Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery

Early predictors of anastomotic leaks after colectomy

BACKGROUND

An anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery is associated with significant morbidity and decreased survival. Our aim was to identify the early predictors of anastomotic leaks.

METHODS

The records of patients undergoing restorative resection for colorectal disease from January 2000 to November 2005 were reviewed. Demographics, clinical events, and laboratory parameters were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 311 patients were included. An anastomotic leak was identified in 25 patients (8%). A leak was suspected and diagnosis confirmed at a mean of 10+/-1 days postoperatively. More respiratory and neurological events occurred in patients with an anastomotic leak (p<0.001). These events occurred early in the postoperative course and were usually the first signs and symptoms of a leak. More patients with a leak had absence of bowel activity by postoperative day 6 compared to patients without a leak (p<0.0001). Elevations of the white blood cell count or temperature were a late finding.

CONCLUSION

The earliest clinical predictors of an anastomotic leak are pulmonary and/or neurological. Awareness of these findings might help in early diagnosis and treatment of an anastomotic leak.

Esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease with an overall poor prognosis. Esophagectomy remains a key therapeutic option in treating patients who have this disease. Tailoring the surgical approach to the patient and the nature of his or her malignancy is essential. Over time, advances in staging, preoperative assessment, operative techniques, and postoperative care have resulted in decreased operative mortality and better long-term outcomes.

The effect of mesh reinforcement of a stapled transection line on the rate of pancreatic occlusion failure after distal pancreatectomy: review of a single institution's experience

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic occlusion failure (POF) after distal pancreatectomy remains a common source of morbidity. Here, we review our experience with distal pancreatectomy and attempt to identify factors which influence POF rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred sixty-nine distal pancreatectomies were performed between 2002 and 2007. Review of the computerized medical records and physician office records was performed for all patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors which might influence the incidence of POF. The data set was analysed for factors which might influence the pancreatic occlusion rate. Analysis included patient and disease characteristics including: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, consistency of the pancreas and history of pancreatitis, as well as intra-operative variables including: surgeon, absorbable mesh reinforcement and operative approach.

RESULTS

POF was the most common peri-operative complication. POF was identified in 32 out of 169 patients (19%). Transection technique (hand sewn, stapled, stapled with mesh) and procedure complexity were factors associated with differences in POF rates by both univariate and multivariate analyses. POF was identified in 7 out of 70 patients (10%) when an absorbable mesh was utilized, and 25 of 99 patients (25%) when mesh was not utilized (P < 0.02).

DISCUSSION

These data suggest that a randomized controlled trial will be required to determine if mesh reinforcement reduces the rate and severity of POF after distal pancreatectomy.

Surgical results of patients after esophageal resection or extended gastrectomy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction

Precise classification of cancers of the esophagogastric junction according to Siewert may be difficult for the presence of Barrett's esophagus or hiatal hernia, which subsequently leads to a difficult choice of the surgical procedure of esophagectomy or gastrectomy. Ninety-six patients with such cancers were operated on in our department in 7 years. Twenty-nine patients (30.2%), classified as type I (group 1), underwent a transthoracic esophagectomy with gastric pull up. Sixty-seven patients (69.8%) classified as type II or III (group 2) underwent an extended gastrectomy. We compared the patients of both groups retrospectively for disease-free survival and postoperative complications. The general performance status of most patients was comparable in both groups and was assigned to the American Society of Anesthesiologists class II or III. Statistically significant differences between the groups were seen for the postoperative reintubation rate [group 1: 31.0% vs. group 2: 9.0% (P = 0.009)], median time for surgery [group 1: 6 (3.5-8.5) hours vs. group 2: 4.7 (2.2-11.5) hours (P = 0.001)], time in the intensive care unit [group 1: 6 (3-85) days vs. group 2: 3 (1-54) days (P = 0.001)], median hospitalization time [group 1: 23 (14-105) days vs. group 2: 18 (10-63) days (P = 0.018)]. No statistical difference was observed for the recurrence-free survival of 40% after 3 years (P = 0.311), the mortality rate, the morbidity rate (P = 0.108), surgical and respiratory complications, and the incidence of anastomotic leakage (P = 0.645). We conclude that in selected cases it may be possible to perform an extended gastrectomy for small type I cancers.

Factors related to anastomotic dehiscence and mortality after terminal stomal closure in the management of patients with severe secondary peritonitis

INTRODUCTION

Management of severe secondary peritonitis (SSP) may require intestinal resections and bowel exteriorization due to an unacceptable high risk for anastomotic dehiscence (AD). Bowel exteriorization can be achieved through loop or terminal stomas. There are no studies addressing the fate of these latter. Our aim was to determine factors associated with AD and mortality in patients submitted to restoration of intestinal continuity after creation of terminal stomas as part of their operative management for SSP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed prospectively collected databases on all consecutive patients with SSP submitted to restoration of intestinal continuity after having had terminal ileostomies (TI) or terminal colostomies (TC) as part of their operative management during a 30-month period. Several patient and disease and operative variables were evaluated as factors related to AD and mortality in this group of patients. Univariate statistical comparisons were made using Student's t test for continuous variables and chi-square test when categorical variables were compared. Multivariate analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 72 male patients and 36 female patients were included in the study; 54 had TI and 54 had TC. Median number of operations performed as part of their management for SSP (prior to stomal closure) was 2 (range, 1-15). A total of 76 (70%) had had diffuse peritonitis, and 39 (36%) required management with an open abdomen (26 of them with a skin-only closure technique). Median time interval between stomal creation and closure was 190 days (range, 14-2,192). Stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses were done in 24 and 84 patients, respectively. AD occurred in 11 patients (10%). Univariate analyses disclosed age > or = 50 years (p < 0.05), high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (> or = 3; p < 0.01), history of chronic renal failure (p < 0.04), history of diffuse peritonitis (p < 0.05), management with an open abdomen (p < 0.05), and lower preoperative hemoglobin values (p < 0.05) as risk factors for AD. Only age > or = 50 years prevailed after multivariate analyses. A total of seven patients died (6%). Factors associated with mortality were age > or = 65 years (p < 0.02), high ASA score (> or = 3; p < 0.01), preoperative use of total parenteral nutrition (p < 0.02), lower preoperative hemoglobin values (p < 0.05), time interval between stomal creation and closure < 3 months (p < 0.01), AD (p < 0.02), and need for reoperation after stomal closure (p < 0.02). After multivariate analyses, time interval between stomal creation and closure < 3 months and need for reoperation were the only ones that prevailed as independent risk factors for mortality (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although several variables were related to AD and mortality, waiting at least >3 months before attempting restoration of intestinal continuity seems to be the best approach and a practical recommendation in this group of challenging patients.

