Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls

Manometric features of eosinophilic esophagitis in esophageal pressure topography

BACKGROUND

Although most of the patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have mucosal and structural changes that could potentially explain their symptoms, it is unclear whether EoE is associated with abnormal esophageal motor function. The aims of this study were to evaluate the esophageal pressure topography (EPT) findings in EoE and to compare them with controls and patients with gastro-esophageal disease (GERD).

METHODS

Esophageal pressure topography studies in 48 EoE patients, 48 GERD patients, and 50 controls were compared. The esophageal contractile pattern was described for ten 5-mL swallows for each subject and each swallow was secondarily characterized based on the bolus pressurization pattern: absent, pan-esophageal pressurization, or compartmentalized distal pressurization.

KEY RESULTS

Thirty-seven percent of EoE patients were classified as having abnormal esophageal motility. The most frequent diagnoses were of weak peristalsis and frequent failed peristalsis. Although motility disorders were more frequent in EoE patients than in controls, the prevalence and type were similar to those observed in GERD patients (P=0.61, chi-square test). Pan-esophageal pressurization was present in 17% of EoE and 2% of GERD patients while compartmentalized pressurization was present in 19% of EoE and 10% of GERD patients. These patterns were not seen in control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The prevalence of abnormal esophageal motility in EoE was approximately 37% and was similar in frequency and type to motor patterns observed in GERD. Eosinophilic esophagitis patients were more likely to have abnormal bolus pressurization patterns during swallowing and we hypothesize that this may be a manifestation of reduced esophageal compliance.

Distal contraction latency: a measure of propagation velocity optimized for esophageal pressure topography studies

OBJECTIVES

A defining feature of peristalsis is propagation velocity, which determines the timing of the distal contraction relative to the swallow. This study aimed to exploit a coordinate-based strategy to quantify the normal latency of the distal esophageal contraction as a measure of propagation velocity optimized for high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT) studies.

METHODS

EPT studies for 75 healthy volunteers were merged in a computer simulation. Swallows were synchronized and analyzed as a 100 × 200 pixel grid that normalized esophageal length from the pharynx to the stomach for a 20-s period to first calculate a composite for each individual and then to establish normative values for the morphology and latency of the distal contraction among individuals.

RESULTS

Stereotyped landmarks in composite EPT studies were pressure troughs in the proximal and distal esophagus isolating the distal segment and the contractile deceleration point (CDP) localizing the termination of peristalsis in the distal segment. Distal contractile latency was timed to the CDP (median 6.0 s, 95% confidence interval 4.8-7.6 s) and to lower esophageal sphincter (LES) contraction (median 9.2 s, 95% confidence interval 6.5-11.5 s). Illustrative examples are shown of rapidly conducted contractions with normal or short latency, suggesting short latency to be the preferable EPT metric of rapid propagation.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed scheme, utilizing the topographic coordinates of contraction relative to the swallow as an alternative to conventional measures of peristaltic velocity, lays the foundation for a physiologically grounded classification of peristaltic abnormalities in EPT. Future studies will test the clinical utility of this scheme.

Achalasia cardia subtyping by high-resolution manometry predicts the therapeutic outcome of pneumatic balloon dilatation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

High-resolution manometry (HRM) with pressure topography is used to subtype achalasia cardia, which has therapeutic implications. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics, manometric variables and treatment outcomes among the achalasia subtypes based on the HRM findings.

METHODS

The patients who underwent HRM at the Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad between January 2008 and January 2009 were enrolled. The patients with achalasia were categorized into 3 subtypes: type I - achalasia with minimum esophageal pressurization, type II - achalasia with esophageal compression and type III - achalasia with spasm. The clinical and manometric variables and treatment outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine out of the 900 patients who underwent HRM were diagnosed as achalasia cardia. Fifty-one patients with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months were included. Types I and II achalasia were diagnosed in 24 patients each and 3 patients were diagnosed as type III achalasia. Dysphagia and regurgitation were the main presenting symptoms in patients with types I and II achalasia. Patients with type III achalasia had high basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and maximal esophageal pressurization when compared to types I and II. Most patients underwent pneumatic dilatation (type I, 22/24; type II, 20/24; type III, 3/3). Patients with type II had the best response to pneumatic dilatation (18/20, 90.0%) compared to types I (14/22, 63.3%) and III (1/3, 33.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The type II achalasia cardia showed the best response to pneumatic dilatation.

A case of symptomatic diffuse esophageal spasm during multiple rapid swallowing test on high-resolution manometry

Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) is an uncommon motility disorder of unknown etiology in which the abnormal motility has been offered as a possible cause for the patient's dysphagia or chest pain. Esophageal manometry is the gold standard for the diagnosis of DES and the diagnostic hallmark is identification of simultaneous contractions in at least 20% of wet swallows, alternating with normal peristalsis. Recently, a new diagnostic technique, high-resolution manometry has been reported to improve the accuracy and detail in describing esophageal function. We report a female patient with intermittent dysphagia and chest pain occurring only when swallowing a large amount of water. On HRM, this patient had esophageal spasms, increased pressurization front velocity attributable to rapid contractile wave front, associated with symptoms, which were provoked by a multiple rapid swallowing test, and thereby was diagnosed with DES.

