Ciclosporin versus infliximab in patients with severe ulcerative colitis refractory to intravenous steroids: a parallel, open-label randomised controlled trial

Oral tacrolimus for pediatric steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) occurring during childhood is generally extensive and is associated with severe flares that may require intravenous steroid treatment. In cases of corticosteroid resistance is necessary to introduce a second-line treatment to avoid or delay surgery.

AIMS

To describe the efficacy and safety of oral tacrolimus for the treatment of severe steroid-resistant UC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study that included all patients under age 18 suffering from severe steroid-resistant UC treated with oral tacrolimus during the period January 1998 to October 2012 and with a follow-up period after treatment of 24 months or more.

RESULTS

A total of ten patients were included. The age at baseline was 9.4±4.9 years, and the time from diagnosis was 1.3 months (IQR, 1-5.7). Seven of the patients were in their first flare of disease. All of them received an oral dose of 0.12 mg/kg/day of tacrolimus divided in two doses. Trough plasma levels of tacrolimus were maintained between 4 and 13 ng/ml. Response was seen in 5/10 patients at 12 months, colectomy was eventually performed in 60% of patients during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus is useful in inducing remission in patients with severe steroid-resistant UC, preventing or delaying colectomy, and allowing the patient and family to prepare for a probable surgery. Tacrolimus may also be used as a treatment bridge for corticosteroid-dependent patients until the new maintenance therapy takes effect.

Differences between treatment guidelines--Germany

When looking at different treatment guidelines the topics most debated for Crohn's disease are the following: (a) the use of mesalamine for remission induction and maintenance in mild to moderate Crohn's disease; (b) the early use of anti-TNF antibodies in Crohn's disease with or without classical immunomodulators for remission induction, and (c) remission induction in steroid-refractory disease with anti-TNF antibodies or calcineurin inhibitors. The topics mentioned above will be discussed with regard to the statements of the German Gastroenterology Association (DGVS) on the basis of the underlying evidence.

Comparing guidelines for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

As we enter into the era of 'personalized medicine', many of the recommendations of 'evidence-based medicine' require scrutiny and adaptation to optimize individual outcomes. Several examples of these discrepancies are exemplified by the topics of aminosalicylate use in Crohn's disease, early use of biologic agents that target TNF and the role of calcineurin inhibitors versus anti-TNF agents in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

The positioning of colectomy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis in the era of biologic therapy

The position of surgery in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) has changed in the era of biologics. Several important questions arise in determining the optimal positioning of surgery in the treatment of UC, which has long been a challenge facing gastroenterologists and surgeons. Surgery is life-saving in some patients and leads to better bowel function and better quality of life in most patients. The benefits of surgery, however, must be weighed against the potential surgical morbidity and compromised functioning that clearly can occur. The introduction of biologic therapy has added further complexity to decisions about medical management, surgery, and the relative timing of these choices. Appropriate medical management of UC may induce and maintain remission and may prevent surgery. However, medical management also carries risks of adverse effects, and recent data suggest that delay of surgery during ineffective medical therapy can increase the chances of negative surgical outcomes. To make individualized timely treatment decisions, early collaboration between gastroenterologists and surgeons is important and more data on predictors of treatment response and positive outcomes are needed. Early identification of patients who would benefit from biologic therapy or surgery is challenging.

Novel treatment options for ulcerative colitis

The approved treatment options for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are currently limited to mesalamine or immunosuppressants. Patients who do not respond to mesalamine-based therapy can be treated with immunomodulators or anti-TNF antibody therapy. Failure or adverse reactions to these medications leaves the patient with little choice other than colectomy. However, novel insights into the pathogenic drivers of UC have led to new developments in drugs that promise clinical efficacy via modulation of targeted pathways. Given the impending expansion of therapeutic options for patients with UC, clinicians and researchers should be familiar with these mechanisms of action. In addition, the typical 'step-up' treatment paradigm for UC will likely need to be reshaped to allow for a more personalized approach to treating UC.

