1
|
Silveira P, Razmaria A, Yeh R. Hepatic PSMA-Avid Postradiation Inflammation. Clin Nucl Med 2024:00003072-990000000-01096. [PMID: 38693645 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000005257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT A 62-year-old man with de novo large volume metastatic prostate cancer to the bone, liver, and nodes status post multiple lines of therapy including external beam radiation to T12-L2 approximately 13 months prior underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to determine eligibility for 177Lu-PSMA therapy. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT demonstrated tracer-avid osseous and nodal lesions consistent with metastases. In addition, regional geographic tracer avidity was seen in the midline left hepatic lobe associated with capsular retraction and demonstrated no FDG avidity on subsequent imaging, probably inflammatory related to prior radiation to T12-L2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Silveira
- From the Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Friedman JS, Durham BH, Reiner AS, Yabe M, Petrova-Drus K, Dogan A, Pulitzer M, Busam KJ, Francis JH, Rampal RK, Ulaner GA, Reddy R, Yeh R, Hatzoglou V, Lacouture ME, Rotemberg V, Mazor RD, Hershkovitz-Rokah O, Shpilberg O, Goyal G, Go RS, Abeykoon JP, Rech K, Morlote D, Fidai S, Gannamani V, Zia M, Abdel-Wahab O, Panageas KS, Rosenblum MK, Diamond EL. Mixed histiocytic neoplasms: A multicentre series revealing diverse somatic mutations and responses to targeted therapy. Br J Haematol 2024. [PMID: 38613141 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
Histiocytic neoplasms are diverse clonal haematopoietic disorders, and clinical disease is mediated by tumorous infiltration as well as uncontrolled systemic inflammation. Individual subtypes include Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease (RDD) and Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), and these have been characterized with respect to clinical phenotypes, driver mutations and treatment paradigms. Less is known about patients with mixed histiocytic neoplasms (MXH), that is two or more coexisting disorders. This international collaboration examined patients with biopsy-proven MXH with respect to component disease subtypes, oncogenic driver mutations and responses to conventional (chemotherapeutic or immunosuppressive) versus targeted (BRAF or MEK inhibitor) therapies. Twenty-seven patients were studied with ECD/LCH (19/27), ECD/RDD (6/27), RDD/LCH (1/27) and ECD/RDD/LCH (1/27). Mutations previously undescribed in MXH were identified, including KRAS, MAP2K2, MAPK3, non-V600-BRAF, RAF1 and a BICD2-BRAF fusion. A repeated-measure generalized estimating equation demonstrated that targeted treatment was statistically significantly (1) more likely to result in a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) (odds ratio [OR]: 17.34, 95% CI: 2.19-137.00, p = 0.007), and (2) less likely to result in progression (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03-0.23, p < 0.0001). Histiocytic neoplasms represent an entity with underappreciated clinical and molecular diversity, poor responsiveness to conventional therapy and exquisite sensitivity to targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S Friedman
- Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Benjamin H Durham
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anne S Reiner
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mariko Yabe
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kseniya Petrova-Drus
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ahmet Dogan
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Melissa Pulitzer
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Klaus J Busam
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jasmine H Francis
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raajit K Rampal
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gary A Ulaner
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, California, USA
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ryan Reddy
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, California, USA
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mario E Lacouture
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Veronica Rotemberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roei D Mazor
- Clinic of Histiocytic Neoplasms, Institute of Hematology, Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Oshrat Hershkovitz-Rokah
- Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
- Translational Research Lab, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Ofer Shpilberg
- Clinic of Histiocytic Neoplasms, Institute of Hematology, Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| | - Gaurav Goyal
- Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Rare Histiocytic Disorders Steering Committee of the Histiocyte Society
| | - Ronald S Go
- Rare Histiocytic Disorders Steering Committee of the Histiocyte Society
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Karen Rech
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Rare Histiocytic Disorders Steering Committee of the Histiocyte Society
| | - Diana Morlote
- Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Shiraz Fidai
- Department of Pathology, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Vedavyas Gannamani
- Department of Pathology, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Maryam Zia
- Department of Pathology, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Omar Abdel-Wahab
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marc K Rosenblum
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eli L Diamond
- Rare Histiocytic Disorders Steering Committee of the Histiocyte Society
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zirakchian Zadeh M, Sotirchos VS, Kirov A, Lafontaine D, Gönen M, Yeh R, Kunin H, Petre EN, Kitsel Y, Elsayed M, Solomon SB, Erinjeri JP, Schwartz LH, Sofocleous CT. Three-Dimensional Margin as a Predictor of Local Tumor Progression after Microwave Ablation: Intraprocedural versus 4-8-Week Postablation Assessment. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:523-532.e1. [PMID: 38215818 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the prognostic accuracy of intraprocedural and 4-8-week (current standard) post-microwave ablation zone (AZ) and margin assessments for prediction of local tumor progression (LTP) using 3-dimensional (3D) software. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data regarding 100 colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) in 75 patients were collected from 2 prospective fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) trials. The target CLMs and theoretical 5- and 10-mm margins were segmented and registered intraprocedurally and at 4-8 weeks after MWA contrast-enhanced CT (or magnetic resonance [MR] imaging) using the same methodology and 3D software. Tumor and 5- and 10-mm minimal margin (MM) volumes not covered by the AZ were defined as volumes of insufficient coverage (VICs). The intraprocedural and 4-8-week post-MWA VICs were compared as predictors of LTP using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 19.6 months (interquartile range, 7.97-36.5 months). VICs for 5- and 10-mm MMs were predictive of LTP at both time assessments. The highest accuracy for the prediction of LTP was documented with the intra-ablation 5-mm VIC (area under the curve [AUC], 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.89). LTP for a VIC of 6-10-mm margin category was 11.4% compared with 4.3% for >10-mm margin category (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS A 3D 5-mm MM is a critical endpoint of thermal ablation, whereas optimal local tumor control is noted with a 10-mm MM. Higher AUCs for prediction of LTP were achieved for intraprocedural evaluation than for the 4-8-week postablation 3D evaluation of the AZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vlasios S Sotirchos
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Assen Kirov
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel Lafontaine
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Henry Kunin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elena N Petre
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yuliya Kitsel
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mohammad Elsayed
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joseph P Erinjeri
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yeh R, O'Donoghue JA, Jayaprakasam VS, Mauguen A, Min R, Park S, Brockway JP, Bromberg JF, Zhi WI, Robson ME, Sanford R, Modi S, Agnew BJ, Lyashchenko SK, Lewis JS, Ulaner GA, Zeglis BM. First-in-Human Evaluation of Site-Specifically Labeled 89Zr-Pertuzumab in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:386-393. [PMID: 38272704 PMCID: PMC10924157 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Radioimmunoconjugates targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) have shown potential to noninvasively visualize HER2-positive tumors. However, the stochastic approach that has been traditionally used to radiolabel these antibodies yields poorly defined and heterogeneous products with suboptimal in vivo performance. Here, we describe a first-in-human PET study on patients with HER2-positive breast cancer evaluating the safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry of 89Zr-site-specific (ss)-pertuzumab PET, a site-specifically labeled radioimmunoconjugate designed to circumvent the limitations of random stochastic lysine labeling. Methods: Six patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective clinical trial. Pertuzumab was site-specifically modified with desferrioxamine (DFO) via a novel chemoenzymatic strategy and subsequently labeled with 89Zr. Patients were administered 74 MBq of 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab in 20 mg of total antibody intravenously and underwent PET/CT at 1 d, 3-4 d, and 5-8 d after injection. PET imaging, whole-body probe counts, and blood draws were performed to assess the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and dosimetry. Results: 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab PET/CT was used to assess HER2 status and heterogeneity to guide biopsy and decide the next line of treatment at progression. The radioimmunoconjugate was able to detect known sites of malignancy, suggesting that these tumor lesions were HER2-positive. The optimal imaging time point was 5-8 d after administration, and no toxicities were observed. Dosimetry estimates from OLINDA showed that the organs receiving the highest doses (mean ± SD) were kidney (1.8 ± 0.5 mGy/MBq), liver (1.7 ± 0.3 mGy/MBq), and heart wall (1.2 ± 0.1 mGy/MBq). The average effective dose for 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab was 0.54 ± 0.03 mSv/MBq, which was comparable to both stochastically lysine-labeled 89Zr-DFO-pertuzumab and 89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. One patient underwent PET/CT with both 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab and 89Zr-DFO-pertuzumab 1 mo apart, with 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab demonstrating improved lesion detection and higher tracer avidity. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the safety, dosimetry, and potential clinical applications of 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab PET/CT. 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab may detect more lesions than 89Zr-DFO-pertuzumab. Potential clinical applications include real-time evaluation of HER2 status to guide biopsy and assist in treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Joseph A O'Donoghue
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Audrey Mauguen
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ryan Min
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sue Park
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Julia P Brockway
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jacqueline F Bromberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - W Iris Zhi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mark E Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Rachel Sanford
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Shanu Modi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Brian J Agnew
- Biosciences Division, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eugene, Oregon
| | - Serge K Lyashchenko
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jason S Lewis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Program in Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gary A Ulaner
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, California
- Departments of Radiology and Translational Genomics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Brian M Zeglis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsai CJ, Yang JT, Shaverdian N, Patel J, Shepherd AF, Eng J, Guttmann D, Yeh R, Gelblum DY, Namakydoust A, Preeshagul I, Modi S, Seidman A, Traina T, Drullinsky P, Flynn J, Zhang Z, Rimner A, Gillespie EF, Gomez DR, Lee NY, Berger M, Robson ME, Reis-Filho JS, Riaz N, Rudin CM, Powell SN. Standard-of-care systemic therapy with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (Consolidative Use of Radiotherapy to Block [CURB] oligoprogression): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet 2024; 403:171-182. [PMID: 38104577 PMCID: PMC10880046 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01857-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with metastatic cancer eventually develop resistance to systemic therapy, with some having limited disease progression (ie, oligoprogression). We aimed to assess whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targeting oligoprogressive sites could improve patient outcomes. METHODS We did a phase 2, open-label, randomised controlled trial of SBRT in patients with oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after having received at least first-line systemic therapy, with oligoprogression defined as five or less progressive lesions on PET-CT or CT. Patients aged 18 years or older were enrolled from a tertiary cancer centre in New York, NY, USA, and six affiliated regional centres in the states of New York and New Jersey, with a 1:1 randomisation between standard of care (standard-of-care group) and SBRT plus standard of care (SBRT group). Randomisation was done with a computer-based algorithm with stratification by number of progressive sites of metastasis, receptor or driver genetic alteration status, primary site, and type of systemic therapy previously received. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, measured up to 12 months. We did a prespecified subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint by disease site. All analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03808662, and is complete. FINDINGS From Jan 1, 2019, to July 31, 2021, 106 patients were randomly assigned to standard of care (n=51; 23 patients with breast cancer and 28 patients with NSCLC) or SBRT plus standard of care (n=55; 24 patients with breast cancer and 31 patients with NSCLC). 16 (34%) of 47 patients with breast cancer had triple-negative disease, and 51 (86%) of 59 patients with NSCLC had no actionable driver mutation. The study was closed to accrual before reaching the targeted sample size, after the primary efficacy endpoint was met during a preplanned interim analysis. The median follow-up was 11·6 months for patients in the standard-of-care group and 12·1 months for patients in the SBRT group. The median progression-free survival was 3·2 months (95% CI 2·0-4·5) for patients in the standard-of-care group versus 7·2 months (4·5-10·0) for patients in the SBRT group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53, 95% CI 0·35-0·81; p=0·0035). The median progression-free survival was higher for patients with NSCLC in the SBRT group than for those with NSCLC in the standard-of-care group (10·0 months [7·2-not reached] vs 2·2 months [95% CI 2·0-4·5]; HR 0·41, 95% CI 0·22-0·75; p=0·0039), but no difference was found for patients with breast cancer (4·4 months [2·5-8·7] vs 4·2 months [1·8-5·5]; 0·78, 0·43-1·43; p=0·43). Grade 2 or worse adverse events occurred in 21 (41%) patients in the standard-of-care group and 34 (62%) patients in the SBRT group. Nine (16%) patients in the SBRT group had grade 2 or worse toxicities related to SBRT, including gastrointestinal reflux disease, pain exacerbation, radiation pneumonitis, brachial plexopathy, and low blood counts. INTERPRETATION The trial showed that progression-free survival was increased in the SBRT plus standard-of-care group compared with standard of care only. Oligoprogression in patients with metastatic NSCLC could be effectively treated with SBRT plus standard of care, leading to more than a four-times increase in progression-free survival compared with standard of care only. By contrast, no benefit was observed in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer. Further studies to validate these findings and understand the differential benefits are warranted. FUNDING National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiaojung Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Narek Shaverdian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juber Patel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Annemarie F Shepherd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juliana Eng
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Guttmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daphna Y Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Azadeh Namakydoust
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Isabel Preeshagul
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shanu Modi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Seidman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tiffany Traina
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pamela Drullinsky
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Flynn
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin F Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Berger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark E Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles M Rudin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simon N Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ma HY, Das J, Prendergast C, De Jong D, Braumuller B, Paily J, Huang S, Liou C, Giarratana A, Hosseini M, Yeh R, Capaccione KM. Advances in CAR T Cell Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2023; 45:9019-9038. [PMID: 37998743 PMCID: PMC10670348 DOI: 10.3390/cimb45110566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Since its first approval by the FDA in 2017, tremendous progress has been made in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, the adoptive transfer of engineered, CAR-expressing T lymphocyte. CAR T cells are all composed of three main elements: an extracellular antigen-binding domain, an intracellular signaling domain responsible for T cell activation, and a hinge that joins these two domains. Continuous improvement has been made in CARs, now in their fifth generation, particularly in the intracellular signaling domain responsible for T cell activation. CAR T cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Nonetheless, the use of CAR T cell therapy for solid tumors has not attained comparable levels of success. Here we review the challenges in achieving effective CAR T cell therapy in solid tumors, and emerging CAR T cells that have shown great promise for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A growing number of clinical trials have been conducted to study the effect of CAR T cell therapy on NSCLC, targeting different types of surface antigens. They include epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mesothelin (MSLN), prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), and mucin 1 (MUC1). Potential new targets such as erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular carcinoma A2 (EphA2), tissue factor (TF), and protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7) are currently under investigation in clinical trials. The challenges in developing CAR T for NSCLC therapy and other approaches for enhancing CAR T efficacy are discussed. Finally, we provide our perspective on imaging CAR T cell action by reviewing the two main radionuclide-based CAR T cell imaging techniques, the direct labeling of CAR T cells or indirect labeling via a reporter gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Yun Ma
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medica Center, 622 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.Y.M.); (J.P.); (M.H.)
