1
|
Lautz Z, Kautz-Freimuth S, Shukri A, Redaèlli M, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Stock S. Predictors of knowledge and knowledge gain after decision aid use among women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Patient Educ Couns 2024; 124:108248. [PMID: 38513456 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors contributing to baseline knowledge in women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) and knowledge gain after decision aid (DA) use. METHODS Women with PVs in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) receiving DAs or a control group (CG). Of the total sample, 417 completed the baseline survey and were included in this analysis. Two multiple regression analyses were conducted: baseline data on socio-demographic, medical, decision-related and psychological variables were used to identify predictors for (1) baseline knowledge within the total group and (2) knowledge gain within the IG after DA use three months post study inclusion. RESULTS At baseline, higher education status, no breast cancer history, and lower decisional conflict related to higher knowledge within the total group. After DA use within the IG, higher baseline scores for decisional conflict predicted higher knowledge gain, and higher baseline scores for depression and intrusion predicted lower knowledge gain. CONCLUSIONS This study identified predictors of baseline knowledge and knowledge gain after DA use in women with BRCA1/2 PVs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Awareness of facilitating and hindering factors on these women's knowledge can improve understanding of their health literacy and enable further targeted support interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoë Lautz
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Arim Shukri
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Marcus Redaèlli
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Centre for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Centre for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meyer-Wilmes P, Huober J, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Janni W, Denkert C, Klare P, Link T, Rhiem K, Bayer C, Reinisch M, Bjelic-Radisic V, Zahm DM, Hanusch C, Solbach C, Heinrich G, Hartkopf AD, Schneeweiss A, Fasching P, Filmann N, Nekljudova V, Holtschmidt J, Stickeler E, Loibl S. Long-term outcomes of a randomized, open-label, phase II study comparing cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer (GENEVIEVE). ESMO Open 2024; 9:103009. [PMID: 38663168 PMCID: PMC11061217 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The GENEVIEVE study, comparing neoadjuvant cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and luminal B/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC), previously reported significant differences in pathological complete response (pCR) rates. Effects on long-term outcome are unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS GENEVIEVE randomized patients with cT2-3, any cN or cT1, cN+/pNSLN+, centrally confirmed TNBC or luminal B/HER2-negative BC (latter defined as estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive and >14% Ki-67-stained cells) to receive either cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 q3w for four cycles or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks. Anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was allowed in case of histologically proven invasive residuals as neoadjuvant treatment or after surgery as adjuvant treatment. Here we report the secondary endpoints invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of the 333 patients randomized, 74.7% and 83.2% completed treatment in the cabazitaxel and paclitaxel arms, respectively. After a median follow-up of 89.3 months (interquartile range 68.8-97.3 months), 80 iDFS events (43 after cabazitaxel and 37 after paclitaxel) and 47 deaths (23 after cabazitaxel and 24 after paclitaxel) were reported. IDFS rates were not significantly different between the cabazitaxel and paclitaxel arms after a 3-year (83.6% versus 85.0%) and 5-year follow-up (76.2% versus 78.3%) [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.82-1.96, P = 0.294], respectively. DDFS rates at 3 years (88.6% versus 87.8%) and 5 years (82.1% versus 82.8%) for cabazitaxel and paclitaxel were comparable (HR = 1.15, P = 0.573). Similarly, OS rates at 3 years (91.6% versus 91.8%) and 5 years (89.2% versus 86.8%) showed no significant differences (HR = 1.05, P = 0.872). Subgroup analysis for TNBC and luminal B/HER2-negative BCs indicated no significant variations in 3- or 5-year iDFS, DDFS, or OS. CONCLUSIONS The significant differences in pCR rates observed in both treatment arms did not significantly impact long-term outcomes for patients treated with cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel in the GENEVIEVE trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Meyer-Wilmes
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Uniklinik Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - J Huober
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medical Services, University Hospital Ulm & Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Breast Center, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - M Untch
- Helios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Berlin
| | - J-U Blohmer
- Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | | | - C Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM)-Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg
| | - P Klare
- MediOnko-Institut GbR Berlin, Berlin
| | - T Link
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden
| | - K Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln
| | - C Bayer
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - M Reinisch
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - V Bjelic-Radisic
- Breast Unit, University Hospital Helios, University Witten Herdecke, Wuppertal
| | - D M Zahm
- SRH Waldklinikum Gera GmbH, Gera
| | | | - C Solbach
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt
| | - G Heinrich
- Schwerpunktpraxis der Gynäkologie und Onkologie Fürstenwalde, Klinikum Offenbach
| | - A D Hartkopf
- AGO Study Group and Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen
| | - A Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg
| | | | - N Filmann
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | | | | | - E Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Uniklinik Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ganz PA, Bandos H, Španić T, Friedman S, Müller V, Kuemmel S, Delaloge S, Brain E, Toi M, Yamauchi H, de Dueñas EM, Armstrong A, Im SA, Song CG, Zheng H, Sarosiek T, Sharma P, Geng C, Fu P, Rhiem K, Frauchiger-Heuer H, Wimberger P, t'Kint de Roodenbeke D, Liao N, Goodwin A, Chakiba-Brugère C, Friedlander M, Lee KS, Giacchetti S, Takano T, Henao-Carrasco F, Virani S, Valdes-Albini F, Domchek SM, Bane C, McCarron EC, Mita M, Rossi G, Rastogi P, Fielding A, Gelber RD, Scheepers ED, Cameron D, Garber J, Geyer CE, Tutt ANJ. Patient-Reported Outcomes in OlympiA: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Adjuvant Olaparib in g BRCA1/2 Mutations and High-Risk Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1288-1300. [PMID: 38301187 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The OlympiA randomized phase III trial compared 1 year of olaparib (OL) or placebo (PL) as adjuvant therapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2, high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer after completing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy ([N]ACT), surgery, and radiotherapy. The patient-reported outcome primary hypothesis was that OL-treated patients may experience greater fatigue during treatment. METHODS Data were collected before random assignment, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary end point was fatigue, measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale. Secondary end points, assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 item, included nausea and vomiting (NV), diarrhea, and multiple functional domains. Scores were compared between treatment groups using mixed model for repeated measures. Two-sided P values <.05 were statistically significant for the primary end point. All secondary end points were descriptive. RESULTS One thousand five hundred and thirty-eight patients (NACT: 746, ACT: 792) contributed to the analysis. Fatigue severity was statistically significantly greater for OL versus PL, but not clinically meaningfully different by prespecified criteria (≥3 points) at 6 months (diff OL v PL: NACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .022; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.3 to -0.2]; P = .017) and 12 months (NACT: -1.6 [95% CI, -2.8 to -0.3]; P = .017; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .025). There were no significant differences in fatigue severity between treatment groups at 18 and 24 months. NV severity was worse in patients treated with OL compared with PL at 6 months (NACT: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.0]; ACT: 5.3 [95% CI, 3.4 to 7.2]) and 12 months (NACT: 6.4 [95% CI, 4.4 to 8.3]; ACT: 4.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to 6.1]). During treatment, there were some clinically meaningful differences between groups for other symptoms but not for function subscales or global health status. CONCLUSION Treatment-emergent symptoms from OL were limited, generally resolving after treatment ended. OL- and PL-treated patients had similar functional scores, slowly improving during the 24 months after (N)ACT and there was no clinically meaningful persistence of fatigue severity in OL-treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia A Ganz
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hanna Bandos
- NRG Oncology SDMC, The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Tanja Španić
- Europa Donna-The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy
- Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Depatment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Masakazu Toi
- Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
- Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Eduardo-M de Dueñas
- Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
- GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anne Armstrong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chuan-Gui Song
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hong Zheng
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | | | | | - Cuizhi Geng
- The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shiijazhuang, China
| | - Peifen Fu
- Breast Surgery Department, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Ning Liao
- Guangdong People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Annabel Goodwin
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Michael Friedlander
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW and Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Keun Seok Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sylvie Giacchetti
- Breast Disease Unit (Sénopole), AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Toshimi Takano
- Breast Medical Oncology Department, The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Edward C McCarron
- MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center-Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Cancer Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Monica Mita
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, SOCCI, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Priya Rastogi
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
- Magee Women's Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Richard D Gelber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Judy Garber
- Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Charles E Geyer
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Andrew N J Tutt
- The Institute of Cancer Research London, London, United Kingdom
- Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tüchler A, De Pauw A, Ernst C, Anota A, Lakeman IMM, Dick J, van der Stoep N, van Asperen CJ, Maringa M, Herold N, Blümcke B, Remy R, Westerhoff A, Stommel-Jenner DJ, Frouin E, Richters L, Golmard L, Kütting N, Colas C, Wappenschmidt B, Rhiem K, Devilee P, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Schmutzler RK, Hahnen E. Clinical implications of incorporating genetic and non-genetic risk factors in CanRisk-based breast cancer risk prediction. Breast 2024; 73:103615. [PMID: 38061307 PMCID: PMC10749276 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) risk prediction models consider cancer family history (FH) and germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in risk genes. It remains elusive to what extent complementation with polygenic risk score (PRS) and non-genetic risk factor (NGRFs) data affects individual intensified breast surveillance (IBS) recommendations according to European guidelines. METHODS For 425 cancer-free women with cancer FH (mean age 40·6 years, range 21-74), recruited in France, Germany and the Netherlands, germline PV status, NGRFs, and a 306 variant-based PRS (PRS306) were assessed to calculate estimated lifetime risks (eLTR) and estimated 10-year risks (e10YR) using CanRisk. The proportions of women changing country-specific European risk categories for IBS recommendations, i.e. ≥20 % and ≥30 % eLTR, or ≥5 % e10YR were determined. FINDINGS Of the women with non-informative PV status, including PRS306 and NGRFs changed clinical recommendations for 31·0 %, (57/184, 20 % eLTR), 15·8 % (29/184, 30 % eLTR) and 22·4 % (41/183, 5 % e10YR), respectively whereas of the women tested negative for a PV observed in their family, clinical recommendations changed for 16·7 % (25/150), 1·3 % (2/150) and 9·5 % (14/147). No change was observed for 82 women with PVs in high-risk genes (BRCA1/2, PALB2). Combined consideration of eLTRs and e10YRs identified BRCA1/2 PV carriers benefitting from IBS <30 years, and women tested non-informative/negative for whom IBS may be postponed. INTERPRETATION For women who tested non-informative/negative, PRS and NGRFs have a considerable impact on IBS recommendations. Combined consideration of eLTRs and e10YRs allows personalizing IBS starting age. FUNDING Horizon 2020, German Cancer Aid, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Köln Fortune.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Tüchler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Antoine De Pauw
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, Paris, France; Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Corinna Ernst
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Amélie Anota
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Human and Social Sciences Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; French National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Inge M M Lakeman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Julia Dick
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nienke van der Stoep
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monika Maringa
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Natalie Herold
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Britta Blümcke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Robert Remy
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anke Westerhoff
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Eléonore Frouin
- Université PSL, Paris, France; Clinical Bioinformatics Unit, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Lisa Richters
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lisa Golmard
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, Paris, France; Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Nadine Kütting
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Chrystelle Colas
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, Paris, France; Université PSL, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Inserm U830, Paris, France
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Inserm U830, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kast K, Rhiem K, Larsen M, Wappenschmidt B, Schmutzler R. Phenotype analysis of families with TP53 germline variants at the Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6920. [PMID: 38230850 PMCID: PMC10905677 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor protein p53 (TP53) pathogenic variant (PV) carriers are identified during genetic testing for hereditary causes of cancer. PVs in TP53 are associated with the Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), and thus, surveillance and preventive measures are important for TP53 PV carriers. However, the penetrance of TP53 PVs can be low if the Chompret criteria are not fulfilled. In this study, we compared the phenotypic characteristics of families that did and did not fulfill the LFS criteria according to Chompret. METHODS The German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) database was used to identify index patients with a likely pathogenic/pathogenic TP53 variant and their family members. The study investigated the type of variant, pedigree, age of onset, number of primary tumors, and histological type of BC. RESULTS TP53 PV were present in the index cases of 35 families, 57% (20/35) of which fulfilled the Chompret criteria. The median age of onset at first BC diagnosis was lower in families that fulfilled the Chompret criteria compared to those who did not. Four of all diseased individuals were minors (4%; 4/105) when malignancy was first diagnosed. Sarcomas and brain tumors occurred in 10% (10/105) and in 7% (7/105) of all diseased persons, respectively. BC was the most frequently occurring first tumor (60%; 62/105) and additional malignancy (45%; 20/44) in this cohort. Subsequent malignancies developed in 31% (20/65) of the individuals who fulfilled the Chompret criteria compared with 15% (6/40) of those who did not. CONCLUSION The tumor spectrum and age of onset found in this study showed that tumors other than BC had low disease penetrance in TP53 PV carriers identified using the GC-HBOC criteria for genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Kast
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - K. Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - M. Larsen
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - B. Wappenschmidt
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - R. Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Herold N, Bredow K, Ernst C, Tüchler A, Blümcke B, Waha A, Keser E, Hauke J, Wappenschmidt B, Hahnen E, Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K. Implementing mainstream genetic counseling within the area-wide network of the German Consortium Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC): Satisfaction of primary care providers with the provided state-of-the-art training by the Cologne Center. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:206-215. [PMID: 38351721 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