Prolonged preoperative hospital stay is a risk factor for complications after emergency colectomy for severe colitis

AIM

Risk factors for postoperative complications in patients undergoing emergency colectomy for severe colitis in inflammatory bowel disease have hardly been studied. Therefore, this study aimed to define predictors of a complicated postoperative course in these patients.

METHOD

A retrospective review was performed of 71 consecutive patients who underwent emergency colectomy for severe colitis between 1999 and 2012 at a tertiary referral centre. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Patients with a complication Grade II or higher were compared with those with no complications or a Grade I complication.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (26.7%) had at least one postoperative complication classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade II or higher. In the group with postoperative complications, patients had a higher age (mean 45 vs 35 years, P = 0.020) and a higher body mass index (BMI) (mean 25.9 vs 21.0 kg/m(2), P = 0.006). Length of preoperative hospital stay (median 15 vs 6 days, P = 0.032) was longer in the group with postoperative complications. During the study period, the preoperative hospital stay decreased by 0.8 days per study year (95% CI 0.2-1.5 days, P < 0.001). This did not influence the complication rate over time, however.

CONCLUSION

Factors increasing the risk of complications after emergency colectomy for severe colitis were a higher age, a higher BMI and a longer preoperative hospital stay.

Outcomes of rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis: data from the United Kingdom inflammatory bowel disease audit

BACKGROUND

Approximately one third of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) fail response to steroids. Ciclosporin and anti-TNFα are proven second-line therapies, but evidence of their efficacy has come mainly from tertiary centres and/or selective clinical trial recruitment.

AIM

To assess ASUC outcomes in a large unselected cohort.

METHODS

UK-wide audits of IBD care were conducted in 2008 (209 hospital sites) and 2010 (198 hospital sites), covering >87% of admitting hospitals. Each site entered data from 20 consecutive UC admissions onto a web-based proforma. Admissions included 852 (2008) and 984 (2010) with ASUC, accounting for 35% and 39% of UC admissions, respectively.

RESULTS

ASUC in-hospital mortality was 1.2% in 2008; 0.7% in 2010 (P = 0.22). Response to first-line steroid therapy was 61% (2008); 58% (2010) and mortality was higher in non-responders: 2008: 2.9% (9/315) vs. 0.19% (1/537; P < 0.001); 2010: 1.8% (7/391) vs. 0.0% (0/593; P = 0.002). In 2010, more patients (56%) received second-line medical therapy than in 2008 (47%, P = 0.02). In-hospital mortality was similar to second-line medical therapy vs. surgery without further medical therapy; 2008: 2.7% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.99; 2010: 0.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.17. Second-line therapy response was more frequently observed with anti-TNFα than ciclosporin: (2008: 76% vs. 46%, P < 0.001; 2010: 80% vs. 58%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality in acute severe ulcerative colitis was low, but higher in steroid non-responders. Patients treated with second-line medical therapies had no higher risk of in-hospital mortality than those undergoing surgery. Second-line 'rescue' medical therapy usage is increasing; however, ciclosporin response rates were relatively low.

Fulminant colitis

Fulminant colitis is an ill-defined entity that is usually viewed as the most severe form of uncomplicated acute colitis. It usually occurs in the course of ulcerative colitis and infectious colitis, but can also be seen in other forms of colitis. Every patient with clinical criteria for severe or fulminant colitis should be approached in a systematic way, based on two premises - intense medical treatment and early surgery in non-responders.

Inflammatory bowel disease in the UK: is quality of care improving?

OBJECTIVE

A national audit conducted in 2005/6 showed unacceptable quality of care for inpatients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the UK. This was re-audited in 2007/8 and 2010/11. The aim of this study is to examine the quality of care provided for inpatients with IBD in the UK.

DESIGN

A programme of engagement and re-audit in 128 hospitals in the UK providing care for adult patients with IBD admitted to hospital between 1 June 2005 and 31 May 2006, 1 September 2007 and 31 August 2008 and 1 September 2010 and 31August 2011.

INTERVENTIONS

Wide dissemination of the results, selected site visits, development of national service standards, and the development of an online document repository.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality, medical and surgical treatment, specialist nursing and dietetic care were audited.

