1
|
Goetz MP, Cicin I, Testa L, Tolaney SM, Huober J, Guarneri V, Johnston SRD, Martin M, Rastogi P, Harbeck N, Shahir A, Wei R, André V, Rugo HS, O'Shaughnessy J. Impact of dose reductions on adjuvant abemaciclib efficacy for patients with high-risk early breast cancer: analyses from the monarchE study. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:34. [PMID: 38671001 PMCID: PMC11053007 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00639-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
In monarchE, adjuvant abemaciclib significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), with sustained benefit beyond the 2-year treatment period. Abemaciclib dose reductions were allowed to proactively manage adverse events. Exploratory analyses to investigate the impact of dose reductions on efficacy were conducted. Across the three patient subgroups as defined by relative dose intensity (≤66%, 66-93%, ≥93%), the estimated 4-year IDFS rates were generally consistent (87.1%, 86.4%, and 83.7%, respectively). In the time-dependent Cox proportional hazard model, the effect of abemaciclib was consistent at the full dose compared to being reduced to a lower dose (IDFS hazard ratio: 0.905; 95% confidence interval: 0.727, 1.125; DRFS hazard ratio: 0.942; 95% confidence interval: 0.742, 1.195). These analyses showed that the efficacy of adjuvant abemaciclib was not compromised by protocol mandated dose reductions for patients with node positive, hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Irfan Cicin
- Istinye University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Laura Testa
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Breast Centre St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Miguel Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Priya Rastogi
- University of Pittsburgh/UPMC, NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Centre München, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ran Wei
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Hope S Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Hellen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Schepper M, Koorman T, Richard F, Christgen M, Vincent-Salomon A, Schnitt SJ, van Diest PJ, Zels G, Mertens F, Maetens M, Vanden Bempt I, Harbeck N, Nitz U, Gräser M, Kümmel S, Gluz O, Weynand B, Floris G, Derksen PW, Desmedt C. Integration of pathological criteria and immunohistochemical evaluation for invasive lobular carcinoma diagnosis: recommendations from the European Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium. Mod Pathol 2024:100497. [PMID: 38641322 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most frequent type of breast cancer (BC) and its peculiar morphology is mainly driven by inactivation of CDH1, the gene coding for E-cadherin cell adhesion protein. ILC-specific therapeutic and disease-monitoring approaches are gaining momentum in the clinic, increasing the importance of accurate ILC diagnosis. Several essential and desirable morphological diagnostic criteria are currently defined by the World Health Organization, the routine use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for E-cadherin is not recommended. Disagreement in the diagnosis of ILC has been repeatedly reported, but inter-pathologist agreement increases with the use of E-cadherin IHC. In this study, we aimed to harmonize the pathological diagnosis of ILC by comparing five commonly used E-cadherin antibody clones (NCH-38, EP700Y, Clone 36, NCL-L-E-cad [Clone 36B5], and ECH-6). We determined their biochemical specificity for the E-cadherin protein and IHC staining performance according to type and location of mutation on the CDH1 gene. Western blot analysis on mouse cell lines with conditional E-cadherin expression revealed a reduced specificity of EP700Y and NCL-L-E-cad for E-cadherin, with cross-reactivity of Clone 36 to P-cadherin. The use of IHC improved inter-pathologist agreement both for ILC as well as for lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia. The E-cadherin IHC staining pattern was associated with variant allele frequency and likelihood of non-sense mediated RNA decay but not with the type or position of CDH1 mutations. Based on these results, we make recommendations for the indication for E-cadherin staining, choice of antibodies, and their interpretation in order to standardize ILC diagnosis in current pathology practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxim De Schepper
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thijs Koorman
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - François Richard
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine Division, Paris, France
| | - Stuart J Schnitt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gitte Zels
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Freya Mertens
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marion Maetens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Monika Gräser
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany; Clinics Essen-Mitte, Breast Unit, Essen, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany; University Clinics Cologne, Women's Clinic and Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Birgit Weynand
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Patrick Wb Derksen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Christine Desmedt
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gascón P, Harbeck N, Rapoport BL, Anderson R, Brueckmann I, Howe S, Aapro M. Filgrastim biosimilar (EP2006): A review of 15 years' post-approval evidence. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 196:104306. [PMID: 38401695 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Filgrastim is approved for several indications, including reduction of the incidence and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and for stem cell mobilization. The filgrastim biosimilar, EP2006, has been available in Europe since 2009, and in the United States since 2015. In this time, preclinical and clinical data used to support the approval of EP2006 have been published. These data established the biosimilarity of EP2006 to reference filgrastim in terms of structure, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Additional real-world evidence studies have also demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety of EP2006 compared with reference filgrastim, both in the reduction of neutropenia and in stem cell mobilization in clinical practice. This review summarizes these preclinical, clinical, and real-world data, as well as the available cost-effectiveness data, for EP2006 since its approval 15 years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pere Gascón
- Division of Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic, Casanova 143, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department OB&GYN and Center for hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Bernardo L Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, 129 Oxford Road, Johannesburg 2196, South Africa; Department of Immunology, Pathology Building, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Ronald Anderson
- Department of Immunology, Pathology Building, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Ines Brueckmann
- Sandoz Group AG, Global Medical Affairs, Industriestr. 25, Holzkirchen D-83607, Germany
| | - Sebastian Howe
- Sandoz Group AG, Global Medical Affairs, Industriestr. 25, Holzkirchen D-83607, Germany.
| | - Matti Aapro
- Cancer Center, Clinique de Genolier, Route du Muids 3, Genolier 1272, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ditsch N, Untch M, Fasching PA, Busch S, Ettl J, Haidinger R, Jackisch C, Lüftner D, Müller L, Müller V, Ruckhäberle E, Schumacher-Wulf E, Thomssen C, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R. ABC7 Consensus: Assessment by a German Group of Experts. Breast Care (Basel) 2024; 19:116-128. [PMID: 38638343 PMCID: PMC11023691 DOI: 10.1159/000535997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The "International Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer" was initiated more than 10 years ago. The rationale was to standardize treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) based on available evidence and to ensure that all ABC patients worldwide receive adequate treatment and access to new therapies. Topics of ABC7 The 7th International Consensus Conference for ABC (ABC7) took place from November 9 to 11, 2023 - as in previous years in Lisbon/Portugal. ABC7 focused not only on metastatic disease but also on locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. Special topics were the management of oligometastatic disease, leptomeningeal disease, brain metastases, and pregnant women with ABC. Due to the current situation worldwide, there was a special interest to patients living in conflict zones. As in previous years, patient advocates from around the world were integrated into the ABC conference and had a major input to the consensus. Rationale for the Manuscript A German breast cancer expert panel comments on the voting results of the ABC7 panelists regarding their relevance for routine clinical practice in Germany. As with previous meetings, the ABC7 votes focused on modified or new statements. Regarding the statements not modified for the ABC7 consensus, they are discussed in the published manuscript from 2021 in which the German experts commented on the ABC6 consensus. The German comments are always based on the current recommendations of the "Breast Committee" of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGO Mamma).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Oncology Center, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Women’s Hospital at the University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Steffi Busch
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Dr. Busch MVZ GmbH, Mühlhausen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinic for Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikverbund Allgäu gGmbH, Klinikum Kempten, Kempten, Germany
| | - Renate Haidinger
- Brustkrebs Deutschland e.V.; Patient Advocate, Board Member ABC Global Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany, and Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Medical University of Brandenburg, Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Lothar Müller
- Onkologie UnterEms, Studienzentrum UnterEms, Leer, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital, Hamburg-Eppendorf, ABC7 Panel Member, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Eugen Ruckhäberle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of The Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Eva Schumacher-Wulf
- Mamma Mia! Breast cancer magazine, Patient Advocate, Co-chair, ABC7 Panel Member, Köln, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Munich, University of Munich (LMU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ABC7 Panel Member, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Munich, University of Munich (LMU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gnant M, Abdullah KL, Boyle F, Huang CS, Bickford K, Neunie S, Noble A, Nunn A, Sproat C, Harbeck N, Barrios C. Assessing Knowledge, Competence, and Performance Following Web-Based Education on Early Breast Cancer Management: Health Care Professional Questionnaire Study and Anonymized Patient Records Analysis. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e50931. [PMID: 38512328 PMCID: PMC10995792 DOI: 10.2196/50931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Web-based learning activities are key components of continuing medical education (CME) for health care professionals (HCPs). However, the published outcomes of web-based educational interventions for early breast cancer (EBC) are limited. OBJECTIVE This study aims to objectively assess knowledge, competence, and performance among HCPs following participation in 2 EBC-focused CME activities and to identify the remaining educational gaps. METHODS We developed 2 CME-accredited web-based educational activities addressing high-risk EBC, including integration of shared decision-making to optimize patient care (touchMDT) and stratification for early identification of high-risk patients and novel treatment strategies (touchPANEL DISCUSSION). Knowledge, competence, and performance were assessed before and after the activities against an expanded outcomes framework (levels 1-5) using self-reported questionnaires and an analysis of anonymized data extracted from patient records. RESULTS Six months after the launch of the activity, 7047 and 8989 HCP participants engaged with touchMDT and touchPANEL DISCUSSION, respectively. The overall satisfaction was 82% (a total score of 20.6 out of 25) for the touchMDT and 88% (a total score of 21.9 out of 25) for the touchPANEL DISCUSSION. For the evaluation of knowledge and competence (50 respondents before the activity and 50 learners after the activity), there was a significant increase in the mean number of correctly answered questions from pre- to postactivity (touchMDT: median 4.0, IQR 3.0-5.0 to median 5.5, IQR 4.0-7.0; mean 4.00, SD 1.39 to mean 5.30, SD 1.56 and touchPANEL DISCUSSION: median 4.0, IQR 4.0-5.0 to median 6.0, IQR 5.0-7.0; mean 4.32, SD 1.30 to mean 5.88, SD 1.49; both P<.001). A significant improvement in self-reported performance (50 respondents before the activity and 50 learners after the activity) was observed in a combined analysis of both activities (median 3.0, IQR 2.0-3.0 to median 4.0, IQR 3.0-5.0; mean 2.82, SD 1.08 to mean 4.16, SD 1.45; P<.001). Patient record analysis (50 respondents before the activity and 50 learners after the activity) showed that the HCPs used a range of measures to determine EBC recurrence risk and revealed no significant differences in adjuvant therapies used before and after the activity (P=.97 and P>.99 for Ki-67 <20% and Ki-67 ≥20% tumors, respectively). The remaining educational gaps included strategies for implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice and the use of genetic and biomarker testing to guide treatment selection. CONCLUSIONS Brief, web-based CME activities on EBC were associated with an improvement in HCP knowledge, competence, and self-reported performance and can help identify unmet needs to inform the design of future CME activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Khatijah Lim Abdullah
- Department of Nursing, School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Frances Boyle
- Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care and Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Chiun-Sheng Huang
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Katie Bickford
- touch Independent Medical Education Limited, Stockport, United Kingdom
| | - Sola Neunie
- touch Independent Medical Education Limited, Stockport, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander Noble
- touch Independent Medical Education Limited, Stockport, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Nunn
- touch Independent Medical Education Limited, Stockport, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Sproat
- touch Independent Medical Education Limited, Stockport, United Kingdom
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital of Munich Ludwig Maximilian, Munich, Germany
| | - Carlos Barrios
- Latin American Cooperative Group and Oncoclínicas Group, Hospital São Lucas da Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Slamon DJ, Diéras V, Rugo HS, Harbeck N, Im SA, Gelmon KA, Lipatov ON, Walshe JM, Martin M, Chavez-MacGregor M, Bananis E, Gauthier E, Lu DR, Kim S, Finn RS. Overall Survival With Palbociclib Plus Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:994-1000. [PMID: 38252901 PMCID: PMC10950136 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.PALOMA-2 demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival with palbociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Here, we report results for the secondary end point overall survival (OS). Postmenopausal women (N = 666) with ER+/HER2- ABC without previous systemic therapy for ABC were randomly assigned 2:1 to palbociclib plus letrozole or placebo plus letrozole. After a median follow-up of 90.1 months, 405 deaths were observed and 155 patients were known to be alive. The median OS was 53.9 months (95% CI, 49.8 to 60.8) with palbociclib plus letrozole versus 51.2 months (95% CI, 43.7 to 58.9) with placebo plus letrozole (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.18]; stratified one-sided P = .34). An imbalance in the number of patients with unknown survival outcome between the treatment arms (13.3% v 21.2%, respectively) limited interpretation of OS results. With recovered survival data, the median OS was 53.8 (95% CI, 49.8 to 59.2) versus 49.8 months (95% CI, 42.3 to 56.4), respectively (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.12]; one-sided P = .21). OS was not significantly improved with palbociclib plus letrozole compared with placebo plus letrozole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis J. Slamon
