-close and CRM- were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Meier Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vanstraelen S, Ali B, Bains MS, Shahzad F, Allen RJ, Matros E, Dycoco J, Adusumilli PS, Bott MJ, Downey RJ, Huang J, Isbell JM, Molena D, Park BJ, Rusch VW, Sihag S, Cordeiro PG, Coriddi MR, Dayan JH, Disa J, McCarthy CM, Nelson JA, Stern C, Mehrara B, Jones DR, Rocco G. The contribution of microvascular free flaps and pedicled flaps to successful chest wall surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:1262-1272.e2. [PMID: 37236598 PMCID: PMC10528168 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pedicled flaps (PFs) have historically served as the preferred option for reconstruction of large chest wall defects. More recently, the indications for microvascular-free flaps (MVFFs) have increased, particularly for defects in which PFs are inadequate or unavailable. We sought to compare oncologic and surgical outcomes between MVFFs and PFs in reconstructions of full-thickness chest wall defects. METHODS We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent chest wall resection at our institution from 2000 to 2022. Patients were stratified by flap reconstruction. End points were defect size, rate of complete resection, rate of local recurrence, and postoperative outcomes. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with complications at 30 days. RESULTS In total, 536 patients underwent chest wall resection, of whom 133 had flap reconstruction (MVFF, n = 28; PF, n = 105). The median (interquartile range) covered defect size was 172 cm2 (100-216 cm2) for patients receiving MVFF versus 109 cm2 (75-148 cm2) for patients receiving PF (P = .004). The rate of R0 resection was high in both groups (MVFF, 93% [n = 26]; PF, 86% [n = 90]; P = .5). The rate of local recurrence was 4% in MVFF patients (n = 1) versus 12% in PF patients (n = 13, P = .3). Postoperative complications were not statistically different between groups (odds ratio for PF, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-5.14]; P = .6). Operative time >400 minutes was associated with 30-day complications (odds ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-9.93; P = .033). CONCLUSIONS Patients with MVFFs had larger defects, a high rate of complete resection, and a low rate of local recurrence. MVFFs are a valid option for chest wall reconstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn Vanstraelen
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Barkat Ali
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Manjit S Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Farooq Shahzad
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert J Allen
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Evan Matros
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joe Dycoco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew J Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert J Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James M Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Peter G Cordeiro
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michelle R Coriddi
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joseph H Dayan
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joseph Disa
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Colleen M McCarthy
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Carrie Stern
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Babak Mehrara
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Fiona and Stanley Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Fiona and Stanley Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cowzer D, Wu AJC, Sihag S, Walch HS, Park BJ, Jones DR, Gu P, Maron SB, Sugarman R, Chalasani SB, Shcherba M, Capanu M, Chou JF, Choe JK, Nosov A, Adusumilli PS, Yeh R, Tang LH, Ilson DH, Janjigian YY, Molena D, Ku GY. Durvalumab and PET-Directed Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase Ib/II Study. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e511-e518. [PMID: 36762546 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and efficacy of adding the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant induction FOLFOX followed by positron emission tomography (PET) directed chemoradiation has demonstrated improved survival for esophageal adenocarcinoma. There is clear benefit now for the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors both in early and advanced stage disease. Given these results we investigated the safety and efficacy of adding durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS Patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma received PET-directed chemoradiation with durvalumab before esophagectomy. Patients who had R0 resections received adjuvant durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks for 6 treatments. The primary endpoint of the study was pathologic complete response. RESULTS We enrolled 36 patients, 33 of whom completed all preoperative treatment and underwent surgery. Preoperative treatment was well tolerated, with no delays to surgery nor new safety signals. Pathologic complete response was identified in 8 [22% (1-sided 90% lower bound: 13.3%)] patients with major pathologic response in 22 [61% (1-sided 90% lower bound: 50%)] patients. Twelve and 24-month overall survival was 92% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The addition of durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and PET-directed chemoradiotherapy before surgery is safe, with a high rate of pathologic response, as well as encouraging survival data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Cowzer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Abraham Jing-Ching Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Smita Sihag
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Henry S Walch
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R Jones
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ping Gu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Steven B Maron
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ryan Sugarman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Marina Shcherba
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marinela Capanu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joanne F Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jennie K Choe
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anton Nosov
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Laura H Tang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David H Ilson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Yelena Y Janjigian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Geoffrey Y Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Harrington CA, Hsu M, Tan KS, Medina B, Boerner T, Adusumilli PS, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Isbell JM, Park BJ, Sihag S, Rusch VW, Jones DR, Rocco G, Molena D. Translating Telemedicine to Thoracic Surgical Oncological Care: Performance Analysis and Patient Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e179-e183. [PMID: 35786673 PMCID: PMC9810766 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective is to determine how the COVID-19 pandemic affected care for patients undergoing thoracic surgery for cancer. BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telemedicine. METHODS Characteristics and outcomes of new patients seen between March 1 and June 30, 2019, and the same period in 2020 were compared. Patients who did not undergo surgery were excluded. Patients who had a telemedicine visit (new and established) in the 2020 period were asked to complete a survey. RESULTS In total, 624 new patients were seen in 2019 versus 299 in 2020 (52% reduction); 45% of patients (n=136) in 2020 were seen via telemedicine. There was no statistically significant difference in time to surgery, pathological upstaging, or postsurgical complications between 2019 and 2020. In total, 1085 patients (new and established) had a telemedicine visit in 2020; 239 (22%) completed the survey. A majority replied that telemedicine was equivalent to in-person care (77%), did not impair care quality (84%), resulted in less stress (69%) and shorter waits (86%), was more convenient (92%), saved money and commuting time (93%), and expanded who could attend visits (91%). Some patients regretted the loss of human interaction (71%). Most would opt for telemedicine after the pandemic (60%), although some would prefer in-person format for initial visits (55%) and visits with complex discussions (49%). Only 21% were uncomfortable with the telemedicine technology. CONCLUSIONS Telemedicine enabled cancer care to continue during the COVID-19 pandemic without delays in surgery, cancer progression, or worsened postoperative morbidity and was generally well received.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin A. Harrington
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Meier Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Benjamin Medina
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Thomas Boerner
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prasad S. Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manjit S. Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew J. Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James M. Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boerner T, Harrington C, Tan KS, Adusumilli PS, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Downey RJ, Huang J, Ilson D, Isbell JM, Janjigian YY, Park BJ, Rocco G, Rusch VW, Sihag S, Wu AJ, Jones DR, Molena D. Waiting to Operate: The Risk of Salvage Esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2023; 277:781-788. [PMID: 36727949 PMCID: PMC10354214 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess postoperative morbidity, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with salvage esophagectomy (SE). BACKGROUND DATA A shift toward a "surgery as needed" approach for esophageal cancer has emerged, potentially resulting in delayed esophagectomy. METHODS We identified patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who underwent chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy from 2001 to 2019. SE was defined as esophagectomy performed >90 days after chemoradiation ("for time") and esophagectomy performed for recurrence after curative-intent chemoradiation ("for recurrence"). The odds of postoperative serious complications were assessed by multivariable logistic regression. The relationship between SE and OS and DFS were quantified using Cox regression models. RESULTS Of 1137 patients identified, 173 (15%) underwent SE. Of those, 61 (35%) underwent SE for recurrence, and 112 (65%) underwent SE for time. The odds of experiencing any serious complication [odds ratio, 2.10 (95% CI, 1.37-3.20); P =0.001] or serious pulmonary complication [odds ratio, 2.11 (95% CI, 1.31-3.42); P =0.002] were 2-fold higher for SE patients; SE patients had a 1.5-fold higher hazard of death [hazard ratio, 1.56 (95% CI, 1.25-1.94); P <0.0001] and postoperative recurrence [hazard ratio, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16-1.77); P =0.001]. Five-year OS for nonsalvage esophagectomy was 45% [(95% CI, 41.6%-48.6%) versus 26.5% (95% CI, 20.2%-34.8%) for SE (log-rank P <0.001)]. Five-year OS for SE for time was 27.1% [(95% CI, 19.5%-37.5%) versus 25.2% (95% CI, 15.3%-41.5%) for SE for recurrence ( P =0.611)]. CONCLUSIONS SE is associated with a higher risk of serious postoperative complications and shorter DFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Boerner
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Caitlin Harrington
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prasad S. Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manjit S. Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew J. Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert J. Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David Ilson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James M. Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yelena Y. Janjigian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Carr RA, Hsu M, Harrington CA, Tan KS, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Ilson DH, Isbell JM, Janjigian YY, Maron SB, Park BJ, Rusch VW, Sihag S, Wu AJ, Jones DR, Ku GY, Molena D. Induction FOLFOX and PET-Directed Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e538-e544. [PMID: 34387205 PMCID: PMC8840992 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of induction FOLFOX followed by PET-directed nCRT, induction CP followed by PET-directed nCRT, and nCRT with CP alone in patients with EAC. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA nCRT with CP is a standard treatment for locally advanced EAC. The results of cancer and leukemia group B 80803 support the use of induction chemotherapy followed by PET-directed chemo-radiation therapy. METHODS We retrospectively identified all patients with EAC who underwent the treatments above followed by esophagectomy. We assessed incidences of pathologic complete response (pCR), near-pCR (ypN0 with ≥90% response), and surgical complications between treatment groups using Fisher exact test and logistic regression; disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated using the log-rank test and extended Cox regression. RESULTS In total, 451 patients were included: 309 (69%) received induction chemotherapy before nCRT (FOLFOX, n = 70; CP, n = 239); 142 (31%) received nCRT with CP. Rates of pCR (33% vs. 16%, P = 0.004), near-pCR (57% vs. 33%, P < 0.001), and 2-year DFS (68% vs. 50%, P = 0.01) were higher in the induction FOLFOX group than in the induction CP group. Similarly, the rate of near-pCR (57% vs. 42%, P = 0.04) and 2-year DFS (68% vs. 44%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the FOLFOX group than in the no-induction group. CONCLUSIONS Induction FOLFOX followed by PET-directed nCRT may result in better histopathologic response rates and DFS than either induction CP plus PET-directed nCRT or nCRT with CP alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A. Carr
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Meier Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Caitlin A. Harrington
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manjit S. Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew J. Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David H. Ilson
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James M. Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yelena Y. Janjigian
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Steven B. Maron
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Geoffrey Y. Ku
