251
|
Stuschke M, Hadaschik B. [Radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer : Prostate-only versus prostate plus whole-pelvic?]. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:939-942. [PMID: 34476530 PMCID: PMC8458169 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01825-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Stuschke
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
252
|
Her EJ, Haworth A, Sun Y, Williams S, Reynolds HM, Kennedy A, Ebert MA. Biologically Targeted Radiation Therapy: Incorporating Patient-Specific Hypoxia Data Derived from Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4897. [PMID: 34638382 PMCID: PMC8507789 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypoxia has been linked to radioresistance. Strategies to safely dose escalate dominant intraprostatic lesions have shown promising results, but further dose escalation to overcome the effects of hypoxia require a novel approach to constrain the dose in normal tissue.to safe levels. In this study, we demonstrate a biologically targeted radiotherapy (BiRT) approach that can utilise multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to target hypoxia for favourable treatment outcomes. METHODS mpMRI-derived tumour biology maps, developed via a radiogenomics study, were used to generate individualised, hypoxia-targeting prostate IMRT plans using an ultra- hypofractionation schedule. The spatial distribution of mpMRI textural features associated with hypoxia-related genetic profiles was used as a surrogate of tumour hypoxia. The effectiveness of the proposed approach was assessed by quantifying the potential benefit of a general focal boost approach on tumour control probability, and also by comparing the dose to organs at risk (OARs) with hypoxia-guided focal dose escalation (DE) plans generated for five patients. RESULTS Applying an appropriately guided focal boost can greatly mitigate the impact of hypoxia. Statistically significant reductions in rectal and bladder dose were observed for hypoxia-targeting, biologically optimised plans compared to isoeffective focal DE plans. CONCLUSION Results of this study suggest the use of mpMRI for voxel-level targeting of hypoxia, along with biological optimisation, can provide a mechanism for guiding focal DE that is considerably more efficient than application of a general, dose-based optimisation, focal boost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily J. Her
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia; (E.J.H.); (M.A.E.)
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | - Yu Sun
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | - Scott Williams
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Hayley M. Reynolds
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand;
| | - Angel Kennedy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia;
| | - Martin A. Ebert
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia; (E.J.H.); (M.A.E.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia;
- 5D Clinics, Perth, WA 6010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
253
|
Rezaeijo SM, Hashemi B, Mofid B, Bakhshandeh M, Mahdavi A, Hashemi MS. The feasibility of a dose painting procedure to treat prostate cancer based on mpMR images and hierarchical clustering. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:182. [PMID: 34544468 PMCID: PMC8454023 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01906-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to assess the feasibility of a dose painting (DP) procedure, known as simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation Therapy (SIB-IMRT), for treating prostate cancer with dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs) based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance (mpMR) images and hierarchical clustering with a machine learning technique. METHODS The mpMR images of 120 patients were used to create hierarchical clustering and draw a dendrogram. Three clusters were selected for performing agglomerative clustering. Then, the DIL acquired from the mpMR images of 20 patients were categorized into three groups to have them treated with a DP procedure being composed of three planning target volumes (PTVs) determined as PTV1, PTV2, and PTV3 in treatment plans. The DP procedure was carried out on the patients wherein a total dose of 80, 85 and 91 Gy were delivered to the PTV1, PTV2, and PTV3, respectively. Dosimetric and radiobiologic parameters [Tumor Control Probability (TCP) and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP)] of the DP procedure were compared with those of the conventional IMRT and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) procedures carried out on another group of 20 patients. A post-treatment follow-up was also made four months after the radiotherapy procedures. RESULTS All the dosimetric variables and the NTCPs of the organs at risks (OARs) revealed no significant difference between the DP and IMRT procedures. Regarding the TCP of three investigated PTVs, significant differences were observed between the DP versus IMRT and also DP versus 3DCRT procedures. At post-treatment follow-up, the DIL volumes and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the DP group differed significantly (p-value < 0.001) from those of the IMRT. However, the whole prostate ADC and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) indicated no significant difference (p-value > 0.05) between the DP versus IMRT. CONCLUSIONS The results of this comprehensive clinical trial illustrated the feasibility of our DP procedure for treating prostate cancer based on mpMR images validated with acquired patients' dosimetric and radiobiologic assessment and their follow-ups. This study confirms significant potential of the proposed DP procedure as a promising treatment planning to achieve effective dose escalation and treatment for prostate cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION IRCT20181006041257N1; Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, Registered: 23 October 2019, https://en.irct.ir/trial/34305 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Masoud Rezaeijo
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Al-Ahmad and Chamran Cross, 1411713116 Tehran, Iran
| | - Bijan Hashemi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Al-Ahmad and Chamran Cross, 1411713116 Tehran, Iran
| | - Bahram Mofid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Bakhshandeh
- Department of Radiology Technology, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Arash Mahdavi
- Department of Radiology, Modares Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
254
|
