Trough imatinib plasma levels are associated with both cytogenetic and molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia

Techniques for risk stratification of newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm caused by BCR-ABL, a constitutively active tyrosine kinase generated as a result of the t(9;22)(q34;q11). The natural history of CML is progression from a relatively benign chronic phase to an acute leukemia termed blast crisis. Imatinib, an inhibitor of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase activity, has a dramatic effect on the natural history of the disease. Despite the favorable outcomes with imatinib, a subset of patients have primary refractory disease, or experience relapse after an initial response. Recently identified molecular predictors of drug response might help predict outcome with tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy more accurately than clinical prognostication scores, but have not yet been introduced into clinical routine. These techniques include analysis of drug transport proteins, in vitro drug assays, measurement of imatinib plasma levels, BCR-ABL activity monitoring, and gene expression profiling. In this article we review the current status of these technologies, which may ultimately allow us to tailor therapy to a specific patient.

Environmental and genetic factors affecting transport of imatinib by OATP1A2

The bioavailability of orally administered imatinib is >90%, although the drug is monocationic under the acidic conditions in the duodenum. In vitro, we found that imatinib is transported by the intestinal uptake carrier organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP1A2) and that this process is sensitive to pH, rosuvastatin, and genetic variants. However, in a study in patients with cancer, imatinib absorption was not associated with OATP1A2 variants and was unaffected by rosuvastatin. These findings highlight the importance of verifying in a clinical setting the drug-transporter interactions observed in in vitro tests.

Dose escalation of imatinib in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients: is it still reasonable?

Suboptimal response or treatment failure to standard-dose imatinib are relevant problems in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Insufficient adherence is one of the main causes of insufficient response but biological reasons also have to be considered. Various mechanisms of resistance have been described in the past, some of them mediating absolute resistance and others, relative resistance, to imatinib. The latter can be overcome by dose intensification of imatinib. However, the availability of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors means these patients can be switched to these novel agents. Thus, which strategy is most appropriate for the individual patient with insufficient response to standard-dose imatinib remains elusive. Moreover, it remains unclear whether dose intensification of imatinib in the first-line setting might allow a more rapid and deeper response rate. This article will summarize data on imatinib dose intensification and will make recommendations about which patients imatinib dose intensification is most appropriate for.

Suboptimal responses in chronic myeloid leukemia: milestones and mechanisms

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who fail to achieve timely treatment responses have a worse prognosis. Although many patients respond well to first-line treatment with imatinib, a significant proportion relapse or experience an inadequate response. Since effective alternative Bcr-Abl inhibitors are available (i.e., dasatinib or nilotinib), several regional groups have proposed milestones for imatinib failure or suboptimal response based on the achievement of specified levels of response within a defined treatment duration. A suboptimal response indicates that, although patients may continue to receive a benefit from continuing imatinib treatment at the assigned dose, long-term outcome may be better with an alternative strategy. The underlying mechanisms behind suboptimal responses are multifactorial and may differ from those causing relapse.

Monitoring response and resistance to treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia (cml) results from expression of the constitutive tyrosine kinase activity of the Bcr-Abl oncoprotein. Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (tki), is highly effective in the treatment of cml. However, some patients treated with imatinib will fail to respond, will respond suboptimally, or will relapse because of primary or acquired resistance or intolerance. Research activities focusing on the mechanisms that underlie imatinib resistance have identified mutations in the BCR-ABL gene, clonal evolution, and amplification of the BCR-ABL gene as common causes. Cytogenetic and molecular techniques are currently used to monitor cml therapy for both response and relapse. With multiple and more potent therapeutic options now available, monitoring techniques can permit treatment to be tailored to the individual patient based on disease characteristics-for example, according to BCR-ABL mutation profile or to patient characteristics such as certain comorbid conditions. This approach should benefit patients by increasing the potential for better long-term outcomes.