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Leitao MM, Kreaden US, Laudone V, Park BJ, Pappou EP, Davis JW, Rice DC, Chang GJ, Rossi EC, Hebert AE, Slee A, Gonen M. The RECOURSE Study: Long-term Oncologic Outcomes Associated With Robotically Assisted Minimally Invasive Procedures for Endometrial, Cervical, Colorectal, Lung, or Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 277:387-396. [PMID: 36073772 PMCID: PMC9905254 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess long-term outcomes with robotic versus laparoscopic/thoracoscopic and open surgery for colorectal, urologic, endometrial, cervical, and thoracic cancers. BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery provides perioperative benefits and similar oncological outcomes compared with open surgery. Recent robotic surgery data have questioned long-term benefits. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer outcomes based on surgical approach was conducted based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines using Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase. Hazard ratios for recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted/estimated using a hierarchical decision tree and pooled in RevMan 5.4 using inverse-variance fixed-effect (heterogeneity nonsignificant) or random effect models. RESULTS Of 31,204 references, 199 were included (7 randomized, 23 database, 15 prospective, 154 retrospective studies)-157,876 robotic, 68,007 laparoscopic/thoracoscopic, and 234,649 open cases. Cervical cancer: OS and DFS were similar between robotic and laparoscopic [1.01 (0.56, 1.80), P =0.98] or open [1.18 (0.99, 1.41), P =0.06] surgery; 2 papers reported less recurrence with open surgery [2.30 (1.32, 4.01), P =0.003]. Endometrial cancer: the only significant result favored robotic over open surgery [OS; 0.77 (0.71, 0.83), P <0.001]. Lobectomy: DFS favored robotic over thoracoscopic surgery [0.74 (0.59, 0.93), P =0.009]; OS favored robotic over open surgery [0.93 (0.87, 1.00), P =0.04]. Prostatectomy: recurrence was less with robotic versus laparoscopic surgery [0.77 (0.68, 0.87), P <0.0001]; OS favored robotic over open surgery [0.78 (0.72, 0.85), P <0.0001]. Low-anterior resection: OS significantly favored robotic over laparoscopic [0.76 (0.63, 0.91), P =0.004] and open surgery [0.83 (0.74, 0.93), P =0.001]. CONCLUSIONS Long-term outcomes were similar for robotic versus laparoscopic/thoracoscopic and open surgery, with no safety signal or indication requiring further research (PROSPERO Reg#CRD42021240519).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY, USA
| | - Usha S Kreaden
- Biostatistics and Global Evidence Management, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | - Vincent Laudone
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| | - Emmanouil P Pappou
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| | - John W Davis
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David C Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emma C Rossi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - April E Hebert
- Biostatistics and Global Evidence Management, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | | | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kahn RM, McMinn E, Yeoshoua E, Boerner T, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Long Roche K, Zivanovic O, Gardner GJ, Sonoda Y, O'Cearbhaill RE, Grisham RN, Tew W, Jones D, Huang J, Park BJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Chi DS. Intrathoracic surgery as part of primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: Going to the next level - A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center study. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:46-53. [PMID: 36621269 PMCID: PMC10023324 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated the feasibility, safety, and survival outcomes of intrathoracic cytoreduction during primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS We conducted a database review of patients with stage IIIB-IV ovarian (including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal) carcinoma who underwent PDS at our institution from 01/01/2006-9/30/2021. Patients who underwent intrathoracic cytoreduction as part of primary treatment were included. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or surgery for reasons other than cytoreduction were excluded. RESULTS Among 178 patients identified for inclusion, complete gross resection (CGR) in the abdomen and thorax was achieved in 131 (74%); 45 (25%) had optimal cytoreduction, and 2 (1%) had suboptimal cytoreduction. Thirty-one patients (17%) had at least one grade ≥ 3 complication; 8 were possibly related to intrathoracic cytoreduction. There were no deaths within 30 days following surgery. Median length of follow-up among survivors was 53.4 months. Among all patients, the median PFS was 33.6 months (95% CI: 24.7-61.9) and the 3-year PFS rate was 48.9% (95% CI: 41.2%-56.2%). Median OS was 81.3 months (95% CI: 68.9-103). When stratified by residual disease status, median PFS was 51.8 months when CGR was achieved versus 16.7 months with residual disease (HR: 2.17; P < .001) and median OS was 97.6 months when CGR was achieved versus 65.9 months with residual disease (HR: 2.05; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS Intrathoracic cytoreduction during PDS for advanced ovarian cancer is both safe and feasible. CGR can be achieved in patients with intrathoracic disease if properly selected, and could significantly improve both PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan M Kahn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Erin McMinn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Effi Yeoshoua
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Thomas Boerner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - William Tew
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - David Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Connolly JG, Kalchiem-Dekel O, Tan KS, Dycoco J, Chawla M, Rocco G, Park BJ, Lee RP, Beattie JA, Solomon SB, Ziv E, Adusumilli PS, Buonocore DJ, Husta BC, Jones DR, Baine MK, Bott MJ. Feasibility of shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy for biomarker identification in patients with thoracic malignancies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022:S0022-5223(22)01258-2. [PMID: 36621452 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.10.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Molecular diagnostic assays require samples with high nucleic acid content to generate reliable data. Similarly, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) requires samples with adequate tumor content. We investigated whether shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) provides adequate samples for molecular and predictive testing. METHODS We retrospectively identified diagnostic samples from a prospectively collected database. Pathologic reports were reviewed to assess adequacy of samples for molecular testing and feasibility of PD-L1 IHC. Tumor cellularity was quantified by an independent pathologist using paraffin-embedded sections. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models were constructed to assess associations between lesion- and procedure-related variables and tumor cellularity. RESULTS In total, 128 samples were analyzed: 104 primary lung cancers and 24 metastatic lesions. On initial pathologic assessment, ssRAB samples were deemed to be adequate for molecular testing in 84% of cases; on independent review of cellular blocks, median tumor cellularity was 60% (interquartile range, 25%-80%). Hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing was successful for 25 of 26 samples (96%), polymerase chain reaction-based molecular testing (Idylla; Biocartis) was successful for 49 of 52 samples (94%), and PD-L1 IHC was successful for 61 of 67 samples (91%). Carcinoid and small cell carcinoma histologic subtype and adequacy on rapid on-site evaluation were associated with higher tumor cellularity. CONCLUSIONS The ssRAB platform provided adequate tissue for next-generation sequencing, polymerase chain reaction-based molecular testing, and PD-L1 IHC in >80% of cases. Tumor histology and adequacy on intraoperative cytologic assessment might be associated with sample quality and suitability for downstream assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James G Connolly
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Or Kalchiem-Dekel
- Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Pulmonary Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kay See Tan
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joe Dycoco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mohit Chawla
- Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Pulmonary Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert P Lee
- Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Pulmonary Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jason A Beattie
- Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Pulmonary Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Etay Ziv
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Darren J Buonocore
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bryan C Husta
- Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Pulmonary Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marina K Baine
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew J Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lengel HB, Zheng J, Tan KS, Liu CC, Park BJ, Rocco G, Adusumilli PS, Molena D, Yu HA, Riely GJ, Bains MS, Rusch VW, Kris MG, Chaft JE, Li BT, Isbell JM, Jones DR. Clinicopathologic outcomes of preoperative targeted therapy in patients with clinical stage I to III non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 165:1682-1693.e3. [PMID: 36528430 PMCID: PMC10085825 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.10.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Targeted therapy improves outcomes in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in the adjuvant setting, but data on its use before surgery are limited. We sought to investigate the safety and feasibility of preoperative targeted therapy in patients with operable NSCLC. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients with clinical stage I to III NSCLC who received targeted therapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, before surgical resection with curative intent, treated from 2004 to 2021. The primary outcome was the safety and feasibility of preoperative targeted therapy; secondary outcomes included objective response rate, major pathologic response (defined as ≤10% viable tumor) rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival. RESULTS Of the 51 patients included, 46 had an activating epidermal growth factor receptor gene alteration and 5 had an anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion. Overall, 37 of 46 evaluable patients experienced at least 1 adverse event before surgery; however, only 3 patients experienced a grade 3 or 4 event. The objective response rate was 38% (17/45) for all evaluable patients and 44% (14/32) for patients with clinical stage II or III disease. The major pathologic response rate was 20% (9/44); 2 patients had a complete pathologic response. Median RFS was 3.8 years (95% CI, 2.8 to not reached). Targeted therapy alone was associated with better RFS than combination therapy (P = .009) in patients with clinical stage II or III disease. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative targeted therapy was well tolerated and associated with good outcomes, with or without induction chemotherapy. In addition, radiographic response and pathologic response were strongly correlated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry B Lengel
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Junting Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Corinne C Liu
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Helena A Yu
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gregory J Riely
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Manjit S Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mark G Kris
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jamie E Chaft
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bob T Li
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James M Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jee J, Lebow ES, Yeh R, Das JP, Namakydoust A, Paik PK, Chaft JE, Jayakumaran G, Rose Brannon A, Benayed R, Zehir A, Donoghue M, Schultz N, Chakravarty D, Kundra R, Madupuri R, Murciano-Goroff YR, Tu HY, Xu CR, Martinez A, Wilhelm C, Galle J, Daly B, Yu HA, Offin M, Hellmann MD, Lito P, Arbour KC, Zauderer MG, Kris MG, Ng KK, Eng J, Preeshagul I, Victoria Lai W, Fiore JJ, Iqbal A, Molena D, Rocco G, Park BJ, Lim LP, Li M, Tong-Li C, De Silva M, Chan DL, Diakos CI, Itchins M, Clarke S, Pavlakis N, Lee A, Rekhtman N, Chang J, Travis WD, Riely GJ, Solit DB, Gonen M, Rusch VW, Rimner A, Gomez D, Drilon A, Scher HI, Shah SP, Berger MF, Arcila ME, Ladanyi M, Levine RL, Shen R, Razavi P, Reis-Filho JS, Jones DR, Rudin CM, Isbell JM, Li BT. Overall survival with circulating tumor DNA-guided therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Med 2022; 28:2353-2363. [PMID: 36357680 PMCID: PMC10338177 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02047-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing guides therapy decisions but has been studied mostly in small cohorts without sufficient follow-up to determine its influence on overall survival. We prospectively followed an international cohort of 1,127 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and ctDNA-guided therapy. ctDNA detection was associated with shorter survival (hazard ratio (HR), 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.74-2.42; P < 0.001) independently of clinicopathologic features and metabolic tumor volume. Among the 722 (64%) patients with detectable ctDNA, 255 (23%) matched to targeted therapy by ctDNA sequencing had longer survival than those not treated with targeted therapy (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.76; P < 0.001). Genomic alterations in ctDNA not detected by time-matched tissue sequencing were found in 25% of the patients. These ctDNA-only alterations disproportionately featured subclonal drivers of resistance, including RICTOR and PIK3CA alterations, and were associated with short survival. Minimally invasive ctDNA profiling can identify heterogeneous drivers not captured in tissue sequencing and expand community access to life-prolonging therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Jee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emily S Lebow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeeban P Das
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Paul K Paik
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamie E Chaft
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - A Rose Brannon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryma Benayed
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ahmet Zehir
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark Donoghue
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Ritika Kundra
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Hai-Yan Tu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chong-Rui Xu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Clare Wilhelm