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA
| | | | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Oleg N. Lipatov
- SAHI Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary under the MoH of Russia, Ufa, Russia
| | - Janice M. Walshe
- Cancer Trials Ireland, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Miguel Martin
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Richard S. Finn
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rastogi P, O'Shaughnessy J, Martin M, Boyle F, Cortes J, Rugo HS, Goetz MP, Hamilton EP, Huang CS, Senkus E, Tryakin A, Cicin I, Testa L, Neven P, Huober J, Shao Z, Wei R, André V, Munoz M, San Antonio B, Shahir A, Harbeck N, Johnston S. Adjuvant Abemaciclib Plus Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: Results From a Preplanned monarchE Overall Survival Interim Analysis, Including 5-Year Efficacy Outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:987-993. [PMID: 38194616 PMCID: PMC10950161 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Two years of adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) resulted in a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) that persisted beyond the 2-year treatment period in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). Here, we report 5-year efficacy results from a prespecified overall survival (OS) interim analysis. In the intent-to-treat population, with a median follow-up of 54 months, the benefit of abemaciclib was sustained with hazard ratios of 0.680 (95% CI, 0.599 to 0.772) for IDFS and 0.675 (95% CI, 0.588 to 0.774) for DRFS. This persistence of abemaciclib benefit translated to continuous separation of the curves with a deepening in 5-year absolute improvement in IDFS and DRFS rates of 7.6% and 6.7%, respectively, compared with rates of 6% and 5.3% at 4 years and 4.8% and 4.1% at 3 years. With fewer deaths in the abemaciclib plus ET arm compared with the ET-alone arm (208 v 234), statistical significance was not reached for OS. No new safety signals were observed. In conclusion, abemaciclib plus ET continued to reduce the risk of developing invasive and distant disease recurrence beyond the completion of treatment. The increasing absolute improvement at 5 years is consistent with a carryover effect and further supports the use of abemaciclib in patients with high-risk EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Rastogi
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Miguel Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Frances Boyle
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Javier Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- USCF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Alexey Tryakin
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | | | - Laura Testa
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ran Wei
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre München, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tolaney SM, Guarneri V, Seo JH, Cruz J, Abreu MH, Takahashi M, Barrios C, McIntyre K, Wei R, Munoz M, Antonio BS, Liepa AM, Martin M, Johnston SRD, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Harbeck N. Long-term patient-reported outcomes from monarchE: Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy as adjuvant therapy for HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk, early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2024; 199:113555. [PMID: 38244363 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In monarchE, abemaciclib demonstrated a sustained benefit in invasive disease-free survival and a tolerable safety profile at 42-months median follow-up. With no expected disease-related symptoms, therapies in the adjuvant setting should preserve quality of life (QoL). With all patients off abemaciclib, we report updated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for the full 2-year treatment period and follow-up. METHODS Patients completed PROs including FACT-B, FACT-ES, and FACIT-Fatigue at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months during treatment, and 1, 6, and 12 months after treatment discontinuation. Mixed effects repeated measures model estimated changes from baseline within and between arms for QoL scales and individual items. Meaningful changes were prespecified and no statistical testing was performed. Frequencies of responses to items associated with relevant adverse events and treatment bother were summarized. RESULTS At baseline, completion rates for PRO instruments were >96 %. Mean changes from baseline for all QoL scales were numerically similar within and between arms (ie, less than prespecified thresholds). The same was observed for all individual items, except diarrhea. Within abemaciclib arm, meaningful differences for diarrhea were observed at 3 and 6 months (mean increases of 1.19 and 1.03 points on 5-point scale, respectively). During treatment, most patients in both arms (69-78 %) reported being bothered "a little bit" or "not at all" by side effects. Overall, patterns for fatigue were similar between arms. During post-treatment follow-up, PROs in both arms were similar to baseline. CONCLUSION PRO findings confirm a tolerable and reversible toxicity profile for abemaciclib. QoL was preserved with the addition of adjuvant abemaciclib to endocrine therapy, supporting its use in patients with HR+, HER2-, high-risk early breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jae Hong Seo
- Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Josefina Cruz
- Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Miguel Henriques Abreu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Masato Takahashi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Carlos Barrios
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Ran Wei
- Eli Lilly and Company, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Miguel Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Villacampa G, Pascual T, Brasó-Maristany F, Paré L, Martínez-Sáez O, Cortés J, Ciruelos E, Martin M, Conte P, Carey LA, Fernandez A, Harbeck N, Marín-Aguilera M, Vivancos A, Curigliano G, Villagrasa P, Parker JS, Perou CM, Prat A, Tolaney SM. Prognostic value of HER2DX in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer: a comprehensive analysis of 757 patients in the Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast dataset (SCAN-B). ESMO Open 2024; 9:102388. [PMID: 38442452 PMCID: PMC10925926 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The HER2DX risk-score has undergone rigorous validation in prior investigations involving patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. In this study, we present the outcomes of the HER2DX risk-score within the most recent release of the Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast (SCAN-B) HER2+ cohort. This updated examination benefits from a larger patient sample, an extended follow-up duration, and detailed treatment information. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical and RNAseq data from the SCAN-B dataset were retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE81538). Among the 6600 patients, 819 had HER2+ breast cancer, with 757 individuals with research-based HER2DX risk-scores and corresponding survival outcomes. The HER2DX risk-score was evaluated (i) as a continuous variable and (ii) using predefined cut-offs. The primary endpoint for this study was overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models were used to estimate OS and a multistate model with four states was fitted to better characterize patients' follow-up. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 7.5 years (n = 757). The most common systemic therapy was chemotherapy with trastuzumab (82.0%) and most tumors were classified as T1-T2 (97.1%). The HER2DX risk-score as a continuous variable was significantly associated with OS after adjustment for clinical variables and treatment regimen [hazard ratios (HR) per 10-unit increment = 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.51, P < 0.001] as well as within predefined risk groups (high versus low; HR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.36-4.85, P < 0.001). Patients classified as HER2DX high-risk also had higher risk of (i) breast cancer recurrence and (ii) death without previous recurrence. Within the subgroup of HER2+ T1N0 tumors (n = 297), those classified as high-risk demonstrated inferior OS compared to low-risk tumors (7-year OS 77.8% versus 96.8%, P < 0.001). The HER2DX mRNA ERBB2 score was associated with clinical HER2 status (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS In patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer, HER2DX risk-score provides prognostic information beyond clinicopathological variables, including treatment regimen with or without trastuzumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Villacampa
- SOLTI Breast Cancer Research Group, Barcelona; Statistics Unit, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona
| | - T Pascual
- SOLTI Breast Cancer Research Group, Barcelona; Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona
| | - F Brasó-Maristany
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona
| | - L Paré
- Reveal Genomics, Barcelona
| | - O Martínez-Sáez
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona
| | - J Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center, Pangaea Oncology, Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona
| | - E Ciruelos
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid
| | - M Martin
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon (IiSGM), CIBERONC, Geicam, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Conte
- San Camillo Hospital, IRCCS, Venezia Lido, Italy
| | - L A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - A Fernandez
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Ludwig Maximilians University-Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - A Vivancos
- Cancer Genomics Group, VHIO, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Curigliano
- Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - J S Parker
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - C M Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - A Prat
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona; Reveal Genomics, Barcelona
| | - S M Tolaney
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wolff J, Smollich M, Wuelfing P, Mitchell J, Wuerstlein R, Harbeck N, Baumann F. App-Based Lifestyle Intervention (PINK! Coach) in Breast Cancer Patients-A Real-World-Data Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1020. [PMID: 38473378 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Overweight and a lack of physical activity not only increase the risk of recurrence in breast cancer patients but also negatively impact overall and long-term survival, as well as quality of life. The results presented here are the first real-world data from the DiGA PINK! Coach examining the physical activity and BMI of app users. Based on the literature, an approximate weight gain of 10% over 6 months and a decrease in physical activity can be expected. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively investigate the effects of the PINK! Coach in a real-world setting on patients' BMI and physical activity level during acute therapies. such as chemotherapy (CHT) and antihormone therapy (AHT). MATERIAL AND METHODS The PINK! Coach app accompanies breast cancer patients during and after acute therapy to bring about a sustainable lifestyle change. The patients are encouraged to establish a healthy diet, become physically active, and make informed decisions. In this study, real-world data from the app were analyzed over 6 months from baseline to T1 (after 12 weeks) and T2 (after 24 weeks). The patients were under acute therapy or in follow-up care receiving either CHT or AHT. RESULTS The analyzed data indicate that all patients were able to maintain a consistent BMI over 6 months independent of pre-defined subgroups such as AHT, CHT, or BMI subgroups. In the subgroup of patients undergoing AHT, overweight patients were even able to significantly reduce their BMI by 1-score-point over 6 months (p < 0.01). The subgroup of patients undergoing CHT also showed an significant overall reduction in BMI (p = 0.01). All patients were also able to significantly increase their daily step count as well as their physical activity minutes per day. After the first 12 weeks, 41.4% of patients experienced weight gain, 33.4% were able to maintain their weight, and 24.2% reduced their weight. CONCLUSION The presented data provides intriguing insights into the users of the PINK! Coach app and the impact of this usage in regards to BMI and physical activity. At the current time, there are only a few effective concepts for encouraging all breast cancer patients to engage in moderate physical activity and reduce body weight. Often, these concepts apply to selected patient groups. The data presented here include all age groups, tumor stages, and therapies, providing an initial insight into a comprehensive approach. Data over an even longer period would be one way to better contextualize the results in current research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefine Wolff
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Smollich
- Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany
| | - Pia Wuelfing
- Department Clinical Research, PINK! gegen Brustkrebs GmbH, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jack Mitchell
- Department Clinical Research, PINK! gegen Brustkrebs GmbH, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Freerk Baumann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gennari A, Brain E, De Censi A, Nanni O, Wuerstlein R, Frassoldati A, Cortes J, Rossi V, Palleschi M, Alberini JL, Matteucci F, Piccardo A, Sacchetti G, Ilhan H, D'Avanzo F, Ruffilli B, Nardin S, Monti M, Puntoni M, Fontana V, Boni L, Harbeck N. Early prediction of endocrine responsiveness in ER+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Pilot study with 18F-Fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) CT/PET. Ann Oncol 2024:S0923-7534(24)00057-7. [PMID: 38423389 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 18F-FES PET/CT is considered an accurate diagnostic tool to determine whole-body endocrine responsiveness. In the ET-FES trial, we evaluated 18F-FES PET/CT as a predictive tool in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS Eligible patients underwent a 18F-FES PET/CT at baseline. Patients with SUV≥2 received single agent ET until PD; patients with SUV<2 were randomized to single agent ET (Arm A) or chemotherapy (CT) (Arm B). Primary objective was to compare the activity of first line ET versus CT in patients with 18F-FES SUV <2. RESULTS Overall, 147 patients were enrolled; 117 presented with 18F-FES SUV≥2 and received ET; 30 pts with SUV<2 were randomized to ET or CT. After a median follow up of 62.4 months, 104 patients (73.2%) had disease progression and 53 died (37.3%). Median PFS was 12.4 months (95%CI 3.1-59.6) in patients with SUV <2 randomised to Arm A versus 23.0 months (95%CI 7.7-30.0) in Arm B, (HR = 0.71, 95%CI 0.3 - 1.7); median PFS was 18.0 months (95%CI 11.2-23.1) in patients with SUV≥2 treated with ET. Median OS was 28.2 months (95%CI 14.2-NE) in patients with SUV <2 randomized to ET (Arm A) versus 52.8 months (95%CI 16.2-NE) in Arm B (CT). Median OS was not reached in patients with SUV≥2. 60-month OS rate was 41.6% (95%CI 10.4-71.1%) in Arm A, 42.0% (95%CI 14.0-68.2%) in Arm B and 59.6% (95%CI 48.6-69.0%) in patients with SUV≥2. In patients with SUV≥2, 60-months OS rate was 72.6% if treated with aromatase inhibitors versus 40.6% in case of fulvestrant or tamoxifen (p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS The ET-FES trial demonstrated that ER+/HER2- MBC patients are a heterogeneous population, with different levels of endocrine responsiveness based on 18F-FES CT/PET SUV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gennari
- Department of Traslational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy;; Division of Medical Oncology, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy.
