Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy

Recommendations and expert opinion on the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in Spain

In Spain 22,000 new cases of colorectal cancer are diagnosed each year, with 13,075 deaths resulting from this disease. Around 70% of colorectal cancers are localised in the colon and 30% in the rectum. A group of Spanish experts established recommendations on what would be the best strategy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Adequate assessment of local tumour extension, including high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal ultrasound, is essential for successful treatment. The three cornerstones in the treatment of LARC are surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Most patients will need a total mesorectal excision (TME). Preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) is preferred for the majority of patients with T3/T4 disease and/or regional node involvement, and adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after a patient-sharing decision. Capecitabine, after showing a trend in improved downstaging in neoadjuvant stratum and the convenience of its oral administration, represents an alternative to 5-FU as perioperative treatment of LARC.

Impact of clinical oral chemotherapy program on wastage and hospitalizations

PURPOSE

The oral chemotherapy cycle management program (CMP) provides clinical management support to patients receiving certain oral chemotherapies. The CMP includes a dose-monitoring (ie, split-fill) plan for early identification and management of adverse effects. If serious adverse effects are identified mid cycle, the remainder of the monthly supply is withheld, thus avoiding potential waste associated with early therapy discontinuation. This study investigated medication wastage and estimated potential cost savings for patients who were enrolled in the CMP, as compared with those who were not enrolled in the program.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective test-control study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients whose oral chemotherapy was initiated between June 2008 and February 2010 and who were enrolled in the CMP were included as the test group. Patient whose oral chemotherapy was initiated between June 2007 and May 2008 and who were not part of the CMP were included as the control group.

RESULTS

Medication wastage associated with early therapy discontinuation was found to be lower in the CMP group. Approximately 34% of patients in the CMP group could have avoided medication wastage if split-fill plans had been available, potentially realizing savings of approximately $934.20 per patient. Linear probability regression models showed that the CMP group had a 2.9% probability for reduction in hospital admissions (P < .05), resulting in additional savings of approximately $440.0 per patient. Combined savings resulting from reduced wastage and hospital admissions was approximately $1,374 per patient.

CONCLUSION

Dose-monitoring programs such as the CMP effectively reduce wastage and serious adverse effects associated with oral chemotherapeutic agents, realizing potential cost savings for both payers and patients.

Pharmacokinetic modeling to assess factors affecting the oral bioavailability of the lactone and carboxylate forms of the lipophilic camptothecin analogue AR-67 in rats

PURPOSE

Camptothecin analogues are anticancer drugs effective when dosed in protracted schedules. Such treatment is best suited for oral formulations. AR-67 is a novel lipophilic analogue with potent efficacy in preclinical models. Here we assessed factors that may influence its oral bioavailability in rats.

METHODS

Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were conducted following administration of AR-67 lactone or carboxylate doses alone or after pre-dosing with inhibitors of the efflux transporters P-gp and Bcrp. A population PK model that simultaneously fitted to oral and intravenous data was used to estimate the bioavailability (F) and clearance of AR-67.

RESULTS

An inverse Gaussian function was used as the oral input into the model and provided the best fits. Covariate analysis showed that the bioavailability of the lactone, but not its clearance, was dose dependent. Consistent with this observation, the bioavailability of AR-67 increased when animals were pretreated orally with GF120918 or Zosuquidar.

CONCLUSION

Absorption of AR-67 is likely affected by solubility of its lactone form and interaction with efflux pumps in the gut. AR-67 appears to be absorbed as the lactone form, most likely due to gastric pH favoring its formation and predominance. F increased at higher doses suggesting saturation of efflux mechanisms.

β-Casein nanoparticle-based oral drug delivery system for potential treatment of gastric carcinoma: stability, target-activated release and cytotoxicity

We studied a potential drug delivery system comprising the hydrophobic anticancer drug paclitaxel entrapped within β-casein (β-CN) nanoparticles and its cytotoxicity to human gastric carcinoma cells. Paclitaxel was entrapped by stirring its dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution into PBS containing β-CN. Cryo-TEM analysis revealed drug nanocrystals, the growth of which was blocked by β-CN. Entrapment efficiency was nearly 100%, and the nanovehicles formed were colloidally stable. Following encapsulation and simulated digestion with pepsin (2 hours at pH=2, 37 °C), paclitaxel retained its cytotoxic activity to human N-87 gastric cancer cells; the IC(50) value (32.5 ± 6.2 nM) was similar to that of non-encapsulated paclitaxel (25.4 ± 2.6 nM). Without prior simulated gastric digestion, β-CN-paclitaxel nanoparticles were non-cytotoxic, suggesting the lack of untoward toxicity to bucal and esophageal epithelia. We conclude that β-CN shows promise to be useful for target-activated oral delivery of hydrophobic chemotherapeutics in the treatment of gastric carcinoma, one of the leading causes of cancer mortality worldwide.

