Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III operated colon cancer patients from a nontrial cohort in a low colon cancer prevalence country with predominant use of modified CAPOX

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the practice of adjuvant chemotherapy, specifically with modified CAPOX, and survival outcomes in operated colon cancer patients from a nontrial cohort in a lower-middle income and low prevalence nation like India is scarce.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent upfront curative resection for colon cancer from January 2013 to December 2016 were analyzed for baseline variables and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 491 patients underwent curative resection in the predefined time period. The median age of the patients was 53 years (range: 17-87). Patients with Stage I, Stage II, and Stage III disease comprised 7.9%, 44.8%, and 45.4% of the entire cohort, respectively. Patients with Stage I cancer were observed. Adjuvant chemotherapy was planned for 384 patients (78.2%), with the doublet regimens (capecitabine-oxaliplatin, or 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin) being used commonly (77.6%). Common toxicities were Hand-foot syndrome (Grade 2/3 - 21.4%) and peripheral neuropathy (Grade 2/3 - 20.1%). About 85% of patients receiving monotherapy (capecitabine or 5 fluorouracil) and 81.2% of patients receiving doublet chemotherapy (mCAPOX or modified FOLFOX-7) completed their planned adjuvant treatment. With a median follow-up of 22 months, estimated 3 years event-free survival was 86%, and overall survival (OS) was 93.6%. Stage, younger age (<50 years), underlying cardiovascular abnormalities, need for dose reductions and noncompletion of planned chemotherapy predicted for inferior estimated 3-year OS on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy especially with modified CAPOX appears well tolerated in the Indian population and early survival outcomes appear to be comparable to published literature.

Clinical Implications of Mismatch Repair Status in Patients With High-risk Stage II Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study evaluated the clinical significance of the mismatch repair (MMR) status and prognostic factors in patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer (CC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 237 patients diagnosed with high-risk stage II CC who had test results for MMR status.

RESULTS

Among the 237 patients, 76 (32.1%) were identified as having a microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status. No significant differences were identified in disease-free or overall survival according to the MMR status. Moreover, no association was found between the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes of the MSI-H group. In a multivariate survival analysis, the primary tumor location (right-sided versus left-sided, hazard ratio(HR)=0.172, p=0.003) and T-stage (HR=4.764, p=0.005) were identified as independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The present study found that the MMR status was neither prognostic nor predictive in patients with high-risk stage II CC.

Nationwide in-hospital mortality following colonic cancer resection according to hospital volume in Germany

Background

Colonic cancer is the most common cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to determine mortality rates following colonic cancer resection and the effect of hospital caseload on in‐hospital mortality in Germany.

Methods

Patients admitted with a diagnosis of colonic cancer undergoing colonic resection from 2012 to 2015 were identified from a nationwide registry using procedure codes. The outcome measure was in‐hospital mortality. Hospitals were ranked according to their caseload for colonic cancer resection, and patients were categorized into five subgroups on the basis of hospital volume.

Results

Some 129 196 colonic cancer resections were reviewed. The overall in‐house mortality rate was 5·8 per cent, ranging from 6·9 per cent (1775 of 25 657 patients) in very low‐volume hospitals to 4·8 per cent (1239 of 25 825) in very high‐volume centres (P < 0·001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis the risk‐adjusted odds ratio for in‐house mortality was 0·75 (95 per cent c.i. 0·66 to 0·84) in very high‐volume hospitals performing a mean of 85·0 interventions per year, compared with that in very low‐volume hospitals performing a mean of only 12·7 interventions annually, after adjustment for sex, age, co‐morbidity, emergency procedures, prolonged mechanical ventilation and transfusion.

Conclusion

In Germany, patients undergoing colonic cancer resections in high‐volume hospitals had with improved outcomes compared with patients treated in low‐volume hospitals.

Perioperative systemic therapy and cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC versus upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, randomised, superiority study (CAIRO6)

Background

Upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (CRS-HIPEC) is the standard treatment for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) in the Netherlands. This study investigates whether addition of perioperative systemic therapy to CRS-HIPEC improves oncological outcomes.

Methods

This open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, randomised, superiority study is performed in nine Dutch tertiary referral centres. Eligible patients are adults who have a good performance status, histologically or cytologically proven resectable PM of a colorectal adenocarcinoma, no systemic colorectal metastases, no systemic therapy for colorectal cancer within six months prior to enrolment, and no previous CRS-HIPEC. Eligible patients are randomised (1:1) to perioperative systemic therapy and CRS-HIPEC (experimental arm) or upfront CRS-HIPEC alone (control arm) by using central randomisation software with minimisation stratified by a peritoneal cancer index of 0–10 or 11–20, metachronous or synchronous PM, previous systemic therapy for colorectal cancer, and HIPEC with oxaliplatin or mitomycin C. At the treating physician’s discretion, perioperative systemic therapy consists of either four 3-weekly neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX), six 2-weekly neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), or six 2-weekly neoadjuvant cycles of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with irinotecan (FOLFIRI) followed by four 3-weekly (capecitabine) or six 2-weekly (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) adjuvant cycles of fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. Bevacizumab is added to the first three (CAPOX) or four (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) neoadjuvant cycles. The first 80 patients are enrolled in a phase II study to explore the feasibility of accrual and the feasibility, safety, and tolerance of perioperative systemic therapy. If predefined criteria of feasibility and safety are met, the study continues as a phase III study with 3-year overall survival as primary endpoint. A total of 358 patients is needed to detect the hypothesised 15% increase in 3-year overall survival (control arm 50%; experimental arm 65%). Secondary endpoints are surgical characteristics, major postoperative morbidity, progression-free survival, disease-free survival, health-related quality of life, costs, major systemic therapy related toxicity, and objective radiological and histopathological response rates.

Discussion

This is the first randomised study that prospectively compares oncological outcomes of perioperative systemic therapy and CRS-HIPEC with upfront CRS-HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal PM.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov/NCT02758951, NTR/NTR6301, ISRCTN/ISRCTN15977568, EudraCT/2016–001865-99.

Tumor-associated Macrophages as Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers for Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer

PURPOSE

For stage II colon cancer, the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. It is well known that tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are important in tumor progression. In this study, TAMs were investigated as prognostic and predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer after radical resection.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This study enrolled two independent cohorts of consecutive patients from one medical center with pathologic stage II colon cancer after radical resections. Macrophages were detected using IHC staining of CD68 and CD206. Infiltration densities of CD68⁺ TAMs, CD206⁺ TAMs, and ratio of CD206⁺ TAMs/CD68⁺ TAMs (CD206/CD68 ratio) were calculated as prognostic and predictive biomarkers.