The German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft DKG) has published a position paper to address the challenges of cancer patient care in the era of genomic medicine. The German Consortium Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) has implemented this recommendation in its care concept for families at risk. Core elements are the outcome-oriented evaluation of structured and standardized clinical measures and reporting recommendations derived therefrom to primary care providers and patients. A cross-sector network with certified breast cancer and gynecological cancer centers was founded in 2015, starting from the Cologne Center of the GC-HBOC. To guarantee the knowledge transfer for mainstream genetic counseling, the Cologne center has established an educational program for physicians and specialized nurses in order to pilot trans-sectoral knowledge transfer on risk assessment and risk-stratified care. It consists of face-to-face lectures with written knowledge test, attending a genetic case conference and genetic counseling sessions with the opportunity to counsel under supervision. The lectures were accompanied by a structured evaluation of the participants' satisfaction and feedback of the needs in mainstream genetic counseling. Thereby, the network ensures that genetic counseling and testing is provided according to state-of-the-art knowledge and allows physicians to participate in knowledge-generating care outside the university setting and patients to receive care close to home. After multiple feedback cycles to improve the educational program, the GC-HBOC, in cooperation with the German Cancer Society, has now adopted this concept and developed a common and uniform online curriculum funded by the Federal Ministry of Health. https://www.krebsgesellschaft.de/fortbildung-familiaerer-krebs.html.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Herold
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kathrin Bredow
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Corinna Ernst
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anja Tüchler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Britta Blümcke
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anke Waha
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ebru Keser
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan Hauke
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Katharina Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Link T, Blohmer JU, Schmitt WD, Kuhlmann JD, Just M, Untch M, Stotzer O, Fasching PA, Thill M, Reinisch M, Schneeweiss A, Wimberger P, Seiler S, Huober J, Jackisch C, Rhiem K, Hanusch C, Sinn BV, Nekljudova V, Loibl S, Denkert C. RANK Expression as an Independent Predictor for Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal-Like Breast Cancer: A Translational Insight from the GeparX Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4606-4612. [PMID: 37725572 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The GeparX study investigated whether denosumab as add-on treatment to nab-paclitaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with two different schedules (125 mg/m² weekly vs. day 1, 8 every 22 days) may increase pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The addition of denosumab to NACT did not improve pCR rates as recently published. In this study, we investigated whether receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK) expression, as part of the denosumab target pathway: (i) may retrospectively identify a subgroup of patients with additional clinical benefit of denosumab or (ii) may predict response to nab-paclitaxel NACT. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN RANK protein was IHC-stained on pre-therapeutic core biopsies from patients of the GeparX study (n = 667) with the antibody RANK/Envision System HRP (DAB) and was analyzed for the percentage of membranous RANK tumor cell staining (>5% RANKhigh vs. ≤5% RANKlow). RESULTS We could not identify any patient subgroup with differential response under denosumab add-on treatment in patients with RANKhigh expression [139/667, 20.8%; OR, 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44-1.68; P = 0.667] or RANKlow expression (528/667 (79.2%) OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.78-1.56; P = 0.589; Pinteraction = 0.528). However, the pCR rate was higher in the RANKhigh subgroup compared with RANKlow (50% vs. 39%; OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04-2.21; P = 0.037). RANK expression constituted an independent predictor of response to NACT frequently in patients with luminal-like subtype (HR+/HER2-; OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.30-6.79; P = 0.010). No predictive value of RANK expression among the different nab-paclitaxel regimens was observed. CONCLUSION We report RANK expression to be an independent predictive biomarker for response to NACT in patients with luminal-like breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Link
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D Schmitt
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Dominik Kuhlmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marianne Just
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Oliver Stotzer
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Hämatologie/Intern. Onkologie, München, Germany
| | | | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mattea Reinisch
- National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Germany Universität Köln, Zentrum familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Köln, Germany
| | | | - Bruno V Sinn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Barele M, Akdeniz D, Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, Andrieu N, Noguès C, van Asperen CJ, Wevers M, Ausems MGEM, de Bock GH, Dommering CJ, Gómez-García EB, van Leeuwen FE, Mooij TM, Easton DF, Antoniou AC, Evans DG, Izatt L, Tischkowitz M, Frost D, Brewer C, Olah E, Simard J, Singer CF, Thomassen M, Kast K, Rhiem K, Engel C, de la Hoya M, Foretová L, Jakubowska A, Jager A, Sattler MGA, Schmidt MK, Hooning MJ. Contralateral breast cancer risk in patients with breast cancer and a germline-BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant undergoing radiation. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1318-1328. [PMID: 37369040 PMCID: PMC10637040 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation-induced secondary breast cancer (BC) may be a concern after radiation therapy (RT) for primary breast cancer (PBC), especially in young patients with germline (g)BRCA-associated BC who already have high contralateral BC (CBC) risk and potentially increased genetic susceptibility to radiation. We sought to investigate whether adjuvant RT for PBC increases the risk of CBC in patients with gBRCA1/2-associated BC. METHODS The gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers diagnosed with PBC were selected from the prospective International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to investigate the association between RT (yes vs no) and CBC risk. We further stratified for BRCA status and age at PBC diagnosis (<40 and >40 years). Statistical significance tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Of 3602 eligible patients, 2297 (64%) received adjuvant RT. Median follow-up was 9.6 years. The RT group had more patients with stage III PBC than the non-RT group (15% vs 3%, P < .001), received chemotherapy more often (81% vs 70%, P < .001), and received endocrine therapy more often (50% vs 35%, P < .001). The RT group had an increased CBC risk compared with the non-RT group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12 to 1.86). Statistical significance was observed in gBRCA2 (HR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.77) but not in gBRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers (HR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.77; P = .39 for interaction). In the combined gBRCA1/2 group, patients irradiated when they were younger than or older than 40 years of age at PBC diagnosis showed similar risks (HR = 1.38; 95% CI = 0.93 to 2.04 and HR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.19, respectively). CONCLUSIONS RT regimens minimizing contralateral breast dose should be considered in gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark van Barele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Delal Akdeniz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Genepso
- Département d’Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
| | - Catherine Noguès
- Département d’Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes & Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
| | - HEBON
- The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON), Coordinating Center, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marijke Wevers
- Department for Clinical Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division of Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte J Dommering
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thea M Mooij
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - EMBRACE
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise Izatt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carole Brewer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Edit Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Centre for Personalized Response Monitoring in Oncology (PREMIO), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Karin Kast
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lenka Foretová
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Margriet G A Sattler
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kautz-Freimuth S, Redaèlli M, Shukri A, Kentenich H, Simic D, Mildenberger V, Schmutzler R, Rhiem K, Stock S. Effectiveness of evidence-based decision aids for women with pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants in the german health care context: results from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:223. [PMID: 37845719 PMCID: PMC10580583 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02327-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants are at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Preventive options include risk-reducing breast and ovarian surgeries and intensified breast surveillance. However, individual decision-making is often associated with decisional conflicts. Two evidence-based decision aids have recently been developed for these women (healthy or with unilateral breast cancer) for the German context to support them in their decision-making process. This study evaluated their effectiveness. METHODS In a randomized controlled study, women (aged 18-70 years) with pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the intervention (IG, n = 230) or control (CG, n = 220) group. All participants received usual care. After baseline survey (t0), IG participants additionally received the DAs. Follow-up surveys were at three (t1) and six (t2) months. Primary outcome was decisional conflict at t1. Secondary analyses included decision status, decision regret, knowledge on risks and preventive options, self-reported psychological symptoms, acceptability of DAs, and preparation for decision-making. RESULTS Of 450 women recruited, 417 completed t0, 398 completed t1 and 386 completed t2. Compared to CG, IG participants had lower decisional conflict scores at t1 (p = 0.049) and t2 (p = 0.006) and higher scores for knowledge (p = 0.004), acceptability (p = 0.000), and preparation for decision-making (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS These DAs can help improve key parameters of decision-making in women with pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants and, thus, provide a useful add-on to the current counseling and care concept for these women in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00015823, retrospectively registered 14/06/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Marcus Redaèlli
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Arim Shukri
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hannah Kentenich
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dusan Simic
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vanessa Mildenberger
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Park-Simon TW, Müller V, Jackisch C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Ditsch N, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Hartkopf AD, Heil J, Huober J, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Wuerstlein R, Janni W, Thill M. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2023. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:289-305. [PMID: 37900552 PMCID: PMC10601667 DOI: 10.1159/000531578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Each year the interdisciplinary Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO), German Gynecological Oncology Group Breast Committee on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer provides updated state-of-the-art recommendations for early and metastatic breast cancer. Summary The updated evidence-based treatment recommendation for early and metastatic breast cancer has been released in March 2023. Key Messages This paper concisely captures the updated recommendations for early breast cancer chapter by chapter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum der Technischen Universität München, Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld GmbH, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Joerg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth und Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Phaon GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz (Buckow) & Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf/Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (Rüdersdorf), Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO), Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Thill M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Ditsch N, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Hartkopf AD, Heil J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Müller V, Würstlein R, Janni W, Park-Simon TW. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2023. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:306-315. [PMID: 37900553 PMCID: PMC10601669 DOI: 10.1159/000531579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO) presents the 2023 update of the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer (mBC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang, Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Forschungsinstitut für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfrauenklinik, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Fachklinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation, Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow & Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf/Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Universitäts Spital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Herold N, Schmolling J, Ernst C, Ataseven B, Blümcke B, Schömig‐Markiefka B, Heikaus S, Göhring U, Engel C, Lampe B, Rhiem K, Harter P, Hauke J, Schmutzler RK, Hahnen E. Pathogenic germline variants in SMARCA4 and further cancer predisposition genes in early onset ovarian cancer. Cancer Med 2023; 12:15256-15260. [PMID: 37345881 PMCID: PMC10417158 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
To assess the role of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in SMARCA4 and further established ovarian cancer (OC) predisposition genes in early onset OC, we investigated a clinical cohort of 206 unrelated OC index patients with an age at diagnosis of OC ≤40 years using an extended panel of 24 (candidate) cancer predisposition genes. PVs in established OC predisposition genes were most frequent in patients with high grade serous OC (21/62, 33.9%), comparatively rare in patients with epithelial OC other than high grade serous (5/74, 6.8%) or borderline ovarian tumours (2/39, 5.1%) and absent in mucinous OC (0/27). We demonstrate that germline PVs in SMARCA4 unlikely predispose for early onset OC other than SCCOHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Herold
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity of Cologne and University Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - Johanna Schmolling
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity of Cologne and University Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - Corinna Ernst
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity of Cologne and University Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic OncologyKliniken Essen‐Mitte (KEM)EssenGermany
- Medical School and University Medical Center East Westphalia‐Lippe, Klinikum Lippe, Academic Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and ObstetricsBielefeld UniversityDetmoldGermany
| | - Britta Blümcke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity of Cologne and University Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | | | - Sebastian Heikaus
- Department of PathologyKliniken Essen‐Mitte (KEM) Evang. Huyssens‐Stiftung/Knappschaft GmbHEssenGermany
| | - Uwe‐Jochen Göhring
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsJohanniter KrankenhausBonnGermany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Björn Lampe
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsDiakonie KaiserswerthDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity of Cologne and University Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic OncologyKliniken Essen‐Mitte (KEM)EssenGermany
| | - Jan Hauke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity of Cologne and University Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity of Cologne and University Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity of Cologne and University Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rhiem K, Zachariae S, Waha A, Grill S, Hester A, Golatta M, van Mackelenbergh M, Fehm T, Schlaiß T, Ripperger T, Ledig S, Meisel C, Speiser D, Veselinovic K, Schröder C, Witzel I, Gallwas J, Weber BH, Solbach C, Aktas B, Hahnen E, Engel C, Schmutzler R. Prevalence of Pathogenic Germline Variants in Women with Non-Familial Unilateral Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:106-112. [PMID: 37261134 PMCID: PMC10228253 DOI: 10.1159/000528972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION International guidelines recommend genetic testing for women with familial breast cancer at an expected prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PVs) of at least 10%. In a study sample of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC), we have previously shown that women with TNBC diagnosed before the age of 50 years but without a family history of breast or ovarian cancer (sTNBC) meet this criterion. The present study investigates the PV prevalence in BRCA1, BRCA2, and nine additional cancer predisposition genes in an extended sTNBC study sample including a cohort of women with a later age at sTNBC diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS In 1,600 women with sTNBC (median age at diagnosis: 41 years, range 19-78 years), we investigated the association between age at diagnosis and PV occurrence in cancer predisposition genes using logistic regression. RESULTS 260 sTNBC patients (16.2%) were found to have a PV in cancer predisposition genes (BRCA1: n = 170 [10.6%]; BRCA2: n = 46 [2.9%], other: n = 44 [2.8%]). The PV prevalence in women diagnosed between 50 and 59 years (n = 194) was 11.3% (22/194). Logistic regression showed a significant increase in PV prevalence with decreasing age at diagnosis (OR 1.41 per 10 years younger age at diagnosis; 95% confidence interval: 1.21-1.65; p < 0.001). The PV prevalence predicted by the model was above 10% for diagnoses before the age of 56.8 years. CONCLUSION Based on the data presented, we recommend genetic testing by gene panel analysis for sTNBC patients diagnosed before the age of 60 years. Due to the still uncertain estimate for women with sTNBC diagnosed above the age of 60 years, further studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Silke Zachariae
