Clinical trial: The effect of somatostatin vs. octreotide in preventing post-endoscopic increase in hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhotics with bleeding varices

BACKGROUND

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) increases significantly after endoscopic therapy in patients with bleeding oesophageal varices, which may precipitate further haemorrhage. Whether vasoactive drugs can suppress these changes remains unknown.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of somatostatin when compared with octreotide in preventing the post-endoscopic increase in HVPG during acute bleeding and whether the changes affect outcome.

METHODS

Thirty-three cirrhotics with bleeding varices were randomized to receive somatostatin (n = 17) or octreotide (n = 16) under double-blind conditions, soon after their admission. HVPG measurements were performed before and immediately after endoscopic treatment.

RESULTS

In the somatostatin group, postendotherapy HVPG values did not change significantly when compared with pre-treatment values (18.9 vs. 17.2, P = 0.092). Conversely, in the octreotide group, HVPG increased significantly after endoscopy (18.2 vs. 20.8, P = 0.003). The probability of 6-week survival without treatment failure was significantly higher in the somatostatin group (P = 0.024). Post-endoscopic HVPG value was independently associated with 6-week failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Somatostatin, but not octreotide, effectively prevents the post-endoscopic increase in HVPG, which may be associated with low probability of treatment failure.

Octreotide enhances portal pressure reduction induced by propranolol in cirrhosis: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In vitro, octreotide potentiates vasoconstriction in isolated, preconstricted, mesenteric arterial vessels. In cirrhotic patients, portal pressure (HVPG) reduction induced by propranolol is partly due to splanchnic vasoconstriction.

AIM

To evaluate HVPG effects of octreotide administration in cirrhotic patients receiving long-term propranolol.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized, controlled trial. First study: a total of 28 patients were studied at baseline and 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide (200 mug) (N = 14) or placebo (N = 14) and then treated with propranolol for approximately 30 days (106 +/- 5 mg/day). Second study: after baseline evaluation patients received octreotide or placebo as they were assigned to in the first study and measurements repeated 30 and 60 minutes later.

RESULTS

In the first study baseline HVPG was 18.7 +/- 0.9 mmHg and decreased to 17.1 +/- 1.1 mmHg and 17.1 +/- 1.0 mmHg (both P < 0.05 vs baseline) at 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide, respectively. Eight patients decreased their HVPG after octreotide. In the second study baseline HVPG was 15.6 +/- 1.3 mmHg (P < 0.01 vs baseline HVPG in first study) and decreased to 14.1 +/- 1.2 mmHg and 14.1 +/- 1.3 mmHg (25.7 +/- 5% lower than baseline HVPG in the first study, P < 0.01) (both P < 0.05 vs baseline) at 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide, respectively. Nine patients (2 responders/7 nonresponders to propranolol) decreased their HVPG after octreotide. Octreotide effects may be mediated by potentiation and additive mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide enhances HVPG reduction induced by propranolol in cirrhotic patients.

A 3-month course of long-acting repeatable octreotide (sandostatin LAR) improves portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis: a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

In patients with cirrhosis, acute octreotide administration may transiently decrease the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Information on long-term effects of octreotide is limited and controversial. We evaluated portal and systemic hemodynamics following a prolonged administration of long-acting octreotide in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Eighteen cirrhotic patients (alcoholic 12; age 55 yr [44-69]; Pugh's score 7.8; HVPG 17.3 mmHg [12-22]), no steatohepatitis on histology, were randomized to intramuscular octreotide 20 mg (group A) q 4 wk for 3 months or placebo (group B) in a double-blind fashion. At baseline and 3 months, we measured the HVPG, systemic hemodynamics, endothelin-1 (ET-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in hepatic venous blood.

