First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin

Phase II study of capecitabine in combination with paclitaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer

The addition of oral capecitabine to docetaxel improves response rate, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This phase II study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a 21-day cycle of oral capecitabine (1000 mg m⁻² twice daily, days 1–14) plus i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg m⁻², day 1) in anthracycline-pretreated advanced/MBC. In all, 73 patients were enrolled at 13 Swedish and Spanish centres. The objective response rate was 52% (95% confidence interval (CI): 40–63%) in the intent-to-treat population, including complete responses in 11%. Disease was stabilised in a further 29%. The median time to disease progression (TTP) was 8.1 months and the median overall survival was 16.5 months. The combination was generally well tolerated with a predictable safety profile. The most common treatment-related nonhaematological adverse events were hand–foot syndrome (42%), alopecia (30%) and diarrhoea (26%). The only treatment-related Grade 3/4 adverse events occurring in >5% of patients were alopecia (22%) and hand–foot syndrome (11%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and lymphocytopenia were reported in 12 and 14% of patients, respectively. Capecitabine plus paclitaxel is highly active with a favourable safety profile in anthracycline-pretreated MBC.

Phase II study of capecitabine in patients with fluorouracil-resistant metastatic colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine converted to fluourouracil (FU) preferentially in tumor tissue. It has proven clinical activity against colorectal cancer when used as first-line therapy. The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and efficacy of capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma who progressed despite previous FU therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

According to the group sequential analysis design of this study, accrual would stop if no responses were observed in the first 20 patients treated. If one or more objective responses were confirmed, the trial would be expanded. Patients received capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice a day for 14 days, every 3 weeks. Tumor lesions were assessed every 6 weeks, and patients were followed for survival every 3 months after completing treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were enrolled onto the study; 22 fulfilled all the eligibility criteria. No objective responses were observed among the 22 eligible patients; 11 patients (50%) had stable disease for a median duration of 141 days (range, 88-289 days). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time to disease progression was 64 days (95% CI, 41 to 134 days). The median survival time estimate was 389 days (95% CI, 267 to 637 days). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and nausea or vomiting. There were no grade 4 toxicities and no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma refractory to FU showed no objective responses and clinical benefit that was, at best, modest. The use of capecitabine in combination with other treatments in this patient population is under investigation.

XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin): active first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Capecitabine has demonstrated high efficacy as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Oxaliplatin shows synergy with fluorouracil (FU), with little toxicity overlap. The XELOX regimen (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin), established in a previous dose-finding study, should improve on infused oxaliplatin with FU and leucovorin (FOLFOX) regimens. The present studies further characterize efficacy and safety of the XELOX regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The antitumor activity of XELOX was investigated in a colon cancer xenograft model. Patients with MCRC received first-line XELOX in 3-week treatment cycles: intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) (day 1) followed by oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily (day 1, evening, to day 15, morning).

RESULTS

A preclinical study confirmed that capecitabine has supra-additive activity with oxaliplatin. In the clinical study, 53 of 96 patients (55%) achieved an objective response, and 30 (31%) experienced disease stabilization for >/= 3 months following treatment. After 24 months' minimum follow-up, median time to disease progression (TTP) and median overall survival were 7.7 and 19.5 months, respectively. XELOX safety was predictable and similar to the FOLFOX4 regimen, except that myelosuppression was uncommon with XELOX (grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 7%). Most adverse events were mild to moderate, the most common being acute sensory neuropathy (85%). Sixty-day, all-cause mortality was 2%.

CONCLUSION

XELOX is a highly effective first-line treatment for MCRC. Response rates, TTP, and overall survival are similar to those observed with FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin combinations. XELOX provides a more convenient regimen, likely to be preferred by both patients and healthcare providers. Capecitabine has the potential to replace FU/LV in combination with oxaliplatin for MCRC.

