Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomized controlled trial

Epigenomic characterization of locally advanced anal cancer: a radiation therapy oncology group 98-11 specimen study

BACKGROUND

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 98-11 clinical trial demonstrated the superiority of standard 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin-C over 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin in combination with radiation in the treatment of anal squamous cell cancer. Tumor size (>5 cm) and lymph node metastases are associated with disease progression. There may be key molecular differences (eg, DNA methylation changes) in tumors at high risk for progression.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to determine whether there are differences in DNA methylation at individual CpG sites and within genes among locally advanced anal cancers, with large tumor size and/or nodal involvement, compared with those that are less advanced.

DESIGN

This was a case-case study among 121 patients defined as high risk (tumor size >5 cm and/or nodal involvement; n = 59) or low risk (≤5 cm, node negative; n = 62) within the mitomycin-C arm of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 98-11 trial. DNA methylation was measured using the Illumina HumanMethylation450 Array.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted in a tertiary care cancer center in collaboration with a national clinical trials cooperative group.

PATIENTS

The patients consisted of 74 women and 47 men with a median age of 54 years (range, 25-79 years).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

DNA methylation differences at individual CpG sites and within genes between low- and high-risk patients were compared using the Mann-Whitney test (p < 0.001).

RESULTS

A total of 16 CpG loci were differentially methylated (14 increased and 2 decreased) in high- versus low-risk cases. Genes harboring differentially methylated CpG sites included known tumor suppressor genes and novel targets.

LIMITATIONS

This study only included patients in the mitomycin-C arm with tumor tissue; however, this sample was representative of the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to apply genome-wide methylation analysis to anal cancer. Biologically relevant differences in methylated targets were found to discriminate locally advanced from early anal cancer. Epigenetic events likely play a significant role in the progression of anal cancer and may serve as potential biomarkers.

Radio-chemotherapy in anal cancer: Institutional experience at a large radiation oncology center in Chile

AIM

In this article the aim is to provide a concise narrative review and inform the institutional experience at a referral center in Chile with the use of radio-chemotherapy in anal cancer.

BACKGROUND

Cancer of the anus and anal canal is mainly a loco-regional disease. For years the standard of care has been concomitant radio-chemotherapy, which permits organ preservation and better local control than alternative surgical procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 44 patients treated between 2002 and 2010 was performed. Local recurrence, distant recurrence and overall survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Relevant groups where compared with the log-rank test and univariate analysis were done with the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Median follow-up of the cohort was 56 months, with a minimum follow-up of at least 24 months. There was a significant difference between clinical stages in disease free survival (log-rank trend p < 0.001), and a significant difference in overall survival (OS) when comparing clinical stages that were grouped in stage I-IIIa and IIIB (log-rank p = 0.001). On univariate analysis, age older than 60, having received full treatment and dose above 45 Gy were all significantly related to OS (p < 0.05). An overall survival of 45% and disease free survival of 45% at 5 years were found in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that results at the Instituto de Radiomedicina in Chile are comparable to published literature. Dismal results in stage IIIb cases indicate much work remains in therapies to achieve loco-regional control in locally advanced cases.

Impact of advancing age on treatment and outcomes in anal cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) may cause significant toxicity, and concerns exist about its tolerability in the elderly. The authors compared tolerability and outcomes across the age groups following CRT for SCCA.

METHODS

Single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with localized SCCA treated with CRT. CRT was standardized at 50.4-54 Gy, with concurrent infusional 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Patients were arbitrarily categorized into three groups: Group 1 - age < 50 years; Group 2 - age ≥ 50 and < 70 years; and Group 3 - age ≥ 70 years.

RESULTS

Of 284 patients identified, 278 were evaluable. The number of patients in each age group was: Group 1 - 51; Group 2 - 140; and Group 3 - 93. Baseline and treatment characteristics, tumor stage, rates of overall acute toxicity, need for unplanned treatment breaks and chemotherapy delivery were largely similar across the age groups. However, nine patients in Group 3 did not complete CRT, compared with five and none in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.006). In addition, five patients in Group 3 had diarrhea requiring treatment break, compared with none in the other two groups (p = 0.004). At a median follow-up 5.3 years, there was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.11), disease-free survival (p = 0.22) or local-recurrence free survival (p = 0.34), across the three age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT is safe and tolerable in the elderly age group, and provides equivalent disease control rates compared with the younger age group. Age alone should therefore not preclude aggressive curative treatment.

Technical aspects of radiation therapy for anal cancer

Historically treated with surgery, current practice recommends anal carcinoma to be treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation. This review will examine the anatomy, modes of disease spread and recurrence, and evaluate the existing evidence for treatment options for these tumors. An in-depth examination of specific radiation therapy (RT) techniques-such as conventional 3D-conformal RT and intensity-modulated RT-will be discussed along with modern dose constraints. RT field arrangement, patient setup, and recommended gross and clinical target volume (CTV) contours will be considered. Areas in need of further investigation, such as the role in treatment for positron emission tomography (PET) will be explored.

Chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer: clinical trials past, present and future

SUMMARY

Anal cancer is a rare cancer whose incidence is increasing in the UK. It is associated with human papilloma virus infection and smoking and is more common in women and immunosuppressed individuals, including those with transplants and HIV infection. The current standard of care is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to the pelvis with surgery reserved for patients where CRT is contraindicated or as salvage treatment for residual disease or recurrence post-CRT. Radiotherapy combined with mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil has emerged as the standard of care following a series of six well-conducted Phase III trials. Trials have shown no benefit for cisplatin-based combination regimens either concurrently, adjuvantly or neoadjuvantly.

