The management of complicated diverticulitis and the role of computed tomography

Percutaneous drainage of colonic diverticular abscess: is colon resection necessary?

BACKGROUND

Recurrent diverticulitis has been reported in up to 30% to 40% of patients who recover from an episode of colonic diverticular abscess, so elective interval resection is traditionally recommended.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous drainage of colonic diverticular abscess without subsequent operative intervention.

DESIGN

This was an observational study.

SETTINGS

This investigation was conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center and a single-hospital health system.

PATIENTS

Patients treated for symptomatic colonic diverticular abscess from 2002 through 2007 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were complications, recurrence, and colectomy-free survival.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighteen patients underwent percutaneous drainage of colonic diverticular abscesses. Thirty-two patients (15%) did not undergo subsequent colonic resection. Abscess location was pelvic (n = 9) and paracolic (n = 23), the mean abscess size was 4.2 cm, and the median duration of percutaneous drainage was 20 days. The comorbidities of this group of patients included severe cardiac disease (n = 16), immunodeficiency (n = 7), and severe pulmonary disease (n = 6). Freedom from recurrence at 7.4 years was 0.58 (95% CI 0.42-0.73). All recurrences were managed nonoperatively. Recurrence was significantly associated with an abscess size larger than 5 cm. Colectomy-free survival at 7.4 years was 0.17 (95% CI 0.13-0.21).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective, nonexperimental design and short follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients, observation after percutaneous drainage of colonic diverticular abscess appears to be a safe and low-risk management option.

Acute diverticulitis: a decade of prospective follow-up

BACKGROUND

Acute diverticulitis (AD) is the most common complication of diverticular disease and affects 10% to 25% of patients. Data regarding the natural history of AD are lacking.

GOALS

Our aim was to prospectively assess the occurrence of recurrent attacks, surgeries, and accompanying symptoms in patients who were hospitalized with AD.

STUDY

All patients hospitalized with first episode of AD between January 2000 and November 2006 were enrolled. Patients were followed up both during hospitalization and after discharge. Data regarding operations and complications were collected. Special attention was paid to patients younger than 45 years of age and compared with older patients.

RESULTS

A total of 261 patients were identified-of them 103 were men. Thirty patients (11.5%) were 45 years old or younger. The mean follow-up period was 88±22 months (range, 52 to 184 mo). Younger patients experienced significantly more complications during hospitalization (37% vs. 12.5%, P=0.001) and underwent more often a sigmoidectomy in the follow-up period (42.3% vs. 18.3%, P=0.01). Older patients tended to be more often asymptomatic after discharge (P=0.053). The average time from index hospitalization to the sigmoidectomy was 18.17±23.35 months (range, 1 to 120 mo). The odds ratio for sigmoidectomy after complicated AD is 16.2 (95% confidence interval, 13.4 to 19.6). Age did not affect the risk for surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger patients with AD experience more complications during hospitalization and undergo surgery after discharge more frequently. Complicated AD at index hospitalization is a risk factor for sigmoidectomy. Our data can help predict the outcome of patients suffering from AD and enable tailoring an individual treatment.

Triage of patients with acute diverticulitis: are some inpatients candidates for outpatient treatment?

AIM

Current recommendations regarding the triage of patients with acute diverticulitis for inpatient or outpatient treatment are vague. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients treated as an inpatient could be managed as an outpatient.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was carried out of 639 patients admitted for a first episode of diverticulitis. The diagnosis of acute diverticulitis was confirmed by computed tomography (CT). The endpoints included length of stay, need for surgery, percutaneous drainage and mortality. Patients were considered to have had a minimal hospitalization, defined as survival to discharge without needing a procedure, hospitalization of ≤ 3 days and no readmission for diverticulitis within 30 days after discharge.

RESULTS

Of 639 patients, 368 (57.6%) had a minimal hospitalization. Female gender and CT scan findings of free air/fluid were negatively associated with the likelihood of minimal hospitalization. The presence of an abscess < 3 cm and stranding on CT did not predict the need for a higher level of care. Despite the statistical significance of several patient-level predictors, the model did not identify patients likely to need only minimal hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Most patients admitted with acute diverticulitis are discharged after minimal hospitalization. Free air/liquid in a patient admitted for acute diverticulitis indicates a more severe clinical course.

Treatment of Hinchey stage III-IV diverticulitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This manuscript is a review of different surgical techniques to manage perforated colon diverticulitis.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to compare the benefits and disadvantages of different surgical treatments for Hinchey III or IV type of colon diverticulitis.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Science Citation Index (1990 and 2011). A total of 1,809 publications were identified and 14 studies with 1,041 patients were included in the study. Any surgical treatment was considered in this review. Mortality was considered the primary outcome, whereas hospital stay and reoperation rate were considered secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Primary resection with anastomosis has a significant advantage in terms of lower mortality rate with respect to Hartmann's procedure (P = 0.02). The postoperative length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the resection with anastomosis group (P < 0.001). Different findings have emerged from studies of patients with the primary resection with anastomosis vs laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and subsequent resection: overall surgical morbidity and hospital stay were lower in the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage group compared to the primary resection and anastomosis group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite numerous published articles on operative treatments for patients with generalized peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis, we found a marked heterogeneity between included studies limiting the possibility to summarize in a metanalytical method the data provided and make difficult to synthesize data in a quantitative fashion. The advantages in the group of colon resection with primary anastomosis in terms of lower mortality rate and postoperative stay should be interpreted with caution because of several limitations. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate different surgical treatments for patients with generalized peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis.

Comparison of outcomes between endoscopic ultrasound-guided transcolonic and transrectal drainage of abdominopelvic abscesses

BACKGROUND

Transrectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pelvic abscess drainage has been reported, but data on transcolonic drainage are scant.