Kerkmeijer LGW, Pos FJ, Haustermans K, van der Heide UA. Reply to I. R. Vogelius et al. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3086-3087. [PMID: 34086505 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Linda G. W. Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Floris J. Pos, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Karin Haustermans, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and Uulke A. van der Heide, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Floris J Pos
- Linda G. W. Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Floris J. Pos, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Karin Haustermans, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and Uulke A. van der Heide, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Linda G. W. Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Floris J. Pos, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Karin Haustermans, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and Uulke A. van der Heide, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Linda G. W. Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Floris J. Pos, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Karin Haustermans, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and Uulke A. van der Heide, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
255
|
Kerkmeijer LGW, Valentini V, Fuller CDD, Slotman BJ. Editorial: Online Adaptive MR-Guided Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:748685. [PMID: 34527596 PMCID: PMC8435672 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.748685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Clifton D Dave Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
256
|
Nagar H, Spratt DE. Prostate SBRT Dose Escalation (9 Gy × 5, 13.3 Gy × 3, 24 Gy × 1): Are We Making Progress? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:110-112. [PMID: 34348105 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
257
|
Richardson M, Skehan K, Wilton L, Sams J, Samuels J, Goodwin J, Greer P, Sridharan S, Martin J. Visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning. J Med Radiat Sci 2021; 68:282-288. [PMID: 34028976 PMCID: PMC8424315 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prostatic urethra is an organ at risk for prostate radiotherapy with genitourinary toxicities a common side effect. Many external beam radiation therapy protocols call for urethral sparing, and with modulated radiotherapy techniques, the radiation dose distribution can be controlled so that maximum doses do not fall within the prostatic urethral volume. Whilst traditional diagnostic MRI sequences provide excellent delineation of the prostate, uncertainty often remains as to the true path of the urethra within the gland. This study aims to assess if a high-resolution isotropic 3D T2 MRI series can reduce inter-observer variability in urethral delineation for radiotherapy planning. METHODS Five independent observers contoured the prostatic urethra for ten patients on three data sets; a 2 mm axial CT, a diagnostic 3 mm axial T2 TSE MRI and a 0.9 mm isotropic 3D T2 SPACE MRI. The observers were blinded from each other's contours. A Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) score was calculated using the intersection and union of the five observer contours vs an expert reference contour for each data set. RESULTS The mean DSC of the observer vs reference contours was 0.47 for CT, 0.62 for T2 TSE and 0.78 for T2 SPACE (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The introduction of a 0.9 mm isotropic 3D T2 SPACE MRI for treatment planning provides improved urethral visualisation and can lead to a significant reduction in inter-observer variation in prostatic urethral contouring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Richardson
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kate Skehan
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lee Wilton
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Joshua Sams
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Justin Samuels
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jonathan Goodwin
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Mathematical and Physical ScienceUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Peter Greer
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Mathematical and Physical ScienceUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Swetha Sridharan
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jarad Martin
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
258
|
Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy as definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer: Pattern of practice in German-speaking countries : A survey of the Prostate Cancer Expert Panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) and the Working Party on Radiation Oncology of the German Cancer Society (DKG-ARO). Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:993-1000. [PMID: 34463814 PMCID: PMC8545730 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01820-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Various randomized phase III clinical trials have compared moderately hypofractionated to normofractionated radiotherapy (RT). These modalities showed similar effectiveness without major differences in toxicity. This project was conducted by the Prostate Cancer Expert Panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) and the Working Party on Radiation Oncology of the German Cancer Society. We aimed to investigate expert opinions on the use of moderately hypofractionated RT as a definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer in German-speaking countries. Methods A 25-item, web-based questionnaire on moderate-hypofractionation RT was prepared by an internal committee. The experts of the DEGRO were asked to complete the questionnaire. Results Fourteen active members of DEGRO completed the questionnaire. The questions described indications for selecting patients eligible to receive moderate hypofractionation based on clinical and pathological factors such as age, urinary symptoms, and risk-group. The questions also collected information on the technical aspects of selection criteria, including the definition of a clinical target volume, the use of imaging, protocols for bladder and rectal filling, the choice of a fractionation schedule, and the use of image guidance. Moreover, the questionnaire collected information on post-treatment surveillance after applying moderately hypofractionated RT. Conclusion Although opinions varied on the use of moderate-hypofractionation RT, the current survey reflected broad agreement on the notion that moderately hypofractionated RT could be considered a standard treatment for localized prostate cancer in German-speaking countries.