Anal cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare cancer but its incidence is increasing throughout the world, and is particularly high in the human immunodeficiency virus positive (HIV+) population. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory (involving radiation therapists, medical oncologists, surgeons, radiologists and pathologists). SCCA usually spreads in a loco-regional manner within and outside the anal canal. Lymph node involvement at diagnosis is observed in 30-40% of cases while systemic spread is uncommon with distant extrapelvic metastases recorded in 5-8% at onset, and rates of metastatic progression after primary treatment between 10% and 20%. SCCA is strongly associated with human papilloma virus (HPV, types 16-18) infection. The primary aim of treatment is to achieve cure with loco-regional control and preservation of anal function, with the best possible quality of life. Treatment dramatically differs from adenocarcinomas of the lower rectum. Combinations of 5FU-based chemoradiation and other cytotoxic agents (mitomycin C) have been established as the standard of care, leading to complete tumour regression in 80-90% of patients with locoregional failures in the region of 15%. There is an accepted role for surgical salvage. Assessment and treatment should be carried out in specialised centres treating a high number of patients as early as possible in the clinical diagnosis. To date, the limited evidence from only 6 randomised trials [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], the rarity of the cancer, and the different behaviour/natural history depending on the predominant site of origin, (the anal margin, anal canal or above the dentate line) provide scanty direction for any individual oncologist. Here we aim to provide guidelines which can assist medical, radiation and surgical oncologists in the practical management of this unusual cancer.

Chemoradiation with capecitabine and mitomycin-C for stage I-III anal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Standard therapy for patients with stage I-III squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal is chemo-radiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C (MMC). While there is limited published evidence to substitute capecitabine (CAP) for 5-FU, the objectives of the study were to describe the toxicity, dose intensity and outcomes of a sequential cohort of patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy with CAP and MCC in a population-based setting.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-III malignancies of the anal canal referred between February 2010 and March 2012 were included. Dose intensity was calculated by comparing delivered versus planned radiation and chemotherapy treatments and toxicity was retrospectively graded according to standard protocol-specified criteria.

RESULTS

Among 66 eligible patients, median planned dose of radiation was 51.9 Gy over 5.5 weeks, range 25.0 to 63 Gy, and dose intensity was 98%. Median delivered dose of MCC delivered was 12 mg/m2 on day one, week one while median CAP dose was 825 mg/m2 twice daily on radiation days. CAP dose reductions due to toxicity were recorded for 13 patients (20%). Median follow-up was 20 months and 94% of patients with squamous cell histology had no evidence of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemo-radiation with CAP plus MMC is well tolerated and may be a reasonable consideration for patients with stage I-III SCC of the anal canal. A range of planned radiation dose was observed and longer follow-up is necessary to ensure that patients who received lower doses of radiation have similar outcomes to those who received larger doses.

Human papillomavirus DNA load and p16INK4a expression predict for local control in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy

As the detection rate of HPV-DNA in anal carcinoma commonly exceeds 90%, a comparison between sole HPV-positive and HPV-negative cancers with respect to treatment response following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and long-term oncological outcome is challenging. Against this background, we aimed to assess HPV types and HPV DNA load in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) of 95 patients treated with standard CRT for anal cancer to correlate viral load (≤/> median) with local failure, distant metastases, cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rates. Various clinicopathologic parameters and the immunohistochemical marker p16(INK4a) were evaluated for any correlation with HPV16 DNA load and were included in uni- and multivariate analyses. The overall prevalence of HPV DNA was 95.8% with HPV16 monoinfection being the most commonly encountered HPV type (78.9%), followed by HPV16 and 31, 35, 39, 44, 58, 66 and 81 dual infection in 9 patients (9.5%). HPV16 DNA load was significantly associated with p16(INK4a) expression (p = 0.001). Patients with HPV16 DNA load ≤ median and low p16(INK4a) expression showed significantly worse local control (HPV16 DNA load: univariate p = 0.023, multivariate p = 0.042; p16(INK4a): univariate p = 0.021), and OS (HPV16 DNA load: univariate p = 0.02, multivariate p = 0.03). Moreover, a combined HPV16 DNA load and p16(INK4a) variable revealed a significant correlation to decreased local failure, and increased CSS and OS (p = 0.019, p = 0.04 and p = 0.031). In conclusion, these data indicate that HPV16 DNA load and p16(INK4a) expression are significant prognostic factors for local tumor control and overall survival of patients with anal SCC following CRT.

Efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation in patients with anal cancer--a retrospective analysis

Background

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy is the preferred standard of care for patients with anal cancer. Several studies have suggested a benefit of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compared with 3D-conformal radiation (3D-CRT) regarding acute toxicity. This study evaluates outcome and toxicity of patients undergoing IMRT/Tomotherapy or 3D-CRT at our institution.

Methods

A cohort of 105 anal cancer patients was treated with chemoradiation or radiation alone (16.2%) between January 2000 and December 2011. 37 patients received 3D-CRT while 68 patients were treated with IMRT. Follow-up exams were performed every 3 to 6 months for a minimum of 3 years and then annually.

