2000 update of recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology Growth Factors Expert Panel

Current Antimicrobial Usage for the Management of Infections in Leukemic Patients in Japan: Results of a Survey

We report the findings of a questionnaire distributed by the Committee of Supportive Care of the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group to 196 hospitals throughout Japan. For antimicrobial prophylaxis, the oral quinolones are prescribed by 38% of physicians and polymixin B by 31%. For antifungal prophylaxis, amphotericin B is prescribed by 42% of physicians and fluconazole by 41%. Febrile neutropenia is empirically treated with cephalosporin or carbapenem monotherapy by 35% of physicians. Overall, dual therapy (i.e., an aminoglycoside plus a cephalosporin, a carbapenem, or an antipseudomonal penicillin) is prescribed by 50% of physicians. When response to initial empirical therapy does not occur after 3-4 days, 51% of physicians add an antifungal agent; fluconazole is preferred to amphotericin B (prescribed by 66% vs. 28% of physicians). For the treatment of fungemia due to Candida albicans, fluconazole was prescribed by 59% of physicians in cases of stable disease and amphotericin B was prescribed by 57% of physicians in cases of unstable disease. Amphotericin B is selected to treat invasive aspergillosis, but a dose of 0.5-0.7 mg/kg, inadequate for this disease, is prescribed by 44% of physicians. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is prescribed to treat patients with acute myelogenous leukemia who have life-threatening infections (27% of physicians) or who have clinically or microbiologically documented infections (26% of physicians).

Economic Issues: Toward a Cost‐Effective Approach to the Management of Febrile Neutropenia in Japan

The cost of treating neutropenic patients unexplained fever is of significant concern in Japan because of the depressed economy and the aging population. Development of a standardized treatment methodology specifically tailored to the situation in Japan will make the treatment more efficient for health care institutions, will allow for improved monitoring of practices and costs, and will result in better patient care. It is essential, however, that the welfare of the patients be the utmost priority--cost savings is not sufficient in the absence of a significant impact on morbidity and mortality.

Emergency department waiting times for patients with cancer with febrile neutropenia: a pilot study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To determine the time frame for evaluation and treatment of adult patients with febrile neutropenia in the emergency department (ED).

DESIGN

Prospective, descriptive survey.

SETTING

ED in a large, urban, academic health center.

SAMPLE

19 patients with febrile neutropenia during 23 ED visits in eight months.

METHODS

Demographic and treatment variables and durations of time were recorded from ED and medical records.

FINDINGS

Patients had fevers a mean of 21 hours (range = 1-72 hours) before seeking treatment. Median waiting time from ED admission to examination was 75 minutes, 210 minutes before antibiotics were given, and 5.5 hours to hospital admission. Patients with more comorbidities and more extensive cancer waited significantly longer than those at lower risk (p less than 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the standard of care is to treat febrile neutropenia as an oncologic emergency, patients waited prolonged periods prior to receiving treatment. Studies are indicated to examine early intervention for febrile neutropenia and to determine whether early intervention improves clinical outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses may repeat this study at other settings and with other populations of people with cancer. Other studies may provide evidence that clinical outcomes are dependent on rapid intervention for febrile neutropenia in the cancer population or evaluate the efficacy of education that oncology nurses deliver to people with cancer and febrile neutropenia.

Optimising management of neutropenia and anaemia in cancer chemotherapy-advances in cytokine therapy

Neutropenia and anaemia are serious complications of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. They have a negative impact on patient quality of life and may reduce response to treatment. Febrile neutropenia, a potentially life-threatening complication of neutropenia, frequently requires hospital admission, while fatigue and weakness from anaemia reduce patient's capacity for activity. Pegfilgrastim and darbepoetin alfa, were designed to simplify and optimise treatment for patients with cancer. Once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim is as effective as daily filgrastim with respect to duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) and may have a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia than filgrastim. Darbepoetin alfa has enhanced biological activity and a serum terminal half-life three-fold longer than that of erythropoietin (EPO), which translates into rapid and sustained correction of anaemia with less frequent dosing. These novel cytokines have the potential to simplify the management of neutropenia and anaemia with fewer injections and less disruption to patients daily lives.

The use of colony stimulating factors in elderly patients with cancer

Hematological toxicity is the most common and the most frequent fatal complication of chemotherapy. It is observed with increased frequency with age, it is a significant independent predictor of the development of febrile neutropenia, and may contribute to a reluctance to administer chemotherapy in the elderly patient population. The authors analyze published data on effectiveness and results of the use of colony stimulating factors for preventing and treating elderly patients affected by tumors during chemotherapy.