Prognostic Significance of Treatment Response in CML in View of Current Recommendations for Treatment and Monitoring

The use of small-molecule kinase inhibitors has redefined the management of cancer. Chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) has become the paradigm for targeted cancer treatment. Imatinib has become the gold standard in the treatment of CML with excellent and durable responses and minimal side effects. Molecular diagnostics constitute an integral part of the routine monitoring. Results of cytogenetic analysis and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) indicate suboptimal response or treatment failure and guide treatment. New Abl kinase inhibitors such as nilotinib or dasatinib are options after the failure of or intolerance to imatinib, and both are available for first-line treatment of newly diagnosed CML. This review focuses on the prognostic significance of achieving a response at specific time points in patients with CML treated with imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib in view of available data and current treatment recommendations.

Navigating the road toward optimal initial therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and are now widely accepted as the initial therapy of choice in this disease, supplanting interferon and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. There are currently three drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for front-line treatment of CML: imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib. A fourth drug, bosutinib, may also win FDA approval in 2011. The goal of this review is to summarize the most recent information on initial treatment of CML and to aid clinicians in managing newly diagnosed CML patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Phase III studies comparing imatinib with nilotinib or dasatinib in newly diagnosed CML were published in June 2010, leading to accelerated FDA approval for both of these 'second-generation' TKIs for initial therapy of CML. There are significant differences between the agents in terms of frequency and rate of responses, progression-free survival, and side-effects. However, the follow-up period on these trials is short, and there are as yet no significant differences in overall survival. Guidelines for monitoring CML patients on TKI therapy have been recently revised.

SUMMARY

Management of newly diagnosed CML patients in the coming decade will begin to resemble antibiotic treatment of infection, with therapy individualized based on patient risk factors, co-morbidities, and tolerability. In addition, the cost of therapy will emerge as an important consideration as generic imatinib becomes available in 2015. In this context, clinical trials to guide decision-making in newly diagnosed CML patients are needed.

Drug interactions with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib

Several cancer treatments are shifting from traditional, time-limited, nonspecific cytotoxic chemotherapy cycles to continuous oral treatment with specific protein-targeted therapies. In this line, imatinib mesylate, a selective tyrosine kinases inhibitor (TKI), has excellent efficacy in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. It has opened the way to the development of additional TKIs against chronic myeloid leukemia, including nilotinib and dasatinib. TKIs are prescribed for prolonged periods, often in patients with comorbidities. Therefore, they are regularly co-administered along with treatments at risk of drug-drug interactions. This aspect has been partially addressed so far, calling for a comprehensive review of the published data. We review here the available evidence and pharmacologic mechanisms of interactions between imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib and widely prescribed co-medications, including known inhibitors or inducers of cytochromes P450 or drug transporters. Information is mostly available for imatinib mesylate, well introduced in clinical practice. Several pharmacokinetic aspects yet remain insufficiently investigated for these drugs. Regular updates will be mandatory and so is the prospective reporting of unexpected clinical observations.

Poor adherence is the main reason for loss of CCyR and imatinib failure for chronic myeloid leukemia patients on long-term therapy

We studied the relation between adherence to imatinib measured with microelectronic monitoring systems and the probabilities of losing a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and of imatinib failure in 87 CCyR chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving long-term therapy. We included in our analysis the most relevant prognostic factors described to date. On multivariate analysis, the adherence rate and having failed to achieve a major molecular response were the only independent predictors for loss of CCyR and discontinuation of imatinib therapy. The 23 patients with an adherence rate less than or equal to 85% had a higher probability of losing their CCyR at 2 years (26.8% vs 1.5%, P = .0002) and a lower probability of remaining on imatinib (64.5% vs 90.6%, P = .006) than the 64 patients with an adherence rate more than 85%. In summary, we have shown that poor adherence is the principal factor contributing to the loss of cytogenetic responses and treatment failure in patients on long-term therapy.

Current status of imatinib as frontline therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia

Imatinib is remarkably effective in treating newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. However, at 5 years more than one third of the patients have abandoned the medication on account of side effects, lack of efficacy, or progression. Here we review the current results with imatinib, the prognostic factors for response, and issues associated with long-term treatment with imatinib such as pregnancy, adherence to therapy, and complete molecular responses.