AIM

To compare outcomes in patients undergoing transcolonic and transrectal drainage of abdominopelvic abscesses.

METHODS

Retrospective study of all patients who underwent EUS-guided drainage of abdominopelvic abscesses over a 7-year period. Abscesses were drained by a standard single-step EUS-guided technique with deployment of double-pigtail stents ± catheters. Technical success was defined as successful placement of stents or drainage catheters within the abscess cavity. Treatment success was defined as resolution of abscess on follow-up computed tomography at 2 weeks with symptom improvement.

RESULTS

Of 38 patients, 11 underwent transcolonic and 27 transrectal drainages. There was no difference in patient demographics, laboratory values, and median abscess size (65 vs 70 mm, P = 0.85) between the two cohorts. Etiology of abscess was postsurgical in 65.7%, diverticulitis in 13.1%, perforated viscus in 10.5%, and other causes in 10.5%. There was no difference in rates of technical success (100% in each cohort), treatment success (70% vs 96.3%, P = 0.052), or complications (none). Three patients in the transcolonic and one in the transrectal cohort underwent surgery for failed endoscopic drainage (27.3% vs 3.7%, P = 0.06). When evaluated by etiology, treatment success for diverticular abscess was significantly lower compared with others (25% vs 97%, P = 0.002). At a median follow-up of 1228.5 days (interquartile range = 131-1660), all patients with treatment success were doing well with no recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Except for patients with diverticular etiology, treatment of abdominopelvic abscess under EUS guidance is highly effective and safe for both routes.

Does the presence of abscesses in diverticular disease prelude surgery?

BACKGROUND

Information on long-term outcome of patients treated conservatively for diverticular abscess is scarce. This study aims to compare diverticulitis patients with abscess to patients without abscess with regard to readmission, complications, and surgical treatment during a follow-up period of at least 12 months.

METHODS

A chart review of all patients admitted for a primary manifestation of diverticulitis between January 2005 and January 2011 was performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients with abscess and 663 without abscess were identified. Median follow-up was 28 months (range 12-103). Initial conservative management was achieved in 54 (91.5 %) patients with diverticular abscess and 635 (96.8 %) without abscess. Readmission occurred more frequently among patients with abscess (hazard ratio (HR) 2.6; confidence interval (CI) 1.51-4.33) with a first-year risk of 27.3 versus 10.7 % and second-year risk of 8.2 versus 4.6 %. Surgery was more frequently performed in patients with diverticular abscess (HR 2.3; CI 1.42-3.66). The first-year risk was 35.1 versus 16.6 % and second-year risk was 12.9 versus 2.4 %. The most frequent indication for surgery was persisting or recurrent disease.

CONCLUSION

Patients with diverticular abscess have a higher risk of being readmitted and/or requiring surgical treatment. The pattern suggests that readmission and need for surgery are the results of an ongoing inflammation of the initial episode.

2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections

Despite advances in diagnosis, surgery, and antimicrobial therapy, mortality rates associated with complicated intra-abdominal infections remain exceedingly high.The 2013 update of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines for the management of intra-abdominal infections contains evidence-based recommendations for management of patients with intra-abdominal infections.

Acute diverticulitis: demographic, clinical and laboratory features associated with computed tomography findings in 741 patients

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) demonstrates diverticulitis severity.

AIM

To assess demographic, clinical and leucocyte features in association with severity.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of 741 emergency department cases and in-patients with diverticulitis. CT findings were: (i) nondiagnostic; (ii) moderate (peri-colic inflammation); and (iii) severe (abscess and/or extra-luminal gas and/or contrast).

RESULTS

Patients with severe vs. nondiagnostic/moderate findings had fewer females (42.4% vs. 58.2%, P = .004), less lower abdominal pain only (74.7% vs. 83.7%, P = .042) and more constipation (24.4% vs. 12.5%, P = .002), fever (52.2% vs. 27.0%, P < .0001), leucocytosis (81.5% vs. 55.2%, P < .0001), neutrophilia (86.2% vs. 59.0%, P < .0001), ‘bandemia’ (18.5% vs. 5.5%, P < .0001) and the triad of abdominal pain, fever and leucocytosis (46.7% vs. 19.9%, P < .0001) respectively. Severe vs. nondiagnostic/moderate findings occurred in 4.8% vs. 95.2% without fever or leucocytosis, 7.0% vs. 93.0% with fever, 12.3% vs. 87.7% with leucocytosis and 25.1% vs. 74.9% with fever and leucocytosis respectively (P < .0001). The former group (odds ratio [95% CI]) included females less often (0.45 [0.26-0.76]) and had less lower abdominal pain only (0.54 [0.29-0.99]) and more constipation (2.32 [1.27-4.23]), fever (2.13 [1.27-3.57]) and leucocytosis (2.67 [1.43-4.99]).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than 50% of severe cases have the clinical/laboratory triad of abdominal pain, fever and leucocytosis, but only 1 of 20 with pain who lack fever and leucocytosis have severe diverticulitis. Male gender, pain not limited to the lower abdomen, constipation, fever and leucocytosis are independently associated with severe diverticulitis.

Endoscopic evaluation of the colon after an episode of diverticulitis: a call for a more selective approach

PURPOSE

Routine colonic evaluation is advised after an episode of diverticulitis to exclude colorectal cancer. In the recent years, the possible relation between diverticulitis and colorectal cancer has been subject of debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of routine colonic endoscopy after an episode of diverticulitis.