Acute myeloid leukemia in the older patient

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an extremely heterogeneous disorder. The biology of AML is incompletely understood, but much data indicates that older patients have a more biologically diverse and chemotherapy resistant form of AML that is quite different from that seen in the younger patients. Approximately 60% of AML cases are in patients greater than 60 years of age, so the predominant burden is in older patients. This problem will be magnified in the future, because the US population is both growing and aging. When one examines the treatment outcomes of older AML patients over the last three decades, there is little progress in long-term survival. Nine major published randomized placebo controlled trials of myeloid growth factors given during induction for AML have been conducted. All of these trials with one exception demonstrated no significant impact on the clinical outcomes of complete response (CR) rate, disease-free, and overall survival. However, the duration of neutropenia was consistently and uniformly reduced by the use of growth factor in all nine of these trials. Because of the favorable impact of the colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) on resource use, antibiotic days, hospital days, etc., it can be more economical and beneficial to use CSFs in AML than to withhold use. The overall dismal outlook for the older AML patient can only be altered by clinical trials with new therapeutic agents. New cellular and molecularly targeted agents are entering clinical trials and bring hope for progress to this area of cancer therapy.

A prospective randomised evaluation of G-CSF or G-CSF plus oral antibiotics in chemotherapy-treated patients at high risk of developing febrile neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia (FN) remains a major dose-limiting complication among patients treated with chemotherapy. Haematopoietic colony stimulating factors (G-CSF and GM-CSF) made possible a significant improvement in the management of FN, both in the therapeutic and in the prophylactic approach. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis also permits a definite reduction of severe infections during neutropenia. Nevertheless, the possible role of these two interventions for secondary prevention of FN is still unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomised trial by comparing the efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the association of G-CSF with oral antibiotics in the secondary prevention of FN. We included in our study those patients who, after an episode of FN, continued to be treated with the same chemotherapy without reduction of dose intensity. They were randomised into two groups: the first received G-CSF (group G; filgrastim, 5 microg/kg day), and the second was treated with an association of G-CSF and amoxicillin/clavulanate plus ciprofloxacin (group G/ACC).

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were randomised (group G: n=23 and group G/ACC: n=25). There was no recurrence of FN among the patients receiving G-CSF and only one episode in the combined therapy group (p=1). With regard to the side effects, there was no significant difference in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of G-CSF for the secondary prevention of FN is extremely effective and allows the maintenance of chemotherapy dose intensity. Our study showed that the addition of antibiotics does not seem to be required.

A phase II trial of the epothilone B analog, BMS-247550, in patients with previously treated advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The epothilone B analog, BMS-247550, is a non-taxane microtubulin-stabilizing agent with preclinical activity in taxane-resistant cell lines and phase I activity in colorectal cancer. We conducted a phase II study of single-agent BMS-247550 in advanced colorectal cancer patients who had disease progression following treatment with irinotecan-5-fluorouracil-leucovorin (IFL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were required to have histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer; progressed on or after chemotherapy with IFL; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or =1; peripheral neuropathy grade < or =1; and adequate laboratory parameters. BMS-247550 40 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously over 3 h every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for response every 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled; all were evaluable for toxicity and 23 were evaluable for response. There were no complete or partial responses. Thirteen patients (56%) had stable disease after two cycles of therapy; five patients (20%) received six or more cycles. The median time to progression was 11 weeks; median overall survival was 36 weeks. There was considerable grade 3/4 hematological toxicity, including neutropenia (48%) and leukopenia (36%). Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities included grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction (12%) and peripheral neuropathy (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent BMS-247550 (40 mg/m(2)) administered every 21 days demonstrated no activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Peripheral neuropathy was treatment-limiting.

Adult acute myeloid leukaemia

The curability of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in a fraction of adult patients was demonstrated a long time ago. Currently, the probability of cure is consistently above fifty per cent in patients with de novo disease expressing favourable-risk associated cytogenetic features. Even better, the cure rate exceeds 75% in the acute promyelocytic subtype since the introduction of retinoic acid-containing regimens. In the meantime, continuing progress in supportive care systems and stem cell transplant procedures is making myeloablative therapies, when needed, somewhat less toxic-and thereby more effective-than in the recent past. Therefore, evidence is accumulating to indicate an improved therapeutic trend over the years, with the notable exception of older (>55 years) patients with adverse-risk chromosomal aberrations and/or leukemia secondary to myelodysplasia or prior cancer-related chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. This review conveys the many facets of this progress, focusing on diagnostic subsets, risk classes, newer biological issues and conventional as well as innovative therapeutic interventions with or without autologous/allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Medical visits for chemotherapy and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a survey of the impact on patient time and activities

Background

Patients with cancer must make frequent visits to the clinic not only for chemotherapy but also for the management of treatment-related adverse effects. Neutropenia, the most common dose-limiting toxicity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, has substantial clinical and economic consequences. Colony-stimulating factors such as filgrastim and pegfilgrastim can reduce the incidence of neutropenia, but the clinic visits for these treatments can disrupt patients' routines and activities.

Methods

We surveyed patients to assess how clinic visits for treatment with chemotherapy and the management of neutropenia affect their time and activities.

Results

The mean amounts of time affected by these visits ranged from approximately 109 hours (hospitalization for neutropenia) and 8 hours (physician and chemotherapy) to less than 3 hours (laboratory and treatment with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim). The visits for filgrastim or pegfilgrastim were comparable in length, but treatment with filgrastim requires several visits per chemotherapy cycle and treatment with pegfilgrastim requires only 1 visit.