Advanced molecular design of biopolymers for transmucosal and intracellular delivery of chemotherapeutic agents and biological therapeutics

Hydrogels have been instrumental in the development of polymeric systems for controlled release of therapeutic agents. These materials are attractive for transmucosal and intracellular drug delivery because of their facile synthesis, inherent biocompatibility, tunable physicochemical properties, and capacity to respond to various physiological stimuli. In this contribution, we outline a multifaceted hydrogel-based approach for expanding the range of therapeutics in oral formulations from classical small-molecule drugs to include proteins, chemotherapeutics, and nucleic acids. Through judicious material selection and careful design of copolymer composition and molecular architecture, we can engineer systems capable of responding to distinct physiological cues, with tunable physicochemical properties that are optimized to load, protect, and deliver valuable macromolecular payloads to their intended site of action. These hydrogel carriers, including complexation hydrogels, tethered hydrogels, interpenetrating networks, nanoscale hydrogels, and hydrogels with decorated structures are investigated for their ability to respond to changes in pH, to load and release insulin and fluorescein, and remain non-toxic to Caco-2 cells. Our results suggest these novel hydrogel networks have great potential for controlled delivery of proteins, chemotherapeutics, and nucleic acids.

Amphiphilic Interpenetrating Networks for the Delivery of Hydrophobic, Low Molecular Weight Therapeutic Agents

To investigate the delivery of hydrophobic therapeutic agents, a novel class of interpenetrating networks (IPNs) were synthesized and composed of two networks: methacrylic acid grafted with poly(ethylene glycol) tethers, P(MAA-g-EG), and poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PBA). The hydrophilic P(MAA-g-EG) networks are pH-responsive hydrogels capable of triggered release of an encapsulated therapeutic agent, such as a low molecular weight drug or a protein, when it passes from the stomach (low pH) to upper small intestine (neutral pH). PBA is a hydrophobic homopolymer that can affect the IPN swelling behavior, the therapeutic agent loading efficiencies in IPNs, and solute release profiles from IPNs. In dynamic swelling conditions, IPNs had greater swelling ratios than P(MAA-g-EG), but in equilibrium swelling conditions the IPN swelling ratio decreased with increasing PBA content. Loading efficiencies of the model therapeutic agent fluorescein ranged from 21 - 44%. Release studies from neat P(MAA-g-EG) and the ensuing IPNs indicated that the transition from low pH (2.0) to neutral pH (7.0) triggered fluorescein release. Maximum fluorescein release depended on the structure and hydrophilicity of the carriers used in these studies.

Preoperative radiotherapy combined with capecitabine chemotherapy in Chinese patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

This phase II study is performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine combined with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in Chinese patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

Between February 2007 and December 2008, 62 patients with LARC were treated with capecitabine (825 mg/m(2), twice daily) and concurrent RT (50.4 Gy/28 fractions). Patients underwent surgery after 6-8 weeks of combined therapy, followed by 4 cycles of adjuvant capecitabine (1,250 mg/m(2), twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (93.5%) completed the preoperative chemoradiation course as initially planned. The most severe hematologic adverse event was leucopenia, which occurred with grade 2 intensity in 12 (19.7%) patients and grade 3 in 2 (3.3%) patients. Grade 3 diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) were observed in one (1.6%) and two (3.3%) patients, respectively. However, no grade 4 toxicity was observed. There were no treatment-related deaths during this study. Of the 59 patients treated with surgery, all had radial margins (R0 resections). Among the 29 patients with the primary tumor ≤5 cm from the anal verge, 18 (62.1%) underwent sphincter-preserving surgical resections. pCR was found in eight patients (13.6%). The pathologic stage was lower than the initial clinical stage in 57.6% (34/59), 63.4% (26/41), and 81.4% (48/59) of the resected tumors for the primary tumor (T), lymph node (N), and combined TN categories, respectively. The estimate of disease-free survival and overall survival at 24 months were 80.6% (95% CI, 70.8-90.4%) and 92.5% (95% CI, 85.9-99.1%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and RT appears to be a safe, well-tolerated, and effective neoadjuvant treatment modality for LARC.

Interventions to promote adherence with oral agents

OBJECTIVES

The advent of oral therapies has dramatically changed the landscape of cancer therapy. Yet the degree to which patients actually take the prescribed agents as ordered remains unknown. This article outlines the challenges that oral chemotherapy agents present to both patients and providers and suggests interventions for promoting adherence.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles and web resources.

CONCLUSION

Barriers and facilitators to medication adherence are reviewed and interventions to promote medication adherence are presented. Strategies that include patient education and symptom management can promote adherence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Maximizing adherence to oral chemotherapy agents can have many positive outcomes, but most important is improvement in overall survival and life expectancy. Other outcomes include improved safety and quality of life. Patients risk improper dosing and an increase in disease recurrence when there is nonadherence with medications. Correct dosing, education, and symptom management are all critical to ensuring adherence. Nursing interventions that incorporate education, early symptom identification, and reminder prompts can improve outcomes.

