Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Neoplasms: Essential Predictive Imaging Features for Personalized Therapy

Tumor biologic characteristics encompassing histopathologic, immune microenvironmental, genetic, and molecular aspects are becoming indispensable factors to be considered in treatment strategies for patients with cancer. Innovations in oncologic treatment have broadened the range of therapeutic approaches and now hold promise for treatments personalized according to tumor biologic characteristics. Particularly for hepatobiliary and pancreatic neoplasms, the advent of cytostatic agents such as molecularly targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, which differ markedly from conventional cytotoxic agents, has contributed to advances in clinical practice. These cytostatic agents increase the potential for curative-intent treatment of unresectable cancers by reducing tumor volume. Radiologic examinations are of more interest than ever to noninvasively obtain information about tumor biologic features. Radiomics represents an invaluable research method for elucidating associations between tumor biologic characteristics and radiologic imaging findings, but their applicability in daily clinical practice remains challenging. Various radiologic predictive findings for tumor biologic characteristics have already been proposed for hepatobiliary and pancreatic neoplasms. Radiologists must gain familiarity with these findings and the roles they have in predicting the clinical prognosis and treatment efficacy. In addition, radiologists should explore the potential applications of these imaging findings to current treatment strategies for the coming era of personalized medicine. The authors describe predictive findings using CT and MRI for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal liver metastases, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with correlations to pathologic, immunologic, molecular, and genetic background factors. ©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article. See the invited commentary by Ronot in this issue.

Radioembolization as a Spearhead Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Localized Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis (RESOLVE): Protocol for an Open-label, Multi-center, Single-arm Trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical course following ablative radioembolization with glass microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with localized portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) in patients with well-preserved liver function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective, open-label, multi-center, single-arm, phase II trial. Key inclusion criteria are unilobar HCC, PVTT confined to the ipsilateral lobe (Vp1-3), no extrahepatic spread, Child-Pugh class A, and a performance status of ≤ 1. Main exclusion criteria are hepatic venous tumor thrombus, bile duct invasion, and massive arterioportal shunting. Depending on the extent of the tumor and PVTT, patients will undergo radiation segmentectomy, modified radiation lobectomy, or ablative lobar treatment, while adhering to dose limits for the non-tumorous liver and lung. The primary outcome measure is overall survival, with the overall survival rate at two years provided as the summary measurement.

STATISTICS

This study will enroll 30 patients to explore the efficacy and safety of ablative radioembolization for HCC with localized PVTT. Efficacy will be evaluated by intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Safety will be assessed for all patients who received radioembolization at any dose.

EXPECTED GAIN OF KNOWLEDGE

This study aims to address the potential of ablative radioembolization as a definitive or effective downstaging treatment for HCC with localized PVTT, where locoregional treatments may be more beneficial than systemic treatments. The results will help establish treatment outcomes that can serve as a standard for future comparative studies and contribute to the standardization of radioembolization approaches for HCC with localized PVTT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT06166576 ). Identifier: NCT06166576.

New systemic treatment paradigms in advanced biliary tract cancer and variations in patient access across Europe

In recent years, treatment options for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) have increased significantly due to the positive results from phase 2/3 clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors, combined with chemotherapy, and molecularly targeted agents. These advances have led to the need for molecular testing to identify actionable alterations and patients amenable to targeted therapies. However, these improvements have brought with them many questions and challenges, including the identification of resistance mechanisms and therapeutic sequences. In this Series paper we aim to provide an overview of the current systemic treatment options for patients with BTC, highlighting disparities in access to innovative treatments and molecular testing across European countries, which lead to inequalities in the possibilities of treating patients with advanced BTC. We also discuss how ongoing European collaborative projects, such as the COST Action Precision-BTC-Network CA22125, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology), linked to the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENSCCA), can help overcome these disparities and improve the current scenario.

Durvalumab Monotherapy in Complex Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Study of Patients Ineligible for Combination Immunotherapy

AIM

Combination immunotherapy is the standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, some patients are unsuitable for such treatment. This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of durvalumab monotherapy in a real-world cohort with advanced HCC who were poor candidates for combination immunotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 35 patients with advanced HCC treated with durvalumab monotherapy across three Japanese institutions between January and December 2023. Patients were selected based on their ineligibility for combination immunotherapy or vascular endothelial growth factor inhibiting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF-TKIs). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.

RESULTS

The median age was 71 years, with 51.4% classified as Child-Pugh B or C. Notably, 91.4% of patients were ineligible for the IMbrave150 or HIMALAYA trials. Median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.84-6.2) and the median OS was not reached. The ORR and DCR were 2.9% and 51.4%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs (trAEs) occurred in 8.6% of patients, with a discontinuation rate of 11.4% due to AEs. The most common AEs were aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased (34.3%), hypoalbuminemia (28.6%), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased (25.7%). Immune-mediated AEs (imAEs) affected 14.3% of the patients. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores showed no significant deterioration in patients without progressive disease (PD) over 12 weeks after treatment initiation (p = 0.771).

CONCLUSIONS

Durvalumab monotherapy demonstrated a favorable safety profile and comparable effectiveness to VEGF-TKIs in patients with advanced HCC unsuitable for combination immunotherapy, especially for those with Child-Pugh B status.

ESR Essentials: radiomics-practice recommendations by the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics

Radiomics is a method to extract detailed information from diagnostic images that cannot be perceived by the naked eye. Although radiomics research carries great potential to improve clinical decision-making, its inherent methodological complexities make it difficult to comprehend every step of the analysis, often causing reproducibility and generalizability issues that hinder clinical adoption. Critical steps in the radiomics analysis and model development pipeline-such as image, application of image filters, and selection of feature extraction parameters-can greatly affect the values of radiomic features. Moreover, common errors in data partitioning, model comparison, fine-tuning, assessment, and calibration can reduce reproducibility and impede clinical translation. Clinical adoption of radiomics also requires a deep understanding of model explainability and the development of intuitive interpretations of radiomic features. To address these challenges, it is essential for radiomics model developers and clinicians to be well-versed in current best practices. Proper knowledge and application of these practices is crucial for accurate radiomics feature extraction, robust model development, and thorough assessment, ultimately increasing reproducibility, generalizability, and the likelihood of successful clinical translation. In this article, we have provided researchers with our recommendations along with practical examples to facilitate good research practices in radiomics. KEY POINTS: Radiomics' inherent methodological complexity should be understood to ensure rigorous radiomic model development to improve clinical decision-making. Adherence to radiomics-specific checklists and quality assessment tools ensures methodological rigor. Use of standardized radiomics tools and best practices enhances clinical translation of radiomics models.

Survival Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database: Comparison with Radiotherapy and Resection

PURPOSE

To determine effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) using a population-based database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2020 to include 194 patients who underwent ablation for iCCA. Data on patient demographics, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival were retrieved. Factors associated with survival were evaluated. Comparison between ablation and surgical resection (n = 2,653) or external beam radiotherapy (n = 1,068) was performed.

