RAD51 interacts with the evolutionarily conserved BRC motifs in the human breast cancer susceptibility gene brca2

Isolation and initial characterization of the BRCA2 promoter

The hereditary breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, is considered to be a tumor suppressor gene that may be involved in the cellular response to DNA damage. The transcript for this gene is cell cycle regulated with mRNA levels reaching a peak just before the onset of DNA synthesis. In order to define the mechanisms by which BRCA2 is transcriptionally regulated, we have begun to study upstream regulatory sequences. In this report, we define a minimal promoter region that has strong activity in human breast epithelial cells. Deletions of this sequence narrowed the strong basal activity to a region extending from -66 to +129 with respect to the BRCA2 transcriptional start site. This sequence demonstrated cell cycle regulated activity with kinetics similar to the endogenous transcript. Examination of the sequence revealed several consensus binding sites for transcription factors including an E-box, E2F and Ets recognition motifs. Electrohoretic mobility shift assays revealed specific protein binding to two sequences upstream of the start site; the palindromic E-box and an Ets/E2F site. Site-directed mutagenesis of either of these sites reduced both the basal activity in log phase cells and the cell cycle regulated activity of the promoter. Mutational inactivation of both sites within the same construct effectively eliminated promoter activity. Antibodies to candidate transcription factors used in super shift experiments revealed specific interactions between the BRCA2 promoter and the basic region/helix - loop - helix containing USF-1 and 2 proteins and Elf-1, an Ets domain protein. Binding of these factors depended upon the presence of intact recognition sequences. The USF factors were shown to bind predominantly as a heterodimeric complex of USF-1 and 2 while Elf-1 bound the promoter when it was not occupied by USF. Co-transfection studies with USF proteins and the varicella zoster IE62 protein provide evidence for the involvement of endogenous and exogenous USF in the activation of the BRCA2 promoter. We propose that interactions between USF-1, USF-2 and Elf-1 play an important role in the transcriptional regulation of the BRCA2 gene.

The contribution of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations to familial ovarian cancer: no evidence for other ovarian cancer-susceptibility genes

To establish the contribution of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations to familial ovarian cancer, we have analyzed both genes in DNA samples obtained from an affected individual in each of 112 families containing at least two cases of epithelial ovarian cancer. Germline mutations were found in 43% of the families; BRCA1 mutations were approximately four times more common than BRCA2 mutations. The extent of family history of ovarian and breast cancers was strongly predictive of BRCA1-mutation status. Segregation analysis suggests that a combination of chance clustering of sporadic cases and insensitivity of mutation detection may account for the remaining families; however, the contribution of other genes cannot be excluded. We discuss the implications for genetic testing and clinical management of familial ovarian cancer arising from the data presented in these studies.

Brca1 controls homology-directed DNA repair

Germline mutations in BRCA1 confer a high risk of breast and ovarian tumors. The role of BRCA1 in tumor suppression is not yet understood, but both transcription and repair functions have been ascribed. Evidence that BRCA1 is involved in DNA repair stems from its association with RAD51, a homolog of the yeast protein involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination. We report here that Brca1-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells have impaired repair of chromosomal DSBs by homologous recombination. The relative frequencies of homologous and nonhomologous DNA integration and DSB repair were also altered. The results demonstrate a caretaker role for BRCA1 in preserving genomic integrity by promoting homologous recombination and limiting mutagenic nonhomologous repair processes.

Is TP53 dysfunction required for BRCA1-associated carcinogenesis?

The identification of the breast/ovarian susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2 was an important advancement in the field of breast and ovarian cancer research. About 40-50% of site specific hereditary breast cancers and up to 80% of hereditary breast-ovarian cancers result from mutations in the BRCA1 gene. Although BRCA1 mediates multiple functions in the cell, including a role in DNA damage repair and gene transcription, the role of BRCA1 has not completely been elucidated yet. It has been suggested that mutational inactivation of TP53 may be required for BRCA1-associated tumorigenesis. Several studies have shown that TP53 is more frequently inactivated in BRCA1-associated tumors than in sporadic breast or ovarian cancer. Up to 90% of BRCA1-associated tumors harbor either a TP53 mutation and/or TP53 protein accumulation. The remaining tumors may well have other alterations affecting the cell cycle checkpoint. Loss of this checkpoint may be obligatory for BRCA1-tumorigenesis. In this review, we discuss recent advances in BRCA1-research and stress the pivotal role TP53 may play in BRCA1-associated carcinogenesis.