Capecitabine or infusional 5-fluorouracil for gastroesophageal cancer: a cost-consequence analysis

BACKGROUND

In patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer, the phase iii Randomized ECF for Advanced and Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Cancer 2 (real-2) trial demonstrated equivalent clinical efficacy when capecitabine (x) was substituted for 5-fluorouracil (5fu) in the epirubicin-cisplatin-5fu (ecf) regimen. The present analysis compares the direct medical costs associated with both regimens.

METHODS

This cost-consequence analysis of direct medical costs took resource utilization data from the real-2 trial where available. Direct medical costs were derived from the perspective of the Canadian public health care system in 2008 Canadian dollars. Mean cost per patient on each treatment arm was calculated.

RESULTS

Drug costs from start of treatment until first progression, including pre- and post-chemotherapy medications and administration costs, totalled $5,344 for ecx as compared with $3,187 for ecf. Costs for treatment of adverse events were estimated at $2,621 for ecx as compared with $3,397 for ecf. An additional cost of $873 was associated with insertion of an implanted venous access. Total incremental cost of ecx over ecf was $508.

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced gastroesophageal cancer, capecitabine is an attractive alternative to 5fu. Although the drug cost per se is greater, use of capecitabine is associated with decreased consumption of hospital resources. Not only does capecitabine fit with patient preference for oral therapy, it also avoids the inconvenience and complications of central venous access.

Use of ibandronate in the prevention of skeletal events in metastatic breast cancer

Bone metastasis from breast cancer often cause significant morbidity including pain, impaired mobility, pathological fracture, and spinal cord compression. Bisphosphonates play an important role in preventing these skeletal related events and are the standard of care for patients with bone metastasis from breast cancer. Ibandronate is a highly potent bisphosphonate available in both intravenous and oral preparations. It has been shown in clinical trials to be effective in reducing skeletal complications and also significantly improve quality of life up to 96 weeks. Unlike other intravenous bisphosphonates, ibandronate has minimal renal toxicity, allowing safe outpatient administration, reducing the need for hospital attendance and safety monitoring. Early trials have shown ibandronate may also be effective in high doses for palliation of opioid-resistant pain from bone metastasis, and as a second-line agent in patients developing a skeletal complication whilst receiving another bisphosphonate.

Electronic database to detect drug-drug interactions between antidepressants and oral anticancer drugs from a cancer center in Singapore: implications to clinicians

BACKGROUND

Electronic drug interaction databases are often utilized in clinical practice to detect for possible drug-drug interactions between drug pairs. It is uncertain, however, whether most of these detections interactions are clinically important in practice. To demonstrate these issues, this study utilized a comprehensive drug-drug interaction (DDI) electronic database to elucidate the prevalence of DDIs at a cancer centre between antidepressants and oral anticancer drugs (ACDs).

METHODS

Drug utilization reports were retrieved to determine the patients who were prescribed with antidepressants oral ACDs between 2006 and 2009 at a cancer center. Medication records of these patients were retrospectively examined using OncoRx, an internet-based oncology-specific database that allows the identification of DDIs.

RESULTS

Out of 910 users of antidepressants, about one-third (281 patients, 30.9%) used an oral ACD and an antidepressant concomitantly. From these patients, about one-fifth (21.0%) had potential DDIs. These patients were users of 17 potentially interacting drug pairs. Ten out of the 17 drug pairs could potentially cause pharmacokinetic interactions, and the rest were pharmacodynamic interactions, with only three out of the 17 drug pairs were clinically documented to cause interacting events.

CONCLUSION

The lack of screening conditions may have led to an over detection of DDI combinations by electronic DDI databases. Many of the detected interactions may not deem high significance in clinical practice. This study exposed a major weakness of current electronic DDI databases for detecting oral ACDs and antidepressants DDIs.

Phase II trial of oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

The efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer is now widely accepted. However, the survival advantage is small, and no internationally accepted standard regimen has emerged. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine (XELOX regimen) as first-line chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 over 2 h on day 1) plus oral capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14). Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were enrolled in the study, median age was 61 years (range, 32-74); median follow-up was 13.2 months (range, 2-24.5). In total, 364 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered. Overall response rate was 62.2% (95% CI, 51.2-73.2), with 3 complete and 43 partial responses; median time to progression and overall survival were 5.9 (95% CI, 4.8-7.0) and 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.7), respectively. The most common hematological adverse event was anemia (67.6% of patients). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 5 patients. The most common nonhematological toxicities were neuropathy (64.9%), nausea/vomiting (48.6%), diarrhea (28.4%), and hand-foot syndrome (39.2%). Grade 3-4 toxicities were rare. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The XELOX regimen was active and well-tolerated as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