A case of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis presented as oropharyngeal Dysphagia

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a rare disease. It is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive muscular paralysis reflecting degeneration of motor neurons which leads to muscle weakness and muscle wasting. Respiratory failure limits survival to 2-5 years after disease onset. Several clinical manifestations including dysphagia can result in reductions in both the quality of life and life expectancy. Dysphagia occurs at onset in about one third of case, although generally it occurs in later stage of the disease. Evaluation of dysphagia includes video-fluoroscopic swallow study, radiological esophagogram, flexible endoscopic examination, ultrasound examination, conventional manometry and electromyography. We report a case of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a 54-year-old man presenting oropharyngeal dysphagia which was diagnosed by high resolution esophageal manometry presenting abnormality of the upper esophageal sphincter.

Has high-resolution manometry changed the approach to esophageal motility disorders?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

High-resolution manometry (HRM) coupled with high-resolution esophageal topography plots (HREPT) has dramatically changed the paradigm of manometric studies. The purpose of the current review is to discuss the salient advantages of HRM that are likely to change the clinical practice of manometry.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies evaluating HRM suggest a significant improvement in the sensitivity for the diagnosis of achalasia when compared with conventional manometry. By reproducibly subtyping achalasia into classic achalasia, achalasia with pressurization, or spastic achalasia with differential responses to treatment, HRM has potential to predict clinical outcomes. Preliminary observations with HRM suggest that much of what was labeled distal esophageal spasm is in fact achalasia with esophageal compression and pseudorelaxation, or spastic achalasia. HRM is capable of selectively analyzing discrete esophagogastric junction contributors (lower esophageal sphincter and crural diaphragm) during deglutitive relaxation to clearly identify the site of abnormally high outflow resistance. HRM has improved the recognition of a clinically heterogeneous entity called functional obstruction with potential for directed therapy.

SUMMARY

Improved, accurate and reproducible recognition of manometric diagnoses by HRM will allow the clinician to confidently diagnose esophageal disorders such as achalasia, direct therapy and predict outcomes.

New diagnostic criteria for nutcracker esophagus using conventional water-perfused manometry: a comparison between nutcracker esophagus with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Controversy continues as to whether nutcracker esophagus (NE) is a 'real' manometric disease due to its poor correlation with clinical symptoms such as chest pain or dysphagia. While new NE criteria were proposed in a recent study, that study included NE patients both with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aimed to analyze both general NE (with or without GERD) and pure NE (without GERD) patients in terms of distal esophageal amplitude (DEA) and its correlation with symptoms.

METHODS

Using previously known normal DEA values (mean and SD), patients were stratified into three different groups: group A (DEA 180 to 220 mmHg, 2 to 3 SD), B (DEA 220 to 260 mmHg, 3 to 4 SD), and C (DEA > 260 mmHg, > 4 SD).

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients who simultaneously underwent esophageal manometry and 24-h pH monitoring were diagnosed with NE. They were separated into groups A (n = 43), B (n = 18), and C (n = 11). Although the proportion of general NE patients with symptoms appeared to be greater in group A (65.6%) than in group C (90.9%), statistical analysis showed that this was not a significant correlation (P = 0.07). Pure NE patients were defined as those returning negative findings after 24-h pH monitoring. These patients were separated into three groups based on the same DEA criteria as above: group A-1 (n = 33), B-1 (n = 11), C-1 (n = 8). The proportion of patients with symptoms increased from 54.5% in group A-1 to 87.5% in group C-1, and this correlation was found to be significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There exists in the general NE population a subset with pure NE. DEA values correlated with symptoms in this subset.

High resolution manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance oesophageal manometry in clinical practice

The past decade has seen new technological advances in the investigation of oesophageal motility disorders. Multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring has been used as an adjunct to conventional manometry in the assessment of oesophageal function, independent of radiography. High resolution manometry provides additional information over conventional manometry, and its topographic analysis makes interpretation of studies easier. Both utilities in non-obstructive dysphagia have been used ultimately in research; however, more studies are addressing their clinical application.

Esophageal motor disorders in terms of high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: what has changed?

The concept of high-resolution manometry (HRM) is to use sufficient pressure sensors such that intraluminal pressure can be monitored as a continuum along luminal length much as time is viewed as a continuum in conventional manometry. When HRM is coupled with pressure topography plots, pressure amplitude is transformed into spectral colors with isobaric conditions indicated by same-colored regions on the display. Together, these technologies are called high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT). HREPT has several advantages compared with conventional manometry, the technology that it was designed to replace. (i) The contractility of the entire esophagus can be viewed simultaneously in a uniform format, (ii) standardized objective metrics can be systematically applied for interpretation, and (iii) topographic patterns of contractility are more easily recognized and have greater reproducibility than with conventional manometry. Compared with conventional manometry, HREPT has improved sensitivity for detecting achalasia, largely due to the objectivity and accuracy with which it identifies impaired esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation. In addition, it has led to the subcategorization of achalasia into three clinically relevant subtypes based on the contractile function of the esophageal body: classic achalasia, achalasia with esophageal compression, and spastic achalasia. Headway has also been made in understanding hypercontractile conditions, including diffuse esophageal spasm and a newly described entity, spastic nutcracker. Ultimately, clinical experience will be the judge, but it seems likely that HREPT data, along with its well-defined functional implications, will improve the clinical management of esophageal motility disorders.

