App-based support for breast cancer patients to reduce psychological distress during therapy and survivorship - a multicentric randomized controlled trial

Introduction

The negative impact of unmanaged psychological distress on quality of life and outcome in breast cancer survivors has been demonstrated. Fortunately, studies indicate that distress can effectively be addressed and even prevented using evidence-based interventions. In Germany prescription-based mobile health apps, known as DiGAs (digital health applications), that are fully reimbursed by health insurances, were introduced in 2020. In this study, the effectiveness of an approved breast cancer DiGA was investigated: The personalized coaching app PINK! Coach supports and accompanies breast cancer patients during therapy and follow-up.

Methods

PINK! Coach was specifically designed for breast cancer (BC) patients from the day of diagnosis to the time of Follow-up (aftercare). The app offers individualized, evidence-based therapy and side-effect management, mindfulness-based stress reduction, nutritional and psychological education, physical activity tracking, and motivational exercises to implement lifestyle changes sustainably in daily routine. A prospective, intraindividual RCT (DRKS00028699) was performed with n = 434 patients recruited in 7 German breast cancer centers from September 2022 until January 2023. Patients with BC were included independent of their stage of diseases, type of therapy and molecular characteristics of the tumor. Patients were randomized into one of two groups: The intervention group got access to PINK! over 12 weeks; the control group served as a waiting-list comparison to "standard of care." The primary endpoint was psychological distress objectified by means of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Subgroups were defined to investigate the app's effect on several patient groups such as MBC vs. EBC patients, patients on therapy vs. in aftercare, patients who received a chemotherapy vs. patients who did not.

Results

Efficacy analysis of the primary endpoint revealed a significant reduction in psychological distress (least squares estimate -1.62, 95% confidence interval [1.03; 2.21]; p<0.001) among intervention group patients from baseline to T3 vs, control group. Subgroup analysis also suggested improvements across all clinical situations.

Conclusion

Patients with breast cancer suffer from psychological problems including anxiety and depression during and after therapy. Personalized, supportive care with the app PINK! Coach turned out as a promising opportunity to significantly improve psychological distress in a convenient, accessible, and low-threshold manner for breast cancer patients independent of their stage of disease (EBC/MBC), therapy phase (aftercare or therapy) or therapy itself (chemotherapy/other therapy options). The app is routinely available in Germany as a DiGA. Clinical Trial Registration: DRKS Trial Registry (DRKS00028699).

Budget Impact of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® Test in Patients with Early Primary Hormone-Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Germany

Background

Gene expression tests can inform decisions on whether to recommend or omit chemotherapy for patients with early HR+, HER2- breast cancer. The benefit of these tests is well established and fully reimbursed by sickness funds for lymph node-negative (pN0) patients in Germany. A budget impact model was built to evaluate the effect of using the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® test also for node-positive (pN1: 1-3 positive lymph nodes) patients.

Methods

The prospective randomized clinical trial, RxPONDER, defined conditions (Recurrence Score result 0-25 for postmenopausal patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes) under which omitting chemotherapy does not significantly impact invasive disease-free survival with results currently reported for 5-year follow-up. The present budget impact model calculates average total cost per node-positive patient versus no testing from a sickness funds perspective, taking into account not only the budgetary impact of avoiding chemotherapy and associated side effects, but also the costs of treating those patients who develop distant metastasis. The stability of the results was investigated by probabilistic multivariate sensitivity analysis.

Results

After deducting testing cost, applying the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test yielded an average savings per node-positive patient of EUR 4,272. Without the test costs, the greatest savings resulted from reductions in direct treatment costs and costs arising from the treatment of chemotherapy-related side effects, which together averaged EUR 6,677. The targeted use of chemotherapy after testing also resulted in slightly lower costs for treatment of distant metastasis, if it did occur. The multivariate sensitivity analysis also almost exclusively resulted in cost savings.

Conclusion

Analogous to the pN0 situation, this budget impact model demonstrates that the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test can also reduce healthcare costs in Germany in treatment of node-positive (pN1: 1-3 positive lymph nodes) patients by minimizing both unnecessary chemotherapy and undertreatment. Additional benefits to patients would include reduced morbidity and improved quality of life for those patients who can safely avoid chemotherapy or undertreatment.

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2023

Background

Each year the interdisciplinary Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO), German Gynecological Oncology Group Breast Committee on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer provides updated state-of-the-art recommendations for early and metastatic breast cancer.

Summary

The updated evidence-based treatment recommendation for early and metastatic breast cancer has been released in March 2023.

Key Messages

This paper concisely captures the updated recommendations for early breast cancer chapter by chapter.

AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2023

The Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO) presents the 2023 update of the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer (mBC).

Is the (Neo)adjuvant Therapy of Patients with Primary HER2-positive Breast Cancer Cost-Covering?: Process Cost Analysis of Neoadjuvant and Post-Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy of Patients with Primary HER2-positive Breast Cancer

Introduction HER2 positivity is one of the most important predictive factors in the treatment of breast cancer patients. Thanks to new targeted anti-HER2 drugs, the prognosis for HER2-positive breast cancer patients has been significantly improved, and the treatment can now be designed according to the risk situation and the response to treatment. At the same time, these innovative targeted anti-HER2 drugs are associated with high costs and require long and involved patient care. Materials and Methods In this paper, we compare the treatment costs of three post-neoadjuvant treatment regimens (trastuzumab vs. trastuzumab/pertuzumab vs. T-DM1) in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer from the perspective of the oncological outpatient clinic of a certified breast center at a university hospital, and evaluate the cost coverage. Results The highest costs in systemic therapy were the material costs. These were the highest for dual blockade with trastuzumab/pertuzumab, followed by T-DM1 and trastuzumab monotherapy. According to our study, all three of these post-neoadjuvant therapy variants achieve a positive contribution margin. While all three models have similar contribution margins, the treatment pathway with T-DM1 is associated with a 30% lower contribution margin. Conclusions Although these model calculations are associated with limitations in view of the introduction of biosimilar antibodies, it can be shown that modern therapeutic approaches do not always have to be associated with lower profits.

Localization Techniques for Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: Current Status, Knowledge Gaps, and Rationale for the MELODY Study (EUBREAST-4/iBRA-NET, NCT 05559411)

BACKGROUND

Surgical excision of a non-palpable breast lesion requires a localization step. Among available techniques, wire-guided localization (WGL) is most commonly used. Other techniques (radioactive, magnetic, radar or radiofrequency-based, and intraoperative ultrasound) have been developed in the last two decades with the aim of improving outcomes and logistics.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review on localization techniques for non-palpable breast cancer.

RESULTS

For most techniques, oncological outcomes such as lesion identification and clear margin rate seem either comparable with or better than for WGL, but evidence is limited to small cohort studies for some of the devices. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with significantly higher negative margin rates in meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Radioactive techniques were studied in several RCTs and are non-inferior to WGL. Smaller studies show higher patient preference towards wire-free localization, but little is known about surgeons' and radiologists' attitudes towards these techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Large studies with an additional focus on patient, surgeon, and radiologist preference are necessary. This review aims to present the rationale for the MELODY (NCT05559411) study and to enable standardization of outcome measures for future studies.

Real-world patient-reported outcomes and physician satisfaction with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors versus chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer from the United States, Europe, and Israel

BACKGROUND

In clinical trials, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) versus chemotherapy resulted in significantly improved progression-free survival, manageable adverse event profiles, and favorable patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCA1/2mut). The objective of this study was to evaluate PROs and physician satisfaction with treatment in patients with gBRCA1/2mut HER2- ABC receiving PARPi or physician's choice of chemotherapy in a multi-country, real-world setting.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis used data from the Adelphi Real World ABC Disease Specific Programmes in the United States, European Union, and Israel. PROs were assessed at a single timepoint using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) scale, Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the breast cancer-specific module (QLQ-BR23). Baseline PROs were not assessed. Physician satisfaction with treatment scores was dichotomized to a 0/1 variable (0 = very dissatisfied/dissatisfied/moderately satisfied; 1 = satisfied/very satisfied). Scores were compared using inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment, controlling for multiple confounding factors.