The N-terminal domain of the human Rad51 protein binds DNA: structure and a DNA binding surface as revealed by NMR

Human Rad51 protein (HsRad51) is a homolog of Escherichia coli RecA protein, and functions in DNA repair and recombination. In higher eukaryotes, Rad51 protein is essential for cell viability. The N-terminal region of HsRad51 is highly conserved among eukaryotic Rad51 proteins but is absent from RecA, suggesting a Rad51-specific function for this region. Here, we have determined the structure of the N-terminal part of HsRad51 by NMR spectroscopy. The N-terminal region forms a compact domain consisting of five short helices, which shares structural similarity with a domain of endonuclease III, a DNA repair enzyme of E. coli. NMR experiments did not support the involvement of the N-terminal domain in HsRad51-HsBrca2 interaction or the self-association of HsRad51 as proposed by previous studies. However, NMR tiration experiments demonstrated a physical interaction of the domain with DNA, and allowed mapping of the DNA binding surface. Mutation analysis showed that the DNA binding surface is essential for double-stranded and single-stranded DNA binding of HsRad51. Our results suggest the presence of a DNA binding site on the outside surface of the HsRad51 filament and provide a possible explanation for the regulation of DNA binding by phosphorylation within the N-terminal domain.

Interaction between the product of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 and DSS1, a protein functionally conserved from yeast to mammals

Germ line mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 predispose to early-onset breast cancer, but the function of the nuclear protein encoded by the gene is ill defined. Using the yeast two-hybrid system with fragments of human BRCA2, we identified an interaction with the human DSS1 (deleted in split hand/split foot) gene. Yeast and mammalian two-hybrid assays showed that DSS1 can associate with BRCA2 in the region of amino acids 2472 to 2957 in the C terminus of the protein. Using coimmunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged BRCA2 and DSS1 cDNA constructs transiently expressed in COS cells, we were able to demonstrate an association. Furthermore, endogenous BRCA2 could be coimmunoprecipitated with endogenous DSS1 in MCF7 cells, demonstrating an in vivo association. Apparent orthologues of the mammalian DSS1 gene were identified in the genome of the yeasts Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast strains in which these DSS1-like genes were deleted showed a temperature-sensitive growth phenotype, which was analyzed by flow cytometry. This provides evidence for a link between the BRCA2 tumor suppressor gene and a gene required for completion of the cell cycle.

Mitotic checkpoint inactivation fosters transformation in cells lacking the breast cancer susceptibility gene, Brca2

The murine Brca2 gene encodes a nuclear protein implicated in DNA repair. Brca2 behaves as a tumor suppressor, but paradoxically, its truncation causes proliferative arrest and spontaneous chromosomal damage. Here, we report that inactivation of cell cycle checkpoints responsive to mitotic spindle disruption, by mutant forms of p53 or Bub1, relieves growth arrest and initiates neoplastic transformation in primary cells homozygous for truncated Brca2. Tumors from Brca2-deficient animals exhibit dysfunction of the spindle assembly checkpoint, accompanied by mutations in p53, Bub1, and Mad3L. The chromosomal aberrations precipitated by Brca2 truncation can be suppressed by mutant forms of Bub1 and p53. Thus, inactivating mutations in mitotic checkpoint genes likely cooperate with BRCA2 deficiency in the pathogenesis of inherited breast cancer, with important implications for treatment.

Coordinate alterations in the expression of BRCA1, BRCA2, p300, and Rad51 in response to genotoxic and other stresses in human prostate cancer cells

BACKGROUND

BRCA1 and BRCA2 participate in cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and DNA repair pathways. The latter role may be mediated by interaction with DNA recombinase Rad51. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of genotoxic and other cytotoxic agents on expression of DNA damage-response genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, p300, and Rad51) in human prostate cancer cells.

METHODS

Subconfluent proliferating cultures of Tsu-Prl or DU-145 cells were treated with various stressful agents and assayed 24 hr later for alterations in: 1) mRNA expression (by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR); 2) cell viability (by trypan blue dye exclusion); and 3) protein expression (by Western blotting).