RESULTS

In the ablation group, patients diagnosed and treated after 2010 demonstrated improved OS than that in the 2000-2009 subgroup (median OS, 32 vs 21 months; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33-0.75; P = .001). Additional factors associated with OS included tumor size (≤3 cm vs >3 cm; P = .049) and tumor stage (P < .001). For patients diagnosed after 2010, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 82.8% (95% CI, 74.8%-88.4%), 43.5% (95% CI, 33.5%-53.1%), and 23.7% (95% CI, 15.3%-33.5%), respectively. Patients with local disease (1-year OS, 87.8%; 95% CI, 78.6%-93.3%) demonstrated improved OS compared with patients with regional (1-year OS, 81.3%; 95% CI, 52.5%-93.5%) and distant disease (50.2%; 95% CI, 34.0%-78.8%; P < .001). For tumors ≤3 cm, ablation and surgical resection offered comparable survival benefits (P = .561), although both were better than radiotherapy (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of patients with iCCA who underwent thermal ablation has improved over the last 10 years. For tumors ≤3 cm, ablation could be as effective as resection with careful candidate selection, and may be considered front-line compared with radiotherapy in certain patient populations. Patient selection based on tumor size and disease stage could improve survival outcomes.

Neoadjuvant Multiagent Systemic Therapy Approach to Liver Transplantation for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCCA) has excellent outcomes following liver transplantation (LT). Neoadjuvant radiation-based locoregional therapy is standard-of-care. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) combination systemic therapies have improved outcomes in advanced settings, but their efficacy pre-LT has not been studied.

Methods

We review our experience following neoadjuvant gem/cis alone versus radiation-based approaches. Patients with phCCA undergoing LT at a single center between January 2008 and February 2023 were identified retrospectively. Neoadjuvant therapy was categorized as gem/cis systemic therapy (ST) alone, or any ST and radiotherapy (RT). Outcomes were posttransplant overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), waitlist time, and pathologic tumor response.

Results

During study period, 27 phCCA patients underwent LT. One patient decompensated with neoadjuvant therapy and was excluded. Median age was 61 y (interquartile range, 53-68 y) and 14 (54%) were male. Of 26 patients, 12 (46%) received ST and 14 (54%) RT. Six RT patients received gem/cis ST. Median waitlist time was 199 d (interquartile range, 98-405 d) and did not differ by neoadjuvant regimen. Explanted tumors were predominantly T1 stage, without lymphovascular invasion or nodal involvement. Neither pathologic features nor percent tumor necrosis differed by regimen. OS probabilities at 1 and 3 y were 84% and 55% for the cohort. There was no significant difference in OS and RFS when stratified by regimen.

Conclusions

Post-LT OS, RFS, waitlist time, and tumor response were similar in the 2 groups. Patients with phCCA who do not undergo RT may still be considered for LT under appropriate institution-based protocols that adhere to other established criteria.

Bintrafusp alfa and chemotherapy as first-line treatment in biliary tract cancer: A randomized phase 2/3 trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We compared the safety and efficacy of bintrafusp alfa (BA) in combination with gemcitabine+cisplatin (GemCis), to those of GemCis alone, in patients with biliary tract cancer.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive design phase 2/3 trial (NCT04066491) included adults who are treatment-naive with locally advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer. Patients (N = 297) were randomized to receive an IV infusion of BA (2400 mg once/3 wk) plus GemCis (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 +cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8/3 wk; 8 cycles) (BA group, n = 148) or placebo+GemCis (placebo group, n = 149). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). For adaptation analysis (phase 2-phase 3; data cutoff: May 20, 2021), efficacy was assessed in the first 150 patients who were antibiotic-naive when 80 progression-free survival events had occurred and ≥ 19 weeks of follow-up had been completed (BA, n = 73; placebo, n = 77). Median OS (95% CI) for the BA (11.5 mo [9.3-not estimable]) and placebo (11.5 mo [10.0-not estimable]) groups was comparable (hazard ration 1.23 [95% CI 0.66-2.28]; p = 0.7394); OS data maturity was 27.2% (41 events/151 patients). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was anemia (BA, 26.0%; placebo, 22.8%). Bleeding adverse events were reported more frequently in the BA group (28.8%) versus the placebo group (7.4%). Deaths within 60 days of the first dose were reported in 7.5% and 1.3% of patients in the BA and placebo groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BA+GemCis did not provide a clinically meaningful benefit compared with GemCis alone as first-line treatment for biliary tract cancer, and the study was discontinued early (terminated: August 20, 2021).

Morphomolecular Pathology and Genomic Insights into the Cells of Origin of Cholangiocarcinoma and Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinomas are a highly heterogeneous group of malignancies that, despite recent progress in the understanding of their molecular pathogenesis and clinical management, continue to pose a major challenge to public health. The traditional view posits that cholangiocarcinomas derive from the neoplastic transformation of cholangiocytes lining the biliary tree. However, increasing genetic and experimental evidence has recently pointed to a more complex, and nuanced, scenario for the potential cell of origin of cholangiocarcinomas. Hepatocytes as well as hepatic stem/progenitor cells are being considered as additional potential sources, depending on microenvironmental contexts, including liver injury. The hypothesis of potentially diverse cells of origin for cholangiocarcinoma, albeit controversial, is certainly not surprising given the plasticity of the cells populating the liver as well as the existence of liver cancer subtypes with mixed histologic and molecular features. This review carefully examines the current pathologic, genomic, and experimental evidence supporting the existence of multiple cells of origin of liver and biliary tract cancers, with particular focus on cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma.

Recent advances in systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis using reconstructed RCT survival data

Background & Aims

Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) was the long-standing first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Following positive results from the TOPAZ-01 and KEYNOTE-966 trials, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy are now the standard of care. We aim to compare the efficacy of first-line therapies for advanced BTCs.

Methods

Our systematic review included studies from five databases focusing on English-language articles published between January 2010 and June 2024. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that featured GemCis in a treatment arm for treatment-naive adults with advanced BTCs. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. We conducted a one-stage meta-analysis using reconstructed survival data, Cox-based models, and restricted mean survival time (RMST).

Results

After screening 8,797 studies, 17 RCTs were selected, involving a total of 4,584 patients. Of these, 2,140 (46.7%) received GemCis. The majority (68.9%) were diagnosed with intrahepatic or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 80% had metastatic disease at the time of treatment. The pooled median OS in the GemCis group was 11.6 months (95% CI 11.3-12.2 months). GemCis plus pembrolizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p <0.001), GemCis plus durvalumab (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p = 0.015), GemCis plus S-1 (HR 0.97 95% CI 0.95-0.99; p <0.001), and GemCis plus nab-paclitaxel (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p <0.001) demonstrated superior OS compared with GemCis alone. These combinations also showed increases in RMST by +1.1, +2.5, +2.8, and +2.1 months, respectively. In terms of progression-free survival, GemCis with ICIs (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78-0.94; p <0.001), GemCis plus S-1 (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99; p = 0.003), and GemCis plus nab-paclitaxel (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p <0.001) also demonstrated superiority, with corresponding RMST increases of +0.7, +1.9, and +2.5 months, respectively.

Conclusions

Despite incremental advancements, a breakthrough in advanced BTC treatment remains elusive. Further improvements in treatment efficacy may require biomarker identification to optimize combinational therapies for better patient selection.

Impact and implications

This study analyzed recent RCTs, including KEYNOTE-966, TOPAZ-1, NIFE, and SWOG 1815, involving 4,584 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. A meta-analysis of 17 treatment arms, using reconstructed survival data, confirmed the modest survival benefit of GemCis plus ICIs, supporting its guideline adoption. The findings, however, highlight the need for biomarker identification and better patient selection.

Safety and Efficacy of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy for Portal Vein Tumour Thrombus in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Centre Experience in Australia

INTRODUCTION

Portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) is a common complication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has a poor prognosis. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with Yttrium-90 (Y90) microspheres is a minimally invasive treatment option that has shown promise in treating PVTT. Studies have suggested a survival advantage of SIRT in this population, but data in the Australasian population are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SIRT in a series of patients at an Australian hospital with advanced HCC and PVTT.