Anastomotic leaks after bowel resection: what does peer review teach us about the relationship to postoperative mortality?

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak is a dreaded complication of intestinal surgery and has been associated with a high mortality rate. But it is uncertain exactly which patient populations are at risk of death from the leak. We sought to assess the impact of surgeon volume on leak rate and to better understand the relationship of a leak to postoperative mortality.

STUDY DESIGN

All adult patients having a small or large bowel resection with anastomosis at a university hospital from July 2003 to June 2006 were entered into a prospectively maintained quality database; data were entered by a specially trained nurse practitioner who rounded daily with housestaff. Patients with a postoperative leak based on standardized criteria were identified. Patient characteristics, surgical procedure, and operating surgeon were noted. Overall complication and leak rates by surgeon were compared using Fisher's exact test. Individual case review by a group of peers was performed for all patients with a leak who died, to determine the relationship to mortality.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-six patients underwent resection with anastomosis during the study period. There were 27 patients with leaks (4.9%), 6 of whom died. Leak rate for the highest-volume surgeons ranged from 1.6% to 9.9% (p <0.01), and overall complication rate varied from 30.5% to 44% (p=0.04). In four of six deaths, leaks occurred in very ill patients undergoing emergency procedures and appeared to be premorbid events. In only one patient did the leak appear to be the primary cause of death.

CONCLUSIONS

The variability in leak rate by surgeons doing similar operations suggests that many leaks may be preventable. But death after a leak is most often a surrogate for a critically ill patient and was infrequently the actual cause of death.

Risk factors and clinical outcome for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Anastomosis leakage is a major complication of rectal surgery. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection (LAR) in rectal cancer patients and study its impact on long-term prognosis and disease-free survival and overall survival in rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent rectal resection with primary anastomosis below the pelvic peritoneal reflexion for rectal cancer between October 1996 to February 2006 were included.

RESULTS

Anastomosis leakage after LAR occurred in 51 patients (4.0%). The median time to leakage was 4 days (range = 2-30 days). In univariate analysis, gender, level of anastomosis less than 4 cm, preoperative concomitant chemoradiation (CCRT), and length of operation greater than 120 min were significantly associated with anastomosis leakage. In a multivariate analysis, gender (p = 0.041; relative risk = 2.007; 95% CI = 1.030-3.912) and preoperative CCRT (p = 0.003; relative risk = 2.861; 95% CI = 1.417-5.778) were identified as independent prognostic factors. The overall survival of the nonleakage group and the leakage group was 80.2% and 64.9%, respectively (p = 0.170). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were not significantly different between the nonleakage and leakage groups (78.1% vs. 65.9%, p = 0.166).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection is relatively low. Male gender and preoperative CCRT were associated with increased risk for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. No effect of anastomosis leakage on local recurrence was found in this series.

Use of rapid sampling microdialysis for intraoperative monitoring of bowel ischemia

PURPOSE

Intestinal ischemia is a major cause of anastomotic leak and death and remains a clinical challenge as the physician relies on several nonspecific signs, biologic markers, and radiologic studies to make the diagnosis. This study used rapid sampling online microdialysis to evaluate the biochemical changes occurring in a segment of human bowel during and after resection, and assessed for the feasibility and reproducibility of this technique in monitoring intestinal ischemia.

METHODS

A custom made, rapid sampling online microdialysis analyzer was used to monitor the changes in the bowel wall of specimens being resected intraoperatively. Two patients were recruited for the pilot study to optimize the analyzer and seven patients undergoing colonic resections were recruited for the data collection and analysis.

RESULTS

The concentration of glucose in the extracellular bowel wall fluid decreased transiently after division of individual feeding arteries followed by a rebound increase in the concentration back to baseline concentrations. After completion of resection, glucose concentrations continued to decrease while lactate concentrations increased constantly.

CONCLUSION

Rapid sampling microdialysis was feasible in the clinical environment. These results suggest that tissue responds to ischemic insult by mobilizing glucose stores which later decrease again, whereas lactate concentrations constantly increased.

Radiological detection of post-oesophagectomy anastomotic leak - a comparison between multidetector CT and fluoroscopy

The purpose of this study was to directly compare CT with fluoroscopy for the diagnosis of occult anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy. Patients undergoing oesophagectomy and gastric conduit formation for the treatment of oesophageal cancer were eligible for inclusion. Imaging was performed 6-8 days post-operatively. Patients underwent multislice CT examination of the chest and abdomen with a bolus of oral contrast, followed by fluoroscopic water-soluble contrast swallow (with subsequent use of barium if this was normal). The studies were reviewed by a consultant radiologist, who was blinded to the results of the other modality. Images were reported as showing "no leak", "possible leak" or "definite leak". The presence of mediastinal gas or fluid or extraluminal contrast at CT was recorded. The clinical outcome after reinstituition of oral intake was used as a reference standard. Patient preference for modality was recorded. 52 patients were recruited. Four were found to have leak on CT and fluoroscopy. 11 had possible leak at CT, but normal fluoroscopy: 2 of these had a leak confirmed later, whereas 9 had no leak. 37 had normal CT and fluoroscopy findings, and remained clinically well. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 80%, 40% and 100%, respectively, for CT, and 67%, 100%, 100% and 96%, respectively, for fluoroscopy. The positive predictive value of mediastinal air, air/fluid and extraluminal contrast were 25%, 75% and 50%, respectively. 35 patients found CT more tolerable. In conclusion, CT was better tolerated and more sensitive but less specific than fluoroscopy for detecting occult anastomotic leak.

The management and outcome of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery

PURPOSE

Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and may result in poor functional and oncological outcomes. Diagnostic difficulties may delay identification and appropriate management of leaks. The aim of this study was to look at the diagnosis, clinical management and outcomes of anastamotic leaks in our department.

METHOD

A retrospective audit and case note review of all patients who underwent the formation of a colorectal anastomosis between January 1996 and December 2002 (n = 1421) was performed. An anastomotic leak was defined as sepsis identified to have arisen from an anastomosis that subsequently required surgery, radiological drainage or intravenous antibiotics. Forty-one patients (25 male, 16 female) with a median age of 60 years (range 7-89 years) were identified as having suffered an anastomotic leak.

