Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

In the last decade the treatment of advanced-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer has substantially improved. If in the early 90s there was still concern about the real efficacy of chemotherapy over best suppotive care alone in the advanced setting, constant developments in clinical research have demonstrated the survival advantage of active anti-cancer drugs not only in the first-line setting, but, lately, even in patients with recurrent disease after failure of two previous chemotherapy lines. With the premises of high throughput technologies, translational research is aiming to characterize patients and tumors on a molecular basis. With pharmacogenomics it would then be possible to accurately predict patient outcome and tailor the treatment strategy according to the geno-phenotype of single patients.

Gemcitabine, ifosfamide and paclitaxel in advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase II study

Although platinum-based two-drug combinations represent the elective therapeutic approach for advanced/metastatic NSCLC, there is still interest in exploring the efficacy and tolerability of platinum-free combinations including third generation agents in selected NSCLC population. Based on the satisfying activity of gemcitabine (G), ifosfamide (I) and paclitaxel (T) as single agents in NSCLC, we have designed a phase II study to explore an alternative approach to platinum-containing regimens using a combination of these three drugs. To investigate the activity/toxicity of T 175 mg/m2 on day 1, I 3 g/m2 on day 1 (with Mesna uroprotection) and G 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1-8, every 3 weeks in the treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC, 46 patients (38 male, 8 female) with NSCLC were enrolled: mean age 58 (range 33-70); Stage IIIB/IV=15/31; ECOG PS 0-1/2=31/15;

HISTOLOGY

adenocarcinoma=20, squamous=14, large cell=3, NSCLC=8, adenosquamous=1. A total of 221 cycles have been administered (median number 4.8 for patients). In intent-to-treat analysis, partial response was achieved in 17 patients (36.95%), stable disease and progressive disease was detected in 16 (34.78%) and 10 (21.73%) patients, respectively. Time to progression was 30.9 weeks; median survival time was 42.7 weeks; the survival rates at 12 and 18 months were 34.79 and 15.21%, respectively. No toxic deaths occurred. No patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia grade 3 occurred in 10 patients (21.7%); Anemia grade 3 in 1 (2.1%); Thrombocytopenia grade 2 in two patients (4.3%) and grade 3 in one (2.1%). Peripheral neuropathy grade 1 occurred in ten (21.7%) and grade 2 in two patients (4.3%). Additional non-haematological toxicities were mild nausea, emesis and fatigue. GIT is well tolerated and active regimen in both advanced and metastatic NSCLC. These data suggest future investigations for GIT schedule as a possible alternative to platinum-based regimens in selected advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients where survival, tolerability and quality of life are the primary goals.

Mature results of a phase II trial of gemcitabine/paclitaxel given every 2 weeks in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine/paclitaxel given every 2 weeks in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Treatment with 1 previous chemotherapy regimen was allowed. Patients received gemcitabine 3000 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes and paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) over 3 hours every 2 weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients were enrolled: 31 patients were chemotherapy naive and 14 patients were previously treated. The median age was 61 years, and the majority of patients had adenocarcinoma and stage IV disease. The minimum follow-up was 4.5 years. The response rate was 27% for all 45 patients and 32% for the 38 patients who were response evaluable.

RESULTS

The response rate was 26% (31% response evaluable) for the patients who were chemotherapy-naive and 29% (33% response evaluable) for the patients who were previously treated. For the entire group, the median time to progression was 3.3 months; median overall survival was 9.4 months, and the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 38% and 13%, respectively. The overall survival and time to progression durations were not significantly different between patients who were chemotherapy-naive and patients who were previously treated. The toxicities associated with treatment were minimal, with only 1 episode of grade 4 neutropenia and a low incidence of significant nonhematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine/paclitaxel is active in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. The every-2-week schedule is likely to be responsible for the low level of toxicity seen with this regimen and could be used as the basis for the addition of other agents in future clinical trials.

Vinorelbine/carboplatin vs gemcitabine/carboplatin in advanced NSCLC shows similar efficacy, but different impact of toxicity

This randomised phase III study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was conducted to compare vinorelbine/carboplatin (VC) and gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) regarding efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and toxicity. Chemonaive patients with NSCLC stage IIIB/IV and WHO performance status 0–2 were eligible. No upper age limit was defined. Patients received vinorelbine 25 mg m⁻² or gemcitabine 1000 mg m⁻² on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin AUC4 on day 1 and three courses with 3-week cycles. HRQOL questionnaires were completed at baseline, before chemotherapy and every 8 weeks until 49 weeks. During 14 months, 432 patients were included (VC, n=218; GC, n=214). Median survival was 7.3 vs 6.4 months, 1-year survival 28 vs 30% and 2-year survival 7 vs 7% in the VC and GC arm, respectively (P=0.89). HRQOL, represented by global QOL, nausea/vomiting, dyspnoea and pain, showed no significant differences. More grade 3–4 anaemia (P<0.01), thrombocytopenia (P<0.01) and transfusions of blood (P<0.01) or platelets (P<0.01) were observed in the GC arm. There was more grade 3–4 leucopoenia (P<0.01) in the VC arm, but the rate of neutropenic infections was the same (P=0.87). In conclusion, overall survival and HRQOL are similar, while grade 3–4 toxicity requiring interventions are less frequent when VC is compared to GC in advanced NSCLC.

Bexarotene (LGD1069, Targretin), a selective retinoid X receptor agonist, prevents and reverses gemcitabine resistance in NSCLC cells by modulating gene amplification

Acquired drug resistance is a major obstacle in cancer therapy. As for many other drugs, this is also the case for gemcitabine, a nucleoside analogue with activity against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we evaluate the ability of bexarotene to modulate the acquisition and maintenance of gemcitabine resistance in Calu3 NSCLC models. In the prevention model, Calu3 cells treated repeatedly with gemcitabine alone gradually developed resistance. However, with inclusion of bexarotene, the cells remained chemosensitive. RNA analysis showed a strong increase of rrm1 (ribonucleotide reductase M1) expression in the resistant cells (Calu3-GemR), a gene known to be involved in gemcitabine resistance. In addition, the expression of genes surrounding the chromosomal location of rrm1 was increased, suggesting that resistance was due to gene amplification at the chr11 p15.5 locus. Analysis of genomic DNA confirmed that the rrm1 gene copy number was increased over 10-fold. Correspondingly, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of metaphase chromosomes showed an intrachromosomal amplification of the rrm1 locus. In the therapeutic model, bexarotene gradually resensitized Calu3-GemR cells to gemcitabine, reaching parental drug sensitivity after 10 treatment cycles. This was associated with a loss in rrm1 amplification. Corresponding with the in vitro data, xenograft tumors generated from the resistant cells did not respond to gemcitabine but were growth inhibited when bexarotene was added to the cytotoxic agent. The data indicate that bexarotene can resensitize gemcitabine-resistant tumor cells by reversing gene amplification. This suggests that bexarotene may have clinical utility in cancers where drug resistance by gene amplification is a major obstacle to successful therapy.