RESULTS

Of 26 agents screened, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA reductions were observed in both cell lines after exposure to adriamycin (ADR), camptothecin (CPT), sodium selenite (SLN), and ultraviolet radiation (UV), while nitrogen mustard (HN2) caused mRNA reduction in DU-145 but not in Tsu-Prl. Inhibition of BRCA1/2 expression by ADR and HN2 was blocked by cycloheximide, suggesting that this requires new protein synthesis, while inhibition by CPT, SLN, and UV did not require protein synthesis. Reduction of p300 and Rad51 mRNA levels occurred in parallel with that of BRCA1/2, suggesting coordinate regulation of these genes. The ability of an agent to inhibit mRNA expression was not directly correlated with cytotoxicity. ADR, CPT, UV, and SLN also caused reduction of protein levels; but the kinetics of decreases in protein vs. mRNA differed. After ADR treatment, high molecular weight (Mr hyperphosphorylated) BRCA1 decreased more rapidly than the low Mr species. BRCA2 showed a more rapid decrease in protein than mRNA, while Rad51 showed the opposite. By 48 and 72 hr post-ADR, all four mRNAs and proteins were reduced to well below control levels, except for Rad51 protein, which was only moderately decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Selected DNA-damaging agents (ADR, CPT, and UV) and a reducing agent (SLN) inhibited BRCA1/2, p300, and Rad51 expression in prostate cancer cells, although decreases in mRNA vs. protein did not coincide. We postulate that temporal changes in relative protein levels affect different phases of the stress response, and that the ultimate downregulation of all four genes promotes prostate cancer survival.

A somatic BRCA2 mutation in RER+ endometrial carcinomas that specifically deletes the amino-terminal transactivation domain

Mismatch repair deficiency and replication errors (RERs) occur in approximately 20% of sporadic endometrial carcinomas. Frameshift mutations in several cancer predisposing genes, especially in their mononucleotide repeats, are seen in RER+ tumors. In a survey of hereditary breast cancer genes in gynecological cancer, we analyzed the entire coding sequence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in 51 endometrial tumors, of which 12 were RER+. Seven somatic mutations were identified in six (50%) of the RER+ tumors, but none in RER- tumors. A novel base pair deletion at a (T)10 tract in BRCA2 intron 2, causing an in-frame splice deletion of exon 3, was observed in four tumors, one of which contained a second, truncating BRCA2 mutation. Two tumors exhibited frameshift mutations at polyA tracts in BRCA1 and BRCA2 exon 11, both predicted to result in premature translation termination. Whereas most mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are known to affect the more carboxy-terminal regions interacting with RAD51, and the transactivating BRCT domains of BRCA1, this is the first demonstration of a recurrent BRCA2 mutation that specifically deletes the amino-terminal transactivation domain. Moreover, our results suggest that somatic mutations in BRCA2(and to some extent BRCA1) may confer a growth advantage in RER+ endometrial carcinomas.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer

Breast cancer, one of the most common serious malignancies affecting women, occurs in hereditary and sporadic forms. Hereditary breast cancer accounts for 5-10% of all cases and has some distinctive clinical features compared with sporadic breast cancer. The recently identified genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 appear to account for the majority of hereditary breast cancer in US and European populations. Both of these genes have already been localized and isolated; however, the exact functions of their proteins are not clear yet. The detection of LOH in the 17q21 and 13q12-q13 regions, where the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are located, indicates that BRCA1 and BRCA2 act as tumor suppressor genes. The list of identified germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 is still growing, and mutation carriers have a substantial lifetime risk of both breast and ovarian cancer. However, it is still undetermined whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 play similar important roles in sporadic breast cancer. This paper reviews the current advances in BRCA1/BRCA2 research: the structure of their genes and proteins, their mutation frequencies, their possible roles in both hereditary and sporadic breast cancers, and their functions in transcriptional regulation and DNA repair.

The genetics of breast cancer susceptibility

Following the genomic localization and subsequent identification of the breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, the basic patterns of cancer risk associated with mutations in these genes have been defined. In addition, preliminary insights into the prevalence of mutations and their contributions to cancer incidence have been acquired. Features of breast and other cancers that develop in these genetic syndromes have now been investigated and shown to differ from sporadic versions of the same neoplasms. However, several areas are complex and require further clarification. There remain discrepancies between published cancer risk estimates. Furthermore, there may be variation in cancer risk between different mutations in the same gene and there is preliminary evidence that genetic and nongenetic influences may modify risks. Finally, it is probable that the genes underlying a substantial component of susceptibility to breast cancer remain to be identified.