| | - E Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie - Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - A De Censi
- Medical Oncology, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy
| | - O Nanni
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - R Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - A Frassoldati
- Clinical Oncology, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - V Rossi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - M Palleschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - J L Alberini
- Nuclear Medicine Department Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, Dijon Cedex, France
| | - F Matteucci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo studio dei tumori (IRST)- Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | - A Piccardo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy
| | - G Sacchetti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine Unit, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - H Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - F D'Avanzo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - B Ruffilli
- Department of Traslational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - S Nardin
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - M Monti
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - M Puntoni
- Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - V Fontana
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa 20900, Italy
| | - L Boni
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa 20900, Italy
| | - N Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Krug D, Banys-Paluchowski M, Brucker SY, Denkert C, Ditsch N, Fasching PA, Haidinger R, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Janni W, Kolberg HC, Loibl S, Lüftner D, van Mackelenbergh M, Radosa JC, Reimer T, Welslau M, Würstlein R, Untch M, Budach W. Radiotherapy statements of the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference-a German expert perspective. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02209-7. [PMID: 38393398 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02209-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarize the radiotherapy-relevant statements of the 18th St. Gallen Breast Cancer Consensus Conference and interpret the findings in light of German guideline recommendations. METHODS Statements and voting results from the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference were collected and analyzed according to their relevance for the radiation oncology community. The voting results were discussed in two hybrid meetings among the authors of this manuscript on March 18 and 19, 2023, in light of the German S3 guideline and the 2023 version of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) guidelines. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION There was a high level of agreement between the radiotherapy-related statements of the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference and the German S3 and AGO guidelines. Discrepancies include the impact of number of lymph node metastases for the indication for postmastectomy radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus L, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Brustzentrum, Campus Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Brustzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Frauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, LMU Klinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medizinische Fakultät, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana-Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
- Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Rüdersdorf/Berlin, Germany
| | - Marion van Mackelenbergh
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Julia C Radosa
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Manfred Welslau
- Onkologie Aschaffenburg, Hämato-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Klinikum Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Aschaffenburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, LMU Klinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pusztai L, Denkert C, O'Shaughnessy J, Cortes J, Dent R, McArthur H, Kümmel S, Bergh J, Park YH, Hui R, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Untch M, Fasching PA, Cardoso F, Zhu Y, Pan W, Tryfonidis K, Schmid P. Event-free survival by residual cancer burden with pembrolizumab in early-stage TNBC: exploratory analysis from KEYNOTE-522. Ann Oncol 2024:S0923-7534(24)00046-2. [PMID: 38369015 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND KEYNOTE-522 demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and event-free survival (EFS) with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Prior studies have shown the prognostic value of the residual cancer burden (RCB) index to quantify the extent of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this preplanned exploratory analysis, we assessed RCB distribution and EFS within RCB categories by treatment group. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 1174 patients with stage T1c/N1-2 or T2-4/N0-2 TNBC were randomized 2 : 1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks given with four cycles of paclitaxel + carboplatin, followed by four cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin + cyclophosphamide. After surgery, patients received pembrolizumab or placebo for nine cycles or until recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints are pCR and EFS. RCB is a prespecified exploratory endpoint. The association between EFS and RCB was assessed using a Cox regression model. RESULTS Pembrolizumab shifted patients into lower RCB categories across the entire spectrum compared with placebo. There were more patients in the pembrolizumab group with RCB-0 (pCR), and fewer patients in the pembrolizumab group with RCB-1, RCB-2, and RCB-3. The corresponding hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for EFS were 0.70 (0.38-1.31), 0.92 (0.39-2.20), 0.52 (0.32-0.82), and 1.24 (0.69-2.23). The most common first EFS events were distant recurrences, with fewer in the pembrolizumab group across all RCB categories. Among patients with RCB-0/1, more than half [21/38 (55.3%)] of all events were central nervous system recurrences, with 13/22 (59.1%) in the pembrolizumab group and 8/16 (50.0%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS Addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in fewer EFS events in the RCB-0, RCB-1, and RCB-2 categories, with the greatest benefit in RCB-2. These findings demonstrate that pembrolizumab not only increased pCR rates, but also improved EFS among most patients who do not have a pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Pusztai
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology Network, Dallas, USA
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Dent
- National Cancer Center Singapore, Duke - National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - H McArthur
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - S Kümmel
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Breast Cancer Centre, Cancer Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Solna, Sweden
| | - Y H Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - R Hui
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital and the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - M Takahashi
- Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - M Untch
- Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin
| | - P A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - F Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Y Zhu
- Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, USA
| | - W Pan
- Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, USA
| | | | - P Schmid
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Harbeck N, Wrobel D, Zaiss M, Terhaag J, Guth D, Distelrath A, Zahn MO, Wuerstlein R, Lorenz A, Bartsch R, Breitenstein U, Schwitter M, Balic M, Jackisch C, Müller V, Rinnerthaler G, Schmidt M, Zaman K, Schinköthe T, Resch A, Valenti R, Lüftner D. Neratinib as Extended Adjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive/HR-Positive Early Breast Cancer Patients in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: Interim Results of the Prospective, Observational ELEANOR Study. Breast Care (Basel) 2024; 19:1-9. [PMID: 38384488 PMCID: PMC10878708 DOI: 10.1159/000533657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prognosis of patients diagnosed with HER2+ early breast cancer (eBC) has substantially improved, but distant recurrences impacting quality of life and survival still occur. One treatment option for extended adjuvant treatment of patients with HER2+/HR+ eBC is neratinib, available in Europe for patients who completed adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy within 1 year. The ELEANOR study is investigating the real-world use of neratinib in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Results from an interim analysis of the first 200 patients observed for ≥3 months are reported. Methods The primary objective of this prospective, multicenter, observational study is to assess patient adherence to neratinib (defined as the percentage of patients taking neratinib on ≥75% prescribed days). Secondary objectives are patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. Results At cut-off (May 2, 2022), a total of 202 patients had been observed for ≥3 months, with neratinib treatment documented for 187 patients (median age: 53.0 years; 67.9% at increased risk of disease recurrence). In total, 151 (80.7%) patients had received prior neoadjuvant treatment; of these, 82 (54.3%) patients achieved a pathologically complete response. Neratinib was initiated at a median 3.6 months after trastuzumab-based treatment, with 36.4% starting at a dose <240 mg/day. Treatment is ongoing for 46.0% of patients, with median treatment duration of 11.2 (interquartile range 0.9-12.0) months. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event (78.6% any grade, 20.3% grade ≥3); pharmacologic prophylaxis was used in 85.6% of patients. Conclusions The pattern of anti-HER2 pretreatment observed reflected the current treatment for HER2+/HR+ eBC in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. These interim results suggest that neratinib as an extended adjuvant is a feasible option after various anti-HER2 pretreatments and that its tolerability can be managed and improved with proactive diarrhea management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Wrobel
- Sozialstiftung Bamberg Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Zaiss
- Praxis fuer Interdisziplinaere Onkologie, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Dagmar Guth
- Gyneco-Oncological Practice Dr. Guth, Plauen, Germany
| | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Lorenz
- Gyneco-Oncological Practice Dr. Lorenz, Hildburghausen, Germany
| | - Rupert Bartsch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Marija Balic
- Divison of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gabriel Rinnerthaler
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Khalil Zaman
- Breast Center, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Anna Resch
- Pierre Fabre Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz & Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Loibl S, André F, Bachelot T, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Burstein HJ, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Dawood S, Del Mastro L, Denkert C, Fallenberg EM, Francis PA, Gamal-Eldin H, Gelmon K, Geyer CE, Gnant M, Guarneri V, Gupta S, Kim SB, Krug D, Martin M, Meattini I, Morrow M, Janni W, Paluch-Shimon S, Partridge A, Poortmans P, Pusztai L, Regan MM, Sparano J, Spanic T, Swain S, Tjulandin S, Toi M, Trapani D, Tutt A, Xu B, Curigliano G, Harbeck N. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:159-182. [PMID: 38101773 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Centre for Haematology and Oncology, Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - F André
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - C H Barrios
- Oncology Department, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group and Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - J Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Bioclinicum, Karolinska Institutet and Breast Cancer Centre, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - M J Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Cancer Centre, Lisbon; Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - L A Carey
- Division of Medical Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - S Dawood
- Department of Oncology, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - L Del Mastro
- Medical Oncology Clinic, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialities, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg
| | - E M Fallenberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - H Gamal-Eldin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - K Gelmon
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - C E Geyer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - M Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - V Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova; Oncology 2 Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - S Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - S B Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - D Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - M Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Universidad Complutense, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Meattini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence; Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'M. Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - M Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - W Janni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Sharett Institute of Oncology Department, Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - A Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - L Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven
| | - M M Regan
- Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - J Sparano
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - T Spanic
- Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - S Swain
- Medicine Department, Georgetown University Medical Centre and MedStar Health, Washington, USA
| | - S Tjulandin
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Toi
- Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center, Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - D Trapani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - A Tutt
- Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - B Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - G Curigliano
- Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Comprehensive Cancer Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Meattini I, Becherini C, Caini S, Coles CE, Cortes J, Curigliano G, de Azambuja E, Isacke CM, Harbeck N, Kaidar-Person O, Marangoni E, Offersen BV, Rugo HS, Salvestrini V, Visani L, Morandi A, Lambertini M, Poortmans P, Livi L. International multidisciplinary consensus on the integration of radiotherapy with new systemic treatments for breast cancer: European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-endorsed recommendations. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e73-e83. [PMID: 38301705 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00534-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Novel systemic therapies for breast cancer are being rapidly implemented into clinical practice. These drugs often have different mechanisms of action and side-effect profiles compared with traditional chemotherapy. Underpinning practice-changing clinical trials focused on the systemic therapies under investigation, thus there are sparse data available on radiotherapy. Integration of these new systemic therapies with radiotherapy is therefore challenging. Given this rapid, transformative change in breast cancer multimodal management, the multidisciplinary community must unite to ensure optimal, safe, and equitable treatment for all patients. The aim of this collaborative group of radiation, clinical, and medical oncologists, basic and translational scientists, and patient advocates was to: scope, synthesise, and summarise the literature on integrating novel drugs with radiotherapy for breast cancer; produce consensus statements on drug-radiotherapy integration, where specific evidence is lacking; and make best-practice recommendations for recording of radiotherapy data and quality assurance for subsequent studies testing novel drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Javier Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center, Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group and Medical Scientia Innovation Research, Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Clare M Isacke
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCMunich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; The School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Elisabetta Marangoni
- Laboratory of Preclinical Investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Morandi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rubio IT, Marotti L, Biganzoli L, Aristei C, Athanasiou A, Campbell C, Cardoso F, Cardoso MJ, Coles CE, Eicher M, Harbeck N, Karakatsanis A, Offersen BV, Pijnappel R, Ponti A, Regitnig P, Santini D, Sardanelli F, Spanic T, Varga Z, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Wengström Y, Wyld L, Curigliano G. EUSOMA quality indicators for non-metastatic breast cancer: An update. Eur J Cancer 2024; 198:113500. [PMID: 38199146 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Quality care in breast cancer is higher if patients are treated in a Breast Center with a dedicated and specialized multidisciplinary team. Quality control is an essential activity to ensure quality care, which has to be based on the monitoring of specific quality indicators. Eusoma has proceeded with the up-dating of the 2017 Quality indicators for non-metastatic breast cancer based on the new diagnostic, locoregional and systemic treatment modalities. METHODS To proceed with the updating, EUSOMA setup a multidisciplinary working group of BC experts and patients' representatives. It is a comprehensive set of QIs for early breast cancer care, which are classified as mandatory, recommended, or observational. For the first time patient reported outcomes (PROMs) have been included. As used in the 2017 EUSOMA QIs, evidence levels were based on the short version of the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. RESULTS This is a set of quality indicators representative for the different steps of the patient pathway in non-metastatic setting, which allow Breast Centres to monitor their performance with referring standards, i.e minimum standard and target. CONCLUSIONS Monitoring these Quality Indicators, within the Eusoma datacentre will allow to have a state of the art picture at European Breast Centres level and the development of challenging research projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Oncology Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Spain.
| | - Lorenza Marotti
- European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists, (EUSOMA), Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Biganzoli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital of Prato - Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Perugia, Italy; Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | | | | | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maria Joao Cardoso
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Faculdade de Medicina, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Charlotte E Coles
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Manuela Eicher
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Karakatsanis
- Department for Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Section for Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology & Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ruud Pijnappel
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Antonio Ponti
- European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists, (EUSOMA), Florence, Italy; CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Peter Regitnig
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Donatella Santini