Conclusions

This study provides useful information for future modelling of additional factors such as disease status and chemotherapy schedule and provides information that should be considered in managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

The economics of the colony-stimulating factors in the prevention and treatment of febrile neutropenia

Healthcare costs continue to rise with hospitalization representing the single largest component of direct medical costs associated with cancer care. Neutropenia and its complications including febrile neutropenia remain the major dose-limiting toxicity associated with systemic cancer chemotherapy. Febrile neutropenia often occurs early in the course of chemotherapy and is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and cost. The colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) have been used effectively in a variety of clinical settings to prevent or treat febrile neutropenia and to assist patients receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy. A meta-analysis of the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has confirmed the efficacy of prophylactic CSFs. Economic models based on measures of resource utilization derived from RCTs have provided estimates of expected treatment costs along with febrile neutropenia risk threshold estimates for the cost saving use of the CSFs. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential value of targeting the CSFs toward patients at greatest risk based on accurate and valid predictive models.

Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD) Regimen for Multiple Myeloma

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column focuses on the commercially available and investigational agents used to treat malignant diseases and reviews issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy.

Prevention and management of prostate cancer chemotherapy complications

Prevention and management of the adverse effects of prostate cancer chemotherapy depend on skilled regimen selection, dose adjustment, use of supportive care strategies, and a thorough understanding of the patient- and regimen-related factors that determine the risk for toxicity. Urologists, radiation oncologists, and primary care providers can play an important role before chemotherapy is prescribed by judicious use of treatments that impair bone marrow and other vital organ function. The current role of chemotherapy in prostate cancer is palliative. Successful palliation depends on reducing cancer-related suffering without introducing treatment-related suffering. Thus prevention and management of toxicity is central to the success of chemotherapy in advanced prostate cancer.

Low-dose lenograstim to enhance engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation: a prospective randomized evaluation of two different fixed doses

BACKGROUND

G-CSF is used to enhance hematopoietic recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), but the optimal dose of G-CSF during engraftment has not been established. The medical cost of ASCT is a serious financial burden in developing countries, and G-CSF is the most costly drug used in this procedure. We evaluated whether a lower, vial-size fitted dose of lenograstim is clinically equivalent to a higher fixed dose.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective randomized study was performed on 33 patients (11 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 8 multiple myeloma, 14 breast cancer) undergoing ASCT. Patients were randomly administered 100 micro g or 250 micro g lenograstim daily starting on the next day of ASCT, with a minimum infusion of 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg.

RESULTS

For both lenograstim doses, median time to neutrophil engraftment was 9 days and median time to PLT engraftment was 11 days. Episodes of clinically documented infections were 10 per 379 patient-days in the 100 microg per day group and 10 per 320 patient-days in the 250 microg per day group. There were no between-group differences in requirements for transfusion of RBCs or PLTs. Duration of hospitalization was 16 days for the 100 microg per day group and 17 days for the 250 microg per day group. Daily lenograstim dose per patient's body weight and total amount of lenograstim used during ASCT were both significantly lower in the 100 microg per day group.

CONCLUSION

Administration of 100 microg per day of lenograstim showed comparable clinical efficacy to 250 microg per day lenograstim for immediate hematopoietic recovery after ASCT. Use of the lower dose was associated with lower overall lenograstim usage and lower cost.

The role of colony-stimulating factors and granulocyte transfusion in treatment options for neutropenia in children with cancer

Children with cancer receiving anticancer therapy always experience neutropenia, and as a result often develop serious neutropenic infections that cause morbidity and/or mortality. Intensive chemotherapy with improved supportive care for neutropenia contribute to the recent advances in treatment outcome in children with cancer. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can shorten the duration and decrease the severity of neutropenia, and thus support intensive chemotherapy. Both G-CSF and GM-CSF stimulate proliferation and maturation of myeloid progenitor cells and are thus used to help mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells, and after stem-cell transplantation. The American Society of Clinical Oncology 2000 Guidelines recommended that colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) can be administered as a primary prophylaxis with a chemotherapy regimen if previous experiences with chemotherapy regimens have shown that the incidence of febrile neutropenia (neutropenic fever) is > or =40%. The routine use of CSFs for secondary prophylaxis or for patients with afebrile neutropenia is not recommended in order to avoid the overuse of CSFs. The use of a CSF may be considered in children with febrile neutropenia with a neutrophil count <100/microL, uncontrolled primary disease, pneumonia, hypotension, multiorgan dysfunction (sepsis syndrome), or invasive fungal infection. Although these guidelines are generally applicable to children with cancer, further studies on CSFs are certainly needed in pediatric oncology. The recent advances in granulocyte collection, using healthy volunteer donor stimulation with G-CSF and/or dexamethasone to yield large numbers of granulocytes has made granulocyte transfusion a more realistic option. Granulocyte transfusion has shown promising results in treating children with severe neutropenic infection; however, controlled trials are warranted to clarify the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this procedure.