RESULTS

Patients remained compensated except for one episode of infection in each group. At 3 months, the HVPG decreased in group A but not in group B (16.5 +/- 1.3 to 11.8 +/- 1.5 mmHg, P < 0.01; 18.2 +/- 1 to 17 +/- 1.1 mmHg, P= 0.4). Systemic hemodynamics and liver function remained unchanged. In group A, but not in group B, VEGF decreased (21.2 +/- 4.7 to 13.7 +/- 3.5 pg/mL, P < 0.01; 22.5 +/- 7.8 to 19.2 +/- 5.4 pg/mL, P= 0.4). ET-1 remained stable. Changes in HVPG and VEGF were correlated (r = 0.49, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Three months of long-acting octreotide in selected cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension decreases the HVPG independent of systemic hemodynamics and liver function. The decrease in VEGF blood levels suggests an improvement in splanchnic hyperemia.

The extent of the collateral circulation influences the postprandial increase in portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

In cirrhosis, repeated flares of portal pressure and collateral blood flow provoked by postprandial hyperaemia may contribute to variceal dilation and rupture.

AIM

To examine the effect of the extent of the collateral circulation on the postprandial increase in portal pressure observed in cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), hepatic blood flow and azygos blood flow were measured in 64 patients with cirrhosis before and after a standard liquid meal.

RESULTS

Peak increases in HVPG (median+14.9%), hepatic blood flow (median+25.4%), and azygos blood flow (median+32.2%) occurred at 30 min after the meal. Compared with patients with marked postprandial increase in HVPG (above the median, n = 32), those showing mild (<15%, n = 32) increase in HVPG had a higher baseline azygos flow (p<0.01) and underwent a greater postprandial increase in azygos flow (p<0.02). Hepatic blood flow increased similarly in both groups. Postprandial increases in HVPG were inversely correlated (p<0.001) with both baseline azygos flow (r = -0.69) and its postprandial increase (r = -0.72). Food intake increased nitric oxide products in the azygos (p<0.01), but not in the hepatic vein. Large varices (p<0.01) and previous variceal bleeding (p<0.001) were more frequent in patients with mild increase in HVPG.

CONCLUSIONS

Postprandial hyperaemia simultaneously increases HVPG and collateral flow. The extent of the collateral circulation determines the HVPG response to food intake. Patients with extensive collateralisation show less pronounced postprandial increases in HVPG, but associated with marked flares in collateral flow. Collateral vessels preserve their ability to dilate in response to increased blood flow.

Current management of the complications of portal hypertension: variceal bleeding and ascites

Portal hypertension is one of the main consequences of cirrhosis. It results from a combination of increased intrahepatic vascular resistance and increased blood flow through the portal venous system. The condition leads to the formation of portosystemic collateral veins. Esophagogastric varices have the greatest clinical impact, with a risk of bleeding as high as 30% within 2 years of medium or large varices developing. Ascites, another important complication of advanced cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension, is sometimes refractory to treatment and is complicated by spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome. We describe the pathophysiology of portal hypertension and the current management of its complications, with emphasis on the prophylaxis and treatment of variceal bleeding and ascites.

Contribution of ascites to impaired gastric function and nutritional intake in patients with cirrhosis and ascites

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Protein calorie malnutrition and weight loss are common among patients with cirrhosis and ascites. The cause of these symptoms is unclear, with several putative mechanisms proposed. The primary aims of this study were to compare gastric volumes and accommodation between patients with cirrhosis complicated by ascites and healthy controls, and to evaluate the effect of large-volume paracentesis in the patient group.

METHODS

Patients with cirrhosis and ascites underwent assessment of gastric volumes as measured by single-photon emission computed tomography, gastric sensation assessed by a validated nutrient drink test, and a 3-day assessment of caloric intake before and after large-volume paracentesis. Age- and sex-adjusted linear regression models were used to compare gastric volumes and accommodation ratios between patients and healthy volunteers. Paired Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare gastric measures before and after paracentesis among the patient group.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (median age, 54 y) were compared with 112 healthy (age- and sex-matched) controls. Median postprandial gastric volumes (627 mL patients vs 721 healthy controls) and gastric accommodation were reduced significantly in patients compared with healthy controls (P = .02 and .006, respectively). After paracentesis: (1) fasting gastric volumes were increased (median 312 mL post- vs 241 mL pre-, P = .04), (2) patients tolerated ingestion of larger maximum volumes (median 964 mL post- vs 738 mL pre-, P = .04), and (3) caloric intake was increased (median 34% kcal post- vs 3110 kcal pre-, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Postprandial gastric volumes and accommodation ratios are reduced in patients with cirrhosis and ascites compared with healthy controls. In addition, large-volume paracentesis increases fasting gastric volumes, volumes ingested until maximal satiation, and caloric intake.

