Reproduction and transplantation: report on the AST Consensus Conference on Reproductive Issues and Transplantation

Hydronephrosis in a pregnant renal transplant patient

Although pregnancy can cause hydronephrosis in native kidneys, renal transplant dysfunction during pregnancy due to obstruction is rare. A 22-week pregnant renal transplant patient presented with deteriorating renal function (serum creatinine 5.22 mg/dL from 2.07 mg/dL 3 weeks previously). Ultrasound showed transplant hydronephrosis with the graft compressed between the gravid uterus and liver. Percutaneous nephrostomy was placed with improvement in graft function. The nephrostomy remained in situ for the rest of the pregnancy. The nephrostomy was removed postpartum with no recurrence of hydronephrosis and subsequent transplant biopsy showed no evidence of rejection. The gravid uterus may obstruct a transplanted kidney.

Experimental uterus transplantation

BACKGROUND

Uterus transplantation (UTx) is developed in animal models as a future method to treat uterine factor infertility.

METHODS

All published studies in the area of UTx research were identified. Aspects relating to surgery, cold-ischemia/reperfusion, rejection, immunosuppression, pregnancy, ethics and institutional requirements were examined.

RESULTS

Uterus retrieval surgery has been solved in animals, including primates. Studies on cold-ischemia/reperfusion indicate an ischemic tolerance of >24 h. The transplantation procedure, with vascular anastomosis, has not been fully developed in animal models, indicated by frequent thrombosis formation. Pregnancies have only been reported in syngenic/auto-UTx animal models. Several ethical issues in relation to UTx, and requirements for a team that would be suitable to undertake human UTx, exist.

CONCLUSION

Much research on UTx has been performed in appropriate animal models. Several aspects of the procedure have been optimized but some remain to be solved. It is predicted that the research will soon reach a stage that could merit introduction of human UTx as an experimental procedure.

Sexual dysfunction after liver transplantation

1. The goal of liver transplantation is not only to ensure the survival of patients but also to offer patients the opportunity to achieve a good balance between the functional efficacy of the graft and their psychological and physical integrity. The quality of life after transplantation may be affected by unsatisfactory sexual activity and reproductive performance. 2. Sexual dysfunction and sex hormone disturbances are widely reported in men and women with chronic liver disease before liver transplantation. 3. Successful liver transplantation should lead to improvements in sexual function and sex hormone disturbances in both men and women, therefore improving reproductive performance, but immunosuppressive drugs may interfere with hormone metabolism. 4. Pregnancy is often successful after liver transplantation, despite the potentially toxic effects of immunosuppressive drug therapy, but fetal and maternal outcomes should be regularly assessed. 5. More detailed and comprehensive data are needed in the field of sexual function after transplantation, and new strategies are needed to support and inform patients on the waiting list and after liver transplantation.

KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients

The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.

The influence of immunosuppressants on the fertility of males who undergo renal transplantation and on the immune function of their offspring

AIM

To investigate the influence of immunosuppressants on the fertility of males who undergo renal transplantation as well as on the immune function of their offspring.

METHODS

A survey was performed on the fertility of 164 male renal transplant recipients who underwent a long-term treatment with cyclosporine A (CsA), azathioprine (Aza) and prednisone (Pred). The immune function of the recipients' children was also surveyed.

RESULTS

The 164 renal transplant recipients produced successful impregnation 15-204 (54.48+/-27.48)months after transplantation, resulting in the births of 167 children (three recipients fathered two children each), including 85 boys and 82 girls. Seven infants (4.2%) were premature. The weight of newborn infants was 2000-4600 (3274+/-395)g. Among the 167 children, 18 children were prone to respiratory tract infection. Examination of serum immunoglobulin from the children aged 1-3 years revealed that the IgA level was slightly lower than the normal reference range, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The IgM level of the children aged 7-12 years was higher than the normal reference range (P<0.01). Other immune indexes did not exhibit significant changes (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

A long-term treatment with small-dose immunosuppressants has no obvious effect on the fertility of males who undergo renal transplantation. However, whether immunosuppressants influence the immune function of the offspring of such transplant recipients remains to be clarified by long-term follow up and prospective studies.