RESULTS

The primary and validation cohorts consisted of 521 and 314 patients, respectively. In both cohorts, high CD206/CD68 ratio was significantly associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). As an independent risk factor, CD206/CD68 ratio also had significantly better prognostic efficacy than CD68⁺ TAM density, CD206⁺ TAM density, and traditional clinicopathologic high-risk factors. Moreover, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved DFS and OS for patients with high CD206/CD68 ratio but not for those with low CD206/CD68 ratio. The interaction analyses were also significant for DFS. In subgroup analysis, CD206/CD68 ratio was still a significant predictor for adjuvant chemotherapy for patients in traditional high-risk group of recurrence (significant interaction for DFS).

CONCLUSIONS

For stage II colon cancer, CD206/CD68 ratio is a better prognostic and predictive biomarker for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Together with clinicopathologic high-risk factors, it will aid in precision treatment.

MicroRNA-940 restricts the expression of metastasis-associated gene MACC1 and enhances the antitumor effect of Anlotinib on colorectal cancer

Background: Metastasis-associated with colon cancer-1 (MACC1) is an important regulator that promotes colorectal cancer (CRC) cells’ proliferation and distant metastasis. Therefore, MACC1 is considered as a promising therapeutic target of CRC. This work aimed to identify the microRNA (miR) targeted to MACC1, and to study the potential of using the particular miR in enhancing the antitumor effect of chemotherapy.

Materials and methods: miR prediction was performed in the miR database. The effect of miR-940 on MACC1’s expression was examined by Western blot, and the effect of miR-940 on the expression of genes related to the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) was identified by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction experiments. In vivo growth of CRC cells were analyzed in the nude mice subcutaneous tumor model and CRC liver metastasis model.

Results: By using the database, miR-940 was identified to target to the 3ʹUTR of MACC1’s mRNA. Experimentally, transfection of miR-940 decreased the expression of MACC1 in CRC cells and inhibited the EMT process of the transfected cells. MiR-940 also enhanced the inhibitory effect of Anlotinib on CRC cells’ in vivo growth and invasion. Correspondingly, ectopic expression of MACC1 mutant, which does not contain miR-940 binding site, blocked the antitumor effect of miR-940 on CRC cells.

Conclusion: MiR-940 restricts the proliferation and invasion of CRC cells by targeting to MACC1’s mRNA, and enhances the antitumor effect of Anlotinib on CRC tumors.

Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Sigmoid Colon Cancer Invading the Urinary Bladder: A Report of Three Cases

Introduction

We herein present three cases of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) invading the urinary bladder, in whom combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgical intervention was effective in disease control and preserving urinary function.

Case Presentation

Before neoadjuvant chemotherapy, all three cases underwent loop transverse colostomy for symptomatic colonic obstruction. Case 1: after 6 courses of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX), we performed sigmoid colectomy and partial resection of the bladder. The histological examination revealed pathological complete response (pCR). The final diagnosis was ypStage 0 (ypT0ypN0M0). Case 2: after 13 courses of CAPOX plus bevacizumab, we performed Hartmann's operation with partial resection of the bladder. The histological examination revealed pCR. The final diagnosis was ypStage 0 (ypT0ypN0M0). Case 3: after 6 courses of chemotherapy with CAPOX plus bevacizumab, we performed sigmoid colectomy and partial resection of the bladder. The pathological response was grade 1a according to the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma. The final diagnosis was ypStage IIC (ypT4bypN0M0). All three cases underwent capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery and patients are alive without recurrence.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX with or without bevacizumab followed by radical surgery could be an effective treatment option for LACC invading the urinary bladder.

3 versus 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine combination therapy for colorectal cancer (SCOT): an international, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

Background

6 months of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy is usually given as adjuvant treatment for stage 3 colorectal cancer. We investigated whether 3 months of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy would be non-inferior to the usual 6 months of treatment.

Methods

The SCOT study was an international, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done at 244 centres. Patients aged 18 years or older with high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer underwent central randomisation with minimisation for centre, choice of regimen, sex, disease site, N stage, T stage, and the starting dose of capecitabine. Patients were assigned (1:1) to receive 3 months or 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimens could consist of CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) or FOLFOX (bolus and infused fluorouracil with oxaliplatin). The regimen was selected before randomisation in accordance with choices of the patient and treating physician. The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival and the non-inferiority margin was a hazard ratio of 1·13. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in patients who started study treatment. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN59757862, and follow-up is continuing.

Findings

6088 patients underwent randomisation between March 27, 2008, and Nov 29, 2013. The intended treatment was FOLFOX in 1981 patients and CAPOX in 4107 patients. 3044 patients were assigned to 3 month group and 3044 were assigned to 6 month group. Nine patients in the 3 month group and 14 patients in the 6 month group did not consent for their data to be used, leaving 3035 patients in the 3 month group and 3030 patients in the 6 month group for the intention-to-treat analyses. At the cutoff date for analysis, there had been 1482 disease-free survival events, with 740 in the 3 month group and 742 in the 6 month group. 3 year disease-free survival was 76·7% (95% CI 75·1–78·2) for the 3 month group and 77·1% (75·6–78·6) for the 6 month group, giving a hazard ratio of 1·006 (0·909–1·114, test for non-inferiority p=0·012), significantly below the non-inferiority margin. Peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or worse was more common in the 6 month group (237 [58%] of 409 patients for the subset with safety data) than in the 3 month group (103 [25%] of 420) and was long-lasting and associated with worse quality of life. 1098 serious adverse events were reported (492 reports in the 3 month group and 606 reports in the 6 month group) and 32 treatment-related deaths occurred (16 in each group).

Interpretation

In the whole study population, 3 months of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy was non-inferior to 6 months of the same therapy for patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer and was associated with reduced toxicity and improved quality of life. Despite the fact the study was underpowered, these data suggest that a shorter duration leads to similar survival outcomes with better quality of life and thus might represent a new standard of care.

Funding

Medical Research Council, Swedish Cancer Society, NETSCC, and Cancer Research UK.