Collapse
|
259
|
Sepulcri M, Fusella M, Cuppari L, Zorz A, Paiusco M, Evangelista L. Value of 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in predicting response to radical radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 30:71-77. [PMID: 34409175 PMCID: PMC8361027 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to establish whether metabolic parameters obtainable from FCH PET/CT can predict long-term response to radical radiotherapy (rRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS Drawing on a single-center database, we retrospectively reviewed the pre-treatment FCH PET/CT scans of 50 patients who underwent rRT between 2012 and 2017. Patients were enrolled if they had a follow-up of at least 3 years after rRT. Various metabolic parameters were considered for each PET/CT, including FCH multifocality. rRT was administered to all patients for a total equivalent dose of 76-80 Gy, using a standard or hypofractionated schedule. Patients were classified as disease-free (DF) if their PSA levels after rRT rose by <2 ng/mL vis-à-vis their PSA nadir, or as not disease free (NDF) if their PSA levels rose by more than 2 ng/ml. RESULTS A multifocal FCH uptake in the prostate gland was identified in 27 patients (54%). At 3-year follow-up, 37 patients (74%) were judged DF, and 13 (26%) were NDF. The SUVmax and SUVmean, and the sum of the two values in all FCH foci in the prostate gland were significantly higher for NDF patients than for DF patients (all p < 0.005). The sum of the TLCKA levels in all FCH foci was likewise significantly higher in patients who were NDF than in those found DF (median 54.5 vs. 29.4; p < 0.05). At univariate analysis, the most of PET-metrics and Gleason Score were predictors of biochemical relapse after 3-year follow-up (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Higher SUVs seems predict a worse outcome for patients with multifocal intraprostatic lesions who are candidates for rRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Sepulcri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Fusella
- Department of Medical Physics, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Lea Cuppari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandra Zorz
- Department of Medical Physics, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Marta Paiusco
- Department of Medical Physics, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
260
|
Burgess L, Roy S, Morgan S, Malone S. A Review on the Current Treatment Paradigm in High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4257. [PMID: 34503067 PMCID: PMC8428221 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
High-risk prostate cancer is traditionally treated with a combination of radiotherapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, recent advancements in systemic treatment and radiotherapy have widened the spectrum of treatment for this patient population. Use of image guidance and intensity modulation, as well as the incorporation of brachytherapy, has led to safe radiotherapy dose escalation with reduced risk of recurrence. Clinical trials have helped define the role of pelvic nodal radiotherapy, the role of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, and the optimal duration and sequencing of ADT in combination with radiotherapy. Emerging evidence has redefined the role of surgery in this cohort. Contemporary clinical trials have identified new systemic therapy options in high-risk prostate cancer. Finally, new imaging modalities including multi-parametric MRI and molecular imaging and genomic classifiers have ushered a new era in patient selection, risk stratification, and treatment tailoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Burgess
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada;
- Radiation Medicine Program, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Soumyajit Roy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60605, USA;
| | - Scott Morgan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada;
- Radiation Medicine Program, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Shawn Malone
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada;
- Radiation Medicine Program, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
261
|
Role of radiotherapy for high risk localized prostate cancers. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:660-662. [PMID: 34417087 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Management of high-risk prostate cancers is still a subject of debate, because of the lack of randomized trial comparing surgery and radiotherapy. If external beam radiotherapy is proposed, it must be associated with a long-term androgen deprivation therapy, at least 18-months. Irradiation of pelvic lymph nodes seems to improve distant metastasis-free survival and is so indicated in most of the cases. Moderate hypofractionation is not validated for pelvic lymph nodes irradiation. A combination of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy improved biochemical control in randomized trials without impact on survival. But this combination has been evaluated in large retrospective studies and seems to improve specific and overall survivals. An integrated boost on the MRI-defined index lesion is another way of dose escalation and improved also biochemical control. Stereotactic radiotherapy is not a validated option at this moment. For each patient, according to the extension of the disease, age, comorbidities and also his willingness, the best approach must be chosen, ideally in multidisciplinary meeting.