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anke Waha
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Grill
- Department of Gynecology and Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Anna Hester
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marion van Mackelenbergh
- Department Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH) Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tanja Schlaiß
- Institute for Gynecology and Obstetrics and Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Can-cer, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Tim Ripperger
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Susanne Ledig
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Cornelia Meisel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Centre Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Dorothee Speiser
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Centre, Centre for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Charité, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Christopher Schröder
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julia Gallwas
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard H.F. Weber
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Institute of Clinical Human Genetics, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Bariyhe Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Imterat M, Harter P, Rhiem K, Heitz F, Schneider S, Concin N, Moubarak M, Welz J, Vrentas V, Traut A, Hahnen E, Schmutzler R, du Bois A, Ataseven B. Incidence and Prognostic Impact of Deleterious Germline Mutations in Primary Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092534. [PMID: 37174000 PMCID: PMC10177155 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Data on deleterious variants in genes other than BRCA1/2 remain limited. A retrospective cohort study was performed, including primary OC cases with TruRisk® germline gene panel testing between 2011 and 2020. Patients with testing after relapse were excluded. The cohort was divided into three groups: (A) no mutations, (B) deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations, and (C) deleterious mutations in other genes. A total of 702 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these 17.4% (n = 122) showed BRCA1/2 mutations and a further 6.0% (n = 42) in other genes. Three-year overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was significantly longer in patients with germline mutations (85%/82.8% for cohort B/C vs. 70.2% for cohort A, p < 0.001) and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) only for cohort B (58.1% vs. 36.9%/41.6% in cohort A/C, p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis for the subgroup of advanced-stages of high-grade serous OC, both cohorts B/C were found to be independent factors for significantly better outcome, cohort C for OS (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25-0.84), and cohort B for both OS and PFS (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.27-0.61 and HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.37-0.66, respectively). Germline mutations were detected in a quarter of OC patients, and a quarter of those in genes other than BRCA1/2. Germline mutations demonstrate in our cohort a prognostic factor and predict better prognosis for OC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majdi Imterat
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), 45136 Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Hadassah Medical Centers, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Kalman Ya'Akov Man St., Jerusalem 91905, Israel
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), 45136 Essen, Germany
- Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Malak Moubarak
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Julia Welz
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Vasileios Vrentas
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Traut
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), 45136 Essen, Germany
- Academic Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Lippe, Medical School, University Medical Center East Westphalia-Lippe, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Huober J, van Mackelenbergh M, Schneeweiss A, Seither F, Blohmer JU, Denkert C, Tesch H, Hanusch C, Salat C, Rhiem K, Solbach C, Fasching PA, Jackisch C, Reinisch M, Lederer B, Mehta K, Link T, Nekljudova V, Loibl S, Untch M. Identifying breast cancer patients at risk of relapse despite pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:23. [PMID: 37029138 PMCID: PMC10082019 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00525-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
This retrospective pooled analysis aims to identify factors predicting relapse despite a pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer (BC). 2066 patients with a pCR from five neoadjuvant GBG/AGO-B trials fulfill the inclusion criteria of this analysis. Primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints is distant DFS (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). After a median follow-up of 57.6 months, DFS is significantly worse for patients with positive lymph nodes (cN+ vs cN0 hazard ratio [HR] 1.94, 95%CI 1.48-2.54; p < 0.001). In patients with triple-negative tumors, lobular histology (lobular vs other HR 3.55, 95%CI 1.53-8.23; p = 0.003), and clinical nodal involvement (cN+ vs cN0 HR 2.45, 95%CI 1.59-3.79; p < 0.001) predict a higher risk of DFS events. Patients with HER2-positive cT3/4 tumors have a significantly higher risk of relapse (cT3/4 vs cT1 HR 2.07, 95%CI 1.06-4.03; p = 0.033). Initial tumor load and histological type predict relapse in patients with a pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Huober
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Ulm, Brustzentrum, Germany
- Kantonsspital St.Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Marion van Mackelenbergh
- Brustzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | | | | | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Salat
- Hämatologisch-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Salat/Stötzer, München, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Theresa Link
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Isselhard A, Lautz Z, Rhiem K, Stock S. Assessing Psychological Morbidity in Cancer-Unaffected BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:3590-3608. [PMID: 37185387 PMCID: PMC10136916 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30040274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Female BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers have an increased lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer-unaffected women who are newly diagnosed with this pathogenic variant may experience psychological distress because of imminent health threat. No comprehensible review on psychological morbidity in cancer-unaffected BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers is currently available. This review aims to give an overview about all available the studies in which psychological outcomes have been assessed in cancer-unaffected BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers, whether as a primary outcome or secondary measurement. A systematic search across four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO) was conducted. Studies had to report on cancer-unaffected pathogenic variant carriers (exclusively or separately) and use a validated measure of psychological morbidity to be eligible. Measures were only included if they were used in at least three studies. The final review consisted of 45 studies from 13 countries. Distress measures, including anxiety and cancer worry, were most often assessed. Most studies found a peak of distress immediately after genetic test result disclosure, with a subsequent decline over the following months. Only some studies found elevated distress in carriers compared to non-carriers in longer follow-ups. Depression was frequently investigated but largely not found to be of clinical significance. Quality of life seemed to be largely unaffected by a positive genetic test result, although there was some evidence that younger women, especially, were less satisfied with their role functioning in life. Body image has been infrequently assessed so far, but the evidence suggested that there may be a decrease in body image after genetic test result disclosure that may decrease further for women who opt for a prophylactic mastectomy. Across all the outcomes, various versions of instruments were used, often limiting the comparability among the studies. Hence, future research should consider using frequently used instruments, as outlined by this review. Finally, while many studies included cancer-unaffected carriers, they were often not reported on separately, which made it difficult to draw specific conclusions about this population.
Collapse
|
17
|
Fasching PA, Schmatloch S, Hauke J, Rey J, Jackisch C, Klare P, Link T, Hanusch C, Huober J, Stefek A, Seiler S, Schmitt WD, Uleer C, Doering G, Rhiem K, Schneeweiss A, Denkert C, Schmutzler RK, Hahnen E, Untch M, Nekljudova V, Blohmer JU, Loibl S. Abstract P4-06-13: Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency – long-term survival of the GeparOLA study. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p4-06-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The GeparOLA study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel (P) plus olaparib (O) as part of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, either hormone receptor (HR)-positive or HR-negative and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) defined as having a g/tBRCA mutation and/or a high HRD score. Primary analysis showed a pCR rate of 55.1% (90% CI 44.5%-65.3%) with PO and 48.6% (90% CI 34.3%-63.2%) with P plus carboplatinum (Cb). The PO combination could not exclude a pCR rate of ≤55% in the PO arm but was significantly better tolerated. Analysis on the stratified subgroups showed higher pCR rates with PO in the cohorts of patients < 40 years and HR-positive tumors (Fasching Ann Oncol 2020). Here, we report long-term data. Methods: GeparOLA (NCT02789332) was a non-comparative, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, phase II trial. Patients with primary HER2-negative breast cancer, HRD and indication for chemotherapy (cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c and cN+ or cT1c and pNSLN+ or cT1c and TNBC or cT1c and Ki-67 >20%) were randomly assigned to receive either P 80 mg/m2 weekly plus O 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks or P plus Cb area under the curve 2 (AUC2) weekly for 12 weeks, both followed by four cycles of either 2-weekly or 3-weekly epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) rate after NACT with PO followed by EC. Long-term efficacy endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). The time-to-event endpoints analysis is planned with median follow-up of at least 4 years and a follow-up completeness of at least 80%. Results: Between September 2016 and July 2018, 274 patients were screened, of whom 107 were randomized and 106 (PO N=69; PCb N=37) started treatment. The median age was 47.0 years (range 25.0-71.0); 32 patients were aged < 40 years; 36.2% of patients had cT1 tumors and 31.8% were cN-positive; the majority (86.8%) had grade 3 tumors and a Ki-67>20% (89.6%). Seventy-seven patients (72.6%) had TNBC. After a median follow-up of 49.8 months (range 0.1-69.1), 18 (15 in PO; 3 in PCb) iDFS events and 7 (6 in PO; 1 in PCb) deaths were reported. The 4-year survival rates are shown in the table below. iDFS (HR PO to PCb=2.86 [95%CI 0.83-9.9], log-rank p=0.081), DDFS (HR =3.03 [95%CI 0.67-13.67], log-rank p=0.129), and OS (HR=3.27 [95%CI 0.39-27.2], log-rank p=0.244) tended to be inferior with olaparib. Patients without g/tBRCA mutation seem to benefit from the use of carboplatinum (7/30 iDFS/DDFS events in PO; 0/16 in PCb, log-rank p=0.037, HR n.a.). Conclusions: In patients with HER2-negative and HRD breast cancer the use of olaparib instead of carboplatinum although showing comparable pCR rates, tended to result in an overall inferior outcome. This was mainly driven by the patients without a g/tBRCA mutation. In patients with a g/t BRCA mutation no difference between olaparib and carboplatinum was seen. Key words: Olaparib, HER2-negative breast cancer, HRD, survival Funding: The study was financially supported by AstraZeneca
Citation Format: Peter A. Fasching, Sabine Schmatloch, Jan Hauke, Julia Rey, Christian Jackisch, Peter Klare, Theresa Link, Claus Hanusch, Jens Huober, Andrea Stefek, Sabine Seiler, Wolfgang D. Schmitt, Christoph Uleer, Gabriele Doering, Kerstin Rhiem, Andreas Schneeweiss, Carsten Denkert, Rita K. Schmutzler, Eric Hahnen, Michael Untch, Valentina Nekljudova, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Sibylle Loibl. Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency – long-term survival of the GeparOLA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-06-13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A. Fasching
- 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Jan Hauke
- 3Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - Theresa Link
- 7Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Jens Huober
- 9Kantonsspital St.Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Sabine Seiler
- 11German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany, Hessen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D. Schmitt
- 12Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Kerstin Rhiem
- 15Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- 16National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- 17Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- 18und Eierstockkrebs - Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- 19Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fasching PA, Schmatloch S, Hauke J, Rey J, Jackisch C, Klare P, Link T, Hanusch C, Huober J, Stefek A, Seiler S, Schmitt WD, Uleer C, Doering G, Rhiem K, Schneeweiss A, Denkert C, Schmutzler RK, Hahnen E, Untch M, Nekljudova V, Blohmer JU, Loibl S. Abstract GS5-02: Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency – long-term survival of the GeparOLA study. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-gs5-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The GeparOLA study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel (P) plus olaparib (O) as part of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, either hormone receptor (HR)-positive or HR-negative and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) defined as having a g/tBRCA mutation and/or a high HRD score. Primary analysis showed a pCR rate of 55.1% (90% CI 44.5%-65.3%) with PO and 48.6% (90% CI 34.3%-63.2%) with P plus carboplatinum (Cb). The PO combination could not exclude a pCR rate of ≤55% in the PO arm but was significantly better tolerated. Analysis on the stratified subgroups showed higher pCR rates with PO in the cohorts of patients < 40 years and HR-positive tumors (Fasching Ann Oncol 2020). Here, we report long-term data. Methods: GeparOLA (NCT02789332) was a non-comparative, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, phase II trial. Patients with primary HER2-negative breast cancer, HRD and indication for chemotherapy (cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c and cN+ or cT1c and pNSLN+ or cT1c and TNBC or cT1c and Ki-67 >20%) were randomly assigned to receive either P 80 mg/m2 weekly plus O 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks or P plus Cb area under the curve 2 (AUC2) weekly for 12 weeks, both followed by four cycles of either 2-weekly or 3-weekly epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) rate after NACT with PO followed by EC. Long-term efficacy endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). The time-to-event endpoints analysis is planned with median follow-up of at least 4 years and a follow-up completeness of at least 80%. Results: Between September 2016 and July 2018, 274 patients were screened, of whom 107 were randomized and 106 (PO N=69; PCb N=37) started treatment. The median age was 47.0 years (range 25.0-71.0); 32 patients were aged < 40 years; 36.2% of patients had cT1 tumors and 31.8% were cN-positive; the majority (86.8%) had grade 3 tumors and a Ki-67>20% (89.6%). Seventy-seven patients (72.6%) had TNBC. After a median follow-up of 49.8 months (range 0.1-69.1), 18 (15 in PO; 3 in PCb) iDFS events and 7 (6 in PO; 1 in PCb) deaths were reported. The 4-year survival rates are shown in the table below. iDFS (HR PO to PCb=2.86 [95%CI 0.83-9.9], log-rank p=0.081), DDFS (HR =3.03 [95%CI 0.67-13.67], log-rank p=0.129), and OS (HR=3.27 [95%CI 0.39-27.2], log-rank p=0.244) tended to be inferior with olaparib. Patients without g/tBRCA mutation seem to benefit from the use of carboplatinum (7/30 iDFS/DDFS events in PO; 0/16 in PCb, log-rank p=0.037, HR n.a.). Conclusions: In patients with HER2-negative and HRD breast cancer the use of olaparib instead of carboplatinum although showing comparable pCR rates, tended to result in an overall inferior outcome. This was mainly driven by the patients without a g/tBRCA mutation. In patients with a g/t BRCA mutation no difference between olaparib and carboplatinum was seen. Key words: Olaparib, HER2-negative breast cancer, HRD, survival Funding: The study was financially supported by AstraZeneca
Citation Format: Peter A. Fasching, Sabine Schmatloch, Jan Hauke, Julia Rey, Christian Jackisch, Peter Klare, Theresa Link, Claus Hanusch, Jens Huober, Andrea Stefek, Sabine Seiler, Wolfgang D. Schmitt, Christoph Uleer, Gabriele Doering, Kerstin Rhiem, Andreas Schneeweiss, Carsten Denkert, Rita K. Schmutzler, Eric Hahnen, Michael Untch, Valentina Nekljudova, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Sibylle Loibl. Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency – long-term survival of the GeparOLA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A. Fasching