Postprandial splanchnic haemodynamic changes in patients with liver cirrhosis and patent paraumbilical vein

OBJECTIVE

The haemodynamic changes induced by a meal on collateral vessels in portal hypertensive cirrhotic patients are not well characterized. We aimed to study the postprandial modifications of splanchnic circulation in patients with a patent paraumbilical vein (PUV).

METHODS

We studied 10 cirrhotic patients with patent PUV and 10 matched cirrhotic patients without PUV, by using echo colour Doppler at baseline and 15, 30 and 45 min after a standard mixed liquid meal (400 ml; 600 kcal). Calibre and blood flow velocities of the superior mesenteric artery, portal vein and PUV were obtained; congestion index of portal vein, portal blood flow, paraumbilical blood flow and effective portal liver perfusion were calculated; intrahepatic and intrasplenic arterial resistance and pulsatility indexes were recorded.

RESULTS

We observed a postprandial splanchnic hyperaemia (superior mesenteric artery and portal vein blood flow increased after the meal in both groups; ANOVA P < 0.05), with no changes of hepatic impedance. In PUV patients, PUV constricted significantly postprandially, maximally at 30 min (calibre -17.5 +/- 7.0%; P = 0.003). Intrasplenic impedance, which may reflect portal pressure, increased, maximally at 30 min (pulsatility index +22.6 +/- 27.0%; P = 0.01), and inversely correlated with PUV vasoconstriction (R = 0.75, P = 0.01). In non-PUV patients intrasplenic impedance did not change. Portal liver perfusion increased similarly in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PUV constricts after the meal, and this vasoconstriction is associated with an increase of splenic impedance which may indicate the postprandial increase of portal pressure observed in cirrhosis. The increase in postprandial portal liver perfusion in the PUV group is allowed by a paradox constriction of the collateral vessel.

Simvastatin enhances hepatic nitric oxide production and decreases the hepatic vascular tone in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In cirrhosis, an insufficient release of nitric oxide contributes to increased hepatic resistance and portal pressure and enhances the postprandial increase in portal pressure. We hypothesized that simvastatin, which enhances Akt-dependent endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation, may increase hepatic nitric oxide release and decrease hepatic resistance in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

METHODS

In protocol 1, 13 patients had measurements of the hepatic venous pressure gradient, hepatic blood flow, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and nitric oxide products before and 30 and 60 minutes after 40 mg of simvastatin. In protocol 2, 17 patients were randomized to receive placebo or simvastatin (40 mg) 12 hours and 1 hour before the study. After baseline measurements of the hepatic venous pressure gradient, hepatic blood flow, and nitric oxide products, a standard liquid meal was given, and measurements were repeated at 15, 30, and 45 minutes.

RESULTS

In protocol 1, acute simvastatin did not modify the hepatic venous pressure gradient but increased the hepatic blood flow (21% +/- 13% at 30 minutes; P = 0.01) and decreased hepatic sinusoidal resistance by 14% +/- 11% (P = 0.04). Nitric oxide product levels significantly increased in hepatic venous blood (from 31.4 +/- 12.3 nmol. mL(-1) to 35.8 +/- 10.7 nmol. mL(-1); P = 0.04), but not in peripheral blood. Systemic hemodynamics were not modified. In protocol 2, simvastatin pretreatment significantly attenuated the postprandial increase in hepatic venous pressure gradient (mean peak increase, 10% +/- 9% vs. 21% +/- 6% in placebo; P = 0.01). Hepatic blood flow increased similarly in the 2 groups. Hepatic nitric oxide products increased in the simvastatin group but not in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Simvastatin administration increases the hepatosplanchnic output of nitric oxide products and decreases hepatic resistance in patients with cirrhosis.