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jesse Galle
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bobby Daly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helena A Yu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Offin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew D Hellmann
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piro Lito
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn C Arbour
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marjorie G Zauderer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark G Kris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth K Ng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juliana Eng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Isabel Preeshagul
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - W Victoria Lai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - John J Fiore
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Afsheen Iqbal
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniela Molena
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bernard J Park
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lee P Lim
- Resolution Bioscience, Agilent Technologies, Kirkland, WA, USA
| | - Mark Li
- Resolution Bioscience, Agilent Technologies, Kirkland, WA, USA
| | - Candace Tong-Li
- GenesisCare, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - David L Chan
- GenesisCare, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Nick Pavlakis
- GenesisCare, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Adrian Lee
- GenesisCare, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Natasha Rekhtman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason Chang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - William D Travis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gregory J Riely
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - David B Solit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Drilon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Howard I Scher
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sohrab P Shah
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Maria E Arcila
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ross L Levine
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronglai Shen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pedram Razavi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - David R Jones
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles M Rudin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - James M Isbell
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bob T Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hubbeling H, Choudhury N, Flynn J, Zhang Z, Falcon C, Rusch VW, Park BJ, Ziv E, Shaverdian N, Gelblum DY, Shepherd AF, Simone CB, Wu AJ, Gomez DR, Drilon A, Rimner A. Outcomes With Local Therapy and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition in Patients With ALK/ ROS1/ RET-Rearranged Lung Cancers. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200024. [PMID: 36201714 PMCID: PMC9848570 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Local therapy prolongs progression-free survival in patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancers treated with chemotherapy. We previously reported that local therapy also prolongs survival and time to next therapy in patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas. Here, we investigate the role of local therapy in patients progressing on TKIs for ALK/ROS1/RET-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with advanced ALK/ROS/RET-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas who underwent radiation, surgery, or percutaneous thermal ablation from 2012 to 2020 for progression on an ALK/ROS1/RET TKI were included. Progression patterns were identified. Times from local therapy to progression, next therapy, and death were measured. RESULTS Sixty-one patients with ALK (n = 37), ROS1 (n = 12), and RET (n = 12) fusions were identified. Patients received radiotherapy (92%), surgery (13%), and percutaneous thermal ablation (8%). Local therapy was administered for solitary/oligoprogressive (94%) or polyprogressive (6%) disease. For most patients (85%), local therapy addressed all progressing sites. The median times from any local therapy to subsequent progression and next systemic therapy were 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 8.1) and 10 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 15.3), respectively. Third or greater local therapy was associated with shorter time to progression and next therapy than first/second local therapies (hazard ratio, 4.97; P < .001 and hazard ratio, 2.48; P < .001). The median overall survival from first local therapy was 34 months (95% CI, 26 to not reached). CONCLUSION Local therapy for progression on ALK, ROS1, or RET TKIs is associated with clinically meaningful time on continued TKI therapy beyond progression, especially earlier in the course of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harper Hubbeling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Noura Choudhury
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jessica Flynn
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Christina Falcon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Etay Ziv
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Narek Shaverdian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daphna Y. Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Annemarie F. Shepherd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel R. Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alexander Drilon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Choe JK, Zhu A, Byun AJ, Zheng J, Tan KS, Dycoco J, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Downey RJ, Huang J, Isbell JM, Molena D, Rusch VW, Park BJ, Rocco G, Sihag S, Jones DR, Adusumilli PS. Brief Report: Contralateral Lobectomy for Second Primary NSCLC: Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes. JTO Clin Res Rep 2022; 3:100362. [PMID: 35859764 PMCID: PMC9289639 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Anatomical resection-often by lobectomy-is the standard of care for patients with early stage NSCLC. With increased diagnosis, survival, and prevalence of persons with early stage NSCLC, the incidence of second primary NSCLC, and consequently, the need for contralateral lobectomy for a metachronous cancer, is increasing. Perioperative outcomes after contralateral lobectomy are unknown. Methods Among patients who underwent contralateral lobectomy for second primary NSCLC during 1995 to 2020, we evaluated 90-day mortality and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grades 3-5) rates and their association with clinicopathologic variables, including the year of contralateral lobectomy and duration between lobectomies. Results A total of 98 patients underwent contralateral lobectomy for second primary NSCLC; 51 during an early time period (1995-2009) and 47 from a late time period (2010-2020). There were five mortalities and 23 patients with major morbidities after contralateral lobectomy; both rates decreased in 2010 to 2020 compared with 1995 to 2009 (mortality 10%-0%, major morbidity 35%-11%). Major morbidity was associated with an interval of less than 1 year between lobectomies, a diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide <80%, and right lower lobe resections. Mortality was associated with squamous cell carcinoma. Patients who underwent contralateral lobectomy for stage I NSCLC had 74% (95% confidence interval: 64%-85%) 3-year overall survival and 15% (95% confidence interval: 6.5%-24%) 3-year lung cancer cumulative incidence of death. Conclusions Contralateral lobectomy for second primary early stage NSCLC was associated with poor outcomes before 2010. Since 2010, perioperative and long-term outcomes of contralateral lobectomy have been comparable with reported outcomes after unilateral lobectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie K. Choe
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy Zhu
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alexander J. Byun
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Junting Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joe Dycoco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manjit S. Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew J. Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert J. Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James M. Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prasad S. Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York,Corresponding author. Address for correspondence: Prasad S. Adusumilli, MD, FACS, Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cowzer D, Wu AJC, Sihag S, Walch HS, Park BJ, Jones DR, Gu P, Maron SB, Sugarman R, Chalasani SB, Shcherba M, Capanu M, Chou JF, Nosov A, Yeh R, Tang LH, Ilson DH, Janjigian YY, Molena D, Ku GY. Durvalumab (D) and PET-directed chemoradiation (CRT) after induction FOLFOX for esophageal adenocarcinoma: Final results. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4029 Background: Induction FOLFOX followed by PET-directed CRT prior to surgery demonstrated positive results in the CALGB 80803 study. We investigated the safety and efficacy of adding D, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, to PET-directed CRT. Methods: Patients (pts) with locally advanced esophageal/GEJ adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Pts received 2 cycles of mFOLFOX6 prior to repeat PET/CT. PET responders (≥35% reduction in SUV (PETr)) received 5-FU/capecitabine and oxaliplatin with RT to 50.4Gy, while induction PET non-responders (PETnr) received carboplatin/paclitaxel with RT. All Pts received D 1,500 mg q4W ×2 starting 2 weeks prior to CRT. Esophagectomy was planned 6-8 weeks after CRT. Pts with R0 resections received adjuvant D 1,500mg q4W ×6. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Results: 36 pts were enrolled. Clinical ≥T3 disease was seen in 32 pts (88.9%, cT4 = 3) and ≥N1 in 23 (63.9%) pts. PD-L1 CPS was ≥1 in 25 (71.4%) of 35 tested with 14 (40%) ≥5. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was identified in 3 (8.3%) pts. 25 (70%) pts were PETr. Preop treatment was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Three pts had disease progression prior to surgery. pCR was identified in 8 (22.2%) pts and 22 (64.7%) had major pathologic response (MPR; ypTanyN0 + ≥90% response). Those with MSI tumors had ≥90% treatment response (1 pCR, 1: ypT1aN0 99% response, 1: ypT2N0, 90% response). 17 (73.9%) of 23 cN+ pts had ypN0 disease. MPR was associated with PD-L1 ≥1 (p = 0.03) and with a higher tumor mutational burden (TMB; p = 0.016) on MSK-IMPACT testing. Adjuvant D was commenced in 27 pts, with a median number of 6 cycles. Early discontinuation was due to risks of visits due to COVID19 (4, 15%), progressive disease (3, 11%), late surgical complications (2, 7%) and immune toxicity (1, 4%). With a median follow-up of 30 months, OS rates were 92% [95%CI: 83%-100%] and 85 % [95%CI: 74%-98%] at 12 and 24 months post induction. 12 and 24-month PFS rates were 81% [95%CI: 69%-95%] and 71% [95%CI: 58%-88%] respectively. In the 33 operated pts, 12 and 24-month disease free survival was 82% [95%CI: 70%-96%] and 78% [95%CI: 65%-94%], respectively. In addition to SUV on PET, total lesion glycolysis (TLG) was correlated with pathologic response. In cases with borderline change in SUV, TLG could predict response to treatment. One PETnr with 30.8% reduction in SUV had 88.1% reduction in TLG and pCR. Conversely, a PETr (-36.3%) who had an increase in TLG (39.3%) had only 40% treatment response on pathology. Conclusions: The addition of D to induction FOLFOX and PET-directed CRT prior to surgery is safe and appears effective with a high rate of pathologic response, as well as encouraging survival data. PD-L1 CPS≥1 and higher TMB may be associated with MPR. TLG is a novel PET variable that should be studied prospectively. Additional correlatives and comparison to a cohort treated with standard PET-directed CRT will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02962063.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Cowzer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Smita Sihag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Ping Gu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Ryan Sugarman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Marinela Capanu
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - Joanne F. Chou
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - Anton Nosov
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Laura H. Tang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Geoffrey Yuyat Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vos EL, Nakauchi M, Capanu M, Park BJ, Coit DG, Molena D, Yoon SS, Jones DR, Strong VE. Phase II Trial Evaluating Esophageal Anastomotic Reinforcement with a Biologic, Degradable, Extracellular Matrix after Total Gastrectomy and Esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:910-917. [PMID: 35426405 PMCID: PMC9128801 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A biologic, degradable extracellular matrix (ECM) has been shown to support esophageal tissue remodeling, which could reduce the risk of anastomotic leak following total gastrectomy and esophagectomy. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of reinforcing the anastomosis with ECM in reducing anastomotic leak as compared to a matched cohort. STUDY DESIGN In this single-center, nonrandomized phase II trial, gastric or esophageal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing total gastrectomy or esophagectomy were recruited from November 2013 through December 2018. ECM was surgically wrapped circumferentially around the anastomosis. Anastomotic leak was assessed clinically and by contrast study and defined as clinically significant if requiring invasive treatment (grade 3 or higher). Anastomotic stenosis, other adverse events, symptoms, and dysphagia score were collected by standardized forms at regular follow-up visits at approximately postoperative days (POD) 21 and 90. Patients receiving ECM were compared to a cohort matched for surgery type and age. RESULTS ECM placement was not feasible in 9 of 75 patients (12%), resulting in 66 patients receiving ECM. Total gastrectomy was performed in 50 patients (76%) and esophagectomy in 16 (24%). Clinically significant anastomotic leak was diagnosed in 6 of 66 patients (9.1%) (3/50 [6.0%] after gastrectomy, 3/16 [18.8%] after esophagectomy); this rate did not differ from that in the matched cohort (p = 0.57). Stenosis requiring invasive treatment occurred in 8 patients (12.5%), and 10 patients (15.6%) reported not being able to eat a normal diet at POD 90. No adverse events related to ECM were reported. CONCLUSIONS Esophageal anastomotic reinforcement after total gastrectomy or esophagectomy with a biologic, degradable ECM was mostly feasible and safe, but was not associated with a statistically significant decrease in anastomotic leak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvira L Vos