New systemic frontline treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Options for first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma have broadened considerably with the introduction of irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Furthermore, the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine has demonstrated efficacy in Phase III trials and recently was approved for first-line treatment in Europe and the United States. Capecitabine yielded similar median times to disease progression and median survival rates compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (Mayo Clinic/North Central Cancer Treatment Group regimen), with superior and similar response rates, respectively. However, its role as a first-line, single-agent substitute for intermittent infusional 5-FU/LV remains to be defined. The addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin to 5-FU/LV resulted in improved response rates and progression-free survival in large, randomized trials; moreover, irinotecan-containing regimens resulted in improved overall survival. Prevalent regimens of irinotecan/5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin/5-FU/LV have been compared in two randomized Phase III trials. One study demonstrated the statistical superiority of oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU/LV over irinotecan/bolus 5-FU/LV in terms of response, time to disease progression, and median survival; however, those advantages may have been attributable to infusional administration or to major differences in second-line therapy. A randomized Phase III study comparing irinotecan and oxaliplatin in combination with the same infusional 5-FU/LV regimens and crossover in case of disease progression showed equivalent efficacy for both schedules in the first-line setting, but the irinotecan combination proved beneficial in terms of safety. New molecular targeted agents, such as angiogenesis-modulating compounds (e.g., bevacizumab) and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (e.g., cetuximab), are under clinical investigation. This review updates current systemic frontline treatments and future perspectives for patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Fatigue in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: an analysis of published studies

Fatigue is a subjective experience that affects everybody. In healthy individuals, it can be considered a physiological response to physical or psychological stress. In people with specific diseases, however, fatigue often represents one of the most significant problems. Fatigue can be caused by many factors, both intrinsic to the patient and extrinsic, such as therapeutic interventions. This review, based on published studies, has been conducted with the aim of presenting a critical discussion of the available information on the characteristics, causes and potential treatments of fatigue in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The incidence of fatigue in these patients, the methods for measuring and evaluating fatigue, and possible therapeutic options are discussed. An appraisal of the toxicity of various chemotherapeutic agents is also presented. Although fatigue is now an ever more considered aspect of the toxicity of chemotherapy, it remains difficult to establish what standard should be used to make a quali-quantitative evaluation of this symptom. Furthermore, in the absence of a clear demonstration of the efficacy of some therapies, the management of cancer-related fatigue remains poorly defined (except for the treatment of anemia-related fatigue). New randomized clinical trials are necessary to indicate the best strategies for tackling this important problem.

Oral capecitabine as an alternative to i.v. 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: safety results of a randomized, phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Oral capecitabine achieves a superior response rate with an improved safety profile compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We report here the results of a large phase III trial investigating adjuvant oral capecitabine compared with 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic regimen) in Dukes' C colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged 18-75 years with resected Dukes' C colon carcinoma were randomized to receive 24 weeks of treatment with either oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days (n = 993), or i.v. bolus 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) with i.v. leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, repeated every 28 days (n = 974).

RESULTS

Patients receiving capecitabine experienced significantly (P <0.001) less diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea/vomiting, alopecia and neutropenia, but more hand-foot syndrome than those receiving 5-FU/LV. Fewer patients receiving capecitabine experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia/sepsis and stomatitis (P <0.001), although more experienced grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than those treated with 5-FU/LV (P <0.001). Capecitabine demonstrates a similar, favorable safety profile in patients aged <65 years or > or = 65 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on its improved safety profile, capecitabine has the potential to replace 5-FU/LV as standard adjuvant treatment for patients with colon cancer. Efficacy results are expected to be available in Keywords: Adjuvant treatment, capecitabine, chemotherapy, colorectal cancer

Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials

This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg m⁻² twice daily, days 1−14 every 21 days; n=603) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo Clinic regimen; n=604). Capecitabine demonstrated a statistically significant superior response rate compared with 5-FU/LV (26 vs 17%; P<0.0002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that capecitabine consistently resulted in superior response rates (P<0.05), even in patient subgroups with poor prognostic indicators. The median time to response and duration of response were similar and time to progression (TTP) was equivalent in the two arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885–1.123, P=0.95; median 4.6 vs 4.7 months with capecitabine and 5-FU/LV, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified younger age, liver metastases, multiple metastases and poor Karnofsky Performance Status as independent prognostic indicators for poor TTP. Overall survival was equivalent in the two arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84–1.06, P=0.48; median 12.9 vs 12.8 months, respectively). Capecitabine results in superior response rate, equivalent TTP and overall survival, an improved safety profile and improved convenience compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment for MCRC. For patients in whom fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is indicated, capecitabine should be strongly considered. Following encouraging results from phase I and II trials, randomised trials are evaluating capecitabine in combination with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Capecitabine is a suitable replacement for i.v. 5-FU as the backbone of colorectal cancer therapy.