- 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Jan Hauke
- 3Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - Theresa Link
- 7Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Jens Huober
- 9Kantonsspital St.Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Sabine Seiler
- 11German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Hessen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D. Schmitt
- 12Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Kerstin Rhiem
- 15Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- 16National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- 17Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- 18und Eierstockkrebs - Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- 19Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Isselhard A, Tüchler A, Dick J, Scherer A, Aue V, Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K. Psychological distress and decision-making factors for prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in cancer-unaffected BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers. Psychooncology 2023; 32:640-648. [PMID: 36774644 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Women carrying a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant have an increased risk for breast cancer and may opt for risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy. In this study, we examine which demographic, psychosocial, and personality factors are associated with their decision to undergo risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy. METHODS Cancer-unaffected women with a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were recruited before receiving their genetic test result and completed follow-up including decision to undergo mastectomy over 6-8 months after genetic test result disclosure. Anxiety, depression, breast cancer worry, personality and sociodemographic data were assessed. RESULTS A total of 125 cancer-unaffected women were included in the analysis. Participants were found to have higher anxiety levels than the general female population regardless of mastectomy decision. Breast cancer worry was higher among women who opted for risk-reducing mastectomy and did not decrease over time. By contrast, women who did not opt for surgery experienced decreasing levels of breast cancer worry. Regression analysis found that women with a pathogenic variant in BRCA1, younger women and women with higher breast cancer worry were more likely to opt for surgery. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides valuable insights into the factors that influence women with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant to undergo risk-reducing mastectomy. These findings may be helpful in understanding individual differences in decision-making concerning preventive options and show the need to address negative anticipatory feelings associated with carrying a pathogenic variant in a high breast cancer risk gene in clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Isselhard
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anja Tüchler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Dick
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anne Scherer
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Viktoria Aue
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Marchetti C, Ataseven B, Cassani C, Sassu CM, Congedo L, D'Indinosante M, Cappuccio S, Rhiem K, Hahnen E, Lucci Cordisco E, Arbustini E, Harter P, Minucci A, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Ovarian cancer onset across different BRCA mutation types: a view to a more tailored approach for BRCA mutated patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:257-262. [PMID: 36581488 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of different specific types of germline breast cancer susceptibility BRCA mutations on the age of onset of high grade serous ovarian cancer. METHODS This was a multicenter, international, retrospective cohort of 474 patients diagnosed with recurrent or newly diagnosed high grade serous ovarian cancer, with known germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes, treated between January 2011 and December 2020 in three academic centers in Europe. Patients were classified into four groups related to the type of BRCA1/2 genes mutation: frameshift, missense, nonsense, and splicing. Data from patients with splicing mutations were removed from the analysis because of the small numbers. The other three groups were compared. RESULTS Excluding the 29 patients with a splicing mutation, 474 patients were enrolled: 309 (65.2%) with frameshift mutations, 102 (21.5%) with nonsense mutations, and 63 (13.3%) with missense mutations. The BRCA1 gene was affected in 324 (68.4%) cases, while BRCA2 was involved in 150 (31.6%) women (p=0.06). We found a difference of more than 5 years in the age of onset of high grade serous ovarian cancer between BRCA1 and BRCA2 patients (mean 53.3 years vs 58.4 years; p=0.001), with a mean age of 55.1 years. Patients with nonsense germline mutations had the youngest age of onset, while women with frameshift mutations had the oldest age of onset of high grade serous ovarian cancer (mean 52.2 years vs mean 55.9 years), both in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 subgroups. There was no statistically significant difference in age of onset between early and advanced groups (mean 55.8 years vs 55.0 years; p=0.55). CONCLUSION Different types of germline BRCA mutations could determine different ages for onset of high grade serous ovarian cancer. If confirmed in larger series, this finding might have a clinical impact, potentially leading to a more tailored approach for risk reducing surgery for the prevention of high grade serous ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Marchetti
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung Essen-Huttrop, Essen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Chiara Cassani
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.,Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Carolina Maria Sassu
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Luigi Congedo
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Marco D'Indinosante
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Serena Cappuccio
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Koln, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Koln, Germany
| | - Emanuela Lucci Cordisco
- UOC Genetica Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Medicina Genomica, Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Eloisa Arbustini
- Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung Essen-Huttrop, Essen, Germany
| | - Angelo Minucci
- Molecular and Genomic Diagnostics Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy .,Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Isselhard A, Lautz Z, Töpper M, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Vitinius F, Fischer H, Berger-Höger B, Steckelberg A, Beifus K, Köberlein-Neu J, Stock S. Coping Self-Efficacy and Its Relationship with Psychological Morbidity after Genetic Test Result Disclosure: Results from Cancer-Unaffected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20:1684. [PMID: 36767056 PMCID: PMC9914784 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20031684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Women who are found to carry a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant experience psychological distress due to an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. They may decide between different preventive options. In this secondary analysis of data collected alongside a larger randomized controlled trial, we are looking at 130 newly found BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and how their coping self-efficacy immediately after genetic test result disclosure is related to their psychological burden and status of preventive decision making. Participants received the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Impact of Event Scale, the Decisional Conflict Scale, and the Stage of Decision-Making Scale after positive genetic test result disclosure. We found that women with higher coping self-efficacy showed fewer symptoms of anxiety or depression and were less affected by receiving the genetic test result in terms of post-traumatic stress. However, coping self-efficacy had no relationship with any decision-related criteria, such as decisional conflict or stage of decision making. This shows that despite its buffering capacity on psychological burden, possessing coping self-efficacy does not lead to more decisiveness in preference-sensitive decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Isselhard
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Zoe Lautz
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Maren Töpper
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Frank Vitinius
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Hannah Fischer
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Birte Berger-Höger
- Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Karolina Beifus
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Juliane Köberlein-Neu
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wimberger P, Blohmer JU, Krabisch P, Link T, Just M, Sinn BV, Simon E, Solbach C, Fehm T, Denkert C, Kühn C, Rhiem K, Tesch H, Kümmel S, Petzold A, Stötzer O, Meisel C, Kuhlmann JD, Nekljudova V, Loibl S. The effect of denosumab on disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) of breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant treatment: a GeparX translational substudy. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:32. [PMID: 36978142 PMCID: PMC10045108 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01619-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow are observed in about 40% at primary diagnosis of breast cancer and predict poor survival. While anti-resorptive therapy with bisphosphonates was shown to eradicate minimal residue disease in the bone marrow, the effect of denosumab on DTCs, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, is largely unknown. The recent GeparX clinical trial reported that denosumab, applied as an add-on treatment to nab-paclitaxel based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), did not improve the patient’s pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Herein, we analyzed the predictive value of DTCs for the response to NACT and interrogated whether neoadjuvant denosumab treatment may eradicate DTCs in the bone marrow.
Methods A total of 167 patients from the GeparX trial were analyzed for DTCs at baseline by immunocytochemistry using the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3. Initially DTC-positive patients were re-analyzed for DTCs after NACT ± denosumab.
Results At baseline, DTCs were observed in 43/167 patients (25.7%) in the total cohort, however their presence did not predict response to nab-paclitaxel based NACT (pCR rates: 37.1% in DTC-negative vs. 32.6% DTC-positive; p = 0.713). Regarding breast cancer subtypes, the presence of DTCs at baseline was numerically associated with response to NACT in TNBC patients (pCR rates: 40.0% in DTC-positive vs. 66.7% in DTC-negative patients; p = 0.16). Overall, denosumab treatment did not significantly increase the given DTC-eradication rate of NACT (NACT: 69.6% DTC-eradication vs. NACT + denosumab: 77.8% DTC-eradication; p = 0.726). In TNBC patients with pCR, a numerical but statistically non-significant increase of DTC-eradication after NACT + denosumab was observed (NACT: 75% DTC-eradication vs. NACT + denosumab: 100% DTC-eradication; p = 1.00).
Conclusion This is the first study worldwide, demonstrating that neoadjuvant add-on denosumab over a short-term period of 24 months does not increase the DTC-eradication rate in breast cancer patients treated with NACT. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-023-01619-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Wimberger
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- grid.461742.20000 0000 8855 0365National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Charité-Univesitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Krabisch
- grid.459629.50000 0004 0389 4214Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Theresa Link
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- grid.461742.20000 0000 8855 0365National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marianne Just
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Bruno Valentin Sinn
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Pathology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eike Simon
- Kreiskrankenhaus Torgau, Torgau, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- grid.411088.40000 0004 0578 8220Universitätsklinik Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- grid.411327.20000 0001 2176 9917Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Rhiem
- grid.411097.a0000 0000 8852 305XUniversität Köln, Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Köln, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- grid.461714.10000 0001 0006 4176Kliniken Essen-Mitte Evang. Huyssen-Stiftung, Essen, Germany
| | - Andrea Petzold
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- grid.461742.20000 0000 8855 0365National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Stötzer
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Hämatologie/Intern. Onkologie, München, Germany
| | - Cornelia Meisel
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- grid.461742.20000 0000 8855 0365National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Dominik Kuhlmann
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- grid.461742.20000 0000 8855 0365National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- grid.434440.30000 0004 0457 2954German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Banys-Paluchowski M, Thill M, Kühn T, Ditsch N, Heil J, Wöckel A, Fallenberg E, Friedrich M, Kümmel S, Müller V, Janni W, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Fasching P, Fehm T, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Gerber B. AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of Breast Cancer: Update 2022. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:1031-1043. [PMID: 36186147 PMCID: PMC9525149 DOI: 10.1055/a-1904-6231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The recommendations of the AGO Breast Committee on the surgical therapy of breast cancer were last updated in March 2022 (www.ago-online.de). Since surgical therapy is one of several partial steps in the treatment of breast cancer, extensive diagnostic and oncological expertise of a breast surgeon and good interdisciplinary cooperation with diagnostic radiologists is of great importance. The most important changes concern localization techniques, resection margins, axillary management in the neoadjuvant setting and the evaluation of the meshes in reconstructive surgery. Based on meta-analyses of randomized studies, the level of recommendation of an intraoperative breast ultrasound for the localization of non-palpable lesions was elevated to "++". Thus, the technique is considered to be equivalent to wire localization, provided that it is a lesion which can be well represented by sonography, the surgeon has extensive experience in breast ultrasound and has access to a suitable ultrasound device during the operation. In invasive breast cancer, the aim is to reach negative resection margins ("no tumor on ink"), regardless of whether an extensive intraductal component is present or not. Oncoplastic operations can also replace a mastectomy in selected cases due to the large number of existing techniques, and are equivalent to segmental resection in terms of oncological safety at comparable rates of complications. Sentinel node excision is recommended for patients with cN0 status receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after completion of chemotherapy. Minimally invasive biopsy is recommended for initially suspect lymph nodes. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients with initially 1 - 3 suspicious lymph nodes and a good response (ycN0) can receive the targeted axillary dissection and the axillary dissection as equivalent options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany,Correspondence/Korrespondenzadresse Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Maggie Banys-Paluchowski Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und GeburtshilfeUniversitätsklinikum
Schleswig-Holstein Campus LübeckRatzeburger Allee 16023538
LübeckGermany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Eva Fallenberg
- Institut für Radiologie, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Peter Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Schweiz
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Neu-Isenburg, Germany,Zentrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane & Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus
GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - H. Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Loibl S, Schneeweiss A, Huober J, Braun M, Rey J, Blohmer JU, Furlanetto J, Zahm DM, Hanusch C, Thomalla J, Jackisch C, Staib P, Link T, Rhiem K, Solbach C, Fasching PA, Nekljudova V, Denkert C, Untch M. Neoadjuvant durvalumab improves survival in early triple-negative breast cancer independent of pathological complete response. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1149-1158. [PMID: 35961599 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a promising strategy in early breast cancer, but the optimal duration of therapy is currently unknown. In the GeparNuevo (NCT02685059) trial, addition of durvalumab to NACT as previously reported led to a moderate increase in pCR rate by absolute 9% (p=0.287). PATIENTS AND METHODS Durvalumab or placebo 1.5g/placebo q4 weeks plus nab-paclitaxel 125mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks, followed by 4 cycles durvalumab/placebo plus epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) q2 weeks was given to cT1b-cT4a-d TNBC patients. Durvalumab was not continued after surgery. Primary objective was pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS 174 patients were randomised between June 2016 and October 2017. After a median follow-up of 43.7 months, 34 events had occurred. Despite a non-significant increase in the pCR rate, significant differences were observed for 3-year iDFS, DDFS and OS: iDFS was 85.6% with durvalumab vs 77.2% with placebo (HR 0.48, 95%CI 0.24-0.97, stratified log-rank p=0.036); DDFS 91.7% vs 78.4% (HR 0.31, 95%CI 0.13-0.74, p=0.005); OS 95.2% vs 83.5% (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.08-0.72, p=0.006). pCR patients had 3-year iDFS of 95.5% with durvalumab and 86.1% without (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-1.06). In non-pCR cohort 3-year iDFS was 76.3% vs 69.7% (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.29-1.54). Multivariable analysis confirmed durvalumab effect independent of the pCR effect. No new safety signals occurred. CONCLUSION Durvalumab added to NACT in TNBC significantly improved survival despite a modest pCR increase and no adjuvant component of durvalumab. Additional studies are needed to clarify the optimal duration and sequence of CPIs in the treatment of early TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Center for Hematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - A Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Huober
- Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Germany; Breast Center, Cantonal hospital St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - M Braun
- Department of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital Munich, Germany
| | - J Rey
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - J-U Blohmer
- Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | | | - D-M Zahm
- SRH Waldklinikum Gera GmbH, Germany
| | - C Hanusch
- Department of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital Munich, Germany
| | - J Thomalla
- Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - P Staib
- Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, St.-Antonius Hospital, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - T Link
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - K Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - C Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Germany
| | - P A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Nuremberg, National Center for Tumour Diseases, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - C Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - M Untch
- HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ditsch N, Wöcke A, Untch M, Jackisch C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Witzel I, Müller V, Janni W, Thill M. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2022. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:403-420. [PMID: 36156915 PMCID: PMC9453658 DOI: 10.1159/000524879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The AGO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, German Gynecological Oncology Group) Task Force on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer as an interdisciplinary team consists of specialists from gynecological oncology, pathology, diagnostic radiology, medical oncology, and radiation oncology with a special focus on breast cancer. Methods The updated evidence-based treatment recommendation 2022 for early breast cancer (EBC) and metastatic breast cancer of the AGO Task Force has been released. Results and Conclusion This paper captures the update of EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöcke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Technischen Universität München, Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Phaon GmbH, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Thill M, Lüftner D, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lux M, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Müller V, Janni W, Ditsch N. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2022. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:421-429. [PMID: 36156913 PMCID: PMC9453659 DOI: 10.1159/000524789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO) presents the 2022 update of the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang, Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michael Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Brustzentrum, Evang, Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hanover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Herold N, Hellmich M, Lichtenheldt F, Ataseven B, Hillebrand V, Wappenschmidt B, Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K. Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Healthy and Unilateral Diseased BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers after Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Reconstruction Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13081357. [PMID: 36011268 PMCID: PMC9407233 DOI: 10.3390/genes13081357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) is the most efficient form of breast cancer (BC) risk reduction in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (pV) carriers. However, this intervention in physical integrity is associated with significant morbidity. We assessed long-term perception of satisfaction and health-related quality of life (QoL) after bilateral RRM and reconstruction using the validated BREAST-Q. We searched the prospective database of the Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cologne for previvors and survivors who underwent bilateral RRM from 1994 to 2015 and evaluated the results of their BREAST-Q scores. The study enrolled 43 previvors and 90 survivors after a mean follow-up of 46.3 ± 45.3 months after RRM. Satisfaction and QoL were independent of the technique of RRM or type of reconstruction but depended on the time of RRM. Compared to survivors, previvors had significantly higher mean satisfaction scores in their psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being (chest) in both modules. Among previvors and survivors, higher psychological well-being correlated with a higher satisfaction with information and higher satisfaction with outcome. As psychological well-being correlated with satisfaction with information and outcome, we developed decision aids to improve shared decision making and long-term satisfaction with the decision and the postoperative outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Herold
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Frank Lichtenheldt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Vanessa Hillebrand
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Rita Katharina Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-221-478-98409
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bredow K, Blümcke B, Schneider S, Püsken M, Schmutzler R, Rhiem K. Long‑term survival of a BRCA2 mutation carrier following second ovarian cancer relapse using PARPi therapy: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2022; 17:137. [PMID: 35949895 PMCID: PMC9353872 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2022.2570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have lifelong increased risks of developing breast and ovarian cancer. Due to the lack of efficient ovarian cancer screening, patients mainly present when the tumors are at an advanced stage, and the long-term survival is poor. The application of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) has been used in personalized cancer treatment. Specific strategies to improve the outcome of patients are available and mainly include targeting of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. The aim of the present study was to report the case of a 67-year old BRCA2 mutation carrier, who was enrolled in 2010 in one of the first PARPi studies (ICEBERG2). The patient exhibited second ovarian cancer (OC) relapse following a platinum-free interval of 5 months. The third-line treatment with olaparib monotherapy was initiated in January 2011, without prior surgery or chemotherapy, and achieved a persistent response. The patient demonstrated an unprecedented long-term survival of >9 years under PARPi monotherapy after the second relapse of OC. The data of the present case report support the use of PARPi as a well-tolerated and effective long-term treatment, even for patients with unfavourable prognostic characteristics, such as platinum resistance, without immediately preceding optimal cytoreduction. However, further studies are required to provide more insight into the selection of patients for favourable maintenance treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Bredow
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, D‑50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Britta Blümcke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, D‑50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen Mitte, D-45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Püsken
- Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Cologne, D‑50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, D‑50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, D‑50931 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rolfes M, Borde J, Möllenhoff K, Kayali M, Ernst C, Gehrig A, Sutter C, Ramser J, Niederacher D, Horváth J, Arnold N, Meindl A, Auber B, Rump A, Wang-Gohrke S, Ritter J, Hentschel J, Thiele H, Altmüller J, Nürnberg P, Rhiem K, Engel C, Wappenschmidt B, Schmutzler RK, Hahnen E, Hauke J. Prevalence of Cancer Predisposition Germline Variants in Male Breast Cancer Patients: Results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:3292. [PMID: 35805063 PMCID: PMC9265404 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Male breast cancer (mBC) is associated with a high prevalence of pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BRCA2 gene; however, data regarding other BC predisposition genes are limited. In this retrospective multicenter study, we investigated the prevalence of PVs in BRCA1/2 and 23 non-BRCA1/2 genes using a sample of 614 patients with mBC, recruited through the centers of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. A high proportion of patients with mBC carried PVs in BRCA2 (23.0%, 142/614) and BRCA1 (4.6%, 28/614). The prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs was 11.0% in patients with mBC without a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Patients with BRCA1/2 PVs did not show an earlier disease onset than those without. The predominant clinical presentation of tumor phenotypes was estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, and HER2-negative (77.7%); further, 10.2% of the tumors were triple-positive, and 1.2% were triple-negative. No association was found between ER/PR/HER2 status and BRCA1/2 PV occurrence. Comparing the prevalence of protein-truncating variants (PTVs) between patients with mBC and control data (ExAC, n = 27,173) revealed significant associations of PTVs in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 with mBC (BRCA1: OR = 17.04, 95% CI = 10.54−26.82, p < 10−5; BRCA2: OR = 77.71, 95% CI = 58.71−102.33, p < 10−5). A case-control investigation of 23 non-BRCA1/2 genes in 340 BRCA1/2-negative patients and ExAC controls revealed significant associations of PTVs in CHEK2, PALB2, and ATM with mBC (CHEK2: OR = 3.78, 95% CI = 1.59−7.71, p = 0.002; PALB2: OR = 14.77, 95% CI = 5.02−36.02, p < 10−5; ATM: OR = 3.36, 95% CI = 0.89−8.96, p = 0.04). Overall, our findings support the benefit of multi-gene panel testing in patients with mBC irrespective of their family history, age at disease onset, and tumor phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muriel Rolfes
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (M.R.); (J.B.); (M.K.); (C.E.); (K.R.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.); (J.H.)
| | - Julika Borde
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (M.R.); (J.B.); (M.K.); (C.E.); (K.R.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.); (J.H.)
| | - Kathrin Möllenhoff
- Mathematisches Institut, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany;
| | - Mohamad Kayali
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (M.R.); (J.B.); (M.K.); (C.E.); (K.R.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.); (J.H.)
| | - Corinna Ernst
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (M.R.); (J.B.); (M.K.); (C.E.); (K.R.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.); (J.H.)
| | - Andrea Gehrig
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Wuerzburg, 97074 Wuerzburg, Germany;
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Juliane Ramser
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany;
| | - Dieter Niederacher
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany;
| | - Judit Horváth
- Institute for Human Genetics, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany;
| | - Norbert Arnold
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, LMU Munich, University Hospital Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany;
| | - Bernd Auber
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, 30645 Hannover, Germany;
| | - Andreas Rump
- Institute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Shan Wang-Gohrke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Julia Ritter
- Institute of Medical and Human Genetics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Julia Hentschel
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Hospitals and Clinics, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Holger Thiele
- Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG) and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; (H.T.); (J.A.); (P.N.)
| | - Janine Altmüller
- Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG) and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; (H.T.); (J.A.); (P.N.)
- Core Facility Genomics, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Nürnberg
- Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG) and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; (H.T.); (J.A.); (P.N.)
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (M.R.); (J.B.); (M.K.); (C.E.); (K.R.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.); (J.H.)
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, 04107 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (M.R.); (J.B.); (M.K.); (C.E.); (K.R.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.); (J.H.)
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (M.R.); (J.B.); (M.K.); (C.E.); (K.R.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.); (J.H.)
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (M.R.); (J.B.); (M.K.); (C.E.); (K.R.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.); (J.H.)
| | - Jan Hauke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (M.R.); (J.B.); (M.K.); (C.E.); (K.R.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.); (J.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Blohmer JU, Link T, Reinisch M, Just M, Untch M, Stötzer O, Fasching PA, Schneeweiss A, Wimberger P, Seiler S, Huober J, Thill M, Jackisch C, Rhiem K, Solbach C, Hanusch C, Seither F, Denkert C, Engels K, Nekljudova V, Loibl S. Effect of Denosumab Added to 2 Different nab-Paclitaxel Regimens as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: The GeparX 2 × 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1010-1018. [PMID: 35588050 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Importance Adjuvant denosumab might improve disease-free survival in hormone receptor (HR)-positive primary breast cancer (BC). The optimal neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel schedule in terms of efficacy and safety is unclear. Objective To determine whether adding denosumab to anthracycline/taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) increases the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and which nab-paclitaxel schedule is more effective in the NACT setting. Design, Setting, and Participants The GeparX was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, phase 2b, 2 × 2 randomized clinical trial conducted by GBG and AGO-B at 38 German sites between February 2017 and March 2019. The analysis data set was locked September 4, 2020; analysis was completed November 13, 2020. Patients had unilateral or bilateral primary BC, stage cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c, with either clinically node-positive or pathologically node-positive or HR-negative disease, or Ki-67 proliferation index greater than 20%, or ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive BC. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive or not receive denosumab, 120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 6 cycles, and either nab-paclitaxel, 125 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks or days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (8 doses), followed by 4 cycles of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, 90/600 mg/m2 (every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks). Carboplatin was given in triple-negative BC (TNBC), and trastuzumab biosimilar ABP980 plus pertuzumab was given in ERBB2-positive BC (ERBB2-positive substudy). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was pCR rates between arms for each randomization. Results A total of 780 female (n = 779) and male (n = 1) patients (median [range] age, 49.0 [22-80] years) were randomized to the 4 treatment groups. The pCR (ypT0 ypN0) rate was 41.0% (90% CI, 37%-45%) with denosumab vs 42.8% (90% CI, 39%-47%) (P = .58) without denosumab, irrespective of BC subtype. Nab-paclitaxel weekly resulted in a significantly (significance level of α = .10) higher pCR rate of 44.9% (90% CI, 41%-49%) vs 39.0% (90% CI, 35%-43%) (P = .06) with nab-paclitaxel days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The pCR rates for nab-paclitaxel schedules in subgroups were only significantly different for TNBC (60.4% vs 50.0%; P = .06). Grade 3 to 4 toxic effects did not differ with or without denosumab. Nonhematologic toxic effects of grade 3 to 4 were higher with nab-paclitaxel weekly (33.7% vs 24.1%; P = .004). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, denosumab added to anthracycline/taxane-based NACT did not improve pCR rates. Nab-paclitaxel at a dosage of 125 mg/m2 weekly significantly increased the pCR rate compared with the days 1 and 8, every-3-weeks schedule overall and in TNBC, but generated higher toxicity. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02682693.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Theresa Link
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Marianne Just
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Oliver Stötzer
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Hämatologie/Intern. Onkologie, München, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany.,Breast Center, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Universität Köln, Zentrum familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Köln, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Knut Engels
- Zentrum für Pathologie, Zytologie und Molekularpathologie Neuss, Neuss, Germany
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.,Bethanien Krankenhaus Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Loibl S, Untch M, Burchardi N, Huober J, Sinn BV, Blohmer JU, Grischke EM, Furlanetto J, Tesch H, Hanusch C, Engels K, Rezai M, Jackisch C, Schmitt WD, von Minckwitz G, Thomalla J, Kümmel S, Rautenberg B, Fasching PA, Weber K, Rhiem K, Denkert C, Schneeweiss A. Corrigendum to "A randomised phase II study investigating durvalumab in addition to an anthracycline taxane-based neoadjuvant therapy in early triple-negative breast cancer: clinical results and biomarker analysis of GeparNuevo study": [Annals of Oncology (2019), volume 30:1279-1288]. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:743-744. [PMID: 35595658 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg; Oncological Practice Bethanien, Cancer Center Frankfurt Northeast, Frankfurt am Main.
| | - M Untch
- HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin
| | | | - J Huober
- Brustzentrum, Universitätsfrauenklinik Ulm, Ulm
| | - B V Sinn
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin
| | - J-U Blohmer
- Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | | | | | - H Tesch
- Oncological Practice Bethanien, Cancer Center Frankfurt Northeast, Frankfurt am Main
| | - C Hanusch
- Rotkreuzklinikum München Frauenklinik, München
| | - K Engels
- Zentrum für Pathologie, Zytologie und Molekularpathologie Neuss, Neuss
| | - M Rezai
- Medical Center, Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
| | - C Jackisch
- Brustzentrum, Sana-Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach
| | - W D Schmitt
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | | | - J Thomalla
- Praxisklinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie Koblenz, Koblenz
| | - S Kümmel
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen
| | - B Rautenberg
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg
| | - P A Fasching
- Brustzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - K Weber
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg
| | - K Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - A Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brédart A, De Pauw A, Tüchler A, Lakeman IMM, Anota A, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, van Asperen CJ, Devilee P, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Kop JL, Dolbeault S. Genetic clinicians' confidence in BOADICEA comprehensive breast cancer risk estimates and counselees' psychosocial outcomes: a prospective study. Clin Genet 2022; 102:30-39. [PMID: 35508697 PMCID: PMC9322298 DOI: 10.1111/cge.14147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Counseling for familial breast cancer focuses on communicating the gene test result (GENE) to counselees, but risk prediction models have become more complex by including non‐genetic risk factors (NGRF) and polygenic risk scores (PRS). We examined genetic clinicians' confidence in counseling and counselees' psychosocial outcomes, using the BOADICEA risk prediction tool with different categories of risk factors as input. A prospective observational study in Dutch, French and German genetic clinics was performed including 22 clinicians, and 406 of 460 (88.3%) eligible cancer‐unaffected women at high breast cancer risk assessed at pre‐test and 350 (76.1%) at post‐test. We performed multilevel analyses accounting for the clinician, and counselees' characteristics. Overall, risk estimates category by GENE versus GENE+ NGRF, or GENE+NGRF+PRS differed in 11% and 25% of counselees, respectively. In multilevel analyses, clinicians felt less confident in counseling when the full model provided lower breast cancer risks than GENE (i.e., in 8% of cases). Older counselees expressed higher breast cancer risk perception and worries about the hereditary predisposition when the full model provided higher breast cancer risks than GENE only. Genetic clinicians appear confident with breast cancer risk comprehensive models, which seem only to affect perceptions of older counselees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Brédart
- Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-oncology Unit, PSL University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris Cedex 05, Paris, France.,University of Paris, 71 avenue Edouard Vaillant, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Antoine De Pauw
- Institut Curie, Cancer genetic clinic, PSL University, University of Paris, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Anja Tüchler
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany, Kerpener Str. 62 50937 Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Inge M M Lakeman
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Genetics, S4-P, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Amélie Anota
- Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Clinical Research and Innovation& Human and Social Sciences Department, 28 rue Laennec, 69373, Lyon; French National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany, Kerpener Str. 62 50937 Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany, Kerpener Str. 62 50937 Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C J van Asperen
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Genetics, S4-P, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Devilee
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, S4-P, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Institut Curie, Cancer genetic clinic, PSL University, University of Paris, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Jean-Luc Kop
- Université de Lorraine, 2LPN, 3 place Godefroy de Bouillon, 54 015 Nancy Cedex, Nancy, France
| | - Sylvie Dolbeault
- Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-oncology Unit, PSL University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris Cedex 05, Paris, France.,CESP, University Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, 16 avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, Villejuif cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Reinisch M, Blohmer JU, Link T, Just M, Untch M, Stötzer O, Fasching P, Schneeweiss A, Wimberger P, Seiler S, Huober J, Thill M, Jackisch C, Rhiem K, Solbach C, Hanusch C, Denkert C, Engels K, Nekljudova V, Loibl S. 94P Patient quality of life (QoL) from the GeparX trial on the addition of denosumab (Dmab) added to two different nab-paclitaxel (nP) regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in primary breast cancer (BC). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.03.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
34
|
Holly J, Harter P, Ataseven B, Moubarak M, Schwameis R, Heikaus S, Concin N, Rhiem K, Denkert C, Heitz F. HRD-Testung und BRCA1/2-Keimbahntestung in der
klinischen Routine bei Patientinnen mit primärem
Ovarialkarzinom. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1746158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J Holly
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Klinik für
Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Essen,
Deutschland
| | - P Harter
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Klinik für
Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Essen,
Deutschland
| | - B Ataseven
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Klinik für
Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Essen,
Deutschland
- Abteilung für Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie,
Universitätsklinikum, LMU München, Deutschland
| | - M Moubarak
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Klinik für
Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Essen,
Deutschland
| | - R Schwameis
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Klinik für
Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Essen,
Deutschland
- Abteilung für allgemeine Gynäkologie und
gynäkologische Onkologie, Universitätsklinik für
Frauenheilkunde, MedUni Wien, Österreich
| | - S Heikaus
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Zentrum für Pathologie,
Essen, Deutschland
| | - N Concin
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Klinik für
Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Essen,
Deutschland
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, MedUni
Innsbruck, Österreich
| | - K Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs der
Universitätsklinik Köln, Deutschland
| | - C Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg
und Universitätsklinik Marburg (UK-GM) Deutschland)
| | - F Heitz
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Klinik für
Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Essen,
Deutschland
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit dem Center für
Onkologische Operative Therapie, Charité Campus, Virchowklinikum,
Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität
Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institut of Health,
Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Brédart A, Kop JL, Tüchler A, De Pauw A, Cano A, Dick J, Rhiem K, Devilee P, Schmutzler R, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Dolbeault S. Assessment of psychosocial difficulties by genetic clinicians and distress in women at high risk of breast cancer: a prospective study. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1067-1075. [PMID: 35399119 PMCID: PMC9437045 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01096-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined how often genetic clinicians correctly identify psychosocial difficulties in women at high breast cancer risk and explored effects of this assessment and the genetic test result on counselees’ distress. A prospective observational study of counselee–clinician dyads was performed in three French, German and Spanish genetic clinics, involving 709 counselees (participation rate, 83.4%) and 31 clinicians (participation rate, 100%). Counselee–clinician agreement in perceived psychosocial difficulties was measured after the pre-test genetic consultation. Multivariate mixed linear models accounting for clinicians were tested. Predicted distress levels were assessed after the pre- (T1) and post-test result disclosure consultations (T2). Depending on the difficulty domain, clinicians adequately assessed the presence or absence of difficulties in 51% (“familial issues”) to 59% (“emotions”) of counselees. When counselees’ and clinicians’ perceptions disagreed, difficulties were generally underestimated by clinicians. Counselees’ distress levels remained stable from T1 to T2, irrespective of clinicians’ appraisal adequacy, and the genetic test result disclosure. Psychological referral need were found in 20–42% of counselees, more frequently observed for difficulties in the “emotions” domain. Our findings suggest that the genetic test result is a suboptimal indicator for psychological referral. Instead, clinicians should focus on emotions expressed by counselees to appraise their needs for psychological support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Brédart
- Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-oncology Unit, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris Cedex 05, France. .,Psychopathology and Health Process Laboratory UR4057, Psychology Institute, Paris University, 71 Avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92774, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
| | - Jean-Luc Kop
- Université de Lorraine, 2LPN, 3 Place Godefroy de Bouillon, 54015, Nancy Cedex, France
| | - Anja Tüchler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Antoine De Pauw
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, INSERM U830, Paris University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Alejandra Cano
- University Autónoma of Barcelona, Clinical and Health Psychology Department, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julia Dick
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Devilee
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, S4-P, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, INSERM U830, Paris University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Sylvie Dolbeault
- Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-oncology Unit, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris Cedex 05, France.,CESP, University Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94807, Villejuif Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rhiem K, Auber B, Briest S, Dikow N, Ditsch N, Dragicevic N, Grill S, Hahnen E, Horvath J, Jaeger B, Kast K, Kiechle M, Leinert E, Morlot S, Püsken M, Schäfer D, Schott S, Schroeder C, Siebers-Renelt U, Solbach C, Weber-Lassalle N, Witzel I, Zeder-Göß C, Schmutzler RK. Consensus Recommendations of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:199-207. [PMID: 35702495 PMCID: PMC9149395 DOI: 10.1159/000516376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) has established a multigene panel (TruRisk®) for the analysis of risk genes for familial breast and ovarian cancer. SUMMARY An interdisciplinary team of experts from the GC-HBOC has evaluated the available data on risk modification in the presence of pathogenic mutations in these genes based on a structured literature search and through a formal consensus process. KEY MESSAGES The goal of this work is to better assess individual disease risk and, on this basis, to derive clinical recommendations for patient counseling and care at the centers of the GC-HBOC from the initial consultation prior to genetic testing to the use of individual risk-adapted preventive/therapeutic measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bernd Auber
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Susanne Briest
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nicola Dikow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Neda Dragicevic
- Institute of Human Genetics, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Grill
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Judit Horvath
- Institute for Human Genetics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Bernadette Jaeger
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Elena Leinert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Susanne Morlot
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Püsken
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dieter Schäfer
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christopher Schroeder
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Christine Solbach
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nana Weber-Lassalle
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christine Zeder-Göß
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schmutzler RK, Schmitz-Luhn B, Borisch B, Devilee P, Eccles D, Hall P, Balmaña J, Boccia S, Dabrock P, Emons G, Gaissmaier W, Gronwald J, Houwaart S, Huster S, Kast K, Katalinic A, Linn SC, Moorthie S, Pharoah P, Rhiem K, Spranger T, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, van Delden JJM, van den Bulcke M, Woopen C. Risk-Adjusted Cancer Screening and Prevention (RiskAP): Complementing Screening for Early Disease Detection by a Learning Screening Based on Risk Factors. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:208-223. [PMID: 35702492 PMCID: PMC9149472 DOI: 10.1159/000517182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-adjusted cancer screening and prevention is a promising and continuously emerging option for improving cancer prevention. It is driven by increasing knowledge of risk factors and the ability to determine them for individual risk prediction. However, there is a knowledge gap between evidence of increased risk and evidence of the effectiveness and efficiency of clinical preventive interventions based on increased risk. This gap is, in particular, aggravated by the extensive availability of genetic risk factor diagnostics, since the question of appropriate preventive measures immediately arises when an increased risk is identified. However, collecting proof of effective preventive measures, ideally by prospective randomized preventive studies, typically requires very long periods of time, while the knowledge about an increased risk immediately creates a high demand for action. SUMMARY Therefore, we propose a risk-adjusted prevention concept that is based on the best current evidence making needed and appropriate preventive measures available, and which is constantly evaluated through outcome evaluation, and continuously improved based on these results. We further discuss the structural and procedural requirements as well as legal and socioeconomical aspects relevant for the implementation of this concept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Björn Schmitz-Luhn
- Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health (ceres), University of Cologne, and Research Unit Ethics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bettina Borisch
- Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Peter Devilee
- Leids Universitair Medisch Zentrum, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Diana Eccles
- Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Per Hall
- Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Vall d'Hebron Instituto de Oncologia (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefania Boccia
- Sezione di Igiene, Instituto di Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health − Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Günter Emons
- Uniklinik Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Gaissmaier
- Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Stefan Huster
- Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, Sozial- und Gesundheitsrecht und Rechtsphilosophie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Center Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Sabine C. Linn
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Molecular Pathology − Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sowmiya Moorthie
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tade Spranger
- Center for Life Science & Law, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Christiane Woopen
- Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health (ceres), University of Cologne, and Research Unit Ethics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stracke C, Lemmen C, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Kautz-Freimuth S, Stock S. "You Always Have It in the Back of Your Mind"-Feelings, Coping, and Support Needs of Women with Pathogenic Variants in Moderate-Risk Genes for Hereditary Breast Cancer Attending Genetic Counseling in Germany: A Qualitative Interview Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:ijerph19063525. [PMID: 35329227 PMCID: PMC8951351 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary breast cancer accounts for approximately 30% of newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC) cases. Pathogenic variants in moderate-risk BC genes (MBCG) differ from those in high-risk genes in terms of associated cancer risks, affected organs, and available preventive options. Little is known about how MBCG pathogenic variant carriers who have attended post-test genetic counseling perceive their situation, how they cope with their situation, and which support needs they might have. Problem-centered, guided, individual interviews were conducted with twelve women carrying pathogenic variants in MBCG. The interview analysis was based on Mayring’s qualitative content analysis. The women were between 29 and 59 years old and carried pathogenic variants in the risk genes CHEK2 (n = 8), ATM (n = 1), or PALB2 (n = 3). Women reported a wide range of feelings, both positive (relief, calmness) and negative (overwhelm, fear, grief, guilt). All women applied strategies of emotion-focused coping to deal with this lifelong situation. Appraisal and evaluation of the affected mother’s coping might influence the patient’s own behavior and coping style. These results could be used during and after post-test genetic counseling to provide more needs-oriented counseling, and to help women in adjusting to and coping with being a pathogenic variant carrier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Stracke
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany; (C.L.); (S.K.-F.); (S.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Clarissa Lemmen
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany; (C.L.); (S.K.-F.); (S.S.)