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Sardanelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Zsuzsanna Varga
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marie Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Dept of surgical oncology, Netherlands cancer institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Dept of surgery Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Wengström
- Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital & Dept of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | - Lynda Wyld
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, United Kingdom
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ziegler C, Sotlar K, Hofmann DM, Kolben T, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R. Use of the Gene Expression Test Prosigna ® in Premenopausal Patients with HR+, HER2- Early Breast Cancer: Correlation of the Results with the Proliferation Marker Ki-67. Breast Care (Basel) 2024; 19:34-42. [PMID: 38384489 PMCID: PMC10878706 DOI: 10.1159/000534634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction In hormone receptor-positive (ER+/PR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early-stage breast cancer (EBC), gene expression tests such as the Prosigna are increasingly used since classic clinicopathological parameters and the proliferation factor Ki-67 often do not allow a definite therapy decision regarding an adjuvant chemotherapy. While the Prosigna test has been validated for postmenopausal patients, few data are available regarding its use in premenopausal patients. The present study compared the Prosigna test with the Ki-67 index in premenopausal patients. Materials and Methods Premenopausal patients with HR+ HER2-, pN0-1, G1-2 EBC were retrospectively enrolled (n = 55). The Prosigna assay was performed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples of surgical resection specimens. Ki-67 was reassessed in original diagnostic core needle biopsy specimens and defined as low, intermediate, or high with the threshold of <10%, 10-24%, ≥25%. Results According to Ki-67, patients were in the low (LR)-, intermediate (IR)-, and high-risk (HR) groups in 40%, 36%, and 24% of the cases. The Prosigna gene signature assay assessed the risk of recurrence as LR for 45% of the patients, IR for 35%, and HR for 20%. The most frequent intrinsic subtypes were luminal A in 73% and luminal B in 24% of the patients. A moderate correlation was found between Prosigna and Ki-67 scores with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.51. In the overall cohort, 47% of the Ki-67-based therapy decision would correspond to those based on the Prosigna score. After exclusion of IR patients, matching of low/low or high/high results was observed in 57% of the cases. Conclusion According to the present study, there is only limited concordance regarding the risk group stratification between Ki-67 and Prosigna-based risk assessment. The relevance and frequency of premenopausal breast cancer emphasizes the need for further evaluation of gene expression analyses in this setting and the correlation with classic clinicopathological parameters regarding therapy decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cordula Ziegler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BreastCenter and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Karl Sotlar
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Maria Hofmann
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
- University Clinics Munich (LMU), Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Kolben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BreastCenter and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BreastCenter and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BreastCenter and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kaidar-Person O, Meattini I, Boersma LJ, Becherini C, Cortes J, Curigliano G, de Azambuja E, Harbeck N, Rugo HS, Del Mastro L, Gennari A, Isacke CM, Vestmø Maraldo M, Marangoni E, Nader Marta G, Mjaaland I, Salvestrini V, Spanic T, Visani L, Morandi A, Lambertini M, Livi L, Coles CE, Poortmans P, Offersen BV. Essential requirements for reporting radiation therapy in breast cancer clinical trials: An international multi-disciplinary consensus endorsed by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO). Radiother Oncol 2023:110060. [PMID: 38122852 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) has advocated the establishment of guidelines to optimise precision radiotherapy (RT) in conjunction with contemporary therapeutics for cancer care. Quality assurance in RT (QART) plays a pivotal role in influencing treatment outcomes. Clinical trials incorporating QART protocols have demonstrated improved survival rates with minimal associated toxicity. Nonetheless, in routine clinical practice, there can be variability in the indications for RT, dosage, fractionation, and treatment planning, leading to uncertainty. In pivotal trials reporting outcomes of systemic therapy for breast cancer, there is limited information available regarding RT, and the potential interaction between modern systemic therapy and RT remains largely uncharted. This article is grounded in a consensus recommendation endorsed by ESTRO, formulated by international breast cancer experts. The consensus was reached through a modified Delphi process and was presented at an international meeting convened in Florence, Italy, in June 2023. These recommendations are regarded as both optimal and essential standards, with the latter aiming to define the minimum requirements. A template for a case report form (CRF) has been devised, which can be utilised by all clinical breast cancer trials involving RT. Optimal requirements include adherence to predefined RT planning protocols and centralised QART. Essential requirements aim to reduce variations and deviations from the guidelines in RT, even when RT is not the primary focus of the trial. These recommendations underscore the significance of implementing these practices in both clinical trials and daily clinical routines to generate high-quality data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; The School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Javier Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group & Medical Scientia Innovation Research (MedSIR), Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato - Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCMunich, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Medicine and Winterhof Family Professor of Breast Oncology, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Department of Translational Medicine, University Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Clare M Isacke
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Maja Vestmø Maraldo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Center of Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Elisabetta Marangoni
- Laboratory of Preclinical Investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Ingvil Mjaaland
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Tanja Spanic
- Europa Donna - The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy; Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Luca Visani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Morandi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of radiation oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Harbeck N, Kates R, Schinköthe T, Schumacher J, Wuerstlein R, Degenhardt T, Lüftner D, Räth P, Hoffmann O, Lorenz R, Decker T, Reinisch M, Göhler T, Staib P, Gluz O, Fasching PA, Schmidt M. Favorable impact of therapy management by an interactive eHealth system on severe adverse events in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated by palbociclib and endocrine therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 121:102631. [PMID: 37862832 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral cancer medications offer advantages but also pose challenges for therapy management and adherence. An eHealth-based platform such as CANKADO can help to support therapy management by probing the patient's quality of life (QoL) continuously throughout the course of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS AGO-B WSG PreCycle (NCT03220178) is a multicenter, randomized phase IV intergroup trial evaluating the impact of eHealth-based Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) assessment on QoL in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR + )/HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy. Patients were randomized (2:1) to CANKADO-active arm (supported by CANKADO PRO-React) or CANKADO-inform arm (drug intake documentation only) This exploratory analysis reports the impact of CANKADO PRO-React on safety. Time to first serious adverse event (SAE) was estimated taking competing risks into account. RESULTS While distributions of adverse events (AEs) were similar by arm overall, patients in the CANKADO-active arm had a favorable hazard ratio of 0.67 (95%CI 0.46-0.97; p = 0.04) for time to first SAE and were significantly less likely overall to suffer an SAE than patients in the inform arm. At 24 months, 22.9% [17.9%-27.8%] of patients in CANKADO-active had suffered an SAE vs. 30.3% [22.6%-38.0%] in CANKADO-inform. AE-related dose reductions affected approximately 20% of patients (CANKADO-active: 18.2%, CANKADO-inform: 21.1%). CONCLUSION Exploratory safety analysis of PreCycle demonstrates for the first time in a randomized prospective trial that interactive autonomous eHealth-based support has a substantial favorable impact on the risk of SAEs and mitigates their severity for patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer on oral tumor therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
| | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Timo Schinköthe
- CANKADO GmbH, Ottobrunn, Germany; Research Center Smart Digital Health, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tom Degenhardt
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Hausarztpraxis Wolfratshausen, Wolfratshausen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische, Schweiz Buckow, Germany; Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf and Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Germany
| | | | | | - Ralf Lorenz
- Studien GbR Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Thomas Decker
- Onkologie Ravensburg, Hematology / Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Mattea Reinisch
- Breast Center, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Peter Staib
- St.-Antonius Hospital gGmbH, Clinic for Hematology and Oncology, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schmid P, Lipatov O, Im SA, Goncalves A, Muñoz-Couselo E, Lee KS, Tamura K, Testa L, Witzel I, Ohtani S, Turner N, Zambelli S, Harbeck N, Andre F, Dent R, Mejia JA, Zhou X, Haiderali A, Nguyen AM, Cortes J, Winer EP. Impact of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy on health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: results from the phase 3 randomised KEYNOTE-119 study. Eur J Cancer 2023; 195:113393. [PMID: 37976633 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In KEYNOTE-119 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02555657), overall survival (primary end-point) was similar between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), although the pembrolizumab treatment effect increased with tumour PD-L1 expression. We report results of prespecified health-related quality of life (HRQoL) analyses from KEYNOTE-119. METHODS Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W intravenously for up to 35 cycles or treatment of physician's choice per local/country guidelines. Prespecified exploratory end-points were the change from baseline in HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23) and to characterise utilities (EQ-5D-3L). Time to deterioration (TTD) was the time from start of treatment to first onset of a ≥10-point worsening from baseline. RESULTS HRQoL analyses included 187 patients with tumour PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥10. Changes from baseline at 6 weeks (primary analysis time point) were directionally better with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (between-group difference in least-squares mean scores of 4.21 [95% CI, -1.38 to 9.80]), QLQ-C30 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, social), QLQ-C30 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, dyspnoea, appetite loss), and QLQ-BR23 symptom scales/items (systemic therapy side-effects, upset by hair loss). Median TTD was directionally longer for pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for QLQ-C30 QHS/QoL (4.3 versus 1.7 months), QLQ-C30 nausea/vomiting (7.7 versus 4.8 months), and QLQ-BR23 systemic therapy side-effects (6.1 versus 3.4 months). Minimal treatment differences were observed for other HRQoL end-points. CONCLUSIONS HRQoL results were consistent with clinical outcomes and appeared to be driven by results for patients with tumour PD-L1 CPS ≥10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schmid
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
| | - Oleg Lipatov
- Medical Oncology, Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Marseille, France
| | - Eva Muñoz-Couselo
- International Breast Cancer Center, Quiron Group, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Keun Seok Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Kenji Tamura
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Laura Testa
- Breast Medical Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Estado do São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Shoichiro Ohtani
- Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Nicholas Turner
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Stefania Zambelli
- Medical Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabrice Andre
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Rebecca Dent
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jaime A Mejia
- Late Stage Drug Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Xuan Zhou
- Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Amin Haiderali
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Allison Martin Nguyen
- Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences - Epidemiology, Patient-Centered Endpoints & Strategy, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Javier Cortes
- Department of Medicine, International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain, & Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eric P Winer
- Division of Breast Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Garrido C, Manoogian M, Ghambire D, Lucas S, Karnoub M, Olson MT, Hicks DG, Tozbikian G, Prat A, Ueno NT, Modi S, Feng W, Pugh J, Hsu C, Tsurutani J, Cameron D, Harbeck N, Fang Q, Khambata-Ford S, Liu X, Inge LJ, Vitazka P. Analytical and clinical validation of PATHWAY Anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) antibody to assess HER2-low status for trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment in breast cancer. Virchows Arch 2023:10.1007/s00428-023-03671-x. [PMID: 37857998 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03671-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
In DESTINY-Breast04 (DB-04), safety and efficacy of HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in previously treated HER2-low unresectable/metastatic breast cancer were established. This manuscript describes the analytical validation of PATHWAY Anti-HER2/neu (4B5) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody (PATHWAY HER2 (4B5)) to assess HER2-low status and its clinical performance in DB-04. Preanalytical processing and tissue staining parameters were evaluated to determine their impact on HER2 scoring. The recommended antibody staining procedure provided the optimal tumor staining, and deviations in cell conditioning and/or antibody incubation times resulted in unacceptable negative control staining and/or HER2-low status changes. Comparisons between antibody lots, kit lots, instruments, and day-to-day runs showed overall percent agreements (OPAs) exceeding 97.9%. Inter-laboratory reproducibility showed OPAs of ≥97.4% for all study endpoints. PATHWAY HER2 (4B5) was utilized in DB-04 for patient selection using 1340 tumor samples (59.0% metastatic, 40.7% primary, (0.3% missing data); 74.3% biopsy, 25.7% resection/excisions). Overall, 77.6% (823/1060) of samples were HER2-low by both central and local testing, with the level of concordance differing by sample region of origin and collection date. In DB-04, the efficacy of T-DXd over chemotherapy of physician's choice was consistent, regardless of the characteristics of the sample used (primary or metastatic, archival, or newly collected, biopsy or excision/resection). These results demonstrate that PATHWAY HER2 (4B5) is precise and reproducible for scoring HER2-low status and can be used with multiple breast cancer sample types for reliably identifying patients whose tumors have HER2-low expression and are likely to derive clinical benefit from T-DXd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David G Hicks
- The University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| | - Gary Tozbikian
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Naoto T Ueno
- University of Hawai'i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Shanu Modi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Ching Hsu
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA
| | - Junji Tsurutani
- The Innovative Center of Translational Research and Clinical Science for Cancer Therapy, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - David Cameron
- University of Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Depart of OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Qijun Fang
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Xuemin Liu
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Patrik Vitazka
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA
- Teva Pharmaceuticals, Parsippany, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Forster M, Wuerstlein R, Koenig A, Stefan A, Wiegershausen E, Batz F, Trillsch F, Mahner S, Harbeck N, Chelariu-Raicu A. Health-related quality of life and patient-centred outcomes with COVID-19 vaccination in patients with breast cancer and gynaecological malignancies. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1217805. [PMID: 37901314 PMCID: PMC10602875 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1217805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Safety and tolerability of COVID-19 vaccines were demonstrated by several clinical trials which led to the first FDA/EMA approvals in 2021. Because of mass immunizations, most social restrictions were waived with effects on quality of life. Therefore, our a-priori hypothesis was that COVID-19 vaccination impacted the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in patients with breast and gynecological cancer. Methods From March 15th until August 11th, 2022, fully vaccinated patients with breast and gynecological cancer treated in the oncological outpatient clinics of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany filled out a vaccine related QoL survey. Patients were asked about demographics (age, comorbidities), clinical parameters related to previous COVID-19 infections, and HR-QoL related parameters (living situation, responsibilities in everyday life). Subsequently, a questionnaire with 12 items was designed using a 5-point Likert scale (0 - strongly disagree/4 - strongly agree), covering the aspects health and therapy, social environment, participation in everyday life and overall assessment. Results By August 11th, 2022, 108 out of 114 (94.7%) patients had received at least three doses of COVID-19 vaccine and six patients at least two doses. More than half of the surveyed patients were >55y (52.6%; mean: 55.1y, range 29-86y). Patients with breast cancer (n= 83) had early (59.0%) or metastatic cancer (41.0%); gynecological cancers (n=31) also included metastatic (54.8%) and non-metastatic cancer (45.2%). 83.3% of the patients stated that COVID-19 vaccination had a positive impact on their HR-QoL. Furthermore, 29 patients (25.4%) had undergone a COVID-19 infection. These patients reported self-limiting symptoms for a median duration of 5.9 days and no hospital admissions were registered. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that vaccination against COVID-19 was positively associated with HR-QoL in patients with breast and gynecological cancer. Furthermore, vaccinated patients who underwent COVID-19 disease experienced only self-limiting symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anca Chelariu-Raicu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cardoso F, Rihani J, Harmer V, Harbeck N, Casas A, Rugo HS, Fasching PA, Moore A, de Courcy J, Pathak P, Haftchenary S, Aubel D, Schumacher-Wulf E. Quality of Life and Treatment-Related Side Effects in Patients With HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer: Findings From a Multicountry Survey. Oncologist 2023; 28:856-865. [PMID: 37523663 PMCID: PMC10546820 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of life (QOL) is a critical factor in decision-making for advanced breast cancer (ABC). There is a need to improve how QOL and treatment-related side effects (SEs) that impact it are clinically assessed. We examined healthcare professionals' (HCPs') and patients' perspectives on the importance of QOL discussions and the impact of SEs on QOL in clinical settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was conducted (7/2020-5/2021) among oncologists, nurses, and patients with HR+/HER2- ABC in 7 countries. RESULTS The survey was completed by 502 HCPs and 467 patients. Overall, 88% of oncologists and 49% of patients recalled QOL discussions at follow-up. In the first- through fourth-line (1L, 2L, 3L, and 4L) settings, respectively, 48%, 57%, 79%, and 85% of oncologists reported QOL was very important; 73% and 45% of patients receiving 1L and 2L treatment and 40% receiving 3L+ treatment indicated QOL was important. Patients reported that insomnia, anxiety, back pain, fatigue, diarrhea, hot flashes, low sexual interest, and loss of appetite had a moderate/severe impact on QOL. Of patients experiencing certain SEs, ≥64% did not discuss them with HCPs until there was a moderate/severe impact on QOL. In patients receiving a CDK4/6 inhibitor, SEs, including insomnia, diarrhea, back pain, and fatigue, had a moderate/severe impact on QOL. CONCLUSIONS This survey discovered disconnects between HCPs and patients with ABC on the importance of QOL discussions and the impact of SEs on QOL. These data support the use of ABC-specific QOL questionnaires that closely monitor SEs impacting QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Cardoso