Collapse
|
262
|
Oxygen-Sensitive MRI: A Predictive Imaging Biomarker for Tumor Radiation Response? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1519-1529. [PMID: 33775857 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a noninvasive prognostic imaging biomarker related to hypoxia to predict SABR tumor control. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 145 subcutaneous syngeneic Dunning prostate R3327-AT1 rat tumors were focally irradiated once using cone beam computed tomography guidance on a small animal irradiator at 225 kV. Various doses in the range of 0 to 100 Gy were administered, while rats breathed air or oxygen, and tumor control was assessed up to 200 days. Oxygen-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T1-weighted, ΔR1, ΔR2*) was applied to 79 of these tumors at 4.7 T to assess response to an oxygen gas breathing challenge on the day before irradiation as a probe of tumor hypoxia. RESULTS Increasing radiation dose in the range of 0 to 90 Gy enhanced tumor control of air-breathing rats with a TCD50 estimated at 59.6 ± 1.5 Gy. Control was significantly improved at some doses when rats breathed oxygen during irradiation (eg, 40 Gy; P < .05), and overall there was a modest left shift in the control curve: TCD50(oxygen) = 53.1 ± 3.1 Gy (P < .05 vs air). Oxygen-sensitive MRI showed variable response to oxygen gas breathing challenge; the magnitude of T1-weighted signal response (%ΔSI) allowed stratification of tumors in terms of local control at 40 Gy. Tumors showing %ΔSI >0.922 with O2-gas breathing challenge showed significantly better control at 40 Gy during irradiation while breathing oxygen (75% vs 0%, P < .01). In addition, increased radiation dose (50 Gy) substantially overcame resistance, with 50% control for poorly oxygenated tumors. Stratification of dose-response curves based on %ΔSI >0.922 revealed different survival curves, with TCD50 = 36.2 ± 3.2 Gy for tumors responsive to oxygen gas breathing challenge; this was significantly less than the 54.7 ± 2.4 Gy for unresponsive tumors (P < .005), irrespective of the gas inhaled during tumor irradiation. CONCLUSIONS Oxygen-sensitive MRI allowed stratification of tumors in terms of local control at 40 Gy, indicating its use as a potential predictive imaging biomarker. Increasing dose to 50 Gy overcame radiation resistance attributable to hypoxia in 50% of tumors.
Collapse
|
263
|
Wegener D, Zips D, Gani C, Boeke S, Nikolaou K, Othman AE, Almansour H, Paulsen F, Müller AC. [Primary treatment of prostate cancer using 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator]. Radiologe 2021; 61:839-845. [PMID: 34297139 PMCID: PMC8410708 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00882-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Der potenzielle Nutzen des verbesserten Weichteilkontrastes von MR-Sequenzen gegenüber der Computertomographie (CT) für die Radiotherapie des Prostatakarzinoms ist bekannt und führt zu konsistenteren und kleineren Zielvolumina sowie verbesserter Risikoorganschonung. Hybridgeräte aus Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) und Linearbeschleuniger (MR-Linac) stellen eine neue vielversprechende Erweiterung der radioonkologischen Therapieoptionen dar. Material und Methoden Dieser Artikel gibt eine Übersicht über bisherige Erfahrungen, Indikationen, Vorteile und Herausforderungen für die Radiotherapie des primären Prostatakarzinoms mit dem 1,5-T-MR-Linac. Ergebnisse Alle strahlentherapeutischen Therapieindikationen für das primäre Prostatakarzinom können mit dem 1,5-T-MR-Linac abgedeckt werden. Die potenziellen Vorteile umfassen die tägliche MR-basierte Lagekontrolle in Bestrahlungsposition und die Möglichkeit der täglichen Echtzeitanpassung des Bestrahlungsplans an die aktuelle Anatomie der Beckenorgane (adaptive Strahlentherapie). Zusätzlich werden am 1,5-T-MR-Linac funktionelle MRT-Sequenzen für individuelles Response-Assessment für die Therapieanpassung untersucht. Dadurch soll das therapeutische Fenster weiter optimiert werden. Herausforderungen stellen u. a. die technische Komplexität und die Dauer der Behandlungssitzung dar. Schlussfolgerung Der 1,5-T-MR-Linac erweitert das radioonkologische Spektrum in der Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms und bietet Vorteile durch tagesaktuelle MRT-basierte Zielvolumendefinition und Planadaptation. Weitere klinische Untersuchungen sind notwendig, um die Patienten zu identifizieren, die von der Behandlung am MR-Linac gegenüber anderen strahlentherapeutischen Methoden besonders profitieren.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Wegener
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
| | - Daniel Zips
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Cihan Gani
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Simon Boeke
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Universitätsklinik für Radiologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Ahmed E Othman
- Universitätsklinik für Radiologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
- Universitätsklink für Neuroradiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Haidara Almansour
- Universitätsklinik für Radiologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Universitätsklinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
264
|