- From the Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service (Vos, Nakauchi, Coit, Yoon, Strong), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Masaya Nakauchi
- From the Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service (Vos, Nakauchi, Coit, Yoon, Strong), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marinela Capanu
- Department of Surgery, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (Capanu), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service (Park, Molena, Jones), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel G Coit
- From the Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service (Vos, Nakauchi, Coit, Yoon, Strong), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service (Park, Molena, Jones), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samuel S Yoon
- From the Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service (Vos, Nakauchi, Coit, Yoon, Strong), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service (Park, Molena, Jones), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Vivian E Strong
- From the Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service (Vos, Nakauchi, Coit, Yoon, Strong), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jones GD, Caso R, Tan KS, Dycoco J, Adusumilli PS, Bains MS, Downey RJ, Huang J, Isbell JM, Molena D, Park BJ, Rocco G, Rusch VW, Sihag S, Jones DR, Bott MJ. Propensity-matched Analysis Demonstrates Long-term Risk of Respiratory and Cardiac Mortality After Pneumonectomy Compared With Lobectomy for Lung Cancer. Ann Surg 2022; 275:793-799. [PMID: 32541218 PMCID: PMC9326811 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to quantify and characterize long-term consequences of pneumonectomy, with particular attention to nononcologic mortality. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Pneumonectomy is associated with profound changes in cardiopulmonary physiology. Studies of long-term outcomes after pneumonectomy typically report generalized measures, such as disease-free and overall survival. METHODS Patients undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy for lung cancer at our institution from 2000 to 2018 were reviewed. Propensity-score matching was performed for 12 clinicopathologic factors. Ninety-day complications and deaths were compared. Five-year cumulative incidence of oncologic and nononcologic mortality were compared using competing risks approaches. RESULTS From 3339 lobectomy and 355 pneumonectomy patients identified, we derived 318 matched pairs. At 90 days, rates of overall complications were similar (46% for pneumonectomy vs 43% for lobectomy; P = 0.40), but rates of major complications (21% vs 13%; P = 0.005) and deaths (6.9% vs 1.9%; P = 0.002) were higher the pneumonectomy cohort. The cumulative incidence of oncologic mortality was not significantly different between cohorts (P = 0.9584). However, the cumulative incidence of nononcologic mortality was substantially higher in the pneumonectomy cohort for both date of surgery and 1-year landmark analyses (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0002, respectively). Forty-five pneumonectomy patients (18%) died of nononcologic causes 1-5 years after surgery; pneumonia (n = 21) and myocardial infarction (n = 10) were the most common causes. In pneumonectomy patients, preexisting cardiac comorbidity and low diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide were predictive of nononcologic mortality. CONCLUSIONS Compared to lobectomy, excess mortality after pneumonectomy extends beyond 1 year and is driven primarily by nononcologic causes. Pneumonectomy patients require lifelong monitoring and may benefit from expeditious assessment and intervention at the initial signs of illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory D. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raul Caso
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joseph Dycoco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Prasad S. Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Manjit S. Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert J. Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James M. Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew J. Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Harrington CA, Carr RA, Hsu M, Tan KS, Sihag S, Adusumilli PS, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Isbell JM, Park BJ, Rocco G, Rusch VW, Jones DR, Molena D. Patterns and Impact of Nodal Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and R0 Resection in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 164:411-419. [PMID: 35346491 PMCID: PMC9288545 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Little is known about the pattern of nodal metastases in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and undergone surgery. We sought to assess this pattern and evaluate its association with prognosis. METHODS All patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation and R0 esophagectomy between 2010 and 2018 at our institution were included (n = 537). The primary objective was to evaluate the association of sites of lymph node metastases with disease-free survival. The number of nodal stations and individual sites of nodal metastases were evaluated first in univariable then in separate multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for clinical factors. RESULTS Of 537 patients, 193 (36%) had pathologic nodal metastases at the time of surgery; 153 (28%) had single-station disease, 32 (6.0%) had 2-station disease, and 8 (1.5%) had 3-station disease. The majority of patients with multiple positive nodal stations had positive nodes in the paraesophageal (93%) and/or left gastric stations (60%). Multivariable models controlling for clinical factors showed that an increasing number of positive nodal stations (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.35-1.84; P < .01)-in particular, the subcarinal (hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.54-5.03; P < .01) and paraesophageal stations (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.58-2.54; P < .01)-was associated with increased risk of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS One-third of patients who have undergone R0 resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma following induction chemoradiation therapy have metastatic lymph nodes. An increasing number of nodal stations, particularly paraesophageal and subcarinal metastases, were associated with increased risk of recurrence.
Collapse
|
26
|
Park BJ. Minimally invasive lung resection after induction therapy: Is there evidence? JTCVS Open 2021; 8:585-587. [PMID: 36004063 PMCID: PMC9390738 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
27
|
Connolly JG, Fiasconaro M, Tan KS, Cirelli MA, Jones GD, Caso R, Mansour DE, Dycoco J, No JS, Molena D, Isbell JM, Park BJ, Bott MJ, Jones DR, Rocco G. Postinduction therapy pulmonary function retesting is necessary before surgical resection for non–small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 164:389-397.e7. [PMID: 35086669 PMCID: PMC9218003 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pretreatment-predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) has been associated with operative mortality in patients who receive induction therapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is unknown whether a reduction in pulmonary function after induction therapy and before surgery affects the risk of morbidity or mortality. We sought to determine the relationship between induction therapy and perioperative outcomes as a function of postinduction pulmonary status in patients who underwent surgical resection for NSCLC. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data for 1001 patients with pathologic stage I, II, or III NSCLC who received induction therapy before lung resection. Pulmonary function was defined according to American College of Surgeons Oncology Group major criteria: DLCO ≥50% = normal; DLCO <50% = impaired. Patients were categorized into 5 subgroups according to combined pre- and postinduction DLCO status: normal-normal, normal-impaired, impaired-normal, impaired-impaired, and preinduction only (without postinduction pulmonary function test measurements). Multivariable logistic regression was used to quantify the relationship between DLCO categories and dichotomous end points. RESULTS In multivariable analysis, normal-impaired DLCO status was associated with an increased risk of respiratory complications (odds ratio, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.12-4.49]; P = .02) and in-hospital complications (odds ratio, 2.83 [95% CI, 1.55-5.26]; P < .001). Type of neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with an increased risk of complications, compared with conventional chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Reduced postinduction DLCO might predict perioperative outcomes. The use of repeat pulmonary function testing might identify patients at higher risk of morbidity or mortality.
Collapse
|
28
|
Nobel TB, Carr RA, Caso R, Livschitz J, Nussenzweig S, Hsu M, Tan KS, Sihag S, Adusumilli PS, Bott MJ, Downey RJ, Huang J, Isbell JM, Park BJ, Rocco G, Rusch VW, Jones DR, Molena D. Primary lung cancer in women after previous breast cancer. BJS Open 2021; 5:6510887. [PMID: 35040941 PMCID: PMC8765335 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the USA. Improved survival has resulted in increasing incidence of second primary malignancies, of which lung cancer is the most common. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for lung-cancer screening do not include previous malignancy as a high-risk feature requiring evaluation. The aim of this study was to compare women undergoing resection for lung cancer with and without a history of breast cancer and to assess whether there were differences in stage at diagnosis, survival and eligibility for lung-cancer screening between the two groups. METHODS Women who underwent lung-cancer resection between 2000 and 2017 were identified. Demographic, clinicopathological, treatment and outcomes data were compared between patients with a history of breast cancer (BC-Lung) and patients without a history of breast cancer (P-Lung) before lung cancer. RESULTS Of 2192 patients included, 331 (15.1 per cent) were in the BC-Lung group. The most common method of lung-cancer diagnosis in the BC-Lung group was breast-cancer surveillance or work-up imaging. Patients in the BC-Lung group had an earlier stage of lung cancer at the time of diagnosis. Five-year overall survival was not statistically significantly different between groups (73.3 per cent for both). Overall, 58.4 per cent of patients (1281 patients) had a history of smoking, and 33.3 per cent (731 patients) met the current criteria for lung-cancer screening. CONCLUSION Differences in stage at diagnosis of lung cancer and treatment selection were observed between patients with and without a history of breast cancer. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in genomic or oncogenic pathway alterations between the two groups, which suggests that lung cancer in patients who previously had breast cancer may not be affected at the genomic level by the previous breast cancer. The most important finding of the study was that a high percentage of women with lung cancer, regardless of breast-cancer history, did not meet the current USPSTF criteria for lung-cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar B Nobel
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rebecca A Carr
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raul Caso
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer Livschitz
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samuel Nussenzweig
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Meier Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matthew J Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert J Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - James M Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Carr RA, Harrington C, Vos E, Bains MS, Bott MJ, Isbell JM, Park BJ, Sihag S, Jones DR, Molena D. Treatment of anastomotic recurrence after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 114:418-425. [PMID: 34509415 PMCID: PMC8938857 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.07.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isolated local recurrence after curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a rare event. Although it is potentially curable, management can be challenging. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) from 2000 to 2019. Date of recurrence was defined as the date at which the initial abnormal surveillance study or symptomatic presentation led to further workup and subsequent pathologic diagnosis of recurrence. Overall survival after recurrence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between treatment groups using the log-rank test. RESULTS Of the 1370 patients with EAC who underwent esophagectomy in our cohort, 531 (39%) developed recurrence of their disease. The 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0%-3.6%) for local, 6.3% (95% CI, 5.2%-7.8%) for regional, and 22.0% (95% CI, 20.0%-24.4%) for distant recurrences. On univariable and multivariable competing-risk regression analysis, advanced pT stage, signet ring histology, and serious complication were independently associated with local recurrence. Patients with local recurrence treated with definitive therapy had a median survival after recurrence of 19.1 months (95% CI, 11.4-33.2 months), compared with 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.5-14.2 months) for chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone and 1.73 months (95% CI, 0.23-15.6 months) for no treatment (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Isolated local recurrence occurred in only 3% of patients. Advanced T stage, signet cell histology, and serious complication were risk factors for recurrence. Although complex surgical resection is required, in very select cases, more-aggressive treatment may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Carr
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Caitlin Harrington
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Elvira Vos
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Manjit S Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew J Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James M Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vimolratana M, Sarkaria IS, Goldman DA, Rizk NP, Tan KS, Bains MS, Adusumilli PS, Sihag S, Isbell JM, Huang J, Park BJ, Molena D, Rusch VW, Jones DR, Bott MJ. Two-Year Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 112:880-889. [DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
31
|