Circulating Tumor DNA: Clinical Monitoring and Early Detection

Roughly 70 years after the presence of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in circulating blood was discovered, cfDNA has emerged as a transformative technology in clinical oncology. The ability to assess the presence, level, and composition of tumor DNA from a routine, noninvasive blood draw has opened the door to a broad array of high-impact clinical applications. While cfDNA is rapidly gaining clinical favor as a means of tumor mutational profiling without the need for an invasive biopsy, emerging applications in the areas of clinical monitoring and early cancer detection hold tremendous promise. These developing applications of cfDNA are reviewed herein.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer

A 55-year-old man with no medical history presents to his primary care physician with fatigue and dark stools and is found to have anemia. He is referred for diagnostic colonoscopy and found to have an ulcerated mass in the ascending colon. Metastatic workup is negative. He is referred to a colorectal surgeon and undergoes an uneventful laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Final pathology reveals a 4-cm ulcerated mass involving the muscularis propria with 3 positive lymph nodes out of 12 (T2N1bM0, stage IIIA). The patient arrives at his postoperative appointment with questions about chemotherapy.

Construction and validation of a simple scoring system for stage III colorectal cancer recurrence (SiS-SCORE). A case control study

BACKGROUND

Stage III colorectal cancer is an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy; however, there is no definite view on the selection of regimen. If the recurrence can be predicted, it can serve as the indicator of regimen selection. The present study aimed to predict the recurrence of stage III colorectal cancer by constructing a simple scoring system.

METHODS

The information of stage III cases that underwent curative surgery was obtained from two facilities and analyzed. A scoring system was constructed from the analysis results and evaluated based on the cases from a different facility.

RESULTS

Five factors were extracted by multivariate analysis: age > 65, male, rectum, ≥pN2 and CA19-9 > 37. When these parameters were scored as 1 point each, the score was correlated with the cumulative recurrence rate. Additionally, when cases were divided into three groups (≤1 point, 2 points, ≥3 points), the 5-year recurrence rate was as follows:, ≤1 point: 33.3%, 2 points: 42.1%, ≥3 points: 78.6%. The cumulative recurrence rate of ≥3 points was significantly higher than that of ≤1 point (P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained by evaluating that cases at a different facility (P = 0.032). Both cases with 2 points were located between ≤1 point and ≥3 points, reflecting the average recurrence rate of each institution.

CONCLUSION

As the SiS-SCORE presented the same result in the facility that was different from the base facility, it can be used widely. However, a prospective study is required to prove the usefulness of the SiS-SCORE.

Colorectal liver metastases: An update on multidisciplinary approach

Liver metastasis is the commonest form of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer. Selection criteria for surgery and liver-directed therapies have recently been extended. However, resectability remains poorly defined. Tumour biology is increasingly recognized as an important prognostic factor; hence molecular profiling has a growing role in risk stratification and management planning. Surgical resection is the only treatment modality for curative intent. The most appropriate surgical approach is yet to be established. The primary cancer and the hepatic metastasis can be removed simultaneously or in a two-step approach; these two strategies have comparable long-term outcomes. For patients with a limited future liver remnant, portal vein embolization, combined ablation and resection, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy have been advocated, and each has their pros and cons. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy is still debated. Targeted biological agents and loco-regional therapies (thermal ablation, intra-arterial chemo- or radio-embolization, and stereotactic radiotherapy) further improve the already favourable results. The recent debate about offering liver transplantation to highly selected patients needs validation from large clinical trials. Evidence-based protocols are missing, and therefore optimal management of hepatic metastasis should be personalized and determined by a multi-disciplinary team.

Effect of oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil on treatment efficacy of radiotherapy in the treatment of elderly patients with rectal cancer

Efficacy of the combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and radiotherapy on rectal cancer in elderly patients was investigated. Seventy-three elderly patients with rectal cancer confirmed by histopathological examination were randomly divided into 3 groups: oxaliplatin group (25 cases): intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin; fluorouracil group (24 cases): intravenous infusion of fluorouracil; combination group (24 cases), intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil. All patients were treated with radiotherapy, and efficacy and safety were evaluated after 2 courses of treatment. MTT assay was used to observe the inhibitory effects of the proliferation of human rectal cancer cells. Cell proliferation and sensitization ratios were compared. After 2 courses of treatment, there was no difference in complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), progression disease (PD) and disease control rate (DCR). Remission rate (RR) was higher in the combination group than that in the oxaliplatin and the fluorouracil groups (P<0.05), and there was no difference between the oxaliplatin and the fuorouracil group (P>0.05). Incidence of neutropenia in the combination group was higher than that in the fluorouracil group (P<0.05). OD values of the combination group were lower than those of the oxaliplatin and the fluorouracil groups (P<0.05). Proliferation ability of SW837 cells of the combination group was significantly lower than that of the oxaliplatin and the fluorouracil groups (P<0.05). Intragroup comparison of sensitization ratio showed that sensitization ratios of three groups of cells at 24, 48 and 72 h were all higher than those at 12 h (P<0.05). The combination of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil is safe and effective in the treatment of rectal cancer in elderly patients, and it can be used for sensitization of radiotherapy. So it should be popularized in clinical practices.

Right versus left sided metastatic colorectal cancer: Teasing out clinicopathologic drivers of disparity in survival

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with a right-sided primary (RC) have an inferior survival to mCRC arising from a left-sided primary (LC). Previous analyses have suggested multiple factors contribute.

METHODS

The Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) Registry prospectively captured data on consecutive mCRC patients. RC were defined as tumors proximal to the splenic flexure; LC were those at and distal to the splenic flexure and included rectal cancers. Patient, tumor, treatment, and survival data were analyzed stratified by side.

RESULTS

Of 2306 patients enrolled from July 2009-March 2018, 747 (32%) had an RC. Patients with RC were older, more likely to be female and have a Charlson score ≥3. RC were more frequently BRAF mutated, deficient in mismatch repair, associated with peritoneal metastases, and less likely to receive chemotherapy. Progression-free survival on first-line systemic therapy was inferior for RC patients (8.1 vs. 10.8 months, hazard ratio [HR] for progression in RC 1.38, P < 0.001). Median overall survival for all RC patients was inferior (19.6 vs. 27.5 months, HR for death in RC 1.44, P < 0.001), and inferior within the treated (21 vs. 29.5 months, HR 1.52, P < 0.001) and untreated subgroups (5.9 vs. 10.3 months, HR 1.38, P = 0.009). Primary side remained a significant factor for overall survival in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our data from a real-world population confirms the poorer prognosis associated with RC. Primary tumor location remains significantly associated with overall survival even when adjusting for multiple factors, indicating the existence of further side-based differences that are as yet undefined.