A Parallel Dose-Escalation Study of Weekly and Twice-Weekly Bortezomib in Combination with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in the First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

To establish maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and tolerability of two schedules of bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients were assigned to increasing doses of bortezomib days 1 and 8 (weekly schedule) or days 1, 4, 8, and 11 (twice-weekly schedule), in addition to gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) day 1, every 21 days. Maximum of six cycles. Plasma pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and gemcitabine were determined at MTD.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enrolled of whom 27 had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Diarrhea, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting toxicities leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) in the weekly schedule. Febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with bleeding were dose-limiting toxicities in the twice-weekly schedule, leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) as well. Most common > or =grade 3 treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. No grade > or =3 treatment-related sensory neuropathy was reported. Of 34 evaluable patients, 13 achieved partial responses, 17 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. Response and survival of NSCLC patients treated with twice weekly or weekly bortezomib were similar. However, increased dose intensity of bortezomib led to increased gastrointestinal toxicity as well as myelosuppression. Pharmacokinetic profiles of cisplatin and gemcitabine were not significantly different in patients receiving either schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) is the recommended phase 2 schedule, constituting a safe combination, with activity in NSCLC.

Optimal Duration of Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

NSCLC is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Approximately 30-40% of patients present with advanced stage disease (Stage IIIb with malignant effusion and Stage IV) and the majority of those who present with "earlier" disease will ultimately develop and succumb to metastatic lung cancer. Although platinum-based combination chemotherapy has been shown to impact overall survival and quality of life, it is not curative and less than 25% of patients survive 2 years. Therefore, the benefits of chemotherapy must be weighed against toxicity, inconvenience, and cost. Several randomized trials have shown that there is no added benefit of extending first line, platinum-based chemotherapy beyond four cycles. There was no additional survival benefit and patients experienced increased toxicity with longer durations of therapy. Attempts to improve outcome by planned sequential therapy, i.e. shifting from one cytotoxic regimen to another after a fixed number of cycles have also not been successful. Several new so-called "targeted" therapeutic agents have recently been evaluated in clinical trials to assess whether the efficacy of first line chemotherapy with platinum doublets can be improved with the addition of these agents. These include bevacizumab, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (erlotinib and gefitinib), bexarotene, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, and others. Other than bevacizumab, none have demonstrated benefit in this scenario. The design of most of these trials employed the concurrent use of the new agent with six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy (usually either carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/gemcitabine) and then continued the new agent until relapse. Three agents have demonstrated benefit in randomized studies in the second line setting, docetaxel, pemetrexed, and erlotinib. No study has evaluated the optimal duration of therapy for these agents, though for erlotinib, it appears that use until progression is optimal. Future studies of novel agents will need to explore not only the potential use of these agents in combination or in comparison with standard therapy, but also the duration of therapy and consider issues of survival, quality of life, and cost.

Treatment of elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients with three different schedules of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin: subanalysis of a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Administration of paclitaxel on a weekly schedule in combination with carboplatin is associated with a lower incidence of neuropathy and myelosuppression. The authors conducted subgroup analysis of their randomized phase II study of three different schedules of weekly paclitaxel with carboplatin to determine the efficacy of each regimen in elderly patients (aged > or = 70 years) with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to one of three different weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin regimens. After four cycles of chemotherapy, those with objective response or stable disease were randomized to weekly paclitaxel or observation as maintenance therapy. Four hundred three patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 111 (28%) were aged 70 years or older.

RESULTS

The treatment regimen of weekly paclitaxel (100 mg/m for 3 of 4 weeks) and carboplatin (area under the curve = 6 mg/ml/min once every 4 weeks) (arm 1) was associated with the best therapeutic index overall. The median survival and 1-year survival rates were 11.3 months and 50% for patients in the > or =70 years cohort versus 11.2 months and 46% for the <70 years cohort in arm 1. Efficacy results were comparable between the two groups in the other arms as well. Grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 13.6% and 2.3% in the > or =70 years cohort compared with 4.5% and 1.1% in the <70 years cohort in arm 1.

CONCLUSION

The weekly regimen of paclitaxel administered in combination with carboplatin is tolerated well by elderly NSCLC patients and has comparable efficacy with younger patients.

Recent improvement in the survival of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer enrolled in phase III trials of first-line, systemic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Few studies have assessed formally whether treatment outcomes have improved substantially over the years for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in Phase III trials. The objective of the current investigation was to determine the time trends in outcomes for the patients in those trials.

METHODS

The literature was searched to identify trials that addressed the role of chemotherapy regimens in the first-line setting for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Trends were tested by using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 121 Phase III trials were identified that involved 42,768 patients with 263 chemotherapy arms and 11 best supportive care (BSC) arms, all of which were initiated between 1982 and 2002. Although the number of randomized patients and the proportion of patients with metastatic disease had increased over the years, the number of patients with a poor performance status who were accrued into the trials had decreased. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was been investigated most frequently during the period. The multiple regression analysis revealed a significant improvement in median survival and in the median time to disease progression over the years, with annual prolongations of 0.1203 months (3.609 days) and 0.0617 months (1.851 days), respectively (P< .0001 and P < .0130, respectively). In addition, the use of cisplatin and carboplatin was associated significantly with survival prolongation. The median survival for patients who received BSC also increased progressively over the years (P = .0487).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of patients with NSCLC in Phase III trials improved slowly but steadily over time, although the main factors responsible for this improvement remain unknown. Nonetheless, the current results also suggested that novel targets and new agents will be required in the future fight against advanced NSCLC.

Phase III study of erlotinib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Tarceva Lung Cancer Investigation Trial

PURPOSE

Erlotinib is a potent inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, with single-agent antitumor activity. Preclinically, erlotinib enhanced the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy. This phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of erlotinib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received erlotinib (150 mg/d) or placebo, combined with up to six 21-day cycles of chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included time to disease progression (TTP), response rate (RR), duration of response, and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

A total of 1,172 patients were enrolled. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were well balanced. There were no differences in OS (hazard ratio, 1.06; median, 43 v 44.1 weeks for erlotinib and placebo groups, respectively), TTP, RR, or QoL between treatment arms. In a small group of patients who had never smoked, OS and progression-free survival were increased in the erlotinib group; no other subgroups were found more likely to benefit. Erlotinib with chemotherapy was generally well tolerated; incidence of adverse events was similar between arms, except for an increase in rash and diarrhea with erlotinib (generally mild).

CONCLUSION

Erlotinib with concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine showed no survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC.

