Reconstitution of peripheral blood B cells after depletion with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Treatment with rituximab affects both the cellular and the humoral arm of the immune system in patients with SLE

Herein we investigated how rituximab-induced B cell depletion affected leukocyte subpopulations and antibody titers in SLE patients. We focused our analysis on time points related to absence and return of B cells after depletion. A correlation was found between the baseline frequency and time to repopulation; the fewer B cells initially, the longer to their return. While the few B cells remaining after treatment were of memory, double-negative (IgD-CD27-), and CD5+ phenotype, the returning B cells were mainly naïve, indicating de novo production of B cells. Serum levels of IgG and antibodies against Ro52, Ro60, La44, measles and tetanus remained unchanged, while decreases in IgM, IgE, anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies were observed. Additionally, a significant increase in activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as well as CD25bright FOXP3+ regulatory T cells was observed. In conclusion, both the humoral and the cellular immune systems were affected by treatment with rituximab.

The emerging role of rituximab in organ transplantation

Long-term acceptance of solid organ allografts remains a challenge. While many acute rejection episodes can be treated, new mechanisms of allograft damage are now being defined especially in kidney transplantation. Unexpected clusters of CD20(+) cells have been discovered in renal biopsies performed for clinical rejection. C4d deposition is now routinely seen in refractory rejection. Despite the rapid introduction of new immunosuppressive agents in transplantation, the search for an efficacious anti-B-cell agent remains. With novel mechanisms of allograft damage now being defined, it is important to consider how an anti-B-cell agent might fit into an immunosuppressive regimen. Rituximab is a high-affinity CD20 specific antibody that depletes the B-cell compartment by inducing cellular apoptosis. Thus, it is a rational choice for therapy in transplantation to abrogate B-cell mediated events. In this review, we will discuss the mechanisms of action of rituximab, and its use in for a variety of indications in solid organ transplantation. There are emerging case reports that show that rituximab may be an effective agent to treat antibody-mediated rejection, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Rituximab has been frequently cited as an important adjunct therapy in desensitization protocols for highly sensitized transplant recipients as well as recipients of ABO incompatible transplants. Rituximab demonstrates promise in this regard and warrants additional consideration in prospective clinical trials.

B cell reconstitution after rituximab treatment of lymphoma recapitulates B cell ontogeny

The long-term immunologic effects of B cell depletion with rituximab and the characteristics of the reconstituting B cell pool in lymphoma patients are not well defined, despite the widespread usage of this therapy. Here we report that during the B cell reconstitution phase a majority of the peripheral blood B cells have an immature transitional phenotype (47.8%+/-25.2% vs. 4.4%+/-2.4% for normal controls, p<0.0001), similar to what has been described during the original ontogeny of the immune system and following bone marrow transplantation. Moreover, the recovery of the CD27+ memory B cell pool was delayed compared to normal B cell ontogeny, remaining below normal controls at 1 year post-rituximab (4.4%+/-3% vs. 31%+/-7%, p<0.0001). Expansion of functionally immature B cells and decreased memory B cells may contribute to an immunodeficient state in patients recovering from rituximab mediated B cell depletion, particularly with repeated treatment.

B cells move to centre stage: novel opportunities for autoimmune disease treatment

The B-cell arm of the immune system has long been appreciated for its crucial role in pathogen resistance, but in the study of many autoimmune diseases, T cells have dominated the limelight for decades. However, the development of the B-cell-depleting antibody rituximab as a lymphoma therapy has provided a tool to probe the contribution made by B cells in several immune disorders. Recently, the success of B-cell depletion with rituximab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has stimulated investigation of its effects in several other immune disorders, and considerable interest in the potential of drugs that can modulate B-cell function for the treatment of such diseases in general. This article discusses the role of B cells in a range of autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, and analyses approaches to therapeutic B-cell manipulation.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with rituximab: An update and possible indications

Based on new biologic and clinical insights, the number of drugs blocking different biologic targets in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [e.g., tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), CTLA4, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-15, IL-18, B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), CD20] has increased considerably over the last decade. Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody that was developed for the treatment of B-cell lymphomas, has been used in different autoimmune diseases where B-cells are thought to play a pivotal role. However, blinded randomised controlled trials have been completed only for RA so far, indicating the clear efficacy of B-cell blockade in RA and highlighting the pathogenetic B-cell in rheumatoid synovitis. The use of rituximab in RA is herein updated, from early preliminary studies to more recent presentations in International Conferences. Key clinical and biologic issues are discussed, i.e., efficacy and safety of rituximab, role of concomitant therapies, use in the long term and retreatment strategies, differences with anti-TNFalpha therapy. The possible indications in RA are finally discussed, also on the ground of personal experience with rituximab in RA and other rheumatic diseases associated with B-cell lymphoproliferation. Further clinical research should go hand in hand with laboratory research, and tissue studies are now needed.