Participation of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 in the N-demethylation of imatinib in human hepatic microsomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Imatinib is a clinically important inhibitor of tyrosine kinases that are dysregulated in chronic myelogenous leukaemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Inter-individual variation in imatinib pharmacokinetics is extensive, and influences drug safety and efficacy. Hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 has been implicated in imatinib N-demethylation, but the clearance of imatinib decreases during prolonged therapy. CYP3A phenotype correlates with imatinib clearance at the commencement of therapy, but not at steady state. The present study evaluated the possibility that multiple CYPs may contribute to imatinib oxidation in liver.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Imatinib biotransformation in human liver microsomes (n= 20) and by cDNA-expressed CYPs was determined by LC-MS. Relationships between imatinib N-demethylation and other drug metabolizing CYPs were assessed.

KEY RESULTS

N-desmethylimatinib formation was correlated with microsomal oxidation of the CYP3A4 substrates testosterone (ρ= 0.60; P < 0.01) and midazolam (ρ= 0.46; P < 0.05), and the CYP2C8 substrate paclitaxel (ρ= 0.58; P < 0.01). cDNA-derived CYPs 2C8, 3A4, 3A5 and 3A7 supported imatinib N-demethylation, but 10 other CYPs were inactive; in kinetic studies, CYP2C8 was a high-affinity enzyme with a catalytic efficiency ∼15-fold greater than those of CYPs 3A4 and 3A5. The CYP3A inhibitors ketoconazole and troleandomycin, and the CYP2C8 inhibitors quercetin and paclitaxel decreased imatinib oxidation. From molecular modelling, the imatinib structure could be superimposed on a pharmacophore for CYP2C8 substrates.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

CYP2C8 and CYPs 3A contribute to imatinib N-demethylation in human liver. The involvement of CYP2C8 may account in part for the wide inter-patient variation in imatinib pharmacokinetics observed in clinical practice.

NCCN Task Force report: tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy selection in the management of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia

The advent of imatinib has dramatically improved outcomes in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). It has become the standard of care for all patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML based on its successful induction of durable responses in most patients. However, its use is complicated by the development of resistance in some patients. Dose escalation might overcome this resistance if detected early. The second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) dasatinib and nilotinib provide effective therapeutic options for managing patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Recent studies have shown that dasatinib and nilotinib provide quicker and potentially better responses than standard-dose imatinib when used as a first-line treatment. The goal of therapy for patients with CML is the achievement of a complete cytogenetic response, and eventually a major molecular response, to prevent disease progression to accelerated or blast phase. Selecting the appropriate TKI depends on many factors, including disease phase, primary or secondary resistance to TKI, the agent's side effect profile and its relative effectiveness against BCR-ABL mutations, and the patient's tolerance to therapy. In October 2010, NCCN organized a task force consisting of a panel of experts from NCCN Member Institutions with expertise in the management of patients with CML to discuss these issues. This report provides recommendations regarding the selection of TKI therapy for the management of patients with CML based on the evaluation of available published clinical data and expert opinion among the task force members.

Nilotinib: evaluation and analysis of its role in chronic myeloid leukemia

Nilotinib, formally known as AMN107, is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, rationally designed from its revolutionary parent compound imatinib, to produce a 30–40-fold enhancement in the inhibition of the BCR–ABL1-derived oncoprotein associated with chronic myeloid leukemia. In clinical trials, nilotinib has proven to be a useful agent in the treatment of imatinib-refractory disease and was initially approved by both the US FDA and EMA in 2007 for use in adults as a second-line therapy. More recently, data from the first randomized controlled trials of the front-line use of nilotinib in newly diagnosed patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia have demonstrated superiority in the rates of major molecular responses at 12 months over the gold standard–imatinib 400 mg. As such, in June 2010, the FDA granted accelerated approval for its use in newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia. Nilotinib is well tolerated, with a favorable side-effect profile. With the emergence of supportive trial data, it is likely to have a leading role both in the front-line management of newly presenting patients and in the second-line treatment of patients resistant to or intolerant of imatinib and other second-line agents.

Management of adverse events associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia

BCR-ABL-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) constitute the cornerstone of treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. Although these agents are normally safe and effective, they can cause side effects that lead to intolerance and necessitate switching to an alternative treatment. In this review, we describe side effects that occur during treatment with imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib-the currently approved TKI treatments for chronic myeloid leukemia-including class effects and key differences in safety profiles. We also describe how common side effects can be effectively managed and offer a working definition of intolerance that may be useful to clinicians when they consider switching between TKIs.