Open, randomized, phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine and docetaxel as first- and second-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy has been widely accepted as standard for palliation in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Gemcitabine and docetaxel are active as single agents. Our previous experience indicates that single-agent therapy, if given sequentially, could be an alternative to doublet combination chemotherapy and that sequence and schedule matter.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive first-line 3-weekly gemcitabine or docetaxel. At progression, patients received second-line therapy with the other agent. Treatment was considered feasible if 30% of the evaluable patients had > or = 2 cycles of first-line and 2 cycles of second-line therapy and patient survival was > or = 7 months from the start of treatment. For efficacy, time to progression, overall survival, response, and quality of life were analyzed.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty patients received gemcitabine followed by docetaxel or docetaxel followed by gemcitabine. Treatment was feasible for 60 patients (38%) with gemcitabine followed by docetaxel and for 80 patients (49%) with docetaxel followed by gemcitabine; treatment favored docetaxel followed by gemcitabine (P = 0.03539). Median survival for gemcitabine followed by docetaxel and docetaxel followed by gemcitabine was 6.3 months and 8.6 months, and 1-year survival rate was 28% and 31%, respectively. Objective response rates were < or = 10% for both treatment strategies. Quality of life was significantly better in gemcitabine followed by docetaxel (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Single-agent gemcitabine and docetaxel are feasible as defined for both sequences but treatment favors docetaxel followed by gemcitabine. Thus, it is reasonable to state that single-agent therapy given sequentially might be a candidate for palliation and therefore should be investigated in comparison with combination therapy.

DNA synthesis and repair genes RRM1 and ERCC1 in lung cancer

BACKGROUND

RRM1, the regulatory subunit of ribonucleotide reductase, is involved in carcinogenesis, tumor progression, and the response of non-small-cell lung cancer to treatment.

METHODS

We developed an automated quantitative determination of the RRM1 protein in routinely processed histologic specimens. In these specimens, we measured the expression of RRM1 and two other proteins that are relevant to non-small-cell lung cancer: the excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein and the phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN). We compared the results with the clinical outcomes in 187 patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer who had received only surgical treatment.

RESULTS

RRM1 expression correlated with the expression of ERCC1 (P<0.001) but not with the expression of PTEN (P=0.37). The median disease-free survival exceeded 120 months in the group of patients with tumors that had high expression of RRM1 and was 54.5 months in the group with low expression of RRM1 (hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the high-expression group, 0.46; P=0.004). The overall survival was more than 120 months for patients with tumors with high expression of RRM1 and 60.2 months for those with low expression of RRM1 (hazard ratio for death, 0.61; P=0.02). Among these 187 patients, the survival advantage was limited to the 30% of patients with tumors that had a high expression of both RRM1 and ERCC1.

CONCLUSIONS

RRM1 and ERCC1 are determinants of survival after surgical treatment of early-stage, non-small-cell lung cancer.

Chemotherapy dose--response relationships in non-small cell lung cancer and implied resistance mechanisms

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized excess resistance factor ("active resistance") gives a dose--response curve (DRC) shoulder, deficiency of a factor required for drug sensitivity ("saturable passive resistance") gives a DRC terminal plateau, and alteration of a factor gives decreased DRC slope.

METHOD

We used response rates from published non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinical studies to estimate mean percent tumor cell kill in each study (assuming cell kill is proportional to tumor volume change) and performed regression and meta-regression analyses of percent cell survival and patient survival vs planned dose-intensity.

RESULTS

As single agents, cell kill approached that of combinations only at highest doses. While DRC shape varied between single agents, DRCs for all combinations tested flattened at higher doses. Patient median survival times also failed to vary significantly with dose for any combination.

CONCLUSIONS

DRC flattening at higher doses suggests therapy efficacy is limited by deficiency/saturation of factors required for cell killing. Based on this and other clinical observations, we hypothesize: (1) active resistance may modulate cell killing at lower doses, but ability to overcome this by increasing doses is limited by saturable passive resistance (e.g. by non-cycling cells). (2) Cells surviving initial chemotherapy may upregulate active resistance mechanisms (permitting growth despite therapy). (3) If active resistance mechanisms are insufficient for growth/survival, cells may survive until therapy cessation by downregulating metabolism/cycling, becoming temporarily quiescent. This could help explain broad cross-resistance between agents and would imply that improved targeting of non-cycling cells will be required for major improvement in therapy efficacy.

Induction of an effective anti-tumor immune response and tumor regression by combined administration of IL-18 and Apoptin

Immunization strategies using plasmid DNA can potentially improve humoral and cellular immune responses that protect against cancer and infectious diseases. The chicken anemia virus-derived Apoptin protein exhibits remarkable specificity in its ability to induce apoptosis in tumor cells, but not in normal diploid cells. Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is a Th1-type cytokine that has demonstrated potential as a biological adjuvant in murine tumor models. In this study, we analyzed the anti-tumor potential and mechanism of action of simultaneous Apoptin and IL-18 gene transfer in C57BL/6 mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC). Here we report that the growth of established tumors in mice immunized with pAPOPTIN in conjunction with pIL-18 was significantly inhibited compared with the growth of tumors in mice immunized with the empty vector (EV) or pAPOPTIN alone. Furthermore, the immunization of mice with pAPOPTIN in conjunction with pIL-18 elicited strong natural killer activity and LLC tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses in vitro. In addition, T cells from lymph nodes of mice vaccinated with pIL-18 or pAPOPTIN + pIL-18 secreted high levels of the Th1 cytokine IL-2 and IFN-gamma, indicating that the regression of tumor cells is related to a Th1-type dominant immune response. These results demonstrate that vaccination with Apoptin together with IL-18 may be a novel and powerful strategy for cancer immunotherapy.

A Phase I Study of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung or Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose for pemetrexed, alone and in combination with carboplatin, with concurrent radiotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or esophageal cancer were treated every 21 days for two cycles. Regimen 1 was pemetrexed (200-600 mg/m(2)); regimen 2 was pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) with escalating carboplatin doses (AUC = 4-6). Both regimens included concurrent radiation (40-66 Gy; palliative-intent doses were lower).