The use of erlotinib in daily practice: a study on adherence and patients' experiences

Background

Adherence to pharmacological therapy is a complex and multi-factorial issue that can substantially alter the outcome of treatment. It has been shown that cancer patients, especially when using long-term medication, have similar adherence rates to those of patients with other diseases. The consequences of poor adherence are poor health outcomes and increased health care costs. Only few studies have focused on the use of oral anticancer agents in daily practice. Information about the reasons for non-adherence is essential for the development of interventions that may increase adherence. This paper presents the CAPER-erlotinib protocol, which is designed to study the relationship between adherence to erlotinib and both the plasma concentration and side-effects in patients with NSCLC. Further, the relationships between patient characteristics, disease characteristics, side-effects, quality of life, patient beliefs and attitude towards disease and medication, dose adjustments, reasons for discontinuation and plasma concentration of erlotinib will be explored.

Methods/Design

In this prospective observational cohort study 65 NSCLC patients of 18 years or older starting treatment with erlotinib will be followed for a period up to 16 weeks. The main study parameters are adherence, the plasma concentration of erlotinib and the number and grade of side-effects. At baseline and on erlotinib treatment in weeks 3-4, 8-9, 12 and 15-16, patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire. In weeks 3-4, 8-9 and 15-16 blood samples are collected, which will be analysed for plasma concentration of erlotinib. Adherence will be measured using a medication event monitoring system.

Discussion

The present study aims to get more insight into patients' experiences with the use of erlotinib in daily practice and the various aspects that govern adherence. We hypothesize that side-effects play an important role in the way patients use erlotinib. We expect that the present study will provide valuable knowledge which will be useful for health care professionals to develop interventions to support patients. This approach will improve the adherence and persistence with the use of erlotinib in order to derive optimal benefit from the medication.

Trial Registration

NTR1830

Cost of non-persistence with oral bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis treatment in France

BACKGROUND

During the last decade, oral bisphosphonates (BP) became the most widely prescribed pharmacologic class for post-menopausal osteoporosis. However, many surveys revealed the important issue of poor persistence with those drugs resulting in a failure of treatment to reduce fracture risk sufficiently. Using a published Markov model, this study analyses the economic impact of non-persistence with bisphosphonates in the context of the introduction of generics in France.

METHODS

Direct costs of vertebral, hip and wrist fracture were assessed and included in an existing 10-year Markov model developed to analyse consequences of non-persistence. Three alternatives of comparison were set: no treatment, real-world persistence, and ideal persistence. Simulated patients' characteristics matched those from a French observational study and the real-world adherence alternative employed persistence data from published database analysis. The risk of fracture of menopausal women and the risk reduction associated with the drugs were based on results reported in clinical trials. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated first between real-world adherence and no treatment alternatives, and second between ideal and real-world persistence alternatives. The cost of non-persistence was defined as the difference between total cost of ideal and real-world persistence alternatives.

RESULTS

Within fractured women population, mean costs of 10-year management of fracture were significantly different between the three alternatives with €7,239 (± €4,783), €6,711 (± €4,410) and €6,134 (± €3,945) in the no-treatment, the real-world and ideal persistence alternatives, respectively (p < 0.0001). Cost-effectiveness ratio for real-world treatment persistence compared with no-treatment alternative was found dominant and as well, alternative of ideal persistence dominated the former. Each ten percentage point of persistence gain amounted to €58 per patient, and extrapolation resulted in a global annual cost of non-persistence of over €30 million to the French health care system, with a substantial transfer from hospital to pharmacy budgets.

CONCLUSION

Within term, improving persistence with oral bisphosphonates should be economically dominant on levels currently known in real-world. Given this potential savings, ambitious adherence-enhancing interventions should be considered in osteoporotic patients.

Lapatinib in breast cancer - the predictive significance of HER1 (EGFR), HER2, PTEN and PIK3CA genes and lapatinib plasma level assessment

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer treatment trends are currently based on tailored therapies using tumor and patient biomarkers. Lapatinib is the first dual inhibitor of HER1 (EGFR, ErbB1) and HER2 (ErbB2, Neu) tyrosine kinases to be used in clinical practice. However, only HER2 is currently used for therapy indications and new predictors for the treatment with lapatinib are sought.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This minireview focuses on lapatinib and its role in breast cancer treatment. Preclinical and clinical studies as well as pharmacological characteristics are briefly reviewed while the focus is on efficacy assessment including predictive factors for therapy outcome.