Results

Median follow-up was 41.4 months (2.8 – 158.4). Overall survival (OS), Progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC) at 3 years was 70.3%, 66.5%, 78.3% in the 3D-CRT group and 82.9%, 66.5%, 75.3% in the IMRT group without statistically significant difference. 3-year Colostomy-free survival (CFS) was 85.7% in the IMRT/Tomotherapy group and 91.8% in the 3D-CRT group (p = 0.48). No grade 4 toxicity was found in both groups. Severe (G2/3) acute skin toxicity (94.6% vs. 63.2%; p < 0.001) and acute gastrointestinal toxicity rate (67.6% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.03) was significantly higher with 3D-CRT compared to IMRT/Tomotherapy.

Conclusion

The use of IMRT can reduce acute severe side effects of the skin and gastrointestinal tract but did not demonstrate improved results regarding OS, PFS, LC and CFS.

Results of age-dependent anal canal cancer treatment: a single centre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Information concerning management of anal canal cancer among the elderly is scarce and much less abundant than for younger subjects.

POPULATION AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 115 patients treated for anal epidermoid cancer between 2000 and 2010. The population was divided according to age (<70 years and ≥70 years).

RESULTS

Of the 115 patients, 81 (70.4%) were <70 years old and 34 were ≥70 years (29.6%). Tumour characteristics were identical between the two groups and median follow-up was 62 months. Elderly patients had a less favourable performance status (p=0.001) and fewer had received radiochemotherapy (61.8% vs 82.5%, p=0.004). Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity was observed more often among elderly subjects. The results at 5 years were less favourable for overall, disease-specific, and disease-free survival (respectively p=0.002, p=0.001, and p=0.001). For patients treated with a curative intent, at 5 years there was no difference between the two groups in terms of overall survival (p=0.2). However, there was a statistically significant difference in favour of the younger group for disease-free survival and metastasis-free survival.

CONCLUSION

If radiochemotherapy can be delivered to elderly subjects with a good general status, the effects appear less favourable than in younger patients.

Inguinal lymph node recurrence in the untreated groin of patients with anal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Inguinal lymph node metastasis is predictive of locoregional recurrence and poor overall survival in anal carcinoma. Metachronous lymph node metastasis occurs in 10% of all anal cancer patients, but multiple studies have shown that the benefit of elective irradiation of the groin depends on T-stage, and the toxicity of groin irradiation must not be underestimated.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the inguinal recurrence rates among patients with anal carcinoma (T1-4, N0-1) who did not receive elective irradiation therapy to the groin and to determine predictors of inguinal recurrence.

DESIGN

Data on 119 patients treated between 1987 and 2005 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were treated with 3-dimensional radiotherapy. The median dose was 60 Gy. During radiotherapy, 108 patients also received chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C).

RESULTS

AJCC staging showed a distribution of 21 T1 (18%), 58 T2 (49%), 27 T3 (23%), 13 T4 (11%), 101 N0 (85%) and 18 N1 (15%) tumors. The median follow up was 65 months (range, 1-240 months). The 5-year inguinal recurrence rate was 0% for T1, 10% for T2, 21% for T3 and 19% for T4 tumors (p = 0.034). T2 tumors of the perianal skin and the anal canal had 5-year inguinal recurrence rates of 12% and 8%, respectively. The 5-year inguinal recurrence rate was 21% for tumors ≥4 cm vs. 2% for tumors <4 cm in size (p = 0.003).

LIMITATIONS

Eleven patients did not receive chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective irradiation of the groin should be considered for local control in patients (N0-N1) with T2 tumors ≥4 cm in size and/or located in the perianal skin, and in all patients with T3 and T4 tumors.

Chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the anal canal: a systematic review

Squamous cell cancer of the anal canal is a rare tumour for which there remains uncertainty regarding optimal therapy. A systematic review was conducted to summarise the evidence examining concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy or different chemotherapy regimens in combination with radiotherapy. MEDLINE, EMBASE and conference proceedings were searched for relevant randomised controlled trials. Outcomes of interest were colostomy rate, local failure, overall survival, disease-free survival, adverse effects and quality of life. Six randomised controlled trials were identified. Two trials reported lower colostomy and local failure rates for concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus mitomycin C (MMC) and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone. The omission of MMC from this regimen resulted in higher colostomy and local failure rates and lower disease-free survival. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent 5-FU plus cisplatin and radiotherapy resulted in a higher colostomy rate than concurrent 5-FU plus MMC and radiotherapy. Haematological toxicity rates were lower in patients who received radiotherapy with 5-FU alone or 5-FU plus cisplatin compared with 5-FU plus MMC. No benefit was seen for the addition of induction or maintenance chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The available evidence continues to support the use of radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU and MMC as standard treatment for cancer of the anal canal to decrease colostomy and local failure rates.

Long-term effects of chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer in patients with HIV infection: oncological outcomes, immunological status, and the clinical course of the HIV disease

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing evidence for chemoradiotherapy as standard treatment for anal cancer in patients with HIV infection, there is still some uncertainty regarding increased toxicity and adverse effects on the immune status.

OBJECTIVE

We report the clinical outcome of 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for anal carcinoma in patients with HIV infection with an emphasis on the long-term course of CD4 counts and the HIV-related morbidity during follow-up.

DESIGN AND SETTINGS

A retrospective single-institution chart review was performed.