METHODS

Records of all consecutive patients presenting with a radiologically confirmed episode of diverticulitis between 2007 and 2010 were retrieved from an in-hospital database. Patients who subsequently underwent colonic evaluation were included. The endoscopic detection rate of hyperplastic polyps, adenomas and advanced colonic neoplasia was assessed. Findings were categorized on the basis of the most advanced lesion identified.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seven patients presented with a radiologically confirmed primary episode of diverticulitis. Two hundred and five patients underwent colonic evaluation. Hyperplastic polyps were found in15 (6.8 %), adenomas in 18 (8.8 %) and advanced neoplastic lesions in 7 (3.4 %) patients. Only two patients had a colorectal malignancy.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be no benefit in performing routine colonic evaluation after an episode of diverticulitis as the incidence of colorectal cancer is almost equal to that of the general population. A more selective approach might therefore be justified. Potentially, only patients with persisting abdominal complaints after an episode of diverticulitis should be offered colonic evaluation to definitively exclude causal pathology.

Complicated diverticular disease: the changing paradigm for treatment

The term "complicated" diverticulitis is reserved for inflamed diverticular disease complicated by bleeding, abscess, peritonitis, fistula or bowel obstruction. Hemorrhage is best treated by angioembolization (interventional radiology). Treatment of infected diverticulitis has evolved enormously thanks to: 1) laparoscopic colonic resection followed or not (Hartmann's procedure) by restoration of intestinal continuity, 2) simple laparoscopic lavage (for peritonitis +/- resection). Diverticulitis (inflammation) may be treated with antibiotics alone, anti-inflammatory drugs, combined with bed rest and hygienic measures. Diverticular abscesses (Hinchey Grades I, II) may be initially treated by antibiotics alone and/or percutaneous drainage, depending on the size of the abscess. Generalized purulent peritonitis (Hinchey III) may be treated by the classic Hartmann procedure, or exteriorization of the perforation as a stoma, primary resection with or without anastomosis, with or without diversion, and last, simple laparoscopic lavage, usually even without drainage. Feculent peritonitis (Hinchey IV), a traditional indication for Hartmann's procedure, may also benefit from primary resection followed by anastomosis, with or without diversion, and even laparoscopic lavage. Acute obstruction (nearby inflammation, or adhesions, pseudotumoral formation, chronic strictures) and fistula are most often treated by resection, ideally laparoscopic. Minimal invasive therapeutic algorithms that, combined with less strict indications for radical surgery before a definite recurrence pattern is established, has definitely lead to fewer resections and/or stomas, reducing their attendant morbidity and mortality, improved post-interventional quality of life, and less costly therapeutic policies.

Sigmoid diverticulitis in 2011: many questions; few answers

AIM

Patients were studied after a first episode of acute left-colonic diverticulitis for the initial and later evolution of the disease with the aim of defining evidence-based indications for elective surgery.

METHOD

Relevant data from prospective studies were retrieved from a MEDLINE search of English language articles.

RESULTS

Young male patients (≤ 50 years of age) had a higher risk of CT-graded severe diverticulitis. After medical treatment of the first episode, the incidence of complications was highest for young patients with CT-graded severe diverticulitis and lowest for older patients with CT-graded moderate diverticulitis. Recurrence in the form of diffuse peritonitis was rare. CT grading of initial diverticulitis seemed to be a predictor of recurrence, whereas the role of age was less clear. A family history of diverticulitis might be predictive of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

CT grading of acute diverticulitis helps to predict poor outcome after medical treatment of a first episode. Elective surgical resection should be proposed to patients with residual symptoms who do not respond to conservative treatment. Additional research is needed to clarify the role of a genetic predisposition in the development of diverticulitis in young adults.

Early complications after stoma formation: a prospective cohort study in 100 patients with 1-year follow-up

PURPOSE

This study aims to provide an overview of all complications that may occur after construction of an ileostomy or colostomy (loop or end) in daily practice.

METHODS

Between July 2007 and April 2008, all adult patients who underwent any type of intestinal stoma formation were asked to participate in this prospective cohort study. All relevant patient characteristics were gathered.Patients were evaluated for complications eight times in a1-year postoperative period. Enterostomal therapy nurses scored complications on specially designed forms.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included; two patients were lost before initial follow-up (FU). During FU, 21% of the patients deceased, and 15% were lost, physically unable to visit the outpatient clinic or withdrew from FU. In 37% of the patients, bowel continuity was restored. Only 26% of the patients were able to complete FU. Overall, 82% of all the patients had one or more stoma-related complications. Most common complications were skin irritation (55%), fixation problems (46%) and leakage (40%). Superficial necrosis,bleeding and retraction occurred in 20%, 14% and 9% of patients, respectively. More stoma related complications were found in stoma's on inappropriate locations.

CONCLUSIONS

In this heterogenic patient population with formation of different stoma types, a high complication rate was detected.

Value of CT for acute left-colonic diverticulitis: the surgeon's view

AIM

To determine the immediate and later role(s) of initial CT in patients presenting with their first episode of acute left-colonic diverticulitis.

METHODS

Prospective inclusion of 542 patients hospitalized in the University Hospital of Geneva between 1986 and 1997. 465 (86%) patients had a CT. CT grading of diverticulitis was divided between moderate diverticulitis (no sign of colonic perforation) and severe diverticulitis (signs of colonic perforation).

RESULTS

During the index hospitalization, surgical treatment of the first episode of acute diverticulitis was needed in 26% of patients with CT-severe diverticulitis compared to 4% for patients with CT-moderate diverticulitis. At 5 years of follow-up after medical treatment of the first episode, incidence of remote complications was the highest (49%) for patients with CT-severe diverticulitis and the lowest (22%) for patients with CT-moderate diverticulitis. Finally, we found that the location of the diseased segment, which is important to guide the type of resection in case of elective surgery, varies in 35% of patients who had 2 episodes of acute diverticulitis.