Cao C, Louie BE, Melfi F, Veronesi G, Razzak R, Romano G, Novellis P, Ranganath NK, Park BJ. Impact of pulmonary function on pulmonary complications after robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 57:338-342. [PMID: 31332434 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Revised: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Percentage-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and their predicted postoperative (ppo) values are established prognostic factors for postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracotomy. However, their predictive value for minimally invasive pulmonary resections remains controversial. This study assessed the incidence of pulmonary complications after robotic lobectomy for primary lung cancer and analysed the predictive significance of FEV1 and DLCO. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent robotic lobectomy from 4 institutions. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed for patients who experienced pulmonary complications versus patients who did not, in relation to FEV1 and DLCO values. To identify thresholds for increased complications, patients were categorized into groups of 10% incremental increases in FEV1 and DLCO, and their ppo values. RESULTS From November 2002 to April 2018, 1088 patients underwent robotic lobectomy. Overall, 169 postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 141 patients. Male gender and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grade ≥1 were associated with increased pulmonary complications on univariable analysis. Patients who experienced pulmonary complications had increased mortality (2.1% vs 0.2%, P = 0.017) and longer hospitalizations (9 vs 4 days, P < 0.001). Pulmonary complications were associated when FEV1 ≤60% and DLCO ≤50%, and when ppo FEV1 or DLCO was ≤50%; ppo FEV1 ≤50% (P < 0.001) and ppo DLCO ≤50% (P = 0.031) remained statistically significant on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Both FEV1 and DLCO were shown to be significant predictors of pulmonary complications. Furthermore, thresholds of percentage-predicted and ppo FEV1 and DLCO values were identified, below which pulmonary complications occurred significantly more frequently, suggesting their predictive values are particularly useful in patients with poorer pulmonary function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Cao
- Department of Surgery, Thoracic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brian E Louie
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Franca Melfi
- Robotic Multispecialty Center for Surgery Robotic, Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Rene Razzak
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gaetano Romano
- Robotic Multispecialty Center for Surgery Robotic, Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Novellis
- Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Neel K Ranganath
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bernard J Park
- Department of Surgery, Thoracic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jones GD, Caso R, No JS, Tan KS, Dycoco J, Bains MS, Rusch VW, Huang J, Isbell JM, Molena D, Park BJ, Jones DR, Rocco G. Prognostic factors following complete resection of non-superior sulcus lung cancer invading the chest wall. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 58:78-85. [PMID: 32040170 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with chest wall invasion carries a high risk of recurrence and portends poor survival (30-40% and 20-50%, respectively). No studies have identified prognostic factors in patients who underwent R0 resection for non-superior sulcus NSCLC. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted for all chest wall resections for NSCLC from 2004 to 2018. Patients with superior sulcus tumours, partial (<1 rib) or incomplete (R1/R2) resection or distant metastasis were excluded. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to determine factors associated with DFS and OS. RESULTS A total of 100 patients met inclusion criteria. Seventy-three (73%) patients underwent induction therapy, and all but 12 (16%) patients experienced a partial radiological response. A median of 3 ribs was resected (range 1-7), and 67 (67%) patients underwent chest wall reconstruction. The 5-year DFS and OS were 36% and 45%, respectively. Pathological N2 status [hazard ratio (HR) 3.12, confidence interval (CI) 1.56-6.25; P = 0.001], intraoperative blood transfusion (HR 2.24, CI 1.28-3.92; P = 0.005) and preoperative forced vital capacity (per % forced vital capacity, HR 0.97, CI 0.96-0.99; P = 0.013) were associated with DFS. Increasing pathological stage, lack of radiological response to induction therapy (HR 7.35, CI 2.35-22.99; P = 0.001) and cardiovascular comorbidity (HR 2.43, CI 1.36-4.36; P = 0.003) were associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that blood transfusion and forced vital capacity are associated with DFS after R0 resection for non-superior sulcus NSCLC, while radiological response to induction therapy greatly influences OS. We confirm that pathological nodal status and pathological stage are reproducible determinants of DFS and OS, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory D Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Raul Caso
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jae Seong No
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kay See Tan
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph Dycoco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Manjit S Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James M Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Banerjee SC, Haque N, Schofield EA, Williamson TJ, Martin CM, Bylund CL, Shen MJ, Rigney M, Hamann HA, Parker PA, McFarland DC, Park BJ, Molena D, Moreno A, Ostroff JS. Oncology Care Provider Training in Empathic Communication Skills to Reduce Lung Cancer Stigma. Chest 2021; 159:2040-2049. [PMID: 33338443 PMCID: PMC8129726 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the clinical importance of assessing smoking history and advising patients who smoke to quit, patients with lung cancer often experience feelings of blame and stigma during clinical encounters with their oncology care providers (OCPs). Promoting empathic communication during these encounters may help reduce patients' experience of stigma and improve related clinical outcomes. This paper presents the evaluation of OCP- and patient-reported data on the usefulness of an OCP-targeted empathic communication skills (ECS) training to reduce the stigma of lung cancer and improve communication. RESEARCH QUESTION What is the impact of the ECS intervention on OCPs' communication skills uptake and patient-reported outcomes (lung cancer stigma, satisfaction with communication, and perceived OCP empathy)? METHODS Study subjects included 30 multidisciplinary OCPs treating patients with lung cancer who participated in a 2.25 h ECS training. Standardized Patient Assessments were conducted prior to and following training to assess ECS uptake among OCPs. In addition, of a planned 180 patients who currently or formerly smoked (six unique patients per OCP [three pretraining, three posttraining]), 175 patients (89 pretraining, 86 posttraining) completed post-OCP visit surveys eliciting feedback on the quality of their interaction with their OCP. RESULTS OCPs exhibited an overall increase in use of empathic communication skills [t(28) = -2.37; P < .05], stigma-mitigating skills [t(28) = -3.88; P < .001], and breadth of communication skill use [t(28) = -2.91; P < .01]. Patients reported significantly higher overall satisfaction with communication post-ECS training, compared with pretraining [t(121) = 2.15; P = .034; Cohen d = 0.35]. There were no significant differences from pretraining to posttraining for patient-reported stigma or perceived OCP empathy. INTERPRETATION Empathy-based, stigma-reducing communication may lead to improved assessments of tobacco use and smoking cessation for patients with smoking-related cancers. These findings support the dissemination and further testing of a new ECS model for training OCPs in best practices for assessment of smoking history and engagement of patients who currently smoke in tobacco treatment delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita C Banerjee
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY..
| | - Noshin Haque
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Elizabeth A Schofield
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Timothy J Williamson
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Chloe M Martin
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Carma L Bylund
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Megan J Shen
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Maureen Rigney
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Heidi A Hamann
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Patricia A Parker
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel C McFarland
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Aimee Moreno
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jamie S Ostroff
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (S. C. Banerjee, N. Haque, E. A. Schofield, T. J. Williamson, C. M. Martin, P. A. Parker, D. C. McFarland, A. Moreno, J. S. Ostroff), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Public Relations (C. L. Bylund), Division of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine (M. J. Shen), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Support Initiatives, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer (M. Rigney), Washington, DC; Department of Psychology and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (H. A. Hamann), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and Department of Surgery (B. J. Park, D. Molena), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wu H, Jin R, Yang S, Park BJ, Li H. Long-term and short-term outcomes of robot- versus video-assisted anatomic lung resection in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 59:732-740. [PMID: 33367615 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Minimally invasive thoracic surgery has evolved with the introduction of robotic platforms. This study aimed to compare the long-term and short-term outcomes of the robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for anatomic lung resection. METHODS We searched published studies that investigated RATS and VATS in anatomic lung resection. Long-term outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) and short-term outcomes (30-day mortality, postoperative complications, conversion rate to open surgery and lymph node upstaging) were extracted. The features were compared and tested as hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) at a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Twenty-five studies with 50 404 patients (7135 for RATS and 43 269 for VATS) were included. The RATS group had a longer disease-free survival than the VATS group (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.59-0.97; P = 0.03), and the overall survival showed a similar trend but was not statistically significant (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.57-1.05; P = 0.10). The RATS group showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.38-0.81; P = 0.002). No significant difference was found in postoperative complications (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.87-1.16; P = 0.94), the conversion rate to open surgery (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.56-1.52; P = 0.75) and lymph node upstaging (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.52-1.54; P = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS RATS has comparable short-term outcomes and potential long-term survival benefits for anatomic lung resection compared with VATS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Wu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Runsen Jin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Su Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hecheng Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jones GD, Lengel HB, Hsu M, Tan KS, Caso R, Ghanie A, Connolly JG, Bains MS, Rusch VW, Huang J, Park BJ, Gomez DR, Jones DR, Rocco G. Management of Synchronous Extrathoracic Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081893. [PMID: 33920810 PMCID: PMC8071146 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 35 to 40% of newly diagnosed cases of NSCLC. The oligometastatic state-≤5 extrathoracic metastatic lesions in ≤3 organs-is present in ~25% of patients with stage IV disease and is associated with markedly improved outcomes. We retrospectively identified patients with extrathoracic oligometastatic NSCLC who underwent primary tumor resection at our institution from 2000 to 2018. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with EFS and OS were determined using Cox regression. In total, 111 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC underwent primary tumor resection; 87 (78%) had a single metastatic lesion. Local consolidative therapy for metastases was performed in 93 patients (84%). Seventy-seven patients experienced recurrence or progression. The five-year EFS was 19% (95% confidence interval (CI), 12-29%), and the five-year OS was 36% (95% CI, 27-50%). Factors independently associated with EFS were primary tumor size (hazard ratio (HR), 1.15 (95% CI, 1.03-1.29); p = 0.014) and lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.73 (95% CI, 1.06-2.84); p = 0.029). Factors independently associated with OS were neoadjuvant therapy (HR, 0.43 (95% CI, 0.24-0.77); p = 0.004), primary tumor size (HR, 1.18 (95% CI, 1.02-1.35); p = 0.023), pathologic nodal disease (HR, 1.83 (95% CI, 1.05-3.20); p = 0.033), and visceral-pleural invasion (HR, 1.93 (95% CI, 1.10-3.40); p = 0.022). Primary tumor resection represents an important treatment option in the multimodal management of extrathoracic oligometastatic NSCLC. Encouraging long-term survival can be achieved in carefully selected patients, including those who received neoadjuvant therapy and those with limited intrathoracic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory D. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (G.D.J.); (H.B.L.); (R.C.); (J.G.C.); (M.S.B.); (V.W.R.); (J.H.); (B.J.P.); (D.R.J.)
| | - Harry B. Lengel
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (G.D.J.); (H.B.L.); (R.C.); (J.G.C.); (M.S.B.); (V.W.R.); (J.H.); (B.J.P.); (D.R.J.)
| | - Meier Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (M.H.); (K.S.T.)
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (M.H.); (K.S.T.)
| | - Raul Caso
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (G.D.J.); (H.B.L.); (R.C.); (J.G.C.); (M.S.B.); (V.W.R.); (J.H.); (B.J.P.); (D.R.J.)
| | - Amanda Ghanie
- College of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA;
| | - James G. Connolly
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (G.D.J.); (H.B.L.); (R.C.); (J.G.C.); (M.S.B.); (V.W.R.); (J.H.); (B.J.P.); (D.R.J.)
| | - Manjit S. Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (G.D.J.); (H.B.L.); (R.C.); (J.G.C.); (M.S.B.); (V.W.R.); (J.H.); (B.J.P.); (D.R.J.)