Does body position modify the results of oesophageal high resolution manometry?

BACKGROUND Oesophageal motility classification using high resolution manometry (HRM) has been established in the supine position. Nevertheless, examination in the sitting position is more physiological. Our aim was to determine if body position modifies oesophago-gastric junction (OGJ) morphology and oesophageal motility. METHODS A total of 100 patients (47 males, mean age 51 years) were included in this study. The oesophageal HRM protocol included examination in supine and sitting positions. Recordings were reviewed by two different operators. Amplitude, duration, velocity, Distal Contractile Integral (DCI) and Pressurization Front Velocity of oesophageal waves induced by swallowing were recorded. KEY RESULTS The lower oesophageal sphincter resting pressure was not significantly changed by body position. The sitting position modified the OGJ classification in 12 patients. The inter-observer agreement to classify OGJ was moderate (kappa = 0.54 and 0.46, in the supine and sitting positions respectively) while it was good to diagnose motility disorders (kappa = 0.72 and 0.83). The percentage of normal waves was lower in the sitting position in comparison with the supine position (56%vs 67%, P < 0.01). The DCI was also lower in the sitting position (1125 mmHg.s.cm vs 1639, P < 0.01) as well as the amplitude of oesophageal waves. Finally the diagnosis was concordant in both positions in 72 patients. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Body position can affect OGJ morphology and oesophageal motility assessment by HRM in some patients. Normal values in the sitting position should thus be determined. Inter-observer variation for the proposed classification of OGJ morphology must also be taken into account.

Pediatric esophageal high-resolution manometry: utility of a standardized protocol and size-adjusted pressure topography parameters

OBJECTIVES

Esophageal high-resolution manometry (EHRM) has evolved rapidly from a research tool to a routine investigation in adult clinical practice. This study proposes and evaluates a standardized EHRM protocol for use in pediatric clinical practice.

METHODS

Thirty pediatric patients underwent unsedated EHRM. Indications for EHRM were dysphagia, feeding difficulty, or pre-fundoplication assessment. Two 20-channel customized water-perfused silicone catheters, with an outside diameter of 3.8 mm (MuiScientific, Ontario, CA), were used. The catheters had one distal gastric channel, five channels 0.5 cm apart for the e-sleeve, and 14 proximal channels either 1 cm (for children <5 years) or 2 cm apart (for children >5 years). Single wet swallows, multiple rapid swallows (MRS), and solid swallows were systematically studied.

RESULTS

The median age was 10 years (range 6 months-15 years). The esophageal motor findings were normal peristalsis (n=15), peristaltic dysfunction (n=12), achalasia (n=3), and spasm on consumption of solid food (n=2). The distal contractile integral adjusted for esophageal length (DCIa) of patients with peristaltic dysfunction was significantly lower than that of patients without peristaltic dysfunction (P<0.001). On MRS, aperistalsis with lack of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation was observed in patients with achalasia, and aperistalsis with complete EGJ relaxation was observed in patients with severe peristaltic dysfunction. On consumption of solid food, esophageal spasm associated with bolus impaction was observed in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides objective information with regard to topography pressure parameters in esophageal motility disorders of childhood while using a standardized EHRM protocol. The new DCIa variable may be useful for the assessment of patients with peristaltic dysfunction.

Effect of atilmotin, a motilin receptor agonist, on esophageal, lower esophageal sphincter, and gastric pressures

BACKGROUND

Motilin, an endogenous gastrointestinal (GI) hormone, increases upper gastrointestinal tract motility and is associated with phase III of the gastric migrating motor complex. The motilin receptor agonist, atilmotin, at doses of 6, 30 or 60 microg intravenously (IV), increases the early phase of gastric emptying. Prior studies at higher doses of 100-450 microg IV demonstrated that some subjects developed noncardiac chest pain.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to determine the effects of atilmotin on esophageal, lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and gastric contractility and the development of esophageal-related symptoms.

METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers underwent esophageal manometry to study the effects of atilmotin on upper GI motility. Five subjects were studied on three separate days following administration of saline placebo and subsequent IV bolus dose of atilmotin (6, 30 or 150 microg). Another five subjects were studied at the highest dose (150 microg).

RESULTS

Atilmotin at 150 microg increased proximal gastric pressure by 6.5 mmHg (P = 0.001 compared with placebo). Atilmotin increased LES pressure at all studied doses; LES pressure increased from 24 +/- 2 mmHg following placebo injection to 34 +/- 4 mmHg following a 30 microg dose of atilmotin (P = 0.007). In the esophagus, atilmotin increased the percentage of failed swallows at the highest dose studied. Failed swallows increased from 17 +/- 7% following placebo injection to 36 +/- 7% following a 150 microg dose of atilmotin (P = 0.016). Atilmotin decreased distal esophageal contractile amplitude only at the highest dose studied, from 69 +/- 8 mmHg (placebo) to 50 +/- 5 mmHg following 150 microg atilmotin (P = 0.018). There were no serious adverse effects or episodes of chest pain with atilmotin.