RESULTS

The study included 96 patients (PARPi, n = 38; platinum/non-platinum-based chemotherapy, n = 58). Patients receiving PARPi versus chemotherapy reported significantly better scores on the EQ-5D-5L Health Utility Index. On the EORTC QLQ-C30 functional scales, patients receiving PARPi reported significantly better scores (mean ± SE) for physical functioning (80.0 ± 2.4 vs 71.9 ± 3.4; p < 0.05) and social functioning (82.0 ± 6.2 vs 63.6 ± 3.7; p < 0.05) and, on the symptom scales, reported significantly better scores for constipation (1.9 ± 1.8 vs 18.7 ± 3.2; p < 0.001), breast symptoms (0.4 ± 3.9 vs 13.3 ± 2.6; p < 0.01), arm symptoms (2.6 ± 1.3 vs 11.4 ± 2.4; p = 0.001), and systemic therapy side effects (13.5 ± 1.8 vs 29.4 ± 2.3; p < 0.001). In contrast, patients receiving chemotherapy scored significantly better on the nausea/vomiting scale (18.3 ± 2.8 vs 34.5 ± 5.1; p < 0.01). Patients receiving PARPi reported numerically better satisfaction scores on the CTSQ scales. Physicians were more likely to be satisfied/very satisfied with PARPi versus chemotherapy (95.4% ± 7.3% vs 40.8% ± 6.2%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The PRO findings in this real-world population of patients with gBRCA1/2mut HER2- ABC complement those from the pivotal clinical trials, providing further support for treatment with PARPi in these patients.

Use of prognostic gene expression profiling tests in primary breast cancer treatment: a German real-world patient survey

Aims: In primary breast cancer, gene expression profiling tests can support adjuvant chemotherapy treatment decisions. Real-world test use in Germany was investigated in an online survey of female breast cancer patients (n = 475). Materials & methods: Relationships between three groups were examined for clinical and statistical relevance: no test indication (n = 353), test indication and tested (n = 65), and test indication but not tested (n = 57). Results: A total of 47% of participants with a test indication were not tested. Test rates increased by 23% from 2012-2018 (49%) to 2019-2021 (60%). A total of 65% of patients without testing received chemotherapy, whereas only 38% of tested patients received chemotherapy. Conclusion: The use of gene expression profiling tests correlates with a real-world chemotherapy reduction. Gene expression profiling testing may improve patient confidence in the decision for or against chemotherapy.

PERFORM: a non-interventional study assessing the patients' treatment starting with 1L palbociclib in HR+/HER2- ABC

The prospective, non-interventional PERFORM study describes and analyzes the effectiveness of palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant) as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer in the real-world setting in Germany and Austria. PERFORM will reflect current patient characteristics and routine treatment patterns including treatment sequences and time to subsequent (chemo)therapy. Besides, second-line treatment effectiveness and patient-relevant end points such as longitudinal patient-reported outcome measurements beyond disease progression will be analyzed. Accounting for the heterogenous real-world patient population, data on clinicopathologic subgroups underrepresented in clinical trials such as elderly or male will be analyzed. Taken together, PERFORM will close knowledge gaps from clinical trials in real world.

Real-world study of patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‒Negative advanced breast cancer: Patient demographics, treatment patterns, adverse events, and physician-reported satisfaction in the United States, Europe, and Israel

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‒negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) are informed by tumor characteristics and include platinum- and non-platinum-based chemotherapy, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy, endocrine monotherapy, or endocrine therapy plus a targeted therapy. In addition, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have recently demonstrated improved clinical and patient-reported outcomes and manageable toxicity profiles compared with chemotherapy in patients with germline breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 or 2 (gBRCA1/2)‒mutated HER2- ABC in clinical trials and are now approved to treat this patient population. This study provides complementary real-world data regarding treatment patterns, adverse events, and physician-reported treatment satisfaction in this population.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis using the Adelphi Real World ABC Disease Specific Programme in the United States, European Union, and Israel included patients aged ≥18 years receiving therapy for stage IIIb or IV gBRCA1/2-mutated HER2- ABC. Oncologists completed a patient record form detailing patient demographics, clinical assessments, and treatment history and a survey regarding their use of and satisfaction with treatments.

RESULTS

Among the 543 patients, mean age was 55 years, 25% were premenopausal, 70% had hormone receptor‒positive (HR+) ABC, and 30% had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PARPi were used in 5%, 11%, and 12% of first-line, second-line, and third-line therapies, respectively, for patients with HR+ ABC; for TNBC, percentages were 18%, 44%, and 36%. Across treatment lines, neutropenia, anemia, and nausea occurred in 16%, 24%, and 32% of patients receiving PARPi, respectively; 22%, 38%, and 33% of patients receiving platinum chemotherapy; and 20%, 20%, and 33% of patients receiving non-platinum-based chemotherapy. Physician satisfaction was highest with PARPi and with chemotherapy plus immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings in this real-world population complement clinical trial observations and provide further support for treatment of patients with PARPi in gBRCA1/2-mutated HER2- ABC.

Treatment Patterns, Safety, and Patient Reported Outcomes among Adult Women with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer with or without, or with Unknown, BRCA1/2 Mutation(s): Results of a Real-World Study from the United States, United Kingdom, and four EU Countries

Introduction

This real-world study assessed the breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 or 2 mutation (BRCA1/2mut) status on treatment patterns, safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in the USA, the UK, and EU4 countries.

Methods

Oncologists abstracted data from medical charts of adult women who presented with HER2- ABC from February to May 2015 and from March to July 2017. Data were collected using a physician-reported form and a patient-reported form, which included questions on breast cancer history/treatment and questions from PRO instruments (EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels [EQ-5D-3L], Brief Pain Inventory [BPI], European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and its breast cancer module).

Results

In total, 742 oncologists provided data for 6,161 patients; 27.5% were tested for BRCA1/2mut. Out of the total patient population, 3.8% had BRCA1/2mut, 16.6% BRCA1/2 wild-type (BRCA1/2wt), and 79.5% were BRCA1/2 unknown (BRCA1/2unk). Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- ABC was more frequent within the BRCA1/2wt versus BRCA1/2mut group and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) within the BRCA1/2mut versus BRCA1/2wt group. More patients with HR+/HER2- ABC with BRCA1/2mut received chemotherapy (with or without targeted or endocrine therapy) versus BRCA1/2wt (66.0% vs. 50.4%; p < 0.01); more patients had ≥1 AE (58.0% vs. 39.1%; p < 0.001). Among patients with BRCA1/2mut versus BRCA1/2wt, a significantly higher proportion had some problems or worse pain discomfort (p = 0.021) and anxiety/depression (p = 0.007) as measured by the EQ-5D-3L; role functioning (p < 0.01) and dyspnea (p < 0.05) measured by EORTC were worse with BRCA1/2mut. Pain scores by BPI were similar between groups.

Conclusions

In patients with HER2- ABC in the real-world setting, more patients with BRCA1/2mut had TNBC; received chemotherapy; had >1 AE; and experienced increased discomfort, anxiety, and dyspnea and diminished role functioning versus patients with BRCA1/2wt.

AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of Breast Cancer: Update 2022

The recommendations of the AGO Breast Committee on the surgical therapy of breast cancer were last updated in March 2022 (www.ago-online.de). Since surgical therapy is one of several partial steps in the treatment of breast cancer, extensive diagnostic and oncological expertise of a breast surgeon and good interdisciplinary cooperation with diagnostic radiologists is of great importance. The most important changes concern localization techniques, resection margins, axillary management in the neoadjuvant setting and the evaluation of the meshes in reconstructive surgery. Based on meta-analyses of randomized studies, the level of recommendation of an intraoperative breast ultrasound for the localization of non-palpable lesions was elevated to "++". Thus, the technique is considered to be equivalent to wire localization, provided that it is a lesion which can be well represented by sonography, the surgeon has extensive experience in breast ultrasound and has access to a suitable ultrasound device during the operation. In invasive breast cancer, the aim is to reach negative resection margins ("no tumor on ink"), regardless of whether an extensive intraductal component is present or not. Oncoplastic operations can also replace a mastectomy in selected cases due to the large number of existing techniques, and are equivalent to segmental resection in terms of oncological safety at comparable rates of complications. Sentinel node excision is recommended for patients with cN0 status receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after completion of chemotherapy. Minimally invasive biopsy is recommended for initially suspect lymph nodes. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients with initially 1 - 3 suspicious lymph nodes and a good response (ycN0) can receive the targeted axillary dissection and the axillary dissection as equivalent options.

AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2022

Introduction

The AGO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, German Gynecological Oncology Group) Task Force on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer as an interdisciplinary team consists of specialists from gynecological oncology, pathology, diagnostic radiology, medical oncology, and radiation oncology with a special focus on breast cancer.

Methods

The updated evidence-based treatment recommendation 2022 for early breast cancer (EBC) and metastatic breast cancer of the AGO Task Force has been released.

Results and Conclusion

This paper captures the update of EBC.

Overall cancer survival inequalities in the state of São Paulo: A comparison between public and private systems

6525

Background: Brazilian cancer patients under the public healthcare system receive diagnoses and treatment at a later disease stage on average than private patients, likely due to the public system having less access than the private system to treatment and diagnostic technologies. The impact of the different healthcare systems on survival is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the difference in overall survival (OS) in cancer patients under public vs. private healthcare systems in São Paulo, Brazil. Methods: Data were drawn from the hospital-based cancer registry of the Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo capturing clinical and demographic data including clinical setting (private/public), date of diagnosis, and disease stage. All patients had complete medical records and malignant, well classified tumors. Analyses used Cox proportional hazards regressions. For multivariate (MTV) and propensity score matched (PSM) analyses; tumor topology and morphology, patient demographics and diagnostic care setting were used as covariates. Analyses were performed for overall cancers and for 20 separate tumor types as recommended by the National Institute of Cancer. Results: Data from 189,850 patients were analyzed. For all cancers, the hazard ratio (HR) for OS for public vs. private healthcare was 2.30 (CI 95% 2.20 - 2.39) in univariate (UNV), 1.59 (CI 95% 1.52 - 1.66) in MTV and 1.69 (CI 95% 1.61 - 1.77) in PSM, indicating that patients under the public system were between 2.30 and 1.69 times less likely to survive their cancer (Table 1). The cancer type with the biggest HR using PSM was multiple myeloma (HR 2.37 CI95% 1.82 - 3.08). Conclusions: Our results show Brazilian cancer patients under the public healthcare system were in some cases more than twice as likely to die from cancer than private patients. Despite possible differences between these populations in lifestyle and other potential influencing factors, our results most likely reflect differences between the two systems in access to treatment and diagnostic technologies. Our findings highlight the inequality of care in public vs. private healthcare in Brazil. Focus should be on closing the gap between the two systems in cancer diagnosis and treatment.[Table: see text]

Budget impact of the Oncotype DX® test compared to other gene expression tests in patients with early breast cancer in Germany

PURPOSE

Gene expression tests can inform decisions on whether to recommend chemotherapy for patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer. The goal of this analysis was to compare treatment costs by an expanded budget impact model of reimbursed gene expression tests in Germany.

METHODS

A cost comparison was constructed as an expanded budget impact model to calculate average total costs per patient covered by public health insurance. Based on the strong clinical evidence from the prospective randomized controlled trial TAILORx including more than 10,000 patients with HR+ and node negative breast cancer, the assumption was made that the Oncotype DX® test accurately predicts chemotherapy benefit and clinical outcomes. For the further reimbursed tests (EndoPredict®, MammaPrint®, Prosigna®), results from comparative studies - aligned with prognosis studies - as analyzed in IQWiG Rapid Report D19-01 were applied.

RESULTS

The use of the Oncotype DX test led to estimated average savings per patient of 2,500 € vs. EndoPredict, 1,936 € vs. MammaPrint, and 649 € vs. Prosigna. Savings were achieved by reduction of unnecessary chemotherapy use, a consequence of false-positive test results (EndoPredict 73%, MammaPrint 42%, Prosigna 20%). False-negative test results (EndoPredict 5%, MammaPrint 22%, Prosigna 49%) reduced necessary chemotherapies, which initially results in cost savings, but may lead to increased long-term costs associated with management of progressive disease.

CONCLUSION

The results from this model suggest that the use of the Oncotype DX test reduces the cost of health care in Germany making it the most cost effective test compared to the further tests.

The Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?

Mature overall survival (OS) data are often unavailable at the time of regulatory and reimbursement decisions for a new cancer treatment. For patients with early-stage cancers treated with potentially curative treatments, demonstrating an OS benefit may take years and may be confounded by subsequent lines of therapy or crossover to the investigational treatment. For patients with advanced-stage cancers, mature OS data may be available but difficult to interpret for similar reasons. There are strong opinions about approval and reimbursement in the absence of mature OS data, with concerns over delay in patient access set against concerns about uncertainty in long-term benefit. This position paper reflects our individual views as patient advocate, clinician or health economist on one aspect of this debate. We look at payer decisions in the absence of mature OS data, considering when and how non-OS trial outcomes could inform decision-making and how uncertainty can be addressed beyond the trial, supporting these views with evidence from the literature. We consider when it is reasonable for payers to expect or not expect mature OS data at the initial reimbursement decision (based on criteria such as cancer stage and treatment efficacy) acknowledging that there are settings in which mature OS data are expected. We propose flexible strategies for generating and appraising patient-relevant evidence, including context-relevant endpoints and quality of life measures, when survival rates are good and mature OS data are not expected. We note that fair reimbursement is important; this means valuing patient benefit as shown through prespecified endpoints and reappraising if there is ongoing uncertainty or failure to show a sustained benefit. We suggest that reimbursement systems continue to evolve to align with scientific advances, because innovation is only meaningful if readily accessible to patients. The proposed strategies have the potential to promote thorough assessment of potential benefit to patients and lead to timely access to effective medicines.

Correction: AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: 2021 Update

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-1499-8431.].

AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: 2021 Update

For many decades, the standard procedure to treat breast cancer included complete dissection of the axillary lymph nodes. The aim was to determine histological node status, which was then used as the basis for adjuvant therapy, and to ensure locoregional tumour control. In addition to the debate on how to optimise the therapeutic strategies of systemic treatment and radiotherapy, the current discussion focuses on improving surgical procedures to treat breast cancer. As neoadjuvant chemotherapy is becoming increasingly important, the surgical procedures used to treat breast cancer, whether they are breast surgery or axillary dissection, are changing. Based on the currently available data, carrying out SLNE prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended. In contrast, surgical axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered the procedure of choice for axillary staging and can range from SLNE to TAD and ALND. To reduce the rate of false negatives during surgical staging of the axilla in pN+ _CNB stage before NACT and ycN0 after NACT, targeted axillary dissection (TAD), the removal of > 2 SLNs (SLNE, no untargeted axillary sampling), immunohistochemistry to detect isolated tumour cells and micro-metastases, and marking positive lymph nodes before NACT should be the standard approach. This most recent update on surgical axillary management describes the significance of isolated tumour cells and micro-metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the clinical consequences of low volume residual disease diagnosed using SLNE and TAD and provides an overview of this yearʼs AGO recommendations for surgical management of the axilla during primary surgery and in relation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Abstract PS10-47: Physician and patient satisfaction with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) versus chemotherapy in adult patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutated (gBRCA1/2mut) HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC): Results from a multi-country real-world (RW) study

Background: Within the past 3 years, PARPi have demonstrated improved progression-free survival and favorable PROs compared with chemotherapy in randomized clinical trials in patients with gBRCA1/2mut HER2- ABC. These agents are now available in multiple countries for the treatment of gBRCA1/2mut HER2- locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer. Limited information is available on physician/patient satisfaction with PARPi from the RW. We assessed RW physician/patient treatment satisfaction among adult patients with gBRCA1/2mut HER2- ABC in Germany, France, Italy, Spain (EU4), US, and Israel.