CONCLUSION

CT is the indispensable tool both to confirm the suspected diagnosis of acute diverticulitis and to appreciate the risk of surgical treatment during the initial acute episode. Moreover, CT grading of diverticulitis is a statistically significant prognostic parameter of the chance of secondary complicated outcome after a first acute diverticulitis episode successfully treated medically. Finally, CT gives the exact location of diverticulitis. In case of elective surgery this colonic segment should be removed.

The gastroenterologist's view

The traditional view that recurrent episodes of diverticulitis lead to progressively complicated disease resulting in a disadvantageous course, more difficult, complicated operations and lethal outcomes did not stand the test of evidence. Only a minority of patients with acute diverticulitis will ever require surgery, and if so, this occurs during or early after the first episode. Complications and recurrence of disease after surgery are enumerable. Strong indicators favoring sigmoid colectomy are major abscess, free air, and fistula, i.e. perforating disease. This occurs predominantly at the initial presentation, frequently in younger or immunosuppressed patients. Important differential diagnoses must be considered both for initial diagnosis of diverticulitis and for recurrent episodes. Conservative management of recurrent diverticulitis is safe and best guided by gastroenterological expertise. Sophisticated ultrasound experience as a part of this competence allows detailed evaluation of the local status and the best evidence in the literature for diagnosing diverticulitis is on US. In practice, however, the question of perforating diverticulitis is adequately answered by subtle CT scan. Medical therapy is usually the treatment of choice for recurrent diverticulitis. Avoidance of drugs bearing the hazard of perforation (e.g. NSAIDs) is emphasized, and smoking is strongly discouraged. A mathematical model based on published data shows that patients with recurrent diverticulitis overall (only) profit from surgery if they are hit by four episodes during the course of disease. This is where theory and reality (should) meet.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Pelvic Pain in the Reproductive Age Group

Premenopausal women who present with acute pelvic pain frequently pose a diagnostic dilemma, exhibiting nonspecific signs and symptoms, the most common being nausea, vomiting, and leukocytosis. Diagnostic considerations encompass multiple organ systems, including obstetric, gynecologic, urologic, gastrointestinal, and vascular etiologies. The selection of imaging modality is determined by the clinically suspected differential diagnosis. Thus, a careful evaluation of such a patient should be performed and diagnostic considerations narrowed before a modality is chosen. Transvaginal and transabdominal pelvic sonography is the modality of choice when an obstetric or gynecologic abnormality is suspected, and computed tomography is more useful when gastrointestinal or genitourinary pathology is more likely. Magnetic resonance imaging, when available in the acute setting, is favored over computed tomography for assessing pregnant patients for nongynecologic etiologies because of the lack of ionizing radiation. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every two years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Challenging a classic myth: pneumoperitoneum associated with acute diverticulitis is not an indication for open or laparoscopic emergency surgery in hemodynamically stable patients. A 10-year experience with a nonoperative treatment

BACKGROUND

In patients presenting with acute diverticulitis (AD) and signs of acute peritonitis, the presence of extradigestive air (EDA) on a computer tomography (CT) scan is often considered to indicate the need for emergency surgery. Although the traditional management of "perforated" AD is open sigmoidectomy, more recently, laparoscopic drainage/lavage (usually followed by delayed elective sigmoidectomy) has been reported. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the results of nonoperative management of emergency patients presenting with AD and EDA.

METHODS

The outcomes of 39 consecutive hemodynamically stable patients (23 men, mean age = 54.7 years) who were admitted with AD and EDA and were managed nonoperatively (antibiotic and supportive treatment) at a tertiary-care university hospital between January 2001 and June 2010 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. These included morbidity (Clavien-Dindo) and treatment failure (need for emergency surgery or death). A univariate analysis of clinical, radiological, and laboratory criteria with respect to treatment failure was performed. Results of delayed elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no mortality. Thirty-six of the 39 patients (92.3%) did not need surgery (7 patients required CT-guided abscess drainage). Mean hospital stay was 8.1 days. Duration of symptoms, previous antibiotic administration, severe sepsis, PCR level, WBC concentration, and the presence of abdominal collection were associated with treatment failure, whereas "distant" location of EDA and free abdominal fluid were not. Five patients had recurrence of AD and were treated medically. Seventeen patients (47.2%) underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for which mean operative time was 246 min (range = 100-450) and the conversion rate was 11.8%. Mortality was nil and the morbidity rate was 41.2%. Mean postoperative stay was 7.1 days (range = 4-23).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative management is a viable option in most emergency patients presenting with AD and EDA, even in the presence of symptoms of peritonitis or altered laboratory tests. Delayed laparoscopic sigmoidectomy may be useless in certain cases and its results poorer than expected.

Review of current classifications for diverticular disease and a translation into clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon prevails in Western society. Its presentation may vary greatly per individual patient, from symptomatic diverticulosis to perforated diverticulitis. Since publication of the original Hinchey classification, several modifications and new grading systems have been developed. Yet, new insights in the natural history of the disease, the emergence of the computed tomography scan, and new treatment modalities plead for evolving classifications.

METHODS

This article reviews all current classifications for diverticular disease.

RESULT

A three-stage model is advanced for a renewed and comprehensive classification system for diverticular disease, incorporating up-to-date imaging and treatment modalities.

Current status of the treatment of acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review

AIM

This paper addresses the current status of the treatment of acute colonic diverticulitis by an evidence-based review.