A phase II study of capecitabine and docetaxel combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Capecitabine and docetaxel have considerable single-agent activity in gastric cancer with distinct mechanisms of action and no overlap of key toxicities. A synergistic interaction between these two drugs is mediated by taxane-induced upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase. We investigated the activity and the feasibility of capecitabine and docetaxel combination chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (AGC). From September 2001 to March 2003, 42 patients with AGC received 21-day cycles of oral capecitabine (1250 mg x m(-2) twice daily on days 1-14) and docetaxel (75 mg x m(-2) i.v. on day 1). The patients received a total of 164 cycles of chemotherapy. The median age was 53.5 years (range 33-73 years). The overall response rate in the 38 efficacy-evaluable patients was 60% (95% confidence interval, 45-74%). The median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (range, 1.0-15.5+ months) and the median overall survival was 10.5 months (range, 2.9-23.7+ months). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (HFS: G3 50%), neutropenia (15%) and leucopenia (12%). Further studies of this combination are clearly warranted, albeit with lower doses of both agents (1000 mg x m(-2) twice daily and 60 mg x m(-2)) to reduce the rate of HFS and onycholysis.

The Role of New Agents in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

New drugs improved efficacy or convenience of treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. The oral fluoropyrimidines capecitabine and UFT are less toxic but equally efficacious relative to intravenous bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA). These agents might be beneficial for patients who unlikely benefit from the more intensive combination therapy with infusional 5-FU/FA and irinotecan or oxaliplatin. First-line therapy with irinotecan or oxaliplatin and 5-FU/FA induces an objective response in up to 50% of the patients and may allow neoadjuvant concepts in unresectable liver metastasis. The combination therapy increased progression-free survival and in the case of irinotecan/5-FU/FA also overall survival when compared to 5-FU/FA. Sequential treatment with infusional 5-FU/FA plus oxaliplatin followed by 5-FU/FA plus irinotecan or vice versa results in a median survival exceeding 20 months. Thus, patients in a good performance status and with favorable prognostic parameters should be offered first-line combination treatment of irinotecan or oxaliplatin with 5-FU/FA, whereby 5-FU is preferably administered as an infusion for combination therapy. New targets in the treatment of colorectal cancer are the EGF and VEGF receptor. The monoclonal EGF receptor antibody cetuximab alone and in combination with irinotecan is active in second-line treatment. The VEGF antibody bevacizumab prolongs survival when given in combination with 5-FU/FA and irinotecan.

Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

Treating patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) represents a significant challenge to oncologists. The tumour-activated oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine, is the only treatment approved for these patients. Our study evaluated the efficacy, safety and impact on quality of life (QOL) of capecitabine in this setting. Patients (n=126) with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer received capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14, followed by a 7-day rest period. Median time to progression was 4.9 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 4.0-6.4). Thirty-five patients (28%) achieved an objective response (95% CI: 20-36%), including five (4%) complete responses. Median overall survival was 15.2 months (95% CI: 13.5-19.6 months). Capecitabine demonstrated a favourable safety profile, with a low incidence of treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events. The most common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome and gastrointestinal effects. QOL assessment showed that capecitabine treatment was associated with an increase in mean Global Health Score. Capecitabine is active, well tolerated and improves the QOL of patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Based on the consistently high activity demonstrated in clinical trials, capecitabine has become the reference treatment in this setting.