Methods: Oncologist were recruited to abstract data from medical records (2019/2020) for patients with gBRCA1/2mut HER2- ABC. Physicians were asked to rank (1=very dissatisfied to 5=very satisfied) their satisfaction with their patient’s current ABC treatment. The scores were dichotomized to a 0/1 variable (0=very dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/moderately satisfied; 1=satisfied/very satisfied). A subset of patients completed the Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, a validated instrument that was used to measure patient’s satisfaction with their current therapy. The physician and patient sample were matched. Physician/patient satisfaction scores were compared between chemotherapy and PARPi monotherapy utilizing inverse probability weighted regression adjustment controlling for age at therapy initiation, Charlson Comorbidity Index at time of data collection, baseline symptoms, hormone receptor (HR) status, ECOG score at therapy initiation, stage of therapy initiation (locally advanced breast cancer or metastatic breast cancer) and number of lines of ABC treatment.

Results: Overall 96 adult female patients participated; mean age was 51 years. Tumor characteristics were: 34.4% HR+/HER2-, 65.6% triple negative breast cancer. Chemotherapy (n=58) was received among 60.4% of pts [n=29 (50.0%) platinum based, n=29 (50.0%) non-platinum based], and PARPi monotherapy (n=38) was received among 39.6% of pts. Physicians were significantly more likely to be satisfied or very satisfied with PARPi in comparison with chemotherapy (95.4% vs. 40.8%, p&lt;0.001). Mean patient satisfactions scores were numerically higher with PARPi vs. chemotherapy: expectation of therapy 81.3 vs. 72.0 (p=0.13), feelings about side effects 55.7 vs. 51.4 (p=0.30), satisfaction with therapy 74.0 vs. 68.5 (p=0.13).

Conclusions: PARPi have demonstrated superior efficacy and favorable PROs vs. chemotherapy in randomized controlled trials. In this RW study, physicians reported significantly higher satisfaction with PARPi vs. chemotherapy; patients reported numerically higher satisfaction scores with PARPi vs. chemotherapy across all domains. These findings further support the value of PARPi in patients with gBRCA1/2mut HER2- ABC. Additional studies to validate these findings are planned.

Funding: Pfizer

Citation Format: Michael Patrick Lux, Alexander Niyazov, Katie Lewis, James Pike, Alex Rider, Bhakti Arondekar, Reshma Mahtani. Physician and patient satisfaction with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) versus chemotherapy in adult patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutated (gBRCA1/2mut) HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC): Results from a multi-country real-world (RW) study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-47.

Abstract PS10-32: Patient reported outcomes (PROs) with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) versus chemotherapy (CTX) in patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 mutated (gBRCA1/2mut) HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC): Results from a multi-country real-world (RW) study

Background: In ABC, where treatment is palliative, an important goal is the maintenance or improvement of quality of life (QoL). In the past 3 years, PARPi have demonstrated improved progression-free survival and favorable PROs compared with CTX in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in pts with ABC and a gBRCA1/2mut. These agents are now available in multiple countries for the treatment of gBRCA1/2mut HER2- locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer. Limited information is available on the PRO benefit of these agents in the RW setting. We assessed RW cancer-related and breast-cancer specific PROs among adult pts with gBRCA1/2mut HER2- ABC in Germany, France, Italy, Spain (EU4), US, and Israel.

Methods: Oncologists were recruited to abstract data from medical records (2019/2020) for pts with gBRCA1/2mut HER2- ABC. A subset of pts completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the breast cancer module QLQ-BR23. PROs were compared between CTX and PARPi monotherapy utilizing inverse probability weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA) controlling for age at therapy initiation, Charlson Comorbidity Index at time of data collection, baseline symptoms, hormone receptor (HR) status, ECOG score at therapy initiation, stage of therapy initiation (locally advanced breast cancer or metastatic breast cancer) and number of lines of ABC treatment.

Results: Overall 96 female pts participated; mean age was 51 years. Tumor characteristics were: 34.4% HR+/HER2-, 65.6% triple negative breast cancer. CTX (n=58) was received among 60.4% of pts [n=29 (50.0%) platinum based, n=29 (50.0%) non-platinum based], and PARPi monotherapy (n=38) was received among 39.6% of pts. Compared to pts receiving CTX, pts receiving PARPi reported significantly better scores in physical and social functioning (Table 1). Pts receiving PARPi reported significantly better symptoms scores vs. CTX in constipation, breast symptoms, arm symptoms and systemic therapy side effects (Table 1). Pts receiving PARPi reported significantly worse scores vs. CTX in nausea/vomiting (Table 1). Global health status (GHS)/QoL scores were numerically better among pts receiving PARPi vs. CTX (Table 1).

Conclusions: PARPi have demonstrated superior efficacy and favorable PROs vs. CTX in RCTs in pts with gBRCA1/2mut HER2- ABC. In this RW study, the PRO benefits reported with PARPi were consistent with what has been observed in RCTs, further supporting the value of PARPi. Additional studies to validate these findings are planned.

Funding: Pfizer

EORTC QLQ-BR23 categories sexual enjoyment and upset by hair loss were excluded from the analysis due to low sample size

Table 1. IPWRA Analysis for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ BR-23a scoresCTX (n=58)PARPi Monotherapy (n=38)P valueEORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and functional scalesGHS/QoL56.5665.240.10Physical71.9079.980.045Role64.5568.060.55Emotional61.2464.580.61Cognitive78.2078.840.89Social63.5781.950.01EORTC QLQ-BR23 Functional scalesSexual12.3717.230.31Future perspective46.6844.530.81Body Image53.2265.360.13EORTC QLQ-C30 Symptoms scalesFatigue40.6739.620.87Nausea/vomiting18.2834.510.005Pain34.2638.880.42Dyspnea22.1523.290.82Insomnia30.7832.400.82Appetite loss24.8531.990.29Constipation18.751.85&lt;.001Diarrhea16.2614.570.81Financial difficulties16.2616.830.92EORTC QLQ-BR23 Symptoms ScalesBreast symptoms13.280.350.008Arm symptoms11.392.600.001Systemic therapy side effects29.3913.48&lt;.001

Citation Format: Reshma Mahtani, Alexander Niyazov, Katie Lewis, James Pike, Alex Rider, Bhakti Arondekar, Michael Patrick Lux. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) versus chemotherapy (CTX) in patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 mutated (gBRCA1/2mut) HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC): Results from a multi-country real-world (RW) study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-32.

Biosimilars in oncology: Effects on economy and therapeutic innovations

AIM

The introduction of new and innovative treatment options for cancer patients is accompanied by a tremendous increase in healthcare costs. Consequently, new financing approaches are strongly needed to reduce the burden on the healthcare system. The introduction of biosimilars - biological drugs containing the active substance of an already approved reference biological drug - can potentially relieve the burden on healthcare systems. Calculating the costs for three frequently used biosimilars, we simulated the health-economic impact of biosimilars in the real world for the German healthcare system.

METHODS

Based on available health-economic analyses, the actual prescription and cost containment potential of biosimilars compared to the originator were calculated exemplarily for the cost-intensive therapies trastuzumab in breast cancer, rituximab in follicular lymphoma and G-CSF in supportive care. Incidence calculations were based e.g. on data from the Robert-Koch-Institution, Munich Cancer Registry, and quality indicators of certified centres. Cost calculation was based on Lauer-Taxe® (official reference for pharmaceutical price information).

RESULTS

The application of biosimilars would generate potential annual savings for the chosen examples of up to 4.9 Mio EUR for rituximab in follicular lymphoma, 40.5 Mio EUR for filgrastim, 56.4 Mio EUR for pegfilgrastim, and between 95.9 and 120.5 Mio EUR for trastuzumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The consequent use of biosimilars allows a considerable reduction of overall treatment costs, especially for cost-intensive long-term maintenance treatments and therapies with high incidences. If the option of biosimilar usage is fully exploited, enormous resources could be released within the healthcare system in order to offset financing new innovative therapies.