CONCLUSIONS

Atilmotin affects esophageal, LES, and gastric motility. LES and gastric pressures were increased, whereas there was disruption of esophageal peristalsis characterized by lower amplitude and failed contractions.

Esophagogastric junction distensibility after fundoplication assessed with a novel functional luminal imaging probe

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) compliance in response to controlled distension in fundoplication (FP) patients and controls using the functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP).

BACKGROUND

FP aims to replicate normal EGJ distensibility. FLIP is a new technology that uses impedance planimetry to measure intraluminal cross-sectional area (CSA) during controlled distension.

METHODS

Ten controls and ten FP patients were studied with high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) and then the FLIP placed across the EGJ. Deglutitive and interdeglutitive EGJ distensibility was assessed with volume-controlled distension. The FLIP measured eight CSAs spaced 4 mm apart within a cylindrical saline-filled bag along with the corresponding intrabag pressure.

RESULTS

The EGJ formed an hourglass shape during distensions with the central constriction at the diaphragmatic hiatus. The distensibility of the hiatus was significantly greater during deglutitive relaxation in both subject groups, but FP patients exhibited reduced EGJ distensibility and compliance compared to controls. During the interglutitive period, the corresponding increase in intrabag pressures at larger volumes were also greater in FP patients implying a longer segment of EGJ constriction. The EGJ distensibility characteristics did not correlate with HREPT measures.

CONCLUSIONS

FLIP technology was used to compare EGJ distensibility in FP patients and control subjects. The least distensible locus within the EGJ was always at the hiatus. EGJ distensibility was significantly reduced, and the length of constriction increased in FP patients. Future FLIP studies will compare patients with and without post-FP dysphagia and gas bloat, symptoms suggestive of an overly restrictive FP.

High-resolution esophageal manometry: using technical advances for clinical advantages

BACKGROUND

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is a new technique to investigate the motor function of the esophagus. It differs from conventional manometry in recording pressures by solid state microtransducers at 12 points around the circumference at every centimeter of esophageal length, and displaying the data in pseudo-three-dimensional format using a topographic plot, where esophageal pressures within a given range are represented by different colors.

RATIONALE

The large amount of data and the capacity to analyze and display it intuitively has afforded many new insights into esophageal dysfunction. Among these insights are the ability to distinguish three different subtypes of achalasia and predict their response to therapy, better understanding of the relationship between the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the crural diaphragm, the development of novel quantitative parameters to understand the nature of the dysfunction in non-specific esophageal motor disorders, and the elucidation of a newly described motility disorder characterized by failure of peristalsis at the transitional zone between the upper skeletal muscle and the more distal smooth muscle portion of the esophagus. It is also ideally suited to analysis of the effect of prokinetic medications. The method is quicker and less uncomfortable for patients and the analysis is visually appealing and intuitively comprehensible.

CONCLUSION

Despite these potential advantages, there are currently no data to demonstrate a clinical advantage in treatment. The results of such studies will be crucial to the acceptance of this novel technology.

Recent concept in interpreting high-resolution manometry

Esophageal manometry is considered the gold standard for assessing esophageal motor function. Although conventional manometry has been widely used to evaluate esophageal motor function, this is not fully satisfactory for explaining esophageal symptoms. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is designed to overcome the limitations of conventional manometric systems with advanced technologies. A solid-state HRM assembly with 36 solid-state sensors spaced at 1 cm intervals (Sierra Scientific Instruments Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA) has been widely used around the world. Calibration and post-study thermal correction should be performed at each test. The HRM assembly was passed transnasally and positioned to record from the hypopharynx to the stomach. After a 5 minutes resting period to assess basal sphincter pressure, 5 mL water swallows are obtained in a supine posture. The interpretation of HRM data is still being refined. Recently, the HRM Classification Working Group revised the Chicago classification based on a systematic analysis of motility patterns in 75 control subjects and 400 consecutive patients. The below will show you a summary of the new Chicago classification of distal esophageal motility disorders to provide a practical way of interpreting HRM.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: medical or surgical treatment?

Background. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common condition with increasing prevalence worldwide. The disease encompasses a broad spectrum of clinical symptoms and disorders from simple heartburn without esophagitis to erosive esophagitis with severe complications, such as esophageal strictures and intestinal metaplasia. Diagnosis is based mainly on ambulatory esophageal pH testing and endoscopy. There has been a long-standing debate about the best treatment approach for this troublesome disease. Methods and Results. Medical treatment with PPIs has an excellent efficacy in reversing the symptoms of GERD, but they should be taken for life, and long-term side effects do exist. However, patients who desire a permanent cure and have severe complications or cannot tolerate long-term treatment with PPIs are candidates for surgical treatment. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery achieves a significant symptom control, increased patient satisfaction, and complete withdrawal of antireflux medications, in the majority of patients. Conclusion. Surgical treatment should be reserved mainly for young patients seeking permanent results. However, the choice of the treatment schedule should be individualized for every patient. It is up to the patient, the physician and the surgeon to decide the best treatment option for individual cases.