Melphalan and Prednisone (MP) Regimen for Multiple Myeloma

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column focuses on the commercially available and investigational agents used to treat malignant diseases and reviews issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy.

Effects of Indirect and Additional Direct Costs on the Risk Threshold for Prophylaxis with Colony-Stimulating Factors in Patients at Risk for Severe Neutropenia from Cancer Chemotherapy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have used direct hospital costs to determine the threshold at which the cost of prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factor (CSF) is offset by savings from the lower risk of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia. By conducting a survey of patients in whom febrile neutropenia had developed during treatment with chemotherapy, we sought to reassess these costs by including estimates of indirect costs associated with febrile neutropenia as well as new categories of direct costs that were not previously available. Costs were included in an existing cost-minimization model, and their effect on the risk threshold at which the prophylactic use of CSF becomes cost saving was determined.

PATIENTS

A sample survey of 26 patients with ovarian cancer who were treated with chemotherapy and developed febrile neutropenia.

INTERVENTION

Analysis of data from patients' questionnaires containing survey items on indirect costs and additional direct costs associated with febrile neutropenia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Estimates of indirect costs and other direct costs from the questionnaires were included in an existing cost-minimization model, and risk thresholds were recalculated. Before modification, the model showed cost neutrality for prophylactic use of CSF when the risk of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia was approximately 23%. Including previously excluded direct costs and indirect costs ranging from 1000-5000 dollars attributable to severe neutropenia in the model lowered the risk threshold for hospitalization for febrile neutropenia at which the prophylactic use of CSF becomes cost neutral to between 22% and 18%.

CONCLUSION

Including additional direct as well as indirect costs associated with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia permits a more realistic assessment of the possible effect of prophylactic use of CSF from a societal perspective. Despite the limited size of the survey, this study shows a cost-benefit rationale to support prophylactic use of CSF in a greater proportion of patients treated with chemotherapy.

Managing hematologic toxicities: novel therapies

Myelosuppression associated with cancer chemotherapy may lead to neutropenia, anemia, or both, resulting in an increased risk for infection, fatigue, diminished quality of life, and reduced survival. In addition, neutropenia specifically has been shown to result in dose reductions, treatment delays, or both in subsequent chemotherapy cycles. Hematopoietic growth factors have been used effectively as supportive therapy to reduce chemotherapy-associated neutropenia and anemia. New preparations have the potential to improve treatment outcome dramatically. Results from recently reported studies indicate that patients at risk for neutropenia can be safely and effectively treated with pegfilgrastim once per chemotherapy cycle, and that those with anemia can be managed with weekly or biweekly darbepoetin alfa therapy. These new treatments have the potential to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with opportunistic infections, decrease the requirement for potentially dangerous blood transfusions, and improve the quality of life for patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. The longer dosing intervals offered by these new preparations may decrease healthcare expenses and enhance patient adherence.

EDAP Regimen for Multiple Myeloma

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column focuses on the commercially available and investigational agents used to treat malignant diseases and reviews issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy.

Phase I dose-finding study of biweekly irinotecan in combination with fixed doses of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, gemcitabine and cisplatin (G-FLIP) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer or other solid tumors

This phase I trial was initiated based on encouraging clinical data with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), gemcitabine and cisplatin (G-FLIP) in the therapy of solid tumors. In this trial, G-FLIP has been modified to facilitate outpatient administration and to optimize sequence-dependent synergistic activity. Treatment consisted of biweekly (once every 14 days) cycles of sequential gemcitabine 500 mg/m, irinotecan per dose escalation schedule, bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m and LV 300 mg on day 1 followed by a 24-h 5-FU infusion 1500 mg/m, followed by cisplatin 35 mg/m on day 2. The irinotecan starting dose was 80 mg/m and escalated by 20 mg/m in cohorts of three patients until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined. Twenty-three patients were enrolled (13 men/10 women) with the following cancers: 11 pancreatic, five gallbladder, three squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, one hepatocellular carcinoma, one melanoma, one gastric, and one breast cancer. Median patient age was 63 years (range 44-78) and median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 80. Patients received a median of 8 cycles (range 1-16) over five irinotecan dose levels (80, 100, 120, 140 and 160 mg/m). Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 3 nausea/vomiting despite aggressive anti-emetic therapy occurred in one patient at dose level 1 and three patients at dose level 3. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities per patient consisted of thrombocytopenia (3%), anemia (6%), thrombosis (23%), neutropenia (16%) and neutropenic fever (10%). Of 18 patients evaluable for response, one complete response (pancreatic) and eight partial responses (three gallbladder, two pancreatic, two head and neck, and one breast) were attained. Seven patients had disease stabilization (five pancreatic, one hepatocellular and one gastric) for a median of 16 weeks (range 10-22). Median time to disease progression among all 23 patients enrolled to the phase I portion of the trial was 20.5 weeks (range 4-37). We conclude that G-FLIP is a novel outpatient chemotherapy regimen with acceptable toxicity at the maximum tolerated irinotecan dose of 120 mg/m. The phase II trial of G-FLIP using an irinotecan dose of 120 mg/m for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer is ongoing.