RESULTS

Data from 1953, 2016 and 1948 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 2074, 2109 and 1900 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) were audited in 2005/6, 2007/8 and 2010/11, respectively. The mortality rate fell from 1.7% to 0.8% (p=0.034) in UC and from 1.3% to 0.8% (p=0.226) in CD. The proportion of inpatients reviewed by an IBD specialist nurse has risen from 23.7% to 44.9% in UC and from 18.1% to 39.9% (p<0.001) in CD. Anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy has increased in UC and CD (p<0.001) while ciclosporin prescription has slightly fallen in UC. Laparoscopic surgeries have significantly increased in UC and CD (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show clear evidence of improvement in most aspects of the quality of care for IBD inpatients.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy does not improve the effects of standardized treatment in a severe attack of ulcerative colitis: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Complementary therapy options are needed in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis (UC). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been shown to have positive effects in experimental models of colitis and perianal Crohn's disease.

METHODS

In the present prospective randomized open-label study, HBOT in addition to conventional medical treatment was compared with conventional treatment alone. The primary objective in this study was improved clinical outcome evaluated by Mayo score, laboratory tests and fecal weight. The secondary objectives were improvement in health-related quality of life, avoidance of colectomy and evaluation of HBOT safety.

RESULTS

The authors found no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in any of the assessed variables.

CONCLUSION

The study results do not support the use of HBOT as a treatment option in a severe attack of UC.

Drug advances in inflammatory bowel disease

The pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains incompletely understood, but is thought to be a consequence of immune dysregulation, impaired mucosal integrity, enteric bacterial dysbiosis and genetic susceptibility factors. Recent drug advances in the treatment of IBD have clarified the role of existing medication, including 5-amino-salicylic acids (5-ASAs) and has seen a burgeoning use of treatment with biologicals. With recent advances in our understanding of these debilitating diseases, it is hoped that novel therapeutic targets can be identified.

Infliximab as rescue therapy in hospitalised patients with steroid-refractory acute ulcerative colitis: a long-term follow-up of 211 Swedish patients

BACKGROUND

Rescue therapy with infliximab (IFX) has been proven effective in a steroid-refractory attack of ulcerative colitis (UC). The long-term efficacy is not well described.

AIM

To present a retrospective study of IFX as rescue therapy in UC. Primary end points were colectomy-free survival at 3 and 12 months.

METHODS

In this multicentre study, 211 adult patients hospitalised between 1999 and 2010 received IFX 5 mg/kg as rescue therapy due to a steroid-refractory, moderate-to-severe attack of UC. Exclusion criteria were duration of current flare for >12 weeks, corticosteroid treatment for >8 weeks before hospitalisation, previous IFX therapy or Crohn's disease.

RESULTS

Probability of colectomy-free survival at 3 months was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.64-0.77), at 12 months 0.64 (95% CI, 0.57-0.70), at 3 years 0.59 (95% CI, 0.52-0.66) and at 5 years 0.53 (95% CI, 0.44-0.61). Steroid-free, clinical remission was achieved in 105/211 (50%) and 112/209 (54%) patients at 3 and 12 months respectively. Of 75 colectomies during the first year, 48 (64%) were carried out during the first 14 days, 13 (17%) on days 15-90 and 14 (19%) between 3 and 12 months. There were three (1.4%) deaths during the first 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab is an effective rescue treatment, both short- and long-term, in a steroid-refractory attack of UC. Most IFX failures underwent surgery during the first 14 days, which calls for studies on how to optimise induction treatment with IFX. Serious complications, including mortality, were rare.

Investigational cytokine-targeted therapies for ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Up to one-third of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) do not respond to standard medications, including mesalamine, steroids and thiopurines. The recognition that UC-related pathological process is the result of an altered balance between inflammatory and counter-regulatory signals, mostly mediated by cytokines, has led to the development of novel compounds, which are now ready to move into clinical practice. This article summarizes the recent data on the development and use of compounds either inhibiting inflammatory cytokines or enhancing the activity of counter-regulatory cytokines in patients with UC and murine models of UC.

AREAS COVERED

A PubMed search was performed using the following keywords: 'ulcerative colitis', 'therapy', 'treatment' and 'cytokine'. In addition, ongoing clinical trials were checked and compounds were searched on the website of pharmaceutical companies.