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (G.D.J.); (H.B.L.); (R.C.); (J.G.C.); (M.S.B.); (V.W.R.); (J.H.); (B.J.P.); (D.R.J.)
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (G.D.J.); (H.B.L.); (R.C.); (J.G.C.); (M.S.B.); (V.W.R.); (J.H.); (B.J.P.); (D.R.J.)
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (G.D.J.); (H.B.L.); (R.C.); (J.G.C.); (M.S.B.); (V.W.R.); (J.H.); (B.J.P.); (D.R.J.)
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Daniel R. Gomez
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (G.D.J.); (H.B.L.); (R.C.); (J.G.C.); (M.S.B.); (V.W.R.); (J.H.); (B.J.P.); (D.R.J.)
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (G.D.J.); (H.B.L.); (R.C.); (J.G.C.); (M.S.B.); (V.W.R.); (J.H.); (B.J.P.); (D.R.J.)
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yang MZ, Lai RC, Abbas AE, Park BJ, Li JB, Yang J, Wu JC, Wang G, Yang HX. Learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy for pulmonary neoplasms: A prospective observational study. Thorac Cancer 2021; 12:1431-1440. [PMID: 33709571 PMCID: PMC8088972 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aim to assess the learning curve of robotic portal lobectomy with four arms (RPL‐4) in patients with pulmonary neoplasms using prospectively collected data. Methods Data from 100 consecutive cases with lung neoplasms undergoing RPL‐4 were prospectively accumulated into a database between June 2018 and August 2019. The Da Vinci Si system was used to perform RPL‐4. Regression curves of cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) and risk‐adjusted CUSUM (RA‐CUSUM) were fit to identify different phases of the learning curve. Clinical indicators and patient characteristics were compared between different phases. Results The mean operative time, console time, and docking time for the entire cohort were 130.6 ± 53.8, 95.5 ± 52.3, and 6.4 ± 3.0 min, respectively. Based on CUSUM analysis of console time, the surgical experience can be divided into three different phases: 1–10 cases (learning phase), 11–51 cases (plateau phase), and >51 cases (mastery phase). RA‐CUSUM analysis revealed that experience based on 56 cases was required to truly master this technique. Total operative time (p < 0.001), console time (p < 0.001), and docking time (p = 0.026) were reduced as experience increased. However, other indicators were not significantly different among these three phases. Conclusions The RPL‐4 learning curve can be divided into three phases. Ten cases were required to pass the learning curve, but the mastery of RPL‐4 for satisfactory surgical outcomes requires experience with at least 56 cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mu-Zi Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ren-Chun Lai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Abbas E Abbas
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin-Chun Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Maoming Farm Hospital of Guangdong Province, Maoming City, China
| | - Gang Wang
- Ganzhou Tumor Hospital, Ganzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao-Xian Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Jones GD, Brandt WS, Shen R, Sanchez-Vega F, Tan KS, Martin A, Zhou J, Berger M, Solit DB, Schultz N, Rizvi H, Liu Y, Adamski A, Chaft JE, Riely GJ, Rocco G, Bott MJ, Molena D, Ladanyi M, Travis WD, Rekhtman N, Park BJ, Adusumilli PS, Lyden D, Imielinski M, Mayo MW, Li BT, Jones DR. A Genomic-Pathologic Annotated Risk Model to Predict Recurrence in Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:e205601. [PMID: 33355651 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Importance Recommendations for adjuvant therapy after surgical resection of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are based solely on TNM classification but are agnostic to genomic and high-risk clinicopathologic factors. Creation of a prediction model that integrates tumor genomic and clinicopathologic factors may better identify patients at risk for recurrence. Objective To identify tumor genomic factors independently associated with recurrence, even in the presence of aggressive, high-risk clinicopathologic variables, in patients with completely resected stages I to III LUAD, and to develop a computational machine-learning prediction model (PRecur) to determine whether the integration of genomic and clinicopathologic features could better predict risk of recurrence, compared with the TNM system. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study included 426 patients treated from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017, at a single large cancer center and selected in consecutive samples. Eligibility criteria included complete surgical resection of stages I to III LUAD, broad-panel next-generation sequencing data with matched clinicopathologic data, and no neoadjuvant therapy. External validation of the PRecur prediction model was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Data were analyzed from 2014 to 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures The study end point consisted of relapse-free survival (RFS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. Associations among clinicopathologic factors, genomic alterations, and RFS were established using Cox proportional hazards regression. The PRecur prediction model integrated genomic and clinicopathologic factors using gradient-boosting survival regression for risk group generation and prediction of RFS. A concordance probability estimate (CPE) was used to assess the predictive ability of the PRecur model. Results Of the 426 patients included in the analysis (286 women [67%]; median age at surgery, 69 [interquartile range, 62-75] years), 318 (75%) had stage I cancer. Association analysis showed that alterations in SMARCA4 (clinicopathologic-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.44; 95% CI, 1.03-5.77; P = .042) and TP53 (clinicopathologic-adjusted HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.09-2.73; P = .02) and the fraction of genome altered (clinicopathologic-adjusted HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.10-1.04; P = .005) were independently associated with RFS. The PRecur prediction model outperformed the TNM-based model (CPE, 0.73 vs 0.61; difference, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.05-0.19]; P < .001) for prediction of RFS. To validate the prediction model, PRecur was applied to the TCGA LUAD data set (n = 360), and a clear separation of risk groups was noted (log-rank statistic, 7.5; P = .02), confirming external validation. Conclusions and Relevance The findings suggest that integration of tumor genomics and clinicopathologic features improves risk stratification and prediction of recurrence after surgical resection of early-stage LUAD. Improved identification of patients at risk for recurrence could enrich and enhance accrual to adjuvant therapy clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory D Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Whitney S Brandt
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ronglai Shen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Francisco Sanchez-Vega
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Axel Martin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jian Zhou
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael Berger
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David B Solit
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hira Rizvi
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yuan Liu
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ariana Adamski
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jamie E Chaft
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Gregory J Riely
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew J Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - William D Travis
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Natasha Rekhtman
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David Lyden
- Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Marcin Imielinski
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Genome Center, New York
| | - Marty W Mayo
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | - Bob T Li
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ku GY, Wu AJC, Sihag S, Park BJ, Jones DR, Gu P, Maron SB, Sugarman R, Chalasani SB, Shcherba M, Feder L, Cowie K, Norris J, Johnson V, Tang LH, Ilson DH, Janjigian YY, Molena D. Durvalumab (D) and PET-directed chemoradiation (CRT) after induction FOLFOX for esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.3_suppl.226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
226 Background: Based on the positive results of the CALGB 80803 study (J Clin Oncol 2017;35:1 [abstr]), we have added D to induction FOLFOX and pre-op CRT. Methods: Patients (Pts) had TanyN+ or T3-4NanyM0 esophageal and Siewert Type I-III GEJ adenocarcinoma staged by EUS, PET/CT and CT. Pts received mFOLFOX6 ×2 prior to repeat PET/CT. PET responders (PETr) received 5-FU or capecitabine and oxaliplatin with RT to 50.4Gy, while induction PET non-responders (PETnr) received carboplatin/paclitaxel with RT. All Pts received D 1,500 mg q4W ×2 starting 2 wks prior to and during CRT. Esophagectomy was planned 6-8 weeks after CRT. Pts who had R0 resections received adjuvant D 1,500mg q4W ×6. Results: 36 Pts have been enrolled: 25 GEJ, 11 esophageal; 23 N+ and 32 T3/4. 26 of 36 Pts (72%) are PETr. 2 Pts developed metastatic disease after CRT and 9 Pts remain on preop treatment. 25 Pts have had surgery (Table). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was seen in 6 (24%); 5 Pts (20%) had ypT1N0 tumors with 99% response and 2 Pts (8%) had ypT0N1 with 99% response. 20 Pts (80%) had >90% response. 3 Pts had MSI tumors (2 PETr; 1 pCR, 1 T1aN0 99% response, 1 ypT2N0 90% response). Notable grade (gd) 3/4 adverse events (AEs) observed were neutropenia in 8 Pts (22%), diarrhea and vomiting in 2 Pts each (6%). Notable gd 1/2 AEs in ≥20%: anemia (31 Pts), thrombocytopenia (29 Pts), nausea (21 Pts), fatigue (25 Pts), increased AST (20 Pts), constipation and diarrhea (9 Pts), diarrhea (8 Pts). Immune-related AEs noted were gd 2 dermatitis (2 Pts), gd 3 hepatitis and gd 1 hypothyroidism in 1 Pt each. Median length of post-op stay was 8 days, with 12% anastomotic complication rate, including 1 Pt who died of hematemesis 16 days after discharge from 55-day hospitalization. Conclusions: The addition of D to induction FOLFOX and PET-directed CRT is safe and feasible. pCR and near-pCR in ½ of operated Pts is encouraging and compares favorably to the pCR rate of 31% in CALGB 80803 Pts who received induction FOLFOX. The final pCR rate and correlatives for the fully accrued study will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02962063. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Smita Sihag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Ping Gu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Ryan Sugarman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Lara Feder
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kendall Cowie
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jaclyn Norris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Laura H. Tang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pedoto A, Noel J, Park BJ, Amar D. Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for Intercostal Nerve Blockade in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 35:1393-1398. [PMID: 33376072 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.11.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to compare the effects of liposomal bupivacaine (Lipo-B) and bupivacaine hydrochloride (B-HCl), in the presence of multimodal analgesia, on postoperative analgesia and opioid consumption in minimally invasive thoracic surgery (MITS) lobectomy. DESIGN Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING Tertiary care cancer center. PARTICIPANTS A total of 60 patients who underwent MITS lobectomy and received intercostal nerve blockade (ICNB) with either 0.66% Lipo-B (n = 29) or 0.5% B-HCl (n = 31). INTERVENTIONS All patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for the first 12 hours postoperatively, followed by opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as needed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Perioperative opioid and nonopioid consumption and pain scores were compared between groups at 12-hour intervals for the first 72 hours. Between the two groups, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics, intraoperative (p = 0.46) and postoperative opioid consumption, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores and pain scores upon postanesthesia care unit arrival and after four hours, length of postanesthesia care unit stay (p = 0.84), or length of hospital stay (p = 0.55). Both groups received intra- and postoperative multimodal analgesia. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort, no differences in opioid consumption or pain scores were observed in the immediate postoperative period following MITS lobectomy between patients given ICNB with Lipo-B and those given ICNB with B-HCl in the presence of multimodal analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pedoto
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - Jovanka Noel
- Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David Amar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ferguson BD, Jones GD, Skovgard M, Molena D, Huang J, Bott MJ, Sihag S, Park BJ, Adusumilli PS, Downey RJ, Isbell JM, Rusch VW, Bains MS, Jones DR, Rocco G. Is Routine Chest Radiography Necessary After Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration? Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 112:467-472. [PMID: 33096072 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chest radiography is routinely performed after endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) to detect clinically occult pneumothorax. Because the established rate of postprocedure pneumothorax is low, this study sought to determine whether routine chest radiography can be safely eliminated and to ascertain the potential cost reduction with its omission. METHODS Patients who underwent EBUS-FNA between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) were retrospectively identified. Patient-related factors were summarized using descriptive statistics. Outcomes were compared using the χ2, Fisher exact, and analysis of variance tests. Univariate regression analysis was used to identify factors predictive of postprocedure pneumothorax. RESULTS A total of 757 patients were included in the study: 72.4% (548 of 757) underwent routine chest radiography in the postanesthesia care unit. Clinically relevant or radiographically evident pneumothorax developed in 1.5% of patients (11 of 757). Of the patients who underwent chest radiography, 0.5% (3 of 548) required unplanned admission for postprocedure pneumothorax, and 0.2% (1 of 548) required tube thoracostomy. Of the 209 patients who did not undergo chest radiography, none experienced a clinically evident pneumothorax. In total, only 1 patient (0.1%) had symptomatic pneumothorax. The pneumothorax event rate was so low that no association with demographic or clinical factors and no predictive factors could be identified. The number of patients needed to be screened by chest radiography to identify 1 patient requiring deviation from routine management is 183. The potential total cost reduction if routine chest radiography had been eliminated was $33,950. CONCLUSIONS The extremely low rate of postprocedure pneumothorax precluded informative statistical analysis. Routine chest radiography after EBUS-FNA may not be necessary, and its omission may confer a cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin D Ferguson