METHOD

All patients underwent pre-treatment imaging with MRI or CT, and immediate post-treatment imaging with Y90 PET CT and MRIs at 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months. The primary endpoints were time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) post-SIRT. The secondary endpoint was safety.

RESULTS

Of the 698 patients who underwent SIRT at our institution between 2007 and 2023, 64 patients had HCC and PVTT. 59/64 (92%) were male, with a median age of 61 years (range 37-86 years). The majority of patients had Child-Pugh a cirrhosis (87%), and the majority were ECOG 0 (91%). The majority had main PVTT at the time of SIRT. All patients underwent SIRT with Y90-coated resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres, Sirtex Medical, Australia). Personalised dosimetry planning was performed by the treating interventional radiologist. SIRT was well tolerated by most patients, with major complications reported in a minority of cases (19/64 patients had an episode of biochemical decompensation within 90 days following treatment). The median TTP was 4.8 months (range 1-48 months). The median OS was 11.5 months (range 1-80 months), with those with a favourable MAAPE score having a median OS of 21.2 months (12.6-29.7 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Our cohort suggests that SIRT is a safe and effective treatment option for a difficult-to-treat patient population. Our data suggest a longer OS for those with preserved liver function, good functional status and low AFP levels at 21.2 months. Poor pre-treatment liver function and functional status are predictors of decompensation, and decompensation is a predictor of poor survival. These data provide an Australasian perspective and support the expanding role of SIRT in HCC treatment guidelines. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings.

Molecular and immune landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma for therapeutic development

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with an estimated 750,000 deaths in 2022. Recent emergence of molecular targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors and their combination therapies have been transforming HCC care, but their prognostic impact in advanced-stage disease remains unsatisfactory. In addition, their application to early-stage disease is still an unmet need. Omics profiling studies have elucidated recurrent and heterogeneously present molecular aberrations involved in pro-cancer tumor (immune) microenvironment that may guide therapeutic strategies. Recurrent aberrations such somatic mutations in TERT promoter and TP53 have been regarded undruggable, but recent studies have suggested that these may serve as new classes of therapeutic targets. HCC markers such as alpha-fetoprotein, glypican-3, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule have also been explored as therapeutic targets. These molecular features may be utilized as biomarkers to guide the application of new approaches as companion biomarkers to maximize therapeutic benefits in patients who are likely to benefit from the therapies, while minimizing unnecessary harm in patients who will not respond. The explosive number of new agents in the pipelines have posed challenges in their clinical testing. Novel clinical trial designs guided by predictive biomarkers have been proposed to enable their efficient and cost-effective evaluation. These new developments collectively facilitate clinical translation of personalized molecular-targeted therapies in HCC and substantially improve prognosis of HCC patients.

Suppressing, stimulating and/or inhibiting: The evolving management of HCC patient after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is a curative strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the risk of HCC recurrence remains a challenging problem. In patients with HCC recurrence after LT (HCC-R_LT), the locoregional and surgical approaches are complex, and the guidelines do not report evidence-based strategies for the management of immunosuppression. In recent years, immunotherapy has become an effective option for patients with advanced HCC in pre-transplant settings. However, due to the risk of potentially fatal allograft rejection, the use of immunotherapy is avoided in post-transplant settings. Combining immunosuppressants with immunotherapy in transplant patients is also challenging due to the complex tumor microenvironment and immunoreactivity. The fear of acute liver rejection and the lack of predictive factors hinder the successful clinical application of immunotherapy for post-liver transplantation HCC recurrence. This review aims to comprehensively summarize the risk of HCC-R_LT, the available evidence for the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with HCC-R_LT, and the clinical issues regarding the innovative management of this patient population.

Transplantation for Peri-Hilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With mTOR Immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has rising incidence and mortality rates. Outcomes from combination systemic, loco-regional therapy (LRT) and liver transplantation (LT) are improving, but more granular data are needed to inform evidence-based management, including patient selection and immunosuppression.

METHODS

Patients with peri-hilar (PH) and intrahepatic (IH) CCA who underwent LT at a single center between January 2008 and February 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with significance determined by Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

During the study period, 53 patients underwent LT for either PH (n = 27), or IH (26). Cohort had mean age 58.5 years old (IQR, 47.0-63.0), body mass index (BMI) 25.9 (IQR, 22.9-30.0) kg/m2, and mean biologic MELD 9 (IQR, 7-17). Most frequent etiology was PSC (n = 12, 22.6%). Forty-nine patients (92.5%) received neoadjuvant therapy, including systemic (n = 48, 90.6%) and locoregional therapy (LRT) (n = 22, 41.5%), to which PH tumors were both most and least responsive (P = .03). On explant pathology, tumor were a median size of 3.5 cm and lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) was present in 13 (24.5%) cases. Median follow-up post-transplant was 910 days (IQR, 407-1509). Probabilities of OS and RFS at 3-years post-LT were 69.2% (95% CI, 56.9%-84.2%) and 57.4% (95% CI, 43.7%-75.4%). In multivariable analysis, OS was associated with tumor type and LVI, and RFS with age, BMI, PSC and LRT. After a median post-LT period of 38 days (IQR, 27-79.5), 39 (71.7%) patients started mTOR inhibition with lowered tacrolimus goal. Cox proportional hazard model showed significant association of OS with mTOR inhibition, though this was not validated by a time-dependent co-variate approach.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single center cohort of CCA, post-LT outcomes were significantly greater for patients with IH tumors and no LVI. Immunosuppression with mTOR inhibition was not consistently associated with outcomes.

Comparative Efficacy of Lenvatinib Plus Immunotherapy and Regorafenib Plus Immunotherapy After Lenvatinib Failure for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The combination of regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has been the most popular second-line systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, considering the good anti-tumor performance of lenvatinib, combined immunotherapy on the basis of lenvatinib after first-line lenvatinib failure is also popular in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus ICI (TACE-R-I) versus lenvatinib plus ICI (TACE-L-I) in patients with advanced HCC after lenvatinib failure.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, 164 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled from January 2019 to March 2024 in China. All patients were aged ≥ 18 years, clinically or pathologically diagnosed with HCC. All patients received trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) as local treatment. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared between groups. The Cox regression model was used to analyze the factors associated with OS and PFS.

RESULTS

We compared 77 patients from each group after propensity score matching (PSM). There was no significant difference in the OS (p = 0.255) or PFS (p = 0.387) between groups. However, in the subgroup (distant metastases, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C or tumor thrombus), the TACE-R-I group showed better survival benefit than the TACE-L-I group. The multivariable Cox regression model suggested that BCLC stage and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were independently associated with OS. Distant metastases, tumor thrombus and Child-Pugh were independent associated factors for PFS (p < 0.05). The frequency of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was not significantly different between groups (p ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that in patients with greater tumor burden, the TACE-R-I group showed better OS and PFS benefits than the TACE-L-I group. However, in the overall population of HCC patients, there was no significant difference in efficacy and safety between the groups.

Prognostic comparison between pulmonary metastasectomy and combination immunotherapy with targeted molecular therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis: A propensity score matching analysis

Background and aims

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with pulmonary metastasis (PM) has a poor prognosis, and optimal treatment strategies remain controversial. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with advanced HCC with PM who were treated with resection of pulmonary metastases versus those treated with targeted therapies combined with immunotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of HCC patients with PM who underwent either pulmonary metastasectomy or immunotherapy combined with targeted therapies at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, Fujian Provincial Hospital, and West China Hospital of Sichuan University from September 2013 to October 2022. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to control the influence of potential confounders, and the survival outcomes were compared.