PATIENTS

Between 1997 and 2012, 36 HIV-positive patients were treated with standard chemoradiotherapy (median tumor dose, 54 (range, 50.4-60.4) Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction; 5-fluorouracil, 800-1000 mg/m(2), days 1-4 or 1-5; mitomycin C, 10 mg/m(2), day 1, in the first and fifth week).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A retrospective analysis was performed with respect to tumor response, local control, cancer and overall survival, and toxicity. Immunological parameters, including pre- and posttreatment CD4 counts, viral load, and HIV-specific morbidity were recorded during follow-up.

RESULTS

Chemoradiotherapy could be completed in all patients. Acute grade 3 toxicities occurred in 17/36 patients (47%). Complete response was achieved in 31 patients (86%). Five-year local control, colostomy-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were 72%, 87%, 77%, and 74%. The median pretreatment CD4 count significantly decreased from 367 cells/μL to 139 cells/μL, 3 to 7 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.001). Four patients (11%) experienced opportunistic illnesses during the follow-up (median, 66; range, 10-164 months).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its retrospective design and its small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm again that, in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era, anal cancer can be treated in HIV-positive patients with standard chemoradiotherapy, with a clinical outcome similar to their HIV-negative counterparts. The chemoradiotherapy-related decline of the CD4 counts, which remain decreased up to 6 years after chemoradiotherapy, was not associated with increased HIV-related clinical morbidity.

Carcinoma of unknown primary in the inguinal lymph node region of squamous cell origin: A case series

PURPOSE

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) of the inguinal region is a rare clinical entity that accounts for 1%-3 % of all CUPs. Of the inguinal lymph node region CUPs, about 10%-15% are of squamous cell origin. This study presents a case series of CUP of the inguinal region of squamous cell origin treated in our institution and review of the outcome.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We have identified 9 patients treated during the period of 1990-2010. All patients were treated radically with chemoradiation. Regimens used were 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin combination (n = 8) or 5-FU/mitomycin-C (n = 1) regimen. Tumor doses were 5400 cGy (n = 7), 5500 cGy (n = 1), and 5040 cGy (n = 1).

RESULTS

The median duration of follow-up was 56 months (range, 10-76 months) for the whole group. There were no deaths or local or distant recurrences reported till the last recorded date of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective data showed significant long-term disease control for patients with localized inguinal region CUP of squamous cell origin who received concurrent chemoradiation.

Immunity and squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare disease, but its incidence has been increasing dramatically since the 1970s. Men who have sex with men (MSM) and infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are the two main risk factors. Risk of developing SCCA is increased more than 100-fold in HIV-seropositive MSM. We review here how immunodeficiency could promote SCCA and how restoration of immunity since the advent of combined antiretroviral therapy can influence the natural history and incidence of SCCA. We also review the prognostic and therapeutic implications of immunosuppression in these patients. Finally, we show how, with anti-HPV vaccines, immunity is a target in the prevention of SCCA and could in the future be used in its treatment.

Management of persistent anal canal carcinoma after combined-modality therapy: a clinical review

Anal canal carcinoma is a rare gastro-intestinal cancer. Radiochemotherapy is the recommended primary treatment for patients with non-metastatic carcinoma; surgery is generally reserved for persistent or recurrent disease. Follow-up and surveillance after primary treatment is paramount to classify patients in those with complete remission, persistent or progressive disease. Locally persistent disease represents a clinically significant problem and its management remains subject of some controversy.The aim of this systematic review is to summarise recommendations for the primary treatment of anal canal carcinoma, to focus on the optimal time to consider residual disease as genuine persistence to proceed with salvage treatment, and to discern how this analysis might inform future clinical trials in management in this class of patients.

Salvage surgery for residual primary and locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy in HIV-positive individuals

BACKGROUND

The treatment of anal cancer in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients-as in the general population-is primarily with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and abdominoperineal resection of residual or recurrent primary disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent of residual primary disease and local recurrence as well as the outcome of salvage surgery after CRT for anal carcinoma in HIV-positive individuals.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied HIV-positive anal carcinoma patients treated between February 1989 and November 2012 in a specialist London unit. Extent of residual primary disease, local recurrence after CRT, postoperative complications, and survival after salvage surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

Complete response was experienced in 44 of 53 (83%) of HIV patients treated with CRT for anal carcinoma. One patient (2.3%) developed local recurrence. Nine patients (eight residual primary disease after CRT and one local recurrence) underwent salvage surgery after CRT. There were no perioperative deaths, and perioperative CD4 counts were sustained. Complications occurred in five patients (55%). Median interval to complete perineal healing was 4 months (range 2-11 months), and median hospital stay was 29 days. Survival (median 16 months) was 25% at 2 years from salvage surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Results in HIV-positive patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) suggest that loss of HIV sensitivity to HAART can be avoided, but that there is increased postoperative morbidity that may be related to HIV disease. Survival was comparable to that for salvage therapy after optimal CRT in non-HIV anal carcinoma patients.