The pregnancy rate and live birth rate in kidney transplant recipients

Fertility is one of the potential benefits for women undergoing kidney transplantation; however, population-based information about the likelihood of pregnancy and successful fetal outcome is not available. In this observational study of 16 195 female kidney transplant recipients aged 15-45 years in the United States between 1990 and 2003, we determined the pregnancy rate and live birth rate using Medicare claims data from the first three posttransplant years. The pregnancy rate was 33 per thousand female transplant recipients between 1990 and 2003 and progressively declined from 59 in 1990 to 20 in 2000. The live birth rate between 1990 and 2003 was 19 per thousand female transplant recipients and declined in parallel with the pregnancy rate. Despite a decrease in therapeutic abortions over time, the proportion of pregnancies resulting in fetal loss (45.6%) remained constant during the study due to an increase in spontaneous abortions and other causes of fetal loss. The pregnancy rate in kidney transplant recipients was markedly lower and declined more rapidly than reported in the general American population during the same period. The live birth rate was substantially lower than reported in voluntary registries of transplant recipients, and the proportion of pregnancies resulting in unexpected fetal loss increased over time.

Pregnancy outcomes after kidney donation

The outcome of pregnancy in kidney donors has generally been viewed to be favorable. We determined fetal and maternal outcomes in a large cohort of kidney donors. A total of 2102 women have donated a kidney at our institution; 1589 donors responded to our pregnancy surveys; 1085 reported 3213 pregnancies and 504 reported none. Fetal and maternal outcomes in postdonation pregnancies were comparable to published rates in the general population. Postdonation (vs. predonation) pregnancies were associated with a lower likelihood of full-term deliveries (73.7% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.0004) and a higher likelihood of fetal loss (19.2% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.0001). Postdonation pregnancies were also associated with a higher risk of gestational diabetes (2.7% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.0001), gestational hypertension (5.7% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.0001), proteinuria (4.3% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.0001) and preeclampsia (5.5% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.0001). Women who had both pre- and post-donation pregnancies were also more likely to have these adverse maternal outcomes in their postdonation pregnancies. In this large survey of previous living donors in a single center, fetal and maternal outcomes and pregnancy outcomes after kidney donation were similar to those reported in the general population, but inferior to predonation pregnancy outcomes.

Pregnancy after transplantation

The National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR) was established in 1991 to study the outcomes of pregnancies in female transplant recipients and pregnancies fathered by male transplant recipients. Data from the NTPR have helped to endorse the reassurances from publications of smaller experiences that successful pregnancies are possible in the transplant population. In our last review for this journal (2000), we noted that important future issues would include the reassessment of prepregnancy guidelines, gestational and organ-specific problems, the role of new immunosuppressive drugs, and the long-term effects of pregnancy on both graft and child. Data collected by the NTPR over the last 7 years have addressed these issues, thus providing additional information for health care providers of transplant recipients of childbearing age. There has been some refinement of prepregnancy guidelines, but there is a need for additional data collection so that organ-specific outcomes and risks can further be identified. To date, the outcomes of the children followed have been encouraging, and specific remote effects have not been identified, but continued surveillance is still vital. Of special concern are the new immunosuppressive drugs, specifically for mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept, Roche Laboratories Inc., Nutley, New Jersey), where data reported to the NTPR and through postmarketing surveillance have shown an increased incidence of nonviable outcomes and a specific pattern and increased incidence of malformation in the newborn, which has resulted in a pregnancy category change. Newer information points to an increased need for vigilance among centers and continued monitoring of pregnancy outcomes in this population. As the first reported pregnancy after transplantation occurred in a kidney recipient 50 years ago, in March 1958, this review also highlights the first reported pregnancies in other solid organ recipients.

The experience of pregnancy after renal transplantation: pregnancies even within postoperative 1 year may be tolerable

BACKGROUND

To identify factors related with successful pregnancy in renal transplant recipients and the effect of pregnancy on long-term graft outcome.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 48 women who conceived after undergoing renal transplantation (total pregnancies 74). The control group consisted of 187 nonpregnant female renal transplant recipients.