Elevation of serum hepatocyte growth factor during granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced peripheral blood stem cell mobilization

We examined serum levels of the angiogenic factors, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), in normal donors for allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim 400 microg/m2/d) was administered to 23 donors for 5 d and aphereses were performed on days 4 and 5. Although bFGF remained at similar levels after G-CSF treatment, serum VEGF and HGF levels increased 1.5-fold (n = 13; P = 0.02) and 6.8-fold (n = 23; P < 0.0001) respectively. The serum HGF level before G-CSF administration on day 1 correlated inversely with mobilized CD34+ cell numbers. Time course kinetics of HGF showed that on the day after G-CSF administration (day 2), serum HGF levels increased to 3678 pg/ml. For auto PBSC mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF 200 microg/m2/d (n = 8), we observed similar HGF elevation, which appeared to be dose-dependent on the G-CSF administered.

The taxanes: toxicity and quality of life considerations in advanced ovarian cancer

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel show good activity in the management of advanced ovarian cancer when used in conjunction with platinum agents. Accumulating evidence from clinical studies, particularly the latest results from the phase III comparative SCOTROC study, indicates that the two drugs confer similar rates of tumour response and survival in women with this condition. However, it is clear that paclitaxel and docetaxel differ in their tolerability profiles and in other respects, and cannot be regarded as directly equivalent drugs. In particular, paclitaxel is associated with significant neurotoxicity; peripheral neuropathy has also been reported with docetaxel, but to a lesser extent. Neutropenia appears more prevalent with docetaxel than with paclitaxel, although clinical trial data show that this adverse effect is manageable and need not compromise dose delivery. Docetaxel is also associated with potential benefits accruing from shorter infusion times and lack of need for premedication with intravenous histamine H(1) and H(2) antagonists. Emerging quality of life data are expected to shed further light on the overall benefit of chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer in general, and on taxane-platinum combinations in particular.

Docetaxel Versus Paclitaxel for Adjuvant Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

The objective of this study was to evaluate the toxicity profile of docetaxel/carboplatin versus paclitaxel/carboplatin. All patients with primary ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal malignancies treated with docetaxel and platinum at the University of Iowa between January 1996 and June 1999 were identified. Controls, treated with paclitaxel and platinum, were matched for age, date of diagnosis, type of cancer, stage, and residual disease. Toxicity was evaluated prior to each cycle and was graded according to the Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria. Twenty patients were identified in each group and evaluated. In the docetaxel/carboplatin group, sixteen (80%) patients experienced hematologic toxicity. Nine (45%) had grade III or IV neutropenia and fever developed in two of these patients. Grade III or IV thrombocytopenia developed in two patients. In contrast, among the paclitaxel/carboplatin group, grade III or IV neutropenia developed in only three patients (p < 0.05) and grade III or IV thrombocytopenia developed in two patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to gastrointestinal or renal toxicity. In the paclitaxel/carboplatin group, 13 patients developed neuropathy compared to only 2 patients (10%) in the docetaxel/carboplatin group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the clinical response between the two treatment groups. In conclusion, neutropenia was more common with the docetaxel/carboplatin regimen, whereas neuropathy was more common in the paclitaxel-based regimen. The therapeutic efficacy was equivalent between the two groups.

Use of erythropoietin in cancer patients: assessment of oncologists' practice patterns in the United States and other countries

PURPOSE

To assess physician use of erythropoietin in cancer patients before publication of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society of Hematology guidelines.

METHODS

Questionnaires about erythropoietin use in practice and 12 hypothetical clinical scenarios involving patients with cancer were mailed to 2000 oncologists/hematologists in the United States and 19 other countries. Response rates were 30% in the United States and 25% internationally. Data on erythropoietin use for ovarian cancer were obtained from one clinical trial. Multivariate regression models assessed predictors of erythropoietin prescription.

RESULTS

Most physicians selected a hemoglobin level < or =10 g/dL as an upper threshold for erythropoietin use (36% to 51% of U.S. physicians and 21% to 32% of foreign physicians). Frequent erythropoietin use (defined as use in at least 10% of cancer patients) was higher in the United States than elsewhere (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5 to 13.4). Among U.S. physicians, those who said they used erythropoietin frequently were more likely to be in fee-for-service than managed care settings (OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.7). Those who reported never using erythropoietin practiced in countries that had lower annual per capita health care expenditures, lower proportions of privately funded health care, and a national health service (P <0.05 for all comparisons). Of 235 ovarian cancer patients who received topotecan, 38% (45/118) of U.S. patients and 2% (2/117) of European patients who developed grade 1 anemia (hemoglobin level between 10 and 12 g/dL) were treated with erythropoietin (P <0.01).

CONCLUSION

Financial considerations and a hemoglobin level <10 g/dL appear to influence erythropoietin use in the United States, whereas financial considerations alone determine erythropoietin use abroad.