RESULTS

Thirty patients (18 locally advanced and 12 metastatic with dominant local symptoms) were enrolled, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1/2 (n = 8/21/1). All dose levels were tolerable for regimen 1 (n = 18: 15 NSCLC and 3 esophageal cancers) and regimen 2 (n = 12: all NSCLC). In regimen 1, one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 esophagitis/anorexia) occurred (500 mg/m(2)). Grade 3 neutropenia (3 of 18 patients) was the main hematologic toxicity. In regimen 2, one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 esophagitis) occurred (500 mg/m(2); AUC = 6); grade 3/4 leukopenia (4 of 12 patients) was the main hematologic toxicity. Four complete responses (2 pathology proven) and eight partial responses were observed. When systemically active chemotherapy doses were reached, further dose escalation was discontinued, and a phase II dose-range was established (pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 5-6).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 5 or 6) with concurrent radiation is well tolerated, allows for the administration of systemically active chemotherapy doses, and shows signs of activity. To further determine efficacy, safety profile, and optimal dosing, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 30407 is currently evaluating this regimen in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Alternating Doublets in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Lung cancer is an epidemic disease in developing countries. Incorporation of new active drugs in the neoadjuvant treatment of operable patients might lead to improved outcomes. Postchemotherapy mediastinal-based treatment decisions allow for in vivo testing of activity and could help to determine the ideal local treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II trial enrolled patients with documented non-small-cell lung cancer, clinically staged IB-IIIA, and considered candidates for surgical resection. Patients received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with alternating doublets: cisplatin/gemcitabine; gemcitabine/vinorelbine, and cisplatin/vinorelbine. After neoadjuvant treatment, clinical restaging was performed. Patients without evidence of progression underwent mediastinoscopy. Those with negative mediastinal nodes were taken to surgery whereas those with positive nodes were treated with radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Between January 2001 and August 2002, 30 patients were included. The median age was 56 years, 66% of the patients were men, 43% of the patients had adenocarcinoma, and 34% had squamous cell carcinoma. Clinical staging was IB in 9 patients (30%), IIB in 7 (23%), and IIIA in 14 (47%). Median tumor size was 6.5 cm (range, 3-11 cm). Twenty-three patients (77%) had clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eight of 12 patients (67%) with N2 disease had clinical downstaging. Twenty-two patients (73%) were taken to surgery. Complete resection rate was achieved in 21 patients (70%). Treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Localized non-small-cell lung cancer is very sensitive to chemotherapy. Postchemotherapy mediastinal-based treatment decision led to a high complete resection rate, even in patients with large tumors. This strategy deserves further investigation.

Coadministration of oxaliplatin does not influence the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine

We investigated the possible pharmacokinetic interactions of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. Ten patients with advanced stage solid tumors were treated with gemcitabine (1500 mg/m) as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8, followed by oxaliplatin (130 mg/m) as a 4-h intravenous infusion, on day 8 every 21 days. Pharmacokinetic data for 24 h after dosing were obtained for both day 1 (gemcitabine without oxaliplatin coadministration) and day 8 (gemcitabine with oxaliplatin) during the first cycle of treatment. Gemcitabine levels in plasma were quantified using a reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography assay with ultraviolet detection, and total and ultrafiltrated platinum levels by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry with deuterium correction. All pharmacokinetic parameters of gemcitabine seemed to be unchanged when coadministered with oxaliplatin (day 8) compared with pharmacokinetic data of gemcitabine given as a single agent (day 1). The mean (maximum) concentration of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 was 13.57 (+/-7.42) and 10.23 (+/-5.21) mg/l, respectively (P=0.28), and the mean half-life was 0.32 and 0.44 h, respectively (P=0.40). Similarly, the P-values for AUC0-24 and the observed clearance were 0.61 and 0.30, respectively. Plasma total and free platinum levels were in agreement with other published data. Gemcitabine disposition appeared to be unaffected by oxaliplatin coadministration because no significant changes in pharmacokinetics between day 1 (gemcitabine without oxaliplatin coadministration) and day 8 (gemcitabine with oxaliplatin) were observed.

In-vitro and in-vivo anti-cancer activity of a novel gemcitabine-cardiolipin conjugate

Our objectives were to study the biological activity of a novel gemcitabine-cardiolipin conjugate (NEO6002) and compare that with gemcitabine. Cytotoxicity in vitro was determined against several gemcitabine-sensitive parental and gemcitabine-resistant cancer cell lines using the sulforhodamine B assay. The in vivo toxicity was examined by changes in body weight and hematologic indices of conventional mice. Immunodeficient SCID mice bearing P388 and BxPC-3 tumor xenografts were used to evaluate the in-vivo therapeutic efficacy. Both NEO6002 and gemcitabine showed pro-apoptotic and cytotoxic effects against all gemcitabine-sensitive cell lines tested. Unlike gemcitabine, the cytotoxicity of NEO6002 was independent of nucleoside transporter (NT) inhibitors, indicating a different internalization route of NEO6002. The conjugate demonstrated a favorable activity not only in ARAC-8C, a NT-deficient gemcitabine-resistant human leukemia cell line, but also in several other gemcitabine-resistant cell lines. At the in-vivo level, a comparative toxicity study showed a significant body weight loss and a decrease in white blood cell counts in gemcitabine-treated mice, whereas the influence of NEO6002 was mild. Treatment of NEO6002 at 27 micromol/kg increased the median survival of CD2F1 mice bearing P388 cells by up to 73%, while at the same doses and schedule of gemcitabine resulted in toxic deaths of all treated mice. At a dose of 18 micromol/kg, NEO6002 inhibited the growth of BxPC-3 xenografts by 52%, while only 32% of tumor inhibition was achieved with gemcitabine. We conclude that NEO6002 may be an effective chemotherapeutic agent with improved tolerability and can potentially circumvent NT-deficient, gemcitabine-resistant tumors.

A phase I study of oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine: correlation of clinical outcome with gene expression

PURPOSE

Oxaliplatin has in vitro activity similar to or higher than other platinum agents. Preclinically, gemcitabine has demonstrated synergy when combined with platinum compounds. These facts formed the rationale for determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin.

METHODS

Eligible patients with advanced incurable solid tumors were given oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion on day 1 followed by escalating doses of gemcitabine given over 30 min on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients were enrolled, including 30 patients at the MTD in an expanded cohort. At a gemcitabine dose of 800 mg/m2, 1/6 patients had a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 blurred vision and memory loss). At 1,000 mg/m2, 1/6 patients had a DLT (grade 3 increase in AST). At 1,200 mg/m2, 2/3 patients had a DLT (grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 confusion). The MTD of gemcitabine with 130 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin was therefore 1,000 mg/m2. The clearances of gemcitabine and ultrafilterable platinum are within the ranges previously reported for single agents. A patient with colon cancer had a partial response, and 21 patients had a best response of stable disease. In patients with tumor biopsies treated at the MTD, decreased ribonucleotide reductase M2 expression correlated with response.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin was well tolerated with primarily hematologic toxicity at the MTD. Study of biochemical correlates of response remain of interest thought current results remain exploratory.

A triplet chemotherapy with cisplatin, docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I/II study

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase I/II study of triplet chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin (CDDP), docetaxel (DCT) and gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Fifty-three untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. All drugs were given on days 1 and 8. The doses of CDDP and DCT were fixed at 40 mg/m(2) and 30 mg/m(2), respectively. In the phase I portion, a dose escalation study of GEM with starting dose of 400 mg/m(2) was conducted and primary objective in the phase II portion was response rate.