Excellent outcomes of children with CML treated with imatinib mesylate compared to that in pre-imatinib era

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and tyrosine kinase inhibitor have revolutionized the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In this study, the clinical impact of HSCT and imatinib mesylate (IM) was retrospectively analyzed in 28 children with CML treated in our institutes from 1984 to 2008. Twelve patients were given oral IM. At 36 months after initiation of IM therapy, the complete cytogenetic response rate was 90.9%, and the major molecular response rate was 36.4%. Sixteen children received allogeneic HSCT without administration of IM. The stage of disease at transplantation was: first chronic phase (n = 10), second chronic phase (n = 2), accelerated phase (n = 2), and blastic crisis (n = 2). The progression rate was significantly lower in patients treated with IM than in those treated without IM (0 vs. 28.6%, p = 0.006). In summary, the survival outcomes of pediatric patients with CML were dramatically improved by treatment with IM compared to HSCT.

Educational session: managing chronic myeloid leukemia as a chronic disease

Elucidation of the pathogenesis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has transformed this disease from being invariably fatal to being the type of leukemia with the best prognosis. Median survival associated with CML is estimated at > 20 years. Nevertheless, blast crisis occurs at an incidence of 1%-2% per year, and once this has occurred, treatment options are limited and survival is short. Due to the overall therapeutic success, the prevalence of CML is gradually increasing. The optimal management of this disease includes access to modern therapies and standardized surveillance methods for all patients, which will certainly create challenges. Furthermore, all available TKIs show mild but frequent side effects that may require symptomatic therapy. Adherence to therapy is the key prerequisite for efficacy of the drugs and for long-term success. Comprehensive information on the nature of the disease and the need for the continuous treatment using the appropriate dosages and timely information on efficacy data are key factors for optimal compliance. Standardized laboratory methods are required to provide optimal surveillance according to current recommendations. CML occurs in all age groups. Despite a median age of 55-60 years, particular challenges are the management of the disease in children, young women with the wish to get pregnant, and older patients. The main challenges in the long-term management of CML patients are discussed in this review.

Effects of herbal products on the metabolism and transport of anticancer agents

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Cancer patients on chemotherapy treatment often seek herbal therapies and this may alter the clearance of anticancer drugs.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Many anticancer drugs are metabolized by CYPs and are substrates of P-glycoprotein, breast cancer resistance protein and multi-drug resistance proteins. CYPs and drug transporters are subject to inhibition and/or induction by the herbal medicines used by cancer patients and the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents may be altered by herbal products. There are increased reports on the interaction of herbal medicines with anticancer agents. A clinical study in cancer patients reported that treatment of St John's wort at 900 mg/day orally for 18 days decreased the plasma levels of the active metabolite of irinotecan, SN-38, by 42%. In healthy subjects, treatment with St John's wort for 2 weeks significantly decreased the systemic exposure of imatinib by 32%. Induction and/or inhibition of CYPs and transporters is considered an important mechanism for these interactions.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Potential interactions of herbal medicines with anticancer agents have become a safety concern in cancer chemotherapy.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Further studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy and safety profiles of herbal medicines commonly used by cancer patients.

The role of imatinib plasma level testing in gastrointestinal stromal tumor

The management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has markedly advanced over the past 10 years. Imatinib has exceptional activity in controlling gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) due to inhibition of the constitutively active conformation of KIT and PDGFRA which is found in the majority of patients with GIST. Although some patients may experience prolonged disease control while on imatinib, most patients will develop imatinib resistance within 2-3 years on therapy. A recent retrospective analysis demonstrated a relationship between imatinib plasma levels and progression-free survival in patients with advanced GIST. Plasma imatinib levels in this study were unrelated to the daily administered dose of imatinib. A prospective trial is underway in order to evaluate whether modification of imatinib dose to achieve a target imatinib plasma level will impact patient outcome when compared to standard imatinib dosing in GIST ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01031628).  This review will explore the current available data on the relationship between imatinib plasma levels, response to treatment, and other prognositic factors as well as discuss the implications of this data for possible future therapeutic approaches.