RESULTS

The median time to diagnosis of an anastomotic leak following surgery was 7 days (range 3-29). At re-operation, 21 patients (51%) underwent formation of a stoma, and any who required the anastomosis to be formally taken down have been left with a 'permanent' stoma. Currently only four of 12 patients (33%) who required a stoma for an anastomotic leak following anterior resection have undergone stoma reversal. Eleven of 16 patients (69%) who had received a stoma following another colorectal procedure had undergone stoma reversal. The mortality associated with an anastamotic leak in this series was 5% (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

Although anastomotic leaks following colorectal surgery are associated with significant morbidity and stoma formation, early and aggressive management should result in a low overall mortality. If an anastomosis is taken down following an anastomotic leak after anterior resection, this will usually result in a 'permanent' stoma.

Anastomotic leaks after anterior resection for mid and low rectal cancer: survey of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of the survey was to assess the incidence of anastomotic leaks (AL) and to identify risk factors predicting incidence and gravity of AL after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer performed by colorectal surgeons of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).

METHODS

Information about patients with rectal cancers less than 12 cm from the anal verge who underwent LAR during 2005 was collected retrospectively. AL was classified as grade I to IV according to gravity. Fifteen clinical variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Further analysis was conducted on patients with AL to identify factors correlated with gravity.

RESULTS

There were 520 patients representing 64% of LAR for rectal cancer performed by SICCR members. The overall rate of AL was 15.2%. Mortality was 2.7% including 0.6% from AL. The incidence of AL was correlated with higher age (p<0.05), lower (<20 per year) centre case volume (p<0.05), obesity (p<0.05), malnutrition (p<0.01) and intraoperative contamination (p<0.05), and was lower in patients with a colonic J-pouch reservoir (p<0.05). In the multivariate analysis age, malnutrition and intraoperative contamination were independent predictors. The only predictor of severe (grade III/IV) AL was alcohol/smoking habits (p<0.05) while the absence of a diverting stoma was borderline significant (p<0.07).

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective survey identified several risk factors for AL. This survey was a necessary step to construct prospective interventional studies and to establish benchmark standards for outcome studies.

Outcomes of colorectal anastomoses during pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancy

BACKGROUND

Although pelvic exenteration is frequently indicated during surgery for gynaecological malignancy, performing a colorectal anastomosis remains contentious because of concern about leakage. This study evaluated the safety of performing a low colorectal anastomosis during pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancy.

METHODS

Between April 2001 and December 2006, 145 consecutive patients underwent low colorectal anastomosis without (122) or with (23) a stoma after pelvic exenteration for advanced primary or recurrent gynaecological malignancy. Subjects were assessed in terms of five patient-, four disease- and two surgery-related variables. The proportion of patients with each risk factor for leakage was found, and the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage was determined.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 53.5 (range 10-77) years and the most common diagnosis was ovarian cancer (77.9 per cent). The mean operating time was 453 (range 145-845) min and the mean blood loss was 1080 (range 110-10 500) ml; 95 patients (65.5 per cent) required a blood transfusion. Of the 145 patients, 81 (55.9 per cent) had patient-related, 94 (64.8 per cent) had disease-related and 67 (46.2 per cent) had surgery-related variables associated with a risk of leakage. Symptomatic anastomotic leakage developed in three patients (2.1 per cent).

CONCLUSION

Although patients with gynaecological malignancy carry considerable risks associated with anastomotic leakage, carefully executed low colorectal anastomosis during pelvic exenteration was found to be safe.

Locally advanced rectal cancer: what is the evidence for induction chemoradiation?

The concept of spatial cooperation in neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer is attractive. Chemotherapy may, as a component of CRT, not only act as a radiosensitizing agent but also potentially eradicate distant micrometastases. Recent trials have demonstrated that the addition of concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy to radiation increases the pathological complete response rate, and reduces local recurrence, but as yet, a survival advantage has not been observed.

AIMS

This review aims to examine the evidence for induction CRT in locally advanced rectal cancer. The endpoints of pathological complete response, a negative circumferential margin, sphincter-sparing surgery, local control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) are examined, as are acute and late morbidity, surgical complications, and late functional results.

METHODS

The information to produce this review was compiled by searching PubMed and MEDLINE for English language articles published until April 2007. The search term included "induction, neoadjuvant, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemoradiation, combined modality" in association with rectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT in the European randomized trials of rectal cancer improves tumor downstaging, pathological complete response, and local control over radiotherapy alone, but does not translate into a benefit in terms of longer DFS or OS, or a higher chance of sphincter preservation. Metastatic disease remains a significant problem, which provides a strong rationale for the integration of a second cytotoxic drug, or biologically targeted agents.

Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic dehiscence is the most severe surgical complication after large bowel resection. This study was designed to assess the incidence, to observe the consequences, and to identify the risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All procedures involving anastomoses of the colon or the rectum, which were performed between November 2002 and February 2006 in a single institution, were prospectively entered into a computerized database.

RESULTS

One thousand eighteen colorectal resections and 811 anastomoses were performed over this 40-month period. The most frequent procedures were sigmoid (276) and right colectomies (217). The overall anastomotic leak rate was 3.8%. The mortality rate associated with anastomotic leak was 12.9%. In univariate analysis, the following parameters were associated with an increased risk for anastomotic dehiscence: (1) ASA score >or= 3 (p = 0.004), (2) prolonged (>3 h) operative time (p = 0.02), (3) rectal location of the disease (p < 0.001), (4) and a body mass index > 25 (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, ASA score >or= 3 (OR = 2.5; 95% CI 1.5-4.3, p < 0.001), operative time > 3 h [OR = 3.0; 95% CI 1.1-8.0, p = 0.02), and rectal location of the disease (OR = 3.75; 95% CI 1.5-9.0 (vs left colon), p = 0.003; OR = 7.69; 95% CI 2.2-27.3 (vs right colon), p = 0.001] were factors significantly associated with a higher risk of anastomotic dehiscence.

CONCLUSIONS

Three risk factors for anastomotic leak have been identified, one is patient-related (ASA score), one is disease-related (rectal location), the third being surgery-related (prolonged operative time). These factors should be considered in perioperative decision-making regarding defunctioning stoma formation.

Anastomotic leakage, the search for a reliable biomarker. A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication leading to severe infection, sepsis and sometimes death. At present the diagnosis is made clinically, usually at 6-8 days after surgery. An objective biomarker reflecting the intra-abdominal milieu surrounding the anastomosis would be a useful additional diagnostic tool to make the diagnosis of AL before its clinical presentation. This review aims to assess the current status of the search for such a biomarker in peritoneal fluid.

METHOD

A literature search was carried out, using MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane library, for all publications concerning human peritoneal fluid in relation to postoperative complications in general, and, more specific, anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.

RESULTS

Analysis of several immune parameters, tissue repair parameters, parameters for ischaemia and microbiological composition of peritoneal fluid show that these can be determined reliably in the fluid, albeit with a large variance. Furthermore the data show that changes in concentration of these parameters precede AL and other postoperative complications by several days.

