Plant disease resistance protein signaling: NBS-LRR proteins and their partners

The HSP90 chaperone complex, an emerging force in plant development and phenotypic plasticity

The essential cellular functions of the molecular chaperone HSP90 have been intensively investigated in fungal and mammalian model systems. Several recent publications have highlighted the importance of this chaperone complex in plant development and responsiveness to external stimuli. In particular, HSP90 is crucial for R-protein-mediated defense against pathogens. Other facets of HSP90 function in plants include its involvement in phenotypic plasticity, developmental stability, and buffering of genetic variation. Plants have emerged as powerful tools that complement other model systems in attempts to extend our knowledge of the myriad impacts of protein folding and chaperone function.

Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens

It has been suggested that effective defense against biotrophic pathogens is largely due to programmed cell death in the host, and to associated activation of defense responses regulated by the salicylic acid-dependent pathway. In contrast, necrotrophic pathogens benefit from host cell death, so they are not limited by cell death and salicylic acid-dependent defenses, but rather by a different set of defense responses activated by jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling. This review summarizes results from Arabidopsis-pathogen systems regarding the contributions of various defense responses to resistance to several biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. While the model above seems generally correct, there are exceptions and additional complexities.

Lipids, lipases, and lipid-modifying enzymes in plant disease resistance

Lipids and lipid metabolites influence pathogenesis and resistance mechanisms associated with plant-microbe interactions. Some microorganisms sense their presence on a host by perceiving plant surface waxes, whereas others produce toxins that target plant lipid metabolism. In contrast, plants have evolved to recognize microbial lipopolysaccharides (LPSs), sphingolipids, and lipid-binding proteins as elicitors of defense response. Recent studies have demonstrated that the plasma membrane provides a surface on which some plant resistance (R) proteins perceive pathogen-derived effectors and thus confer race-specific resistance. Plant cell membranes also serve as reservoirs from which biologically active lipids and precursors of oxidized lipids are released. Some of these oxylipins, for example jasmonic acid (JA), are important signal molecules in plant defense. Arabidopsis thaliana is an excellent model plant to elucidate the biosynthesis and metabolism of lipids and lipid metabolites, and the characterization of signaling mechanisms involved in the modulation of plant defense responses by phytolipids. This review focuses on recent studies that highlight the involvement of lipids and lipid metabolites, and enzymes involved in lipid metabolism and modification in plant disease resistance.

Introgression of crown rust (Puccinia coronata) resistance from meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis) into Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and physical mapping of the locus

Resistance was found in the meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis) to crown rust (Puccinia coronata), originating from ryegrasses (Lolium spp). A backcrossing programme successfully transferred this resistance into diploid Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and genomic in situ hybridisation (GISH) was used to identify the introgressed fescue chromosome segment. The resistant (R) plants in two BC3 lines all carried an introgressed segment on a single chromosome, which in one of the lines was confined to the short arm of the chromosome. Susceptible (S) plants either contained no introgressed chromosome segment or a segment which was physically smaller than the segments in resistant plants. Using GISH the resistance locus could be physically mapped to the midpoint of a short arm. Segregation ratios of the progeny of BC3 plants, when crossed as R x S and R x R, were in agreement with the hypothesis that the resistance was controlled by a single gene or very closely linked genes. No R plants were produced by crossing S x S plants.