RESULTS

Mean ages at the time of transplantation and pregnancy were 28.0+/-4.0 years and 31.6+/-4.1 years, respectively. The mean interval from transplantation to pregnancy was 40.2+/-27.1 months. Outcomes included 49 live births, 12 terminations, 9 miscarriages, 3 stillbirths, and 1 ectopic pregnancy. Eleven of the 74 pregnancies (15%) were within 1 year of transplantation, resulting in seven live births, two miscarriages, and two terminations. Live births were associated with younger age at the time of transplantation (relative risk, 0.75; P=0.042) and younger age at the time of pregnancy (relative risk, 0.76; P=0.022). Graft failure rate from transplantation to end of follow-up did not differ between the pregnant and nonpregnant groups (19% vs. 21%, P=0.688). The 10-year graft survival rates were also similar in the 11 women who became pregnant less than or equal to 12 months after transplantation and the 37 who became pregnant more than 12 months after transplantation (78.8% vs. 78.6%, P=0.941).

CONCLUSION

A younger age at transplantation and at pregnancy was associated with a greater likelihood of a live birth. Transplantation to conception interval of less than 1 year was not associated with a greater number of adverse pregnancy events when compared with the group with transplantation to conception interval greater than 1 year.

Pregnancy and cirrhosis

As the treatment of cirrhosis improves, pregnancy in patients with cirrhosis is likely to become more common. Although maternal and fetal mortality is expected to similarly improve, pregnant patients with cirrhosis face unique risks. These include higher rates of spontaneous abortion and prematurity and a potential for life-threatening variceal hemorrhage, hepatic decompensation, splenic artery aneurysm rupture, and postpartum hemorrhage. Pregnancy outcome may be influenced by the underlying etiology of liver disease, as in viral and autoimmune hepatitis. Medications also impact the course of pregnancy, and must be tailored appropriately during this time.

Sirolimus may reduce fertility in male renal transplant recipients

Assessment of sex hormones in organ transplant recipients suggests that sirolimus may impair testicular function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and severity of sirolimus-associated alterations in sperm parameters and their impact on fathered pregnancy rate. An observational study was carried out in male patients aged 20-40 years who received a kidney transplant during 1995-2005. Patients were sent a questionnaire by post, and sperm analysis was proposed. The fathered pregnancy rates according to the immunosuppressive regimen were estimated and compared using the Poisson model. Complete information was obtained from 95 out of 116 recipients. Patients treated with sirolimus throughout the post-transplant period had a significantly reduced total sperm count compared to patients who did not receive sirolimus (28.6 +/- 31.2 x 10(6) and 292.2 +/- 271.2 x 10(6), respectively; p = 0.006), and a decreased proportion of motile spermatozoa (22.2 +/- 12.3% and 41.0 +/- 14.5%, p = 0.01). Moreover, the fathered pregnancy rate (pregnancies/1000 patient years) was 5.9 (95% CI, 0.8-42.1) and 92.9 (95% CI, 66.4-130.0) in patients receiving sirolimus-based and sirolimus-free regimens, respectively (p = 0.007). Of six patients in whom sirolimus treatment was interrupted, only three showed a significant improvement in sperm parameters. Sirolimus is associated with impaired spermatogenesis and, as a corollary, may reduce male fertility.

Pregnancy after kidney transplantation

Reproductive success is a common, expected outcome for male and female recipients of solid-organ transplants. Men can father children, and women can become pregnant and carry the fetus to delivery. There are, however, important maternal and fetal complications that need to be considered to provide optimal care to the mother and her infant. Although pregnancy is common after the transplantation of all solid organs, guidelines for optimal counseling and clinical management are limited. This review discusses information to help the physician counsel the kidney transplant recipient about risks of pregnancy for the mother and the fetus and provides information to help guide treatment of the pregnant transplant recipient.

Pregnancy after liver transplantation

There have been great strides in transplant medicine over the past few decades, and hundreds of pregnancies have now been reported in liver transplant recipients. Information on pregnancy in transplant patients has been collected through case reports, retrospective center-specific studies, and voluntary registries. Overall, favorable pregnancy outcomes have been reported for these patients. Pregnancy complications, however, are more common in liver transplant recipients than in the general population. Accordingly, pregnancies in liver transplant recipients should be followed by a multidisciplinary team involving both maternal fetal medicine specialists and transplant physicians. This chapter outlines the available data on the maternal and obstetrical outcomes of pregnancies in liver transplant recipients, and will review guidelines for management of these high-risk pregnancies.