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gregory D Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew Skovgard
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew J Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert J Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James M Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manjit S Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chudgar NP, Yan S, Hsu M, Tan KS, Gray KD, Molena D, Nobel T, Adusumilli PS, Bains M, Downey RJ, Huang J, Park BJ, Rocco G, Rusch VW, Sihag S, Jones DR, Isbell JM. Performance Comparison Between SURPAS and ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Pulmonary Resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 111:1643-1651. [PMID: 33075322 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate preoperative risk assessment is critical for informed decision making. The Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS) and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator (SRC) predict risks of common postoperative complications. This study compares observed and predicted outcomes after pulmonary resection between SURPAS and NSQIP SRC. METHODS Between January 2016 and December 2018, 2514 patients underwent pulmonary resection and were included. We entered the requisite patient demographics, preoperative risk factors, and procedural details into the online NSQIP SRC and SURPAS formulas. Performance of the prediction models was assessed by discrimination and calibration. RESULTS No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 models in discrimination performance for 30-day mortality, urinary tract infection, readmission, and discharge to a nursing or rehabilitation facility. The ability to discriminate between a patient who will develop a complication and a patient who will not was statistically indistinguishable between NSQIP and SURPAS, except for renal failure. With a C index closer to 1.0, the NSQIP performed significantly better than the SURPAS SRC in discriminating risk of renal failure (C index, 0.798 vs 0.694; P = .003). The calibration curves of predicted and observed risk for each model demonstrate similar performance with a tendency toward overestimation of risk, apart from renal failure. CONCLUSIONS Overall, SURPAS and NSQIP SRC performed similarly in predicting outcomes for pulmonary resections in this large, single-center validation study with moderate to good discrimination of outcomes. Notably, SURPAS uses a smaller set of input variables to generate the preoperative risk assessment. The addition of thoracic-specific input variables may improve performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neel P Chudgar
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Shi Yan
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Thoracic Surgery II, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Meier Hsu
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Katherine D Gray
- Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Tamar Nobel
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manjit Bains
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert J Downey
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James M Isbell
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Boerner T, Filippova OT, Chi AJ, Iasonos A, Zhou QC, Long Roche K, Zivanovic O, Park BJ, Huang J, Jones DR, Abu-Rustum NR, Gardner G, Sonoda Y, Chi DS. Video-assisted thoracic surgery in the primary management of advanced ovarian carcinoma with moderate to large pleural effusions: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary Study. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:66-71. [PMID: 32792282 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We assessed the utility of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in defining extent of intrathoracic disease in advanced ovarian carcinoma with moderate-to-large pleural effusions. METHODS Beginning in 2001, VATS was performed on all patients with suspected advanced ovarian carcinoma and moderate-to-large pleural effusions, evaluating for macroscopic intrathoracic disease. The algorithm recommended primary debulking surgery (PDS) for ≤1 cm, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)/interval debulking surgery (IDS) for >1 cm intrathoracic disease. We reviewed records of patients undergoing VATS from 10/01-01/19. Differences between treatment groups were tested using standard statistical techniques. RESULTS One-hundred patients met eligibility criteria (median age, 60; median CA-125 level, 1158 U/mL; medium serum albumin, 3.8 g/dL). Macroscopic pleural disease was found in 70 (70%). After VATS, 50 (50%) underwent attempted PDS (PDS group), 50 (50%) received NACT (NACT/IDS group). Forty-seven (94%) underwent IDS. Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort (n = 100) was 44.5 months (95% CI: 37.8-51.7). The PDS group had significantly longer survival than the NACT/IDS group [45.8 (95% CI: 40.5-87.8) vs. 37.4 months (95% CI: 33.3-45.2); p = .016]. On multivariable analysis, macroscopic intrathoracic disease (HR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.14-4.18; p = .019) and age ≥ 65 (HR 1.98, 95% CI: 1.16-3.40; p = .013) were independently associated with elevated death risk. Patients with the best outcome had no macroscopic disease at VATS and underwent PDS (median OS, 87.8 months). CONCLUSIONS VATS is useful in therapeutic decision-making for PDS vs. NACT/IDS in advanced ovarian cancer with moderate-to-large pleural effusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Boerner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olga T Filippova
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin C Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bernard J Park
- Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA; Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James Huang
- Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA; Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David R Jones
- Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA; Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jones GD, Caso R, Choe G, Tan KS, Connolly JG, Dycoco J, Molena D, Park BJ, Huang J, Adusumilli PS, Bott MJ, Downey RJ, Travis WD, Jones DR, Rocco G. Intentional Segmentectomy for Clinical T1 N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Survival Differs by Segment. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 111:1028-1035. [PMID: 32739257 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes after segmentectomy compare favorably with those after lobectomy in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether long-term outcomes vary by segmentectomy location is unclear. We investigated whether disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) differ by segmentectomy location after intentional segmentectomy for clinical T1 N0 M0 NSCLC. METHODS Patients who received intentional segmentectomy for cT1 N0 M0 NSCLC from 2000 to 2018 were reviewed. Patients with prior lung cancer, forced expiratory volume in 1 second of less than 50%, or R1/R2 resection were excluded. Segmentectomy groups were left (L) basilar, L segment 6, L lingula, L trisegment; right (R): basilar (R_Bas), segment 6 (R_S6), and R upper. The 5- and 10-year DFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Factors associated with DFS and OS were determined using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS In total, 416 patients met the inclusion criteria. Segmentectomy groups differed with regard to surgical approach, mediastinal lymphadenectomy, lymphovascular invasion, tumor histology, margin distance, and adjuvant therapy. Long-term outcomes were worst after R_S6 resection (5-year DFS, 57.6% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 45.7%-72.7%]; OS, 66.3% [95% CI, 54.7%-80.3%]) and best after R_Bas resection (5-year DFS, 77.1% [95% CI, 59.2%-100%]; OS, 79.5% [95% CI, 60.9%-100%]). On multivariable analysis, R_S6 resection was independently associated with DFS vs R_Bas (hazard ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.18-7.08; P = .02) and OS vs R_Bas (hazard ratio, 4.35; 95% CI, 1.61-11.76; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS Resection of R_S6 is independently associated with worse DFS and OS in patients receiving intentional segmentectomy for cT1 N0 M0 NSCLC and may warrant more extensive resection, complete lymph node dissection, and closer postoperative surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory D Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Raul Caso
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Giye Choe
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James G Connolly
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joe Dycoco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew J Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert J Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - William D Travis
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Soh Y, Park BJ. Giant Vertebral Artery Aneurysm: A Rare Cause of Respiratory Failure and Swallowing Disorder. Neurochirurgie 2020; 66:412-413. [PMID: 32623055 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2020.04.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Y Soh
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, 23 Kyunghee-daero, Dongdaemun-gu, 130-701 Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - B J Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pinheiro MDO, Simmons DBD, Villella M, Tetreault GR, Muir DCG, McMaster ME, Hewitt LM, Parrott JL, Park BJ, Brown SB, Sherry JP. Brown bullhead at the St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) Area of Concern: health and endocrine status in the context of tissue concentrations of PCBs and mercury. Environ Monit Assess 2020; 192:404. [PMID: 32472215 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-08355-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The St. Lawrence River, at Cornwall Ontario, has accumulated sediment contaminants, mainly mercury (Hg) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), from industrial point sources over many years. Although those sources are past, the river at Cornwall remains an Area of Concern (AOC). Because of remediation and other changes in the AOC, improved knowledge of contaminants in wild-fish and their putative links to health effects could help decision makers to better assess the AOC's state. Thus, we compared tissue concentrations of Hg, PCBs, morphometric measures of health, and biomarkers of exposure, metabolic-, and reproductive health in native brown bullhead (Ameiurus nebulosus) from the AOC to those of upstream reference fish. Linear discriminant analysis separated the adult fish of both sexes among upstream and downstream sites without misclassification. Burdens of total-Hg (all sites) and PCB toxic equivalents (downstream sites) exceeded the guidance for the protection of wildlife consumers. There were subtle effects of site on physiological variables, particularly in female fish. Total-Hg in tissue correlated negatively to plasma testosterone and 17β-estradiol in female fish at Cornwall: moreover, concentrations of both hormones were lower within the AOC compared to reference site fish. A similar effect on vitellogenin, which was uncorrelated to E2/T at the downstream sites, indicated the potential for reproductive effects. Downstream fish also had altered thyroidal status (T3, TSH, and ratio of thyroid epithelial cell area to colloid area). Despite spatial and temporal variability of the endocrine-related responses, these subtle effects on fish health within the AOC warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D O Pinheiro
- Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - D B D Simmons
- Faculty of Science, Ontario Technical University, Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 0C5, Canada
| | - M Villella
- Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Water Research Institute, Burlington, ON, L7S 1A1, Canada
| | - G R Tetreault
- Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Water Research Institute, Burlington, ON, L7S 1A1, Canada
| | - D C G Muir
- Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Water Research Institute, Burlington, ON, L7S 1A1, Canada
| | - M E McMaster
- Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Water Research Institute, Burlington, ON, L7S 1A1, Canada
| | - L M Hewitt
- Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Water Research Institute, Burlington, ON, L7S 1A1, Canada
| | - J L Parrott
- Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Water Research Institute, Burlington, ON, L7S 1A1, Canada
| | - B J Park
- Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5B3, Canada
| | - S B Brown
- Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Water Research Institute, Burlington, ON, L7S 1A1, Canada
| | - J P Sherry
- Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Water Research Institute, Burlington, ON, L7S 1A1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hristov B, Eguchi T, Bains S, Dycoco J, Tan KS, Isbell JM, Park BJ, Jones DR, Adusumilli PS. Minimally Invasive Lobectomy Is Associated With Lower Noncancer-specific Mortality in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Competing Risks Analysis. Ann Surg 2019; 270:1161-1169. [PMID: 29672399 PMCID: PMC7421837 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate cancer- and noncancer-specific mortality following lobectomy by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open thoracotomy in elderly patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). BACKGROUND Two-thirds of patients with NSCLC are ≥65 years of age. As age increases, the risk of competing events, such as noncancer death, also increases. METHODS Elderly patients (≥65 yrs of age) who have undergone curative-intent lobectomy for stage I-III NSCLC without induction therapy (2002-2013) were included (n=1,303). Of those, 607 patients had undergone MIS and 696 had undergone thoracotomy. Propensity-score matching was performed to identify pairs of thoracotomy and MIS patients with comparable clinical characteristics (eg, year of surgery, comorbidities, and pulmonary function). Association between surgical approach (MIS vs thoracotomy) and lung cancer-specific and noncancer-specific cumulative incidence of death (CID) was analyzed using competing risks approach. RESULTS Following propensity score matching of patients who had undergone thoracotomy (n=338) versus MIS (n=338), MIS was associated with shorter length of stay (P <0.001), lower noncancer-specific 1-year mortality (P=0.027), and lower noncancer-specific CID (P=0.014) compared with thoracotomy; there was no difference in lung cancer-specific CID between surgical approaches. On multivariable analysis, thoracotomy was a significant risk factor for noncancer-specific death (subhazard ratio 2.45, 95% CI 1.18-5.06, P=0.016) independent of age, sex, and diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide. CONCLUSION In a propensity score-matched cohort, multivariable analysis has indicated that lobectomy performed by MIS is associated with lower incidence of noncancer-specific mortality compared with lobectomy performed by open thoracotomy in elderly patients with NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Hristov
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Takashi Eguchi
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Sarina Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joe Dycoco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James M. Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Prasad S. Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Choe G, Ghanie A, Riely G, Rimner A, Park BJ, Bains MS, Rusch VW, Adusumilli PS, Downey RJ, Jones DR, Huang J. Long-term, disease-specific outcomes of thymic malignancies presenting with de novo pleural metastasis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 159:705-714.e1. [PMID: 31610957 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Treatment of patients with thymic malignancies metastatic to the pleura or pericardium is challenging, and benefits of aggressive treatment are unclear. We sought to characterize the long-term outcomes in this population. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients who underwent resection for de novo thymic malignancies metastatic to the pleura between May 1997 and December 2017. Patients with pleural recurrence after prior thymectomy were excluded. Patient demographics, perioperative treatments, pathologic findings, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. RESULTS Seventy-two patients were included (median age, 51 years [range 25-80]; 36/72 women [50%]). Pathologic diagnosis was thymoma in 57 patients (79%) and thymic carcinoma in 15 patients (21%). Most patients (67/72; 93%) received chemotherapy, radiation, or both. Forty-eight patients underwent thymectomy with pleurectomy, 7 patients underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy, 10 patients underwent thymectomy alone, and 7 patients were unresectable. Macroscopic complete resection was achieved in 52 patients (73%). Five-, 10-, and 15-year overall survivals were 73%, 51%, and 18%, respectively, and median overall survival was 11 years (median follow-up, 5.9 years). Forty-six patients (64%) had disease progression (median time to progression, 2.2 years). Repeat episodes of progression and treatment were common (median, 3 episodes/patient). The longest disease-free interval was 12.4 years. Thirteen patients (18%) remain disease-free; 7 patients (10%) were disease-free for more than 5 years. The longest ongoing survival without progression or reintervention is 9.9 years. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged survival and, in some cases, cure can be achieved in patients with thymic malignancies metastatic to the pleura or pericardium. Aggressive multimodality therapy may be appropriate for select patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giye Choe
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amanda Ghanie
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gregory Riely
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Manjit S Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert J Downey
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Robinson EM, Ilonen IK, Tan KS, Plodkowski AJ, Bott M, Bains MS, Adusumilli PS, Park BJ, Rusch VW, Jones DR, Huang J. Prevalence of Occult Peribronchial N1 Nodal Metastasis in Peripheral Clinical N0 Small (≤2 cm) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 109:270-276. [PMID: 31479639 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been growing interest in limited resection and nonsurgical treatment for small lung cancers. We examined the pattern and rate of occult N1 nodal metastasis in patients with peripheral, small (≤2 cm), clinically node-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS Patients with peripheral small (≤2 cm) NSCLC with no evidence of locally advanced or metastatic disease (clinical T1a-b N0 M0, American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Cancer Staging Manual), who were deemed eligible for lobectomy or sublobar resection, were identified from preregistration eligibility screening logs for the Alliance/Cancer and Leukemia Group B 140503 trial at our institution. Pathologic outcomes were examined in all patients undergoing anatomic resection with mediastinal and hilar lymphadenectomy. RESULTS Included were 58 patients treated between November 2014 and January 2017 who met the inclusion criteria: 51 underwent lobectomy, and 7 underwent segmentectomy. Mean tumor diameter on computed tomography was 1.5 cm, and mean positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value was 3.9. The mean consolidation-to-tumor ratio was 0.77. Occult nodal metastases in N1 stations were found in 8 of 58 patients (14%), and most of these nodes were found in interlobar or peribronchial stations (11 or 12). An additional 2 patients (3%) had occult positive N2 nodes. Overall, the false-negative rate for clinical staging was 16%. CONCLUSIONS Occult nodal disease was frequently identified in peripheral N1 stations (11-13) in patients with small (≤2 cm) clinical N0 NSCLC. Hilar lymphadenectomy is essential for accurate staging in the management of patients with small clinical N0 NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric M Robinson
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Ilkka K Ilonen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew J Plodkowski
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew Bott
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manjit S Bains
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard J Park
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R Jones
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Huang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Turner SR, Mormando J, Park BJ, Huang J. Attitudes of robotic surgery educators and learners: challenges, advantages, tips and tricks of teaching and learning robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 2019; 14:455-461. [PMID: 31463878 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01013-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
As the application of robotic surgical technology grows, so does the need to instruct surgical residents in robotic techniques. To better understand the challenges and benefits unique to robotic surgery education, this study explored the attitudes of teachers and learners. A 43-item questionnaire was developed with five domains: challenges and benefits of robotic education, training methodologies, trainees' readiness for learning, and education tips. This was delivered to surgeons and surgical fellows at a high-volume surgical department. 31 surgeons and 25 fellows from 7 specialties responded (response rate 70% and 43%). The teaching and learning of robotic surgery were perceived as superior to traditional minimally invasive surgery by both surgeons (in 7/9 factors studied) and fellows (7/9), but was seen as mostly disadvantageous compared to open surgery by both surgeons (in 6/9 factors studied) and fellows (8/9). Surgeons frequently stated the greatest challenge to teaching robotics was the need to relinquish total control to the trainee. Robotic surgery education is generally well received and offers several advantages. However, teaching robotic surgery presents unique challenges, especially when compared to open surgery. Understanding the benefits of, and barriers to, robotic surgery education may help develop more effective training paradigms that are responsive to educational needs while maintaining patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Turner
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. .,Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - J Mormando
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.,Department of Surgery, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - B J Park
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - J Huang
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Adhikari G, Adhikari P, de Souza EB, Carlin N, Choi S, Djamal M, Ezeribe AC, Ha C, Hahn IS, Jeon EJ, Jo JH, Joo HW, Kang WG, Kang W, Kauer M, Kim GS, Kim H, Kim HJ, Kim KW, Kim NY, Kim SK, Kim YD, Kim YH, Ko YJ, Kudryavtsev VA, Lee HS, Lee J, Lee JY, Lee MH, Leonard DS, Lynch WA, Maruyama RH, Mouton F, Olsen SL, Park BJ, Park HK, Park HS, Park KS, Pitta RLC, Prihtiadi H, Ra SJ, Rott C, Shin KA, Scarff A, Spooner NJC, Thompson WG, Yang L, Yu GH. Search for a Dark Matter-Induced Annual Modulation Signal in NaI(Tl) with the COSINE-100 Experiment. Phys Rev Lett 2019; 123:031302. [PMID: 31386435 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.123.031302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
We present new constraints on the dark matter-induced annual modulation signal using 1.7 years of COSINE-100 data with a total exposure of 97.7 kg yr. The COSINE-100 experiment, consisting of 106 kg of NaI(Tl) target material, is designed to carry out a model-independent test of DAMA/LIBRA's claim of WIMP discovery by searching for the same annual modulation signal using the same NaI(Tl) target. The crystal data show a 2.7 cpd/kg/keV background rate on average in the 2-6 keV energy region of interest. Using a χ-squared minimization method we observe best fit values for modulation amplitude and phase of 0.0092±0.0067 cpd/kg/keV and 127.2±45.9 d, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Adhikari
- Department of Physics, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
| | - P Adhikari
- Department of Physics, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
| | - E Barbosa de Souza
- Department of Physics and Wright Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - N Carlin
- Physics Institute, University of São Paulo, 05508-090, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - S Choi
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - M Djamal
- Department of Physics, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
| | - A C Ezeribe
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
| | - C Ha
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - I S Hahn
- Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - E J Jeon
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - J H Jo
- Department of Physics and Wright Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - H W Joo
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - W G Kang
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - W Kang
- Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
| | - M Kauer
- Department of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - G S Kim
- Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
| | - H Kim
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - H J Kim
- Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
| | - K W Kim
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - N Y Kim
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - S K Kim
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Y D Kim
- Department of Physics, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - Y H Kim
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
- Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - Y J Ko
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - V A Kudryavtsev
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
| | - H S Lee
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - J Lee
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - J Y Lee
- Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
| | - M H Lee
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - D S Leonard
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - W A Lynch
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
| | - R H Maruyama
- Department of Physics and Wright Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - F Mouton
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
| | - S L Olsen
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - B J Park
- IBS School, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - H K Park
- Department of Accelerator Science, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Republic of Korea
| | - H S Park
- Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
| | - K S Park
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - R L C Pitta
- Physics Institute, University of São Paulo, 05508-090, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - H Prihtiadi
- Department of Physics, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
| | - S J Ra
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - C Rott
- Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
| | - K A Shin
- Center for Underground Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34126, Republic of Korea
| | - A Scarff
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
| | - N J C Spooner
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
| | - W G Thompson
- Department of Physics and Wright Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - L Yang
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
| | - G H Yu
- Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|