RESULTS

The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of GEM were determined as 800 mg/m(2) because grade 3 non-hematological toxicity (liver damage, diarrhea, and fatigue) developed in three of nine patients evaluated at that dose level. In pharmacokinetic analysis, C (max) and AUC of dFdC and dFdU were increased along with the dose escalation of GEM. However, no relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicity or response was observed. Objective response rate was 34% and median survival time was 11.7 months. Though major toxicity was myelosuppression, there were no life-threatening toxicities.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that this triplet chemotherapy is feasible and effective in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase II study of SPI-77 (sterically stabilised liposomal cisplatin) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

To determine the efficacy and tolerability of SPI-77 (sterically stabilised liposomal cisplatin) at three dose levels in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients had Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and were chemo-naïve, and Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group 0-2. The first cohort received SPI-77 at 100 mg m-2, the second 200 mg m-2 and the final cohort 260 mg m-2. Patients had also pharmacokinetics and analysis of leucocyte platinum (Pt)-DNA adducts performed. Twenty-six patients were treated, with 22 patients being evaluable for response. Only one response occurred at the 200 mg m-2 dose level for an overall response rate of 4.5% (7.1% at >or=200 mg m-2). No significant toxicity was noted including nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity aside from two patients with Grade 3 nausea. No routine antiemetics or hydration was used. The pharmacokinetic profile of SPI-77 was typical for a liposomally formulated drug, and the AUC appeared to be proportional to the dose of SPI-77. Plasma Pt levels and leucocyte DNA adduct levels did not appear to rise with successive doses. SPI-77 demonstrates only modest activity in patients with NSCLC.

Gemcitabine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin combination (GIP) in treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer: results of a phase II study

OBJECTIVES

We have carried out a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and the toxicity associated with the combination of gemcitabine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (GIP) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Each cycle consisted of treatment with ifosfamide (3000 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1500 mg/m2) on day 1, followed by cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1500 mg/m2) on day 15. Each treatment cycle was repeated every 28 days. A maximum of 6 cycles were administered.

RESULTS

Sixty NSCLC patients (23 stage III and 37 stage IV) were entered in this study. The median survival for all patients is 9 months (stage III: 12.3 months; stage IV: 7.5 months). The overall survival at 1 and 2 years is 38% and 17%, respectively (52% and 30% for stage III; 30% and 8% for stage IV). The median time to progression is 6.3 months (stage III: 8.8 months; stage IV: 3.6 months). Progression free survival at 1 and 2 years for all patients is 22% and 8%. The response rate is 56% for patients with stage III disease and 27% for patients with stage IV disease. Among the grade 3/4 toxicities, hematological toxicity was the most frequent (59% of patients) followed by gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea/vomiting) in 21% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The GIP combination yields an efficacy, in terms of response and survival, comparable to that reported with other triplet combination treatments for local advanced or metastatic NSCLC, with an acceptable toxicity profile.

A Retrospective Analysis of Second-Line Chemotherapy or Best Supportive Care in Patients with Advanced-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in first-line chemotherapy trials conducted by our group with respect to receiving or not receiving subsequent treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected from 634 patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with platinum and nonplatinum agent-based first-line regimens. Patient survival was calculated from the day of registration to first-line chemotherapy trials (OS1) as well as from the day of first-line treatment failure or the initiation of second-line chemotherapy (OS2) until death. The decision for administering second-line chemotherapy was, in all cases, at the discretion of the physician. Two hundred twenty-four patients (35.3%) received second-line chemotherapy (second-line group) in the context of second-line clinical trials run by the same group, and 410 (64.7%) received best supportive care (BSC group). There were significant differences between second-line and BSC groups in terms of age, histology, early discontinuation of first-line chemotherapy, and performance status after first-line treatment.

RESULTS

Three (1.3%) complete and 25 (11.2%) partial responses to second-line chemotherapy were observed for an overall response rate of 12.5% (95% confidence interval, 8.2%-16.8%). The median OS1 was 13 months and 7 months (P < 0.001) and the OS2, 7 months and 3 months (P < 0.001) for the second-line and BSC groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that good performance status, disease stage IIIB, response to first-line treatment, and late termination of first-line chemotherapy were significantly associated with increased survival. The administration of second-line chemotherapy was also independently correlated with better outcome.

CONCLUSION

The second-line chemotherapy and BSC groups represent different populations of patients with NSCLC. Factors indicative of increased probability of survival could be used to identify the subgroup of patients most likely to benefit from second-line chemotherapy.

Common arm analysis: one approach to develop the basis for global standardization in clinical trials of non-small cell lung cancer

The global development of new anticancer treatments is desirable. However, whether results of clinical trials performed in one population can be fully extrapolated to another population remains in question. We retrospectively compared "common arms" of platinum-based doublet phase III trials among Japanese, European, and American patients with non-small cell lung cancer to develop the basis for global standardization in clinical trials. Patient demographics were very similar through all studies, indicating that extrinsic ethnic factors including socioeconomic factors, medical service background, and patient selection process for clinical trials may be consistent between geographically different oncology groups. The doses of docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine were lower in Japanese studies. The toxicity profile was generally acceptable and similar among many studies. Thus, the dose and schedule of anticancer agents established in prior phase I and II studies conducted in each country were appropriate and applicable to large patient populations in these countries. Response rates seemed to be distributed randomly from one study to another, whereas patient survival might be better in Japanese studies. In conclusion, geographical differences in the dose of anticancer agents, response, survival and toxicity of lung cancer chemotherapy were actually observed. However, extrapolation of clinical data obtained in one country to another population and global clinical trials were considered possible with adequate dose adjustment based on dose finding studies using a carefully projected protocol.

Phase II study of a gemcitabine and cisplatin combination regimen in taxane resistant metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with taxane resistant metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three taxane resistant metastatic breast cancer patients were treated with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 IV infusion over 30 min on days 1 and 8, and with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 by IV infusion over 1 h on day 1 in 21 day cycles.

RESULTS

Of the 30 evaluable patients, there were 9 (30%) partial responses and no complete response, an overall objective response rate of 30%. Median time to progression and median survival duration for all study subjects were 7 (95% CI 5.1-8.9 months) and 15 months (95% CI 10.5-19.5 months), respectively. Toxicities included grade 3 and 4 leucopenia in 10 (30%), thrombocytopenia in 6 (18%), anemia in 2 (6%) and oral mucositis in 2 (6%). No grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy, renal dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, or nausea/vomiting was observed, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

The described gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination was found to be an active and tolerable salvage regimen in patients with taxane resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Cost-minimization analysis for Portugal of five doublet chemotherapy regimens from two phase III trials in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Economic evaluations of chemotherapy regimens for stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been conducted for many European countries, but not for Portugal. This study evaluates the total health care costs of five commonly used doublet regimens with similar efficacy results.