Results

A total of 119 HCC patients with PM were included in this study. The overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy was significantly longer than that of patients who received immunotherapy targeted combinations (OS: 1-year, 80.0% vs. 59.3%; 2-year, 31.7% vs. 20.3%; 3-year, 20.0% vs. 0; P < 0.001). After PSM, the long-term prognosis of the pulmonary metastasectomy group remained significantly better than that of the immunotherapy combination group (OS: 1-year, 87.0% vs. 69.6%; 2-year, 34.8% vs. 30.4%; 3-year, 21.7% vs. 0; P = 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that treatment allocation (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.177, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.068-4.439) and hepatic tumor T stage (HR = 2.342, 95% CI = 1.209-4.538) were independent risk factors for OS.

Conclusions

Pulmonary metastasectomy was associated with improved survival compared to immunotherapy combined with targeted therapies and may represent an optimal treatment option for highly selected HCC patients with resectable PM.

TRIM29 reverses lenvatinib resistance in liver cancer cells by ubiquitinating and degrading YBX1 to inhibit the PI3K/AKT pathway

Sorafenib and lenvatinib are frontline treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While lenvatinib surpasses sorafenib in efficacy and tolerability, resistance remains a significant clinical challenge. Recent research highlights the potential of TRIM family proteins in modulating lenvatinib resistance in HCC, necessitating a deeper understanding of their specific mechanisms. In this study, we screened TRIM family genes differentially expressed in lenvatinib-resistant cells using the GEO database, verifying their expression through qRT-PCR and identifying TRIM29 as a key target. Clinical samples were analyzed to assess TRIM29 expression, clinical significance, and its correlation with lenvatinib treatment efficacy. Stable TRIM29 overexpression in SK-Hep1 and LM3 cells was confirmed by Western blotting. The impact of TRIM29 on lenvatinib sensitivity in liver cancer cells was evaluated using colony formation assays, CCK8, flow cytometry, and in vivo experiments. Transcriptome sequencing, mass spectrometry, and co-immunoprecipitation (CO-IP) were employed to elucidate TRIM29's regulatory mechanisms. Results from the GEO database indicated significant upregulation of TRIM29, TRIM50, TRIM31, and TRIM9 in HUH7-resistant cells, with qRT-PCR confirming TRIM29 as markedly upregulated. In 112 liver cancer patients clinical samples, TRIM29 expression was significantly higher in patients with stable disease or partial response to lenvatinib compared to those with disease progression. High TRIM29 expression was associated with longer overall survival and recurrence-free periods in HCC patients. Mechanistic studies revealed that TRIM29 enhances lenvatinib sensitivity by degrading YBX1 through ubiquitination, thereby inhibiting the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and reversing resistance. These findings suggest that TRIM29 is a promising therapeutic target for overcoming lenvatinib resistance in HCC. CONCLUSION: TRIM29 degrades YBX1 through ubiquitination, thereby inhibiting the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and reversing lenvatinib resistance in HCC. TRIM29 can serve as an independent prognostic indicator of survival and recurrence in HCC patients, and it may provide new avenues for developing innovative treatment strategies for HCC.

Questionnaire on the surgical indications for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma administered to Japanese board-certified expert hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeons and instructors

BACKGROUND

Treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains challenging owing to the lack of clear guidelines on surgical resection. The 2021 ICC guidelines have not fully resolved the ongoing debate between surgical and nonsurgical treatment options. This study aimed to identify trends and issues in ICC treatment strategies in the clinical field by surveying the attitudes of hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) surgeons.

METHODS

A survey was conducted among 235 board-certified HBP surgeons affiliated with the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. This survey explored the perspectives on tumor conditions that define resectable, borderline resectable, and unresectable diseases, focusing on tumor size, number, and vascular invasion.

RESULTS

Notable variability was observed in the criteria for oncological resectability. While 42.1% of the respondents considered a maximum tumor diameter of 5 cm as resectable, 37.5% indicated no size limit for resectability. Opinions regarding the resectability of tumors with lymph node involvement and vascular invasion vary widely, highlighting the need for standardized criteria.

CONCLUSION

This survey revealed diverse approaches for defining resectability in ICC, emphasizing the necessity for more precise guidelines. Further research and expert consensus are required to establish standardized criteria that can guide clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

Radiation Lobectomy in Adjunct to Double Vein Embolization to Reach Sufficient Future Liver Remnant in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Case Series

PURPOSE

To describe the outcome of radiation lobectomy (RL) after double vein embolization (portal vein embolization + hepatic vein embolization) for patients with insufficient future liver remnant growth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with insufficient FLR function (as determined by hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HIDA); < 2.7%/min/m2) after double vein embolization who underwent RL between 2020 and 2023 were selected. Follow-up consisted of toxicity graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 5.0 criteria, HIDA and computed tomography imaging at 1-2-month intervals to assess treatment effect and resectability. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo system.

RESULTS

Five patients with colorectal liver metastases were selected. After RL, 4/5 patients had sufficient FLR function. Overall, the median volumetric and functional increase of the FLR was 47.5% (range 5.8-102.8%) and 66.7% (range 0-233.3%), respectively, and within a median of 81 days. No severe toxicities were reported after adjunct RL. Two patients did not undergo surgery due to disease progression. Three patients underwent surgery. The postoperative stay was complicated by persistent bile leakage in one patient and respiratory insufficiency in another. There was no 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

RL was safely employed in adjunct to double vein embolization to induce a further increase in the FLR volume and function.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy enhances the efficacy of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) was an effective treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and its effectiveness in combination with targeted immunotherapy regimens was controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of adding HAIC to lenvatinib in combination with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors.

METHODS

Literature related to the efficacy of HAIC in combination with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced HCC was searched through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases. TSA was used to control for the risk of random error and assess whether the meta-analysis evidence was conclusive.

RESULTS

Eight relevant papers with a total of 1244 patients. Compared with the L-P treatment group, the H-L-P treatment group significantly prolonged OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.11 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.82-2.44]; p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 1.91 [95 % CI 1.67-2.17]; p < 0.001) and improved ORR (risk ratio [RR] 2.20 [95 % CI 1.74-2.78]; p < 0.001) and DCR (RR 1.28 [95 % CI 1.15-1.42]; p < 0.001) in patients with advanced HCC. TSA analysis indicated that further trials were unnecessary, preliminary positive results were promptly obtained. Prognostic factor analysis demonstrated that extrahepatic metastasis were common independent risk factor for OS and PFS. The rate of adverse events (AEs) was higher in the H-L-P treatment group than in the L-P treatment group.

CONCLUSION

HAIC combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors markedly extended OS and PFS, particularly in patients without extrahepatic metastases. Furthermore, it markedly enhanced ORR and DCR in patients with HCC.