The value of high-resolution manometry in the assessment of the resting characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter

INTRODUCTION

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is faster and easier to perform than conventional water perfused manometry. There is general acceptance of its usefulness in evaluating upper esophageal sphincter and esophageal body. There has been less emphasis on the use of HRM to evaluate the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure and length, both factors important in LES barrier function. The aim of this study was to compare the resting characteristics of the LES determined by HRM and conventional manometry in the same patients.

METHODS

We performed both HRM and conventional manometry including a slow motorized pull-through technique in 55 patients with foregut symptoms. The characteristics of the LES analyzed were: resting pressure, total length, and abdominal length. Four available modes of HRM analysis were used to assess resting characteristics of the LES: spatiotemporal mode using both abrupt color change and isobaric contour, line tracing, and pressure profile. The values obtained from these four HRM modes were then compared to the conventional manometry measurements.

RESULTS

High-resolution manometry and conventional manometry did not differ in their measurement of LES resting pressure. LES overall and abdominal length were consistently overestimated by HRM. A variability up to 4 cm in overall length was observed and was greatest in patients with hiatal hernia (1.8 vs. 0.9 cm, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

The current construction of the catheter and software analysis used in high-resolution manometry do not allow precise measurement of LES length. Errors in the identification of the upper border of the sphincter may compromise accurate positioning of a pH probe.

Esophageal pressure topography criteria indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high-resolution impedance manometry

OBJECTIVES

This study used high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) to determine pressure topography thresholds of peristaltic integrity predictive of incomplete esophageal bolus clearance.

METHODS

A total of 16 normal controls and 8 patients with dysphagia were studied using a solid-state HRIM assembly incorporating 36 manometric sensors and 12 impedance segments. Each of the 10 saline swallows in each study was dichotomously scored as either complete or incomplete bolus clearance by impedance criteria, and peristaltic integrity was evaluated using pressure topography isobaric contours ranging from 10 to 30 mm Hg in 5- mm Hg increments. Each isobaric contour plot was characterized by the location and length of breaks in the isobaric contour.

RESULTS

All subjects had normal esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation and none met the pressure topography criteria of hiatus hernia. In all, 70 (29%) of the 240 individual swallows had incomplete bolus clearance. In every case, an intact >or=20 mm Hg isobaric contour was associated with complete bolus clearance. The largest defect in the 20 and 30 mm Hg isobaric contours associated with complete bolus clearance measured 1.7 and 3.0 cm, respectively, in length, whereas the smallest defect predictive of incomplete bolus clearance measured 2.1 and 3.2 cm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In individuals with normal EGJ relaxation and morphology, peristaltic contractions with breaks <2 cm in the 20 mm Hg isobaric contour or <3 cm in the 30 mm Hg isobaric contour are associated with complete bolus clearance, and longer breaks predict incomplete bolus clearance.

Evaluation of esophageal motor disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry and intraluminal impedance

The past few years were an exciting time in the study of esophageal motor disorders because new technologies emerged to study esophageal motor function and bolus transit. Although conventional manometry was long considered the "gold standard" for defining esophageal motor disorders, many technologic improvements occurred due to advances in transducer technology, computerization, and graphic data presentation. In addition, a relatively new technology, intraluminal impedance, was incorporated into manometric modalities. The most sophisticated systems now include combined high-resolution manometry with high-resolution impedance. Although these techniques provide more detailed information about esophageal function, whether they improve our ability to diagnose and treat patients more effectively is debatable. However, more recent data support that these advances actually improve our ability to diagnose and treat esophageal motor disorders. This article provides an update on these technologies in clinical practice and how they may be helpful in the future.

High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities

High-resolution manometry capable of pressure monitoring from the pharynx to the stomach together with pressure topography plotting represents an unquestionable evolution in oesophageal manometry. However, with this advanced technology come challenges and one of those is devising the optimal scheme to apply high-resolution oesophageal pressure topography (HROPT) to the clinical evaluation of patients. The first iteration of the Chicago classification was based on a systematic analysis of motility patterns in 75 control subjects and 400 consecutive patients. This review summarizes the analysis process as it has evolved. Individual swallows are analysed in a stepwise fashion for the morphology of the oesophagogastric junction (OGJ), the extent of OGJ relaxation, the propagation velocity of peristalsis, the vigour of the peristaltic contraction, and abnormalities of intrabolus pressure utilizing metrics that have now been customized to HROPT. These results are then synthesized into a comprehensive diagnosis that, although based on conventional manometry criteria, is also customized to HROPT measures. The resultant classification objectifies the identification of three unique subtypes of achalasia. Additionally, it provides enhanced detail in the description of distal oesophageal spasm, nutcracker oesophagus subtypes, and OGJ obstruction. It is our expectation that modification of this classification scheme will continue to occur and this should further clarify the utility of pressure topography plotting in assessing oesophageal motility disorders.

Unique features of esophagogastric junction pressure topography in hiatus hernia patients with dysphagia

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to assess pressure dynamics within the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) in sliding hiatus hernia (HH) during normal peristalsis and to compare the pressure profiles of HH patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (HH-GERD) to HH patients with dysphagia (HH-dysphagia).