CONCLUSION

The results of the review demonstrate that it is possible to distinguish between patients with and without AL by measuring biomarkers in fluid from the peritoneal drain. Prospective studies with larger numbers of patients should, however, be performed and additional biomarkers should be studied to explore the full diagnostic potential of this approach.

Radiological evaluation of colorectal anastomoses

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy, interobserver variability, timing and discordance with relaparotomy of postoperative radiological examination of colorectal anastomoses.

PATIENT/METHODS

From 2000 to 2005, 429 patients underwent an ileocolonic, colo-colonic, or colorectal anastomosis. Radiological examination of the anastomosis was not performed routinely, but only when there were clinically signs of leakage. Radiological imaging was reviewed by an independent radiologist and medical records were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical anastomotic leakage was the standard of reference and defined as leakage confirmed during relaparotomy, drainage of pus per anum or as an anastomotic defect identified at digital examination.

RESULTS

Radiological evaluation of the anastomosis was performed in 91 patients (21%): CT in 27 patients, contrast radiography in 40, and both imaging modalities in 24 patients. The interobserver variability of CT and contrast radiography was 10% and 14%, respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of imaging of the anastomosis was 65% and 73%, respectively. Anastomotic leakage was found in 11 of 21 patients (52%) who underwent relaparotomy despite negative imaging. Three of 36 patients (8%) with a diagnosis of anastomotic leakage based on radiological examination had an intact anastomosis at relaparotomy.

CONCLUSION

Radiological imaging of the anastomosis after colorectal surgery should be restrictively applied and interpreted with caution because of the high false-negative rate and the substantial interobserver variability.

Prospective trial comparing contrast swallow, computed tomography and endoscopy to identify anastomotic leak following oesophagogastric surgery

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leaks are a major complication of oesophagogastric surgery. We compare contrast swallow fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT) with oral contrast and endoscopy in identifying anastomotic leaks following oesophagogastric surgery.

METHODS

A prospective trial of 38 patients undergoing oesophagogastric resection was undertaken with informed consent and institutional review board (ethics committee) approval. Patients underwent all three investigations (over 24 hours) 1 week postoperatively.

RESULTS

Eight (21%) had clinically apparent leaks. Three pseudo-leaks were suggested on contrast swallow but were confirmed normal on CT and endoscopy. Contrast swallow and CT missed one anastomotic leak each. Endoscopy identified anastomotic defects in three patients, in whom CT and contrast swallow were either normal or conflicting.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine tests of anastomotic integrity are unnecessary. When clinically suspected, contrast swallow or CT with oral contrast will identify most leaks. Endoscopy is useful in cases where there are incongruous results.

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer: a mortality-free experience

BACKGROUND

Leakage is a serious complication of esophagectomy and is historically associated with high mortality. This study aimed to describe the morphology and strategies for clinical management of leakage after esophagectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

A database prospectively maintained from July 2002 to July 2005 at a referral unit for foregut cancer was used to identify patients with leakage of saliva or gastrointestinal contents after esophagectomy and reconstruction with stomach. Contrast swallow was routinely performed on postoperative day 7. Leakage was diagnosed and classified by well-defined criteria.

RESULTS

There were 99 men and 27 women, yielding an institutional volume of 42 esophagectomies per year. There was no in-hospital mortality from any cause. Actual 1-year survival was 87%. An Ivor Lewis operation was performed on 103 patients (82%); 4 patients had leakage within 5 days of operation and all had immediate rethoracotomy. An additional 8 patients with Ivor Lewis operation had leakage after day 5, and this was detected by contrast swallow in only 3 patients; 2 patients had no intervention, 4 patients had radiology-guided drainage, 1 had thoracoscopy, and 1 had rethoracotomy. Leakage was from the actual esophagogastric anastomosis in eight patients, from the linear gastric staple line in three patients, or from gastric necrosis in one patient. Twenty-three patients had a transhiatal or three-stage operation; leakage was from the actual anastomosis in five patients or gastric necrosis in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

After Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, leakage was from the actual anastomosis in two-thirds of patients or from the gastric conduit in the remaining one-third. Prompt reoperation is recommended for early postoperative leakage. Most patients with leakage after day 5 can be treated nonoperatively.

Low anastomotic leak rate after colorectal surgery: a single-centre study

OBJECTIVE

Anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery is a serious event associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is little consensus regarding 'acceptable' rates of leakage, however. This study describes the experience of anastomotic leakage after both elective and emergency colorectal surgery in a district general hospital.

METHOD

A prospectively collected database of all patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in a single hospital formed the basis of the study. Leak was defined as breakdown of the anastomosis contributing to death or requiring reoperation or reintervention.

RESULTS

A total of 949 patients underwent surgery with an anastomosis between 1996 and 2004, including 331 patients treated with anterior resection. Anastomotic leaks requiring reoperation occurred in eight patients (0.8%). Thirty-day and in-hospital mortality was 4%.

CONCLUSION

A very low rate of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery is possible in a district general hospital setting. Given the impact of anastomotic leakage on function, tumour recurrence and long-term survival, it should be considered as a marker of surgical quality when evaluating surgical performance.

Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this randomized multicenter trial was to assess the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage in patients operated on with low anterior resection for rectal cancer and who were intraoperatively randomized to a defunctioning stoma or not.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The introduction of total mesorectal excision surgery as the surgical technique of choice for carcinoma in the lower and mid rectum has led to decreased local recurrence and improved oncological results. Despite these advances, perioperative morbidity remains a major issue, and the most feared complication is symptomatic anastomotic leakage. The role of the defunctioning stoma in regard to anastomotic leakage is controversial and has not been assessed in any randomized trial of sufficient size.

METHODS

From December 1999 to June 2005, a total of 234 patients were randomized to a defunctioning loop stoma or no loop stoma. Loop ileostomy or loop transverse colostomy was at the choice of the surgeon. Inclusion criteria for randomization were expected survival >6 months, informed consent, anastomosis < or =7 cm above the anal verge, negative air leakage test, intact anastomotic rings, and absence of major intraoperative adverse events.