Graff P, Crehange G. [Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: Results, limits and prospects]. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:684-691. [PMID: 34274223 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Still an emerging approach a few years ago, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has ranked as a valid option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Inherent properties of prostatic adenocarcinoma (low α/β) make it the perfect candidate. We propose a critical review of the literature trying to put results into perspective to identify their strengths, limits and axes of development. Technically sophisticated, the stereotactic irradiation of the prostate is well tolerated. Despite the fact that median follow-up of published data is still limited, ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy seems very efficient for the treatment of low and intermediate risk prostate cancers. Data seem satisfying for high-risk cancers as well. New developments are being studied with a main interest in treatment intensification for unfavorable intermediate risk and high-risk cancers. Advantage is taken of the sharp dose gradient of stereotactic radiotherapy to offer safe reirradiation to patients with local recurrence in a previously irradiated area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Graff
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - G Crehange
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
265
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To present an overview of radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer over the past decade. METHODS The literature on prostate cancer radiation therapy was reviewed and summarised. Radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer has dramatically evolved in the past decade, with superior techniques and exciting advances, pushing the role of the radiation oncologist to new frontiers. RESULTS Innovations in imaging, treatment delivery, and a deeper understanding of biology has resulted in more tailored RT for individuals. In the present review, we summarise the changing landscape and broadly discuss new developments in prostate RT. CONCLUSIONS Questions and challenges remain in the field, however there are multiple opportunities to further improve upon RT for our patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia C Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anthony L Zietman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
266
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
267
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
268
|
McLaughlin MF, Folkert MR, Timmerman RD, Hannan R, Garant A, Hudak SJ, Costa DN, Desai NB. Hydrogel Spacer Rectal Wall Infiltration Associated With Severe Rectal Injury and Related Complications After Dose Intensified Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100713. [PMID: 34195499 PMCID: PMC8239444 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The risk of rectal toxicity during and after prostate cancer radiation therapy is common to all treatment regimens. Hydrogel rectal spacers are increasingly being used to mitigate this risk and to facilitate dose-escalation, but also may infiltrate the rectal wall, with unclear clinical implication. We present a case of significant infiltration associated with severe late rectal injury (grade 4) and further grade 3 to 4 sequelae (recto-urethral fistula and associated osteomyelitis requiring exenteration) after high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. The injury's temporal pattern associated with the expected timing of gel dissolution and displacement of infiltrated rectal layers potentially toward high dose regions together suggest a contributing role of the infiltration to the injury. In light of the rapid increase of hydrogel rectal spacer utilization, we review the case's evolution, concerning imaging findings, and associated literature and make suggestions regarding treatment planning and endoscopic assessment in the setting of infiltration or expected injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark F. McLaughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michael R. Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Robert D. Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Aurelie Garant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Steven J. Hudak
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Daniel N. Costa
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Neil B. Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
269
|
Dess RT. Prostate Brachytherapy Boost: Where Are We and Where Are We Going. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:708-711. [PMID: 34089677 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert T Dess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
270
|
Groen VH, Zuithoff NPA, van Schie M, Monninkhof EM, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer HCJ, van der Voort van Zyp J, Pos FJ, Smeenk RJ, Haustermans K, Isebaert S, Draulans C, Depuydt T, Verkooijen HM, van der Heide UA, Kerkmeijer LGW. Anorectal dose-effect relations for late gastrointestinal toxicity following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the FLAME trial. Radiother Oncol 2021; 162:98-104. [PMID: 34214614 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The phase III FLAME trial (NCT01168479) showed an increase in five-year biochemical disease-free survival, with no significant increase in toxicity when adding a focal boost to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer [Kerkmeijer et al. JCO 2021]. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between delivered radiation dose to the anorectum and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (grade ≥2). MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients in the FLAME trial were analyzed, irrespective of treatment arm. The dose-effect relation of the anorectal dose parameters (D2cm3 and D50%) and GI toxicity grade ≥2 in four years of follow-up was assessed using a mixed model analysis for repeated measurements, adjusted for age, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, T-stage, baseline toxicity grade ≥1, hormonal therapy and institute. RESULTS A dose-effect relation for D2cm3 and D50% was observed with adjusted odds ratios of 1.17 (95% CI 1.13-1.21, p < 0.0001) and 1.20 (95% CI 1.14-1.25, p < 0.0001) for GI toxicity, respectively. CONCLUSION Although there was no difference in toxicity between study arms, a higher radiation dose to the anorectum was associated with a statistically significant increase in GI toxicity following EBRT for prostate cancer. This dose-effect relation was present for both large and small anorectal volumes. Therefore, further increase in dose to the anorectum should be weighed against the benefit of focal dose escalation for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle H Groen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas P A Zuithoff
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel van Schie
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans C J de Boer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
| | | | - Floris J Pos
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sofie Isebaert
- University Hospitals Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Belgium
| | | | - Tom Depuydt
- University Hospitals Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Belgium
| | | | | | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
271
|
Petersen SE, Høyer M. Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined With Particle Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:695647. [PMID: 34249753 PMCID: PMC8260995 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.695647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is high-level evidence for addition of androgen deprivation therapy to photon-based radiotherapy of the prostate in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Little is known about the value of ADT in particle therapy of prostate cancer. We are conducting a systematic review on biochemical disease-free survival, overall survival, and morbidity after combined particle therapy and ADT for prostate cancer. Methods A thorough search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were conducted, searching for relevant studies. Clinical studies on prostate cancer and the treatment combination of particle therapy and androgen deprivation therapy were included. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021230801). Results A total of 298 papers were identified. Fifteen papers reporting on 7,202 patients after proton or carbon-ion therapy for localized prostate cancer where a fraction or all patients received ADT were selected for analysis. Three thousand five hundred and nineteen (49%) of the patients had received combined ADT and particle therapy. Primarily high-risk (87%), to a lesser extent intermediate-risk (34%) and low-risk patients (12%) received ADT. There were no comparative studies on the effect of ADT in patients treated with particles and no studies identified ADT as an independent prognostic factor related to survival outcomes. Conclusions The review found no evidence to support that the effects on biochemical disease-free survival and morbidity of combining ADT to particle therapy differs from the ADT effects in conventional photon based radiotherapy. The available data on the topic is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
272
|
Sundar S, Symonds P. Prostate ultra-radical radiotherapy: reinventing the wheel. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e223. [PMID: 34087133 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00185-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
| | - Paul Symonds
- Department of Oncology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
273
|
Vogelius IR, Bentzen SM. Radiation Dose Escalation for Early Prostate Cancer: Reigniting the FLAME? J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3085-3086. [PMID: 34086509 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan R Vogelius
- Ivan R. Vogelius, PhD, DMSc, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Søren M. Bentzen, PhD, DMSc, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Ivan R. Vogelius, PhD, DMSc, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Søren M. Bentzen, PhD, DMSc, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
274
|
Stuschke M, Hadaschik B. [Elective radiotherapy of pelvic lymph nodes in high-risk prostate cancer? : Evaluation of the relationship between the relative risk reduction of PSA (prostate-specific antigen) relapse within 5 years and absolute survival benefit]. Urologe A 2021; 60:1051-1053. [PMID: 34081179 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01543-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Stuschke
- Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Strahlenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
| | - B Hadaschik
- Urologische Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Essen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
275
|