METHODS

Using the methodology reported by Schiller [Schiller JH, Tilden D, Aristides M, Lees M, Kielhorn A, Maniadakis N, et al. Restropective cost analysis of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer compared to other combination therapies in Europe. Lung Cancer 2004;43:101-12], we conducted a cost-minimization analysis to compare vinorelbine-cisplatin (Vin/Cis), gemcitabine-cisplatin (Gem/Cis), paclitaxel-carboplatin (Pac/Carb), docetaxel-cisplatin (Doc/Cis), and paclitaxel-cisplatin (Pac/Cis). The perspective was that of the Portuguese National Health Service and included only direct medical costs (reimbursed costs plus co-payments): chemotherapy acquisition, chemotherapy administration, hospitalizations due to adverse events, and other medical resources. Unit costs were drawn from official sources (Diagnosis Related Groups and retail/hospital costs) (2003 value [Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) published at Diário da República; 2003]). Resource use was estimated from two multicenter randomized phase III trials [Comella P, Frasci G, Panza N, Manzione L, De Cataldis G, Cioffi R, et al. Randomized trial comparing cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine with either cisplatin and gemcitabine or cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: interim analysis of a phase III trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1451-7; Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;346:92-8]. A time horizon of a full course of therapy was adopted. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The least and the most costly chemotherapy regimens were Gem/Cis and Pac/Carb, respectively. Total mean cost per patient was estimated at euro7083 for Gem/Cis and euro10,008 for Pac/Carb, a mean cost savings of euro2925 per patient for Gem/Cis. The differences were mainly due to the higher chemotherapy acquisition costs of Pac/Carb than for Gem/Cis. Gem/Cis was less costly in all sensitivity analyses except when 100% inpatient chemotherapy administration was assumed.

CONCLUSION

Gem/Cis should be considered as a cost-saving alternative to the other four regimens in treating NSCLC patients in Portugal.

A randomized phase II trial evaluating standard (50mg/min) versus low (10mg/min) infusion duration of gemcitabine as first-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients who are not eligible for platinum-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine is one of the most active drugs against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical data suggested that gemcitabine efficacy could be improved by increasing the dose or by increasing the infusion duration. This study has been designed in order to explore two different approaches of gemcitabine dose intensification in patients with advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 121 chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not suitable for a platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly allocated to chemotherapy with gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks by standard 30 min intravenous infusion (arm A), or gemcitabine 10 mg/m2/min for 150 min on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks by intravenous infusion at fixed dose rate (arm B).

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen patients were fully analyzed. No difference in response rate (16.1% versus 9.9%, p=0.28), median time to disease progression (4 months versus 4.5 months, p=0.34) median survival (9.8 months in both arms), and 1-year survival (42.6% versus 39.0% p=0.98) was detected in arms A and B, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Main hematological toxicities were grade 3-4 neutropenia observed in 17.9% of patients in group A and in 49.2% of individuals in group B (p=0.0002). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 3.3% in arm A and 0% in arm B (p=0.17). Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was more frequently observed in arm B patients (9.9% versus 1.8%, p=0.057). Non-hematological toxicity was similar in both arms, and consisted in grade 1-2 gastrointestinal toxicity observed in 48.2% of patients in arm A and 41.0% in arm B.

CONCLUSION

Intensification of standard doses or prolonged infusion schedule did not result in efficacy improvement. Gemcitabine infusion duration does not warrant further investigation in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine on days 1 and 4 every 21 days for solid tumors: Result of a dose-intensity study

BACKGROUND

Three and 4-week cisplatin-gemcitabine schedules have shown similar dose-intensity (DI) and activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The 3-week schedule is generally preferred because it enables better treatment compliance. To improve DI and compliance further, we delivered gemcitabine plus cisplatin over 4 days every 21 days.

METHODS

Patients with any stage NSCLC or epithelial neoplasms and an ECOG PS < or = 2 were given gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 4 plus cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) on day 2 of a 21-day cycle. Minimax design was used and a received DI for gemcitabine of > or = 580 mg/m(2)/wk was considered successful.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (34 NSCLC, 5 epithelial neoplasias) were enrolled. SWOG grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 17.9% and 12.8% of patients, respectively. Nonhematological toxicity was minimal. Twenty-eight (18%) of 158 cycles required dose modifications and/or delays. Twenty-five patients received a gemcitabine dose intensity of > or = 580 mg/m(2)/wk. The received DIs were 601.8 mg/m(2)/wk for gemcitabine and 21.0 for cisplatin, with a relative DIs of 90.3% and 90.1%, respectively. The response rate of 27 evaluable patients with NSCLC was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.3 to 62.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The shorter schedule of gemcitabine on days 1 and 4 plus cisplatin on day 2 produces an effective DI and a toxicity profile comparable to that of weekly regimens.

Role of gemcitabine in cancer therapy

Gemcitabine, a pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite, is one of the most promising new cytotoxic agents. The drug has shown activity in a variety of solid tumors, and has been approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic, bladder, and breast cancer. Recent data showed that gemcitabine is also active against ovarian cancer. Gemcitabine has a good toxicity profile, with myelosuppression being the most common side effect, while non-hematological events are relatively uncommon. The low toxicity profile makes the drug a valid option for unfit and elderly patients. Due to the synergistic activity with other chemotherapeutic compounds, mainly cisplatinum, several trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine in combination with other cytotoxic agents. Current clinical trials are evaluating the role of gemcitabine in combination with new targeted therapies.

Development of gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer: the Italian contribution

Gemcitabine, a pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite, is one of the most promising new cytotoxic agents. The drug has shown activity in a variety of solid tumors, but appears to be most active in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. In this disease, several Italian investigators have evaluated gemcitabine in phase II and III clinical trials. Due to preclinical synergism with cisplatin, the Italian Lung Cancer Project played an important role to assess the efficacy and activity of the gemcitabine-cisplatin combination along with the best doses and schedule to adopt, thus leading to gemcitabine approval for first line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Several Italian studies have also investigated gemcitabine non-platinum based combinations, gemcitabine in third generation platinum-based triplets and gemcitabine as second line therapy, but all these studies led to conflicting and inconclusive results. The low toxicity profile makes the drug a valid option for unfit and elderly patients. The Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study was a phase III randomized trial conducted in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer that showed that single agent gemcitabine is at least as effective as either single agent vinorelbine or the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine. In the neoadjuvant treatment of stage III disease, a number of phase II studies with third generation platinum-based doublets or triplets have been conducted by Italian investigators with encouraging results. Current clinical trials are addressing the role of gemcitabine in combination with new targeted therapies. Future studies should be designed in order to identify subgroups of patients who are more likely to benefit from gemcitabine chemotherapy.

Cisplatin and gemcitabine first-line chemotherapy followed by maintenance gemcitabine or best supportive care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase III trial

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this randomized phase III study was to show significant difference in median time to progression (TTP) in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with single-agent gemcitabine maintenance therapy versus best supportive care following gemcitabine plus cisplatin initial first-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) every 21 days. Patients achieving objective response or disease stabilization following initial gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy were randomized (2:1 fashion) to receive maintenance gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) plus best supportive care (GEM arm), or best supportive care only (BSC arm).