RESULTS

The overall rate of symptomatic leakage was 19.2% (45 of 234). Patients randomized to a defunctioning stoma (n = 116) had leakage in 10.3% (12 of 116) and those without stoma (n = 118) in 28.0% (33 of 118) (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-6.9; P < 0.001). The need for urgent abdominal reoperation was 8.6% (10 of 116) in those randomized to stoma and 25.4% (30 of 118) in those without (P < 0.001). After a follow-up of median 42 months (range, 6-72 months), 13.8% (16 of 116) of the initially defunctioned patients still had a stoma of any kind, compared with 16.9% (20 of 118) those not defunctioned (not significant). The 30-day mortality after anterior resection was 0.4% (1 of 234) and after elective reversal a defunctioning stoma 0.9% (1 of 111). Median age was 68 years (range, 32-86 years), 45.3% (106 of 234) were females, 79.1% (185 of 234) had preoperative radiotherapy, the level of anastomosis was median 5 cm, and intraoperative blood loss 550 mL, without differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Defunctioning loop stoma decreased the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage and is therefore recommended in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Interactions of polysaccharide-based tissue adhesives with clinically relevant fibroblast and macrophage cell lines

The effects of polysaccharide-based tissue adhesives on cell survival and inflammatory cell activation were determined using in vitro mouse cell cultures. Cytotoxicity of tissue adhesives was evaluated by placing adhesives in direct contact with 3T3 fibroblast cells. Polysaccharide-based tissue adhesives composed of dextran aldehyde and star PEG amine were non-cytotoxic to fibroblasts; in contrast, a commercial adhesive composed of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate was highly cytotoxic to fibroblasts. The inflammatory potential of tissue adhesives was evaluated by exposing J774 macrophage cells to adhesives, and measuring TNF-alpha release from macrophages. Polysaccharide-based tissue adhesives did not elicit inflammatory TNF-alpha release from macrophages. These results suggest that polysaccharide-based tissue adhesives are non-cytotoxic and non-inflammatory; the results are therefore significant in the design of in vitro cell culture systems to study biomaterials.

Imaging following surgery for oesophageal cancer

The incidence of oesophageal malignancy is increasing in the UK. Surgical management with oesophagectomy is determined by tumour location, stage and extent of lymphadenectomy,and is also dependent on patient age and co-morbidity. Surgery is associated with considerable postoperative morbidity and mortalities of up to 7%. The indications for imaging and findings in both the immediate and delayed postoperative periods are discussed.

Bovine pericardium buttress reinforces colorectal anastomoses in a canine model

PURPOSE

The consequences of an anastomotic leak or disruption can be devastating, particularly in the colorectal surgery population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare colon anastomoses with or without a collagen matrix buttress derived from bovine pericardium.

METHODS

A circular stapler was used to create colon-colon anastomoses in a canine model. Twenty animals underwent two anastomoses each: one buttressed with bovine pericardium, and one without any reinforcement. Staple lines were evaluated at Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 42, and 84. Three animals were killed at each time interval, and evaluation included bursting pressure, bursting location, and histology.

RESULTS

Colon segments with nonbuttressed anastomoses were more likely to burst at the staple line (63 percent), whereas buttressed anastomoses were more likely to burst at the adjacent intestine (74 percent; P=0.048). The burst pressure of nonbuttressed staple lines tended to be consistently, although not significantly, higher than the burst pressure of buttressed staple lines (P=0.651). At histologic analysis, the bovine pericardium buttress demonstrated an ability to allow cellular ingrowth at Day 3 and neovascularization at Day 7. There was no evidence of stenosis or infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a collagen matrix buttress in colorectal anastomoses was safe in a canine model. Our study indicates that true burst strength of the majority of buttressed anastomoses was greater than the adjacent intestine.

Perioperative Vasopressors Are Associated with an Increased Risk of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of vasopressors on gastrointestinal (GI) anastomotic leaks. Vasopressors are commonly used in surgical patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and their effects on GI anastomotic integrity are unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Surgical patients admitted to the ICU in our tertiary university hospital following the creation of a GI anastomosis were studied by a retrospective chart analysis for anastomotic leaks and complications

RESULTS

A total of 223 patients with 259 GI anastomoses, mostly for cancer, were admitted to the ICU immediately after surgery. Twenty-two patients developed anastomotic leaks (9.9%). The two groups (leak versus no-leak) had similar demographics, surgery type and indication, type of anastomosis, co-morbidities, cancer, steroid use, blood transfusion, drains, and epidural catheters. Vasopressor use was associated with increased anastomotic leakage (p = 0.02, OR 3.25). Multiple vasopressors and prolonged exposure caused even higher leaking rates. This effect was independent of the medical status and operative morbidity (APACHE II, POSSUM). Blood pressure preceding vasopressor use was similar in both groups. Vasopressors might have been occasionally used to treat hypovolemia. Patients with leaks had higher reoperation rates (41% versus 1%, p < 0.0001) and mortality (21% versus 4%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Vasopressors appear to increase anastomotic leaks threefold, independent of clinical/surgical status or hypotension. Evidence-based guidelines are warranted for the optimal use of vasopressors in postoperative patients admitted to the ICU.

Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system

BACKGROUND

Improving surgical quality of care requires accurate reporting of postoperative complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Accuracy of a prospective surgical complication grading database was assessed by performing a retrospective review of 204 pancreaticoduodenectomies (PDs) entered into the database from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2003. This updated database was then used to characterize 30-day morbidity and mortality after PD.

RESULTS

On review, 13% of patients had a complication not identified in the prospective complication database, 8% of patients had a complication reclassified, and 4% of patients had a complication removed. At least 1 postoperative complication was experienced by 47% of patients. After PD, 45 different complications occurred. Postoperative mortality at 30 days was 1%, and 30-day readmission rate was 11%. The 30-day reoperation rate was 9%, and 14% of patients required a percutaneous drainage procedure. Pancreatic anastomotic leak (12%), wound infection (11%), and delayed gastric emptying (7%) were the 3 most common postoperative complications, and all were associated with an increased length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Our prospective surgical complication database accurately characterized outcomes after PD and facilitated information gathering and analysis. The accuracy, efficiency, and reproducibility of a prospective surgical complication database favor its widespread use in postoperative complication reporting.

[Results of defunctionalized jejunal loop after pancreaticoduodenectomy]

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic leak continues to be a common cause of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Numerous surgical techniques have been described to avoid this complication.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the use of a defunctionalized jejunal loop for the pancreas after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1991 and 2005, the findings in 80 patients were analyzed in this prospective study of the use of a defunctionalized jejunal loop for the pancreas as a reconstructive procedure following pancreaticoduodenectomy. All the patients were operated on by two surgeons. The following clinical variables were recorded: age, sex, diameter of the main pancreatic duct, pancreas texture, operating time, intraoperative blood transfusion, mean length of hospital stay, and operative mortality. Seven complications were defined: anastomotic leakage (biliary and duodenal), pancreatic fistula, abscess, sepsis, bleeding, delayed gastric emptying, and postoperative pancreatitis. Four different definitions were used for pancreatic fistula.