Early colorectal cancer: diagnosis, treatment and survivorship care

CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. With advances in treatment, colorectal cancer is being transformed from a deadly disease to an illness that is increasingly curable. With this transformation has come increased interest in the unique problems, risks, needs, and concerns of survivors who have completed treatment and are cancer-free. They often suffer late/long-term side effects of therapies that may compromise their QoL such as fatigue, sleep difficulty, fear of recurrence, anxiety, depression, negative body image, sensory neuropathy, gastrointestinal problems, urinary incontinence, and sexual dysfunction. In this review, we discuss what is known about early colorectal diagnosis, staging, treatments and their long-term effects on quality of life and survivorship care.

Is Adjuvant Chemotherapy Efficient in Colon Cancer with High Microsatellite Instability? A Look Towards the Future

The high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is frequently observed in localized colorectal adenocarcinoma. MSI-H is a good prognostic factor in nonmetastatic colon adenocarcinoma. However, MSI-H is not a predictive factor because it is not related with better survival in patients with colon cancer with adjuvant chemotherapy. MSI-H should be a predictive factor because it is associated with a higher expression of enzymes, which are inhibited by cytotoxic agents. Here, we analyze this controversy. We conclude MSI-H is not a predictive factor because the adjuvant therapy based on traditional cytotoxic agents does not act on either immune signaling pathways or BRAF mutation.

Impact of primary tumor location as a predictive factor in patients suffering from colorectal cancer treated with cytotoxic anticancer agents based on the collagen gel droplet-embedded drug sensitivity test

In recent studies, better clinical outcomes for patients with left-sided colon cancer (CC) compared with right-sided CC have been reported; however, in such investigations, the chemotherapy regimens included molecular-targeting agents. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of primary tumor location as a predictive factor in patients suffering from CC treated with cytotoxic anticancer agents alone has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of the primary tumor location as a predictive factor of patients undergoing the following cytotoxic anticancer agent regimens: Leucovorin and fluorouracil + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or Leucovorin and fluorouracil + irinotecan (FOLFIRI), using the collagen gel droplet-embedded drug sensitivity test (CD-DST). Between March 2008 and April 2017, tumor specimens were obtained from 133 patients suffering from colorectal cancer (CRC) who had not received preoperative chemotherapy. CD-DST was performed and the growth inhibition rate (IR) was determined in FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimens. The associations between tumor location and IR values for each condition were evaluated. In the present study, the prognosis of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy as well as treatment with molecularly-targeted agents was also investigated. There were no significant differences in the IRs (%) of the two regimens using CD-DST for right-sided tumors compared with left-sided tumors, including or excluding the rectum. The median survival times of patients with right CC and left CC who had received palliative chemotherapy and treatment with molecularly-targeted agents were 960 and 1,348 days, respectively. Primary tumor location did not represent a predictive factor for the efficacy of treatment with cytotoxic anticancer agent regimens using CD-DST. However, patients suffering from left-sided CC were revealed to exhibit better clinical outcomes compared with patients suffering from right-sided CC when molecularly-targeted agent regimens were administered. Therefore, the results of the present study suggested that molecularly-targeted agents rather than cytotoxic anticancer agents may result in improved clinical outcomes for patients with CRC suffering from left-sided tumors.

[Epidemiology of microsatellite instability across solid neoplasms]

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, regardless of the tumor type. While clinical characteristics of MSI cancer patients have been largely described in tumor localizations frequently associated with this genetic phenotype (i.e. colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer), it remains poorly characterized in other neoplasms. Pan-tumor high-throughput genome sequence analyses have contributed to the broadening of knowledge about the landscape of MSI. This review aims at synthetizing the literature concerning the frequency of MSI status in solid cancers, according to the cancer stage and the hereditary or sporadic origin of the mismatch repair deficiency. We then check for other cancers frequently associated with MSI and describe the clinical and pathological characteristics that should suggest a MSI phenotype.

The Optimal Duration of Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: the European Perspective

OPINION STATEMENT

The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Therapy (IDEA) collaboration was created to pool data from different studies worldwide in order to assess whether a shorter duration of adjuvant treatment in colon cancer could maintain the expected benefit while reducing toxicity. The results of the IDEA trials were clinically relevant. They confirmed a two- to sixfold reduction in neurotoxicity for the shorter duration across trials. Overall, the 3-year disease-free survival was very similar: only 0.9% lower for the 3 months group. However, the results were partially unexpected, because they revealed a difference among chemotherapy regimens (CAPOX better than FOLFOX) and risk groups within stage III. The similar outcome between 3 and 6 months of CAPOX coupled with the substantial reduction in toxicity makes us use the CAPOX regimen for 3 months for most stage III patients. An exception to this general rule is the patient with very high risk, i.e., either T4N1b-T4anyN2 or anyTN2b where we use 6 months of CAPOX. Our take from the trial results is also that FOLFOX should never be given for 3 months and preferably not used at all in the adjuvant setting. The conduction of the IDEA enterprise was truly global. The European contribution was major with three fourths of patients enrolled in the four European trials. Herein, we review the results of the "3 versus 6" trials and the literature regarding the interpretation of the collected data in Europe and in the rest of the world.

Symptoms during chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients experience several physical and psychological co-occurring symptoms, but little is known about symptom variation during chemotherapy cycles. Therefore, the aims were (1) to assess the occurrence and severity of frequently occurring symptoms (worrying, lack of energy, numbness/tingling, nausea, and pain) at multiple time points during chemotherapy, (2) to investigate differences in symptom trajectories between chemotherapy groups, and (3) to determine whether selected patient and clinical characteristics are associated with symptom severity throughout the treatment trajectory.

METHODS

In total, 120 CRC patients receiving chemotherapy with curative or palliative intent completed the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire (SCQ-19), and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale eight times, during two cycles of chemotherapy and 3 and 6 months after enrolment. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models for repeated measures to assess the effects of selected variables on outcomes over time.