Wang YF, Tadimalla S, Hayden AJ, Holloway L, Haworth A. Artificial intelligence and imaging biomarkers for prostate radiation therapy during and after treatment. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 65:612-626. [PMID: 34060219 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). Quantitative MRI (qMRI) parameters, derived from multi-parametric MRI, provide indirect measures of tumour characteristics such as cellularity, angiogenesis and hypoxia. Using Artificial Intelligence (AI), relevant information and patterns can be efficiently identified in these complex data to develop quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) of tumour function and biology. Such QIBs have already demonstrated potential in the diagnosis and staging of PCa. In this review, we explore the role of these QIBs in monitoring treatment response during and after PCa radiotherapy (RT). Recurrence of PCa after RT is not uncommon, and early detection prior to development of metastases provides an opportunity for salvage treatments with curative intent. However, the current method of monitoring treatment response using prostate-specific antigen levels lacks specificity. QIBs, derived from qMRI and developed using AI techniques, can be used to monitor biological changes post-RT providing the potential for accurate and early diagnosis of recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Feng Wang
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sirisha Tadimalla
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy J Hayden
- Sydney West Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Wentworthville, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
276
|
Spohn SKB, Sachpazidis I, Wiehle R, Thomann B, Sigle A, Bronsert P, Ruf J, Benndorf M, Nicolay NH, Sprave T, Grosu AL, Baltas D, Zamboglou C. Influence of Urethra Sparing on Tumor Control Probability and Normal Tissue Complication Probability in Focal Dose Escalated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy: A Planning Study Based on Histopathology Reference. Front Oncol 2021; 11:652678. [PMID: 34055621 PMCID: PMC8160377 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Multiparametric magnetic resonance tomography (mpMRI) and prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) are used to guide focal radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation concepts. Besides improvements of treatment effectiveness, maintenance of a good quality of life is essential. Therefore, this planning study investigates whether urethral sparing in moderately hypofractionated RT with focal RT dose escalation influences tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). Patients and Methods 10 patients with primary prostate cancer (PCa), who underwent 68Ga PSMA-PET/CT and mpMRI followed by radical prostatectomy were enrolled. Intraprostatic tumour volumes (gross tumor volume, GTV) based on both imaging techniques (GTV-MRI and -PET) were contoured manually using validated contouring techniques and GTV-Union was created by summing both. For each patient three IMRT plans were generated with 60 Gy to the whole prostate and a simultaneous integrated boost up to 70 Gy to GTV-Union in 20 fractions by (Plan 1) not respecting and (Plan 2) respecting dose constraints for urethra as well as (Plan 3) respecting dose constraints for planning organ at risk volume for urethra (PRV = urethra + 2mm expansion). NTCP for urethra was calculated applying a Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model. TCP-Histo was calculated based on PCa distribution in co-registered histology (GTV-Histo). Complication free tumour control probability (P+) was calculated. Furthermore, the intrafractional movement was considered. Results Median overlap of GTV-Union and PRV-Urethra was 1.6% (IQR 0-7%). Median minimum distance of GTV-Histo to urethra was 3.6 mm (IQR 2 - 7 mm) and of GTV-Union to urethra was 1.8 mm (IQR 0.0 - 5.0 mm). The respective prescription doses and dose constraints were reached in all plans. Urethra-sparing in Plans 2 and 3 reached significantly lower NTCP-Urethra (p = 0.002) without significantly affecting TCP-GTV-Histo (p = p > 0.28), NTCP-Bladder (p > 0.85) or NTCP-Rectum (p = 0.85), resulting in better P+ (p = 0.006). Simulation of intrafractional movement yielded even higher P+ values for Plans 2 and 3 compared to Plan 1. Conclusion Urethral sparing may increase the therapeutic ratio and should be implemented in focal RT dose escalation concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ilias Sachpazidis
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Wiehle
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Thomann
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - August Sigle
- Department of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
277
|
Kamran SC, Efstathiou JA. Current State of Personalized Genitourinary Cancer Radiotherapy in the Era of Precision Medicine. Front Oncol 2021; 11:675311. [PMID: 34026653 PMCID: PMC8139515 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.675311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy plays a crucial role for the management of genitourinary malignancies, with technological advancements that have led to improvements in outcomes and decrease in treatment toxicities. However, better risk-stratification and identification of patients for appropriate treatments is necessary. Recent advancements in imaging and novel genomic techniques can provide additional individualized tumor and patient information to further inform and guide treatment decisions for genitourinary cancer patients. In addition, the development and use of targeted molecular therapies based on tumor biology can result in individualized treatment recommendations. In this review, we discuss the advances in precision oncology techniques along with current applications for personalized genitourinary cancer management. We also highlight the opportunities and challenges when applying precision medicine principles to the field of radiation oncology. The identification, development and validation of biomarkers has the potential to personalize radiation therapy for genitourinary malignancies so that we may improve treatment outcomes, decrease radiation-specific toxicities, and lead to better long-term quality of life for GU cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia C. Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