RESULTS

Of the 80 patients, 16 (20%) developed pancreatic fistula according to at least one of the criteria used. Pancreatic fistula was more frequent in patients with a small duct (33.3%), and soft pancreatic texture (29%), and was the cause of 100% of intraabdominal hemorrhages, 80% of abdominal abscesses, and 60% of mortality. The mean length of hospital stay was 20.6 days and the mortality rate was 6.6% (5/80). During follow-up two patients developed pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION

After pancreaticoduodenectomy, reconstruction with a defunctionalized jejunal loop for the pancreas is a safe and effective technique.

Postoperative Imaging of Esophageal Cancer: What Chest Radiologists Need to Know

A variety of surgical procedures are used in the treatment of esophageal cancer. These procedures include transthoracic esophagectomy (Ivor Lewis procedure, McKeown procedure, left thoracoabdominal approach), transhiatal esophagectomy, and various forms of bypass surgery. Although meticulous surgical techniques and improved postoperative care have markedly reduced the complications associated with these techniques, esophageal resection is still associated with various intraoperative complications (hemorrhage, injury to the tracheobronchial tree, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury) and postoperative complications (anastomotic leak; mediastinitis; respiratory problems, including pleural effusion, pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome; cardiac and functional complications). Postoperative tumor recurrence is not uncommon in patients undergoing curative resection for esophageal cancer and can be categorized as either locoregional (locoregional lymph node metastases, anastomotic recurrence) or distant (hematogenous metastases, pleural or peritoneal seeding). Hematogenous metastases most commonly involve the liver, lungs, and bones, followed by the adrenal glands, brain, and kidneys. Hematogenous metastases may also involve multiple organs simultaneously. The sophisticated surgical procedures used in esophagectomy can result in anatomic changes and confound image interpretation. The radiologist must understand how these procedures can affect imaging data and be familiar with the appearances of postoperative anatomic changes, complications, and tumor recurrence to ensure accurate evaluation of affected patients.

Diagnostic sensitivity of contrast swallow for leakage after gastric resection

INTRODUCTION

We examined the clinical manifestations and computed tomography findings of patients with leakage after gastrectomy for cancer and determined the sensitivity of the contrast swallow for the leakage diagnosis.

METHODS

The medical records of 331 consecutive patients undergoing gastrectomy between January 1992 and December 2003 were reviewed. Routine contrast swallow was performed in all patients before oral intake. Once leakage was suspected, an emergency contrast swallow was performed and its diagnostic sensitivity determined.

RESULTS

In total, leakage was diagnosed 9 of 17 times by the contrast swallow, for a diagnostic sensitivity of 53%. The clinical signs or another imaging modality often corrected the misdiagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic sensitivity of contrast swallow for leakage after gastrectomy was low. Therefore, if we employ the contrast swallow technique, we should keep in mind its low sensitivity.

Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it's later than you think

PURPOSE

Anastomotic leaks are among the most dreaded complications after colorectal surgery. However, problems with definitions and the retrospective nature of previous analyses have been major limitations. We sought to use a prospective database to define the true incidence and presentation of anastomotic leakage after intestinal anastomosis.

METHODS

A prospective database of two colorectal surgeons was reviewed over a 10-year period (1995-2004). The incidence of leak by surgical site, timing of diagnosis, method of detection, and treatment was noted. Complications were entered prospectively by a nurse practitioner directly involved in patient care. Standardized criteria for diagnosis were used. A logistic regression model was used to discriminate statistical variation.

RESULTS

A total of 1223 patients underwent resection and anastomosis during the study period. Mean age was 59.1 years. Leaks occurred in 33 patients (2.7%). Diagnosis was made a mean of 12.7 days postoperatively, including four beyond 30 days (12.1%). There was no difference in leak rate by surgeon (3.6% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.08). The leak rate was similar by surgical site except for a markedly increased leak rate with ileorectal anastomosis (P = 0.001). Twelve leaks were diagnosed clinically versus 21 radiographically. Contrast enema correctly identified only 4 of 10 leaks, whereas CT correctly identified 17 of 19. A total of 14 of 33 (42%) patients had their leak diagnosed only after readmission. Fifteen patients required fecal diversion, whereas 18 could be managed nonoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Anastomotic leaks are frequently diagnosed late in the postoperative period and often after initial hospital discharge, highlighting the importance of prospective data entry and adequate follow-up. CT scan is the preferred diagnostic modality when imaging is required. More than half of leaks can be managed without fecal diversion.

Anastomotic leaks: what is the best diagnostic imaging study?

PURPOSE

Postoperative anastomotic leaks are one of the most devastating consequences of colorectal surgery. Diagnostic imaging for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks has been evaluated and reported on extensively. No study has compared the utility and effectiveness of CT scans and water-soluble enemas for the identification of postoperative lower gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks. The present study was designed to evaluate and compare these two common radiographic imaging modalities in detecting lower gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed that identified 36 patients during a seven-year period who underwent reoperative surgery for a lower gastrointestinal anastomotic leak. Patient's imaging studies were classified as positive if extravasation of contrast material was demonstrated. When negative, a study was retrospectively reviewed in an attempt to identify findings suggestive of an anastomotic leak.

RESULTS

There were 36 patients identified with a postoperative lower gastrointestinal leak requiring surgical intervention. There were 28 of 36 patients (78 percent) re-explored on the basis of a radiologic study demonstrating an anastomotic leak. A total of 27 CT scans were performed, of which 4 (14.8 percent) were considered positive for an anastomotic leak. On review of the remaining negative CT scans, nine (33.3 percent) were considered descriptive positive with a large amount of fluid or air in the peritoneal cavity but without obvious extravasation of contrast. Eighteen patients were evaluated with a water-soluble enema and 15 (83.3 percent) demonstrated extravasation of contrast material. In the 26 patients with a distal anastomotic leak, 17 water-soluble enemas were performed, with 15 (88 percent) demonstrating a leak. In contrast, only 2 of 17 (12 percent) CT scans were positive in this group of patients (P < 0.001). There were ten patients who initially had a CT scan followed by a water-soluble enema. Of these patients, eight of nine (88 percent) initially had a negative CT scan but were considered to be clinically suspicious of having an anastomotic leak and subsequently had a leak demonstrated on a water-soluble enema.

CONCLUSIONS

Early intervention in patients who develop an anastomotic leak can be shown to improve the ultimate outcome, especially with respect to mortality. It is usually necessary to obtain objective tests of anastomotic integrity because of the nonspecificity of clinical signs. Our study supported the superiority of water-soluble enema to CT imaging in patients in whom both modalities were used. This difference was most pronounced for distal anastomotic leaks, whereas no radiologic imaging study proved effective in evaluating proximal anastomoses.