Risk factors for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in women with genital dysplasia

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors associated with anal intraepithelial neoplasia and develop a model for predicting the likelihood of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in heterosexual women.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 327 patients from 2006 to 2011 with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of genital intraepithelial neoplasia (vulvar, vaginal, or cervical) underwent both anal cytology and anoscopy. Variables significant between those with and without anal intraepithelial neoplasia were identified using logistic regression. A forward stepwise regression analysis was carried out to identify a combination of variables that effectively predicted anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

RESULTS

In the cohort of analyzed patients, 64 (46.7%) women with anal intraepithelial neoplasia were identified, yielding a prevalence of 19.6%. Immunosuppression, vulvar dysplasia, multiple sexual partners (more than four), smoking history, and history of anal sex were positively associated with anal intraepithelial neoplasia (P<.05). These variables were analyzed using forward stepwise logistic regression. The final model used the presence of any two of three risk factors (vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia [VIN], immunosuppression, and history of anal sex) to predict 38.8% of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in our population. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for two of three of the factors was 0.708 (P<.05). This model has a negative predictive value of 88.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.92) and positive predictive value of 43.1% (95% CI 0.31-0.56).

CONCLUSION

A simple predictive model based on the presence or absence of two of three risk factors (VIN, immunosuppression, and history of anal sex) can be used by the clinician to quantify anal intraepithelial neoplasia risk in women with genital dysplasia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Management of two cases of recurrent anal carcinoma

Due to the low incidence of anal cancer and generally high cure rates, few second-line treatment options have been evaluated in the setting of formal clinical trials. We briefly report two cases that were both found to have wild-type K-RAS, with no epidermal growth factor receptor amplification or evidence of prior persistent human papilloma virus infection. Both cases were treated with irinotecan and cetuximab with evidence of clinical benefit in the setting of a third recurrence, as well as evidence of response to other strategies employed in their management. These cases provide support for the suggestion that treatment planning in conjunction with molecular profiling may be beneficial in such uncommon clinical settings.

Predictive factors for early and late local toxicities in anal cancer treated by radiotherapy in combination with or without chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The treatment of anal cancer is based on concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy and is associated with a nonnegligible rate of local severe toxicities that can strongly impair the quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective analysis was performed to screen the following factors as potential predictive factors for local skin and digestive toxicities, and as potential prognostic factors for cumulative colostomy incidence: sex, age, tumor size, clinical T and N stage, circumferential extension, invasion of anal margin, HIV status, type of chemotherapy, and type of radiotherapy and dose delivered.

METHODS

One hundred five patients in our database treated between January 2000 and February 2010 met the eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 54.1 months (range, 1-133). Early and late severe local toxicities occurred in 33 patients (31.4%) and 18 patients (17.1%). The 5-year cumulative rate of colostomy was 26.6%. Predictive factors for local severe early toxicities were as follows: clinical stage III/IV (p = 0.01), no brachytherapy boost (p = 0.003), and use of chemotherapy (p = 0.01). Only brachytherapy retained its independence in multivariate analysis (OR = 4.8 (1.4-16.3), p = 0.01). Human immunodeficiency virus positivity (p = 0.04) was the only predictive factor for late toxicities in univariate analysis; it was linked independently to the occurrence of ulcer (OR = 0.1 (0.01-0.66), p = 0.01). Tumor size ≥4 cm (p < 0.001) and occurrence of grade 2 to 3 ulcers (p < 0.001) were correlated with greater cumulative colostomy incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, nonuse of brachytherapy was an independent predictive factor for local acute toxicity. Human immunodeficiency virus positivity was the only predictive factor for local late toxicities and strongly influenced the onset of ulcer.

Anal cancer: are we making progress?

Anal cancer is an uncommon malignancy. There have been some intriguing developments in the past 3 years, in terms of our understanding of the molecular biology and processes that lead to anal cancer. There have also been some notable successes in prevention, imaging and treatment. Nonsurgical treatment is highly effective. The primary aim of such treatment is to achieve loco-regional control with chemoradiation (CRT), and preserve anal function without a colostomy. Randomised phase III trials presented or published over the past 3 years have explored novel strategies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, maintenance chemotherapy, radiotherapy dose escalation and replacement of mitomycln C (MMC) with cisplatin in CRT. All have failed to improve on the current standard of care; i.e. MMC/ 5 fluorouracil (5FU) chemoradiation. However, more conformal strategies such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) appear feasible to deliver with reduced toxicity, and may offer an opportunity to dose-escalate both to gross tumour and areas of potential nodal spread. Preliminary outcome data suggest no loss of efficacy. We evaluate the relevant recent literature published over the past 2 years, and summarize interesting and important new findings, with the aim of bringing the reader up-to-date on anal cancer.

Lessons learned from radiation oncology clinical trials

A workshop entitled "Lessons Learned from Radiation Oncology Trials" was held on December 7-8, 2011, in Bethesda, MD, to present and discuss some of the recently conducted radiation oncology clinical trials with a focus on those that failed to refute the null hypothesis. The objectives of this workshop were to summarize and examine the questions that these trials provoked, to assess the quality and limitations of the preclinical data that supported the hypotheses underlying these trials, and to consider possible solutions to these challenges for the design of future clinical trials. Several themes emerged from the discussions: (i) opportunities to learn from null-hypothesis trials through tissue and imaging studies; (ii) value of preclinical data supporting the design of combinatorial therapies; (iii) significance of validated biomarkers; (iv) necessity of quality assurance in radiotherapy delivery; (v) conduct of sufficiently powered studies to address the central hypotheses; and (vi) importance of publishing results of the trials regardless of the outcome. The fact that well-designed hypothesis-driven clinical trials produce null or negative results is expected given the limitations of trial design and complexities of cancer biology. It is important to understand the reasons underlying such null results, however, to effectively merge the technologic innovations with the rapidly evolving biology for maximal patient benefit through the design of future clinical trials.