The pharmacogenetics of imanitib

Imatinib mesylate (IM), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is one of the first molecularly targeted therapies to have been used in the clinic. It has proven to be efficient in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and also in other malignancies that involve expression of a tyrosine kinase. However, some patients can develop resistance and others suffer from toxic side effects. The pharmacokinetics of IM depends on several enzymes and transporters, and several studies have attempted to identify genetic factors associated with variable drug levels and clinical responses using a candidate gene approach. Larger and more homogenous studies are still needed to replicate the findings obtained so far, or to analyze other genetic variations to get clearer insights into how IM treatment can be tailored to each patient's genetics. Here we summarize pharmacogenetic studies of IM and highlight the genetic markers that could be used to improve the treatment and management of diseases for which IM is used.

Correlations between imatinib pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adherence, and clinical response in advanced metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): an emerging role for drug blood level testing?

Imatinib is the standard of care for patients with advanced metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and is also approved for adjuvant treatment in patients at substantial risk of relapse. Studies have shown that maximizing benefit from imatinib depends on long-term administration at recommended doses. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic factors, adherence, and drug-drug interactions can affect exposure to imatinib and impact clinical outcomes. This article reviews the relevance of these factors to imatinib's clinical activity and response in the context of what has been demonstrated in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and in light of new data correlating imatinib exposure to response in patients with GIST. Because of the wide inter-patient variability in drug exposure with imatinib in both CML and GIST, blood level testing (BLT) may play a role in investigating instances of suboptimal response, unusually severe toxicities, drug-drug interactions, and suspected non-adherence. Published clinical data in CML and in GIST were considered, including data from a PK substudy of the B2222 trial correlating imatinib blood levels with clinical responses in patients with GIST. Imatinib trough plasma levels < 1100 ng/mL were associated with lower rates of objective response and faster development of progressive disease in patients with GIST. These findings have been supported by other analyses correlating free imatinib (unbound) levels with response. These results suggest a future application for imatinib BLT in predicting and optimizing therapeutic response. Nevertheless, early estimates of threshold imatinib blood levels must be confirmed prospectively in future studies and elaborated for different patient subgroups.

Seeking the causes and solutions to imatinib-resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia

Although only 5000 new cases of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) were seen in the United States in 2009, this neoplasm continues to make scientific headlines year-after-year. Advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis coupled with exciting developments in both drug design and development, targeting the initiating tyrosine kinase, have kept CML in the scientific limelight for more than a decade. Indeed, imatinib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the leukemia-initiating Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase, has quickly become the therapeutic standard for newly diagnosed chronic phase-CML (CP-CML) patients. Yet, nearly one-third of patients will still have an inferior response to imatinib, either failing to respond to primary therapy or demonstrating progression after an initial response. Significant efforts geared toward understanding the molecular mechanisms of imatinib resistance have yielded valuable insights into the cellular biology of drug trafficking, enzyme structure and function, and the rational design of novel small molecule enzyme inhibitors. Indeed, new classes of kinase inhibitors have recently been investigated in imatinib-resistant CML. Understanding the pathogenesis of tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance and the molecular rationale for the development of second and now third generation therapies for patients with CML will be keys to further disease control over the next 10 years.

Imatinib treatment in chronic myelogenous leukemia: What have we learned so far?

Imatinib mesylate is currently the standard therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia patients. Despite the remarkable results achieved with imatinib, the emergence of resistance to this drug has become a significant problem. Actually, two other second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been used for resistant/intolerant patients to imatinib. With the availability of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia, questions relating to adherence to prescribed therapy have become an important issue. It has been demonstrated that the effectiveness of the treatment with imatinib requires high compliance to the prescribed dose of the drug for an indefinite period of time, whereas reduced adherence to therapy has been associated with delay in achieving cytogenetic or molecular response and/or possible development of resistance. The aim of this review is to discuss the importance of adherence, and the possible tools that we have to measure it, to improve our knowledge on possible underlying causes of non-adherence and the impact of non-adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost through a systematic review of the data published to date.