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (K.R.); (R.S.)
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (K.R.); (R.S.)
| | - Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany; (C.L.); (S.K.-F.); (S.S.)
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany; (C.L.); (S.K.-F.); (S.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Berger-Höger B, Vitinius F, Fischer H, Beifus K, Köberlein-Neu J, Isselhard A, Töpper M, Wiedemann R, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Stock S, Steckelberg A. Nurse-led decision coaching by specialized nurses for healthy BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers - adaptation and pilot testing of a curriculum for nurses: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:42. [PMID: 35139834 PMCID: PMC8829999 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00810-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women with BRCA1/2 mutations are at high risk to develop breast and ovarian cancer. To support these women to participate in shared decision-making, structured nurse-led decision coaching combined with an evidence-based decision aid may be employed. In preparation of the interprofessional randomized controlled trial to evaluate a decision coaching program to support preventive decisions of healthy female BRCA 1/2 gene mutation carriers (EDCP-BRCA), we adapted and piloted an existing training program for specialized nurses and included elements from an existing physician communication training. Methods The training was adapted according to the six-step-approach for medical curriculum development. The educational design is based on experience- and problem-based learning. Subsequently, we conducted a qualitative pilot study. Nurses were recruited from six German centers for familial breast and ovarian cancer. The acceptability and feasibility were assessed by structured class observations, field notes and participants’ feedback. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The training was revised according to the results. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the patient intervention was adapted as a virtual coaching and a brief additional training for nurses was added. Results The training consists of two modules (2 + 1 day) that teach competences in evidence-based medicine and patient information, (risk) communication and decision coaching. One pilot test was conducted with six nurses of which three were specialized and experienced in patient counselling. A final set of eight main categories was derived from the data: framework conditions; interaction; schedule, transparency of goals, content, methods, materials and practical relevance and feasibility. Overall, the training was feasible and comprehensible. Decision coaching materials were awkward to handle and decision coaching role plays were set too short. Therefore, materials will be sent out in advance and the training was extended. Conclusions Specialized nurses are rarely available and nurse-led counselling is not routinely implemented in the centers of familial breast and ovarian cancer. However, training of less qualified nurses seems feasible. Decision coaching in a virtual format seems to be a promising approach. Further research is needed to evaluate its feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness. Trial registration The main trial is registered under DRKS-ID: DRKS00015527. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-022-00810-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birte Berger-Höger
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - Frank Vitinius
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hannah Fischer
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karolina Beifus
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Juliane Köberlein-Neu
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Anna Isselhard
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maren Töpper
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Regina Wiedemann
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gerber B, Schneeweiss A, Möbus V, Golatta M, Tesch H, Krug D, Hanusch C, Denkert C, Lübbe K, Heil J, Huober J, Ataseven B, Klare P, Hahn M, Untch M, Kast K, Jackisch C, Thomalla J, Seither F, Blohmer JU, Rhiem K, Fasching PA, Nekljudova V, Loibl S, Kühn T. Pathological Response in the Breast and Axillary Lymph Nodes after Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment in Patients with Initially Node-Positive Breast Cancer Correlates with Disease Free Survival: An Exploratory Analysis of the GeparOcto Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030521. [PMID: 35158789 PMCID: PMC8833390 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The extent of axillary surgery has been reduced in recent years to minimize side effects. However, a negative impact of reduced surgery on outcome must be avoided. We investigated for whom the extent of surgery can be safely reduced by examining early-stage breast cancer patients converting from lymph node (LN)-positive to LN-negative disease after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST). Of 242 initially LN-positive patients treated within the GeparOcto trial, 54.5% were classified as LN-negative after NAST, 31.8% as LN-positive, and for 13.6% data were missing. Overall, 92.1% of patients underwent complete axillary LN dissection, with 6.6% undergoing sentinel LN dissection only. At surgery, 55.4% of patients had no signs of cancer in the LN, 45.0% had no signs of cancer in the breast (of those 8.3% had involved LN), and 41.3% had no signs of cancer at all. Patients with involved LN still had a bad prognosis. Conversion from LN-positive to LN-negative after NAST is of highest prognostic value. Surgical axillary staging after NAST is essential in these patients to offer tailored treatment. Abstract Background: The conversion of initially histologically confirmed axillary lymph node-positive (pN+) to ypN0 after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC) patients and may influence surgical de-escalation strategies. We aimed to determine pCR rates in lymph nodes (pCR-LN), the breast (pCR-B), and both (tpCR) in women who present with pN+ BC, to assess predictors for response and the impact of pCR-LN, pCR-B, and tpCR on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Methods: Retrospective, exploratory analysis of 242 patients with pN+ at diagnosis from the multicentric, randomized GeparOcto trial. Results: Of 242 patients with initially pN+ disease, 134 (55.4%) had a pCR-LN, and 109 (45.0%) a pCR-B. Of the 109 pCR-B patients, 9 (8.3%) patients had involved LN, and 100 (41.3%) patients had tpCR. Those with involved LN still had a bad prognosis. As expected, pCR-B and intrinsic subtypes (TNBC and HER2+) were identified as independent predictors of pCR-LN. pCR-LN (ypN0; hazard ratio 0.42; 95%, CI 0.23–0.75; p = 0.0028 for iDFS) was the strongest independent prognostic factor. Conclusions: In initially pN+ patients undergoing NAST, the conversion to ypN0 is of high prognostic value. Surgical axillary staging after NAST is still essential in these patients to offer tailored treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Gerber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Südring 81, 18059 Rostock, Germany;
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Volker Möbus
- Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany;
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (J.H.)
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice, Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Im Prüfling 17-19, 60389 Frankfurt, Germany;
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Claus Hanusch
- Department of Senology, Rotkreuz-Klinikum, Rotkreuzplatz 8, 80634 Munich, Germany;
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, Germany;
| | - Kristina Lübbe
- Breast Center, Diakovere Henriettenstift, Schwemannstraße 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany;
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (J.H.)
| | - Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Klare
- Oncologic Medical Care Center Krebsheilkunde, Möllendorffstraße 52, 10367 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Markus Hahn
- Department for Women’s Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany;
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Karin Kast
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Starkenburgring 66, 63069 Offenbach, Germany;
| | - Jörg Thomalla
- Praxisklinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie Koblenz, Neversstraße 5, 56068 Koblenz, Germany;
| | - Fenja Seither
- German Breast Group, Martin Behaim Strasse 12, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany; (F.S.); (V.N.)
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Erlangen, Universitätsstraße 21/23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Valentina Nekljudova
- German Breast Group, Martin Behaim Strasse 12, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany; (F.S.); (V.N.)
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, Martin Behaim Strasse 12, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany; (F.S.); (V.N.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-610-2748-0411; Fax: +49-610-2748-0111
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynecology, Klinikum Esslingen, Hirschlandstraße 97, 73730 Esslingen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Brédart A, De Pauw A, Anota A, Tüchler A, Dick J, Müller A, Kop JL, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Devilee P, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Dolbeault S. Information needs on breast cancer genetic and non-genetic risk factors in relatives of women with a BRCA1/2 or PALB2 pathogenic variant. Breast 2021; 60:38-44. [PMID: 34455229 PMCID: PMC8403756 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Comprehensive breast cancer (BC) risk models integrating effects of genetic (GRF) and non-genetic risk factors (NGRF) may refine BC prevention recommendations. We explored the perceived information received on BC risk factors, and related characteristics, in female relatives of women with a BRCA1/2 or PALB2 pathogenic variant, undergoing BC risk assessment using the CanRisk© prediction tool. METHODS Of 200 consecutive cancer-free women approached after the initial genetic consultation, 161 (80.5%) filled in questionnaires on their perception of information received and wished further information on BC risk factors (e.g., being a carrier of a moderate risk altered gene, personal genetic profile, lifestyles). Multilevel multivariate linear models were performed accounting for the clinician who met the counselee and exploring the effect of counselees' socio-demographic, familial and psychological characteristics on the perceived extent of information received. RESULTS Perceived no/little information received and wish for further information were more frequent for NGRF (>50%) than for GRF, especially high-risk genes (<20%). Perceived amount of information received and desire for further information were inversely correlated (p=<0.0001). Higher education level related to lower perceived levels of information received on GRF. Younger counselees' age (β = 0.13, p = 0.02) and less frequent engagement coping (e.g., inclination to solicit information) (β = 0.24, p = 0.02) related to lower perceived information received about NGRF. Other assessed counselees' features were not found to be associated to GRF and NGRF information perception. CONCLUSIONS Awareness of counselees' perceived lack of information on BC risk factors indicates a need to enhance evidence-based information on BC NGRF especially.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Brédart
- Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-oncology Unit, PSL University, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris, 75005 Paris Cedex 05, France; University of Paris, 71 Avenue Edouard Vaillant, Boulogne-Billancourt, 92774, France.