RESULTS

The patients experienced greatest symptom severity in the days following the administration of chemotherapy; these were lack of energy, numbness/tingling (oxaliplatin group), and nausea. Palliative patients reported significantly higher pain scores compared with curative patients over time, whereas the severity of worrying decreased over time in both treatment groups. Age, sex, educational level, performance status, treatment intent and type of chemotherapy were significantly associated with symptom severity throughout the chemotherapy trajectory.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians can use these findings to identify and inform patients about risk for more severe symptom burden, in order to offer supportive care at the right time during the chemotherapy treatment.

Impact of primary tumor location as a predictive factor in patients suffering from colorectal cancer treated with cytotoxic anticancer agents based on the collagen gel droplet-embedded drug sensitivity test

In recent studies, better clinical outcomes for patients with left-sided colon cancer (CC) compared with right-sided CC have been reported; however, in such investigations, the chemotherapy regimens included molecular-targeting agents. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of primary tumor location as a predictive factor in patients suffering from CC treated with cytotoxic anticancer agents alone has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of the primary tumor location as a predictive factor of patients undergoing the following cytotoxic anticancer agent regimens: Leucovorin and fluorouracil + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or Leucovorin and fluorouracil + irinotecan (FOLFIRI), using the collagen gel droplet-embedded drug sensitivity test (CD-DST). Between March 2008 and April 2017, tumor specimens were obtained from 133 patients suffering from colorectal cancer (CRC) who had not received preoperative chemotherapy. CD-DST was performed and the growth inhibition rate (IR) was determined in FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimens. The associations between tumor location and IR values for each condition were evaluated. In the present study, the prognosis of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy as well as treatment with molecularly-targeted agents was also investigated. There were no significant differences in the IRs (%) of the two regimens using CD-DST for right-sided tumors compared with left-sided tumors, including or excluding the rectum. The median survival times of patients with right CC and left CC who had received palliative chemotherapy and treatment with molecularly-targeted agents were 960 and 1,348 days, respectively. Primary tumor location did not represent a predictive factor for the efficacy of treatment with cytotoxic anticancer agent regimens using CD-DST. However, patients suffering from left-sided CC were revealed to exhibit better clinical outcomes compared with patients suffering from right-sided CC when molecularly-targeted agent regimens were administered. Therefore, the results of the present study suggested that molecularly-targeted agents rather than cytotoxic anticancer agents may result in improved clinical outcomes for patients with CRC suffering from left-sided tumors.

[Predictive and prognostic value of MSI phenotype in adjuvant colon cancer: Who and how to treat?]

The MSI phenotype in colon cancer is a good prognostic factor, with an impact probably more pronounced for stage II than stage III tumor. This survival advantage may be related to the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes observed in MSI tumors, thus explaining the existence of a probably more effective anti-tumor immune response. In addition, the MSI status would also be a biomarker able to predict the lack of efficacy of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5FU) chemotherapy. In contrast, as observed in MSS colon cancer, the MSI tumors would have a survival benefit with the addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant 5FU chemotherapy. Based on these data, the "French National Thesaurus of Digestive Oncology" suggests for patients with MSI colon cancer, an adjuvant chemotherapy combining fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin for stage III, and surgery alone without adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II (excepted for pT4b tumors in which the combination of fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin may be a therapeutic option). Beyond these recommendations, the discussion of adjuvant treatment in MSI tumors should also include other factors such as the patient's age and comorbidities. The duration of the adjuvant treatment (3 or 6 months) and the regimen used (FOLFOX or XELOX) should be based on the recommendations of the international IDEA consortium pending the results of the translational studies of this trial. Finally, the promising results of immunotherapy in metastatic MSI colorectal led to the development of clinical trials evaluating "immune checkpoint blockers" in combination with FOLFOX in the treatment of stage III MSI colon cancer.

Mismatch repair deficiency assessment by immunohistochemistry: for Lynch syndrome screening and beyond

While mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency has been studied extensively, the assessment of MMR status in colorectal and other cancers remains highly relevant, particularly in light of recent data demonstrating that MMR deficiency is a strong predictor for treatment benefit with immune checkpoint inhibitors across multiple tumor types. In colorectal cancer, there is a growing consensus in support of routine MMR testing for Lynch syndrome screening, to inform prognosis and adjuvant chemotherapy use in early stage disease, and to predict response to immunotherapy in advanced disease. Here, we provide a review of the Ventana MMR Immunohistochemistry Panel, which was recently approved by the US FDA for use in Lynch syndrome screening.

Bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) In Combination With Oxaliplatin Is Safe and Well Tolerated in Patients Who Experienced Coronary Vasospasm With Infusional 5-FU or Capecitabine

INTRODUCTION

Coronary vasospasm associated with fluoropyrimidine (FP)-based chemotherapy is a potentially serious complication and reported to occur more often with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine than with bolus 5-FU. Given the additional benefit of oxaliplatin over FP alone in the management of colorectal cancer, retaining oxaliplatin in the treatment regimen is desirable, but the safety of combining bolus 5-FU with oxaliplatin in patients with FP-induced vasospasm is not well established. We performed a retrospective review to explore the safety of substituting FLOX (bolus 5-FU, oxaliplatin, leucovorin) for FOLFOX (infusional 5-FU, oxaliplatin, leucovorin) and CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin) in patients who had FP-induced coronary vasospasm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The pharmacy database of Mayo Clinic was queried to identify patients who developed coronary vasospasm associated with FOLFOX or CAPOX between January 2011 and January 2018 and were subsequently treated with FLOX. Detailed information was obtained on these patients by retrospective electronic chart review.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients (median age, 56.5 years; range, 36-77 years) were identified, 9 with FOLFOX and 1 with CAPOX. Among the patients treated with FOLFOX, 8 patients had chest pain as the presenting complaint that had started within 48 hours of beginning of the 5-FU infusion. In 9 of 10 patients, coronary vasospasm occurred with the first cycle of therapy. All patients made full recovery after discontinuation of infusional 5-FU or capecitabine. All patients subsequently received FLOX with 7 median bolus 5-FU doses (range, 2-22 doses) and 7 median oxaliplatin doses (range, 2-12 doses) at 7 days to 18 months after the event, with 7 patients treated within 4 weeks of the event. FLOX did not cause any cardiovascular adverse events in any of the 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

Bolus 5-FU in combination with oxaliplatin is safe in patients who have experienced coronary vasospasm with infusional 5-FU or capecitabine.

Lower serum CA125 level, negative vascular invasion, and wild BRAF were strongly associated with better 2-year disease-free survival in patients with stage III colorectal cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy plays important role in the comprehensive treatment of patients with stage III colorectal cancer. However, there is few molecular markers for predicting the therapeutic effect.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors that could predict adjuvant chemotherapy benefits in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The medical records of 294 patients were reviewed and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis.