A pilot study to investigate the use of oxpentifylline (pentoxifylline) and thalidomide in portal hypertension secondary to alcoholic cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Tumour necrosis factor-alpha is thought to be important in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension. Oxpentifylline (pentoxifylline) and thalidomide inhibit endotoxin-induced tumour necrosis factor-alpha production in vitro.

AIMS

To assess the toxicity of oxpentifylline (pentoxifylline) and thalidomide in cirrhosis and their effect on the hepatic venous pressure gradient and tumour necrosis factor-alpha production.

METHODS

In an open-label pilot study, 20 abstinent patients with stable alcoholic cirrhosis and oesophageal varices were recruited; 12 patients completed haemodynamic measurements before and after treatment with oxpentifylline (pentoxifylline) 1800 mg (n=6) or thalidomide 200 mg (n=6) daily for 2 weeks. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha production was assessed in ex vivo monocyte cultures stimulated with endotoxin.

RESULTS

Thalidomide reduced the hepatic venous pressure gradient from 19.7 mmHg (9.3-23.5 mmHg) to 12.2 mmHg (4.7-19.5 mmHg) (P=0.03) without reducing the hepatic blood flow or altering systemic haemodynamic parameters. Thalidomide reduced ex vivo tumour necrosis factor-alpha production by approximately 50%. Oxpentifylline (pentoxifylline) had no significant effect on any of the parameters measured. Side-effects led to dose reduction or treatment withdrawal in 40% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Thalidomide, but not oxpentifylline (pentoxifylline), reduces the hepatic venous pressure gradient in stable alcoholic cirrhotics, an effect that may be mediated by the inhibition of tumour necrosis factor-alpha production. The role of tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitory drugs in the therapy of portal hypertension should be investigated in a randomized controlled trial.

Effect of propranolol and depot lanreotide SR on postprandial and circadian portal haemodynamics in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Long-acting somatostatin analogues have been suggested as an alternative to propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of lanreotide SR, a new depot formulation injected once-weekly, and propranolol in reducing circadian portal blood flow (PVF) and meal-stimulated hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive either lanreotide SR intramuscularly (30 mg once weekly, n=12) or propranolol (n=12) orally. Hemodynamic measurements were performed on day 0 and on day 21 after a 3-week period of drug administration, while patients received three standard oral liquid test meals. On each study day 27 PVF measurements were performed over 24 h and eight measurements of HVPG during the first postprandial period.

RESULTS

Propranolol was more effective than lanreotide SR in reducing baseline HVPG (-21.9 vs. -13.6%, P=0.04) and meal-stimulated HVPG (-16.6 vs. -3.8%, P=0.04). Propranolol reduced circadian PVF significantly by 9.3% (P=0.03) but not lanreotide SR.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment with propranolol reduced baseline and postprandial HVPG and circadian PVF, while lanreotide SR did not. The results of our study do not encourage clinical testing of lanreotide SR 30 mg for the prevention of variceal haemorrhage.

Pharmacological rationale for the use of somatostatin and analogues in portal hypertension

Somatostatin and its analogue octreotide have been used for two decades to treat oesophageal variceal haemorrhage. The drug was introduced because of its capacity to decrease portal venous pressure without major side effects. In clinical trials assessing the efficacy of somatostatin and long-acting analogues in arresting variceal haemorrhage, conflicting results have been obtained. Furthermore, in haemodynamic studies evaluating the effects of somatostatin and analogues in patients with cirrhosis, divergent effects were observed. The main reason for these differences is probably related to different affinities of the drugs for different somatostatin receptor subtypes. The effects of somatostatin and analogues are mediated via five different G-protein coupled receptors (somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5), which regulate the activity of ion channels (Ca2+, K+, Na+ and Cl-) and enzymes (adenyl cyclase, phospholipase C, phospholipase A2, phosphoinositide 3-kinase and guanylate cyclase) responsible for the synthesis or degradation of intracellular second messengers including cyclic AMP, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, diacylglycerol and cyclic GMP. Despite universal use of somatostatin, the cellular and biochemical mechanisms of its effects in portal hypertension are relatively poorly studied and remain incompletely understood. In this review, we summarize relevant signal transduction of somatostatin and analogues, the haemodynamic effects of the drugs and the possible mechanisms by which these effects are mediated.