| | - Antoine De Pauw
- Institut Curie, Cancer Genetic Clinic, PSL University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Amélie Anota
- Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Clinical Research and Innovation& Human and Social Sciences Department, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon; French National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Lyon, 69373, France
| | - Anja Tüchler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Kerpener Str. 62 50937 Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Dick
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Kerpener Str. 62 50937 Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anita Müller
- Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-oncology Unit, PSL University, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris, 75005 Paris Cedex 05, France; VCR, École de Psychologues Praticiens de l'Institut Catholique de Paris, 23 Rue du Montparnasse, 75006, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Kop
- Université de Lorraine, 2LPN, 3 Place Godefroy de Bouillon, Nancy, 54 015 Nancy Cedex, France
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Kerpener Str. 62 50937 Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian and Cancer for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Kerpener Str. 62 50937 Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Devilee
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, S4-P, P.O. Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Institut Curie, Cancer Genetic Clinic, PSL University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Sylvie Dolbeault
- Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-oncology Unit, PSL University, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris, 75005 Paris Cedex 05, France; CESP, University Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94807, Villejuif Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Stracke C, Lemmen C, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Kautz-Freimuth S, Stock S. Medical knowledge and information needs among women with pathogenic variants in moderate-risk genes for hereditary breast cancer attending genetic counseling at an academic hospital in Germany-A qualitative approach. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:698-712. [PMID: 34837291 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
With 69,000 newly diagnosed cases every year, breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer disease among women in Germany. Familial clustering is seen in about 30% of newly diagnosed cases. Besides the high-risk genes BRCA1/2, there are also moderate-risk BC genes (MBCG) that are associated with a 20%-50% risk of BC, such as CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2. In Germany, carriers of pathogenic variants in MBCG receive specific information on their test results, individual risks, and preventive options during genetic counseling for the disclosure of the results in a specialized center. Little is known about the medical knowledge that women have after attending counseling. This study aims to identify the medical knowledge, further information needs, and the possible impact of a lack of information on dealing with everyday life for women with pathogenic variants in MBCG who have attended genetic counseling at an academic hospital in Germany. Problem-centered, guided, individual interviews were conducted with twelve women carrying pathogenic variants in MBCG. The interview guide was developed based on the methods of the problem-centered interview according to Witzel. The interview analysis was based on Mayring's qualitative content analysis. The women were between 29 and 59 years old and carried pathogenic variants in the risk genes CHEK2 (n = 8), ATM (n = 1), or PALB2 (n = 3). Several medical uncertainties and information needs emerged from the data, concerning (a) medical terms, (b) risk perception, (c) BC therapy for hereditary BC, (d) lifestyle advice and risk factors, and (e) family planning and risk-reducing mastectomy. Women with pathogenic variants in MBCG might develop their own conceptions regarding the onset of disease and inheritance. In order to meet the need for information and address the uncertainties that may still exist after genetic counseling, structured, evidence-based and comprehensible written information in German should be developed for this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Stracke
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clarissa Lemmen
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Schneeweiss A, Michel LL, Möbus V, Tesch H, Klare P, Hahnen E, Denkert C, Kast K, Pohl-Rescigno E, Hanusch C, Link T, Untch M, Jackisch C, Blohmer JU, Fasching PA, Solbach C, Schmutzler RK, Huober J, Rhiem K, Nekljudova V, Lübbe K, Loibl S. Survival analysis of the randomised phase III GeparOcto trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy of intense dose-dense epirubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide versus weekly paclitaxel, liposomal doxorubicin (plus carboplatin in triple-negative breast cancer) for patients with high-risk early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2021; 160:100-111. [PMID: 34801353 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND GeparOcto demonstrated that pathological complete response (pCR) of intense dose-dense epirubicin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (iddEPC) was comparable to weekly paclitaxel/non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (plus carboplatin (PM(Cb) in triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]) in high-risk early breast cancer (BC). Here, we report time-to-event secondary end-points. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomised to receive 18 weeks of E (150 mg/m2) followed by P (225 mg/m2) followed by C (2000 mg/m2), each q2w or weekly P (80 mg/m2) plus M (20 mg/m2) plus, in TNBC, Cb (AUC 1.5). Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+)BC received trastuzumab (6[loading dose 8]mg/kg q3w) and pertuzumab (420[840]mg q3w) with P and C cycles. RESULTS 945 patients started treatment (iddEPC n = 470; PM(Cb) n = 475). After a median follow-up of 47.0 (range 1.6-61.5) months, 162 (75 in iddEPC; 87 in PM(Cb)) invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) events and 79 (41 in iddEPC; 38 in PM(Cb)) deaths were reported. No significant difference was observed in 4-year iDFS (81.9% iddEPC versus 79.7% PM(Cb), HR = 1.16 [95%CI 0.85-1.59], log-rank p = 0.334) or 4-year overall survival (OS) (90.3% iddEPC versus 90.6% PM(Cb), HR = 0.90 [95%CI 0.58-1.40], log-rank p = 0.637) overall and in HER2+ and TNBC subgroups. HR+/HER2- BC patients, however, had significantly better 4-year iDFS (77.9% iddEPC versus 62.5% PM, HR = 2.11 [95%CI 1.08-4.10], log-rank p = 0.025) and 4-year OS with iddEPC (94.7% iddEPC versus 80.1% PM, HR = 3.26 [95%CI 1.06-10.00], log-rank p = 0.029). CONCLUSION While there was no difference in survival for the entire cohort, the HR+/HER2-subgroup significantly benefits from iddEPC. This supports the concept of an additional effect of NACT beyond pCR in patients with HR+/HER2- BC. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT02125344.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura L Michel
- National Center for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Möbus
- Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Centre for Haematology and Oncology, Bethanien Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Esther Pohl-Rescigno
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Claus Hanusch
- Department of Gynecology, Rotkreuzklinikum München, Germany
| | - Theresa Link
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology, Helios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Cancer, Charité Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Kristina Lübbe
- Diakovere Henriettenstift, Breast Center, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Friedrich M, Kühn T, Janni W, Müller V, Banys-Paluchowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Krug D, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer J, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Gluz O, Hanf V, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Kreipe HH, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Möbus V, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Thill M, Ditsch N. Correction: AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: 2021 Update. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:e31. [PMID: 34720743 PMCID: PMC8548988 DOI: 10.1055/a-1674-1114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-1499-8431.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Janni
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, UK-SH, Lübeck, Germany.,Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Fallenberg
- Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Institut für Klinische Radiologie, München, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik, Nathanstift Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Brustzentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik, St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Friedrich M, Kühn T, Janni W, Müller V, Banys-Pachulowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Krug D, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer J, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Gluz O, Hanf V, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Kreipe HH, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Möbus V, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Thill M, Ditsch N. AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: 2021 Update. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:1112-1120. [PMID: 34629490 PMCID: PMC8494519 DOI: 10.1055/a-1499-8431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
For many decades, the standard procedure to treat breast cancer included complete dissection of the axillary lymph nodes. The aim was to determine histological node status, which was then used as the basis for adjuvant therapy, and to ensure locoregional tumour control. In addition to the debate on how to optimise the therapeutic strategies of systemic treatment and radiotherapy, the current discussion focuses on improving surgical procedures to treat breast cancer. As neoadjuvant chemotherapy is becoming increasingly important, the surgical procedures used to treat breast cancer, whether they are breast surgery or axillary dissection, are changing. Based on the currently available data, carrying out SLNE prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended. In contrast, surgical axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered the procedure of choice for axillary staging and can range from SLNE to TAD and ALND. To reduce the rate of false negatives
during surgical staging of the axilla in pN+
CNB
stage before NACT and ycN0 after NACT, targeted axillary dissection (TAD), the removal of > 2 SLNs (SLNE, no untargeted axillary sampling), immunohistochemistry to detect isolated tumour cells and micro-metastases, and marking positive lymph nodes before NACT should be the standard approach. This most recent update on surgical axillary management describes the significance of isolated tumour cells and micro-metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the clinical consequences of low volume residual disease diagnosed using SLNE and TAD and provides an overview of this yearʼs AGO recommendations for surgical management of the axilla during primary surgery and in relation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Janni
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Pachulowski
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, UK-SH, Lübeck, Germany.,Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Fallenberg
- Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Institut für Klinische Radiologie, München, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik, Nathanstift Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Brustzentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik, St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lorke M, Harzheim L, Rhiem K, Woopen C, Jünger S. The ticking time-bomb. Health literacy in the context of genetic risk prediction in familial breast-ovarian cancer; A qualitative study. Qual Res Med Healthc 2021. [DOI: 10.4081/qrmh.2021.9647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Personalised methods of predicting breast and ovarian cancer risk through genetic testing increasingly demand a person’s understanding and critical appraisal of risk-related information, as well as decision-making and acting upon disclosure of a positive test result. The current study aims at understanding health literacy (HL) among persons at risk of developing familial breast-ovarian cancer (FBOC) from a bottom-up perspective—incorporating their viewpoints into the research process. Its qualitative design integrates an ethnographic-narrative approach and findings from 10 narrative interviews with women who have undergone genetic testing, analysed by using reflexive grounded theory. The collected data reveal the entanglement of the women’s perceptions concerning the risk of getting ill, their identity, and their strategies of managing health. The analysis of this interplay provides an empirical basis for approaching HL in its communicative dimension, considering individuals’ understandings of health and illness, and emphasizing the role of critical HL.
Collapse
|
47
|
Dick J, Aue V, Wesselmann S, Brédart A, Dolbeault S, Devilee P, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K. Survey on Physicians' Knowledge and Training Needs in Genetic Counseling in Germany. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:389-395. [PMID: 34602945 DOI: 10.1159/000511136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In recent years, germline testing of women with a risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer has increased rapidly. This is due to lower costs for new high-throughput sequencing technologies and the manifold preventive and therapeutic options for germline mutation carriers. The growing demand for genetic counseling meets a shortfall of counselors and illustrates the need to involve the treating clinicians in the genetic testing process. This survey was undertaken to assess their state of knowledge and training needs in the field of genetic counseling and testing. Methods A cross-sectional survey within the European Bridges Study (Breast Cancer Risk after Diagnostic Gene Sequencing) was conducted among physician members (n = 111) of the German Cancer Society who were primarily gynecologists. It was designed to examine their experience in genetic counseling and testing. Results Overall, the study revealed a need for training in risk communication and clinical recommendations for persons at risk. One-third of respondents communicated only relative disease risks (31.5%) instead of absolute disease risks in manageable time spans. Moreover, almost one-third of the respondents (31.2%) communicated bilateral and contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy as an option for healthy women and unilateral-diseased breast cancer patients without mutations in high-risk genes (e.g. BRCA1 or BRCA2). Most respondents expressed training needs in the field of risk assessment models, the clinical interpretation of genetic test results, and the decision-making process. Conclusion The survey demonstrates a gap of genetic and risk literacy in a relevant proportion of physicians and the need for appropriate training concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Dick
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Viktoria Aue
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Anne Brédart
- Supportive Care Department, Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,University Paris Descartes, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Sylvie Dolbeault
- Supportive Care Department, Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Épidémiologie et Santé des Populations (CESP), University Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif Cedex, France
| | - Peter Devilee
- Departments of Human Genetics and Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rippinger N, Fischer C, Sinn HP, Dikow N, Sutter C, Rhiem K, Grill S, Cremer FW, Nguyen HP, Ditsch N, Kast K, Hettmer S, Kratz CP, Schott S. Breast cancer characteristics and surgery among women with Li-Fraumeni syndrome in Germany-A retrospective cohort study. Cancer Med 2021; 10:7747-7758. [PMID: 34569185 PMCID: PMC8559485 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women with Li‐Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) have elevated breast cancer (BC) risk. Optimal BC treatment strategies in this population are yet unknown. Methods BC subtypes and treatment were retrospectively investigated between December 2016 and January 2019 in a multicentre study. BC risks were evaluated according to the type of surgery. Results Thirty‐five women of our study population (35/44; 79.5%) had developed 36 breast lesions at first diagnosis at a mean age of 34 years. Those breast lesions comprised 32 invasive BCs (89%), three ductal carcinoma in situ alone (8%) and one malignant phyllodes tumour (3%). BCs were mainly high‐grade (18/32), of no special type (NST; 31/32), HER2‐enriched (11/32) or luminal‐B‐(like)‐type (10/32). Affected women (n = 35) received breast‐conserving surgery (BCS, n = 17) or a mastectomy (ME, n = 18) including seven women with simultaneous contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) at first diagnosis. Nineteen women suffered 20 breast or locoregional axillary lesions at second diagnosis with mean age of 36. Median time between first and second diagnosis was 57 months; median time to contra‐ and ipsilateral recurrence depended on surgical strategies (BCS: 46 vs. unilateral ME: 93 vs. bilateral ME > 140 months). Women with a primary treatment of solitaire therapeutic ME suffered from contralateral BC earlier compared to those with therapeutic ME and CPM (median: 93 vs. >140 months). Conclusion Aggressive BC subtypes occur among women with LFS. Surgical treatment, i.e. ME and CPM, may prolong time to a second BC diagnosis. Conclusion on long‐term survival benefit is pending. Individual competing tumour risks and long‐term outcomes need to be taken into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Rippinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Fischer
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicola Dikow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Grill
- Department of Gynecology and Centre for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC TUM), University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Huu P Nguyen
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Human Genetics, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstretrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Hettmer
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian P Kratz
- Paediatric Haematology and Oncology and Rare Disease Program, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ataseven B, Tripon D, Schwameis R, Harter P, Rhiem K, Schneider S, Heikaus S, Baert T, Francesco AP, Heitz F, Traut A, Groeben HT, Schmutzler R, du Bois A. Clinical outcome in patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer and germline BRCA1/2-mutation - real life data. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:569-577. [PMID: 34565600 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the clinical impact of germline (g)BRCA1/2-mutation on initial disease presentation, surgical implications, surgical morbidity and survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) undergoing debulking surgery (DS). METHODS Data of all consecutive EOC patients with stage III/IV, high-grade serous disease and known gBRCA1/2 status (gBRCA; non-gBRCA), who underwent DS at our department between 01/2011 and 06/2019 were analyzed. Associations between gBRCA-status and severe postoperative complications and survival were analyzed. RESULTS gBRCA-status was determined in 50.1% (612/1221) of all patients. gBRCA was present in 21.9% (134/612). Significant differences were observed in terms of median age (p = 0.001) and histology (high-grade serous histology gBRCA: 98.5%, non-gBRCA 76.2%; p < 0.001). gBRCA-status had no impact on intraoperative disease presentation, surgical complexity or complete resection rate (gBRCA: 74.4%, non-gBRCA: 69.0%; p = 0.274). gBRCA-status was not predictive for severe postoperative complication (gBRCA: 12.0%, non-gBRCA: 19.1%; p = 0.082). Median PFS and OS was 31/22 and 71/53 months in patients with/without gBRCA-mutation, respectively. gBRCA was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (HR 0.57 p < 0.001) and for OS (HR 0.64, p = 0.048) after adjusting for established prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS gBRCA-status had no impact on initial disease presentation, surgical results or postoperative complications. gBRCA patients have a significantly longer PFS but the impact on the long term prognosis is unclear. Complete resection remains the most important prognostic factor in patients with EOC independent of gBRCA-status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
| | - Denise Tripon
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Richard Schwameis
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Thaïs Baert
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Gynecology, Campus Virchow Clinic, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Traut
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Harald-Thomas Groeben
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Isselhard A, Töpper M, Steckelberg A, Berger-Höger B, Vitinius F, Köberlein-Neu J, Manderscheid L, Wiedemann R, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Stock S. Workshop: Corona Pandemie – Herausforderungen nicht nur für die Grundlagenwissenschaften. Das Gesundheitswesen 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A Isselhard
- Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und klinische Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - M Töpper
- Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und klinische Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - A Steckelberg
- Instituts für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaft, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
| | - B Berger-Höger
- Instituts für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaft, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
| | - F Vitinius
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - J Köberlein-Neu
- Bergisches Kompetenzzentrum für Gesundheitsökonomik und Versorgungsforschung, Bergische Universität Wuppertal
| | - L Manderscheid
- Bergisches Kompetenzzentrum für Gesundheitsökonomik und Versorgungsforschung, Bergische Universität Wuppertal
| | - R Wiedemann
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - K Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - R Schmutzler
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - S Stock
- Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und klinische Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| |
Collapse
|