Anal carcinoma: impact of TN category of disease on survival, disease relapse, and colostomy failure in US Gastrointestinal Intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase 3 trial

PURPOSE

The long-term update of US GI Intergroup RTOG 98-11 anal cancer trial found that concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) with fluorouracil (5-FU) plus mitomycin had a significant impact on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with induction plus concurrent 5-FU plus cisplatin. The intent of the current analysis was to determine the impact of tumor node (TN) category of disease on survival (DFS and OS), colostomy failure (CF), and relapse (local-regional failure [LRF] and distant metastases [DM]) in this patient group.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

DFS and OS were estimated univariately by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and 6 TN categories were compared by the log-rank test (T2N0, T3N0, T4N0, T2N1-3, T3N1-3, and T4N1-3). Time to relapse and colostomy were estimated by the cumulative incidence method, and TN categories were compared using Gray's test.

RESULTS

Of 682 patients, 620 were analyzable for outcomes by TN category. All endpoints showed statistically significant differences among the TN categories of disease (OS, P<.0001; DFS, P<.0001; LRF, P<.0001; DM, P=.0011; CF, P=.01). Patients with the poorest OS, DFS, and LRF outcomes were those with T3-4N-positive (+) disease. CF was lowest for T2N0 and T2N+ (11%, 11%, respectively) and worst for the T4N0, T3N+, and T4N+ categories (26%, 27%, 24%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

TN category of disease has a statistically significant impact on OS, DFS, LRF, DM, and CF in patients treated with CCRT and provides excellent prognostic information for outcomes in patients with anal carcinoma. Significant challenges remain for patients with T4N0 and T3-4N+ categories of disease with regard to survival, relapse, and CF and lesser challenges for T2-3N0/T2N+ categories.

The prognostic significance of pretreatment leukocytosis in patients with anal cancer treated with radical chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

There are emerging data showing the prognostic significance of pretreatment leukocytosis in patients with cervical cancer; it is generally associated with adverse outcome. However, the prognostic impact of leukocytosis in patients with anal cancer has not been previously reported.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between pretreatment leukocytosis and clinical outcomes in patients with anal cancer treated with radical chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

One hundred twenty-six patients with invasive anal canal cancer, treated with radical chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy between 2000 and 2008 at 2 major tertiary cancer centers, were evaluated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 24 months. Pretreatment leukocytosis (white blood cell count >10 × 10/L) was identified in 15.9% (20/126) of patients. After adjusting for sex, tumor size, and stage in a multivariate analysis, leukocytosis remained significantly associated with worse disease-free survival (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.8; p = 0.045) and worse overall survival (HR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1-7.9; p = 0.036). Patients with both leukocytosis and anemia (pretreatment hemoglobin <125 g/L) had the worst prognosis: 2-year disease-free survival 42.1% versus 72.9% for patients without these factors (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.8; p = 0.033); 2-year overall survival 60.9% versus 89.8% (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.5-13.2; p = 0.006).

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective nature and lack of patients with multiple hematologic abnormalities (ie, both anemia and leukocytosis). HIV status was unable to be evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment leukocytosis in patients with anal cancer is associated with significantly worse disease-free and overall survival, which appears to be exacerbated with the presence of pretreatment anemia.

Outcome of salvage surgery for anal squamous cell carcinoma

AIM

The purpose of this study was to examine factors related to treatment failure following chemoradiotherapy for squamous cancer and to compare the outcome of salvage surgery in one unit with national audit standards published by the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) (ACPGBI position statement for management of anal cancer. Colorectal Disease 2011; 13(Suppl. 1): 1-52).

METHOD

Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus treated with radical intent between 1997 and 2010 in a single tertiary referral oncology institute were prospectively identified. Multivariate analysis was used to establish factors associated with treatment failure. Cancer-specific end-points after salvage surgery were determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients received chemoradiotherapy with radical intent with a 5-year overall survival of 83% (all stages) at a median follow up of 35 months. Of these, 11 (12%) required salvage surgery, five of whom were Stage T4 at presentation. Six patients had failed to respond to chemoradiotherapy and five presented with recurrence at a median of 10 (10-36) months. Only Stage T4 disease at presentation was predictive of the need for salvage surgery (OR 5.6, CI 4.9-6.3, P = 0.015). There was no surgical mortality and no delayed perineal healing where a myocutaneous flap was used. The resection margin was involved in one (9%) patient. The 5-year survival rate was 64%. Audit standards for case selection, local control, survival and perineal complications were achieved.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival was achieved in two- thirds of patients following salvage surgery after failed primary chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer in a multidisciplinary oncological unit. Stage T4 disease at presentation strongly predicted the need for subsequent salvage intervention.