[Are men and women with breast cancer treated equally in Germany?]

INTRODUCTION

Within the statutory health insurance system of the Federal Republic of Germany, a system of quality assurance has been implemented and operationalised through the measurement of quality indicators. For breast surgery, these quality indicators are mainly based on recommendations of the German clinical guideline for screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of breast cancer. The 2018 update of this guideline includes a new chapter on breast cancer in men. The aim of this analysis is to examine whether male and female patients with breast cancer are treated equally where appropriate and recommended by the clinical guideline, as measured by the quality indicators.

METHOD

Data of ten quality assurance indicators were analysed, for each indicator separately, stratified by sex and pooled over a 5-year period to gain statistical power. This dataset constitutes the largest data pool of men with surgical interventions for breast neoplasm in Germany. Indicator results were then compared between male and female cases. Additional subgroup analyses were carried out for two quality indicators with substantial outcome difference between male and female cases in order to detect possible differences in the treatment of breast cancer between different medical departments.

RESULTS

The database of the ten quality assurance indicators comprised 551,221 patients (546,324 females and 4,897 males) between 2014 and 2018. Pooled data of nine quality indicators (QIs) showed statistically significant outcome differences between male and female cases. In spite of pooling, the male sample size of four QIs was too small to allow for statistically reliable comparisons between male and female patients. Outcome differences in the remaining five QIs may, on the one hand, be explained by anatomical differences and different extent of the surgery, and on the other hand they confirm international data for lower HER2-positivity rates in male breast cancer patients. However, two process indicators, aiming at pretherapeutic biopsy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in invasive breast cancer recommended by the clinical guideline, show substantial differences of more than 6 percentage points between the sexes: although recommended by the clinical guideline, both procedures are carried out less often in male cases. Further analysis regarding the medical departments that recorded the treatment revealed that risk for non-adherence to guideline recommendation was high if treatment took place in non-gynaecological departments. Compared to gynaecological departments, procedures such as pretherapeutic biopsy and sentinel lymph node biopsy were carried out less frequently if cases were documented to be handled by surgery or plastic surgery departments.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Analysis of breast surgery quality indicators reveals a lower level of adherence to guideline recommendations for men with breast cancer compared to women in some aspects of the guideline, as measured by statutory quality indicators in breast surgery. Male breast cancer might be a rare disease, but nevertheless, awareness-rising is needed in diagnostics, treatment and interdisciplinarity in order to avoid inequality between the sexes.

Complementary and alternative medicine and musculoskeletal pain in the first year of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment in early breast cancer patients

Background

Patients with breast cancer (BC) show strong interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), particularly for adverse effects of adjuvant endocrine treatment — e.g., with letrozole. Letrozole often induces myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia, with potential noncompliance and treatment termination. This analysis investigated whether CAM before aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy is associated with pain development and the intensity of AI-induced musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS) during the first year of treatment.

Patients and methods

The multicenter phase IV PreFace study evaluated letrozole therapy in postmenopausal, hormone receptor–positive patients with early BC. Patients were asked about CAM use before, 6 months after, and 12 months after treatment started. They recorded pain every month for 1 year in a diary including questions about pain and numeric pain rating scales. Data were analyzed for patients who provided pain information for all time points.

Results

Of 1396 patients included, 901 (64.5%) had used CAM before AI treatment. Throughout the observation period, patients with CAM before AI treatment had higher pain values, for both myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia, than non-users. Pain increased significantly in both groups over time, with the largest increase during the first 6 months. No significant difference of pain increase was noted regarding CAM use.

Conclusions

CAM use does not prevent or improve the development of AIMSS. Pain intensity was generally greater in the CAM group. Therefore, because of the risk of non-compliance and treatment discontinuation due to the development of higher pain levels, special attention must be paid to patient education and aftercare in these patients.

•

Pain levels of myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia increase under letrozole intake.

•

Within one year pain levels increase in both, CAM users as well as non-CAM users.

•

In CAM users pain levels were higher at all time points than in non-CAM users.

•

The greatest increase of pain levels was noted in the first six treatment months.

•

CAM does not prevent or improve the development of myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia.

[TILGen study-immunological targets in patients with breast cancer : Influence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes]

BACKGROUND

The interaction of our immune system with breast cancer (BC) cells prompted the investigation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and targeted, tumor antigen-specific immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

Correlation between TILs and pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NACT). Tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) in HER2+ and triple negative BC and establishment of TSA-specific therapies within the interdisciplinary TILGen study.

METHODS

Illustration of the TILGen study design. Assessment of TILs and correlation with pCR within this BC study.

RESULTS

pCR was achieved in 38.4% (56/146) and associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negative (ER-/PR-) and HER2+ tumors. Lymphocytic predominant BC (LPBC) was found in 16.4% (24/146), particularly in ER-/PR- (ER-: 27.3% vs. ER+: 9.9%, PR-: 22.3% vs. PR+: 8.2%), large, and poorly differentiated BC. TILs were significantly correlated with pCR in multivariate analysis. In LPBC, pCR was achieved in 66.7%, whereas it was 32.8% in non-LPBC.

CONCLUSIONS

First results confirm the influence of the human immune system on the response to NACT in HER2+ and triple negative BC. TSA-specific immunotherapy might improve the outcome in BC patients but there is an urgent need for comprehensive studies to further investigate this issue.

AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2019

Every year the Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO), a group of gynecological oncologists specialized in breast cancer and interdisciplinary members specialized in pathology, radiologic diagnostics, medical oncology, and radiation oncology, prepares and updates evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with early and metastatic breast cancer. Every update is performed according to a documented rule-fixed algorithm, by thoroughly reviewing and scoring the recent publications for their scientific validity and clinical relevance. This current publication presents the 2019 update on the recommendations for metastatic breast cancer.

Surrogate threshold effect based on a meta-analysis for the predictive value of progression-free survival for overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Clinical trials investigating therapies for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) generally use progression-free survival (PFS) as primary endpoint, which is not accepted as patient-relevant outcome within the German benefit assessment. Hence a validation of PFS as surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) is needed, e.g., in the indication of HR+, HER2-negative mBC.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted. RCT were included if at least one study arm investigated fulvestrant, letrozole, tamoxifen, exemestane, or anastrozole. Additionally, hazard ratios reported for OS/PFS including confidence interval or standard error were mandatory. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to estimate the relation of surrogate endpoint PFS and patient-relevant outcome OS as well as the surrogate threshold effect (STE) which is used to determine thresholds for the estimate of the surrogate endpoint.

RESULTS

16 studies with 5324 patients in total were included in the analyses. The correlation between hazard ratios of PFS and OS was statistically significant (r = 0.72, 95% CI 0.35-0.90) representing a positive linear relationship. STE analysis was applied. The meta-regression model revealed a STE for HR_PFS of 0.60 and sensitivity analyses underlined robustness of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the derived STE, it is possible to draw conclusions on a significant effect in OS for a hypothetical trial demonstrating an upper confidence limit of HR_PFS < 0.60 in PFS. However, only final OS results are able to confirm if a clinical relevant difference in survival time can be achieved.

Abstract OT1-11-02: PRAEGNANT - Real world evidence, translational research, big and smart data: A prospective academic translational research network for the optimization of the oncological health care quality in the adjuvant and advanced/ metastatic setting (NCT02338167)

Background

During the last decades the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients has improved due to a variety of new treatment strategies. Nevertheless, many ABC patients are faced with limited prognosis, and their treatment remains a challenge. New targeted therapies complement the well-established treatment options for ABC (CDK4/6 inhibition, anti-endocrine, chemotherapy, antibody based and bone related therapies), leading to improved treatment regimens tailored to the needs of special patient sub-populations.