CONCLUSION

Lapatinib (Tykerb/Tyverb) was Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved in 2007 for use in combination with capecitabine for the treatment of HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer in patients who had received previous treatment (including anthracycline, taxane and trastuzumab containing regimens) and in 2010 for use in combination with letrozole for postmenopausal women with hormonal receptor positive and HER2- positive metastatic breast cancer. In contrast to trastuzumab (Herceptin), lapatinib is orally administered and it targets both HER2 and HER1 receptors. As a synthetic and oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), it is convenient, cheaper and easier to produce than monoclonal antibodies. The recommended dosage is not dependent on body weight either. Lapatinib plasma level measurement could be an approach to tailored therapy for further optimizing the dose and prolonging this efficient therapy. New lapatinib response predictors are being evaluated. At this time, only HER2 amplification/overexpression is used to choose lapatinib therapy candidates. Further studies on concurrent HER1 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)/immunohistochemistry (IHC) assessment and/or microarray analyses may produce new data on the predictive role of the HER1 (EGFR) gene/protein. PTEN loss and PIK3CA gene mutations are other markers that may predict lapatinib poor response.

A phase I trial of oral metronomic vinorelbine plus capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of oral metronomic vinorelbine with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Escalated doses of oral metronomic vinorelbine (starting dose 30 mg) every other day continuously and capecitabine (starting dose 800 mg/m(2) bid) on days 1-14 every 21 days were administered. DLTs were evaluated during the first cycle.

RESULTS

Thirty-six women were enrolled at eight escalating dose levels. For twenty-four patients, treatment was first line, for eight second line, and for four third line. The DLT level was reached at oral metronomic vinorelbine 70 mg and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2), and the recommended MTD doses are vinorelbine 60 mg and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2). DLTs were febrile neutropenia grade 3 and 4, diarrhea grade 4, and treatment delays due to unresolved neutropenia. There was no treatment-related death. The main toxicities were grade 2-3 neutropenia in 16.6% of patients each, grade 2-3 anemia 16.5%, grade 2-4 fatigue 27.5%, grade 2-3 nausea/vomiting 11%, and grade 3-4 diarrhea 8.2%. Two complete and 10 partial responses were documented.

CONCLUSION

Oral metronomic vinorelbine with capecitabine is a well-tolerated and feasible regimen that merits further evaluation in MBC.

Maintenance therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: evolution, tolerability and outcomes

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer death in the industrialized world. Despite significant progress in early stage disease, survival rates for advanced disease remain low. Maintenance therapy is a treatment strategy that has been investigated extensively in NSCLC and has been the subject of considerable recent debate. Options for maintenance include continuing the initial combination chemotherapy regimen, continuing only single agent chemotherapy ('continuation maintenance') or introducing a new agent ('switch' maintenance therapy). Therapies that have been studied in this setting in randomized trials to date include chemotherapy, molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapy approaches. Following the development of multiple new agents that show activity in NSCLC, and have a tolerable side-effect profile, there has been increasing interest in utilizing them to maintain response to initial therapy after treatment with platinum-based doublets. Despite considerable controversy, it has become an acceptable treatment paradigm. Here, we briefly outline the evolution of this treatment paradigm and examine which subgroups of patients are most likely to benefit.

Acceptance of oral chemotherapy in breast cancer patients - a survey study

Background

Oral (p.o.) chemotherapy treatments gained increasing importance in the palliative treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Aim of this survey was to evaluate the acceptance of p.o. treatment and patients' individual attitudes towards it.

Methods

A specific 14 item-questionnaire was designed. Patients suffering from breast cancer receiving a newly launched p.o. or i.v. chemotherapy treatment were prospectively evaluated during 4 months of time. 224 questionnaires using descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Spearman correlation were evaluated.

Results

Patients' median age was 54 years, 164 received i.v., 60 p.o therapy. 89% with p.o. and 67% with i.v. regimens would choose p.o. over i.v. therapy, if equal efficacy is guaranteed. Significant differences were especially found in terms of personal benefit (55% i.v., 92% p.o.), reduced feeling of being ill due to p.o. treatment (26% i.v., 65% p.o.), better coping with disease due to p.o. therapy (36% i.v., 68% p.o.). Side effects were significantly less often reported under p.o. treatment (19% p.o. vs. 53% i.v.)

Conclusion

P.o. chemotherapy shows a high acceptance in MBC patients under palliative therapy. Compliance can be achieved in particular through a differentiated indication, patient education and competent support along a p.o. treatment.

Shared decision-making in palliative care: a systematic mixed studies review using narrative synthesis

The aim of this study is to synthesize knowledge about the process of shared decision-making (SDM) in palliative care. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Web of Science were searched with core concepts: shared decisions, patient participation in decision-making, and palliative care. Titles and abstracts were screened according to inclusion criteria (original research, adult patients, Western contexts, decision-making, palliative treatment or setting), yielding 37 articles for analysis. A narrative synthesis was created using the methods of thematic analysis, conceptual mapping, and critical reflection on the synthesis process. Results demonstrate that while a majority of patients want to participate in treatment decisions to some extent, most do not achieve their preferred levels of involvement because decisions are delayed and alternative treatment options are seldom discussed. The literature regarding the process of SDM itself remains scarce in palliative care. Further research is needed in order to better understand the longitudinal, interactive, and interdisciplinary process of decision-making in palliative care.