RESULTS

Lower CA125 (⩽ 35 u/ml, P= 0.0015) serum levels, stage IIIa (P= 0.0027), 1-3 positive lymph nodes (P= 0.0256), negative vascular invasion (P= 0.0215), lower CA199 (⩽ 27 u/ml, P= 0.0038) serum levels, and wild-type BRAF status (P= 0.0125) were significantly associated with a higher 2-year DFS rate in patients with stage III colorectal cancer. However, in multivariate COX analysis, the association remained significant only for CA125 levels (vs. ⩽ 35 u/ml group, HR 3.341; 95% CI, 1.198-9.316; P= 0.0212), vascular invasion (vs. negative vascular invasion, HR, 2.349; 95% CI, 1.227-4.499; P= 0.01), and BRAF (V600E) (vs. wild Braf, HR, 7.794; 95% CI, 1.867-32.531; P= 0.0049).

CONCLUSION

Lower CA125 serum levels, negative vascular invasion, and wild-type BRAF status were significantly associated with improved 2-year DFS rates among patient with stage III disease who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Role of circulating tumor DNA in the management of patients with colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a major health burden with a prognosis that has been improved with the progresses in diagnosis and the advance of chemotherapy and personalized medicine. However, because of intra-tumor heterogeneity, clonal evolution and selection, tumors often develop resistance to treatments. "Liquid biopsy" is a minimally invasive method, based on analysis of tumor-specific material in peripheral blood samples of patients. Analysis of tumor specific genetic or epigenetic alterations in cell-free circulating nucleic acids may reflect the molecular heterogeneity of the underlying disease process and serial testing could allow to monitor its temporal genomic changing without using re-biopsy. In this review, we focused on the role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker in the management of patients with colorectal cancer at early and advanced stages. Through recent studies, we described its promising clinical applications for diagnosis, detection of recurrence after surgery and monitoring for tumor response or therapeutic resistance in metastatic setting. Such recent developments offer new perspectives for personalized medicine in colorectal cancer but still needs some standardized detection methods and further studies to validate its use in clinical routine.

Prognostic value of the combination of microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the combination of microsatellite instability (MSI) and BRAF V600E mutation in colorectal cancer (CRC).

Materials and methods

We compare the prognosis difference among CRC patients with four subtypes according to MSI and BRAF mutation, ie, microsatellite stable/BRAF wild type (MSS/BRAFwt), MSS/BRAF mutation (MSS/BRAFmut), MSI/BRAFwt, and MSI/BRAFmut, by pooling the previous related reports and public available data sets till December 2017 for the first time.

Results

Twenty-seven independent studies comprising 24,067 CRC patients were included. Meta-analysis suggested that, compared with MSS/BRAFwt subtype, MSS/BRAFmut was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (N=25, HR = 2.018, 95% CI = 1.706-2.388, P=2.220E-16), while there was a trend of association of MSI/BRAFmut with OS (N=13, HR = 1.324, 95% CI = 0.938-1.868, P=1.096E-01) and no association of MSI/BRAFwt with OS (N=17, HR = 0.996, 95% CI = 0.801-1.240, P=9.761E-01). Compared with MSI/ BRAFwt subtype, MSI/BRAFmut was a poor factor for OS (N=22, HR = 1.470, 95% CI = 1.243-1.740, P=7.122E-06). Compared with MSS/BRAFmut subtype, both MSI/BRAFwt (N=11, HR = 0.560, 95% CI = 0.433-0.725, P=1.034E-05) and MSI/BRAFmut (N=16, HR = 0.741, 95% CI = 0.567-0.968, P=2.781E-02) were favorable for OS. Subgroup analysis revealed similar results in all subgroups except the subgroup of stage IV cancer, in which MSI showed poor effects on OS in BRAF wild-type patients (N=6, HR = 1.493, 95% CI = 1.187-1.879, P=6.262E-04) but not in BRAF-mutated patients (N=5, HR = 1.143, 95% CI = 0.789-1.655, P=4.839E-01). Meta-analysis regression and test of interaction revealed no interaction of MSI with BRAF mutation when evaluating the associations of MSI/BRAF mutation subtypes with OS in CRC.

Conclusion

Among the four subtypes according to MSI and BRAF mutation, MSS/BRAFmut was a poor prognostic factor, while MSS/BRAFwt and MSI/BRAFwt were comparable and favorable and MSI/BRAFmut was moderate in CRC. The combination of MSI/BRAF mutations could facilitate the planning of individualized treatment strategies and prognosis improvement in CRC.

Recent advances in understanding colorectal cancer

The achievements in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer during recent years are based on a better understanding of the disease and individualized regimen planning. In adjuvant treatment, the highly important IDEA (International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy) study has shown that treatment duration can safely be reduced in selected patient populations. In patients with pN1 and pT1-pT3 tumors, 3 months of treatment with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin is comparable with respect to 3-year survival rate to 6 months of treatment. For patients with N2 tumors, 6 months of treatment should stay the standard of care. The limitation of the duration of the adjuvant treatment is significantly reducing the chemotherapy-induced morbidity. New studies will explore the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in the adjuvant setting in microsatellite-instable (MSI) tumors. In metastatic disease, next to the required molecular testing for RAS and BRAF mutations, MSI testing is recommended. In the rare group of patients with a MSI tumor, immune-checkpoint inhibition is changing the course of the disease dramatically. Therefore, it is important to identify those patients early. For the RAS-mutant cases, no new and targeted treatment options have been identified yet. An optimal treatment strategy for those patients is urgently needed. RAS wild-type patients with tumors derived from the left side of the colon (splenic flexure to rectum) should be treated in first line with epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies. This selection by a molecular and a clinical marker increased the benefit derived by EGFR antibodies dramatically and defined the most effective treatment option for those patients. New selection criteria based on gene expression, methylation, and other molecular changes are explored and will further influence our therapeutic strategies in the future.