Pregnancy after thoracic organ transplantation

A growing number of heart, heart-lung, or lung transplant recipients are women of reproductive age. Fertility and pregnancy are important issues in this group of patients and often pose complex medical, psychosocial, and ethical problems. Many successful pregnancy outcomes have been reported following heart or lung transplantation. Nevertheless, these patients are at risk of certain maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications, including hypertension, preeclampsia, infection, preterm birth, and low birth weight. The physiological changes that occur in pregnancy are generally well tolerated by patients who have undergone thoracic organ transplant(s). The risk of allograft rejection during and after pregnancy is significant, and it is important to maintain an adequate level of immunosuppression. Pregnancies among lung transplant recipients are at higher risk for certain complications. The rate for graft rejection, independent of pregnancy status, is higher in this population. The long-term graft and patient outcomes citing a 50% 5-year mortality will be critical while counseling these patients regarding the impact of pregnancy on survival, and the ability to participate in raising the child. A multi-disciplinary team, involving specialists in maternal fetal medicine, cardiology or pulmonary medicine, transplant medicine, anesthesiology, high-risk nursing, neonatology, psychology, genetics, and social service, is crucial to the care of these patients. This team approach should be initiated at the time of pretransplant and preconception counseling and be continued through the prenatal and postpartum periods. The management plan should be individualized according to the status of the mother, the fetus, and the allograft. For most cases, given the need for close collaboration and frequent monitoring, these patients are best managed at their primary transplant institution in collaboration with local or referring physicians.

Immunosuppressant therapy in pregnant organ transplant recipients

Transplant recipients are becoming pregnant with increasing frequency, and successful pregnancy outcomes have now been reported for women with all types of solid organ transplants. To prevent rejection of the transplanted organ, these patients are maintained on a life-long immunosuppressive regimen that must also be continued through pregnancy. Controlled human studies of the safety of these drugs have not been conducted, and knowledge regarding the pharmacokinetics of these medications in pregnancy is limited. Significant experience and safety data regarding the use of some of the more common immunosuppressants in pregnancy have, however, been accumulated from large case series and national registries. These observational studies suggest that successful pregnancy outcomes are possible in female organ transplant recipients, although sporadic adverse outcomes have been reported after immunosuppressant use in pregnancy. In this chapter, we will outline the information available regarding the use of immunosuppressive medications in pregnant transplant recipients as well as general concepts regarding fetal exposure to immunosuppressants.

Pregnancy in renal transplant recipients

Women with renal disease face increasing infertility and high-risk pregnancy as they approach end-stage renal disease due to uremia. Renal transplantation has provided these patients the ability to return to a better quality of life, and for a number of women who are of child bearing age with renal disease, it has restored their fertility and provided the opportunity to have children. But, although fertility is restored, pregnancy in these women still harbors risk to the mother, graft, and fetus. Selected patients who have stable graft function can have successful pregnancies under the supervision of a multidisciplinary team involving maternal fetal medicine specialists and transplant nephrologists. Careful observation and management are required to optimize outcome for mother and fetus.

Hepatitis B in pregnancy

In countries with a high prevalence of chronic hepatitis B, perinatal transmission from mother to infant accounts for the majority of cases of chronic hepatitis B. Passive-active immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and hepatitis B vaccine at birth is 95% efficacious in reducing the risk of HBV transmission but is less effective in HBeAg-positive mothers with very high serum HBV DNA levels. In the last 4 weeks of pregnancy lamivudine may provide additional protection in pregnant women who have high-level viremia. Further studies are needed to evaluate the use of nucleos(t)ide analogues to treat chronic hepatitis B during pregnancy.

Pregnancy after organ transplantation: a report from the UK Transplant pregnancy registry

BACKGROUND

Maternal and fetal complications in pregnancies after renal transplantation have been highlighted in several reports, but information on their main predisposing factors is limited. The U.K. Transplant Pregnancy Registry was established in 1997 to obtain detailed information on pregnancies in female organ transplant recipients across the U.K.

METHODS

For each female kidney, liver, or cardiothoracic organ transplant recipient who had had a recent pregnancy, data on maternal and fetal factors and pregnancy outcomes were collected using forms completed by their transplant follow-up and obstetric units. For kidney transplant recipients, the factors that influence pregnancy outcome were studied using logistic regression, and the effect of pregnancy on graft function was analyzed.