METHOD

A systematic search in PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google scholar on colonic diverticulitis was performed. Diagnostic tools, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized comparative studies, observational epidemiological studies, national and international guidelines, reviews of observational studies on elective and emergency surgical treatment of diverticulitis, and studies of prognostic significance were reviewed. Criteria for eligibility of the studies were diagnosis and classification, medical treatment, inpatients and outpatients, diverticulitis in young patients, immunosuppression, recurrence, elective resection, emergency surgery, and predictive factors.

RESULTS

Some 92 publications were selected for comprehensive review. The review highlighted that computed tomography is the most effective test in the diagnosis and staging of acute diverticulitis; outpatient treatment can be performed for uncomplicated diverticulitis in patients without associated comorbidities; conservative treatment is aimed at those patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis; elective surgery must be done on an individual basis; laparoscopic approach for elective treatment of diverticulitis is appropriate but may be technically complex; in perforated diverticulitis, resection with primary anastomosis is a safe procedure that requires experience and should take into account strict exclusion criteria.

CONCLUSION

The heterogeneity of patients with colonic diverticular disease means that both elective and urgent treatment should be tailored on an individual basis.

How complicated is complicated diverticulitis?--phlegmonous diverticulitis revisited

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to elucidate the accuracy of a clinical classification system for acute diverticulitis with special regard to "phlegmonous diverticulitis".

METHODS

A consecutive patient series (n = 318; General Hospital Nuremberg, 1/2004-12/2006) was classified preoperatively (imaging with 4/16-slice spiral CT scanner) according to the Hansen and Stock (H&S) classification which is commonly used in Germany and evaluated based on histopathology.

RESULTS

Pre-treatment classification grouped 30 patients (9.4%) as uncomplicated diverticulitis (type I according to H&S), for whom treatment was merely conservative. One hundred twelve patients (35.2%) were classified as phlegmonous diverticulitis (type IIA), 84 (26.4%) as "covered perforations" (type IIB) and 27 (8.5%) as "free perforations" (type IIC), and 54 (17.0%) as chronically recurrent diverticulitis (type III, 17.0%). The remaining 11 patients (3.5%) were not staged preoperatively. Accuracy of staging of complicated diverticulitis differed significantly between type IIC (100.0%), type IIB (91.0%), and type IIA (36.1%). The latter group was frequently understaged as it concealed a substantial number of patients (n = 44; 53.0%) with IIB disease. Neither laboratory tests (CRP/WBC) nor clinical parameters allowed distinction of correctly and falsely staged patients with type IIA disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with phlegmonous diverticulitis (type IIA) represent the most challenging group among patients with acute diverticulitis as they are frequently understaged and conceal cases with covered perforations (type IIB). This may support the view to subsume phlegmonous diverticulitis (type IIA) under complicated diverticulitis.

Multicentre observational study of the natural history of left-sided acute diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

The natural history of acute diverticulitis (AD) is still unclear. This study investigated the recurrence rate, and the risks of emergency surgery, associated stoma and death following initial medical or surgical treatment of AD.

METHODS

The Italian Study Group on Complicated Diverticulosis conducted a 4-year multicentre retrospective and prospective database analysis of patients admitted to hospital for medical or surgical treatment of AD and then followed for a minimum of 9 years. The persistence of symptoms, recurrent episodes of AD, new hospital admissions, medical or surgical treatment, and their outcome were recorded during follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 1046 patients enrolled at 17 centres, 743 were eligible for the study (407 recruited retrospectively and 336 prospectively); 242 patients (32·6 per cent) underwent emergency surgery at accrual. After a mean follow-up of 10·7 years, rates of recurrence (17·2 versus 5·8 per cent; P < 0·001) and emergency surgery (6·9 versus 1·3 per cent; P = 0·021) were higher for medically treated patients than for those treated surgically. Among patients who had initial medical treatment, age less than 40 years and a history of at least three episodes of AD were associated with an increased risk of AD recurrence. There was no association between any of the investigated parameters and subsequent emergency surgery. The risk of stoma formation was below 1 per cent and disease-related mortality was zero in this group. The disease-related mortality rate was 0·6 per cent among patients who had surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Long-term risks of recurrent AD or emergency surgery were limited and colectomy did not fully protect against recurrence.

Treatment of diverticular disease of the colon and prevention of acute diverticulitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Diverticular disease of the colon is a common disorder, characterized by recurrent symptoms and complications such as diverticulitis, requiring hospital admissions and surgery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically review the evidence for medical therapy of diverticular disease in reducing symptoms and preventing acute diverticulitis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and Embase databases (1966 to February 2010).

STUDY SELECTION

The studies selected were prospective clinical trials on uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon.

INTERVENTIONS

Four investigators independently reviewed articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality according to standardized criteria.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcomes measured were improvement in symptoms, complete remission of symptoms, and prevention of acute diverticulitis.

RESULTS

We identified 31 studies, including 6 placebo-controlled trials. The methodological quality of these studies was suboptimal. Only 10 trials provided a detailed description of the patient history, 8 assessed symptoms by the use of a validated questionnaire, and 14 appropriately defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Only one long-term double-blind placebo-controlled study was identified. This reported a significant improvement in symptoms and greater prevalence of symptom-free patients at 1 year with fiber plus rifaximin in comparison with fiber alone. The efficacy of treatment in preventing acute diverticulitis was evaluated in 11 randomized trials. Four trials compared rifaximin plus fiber vs fiber alone and failed to show a significant difference between treatments. However, cumulative data from these trials revealed a significant benefit following rifaximin and fiber (1-year rate of acute diverticulitis: 11/970 (1.1%) vs 20/690 (2.9%); P = .012), but with a number needed to treat of 57, to prevent an attack of acute diverticulitis.