Capecitabine in the management of colorectal cancer

5-Fluorouracil has been a mainstay in the treatment of colorectal cancer for nearly five decades; however, the use of oral formulations of the medication has been gaining increasing traction since capecitabine was approved for use in adjuvant settings by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2005. The use of capecitabine has since spread to a number of off-label indications, including the treatment of advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer and the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer. In light of increasing utilization, it is critical that clinicians have a firm understanding of the literature supporting capecitabine across various settings as well as the attributes of the drug, such as its dosing recommendations, side-effect profile, and use in the elderly. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the literature in a fashion that can be used to help guide decisions. In a setting of increasing focus on cost, the pharmacoeconomic literature is also briefly reviewed.

Randomized phase 3 trial comparing preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Although many trials have shown the efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or postoperative CRT compared with surgery alone, the optimal sequence of radiotherapy and surgery is unclear. The authors reported the final results of this single institution prospective randomized phase 3 trial comparing preoperative CRT with postoperative CRT using capecitabine in survival, local control, sphincter preservation, and toxicity for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3, potentially resectable cT4 or N+) were randomly assigned to receive preoperative or postoperative CRT. CRT consisted of 50 Gy/25 fractions and concurrent capecitabine (1,650 mg/m(2)/day). Total mesorectal excision was performed.

RESULTS

From March 2004 to April 2006, 240 patients were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were well balanced between both arms, except for more low-lying (<5 cm from anal verge) tumors in the preoperative CRT arm (60% vs 46%, P = .041). After a median follow-up time of 52 months, the 3- and 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cumulative incidence of local recurrence were similar between both arms. However, for the patients with low-lying tumors, the preoperative CRT arm had a higher rate of sphincter preservation (68% vs 42%, P = .008). Acute and late complication rates were similar between both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Although significant benefit of preoperative CRT in local control and survival was not demonstrated, the data showed that increased rate of sphincter preservation was possible in low-lying tumors without jeopardizing local control and surgical complication by preoperative CRT.

Development and characterization of a novel lipid nanocapsule formulation of Sn38 for oral administration

The purpose of this work was to encapsulate 7-Ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (Sn38) in lipid nanocapsules (LNCs) using phase inversion-based method in order to deliver Sn38 by oral route. LNCs were prepared by a low-energy emulsification method and were characterized for size, polydispersity index (PDI), surface charge, drug payload, in vitro drug release, and storage stability. Moreover, in view of an oral administration, in vitro stability in gastrointestinal fluid and permeability across Caco-2 cells were tested. Sn38-loaded LNCs with a mean particle size of 38±2 nm were obtained. The particles displayed a narrow size distribution and a drug payload of 0.40±0.07 mg/g of LNC dispersion. In vitro stability in simulated gastric and intestinal media was also observed. Finally, Sn38-loaded LNCs improved permeability of Sn38 across Caco-2 cells (5.69±0.87×10(6) cm s(-1) at 6h vs 0.31±0.02×10(6) cm s(-1)) and intracellular concentration compared with free Sn38. In conclusion, Sn38 nanocarriers have been developed and display a strong potential for oral administration.

Safe handling of oral chemotherapeutic agents in clinical practice: recommendations from an international pharmacy panel

Although there has been a significant increase in the availability and use of oral chemotherapeutic agents, the guidelines around their safe handling are still evolving. Although oral chemotherapy is associated with ease of administration, it has the same exposure risks to health care practitioners, patients, and their caregivers as intravenous formulations, and because it is administered in the home, to the families of patients. However, the general misconception appears to be that exposure risk is low and therefore oral chemotherapeutic agents present little risk and are safer to handle. In a series of three roundtable meetings, a team of international pharmacists from North America and Europe reviewed existing guidelines and identified gaps in recommendations that we believe are important for safe handling. The present article is a compilation of these gaps, especially applicable to manufacturers and distributors, storage and handling, and patient education regarding safe handling. These recommendations, on the basis of our experience and of best practices, provide an international perspective and can be adapted by institutions and practices for development of standardized procedures specific to their needs for the safe handling of oral chemotherapeutic agents.