Molecular and immune landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma to guide therapeutic decision-making

Liver cancer, primarily HCC, exhibits highly heterogeneous histological and molecular aberrations across tumors and within individual tumor nodules. Such intertumor and intratumor heterogeneities may lead to diversity in the natural history of disease progression and various clinical disparities across the patients. Recently developed multimodality, single-cell, and spatial omics profiling technologies have enabled interrogation of the intertumor/intratumor heterogeneity in the cancer cells and the tumor immune microenvironment. These features may influence the natural history and efficacy of emerging therapies targeting novel molecular and immune pathways, some of which had been deemed undruggable. Thus, comprehensive characterization of the heterogeneities at various levels may facilitate the discovery of biomarkers that enable personalized and rational treatment decisions, and optimize treatment efficacy while minimizing the risk of adverse effects. Such companion biomarkers will also refine HCC treatment algorithms across disease stages for cost-effective patient management by optimizing the allocation of limited medical resources. Despite this promise, the complexity of the intertumor/intratumor heterogeneity and ever-expanding inventory of therapeutic agents and regimens have made clinical evaluation and translation of biomarkers increasingly challenging. To address this issue, novel clinical trial designs have been proposed and incorporated into recent studies. In this review, we discuss the latest findings in the molecular and immune landscape of HCC for their potential and utility as biomarkers, the framework of evaluation and clinical application of predictive/prognostic biomarkers, and ongoing biomarker-guided therapeutic clinical trials. These new developments may revolutionize patient care and substantially impact the still dismal HCC mortality.

Deep immune profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with CODEX multiplexed imaging

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) may be genomically subclassified by the presence of potentially actionable molecular aberrations, of which pathogenic alterations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)2 are the most frequently observed. The impact of these molecular alterations on the tumor immune microenvironment remains incompletely understood.

METHODS

We performed a high-parameter spatial immune phenotyping of iCCA samples with pathogenic FGFR2 or IDH1 alterations and FGFR2/IDH1 wild-type controls at the single-cell level using CO-Detection by indEXing.

RESULTS

A total of 24 tumors were examined. Tumors with FGFR2 alterations were characterized by fewer CD8+ T cells and "M2-like" macrophages but higher levels of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells as compared to FGFR2 wild-type tumors. Spatial relationships between polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells and multiple other cell types in the tumor microenvironment (including tumor cells, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells) were enriched in tumors with FGFR2 alterations. Tumors with IDH1 mutations had a trend toward more fibroblasts and were characterized by a closer proximity of tumor cells to CD4+ T cells, and between macrophages and multiple structural tumor microenvironment components as compared to other subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

iCCAs with pathogenic FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements and IDH1 mutations have distinct immunophenotypes. Tailoring immunotherapeutic approaches to specific molecular subsets could improve treatment outcomes across the divergent molecularly defined iCCA subtypes.

Expression of claudin-18.2 in cholangiocarcinoma: a comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis from a German tertiary centre

AIMS

Anti-claudin-18.2 (CLDN18.2) therapy was recently approved for the treatment of gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of CLDN18.2 in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) to determine whether there is a subgroup of patients who might also benefit from anti-CLDN18.2 therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A tissue microarray (TMA) cohort of all CCA patients who underwent surgical resection with curative intent between August 2005 and December 2021 at University Hospital Frankfurt were immunohistochemically evaluated using the VENTANA® CLDN18 (43-14A) antibody. Tumour positivity for CLDN18.2 was determined as follows: ≥ 75% of tumour cells with moderate-to-strong CLDN18 membranous staining. In total, 160 patients with surgically resected CCA were suitable for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. Of the patients, 13.1% (n = 21) showed moderate to strong membranous staining of VENTANA® CLDN18 antibody, while 86.9% (n = 139) were negative. Subtype analysis revealed strong differences in CLDN18 expression. Positive staining of CLDN18 could be observed in 26.5% (n = nine of 34) and 7.4% (n = seven of 95) of the perihilar (pCCA) and intrahepatic (iCCA) subgroup, respectively. CCA patients with CLDN18 expression had a more frequently intraoperative finding of distant metastasis (P = 0.002), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.008) and positive perineural invasion (Pn1) status (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that a subset of patients with CCA exhibited a marked expression of CLDN18.2. These findings underline the need to perform a clinical study evaluating the efficacy of anti-CLDN18.2 therapy in patients suffering from CCA.

Imaging-based prediction of early recurrence and neoadjuvant therapy outcomes for resectable beyond Milan HCC

PURPOSE

To develop and validate an MRI-based model for predicting postoperative early (≤2 years) recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients receiving upfront surgical resection (SR) for beyond Milan hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to assess the model's performance in separate patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for similar-stage tumors.

METHOD

This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients with resectable BCLC A/B beyond Milan HCC undergoing upfront SR or neoadjuvant therapy. All images were independently evaluated by three blinded radiologists. In patients receiving upfront SR, an MRI-based Early Recurrence Outside Milan (EROM) score was developed and validated for predicting early RFS via Cox regression analyses and compared with the BCLC staging system. In separate patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, interval tumor progression rate and postoperative early RFS were compared between EROM-predicted high- and low-risk groups.

RESULTS

279 patients (median, 56 years; 236 men) were included, 220 (78.9 %) undergoing upfront SR and 59 (21.1 %) received transarterial chemoembolization-based neoadjuvant therapy. Alpha-fetoprotein > 20 ng/mL (HR, 2.03; P = 0.007), size of the largest tumor (HR, 1.10; P = 0.016), infiltrative appearance (HR, 2.20; P = 0.032), and < 50 % arterial phase hyperenhancement (HR, 1.74; P = 0.023) formed the EROM score, with superior testing dataset C-index than the BCLC system (0.69 vs. 0.52, P < 0.001). The EROM-predicted high-risk (>15.3 points) patients had higher tumor progression (25.0 % vs. 0.0 %, P = 0.033) and lower postoperative 2-year RFS (16.0 % vs. 39.3 %, P = 0.025) rates after neoadjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resectable beyond Milan HCC, EROM allowed noninvasive prediction of postoperative early RFS and informed interval tumor progression risks after neoadjuvant therapy.

Correlation Between Treatment-Related Adverse Events and Efficacy of Camrelizumab in Combination With Apatinib in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The relationship between treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and efficacy in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with anti-angiogenic therapy remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the potential correlation between TRAEs and efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treated with the combination of camrelizumab and apatinib.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of efficacy and safety data obtained from 189 patients with uHCC enrolled in a phase II trial. All patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg once daily in 4-week cycles. Efficacy was evaluated based on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). We described the profiles of TRAEs and analyzed the correlation between TRAEs and treatment efficacy. To mitigate the impact of immortal time bias, landmark analysis and time-dependent Cox regression analysis were employed to assess the correlation between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

As of March 10, 2021, irAEs of any grade were reported in 88 (46.6%) patients, with 17 (9.0%) patients experiencing grade 3-4 irAEs. The median onset time for any grade irAEs was 17.4 weeks. Apatinib-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade were reported in 188 (99.5%) patients. Among them, 139 (73.5%) patients experienced any grade of apatinib-related hypertension, while 65 (34.4%) patients had grade 3-4 hypertension. Patients who experienced irAEs exhibited significantly higher ORR and DCR, but the onset of irAEs occurred later than the time of PR or CR in 75.0% (30/40) of patients. Furthermore, in the landmark analysis and time-dependent Cox regression analysis, no significant differences in survival outcomes were observed between patients with irAEs and those without. Notably, patients with apatinib-related hypertension demonstrated better ORR (38.1% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.009) and DCR (84.2% vs. 60.0%, p < 0.001), as well as longer PFS (6.5 vs. 3.7 months, p = 0.001) and OS (23.0 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the occurrence of irAEs did not predict the efficacy of camrelizumab in combination with apatinib, likely due to the decreased incidence and delayed occurrence. On the other hand, apatinib-related hypertension was associated with improved treatment efficacy.

Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Compared with Surgical Resection in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Macrovascular Invasion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macrovascular invasion (MVI) are recommended to receive systemic therapy according to guidelines. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgery are increasingly used in this patient population. This study compares outcomes from these local treatments.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with HCC with MVI and treated with surgery or SBRT between 1999 and 2022 were included. Propensity score matching minimized bias from confounders. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method,. and local, regional, and distant recurrences were assessed via competing risk methods. Univariable and multivariable analyses adjusted by the Lasso method evaluated OS predictors.

RESULTS

Among 175 patients, 38 underwent surgery and 137 received SBRT. The median age was 61 years, tumor volume was 158.6 cc, and α-fetoprotein level was 197 IU/mL. Most surgical patients had major resection (74%) via an open approach (97%). The median biologically effective dose (BED) for SBRT was 53.7 Gy. After matching, 35 patients per group had a median OS of 16 months. Local failure was higher in the SBRT group (20%) than in the surgery group (12%) at 1 year (p = 0.028). Distant failure was more frequent in surgery (54%) compared with SBRT (17%) [p = 0.003]. Excluding SBRT patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy did not change the results. In-hospital mortality was 9% post-surgery and 14% experienced post-SBRT liver impairment.

CONCLUSION

Both surgery and SBRT offer good long-term OS and control. Surgery provides better local control, while SBRT had lower distant relapse. While SBRT has acceptable toxicity, surgery carries a significant mortality risk.

Advancements in second-line treatment research for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. Due to its insidious onset, most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, often missing the opportunity for surgical resection. Consequently, systemic treatments play a pivotal role. In recent years, an increasing number of drugs have been approved for first-line systemic treatment of HCC. However, their efficacy is limited, and some patients develop drug resistance after a period of treatment. For such patients, there is currently a lack of standard second-line systemic treatment options. This review summarizes the latest advancements in second-line systemic treatment research for HCC patients who have developed resistance to various first-line systemic treatments, aiming to provide more rational and personalized second-line treatment strategies.

Recent 5‑year trends in biliary tract cancer survival rates: An analytical big data survey

Biliary tract cancer (BTC), also known as cholangiocarcinoma, is a relatively rare type of cancer with a poor prognosis. Despite the combination of chemotherapy and advances in targeted therapy, which have potentially improved the prognosis of patients with BTC, research on outcomes remains inadequate. The present study thus analyzed the survival trends of patients with BTC. The present study used anonymized data from a public national database and focused on 13,600 individuals diagnosed with BTC between 2015 and 2020. The overall and 1-year mortality rates were analyzed according to cancer anatomic sites, along with the impact of comorbidities, such as diabetes and hepatitis on these rates. A total of 13,600 patients were included in the analysis; 26.31% of the patients had intrahepatic BTC, 27.46% had extrahepatic BTC and 46.24% had gallbladder (GB) cancer. For all BTC types, the 1-year survival hazard ratio (HR) in 2018 was 0.992 compared with that in 2015, and 0.986 in 2019. Compared with intrahepatic BTC, the 1-year survival rate was 0.349 for GB cancer and 0.641 for extrahepatic BTC. Patients with diabetes had an HR of 1.318 compared with those without diabetes. For patients with BTC previously diagnosed with GB stones, the survival HR was 0.902, compared to those without GB stones. On the whole, the analysis of national healthcare big data indicated an improvement in the overall prognosis of patients with BTC from 2018. Moreover, these data highlight that the prognosis of patients with BTC is influenced by the anatomical location of the cancer, and that co-existing medical conditions in patients affect the survival rate.

TACE vs. TARE for HCC ≥ 8 cm: A propensity score analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) as first-line treatments for unresectable HCC > 8 cm.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 129 HCC patients with tumor diameters greater than 8 cm from January 2010 to December 2021, including 40 patients who received TARE, and 89 patients treated with TACE as primary treatment. Following Propensity Score Matching (PSM), 40 patients from each group were harmonized for baseline characteristics. Tumor responses were evaluated using mRECIST criteria, and survival outcomes were compared between treatment groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and the Log-rank test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) at 3, 6, and 12 months between the two groups; ORR and DCR were 72.6%, 83.1% in TACE group vs. 72.5%. 87.5% in TARE group for best tumor response (p-values: 0.625 and 0.981, respectively). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups were comparable pre- and post-PSM. After PSM, the OS was 33.2 months (20.0-58.6) in TACE group and 38.1 months (13.8-98.1) in TARE group (p = 0.53), while PFS was 11.5 months (7.7-18.4) and 9.1 months (5.2-23.8) respectively. After PSM, post-embolization syndrome developed more in TACE group (100% vs. 75%, p = 0.002). Major adverse events were 72% in TACE group vs. 5% in TARE group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TARE and TACE offer comparable efficacy in managing large HCC, with TARE providing a safer profile, suggesting its consideration as a preferable initial therapeutic approach for unresectable HCC patients with tumors larger than 8 cm.

Phase II study with sorafenib plus radiotherapy for advanced HCC with portal and/or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Portal and hepatic vein tumor thrombosis is associated with inferior outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and systemic treatment alone is often insufficient. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining sorafenib with radiotherapy in advanced HCC with thrombosis.

METHODS

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03535259), this phase II single-arm prospective trial targeted patients with HCC with portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis, liver minus gross tumor volume >700 ml, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scores of 0 or 1. Participants underwent 40-66 Gy radiotherapy for the hepatic primary tumor and vein tumor thrombosis, with concurrent oral sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS) and the secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), median progression-free survival (mPFS), time to tumor progression (TTP), tumor thrombosis control, and grade ≥3 adverse events.

RESULTS

Between May 2018 and January 2020, 86 patients were enrolled with a median radiotherapy dose of 54 Gy (40-65 Gy). At a median follow-up of 17.2 months, mOS, mPFS, and TTP stood at 16.5, 6.1, and 6.8 months, respectively. ORR reached 47.7% and 52.3% per RECIST and mRECIST, respectively. For the tumor thrombosis, 2-year control rates per mRECIST were 93.1%. No grade 5 adverse events were noted, whereas thrombocytopenia (22.1%) and leukopenia (14.0%) were the main grade 3 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent sorafenib and radiotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with HCC with portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Treatment options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and vascular tumor thrombus are limited. The efficacy and safety of concurrent sorafenib and radiation for HCC with portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis has not been elucidated. This phase II trial shows that concurrent sorafenib and radiotherapy is effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of advanced HCC with portal vein or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03535259).

HER2 Pathway in Biliary Tract Cancer: A Snapshot of the Current Understanding and Future Directions

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a wide class of malignancies with dismal prognosis. The therapeutic scenario of metastatic BTCs has profoundly changed during recent years. The combination of cisplatin-gemcitabine plus immunotherapy is currently the gold standard in the first line. The more extensive comprehension of the mechanisms at the basis of BTCs and the identification of several molecular alterations has led to the introduction of target-directed therapies in the second line and beyond that have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium alongside the standard FOLFOX regimen, and for the near future, the results of some trials with targeted therapies in first line are expected. HER2 represents a promising therapeutic target detected in BTCs, being overexpressed in approximately 15-20% of cases, with a strong predilection for gallbladder carcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, although a small proportion of HER2 overexpression can be detected even in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The efficacy and safety of different HER2 inhibitors have been investigated in several studies in the second line and beyond with encouraging results. This comprehensive review is intended to provide a summary of existing evidence and future perspectives on HER2 altered BTCs.

Comparative Validation of Prediction Models for HCC Outcomes in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Superiority of Tumor Markers to Imaging Study

BACKGROUND

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers timely curative treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to validate and compare previous prediction models for HCC outcomes in 488 LDLT recipients.