LIMITATIONS

: Heterogeneity of the study design, patients' characteristics, regimens and combination of studied treatment, and outcome reporting precluded the pooling of results and limited interpretation.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment for diverticular disease relies mainly on data from uncontrolled studies. Treatment showed some evidence of improvement in symptoms, but its role in the prevention of acute diverticulitis remains to be defined.

The medical and nonoperative treatment of diverticulitis

The success of medical management for diverticular disease depends on the patient's presentation and degree of response to treatment. The patient's presentation can be grouped into categories using classification systems such as the modified Hinchey system. Clinical presentation and diagnostic studies help to group patients. Mild disease can often be managed with oral antibiotics as an outpatient; more severe disease requires hospitalization, bowel rest, and intravenous antibiotics. Interventions such as percutaneous drainage of associated abscesses may allow successful medical management. Probiotics and antiinflammatories may have a supportive role. Indications for elective resections are discussed.

Imaging update: acute colonic diverticulitis

Because the incidence of colonic diverticulosis is high in the general population, incidental asymptomatic diverticulosis is commonly seen on radiology imaging studies. However, diagnostic imaging performed specifically for diverticular disease is essentially limited to imaging of suspected acute colonic diverticulitis (ACD) and its complications. The clinical diagnosis of ACD can be challenging, and imaging has become an essential tool to aid in diagnosis, assess severity of disease, and aid in treatment planning. Computed tomography (CT) has replaced contrast enema as the imaging procedure of choice for diverticulitis. Ultrasound has also been successfully used for diagnosis, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has significant potential as a radiation-free imaging test for acute colonic diverticulitis.

The efficacy of nonoperative management of acute complicated diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of acute complicated diverticulitis has evolved to avoid emergency surgery in favor of elective resection. The optimal manner to accomplish this goal remains debatable.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of nonoperative management of acute diverticulitis with abscess or perforation.

DESIGN

A retrospective review was performed of an institutional review board-approved database of patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute complicated diverticulitis from 1995 to 2008. Patient demographics, disease manifestation, management, and outcomes were collected.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital/referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients were included who presented with complicated diverticulitis defined as having an associated abscess or free air diagnosed by CT scan.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary end points were the success of nonoperative management and need for surgery during the initial admission.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-six patients were identified with perforated diverticulitis: 19 had localized free air, 45 had abscess <4 cm or distant free air measuring <2 cm, 66 had abscess >4 cm or distant free air >2 cm, and 6 had distant free air with free fluid. Thirty-eight patients (28%) required percutaneous abscess drains and 37 (27%) required parenteral nutrition. Only 5 patients (3.7%) required urgent surgery at the time of admission, and 7 (5%) required urgent surgery for failed nonoperative management. Thus, the overall success rate of nonoperative management was 91%. One hundred twenty-four of 131 (95%) patients were treated with nonoperative management successfully. Twenty-five of 27 (92.5%) patients with free air remote from the perforation site were successfully treated nonoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative management of acute complicated diverticulitis is highly effective. For patients with free air remote from the site of perforation, nonoperative management is able to convert an emergent situation into an elective one in 93% of cases. The decision to attempt nonoperative therapy must be made based on the patient's physiologic state and associated comorbidities.

Diagnostic value of inflammation markers in predicting perforation in acute sigmoid diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

The importance of inflammation markers in predicting perforation in acute sigmoid diverticulitis is not well known. Predicting perforation by clinical examination alone may be hazardous. If perforation is suspected, then appropriate diagnostic tools such as computed tomography (CT) are indicated, and surgical intervention might be necessary.

METHODS

A cohort of consecutive patients with acute sigmoid diverticulitis diagnosed by CT and with complete laboratory findings (n = 247) were retrospectively divided into two groups, one with perforation (n = 86) and another without (n = 161). The latest values of C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and serum bilirubin, as well as the activity of the alkaline phosphatase (AP) measured during the 48 h period before the CT scan, were assessed.

RESULTS

In the Wilcoxon rank sum test CRP and WBC correlate significantly (p < 0.05) with perforation in acute sigmoid diverticulitis, whereas the logistic regression model shows only CRP to correlate significantly (p = 0.001) with perforation. The sensitivities/specificities for perforation are 98%/5% for elevated CRP (>5 mg/l), 86%/27% for a CRP higher than 50 mg/l, 44%/81% for a CRP higher than 150 mg/l, 28%/93% for a CRP higher than 200 mg/l, 88%/44% for elevated WBC (>10 × 10(9)/l), 35%/90% for hyperbilirubinemia (>20 μmol/l), and 35%/91% for elevated AP (>110 U/l).

CONCLUSIONS

A CRP below 50 mg/l suggests a perforation to be unlikely in acute sigmoid diverticulitis, whereas a CRP higher than 200 mg/l is a strong indicator of perforation.

Inflammatory manifestations at colonoscopy in patients with colonic diverticular disease

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis with diverticulosis (UCD), segmental colitis associated with diverticulosis (SCAD) and acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) may affect the same colonic regions, but the real incidence of these entities in clinical practice is unknown.

AIM

To assess the incidence and the endoscopic findings of UCD, SCAD and AUD.

METHODS

From January 2004 to June 2009, 8525 consecutive colonoscopies were performed. Diagnosis of the diseases was based on specific endoscopic and histological (UCD and SCAD), and on endoscopic and radiological (AUD) patterns.