Anticancer oral therapy: emerging related issues

The use of oral anticancer drugs has shown a steady increase. Most patients prefer anticancer oral therapy to intravenous treatment primarily for the convenience of a home-based therapy, although they require that the efficacy of oral therapy must be equivalent and toxicity not superior than those expected with the intravenous treatment. A better patient compliance, drug tolerability, convenience and possible better efficacy for oral therapy as compared to intravenous emerge as the major reasons to use oral anticancer agents among oncologists. Inter- and intra-individual pharmacokinetic variations in the bioavailability of oral anticancer drugs may be more relevant than for intravenous agents. Compliance is particularly important for oral therapy because it determines the dose-intensity of the treatment and ultimately treatment efficacy and toxicity. Patient stands as the most important determinant of compliance. Possible measures for an active and safe administration of oral therapy include a careful preliminary medical evaluation and selection of patients based on possible barriers to an adequate compliance, pharmacologic issues, patient-focused education, an improvement of the accessibility to healthcare service, as well as the development of home-care nursing symptom-focused interventions. Current evidences show similar quality of life profile between oral and intravenous treatments, although anticancer oral therapy seems to be more convenient in terms of administration and reduced time lost for work or other activities. Regarding cost-effectiveness, current evidences are in favor of oral therapy, mainly due to reduced need of visits and/or day in hospital for the administration of the drug and/or the management of adverse events.

A phase I study of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, & capecitabine (DOC) as first-line therapy of patients with locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach and GE junction

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase I trial of chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients had chemotherapy doses increased until dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were accrued. No DLT was observed in first three patients at level 1. DLT was observed in two out of five patients at level 2. Six additional patients were treated at level 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommended doses for future trials are: docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 675 mg/m(2) PO, bid, on days 1-14 on a three weekly basis.

Oral cancer chemotherapy: the critical interplay between patient education and patient safety

Currently, 10% of cancer chemotherapy is prescribed to patients by means of an oral formulation, but, by 2013, this percentage is predicted to increase to 25%. Oral chemotherapy offers many advantages, including no need for sometimes painful intravenous access, no intravenous drug administration fees, more time at home for patients, and a greater sense of patient autonomy. However, oral cancer chemotherapy also poses challenges, many of which revolve around adherence and safety. These challenges are discussed here. There are few other circumstances in which patient education and the maintenance of institutional safety infrastructure play such an integral role in sustaining favorable cancer clinical outcomes.

A prospective multicenter phase II study of oral and i.v. vinorelbine plus trastuzumab as first-line therapy in HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral and i.v. vinorelbine plus trastuzumab as first-line regimen in a patient-convenient application for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two women were enrolled in a multicenter study. The patients received i.v. vinorelbine at a dose of 25 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by oral vinorelbine at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) on days 8 and 15 in a 3-week cycle. Standard dose trastuzumab was given at 3-week intervals.

RESULTS

Complete response was observed in 7 patients (18.9%) and partial response in 19 patients (51.4%), for an overall response rate of 70.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53.0-84.1]. The disease control rate reached 91.9% (95% CI 78.1-98.3). The median time to progression was 9.3 months, while median overall survival reached 35.6 months. Hematological and non-hematological toxic effects were acceptable with grade 3-4 leukopenia of 14% and neutropenia of 38%; cardiac toxicity did not reach the level of clinical relevance.

CONCLUSION

The combination of i.v. and oral vinorelbine plus trastuzumab demonstrates high activity and good tolerability in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. In addition, it offers convenience for the patients with only one i.v. treatment every 3 weeks.

Systematic Review of topotecan (Hycamtin) in relapsed small cell lung cancer

Background

To undertake a systematic review of the available data for oral and intravenous topotecan in adults with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) for whom re-treatment with the first line regimen is not considered appropriate.

Methods

We searched six databases from 1980 up to March 2009 for relevant trials regardless of language or publication status. Relevant studies included any randomised trial of any chemotherapeutic treatment against any comparator in this licensed indication. Where possible we used apposite quantitative methods. Where meta-analysis was considered unsuitable for some or all of the data, we employed a narrative synthesis method. For indirect comparisons we used the method of Bucher et al., where available data allowed it, otherwise we used narrative descriptions.

Results

Seven unique studies met the inclusion criteria, four of which could be used in our analyses. These included one study comparing oral topotecan plus best supportive care (BSC) to BSC alone, one study comparing intravenous topotecan to cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and vincristine (CAV), and two studies comparing oral topotecan with intravenous topotecan. All four studies appear to be well conducted and with low risk of bias.

Oral topotecan plus BSC has advantages over BSC alone in terms of survival (hazard ratio = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87) and quality of life (EQ-5 D difference: 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.25). Intravenous topotecan was at least as effective as CAV in the treatment of patients with recurrent small-cell lung cancer and resulted in improved quality-of-life with respect to several symptoms.

CAV was associated with significantly less grade 4 thrombocytopenia compared with IV topotecan (risk ratio = 5.83; 95% CI, 2.35 to 14.42). Survival (hazard ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.25) and response (pooled risk ratio = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.85) data were similar for the oral and IV topotecan groups. Symptom control was also very similar between the trials and between the oral and IV groups. Toxicity data showed a significant difference in favour of oral topotecan for neutropenia (pooled risk ratio = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.89).