RESULTS

There were live births in 83%, 69%, and 79% of pregnancies in cardiothoracic organ, liver, and kidney recipients, respectively. In 50% of live births from renal patients, delivery was preterm (<37 weeks), with 83% of the preterm infants delivered via caesarean. Preterm delivery was associated with maternal drug-treated hypertension and impaired renal function. A matched case-control study showed no evidence of increased renal allograft loss after pregnancy. A univariate survival analysis, however, suggested an association between drug-treated hypertension during pregnancy and poorer postpregnancy graft survival. In patients with prepregnancy serum creatinine (SCr) >150 micromol/L, a trend toward increased postpregnancy SCr was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy is likely to end in a live birth in a majority of organ transplant recipients. In patients with greater prepregnancy SCr and/or drug-treated hypertension during pregnancy, however, subsequent renal function may be adversely affected.

Medications during pregnancy: antihypertensives and immunosuppressives

Use of prescription and nonprescription medications is common during pregnancy and is required in many women with underlying kidney disease or hypertension and in all with solid-organ allografts. Systematic assessment of drug safety during pregnancy is lacking, as are rigorous and comprehensive studies of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to guide drug selection and dosing across pregnancy. Renal and hepatic clearances of many drugs change markedly during pregnancy and pitfalls may complicate routine therapeutic monitoring of some drugs during pregnancy. However, available data and clinical experience allow reasonable strategies for selection and dosing of immunosuppressive agents in pregnant transplant recipients and of antihypertensive agents in women with mild or more severe hypertension complicating their pregnancies.

Pregnancy and contraceptive counseling of women with chronic kidney disease and kidney transplants

Women with kidney disease of childbearing age should expect proactive counseling regarding pregnancy and contraception. Discussions should include the impact of pregnancy on their kidney disease and the impact of kidney disease on maternal and fetal outcomes. However, nephrologists rarely discuss sexual dysfunction, infertility, menstrual irregularities, and contraception with their premenopausal women patients. This review will consider pregnancy-related issues to discuss when counseling women with all stages of chronic kidney disease. Issues related to contraception in women on dialysis, women with functioning kidney transplants, and those with chronic kidney disease will also be reviewed.

Obstetric considerations in the management of pregnancy in kidney transplant recipients

Kidney transplant improves reproductive function; planning for pregnancy is crucial. Prenatal management must address potential fetal complications: preterm delivery, intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight; as well as maternal: hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, acute rejection or graft loss. The latter depends upon timing after transplant, prepregnancy kidney function, and continuation of immunosuppressive agents at appropriate levels. Graft function is not adversely affected if preconception kidney function was normal. Acute rejection, 9%-14%, must be immediately addressed, with kidney biopsy if necessary. Blood pressure should be meticulously managed; serious morbidity results from poor control. Blood pressures >130/80 mmHg require acceptable antihypertensives: beta-blockers, alpha-methyldopa, hydralazine, and calcium channel blockers. Preeclampsia requires seizure prophylaxis with magnesium sulfate, with expeditious delivery. Screening for urinary tract infections with aggressive treatment and for opportunistic infections that may affect the fetus is essential. Surveillance for fetal anomalies, growth, and antenatal testing is important. Steroids for fetal lung maturity are indicated for preterm delivery. Vaginal birth is preferred, reserving cesarean for obstetrical indications, with pain management similar to normal laboring patients. Surveillance for infection postpartum is warranted. Conflicting information exists regarding safety of breastfeeding with immunosuppressive drugs; immunosuppressive medication must be adjusted to prepregnancy levels and contraception counseling addressed.

Considerations in the medical management of pregnancy in transplant recipients

Pregnancy, although rare in the patient with end-stage renal disease, is not uncommon in the transplant recipient. Physicians taking care of transplant recipients must be able to inform patients about the potential risks of pregnancy in this setting. The patient and her partner must know that the risks associated with pregnancy increase with worsening kidney function and hypertension. Current consensus opinion is that pregnancy can be relatively safely undertaken by 1 year after transplant if the patient has had no rejections during the year, allograft function is adequate, there are no infections that could affect the fetus, the patient is not taking teratogenic medications, and immunosuppressive medication dosing is stable. Consideration must be given to immunosuppression during pregnancy both with respect to the specific agents as well as the level of dosing. None of the medications are FDA category A; all are B or higher. Part of planning for pregnancy should include an evaluation of immunosuppression medication and a plan to modify the regimen prior to conception if its use may be risky for the developing fetus. Rejection can occur during a kidney transplant, so maintaining adequate immunosuppression is important. Other issues that need to be managed when caring for a pregnant transplant patient include: potential for infection (urinary tract infections are very common), hypertension, and anemia. The type of delivery, posttransplant contraception, and breast-feeding also need to be addressed.