Glycosyltransferase Gene Expression Identifies a Poor Prognostic Colorectal Cancer Subtype Associated with Mismatch Repair Deficiency and Incomplete Glycan Synthesis

Purpose: We aimed to discover glycosyltransferase gene (glycogene)-derived molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer associated with patient outcomes.Experimental Design: Transcriptomic and epigenomic datasets of nontumor, precancerous, cancerous tissues, and cell lines with somatic mutations, mismatch repair status, clinicopathologic and survival information were assembled (n = 4,223) and glycogene profiles were analyzed. IHC for a glycogene, GALNT6, was conducted in adenoma and carcinoma specimens (n = 403). The functional role and cell surface glycan profiles were further investigated by in vitro loss-of-function assays and lectin microarray analysis.Results: We initially developed and validated a 15-glycogene signature that can identify a poor-prognostic subtype, which closely related to deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and GALNT6 downregulation. The association of decreased GALNT6 with dMMR was confirmed in multiple datasets of tumors and cell lines, and was further recapitulated by IHC, where approximately 15% tumors exhibited loss of GALNT6 protein. GALNT6 mRNA and protein was expressed in premalignant/preinvasive lesions but was subsequently downregulated in a subset of carcinomas, possibly through epigenetic silencing. Decreased GALNT6 was independently associated with poor prognosis in the IHC cohort and an additional microarray meta-cohort, by multivariate analyses, and its discriminative power of survival was particularly remarkable in stage III patients. GALNT6 silencing in SW480 cells promoted invasion, migration, chemoresistance, and increased cell surface expression of a cancer-associated truncated O-glycan, Tn-antigen.Conclusions: The 15-glycogene signature and the expression levels of GALNT6 mRNA and protein each serve as a novel prognostic biomarker, highlighting the role of dysregulated glycogenes in cancer-associated glycan synthesis and poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4468-81. ©2018 AACR.

Should adjuvant chemotherapy be recommended to a 75-year-old woman with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) gene product expression seen in a stage II colon adenocarcinoma with lymphovascular invasion?

The risk of recurrence from stage II colon cancer and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy is influenced significantly by the molecular marker termed microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair (MMR) gene product expression.¹ Study results and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Colon Cancer Guideline panel suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine [5-FU] +/- oxaliplatin) be considered for patients with stage II colon adenocarcinoma harboring one or more "high-risk" features.² However, for patients with deficient-MMR (dMMR) stage II colon cancer, evidence suggests there may be a detrimental effect with adjuvant 5-FU alone.³ Finally, the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU does not appear to benefit older patients with stage II colon cancer.^4,5 For the patient described, the challenge involved how to advise an older patient with a dMMR stage II colon cancer and a high-risk feature. The identified lymphovascular invasion in the tumor implies that adjuvant chemotherapy with either 5-FU or capecitabine +/- oxaliplatin would be reasonable considerations. However, the dMMR status of the tumor suggests that 5-FU alone would be contraindicated, and her age suggests that a lack of benefit would be expected from oxaliplatin.

Report from the 19th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Winnipeg, Manitoba; 29-30 September 2017

The 19th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (wcgccc) was held in Winnipeg, Manitoba, 29-30 September 2017. The wcgccc is an interactive multidisciplinary conference attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists; pathologists; radiologists; and allied health care professionals participated in presentation and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of colorectal cancer.

Noninferiority of three months versus six months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer. How should IDEA findings affect clinical practice?

The eagerly awaited results of the multi-continental International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) project have recently been presented at major oncological meetings. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was presented for 12,834 Stage III colon cancer patients in a pooled analysis of 6 individual noninferiority phase III randomized trials, all investigating three versus six months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy. Noninferiority (NI) could not be demonstrated for the whole population as the DFS hazard ratio (HR) of 1.07 with its 95% CI of 1.00-1.15 crossed the postulated NI boundary of 1.12. However, there was an expected reduction in the incidence of specific side effects with the three months treatment. NI could be demonstrated for the T3N1 subgroup (∼60% of patients, HR for DFS 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.12). Moreover, NI was also declared for the subgroup treated with the CAPOX regimen (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin, ∼40% of patients), but the CAPOX choice was physician-based and not subject to randomization. Overall, the IDEA results indicate that three months of therapy might be adequate for most of Stage III tumors; however, a small subset of these patients still have high risk of recurrence and death with short treatment duration. Precise predictors of benefit need to be identified, nonetheless tumor-intrinsic factors, such as tumor stage, might currently be considered as useful tools to inform the decision-making process.

Meta-analysis of postoperative adjuvant therapy for small bowel adenocarcinoma

Objective

The role of adjuvant therapy in small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis, is controversial. The purpose of this article is to investigate the impact of adjuvant therapy on the survival of patients with SBA in a meta-analysis.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library database between 2010 and 2017. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were used to assess the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment after curative surgery in patients with SBA. Moreover, impact of age, sex, stage, differentiation, lymph node involvement, and margin status was also evaluated.

Results

We included 15 studies to evaluate the effect of adjuvant therapy on the survival of patients with SBA. The pooled HR of overall survival (OS) involving 5986 patients showed that adjuvant therapy did not have a statistically significant effect on the survival of patients with SBA (pooled HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.73–1.09, p = 0.25). Further, 607 patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) had similar results (pooled HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.75–1.23, p = 0.77). Similarly, adjuvant treatment vs. non-adjuvant treatment in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) or relapse-free survival (RFS) showed the same results (pooled HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.64–1.23, p = 0.48). However, we found that adjuvant therapy resulted in favorable postoperative survival in Europe according to the subgroup analysis (pooled HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.5–0.8, p = 0.0002). In addition, the pooled HR shows that stage, differentiation, lymph node involvement, and margin status were related to the OS of patients with SBA.

Conclusion

Patients with SBA who received adjuvant therapy after surgery did not receive a significant survival benefit. Adjuvant therapy may be more useful in advanced cancer or metastatic patients.

miRNAs and lncRNAs as Predictive Biomarkers of Response to FOLFOX Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

Chemotherapy is one of the options for cancer treatment. FOLFOX is one of the widely used chemotherapeutic regimens used to treat primarily colorectal cancer and other cancers as well. However, the emergence of chemo-resistance clones during cancer treatment has become a critical challenge in the clinical setting. It is crucial to identify the potential biomarkers and therapeutics targets which could lead to an improvement in the success rate of the proposed therapies. Since non-coding RNAs have been known to be important players in the cellular system, the interest in their functional roles has intensified. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) as regulators at the post-transcriptional level could be very promising to provide insights in overcoming chemo-resistance to FOLFOX. Hence, this mini review attempts to summarize the potential of ncRNAs correlating with chemo-sensitivity/resistance to FOLFOX.