RESULTS

Ulcerative colitis with diverticulosis was diagnosed in 25 patients (0.3%), SCAD was diagnosed in 129 patients (2%) and AUD was diagnosed in 130 patients (2%). In UCD, the inflammation in colonic area harbouring diverticula always affects the overall colonic mucosa in all cases, involving also diverticular orifices. The endoscopic characteristic of SCAD is that inflammation is mainly detected within the inter-diverticular mucosa without involvement of the diverticular orifices. In AUD, the inflammation affects primarily diverticular orifice and peri-diverticular mucosa.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, the incidence of mucosal inflammation in the presence of colonic diverticular disease is low and endoscopy is the mainstay of differential diagnosis.

Acute diverticulitis in younger patients: Any rationale for a different approach?

AIM: To compare the natural history and course of acute diverticulitis in a younger age group with an older population and to evaluate whether younger patients should be managed differently.

METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 157 patients treated with acute diverticulitis between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2007. Diverticulitis was stratified according to the Hinchey classification. Patients were divided into 2 populations: group A ≤ 50 years (n = 31); group B > 50 years (n = 126). Mean patient follow-up was 15 mo.

RESULTS: The median age was 60 years. A significantly higher proportion of patients in group B presented with complicated diverticulitis (36.5% vs 12.9%, P = 0.01). Recurrence was more frequent in group A (25.8% vs 11.1%, P = 0.03) and the mean time-to-recurrence was shorter (12 mo vs 28 mo, P = 0.26). The most severe recurrent episodes of acute diverticulitis were classified as Hinchey stage I and none of the patients required emergency surgery. In multivariate analysis, only age (P = 0.024) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence.

CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, the authors recommend that diverticulitis management should be based on the severity of the disease and not on the age of the patient.

WSES consensus conference: Guidelines for first-line management of intra-abdominal infections

Intra-abdominal infections are still associated with high rate of morbidity and mortality.A multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with intra-abdominal infections may be an important factor in the quality of care. The presence of a team of health professionals from various disciplines, working in concert, may improve efficiency, outcome, and the cost of care.A World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Consensus Conference was held in Bologna on July 2010, during the 1st congress of the WSES, involving surgeons, infectious disease specialists, pharmacologists, radiologists and intensivists with the goal of defining recommendations for the early management of intra-abdominal infections.This document represents the executive summary of the final guidelines approved by the consensus conference.

Use of antibiotics in uncomplicated diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

The value of antibiotics in the treatment of acute uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis is not well established. The aim of this review was to assess whether or not antibiotics contribute to the (uneventful) recovery from acute uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis, and which types of antibiotic and route of administration are most effective.

METHODS

Medline, the Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective or retrospective cohort studies addressing conservative treatment of mild uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis and use of antibiotics were included.

RESULTS

No randomized or prospective studies were found on the topic of effect on outcome. One retrospective cohort study was retrieved that compared a group treated with antibiotics with observation alone. This study showed no difference in success rate between groups. Only one RCT of moderate quality compared intravenous and oral administration of antibiotics, and found no differences. One other RCT of very poor quality compared two different kinds of intravenous antibiotic and also found no difference. A small retrospective cohort study comparing antibiotics with and without anaerobe coverage showed no difference in group outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Evidence on the use of antibiotics in mild or uncomplicated diverticulitis is sparse and of low quality. There is no evidence mandating the routine use of antibiotics in uncomplicated diverticulitis, although several guidelines recommend this. Copyright © 2011 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Features and management of colonic diverticular disease

Diverticular disease is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal conditions to afflict Western populations. Although the majority of patients with diverticulosis remain asymptomatic, about one third will develop symptoms at some point in their lives. Symptomatic diverticular disease can range from chronic mild gastrointestinal distress to acute bouts of diverticulitis complicated by abscess or frank colonic perforation. The mainstay of treatment of symptomatic diverticular disease has long been bowel rest, antibiotics, and pain control, reserving surgery for those with complicated disease. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of the spectrum of diverticular disease, including recent advances in the treatment of chronic diverticular disease.

Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review

AIM

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for patients with perforated diverticulitis.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases, Google Scholar and five major publisher websites without language restriction. All articles which reported the use of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for patients with perforated diverticulitis were included.

RESULTS

Two prospective cohort studies, nine retrospective case series and two case reports reporting 231 patients were selected for data extraction. Most (77%) patients had purulent peritonitis (Hinchey III). Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage successfully controlled abdominal and systemic sepsis in 95.7% of patients. Mortality was 1.7%, morbidity 10.4% and only four (1.7%) of the 231 patients received a colostomy.

CONCLUSION

There have been no publications of high methodological quality on laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for patients with perforated colonic diverticulitis. The published papers do, however, show promising results, with high efficacy, low mortality, low morbidity and a minimal need for a colostomy.

A multicenter randomized clinical trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies with or without antibiotics for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis (DIABOLO trial)

BACKGROUND

Conservative treatment of uncomplicated or mild diverticulitis usually includes antibiotic therapy. It is, however, uncertain whether patients with acute diverticulitis indeed benefit from antibiotics. In most guidelines issued by professional organizations antibiotics are considered mandatory in the treatment of mild diverticulitis. This advice lacks evidence and is merely based on experts' opinion. Adverse effects of the use of antibiotics are well known, including allergic reactions, development of bacterial resistance to antibiotics and other side-effects.

METHODS

A randomized multicenter pragmatic clinical trial comparing two treatment strategies for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. I) A conservative strategy with antibiotics: hospital admission, supportive measures and at least 48 hours of intravenous antibiotics which subsequently are switched to oral, if tolerated (for a total duration of antibiotic treatment of 10 days). II) A liberal strategy without antibiotics: admission only if needed on clinical grounds, supportive measures only. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they have a diagnosis of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis as demonstrated by radiological imaging. Only patients with stages 1a and 1b according to Hinchey's classification or "mild" diverticulitis according to the Ambrosetti criteria are included. The primary endpoint is time-to-full recovery within a 6-month follow-up period. Full recovery is defined as being discharged from the hospital, with a return to pre-illness activities, and VAS score below 4 without the use of daily pain medication. Secondary endpoints are proportion of patients who develop complicated diverticulitis requiring surgery or non-surgical intervention, morbidity, costs, health-related quality of life, readmission rate and acute diverticulitis recurrence rate. In a non-inferiority design 264 patients are needed in each study arm to detect a difference in time-to-full recovery of 5 days or more with a power of 85% and a confidence level of 95%. With an estimated one percent of patients lost to follow up, a total of 533 patients will be included.