EXPERT OPINION

Several investigational cytokine-based therapies have provided promising results in attenuating clinical activity in patients with UC and mice with experimental colitis. However, clinical and immunological heterogeneity of UC patients, therapy-related side effects and redundant biological functions of cytokines represent potential pitfalls and should be considered in optimizing therapeutic strategies.

Review article: the role of anti-TNF in the management of ulcerative colitis -- past, present and future

BACKGROUND

Until recently, the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) consisted of the stepwise use of mesalazine, corticosteroids and immunomodulators, or consideration of surgery. Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents are recent additions to the UC-treatment algorithm.

AIM

To provide clinicians with a review of the role of anti-TNFs in UC, discussing how the drug(s) were used in the past, their current use and to determine their future role.

METHODS

The scientific literature was reviewed to evaluate data on the use of anti-TNFs in UC.

RESULTS

In this review, we report how the management of UC has changed with the availability of anti-TNFs. The results from landmark anti-TNF trials have impacted clinical practice, leading to a readjustment of treatment goals. In addition, experience from clinical trials and local real-life cohorts have helped to clarify some misunderstandings in the management of UC. New anti-TNFs are on the horizon but questions still remain on the future role of anti-TNFs with regard to impact on disability, digestive damage and the possible development of risk matrices. Experiences from the use of anti-TNFs in Crohn's disease (for example, combination therapy and early treatment) now need to be addressed in UC.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of anti-TNFs in the management of UC has matured rapidly. Clinical experience has helped shape the current role of anti-TNFs, but more clinical research is needed to optimise their future role.

Impact of mucosal healing on long-term outcomes in ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab: a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Mucosal healing can be achieved with infliximab (IFX).

AIM

To assess the impact of mucosal healing on long-term outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) when treated with infliximab (IFX) beyond 1 year.

METHODS

All consecutive adult patients with refractory UC receiving maintenance treatment with IFX in five French referral centres were analysed retrospectively. Only patients who had endoscopic evaluation between 6 and 52 weeks following IFX initiation were included. According to their Mayo endoscopic sub-score, patients were categorised into mucosal healing (sub-score: 0-1) and no mucosal healing (2-3). Outcome measures were colectomy and IFX failure defined by drug withdrawal due to secondary failure among primary responders.

RESULTS

Of the 63 patients (30 women; median age: 38 years), 30 (48%) achieved mucosal healing. The median follow-up duration was 27 (3-79) months. Colectomy-free survival rates at 12, 24 and 36 months were, respectively, 100%, 96% and 96% in patients with mucosal healing. The corresponding figures were, respectively, 80%, 65% and 65% in patients without mucosal healing (P = 0.004). By multivariate analysis, mucosal healing was the only factor associated with colectomy-free survival, with an odds ratio of 18.01 (95%CI: 1.58-204.92). IFX failure-free survival rates at 12, 24 and 36 months were, respectively, 76%, 69% and 64% in patients with mucosal healing, and 44%, 25% and 21% in those without mucosal healing (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Patients with refractory UC who achieved mucosal healing after IFX initiation had better long-term outcomes, with significantly less colectomy and less IFX failure.

Management of difficult-to-treat patients with ulcerative colitis: focus on adalimumab

The treatment of ulcerative colitis has changed over the last decade, with the introduction of biological drugs. This article reviews the currently available therapies for ulcerative colitis and the specific use of these therapies in the management of patients in different settings, particularly the difficult-to-treat patients. The focus of this review is on adalimumab, which has recently obtained approval by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration, for use in treating adult patients with moderate-to-severe, active ulcerative colitis, who are refractory, intolerant, or who have contraindications to conventional therapy, including corticosteroids and thiopurines. Since the results emerging from the pivotal trials have been subject to some debate, the aim of this review was to summarize all available data on the use of adalimumab in ulcerative colitis, focusing also on a retrospective series of real-life experiences. Taken together, the current evidence indicates that adalimumab is effective for the treatment of patients with different types of ulcerative colitis, including biologically naïve and difficult-to-treat patients.