SPECIFIC AIMS/TRIAL DESIGN

The PRAEGNANT network study is conducted as an academic, prospective registry and diagnostic translational study, accompanied by biomaterial collection. The pilot phase in more than 60 centers aims at including 3500 ABC patients. The primary objective is to discover biomarkers, which predict progression free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS), breast cancer specific survival, objective response rate, patient reported outcomes (PRO), description of therapies used in the metastatic setting, therapy adherence, health economics for patients with ABC, incidence of (serious) adverse events and big data/ machine learning algorithms. The exploratory objectives comprise correlations of gene alterations and their influence on OS, PFS, side effects and PRO. Exploratory biomarkers are assessed at baseline and at every change of therapy. These biomarkers include gene expression profiling of the primary tumor and corresponding metastasis, somatic mutations (measured in the tumor and in circulating tumor DNA), germline genetic variations, epigenetic changes and miRNA variations. Furthermore, plasma and serum markers are assessed. If actionable molecular alterations are detected patients are informed and recruited into suitable studies if available.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:

Any adult patient (&gt;18 years) with the diagnosis of ABC and who is willing and able to sign the informed consent can be enrolled.

STATISTICAL METHODS/TARGET ACCRUAL:

The PRAEGNANT study as a prospective real world registry and diagnostic translational study aims to identify biomarkers in ABC patients, which may predict PFS. Target accrual for the pilot phase is 3500 patients. Each patient will be documented for up to 36 months with an estimated median PFS for all patients of 11 months across all treatment lines.

Citation Format: Müller V, Huober J, Volz B, Overkamp F, Kolberg H-C, Hadji P, Haeberle L, Ettl J, Hartkopf AD, Lux MP, Lüftner DI, Wallwiener M, Taran F-A, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Lermann J, Abenhardt A, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Janni W, Fehm TN, Brucker SY, Wallwiener D, Schneeweiss A, Fasching PA, Tesch H. PRAEGNANT - Real world evidence, translational research, big and smart data: A prospective academic translational research network for the optimization of the oncological health care quality in the adjuvant and advanced/ metastatic setting (NCT02338167) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-11-02.

Abstract P6-17-37: Therapy landscape of patients with metastatic, HER2 positive breast cancer - Data from the real world breast cancer registry PRAEGNANT (NCT02338167)

Purpose:

This analysis describes comprehensive real-world data concerning the use of anti-HER2 therapies in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Specifically, it describes the therapy patterns of treatments with trastuzumab (TZM), pertuzumab+trastuzumab (PTZ/TZM), lapatinib (LAP) and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1).

Methods:

The PRAEGNANT study is a real-time, real-world registry for patients with MBC. Patients can be registered for PRAEGNANT at any time during the course of their metastatic disease and are followed up until death. All therapy lines are documented. This analysis presents the utilization of anti-HER2 therapies as well as therapy sequences.

Results:

Of 1936 patients within PRAEGNANT at the time of database closure 451 were HER2 positive (23.3%). Within the analysis set (417 patients after an unilateral breast cancer diagnosis), of which 53% were included in PRAEGNANT in the 1stline setting, 241 were treated with TZM (58%), 237 with PTZ (57%), 85 with LAP (20%) and 125 with T-DM1 (30%) during the course of their therapies. The sequence PTZ/TZMàT-DM1 was given to 51 patients (12%). Worse ECOG, negative hormone receptor status, and visceral or brain metastases were associated with a more frequent use of this therapy sequence. Most patients received T-DM1 after a therapy with pertuzumab.

Conclusions:

Both novel therapies (PTZ/TZM and T-DM1) are utilized in a high proportion of HER2 positive breast cancer patients. As most patients receive T-DM1 after pertuzumab real world data might help to understand whether this sequence has similar efficacy like in the approval study.

Citation Format: Lux MP, Hartkopf AD, Huober J, Volz B, Taran F-A, Overkamp F, Hadji P, Tesch H, Haeberle L, Ettl J, Lueftner DI, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Lermann J, Abenhardt W, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Fasching PA, Janni W, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Kolberg H-C. Therapy landscape of patients with metastatic, HER2 positive breast cancer - Data from the real world breast cancer registry PRAEGNANT (NCT02338167) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-37.

Abstract P6-17-22: Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) after previous treatment with pertuzumab in patients with advanced breast cancer (NCT02338167)

Background

Studies leading to the approval of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) have been conducted without pertuzumab as previous therapy. Therefore data about patient characteristics and the efficacy of T-DM1 after a treatment with pertuzumab is scarce. Aim of this study was to analyze a real world patient cohort of advanced breast cancer (aBC) patients, who were treated with T-DM1 after a treatment containing pertuzumab in the metastatic setting with regard to patient characteristics and progression free survival (PFS).

Methods

The PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer registry (NCT02338167) is a prospective registry for metastatic breast cancer patients with focus on molecular biomarkers. Patients of all therapy lines with any kind of treatment are eligible for this registry. Collected data comprises all relevant patient and tumor characteristics, therapies, adverse events, quality of life, patient reported outcomes, response and survival (PFS/OS). Here we report on the patient characteristics and PFS data for HER2 positive patients treated with T-DM1 after a treatment with pertuzumab. Patients had to be included before or at the beginning of the T-DM1 therapy.

Results

A total of 58 patients could be identified, who were suitable for the analysis. Of those 34 were treated in the second line, 14 in the third line and 10 in the fourth line or higher. Most of the pertuzumab therapies before T-DM1 were conducted in first line (n=46; 79.3%). Median PFS for all patients was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.0-7.8 months). Median PFS for patients treated in the 3rdline and 4thline or higher was 4.2 months(95%CI: 2.3 - NA) and 4.0 months (95%CI: 1.8-N.A.), respectively. In patients treated 2ndline with T-DM1 PFS was 7.7 months (95%CI: 2.8 – 12.2).

Conclusion

T-DM1 is effective as 2ndand further line therapy following pretreatment with pertuzumab. Overall PFS was about 5 months with 7.7 months as 2nd-line therapy. The PFS in higher therapy lines might be shorter. As the sample size of this real world cohort was rather low and analyses have to be considered exploratory, this data need to be confirmed in studies with a larger sample size.

Citation Format: Schneeweiss A, Lux MP, Hartkopf AD, Volz B, Kolberg H-C, Hadji P, Tesch H, Haeberle L, Ettl J, Lüftner DI, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Lermann J, Abenhardt W, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Overkamp F, Huober J, Taran F-A, Janni W, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Fasching PA, Fehm TN. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) after previous treatment with pertuzumab in patients with advanced breast cancer (NCT02338167) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-22.

Abstract P2-09-04: Identification of a neoantigen targeted by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a patient with Her2+ breast cancer

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) positively correlates with outcome and response to chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). Furthermore, first studies of immune-checkpoint inhibitors showed promising results in those patients. However, the targets of those TILs remain unknown. Neoantigens, which arise in the process of tumorigenesis, appear as potential targets. They can elicit high avidity, tumor-specific T-cell responses. Thus, it is the aim of our study to ascertainif these TILs are directed against tumor-specific mutations.

Methods: TILs from breast cancer biopsies taken at the time point of diagnosis were expanded by unspecific stimulation. Additionally, we used the Gentle Macs Dissociator in combination with flow cytometry to investigate the number of TILs in the tumor tissue. Furthermore, we performed whole-genome sequencing of tumor tissue and as reference autologous blood cells to determine tumor-specific mutations. Mutations leading to a non-synonymous amino acid change were analyzed for RNA expression of the encoding gene as well as to determine potential neoantigens. Neoantigens were evaluated for their potential binding to the patient's specific HLA molecules. Peptides for potential neoantigens were synthesized, loaded onto autologous antigen presenting cells (APCs) and cocultured with TILs. All IFNγ producing T-cells were clonally expanded and retested for peptide specificity to identify neoantigen specific T-cell clones.