The contribution of homologous recombination in preserving genome integrity in mammalian cells

Although it is clear that mammalian somatic cells possess the enzymatic machinery to perform homologous recombination of DNA molecules, the importance of this process in mitigating DNA damage has been uncertain. An initial genetic framework for studying homologous recombinational repair (HRR) has come from identifying relevant genes by homology or by their ability to correct mutants whose phenotypes are suggestive of recombinational defects. While yeast has been an invaluable guide, higher eukaryotes diverge in the details and complexity of HRR. For eliminating DSBs, HRR and end-joining pathways share the burden, with HRR contributing critically during S and G2 phases. It is likely that the removal of interstrand cross-links is absolutely dependent on efficient HRR, as suggested by the extraordinary sensitivity of the ercc1, xpf/ercc4, xrcc2, and xrcc3 mutants to cross-linking chemicals. Similarly, chromosome stability in untreated cells requires intact HRR, which may eliminate DSBs arising during DNA replication and thereby prevent chromosome aberrations. Complex regulation of HRR by cell cycle checkpoint and surveillance functions is suggested not only by direct interactions between human Rad51 and p53, c-Abl, and BRCA2, but also by very high recombination rates in p53-deficient cells.

The pathology of familial breast cancer: How do the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 relate to breast tumour pathology?

Women with mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, have an increased risk of developing breast cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are thought to be tumour suppressor genes since the wild type alleles of these genes are lost in tumours from heterozygous carriers. Several functions have been proposed for the proteins encoded by these genes which could explain their roles in tumour suppression. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been suggested to have a role in transcriptional regulation and several potential BRCA1 target genes have been identified. The nature of these genes suggests that loss of BRCA1 could lead to inappropriate proliferation, consistent with the high mitotic grade of BRCA1-associated tumours. BRCA1 and BRCA2 have also been implicated in DNA repair and regulation of centrosome number. Loss of either of these functions would be expected to lead to chromosomal instability, which is observed in BRCA1 and BRCA2-associated tumours. Taken together, these studies give an insight into the pathogenesis of BRCA-associated tumours and will inform future therapeutic strategies.

Inherited breast cancer: an emerging picture

A role for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the control of genome integrity easily fits a tumor suppressor model. It is well established that mutations in DNA repair genes lead to genomic instability (138). Genomic instability may directly lead to tumorigenesis by allowing for the accumulation of mutations in key cell cycle regulators (139). The studies summarized here suggest that BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51. and BARD1 function as a biochemical complex. This complex apparently plays a role in one or more of the DNA damage response pathways. Experimental data suggest that BRCA1 and BRCA2 function as regulators of transcription. These observations highlight some of the fundamental questions that remain to be addressed in the study of the biology of these genes. Are the DNA repair and transcriptional regulatory functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 related? BRCA1 and BRCA2 may maintain the integrity of the genome by regulating expression of genes directly involved in this process. Alternatively, if the functions are not related, which is required for suppression of tumorigenesis? Researchers also are grappling with another paradox. If BRCA1 and BRCA2 are ubiquitously expressed, why do mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 lead specifically to tumors primarily of the breast and ovary, as well as a limited number of other tissues to a lesser degree? Nothing to date has been revealed that would explain how alteration of the transcriptional regulatory function and or the DNA repair function ascribed to BRCA1 and BRCA2 would result in tumor specificity as both of these functions are essential to a broad spectrum of tissues. It is possible that BRCAI and BRCA2 may regulate genes expressed only in the breast and ovary. Similarly, there may be unidentified BRCA1 and BRCA2 co-factors that are active only in the breast and ovary and, therefore, are critical to tumorigenesis. All breast cancer is genetic, although only a small fraction of cases are attributable to inherited genetic predisposition. Most breast cancer is due to genetic alterations that are specific to breast epithelial cells, many of which remain unknown. Integration of genetic approaches into research designed to elucidate biological pathways of breast cancer tumorigenesis will ultimately lead to new information critical to the development of new tools for the diagnosis and treatment of disease.

The BRCA2 gene product functionally interacts with p53 and RAD51

Germ-line mutations in the human BRCA2 gene confer susceptibility to breast cancer. Efforts to elucidate its function have revealed a putative transcriptional activation domain and in vitro interaction with the DNA repair protein RAD51. Other studies have indicated that RAD51 physically associates with the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Here we show that the BRCA2 gene product is a 460-kDa nuclear phosphoprotein, which forms in vivo complexes with both p53 and RAD51. Moreover, exogenous BRCA2 expression in cancer cells inhibits p53's transcriptional activity, and RAD51 coexpression enhances BRCA2's inhibitory effects. These findings demonstrate that BRCA2 physically and functionally interacts with two key components of cell cycle control and DNA repair pathways. Thus, BRCA2 likely participates with p53 and RAD51 in maintaining genome integrity.