Efficacy of infliximab in acute severe ulcerative colitis: A single-centre experience

AIM: To suggest infliximab (IFX) is effective for acute severe ulcerative colitis, from real-life clinical practice.

METHODS: All patients receiving IFX for the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis in a single centre were included. Data were extracted from clinical records in order to assess response to IFX therapy. The primary endpoint was colectomy-free survival, and secondary outcomes included glucocorticosteroid-free remission and safety, which was evaluated by recording deaths and adverse events. Demographic and clinical characteristics of those who underwent colectomy and those who were colectomy-free, both at discharge from their index admission, and during follow-up after an initial response to IFX were compared.

RESULTS: Forty-four patients (16 females, mean age 36 years) received IFX between May 2006 and January 2012 for acute severe ulcerative colitis. The median duration of follow-up post-first infusion was 396 d (interquartile range = 173-828 d). There were 21 (47.7%) patients with < 1 year of follow-up, 10 (22.7%) with 1 years to 2 years of follow-up, and 13 (29.5%) with > 2 years of follow-up post-first infusion of IFX. Overall, 35 (79.5%) responded to IFX, avoiding colectomy during their index admission, 29 (65.9%) were colectomy-free at last point of follow-up (median follow-up 396 d), and 25 (56.8%) were in glucocorticosteroid-free remission at end of follow-up. There was one death from post-operative sepsis, 20 d after a single IFX infusion. Colectomy rates were generally lower among those “bridging” to thiopurine. Of 18 patients “bridged” to thiopurine therapy, 17 (94.4%) were colectomy-free, and 15 (83.3%) were in glucocorticosteroid-free remission at study end. No predictors of response were identified.

CONCLUSION: IFX is effective for acute severe ulcerative colitis in real-life clinical practice. Two-thirds of patients avoided colectomy, and more than 50% were in glucocorticosteroid-free remission.

Defining the difference: What Makes Biologics Unique

Biologics differ from chemically derived drugs in ways that affect their cost, production, administration, and clinical efficacy. Here's a look at the most important differences and their implications.

Short-term efficacy of tacrolimus in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis - experience in 130 patients

BACKGROUND

Steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) remains a challenging condition warranting surgery upon failure of pharmacological treatment. Calcineurin inhibitors or infliximab are alternatives in this situation. Data on the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in this setting are limited.

AIM

To study the short-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in moderate-to-severe steroid-refractory UC. The role of thiopurines in this situation and predictors of colectomy were evaluated.

METHODS

In three centers, all charts from tacrolimus-treated patients with steroid-refractory UC were reviewed. Efficacy was assessed by colectomy-free survival and clinical remission at 3 months.

RESULTS

We identified 130 patients with pancolitis in 75 (59%), left-sided disease in 35 (27%) and proctitis in 18 patients (14%) (disease localisation not obtainable in two patients). The median age was 40 (range: 18-81). Clinical activity according to the median Lichtiger score decreased from 13 (range: 4-17) at baseline to 3 (0-14) at week 12. Eighteen patients underwent colectomy within the first 3 months of treatment with tacrolimus (14%). Clinical remission was achieved in 94 patients (72%) in this period. Thiopurines given in parallel to tacrolimus tended to limit colectomy and significantly increased remission (P = 0.002) in the short-term. No other predictors of colectomy or remission were identified. Side effects were noticed in 53% of patients and no severe events occurred.

CONCLUSION

This large survey confirms the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

Challenges to the design, execution, and analysis of randomized controlled trials for inflammatory bowel disease

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has greatly improved with the development of targeted, monoclonal antibody-based therapies. Tumor necrosis factor antagonists are frequently used to treat patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, but they have side effects and their efficacy often decreases with use. New, more effective drugs are therefore needed and in development. However, many agents that appeared to be promising in preclinical studies have failed to show efficacy in clinical trials. We discuss possible reasons for the failures of these reagents in trials, which include the high rate of response to placebo, an inadequate range of doses, inappropriate timing of end point measurements, the changing therapeutic environment, and the competitive trial system. We also review regulatory guidelines for end points and trial design and recommend ways to improve trials.