Adherence to the guidelines of the CCCE in the treatment of node-positive breast cancer patients

Guidelines are tools to improve the quality of care in daily practice. To accomplish adherence, active implementation is needed. The effect of audit, group-oriented feedback and educational activities to increase guideline adherence were investigated in this study. Treatment according to a guideline for premenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients from 1988 to 1992 (P1) and from 1996 to 1998 (P2) was assessed using the following indicators: percentage of patients with breast-conserving surgery, secondary surgery, > or = 10 reported resected axillary lymph nodes, reported tumour differentiation grade, reported hormonal receptor status, chemotherapy received (CT), start of CT < or = 28 days after surgery, Dose Intensity (DI) > or = 85% and completion of CT < or = 1 week beyond the ideal duration of CT. Data were audited from patients' records. The first audit resulted in a quality programme with feedback focused on the delivery of chemotherapy and resected axillary lymph nodes and educational sessions. A Fisher's exact test was used to estimate significant differences between the two time periods. In P1, 323 patients and in P2, 155 patients were eligible for treatment according to the guideline. The percentage of patients with > or = 10 lymph nodes improved from 65.3 to 81.3% (P=0.0004), as did the percentage with a reported oestrogen receptor (ER) status, from 84.8 to 96.8% (P=0.00004), progesterone receptor (PR) status from 82.3% to 97.4% (P<0.000001) and with a DI > or = 85%, from 74.9 to 93.9% (P=0.000003). Adherence varied between the hospitals. In conclusion, significant improvements were observed for the indicators of resected axillary lymph nodes and DI of chemotherapy, which may be attributed to the quality programme. Repeated assessment of the adherence to the guideline is important to observe changes and interhospital variations in order to remain focused on areas for improvement.

Phase III trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium

BACKGROUND

The regimens of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) were compared in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma were randomized to receive either CP (paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin [targeted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6] given every 21 days) or the standard M-VAC dosage.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were randomized to the respective treatment regimens (41 to CP and 44 to M-VAC). Response rates and overall survival were similar for both treatment arms. Patients treated with CP had an overall response rate of 28.2% (95% binomial confidence interval, 15.0-44.9%) compared with an overall response rate of 35.9% for the M-VAC arm (95% binomial confidence interval, 21.2-52.8%) (P = 0.63, Fisher exact test). The median progression-free survival among patients who were treated with M-VAC was 8.7 months and was 5.2 months for patients receiving CP (P = 0.24, log-rank test). At a median follow-up of 32.5 months, the median survival for patients treated with M-VAC was 15.4 months versus 13.8 months for patients treated with CP (P = 0.65, log-rank test). Patients treated with M-VAC were found to have more severe worst-degree toxicities compared with patients treated with CP (P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences with regard to quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder (FACT-BL) instrument (P = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Interpretation of the results of this study must be made with caution because the study failed to reach its accrual goal. Patients treated with CP had a median survival of 13.8 months compared with 15.4 months for patients treated with M-VAC. Patients treated with CP appeared in general to better tolerate their treatment; however, there were no significant differences noted with regard to measured quality of life parameters.

Dimensions of Neutropenia in Adult Cancer Patients

Neutropenia is a common and dangerous toxicity of cancer therapy that profoundly affects patients' lives. Neutropenia is typically defined by the numerical value of the absolute neutrophil count. However, considering neutropenia exclusively as the numerical value of the absolute neutrophil count limits its conceptualizations to physiologically related aspects, minimizes its complexities, and neglects dimensions of human response and the patient experience. This article offers a dimensional analysis of neutropenia derived from 42 research and clinical articles. Schatzman's dimensional analysis methods were applied to the literature to identify aspects of this phenomenon lying beyond its numerical boundaries. Dimensions of neutropenia that emerged were sorted into categories of perspective, context, conditions, processes, and consequences. The presence of the same dimension in more than 1 category and the circuitous relationships among categories begin to explicate the complexity and gravity of neutropenia. Articulation of these dimensions is necessary to assemble the beginnings of a theoretical understanding of neutropenia, which is crucial for the development and application of knowledge to research and practice. Limitations evident in the literature illuminate the urgent need for research into the psychosocial as well as physiologic dimensions of neutropenia.

Cyclophosphamide and Fludarabine with or without Rituximab (CF ± R) for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column focuses on the commercially available and investigational agents used to treat malignant diseases and reviews issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

Cytotoxic chemotherapy suppresses the hematopoietic system, impairing host protective mechanisms and limiting the doses of chemotherapy that can be tolerated. Neutropenia, the most serious hematologic toxicity, is associated with the risk of life-threatening infections as well as chemotherapy dose reductions and delays that may compromise treatment outcomes. The authors reviewed the recent literature to provide an update on research in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and its complications and impact, and they discuss the implications of this work for improving the management of patients with cancer who are treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Despite its importance as the primary dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy, much concerning neutropenia and its consequences and impact remains unknown. Recent surveys indicate that neutropenia remains a prevalent problem associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. Much research has sought to identify risk factors that may predispose patients to neutropenic complications, including febrile neutropenia, in an effort to predict better which patients are at risk and to use preventive strategies, such as prophylactic colony-stimulating factors, more cost-effectively. Neutropenic complications associated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, possibly compromised treatment outcomes, and excess healthcare costs. Research in quantifying the risk of neutropenic complications may make it possible in the near future to target patients at greater risk with appropriate preventive strategies, thereby maximizing the benefits and minimizing the costs.