Bone-targeting radiopharmaceuticals including radium-223

Bone-seeking radionuclides including samarium-153 ethylene diamine tetramethylene phosphonate and strontium-89 have been used for decades in the palliation of pain from bone metastases especially from prostate cancer. Emerging evidence of improved survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with the first-in-class α-radionuclide, radium-223 (Ra) has rekindled interest in the role of bone-seeking radionuclide therapy.We review the literature for randomized controlled trials of bone-seeking radionuclides and explore some of the issues regarding the optimal use of these agents. In particular, we discuss dose, dose rate, radiobiology, and quality of radiation and postulate on potential future directions in particular combination schedules. β-Emitting, bone-seeking radionuclides have proven ability to control pain in prostate cancer metastatic to bone with pain response rates in the order of 60% to 70% when used as single agents. Most of the published trials were underpowered to detect differences in survival; however, there is evidence of the potential for disease modification when these agents are used in combination with chemotherapy or in multiple cycles.Data from the recent phase III ALSYMPCA trial that compared Ra to placebo in symptomatic CRPC demonstrate a significant improvement in median overall survival of 3.6 months for patients with symptomatic CRPC metastatic to bone treated with 6 cycles of the α-emitting radionuclide Ra compared with placebo. The success of Ra in improving survival in CRPC will lead this agent to become part of the treatment paradigm for this disease, and with such an excellent safety profile, Ra has huge potential in combination strategies as well as for use earlier in the natural history of metastatic prostate cancer.

Current treatment options for management of anal intraepithelial neoplasia

Anal squamous cell cancer is an uncommon malignancy caused by infection with oncogenic strains of Human papilloma virus. Anal cancer is much more common in immunocompromised persons, including those infected with Human immunodeficiency virus. High-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN), the precursor of anal cancer, is identified by clinicians providing care for patients with anorectal disease, and is increasingly being identified during screening of immunosuppressed patients for anal dysplasia. The traditional treatment for HGAIN has been excision of macroscopic disease with margins. This approach is effective for patients with small unifocal HGAIN lesions. Patients with extensive multifocal HGAIN frequently have recurrence of HGAIN after excision, and may have postoperative complications of anal stenosis or fecal incontinence. This led to the suggestion by some that treatment for HGAIN should be delayed until patients developed anal cancer. Alternative approaches in identification and treatment have been developed to treat patients with multifocal or extensive HGAIN lesions. High-resolution anoscopy combines magnification with anoscopy and is being used to identify HGAIN and determine treatment margins. HGAIN can then be ablated with a number of modalities, including infrared coagulation, CO2 laser, and electrocautery. These methods for HGAIN ablation can be performed with local anesthesia on outpatients and are relatively well tolerated. High-resolution anoscopy-directed HGAIN ablation is evolving into a standard approach for initial treatment and then subsequent monitoring of a disease which should be expected to be recurrent. Another treatment approach for HGAIN is topical treatment, principally with 5-fluorouracil or imiquimod. Topical therapies have the advantage of being nonsurgical and are well suited for treating widespread multifocal disease. Topical treatments have the disadvantage of requiring extended treatment courses and causing a symptomatic inflammatory response. Successful treatment requires adherence to a regime that is uncomfortable at best and at worst painful. Topical treatments can be successful in motivated adherent patients willing to accept these side effects.

Mitomycin and Fluorouracil With Concurrent Radiation (FUMIR) Regimen for Anal Cancer

The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of antineoplastic therapy, and the agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases. Questions or suggestions for topics should be addressed to Dominic A. Solimando, Jr, President, Oncology Pharmacy Services, Inc, 4201 Wilson Blvd #110-545, Arlington, VA 22203, e-mail: OncRxSvc@aol.com; or J. Aubrey Waddell, Professor, University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy; Oncology Pharmacist, Pharmacy Department, Blount Memorial Hospital, 907 E. Lamar Alexander Parkway, Maryville, TN 37804, e-mail: waddfour@charter.net.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy in the treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Definitive chemoradiation is the standard management for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC); more conformal pelvic radiotherapy using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) minimizes toxicity but may increase locoregional recurrences (LRR). We compared IMRT and conventional radiotherapy (CRT) outcomes in ASCC patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of 223 ASCC patients treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1991 to 2010. Forty-five patients received IMRT and 178 CRT. We determined locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) for each radiation modality. A propensity score analysis was performed using potentially confounding variables. Locoregional and distant patterns of failure for CRT and IMRT were compared.

RESULTS

Patients treated with IMRT had significantly higher N stage (P<.01), and were less likely to be treated with induction chemotherapy (P=.01). The 2-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS were 87%, 86%, and 93%, respectively, for IMRT; and 82%, 88%, 90%, respectively, for CRT; with no significant difference in outcomes by univariate analysis or in a propensity score analysis adjusted for disparity between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, single-institution experience of definitive chemoradiation for ASCC using CRT vs. IMRT demonstrates that outcomes are not compromised by more conformal radiotherapy. In the absence of prospective, multi-institutional, randomized trials of IMRT in ASCC, these retrospective data, using methods to minimize bias, can help to establish the role of IMRT in the definitive therapy of ASCC.

Phase 1 study of cetuximab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced anal canal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study sought to determine the feasibility and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of cetuximab with chemoradiotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CP) in locally advanced anal canal carcinoma.