RESULTS

Between November 1999 and November 2002, we enrolled 352 patients (median age: 57 years; stage IV disease: 74%; Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >80: 41%). Following initial therapy, 206 patients were randomized and treated with gemcitabine (138) or best supportive care (68). TTP throughout the study period was 6.6 and 5 months for GEM and BSC arms, respectively, while values for the maintenance period were 3.6 and 2.0 months (for p < 0.001 for both). Median overall survival (OS) throughout study was 13.0 months for GEM and 11.0 months for BSC arms (p = 0.195). The toxicity profile was mild, with neutropenia being most common grade 3/4 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Maintenance therapy with gemcitabine, following initial therapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin, was feasible, and produced significantly longer TTP compared to best supportive care alone. Further studies are warranted to establish the place of maintenance chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer

Gefitinib (Iressa), an orally-active tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is the first approved molecular-targeted drug for the management of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two Phase II trials (IDEAL [Iressa Dose Evaluation in Advanced Lung Cancer]-1 and -2), evaluated the efficacy of gefitinib in advanced NSCLC patients who received < or = 2 (IDEAL1) or > or = 2 (IDEAL2) previous chemotherapy regimens. The response rate and disease control rate in IDEAL1 and -2 was 18/12% and 54/42%, respectively. The median survival time and one-year survival rate in both studies were approximately 7 months and 30%, respectively. As gefitinib has demonstrated antitumour activity and an acceptable tolerability profile not typically associated with cytotoxic adverse events, such as hematological toxicities, combinations with cytotoxic drugs have been evaluated. Disappointingly, in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC, gefitinib 250 and 500 mg/day combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (gemcitabine/cisplatin or paclitaxel/carboplatin) did not produce prolonged survival, compared with chemotherapy alone in two large, randomised, placebo-controlled, multi-centre Phase III trials (INTACT [Iressa NSCLC Trial Assessing Combination Treatment]-1 and -2). Furthermore, in a recent randomised, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial (ISEL: IRESSA Survival Evaluation in Lung cancer), gefitinib failed to prolong survival compared with placebo in patients with advanced NSCLC who had failed one or more lines of chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis of ISEL suggested improved survival in patients of Asian origin and non-smokers. In addition, subset analyses of IDEAL and several retrospective studies have indicated that female gender, adenocarcinoma histology (especially bronchial alveolar carcinoma), non-smoker status and Asian ethnicity are factors which predict to response to gefitinib. Two types of somatic mutation clustered around the ATP binding pocket in the tyrosine kinase domain of the EGFR gene have been reported as possible surrogate biological markers for predicting response to gefitinib. Appropriate patient selection by clinical characteristics or genetical information is needed, both for future clinical trials of gefitinib and its routine use in the clinic among patients with advanced NSCLC.

A phase I–II study of bi-weekly gemcitabine and irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer after prior taxane + platinum-based regimens

PURPOSE

Treatment options in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of poor activity of most agents after failure of platinum-based therapy. In the present phase I-II study, we evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of bi-weekly gemcitabine (GEM) + irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with relapsed NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC, WHO-performance status (PS) </= 2, prior taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered in a dose-escalated fashion in subgroups of 3-6 patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was encountered as follows: CPT-11 150 or 180 mg/m(2) followed by GEM 1,200-1,800 mg/m(2), both on days 1 + 15, recycled every 28 days in four dose levels (DLs).

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients entered the phase I and II part of the study (phase I: 12-phase II: 37 + 3 at DL-3), and 40 patients were evaluable for a response in phase II and all for toxicity: median age, 61 years (range 36-74); PS, 1 (0-2); gender, 43 males/6 females-histologies; adenocarcinoma, 25; squamous, 20; large cell, 4. Metastatic sites included lymph nodes, 38; bone, 5; liver, 4; brain, 3; lung nodules, 14; adrenals, 13; other, 3. All patients had prior taxane + platinum-based treatment, and 42 patients had prior docetaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin/or-carboplatin regimens. DLT was observed at DL-4 and included 2/3 cases with grade 3 diarrhea-1/3 of these with febrile neutropenia. The recommended DL for phase II evaluation was DL3: GEM, 1,500 + CPT-11-180 mg/m(2). Objective responses in phase II were PR, 6/40 [15%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5-31%]; stable disease, 16/40 (40%; 95% CI, 21-53%); and progressive disease, 18/40 (45%; 95% CI, 28.5-62.5%). The median time-to-progression was 4 months (range 1-12) and median survival 7 months (range 1.5-42 +), while 1-year survival was 20%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 18% of patients (6% grade 4) and 6% incidence of febrile neutropenia. No Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were seen, grade 3 diarrhea in 6% of patients and grade 2 in 15% of patients, while other grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were never encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Bi-weekly GEM + CPT-11 is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC failing prior taxane + platinum regimens, and represents an effective and convenient combination to apply in the palliative treatment of relapsed NSCLC particularly after failure of first-line docetaxel + platinum-based regimens.

Phase II trial of a 2-h infusion of gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of using gemcitabine as a rate infusion of 10 mg/m(2) per min with carboplatin in front-line chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC have been included, 44 males and 10 females, with a median age 63 years (range 19-75). Thirty-two (59%) patients had adenocarcinoma, 13 (24%) squamous cell, 1 (2%) large cell carcinoma and 8 (15%) others. Eight (15%) had stage IIIB and 46 (85%) stage IV. Treatment was consisted of 1,200 mg/m(2) gemcitabine given as a 2-h continuous infusion (10 mg/m(2) per min) on days 1 and 8 of each cycle an AUC 5 carboplatin as on day 1, repeating each cycle for every 21 days. A total of 223 chemotherapy cycles were administered, with a median of four cycles per patient (range 1-6), and 15 (28%) patients received all six cycles.

RESULTS

Of the 54 patients enrolled, all were evaluated for toxicity and 51 assessed for response. The overall response rate was 41% (95% confidence interval, 28-57%) with complete and partial responses of 4 and 37%, respectively. The median time to disease progression was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.7-6.3 months), and median overall survival time was 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.9-13.1 months). One-year survival was 42%. The main grade 3-4 toxicity (according to the WHO scale) consisted of neutropenia (56%) and thrombocytopenia (57%). Patients were required platelet transfusion in 27 cycles (12%) and hematopoietic growth factors support care in 56 (25%) cycles. No bleeding episodes were recorded. Grade 3 nausea/vomiting occurred in 6% and grade 1-2 skin rash occurred in 43%.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged gemcitabine infusion combined with carboplatin is manageable and tolerated, and its efficacy is similar to that of other chemotherapeutic schemes used for NSCLC treatment.

A Pilot Trial of Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine Plus Capecitabine in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a pilot study of gemcitabine, vinorelbine and capecitabine combination to evaluate its toxicity and efficacy in chemo-naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after a short phase IB trial.

METHODS

Eligible chemo-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received outpatient administration of gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks, concurrently with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 given orally twice a day on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 (dose level I), or days 1 to 6 and 8 to 13 (dose level II).