B-cell targeting in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases

B-cell-targeted therapy for autoimmune disease emerged from theoretical proposition to practical reality between 1997 and 1998, with the availability of the B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody rituximab. Since then, a score of autoantibody-associated disorders have been treated, with most convincing evidence of efficacy seen in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. Several classes of B-cell-targeted agent are now under investigation. From the outset, a major goal of B-cell targeting has been the re-establishment of some form of immunological tolerance. In some subjects, the observed improvement of disease for years following therapy fuels hope that this goal might ultimately be achievable.

B-Cell-Targeted Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex disease characterised by numerous autoantibodies and clinical involvement in multiple organ systems. The immunological events triggering the onset of clinical manifestations have not yet been fully defined, but a central role for B cells in the pathogenesis of this disease has more recently gained prominence as a result of research in both mice and humans. Both antibody-dependent and -independent mechanisms of B cells are important in SLE. Autoantibodies contribute to autoimmunity by multiple mechanisms, including immune complex-mediated type III hypersensitivity reactions, type II antibody-dependent cytotoxicity, and by instructing innate immune cells to produce pathogenic cytokines such as interferon-alpha, tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-1. Suggested autoantibody-independent B-cell functions include antigen presentation, T-cell activation and polarisation, and dendritic-cell modulation. Several of these functions are mediated by the ability of B cells to produce immunoregulatory cytokines, chemokines and lymphangiogenic growth factors, and by their critical contribution to lymphoid tissue development and organisation, including the development of ectopic tertiary lymphoid tissue. Given the large body of evidence implicating abnormalities in the B-cell compartment in SLE, a recent therapeutic focus has been to develop interventions that target the B-cell compartment by multiple mechanisms.Rituximab, a mouse-human chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20 that specifically depletes B cells, has been studied the most extensively. Although promising open-label data await confirmation in ongoing multicentre placebo-controlled trials, a number of preliminary conclusions can be drawn. The adequacy of peripheral B-cell depletion depends on achieving high and sustained serum rituximab concentrations, pharmacokinetics that can be varied with treatment dose and factors that may affect drug clearance, such as human anti-chimeric antibodies. In SLE patients with effective B-cell depletion, the clinical response can be significant, with favourable responses observed in a diverse array of disease manifestations. Moreover, rituximab appears to have the potential to induce clinical remission in severe, refractory disease. B-cell depletion has the potential to induce disease amelioration by inhibiting autoantibody production and/or by interfering with other B-cell pathogenic functions. The fact that clinical improvement correlates with B-cell depletion and precedes by several months any decline in serum levels of relevant autoantibodies suggests a predominant effect of autoantibody-independent functions of B cells, although the subset of patients with disease remission ultimately also experience autoantibody normalisation. Significant questions remain about rituximab therapy in SLE, including the immunological determinants of treatment response and remission, the role of combination therapy, and the safety of repeated courses of rituximab. In addition, the efficacy and role of other B-cell-depleting approaches, such as humanised anti-CD20 antibodies and anti-CD22, remain to be defined. Another B-cell-targeted therapeutic approach is to block costimulatory interactions between T and B cells. Blockade of the CD40-CD40 ligand pathway has met with variable clinical benefit and unfortunate thromboembolic complications, although inhibition of the B7 pathway with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4Ig is currently under early investigation in SLE clinical trials. Preliminary data on the treatment of SLE with belimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to and neutralises the B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS or B-cell-activating factor [BAFF]), are now available. In a phase II double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of three different doses administered in addition to standard therapy, belimumab was well tolerated but reportedly did not meet primary efficacy endpoints. Blockade of BAFF is still viewed as a promising therapeutic approach and additional agents that interfere with the BAFF pathway are under study.Overall, therapies targeting B cells appear to be promising in the treatment of SLE, provide additional evidence for the importance of B cells to disease pathogenesis, and will continue to elucidate the diverse roles of B cells in this disease.