METHODS

Cetuximab was administered on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43, and 50 (400 mg/m(2) initial dose, then 250 mg/m(2) /week) concurrent with total dose radiation of 55 to 59 Gy, both starting on day 1. Escalating doses of 5-FU (96-hour infusion) and CP (2-hour infusion), both on days 1 and 29, were administered according to the following design: starting dose level (0) 5-FU/CP = 800/60 mg/m(2) /day and up to dose level (+2) 5-FU/CP = 1000/80 mg/m(2) /day.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) events (uncontrolled diarrhea or febrile neutropenia) occurred in 3 of 14 assessable patients receiving escalated dose of 5-FU/CP, with 1 in dose level (0) and 2 in dose level (+2). The RP2D was 5-FU/CP = 800/80 mg/m(2) /day. Because of unexpected non-DLT treatment-related grade 3 (G3) adverse events (AEs) such as thrombosis/embolism, syncope, and infection occurring in ≥ 20% of patients, a safety expansion cohort with an additional 9 patients was investigated with the RP2D. The most frequent G3/G4 AEs evaluated in 23 patients were radiation dermatitis (12 patients), diarrhea (10 patients), thrombosis/embolism (6 patients), and infection (5 patients). The study was closed due to these severe AEs, although no G5 AEs occurred. Twenty of 21 patients (95%) achieved pathological complete response at primary tumor. With a median follow-up of 43.4 months, the 3-year locoregional control rate was 64.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Cetuximab could not be integrated with chemoradiotherapy-cisplatin-based therapy due to the high toxicity rate. However, efficacy is encouraging and further investigation of an epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted agent (other than cetuximab) concurrent with chemoradiation should be pursued.

Impaired health-related quality of life after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer: late effects in a national cohort of 128 survivors

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy is an effective treatment for anal cancer, yet from follow-up many survivors seem to suffer from late effects. Data of long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in anal cancer survivors are limited, and there is a growing interest in cancer survivorship.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A national cohort of all anal cancer survivors treated with curative chemoradiotherapy in 2000-2007 was invited to a cross-sectional study. Of 199 eligible survivors, 128 (64%) returned the questionnaires, the median time since diagnosis was 66 months. The median age was 61 years and 79% were women. HRQOL was evaluated with EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29, and neurotoxicity with the Scale of Chemotherapy-Induced Neurotoxicity. An age- and sex-matched reference group of volunteers (n = 269) not treated for pelvic cancer answered the same questionnaires. Results from QLQ-C30 of the reference group were compared to Norwegian and Dutch normative data.

RESULTS

The mean scores of anal cancer survivors were poorer compared to volunteers and normative data. Anal cancer survivors reported significant impairment of function, especially social and role function, compared to the volunteers (difference ≥ 20 points, p < 0.001). Survivors had markedly increased scores for fatigue, dyspnoea, insomnia and diarrhoea (difference ≥ 15 points, p < 0.001). The global quality of life was significantly reduced (difference 15 points, p < 0.001). Anal cancer survivors had increased stool frequency, more buttock pain, flatulence, faecal incontinence, impotence (males), dyspareunia and reduced sexual interest (females) (difference ≥ 15 points, p < 0.001). There was increased frequency of tinnitus in survivors treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Survivors after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer have significant long-term impairment of HRQOL. Reduced social, role and sexual function, and increased diarrhoea, incontinence for gas and stools, and buttock pain were commonly reported. Increased awareness of this may lead to better management of late effects and better care for cancer survivors.

Sphincter preservation in anal cancer: a brief review

Management of anal cancer is a challenge. The goal of treatment is to eradicate tumor without sacrificing the anal sphincters. The idea of organ preservation emerged following the discovery of a high complete response rate from preoperative combined chemoradiation (CRT) prior to abdominoperineal resection.CRT is widely accepted as the standard therapy for treating anal squamous cell cancer. The combination of external beam radiotherapy with interstitial brachytherapy increases the dose to the tumor volume and decreases dose to normal tissues. The current goal is to avoid colostomy, and surgery has become a salvage or secondary therapy. In this article, we review the non-surgical management of anal cancer with special emphasis on CRT, role of intensity modulated radiation therapy and brachytherapy.

Elective inguinal node irradiation in early-stage T2N0 anal cancer: prognostic impact on locoregional control

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of elective inguinal node radiation therapy (INRT) on locoregional control (LRC) in patients with early-stage T2N0 anal cancer treated conservatively with primary RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1976 and 2008, 116 patients with T2 node-negative anal cancer were treated curatively with RT alone (n=48) or by combined chemoradiation therapy (CRT) (n=68) incorporating mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil. Sixty-four percent of the patients (n=74) received elective INRT.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 69 months (range, 4-243 months), 97 (84%) and 95 patients (82%) were locally and locoregionally controlled, respectively. Rates for 5-year actuarial local control, LRC, cancer-specific, and overall survival for the entire population were 81.7% ± 3.8%, 79.2% ± 4.1%, 91.1% ± 3.0%, and 72.1% ± 4.5%, respectively. The overall 5-year inguinal relapse-free survival was 92.3% ± 2.9%. Isolated inguinal recurrence occurred in 2 patients (4.7%) treated without INRT, whereas no groin relapse was observed in those treated with INRT. The 5-year LRC rates for patients treated with and without INRT and with RT alone versus combined CRT were 80.1% ± 5.0% versus 77.8% ± 7.0% (P=.967) and 71.0% ± 7.2% versus 85.4% ± 4.5% (P=.147), respectively. A trend toward a higher rate of grade ≥3 acute toxicity was observed in patients treated with INRT (53% vs 31%, P=.076).

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of node-negative T2 anal cancer, the inguinal relapse rate remains relatively low with or without INRT. The role of INRT in the treatment of early-stage anal carcinoma needs to be investigated in future prospective trials.

Anal cancer - a review

Anal cancer accounts for only 1.5% of gastrointestinal malignancies but this disease has shown a steady increase in incidence particularly in HIV positive males. The understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of anal cancer has changed radically over last thirty years. Risk factors have been identified and organ preservation by chemoradiotherapy has become a standard. This article aims to review the clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options for anal cancer in the light of current literature.