Development of and clinical experience with capecitabine (Xeloda®) in the treatment of solid tumours

The oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine (Xeloda) delivers 5-FU to the tumour site, thereby limiting the side effects and other complications associated with intravenous (i.v.) 5-FU. As an oral drug, capecitabine is preferred to 5-FU by many patients as it can be conveniently taken at home. In first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC), capecitabine results in superior response rates and equivalent progression-free and overall survival compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV. There is also increasing evidence for replacing i.v. 5-FU with capecitabine in combination with other anticancer agents (e.g. oxaliplatin and irinotecan) in MCRC and in the adjuvant treatment of early stage colon cancer. In anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC), adding capecitabine to docetaxel improves survival, time to progression (TTP) and response rates beyond docetaxel. Single-agent capecitabine is also effective in pretreated MBC and is a promising first-line therapy. Capecitabine has a favourable safety profile, the most frequent adverse events being hand-foot syndrome, stomatitis and diarrhoea. Because capecitabine is orally administered, it is possible to intervene promptly with dose interruption/reduction to resolve adverse events without impacting on efficacy. The increasing availability of capecitabine in the home-based setting requires careful consideration of the role of the oncology nurse, who is the key link between the patient and clinician for effective and efficient management.

Treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma with oxaliplatin and capecitabine

BACKGROUND

The current study was designed to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the objective response rate, and a secondary endpoint was to measure the time to disease progression.

METHODS

A 2-stage trial was planned with an accrual goal of 35 patients. The treatment included oxaliplatin given at a dose of 130 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Initially, capecitabine at a dose of 2000 mg/m2/day in 2 divided doses was given on Days 1-14 of each cycle, but this was reduced to a dose of 1500 mg/m2/day because of toxicity. Patients were followed by computed tomography scans every two cycles to evaluate treatment response, and toxicity was monitored.

RESULTS

The first 13 patients on the trial received the higher dose of capecitabine. Although 5 responses (38.5%) were noted, 5 patients were hospitalized with diarrhea and dehydration. This toxicity led to a decrease in the dose of capecitabine to 1500 mg/m2/day and an additional 35 patients were treated. At the lower dose, the partial response rate was 37.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 21.5-55.1%). The estimated median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.4-8.2 months). At the lower dose, four patients were hospitalized with diarrhea/dehydration (with one death reported), one with febrile neutropenia, and one with ventricular fibrillation. Overall, Grade (according to version 2.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) 3-4 diarrhea was reported to develop in 20% of those patients treated at the capecitabine dose of 1500 mg/m2/day compared with 62% of patients treated at the dose of 2000 mg/m2/day.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oxaliplatin and capecitabine is an active and convenient regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma and should be compared with other front-line regimens as therapy for disease.

Implications of capecitabine (Xeloda®) for cancer nursing practice

Home-based therapy with oral capecitabine (Xeloda) has a number of advantages over i.v. hospital-based chemotherapy regimens, including improvement in patients' quality of life, and medical resource/cost savings compared with 5-FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer. In addition, the ability of capecitabine to extend survival beyond docetaxel in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer means that capecitabine plus docetaxel is a very cost-effective combination. Oncology nurses should prepare for the increased use of oral capecitabine as a single agent or in combination regimens in the outpatient setting. The use of this drug requires enhanced patient education skills, communication (e.g. telephone contact) and patient management on the part of the nurse. Oncology nurses will also need to accept a more significant and pivotal role in the clinical oncology team, not only as a point of contact between the patient and clinician, but also in documenting the benefits of capecitabine to ensure the effective management of patients receiving the drug.

Management of adverse events and other practical considerations in patients receiving capecitabine (Xeloda®)

As capecitabine (Xeloda) is converted to 5-FU within tumours it can produce 5-FU-like side effects. However, diarrhoea, stomatitis, nausea, alopecia and neutropenia are significantly less frequent than with i.v. 5-FU. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is the only clinical adverse event occurring more often during capecitabine treatment. These findings in MCRC have also been confirmed in a large phase III trial in early stage colon cancer (X-Act adjuvant study) and phase II clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer. Because capecitabine is taken in the outpatient setting, the nurse and/or supervising clinician are responsible for educating patients how to use it correctly and on the nature/recognition/severity of adverse events. Patients need to be aware that temporary interruptions/dose modifications do not reduce the overall efficacy of capecitabine and will most likely lead to a resolution of side effects. Consequently, oncology nurses will be assuming a more significant and pivotal role in the efficient education and support of patients during home-based therapy with capecitabine.

Randomized multicenter Phase II trial of two different schedules of irinotecan combined with capecitabine as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current randomized Phase II study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine combined with irinotecan as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC).