Functional domains of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins

The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes encode large unrelated proteins that presumably function as tumor suppressors in normal epithelial cells of the breast. However, the primary amino acid sequences of these proteins provide few insights into the mechanisms by which BRCA1 and BRCA2 inhibit tumor development. Nevertheless, recent studies have uncovered many similarities in the biological properties of BRCA1 and BRCA2, raising the prospect that these proteins may function in a common pathway of tumor suppression and that inactivation of either gene may represent an equivalent step in the development of breast cancer. Several lines of evidence now suggest a role for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the cellular response to DNA damage, possibly by virtue of their relationship with proteins required for the recombinational repair of double-strand DNA breaks. Accordingly, the loss of BRCA1 or BRCA2 function might accelerate tumor development by allowing cells to accumulate DNA lesions that are potentially oncogenic.

Functional characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2: clues from their interacting proteins

The familial breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been the subject of extensive functional analysis studies since their cloning. Clues to their biological role in maintaining the genomic integrity were provided by studies that revealed their interaction with the recombination repair protein HsRad51. The first clue of an interaction between HsRad51 and BRCA1 came from the colocalization of the characteristic nuclear foci formed by these two proteins during S phase of the cell cycle. An interaction between murine Brca2 and MmRad51 was detected by the yeast two hybrid system. Utilizing the yeast two hybrid system and other techniques several other Brca1 and Brca2 interacting proteins have been identified like, BARD1, importin-alpha, BIPs, RNA polymerase II holoenzyme, BRAP2 etc. Recently, mutations suggesting a role as a tumor suppressor have been identified in the BARD1 gene in primary human tumors. The identification of molecules that interact with Brca1 and Brca2 has greatly enhanced our knowledge of how BRCA1 and BRCA2 may function as tumor suppressors.

The genetics of inherited breast cancer

The isolation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 has greatly increased our understanding of the genetics of inherited breast and ovarian cancer although the functions of these genes are not yet fully understood. We will discuss the current state of knowledge about the function of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and summarize the cancer risks in women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. We review the evidence for gene-gene and gene-environment interaction in modifying that risk, and discuss the contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and other high penetrance genes to both inherited and sporadic breast cancer.

Chromosomal rearrangements occur in S. cerevisiae rfa1 mutator mutants due to mutagenic lesions processed by double-strand-break repair

Three temperature-sensitive S. cerevisiae RFA1 alleles were found to cause elevated mutation rates. These mutator phenotypes resulted from the accumulation of base substitutions, frameshifts, gross deletions (8 bp-18 kb), and nonreciprocal translocations. A representative rfa1 mutation exhibited a growth defect in conjunction with rad51, rad52, or rad10 mutations, suggesting an accumulation of double-strand breaks. rad10 and rad52 mutations eliminated deletion and translocation formation, whereas a rad51 mutation increased the frequency of these events and revealed a new class of genetic rearrangements--loss of a portion of a chromosome arm combined with telomere addition. The breakpoints of the translocations and deletions were flanked by imperfect direct repeats of 2-20 bp, similar to the breakpoint structures observed at translocations and gross deletions, including LOH events, underlying human cancer and other hereditary diseases.

Breast cancer susceptibility genes. BRCA1 and BRCA2

Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes lead to an increased susceptibility to breast, ovarian, and other cancers. It is estimated that 3%-8% of all women with breast cancer will be found to carry a mutation in 1 of these genes. Families with multiple affected first-degree relatives and patients with early-onset disease have been found to harbor mutations at a higher frequency. The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes code for large proteins that bear no resemblance to other known genes. In the cell, they appear to act as tumor suppressor genes and play a role in the maintenance of genome integrity, although the precise function of these genes has yet to be discovered. A large number of distinct mutations have been found in cancer families around the world. The majority of the defined pathologic mutations result in premature truncation of the protein (frameshift and nonsense mutations). These mutations may substantially increase the risk for breast and ovarian cancer, but a precise risk estimate for each different mutation cannot be determined. Depending on the familial context, the risk of breast cancer associated with carrying a mutation has been estimated to range from 50% to 85%. The role of these genes in sporadic cancer remains unknown. Patients and physicians considering BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing are faced with a difficult decision. The diversity of mutations and lack of general population data prevent accurate risk prediction. This is further complicated by the paucity of data on effective prevention strategies for those identified at higher risk. Thus, the nature of clinical testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 continues to present challenges that reinforce the necessity of personal choice within the context of thorough genetic counseling.

Functions of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes

Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer a high risk of breast cancer development. Both genes encode very large proteins of unknown function but recent results suggest that they may have roles in transcriptional regulation and DNA repair. These advances offer the prospect of understanding not only the normal cellular function of these genes but also how their loss leads to tumour formation.