| | - Jeeban Das
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Conor Prendergast
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medica Center, 622 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.Y.M.); (J.P.); (M.H.)
| | | | - Brian Braumuller
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medica Center, 622 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.Y.M.); (J.P.); (M.H.)
| | - Jacienta Paily
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medica Center, 622 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.Y.M.); (J.P.); (M.H.)
| | - Sophia Huang
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medica Center, 622 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.Y.M.); (J.P.); (M.H.)
| | - Connie Liou
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medica Center, 622 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.Y.M.); (J.P.); (M.H.)
| | - Anna Giarratana
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medica Center, 622 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.Y.M.); (J.P.); (M.H.)
| | - Mahdie Hosseini
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medica Center, 622 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.Y.M.); (J.P.); (M.H.)
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Kathleen M. Capaccione
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medica Center, 622 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.Y.M.); (J.P.); (M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang S, de Jong D, Das JP, Widemon RS, Braumuller B, Paily J, Deng A, Liou C, Roa T, Huang A, Ma H, D'Souza B, Leb J, L'Hereaux J, Nguyen P, Luk L, Francescone M, Yeh R, Maccarrone V, Dercle L, Salvatore MM, Capaccione KM. Imaging the Side Effects of CAR T Cell Therapy: A Primer for the Practicing Radiologist. Acad Radiol 2023; 30:2712-2727. [PMID: 37394411 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a revolutionary form of immunotherapy that has proven to be efficacious in the treatment of many hematologic cancers. CARs are modified T lymphocytes that express an artificial receptor specific to a tumor-associated antigen. These engineered cells are then reintroduced to upregulate the host immune responses and eradicate malignant cells. While the use of CAR T cell therapy is rapidly expanding, little is known about how common side effects such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) present radiographically. Here we provide a comprehensive review of how side effects present in different organ systems and how they can be optimally imaged. Early and accurate recognition of the radiographic presentation of these side effects is critical to the practicing radiologist and their patients so that these side effects can be promptly identified and treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Huang
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Dorine de Jong
- Department of Immunology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065 (D.J.)
| | - Jeeban P Das
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065 (J.D., R.Y.)
| | - Reginald Scott Widemon
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Brian Braumuller
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Jacienta Paily
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Aileen Deng
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Novant Health, 170 Medical Park Road, Mooresville, North Carolina 28117 (A.D.)
| | - Connie Liou
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Tina Roa
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Alice Huang
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Hong Ma
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Belinda D'Souza
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Jay Leb
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Jade L'Hereaux
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Pamela Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Lyndon Luk
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Mark Francescone
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065 (J.D., R.Y.)
| | - Valerie Maccarrone
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Mary M Salvatore
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.)
| | - Kathleen M Capaccione
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032 (S.H., R.S.W., B.B., J.P., C.L., T.R., A.H., H.M., B.D.S., J.L., J.L.H., P.N., L.L., M.F., V.M., L.D., M.S., K.M.C.).
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McGale J, Hama J, Yeh R, Vercellino L, Sun R, Lopci E, Ammari S, Dercle L. Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics: Clinical Applications for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immunotherapy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3065. [PMID: 37835808 PMCID: PMC10573034 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy has greatly improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma. However, it has also led to new patterns of response and progression, creating an unmet need for better biomarkers to identify patients likely to achieve a lasting clinical benefit or experience immune-related adverse events. In this study, we performed a focused literature survey covering the application of artificial intelligence (AI; in the form of radiomics, machine learning, and deep learning) to patients diagnosed with melanoma and treated with immunotherapy, reviewing 12 studies relevant to the topic published up to early 2022. The most commonly investigated imaging modality was CT imaging in isolation (n = 9, 75.0%), while patient cohorts were most frequently recruited retrospectively and from single institutions (n = 7, 58.3%). Most studies concerned the development of AI tools to assist in prognostication (n = 5, 41.7%) or the prediction of treatment response (n = 6, 50.0%). Validation methods were disparate, with two studies (16.7%) performing no validation and equal numbers using cross-validation (n = 3, 25%), a validation set (n = 3, 25%), or a test set (n = 3, 25%). Only one study used both validation and test sets (n = 1, 8.3%). Overall, promising results have been observed for the application of AI to immunotherapy-treated melanoma. Further improvement and eventual integration into clinical practice may be achieved through the implementation of rigorous validation using heterogeneous, prospective patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy McGale
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Jakob Hama
- Queens Hospital Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, Queens, NY 10029, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Laetitia Vercellino
- Nuclear Medicine Department, INSERM UMR S942, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance-Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Roger Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Samy Ammari
- Department of Medical Imaging, BIOMAPS, UMR1281 INSERM, CEA, CNRS, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94800 Villejuif, France
- ELSAN Department of Radiology, Institut de Cancérologie Paris Nord, 95200 Sarcelles, France
| | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cowzer D, Wu AJC, Sihag S, Walch HS, Park BJ, Jones DR, Gu P, Maron SB, Sugarman R, Chalasani SB, Shcherba M, Capanu M, Chou JF, Choe JK, Nosov A, Adusumilli PS, Yeh R, Tang LH, Ilson DH, Janjigian YY, Molena D, Ku GY. Durvalumab and PET-Directed Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase Ib/II Study. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e511-e518. [PMID: 36762546 PMCID: PMC11065504 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and efficacy of adding the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant induction FOLFOX followed by positron emission tomography (PET) directed chemoradiation has demonstrated improved survival for esophageal adenocarcinoma. There is clear benefit now for the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors both in early and advanced stage disease. Given these results we investigated the safety and efficacy of adding durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS Patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma received PET-directed chemoradiation with durvalumab before esophagectomy. Patients who had R0 resections received adjuvant durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks for 6 treatments. The primary endpoint of the study was pathologic complete response. RESULTS We enrolled 36 patients, 33 of whom completed all preoperative treatment and underwent surgery. Preoperative treatment was well tolerated, with no delays to surgery nor new safety signals. Pathologic complete response was identified in 8 [22% (1-sided 90% lower bound: 13.3%)] patients with major pathologic response in 22 [61% (1-sided 90% lower bound: 50%)] patients. Twelve and 24-month overall survival was 92% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The addition of durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and PET-directed chemoradiotherapy before surgery is safe, with a high rate of pathologic response, as well as encouraging survival data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Cowzer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Abraham Jing-Ching Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Smita Sihag
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Henry S Walch
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J Park
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R Jones
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ping Gu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Steven B Maron
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ryan Sugarman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Marina Shcherba
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marinela Capanu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joanne F Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jennie K Choe
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anton Nosov
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Laura H Tang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David H Ilson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Yelena Y Janjigian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Geoffrey Y Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McGale J, Khurana S, Huang A, Roa T, Yeh R, Shirini D, Doshi P, Nakhla A, Bebawy M, Khalil D, Lotfalla A, Higgins H, Gulati A, Girard A, Bidard FC, Champion L, Duong P, Dercle L, Seban RD. PET/CT and SPECT/CT Imaging of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4882. [PMID: 37568284 PMCID: PMC10419459 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12154882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
HER2 (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2)-positive breast cancer is characterized by amplification of the HER2 gene and is associated with more aggressive tumor growth, increased risk of metastasis, and poorer prognosis when compared to other subtypes of breast cancer. HER2 expression is therefore a critical tumor feature that can be used to diagnose and treat breast cancer. Moving forward, advances in HER2 in vivo imaging, involving the use of techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), may allow for a greater role for HER2 status in guiding the management of breast cancer patients. This will apply both to patients who are HER2-positive and those who have limited-to-minimal immunohistochemical HER2 expression (HER2-low), with imaging ultimately helping clinicians determine the size and location of tumors. Additionally, PET and SPECT could help evaluate effectiveness of HER2-targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab or pertuzumab for HER2-positive cancers, and specially modified antibody drug conjugates (ADC), such as trastuzumab-deruxtecan, for HER2-low variants. This review will explore the current and future role of HER2 imaging in personalizing the care of patients diagnosed with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy McGale
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Sakshi Khurana
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Alice Huang
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Tina Roa
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Dorsa Shirini
- School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1985717443, Iran
| | - Parth Doshi
- Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC 27546, USA
| | - Abanoub Nakhla
- American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine, Cupecoy, Sint Maarten
| | - Maria Bebawy
- Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, Middletown, NY 10940, USA
| | - David Khalil
- Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC 27546, USA
| | - Andrew Lotfalla
- Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, Middletown, NY 10940, USA
| | - Hayley Higgins
- Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, Middletown, NY 10940, USA
| | - Amit Gulati
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, New York, NY 11219, USA
| | - Antoine Girard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 80054 Amiens, France
| | - Francois-Clement Bidard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inserm CIC-BT 1428, Curie Institute, Paris Saclay University, UVSQ, 78035 Paris, France
| | - Laurence Champion
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Institut Curie, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
- Laboratory of Translational Imaging in Oncology, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, Institut Curie, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Phuong Duong
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Romain-David Seban
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Institut Curie, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
- Laboratory of Translational Imaging in Oncology, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, Institut Curie, 91401 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
de Jong D, Desperito E, Al Feghali KA, Dercle L, Seban RD, Das JP, Ma H, Sajan A, Braumuller B, Prendergast C, Liou C, Deng A, Roa T, Yeh R, Girard A, Salvatore MM, Capaccione KM. Advances in PET/CT Imaging for Breast Cancer. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4537. [PMID: 37445572 PMCID: PMC10342839 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
One out of eight women will be affected by breast cancer during her lifetime. Imaging plays a key role in breast cancer detection and management, providing physicians with information about tumor location, heterogeneity, and dissemination. In this review, we describe the latest advances in PET/CT imaging of breast cancer, including novel applications of 18F-FDG PET/CT and the development and testing of new agents for primary and metastatic breast tumor imaging and therapy. Ultimately, these radiopharmaceuticals may guide personalized approaches to optimize treatment based on the patient's specific tumor profile, and may become a new standard of care. In addition, they may enhance the assessment of treatment efficacy and lead to improved outcomes for patients with a breast cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorine de Jong
- Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Elise Desperito
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (E.D.); (L.D.); (H.M.); (A.S.); (B.B.); (C.P.); (C.L.); (T.R.); (M.M.S.)
| | | | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (E.D.); (L.D.); (H.M.); (A.S.); (B.B.); (C.P.); (C.L.); (T.R.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Romain-David Seban
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Institut Curie, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France;
- Laboratory of Translational Imaging in Oncology, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, Institut Curie, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Jeeban P. Das
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.P.D.); (R.Y.)