METHODS

A total of 140 patients received capecitabine at a dose of 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily on Days 2-15 and irinotecan at a dose of either 300 mg/m(2) on Day 1 (Arm A) or 150 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 (Arm B) every 3 weeks. During the course of the study, enrollment was continued using lower doses of capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) twice daily) and irinotecan (Arm A: 240 mg/m(2); Arm B: 120 mg/m(2)) to improve the safety profile of the combinations.

RESULTS

Efficacy was evaluable in 134 patients (68 in Arm A, 66 in Arm B). Objective responses were observed in 46% of the patients (8% complete response [CR]), including 47% in Arm A (9% CR; 38% partial response [PR]) and 44% in Arm B (8% CR; 36% PR). The median progression-free survival was 8.3 months in Arm A and 7.6 months in Arm B. Among the first 52 patients treated with the higher doses, the most frequent Grade 3-4 adverse event was diarrhea (27%). The lower doses adopted in the subsequent 88 patients led to better diarrhea control, particularly in Arm A, and significant reductions in the incidence of all-grade hand-foot syndrome and abdominal pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The capecitabine and irinotecan combination was a highly active first-line therapy in metastatic CRC. An acceptable safety profile was observed after dose reduction, particularly when irinotecan was administered on 1 day.

Implementation of capecitabine (Xeloda®) into a cancer centre: UK experience

Switching patients from intravenous 5-FU/LV to oral capecitabine (Xeloda) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with a reduction in the need for hospitalisations to manage 5-FU-associated delivery and complications, with resulting healthcare savings. However, implementing oral therapy with capecitabine within a cancer centre in the UK has required a considerable change in attitude within healthcare services. The resulting need for patients to take an active role in their treatment, and the co-ordination and monitoring of such a service at home has raised issues for chemotherapy services. To enhance patient involvement and compliance with medication a patient guide was developed to educate, and support individuals and enable them to understand the rationale for treatment and when to seek help. In addition, patients are encouraged to monitor and record symptoms in a diary. This change in service focus has required an investment in time educating and informing patients, community health workers and hospital practitioners. This change has been co-ordinated through the chemotherapy outpatient clinic. Effective communication between hospital and home has been important in implementing oral chemotherapy. While the initial challenge of monitoring and educating patients receiving capecitabine has been met, the Primary Care team and cancer centre need to continue to assess side effects and patient compliance in order to improve knowledge of capecitabine among healthcare professionals and ensure safe practice.

A phase II trial of capecitabine (Xeloda) in recurrent ovarian cancer

Oral capecitabine is a highly active, well-tolerated and convenient treatment for breast and colorectal cancer. This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of single-agent capecitabine in patients with previously treated ovarian cancer. A total of 29 patients with platinum-pretreated relapsed ovarian cancer were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, single-centre, phase II study. Patients received oral capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. Tumour response was evaluated using serum CA125. Out of 29 enrolled patients, 28 were evaluable, and a response was observed in eight patients (29%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 13-49%). Median progression-free and overall survivals were 3.7 (95% CI, 2.8-4.6) and 8.0 (95% CI, 4.1-11.8) months, respectively. After 6 months of treatment, 28% (95% CI, 13-48%) of patients remained progression-free and 62% (95% CI, 42-79%) were still alive. The most common clinical adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (HFS), nausea and diarrhoea. Grade 3 HFS occurred in 14% of patients, grade 3 vomiting in 10%. Efficacy and safety of capecitabine compare favourably with other monotherapies in platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. The convenience and improved safety profile of capecitabine compared with intravenous. regimens make it an ideal agent for administration in the outpatient setting.

Irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer: dose intensification and combination with new agents, including biological response modifiers

Phase I/II studies suggest that the combination of irinotecan with capecitabine is feasible and has promising activity. Diarrhea and neutropenia are dose limiting. Overall response rates (RRs) in the 40% to 60% range are seen from preliminary data. Work in progress is assessing the combination of irinotecan with UFT/leucovorin (LV). The use of irinotecan together with raltitrexed is also being investigated, as is its combination with oxaliplatin. Two phase II studies of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin in second-line patients report median survivals of 11-12 months. It seems possible to safely escalate the dose of single-agent irinotecan to 500 mg/m(2) in patients showing good tolerance of the drug. Irinotecan can be used in combination with LV5FU2 at doses up to 260 mg/m(2), especially if only one bolus of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is given. Control of tumor growth is achieved in 90% of patients. Preliminary data suggest that regimens based on 5-FU/LV and irinotecan can safely be combined with the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab. In patients with EGFR-positive tumors, this may prove an effective means of increasing response rate or combating treatment resistance. Following evidence that COX-2 inhibition can slow progression in familial adenomatous polyposis, celecoxib is to be studied in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In vitro, the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol enhances the induction of apoptosis by chemotherapy. Clinically, it can safely be administered with irinotecan, and studies in CRC are planned.

Capecitabine and irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of an extended phase I study

BACKGROUND

To define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the combination of capecitabine and irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated at three dose levels (DLs). For the first two dose levels, irinotecan (70 mg/m(2)) was administered once a week for 6 weeks in combination with 2 weeks of capecitabine at 1000 mg/m(2) (DL1) or 1250 mg/m(2) (DL2) twice daily, starting on days 1 and 22. In the last dose escalation step, the dose of irinotecan was increased to 80 mg/m(2) (DL3). One cycle lasted 7 weeks.

RESULTS

In the subsequent phase I trial, 96 cycles of capecitabine and irinotecan were administered. At DL3, three out of six patients experienced DLTs (diarrhea, neutropenia, asthenia). In order to confirm the safety of the recommended dose, DL2 was extended to 15 patients. Five patients (33%) showed DLTs at this dose level, which was considered too high to embark on further clinical studies. Subsequently, the starting dose (DL1) was extended to a total of 16 patients, with diarrhea being the main toxicity. The overall response rate was 38% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21% to 58%], with a median response duration of 8.7 months (95% CI 6.4-11.5 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended doses for further studies are irinotecan 70 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2). The combination of capecitabine and irinotecan appears to have significant therapeutic efficacy with manageable toxicity.

Adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer--the transatlantic view

In North America there are two conventional treatments for clinically resectable rectal cancer. First is surgery and, if the tumour is T3 and/or N1-2, this is followed by postoperative combined modality therapy. The second, for patients with ultrasound T3 or clinical T4 disease, is pre-operative combined modality therapy followed by surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. Pre-operative therapy (most commonly combined modality therapy) has gained acceptance as a standard adjuvant therapy. The potential advantages of this approach compared with postoperative therapy include less acute toxicity and enhanced sphincter preservation. Recently completed randomized trials in the US and Germany will provide a definitive answer to this theory. In contrast to the combined modality approach to pre-operative therapy a number of European centres advocate an intensive short course of radiation (5 Gy x 5 followed one week later by surgery). The only randomized trial which has revealed a significant advantage in survival is the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. The Dutch CKVO 95-04 TME trial did not confirm a survival advantage and two metanalyses report conflicting results. Due to selection bias, it is not possible accurately to compare the local recurrence and survival results of intensive short course radiation with conventional pre-operative combined modality therapy. The intensive short course radiation approach is not used in North America due to its higher toxicity and lack of sphincter preservation. In the Dutch trial the 5-year local recurrence was 12% with TME and was significantly decreased to 6% with pre-operative radiation. The 5-year local recurrence rate in the 324 patients with stage III disease who underwent a TME alone with negative margins was 20%. Therefore, despite TME surgery, radiation therapy is still a necessary component in the adjuvant management of rectal cancer.

Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine (Xeloda(")) in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing after treatment with a taxane-containing therapy

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine is a rationally designed oral, tumor-activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate with high activity in metastatic breast cancer. This multicenter phase II study was designed to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with a taxane-containing regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients had to have documented progression after paclitaxel- or docetaxel-containing chemotherapy. Treatment comprised 3-week cycles of oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice-daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest period.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six patients were enrolled. Disease stabilization occurred in 63 patients (46%) and the overall response rate was 15% (95% confidence interval 10% to 23%), providing an overall tumor control rate of 62%. Median time to progression was 3.5 months, median duration of response was 7.5 months and median overall survival was 10.1 months. Capecitabine was generally well-tolerated: most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1/2 in intensity; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (13%), diarrhea (8%), vomiting (4%) and nausea (3%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that capecitabine achieves a high tumor control rate in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Due to its favorable safety profile and convenient oral administration, capecitabine can be given as an outpatient therapy. Capecitabine should be considered the reference treatment in this setting based on consistently high efficacy and good tolerability.