RESULTS

Between November 2002 and December 2003, 19 patients participated in the study at either dose level I (7 patients) or dose level II (12 patients). The maximum tolerated dose, defined as the dose at which no more than 1 of 6 patients in a cohort experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first cycle, was not established. However, 1 of 7 patients at dose level I, and 2 of 12 at dose level II experienced DLTs (ie, grade 3 hepatotoxicity in 2 patients, and grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 1 patient). In addition, 2 patients experienced treatment-related pneumonitis requiring mechanical ventilator support after the second course of therapy. Objective tumor response was observed in 5 (26.3%) of 19 patients. Further patient accrual was stopped according to the study design.

CONCLUSIONS

This 3-drug combination showed disappointing antitumor activity against NSCLC with unexpected life-threatening pulmonary toxicity. No further investigation of this regimen is recommended for patients with NSCLC.

First-line chemotherapy for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: focus on docetaxel

Systemic chemotherapy results in modest improvements in survival and quality of life for patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Administration of a platinum compound in combination with a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel), gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or irinotecan is considered optimal first-line therapy for patients with advanced-stage NSCLC who have a good performance status. Studies that have compared various platinum agent-based doublet regimens have demonstrated comparable efficacy between these regimens. In addition, non-platinum agent-based regimens have also demonstrated response rates and survival similar to the platinum agent-based combinations. These developments have allowed for tailoring of chemotherapy to individual patients based on factors such as toxicity profile, treatment schedule, and cost. Docetaxel is approved for first-line therapy and salvage treatment of advanced-stage NSCLC. Multiple randomized clinical trials have established the efficacy of platinum-agent/docetaxel regimens for first-line treatment of advanced-stage NSCLC. Improvements in various lung cancer-related symptoms and global quality of life indices have been noted with docetaxel-based regimens. Combination chemotherapy appears to be beneficial even for elderly patients. The current generation of clinical trials is evaluating the incorporation of molecularly targeted agents into existing 2-drug chemotherapy regimens. This article will discuss the role of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced-stage NSCLC.

Concomitant radio-chemotherapy based on platin compounds in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A meta-analysis of individual data from 1764 patients

BACKGROUND

Despite several randomised trials comparing radiotherapy alone with concomitant radio-chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is not clear whether the addition of chemotherapy improves survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This meta-analysis was based on individual patient data from published and unpublished randomised trials which compared radiotherapy alone with the same radiotherapy combined with concomitant cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Trials with accrual completed after 2000 were excluded. Trials were sought in electronic databases, clinical trial registries and by additional manual searches. The primary endpoint was overall survival analysed using the log-rank test stratified by trials.

RESULTS

There were twelve eligible trials that included a total of 1921 patients. The data from 3 trials were not available. Therefore, the analysis was based on 9 trials including 1764 patients. Median follow-up was 7.2 years. The hazard ratio of death among patients treated with radio-chemotherapy compared to radiotherapy alone was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.98; P = 0.02) corresponding to an absolute benefit of chemotherapy of 4% at 2 years. There was some evidence of heterogeneity among trials and sensitivity analyses did not lead to consistent results. The combination of platin with etoposide seemed more effective than platin alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant platin-based radio-chemotherapy may improve survival of patients with locally advanced NSCLC. However, the available data are insufficient to accurately define the size of such a potential treatment benefit and the optimal schedule of chemotherapy.

Randomized multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine versus docetaxel as first-line therapy with second-line crossover in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A randomized phase II study was performed to determine whether single-agent gemcitabine or docetaxel with the introduction of the opposite agent in case of disease progression (ie, in the second-line setting) is feasible and effective in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The doses were 1,000 mg/m2 for gemcitabine and 35 mg/m2 for docetaxel, each given on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. After a planned interim analysis, the docetaxel/gemcitabine arm (ie, docetaxel followed by gemcitabine) was closed after enrollment of 49 patients because of poor predefined feasibility. A total of 98 patients were recruited to the gemcitabine/docetaxel arm (ie, gemcitabine followed by docetaxel).

RESULTS

Quality of life remained near baseline levels during the administration of 6 cycles of gemcitabine/docetaxel chemotherapy, whereas it deteriorated after 2 cycles of docetaxel/gemcitabine. Toxicity was comparable between arms. Median times to progression were 4.3 months and 2.2 months with gemcitabine/docetaxel and docetaxel/gemcitabine, respectively, and median overall survival times were 9 months (gemcitabine/docetaxel) and 5 months (docetaxel/gemcitabine; P=0.029, Wilcoxon rank-sum test).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that first-line gemcitabine followed by second-line weekly docetaxel is feasible, with promising survival in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Intratumoral administration of cisplatin through a bronchoscope followed by irradiation for treatment of inoperable non-small cell obstructive lung cancer

PURPOSE

Patients presenting with inoperable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung associated with severe bronchial obstruction are at a high risk for developing post-obstructive pneumonia or respiratory failure. This often leads to death in weeks to months. Several studies suggest that initial use of debulking of obstructed airways by Nd-YAG laser photo resection or by cryotherapy lessens morbidity by reducing infections and respiratory insufficiencies. This can shorten hospitalization, improve the quality of life, and prolong survival. It has also been demonstrated that patients first treated for debulking and then by irradiation have better survival than similar patients treated with irradiation alone. Intratumoral (IT) injection of cytotoxic drugs (IT chemotherapy) has also been successfully used to debulk airways. The aim of the present work was to study the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of initial debulking by IT chemotherapy with cisplatin combined with irradiation with a curative intent in the treatment of obstructive inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty three patients were treated first by bronchoscopic IT injection of up to 40 mg cisplatin solution (4 mg/ml), administered weekly four times (on days: 1, 8, 15, 22) and then by irradiation.

RESULTS

At the end of a 3-week period of IT treatment, 11 of 23 patients showed an increase in airway lumen diameter of more than 50% (good response), 8 patients showed an improvement of 25-50% (partial response) and 4 patients showed an increase of less than 25% (small response). Overall, debulking by IT chemotherapy was considered clinically effective in 19 of 23 patients and only marginally effective in 4 patients. Statistical analysis indicated a statistically significant improvement in lumen diameter (P < 0.001) for all patients. The combination of IT chemotherapy and irradiation resulted in prolonged survival in the patients with good response (median survival 636 days) compared to patients with partial response (median survival 342 days). The four patients with only a small response had a median survival of 202 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Debulking by intratumoral injection of cisplatin was shown to be a safe, simple, and cost effective procedure. There were no severe side effects and complications. Initial debulking of obstructed airways by IT administration of cisplatin, followed by irradiation requires further studies in order to determine its effect on survival.

A ten-year review of progress in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer with gemcitabine

During the past two decades, clinical research has focused on developing chemotherapeutic regimens that effectively prolong survival and provide palliation for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the mid-to late-1990s, several new agents emerged from clinical development and demonstrated activity against this disease, including the novel antimetabolite gemcitabine. Gemcitabine is one of the most active agents for the treatment of NSCLC. When combined with a platinum analog, gemcitabine produces the best progression-free survival outcome of any platinum-based regimen in first-line advanced NSCLC treatment setting. On the basis of its excellent antitumor activity and favorable toxicity profile, gemcitabine has been approved for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.