Correlation between imatinib pharmacokinetics and clinical response in Japanese patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia

Despite the outstanding results generally obtained with imatinib mesylate (IM) in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), some patients show a poor molecular response. To evaluate the relationship between steady-state trough plasma IM concentration (IM-C(min)) and clinical response in CML patients, we integrated data from six independent Japanese studies. Among 254 CML patients, the mean IM-C(min) was 1,010.5 ng/ml. Importantly, IM-C(min) was significantly higher in patients who achieved a major molecular response (MMR) than in those who did not (P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that an MMR was associated with both age (odds ratio (OR) = 0.97 (0.958-0.995); P = 0.0153) and with IM-C(min) (OR = 1.0008 (1.0003-1.0015); P = 0.0044). Given that patients with IM-C(min) values >1,002 ng/ml had a higher probability of achieving an MMR in our large cohort (P = 0.0120), the data suggest that monitoring of IM levels in plasma may improve the efficacy of IM therapy for CML patients.

Nilotinib in patients with GIST who failed imatinib and sunitinib: importance of prior surgery on drug bioavailability

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of nilotinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) resistant or intolerant to both imatinib and sunitinib and to explore the potential relationship between nilotinib pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetic parameters of nilotinib (400 mg twice daily) in 17 GIST patients with histories of prior gastrointestinal surgery.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 59 years (range, 35-71 years), 14 of 17 patients (82.4%) were male, and mean body weight was 59.4 kg. Of the 17 patients, 2 (11.8%) had partial responses (PR), 10 (58.8%) had stable disease (SD), and 5 (29.4%) had progressive disease (PD), with a clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD) at 24 weeks of 47.0%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 23.6 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0-50.6 weeks) and 74.0 weeks (95% CI 27.4-120.6 weeks), respectively. Most observed adverse events were mild (grade 1, 41.2%; grade 2, 52.9%), with no grade 3/4 events. Pharmacokinetic parameters of nilotinib were as follows: C (max) of 1,754 ± 970 μg/L, T(1/2) of 13.4 ± 8.94 h and AUC (0-12 h) of 14,190 ± 6,853 h μg/L. The AUC (0-12 h) of nilotinib was significantly lower in the 4 patients with prior major (total or subtotal) gastrectomy than in the other 13 patients (8,526 ± 7,869 h μg/L vs. 15,930 ± 5,759 h μg/L, P = 0.014). Of the 4 gastrectomized patients, two (50%) showed markedly decreased nilotinib exposure (AUC (0-12 h) of 1,914 and 3,194 h μg/L) and rapid disease progression (PFS of 4.6 and 7.1 weeks).

CONCLUSION

Nilotinib was active and safe in patients with advanced GIST resistant to both imatinib and sunitinib. Major gastrectomy decreased the bioavailability of nilotinib and, in some patients, lowered its clinical activity.

Trough plasma concentration of imatinib reflects BCR-ABL kinase inhibitory activity and clinical response in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a report from the BINGO study

Pharmacokinetic (PK) factors have been suggested to be involved in the unfavorable clinical responses of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with imatinib. The purpose of this study was to clarify prognostic implications of PK factors in CML patients treated with imatinib. The plasma trough (C(min)) level of imatinib and serum α(1)-acid glycoprotein (AGP) level were measured on two different days in 65 CML patients treated with imatinib for more than 12 months. We further examined whether the C(min) level of imatinib actually reflects inhibitory activity against BCR-ABL kinase using the plasma inhibitory activity (PIA) assay. Since the differences of five patients were statistically rejected by the Smirnov-Grubbs' test, we excluded them for further analysis. The C(min) level was strongly associated with the achievement of MMR at the 12th month, and ROC analysis demonstrated C(min) levels and their discrimination potential for major molecular response (MMR) with the best sensitivity (63.2%) and specificity (68.2%) at a C(min) threshold of 974 ng/mL. The α(1)-Acid glycoprotein (AGP) level was within the normal range in 57 of 60 patients, indicating little impact of AGP on our study. There was a weak correlation between PIA against phospho (P)-BCR-ABL and the C(min) level of imatinib (r(2) = 0.2501, P = 0.0007), and patient plasma containing >974 ng/mL imatinib sufficiently inhibited P-BCR-ABL. These results collectively indicated that maintaining ∼1000 ng/mL of C(min) was clinically and biologically important for the optimal response in CML patients treated with imatinib. A prospective intervention study is required to establish PK-based management in CML patients treated with imatinib.

