Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients

Noninvasive ventilation in patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the recent literature concerning the use of noninvasive ventilation for hypoxemic acute respiratory failure.

RECENT FINDINGS

The benefits of noninvasive ventilation for patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure are unclear. In immunocompromised patients and following thoracic surgery, there is a strong rationale for using noninvasive ventilation to treat acute respiratory failure. Prophylactic continuous positive airway pressure after abdominal or thoracic surgery and prophylactic noninvasive ventilation in patients at risk of extubation failure have proved beneficial. Recent studies show that noninvasive ventilation has a favourable impact in immunocompetent patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome, but caution is required. In hypoxemic acute respiratory failure after extubation, one study reported excess mortality in patients treated with noninvasive ventilation, possibly related to the delay for intubation. A major issue is avoiding undue noninvasive ventilation prolongation and staying alert for predictors of early noninvasive ventilation failure. Caution, close monitoring, and broad experience are required.

SUMMARY

Hypoxemic acute respiratory failure may benefit from noninvasive ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure, but undue prolongation should be avoided. In postextubation respiratory failure there is no evidence for routine use of noninvasive ventilation.

Noninvasive ventilation

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) is the delivery of mechanical-assisted breathing without placement of an artificial airway such as an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy. During the first half of 20th century, negative-pressure ventilation (iron lung) provided mechanical ventilatory assistance. By the 1960s, however, invasive (ie, by means of an endotracheal tube) positive-pressure ventilation superseded negative-pressure ventilation as the primarily mode of support for ICU patients because of its superior delivery of support and better airway protection. Over the past decade, the use of NPPV has been integrated into the treatment of many medical diseases, largely because the development of nasal ventilation. Nasal ventilation has the potential benefit of providing ventilatory assistance with greater convenience, comfort, safety, and less cost than invasive ventilation. NPPV is delivered by a tightly fitted mask or helmet that covers the nares, face, or head. NPPV is used in various clinical settings and is beneficial in many acute medical situations. This article explores the trends regarding the use of noninvasive ventilation. It also provides a current perspective on applications in patients with acute and chronic respiratory failure, neuromuscular disease, congestive heart failure, and sleep apnea. Additionally, it discusses the general guidelines for application, monitoring, and avoidance of complications for NPPV.

Bringing quality improvement into the intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

During the last several years, many governmental and nongovernmental organizations have championed the application of the principles of quality improvement to the practice of medicine, particularly in the area of critical care.

OBJECTIVE

To review the breadth of approaches to quality improvement in the intensive care unit, including measures such as mortality and length of stay, and the use of protocols, bundles, and the role of large, multiple-hospital collaboratives.

RESULTS

Several agencies have participated in the application of the quality movement to medicine, culminating in the development of standards such as the intensive care unit core measures of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Although "zero defects" may not be possible in all measurable variables of quality in the intensive care unit, several measures, such as catheter-related bloodstream infections, can be significantly reduced through the implementation of improved processes of care, such as care bundles. Large, multiple-center, quality improvement collaboratives, such as the Michigan Keystone Intensive Care Unit Project, may be particularly effective in improving the quality of care by creating a "bandwagon effect" within a geographic region.

CONCLUSION

The quality revolution is having a significant effect in the critical care unit and is likely to be facilitated by the transition to the electronic medical record.

Automatic adjustment of noninvasive pressure support with a bilevel home ventilator in patients with acute respiratory failure: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

To test the feasibility of applying noninvasive ventilation (NIV) using a prototype algorithm implemented in a bilevel ventilation device designed to adjust pressure support (PS) to maintain a clinician-set alveolar ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure after initial stabilization.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective crossover interventional study in an intensive care unit, university hospital.

PATIENTS

19 patients receiving NIV for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (13 men, 6 women; mean age 70+/-11 years).

METHODS

The same bilevel ventilator was used with manually adjusted PS and with the automated algorithm (autoPS), set to maintain the same alveolar ventilation as in PS. Sequence (measurements at end of each period): (a) prior to initiating NIV (baseline 1); (b) 45 min with manually set PS; (c) 60 min without NIV; (d) 45 min with autoPS; (e) 60 min without NIV; (f) 45 min with manually set PS.

RESULTS

The magnitude of decrease in PaCO(2) and increase in pH with autoPS was comparable to that of conventional PS, with the same alveolar ventilation and level of PS. No technical problem occurred in autoPS mode, and no NIV trial had to be discontinued because of patient discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the alveolar ventilation based automatic control of PS during NIV with a bilevel device is feasible and leads to beneficial effects in patients with acute respiratory failure comparable to those of manually set PS. Further studies should now explore the potential of this system over longer periods in patients with acute and chronic respiratory failure.

Automatic adjustment of pressure support by a computer-driven knowledge-based system during noninvasive ventilation: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of using a knowledge-based system designed to automatically titrate pressure support (PS) to maintain the patient in a "respiratory comfort zone" during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with acute respiratory failure.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective crossover interventional study in an intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients.

INTERVENTIONS

After initial NIV setting and startup in conventional PS by the chest physiotherapist NIV was continued for 45 min with the automated PS activated.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

During automated PS minute-volume was maintained constant while respiratory rate decreased significantly from its pre-NIV value (20+/-3 vs. 25+/-3 bpm). There was a trend towards a progressive lowering of dyspnea. In hypercapnic patients PaCO(2) decreased significantly from 61+/-9 to 51+/-2 mmHg, and pH increased significantly from 7.31+/-0.05 to 7.35+/-0.03. Automated PS was well tolerated. Two system malfunctions occurred prompting physiotherapist intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this feasibility study suggest that the system can be used during NIV in patients with acute respiratory failure. Further studies should now determine whether it can improve patient-ventilator interaction and reduce caregiver workload.

Time of non-invasive ventilation

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a safe, versatile and effective technique that can avert side effects and complications associated with endotracheal intubation. The success of NIV relies on several factors, including the type and severity of acute respiratory failure, the underlying disease, the location of treatment, and the experience of the team. The time factor is also important. NIV is primarily used to avert the need for endotracheal intubation in patients with early-stage acute respiratory failure and post-extubation respiratory failure. It can also be used as an alternative to invasive ventilation at a more advanced stage of acute respiratory failure or to facilitate the process of weaning from mechanical ventilation. NIV has been used to prevent development of acute respiratory failure or post-extubation respiratory failure. The number of days of NIV and hours of daily use differ, depending on the severity and course of the acute respiratory failure and the timing of application. In this review article, we analyse, compare and discuss the results of studies in which NIV was applied at various times during the evolution of acute respiratory failure.