METHODS

For 488 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC, pretransplant imaging studies assessed by modified RECSIT criteria, tumor markers such as alpha feto-protein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA II), and explant pathology were recruited. C-index of models for the HCC outcomes was compared, followed by further investigation for the predictive performances of the best model.

RESULTS

We found MoRAL (11√PIVKA-II + 2√AFP) demonstrated a higher C-index for HCC recurrence than other models that included radiologically viable tumor number and/or size (MoRAL: 0.709, Milan: 0.537, UCSF: 0.575, Up-to-7: 0.572, French AFP: 0.634, Pre-MORAL: 0.637, HALT-HCC: 0.626, Metroticket2.0: 0.629) and also had the highest C-index for HCC-specific deaths (0.706). Five-year HCC recurrence was well stratified upon dividing the patients into three groups by MoRAL cutoffs (11.9% for MoRAL < 100, 29.6% for MoRAL 100-200, and 48.6% for MoRAL > 200, p < 0.001). However, patients with major vessel invasion or portal vein tumor thrombus showed similarly high HCC recurrence regardless of this grouping (p = 0.612).

CONCLUSION

The MoRAL, based on tumor markers, showed the best predictive performance for HCC recurrence and HCC-specific death among the validated models, except in cases with major vessel invasion or portal vein tumor thrombus.

Impact of immunotherapy on the care patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Modern immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors revolutionized cancer treatment and outcomes. This study aims to demonstrate how immunotherapy has impacted the national landscape of systemic treatment and palliative care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort selecting patients from the U.S.-based National Cancer Database (NCDB) with clinical stages T3b/T4 and stage IV HCC from 2010 to 2021. We performed a multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazard for overall survival (OS) comparisons and a logistic regression model to study immunotherapy use.

RESULTS

Immunotherapy use increased from 0.27 % in 2010 to 33.80 % in 2021. The median OS survival (in months) was 2 for untreated patients, 7.20 for chemotherapy, and 7.46 for immunotherapy. There was a better OS with immunotherapy (HR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.56-0.62). Systemic therapy for palliation increased from 14.41 % in 2010 to 25.32 % in 2021. Compared to surgical palliation, radiation (HR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.52-0.71) and systemic palliative (HR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.51-0.69) therapies improved OS.

CONCLUSION

From 2010 to 2021, there was a significant increase in the use of immunotherapy, parallel to a large shift toward systemic therapy use for palliative care in patients with advanced HCC. Immunotherapy was associated with a significant OS benefit in the palliative setting.

Cholangiocarcinoma Targeted Therapies: Mechanisms of Action and Resistance

Cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive bile duct malignancy with heterogeneous genomic features. Although most patients receive standard-of-care chemotherapy/immunotherapy, genomic changes that can be targeted with established or emerging therapeutics are common. Accordingly, precision medicine strategies are transforming the next-line treatment for patient subsets. Hotspot IDH1 mutations and activating fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 fusions occur frequently, and small-molecule inhibitors against these alterations are US Food and Drug Administration approved. Translational and basic science studies have elucidated the mechanisms of response and resistance in cholangiocarcinoma, providing insights into these targets that extend to other cancers. Additional US Food and Drug Administration-approved and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-recommended treatments for recurrent genomic changes include BRAF inhibition (BRAF-V600E) and trastumazab deruxtecan (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 amplification). Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials show promising results with KRAS inhibition (KRAS-codon 12 mutations), PRTM5 inhibition, alone or with methylthioadenosine inhibition (5-methylthioadenosine phosphorylase deletion), and murine double minute 2 inhibition (murine double minute 2 amplification). Despite these advances, the rate, depth, and duration of response to each treatment need improvement. Moreover, many patients do not have currently targetable genotypes. This review examines the clinical efficacy and mechanisms of resistance associated with these treatments, as well as insights into the molecular and biological effects of pathway activation and inhibition, based on study of patient samples and preclinical models. It also explores strategies to overcome resistance and possible precision medicine approaches for additional patient subsets.

Nanomaterials for liver cancer targeting: research progress and future prospects

The incidence and mortality rates of liver cancer in China remain elevated. Although early-stage liver cancer is amenable to surgical resection, a significant proportion of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Currently, in addition to surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, the primary treatment modalities predominantly include chemotherapy. The widespread use of chemotherapy, which non-selectively targets both malignant and healthy cells, often results in substantial immunosuppression. Simultaneously, the accumulation of chemotherapeutic agents can readily induce drug resistance upon reaching the physiological threshold, thereby diminishing the efficacy of these treatments. Besides chemotherapy, there exist targeted therapy, immunotherapy and other therapeutic approaches. Nevertheless, the development of drug resistance remains an inevitable challenge. To address these challenges, we turn to nanomedicine, an emerging and widely utilized discipline that significantly influences medical imaging, antimicrobial strategies, drug delivery systems, and other related areas. Stable and safe nanomaterials serve as effective carriers for delivering anticancer drugs. They enhance the precision of drug targeting, improve bioavailability, and minimize damage to healthy cells. This review focuses on common nanomaterial carriers used in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment over the past five years. The following is a summary of the three drugs: Sorafenib, Gefitinib, and lenvatinib. Each drug employs distinct nanomaterial delivery systems, which result in varying levels of bioavailability, drug release rates, and therapeutic efficacy.

Systemic Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Surgeon's Perspective

In recent years, the standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed dramatically due to the emergence of potent systemic treatment options. These advanced therapies have led to increased survival benefits for patients with advanced or intermediate-stage HCC. Advancements in HCC treatments also offer the possibility of conversion therapy for initially unresectable HCC. However, the treatment of HCC is becoming increasingly complex, due to the expanding availability of systemic therapies, their use in combination with locoregional therapies, and their perioperative applications. Patient characteristics such as liver function, esophageal and gastric variceal status, and treatment goal (downstaging resection or long-term maintenance treatment), are the most critical factors when selecting a systemic treatment strategy. Consequently, the necessity to tailor a personalized and comprehensive treatment strategy for individual patients is growing. This review briefly summarizes the current systemic treatment regimens for HCC from a surgeon's perspective. It is based on results from clinical studies as well as personal experience and introduces the concept of a patient-centered, treatment goals-driven, individualized systemic treatment strategy for managing HCC.

Haemorrhage-related adverse events profles of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab alone or in combination: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database

OBJECTIVE

Limited understanding exists regarding the haemorrhagic risk resulting from potential interactions between lenvatinib and pembrolizumab. We investigated haemorrhagic adverse events (ADEs) associated with co-administration of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) in an effort to provide recommendations for their safe and sensible use.

METHODS

The FAERS database's bleeding events linked to lenvatinib and pembrolizumab were carefully examined. Haemorrhagic signals mining was performed by the reported odds ratios (RORs) and information component (IC), corroborated by additive and multiplicative models.

RESULTS

A total of 38,416,055 adverse event cases were analyzed, with 1188 bleeding events records in the lenvatinib alone, 952 bleeding events records in the pembrolizumab alone and 420 bleeding events reports in the combination therapy, respectively. We observed a significantly higher risk of haemorrhage with the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab compare with pembrolizumab alone. In addition, in the baseline model analysis of suspected bleeding adverse reactions, the additive model detected an increased incidence of small intestinal haemorrhage caused by combination therapy, and found no risk signals of tumour haemorrhage and tracheal haemorrhage; the results of multiplicative model are all negative.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of FAERS data reveals different levels of haemorrhagic risk when lenvatinib and pembrolizumab are administered concurrently, highlighting the significance of being cautious when using them in clinical practice.