Results: Our flow cytometric analysis of the tumor biopsy for more than 300 patients showed higher frequencies of TILs in TNBC as compared to other types of breast cancer or patients without malignancy. Screening for neoantigen specific T-cells in one patient led to identification of three peptide-specific CD4+ T-cell clones isolated from HER2+ breast cancer tissue taken at the time point of diagnosis. All T-cell clones specifically recognized the same tumor-specific mutation and not the wildtype counterpart. Furthermore, we demonstrated that these T-cell clones also recognized the endogenously expressed mutated antigen. This verified the ability of processing and presentation of the respective protein. Interestingly, we could also isolate a T-cell clone recognizing the same neoantigen in the resected tumor tissue after neoadjuvant therapy. Based on CDR3 sequencing we could prove that the four T-cell clones represented individual clones. This confirms the polyclonal nature of the immune response. Moreover, we showed that the same neoepitope was presented in two different HLA restriction molecules of the patient with three of the clones recognizing it in HLA-DPB1*0401 and one in HLA-DPB1*0201. These results further underline the immunogenicity of this neoantigen.

Conclusion: In conclusion, our data demonstrate tumor-specificity of TILs in a patient with HER2+ breast cancer. Furthermore, we show the feasibility to identify individual cancer specific T-cell targets in breast cancer patients. These results may contribute to the development of targeted patient-specific immunotherapies in the future.

Citation Format: Reimann H, Nguyen A, Hübner H, Erber R, Bausenwein J, Van der Meijden ED, Lux MP, Jud S, Griffioen M, Rauh C, Sanborn JZ, Benz SC, Rabizadeh S, Beckmann MW, Mackensen A, Rübner M, Fasching PA, Kremer AN. Identification of a neoantigen targeted by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a patient with Her2+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-04.

Design and Implementation of a Single Source Multipurpose Hospital-Wide Clinical Trial Registry

IT-supported patient recruitment, serious adverse event reporting as well as making information about clinical trials accessible to the public on websites, are still major challenges in clinical trials. Too often the distribution of information about trials being performed within a hospital across numerous institutions and IT systems is a barrier to provide efficient IT support for such scenarios. Thus, the essential prerequisite to mastering those challenges is to achieve one single point of truth with adequate, complete, accurate and up-to-date information about all clinical trials running at a hospital. We describe the design and implementation of such a single source clinical trial registry serving multiple purposes at a university hospital.

Abstract P3-11-07: Factors associated with first line chemotherapy use in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer – data from the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry

Background

For breast cancer patients with metastases which are not life threatening national and international guidelines recommend the exhaustion of all antihormonal therapeutic options before recommending chemotherapy. In Germany up to now only everolimus was an additional option to overcome endocrine resistance. CDK4/6 inhibitors recently became available in Germany (Nov 2011). Aim of this analysis was the identification of predictors for a decision against an antihormonal treatment.

Methods

The PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer registry (NCT02338167) is a prospective registry for metastatic breast cancer patients. Besides biomarker research the description of real-world treatment data was one of the main study aims. This analysis was restricted to first line metastatic patients who were hormone receptor (HR) positive and HER2 negative. First, predictors were identified with a multiple logistic regression model. Then patients, who received chemo or not ,were compared with regard to overall survival using Cox regression analysis with the predictors for chemotherapy from above and additionally chemo status (yes/no)

Results

A total of 389 HR-positive and HER2-negative patients with detailed treatment information were included during the 1st line therapy into PRAEGNANT. Of those 173 (44.5%) received a chemotherapy, 190 an antihormone therapy (AHT) (48.8%), and 26 (6.7%) everolimus+AHT. In the multiple logistic regression model, older patients, lower graded tumors, bone only disease and previous adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with a lower rate of first line chemotherapies. BMI and number of concomitant diseases had no influence on the choice of first line metastatic therapy. In patients with visceral metastases 58.1% were treated with a 1st line chemo, while in patients with brain metastases or bone only metastases these numbers were 55.6% and 26.9%. Grading had an influence with patients having a G1, G2 and G3 tumor receiving 1st line chemo in 28.0%, 38.4% and 63.2% of the cases respectively. Patients who received chemo seemed to have a worse overall survival than patients who did not receive chemo (adjusted HR 1.58; 95% CI, 0.89 to 2.18). However, this result was not signifcant (p = 0.12). Overall survival was primarily influenced by ECOG and location of metastasis

Conclusion

The usage of chemotherapy can be predicted with age, metastasis pattern, grading and previous use of chemotherapy. However, we could not show that patients benefited from chemotherapy. On contrary, there was a tendency that patients treated with chemotherapy had poorer overall survival. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm this claim.

Citation Format: Huober J, Fasching PA, Taran F-A, Volz B, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Haeberle L, Ettl J, Hartkopf AD, Lux MP, Lueftner D, Wallwiener M, Mueller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Fersis N, Abenhardt W, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Janni W, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Fehm TN. Factors associated with first line chemotherapy use in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer – data from the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-07.

Abstract P1-07-20: Developing prognostic indicators of poor outcomes in PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer cohort

Background: Despite novel, targeted therapies, metastatic breast cancer patients have an extremely unfavourable prognosis. Prognostic and predictive factors for patients with advanced breast cancer are not well understood. Molecular assessment of the patient and the tumor in the metastatic situation is not routinely performed despite advances in molecular precision medicine indicating great benefit to this patient group. Here we present early findings from the first 142 patients of a prospective molecular breast cancer registry with completed transcriptomic profiling.

Methods: The PRAEGNANT study proctocol (NCT02338767) is a molecular registry designed to provide an infrastructure for the real-time comprehensive analysis of tumor and patient molecular characteristics under study conditions. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumors have been used from this registry to identify molecular, transcriptomic predictors for overall survival (OS).

Known clinical correlates for OS (e.g. hormone-receptor status, age at diagnosis, and BMI) were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard ratios, and compared to transcriptomic markers of outcomes. Transcriptomes for all patient tumors were sequenced on the Illumina sequencing platform, and analyzed by RSEM to estimate transcripts per million (TPM) values for each gene isoform. Log-TPM values were used in established (PAM50) and novel (hierarchical clustering) expression-based subtyping of tumor samples. Expression-based subtypes were demonstrated to be strong prognostic indicators by Cox analysis. A Lasso regression machine learning algorithm was used to develop an expression-based predictive model of OS.

Results: Hormone receptor positivity (HR=0.7, p&lt;0.006) and TNBC status (HR=1.4, p&lt;0.01) were significantly associated with outcomes. PAM50 subtypes were also strong indicators of outcomes (e.g. Basal disease compared to Luminal-A subtype has HR=1.4, p&lt;0.017). A novel expression-based high-risk cluster in this cohort was more indicative of poor prognosis than clinical variates or Basal-type, with a HR=2.7 (p&lt;0.009) when compared to Luminal-A subtype. An expression-based survival prediction model achieved a concordance-index of 0.65 in an unseen validation cohort. Patients predicted as having the shortest survival times were in the high-risk cluster.

Conclusions: Here we demonstrate using molecular profiling to develop prognostic signatures that out-perform standard clinical correlates of poor outcomes, even in a small subset of the total cohort. As the PRAEGNANT cohort expands these prognostic tools will continue to improve and supplement physician knowledge to improve patient outcomes.

Citation Format: Szeto C, Benz S, Nguyen A, Rübner M, Wallwiener D, Tesch H, Hadji P, Fehm TN, Janni W, Overkamp F, Lueftner D, Lux MP, Wallwiener M, Beckmann MW, Huebner H, Ettl J, Hartkopf AD, Mueller V, Taran FA, Belleville E, Schneeweiss A, Soon-Shiong P, Rabizadeh S, Fasching PA. Developing prognostic indicators of poor outcomes in PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-20.

Abstract P5-21-09: Overall survival of metastatic breast cancer patients – data from the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry

Background

Breast Cancer registries can help to understand how patient groups are treated outside clinical trials and what outcome is to expected for specific patient groups and therapy lines, which are not included into clinical trials. Here we present overall survival data according to therapy lines, patient and tumor characteristics.

Methods

The PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer registry (NCT02338167) is a prospective registry for breast cancer patients with focus on molecular biomarkers. Patients of all therapy lines with any kind of treatment are eligible for this registry. Collected data comprises therapies, adverse events, quality of life and other patient reported outcomes. Here we report on the comparison of overall survival data for different patient groups. For that analysis was restricted to patients included in the first therapy line for subgroup comparisons. Only for the analysis of the effect of therapy line on overall survival the complete dataset was used.