Standard treatment of Ph+ CML in 2010: how, when and where not to use what BCR/ABL1 kinase inhibitor?

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a haematopoietic neoplasm characterised by the BCR/ABL1 oncoprotein. In chronic phase CML, the neoplastic clone exhibits multilineage differentiation and maturation capacity. The BCR/ABL1 kinase blocker imatinib shows major antileukaemic effects in most patients and is considered standard frontline therapy. However, not all patients have a long-lasting response to imatinib. Notably, resistance to imatinib has been recognised as an emerging problem and challenge in CML. Whereas CML stem cells are considered to exhibit intrinsic resistance, acquired resistance may, in addition, develop in subclones over time, resulting in an overt relapse. A key trigger of resistance in subclones are BCR/ABL1 mutations. For such patients, novel multikinase inhibitors such as nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib or bafetinib, which block the kinase activity of various BCR/ABL1 mutants, have been developed and reportedly exert antileukaemic effects in drug-resistant cells. For highly resistant patients, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is an alternative option. Treatment decisions and the selection of drugs are based on the presence and type of BCR/ABL1 mutation(s), phase of disease, other disease-related variables and patient-related factors including age, compliance and co-morbidity. The current review provides an overview on standards in the diagnosis and therapy in CML, with special reference to novel BCR/ABL1 inhibitors.

BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia: a review

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is a clonal disease characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia (Ph+) chromosome and its oncogenic product, BCR-ABL, a constitutively active tyrosine kinase, that is present in >90% of the patients. Epidemiologic data indicates that almost 5000 new cases are reported every year and 10% of these patients eventually succumb to the disease. The treatment of CML was revolutionized by the introduction of imatinib mesylate (IM, Gleevec), a BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The clinical use of specific BCR-ABL inhibitors has resulted in a significantly improved prognosis, response rate, overall survival, and patient outcome in CML patients compared to previous therapeutic regimens. However, the complete eradication of CML in patients receiving imatinib was limited by the emergence of resistance mostly due to mutations in the ABL kinase domain and to a lesser extent by molecular residual disease after treatment. The second-generation BCR-ABL TKIs nilotinib (Tasigna) and dasatinib (Sprycel), showed significant activity in clinical trials in patients intolerant or resistant to imatinib therapy, except in those patients with the T315I BCR-ABL mutation. Identifying key components involved in the CML pathogenesis may lead to the exploration of new approaches that might eventually overcome resistance mediated to the BCR-ABL TKIs. Here, we present an overview about the current treatment of Ph+ CML patients with the TKIs and the obstacles to successful treatment with these drugs.

High-performance liquid chromatography with solid-phase extraction for the quantitative determination of nilotinib in human plasma

A simple, rapid and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-based method with ultraviolet detection was developed for the quantitation of nilotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in human plasma. Nilotinib and the internal standard dasatinib were separated using a mobile phase of 0.5% KH(2)PO(4) (pH2.5)-acetonitrile-methanol (55:25:20, v/v/v) on a Capcell Pak MG II column (250 x 4.6 mm) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min and optical measurement at 250 nm. Analysis required only 100 microL of plasma and involved a rapid and simple solid-phase extraction with an Oasis HLB cartridge, which gave recoveries from 72 to 78% for nilotinib and from 74 to 76% for dasatinib. The lower limit of quantification for nilotinib was 10 ng/mL. The linear range of this assay was between 10 and 5000 ng/mL (r(2) > 0.9992 for the regression line). Intra- and inter-day coefficients of variation were less than 10.0% and accuracies were within 10.4% over the linear range. Our results indicate that this method is applicable to the monitoring of plasma levels of nilotinib in a clinical setting.

Predicting the response of CML patients to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has significantly changed the treatment paradigm for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The first-generation inhibitor, imatinib, has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in most chronic-phase patients. Disease progression remains a significant risk for the first 2 to 3 years of TKI therapy, but the risk falls significantly thereafter. Early recognition of each individual's risk of progression may facilitate a customized approach to TKI therapy. Using such an approach, drug selection and treatment intensity would be adjusted on the basis of each patient's disease profile. Currently available prognostic indicators have limited value in the setting of the potent kinase inhibition afforded by TKIs. Furthermore, these indicators provide little guidance regarding optimal drug choice and dose intensity. In the future, assays that directly assess the efficacy of the protein-drug interaction, taking into account factors intrinsic to the patient and the amount of drug freely available in the plasma, are likely to be of greater value.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia stem cells: What's new?

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloproliferative disorder that arises in the hematopoietic stem cell compartment. CML is one of the best-understood malignancies, as it results from a single genetic mutation, the fusion oncogene BCR-ABL, which has been widely studied. Specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been developed to target BCR-ABL in CML, but these agents fail to eliminate the CML stem cell population and thus are unlikely to cure CML. This article reviews recent developments in the biology and treatment of CML, specifically focusing on CML stem cells. Significant progress continues to be made in our understanding of CML stem cell biology, which has wider implications within the cancer stem cell field. We are also beginning to see the identification of novel therapies that specifically target the CML stem cell. These are exciting times in the quest to cure CML.

Relationship of serum imatinib trough level and response in CML patients: long term follow-up

One hundred and three patients with Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase who were on oral imatinib were included in this study. The study aimed to assess the relationship between imatinib trough serum levels and clinical outcome (as determined by molecular response) in Jordanian CML patients who have been on imatinib therapy for at least 12 months. The mean trough imatinib serum level in the group with complete molecular response (CMR) was 2891±856 ng/ml, the group with major molecular response (MMR) was 2337±434 ng/ml, the group with complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was 1817±563 ng/ml, and the group without CCyR was 1723±673 ng/ml. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed after dividing patient sample into two groups, those with MMR or better and those without MMR, in order to estimate a threshold for imatinib level that correlates with a favorable response (the former group), and analysis yielded a value of 2158 ng/ml.

Imatinib plasma trough concentration and its correlation with characteristics and response in Chinese CML patients

AIM

To investigate the pharmacokinetics of imatinib in Chinese chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients.

METHODS

Fourty-six naïve Chinese CML patients treated with imatinib (400 and 600 mg daily, n=36 and 10, respectively) were recruited. The correlations of imatinib (400 mg) trough plasma concentrations (C(mins)) with the patients' characteristics and responses were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall mean (+/-SD, CV%) steady-state C(mins) for imatinib at 400 mg (n=36) and 600 mg (n=10) daily was 1325.61 ng/mL (+/-583.53 ng/mL; 44%) and 1550.90 ng/mL (+/-462.63 ng/mL; 30%), respectively, and no statistically significant differences were found between them (P=0.267). At 400 mg daily, female patients had significantly higher C(mins) than the male patients (P=0.048), and molecular responses were not correlated with imatinib C(mins), but they were correlated with time elapsed before imatinib therapy.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that Chinese CML patients have higher imatinib C(mins) than their Caucasian counterparts and that the optimal initial imatinib dose for them requires further investigation.

Resistance to imatinib in chronic myelogenous leukemia: mechanisms and clinical implications

The introduction of imatinib represented a breakthrough in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). However, about 20% of patients treated in early chronic-phase CML are off therapy after 6 years because of resistance or intolerance, and most patients taking imatinib remain BCR-ABL-positive at the molecular level, indicating primary refractoriness of a leukemic subpopulation. Patients with advanced disease often do not respond, or they eventually relapse. Resistance frequently is associated with mutations in the kinase domain of BCR-ABL. Other mechanisms leading to reactivation of BCR-ABL or preventing sufficient BCR-ABL inhibition also exist. Resistance of patients with continued BCR-ABL inhibition despite leukemic progression indicates clonal evolution triggered by BCR-ABL-independent mechanisms. Current efforts to optimize BCR-ABL-targeted treatment focus on the difficulty in reaching CML stem cells. Success will most likely depend on integration of combined treatment algorithms-whether they be a combination of molecules interfering with signaling pathways or additional immune-based treatment adjuncts.