- Department of Oncology, Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Julie Rihani
- Department of Oncology, Independent Patient Advocate, Amman, Jordan
| | - Victoria Harmer
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ana Casas
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Department of Oncology, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Adam Moore
- Department of Oncology, Adelphi Real World, Cheshire, UK
| | | | - Purnima Pathak
- Department of Oncology, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Sina Haftchenary
- Department of Oncology, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Dawn Aubel
- Department of Oncology, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Eva Schumacher-Wulf
- Department of Oncology, Mamma Mia! Breast Cancer Magazine, Kronberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wolff J, Wuelfing P, Koenig A, Ehrl B, Damsch J, Smollich M, Baumann FT, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R. App-Based Lifestyle Coaching (PINK!) Accompanying Breast Cancer Patients and Survivors to Reduce Psychological Distress and Fatigue and Improve Physical Activity: A Feasibility Pilot Study. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:354-365. [PMID: 37901047 PMCID: PMC10601684 DOI: 10.1159/000531495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of using an app-based certified medical product named PINK! on breast cancer patients and survivors. The objectives were to measure psychological distress, physical activity, and therapy-related fatigue of patients using PINK! to identify trends and develop a study design for a subsequent multicentric proof of efficacy RCT. Materials and Methods PINK! offers individualized, evidence-based therapy and side-effect management, mindfulness-based stress reduction, nutritional and psychological education, physical activity tracking, and motivational exercises to implement lifestyle changes sustainably in daily routine. A prospective, intraindividual RCT was performed with n = 60 patients in 2021 at Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich. Patients with BC were included independent of the stage of diseases. The intervention group got access to PINK! over 12 weeks. Control group served as a waiting-list comparison to "standard of care." Results Primary efficacy variable analysis revealed a relative average decrease of 32.9% in psychological distress, which corresponds to a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.001) within 12 weeks compared to the control group. Linear regressions within usage groups showed a correlation of high app usage and a reduction of psychological distress. Fatigue data presented a statistically significant antifatigue efficacy (p < 0.001) and physical activity increased by 63.9%. Conclusion App-based supportive care offers a promising, low-threshold, and cost-efficient opportunity to improve psychological well-being, quality of life, fatigue, and physical activity. More research is needed to implement eHealth solutions in clinical cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefine Wolff
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Pia Wuelfing
- PINK! gegen Brustkrebs GmbH, Department Clinical Research, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Koenig
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Brigitte Ehrl
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Jana Damsch
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Smollich
- Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen JW, Jacot W, Cortés J, Krop IE, Dent S, Harbeck N, De Laurentiis M, Diéras V, Im Y, Stout TJ, Schimmoller F, Savage HM, Hutchinson KE, Wilson TR. ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with taselisib and fulvestrant: genomic landscape and associated clinical outcomes. Mol Oncol 2023; 17:2000-2016. [PMID: 36892268 PMCID: PMC10552898 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Taselisib is a potent β-sparing phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor that, with endocrine therapy, improves outcomes in phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA)-mutated (PIK3CAmut) advanced breast cancer. To understand alterations associated with response to PI3K inhibition, we analysed circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) from participants enrolled in the SANDPIPER trial. Participants were designated as either PIK3CAmut or PIK3CA no mutation was detected (NMD) per baseline ctDNA. The top mutated genes and tumour fraction estimates identified were analysed for their association with outcomes. In participants with PIK3CAmut ctDNA treated with taselisib + fulvestrant, tumour protein p53 (TP53; encoding p53) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) alterations were associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) compared to participants with NMD in these genes. Conversely, participants with PIK3CAmut ctDNA harbouring a neurofibromin 1 (NF1) alteration or high baseline tumour fraction estimate experienced improved PFS upon treatment with taselisib + fulvestrant compared to placebo + fulvestrant. Broadly, alterations in oestrogen receptor (ER), PI3K and p53 pathway genes were associated with resistance to taselisib + fulvestrant in participants with PIK3CAmut ctDNA. Altogether, we demonstrated the impact of genomic (co-)alterations on outcomes with one of the largest clinico-genomic datasets of ER+, HER2-, PIK3CAmut breast cancer patients treated with a PI3K inhibitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica W. Chen
- Oncology Biomarker DevelopmentGenentech, Inc.South San FranciscoCAUSA
| | - William Jacot
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM) Val d'AurelleMontpellier University, INSERM U1194France
| | - Javier Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea OncologyQuironsalud GroupMadridSpain
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea OncologyQuironsalud GroupBarcelonaSpain
- Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of MedicineUniversidad Europea de MadridMadridSpain
| | | | - Susan Dent
- Duke Cancer InstituteDuke UniversityDurhamNCUSA
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department Gynecology and Obstetrics and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) MunichLudwig‐Maximilians‐University (LMU) HospitalMunichGermany
| | | | | | - Young‐Hyuck Im
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
| | - Thomas J. Stout
- Product Development OncologyGenentech, Inc.South San FranciscoCAUSA
| | | | - Heidi M. Savage
- Oncology Biomarker DevelopmentGenentech, Inc.South San FranciscoCAUSA
| | | | - Timothy R. Wilson
- Oncology Biomarker DevelopmentGenentech, Inc.South San FranciscoCAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Debes AM, Koenig A, Strobach D, Schinkoethe T, Forster M, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R. Biologically Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Breast Cancer Patients and Possible Drug-Drug Interactions. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:327-335. [PMID: 37901050 PMCID: PMC10601661 DOI: 10.1159/000531346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Biologically based complementary and alternative medicine (BB-CAM) is gaining importance. Cancer patients in particular are at risk of interactions between the prescribed medications (intravenous or oral anticancer therapy, concomitant medication, medication for pre-existing illnesses) and BB-CAM. This investigation aims to identify potentially clinically relevant interactions between both BB-CAM and conventional medicine and two BB-CAM products in breast cancer patients (n = 47). Methods From March 2020 to January 2021, consecutive breast cancer patients (n = 47) completed a questionnaire about their medication and BB-CAM intake at the beginning of a new intravenous or oral tumor therapy (time point 1) and again after 10 to 12 weeks (time point 2) at the LMU Breast Center in Munich. The collective was divided into two subgroups based on the time after initial diagnosis; a cutoff of 6 months was used. The survey was available through an eHealth application called CANKADO as electronic patient-reported outcome only. Lexicomp® and AiD Klinik® databases were used for evaluating potentially clinically relevant interactions. As part of routine care, the collected data were evaluated and cross-checked in interdisciplinary cooperation with the University Hospital Pharmacy LMU. Results 43 of the 47 included breast cancer patients (91%) used BB-CAM at some point during their treatment period. We found a significant increase from time point 1 (n = 27) to time point 2 (n = 40) (p = 0.004). Moreover, in the subgroup of newly diagnosed patients, the number significant rose from 17 at time point 1 to 28 at time point 2 (p = 0.007). Overall, we found potentially clinically relevant interactions in 30 of 43 patients (70%). Sixty interactions were detected at both times of investigations. Twenty-three different kinds of BB-CAM-to-BB-CAM (time point 1 [n = 12], time point 2 [n = 11]) or conventional medicine-to-BB-CAM interactions (time point 1 [n = 15], time point 2 [n = 22]) were discovered. Importantly, there was not a single interaction between BB-CAM and an anticancer drug. Conclusion Breast cancer patients frequently use BB-CAM. Interactions were detected at both time points of investigation (time point 1 [n = 27], time point 2 [n = 33]). Interactions were particularly evident between BB-CAM substances as well as between BB-CAM and the patients' medication for pre-existing illnesses. Although no interaction between BB-CAM and an anticancer therapy was found, the use of BB-CAM should be evaluated at the beginning and regularly during therapy in view of the substantial number of interactions detected and the large number of upcoming targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Marie Debes
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Koenig
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Dorothea Strobach
- Hospital Pharmacy and Doctoral Program Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Timo Schinkoethe
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- CANKADO Service GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marie Forster
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Herzog C, Jones A, Evans I, Zikan M, Cibula D, Harbeck N, Colombo N, Rådestad AF, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Pashayan N, Widschwendter M. DNA methylation at quantitative trait loci (mQTLs) varies with cell type and nonheritable factors and may improve breast cancer risk assessment. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023; 7:99. [PMID: 37758816 PMCID: PMC10533818 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00452-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
To individualise breast cancer (BC) prevention, markers to follow a person's changing environment and health extending beyond static genetic risk scores are required. Here, we analysed cervical and breast DNA methylation (n = 1848) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (n = 1442) and demonstrate that a linear combination of methylation levels at 104 BC-associated methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTL) CpGs, termed the WID™-qtBC index, can identify women with breast cancer in hormone-sensitive tissues (AUC = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.65-0.77] in cervical samples). Women in the highest combined risk group (high polygenic risk score and WID™-qtBC) had a 9.6-fold increased risk for BC [95% CI: 4.7-21] compared to the low-risk group and tended to present at more advanced stages. Importantly, the WID™-qtBC is influenced by non-genetic BC risk factors, including age and body mass index, and can be modified by a preventive pharmacological intervention, indicating an interaction between genome and environment recorded at the level of the epigenome. Our findings indicate that methylation levels at mQTLs in relevant surrogate tissues could enable integration of heritable and non-heritable factors for improved disease risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Herzog
- European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening (EUTOPS) Institute, Milser Str. 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Research Institute for Biomedical Aging Research, Universität Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Allison Jones
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Medical School Building, Room 340, 74 Huntley Street, WC1E 6AU, London, UK
| | - Iona Evans
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Medical School Building, Room 340, 74 Huntley Street, WC1E 6AU, London, UK
| | - Michal Zikan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and Hospital Na Bulovce, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - David Cibula
- Gynaecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
- University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening (EUTOPS) Institute, Milser Str. 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
- Research Institute for Biomedical Aging Research, Universität Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Medical School Building, Room 340, 74 Huntley Street, WC1E 6AU, London, UK.
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Litton JK, Regan MM, Pusztai L, Rugo HS, Tolaney SM, Garrett-Mayer E, Amiri-Kordestani L, Basho RK, Best AF, Boileau JF, Denkert C, Foster JC, Harbeck N, Jacene HA, King TA, Mason G, O'Sullivan CC, Prowell TM, Richardson AL, Sepulveda KA, Smith ML, Tjoe JA, Turashvili G, Woodward WA, Butler LP, Schwartz EI, Korde LA. Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: NeoSTEEP. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4433-4442. [PMID: 37433103 PMCID: PMC10522109 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) criteria, established in 2007 and updated in 2021 (STEEP 2.0), provide standardized definitions of adjuvant breast cancer (BC) end points. STEEP 2.0 identified a need to separately address end points for neoadjuvant clinical trials. The multidisciplinary NeoSTEEP working group of experts was convened to critically evaluate and align neoadjuvant BC trial end points. METHODS The NeoSTEEP working group concentrated on neoadjuvant systemic therapy end points in clinical trials with efficacy outcomes-both pathologic and time-to-event survival end points-particularly for registrational intent. Special considerations for subtypes and therapeutic approaches, imaging, nodal staging at surgery, bilateral and multifocal diseases, correlative tissue collection, and US Food and Drug Administration regulatory considerations were contemplated. RESULTS The working group recommends a preferred definition of pathologic complete response (pCR) as the absence of residual invasive cancer in the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes (ypT0/Tis ypN0 per AJCC staging). Residual cancer burden should be a secondary end point to facilitate future assessment of its utility. Alternative end points are needed for hormone receptor-positive disease. Time-to-event survival end point definitions should pay particular attention to the measurement starting point. Trials should include end points originating at random assignment (event-free survival and overall survival) to capture presurgery progression and deaths as events. Secondary end points adapted from STEEP 2.0, which are defined from starting at curative-intent surgery, may also be appropriate. Specification and standardization of biopsy protocols, imaging, and pathologic nodal evaluation are also crucial. CONCLUSION End points in addition to pCR should be selected on the basis of clinical and biologic aspects of the tumor and the therapeutic agent investigated. Consistent prespecified definitions and interventions are paramount for clinically meaningful trial results and cross-trial comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K. Litton
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Meredith M. Regan
- Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Breast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sara M. Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Reva K. Basho
- The Lawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ana F. Best
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Jared C. Foster
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- The Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tari A. King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ginny Mason
- The Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Broadway, VA
| | | | - Tatiana M. Prowell
- US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
- Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | - Judy A. Tjoe
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Novant Health, Greensboro, NC
| | - Gulisa Turashvili
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Wendy A. Woodward
- Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Elena I. Schwartz
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Larissa A. Korde