Absorbable mesh reinforcement of a stapled pancreatic transection line reduces the leak rate with distal pancreatectomy

Pancreatic leak remains a significant cause of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. We report the use of an absorbable mesh to reinforce a stapled pancreatic transection line for distal pancreatectomy. Forty consecutive distal pancreatectomies (33 open and 7 laparoscopic) were performed since the introduction of mesh reinforcement. We utilized an inclusive definition of pancreatic leak to critically evaluate the staple line reinforcement material. In addition, we compared the pancreatic leak rate for this case series with the antecedent 40 cases where mesh reinforcement was not available. In the prospective series there was 1 leak in 29 cases (3.5%) in which mesh reinforcement was utilized, and 4 leaks in 11 cases (36%) when mesh was not utilized (p < 0.005). The 12.5% leak rate for the 40 cases during the prospective period, compared favorably to the 27.5% leak rate for the 40 cases preceding the study period (p = 0.09). Twenty-nine cases receiving mesh compared favorably to the 23 stapled cases in the control series, reducing leak rate from 22 to 3.5% (p = 0.04). Mesh reinforcement of the stapled pancreatic transection line reduced the pancreatic leak rate after distal pancreatectomy. Mesh reinforcement was possible with open or laparoscopic resections. No complications were attributable to the use of absorbable mesh.

Clinical and subclinical leaks after low colorectal anastomosis: a clinical and radiologic study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to examine the natural history of subclinical leaks and their effect on bowel function and quality of life and to evaluate water-soluble contrast enema features that predict anastomotic healing after leaks.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent low rectal anastomosis were followed up postoperatively for leaks. All leaks were confirmed radiologically with CT scanning and water-soluble contrast enema imaging. Water-soluble contrast enemas were serially repeated to identify healing. Characteristics on initial water-soluble contrast enema were correlated with observed healing. Postoperatively, patients were required to fill in a quality of life and a bowel function questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients underwent low rectal anastomosis procedures with a median follow-up period of 26 (interquartile range, 19-37) months. There were 23 documented leaks of which 13 (9 percent) presented clinically and 10 (8 percent) presented subclinically. Ileostomy closure was possible in 4 of 13 (30 percent) patients with a clinical leak and all 10 (100 percent) patients with a subclinical leak. Median quality of life scores were lower for patients with clinical leaks and no ileostomy closure (P = 0.03). Bowel function for subclinical leak patients and clinical leak patients with ileostomy closure were similarly impaired. The presence of a cavity (P = 0.01) and a stricture (P = 0.01) at the anastomotic site were unfavorable radiologic features associated with nonhealing.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical leaks are more benign in their natural history compared with clinical leaks. Quality of life and bowel function is no better in patients with a subclinical leak compared with patients with a clinical leak who have ileostomy closure. Anastomotic leaks may resolve if favorable radiologic features are present.

Action of matrix metalloproteinases at restricted sites in colon anastomosis repair: an immunohistochemical and biochemical study

BACKGROUND

Dehiscence of colon anastomosis is a common, serious and potentially life-threatening complication after colorectal operation. In experimental models, impaired biomechanic strength of colon anastomoses is preventable by general inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and associated with collagen loss, which indicates a possible link between MMP-mediated collagen degradation and dehiscence. The precise localization of collagen degradation within the anastomotic area and the specific MMPs responsible are unknown.

METHODS

We have analyzed distinct zones within anastomoses using a novel microdissection technique for collagen levels, collagenolytic activity exerted directly by endogenous proteinases, and MMP-8 and MMP-9 immunoreactivity and their collagenolytic activity.

RESULTS

The most pronounced collagen loss was observed in the suture-holding zone, showing a 29% drop compared with adjacent micro-areas of 3-day-old anastomoses. Only this specific tissue compartment underwent a dramatic and significant increase in collagenolysis, amounting to a loss of 10% of existing collagen molecules in 24 hours, and was abolished by metalloproteinase inhibitors. The tissue surrounding suture channels was heavily infiltrated with CD68-positive histiocytes that expressed MMP-8 and to a lesser extent MMP-9. The collagenolytic effect of the interstitial collagenase MMP-8 was synergistically potentiated by the gelatinase MMP-9 when added to colon biopsies incubated in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique finding of this study was that the specific tissue holding the sutures of a colon anastomosis lost the most collagen presumably through induction and activation of multiple MMPs that may explain the beneficial effects of treatment with non-selective MMP antagonists.

Use of icodextrin 4% solution in the prevention of adhesion formation following general surgery: from the multicentre ARIEL Registry

INTRODUCTION

Intra-abdominal adhesions occur in many patients following major abdominal surgery and represent a serious burden to patients and healthcare providers. The multicentre ARIEL (Adept Registry for Clinical Evaluation) Registry was established to gather clinical experiences in the use of icodextrin 4% solution, an approved adhesion-reduction agent, during routine general surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

General surgeons from five European countries completed anonymised data collection forms for patients undergoing laparotomy or laparoscopy. Surgeons recorded patient demographics, use of icodextrin 4% solution and adverse events, and made subjective assessments of ease of use and patient acceptability with the agent.

RESULTS

The general surgery registry included 1738 patients (1469 laparotomies, 269 laparoscopies). Leakage of fluid from the surgical site did not appear to be affected by icodextrin 4% solution and was classified as 'normal' or 'less than normal' in most patients (laparotomies 86%, laparoscopies 88%). Overall, satisfaction with ease of use was rated as 'good' or 'excellent' by the majority of surgeons (laparotomies 77%, laparoscopies 86%). Patient acceptability was also good, with ratings of 'as expected' or 'less than expected' in most cases for both abdominal distension (laparotomies 90%, laparoscopies 91%) and abdominal discomfort (laparotomies 91%, laparoscopies 93%). Adverse events occurred in 30.6% of laparotomy patients and 16.7% of laparoscopy patients; the most common events were septic/infective events (4.2% and 3.4% in the laparotomy and laparoscopy groups, respectively). Anastomotic wound-healing problems were reported in 7.6% of patients in the subset of laparoscopy patients undergoing anastomotic procedures (n = 66).

DISCUSSION

Volumes of icodextrin 4% solution used as an irrigant and instillate were in line with recommendations. Surgeons considered the agent to be easy to use and acceptable to patients. The reported frequencies of adverse events were in line with those published in the literature for surgical procedures, supporting the good safety profile of this agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Icodextrin 4% solution can be used in a wide range of surgical procedures. In combination with good surgical technique, it may play an important role in adhesion reduction.