METHODS

High-resolution manometry studies in 230 consecutive patients and 68 controls were reviewed. HH patients were defined by a >or=1.5 cm separation between the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm (CD) on pressure topography plots. The HH population was further culled to eliminate those patients with motor disorders or stricture. The study groups were composed of 18 HH patients with only reflux symptoms and 10 HH patients with only dysphagia. Analysis of the pressure dynamics within the EGJ was performed at rest and after swallowing to independently quantify the LES and CD contributions to residual EGJ pressure, as well as the magnitude and genesis of distal esophageal intrabolus pressure (IBP). Differences among study groups were analyzed with analysis of variance.

RESULTS

After swallows, HH-dysphagia patients had greater residual CD pressure (9 mmHg; standard deviation [SD], 4) and IBP pressure (19 mmHg; SD, 4) compared to HH-GERD patients (5 mmHg; SD, 2; and 12 mmHg; SD, 2, respectively; P<.001) or normal subjects (NA; 11 mmHg; SD, 3; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Sliding HH alters the pressure dynamics through the EGJ and can lead to a functional obstruction. Patients with HH and dysphagia have greater pressures through the CD compared to HH patients with GERD symptoms, supporting the hypothesis that sliding HH in and of itself may be responsible for dysphagia.

A new era in esophageal diagnostics: the image-based paradigm of high-resolution manometry

BACKGROUND

The development of high-resolution (HRM) catheters and software displays of manometric recordings in color-coded pressure plots has changed the diagnostic assessment of esophageal disease. HRM may offer advantages over conventional methods, including improved identification of motility disorders, hiatal hernia, and outflow obstruction, and ease interpretation.

STUDY DESIGN

HRM studies were obtained in 50 healthy volunteers and 106 patients. HRM was performed using a 36-channel catheter, with sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals. Manometric findings were classified into abnormalities of the gastroesophageal barrier and those of the esophageal body and validated by comparison with endoscopic and radiographic diagnostic methods.

RESULTS

The mean time for HRM was significantly lower than that for a conventional method (8.1versus 24.4 minutes; p < 0.0001). A structurally defective lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was present in 53 (57.3%) patients, a hypertensive LES in 6 (7.8%), and impaired LES relaxation in 17 patients (16.7%). Validating the LES findings, 86.3% (44 of 51) of patients with a defective sphincter by HRM had radiographic or endoscopic evidence of a hiatal hernia, and 80% (41 of 51) had a positive pH study, endoscopic erosive esophagitis, or Barrett's esophagus. Evidence of a hiatal hernia by HRM was seen in 33 (56%) patients; a hiatal hernia was seen in 91% (30 of 33) of these on endoscopy and 81% (17 of 21) on barium swallow. Fifty-eight patients (54.7%) had an abnormal body motility.

CONCLUSIONS

HRM studies are shorter than those using conventional methods. Interpretation is image based, and correlation with objective endoscopic and physiologic findings confirms the accuracy of interpretation. The introduction of HRM is a significant advance in the outpatient evaluation of esophageal function.

In-vivo demonstration of a high resolution optical fiber manometry catheter for diagnosis of gastrointestinal motility disorders

Fiber optic catheters for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal motility disorders are demonstrated in-vitro and in-vivo. Single element catheters have been verified against existing solid state catheters and a multi-element catheter has been demonstrated for localized and full esophageal monitoring. The multi-element catheter consists of a series of closely spaced pressure sensors that pick up the peristaltic wave traveling along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The sensors are spaced on a 10 mm pitch allowing a full interpolated image of intraluminal pressure to be generated. Details are given of in-vivo trials of a 32-element catheter in the human oesophagus and the suitability of similar catheters for clinical evaluation in other regions of the human digestive tract is discussed. The fiber optic catheter is significantly smaller and more flexible than similar commercially available devices making intubation easier and improving patient tolerance during diagnostic procedures.

New technologies in the gastrointestinal clinic and research: Impedance and high-resolution manometry

The last five years have been an exciting time in the study of esophageal motor disorders due to the recent advances in esophageal function testing. New technologies have emerged, such as intraluminal impedance, while conventional techniques, such as manometry, have enjoyed many improvements due to advances in transducer technology, computerization and graphic data presentation. While these techniques provide more detailed information regarding esophageal function, our understanding of whether they can improve our ability to diagnose and treat patients more effectively is evolving. These techniques are also excellent research tools and they have added substantially to our understanding of esophageal motor function in dysphagia. This review describes the potential benefits that these new technologies may have over conventional techniques for the evaluation of dysphagia.

Diagnostic criteria and surgical procedure for megaesophagus--a personal experience

Megaesophagus is the end-stage of achalasia cardiae. It is the result of peristaltic disorders and slow decompensation of the muscular layer of the esophagus. The aim of this article is to detail the diagnostic criteria and surgical management of megaesophagus. Criteria were acute bending of esophagus axis; lack of esophagus peristalsis, and no response to stimulation in the manometric test; and Los Angeles C/D esophagitis in the endoscopic examination. Between 1991 and 2004 seven patients (5 females, 2 males; age, 51-67 years; average age, 59 +/- 8 years) were treated. A bypass made from the pedunculated part of the jejunum connecting the part of esophagus above the narrowing with the praepyloric part of the stomach was made. Access was by an abdominal approach. A jejunum bypass was made in six patients with megaesophagus. A transhiatal esophageal resection was carried out, and in the second stage a supplementary esophagus was made from the right half of the colon on the ileocolic vessels in one patient who had experienced two earlier unsuccessful operations. Symptoms of dysphagia, recurrent inflammation of the respiratory tract, and pain subsided in all patients. Complications were not reported in the postoperative period. All patients survived. Subsequent radiographic and endoscopic examination showed very good outcome. The jejunum bypass gave very good results in the surgical treatment of megaesophagus.