278
|
Cuccia F, Corradini S, Mazzola R, Spiazzi L, Rigo M, Bonù ML, Ruggieri R, Buglione di Monale e Bastia M, Magrini SM, Alongi F. MR-Guided Hypofractionated Radiotherapy: Current Emerging Data and Promising Perspectives for Localized Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1791. [PMID: 33918650 PMCID: PMC8070332 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review we summarize the currently available evidence about the role of hybrid machines for MR-guided radiotherapy for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy. Given the novelty of this technology, to date few data are accessible, but they all report very promising results in terms of tolerability and preliminary clinical outcomes. Most of the studies highlight the favorable impact of on-board magnetic resonance imaging as a means to improve target and organs at risk identification with a consequent advantage in terms of dosimetric results, which is expected to relate to a more favorable toxicity pattern. Still, the longer treatment time per session may potentially affect the patient's compliance to the treatment, although first quality of life assessment studies have reported substantial tolerability and no major impact on quality of life. Finally, in this review we hypothesize some future scenarios of further investigation, based on the possibility to explore the superior anatomy visualization and the role of daily adapted treatments provided by hybrid MR-Linacs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; (F.C.); (R.M.); (M.R.); (R.R.); (F.A.)
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Munich Campus Grosshadern, 81377 Munchen, Germany;
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; (F.C.); (R.M.); (M.R.); (R.R.); (F.A.)
| | - Luigi Spiazzi
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; (F.C.); (R.M.); (M.R.); (R.R.); (F.A.)
| | - Marco Lorenzo Bonù
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (M.L.B.); (M.B.d.M.eB.); (S.M.M.)
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| | - Ruggero Ruggieri
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; (F.C.); (R.M.); (M.R.); (R.R.); (F.A.)
| | - Michela Buglione di Monale e Bastia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (M.L.B.); (M.B.d.M.eB.); (S.M.M.)
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (M.L.B.); (M.B.d.M.eB.); (S.M.M.)
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; (F.C.); (R.M.); (M.R.); (R.R.); (F.A.)
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
279
|
Trägårdh E, Simoulis A, Bjartell A, Jögi J. Tumor detection of 18F-PSMA-1007 in the prostate gland in patients with prostate cancer using prostatectomy specimens as reference method. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:jnumed.121.261993. [PMID: 33789930 PMCID: PMC8612187 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.261993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radiopharmaceuticals used with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) are a promising tool for managing patients with prostate cancer. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT for detecting tumors in the prostate gland using radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as a reference method and to determine whether a correlation exists between 18F-PSMA-1007 uptake and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade and prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels at diagnosis. Methods: Thirty-nine patients referred for 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT for initial staging and who underwent RP within four months were retrospectively included. Uptake of 18F-PSMA-1007 indicative of cancer was assessed and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and total lesion uptake (TLU) were calculated for the index tumor. Histopathology was assessed from RP specimens. True positive, false negative, and false positive lesions were calculated. Results: In 94.9% of patients, the index tumor was correctly identified with PET. SUVmax was significantly higher in the tumors vs normal prostate tissue, but no significant differences were found between different ISUP grades and SUVmax There was a poor correlation between PSA at diagnosis and SUVmax (r=0.23) and moderate agreement between PSA at diagnosis and TLU (r=0.67). When all tumors (also non-index tumors) were considered, many small tumors (approx. 1-2 mm) were not detected with PET. Conclusion: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT performs well in correctly identifying the index tumor in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. Approximately 5% of the index tumors were missed by PET, which agrees with previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin Trägårdh
- Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Athanasios Simoulis
- Department of Pathology, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; and
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jonas Jögi
- Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|