| | - Hong Ma
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (E.D.); (L.D.); (H.M.); (A.S.); (B.B.); (C.P.); (C.L.); (T.R.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Abin Sajan
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (E.D.); (L.D.); (H.M.); (A.S.); (B.B.); (C.P.); (C.L.); (T.R.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Brian Braumuller
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (E.D.); (L.D.); (H.M.); (A.S.); (B.B.); (C.P.); (C.L.); (T.R.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Conor Prendergast
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (E.D.); (L.D.); (H.M.); (A.S.); (B.B.); (C.P.); (C.L.); (T.R.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Connie Liou
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (E.D.); (L.D.); (H.M.); (A.S.); (B.B.); (C.P.); (C.L.); (T.R.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Aileen Deng
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Novant Health, 170 Medical Park Road, Mooresville, NC 28117, USA;
| | - Tina Roa
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (E.D.); (L.D.); (H.M.); (A.S.); (B.B.); (C.P.); (C.L.); (T.R.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.P.D.); (R.Y.)
| | - Antoine Girard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France;
| | - Mary M. Salvatore
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (E.D.); (L.D.); (H.M.); (A.S.); (B.B.); (C.P.); (C.L.); (T.R.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Kathleen M. Capaccione
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (E.D.); (L.D.); (H.M.); (A.S.); (B.B.); (C.P.); (C.L.); (T.R.); (M.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zirakchian Zadeh M, Yeh R, Kirov AS, Kunin HS, Gönen M, Sotirchos VS, Soares KS, Sofocleous CT. Gradient-based Volumetric PET Parameters on Immediate Pre-ablation FDG-PET Predict Local Tumor Progression in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis Treated by Microwave Ablation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00270-023-03470-6. [PMID: 37268735 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03470-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the optimal method of segmentation of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) on immediate pre-ablation PET scans and assess the prognostic value of quantitative pre-ablation PET parameters with regards to local tumor control. A secondary objective was to correlate the target tumor size estimation by PET methods with the tumor measurements on anatomical imaging. METHODOLOGY A prospectively accrued cohort of 55 CLMs (46 patients) treated with real-time 18F-FDG-PET/CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation was followed-up for a median of 10.8 months (interquartile: 5.5-20.2). Total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) values of each CLM were derived from pre-ablation 18F-FDG-PET with gradient and threshold PET segmentation methodologies. The event was defined as local tumor progression (LTP). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to assess area under the curves (AUCs). Intraclass correlation (ICC) and 95.0% confidence interval (CI) were performed to measure the linear relationships between the continuous variables. RESULTS AUCs for prediction of LTP obtained from time-dependent ROC analysis for the gradient technique were higher in comparison to the threshold methodologies (AUCs for TLG and volume were: 0.790 and 0.807, respectively). ICC between PET gradient-based and anatomical measurements were higher in comparison to threshold methodologies (ICC for the longest diameter: 733 (95.0% CI 0.538-0.846), ICC for the shortest diameter: .747 (95.0% CI 0.546-0.859), p-values < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The gradient-based technique had a higher AUC for prediction of LTP after microwave ablation of CLM and showed the highest correlation with anatomical imaging tumor measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdi Zirakchian Zadeh
- Interventional Oncology/Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, IR Suite H118, New York, NY, 10075, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Assen S Kirov
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Henry S Kunin
- Interventional Oncology/Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, IR Suite H118, New York, NY, 10075, USA
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Biostatistics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vlasios S Sotirchos
- Interventional Oncology/Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, IR Suite H118, New York, NY, 10075, USA
| | - Kevin S Soares
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Interventional Oncology/Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, IR Suite H118, New York, NY, 10075, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
de Jong D, Das JP, Ma H, Pailey Valiplackal J, Prendergast C, Roa T, Braumuller B, Deng A, Dercle L, Yeh R, Salvatore MM, Capaccione KM. Novel Targets, Novel Treatments: The Changing Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2855. [PMID: 37345192 PMCID: PMC10216085 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a paradigm shift. Once a disease with limited potential therapies, treatment options for patients have exploded with the availability of molecular testing to direct management and targeted therapies to treat tumors with specific driver mutations. New in vitro diagnostics allow for the early and non-invasive detection of disease, and emerging in vivo imaging techniques allow for better detection and monitoring. The development of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has arguably been the biggest advance in lung cancer treatment, given that the vast majority of NSCLC tumors can be treated with these therapies. Specific targeted therapies, including those against KRAS, EGFR, RTK, and others have also improved the outcomes for those individuals bearing an actionable mutation. New and emerging therapies, such as bispecific antibodies, CAR T cell therapy, and molecular targeted radiotherapy, offer promise to patients for whom none of the existing therapies have proved effective. In this review, we provide the most up-to-date survey to our knowledge regarding emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for lung cancer to provide clinicians with a comprehensive reference of the options for treatment available now and those which are soon to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorine de Jong
- Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Jeeban P. Das
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.P.D.); (R.Y.)
| | - Hong Ma
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.M.); (J.P.V.); (C.P.); (T.R.); (B.B.); (L.D.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Jacienta Pailey Valiplackal
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.M.); (J.P.V.); (C.P.); (T.R.); (B.B.); (L.D.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Conor Prendergast
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.M.); (J.P.V.); (C.P.); (T.R.); (B.B.); (L.D.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Tina Roa
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.M.); (J.P.V.); (C.P.); (T.R.); (B.B.); (L.D.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Brian Braumuller
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.M.); (J.P.V.); (C.P.); (T.R.); (B.B.); (L.D.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Aileen Deng
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Novant Health, 170 Medical Park Road, Mooresville, NC 28117, USA;
| | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.M.); (J.P.V.); (C.P.); (T.R.); (B.B.); (L.D.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.P.D.); (R.Y.)
| | - Mary M. Salvatore
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.M.); (J.P.V.); (C.P.); (T.R.); (B.B.); (L.D.); (M.M.S.)
| | - Kathleen M. Capaccione
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA; (H.M.); (J.P.V.); (C.P.); (T.R.); (B.B.); (L.D.); (M.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Backhaus P, Burg MC, Asmus I, Pixberg M, Büther F, Breyholz HJ, Yeh R, Weigel SB, Stichling P, Heindel W, Bobe S, Barth P, Tio J, Schäfers M. Initial Results of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/MRI to Assess Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:717-723. [PMID: 36396458 PMCID: PMC10152127 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Improving imaging-based response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer assessment could obviate histologic confirmation of pathologic complete response (pCR) and facilitate deescalation of chemotherapy or surgery. Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/MRI is a promising novel molecular imaging agent for the tumor microenvironment with intense uptake in breast cancer. We assessed the diagnostic performance of follow-up breast 68Ga-FAPI-46 (68Ga-FAPI) PET/MRI in classifying the response status of local breast cancer and lymph node metastases after completion of NAC and validated this approach immunohistochemically. Methods: In women who completed NAC for invasive breast cancer, follow-up 68Ga-FAPI PET/MRI and corresponding fibroblast activation protein (FAP) immunostainings were retrospectively analyzed. Metrics of 68Ga-FAPI uptake and FAP immunoreactivity in women with or without pCR were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Diagnostic performance to detect remnant invasive cancer was calculated for tracer uptake metrics using receiver-operating-characteristic curves and for masked readers' visual assessment categories of PET/MRI and MRI alone. Results: Thirteen women (mean age ± SD, 47 ± 9 y) were evaluated. Seven of the 13 achieved pCR in the breast and 6 in the axilla. FAP immunoreactivity was significantly associated with response status. The 68Ga-FAPI PET/MRI mean breast tumor-to-background ratio was 0.9 (range, 0.6-1.2) for pCR and 2.1 (range, 1.4-3.1) for no pCR (P = 0.001). Integrated PET/MRI could classify breast response correctly in all 13 women based on readers' visual assessment or tumor-to-background ratio. Evaluation of MRI alone resulted in at least 2 false-positives. For lymph nodes, PET/MRI readers had at least 2 false-negative classifications, whereas MRI alone resulted in 2 false-negatives and 1 false-positive. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this was the first analysis of 68Ga-FAPI PET/MRI for response assessment after NAC for breast cancer. The diagnostic performance of PET/MRI in a small study sample trended toward a gain over MRI alone, clearly supporting future prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthias C. Burg
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Inga Asmus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Michaela Pixberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Florian Büther
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Hans-Jörg Breyholz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | | | | | - Walter Heindel
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Stefanie Bobe
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
- Gerhard-Domagk Institute for Pathology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; and
| | - Peter Barth
- Gerhard-Domagk Institute for Pathology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; and
| | - Joke Tio
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Schäfers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prendergast CM, Capaccione KM, Lopci E, Das JP, Shoushtari AN, Yeh R, Amin D, Dercle L, De Jong D. More than Just Skin-Deep: A Review of Imaging's Role in Guiding CAR T-Cell Therapy for Advanced Melanoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:992. [PMID: 36900136 PMCID: PMC10000712 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced melanoma is one of the deadliest cancers, owing to its invasiveness and its propensity to develop resistance to therapy. Surgery remains the first-line treatment for early-stage tumors but is often not an option for advanced-stage melanoma. Chemotherapy carries a poor prognosis, and despite advances in targeted therapy, the cancer can develop resistance. CAR T-cell therapy has demonstrated great success against hematological cancers, and clinical trials are deploying it against advanced melanoma. Though melanoma remains a challenging disease to treat, radiology will play an increasing role in monitoring both the CAR T-cells and response to therapy. We review the current imaging techniques for advanced melanoma, as well as novel PET tracers and radiomics, in order to guide CAR T-cell therapy and manage potential adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor M. Prendergast
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Kathleen M. Capaccione
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCSS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Jeeban P. Das
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Daniel Amin
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Dorine De Jong
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dercle L, Sun S, Seban RD, Mekki A, Sun R, Tselikas L, Hans S, Bernard-Tessier A, Bouvier FM, Aide N, Vercellino L, Rivas A, Girard A, Mokrane FZ, Manson G, Houot R, Lopci E, Yeh R, Ammari S, Schwartz LH. Emerging and Evolving Concepts in Cancer Immunotherapy Imaging. Radiology 2023; 306:e239003. [PMID: 36803004 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.239003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
|
17
|
Zadeh MZ, Kirov A, Lafontaine D, Yeh R, Kunin H, Solomon S, Erinjeri J, Sotirchos V, Sofocleous C. Abstract No. 155 Immediate 3D Imaging Assessment is the Most Accurate Predictor of Local Tumor Progression after Microwave Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.12.209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2023] Open
|
18
|
Dercle L, Sun S, Seban RD, Mekki A, Sun R, Tselikas L, Hans S, Bernard-Tessier A, Mihoubi Bouvier F, Aide N, Vercellino L, Rivas A, Girard A, Mokrane FZ, Manson G, Houot R, Lopci E, Yeh R, Ammari S, Schwartz LH. Emerging and Evolving Concepts in Cancer Immunotherapy Imaging. Radiology 2023; 306:32-46. [PMID: 36472538 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.210518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Criteria based on measurements of lesion diameter at CT have guided treatment with historical therapies due to the strong association between tumor size and survival. Clinical experience with immune checkpoint modulators shows that editing immune system function can be effective in various solid tumors. Equally, novel immune-related phenomena accompany this novel therapeutic paradigm. These effects of immunotherapy challenge the association of tumor size with response or progression and include risks and adverse events that present new demands for imaging to guide treatment decisions. Emerging and evolving approaches to immunotherapy highlight further key issues for imaging evaluation, such as dissociated response following local administration of immune checkpoint modulators, pseudoprogression due to immune infiltration in the tumor environment, and premature death due to hyperprogression. Research that may offer tools for radiologists to meet these challenges is reviewed. Different modalities are discussed, including immuno-PET, as well as new applications of CT, MRI, and fluorodeoxyglucose PET, such as radiomics and imaging of hematopoietic tissues or anthropometric characteristics. Multilevel integration of imaging and other biomarkers may improve clinical guidance for immunotherapies and provide theranostic opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Dercle
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Shawn Sun
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Romain-David Seban
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Ahmed Mekki
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Roger Sun
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Lambros Tselikas
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Sophie Hans
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Alice Bernard-Tessier
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Fadila Mihoubi Bouvier
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Nicolas Aide
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Laetitia Vercellino
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Alexia Rivas
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Antoine Girard
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Fatima-Zohra Mokrane
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Guillaume Manson
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Roch Houot
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Egesta Lopci
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Randy Yeh
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Samy Ammari
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Elsakka A, Yeh R, Das J. The Clinical Utility of Molecular Imaging in COVID-19: An Update. Semin Nucl Med 2023; 53:98-106. [PMID: 36243572 PMCID: PMC9492514 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The novel pathogen severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first discovered in Wuhan, China in late 2019 with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) declared a global pandemic in March 2020. Primarily involving the lungs, conventional imaging with chest radiography and CT can play a complementary role to RT-PCR in the initial diagnosis, and also in follow up of select patients. As a broader understanding of the multi-systemic nature of COVID-19 has evolved, a potential role for molecular imaging has developed, that may detect functional changes in advance of standard cross-sectional imaging. In this review, we highlight the evolving role of molecular imaging such as fluorine-18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) with PET/CT and PET/MRI in the evaluation of both pulmonary and extra-pulmonary COVID-19, ventilation and perfusion scan with SPECT/CT for thromboembolic disease, long term follow-up of COVID-19 infection, and COVID-19 vaccine-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Elsakka
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - Jeeban Das
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zirakchian Zadeh M, Yeh R, Kunin HS, Kirov AS, Petre EN, Gönen M, Silk M, Cornelis FH, Soares KC, Ziv E, Solomon SB, Sotirchos VS, Sofocleous CT. Real-Time Split-Dose PET/CT-Guided Ablation Improves Colorectal Liver Metastasis Detection and Ablation Zone Margin Assessments without the Need for Repeated Contrast Injection. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246253. [PMID: 36551738 PMCID: PMC9777508 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-time split-dose PET can identify the targeted colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) and eliminate the need for repeated contrast administration before and during thermal ablation (TA). This study aimed to assess the added value of pre-ablation real-time split-dose PET when combined with non-contract CT in the detection of CLM for ablation and the evaluation of the ablation zone and margins. METHODS A total of 190 CLMs/125 participants from two IRB-approved prospective clinical trials using PET/CT-guided TA were analyzed. Based on detection on pre-TA imaging, CLMs were categorized as detectable, non-detectable, and of poor conspicuity on CT alone, and detectable, non-detectable, and low FDG-avidity on PET/CT after the initial dose. Ablation margins around the targeted CLM were evaluated using a 3D volumetric approach. RESULTS We found that 129/190 (67.9%) CLMs were detectable on CT alone, and 61/190 CLMs (32.1%) were undetectable or of poor conspicuity, not allowing accurate depiction and targeting by CT alone. Thus, the theoretical 5- and 10-mm margins could not be defined in these tumors (32.1%) using CT alone. When TA intraprocedural PET/CT images are obtained and inspected (fused PET/CT), only 4 CLM (2.1%) remained undetectable or had a low FDG avidity. CONCLUSIONS The addition of PET to non-contrast CT improved CLM detection for ablation targeting, margin assessments, and continuous depiction of the FDG avid CLMs during the ablation without the need for multiple intravenous contrast injections pre- and intra-procedurally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdi Zirakchian Zadeh
- Interventional Radiology/Oncology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Henry S. Kunin
- Interventional Radiology/Oncology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Assen S. Kirov
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Elena N. Petre
- Interventional Radiology/Oncology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Biostatistics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Mikhail Silk
- Interventional Radiology/Oncology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Francois H. Cornelis
- Interventional Radiology/Oncology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Kevin C. Soares
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Etay Ziv
- Interventional Radiology/Oncology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Stephen B. Solomon
- Interventional Radiology/Oncology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Vlasios S. Sotirchos
- Interventional Radiology/Oncology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Constantinos T. Sofocleous
- Interventional Radiology/Oncology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jee J, Lebow ES, Yeh R, Das JP, Namakydoust A, Paik PK, Chaft JE, Jayakumaran G, Rose Brannon A, Benayed R, Zehir A, Donoghue M, Schultz N, Chakravarty D, Kundra R, Madupuri R, Murciano-Goroff YR, Tu HY, Xu CR, Martinez A, Wilhelm C, Galle J, Daly B, Yu HA, Offin M, Hellmann MD, Lito P, Arbour KC, Zauderer MG, Kris MG, Ng KK, Eng J, Preeshagul I, Victoria Lai W, Fiore JJ, Iqbal A, Molena D, Rocco G, Park BJ, Lim LP, Li M, Tong-Li C, De Silva M, Chan DL, Diakos CI, Itchins M, Clarke S, Pavlakis N, Lee A, Rekhtman N, Chang J, Travis WD, Riely GJ, Solit DB, Gonen M, Rusch VW, Rimner A, Gomez D, Drilon A, Scher HI, Shah SP, Berger MF, Arcila ME, Ladanyi M, Levine RL, Shen R, Razavi P, Reis-Filho JS, Jones DR, Rudin CM, Isbell JM, Li BT. Overall survival with circulating tumor DNA-guided therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Med 2022; 28:2353-2363. [PMID: 36357680 PMCID: PMC10338177 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02047-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing guides therapy decisions but has been studied mostly in small cohorts without sufficient follow-up to determine its influence on overall survival. We prospectively followed an international cohort of 1,127 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and ctDNA-guided therapy. ctDNA detection was associated with shorter survival (hazard ratio (HR), 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.74-2.42; P < 0.001) independently of clinicopathologic features and metabolic tumor volume. Among the 722 (64%) patients with detectable ctDNA, 255 (23%) matched to targeted therapy by ctDNA sequencing had longer survival than those not treated with targeted therapy (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.76; P < 0.001). Genomic alterations in ctDNA not detected by time-matched tissue sequencing were found in 25% of the patients. These ctDNA-only alterations disproportionately featured subclonal drivers of resistance, including RICTOR and PIK3CA alterations, and were associated with short survival. Minimally invasive ctDNA profiling can identify heterogeneous drivers not captured in tissue sequencing and expand community access to life-prolonging therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Jee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emily S Lebow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeeban P Das
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Paul K Paik
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamie E Chaft
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - A Rose Brannon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryma Benayed
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ahmet Zehir
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark Donoghue
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Ritika Kundra
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Hai-Yan Tu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chong-Rui Xu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Clare Wilhelm
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jesse Galle
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bobby Daly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helena A Yu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Offin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew D Hellmann
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piro Lito
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn C Arbour
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marjorie G Zauderer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark G Kris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth K Ng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juliana Eng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Isabel Preeshagul
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - W Victoria Lai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - John J Fiore
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Afsheen Iqbal
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniela Molena
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bernard J Park
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lee P Lim
- Resolution Bioscience, Agilent Technologies, Kirkland, WA, USA
| | - Mark Li
- Resolution Bioscience, Agilent Technologies, Kirkland, WA, USA
| | - Candace Tong-Li
- GenesisCare, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - David L Chan
- GenesisCare, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Nick Pavlakis
- GenesisCare, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Adrian Lee
- GenesisCare, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Natasha Rekhtman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason Chang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - William D Travis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gregory J Riely
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - David B Solit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Drilon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Howard I Scher
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sohrab P Shah
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Maria E Arcila
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ross L Levine
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronglai Shen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pedram Razavi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - David R Jones
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles M Rudin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - James M Isbell
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bob T Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Perrier N, Lang BH, Farias LCB, Poch LL, Sywak M, Almquist M, Vriens MR, Yeh MW, Shariq O, Duh QY, Yeh R, Vu T, LiVolsi V, Sitges-Serra A. Surgical Aspects of Primary Hyperparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Res 2022; 37:2373-2390. [PMID: 36054175 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Parathyroidectomy (PTX) is the treatment of choice for symptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). It is also the treatment of choice in asymptomatic PHPT with evidence for target organ involvement. This review updates surgical aspects of PHPT and proposes the following definitions based on international expert consensus: selective PTX (and reasons for conversion to an extended procedure), bilateral neck exploration for non-localized or multigland disease, subtotal PTX, total PTX with immediate or delayed autotransplantation, and transcervical thymectomy and extended en bloc PTX for parathyroid carcinoma. The systematic literature reviews discussed covered (i) the use of intraoperative PTH (ioPTH) for localized single-gland disease and (ii) the management of low BMD after PTX. Updates based on prospective observational studies are presented concerning PTX for multigland disease and hereditary PHPT syndromes, histopathology, intraoperative adjuncts, localization techniques, perioperative management, "reoperative" surgery and volume/outcome data. Postoperative complications are few and uncommon (<3%) in centers performing over 40 PTXs per year. This review is the first global consensus about surgery in PHPT and reflects the current practice in leading endocrine surgery units worldwide. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Perrier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Section of Surgical Endocrinology, University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian H Lang
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | | | - Leyre Lorente Poch
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mark Sywak
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin Almquist
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Menno R Vriens
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael W Yeh
- Department of Surgery, Section of Endocrine Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Omair Shariq
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Headington, UK
| | - Quan-Yang Duh
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thinh Vu
- Neuroradiology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Virginia LiVolsi
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bilezikian JP, Khan AA, Silverberg SJ, Fuleihan GEH, Marcocci C, Minisola S, Perrier N, Sitges-Serra A, Thakker RV, Guyatt G, Mannstadt M, Potts JT, Clarke BL, Brandi ML, Balaya Z, Hofbauer L, Insogna K, Lacroix A, Liberman UA, Palermo A, Rizzoli R, Wermers R, Hannan FM, Pepe J, Cipriani C, Eastell R, Liu J, Mithal A, Moreira CA, Peacock M, Silva B, Walker M, Chakhtoura M, Schini M, Zein OE, Almquist M, Farias LCB, Duh Q, Lang BH, LiVolsi V, Swayk M, Vriens MR, Vu T, Yeh MW, Yeh R, Shariq O, Poch LL, Bandeira F, Cetani F, Chandran M, Cusano NE, Ebeling PR, Gosnell J, Lewiecki EM, Singer FR, Frost M, Formenti AM, Karonova T, Gittoes N, Rejnmark L. Evaluation and Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Summary Statement and Guidelines from the Fifth International Workshop. J Bone Miner Res 2022; 37:2293-2314. [PMID: 36245251 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The last international guidelines on the evaluation and management of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) were published in 2014. Research since that time has led to new insights into epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, measurements, genetics, outcomes, presentations, new imaging modalities, target and other organ systems, pregnancy, evaluation, and management. Advances in all these areas are demonstrated by the reference list in which the majority of listings were published after the last set of guidelines. It was thus, timely to convene an international group of over 50 experts to review these advances in our knowledge. Four Task Forces considered: 1. Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Genetics; 2. Classical and Nonclassical Features; 3. Surgical Aspects; and 4. Management. For Task Force 4 on the Management of PHPT, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology addressed surgical management of asymptomatic PHPT and non-surgical medical management of PHPT. The findings of this systematic review that applied GRADE methods to randomized trials are published as part of this series. Task Force 4 also reviewed a much larger body of new knowledge from observations studies that did not specifically fit the criteria of GRADE methodology. The full reports of these 4 Task Forces immediately follow this summary statement. Distilling the essence of all deliberations of all Task Force reports and Methodological reviews, we offer, in this summary statement, evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for the evaluation and management of PHPT. Different from the conclusions of the last workshop, these deliberations have led to revisions of renal guidelines and more evidence for the other recommendations. The accompanying papers present an in-depth discussion of topics summarized in this report. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Bilezikian
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aliya A Khan
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Shonni J Silverberg
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan
- Calcium Metabolism and Osteoporosis Program, WHO CC for Metabolic Bone Disorders, Division of Endocrinology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Claudio Marcocci
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Endocrine Unit 2, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Salvatore Minisola
- Department of Clinical, Internal, Anaesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, 'Sapienza', Rome University, Rome, Italy
| | - Nancy Perrier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Rajesh V Thakker
- Academic Endocrine Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Gordon Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Mannstadt
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John T Potts
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bart L Clarke
- Mayo Clinic Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- Fondazione Italiana sulla Ricerca sulle Malattie dell'Osso (F.I.R.M.O. Foundation), Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Strom J, Xu J, Sun T, Song Y, Sevilla-Cazes J, Wadhera R, Yeh R. Ascertainment of aortic valve disease using administrative claims. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Administrative claims may be useful for characterizing patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic regurgitation (AR) and estimating disease prevalence. However, the accuracy of diagnostic codes for aortic valve disease has not been well studied.
Purpose
To evaluate the validity of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for identification of AS and AR.
Methods
Using a large, transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) report dataset linked to Medicare Fee-for-service (FFS) claims, 2017–2018, the performance of candidate claims to ascertain AS/AR status using standard TTE definitions was evaluated. Recursive partitioning with 10-fold cross validation was used to build the optimal prediction tree for AS/AR status using all ICD-10 codes as candidate predictors. The optimal performing claims algorithm was tested against patient outcomes in a separate 100% sample of Medicare FFS inpatient and outpatient claims, 2017–2019.
Results
Of those included in the derivation dataset (N=5497, mean age 74.4±11.0 years, 49.7% female), any AS or AR was present in 24% and 38.8%, respectively. The code I35.0 was optimal for identification of any AS with a sensitivity and specificity for any AS of 53.1% and 94.8%, respectively (Table 1). Amongst those with an I35.0 code, 40.3% had severe AS. Claims were unable to distinguish disease severity (i.e. severe vs. non-severe) or subtypes (e.g. bicuspid or rheumatic AS), and were insensitive and nonspecific for AR of any severity. Among all Medicare beneficiaries who received an TTE (N=3,783,249), those with an I35.0 code, compared to those without, had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.63–1.67), heart failure hospitalization (HR 2.17, 95% CI 2.11–2.24), and aortic valve replacement (HR 32.35, 95% CI 31.46–33.27) (Table 2).
Conclusions
Amongst those receiving TTE, the ICD-10 code I35.0 in any position was optimal for identification of AS and identified a population at significant greater risk of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and receipt of aortic valve replacement. Though 40.3% of those with I35.0 had severe AS, claims were unable to distinguish disease severity of subtype. Claims may be feasibly used to identify those with AS who may be at risk for adverse valve-related cardiovascular events and require future treatment.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): National, Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Strom
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School, Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology , Boston , United States of America
| | - J Xu
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School, Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology , Boston , United States of America
| | - T Sun
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School, Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology , Boston , United States of America
| | - Y Song
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School, Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology , Boston , United States of America
| | - J Sevilla-Cazes
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston , United States of America
| | - R Wadhera
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School, Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology , Boston , United States of America
| | - R Yeh
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School, Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology , Boston , United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dercle L, McGale J, Sun S, Marabelle A, Yeh R, Deutsch E, Mokrane FZ, Farwell M, Ammari S, Schoder H, Zhao B, Schwartz LH. Artificial intelligence and radiomics: fundamentals, applications, and challenges in immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2022-005292. [PMID: 36180071 PMCID: PMC9528623 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy offers the potential for durable clinical benefit but calls into question the association between tumor size and outcome that currently forms the basis for imaging-guided treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics allow for discovery of novel patterns in medical images that can increase radiology’s role in management of patients with cancer, although methodological issues in the literature limit its clinical application. Using keywords related to immunotherapy and radiomics, we performed a literature review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase from database inception through February 2022. We removed all duplicates, non-English language reports, abstracts, reviews, editorials, perspectives, case reports, book chapters, and non-relevant studies. From the remaining articles, the following information was extracted: publication information, sample size, primary tumor site, imaging modality, primary and secondary study objectives, data collection strategy (retrospective vs prospective, single center vs multicenter), radiomic signature validation strategy, signature performance, and metrics for calculation of a Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). We identified 351 studies, of which 87 were unique reports relevant to our research question. The median (IQR) of cohort sizes was 101 (57–180). Primary stated goals for radiomics model development were prognostication (n=29, 33.3%), treatment response prediction (n=24, 27.6%), and characterization of tumor phenotype (n=14, 16.1%) or immune environment (n=13, 14.9%). Most studies were retrospective (n=75, 86.2%) and recruited patients from a single center (n=57, 65.5%). For studies with available information on model testing, most (n=54, 65.9%) used a validation set or better. Performance metrics were generally highest for radiomics signatures predicting treatment response or tumor phenotype, as opposed to immune environment and overall prognosis. Out of a possible maximum of 36 points, the median (IQR) of RQS was 12 (10–16). While a rapidly increasing number of promising results offer proof of concept that AI and radiomics could drive precision medicine approaches for a wide range of indications, standardizing the data collection as well as optimizing the methodological quality and rigor are necessary before these results can be translated into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Dercle
- Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeremy McGale
- Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shawn Sun
- Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aurelien Marabelle
- Therapeutic Innovation and Early Trials, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France
| | | | - Michael Farwell
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Samy Ammari
- Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France.,Radiology, Institut de Cancérologie Paris Nord, Sarcelles, France
| | - Heiko Schoder
- Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Binsheng Zhao
- Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jayaprakasam VS, Gibbs P, Gangai N, Bajwa R, Sosa RE, Yeh R, Greally M, Ku GY, Gollub MJ, Paroder V. Can 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics Features Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14123035. [PMID: 35740700 PMCID: PMC9221147 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14123035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary PET/CT is an important staging modality in the baseline assessment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Accurate staging and response prediction in these patients is essential for management. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics features in predicting outcomes such as tumor and nodal categories, PET-based response to induction chemotherapy, progression-free survival, and overall survival. In a final cohort of 74 patients, we found that the developed radiomics models can predict these clinical and prognostic outcomes with reasonable accuracy, similar or better than those derived from conventional imaging. Future studies with a larger cohort would be helpful in establishing the significance of these models. Abstract This study aimed to assess the usefulness of radiomics features of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancers (ESCC) in predicting outcomes such as clinical tumor (cT) and nodal (cN) categories, PET response to induction chemotherapy (PET response), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Pretreatment PET/CT images from patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy from July 2002 to February 2017 were segmented, and data were split into training and test sets. Model development was performed on the training datasets and a maximum of five features were selected. Final diagnostic accuracies were determined using the test dataset. A total of 86 PET/CTs (58 men and 28 women, mean age 65 years) were segmented. Due to small lesion size, 12 patients were excluded. The diagnostic accuracies as derived from the CT, PET, and combined PET/CT test datasets were as follows: cT category—70.4%, 70.4%, and 81.5%, respectively; cN category—69.0%, 86.2%, and 86.2%, respectively; PET response—60.0%, 66.7%, and 70.0%, respectively; PFS—60.7%, 75.0%, and 75.0%, respectively; and OS—51.7%, 55.2%, and 62.1%, respectively. A radiomics assessment of locally advanced ESCC has the potential to predict various clinical outcomes. External validation of these models would be further helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (V.S.J.); (R.Y.)
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
| | - Natalie Gangai
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
| | - Raazi Bajwa
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
| | - Ramon E. Sosa
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (V.S.J.); (R.Y.)
| | | | - Geoffrey Y. Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Marc J. Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jayaprakasam VS, Gibbs P, Gangai N, Bajwa R, Sosa RE, Yeh R, Greally M, Ku GY, Gollub MJ, Paroder V. Can 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics Features Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? Cancers (Basel) 2022. [PMID: 35740700 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14123035%' and 2*3*8=6*8 and 'xj6b'!='xj6b%] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the usefulness of radiomics features of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancers (ESCC) in predicting outcomes such as clinical tumor (cT) and nodal (cN) categories, PET response to induction chemotherapy (PET response), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Pretreatment PET/CT images from patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy from July 2002 to February 2017 were segmented, and data were split into training and test sets. Model development was performed on the training datasets and a maximum of five features were selected. Final diagnostic accuracies were determined using the test dataset. A total of 86 PET/CTs (58 men and 28 women, mean age 65 years) were segmented. Due to small lesion size, 12 patients were excluded. The diagnostic accuracies as derived from the CT, PET, and combined PET/CT test datasets were as follows: cT category-70.4%, 70.4%, and 81.5%, respectively; cN category-69.0%, 86.2%, and 86.2%, respectively; PET response-60.0%, 66.7%, and 70.0%, respectively; PFS-60.7%, 75.0%, and 75.0%, respectively; and OS-51.7%, 55.2%, and 62.1%, respectively. A radiomics assessment of locally advanced ESCC has the potential to predict various clinical outcomes. External validation of these models would be further helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Natalie Gangai
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Raazi Bajwa
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Ramon E Sosa
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Geoffrey Y Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jayaprakasam VS, Gibbs P, Gangai N, Bajwa R, Sosa RE, Yeh R, Greally M, Ku GY, Gollub MJ, Paroder V. Can 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics Features Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:3035. [PMID: 35740700 PMCID: PMC9221147 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14123035&n999822=v982537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the usefulness of radiomics features of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancers (ESCC) in predicting outcomes such as clinical tumor (cT) and nodal (cN) categories, PET response to induction chemotherapy (PET response), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Pretreatment PET/CT images from patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy from July 2002 to February 2017 were segmented, and data were split into training and test sets. Model development was performed on the training datasets and a maximum of five features were selected. Final diagnostic accuracies were determined using the test dataset. A total of 86 PET/CTs (58 men and 28 women, mean age 65 years) were segmented. Due to small lesion size, 12 patients were excluded. The diagnostic accuracies as derived from the CT, PET, and combined PET/CT test datasets were as follows: cT category-70.4%, 70.4%, and 81.5%, respectively; cN category-69.0%, 86.2%, and 86.2%, respectively; PET response-60.0%, 66.7%, and 70.0%, respectively; PFS-60.7%, 75.0%, and 75.0%, respectively; and OS-51.7%, 55.2%, and 62.1%, respectively. A radiomics assessment of locally advanced ESCC has the potential to predict various clinical outcomes. External validation of these models would be further helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (V.S.J.); (R.Y.)
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
| | - Natalie Gangai
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
| | - Raazi Bajwa
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
| | - Ramon E. Sosa
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (V.S.J.); (R.Y.)
| | | | - Geoffrey Y. Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Marc J. Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (P.G.); (N.G.); (R.B.); (R.E.S.); (M.J.G.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shaw A, Seban RD, Besson FL, Vila-Reyes H, Ammari S, Mokrane FZ, Yeh R, Dercle L. Editorial: Breakthrough in Imaging-Guided Precision Medicine in Oncology. Front Oncol 2022; 12:908561. [PMID: 35664770 PMCID: PMC9159369 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.908561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Shaw
- Department of Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Romain-David Seban
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Laboratory of Translational Imaging in Oncology, Paris Sciences et Lettres University (PSL) Research University, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Florent L Besson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Helena Vila-Reyes
- Department of Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Samy Ammari
- Department of Medical Imaging, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Fatima-Zohra Mokrane
- Department of Radiology, Faculté de Médecine Rangueil, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cowzer D, Wu AJC, Sihag S, Walch HS, Park BJ, Jones DR, Gu P, Maron SB, Sugarman R, Chalasani SB, Shcherba M, Capanu M, Chou JF, Nosov A, Yeh R, Tang LH, Ilson DH, Janjigian YY, Molena D, Ku GY. Durvalumab (D) and PET-directed chemoradiation (CRT) after induction FOLFOX for esophageal adenocarcinoma: Final results. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4029 Background: Induction FOLFOX followed by PET-directed CRT prior to surgery demonstrated positive results in the CALGB 80803 study. We investigated the safety and efficacy of adding D, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, to PET-directed CRT. Methods: Patients (pts) with locally advanced esophageal/GEJ adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Pts received 2 cycles of mFOLFOX6 prior to repeat PET/CT. PET responders (≥35% reduction in SUV (PETr)) received 5-FU/capecitabine and oxaliplatin with RT to 50.4Gy, while induction PET non-responders (PETnr) received carboplatin/paclitaxel with RT. All Pts received D 1,500 mg q4W ×2 starting 2 weeks prior to CRT. Esophagectomy was planned 6-8 weeks after CRT. Pts with R0 resections received adjuvant D 1,500mg q4W ×6. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Results: 36 pts were enrolled. Clinical ≥T3 disease was seen in 32 pts (88.9%, cT4 = 3) and ≥N1 in 23 (63.9%) pts. PD-L1 CPS was ≥1 in 25 (71.4%) of 35 tested with 14 (40%) ≥5. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was identified in 3 (8.3%) pts. 25 (70%) pts were PETr. Preop treatment was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Three pts had disease progression prior to surgery. pCR was identified in 8 (22.2%) pts and 22 (64.7%) had major pathologic response (MPR; ypTanyN0 + ≥90% response). Those with MSI tumors had ≥90% treatment response (1 pCR, 1: ypT1aN0 99% response, 1: ypT2N0, 90% response). 17 (73.9%) of 23 cN+ pts had ypN0 disease. MPR was associated with PD-L1 ≥1 (p = 0.03) and with a higher tumor mutational burden (TMB; p = 0.016) on MSK-IMPACT testing. Adjuvant D was commenced in 27 pts, with a median number of 6 cycles. Early discontinuation was due to risks of visits due to COVID19 (4, 15%), progressive disease (3, 11%), late surgical complications (2, 7%) and immune toxicity (1, 4%). With a median follow-up of 30 months, OS rates were 92% [95%CI: 83%-100%] and 85 % [95%CI: 74%-98%] at 12 and 24 months post induction. 12 and 24-month PFS rates were 81% [95%CI: 69%-95%] and 71% [95%CI: 58%-88%] respectively. In the 33 operated pts, 12 and 24-month disease free survival was 82% [95%CI: 70%-96%] and 78% [95%CI: 65%-94%], respectively. In addition to SUV on PET, total lesion glycolysis (TLG) was correlated with pathologic response. In cases with borderline change in SUV, TLG could predict response to treatment. One PETnr with 30.8% reduction in SUV had 88.1% reduction in TLG and pCR. Conversely, a PETr (-36.3%) who had an increase in TLG (39.3%) had only 40% treatment response on pathology. Conclusions: The addition of D to induction FOLFOX and PET-directed CRT prior to surgery is safe and appears effective with a high rate of pathologic response, as well as encouraging survival data. PD-L1 CPS≥1 and higher TMB may be associated with MPR. TLG is a novel PET variable that should be studied prospectively. Additional correlatives and comparison to a cohort treated with standard PET-directed CRT will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02962063.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Cowzer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Smita Sihag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Ping Gu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Ryan Sugarman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Marinela Capanu
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - Joanne F. Chou
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - Anton Nosov
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Laura H. Tang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Geoffrey Yuyat Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Das JP, Yeh R. Prostate cancer cardiac metastasis detected on serial imaging with [ 68Ga] PSMA-11 PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3952-3953. [PMID: 35543730 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05815-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeeban Paul Das
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Yeh R, Amer A, Johnson JM, Ginat DT. Pearls and Pitfalls of 18FDG-PET Head and Neck Imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2022; 32:287-298. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
33
|
Chi P, Qin LX, Nguyen B, Kelly CM, D'Angelo SP, Dickson MA, Gounder MM, Keohan ML, Movva S, Nacev BA, Rosenbaum E, Thornton KA, Crago AM, Yoon S, Ulaner G, Yeh R, Martindale M, Phelan HT, Biniakewitz MD, Warda S, Lee CJ, Berger MF, Schultz ND, Singer S, Hwang S, Chen Y, Antonescu CR, Tap WD. Phase II Trial of Imatinib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With Treatment-Naive Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:997-1008. [PMID: 35041493 PMCID: PMC8937014 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Dual targeting of the gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) lineage-specific master regulators, ETV1 and KIT, by MEK and KIT inhibitors were synergistic preclinically and may enhance clinical efficacy. This trial was designed to test the efficacy and safety of imatinib plus binimetinib in first-line treatment of GIST. METHODS In this trial (NCT01991379), treatment-naive adult patients with confirmed advanced GISTs received imatinib (400 mg once daily) plus binimetinib (30 mg twice daily), 28-day cycles. The primary end point was RECIST1.1 best objective response rate (ORR; complete response plus partial response [PR]). The study was designed to detect a 20% improvement in the ORR over imatinib alone (unacceptable rate of 45%; acceptable rate of 65%), using an exact binomial test, one-sided type I error of 0.08 and type II error of 0.1, and a planned sample size of 44 patients. Confirmed PR or complete response in > 24 patients are considered positive. Secondary end points included Choi and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Response Rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), pathologic responses, and toxicity. RESULTS Between September 15, 2014, and November 15, 2020, 29 of 42 evaluable patients with advanced GIST had confirmed RECIST1.1 PR. The best ORR was 69.0% (two-sided 95% CI, 52.9 to 82.4). Thirty-nine of 41 (95.1%) had Choi PR approximately 8 weeks. Median PFS was 29.9 months (95% CI, 24.2 to not estimable); median OS was not reached (95% CI, 50.4 to not estimable). Five of eight patients with locally advanced disease underwent surgery after treatment and achieved significant pathologic response (≥ 90% treatment effect). There were no unexpected toxicities. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity included asymptomatic creatinine phosphokinase elevation (79.1%), hypophosphatemia (14.0%), neutrophil decrease (9.3%), maculopapular rash (7.0%), and anemia (7.0%). CONCLUSION The study met the primary end point. The combination of imatinib and binimetinib is effective with manageable toxicity and warrants further evaluation in direct comparison with imatinib in frontline treatment of GIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Chi
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Li-Xuan Qin
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bastien Nguyen
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Marie-José and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ciara M. Kelly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sandra P. D'Angelo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mark A. Dickson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mrinal M. Gounder
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mary L. Keohan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sujana Movva
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Benjamin A. Nacev
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Evan Rosenbaum
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Katherine A. Thornton
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Aimee M. Crago
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sam Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Gary Ulaner
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, CA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, CA
| | - Moriah Martindale
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Haley T. Phelan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Sarah Warda
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Cindy J. Lee
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael F. Berger
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Marie-José and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nikolaus D. Schultz
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Marie-José and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samuel Singer
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sinchun Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yu Chen
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - William D. Tap
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Horvat JV, Sevilimedu V, Becker AS, Perez-Johnston R, Yeh R, Feigin KN. Frequency and outcomes of MRI-detected axillary adenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5752-5758. [PMID: 35247087 PMCID: PMC8897548 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08655-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To assess the frequency of ipsilateral axillary adenopathy on breast MRI after COVID-19 vaccination. To investigate the duration, outcomes, and associated variables of vaccine-related adenopathy. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, our database was queried for patients who underwent breast MRI following COVID-19 vaccination from January 22, 2021, to March 21, 2021. The frequency of ipsilateral axillary adenopathy and possible associated variables were evaluated, including age, personal history of ipsilateral breast cancer, clinical indication for breast MRI, type of vaccine, side of vaccination, number of doses, and number of days between the vaccine and the MRI exam. The outcomes of the adenopathy were investigated, including the duration of adenopathy and biopsy results. Results A total of 357 patients were included. The frequency of adenopathy on breast MRI was 29% (104/357 patients). Younger patients and shorter time intervals from the second dose of the vaccine were significantly associated with the development of adenopathy (p = 0.002 for both). Most adenopathy resolved or decreased on follow-up, with 11% of patients presenting persistence of adenopathy up to 64 days after the second dose of the vaccine. Metastatic axillary carcinoma was diagnosed in three patients; all three had a current ipsilateral breast cancer diagnosis. Conclusions Vaccine-related adenopathy is a frequent event after COVID-19 vaccination; short-term follow-up is an appropriate clinical approach, except in patients with current ipsilateral breast cancer. Adenopathy may often persist 4–8 weeks after the second dose of the vaccine, thus favoring longer follow-up periods. Key Points • MRI-detected ipsilateral axillary adenopathy is a frequent benign finding after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. • Axillary adenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination often persists > 4 weeks after vaccination, favoring longer follow-up periods. • In patients with concurrent ipsilateral breast cancer, axillary adenopathy can represent metastatic carcinoma and follow-up is not appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao V Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anton S Becker
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Rocio Perez-Johnston
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Kimberly N Feigin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bourdoncle S, Eche T, McGale J, Yiu K, Partouche E, Yeh R, Ammari S, Rousseau H, Dercle L, Mokrane FZ. Investigating of the role of CT scan for cancer patients during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Research in Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 2022. [PMID: 37520011 PMCID: PMC8970534 DOI: 10.1016/j.redii.2022.100004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Amidst this current COVID-19 pandemic, we undertook this systematic review to determine the role of medical imaging, with a special emphasis on computed tomography (CT), on guiding the care and management of oncologic patients. Material and Methods Study selection focused on articles from 01/02/2020 to 04/23/2020. After removal of irrelevant articles, all systematic or non-systematic reviews, comments, correspondence, editorials, guidelines and meta-analysis and case reports with less than 5 patients were also excluded. Full-text articles of eligible publications were reviewed to select all imaging-based publications, and the existence or not of an oncologic population was reported for each publication. Two independent reviewers collected the following information: ( 1) General publication data; (2) Study design characteristics; (3) Demographic, clinical and pathological variables with percentage of cancer patients if available; (4) Imaging performances. The sensitivity and specificity of chest CT (C-CT) were pooled separately using a random-effects model. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of C-CT as a test was estimated for a wide range of disease prevalence rates. Results A total of 106 publications were fully reviewed. Among them, 96 were identified to have extractable data for a two-by-two contingency table for CT performance. At the end, 53 studies (including 6 that used two different populations) were included in diagnosis accuracy analysis (N = 59). We identified 53 studies totaling 11,352 patients for whom the sensitivity (95CI) was 0.886 (0.880; 0.894), while specificity remained low: in 93% of cases (55/59), specificity was ≤ 0.5. Among all the 106 reviewed studies, only 7 studies included oncologic patients and were included in the final analysis for C-CT performances. The percentage of patients with cancer in these studies was 0.3% (34/11352 patients), lower than the global prevalence of cancer. Among all these studies, only 1 (0.9%, 1/106) reported performance specifically in a cohort of cancer patients, but it however only reported true positives. Discussion There is a concerning lack of COVID-19 studies involving oncologic patients, showing there is a real need for further investigation and evaluation of the performance of the different medical imaging modalities in this specific patient population.
Collapse
|
36
|
Mahajan S, Barker CA, Mauguen A, D'Angelo SP, Yeh R, Pandit-Taskar N. 18F-FDG PET/CT for post-treatment surveillance imaging of patients with stage III Merkel cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2021; 63:906-911. [PMID: 34620729 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate diagnostic and prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for surveillance imaging in patients treated for Stage III Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Methods: This retrospective study included 61 consecutive stage III MCC patients, who were clinically asymptomatic and underwent surveillance FDG-PET/CT. Findings were correlated with either pathology and/or clinical/imaging follow-up. Median follow-up period was 4.8 years. Statistical analyses were performed. Results: FDG-PET/CT detected unsuspected recurrences in 33% patients (20/61) with lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. Mean±SD SUV for malignant and benign lesions was 7.5±3.9 and 3.8±2.0, respectively. Unknown distant metastases, as first recurrence site, were noted in 12 of 61 patients. Those with positive disease on FDG-PET/CT within one year of definitive treatment had relatively worse overall survival (p<0.0001). After adjustment on stage, risk of death increased with higher SUVmax (HR for one unit=1.17;P = 0.006) and with a higher number of positive lesions on FDG-PET/CT (HR for one additional lesion = 1.60;p<0.001). Conclusion: Post-definitive treatment surveillance FDG-PET/CT scan detects unsuspected recurrences and has prognostic value. Inclusion of FDG-PET/CT within the first 6 months after definitive treatment would be appropriate for surveillance and early detection of recurrence. Our data merits further studies to evaluate the prognostic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- J H Kuo
- Section of Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Boas FE, Kemeny NE, Sofocleous CT, Yeh R, Thompson VR, Hsu M, Moskowitz CS, Ziv E, Yarmohammadi H, Bendet A, Solomon SB. Bronchial or Pulmonary Artery Chemoembolization for Unresectable and Unablatable Lung Metastases: A Phase I Clinical Trial. Radiology 2021; 301:474-484. [PMID: 34463550 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021210213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Lung chemoembolization is an emerging treatment option for lung tumors, but the optimal embolic, drug, and technique are unknown. Purpose To determine the technical success rate and safety of bronchial or pulmonary artery chemoembolization of lung metastases using ethiodized oil, mitomycin, and microspheres. Materials and Methods Patients with unresectable and unablatable lung, endobronchial, or mediastinal metastases, who failed systemic chemotherapy, were enrolled in this prospective, single-center, single-arm, phase I clinical trial (December 2019-September 2020). Pulmonary and bronchial angiography was performed to determine the blood supply to the lung metastases. Based on the angiographic findings, bronchial or pulmonary artery chemoembolization was performed using an ethiodized oil and mitomycin emulsion, followed by microspheres. The primary objectives were technical success rate and safety, according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. CIs of proportions were estimated with the equal-tailed Jeffreys prior interval, and correlations were evaluated with the Spearman test. Results Ten participants (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 52-70 years; six women) were evaluated. Nine of the 10 participants (90%) had lung metastases supplied by the bronchial artery, and one of the 10 participants (10%) had lung metastases supplied by the pulmonary artery. The technical success rate of intratumoral drug delivery was 10 of 10 (100%) (95% CI: 78, 100). There were no severe adverse events (95% CI: 0, 22). The response rate of treated tumors was one of 10 (10%) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and four of 10 (40%) according to the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors. Ethiodized oil retention at 4-6 weeks was correlated with reduced tumor size (ρ = -0.83, P = .003) and metabolic activity (ρ = -0.71, P = .03). Pharmacokinetics showed that 45% of the mitomycin dose underwent burst release in 2 minutes, and 55% of the dose was retained intratumorally with a half-life of more than 5 hours. The initial tumor-to-plasma ratio of mitomycin concentration was 380. Conclusion Lung chemoembolization was technically successful for the treatment of lung, mediastinal, and endobronchial metastases, with no severe adverse events. Clinical trial registration no. NCT04200417 © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Georgiades et al in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Edward Boas
- From the Department of Radiology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (F.E.B.); Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology (F.E.B., C.T.S., E.Z., H.Y., A.B., S.B.S.), Department of Medicine (N.E.K.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service (R.Y.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY (V.R.T.)
| | - Nancy E Kemeny
- From the Department of Radiology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (F.E.B.); Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology (F.E.B., C.T.S., E.Z., H.Y., A.B., S.B.S.), Department of Medicine (N.E.K.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service (R.Y.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY (V.R.T.)
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- From the Department of Radiology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (F.E.B.); Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology (F.E.B., C.T.S., E.Z., H.Y., A.B., S.B.S.), Department of Medicine (N.E.K.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service (R.Y.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY (V.R.T.)
| | - Randy Yeh
- From the Department of Radiology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (F.E.B.); Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology (F.E.B., C.T.S., E.Z., H.Y., A.B., S.B.S.), Department of Medicine (N.E.K.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service (R.Y.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY (V.R.T.)
| | - Vanessa R Thompson
- From the Department of Radiology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (F.E.B.); Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology (F.E.B., C.T.S., E.Z., H.Y., A.B., S.B.S.), Department of Medicine (N.E.K.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service (R.Y.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY (V.R.T.)
| | - Meier Hsu
- From the Department of Radiology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (F.E.B.); Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology (F.E.B., C.T.S., E.Z., H.Y., A.B., S.B.S.), Department of Medicine (N.E.K.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service (R.Y.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY (V.R.T.)
| | - Chaya S Moskowitz
- From the Department of Radiology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (F.E.B.); Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology (F.E.B., C.T.S., E.Z., H.Y., A.B., S.B.S.), Department of Medicine (N.E.K.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service (R.Y.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY (V.R.T.)
| | - Etay Ziv
- From the Department of Radiology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (F.E.B.); Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology (F.E.B., C.T.S., E.Z., H.Y., A.B., S.B.S.), Department of Medicine (N.E.K.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service (R.Y.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY (V.R.T.)
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- From the Department of Radiology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (F.E.B.); Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology (F.E.B., C.T.S., E.Z., H.Y., A.B., S.B.S.), Department of Medicine (N.E.K.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service (R.Y.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY (V.R.T.)
| | - Achiude Bendet
- From the Department of Radiology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (F.E.B.); Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology (F.E.B., C.T.S., E.Z., H.Y., A.B., S.B.S.), Department of Medicine (N.E.K.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service (R.Y.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY (V.R.T.)
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- From the Department of Radiology, City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (F.E.B.); Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology (F.E.B., C.T.S., E.Z., H.Y., A.B., S.B.S.), Department of Medicine (N.E.K.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service (R.Y.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.H., C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY (V.R.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yeh R, Elsakka A, Wray R, Johnston RP, Gangai NC, Yarmohammadi H, Schoder H, Pandit-Taskar N. FDG PET/CT imaging features and clinical utility in COVID-19. Clin Imaging 2021; 80:262-267. [PMID: 34418873 PMCID: PMC8349436 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To determine the imaging findings and potential clinical utility of FDG PET/CT in patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Methods We performed a single institution retrospective review of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 using real time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) who underwent FDG PET/CT for routine cancer care between March 1, 2020 to April 30, 2020, during the height of the pandemic in New York City, New York, United States. PET/CT scans were retrospectively reviewed for imaging findings suspicious for COVID-19. For positive scans, PET and CT findings were recorded, including location, FDG avidity (SUVmax) and CT morphology. Patient demographics and COVID-19 specific clinical data were collected and analyzed with respect to PET/CT scan positivity, lung SUVmax, and time interval between PET/CT and RT-PCR. Results Thirty-one patients (21 males and 10 females, mean age 57 years ± 16) were evaluated. Thirteen of 31 patients had positive PET/CT scans, yielding a detection rate of 41.9%. Patients with positive scans had significantly higher rates of symptomatic COVID-19 infection (77% vs 28%, p = 0.01) and hospitalizations (46% vs. 0%, p = 0.002) compared to patients with negative scans. Eleven of 13 patients (84.6%) with positive scans had FDG-avid lung findings, with mean lung SUVmax of 5.36. Six of 13 patients (46.2%) had extrapulmonary findings of FDG-avid thoracic lymph nodes. The detection rate was significantly lower when the scan was performed before RT-PCR versus after RT-PCR (18.8% (n = 3/16) vs. 66.7% (n = 10/15), p = 0.009). Lung SUVmax was not associated with COVID-19 symptoms, severity, or disease course. Conclusion FDG PET/CT has limited sensitivity for detecting COVID-19 infection. However, a positive PET scan is associated with higher risk of symptomatic infection and hospitalizations, which may be helpful in predicting disease severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States of America.
| | - Ahmed Elsakka
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States of America; Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Rick Wray
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Rocio Perez Johnston
- Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Natalie C Gangai
- Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Heiko Schoder
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Neeta Pandit-Taskar
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Becker AS, Perez-Johnston R, Chikarmane SA, Chen MM, El Homsi M, Feigin KN, Gallagher KM, Hanna EY, Hicks M, Ilica AT, Mayer EL, Shinagare AB, Yeh R, Mayerhoefer ME, Hricak H, Vargas HA. Multidisciplinary Recommendations Regarding Post-Vaccine Adenopathy and Radiologic Imaging: Radiology Scientific Expert Panel. Radiology 2021; 300:E323-E327. [PMID: 33625298 PMCID: PMC7909071 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021210436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Vaccination-associated adenopathy is a frequent imaging finding after administration of COVID-19 vaccines that may lead to a diagnostic conundrum in patients with manifest or suspected cancer, in whom it may be indistinguishable from malignant nodal involvement. To help the medical community address this concern in the absence of studies and evidence-based guidelines, this special report offers recommendations developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts from three of the leading tertiary care cancer centers in the United States. According to these recommendations, some routine imaging examinations, such as those for screening, should be scheduled before or at least 6 weeks after the final vaccination dose to allow for any reactive adenopathy to resolve. However, there should be no delay of other clinically indicated imaging (eg, for acute symptoms, short-interval treatment monitoring, urgent treatment planning or complications) due to prior vaccination. The vaccine should be administered on the side contralateral to the primary or suspected cancer, and both doses should be administered in the same arm. Vaccination information-date(s) administered, injection site(s), laterality, and type of vaccine-should be included in every preimaging patient questionnaire, and this information should be made readily available to interpreting radiologists. Clear and effective communication between patients, radiologists, referring physician teams, and the general public should be considered of the highest priority when managing adenopathy in the setting of COVID-19 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton S Becker
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Rocio Perez-Johnston
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Sona A Chikarmane
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Melissa M Chen
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Maria El Homsi
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Kimberly N Feigin
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Katherine M Gallagher
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Marshall Hicks
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Ahmet T Ilica
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Erica L Mayer
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Atul B Shinagare
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Randy Yeh
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Marius E Mayerhoefer
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Hedvig Hricak
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - H Alberto Vargas
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H-704, New York, NY 10065 (A.S.B., R.P.J., M.E.H., K.N.F., K.M.G., A.T.I., R.Y., M.E.M., H.H., H.A.V.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (S.A.C., A.B.S.); Departments of Imaging (S.A.C., A.B.S.) and Medical Oncology (E.L.M.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass; and Division of Diagnostic Imaging (M.M.C., M.H.) and Department of Head and Neck Surgery (E.Y.H.), MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Partouche E, Yeh R, Eche T, Rozenblum L, Carrere N, Guimbaud R, Dierickx LO, Rousseau H, Dercle L, Mokrane FZ. Updated Trends in Imaging Practices for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Pave the Way for Standardization in the New Era of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Front Oncol 2021; 11:628408. [PMID: 34336643 PMCID: PMC8316992 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Medical imaging plays a central and decisive role in guiding the management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Our aim was to synthesize all recent literature of PNETs, enabling a comparison of all imaging practices. Methods based on a systematic review and meta-analysis approach, we collected; using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases; all recent imaging-based studies, published from December 2014 to December 2019. Study quality assessment was performed by QUADAS-2 and MINORS tools. Results 161 studies consisting of 19852 patients were included. There were 63 ‘imaging’ studies evaluating the accuracy of medical imaging, and 98 ‘clinical’ studies using medical imaging as a tool for response assessment. A wide heterogeneity of practices was demonstrated: imaging modalities were: CT (57.1%, n=92), MR (42.9%, n=69), PET/CT (13.3%, n=31), and SPECT/CT (9.3%, n=15). International imaging guidelines were mentioned in 2.5% (n=4/161) of studies. In clinical studies, imaging protocol was not mentioned in 30.6% (n=30/98) of cases and only mentioned imaging modality without further information in 63.3% (n=62/98), as compared to imaging studies (1.6% (n=1/63) of (p<0.001)). QUADAS-2 and MINORS tools deciphered existing biases in the current literature. Conclusion We provide an overview of the updated current trends in use of medical imaging for diagnosis and response assessment in PNETs. The most commonly used imaging modalities are anatomical (CT and MRI), followed by PET/CT and SPECT/CT. Therefore, standardization and homogenization of PNETs imaging practices is needed to aggregate data and leverage a big data approach for Artificial Intelligence purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ephraïm Partouche
- Radiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service., New York, NY, United States
| | - Thomas Eche
- Radiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Laura Rozenblum
- Sorbonne Université, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, AP-HP, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Carrere
- Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Rosine Guimbaud
- Oncology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Hervé Rousseau
- Radiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Vagellos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Seban RD, Champion L, Yeh R, Schwartz LH, Dercle L. Assessing immune response upon systemic RNA vaccination on [18F]-FDG PET/CT for COVID-19 vaccine and then for immuno-oncology? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:3351-3352. [PMID: 34164727 PMCID: PMC8221274 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05468-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Romain-David Seban
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France.
- Laboratoire D'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie, Inserm, Institut Curie, 91401, Orsay, France.
| | - Laurence Champion
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France
- Laboratoire D'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie, Inserm, Institut Curie, 91401, Orsay, France
| | - Randy Yeh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Boas FE, Kemeny NE, Sofocleous CT, Yeh R, Thompson VR, Hsu M, Moskowitz CS, Ziv E, Yarmohammadi H, Bendet A, Solomon SB. Phase I study of transarterial chemoembolization of lung metastases. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3602 Background: Lung chemoembolization (via the bronchial or pulmonary artery) is a new treatment option for unresectable and unablatable lung metastases. Methods: 10 patients with unresectable and unablatable lung, endobronchial, or mediastinal metastases, who failed systemic chemotherapy, were enrolled in this single center, single arm, phase I trial. Pulmonary and bronchial angiography was performed in all patients, to determine the blood supply to the lung metastases. Based on the angiographic findings, bronchial or pulmonary artery chemoembolization was performed, using a lipiodol / mitomycin emulsion, followed by spherical particles. Technical success, safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare change in size of treated versus untreated tumors. Results: On angiography, all patients had lung metastases that were hypervascular compared to normal lung. 90% of patients had lung metastases supplied by the bronchial artery, and 10% were supplied by the pulmonary artery. Technical success rate of intra-tumoral drug delivery was 100% (95% CI: 76-100%). There were no severe adverse events, and all patients met criteria for discharge 4 hours post procedure. Response rate of treated lesions was 10% by RECIST and 40% by PERCIST. Treated tumors were mostly stable to decreased in size after chemoembolization (median change in size: 0%; IQR: -11% to 2%; mean: -4%), and untreated tumors were mostly increased in size (median change in size: 10%; IQR: 0% to 17%; mean 9%; p= 0.02). Intra-tumoral lipiodol retention at 4-6 weeks was correlated with decreased tumor size and metabolic activity. Pharmacokinetics showed that 45% of the mitomycin dose underwent burst release in 2 minutes, and 55% of the dose was retained intratumorally with a half-life > 5 hours. Initial tumor-to-plasma ratio of mitomycin concentration was 380. Half-life of intratumoral lipiodol retention was 16 days. In vitro experiments showed 50% emulsion separation in 6.2 days, and 50% drug release in 7.1 hours. Conclusions: Lung chemoembolization can safely treat lung, mediastinal, and endobronchial metastases, with minimal systemic toxicity. High intratumoral drug concentrations after chemoembolization can overcome chemoresistance. Clinical trial information: NCT04200417.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Meier Hsu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Etay Ziv
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tay D, Das JP, Yeh R. Preoperative Localization for Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Clinical Review. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9040390. [PMID: 33917470 PMCID: PMC8067482 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9040390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
With increasing use of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (PTx) over traditional bilateral neck exploration in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), accurate preoperative localization has become more important to enable a successful surgical outcome. Traditional imaging techniques such as ultrasound (US) and sestamibi scintigraphy (MIBI) and newer techniques such as parathyroid four-dimension computed tomography (4D-CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are available for the clinician to detect the diseased gland(s) in the preoperative workup. Invasive parathyroid venous sampling may be useful in certain circumstances such as persistent or recurrent PHPT. We review the diagnostic performance of these imaging modalities in preoperative localization and discuss the advantages and weaknesses of these techniques. US and MIBI are established techniques commonly utilized as first-line modalities. 4D-CT has excellent diagnostic performance and is increasingly performed in first-line setting and as an adjunct to US and MIBI. PET and MRI are emerging adjunct modalities when localization has been equivocal or failed. Since no evidence-based guidelines are yet available for the optimal imaging strategy, clinicians should be familiar with the range and advancement of these techniques. Choice of imaging modality should be individualized to the patient with consideration for efficacy, expertise, and availability of such techniques in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donovan Tay
- Department of Medicine, Sengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang E Way, Singapore 544886, Singapore;
| | - Jeeban P. Das
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Steinl GK, Yeh R, McManus CM, Lee JA, Kuo JH. Variations in the Course of the Carotid Arteries in Patients with Retropharyngeal Parathyroid Adenomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:749-752. [PMID: 33602744 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The carotid arteries, classically described as taking a relatively straight course through the neck, deviate medially in a minority of patients. At the extreme, the internal carotid arteries may "kiss" in the midline, coming extremely close to the pharyngeal wall. In this clinical report, we describe 5 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, all with ectopic retropharyngeal parathyroid adenomas but all with varying carotid artery anatomy. We describe these variations using a previously developed clinical grading system that highlights 1) the relationship between carotid artery location and risk of injury during pharyngeal procedures and 2) the importance of universal, objective criteria to classify carotid anatomy. Radiologists should be familiar with variations in carotid anatomy and communicate them to the operative team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G K Steinl
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery (G.K.S., C.M.M., J.A.L., J.H.K.), Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - R Yeh
- Department of Radiology (R.Y.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - C M McManus
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery (G.K.S., C.M.M., J.A.L., J.H.K.), Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - J A Lee
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery (G.K.S., C.M.M., J.A.L., J.H.K.), Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - J H Kuo
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery (G.K.S., C.M.M., J.A.L., J.H.K.), Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Steinl GK, Yeh R, Walker MD, McManus C, Lee JA, Kuo JH. Preoperative imaging predicts change in bone mineral density after parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Bone 2021; 145:115871. [PMID: 33540118 PMCID: PMC9450481 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bone Mineral Density (BMD) improves after parathyroidectomy (PTX), but data on factors that predict bone recovery are limited. No studies have evaluated if preoperative imaging findings are associated with postoperative change in BMD. We hypothesized that larger, metabolically active glands would be associated with greater increase in BMD after PTX. METHODS Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) who underwent combined Tc-99m sestamibi and 4D-CT imaging prior to PTX and had pre- and post-operative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at our institution were considered for inclusion. Retrospectively, data were collected from imaging studies on each parathyroid gland, including estimated weight (using the ellipsoid formula) and contrast enhancement on 4D-CT as well as sestamibi avidity. Total estimated parathyroid weight was calculated. The main outcome measure was the percent change in BMD at the lumbar spine (LS) from pre- to post-operative DXA. Predictors of change in BMD at the LS were assessed. RESULTS Complete DXA data was available in 25 patients. Median total parathyroid weight on 4D-CT was 270 mg, and mean change in BMD at the LS was 2.4 ± 4.3%. The increase in BMD was best predicted by higher preoperative serum calcium (p = 0.01), greater estimated parathyroid weight (p = 0.001), sestamibi avidity (p = 0.03), and increased time between DXA scans (p = 0.03) in the multivariable model (R2 = 0.79, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION In PHPT, higher preoperative serum calcium, parathyroid gland weight on imaging, and sestamibi avidity are associated with greater increases in BMD after curative PTX. These findings suggest that larger, metabolically active adenomas may mobilize more calcium from bone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle K Steinl
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, United States of America
| | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, United States of America
| | - Marcella D Walker
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center Department of Medicine, Endocrinology, United States of America
| | - Catherine McManus
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center Department of Surgery, Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, United States of America
| | - James A Lee
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center Department of Surgery, Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, United States of America
| | - Jennifer H Kuo
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center Department of Surgery, Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Das JP, Yeh R, Schöder H. Clinical utility of perfusion (Q)-single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT for diagnosing pulmonary embolus (PE) in COVID-19 patients with a moderate to high pre-test probability of PE. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:794-799. [PMID: 32959115 PMCID: PMC7505736 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05043-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We reviewed the clinical utility of perfusion (Q)-single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT for diagnosing pulmonary embolus (PE) in patients hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2). METHODS Following the World Health Organization's declaration of a global pandemic, our department policy recommended Q-only SPECT/CT for all patients undergoing nuclear medicine evaluation for suspected PE to reduce the risk of aerosolization of respiratory droplets. We performed a retrospective review of sequential patients admitted with COVID-19 imaged with Q-SPECT/CT between March 17, 2020, and June 30, 2020, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. We recorded patient demographics, clinical symptoms, Wells score (to stratify patients according to pre-test probability for PE prior to Q-SPECT/CT), and noted ancillary imaging findings on CT. RESULTS Of the 33 patients imaged with Q-SPECT/CT, 6 patients (3 men, 3 women) had a laboratory confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (mean age, 55, ± 11.4 years, range 33-68). All patients had a current diagnosis of malignancy and had a moderate or high pre-test probability for PE (mean Wells score 2.8, range 2-4). Q-SPECT/CT was positive in 4/6 (67%) of patients. Distribution of pulmonary emboli was bilateral and segmental in 75% of patients. Ancillary acute findings on SPECT/CT included bilateral parenchymal ground glass opacities (n = 5), pleural effusions (n = 2), and pneumomediastinum (n = 1). CONCLUSION Q-SPECT/CT has clinical utility for diagnosing PE in patients with COVID-19 where there is a contraindication for iodinated contrast media and a moderate or high pre-test probability for PE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeeban P Das
- Department of Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Department of Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yeh R, Tay YKD, Dercle L, Bandeira L, Parekh MR, Bilezikian JP. A Simple Formula to Estimate Parathyroid Weight on 4D-CT, Predict Pathologic Weight, and Diagnose Parathyroid Adenoma in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41:1690-1697. [PMID: 32816774 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Parathyroid gland weight is a clinically relevant parameter used to diagnose parathyroid adenomas intraoperatively. We evaluated the accuracy of a formula to estimate parathyroid weight on preoperative 4D-CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS A single-institution retrospective study was performed in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent 4D-CT between January 2013 and December 2014 with subsequent parathyroidectomy and surgical cure. All patients had correct localization of a solitary parathyroid adenoma. The longest 3 dimensions of all identified parathyroid glands were measured on CT, and weight was estimated using the formula: weight4D-CT (mg) = 1 mg/mm3 × Length (mm) × Width (mm) × Height (mm) × π/6. We correlated weight4D-CT with pathology specimen weight (weightpathology). Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we estimated the performance of weight4D-CT to discriminate a parathyroid adenoma from normal glands on 4D-CT and determined the optimal threshold based on the Youden index. RESULTS One hundred sixteen patients (85 women, 31 men) were evaluated. Weight4D-CT was shown to be strongly correlated with weightpathology as demonstrated by Spearman ρ = 0.73 (P < .01), concordance correlation coefficient = 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94), and Cronbach α = 0.96. The performance of weight4D-CT for the diagnosis of parathyroid adenoma was excellent, with an area under the curve of 0.955 (95% CI, 0.925-0.985; P < .001). Based on the Youden index, the optimal threshold was >50 mg, with a sensitivity of 96.7% and a specificity of 95.7%. CONCLUSIONS Radiologists can accurately estimate parathyroid adenoma weight on 4D-CT. This metric is highly correlated with pathologic weight, and a threshold cutoff of >50 mg can be used to distinguish parathyroid adenoma from normal glands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Yeh
- From the Department of Radiology (R.Y.), Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York .,Department of Radiology (R.Y., L.D., M.R.P.), New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Y-K D Tay
- Department of Endocrinology (Y.-K.D.T.), Sengkang General Hospital, Singhealth, Singapore
| | - L Dercle
- Department of Radiology (R.Y., L.D., M.R.P.), New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - L Bandeira
- Department of Endocrinology (L.B.), Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.,Fleury Group (L.B.), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - M R Parekh
- Department of Radiology (R.Y., L.D., M.R.P.), New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.,Department of Radiology (M.R.P.), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - J P Bilezikian
- Department of Medicine (J.P.B.), Division of Endocrinology, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ulaner GA, Carrasquillo JA, Riedl CC, Yeh R, Hatzoglou V, Ross DS, Jhaveri K, Chandarlapaty S, Hyman DM, Zeglis BM, Lyashchenko SK, Lewis JS. Identification of HER2-Positive Metastases in Patients with HER2-Negative Primary Breast Cancer by Using HER2-targeted 89Zr-Pertuzumab PET/CT. Radiology 2020; 296:370-378. [PMID: 32515679 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies are successful in patients with HER2-positive malignancies; however, spatial and temporal heterogeneity of HER2 expression may prevent identification of optimal patients for these therapies. Purpose To determine whether imaging with the HER2-targeted PET tracer zirconium 89 (89Zr)-pertuzumab can depict HER2-positive metastases in women with HER2-negative primary breast cancer. Materials and Methods From January to June 2019, women with biopsy-proven HER2-negative primary breast cancer and biopsy-proven metastatic disease were enrolled in a prospective clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02286843) and underwent 89Zr-pertuzumab PET/CT for noninvasive whole-biopsy evaluation of potential HER2-positive metastases. 89Zr-pertuzumab-avid foci that were suspicious for HER2-positive metastases were tissue sampled and examined by pathologic analysis to document HER2 status. Results Twenty-four women (mean age, 55 years ± 11 [standard deviation]) with HER2-negative primary breast cancer were enrolled. Six women demonstrated foci at 89Zr-pertuzumab PET/CT that were suspicious for HER2-positive disease. Of these six women, three had biopsy-proven HER2-positive metastases, two had pathologic findings that demonstrated HER2-negative disease, and one had a fine-needle aspirate with inconclusive results. Conclusion Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted imaging with zirconium 89-pertuzumab PET/CT was successful in detecting HER2-positive metastases in women with HER2-negative primary breast cancer. This demonstrates the ability of targeted imaging to identify patients for targeted therapies that might not otherwise be considered. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See the editorial by Mankoff and Pantel in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary A Ulaner
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| | - Jorge A Carrasquillo
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| | - Christopher C Riedl
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| | - Randy Yeh
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| | - Dara S Ross
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| | - Komal Jhaveri
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| | - Sarat Chandarlapaty
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| | - David M Hyman
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| | - Brian M Zeglis
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| | - Serge K Lyashchenko
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| | - Jason S Lewis
- From the Department of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., B.M.Z., S.K.L., J.S.L.), Department of Pathology (D.S.R.), Department of Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), and Molecular Pharmacology Program (B.M.Z., J.S.L.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 77, New York, NY 10065; Departments of Radiology (G.A.U., J.A.C., C.C.R., R.Y., V.H., S.K.L., J.S.L.) and Medicine (K.J., S.C., D.M.H.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and Department of Chemistry, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY (B.M.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Francis RO, D’Alessandro A, Eisenberger A, Soffing M, Yeh R, Coronel E, Sheikh A, Rapido F, La Carpia F, Reisz JA, Gehrke S, Nemkov T, Thomas T, Schwartz J, Divgi C, Kessler D, Shaz BH, Ginzburg Y, Zimring JC, Spitalnik SL, Hod EA. Donor glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency decreases blood quality for transfusion. J Clin Invest 2020; 130:2270-2285. [PMID: 31961822 PMCID: PMC7191001 DOI: 10.1172/jci133530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDGlucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency decreases the ability of red blood cells (RBCs) to withstand oxidative stress. Refrigerated storage of RBCs induces oxidative stress. We hypothesized that G6PD-deficient donor RBCs would have inferior storage quality for transfusion as compared with G6PD-normal RBCs.METHODSMale volunteers were screened for G6PD deficiency; 27 control and 10 G6PD-deficient volunteers each donated 1 RBC unit. After 42 days of refrigerated storage, autologous 51-chromium 24-hour posttransfusion RBC recovery (PTR) studies were performed. Metabolomics analyses of these RBC units were also performed.RESULTSThe mean 24-hour PTR for G6PD-deficient subjects was 78.5% ± 8.4% (mean ± SD), which was significantly lower than that for G6PD-normal RBCs (85.3% ± 3.2%; P = 0.0009). None of the G6PD-normal volunteers (0/27) and 3 G6PD-deficient volunteers (3/10) had PTR results below 75%, a key FDA acceptability criterion for stored donor RBCs. As expected, fresh G6PD-deficient RBCs demonstrated defects in the oxidative phase of the pentose phosphate pathway. During refrigerated storage, G6PD-deficient RBCs demonstrated increased glycolysis, impaired glutathione homeostasis, and increased purine oxidation, as compared with G6PD-normal RBCs. In addition, there were significant correlations between PTR and specific metabolites in these pathways.CONCLUSIONBased on current FDA criteria, RBCs from G6PD-deficient donors would not meet the requirements for storage quality. Metabolomics assessment identified markers of PTR and G6PD deficiency (e.g., pyruvate/lactate ratios), along with potential compensatory pathways that could be leveraged to ameliorate the metabolic needs of G6PD-deficient RBCs.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT04081272.FUNDINGThe Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grant 71590, the National Blood Foundation, NIH grant UL1 TR000040, the Webb-Waring Early Career Award 2017 by the Boettcher Foundation, and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants R01HL14644 and R01HL148151.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard O. Francis
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Angelo D’Alessandro
- University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Mark Soffing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Randy Yeh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Esther Coronel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Arif Sheikh
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Francesca Rapido
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France
| | - Francesca La Carpia
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Julie A. Reisz
- University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sarah Gehrke
- University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Travis Nemkov
- University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Tiffany Thomas
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joseph Schwartz
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chaitanya Divgi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Yelena Ginzburg
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - James C. Zimring
- Carter Immunology Center, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Steven L. Spitalnik
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eldad A. Hod
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|