Population-based study of risk factors for postoperative death after anterior resection of the rectum

BACKGROUND

The aim of this population-based study was to analyse risk factors for death within 30 days after anterior resection of the rectum.

METHODS

Between 1987 and 1995 a total of 6833 patients underwent elective anterior resection of the rectum in Sweden. One hundred and forty of these patients died within 30 days or during the initial hospital stay. These patients were compared with a randomly chosen cohort of 423 patients who underwent the same operation during the same interval, and were alive after 30 days and discharged from hospital. The association between death and 12 putative risk factors was studied.

RESULTS

The mortality rate after elective anterior resection was 2.1 per cent (140 of 6833). The incidence of clinical anastomotic leakage was 42.1 per cent (59 of 140) among those who died and 10.9 per cent (46 of 423) in the cohort group. Multivariate regression analysis identified clinical leakage, increased age, male sex, Dukes' 'D' stage and intraoperative adverse events as independent risk factors for death within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Clinical anastomotic leakage was a major cause of postoperative death after anterior resection.

Surgical techniques

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) has shown a remarkable increase during recent decades. Most patients are present with advanced stage disease, reflecting transmural growth and metastasis to lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis. Moreover, the pattern of lymph node dissemination is chaotic and difficult to predict, and despite the use of modern technology (e.g., spiral CT, EUS, FDG-PET), clinical staging remains suboptimal. These shortcomings in staging, as well as in different attitudes toward extent of resection and lymphadenectomy, are reflected by a great variation in surgical techniques, which are discussed in this review. As to the results, primary surgery can currently be performed with low mortality, below 5% in high volume centers. Hospital mortality and morbidity are mainly related to pulmonary complications and anastomotic leaks, the latter mostly resolving under conservative treatment. Overall 5-year survival varies between 10% and 59%. As expected the most important prognostic determinants are completeness of resection (R0 vs. R1-R2) and lymph node status (N0, N1). R0 resection currently offers 5-year survival rates of over 40%. Five-year survival figures for node-negative (N0) patients exceed 70%, and even for node-positive (N1), patients reach 25%. It is not known whether performing a three-field lymph node dissection is beneficial for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. With overall 5-year survival currently exceeding 30%-40%, these figures should be the gold standard against which all other therapeutic modalities are compared.

[Complications following oesophagectomy: mechanism, detection, treatment and prevention]

Oesophageal surgery remains a relatively morbid operation with potentially devastating complications that can be minimized by prevention, early recognition, and appropriate management. Anastomotic leak, conduit necrosis, and pulmonary failure are the most serious complications. The management of complications following oesophagectomy is reviewed in the following section.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is still regarded as a major complication. The incidence of POPF varies greatly in different reports, depending on the definition applied at each surgical center. Our aim was to agree upon an objective and internationally accepted definition to allow comparison of different surgical experiences.

METHODS

An international panel of pancreatic surgeons, working in well-known, high-volume centers, reviewed the literature on the topic and worked together to develop a simple, objective, reliable, and easy-to-apply definition of POPF, graded primarily on clinical impact.

RESULTS

A POPF represents a failure of healing/sealing of a pancreatic-enteric anastomosis or a parenchymal leak not directly related to an anastomosis. An all-inclusive definition is a drain output of any measurable volume of fluid on or after postoperative day 3 with an amylase content greater than 3 times the serum amylase activity. Three different grades of POPF (grades A, B, C) are defined according to the clinical impact on the patient's hospital course.

CONCLUSIONS

The present definition and clinical grading of POPF should allow realistic comparisons of surgical experiences in the future when new techniques, new operations, or new pharmacologic agents that may impact surgical treatment of pancreatic disorders are addressed.

A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Only 2 large (more than 100 patients) prospective trials comparing pancreatogastrostomy (PG) with pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) have been reported until now. One nonrandomized study showed that there were less pancreatic and digestive tract fistula with PG, whereas the other, a randomized trial from a single high-volume center, found no significant differences between the two techniques.

METHODS

Single blind, controlled randomized, multicenter trial. The main endpoint was intra-abdominal complications (IACs).

RESULTS

Of 149 randomized patients, 81 underwent PG and 68 PJ. No significant difference was found between the two groups concerning pre- or intraoperative patient characteristics. The rate of patients with one or more IACs was 34% in each group. Twenty-seven patients sustained a pancreatoenteric fistula (18%), 13 in PG (16%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8-24%) and 14 in PJ (20%; 95% CI 10.5-29.5%). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups concerning the mortality rate (11% overall), the rate of reoperations and/or postoperative interventional radiology drainages (23%), or the length of hospital stay (median 20.5 days). Univariate analysis found the following risk factors: (1) age > or =70 years old, (2) extrapancreatic disease, (3) normal consistency of pancreas, (4) diameter of main pancreatic duct <3 mm, (5) duration of operation >6 hours, and (6) a center effect. Significantly more IAC, pancreatoenteric fistula, and deaths occurred in one center (that included the most patients) (P = .05), but there were significantly more high-risk patients in this center (normal pancreas consistency, extrapancreatic pathology, small pancreatic duct, higher transfusion requirements, and duration of operation >6 hours) compared with the other centers. In multivariate analysis, the center effect disappeared. Independent risk factors included duration of operation >6 hours for IAC and for pancreatoenteric fistula (P = .01), extrapancreatic disease for pancreatoenteric fistulas (P < .04), and age > or =70 years for mortality (P < .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of pancreatoenteric anastomosis (PJ or PG) after PD does not significantly influence the rate of patients with one or more IAC and/or pancreatic fistula or the severity of complications.

Safety and efficacy of the use of bioabsorbable seamguard in colorectal surgery at the Texas endosurgery institute

Bioabsorbable Seamguard (BSG) is a random-fiber web of polyglycolic acid/trimethylene carbonate. It is completely absorbed within 6 months or less due to its constitution of a bioabsorbable membrane with polyester braided suture. It has been used in obesity surgery and pulmonary surgery as staple-line reinforcement with good results. As such, we believe that BSG may be ideal to use in colorectal surgery as an aid during the healing process of an anastomosis and may help prevent anastomotic bleeding and staple-line disruption. From July 2003 through September 2004, 30 patients underwent placement of BSG for the following procedures: 12 right hemicolectomies, 7 low anterior resections, 5 sigmoid colectomies, 3 total colectomies, 2 partial resections, and 1 colostomy closure. Median follow-up was 7 months (range 1-13). There were no clinical leaks, no strictures, and no bleeding in our early postoperative follow-up period. The use of BSG as a staple-line reinforcer appears to be safe and may be useful in preventing anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and intraluminal stenosis.