Heat shock protein 27 influences the anti-cancer effect of curcumin in colon cancer cells through ROS production and autophagy activation

The problem of therapeutic resistance and chemotherapeutic efficacy is tricky and critical in the management of colorectal cancer (CRC). Curcumin is a promising anti-cancer agent. Heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) is correlated with CRC progression and is said to affect CRC response to different therapies. However, the role of HSP27 on the therapeutic efficacy of curcumin remains unknown. HSP27 was silenced using small hairpin RNA (shRNA) technique. The cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of curcumin were assessed by sulforhodamine B (SRB) colorimetric assay, flow cytometric cell cycle analysis, and annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) double-labeling assays. Total reactive oxygen species (ROS)/superoxide and autophagy detection were performed, and the levels of apoptosis-related proteins were examined by Western blotting. It was found that the silencing of HSP27 (HSP27-KD) resulted in increased treatment resistance to curcumin in CRC cells. In addition, cell cycle analysis showed that the curcumin treatment caused cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase in the control group, and apoptosis was reduced in the HSP27-KD group. Curcumin treatment also resulted in a decrease in anti-apoptotic proteins, p-Akt, Akt, Bcl-2 and p-Bad, and increase in pro-apoptotic proteins Bad and c-PARP levels in the control cells but not in the HSP27-KD cells. This was also followed by low reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS), superoxide and autophagy induction levels in the HSP27-KD cells as compared to the control cells. Therefore, as silencing of HSP27 increases curcumin resistance by reducing apoptosis and reactive oxidative stress production, HSP27 is a potential selective target for curcumin treatment in CRC.

Effects of CDX2 on prognosis and chemotherapy responsiveness in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer

Background

Caudal‐related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) is an intestine‐specific transcription factor implicated in tumour differentiation, proliferation, cell adhesion and migration. Negative CDX2 status (CDX2−) is associated with worse prognosis in colorectal cancer and may identify high‐risk stage II disease that benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy. This observational study investigated whether CDX2− is associated with prognosis or response to chemotherapy in the mismatch repair‐deficient (dMMR) phenotype of colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients with resectable dMMR colorectal cancer were eligible for inclusion. The prognostic and predictive value of CDX2 expression on the presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival was investigated. CDX2 status was determined via immunohistochemistry using the Leica Bond™ CDX2 (clone EP25) ready‐to‐use primary antibody.

Results

Some 235 of 238 consecutive dMMR tumours were assessed for CDX2 status. CDX2− was observed in 15·7 per cent of colorectal cancer. Interobserver agreement was excellent (κ = 0·863; P < 0·001). CDX2− was significantly associated with female sex, increased size, advanced stage, worse conventional and poorly differentiated cluster (PDC) grade, mucinous morphology, perineural and lymphovascular invasion, and pN status (all P ≤ 0·038). CDX2− was not associated with LNM or survival in multivariable analysis. Independent predictors of LNM were PDC grade (odds ratio (OR) 4·12, 95 per cent c.i. 1·76 to 9·63; P = 0·001) and extramural venous invasion (OR 3·79, 1·62 to 8·85; P = 0·002). Budding (hazard ratio (HR) 2·79, 95 per cent c.i. 1·60 to 4·87; P < 0·001), pT status (HR 3·59, 1·29 to 10·01; P = 0·015) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2·07, 1·15 to 3·74; P = 0·016) were independently associated with worse disease‐free survival.

Conclusion

CDX2− does not confer a worse prognosis in the dMMR phenotype of colorectal cancer. The MMR status of patients with colorectal cancer should be determined before assessing CDX2 status.

Association Between Use of Traditional Chinese Medicine Herbal Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Chinese cancer patients often use Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) herbal medicine during or after active cancer treatments. However, little is known about how TCM herbal medicine impacts cancer outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the association between TCM herbal therapy and survival outcomes in patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer.

Methods

We conducted an eight-center prospective cohort study in China among patients who had undergone radical resection for stage II and III colorectal cancer. All patients received comprehensive conventional treatments according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, and follow-up visits were conducted over five years. We defined high exposure as a patient's use of TCM individualized herbs for more than one year, ascertained via clinical interviews. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS), with overall survival (OS) as a secondary outcome.

Results

Between April 2007 and February 2009, we enrolled 312 patients into the cohort; 166 (53.2%) met the definition of high exposure to TCM herbs. Adjusting for covariates, high exposure to TCM was associated with both better DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39 to 0.98) and OS (HR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.68). In subgroup exploratory analysis, the effects demonstrated that the differences in outcomes were statistically significant in patients who had received chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Longer duration of TCM herbal use is associated with improved survival outcomes in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients in China. More research is needed to evaluate the effects and underlying mechanisms of herbal medicine on colorectal cancer outcomes.

Trends in presentation, treatment and survival of 1777 patients with colorectal cancer over a decade: a Biobank study

BACKGROUND

Most survival data in colorectal cancer (CRC) is derived from clinical trials or register-based studies. Hospital Biobanks, linked with hospital electronic records, could serve as a data-gathering method based on consecutively collected tumor samples. The aim of this Biobank study was to analyze survival of colorectal patients diagnosed and treated in a single-center university hospital over a period of 12 years, and to evaluate factors contributing to outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 1777 patients with CRC treated during 2001-2012 were identified from the Auria Biobank, Turku, Finland. Longitudinal clinical information was collected from various hospital electronic records and date and cause of death obtained from Statistics Finland.

RESULTS

Cancer-specific, overall and disease-free survival was higher in patients diagnosed during 2004-2008 as compared with patients diagnosed in 2001-2003. Further improvement was not seen during years 2009-2012. Potential factors contributing to the improvement were introduction of multidisciplinary meetings, centralization of rectal cancer surgery, use of adjuvant chemotherapy and systematic preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer. The proportion of patients with stage I-IV CRC remained similar over the study period, but a marked decrease in non-metastatic rectal cancer with biopsy only (locally advanced disease) was observed. In stage I-III rectal cancer, Cox multivariate analysis suggested age, comorbidity, R1 resection, T staging and tumor grade as prognostic factors. In colon cancer, prognostic factors were age, comorbidity, gender and presence of lymph node metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Organizational changes in the treatment of CRC patients made since 2004 coincide with improved survival in CRC and a marked reduction in locally advanced rectal cancers. The clinical presentation of CRC has remained similar between 2001 and 2012.