Incidence and Predictors of Low Dose-Intensity in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Chemotherapy: A Nationwide Study of Community Practices

Purpose: This retrospective study was undertaken to assess practice patterns in adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) and to define the incidence and predictive factors of reduced relative dose-intensity (RDI).

Patients and Methods: A nationwide survey of 1,243 community oncology practices was conducted, with data extracted from records of 20,799 ESBC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Assessments included demographic and clinical characteristics, chemotherapy dose modifications, incidence of febrile neutropenia, and patterns of use of colony-stimulating factor (CSF). Dose-intensity was compared with published reference standard regimens.

Results: Dose reductions ≥15% occurred in 36.5% of patients, and there were treatment delays ≥7 days in 24.9% of patients, resulting in 55.5% of patients receiving RDI less than 85%. Nearly two thirds of patients received RDI less than 85% when adjusted for differences in regimen dose-intensity. Multivariate analysis identified several independent predictors for reduced RDI, including increased age; chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil; a 28-day schedule; body-surface area greater than 2 m 2 ; and no primary CSF prophylaxis. CSF was often initiated late in the chemotherapy cycle.

Conclusion: Patients with ESBC are at substantial risk for reduced RDI when treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients at greatest risk include older patients, overweight patients, and those receiving three-drug combinations or 28-day schedules. Predictive models based on such risk factors should enable the selective application of supportive measures in an effort to deliver full dose-intensity chemotherapy.

Drug-induced myelosuppression : diagnosis and management

Myelosuppression is a common and anticipated adverse effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy. It is a potential but rare idiosyncratic effect with any other drug, but there is a recognised association with a number of higher-risk agents which justify additional vigilance. Genetic risk factors are being identified which may predispose individuals to this reaction with particular drugs. As marker tests become available, dose adjustment or alternative treatment choices may help to avoid more severe reactions. Myelosuppression is potentially life threatening because of the infection and bleeding complications of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Strategies for monitoring, early detection, diagnostic confirmation and appropriate supportive care are well developed for cytotoxic therapy. Developments in antimicrobial chemotherapy, blood product transfusion support and growth factor therapy have improved outcomes. These advances are largely applicable to idiosyncratic drug-induced myelosuppression, reinforcing the importance of early recognition and referral to appropriate expertise. Many reactions will resolve on drug withdrawal with appropriate supportive care during the period of cytopenia. Prolonged marrow failure may require more specific treatment with intensive immunosuppression or consideration of bone marrow transplantation.

Infections candidosiques sévères chez le patient neutropénique en onco-hématologie pédiatrique

Incidence of severe candidal infections is rapidly increasing since 15 years and is becoming a major concern in onco-hematology practice, especially due to its poor prognosis in neutropenic patients. Diagnosis of candidemia is suspected in case of persistent fever resistant to a large antibiotherapy and requires to search for secondary locations as cutaneous and hepatosplenic candidal infection. Improvement of yeasts detection in blood culture bottles with specific medium is now helpful but use of specific immunoserodiagnosis or PCR methods is at this point unuseful. Fluconazole and Amphotericine B remain the recommended treatments for candidemia. Indications for "new antifongal drugs" are still limited regarding their high cost and the limited clinical studies.

Impact of neutropenia on delivering planned adjuvant chemotherapy: UK audit of primary breast cancer patients

The UK audit was undertaken in primary breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy to: (1) record the incidence of neutropenic events (hospitalisation due to febrile neutropenia, dose delay of > or =1 week or dose reduction of > or =15% due to neutropenia); (2) evaluate the impact of neutropenic events on overall dose intensity (DI) received and (3) review the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in clinical practice. Data from 422 patients with Stage I-III breast cancer were collected from 15 centres. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil(CMF)- or anthracycline-based regimens were the most commonly used. Only 5.2% of patients received G-CSF. Overall, 29% of patients experienced a neutropenic event, most frequently dose delay. Neutropenic events had a significant impact on the ability to deliver planned DI. Out of 422 patients, 17% did not achieve 85% of their planned DI; due to neutropenia in 11% of patients. Of the neutropenic patients receiving CMF- or anthracycline-based regimens, around 40 and 32% of patients, respectively, did not achieve 85% of their planned DI. Patients who experienced one neutropenic event had a higher risk of a second event. During adjuvant chemotherapy of primary breast cancer, neutropenic events are common, likely to occur in subsequent chemotherapy cycles, and have a significant impact on receiving planned DI.