Results

A total of 1854 patients took part in this analysis. Of those 1016 were included first line, and 340, 213 and 285 patients 2nd line, 3rd lin4 and 4th line or higher respectively. A total of 339 deaths were observed. Two year survival rates (2Y-OS) for these groups were 75%, 65%, 57% and 36% (p(log-rank)&lt;0.001). All further analyses were done only for the subset of first line treated patients with a total of 127 events. HER2 positive patients had the highest 2Y-OS rate of 84% and TNBC had the worst with 60% (see figure 1). Absolute numbers of deaths for TNBC, luminal A like, luminal B like and HER2 posives were 21, 48, 25, and 21. According to metastastic pattern the following survival rates were seen: brain (48%), other locations (69%), visceral (78%) and bone only (81%). ECOG was another factor that had a large influence on OS with ECOG 0: 83%, ECOG 1: 67% and EGOG 2+: 63% 2Y-OS. Age, BMI, number of concomitant diseases, and primary metastatic status did not have an influence on 2Y-OS.

Conclusion

This breast registry included patients over all therapy lines however mainly during the 1st line of therapy. Simple patient and tumor characteristics can classify patients into patients with differently favourable prognosis. Patients with HER2 positive disease had the best overall survival, while TNBC and luminal B like patients had the worst prognosis. As most of the patients were luminal A like 43% of all deaths occured within the group of luminal A like patients, which will need further focus for therapy development in the future.

Citation Format: Taran F-A, Fasching PA, Volz B, Huober J, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Haeberle L, Ettl J, Lux MP, Hartkopf AD, Lueftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Fersis N, Abenhardt W, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Janni W, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A. Overall survival of metastatic breast cancer patients – data from the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-09.

Abstract P6-11-10: Impact of disease progression on health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer in the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry

Background: Improved progression-free survival is considered as treatment goal for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) since it is assumed to delay or prevent deterioration of quality of life.Aim of our analysis was to examine the influence of disease progression on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods: The PRAEGNANT study comprises a real-life registry for patients with MBC. HRQoL was assessed with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Version 3.0 questionnaire at study entry and every 3 months thereafter. The primary endpoint was minimally important deterioration (MID) in global HRQoL score by ≥ five points between baseline and any follow-up assessment. A logistic regression model was built with MID (yes/no) at a follow-up timepoint as outcome variable and several covariates as predictors.

Results: In total, 329 patients were included in this analysis, with disease progression in 63 patients. Concerning the primary study aim, progression status predicted MID of global HRQoL status in addition to the other covariates. The adjusted odds ratio for the effect of progression status on MID was 2.22 (95% CI: 1.04 – 4.73). Comparisons of mean differences of QoL domains/scales yielded no differences.

Conclusions: We provide evidence that disease progression in patients with metastatic breast cancer in a real-world registry has a significant negative impact on HRQoL as measured by MID of HRQoL. This study emphasizes the relevance of avoiding progression and prolonging PFS to maintain QoL.

Citation Format: Wallwiener M, Nabieva N, Haeberle L, Taran FA, Hartkopf AD, Volz B, Overkamp F, Brandl AL, Kolberg H-C, Hadji P, Tesch H, Ettl J, Lux MP, Lueftner D, Belleville E, Fasching PA, Janni W, Beckmann MW, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Fehm T, Brucker SY, Wallwiener D, Schneeweiss A, Mueller V. Impact of disease progression on health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer in the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-10.

Budget impact analysis of gene expression tests to aid therapy decisions for breast cancer patients in Germany

OBJECTIVES

Many women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer may not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Gene expression tests can reduce chemotherapy over- and undertreatment by providing prognostic information on the likelihood of recurrence and, with Oncotype DX, predictive information on chemotherapy benefit. These tests are currently not reimbursed by German healthcare payers. An analysis was conducted to evaluate the budget impact of gene expression tests in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Costs of gene expression tests and medical and non-medical costs associated with treatment were assessed from healthcare payer and societal perspectives. Costs were estimated from data collected at a university hospital and were combined with decision impact data for Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, Prosigna and EndoPredict (EPclin). Changes in chemotherapy use and budget impact were evaluated over 1 year for 20,000 women.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy was associated with substantial annual costs of EUR 19,003 and EUR 84,412 per therapy from the healthcare payer and societal perspective, respectively. Compared with standard care, only Oncotype DX was associated with cost savings to healthcare payers and society (EUR 5.9 million and EUR 253 million, respectively). Scenario analysis showed that both women at high clinical but low genomic risk and low clinical but high genomic risk were important contributors to costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncotype DX was the only gene expression test that was estimated to reduce costs versus standard care in Germany. The reimbursement of Oncotype DX testing in standard clinical practice in Germany should be considered.

Genetic Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Prognosis in the Prospectively Randomized SUCCESS A Study

Large-scale genotyping studies have identified over 70 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with breast cancer (BC) risk. However, knowledge regarding genetic risk factors associated with the prognosis is limited. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the prognostic effect of nine known breast cancer risk SNPs. BC patients (n = 1687) randomly sampled in an adjuvant, randomized phase III trial (SUCCESS A study) were genotyped for nine BC risk SNPs: rs17468277 (CASP8) , rs2981582 (FGFR2) , rs13281615(8q24), rs3817198 (LSP1) , rs889312 (MAP3K1) , rs3803662 (TOX3) , rs13387042(2q35), rs4973768 (SLC4A7) , rs6504950 (COX11) . Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the SNPs' association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Additional analyses were carried out for molecular subgroups. rs3817198 in LSP1 (lymphocyte-specific protein 1) was the only SNP that significantly influenced OS (p = 0.01) and PFS (p < 0.01) in the likelihood ratio test comparing the genetic survival model with the clinical survival model. In the molecular subgroups, triple-negative patients with two minor alleles in rs3817198 had a much better prognosis relative to OS (adjusted HR 0.03; 95% CI 0.002 - 0.279) and PFS (HR 0.09; 95% CI 0.02 - 0.36) than patients with the common alleles. The same effect on PFS was shown for patients with luminal A tumors (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05 - 0.84), whereas patients with luminal B tumors had a poorer PFS with two minor alleles (HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.02 - 4.40). The variant in rs3817198 has a prognostic effect particularly in the subgroup of patients with triple-negative BC, suggesting a possible link with immunomodulation and BC.

A phase III, open label, randomized multicenter controlled trial of oral versus intravenous treosulfan in heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer: a study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO)

OBJECTIVE

In recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), there is a high demand on effective therapies with a mild toxicity profile. Treosulfan is an alkylating agent approved as oral (p.o.) and intravenous (i.v.) formulation for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Data on safety and efficacy for either formulation are rare. For the first time we conducted a randomized phase III study comparing both formulations in women with ROC.

METHODS

Patients having received at least two previous lines of chemotherapy were randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms: treosulfan i.v. 7000 mg/m² d1 q4w or treosulfan p.o. 600 mg/m² d1-28 q8w. Primary endpoint was safety regarding hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity grade III/IV, secondary endpoints were other toxicities, clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and quality of life.

RESULTS

250 patients were treated with treosulfan i.v. (128) or treosulfan p.o. (122). In general treosulfan therapy was well tolerated in both treatment arms. Leukopenia grade III/IV occurred significantly more frequently in the p.o. arm (3.9% i.v. arm, 14.8% p.o. arm, p = 0.002). Other toxicities were similar in both arms. CBR was comparable between arms (41.4% i.v. arm, 36.9% p.o. arm). No difference in TTP (3.7 months i.v. arm, 3.5 months p.o. arm) or OS (13.6 months i.v. arm, 10.4 months p.o. arm, p = 0.087) occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the safety and efficacy results treosulfan is an acceptable option for heavily pretreated OC patients. Regarding the toxicity profile the i.v. application was better tolerated with less grade III and IV toxicities.