Developmental and reproductive health issues in adolescent solid organ transplant recipients

The improved survival of pediatric recipients of solid organ transplants has prompted increased attention to quality of life issues. In adolescents these include attainment of normal growth and development, and involvement in romantic and sexual relationships. This review focuses on the reproductive health care needs of adolescent solid organ transplant recipients, including issues related to puberty, menstruation, and fertility. Contraceptive options, and the implications of their use by transplant recipients, are described. With close clinical follow up, most currently available hormonal contraceptive methods can be considered, and the impact of drug interactions with immunosuppressants can be minimized by eliminating hormone-free intervals. Monitoring for sexually transmitted infections, including oncogenic Human Papilloma Virus and its sequelae, is especially important for transplant recipients. Comprehensive reproductive health care visits are recommended for all sexually active adolescent solid organ transplant recipients.

Pregnancy in cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients: case series and review

A single centre experience of four pregnancies in four cystic fibrosis (CF) lung transplant recipients is reported. Six more cases were identified from the literature review and combined data analysis on 10 pregnancies in 10 CF lung transplant recipients was performed to determine maternal, foetal and graft outcome. There were nine live births and one therapeutic abortion. Three required caesarean sections. Five babies were premature but all nine children were well at follow-up. Five recipients who had a long, stable interval (i.e. at least three years) between transplant and pregnancy had a favourable outcome. Three recipients developed rejection during the pregnancy and one already had obliterative bronchiolitis before pregnancy. All showed progressive decline in lung function and subsequently died of chronic rejection within 38 months of delivery. Pregnancy in CF lung transplant recipients is feasible but should still be regarded as a risky undertaking.

Posttransplantation Quality of Life: More Than Graft Function

Whereas newer immunosuppressive therapies have increased patient and graft survival, long-term treatment with these drugs has been linked to medical and physical complications that may impact on posttransplantation quality of life. Immunosuppression-related physical side effects that can alter appearance--including hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia, weight gain, cushingoid facies, hand tremors, alopecia, and skin disorders--are among the most bothersome to patients and may have serious psychosocial implications. In addition, physical side effects may influence patient adherence to their prescribed treatment regimens and result in more serious complications, such as acute rejection, graft loss, rehospitalization, and even mortality. Therefore, strategies for minimizing side effects of immunosuppressive therapy and improving medication adherence are integral to better long-term transplant recipient management.

Effect of pregnancy on long-term kidney function in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine and with azathioprine

In order to investigate the effect of different immunosuppressive regimens and the time interval between transplantation and pregnancy on long-term outcome, we performed a case-control study in pregnant renal allograft recipients. Eighty-one pregnancies of kidney transplanted recipients were identified [cyclosporine (CYA): n = 40; azathioprine (AZA): n = 41]. Controls were matched with respect to important prognostic factors. Posttransplant follow-up was 91.3 +/- 5 months. Graft and patient survival were similar in both groups and there was no apparent effect of immunosuppression. A total of 28 recipients (33%) delivered within 2 years and 6 (8%) subjects within 1 year after transplantation, but these short transplantation-to-pregnancy intervals had no apparent adverse effect on long-term outcome. In contrast to AZA-treated patients, CYA-treated patients experienced an increase in serum creatinine postpartum (1.15 +/- 0.2 mg/dL vs. 1.61 +/- 0.1 mg/dL; p < 0.05). Whole blood CYA levels decreased transiently during pregnancy from 115.9 +/- 8 ng/mL to 80.7 +/- 7 ng/mL leading to a gradual increase in drug dose from 240 +/- 14 mg/day to 324 +/- 21 mg/day (p < 0.05). Following delivery, there was an increase in CYA concentrations to 173 +/- 5.4 ng/mL, requiring rapid dose tapering to baseline of 246 +/- 15 mg/day. Pregnancies in renal recipients do not affect long-term patient and graft survival, independent of the immunosuppression. No detrimental effect of short transplantation-to-pregnancy intervals on long-term graft function was detected.