EORTC Cancer in the Elderly Task Force guidelines for the use of colony-stimulating factors in elderly patients with cancer

Increasing age is not, in itself, a contraindication to cancer chemotherapy. Myelosuppression, however, a common adverse consequence of the administration of many standard-dose chemotherapy regimens to both young and elderly patients with cancer, increases with age. The risk of development of febrile neutropenia may contribute to a reluctance to administer chemotherapy in the elderly patient population. We conducted a detailed literature search (1992-2002) to derive evidence-based conclusions on the value of prophylactic colony-stimulating factor (CSF) administration in elderly patients receiving chemotherapy. Sufficient evidence allows us to affirm that prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and infections in elderly patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) or urothelial tumours. Lack of available trial data does not allow similar conclusions to be drawn for other cancers studied, but it is likely that similar benefits would accrue from the use of prophylactic G-CSF. There is insufficient evidence to extend this recommendation to include the use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). There are insufficient data available to allow the evaluation of the impact of prophylactic CSF on the incidence of toxic deaths in elderly patients with cancer and this is a crucial question for geriatric oncology practice. There is no evidence in elderly patients that the delivery of standard-dose chemotherapy on schedule improves efficacy measures. The data show that febrile neutropenic events are more likely to occur during the first and second cycles of chemotherapy, thus prophylactic measures should be considered early in the course of treatment. Furthermore, since systematic dose reduction can impact on outcome, primary prophylactic use of G-CSF for all elderly patients receiving curative myelotoxic chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) or CHOP-like) is indicated and we suggest a risk-adapted strategy with primary prophylactic G-CSF administration in high-risk patients. Dose intensification, through dose interval reduction, facilitated by prophylactic G-CSF, improved survival in elderly patients with some specific diseases. There is a need for further well-designed studies to identify the elderly patients who will benefit most from prophylactic G-CSF. To achieve this, we strongly urge the design of and participation in further trials.

Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the salvage treatment of ovarian cancer

In total, 70 patients were enrolled into this phase II study, to evaluate the activity of the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and gemcitabine (GEM) combination in recurrent ovarian cancer patients. PLD, 30 mg m(-2), was administered on day 1 by 60' i.v. infusion, followed by GEM, 1000 mg m(-2), given by 30' i.v. on days 1 and 8; cycles were repeated every 21 days. In all, 67 patients are so far evaluable for response. Seven complete responses (10.4%, 95% CI: 3.1-17.7), 16 partial responses (23.9%, 95% CI: 13.7-34.1), 26 disease stabilisations (38.8%, 95% CI: 27.1-50.5) and 18 progressions (26.9%, 95% CI: 16.3-37.5) have been registered. Within the resistant population (n=36), the response rate was 25% (95% CI: 10.9-39.1). Within the group of platinum-sensitive patients (n=31), the response rate was 45.2% (95% CI: 27.7-62.7). A total of 443 courses are evaluable for toxicity. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity was registered in 30 patients (42.8%), mainly represented by neutropenia (35.6%); palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia affected 24 patients (34.2%), but it was of grade 3 in only seven of them (10%).

Cost analyses of adjunct colony stimulating factors for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia : can they improve clinical decision making?

Colony stimulating factors (CSF) have been shown to reduce the duration of neutropenia following intensive chemotherapy in a variety of settings, with many of these studies targeting older patients with leukaemia. We review the clinical and economic findings for use of growth factors for older adults with acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML). The cost analyses were based on the perspective of the third party payer. One study, conducted by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) randomised 207 AML patients to receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or placebo and found no significant difference in number of infections and in days of hospitalisation, 3 fewer days with an absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/microL with G-CSF, and an estimated incremental cost of only US 120 dollars with G-CSF over placebo (1997 costs). A second study, conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), randomised 119 AML patients to receive granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or placebo and found a reduction in severe infections, 4 fewer days with an absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/microL, no significant difference in the duration of hospitalisation, and estimated cost savings of US 2310 dollars with GM-CSF (1997 costs). These data may be useful to physicians faced with concerns over clinical and economic factors associated with CSF use as adjunct therapy for older persons with AML.

Treatment of fungal infections in hematology and oncology--guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO)

The Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Haematology and Oncology presents their guidelines for the treatment of fungal infections in patients with hematological and oncological malignancies. These guidelines are evidence-based, considering study results, case reports and expert opinions, using the evidence criteria of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). The recommendations for major fungal complications in this setting are summarized here. The primary choice of therapy for chronic candidiasis should be fluconazole, reserving caspofungin or amphotericin B (AmB) for use in case of progression of the Candida infection. Patients with candidemia (except C. krusei or C. glabrata) who are in a clinically stable condition without previous azole prophylaxis should receive fluconazole, otherwise AmB or caspofungin. Voriconazole is recommended for the first-line treatment of invasive aspergillosis. The benefit of a combination of AmB and 5-flucytosine has not been demonstrated except in patients with cryptococcal meningitis. Mucormycosis is relatively rare. The drug therapy of choice consists of AmB, desoxycholate or liposomal formulation, in the highest tolerable dosage. Additional surgical intervention has been shown to achieve a lower fatality rate than with antifungal therapy alone. The role of interventional strategies, cytokines/G-CSF, and granulocyte transfusions in invasive fungal infections are further reviewed. These guidelines offer actual standards and discussions on the treatment of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis, cryptococcosis and mould infections.