Colorectal cancer in the elderly: is palliative chemotherapy of value?

Colorectal cancer is a disease of the elderly, with 70% of patients being aged 65 years or older. In Western countries, the total number of elderly patients with this disease is expected to further increase in the future. Since the incidence of adverse physical or socioeconomic conditions in the elderly is higher than in younger patients, a thorough assessment of the patient's suitability for therapy should be performed before a decision is made. Using a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to subdivide the population of elderly cancer patients into three groups can help to guide treatment decisions. Both in the adjuvant and in the palliative setting, there are sufficient data supporting the use of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in fit elderly patients who can tolerate cytotoxic treatment. Systemic chemotherapy has been shown to effectively reduce mortality in the adjuvant situation and to be of clinical benefit for patients with metastatic disease in terms of longer survival, control of symptoms and quality of life. In recent years, new substances such as oxaliplatin or irinotecan have shown significant activity in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, information on how to guide the use of these new drugs in elderly patients is still lacking. Limited data from clinical trials indicate treatment efficacy in selected elderly patients comparable to that observed in younger patients, with overall manageable toxicity. Clearly, further clinical trials in elderly patients with colorectal cancer are necessary as well as the incorporation of aspects of geriatric medicine into the teaching programme of medical oncologists.

Capecitabine in combination with docetaxel and epirubicin in patients with previously untreated, advanced breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of oral capecitabine in combination with docetaxel and epirubicin (TEX) as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced/metastatic breast carcinoma.

METHODS

This open-label, Phase II study was conducted at six Italian centers. Treatment consisted of epirubicin, 75 mg/m(2) (intravenous bolus), and docetaxel, 75 mg/m(2) (1-hour infusion), both administered on Day 1, plus oral capecitabine, 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily, on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients received 392 cycles of treatment, with a median of 6 cycles in patients with Stage III disease (n = 34 patients) and a median of 8 cycles in patients with Stage IV disease (n = 33 patients). The objective response rate was 82%, including complete responses in 21% of patients. A greater proportion of patients with Stage III disease achieved tumor responses compared with patients who had Stage IV disease (97% vs. 67%, respectively). Among 34 patients with Stage III disease, pathologic complete responses were confirmed in 10 patients (29%). TEX chemotherapy demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. There was a low incidence of Grade 3 adverse events, and Grade 4 adverse events were particularly rare (4%). The most common Grade 3-4 adverse event was febrile neutropenia, which occurred in 16% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

TEX combination therapy has important antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in this setting. A large, randomized, Phase III trial is ongoing to compare TEX chemotherapy with an epirubicin plus docetaxel regimen in patients with untreated, advanced breast carcinoma.

Capecitabine named-patient programme for patients with advanced breast cancer. the UK experience

Following the encouraging results achieved with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in clinical trials, a named patient programme was initiated in the UK, through which patients with advanced breast cancer were prescribed capecitabine monotherapy. In this programme, patients were treated with the standard dose of oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-day treatment cycle). Efficacy and safety data were collected and analysed from 102 patients receiving outpatient treatment with capecitabine. All patients had previously received chemotherapy and for the majority (75%) this was in the metastatic setting. In total, 482 treatment cycles were administered, with a median of 4.5 treatment cycles (range 1-22) per patient. Tumour responses were observed in 20 patients (20%), with an additional 47 patients (46%) achieving disease stabilisation. The median time to disease progression was 4.1 months and median overall survival was 7.7 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (PPE) (36%) and gastrointestinal toxicities (diarrhoea (33%) and nausea (24%)). Dose reductions due to adverse events were required in 33% of patients, but capecitabine was administered without a dose reduction for 90% of cycles. The results achieved with capecitabine in this named-patient programme confirm that, under 'real practice' conditions, capecitabine is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced breast cancer.