Indirect evidence showed that oral topotecan was at least as good as or better than CAV on all outcomes (survival, response rates, toxicities, and symptoms) that allowed indirect comparisons, with the only exception being grade four thrombocytopenia which occurred less often on CAV treatment.

Conclusions

Concerning topotecan both the oral and intravenous options have similar efficacy, and patient preference may be a decisive factor if the choice would be between the two formulations. The best trial evidence for decision making, because it was tested versus best supportive care, exists for oral topotecan. Indirectly, because we have two head-to-head comparisons of oral versus intravenous topotecan, and one comparison of intravenous topotecan versus CAV in similar patients as in the trial against best supportive care, one might infer that IV topotecan and CAV could also be superior to best supportive care, and that oral topotecan has similar effects to CAV with possibly better symptom control. From the evidence discussed above, it is evident that oral topotecan has similar efficacy to IV topotecan (direct comparison) and CAV (indirect comparison). There is no further evidence base of direct or possible indirect comparisons for other comparators than CAV of either oral or IV topotecan.

Cost analysis of capecitabine vs 5-fluorouracil-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer patients

The aim was to evaluate the cost of capecitabine vs conventional combination chemotherapics such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Italy. The study was a multicenter, retrospective longitudinal treatment-cost analysis. Patients older than 18 years, diagnosis of mCRC and at least 3 completed cycles of chemotherapy with oral capecitabine or 5-FU also in association with other chemotherapic agents were enrolled. Direct healthcare resources attributable to mCRC treatment were quantified using 2007 prices and tariffs. The analysis was conducted from the National Health Service perspective with a 6-month time horizon. A total of 231 patients affected by mCRC (55% males; mean age 63.7+/-10.31 yrs) were studied. Total direct costs per patient per month in capecitabine and 5-FU groups were euro1,001.66 +/- euro434.93 and euro3,172.81 +/- euro1,232.37 respectively (p<0.0001). Oral capecitabine therapy cost the health service less than intravenous therapies.

Adherence to disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement from the Middle East MS Advisory Group

Adherence to therapy is a key issue in chronic illnesses. In addition, several features of multiple sclerosis (MS) and its treatment may increase the likelihood of patient nonadherence and discontinuation of treatment. Nonadherence will obviously compromise the efficacy of disease-modifying drugs in patients with MS. This subject was discussed by a group of local MS specialists from the Middle East. The group debated several key questions about the features and causes of patient nonadherence and its management. Further, they made recommendations for optimizing treatment adherence in this area.

A phase I study of capecitabine, irinotecan, celecoxib, and radiation as neoadjuvant therapy of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a prospective phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine and irinotecan when used in combination with celecoxib and radiation as preoperative therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with histologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of distal rectum, evidence of T3/T4 tumor or nodal involvement by endorectal ultrasound/magnetic resonance imaging, any T status where tumor was close to but not involving the sphincter requiring abdominoperineal resection were evaluated by standard phase I methodology. Starting chemotherapy dosage (dose level: 0) was capecitabine 550 mg/m bid, day 1 to 5 every week through out x-ray therapy, irinotecan 30 mg/ m IV on days 1, 8, 22, 29 (no treatment on day 15 and day 36), and celecoxib 400 mg PO bid from day 1 till the last day of radiation. Radiation dosage of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was delivered in 5.6 weeks. If no dose limiting toxicity was observed, dose of capecitabine was escalated by 75 mg/m and irinotecan by 5 mg/m. Celecoxib dosage was fixed.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were accrued. Dose limiting toxicity was observed at level 2 and was primarily hematological and gastrointestinal. Two patients at level 2 developed grade-3 diarrhea and thrombocytopenia and 1 patient at level 2 developed grade 3/4 vomiting, diarrhea and dehydration.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommended dosage for future trials is capecitabine 625 mg/m bid, irinotecan 35 mg/m, and celecoxib 400 mg orally bid in combination with pelvic radiation.

Therapy of small cell lung cancer with emphasis on oral topotecan

Systemic chemotherapy plays the major role in the management of patients with small cell lung cancer. Cisplatin plus etoposide is the most widely used regimen and is considered as standard in patients with limited disease. Cisplatin plus irinotecan improved survival compared to cisplatin plus etoposide in a Japanese trial but failed to do so in two trials in Caucasians. Cisplatin plus topotecan had similar efficacy compared to cisplatin plus etoposide in patients with extensive disease. In the second-line setting, topotecan showed similar efficacy but better tolerability compared to cyclophosphamide, doxorubin plus vincristine. Oral topotecan was as efficacious as its intravenous formulation and was shown to improve survival compared to best supportive care alone in patients previously treated with chemotherapy. Thus topotecan is considered as the standard second-line chemotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer.