A Simple Formula to Estimate Parathyroid Weight on 4D-CT, Predict Pathologic Weight, and Diagnose Parathyroid Adenoma in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Parathyroid gland weight is a clinically relevant parameter used to diagnose parathyroid adenomas intraoperatively. We evaluated the accuracy of a formula to estimate parathyroid weight on preoperative 4D-CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-institution retrospective study was performed in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent 4D-CT between January 2013 and December 2014 with subsequent parathyroidectomy and surgical cure. All patients had correct localization of a solitary parathyroid adenoma. The longest 3 dimensions of all identified parathyroid glands were measured on CT, and weight was estimated using the formula: weight_4D-CT (mg) = 1 mg/mm³ × Length (mm) × Width (mm) × Height (mm) × π/6. We correlated weight_4D-CT with pathology specimen weight (weight_pathology). Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we estimated the performance of weight_4D-CT to discriminate a parathyroid adenoma from normal glands on 4D-CT and determined the optimal threshold based on the Youden index.

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen patients (85 women, 31 men) were evaluated. Weight_4D-CT was shown to be strongly correlated with weight_pathology as demonstrated by Spearman ρ = 0.73 (P < .01), concordance correlation coefficient = 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94), and Cronbach α = 0.96. The performance of weight_4D-CT for the diagnosis of parathyroid adenoma was excellent, with an area under the curve of 0.955 (95% CI, 0.925-0.985; P < .001). Based on the Youden index, the optimal threshold was >50 mg, with a sensitivity of 96.7% and a specificity of 95.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiologists can accurately estimate parathyroid adenoma weight on 4D-CT. This metric is highly correlated with pathologic weight, and a threshold cutoff of >50 mg can be used to distinguish parathyroid adenoma from normal glands.

Screening for childhood obesity: international vs population-specific definitions. Which is more appropriate?

AIM

The objectives of this study are: (1) to study the relation between body mass index (BMI), percentage-weight-for-height (PWH) and percentage body fat (PBF) in Singaporean Chinese children; (2) to assess the applicability of an international definition of obesity (the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) BMI) as a screening tool to detect childhood obesity, as compared with the current Singapore population-specific definition using PWH.

METHODS

A total of 623 Chinese children aged 6-11 y (321 males, 302 females) were recruited from a school by proportionate (40%) stratified random sampling. BMI and PWH were calculated from weight and height, while PBF was derived using leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis. The strength of association among the three indices of obesity was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Obese children were defined as those above the 95th percentile of PBF in each age-gender-specific group. Sensitivity and specificity of IOTF-BMI cutoff values and PWH cutoff values were compared by testing their ability to correctly identify obese children.

RESULTS

All three indices correlated well with one another (BMI:PWH r=0.83, BMI:PBF r=0.87, PWH:PBF r=0.76). Prevalence of obesity was lower using IOTF-BMI cutoffs (6.9%) than using PWH cutoffs (16.4%). The sensitivity and specificity of IOTF-BMI cutoff values were 75.0 and 96.0%, respectively, with sensitivity differing between boys (83.3%) and girls (66.6%) (P=0.35). In comparison, PWH cutoff values had higher sensitivity (91.6%) but lower specificity (86.6%), with no significant difference between the genders.

CONCLUSION

IOTF-recommended BMI cutoff values had low sensitivity and may underestimate the local prevalence of childhood obesity. For screening purposes, we recommend that population-specific measures rather than international cutoff values be used.