CONCLUSION

A clinically relevant difference of more than 5 days in time-to-full recovery between the two treatment strategies is not expected. The liberal strategy without antibiotics and without the strict requirement for hospital admission is anticipated to be more a more cost-effective approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01111253.

Prospective randomized trial comparing short-term antibiotic therapy versus standard therapy for acute uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis

PURPOSE

To date, the standard therapy used for acute episodes of uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis has been a 7-10-day antibiotic treatment regimen. Thanks to the development of highly potent, broad-spectrum antibiotics such as ertapenem, the question arises as to whether the duration of treatment of acute uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis can be reduced by using highly effective antibiotics.

METHODS

To compare the efficacy of short-term therapy (4 days) versus standard therapy (7 days) for uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis, a prospective randomized multicenter trial was conducted. Patients were randomized to treatment groups after 4 days. Both patient groups were monitored until discharge and were followed up after 4-6 weeks and 52 weeks. [corrected] The results were standardized and statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

Between 16 December 2004 and 15 November 2007, 123 patients from 11 hospitals were enrolled in the study. Seventeen patients dropped out. In the remaining 106 cases, no significant differences were discerned between the two groups in terms of the basic data, apart from the mean number of diverticulitis episodes (short term 1.28 +/- 0.64 versus standard 1.64 +/- 1.07, p = 0.037). The mean hospital stay was 8.8 days, with significant differences seen between short-term and standard therapy (7.8 +/- 2.8 versus 9.7 +/- 3.2 days; p = 0.002). After 4 days, treatment was classified as having proved successful in 98.0% of cases and after 7 days in 98.2% of cases. An overall success rate of 95.1% (94.0% versus 96.2%, n.s.) was recorded after 1 month.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained with short-term ertapenem therapy (4 days) showed that this was as effective as standard therapy (7 days) for treatment of uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis.

Organised diverticular abscess mimicking incarcerated parastomal hernia in an immunocompromised patient

A 68-year-old immunosuppressed woman was admitted with poor-functioning colostomy, which she had following a Hartmann's procedure for diverticular disease in sigmoid colon 8 years previously. She was on cyclosporin and warfarin for transplanted kidney and atrial fibrillation, respectively. On admission, an erythematous and tender swelling was found around the stoma, which was diagnosed as an irreducible, parastomal hernia clinically. The swelling was investigated further with CT, which revealed an organised mesocolic abscess of diverticular origin. The abscess was drained percutaneously under radiological guidance. She recovered well subsequently. This case is a unique presentation of diverticular abscess and management was a challenge considering the patient's co-morbidities and the location of the abscess.

Missed opportunities for primary repair in complicated acute diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

Complicated acute diverticulitis (CAD) requiring an urgent operation is usually managed by fecal diversion (FD) despite reports suggesting that primary repair (PR) is safe. We aim to identify patient characteristics predicting successful PR and explore if patients are managed by FD despite the presence of such characteristics.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 194 patients with CAD, requiring colectomy within 48 hr of admission from January 1996 to January 2006. Exclusion criteria included: admission for elective repair, treatment with antibiotics and/or percutaneous abscess drainage prior to operation (semi-elective), concurrent inflammatory disease, cancer, and inadequate documentation. Univariate and multivariate analysis identified independent predictors of PR. Patients who despite having these independent predictors underwent FD, were compared with the PR group.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (9%) received PR. They were younger than FD patients, had a lower incidence of left-sided disease, were less frequently operated on within 4 hr of hospital arrival, and had less severe disease (Hinchey I or II). They also had shorter postoperative hospital stays (6.2 ± 2.3 vs 14.6 ±16.1; P = .002) and a trend towards a lower mortality (0% vs 6.8%; P = .38). The independent predictors of performing PR included: age less than 55 years, interval between admission and operation longer than 4 hr, and a Hinchey score I or II. There were 71 patients who had 2 (64) or all 3 (7) independent predictors of PR but still received FD. These patients were not different in any characteristic from the PR patients but had worse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

FD remains the prevailing operative method of choice of CAD. Despite the presence of factors favoring PR, many patients still receive FD and have worse outcomes. PR can be used more liberally in CAD.

Colonic diverticulitis: a prospective analysis of diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical evaluation and cross-sectional imaging modalities such as ultrasound and computed tomography for patients with suspected colonic diverticulitis and to determine the value of these examinations in clinical decision-making.

METHOD

A prospective analysis was conducted of 802 consecutive patients that presented with abdominal pain at the emergency department. Initial clinical diagnoses and management proposals were compared to the final diagnoses and therapeutic strategies for all patients.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were identified with colonic diverticulitis as the final diagnosis. The positive and negative predictive values for the clinical diagnosis of colonic diverticulitis were 0.65 and 0.98 respectively. Additional cross-sectional imaging had a positive and negative predictive value of respectively 0.95 and 0.99 or higher. These additional examinations led to a correct change of the initial clinical diagnosis in 37% of the patients, and a change in management in only 7%.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis for colonic diverticulitis is low. Ultrasound and computed tomography have superior diagnostic accuracy but these examinations rarely change the initial management proposal.