- Cancer Therapy and Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Klier K, Patel YJ, Schinköthe T, Harbeck N, Schmidt A. Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Diagnostic App for the Oncological Routine: Development Study. JMIR Cardio 2023; 7:e48096. [PMID: 37695655 PMCID: PMC10520775 DOI: 10.2196/48096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous antineoplastic drugs such as chemotherapeutics have cardiotoxic side effects and can lead to long QT syndrome (LQTS). When diagnosed and treated in time, the potentially fatal outcomes of LQTS can be prevented. Therefore, regular electrocardiogram (ECG) assessments are critical to ensure patient safety. However, these assessments are associated with patient discomfort and require timely support of the attending oncologist by a cardiologist. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine whether this approach can be made more efficient and comfortable by a smartphone app (QTc Tracker), supporting single-lead ECG records on site and transferring to a tele-cardiologist for an immediate diagnosis. METHODS To evaluate the QTc Tracker, it was implemented in 54 cancer centers in Germany. In total, 266 corrected QT interval (QTc) diagnoses of 122 patients were recorded. Moreover, a questionnaire on routine ECG workflow, turnaround time, and satisfaction (1=best, 6=worst) was answered by the centers before and after the implementation of the QTc Tracker. RESULTS Compared to the routine ECG workflow, the QTc Tracker enabled a substantial turnaround time reduction of 98% (mean 2.67, 95% CI 1.72-2.67 h) and even further time efficiency in combination with a cardiologic on-call service (mean 12.10, 95% CI 5.67-18.67 min). Additionally, nurses and patients reported higher satisfaction when using the QTc Tracker. In particular, patients' satisfaction sharply improved from 2.59 (95% CI 2.41-2.88) for the routine ECG workflow to 1.25 (95% CI 0.99-1.51) for the QTc Tracker workflow. CONCLUSIONS These results reveal a significant improvement regarding reduced turnaround time and increased user satisfaction. Best patient care might be guaranteed as the exposure of patients with an uncontrolled risk of QTc prolongations can be avoided by using the fast and easy QTc Tracker. In particular, as regular side-effect monitoring, the QTc Tracker app promises more convenience for patients and their physicians. Finally, future studies are needed to empirically test the usability and validity of such mobile ECG assessment methods. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04055493; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04055493.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Klier
- Institute of Sport Science, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany
| | | | - Timo Schinköthe
- CANKADO GmbH, Ottobrunn, Germany
- Research Center for Smart Digital Health, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Annette Schmidt
- Institute of Sport Science, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany
- Research Center for Smart Digital Health, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Becherini C, Visani L, Caini S, Bhattacharya IS, Kirby AM, Nader Marta G, Morgan G, Salvestrini V, Coles CE, Cortes J, Curigliano G, de Azambuja E, Harbeck N, Isacke CM, Kaidar-Person O, Marangoni E, Offersen B, Rugo HS, Morandi A, Lambertini M, Poortmans P, Livi L, Meattini I. Safety profile of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors with concurrent radiation therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 119:102586. [PMID: 37336117 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have become the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer, improving survival outcomes compared to endocrine therapy alone. Abemaciclib and ribociclib, in combination with endocrine therapy, have demonstrated significant benefits in invasive disease-free survival for high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients. Each CDK4/6i-palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib-exhibits distinct toxicity profiles. Radiation therapy (RT) can be delivered with a palliative or ablative intent, particularly using stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. However, pivotal randomized trials lack information on concomitant CDK4/6i and RT, and existing preclinical and clinical data on the potential combined toxicities are limited and conflicting. As part of a broader effort to establish international consensus recommendations for integrating RT and targeted agents in breast cancer treatment, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety profile of combining CDK4/6i with palliative and ablative RT in both metastatic and early breast cancer settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlotta Becherini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | | | - Anna M Kirby
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Gilberto Morgan
- Division of Medical and Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Javier Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group & Medical Scientia Innovation Research (MedSIR), Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato - Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCMunich, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Clare M Isacke
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproductive (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabetta Marangoni
- Laboratory of Preclinical Investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Birgitte Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hope S Rugo
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrea Morandi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Untch M, Banys-Paluchowski M, Brucker SY, Budach W, Denkert C, Ditsch N, Fasching PA, Haidinger R, Heil J, Jackisch C, Janni W, Kolberg HC, Krug D, Loibl S, Lüftner D, van Mackelenbergh M, Radosa JC, Reimer T, Welslau M, Würstlein R, Harbeck N, Huober J. Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: The 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference against the Background of Current German Treatment Recommendations. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:1102-1116. [PMID: 37706057 PMCID: PMC10497346 DOI: 10.1055/a-2121-2495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
This year's 18th St. Gallen (SG) consensus conference on the treatment of early breast cancer (SGBCC: St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference) focused on practice-oriented questions. The individual situation and risk-benefit assessment were discussed in great detail. As in previous years, a German working group of leading breast cancer experts presented the results of the international SGBCC 2023 against the background of German treatment recommendations - especially the updated treatment recommendations of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie e. V. (AGO) - for everyday clinical practice in Germany. The German treatment recommendations of AGO are based on the current evidence. The comparison with the clinical approach in Germany has proven useful, as the SGBCC panel consists of experts from different countries and disciplines. That is why country-specific characteristics can be incorporated into the SGBCC recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Brustzentrum, Campus Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Brustzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Frauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Jörg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medizinische Fakultät Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana-Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie (Radioonkologie), Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
- Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Marion van Mackelenbergh
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Julia C. Radosa
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Manfred Welslau
- Onkologie Aschaffenburg, Hämato-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis am Klinikum Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Aschaffenburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, LMU Klinikum München, München, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, LMU Klinikum München, München, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Salvestrini V, Kim K, Caini S, Alkner S, Ekholm M, Skyttä T, Becherini C, Coles CE, Kaidar-Person O, Offersen B, de Azambuja E, Visani L, Cortes J, Harbeck N, Rugo HS, Isacke CM, Marangoni E, Morandi A, Lambertini M, Poortmans P, Livi L, Meattini I. Safety profile of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) with concurrent radiation therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109805. [PMID: 37437610 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In recent years, the treatment landscape for breast cancer has undergone significant advancements, with the introduction of several new anticancer agents. One such agent is trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), an antibody drug conjugate that has shown improved outcomes in both early and advanced breast cancer. However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive evidence regarding the safety profile of combining T-DM1 with radiation therapy (RT). In this study, we aim to provide a summary of the available data on the safety of combining RT with T-DM1 in both early and metastatic breast cancer settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis project is part of the consensus recommendations by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Guidelines Committee on integrating RT with targeted treatments for breast cancer. A thorough literature search was conducted using the PUBMED/MedLine, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify original studies focusing on the safety profile of combining T-DM1 with RT. RESULTS After applying eligibility criteria, nine articles were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled data from these studies revealed a high incidence of grade 3 + radionecrosis (17%), while the rates of grade 3 + radiation-related pneumonitis (<1%) and skin toxicity (1%) were found to be very low. CONCLUSION Although there is some concern regarding a slight increase in pneumonitis when combining T-DM1 with postoperative RT, the safety profile of this combination was deemed acceptable for locoregional treatment in non-metastatic breast cancer. However, caution is advised when irradiating intracranial sites concurrently with T-DM1. There is a pressing need for international consensus guidelines regarding the safety considerations of combining T-DM1 and RT for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Sara Alkner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Lund University Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maria Ekholm
- Department of Oncology, Region Jönköping County, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - Carlotta Becherini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproductive (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Birgitte Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luca Visani
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Javier Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group & Medical Scientia Innovation Research (MedSIR), Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCMunich, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Hope S Rugo
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Clare M Isacke
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Elisabetta Marangoni
- Laboratory of Preclinical Investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Morandi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kolberg HC, Hartkopf AD, Fehm TN, Welslau M, Müller V, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Janni W, Witzel I, Thomssen C, Beierlein M, Belleville E, Untch M, Thill M, Tesch H, Ditsch N, Lux MP, Aktas B, Banys-Paluchowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Wöckel A, Harbeck N, Stickeler E, Bartsch R, Schneeweiss A, Ettl J, Krug D, Taran FA, Lüftner D, Würstlein R. Update Breast Cancer 2023 Part 3 - Expert Opinions of Early Stage Breast Cancer Therapies. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:1117-1126. [PMID: 37706055 PMCID: PMC10497347 DOI: 10.1055/a-2143-8125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The St. Gallen (SG) International Breast Cancer Conference is held every two years, previously in St. Gallen and now in Vienna. This year (2023) marks the eighteenth edition of this conference, which focuses on the treatment of patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. A panel discussion will be held at the end of this four-day event, during which a panel of experts will give their opinions on current controversial issues relating to the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients. To this end, questions are generally formulated in such a way that clinically realistic cases are presented - often including poignant hypothetical modifications. This review reports on the outcome of these discussions and summarises the data associated with individual questions raised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Klinik für Gynäkologie, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Milena Beierlein
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Rupert Bartsch
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Klinikum Kempten, Klinikverbund Allgäu, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Gynäkologie, Kempten, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Kiel, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
- Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schindler F, Schinkoethe T, Mahner S, Kolben T, Wuerstlein R, Culmsee C, Harbeck N, Eggersmann TK. Clinical relevance of potential self-medication drug interactions in antineoplastic and immune-modulating therapy among online pharmacy customers. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2023; 14:20420986231188845. [PMID: 37636837 PMCID: PMC10460262 DOI: 10.1177/20420986231188845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Modern oral antineoplastic and immune-modulating drugs offer an array of therapeutic advantages, and yet pose challenges in daily use for patients, physicians and pharmacists. In contrast to intravenous administration, these drugs are not subject to direct medical control. Recently, we have seen a huge rise in sales of non-prescription over-the-counter (OTC) medicines via the internet without any advice from a healthcare professional. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate whether the risk of known potential drug-drug interactions between modern oral antineoplastic and immune-modulating drugs and OTC drugs differs between sales in traditional community pharmacies versus online pharmacies. Design Real-life sales data from community and online pharmacies were used as basis for the analysis. Methods We determined the most frequently purchased antineoplastic and immune-modulating drug-substances in 14 local community pharmacies within the Munich area, Germany and identified the OTC substance groups that could potentially cause interactions with oncological therapies. Using sales data from 11 local community pharmacies and three online pharmacies, we investigated whether OTC purchases differed between the two sales channels. Results We identified 10 relevant OTC substance classes and detected significant variations in patients' preferred sales channels between the drug classes. Certain OTC drugs, which seem to be bought more often over the internet, pose risks during antineoplastic and immune-modulating therapy. Conclusion Patients should therefore be proactively made aware of the corresponding risks in order not to jeopardize the activity of the antineoplastic and immune-modulating drugs and thus the success of their therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Schindler
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Timo Schinkoethe
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- CANKADO, Kirchheim, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Kolben
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Carsten Culmsee
- Institute for Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Biochemical-Pharmacological Center Marburg, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich 80333, Germany
| | - Tanja K. Eggersmann
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Park-Simon TW, Müller V, Jackisch C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Ditsch N, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Hartkopf AD, Heil J, Huober J, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Wuerstlein R, Janni W, Thill M. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2023. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:289-305. [PMID: 37900552 PMCID: PMC10601667 DOI: 10.1159/000531578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Each year the interdisciplinary Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO), German Gynecological Oncology Group Breast Committee on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer provides updated state-of-the-art recommendations for early and metastatic breast cancer. Summary The updated evidence-based treatment recommendation for early and metastatic breast cancer has been released in March 2023. Key Messages This paper concisely captures the updated recommendations for early breast cancer chapter by chapter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum der Technischen Universität München, Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld GmbH, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Joerg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth und Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Phaon GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz (Buckow) & Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf/Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (Rüdersdorf), Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO), Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Thill M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Ditsch N, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Hartkopf AD, Heil J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Müller V, Würstlein R, Janni W, Park-Simon TW. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2023. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:306-315. [PMID: 37900553 PMCID: PMC10601669 DOI: 10.1159/000531579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO) presents the 2023 update of the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer (mBC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang, Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Forschungsinstitut für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsfrauenklinik, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Fachklinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation, Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow & Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf/Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Universitäts Spital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bottoni G, Fiz F, Puntoni M, Matteucci F, Monti M, DeCensi A, Nanni O, Brain E, Alberini JL, Dib B, Sacchetti G, Trimboli P, Treglia G, Harbeck N, Sola S, Gennari A, Piccardo A. Diagnostic effectiveness of [ 18F]Fluoroestradiol PET/CT in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: the key role of histopathology. Evidence from an international multicentre prospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2477-2485. [PMID: 36879065 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06173-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION [18F]Fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) PET/CT has been proposed as a tool for detecting the oestrogen receptor density in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC) non-invasively across all disease localizations. However, its diagnostic potential in terms of the detection rate (DR) of metastases is unclear. In this study, we pitted this method against [18F]FDG PET/CT and tried to identify predictors of the diagnostic superiority of the [18F] FES-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS From a multicentre database, we enrolled all patients with metastatic BC who had undergone both [18F]FES PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT. Two readers assessed both images independently and used a patient-based (PBA) and lesion-based analysis (LBA) to calculate the DR. Pathology-related and clinical factors were tested as predictors of [18F]FES PET/CT superiority using a multivariate model. RESULTS 92 patients, bearing a total of 2678 metastases, were enrolled. On PBA, the DR of [18F]FDG and [18F]FES PET/CT was 97% and 86%, respectively (p = 0.018). On LBA, the [18F]FES method proved more sensitive than [18F]FDG PET/CT in lymph nodes, bone, lung and soft tissue (p < 0.01). This greater sensitivity was associated with lobular histology, both on PBA (Odds Ratio (OR) 3.4, 95%CI 1.0-12.3) and on LBA (OR 4.4, 95%CI 1.2-16.1 for lymph node metastases and OR 3.29, 95%CI 1.1-10.2 for bone localizations). CONCLUSIONS The overall DR of [18F]FES PET/CT appears to be lower than that of [18F]FDG PET/CT on PBA. However, the [18F]FES method, if positive, can identify more lesions than [18F]FDG at most sites. The higher sensitivity of [18F]FES PET/CT was associated with lobular histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Bottoni
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera", Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Italy
| | - Francesco Fiz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera", Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Italy.