Expanding Indications in Transplant Oncology

Liver transplantation is aptly described as the only curative treatment for cirrhosis and cirrhosis with co-morbid hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Its utility in the management of various other primary and secondary liver cancers is gaining traction rapidly, with more thorough assessments on broader populations continuing to emerge. Most prominently, this includes colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and more. Furthermore, despite being a well described treatment for HCC for many years, growing evidence supports a change in oncological strategy for HCC, with broadened selection criteria and more advanced systemic and locoregional therapies available. Our review aims to describe the evidence supporting the expansion of indications and selection criteria for liver transplantation in various oncologic indications of primary and secondary liver tumors.

Research progress of T cells in cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a malignant tumor, is typically challenging to detect early and often results in a poor prognosis. In recent years, research interest has grown in the potential application of immunotherapy for CCA treatment. T cells, as a crucial component of the immune system, play a significant role in immune surveillance and therapy for cholangiocarcinoma. This article provides a review of the research advancements concerning T cells in cholangiocarcinoma patients, including their distribution, functional status, and correlation with patient prognosis within the tumor microenvironment. It further discusses the potential applications and challenges of immunotherapy strategies targeting T cells in CCA treatment and anticipates future research directions. A more profound understanding of T cells' role in cholangiocarcinoma can guide the development of clinical treatment strategies, thereby enhancing patient survival rates and quality of life. Finally, we explored the potential risks and side effects of immunotherapy for T-cell cholangiocarcinoma.

Advances in Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Over the past several years, the therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma has been transformed by the incorporation of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy into the treatment paradigm. Frontline systemic treatment options have expanded beyond anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sorafenib, to a combination of immunotherapy approaches, including atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab, both of which have demonstrated superior response and survival to sorafenib. Additionally, combination treatments with checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been investigated with variable success. In this review, we discuss these advances in systemic treatment with immunotherapy, with a focus on understanding both the underlying biology and mechanism of these strategies and their efficacy outcomes in clinical trials. We also review challenges in identifying predictive biomarkers of treatments and discuss future directions with novel immunotherapy targets.

PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy or lenvatinib in advanced gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a refractory primary cancer. Some GBC patients are prone to recurrence even after surgical resection. In such cases, chemotherapy is the most common non-surgical treatment. The emergence of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and targeted therapy have provided an additional option for those suffering from advanced tumors.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study involving patients with advanced GBC treated at the Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. The patients who received a PD-1 inhibitor (tislelizumab) with chemotherapy or with lenvatinib were retrospectively analyzed. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) was used as the efficacy evaluation standard. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and tumor marker CA199 were evaluated.

RESULTS

This study involved 61 patients with advanced GBC. Of these, 32 patients received tislelizumab and GS (gemcitabine and TS-1) chemotherapy, whereas 29 patients received tislelizumab and lenvatinib. For the Tislelizumab plus GS chemotherapy group, the median OS and PFS were 19.64 ± 11.81 (95% CI: 16.47-25.20) and 15.44 ± 13.42 (95% CI: 12.08-22.25) months, respectively. For the lenvatinib group, the OS and PFS were 13.06 ± 9.41 (95% CI: 9.72-16.63) and 10.34 ± 10.03 (95% CI: 6.56-14.13) months, respectively. The ORR and DCR were 59.38% and 81.3%, respectively, for the Tislelizumab plus GS chemotherapy group, which were significantly longer than those for the Tislelizumab plus Lenvatinib group. Treatment-related adverse events were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Tislelizumab combined with GS chemotherapy provides a safe and more efficient treatment option for advanced GBC patients.

Immunotherapy and MASLD-Related HCC: Should We Reconsider the Role of Etiology in the Therapeutic Approach to HCC?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of primary liver cancers and typically arises in the context of chronic liver disease. With the increasing prevalence of metabolic disorders, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has become the leading cause of chronic liver disease and the most rapidly increasing cause of HCC. The role of dysfunctional innate and adaptive immune responses in the development and progression of HCC is well-established, prompting numerous trials to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in targeting tumor cells. These trials have yielded promising results, and ICIs, in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibodies, are now approved as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic or unresectable HCC, irrespective of the underlying liver disease. Notably, MASLD itself is characterized by immune system dysfunction, as metabolic inflammation plays a central role in its onset and progression. However, clinical studies and post-hoc analyses suggest that immunotherapy may be less effective in MASLD-associated HCC compared to viral-related HCC. This emerging evidence raises the question of whether the underlying liver disease influences the therapeutic response to ICIs in HCC. It may be time to consider tailoring therapeutic strategies for HCC based on the specific etiological, histological, and genotypical subgroups.

18F-FDG PET/CT-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics combining ensemble learning for prognosis prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Radiomic models combining intratumoral with peritumoral features are potentially beneficial to enhance the predictive performance. This study aimed to identify the optimal 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived radiomic models for prediction of prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A total of 135 HCC patients from two institutions were retrospectively included. Four peritumoral regions were defined by dilating tumor region with thicknesses of 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm, respectively. Based on segmentation of intratumoral, peritumoral and integrated volume of interest (VOI), corresponding radiomic features were extracted respectively. After feature selection, a total of 15 intratumoral radiomic models were constructed based on five ensemble learning algorithms and radiomic features from three image modalities. Then, the optimal combination of ensemble learning algorithms and image modality in the intratumoral models was selected to develop subsequent peritumoral radiomic models and integrated radiomic models. Finally, a nomogram was developed incorporating the optimal radiomic model with clinical independent predictors to achieve an intuitive representation of the prediction model.

RESULTS

Among the intratumoral radiomic models, the one which combined PET/CT-based radiomic features with SVM classifier outperformed other models. With the addition of peritumoral information, the integrated model based on an integration of intratumoral and 2 mm-peritumoral VOI, was finally approved as the optimal radiomic model with a mean AUC of 0.831 in the internal validation, and a highest AUC of 0.839 (95%CI:0.718-0.960) in the external test. Furthermore, a nomogram incorporating the optimal radiomic model with HBV infection and TNM status, was able to predict the prognosis for HCC with an AUC of 0.889 (95%CI: 0.799-0.979).

CONCLUSIONS

The integrated intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic model, especially for a 2 mm peritumoral region, was verified as the optimal radiomic model to predict the overall survival of HCC. Furthermore, combination of integrated radiomic model with significant clinical parameter contributed to further enhance the prediction efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was a retrospective study, so it was free from registration.

Effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study screened patients with uICC who underwent TACE in combination with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib between January 2019 and June 2023. Tislelizumab or camrelizumab (200 mg) was intravenously administered every three weeks. The daily dose of lenvatinib was 8 mg for patients weighing < 60 kg and 12 mg for those weighing ≥ 60 kg. In cases of disease progression, the therapeutic strategy was adjusted based on the clinical condition and individual patient's treatment preferences. Options included transitioning to standard or supportive care or continuing treatment with TACE in combination with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients with uICC were included. Over a median follow-up period of 32.3 months, the median OS and PFS were 25.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.9-33.7) and 9.5 months (95% CI: 7.9-11.0), respectively. The ORR was 55.9%, and the DCR was 96.6%. Grade 3 or four AEs were observed in 15 of 59 patients (25.4%).

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib demonstrated a promising therapeutic potential with a manageable safety profile for patients with uICC.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The combination of TACE, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib represents a novel therapeutic option for patients with uICC.

KEY POINTS

TACE plus PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib represent a promising therapeutic strategy for uICC. The safety profile of TACE plus PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib was manageable. This study demonstrated improved outcomes compared to prior standard-of-care treatments.