Esophageal motility testing: impedance-based transit measurement and high-resolution manometry

Esophageal function tests are widely used, not only to obtain insight into esophageal physiology and pathophysiology in a research setting, but also to diagnose esophageal motor disorders in patients with symptoms such as dysphagia and chest pain. While esophageal function testing has long been considered almost synonymous with manometry, recently new techniques such as impedance measurement and high-resolution manometry have emerged. With impedance monitoring the transit of a bolus through the esophagus can be studied without the use of ionizing radiation. High-resolution manometry offers a highly detailed and comprehensive view of esophageal pressure patterns. Multichannel high resolution manometry with color plotting facilitates positioning of the catheter and interpretation of the tracings. In this article the development, clinical usefulness, and indications of these new tests are discussed.

Oesophageal peristaltic transition zone defects: real but few and far between

This study analysed the association between oesophageal transition zone (TZ) defects [characterized by a delay and/or spatial gap between the terminus of the proximal oesophageal (striated muscle) contraction and the initiation of the distal oesophageal (smooth muscle) contraction] and dysphagia in a large patient cohort. Four hundred consecutive patients (178 with dysphagia) and 75 controls were studied with 36-channel high-resolution manometry (HRM). The resultant pressure topography plots were first analysed for impaired oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) relaxation, distal segment contractile abnormalities, and proximal contractile abnormalities using normal values from the 75 controls. If these aspects of oesophageal motility were deemed normal, the TZ was characterized by length and duration between the proximal and distal contractions using a 20 mmHg isobaric contour to establish the segment boundaries. Patients were then classified according to whether or not they exhibited TZ defects (spatial separation or delay) and the occurrence of unexplained dysphagia. Of the 400 patients, 267 were suitable for TZ analysis and of these 55 had a spatial or temporal TZ measurement exceeding the 95th percentile of the controls (2 cm, 1 s). Exactly 34.6% of the patients (n = 19) with spatial and/or temporal TZ defects had unexplained dysphagia, which was significantly more than seen with normal TZ dimensions (19.8%). Although far less common than distal peristaltic or OGJ abnormailites, TZ defects may be related to dysphagia in a minority of patients (<4% in this series) and should be considered a distinct oesophageal motility disorder.

Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although the diagnosis of achalasia hinges on demonstrating impaired esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation and aperistalsis, 3 distinct patterns of aperistalsis are discernable with high-resolution manometry (HRM). This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and treatment response of these 3 subtypes.

METHODS

One thousand clinical HRM studies were reviewed, and 213 patients with impaired EGJ relaxation were identified. These were categorized into 4 groups: achalasia with minimal esophageal pressurization (type I, classic), achalasia with esophageal compression (type II), achalasia with spasm (type III), and functional obstruction with some preserved peristalsis. Clinical and manometric variables including treatment response were compared among the 3 achalasia subtypes. Logistic regression analysis was performed using treatment success as the dichotomous dependent variable controlling for independent manometric and clinical variables.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were newly diagnosed with achalasia (21 type I, 49 type II, 29 type III), and 83 of these had sufficient follow-up to analyze treatment response. Type II patients were significantly more likely to respond to any therapy (BoTox [71%], pneumatic dilation [91%], or Heller myotomy [100%]) than type I (56% overall) or type III (29% overall) patients. Logistic regression analysis found type II to be a predictor of positive treatment response, whereas type III and pretreatment esophageal dilatation were predictive of negative treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

Achalasia can be categorized into 3 subtypes that are distinct in terms of their responsiveness to medical or surgical therapies. Utilizing these subclassifications would likely strengthen future prospective studies of treatment efficacy in achalasia.

High-resolution manometry and impedance-pH/manometry: valuable tools in clinical and investigational esophagology

Both high-resolution manometry (HRM) and impedance-pH/manometry monitoring have established themselves as research tools and both are now emerging in the clinical arena. Solid-state HRM capable of simultaneously monitoring the entire pressure profile from the pharynx to the stomach along with pressure topography plotting represents an evolution in esophageal manometry. Two strengths of HRM with pressure topography plots compared with conventional manometric recordings are (1) accurately delineating and tracking the movement of functionally defined contractile elements of the esophagus and its sphincters, and (2) easily distinguishing between luminal pressurization attributable to spastic contractions and that resultant from a trapped bolus in a dysfunctional esophagus. Making these distinctions objectifies the identification of achalasia, distal esophageal spasm, functional obstruction, and subtypes thereof. Ambulatory intraluminal impedance pH monitoring has opened our eyes to the trafficking of much more than acid reflux through the esophageal lumen. It is clear that acid reflux as identified by a conventional pH electrode represents only a subset of reflux events with many more reflux episodes being composed of less acidic and gaseous mixtures. This has prompted many investigations into the genesis of refractory reflux symptoms. However, with both technologies, the challenge has been to make sense of the vastly expanded datasets. At the very least, HRM is a major technological tweak on conventional manometry, and impedance pH monitoring yields information above and beyond that gained from conventional pH monitoring studies. Ultimately, however, both technologies will be strengthened as outcome studies evaluating their utilization become available.

Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The nature of the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and reflux oesophagitis is still not clear. To investigate the correlation between Helicobacter pylori infection and GERD taking into account endoscopic, pH-metric and histopathological data.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and January 2003 a prospective study was performed in 146 patients with GERD in order to determine the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection at gastric mucosa; further the value of the De Meester score endoscopic, manometric and pH-metric parameters, i.e. reflux episodes, pathological reflux episodes and extent of oesophageal acid exposure, of the patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection were studied and statistically compared. Finally, univariate analysis of the above mentioned data were performed in order to evaluate the statistical correlation with reflux esophagitis.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups, HP infected and HP negative patients, regarding age, gender and type of symptoms. There was no statistical difference between the two groups regarding severity of symptoms and manometric parameters. The value of the De Meester score and the ph-metric parameters were similar in both groups. On univariate analysis, we observed that hiatal hernia (p = 0,01), LES size (p = 0,05), oesophageal wave length (p = 0,01) and pathological reflux number (p = 0,05) were significantly related to the presence of reflux oesophagitis.

CONCLUSION

Based on these findings, it seems that there is no significant evidence for an important role for H. pylori infection in the development of GERD and erosive esophagitis. Nevertheless, current data do not provide sufficient evidence to define the relationship between HP and GERD. Further assessments in prospective large studies are warranted.

Physiology of the oesophageal transition zone in the presence of chronic bolus retention: studies using concurrent high resolution manometry and digital fluoroscopy

Distinct contraction waves (CWs) exist above and below the transition zone (TZ) between the striated and smooth muscle oesophagus. We hypothesize that bolus transport is impaired in patients with abnormal spatio-temporal coordination and/or contractile pressure in the TZ. Concurrent high resolution manometry and digital fluoroscopy were performed in healthy subjects and patients with reflux oesophagitis; a condition associated with ineffective oesophageal contractility and clearance. A detailed analysis of space-time variations in bolus movement, intra-bolus and intra-luminal pressure was performed on 17 normal studies and nine studies in oesophagitis patients with impaired bolus transit using an interactive computer based system. Compared with normal controls, oesophagitis patients had greater spatial separation between the upper and lower CW tails [median 5.2 cm (range 4.4-5.6) vs 3.1 cm (2.2-3.7)], the average relative pressure within the TZ region (TZ strength) was lower [30.8 mmHg (28.3-36.5) vs 45.8 mmHg (36.1-55.7), P < 0.001], and the risk of bolus retention was higher (90%vs 12%; P < 0.01). The presence of bolus retention was associated with a wider spatial separation of the upper and lower CWs (>3 cm, the upper limit of normal; P < 0.002), independent of the presence of oesophagitis. We conclude that bolus retention in the TZ is associated with excessively wide spatial separation between the upper and lower CWs and lower TZ muscle squeeze. These findings provide a physio-mechanical basis for the occurrence of bolus retention at the level of the aortic arch, and may underlie impaired clearance with reflux oesophagitis.

Diagnostic evaluation of dysphagia

Taking a careful history is vital for the evaluation of dysphagia. The history will yield the likely underlying pathophysiologic process and anatomic site of the problem in most patients, and is crucial for determining whether subsequently detected radiographic or endoscopic 'anomalies' are relevant or incidental. Although the symptoms of pharyngeal dysphagia can be multiple and varied, the typical features of neurogenic pharyngeal dysphagia are highly specific, and can accurately distinguish pharyngeal from esophageal disorders. The history will also dictate whether the next diagnostic procedure should be endoscopy, a barium swallow or esophageal manometry. In some difficult cases, all three diagnostic techniques may need to be performed to establish an accurate diagnosis. Stroke is the most common cause of pharyngeal dysphagia. A videoradiographic swallow study is vital in such cases to determine the extent and timing of aspiration and the severity and mechanics of dysfunction as a prelude to therapy.

New esophageal function testing (impedance, Bravo pH monitoring, and high-resolution manometry): clinical relevance

Esophageal testing aims to quantify gastroesophageal reflux or characterize esophageal motility. Reflux monitoring traditionally has been based on the detection of acidic reflux by a transnasal catheter that measures esophageal pH. Recently there have been two major developments in this field: the wireless Bravo pH capsule (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN), which allows catheter-free monitoring, and impedance-pH measurement, a catheter-based technique that enables detection of acidic and nonacidic reflux. The assessment of esophageal motility has relied on conventional manometry for many years. Two new procedures also recently became available to assess esophageal motility: high-resolution manometry, which uses many closely spaced pressure sensors and provides spatiotemporal plots of esophageal pressure changes, and impedance manometry, a test that directly measures bolus transit and provides conventional manometric data. The advantages, disadvantages, and clinical importance of these new esophageal tests are discussed in this review.