| | - Matteo Puntoni
- Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Federica Matteucci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo studio dei tumori (IRST)- Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | - Manuela Monti
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo studio dei tumori (IRST)- Dino Amadori_, Meldola, Italy
| | - Andrea DeCensi
- Department of Medicine and Oncology, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera", Genoa, Italy
| | - Oriana Nanni
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo studio e la cura dei tumori, IRST, Meldola, Italy
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Clinical Research & Medical Oncology, Institut Curie (Hôpital René Huguenin), St Cloud, France
| | - Jean Louis Alberini
- Nuclear Medicine Department Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, 1 rue du Pr Marion, 21079, Dijon Cedex, France
| | - Bassam Dib
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Pierpaolo Trimboli
- Clinic of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giorgio Treglia
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Simona Sola
- Pathology Unit, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera", Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Department of Translational Oncology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Arnoldo Piccardo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera", Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Frank T, Pichler T, Maier S, Batenhorst I, Abawi T, Harbeck N, Algül H, Heinemann V, Hermelink K, Mumm F, Dinkel A. Stressors related to the COVID-19 pandemic and their association with distress, depressive, and anxiety symptoms in cancer out-patients. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1100236. [PMID: 37333585 PMCID: PMC10272444 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1100236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer might be particularly prone to stress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of pandemic-related stressors on oncological patients' psychological well-being. During the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany 122 cancer out-patients of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich reported on COVID-19-related stressors (information satisfaction, threat perception, and fear of disease deterioration) and answered standardized questionnaires for psychosocial distress (DT) as well as depression and anxiety symptoms (PHQ-2, GAD-2). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify associations of the COVID-19-related stressors with psychological symptoms, controlling for sociodemographic, psychological (self-efficacy, ASKU) and clinical (somatic symptom burden, SSS-8) variables. Initially, satisfaction with information was significantly negatively associated with all three outcome variables. Fear of disease deterioration was associated with distress and depressive symptoms. After controlling for additional variables, only satisfaction with information remained an independent determinant of anxiety (β = -0.35, p < 0.001). All three outcomes were most strongly determined by somatic symptom burden (β ≥ 0.40, p < 0.001). The results of this study tentatively suggest that physical well-being overrides the relevance of some COVID-19-related stressors for oncological patients' psychological wellbeing. Physical symptoms are strongly tied to personal wellbeing as they are associated with suffering from cancer, which might be more central to personal wellbeing than the possibility of getting infected with SARS-CoV-2. However, satisfaction with the information received seems to be important beyond physical wellbeing, as this emerged as an independent determinant of anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Frank
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Tanja Abawi
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Hana Algül
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
- Mildred-Scheel-Professor of Tumor Metabolism, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hermelink
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Dinkel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lux MP, Hartkopf AD, Fehm TN, Welslau M, Müller V, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Janni W, Witzel I, Thomssen C, Beierlein M, Belleville E, Untch M, Thill M, Tesch H, Ditsch N, Aktas B, Banys-Paluchowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Wöckel A, Kolberg HC, Harbeck N, Bartsch R, Schneeweiss A, Ettl J, Würstlein R, Krug D, Taran FA, Lüftner D, Stickeler E. Update Breast Cancer 2023 Part 2 - Advanced-Stage Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:664-672. [PMID: 37916184 PMCID: PMC10617389 DOI: 10.1055/a-2074-0125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, a number of new therapies have led to advances in the treatment of patients with advanced breast carcinoma. These substances are mainly CDK4/6 inhibitors and other substances that can overcome endocrine resistance, oral selective estrogen receptor degraders, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), and PARP inhibitors. This review summarizes and evaluates the latest study results that have been published in recent months. This includes the overall survival data of the Destiny-Breast03 study, the first analysis of the CAPItello-291 study, the comparison of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment with chemotherapy in the first line of therapy (RIGHT Choice study), the first analysis of the Destiny-Breast02 study in the treatment setting after T-DM1 treatment, and the first analysis of the Serena-2 study. Most of these studies have the potential to significantly change the therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced breast carcinoma and show that the continued rapid development of new therapies is always producing new results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Milena Beierlein
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, München, Germany
| | - Rupert Bartsch
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Gynäkologie, Klinikum Kempten, Klinikverbund Allgäu, Kempten, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, München, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinkum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gluz O, Kuemmel S, Nitz U, Braun M, Lüdtke-Heckenkamp K, von Schumann R, Darsow M, Forstbauer H, Potenberg J, Uleer C, Grischke EM, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Zu Eulenburg C, Kates R, Jóźwiak K, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Baehner R, Christgen M, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Nab-paclitaxel weekly versus dose-dense solvent-based paclitaxel followed by dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide in high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: results from the neoadjuvant part of the WSG-ADAPT-HR+/HER2- trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:531-542. [PMID: 37062416 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In high-risk hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC), nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel showed promising efficacy versus solvent-based (sb)-paclitaxel in neoadjuvant trials; however, optimal patient and therapy selection remains a topic of ongoing research. Here, we investigate the potential of Oncotype DX® recurrence score (RS) and endocrine therapy (ET) response (low post-endocrine Ki67) for therapy selection. PATIENTS AND METHODS Within the WSG-ADAPT trial (NCT01779206), high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC patients were randomized to (neo)adjuvant 4× sb-paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q2w or 8× nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 q1w, followed by 4× epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (90 mg + 600 mg) q2w; inclusion criteria: (i) cN0-1, RS 12-25, and post-ET Ki67 >10%; (ii) cN0-1 with RS >25. Patients with cN2-3 or (G3, baseline Ki67 ≥40%, and tumor size >1 cm) were allowed to be included without RS and/or ET response testing. Associations of key factors with pathological complete response (pCR) (primary) and survival (secondary) endpoints were analyzed using statistical mediation and moderation models. RESULTS Eight hundred and sixty-four patients received neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (n= 437) or sb-paclitaxel (n = 427); nab-paclitaxel was superior for pCR (20.8% versus 12.9%, P = 0.002). pCR was higher for RS >25 versus RS ≤25 (16.0% versus 8.4%, P = 0.021) and for ET non-response versus ET response (15.1% versus 6.0%, P = 0.027); no factors were predictive for the relative efficacy of nab-paclitaxel versus sb-paclitaxel. Patients with pCR had longer distant disease-free survival [dDFS; hazard ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.91, P = 0.024]. Despite favorable prognostic association of RS >25 versus RS ≤25 with pCR (odds ratio 3.11, 95% CI 1.71-5.63, P ≤ 0.001), higher RS was unfavorably associated with dDFS (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS In high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC, neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel q1w appears superior to sb-paclitaxel q2w regarding pCR. Combining RS and ET response assessment appears to select patients with highest pCR rates. The disadvantage of higher RS for dDFS is reduced in patients with pCR. These are the first results from a large neoadjuvant randomized trial supporting the use of RS to help select patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach; University Clinics Cologne, Cologne.
| | - S Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen; Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - U Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach
| | - M Braun
- Breast Center, Rotkreuz Clinics Munich, Munich
| | - K Lüdtke-Heckenkamp
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Niels Stensen-Kliniken, Georgsmarienhütte
| | - R von Schumann
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach
| | - M Darsow
- Breast Center, Luisenhospital, Duesseldorf; Practice for Senologic Oncology, Duesseldorf
| | | | | | - C Uleer
- Frauenaerzte am Bahnhofsplatz, Practice of Gynecology and Oncology, Hildesheim
| | - E M Grischke
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Tuebingen, Tuebingen
| | - B Aktas
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Essen, Essen; University Clinics Leipzig, Women's Clinic, Leipzig
| | - C Schumacher
- Breast Center, St. Elisabeth Hospital Cologne, Cologne
| | - C Zu Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg
| | - R Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach
| | - K Jóźwiak
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin
| | - M Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach; Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg
| | - R Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - M Christgen
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - H H Kreipe
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - N Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hartkopf AD, Fehm TN, Welslau M, Müller V, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Janni W, Witzel I, Thomssen C, Beierlein M, Belleville E, Untch M, Thill M, Tesch H, Ditsch N, Lux MP, Aktas B, Banys-Paluchowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Wöckel A, Kolberg HC, Harbeck N, Stickeler E, Bartsch R, Schneeweiss A, Ettl J, Würstlein R, Krug D, Taran FA, Lüftner D. Update Breast Cancer 2023 Part 1 - Early Stage Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:653-663. [PMID: 37916183 PMCID: PMC10617391 DOI: 10.1055/a-2074-0551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
With abemaciclib (monarchE study) and olaparib (OlympiA study) gaining approval in the adjuvant treatment setting, a significant change in the standard of care for patients with early stage breast cancer has been established for some time now. Accordingly, some diverse developments are slowly being transferred from the metastatic to the adjuvant treatment setting. Recently, there have also been positive reports of the NATALEE study. Other clinical studies are currently investigating substances that are already established in the metastatic setting. These include, for example, the DESTINY Breast05 study with trastuzumab deruxtecan and the SASCIA study with sacituzumab govitecan. In this review paper, we summarize and place in context the latest developments over the past months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Milena Beierlein
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, München, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Rupert Bartsch
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Gynäkologie, Klinikum Kempten, Klinikverbund Allgäu, Kempten, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, München, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinkum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Müller V, Fasching PA, Nabieva N, Fehm TN, Thill M, Schmidt M, Kühn T, Banys-Paluchowski M, Belleville E, Juhasz-Böss I, Untch M, Kolberg HC, Harbeck N, Aktas B, Stickeler E, Kreuzeder J, Hartkopf AD, Janni W, Ditsch N. Systemic Therapy of Premenopausal Patients with Early Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer - Controversies and Standards in Healthcare. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:673-685. [PMID: 37614683 PMCID: PMC10442909 DOI: 10.1055/a-2073-1887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In patients with existing ovarian function, there are some special aspects to adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR pos./HER2 neg.) breast cancer. Treatment options include tamoxifen with or without a GnRH analog, and aromatase inhibitors with a GnRH analog. Furthermore, ovarian function is affected by previous chemotherapy. Both aromatase inhibitors (+GnRH analogs) and GnRH analogs in combination with tamoxifen are supposed to be indicated for patients at increased risk of recurrence. However, national and international guidelines and therapy recommendations do not provide a clear definition of intermediate or high risk; as a result, therapy decisions are often made for each patient on an individual basis. This is also reflected in the considerable variability at national and international levels, e.g., with regard to the use of aromatase inhibitors + GnRH analogs. This review summarizes the data on completed studies (e.g., SOFT, TEXT, EBCTCG meta-analyses) and the current multigene testing studies (TailorX, RxPonder, ADAPT), discusses the rationale for current studies (e.g., CLEAR-B), and looks ahead to future questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | | | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | | | | | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, München, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Im SA, Gennari A, Park YH, Kim JH, Jiang ZF, Gupta S, Fadjari TH, Tamura K, Mastura MY, Abesamis-Tiambeng MLT, Lim EH, Lin CH, Sookprasert A, Parinyanitikul N, Tseng LM, Lee SC, Caguioa P, Singh M, Naito Y, Hukom RA, Smruti BK, Wang SS, Kim SB, Lee KH, Ahn HK, Peters S, Kim TW, Yoshino T, Pentheroudakis G, Curigliano G, Harbeck N. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101541. [PMID: 37178669 PMCID: PMC10186487 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was published in 2021. A special, hybrid guidelines meeting was convened by ESMO and the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO) in collaboration with nine other Asian national oncology societies in May 2022 in order to adapt the ESMO 2021 guidelines to take into account the differences associated with the treatment of MBC in Asia. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with MBC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Indonesia (ISHMO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO). The voting was based on the best available scientific evidence and was independent of drug access or practice restrictions in the different Asian countries. The latter were discussed when appropriate. The aim of these guidelines is to provide guidance for the harmonisation of the management of patients with MBC across the different regions of Asia, drawing from data provided by global and Asian trials whilst at the same time integrating the differences in genetics, demographics and scientific evidence, together with restricted access to certain therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S-A Im
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - A Gennari
- Department of Translational Medicine, University Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Y H Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - J H Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Z-F Jiang
- Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - S Gupta
- Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - T H Fadjari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - K Tamura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shimane University Hospital, Shimane, Japan
| | - M Y Mastura
- Cancer Centre, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - M L T Abesamis-Tiambeng
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardinal Santos Cancer Center, San Juan, The Philippines
| | - E H Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C-H Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Cancer Center Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - A Sookprasert
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - N Parinyanitikul
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital and Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - L-M Tseng
- Taipei-Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - S-C Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore
| | - P Caguioa
- The Cancer Institute of St Luke's Medical Center, National Capital Region, The Philippines; The Cancer Institute of the University of Santo Tomas Hospital, National Capital Region, The Philippines
| | - M Singh
- Department of Radiotherapy, Pantai Cancer Institute, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Department of Oncology, Pantai Cancer Institute, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Y Naito
- Department of General Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - R A Hukom
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Dharmais Hospital (National Cancer Center), Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - B K Smruti
- Medical Oncology, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre and Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences, Mumbai, India
| | - S-S Wang
- Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - S B Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Centre, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - K-H Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - H K Ahn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - S Peters
- Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - T W Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | | - G Curigliano
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tagliamento M, Gennari A, Lambertini M, Salazar R, Harbeck N, Del Mastro L, Aguilar-Company J, Bower M, Sharkey R, Dalla Pria A, Plaja A, Jackson A, Handford J, Sita-Lumsden A, Martinez-Vila C, Matas M, Miguel Rodriguez A, Vincenzi B, Tonini G, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Pedrazzoli P, D'Avanzo F, Biello F, Sinclair A, Lee AJ, Rossi S, Rizzo G, Mirallas O, Pimentel I, Iglesias M, Sanchez de Torre A, Guida A, Berardi R, Zambelli A, Tondini C, Filetti M, Mazzoni F, Mukherjee U, Diamantis N, Parisi A, Aujayeb A, Prat A, Libertini M, Grisanti S, Rossi M, Zoratto F, Generali D, Saura C, Lyman GH, Kuderer NM, Pinato DJ, Cortellini A. Pandemic Phase-Adjusted Analysis of COVID-19 Outcomes Reveals Reduced Intrinsic Vulnerability and Substantial Vaccine Protection From Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2800-2814. [PMID: 36720089 PMCID: PMC10414724 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although representing the majority of newly diagnosed cancers, patients with breast cancer appear less vulnerable to COVID-19 mortality compared with other malignancies. In the absence of patients on active cancer therapy included in vaccination trials, a contemporary real-world evaluation of outcomes during the various pandemic phases, as well as of the impact of vaccination, is needed to better inform clinical practice. METHODS We compared COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among patients with breast cancer across prevaccination (February 27, 2020-November 30, 2020), Alpha-Delta (December 1, 2020-December 14, 2021), and Omicron (December 15, 2021-January 31, 2022) phases using OnCovid registry participants (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04393974). Twenty-eight-day case fatality rate (CFR28) and COVID-19 severity were compared in unvaccinated versus double-dosed/boosted patients (vaccinated) with inverse probability of treatment weighting models adjusted for country of origin, age, number of comorbidities, tumor stage, and receipt of systemic anticancer therapy within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS By the data lock of February 4, 2022, the registry counted 613 eligible patients with breast cancer: 60.1% (n = 312) hormone receptor-positive, 25.2% (n = 131) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and 14.6% (n = 76) triple-negative. The majority (61%; n = 374) had localized/locally advanced disease. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 51-74 years). A total of 193 patients (31.5%) presented ≥ 2 comorbidities and 69% (n = 330) were never smokers. In total, 392 (63.9%), 164 (26.8%), and 57 (9.3%) were diagnosed during the prevaccination, Alpha-Delta, and Omicron phases, respectively. Analysis of CFR28 demonstrates comparable estimates of mortality across the three pandemic phases (13.9%, 12.2%, 5.3%, respectively; P = .182). Nevertheless, a significant improvement in outcome measures of COVID-19 severity across the three pandemic time periods was observed. Importantly, when reported separately, unvaccinated patients from the Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases achieved comparable outcomes to those from the prevaccination phase. Of 566 patients eligible for the vaccination analysis, 72 (12.7%) were fully vaccinated and 494 (87.3%) were unvaccinated. We confirmed with inverse probability of treatment weighting multivariable analysis and following a clustered robust correction for participating center that vaccinated patients achieved improved CFR28 (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.40), hospitalization (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.69), COVID-19 complications (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.45), and reduced requirement of COVID-19-specific therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.63) and oxygen therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.67) compared with unvaccinated controls. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight a consistent reduction of COVID-19 severity in patients with breast cancer during the Omicron outbreak in Europe. We also demonstrate that even in this population, a complete severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination course is a strong determinant of improved morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Medical Oncology Department, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Ramon Salazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO L'Hospitalet, Oncobell Program (IDIBELL), CIBERONC, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and Gynecological Cancer Center and CCC Munich, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Medical Oncology Department, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Juan Aguilar-Company
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
- Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mark Bower
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Sharkey
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alessia Dalla Pria
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Plaja
- Medical Oncology Department, B-ARGO Group, IGTP, Catalan Institute of Oncology-Badalona, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Jasmine Handford
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ailsa Sita-Lumsden
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Bruno Vincenzi
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Alexia Bertuzzi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Joan Brunet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Paolo Pedrazzoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca D'Avanzo
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Federica Biello
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Alasdair Sinclair
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alvin J.X. Lee
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sabrina Rossi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Rizzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Oriol Mirallas
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Pimentel
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Annalisa Guida
- Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Tondini
- Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | - Uma Mukherjee
- Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alessandro Parisi
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Avinash Aujayeb
- Respiratory Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, United Kingdom
| | - Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michela Libertini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Maura Rossi
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera “SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo,” Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Generali
- Multidisciplinary Breast Pathology and Translational Research Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Cristina Saura
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gary H. Lyman
- Public Health Sciences Division and Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
- Divisions of Public Health Science and Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - David J. Pinato
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Degenhardt T, Fasching PA, Lüftner D, Müller V, Thomssen C, Schem C, Witzel I, Decker T, Tesch H, Kümmel S, Uleer C, Wuerstlein R, Hoffmann O, Warm M, Marschner N, Schinköthe T, Kates RE, Schumacher J, Otremba B, Zaiss M, Harbeck N, Schmidt M. PRECYCLE: multicenter, randomized phase IV intergroup trial to evaluate the impact of eHealth-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment on quality of life in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib and an aromatase inhibitor or palbociclib and fulvestrant. Trials 2023; 24:338. [PMID: 37198674 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07306-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficacy and quality of life (QoL) are key criteria for therapy selection in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In hormone receptor positive (HR +) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2 -) MBC, addition of targeted oral agents such as everolimus or a cycline-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitor (e.g., palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) to endocrine therapy substantially prolongs progression-free survival and in the case of a CDK 4/6i also overall survival. However, the prerequisite is adherence to therapy over the entire course of treatment. However, particularly with new oral drugs, adherence presents a challenge to disease management. In this context, factors influencing adherence include maintaining patients' satisfaction and early detection/management of side effects. New strategies for continuous support of oncological patients are needed. An eHealth-based platform can help to support therapy management and physician-patient interaction. METHODS PreCycle is a multicenter, randomized, phase IV trial in HR + HER2 - MBC. All patients (n = 960) receive the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib either in first (62.5%) or later line (37.5%) together with endocrine therapy (AI, fulvestrant) according to national guidelines. PreCycle evaluates and compares the time to deterioration (TTD) of QoL in patients supported by eHealth systems with substantially different functionality: CANKADO active vs. inform. CANKADO active is the fully functional CANKADO-based eHealth treatment support system. CANKADO inform is a CANKADO-based eHealth service with a personal login, documentation of daily drug intake, but no further functions. To evaluate QoL, the FACT-B questionnaire is completed at every visit. As little is known about relationships between behavior (e.g., adherence), genetic background, and drug efficacy, the trial includes both patient-reported outcome and biomarker screening for discovery of forecast models for adherence, symptoms, QoL, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). DISCUSSION The primary objective of PreCycle is to test the hypothesis of superiority for time to deterioration (TTD) in terms of DQoL = "Deterioration of quality of life" (FACT-G scale) in patients supported by an eHealth therapy management system (CANKADO active) versus in patients merely receiving eHealth-based information (CANKADO inform). EudraCT Number: 2016-004191-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Degenhardt
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Hausarztpraxis Wolfratshausen, Wolfratshausen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
- Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf and Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Gynecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Saale, Germany
| | | | - Isabell Witzel
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Decker
- Hematology/Oncology, Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Hämatologisch-Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Mathias Warm
- Breast Center, Academic Hospital Cologne-Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Timo Schinköthe
- CANKADO Service GmbH, Kirchheim, Germany
- Research Center Smart Digital Health, University of the Bundeswehr, Neubiberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Matthias Zaiss
- Praxis Interdisziplinäre Onkologie U. Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Harbeck N, Fasching PA, Würstlein R, Degenhardt T, Lüftner D, Kates RE, Schumacher J, Räth P, Hoffmann O, Lorenz R, Decker T, Reinisch M, Göhler T, Staib P, Gluz O, Schinköthe T, Schmidt M. Significantly longer time to deterioration of quality of life due to CANKADO PRO-React eHealth support in HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients receiving palbociclib and endocrine therapy: Primary outcome analysis of the multicenter randomized AGO-B WSG PreCycle trial. Ann Oncol 2023:S0923-7534(23)00684-1. [PMID: 37201751 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The multicenter, randomized phase IV intergroup AGO-B WSG PreCycle trial (NCT03220178) evaluated the impact of CANKADO-based ePRO (electronic patient-reported outcomes) assessment on quality of life (QoL) in HR+ HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients receiving palbociclib (P) and an aromatase inhibitor or P+fulvestrant. CANKADO PRO-React, an EU-registered medical device, is an interactive autonomous application reacting to patient self-reported observations. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2017 and 2021, 499 patients (median age 59 years) from 71 centers were randomized (2:1, stratified by therapy line) between an active version of CANKADO PRO-React (CANKADO-active arm) or a version with limited functionality (CANKADO-inform arm). 412 patients (271 CANKADO-active; 141 CANKADO-inform) were available for analysis of the primary endpoint, time to deterioration (TTD) of QoL (10-point drop on FACT-G), using an Aalen-Johansen estimator for cumulative incidence function of TTD DQoL with 95% pointwise confidence intervals (CI). Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, and DQoL (QoL deterioration). RESULTS In all pts (ITT-ePRO), cumulative incidence of DQoL was significantly more favorable (lower) in the CANKADO-active arm (HR=0.698, 95%CI [0.506 - 0.963]). Among 1stL patients (n=295), the corresponding HR was 0.716 (0.484-1.060; p=0.09), and in 2ndL patients (n=117) it was 0.661 (0.374-1.168; p=0.2). Absolute patient numbers declined in later visits; FACT-G completion rates were 80% and higher until about visit 30; mean FACT-G scores showed steady decline from baseline and an offset in favor of CANKADO-active. No significant differences in clinical outcome were observed between arms: Median PFS (ITT population) was 21.4 (95%CI 19.4-23.7) (CANKADO-active) and 18.7 (15.1-23.5) months (CANKADO-inform); median OS was not reached (CANKADO-active) and 42.6 months (CANKADO-inform). CONCLUSIONS PreCycle is the first multicenter randomized eHealth trial demonstrating a significant benefit for MBC patients receiving oral tumor therapy when using an interactive autonomous patient empowerment application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich LMU, University Hospital, Munich, Germany; West German Study Group, Statistics, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
| | - P A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen, Germany
| | - R Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich LMU, University Hospital, Munich, Germany; West German Study Group, Statistics, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - T Degenhardt
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich LMU, University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Hausarztpraxis Wolfratshausen, Wolfratshausen, Germany
| | - D Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz Buckow, Germany; Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf and Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Germany
| | - R E Kates
- West German Study Group, Statistics, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - P Räth
- palleos healthcare GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - O Hoffmann
- University Hospital Essen, Breast Center, Essen, Germany
| | - R Lorenz
- Studien GbR Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - T Decker
- Hematology / Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - M Reinisch
- Breast Center, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - T Göhler
- Oncocenter Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - P Staib
- St.-Antonius Hospital gGmbH, Clinic for Hematology and Oncology, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - O Gluz
- West German Study Group, Statistics, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - T Schinköthe
- CANKADO Service GmbH, Kirchheim, Germany; Research Center Smart Digital Health, University of the Bundeswehr, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - M Schmidt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gluz O, Nitz UA, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Holtschmidt J, Schumacher J, Hartkopf A, Potenberg J, Lüedtke-Heckenkamp K, Just M, Schem C, von Schumann R, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Eulenburg CZ, Schinköthe T, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Kates RE, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Efficacy of Endocrine Therapy Plus Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab vs De-escalated Chemotherapy in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive/ERBB2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: The Neoadjuvant WSG-TP-II Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023:2804892. [PMID: 37166817 PMCID: PMC10176180 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Importance Combination of chemotherapy with (dual) ERBB2 blockade is considered standard in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/ERBB2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). Despite some promising data on endocrine therapy (ET) combination with dual ERBB2 blockade in HR-positive/ERBB2-positive BC, to our knowledge, no prospective comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs ET plus ERBB2 blockade in particular with focus on molecular markers has yet been performed. Objective To determine whether neoadjuvant de-escalated chemotherapy is superior to endocrine therapy, both in combination with pertuzumab and trastuzumab, in a highly heterogeneous HR-positive/ERBB2-positive EBC. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, multicenter, neoadjuvant randomized clinical trial allocated 207 patients with centrally confirmed estrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive (>1%) HR-positive/ERBB2-positive EBC to 12 weeks of standard ET (n = 100) vs paclitaxel (n = 107) plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab. A total of 186 patients were required to detect a statistically significant difference in pathological complete response (pCR) (assumptions: 19% absolute difference in pCR; power, ≥80%; 1-sided Fisher exact test, 2.5% significance level). Interventions Standard ET (aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen) or paclitaxel, 80 mg/m2, weekly plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab every 21 days. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0). Secondary end points included safety, translational research, and health-related quality of life. Omission of further chemotherapy was allowed in patients with pCR. PAM50 analysis was performed on baseline tumor biopsies. Results Of the 207 patients included (median [range] age, 53 [25-83] years), 121 (58%) had cT2 to cT4 tumors, and 58 (28%) had clinically node-positive EBC. The pCR rate in the ET plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm was 23.7% (95% CI, 15.7%-33.4%) vs 56.4% (95% CI, 46.2%-66.3%) in the paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm (odds ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.46; P < .001). Both immunohistochemical ERBB2 score of 3 or higher and ERBB2-enriched subtype were independent predictors for pCR in both arms. Paclitaxel was superior to ET only in the first through third quartiles but not in the highest ERBB2 quartile by messenger RNA. In contrast with the paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm, no decrease in health-related quality of life after 12 weeks was observed in the ET plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm. Conclusions and Relevance The WSG-TP-II randomized clinical trial is, to our knowledge, the first prospective trial comparing 2 neoadjuvant de-escalation treatments in HR-positive/ERBB2-positive EBC and demonstrated an excellent pCR rate after 12 weeks of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab that was clearly superior to the pCR rate after ET plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03272477.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- University Clinics Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike A Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Holtschmidt
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Breast Center, St Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Köln-Hohenlind, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tüebingen University Hospital, Tüebingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christine Zu Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Timo Schinköthe
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- CANKADO Service GmbH, Kirchheim bei München, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Johnston SRD, Tolaney SM, O'Shaughnessy J, Rastogi P, Harbeck N, Martin M. Review of the monarchE trial suggests no evidence to support use of adjuvant abemaciclib in women with breast cancer - Authors' reply. Lancet Oncol 2023:S1470-2045(23)00214-0. [PMID: 37146620 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00214-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Priya Rastogi
- NSABP Foundation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Miguel Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hutchinson KE, Chen JW, Savage HM, Stout TJ, Schimmoller F, Cortés J, Dent S, Harbeck N, Jacot W, Krop I, Trabucco SE, Sivakumar S, Sokol ES, Wilson TR. Multiple PIK3CA mutation clonality correlates with outcomes in taselisib + fulvestrant-treated ER+/HER2-, PIK3CA-mutated breast cancers. Genome Med 2023; 15:28. [PMID: 37101291 PMCID: PMC10131374 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-023-01181-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mutations in the p110α catalytic subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), encoded by the PIK3CA gene, cause dysregulation of the PI3K pathway in 35-40% of patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Preclinically, cancer cells harboring double or multiple PIK3CA mutations (mut) elicit hyperactivation of the PI3K pathway leading to enhanced sensitivity to p110α inhibitors. METHODS To understand the role of multiple PIK3CAmut in predicting response to p110α inhibition, we estimated the clonality of multiple PIK3CAmut in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer enrolled to a prospectively registered clinical trial of fulvestrant ± taselisib, and analyzed the subgroups against co-altered genes, pathways, and outcomes. RESULTS ctDNA samples with clonal multiple PIK3CAmut had fewer co-alterations in receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) or non-PIK3CA PI3K pathway genes compared to samples with subclonal multiple PIK3CAmut indicating a strong reliance on the PI3K pathway. This was validated in an independent cohort of breast cancer tumor specimens that underwent comprehensive genomic profiling. Furthermore, patients whose ctDNA harbored clonal multiple PIK3CAmut exhibited a significantly higher response rate and longer progression-free survival vs subclonal multiple PIK3CAmut. CONCLUSIONS Our study establishes clonal multiple PIK3CAmut as an important molecular determinant of response to p110α inhibition and provides rationale for further clinical investigation of p110α inhibitors alone or with rationally-selected therapies in breast cancer and potentially other solid tumor types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Hutchinson
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA
| | - Jessica W Chen
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA
| | - Heidi M Savage
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA
| | - Thomas J Stout
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Frauke Schimmoller
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Javier Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Madrid & Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Susan Dent
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department Gynecology and Obstetrics and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - William Jacot
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM) Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - Ian Krop
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | | | - Timothy R Wilson
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
| |
Collapse
|