Octreotide in hepatorenal syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study

The hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is related to vasoconstriction of the renal cortex induced by systemic hypovolemia that follows splanchnic vasodilatation as the primary event in the cascade of hemodynamic changes associated with portal hypertension. We evaluated the effects of octreotide, a splanchnic vasoconstrictor, on HRS in cirrhotic patients. We compared the effects of octreotide infusion (50 microg/h) to placebo using a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design over 2, 4-day periods. Nineteen patients were included, and 14 patients could complete the 2 phases of the study (group 1: placebo first; n = 8 and group 2: octreotide first; n = 6) The end point of the study was to evaluate improvement in renal function as defined by a 20% decrease in serum creatinine value after a 4-day treatment as compared with baseline. In all the patients, a normal central venous pressure was maintained by daily intravenous administration of 2 units of albumin. The 2 groups were similar with regard to demographic data and liver and kidney function parameters at baseline. Improvement in renal function was observed in 2 patients after the placebo and 1 patient after octreotide infusion in group 1 and in 2 patients after octreotide infusion and 1 patient after placebo in group 2 (P = not significant). In addition, treatment with octreotide infusion did not result in significant changes in creatinine clearance, daily urinary sodium, plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone and glucagon levels, or renal and mesenteric artery resistance indices as measured by Doppler ultrasonography. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that, under our experimental conditions, octreotide infusion combined with albumin is not effective for the treatment of HRS in cirrhotic patients.

Nitric oxide and portal hypertension: a nitric oxide-releasing derivative of ursodeoxycholic acid that selectively releases nitric oxide in the liver

Portal hypertension, a common consequence of chronic liver diseases, is directly responsible for most complications of cirrhosis. In liver microcirculation, nitric oxide is considered a major fine tuner of vascular tone by counterbalancing vasoconstrictors (sympathetic nervous activity, the renin-angiotensin system, and endothelin-1) in normal and cirrhotic livers. The deficiency of endothelial nitric oxide release is a key factor in the hemodynamic abnormalities associated with the dynamic component of portal hypertension. Conventional nitric oxide donors release nitric oxide into the blood stream, causing systemic hypotension and progression of vasodilatory syndrome in cirrhotic patients. NCX1000 is a nitric oxide-releasing derivative of ursodeoxycholic acid-derived compounds, being capable of selectively releasing nitric oxide into the liver circulation. Administration of NCX1000 to portal hypertensive rats decreases intrahepatic resistance providing a novel therapy for the treatment of portal hypertension.

Portal hypertension

Portal hypertension, the main complication of cirrhosis, is responsible for its most common complications: variceal hemorrhage, ascites, and portosystemic encephalopathy. Portal hypertension is the result of increased intrahepatic resistance and increased portal venous inflow. Vasodilatation (splanchnic and systemic) and the hyperdynamic circulation are hemodynamic abnormalities typical of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Gastroesophageal varices result almost solely from portal hypertension, although the hyperdynamic circulation contributes to variceal growth and hemorrhage. Ascites results from sinusoidal hypertension and sodium retention, which, in turn, is secondary to vasodilatation and activation of neurohumoral systems. The hepatorenal syndrome represents the result of extreme vasodilatation, with an extreme decrease in effective blood volume that leads to maximal activation of vasoconstrictive systems, renal vasoconstriction, and renal failure. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is a potentially lethal infection of ascites that occurs in the absence of a local source of infection. Portosystemic encephalopathy is a consequence of both portal hypertension (shunting of blood through portosystemic collaterals) and hepatic insufficiency that result in the accumulation of neurotoxins in the brain. This review covers the recent advances in the pathophysiology and management of the complications of portal hypertension.

Low doses of isosorbide mononitrate attenuate the postprandial increase in portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis

Postprandial hyperemia is associated with a significant increase in portal pressure in cirrhosis, which may contribute to progressive dilation and rupture of gastroesophageal varices. In cirrhosis, an insufficient hepatic production of nitric oxide (NO) may impair the expected hepatic vasodilatory response to increased blood flow, further exaggerating the postprandial increase in portal pressure. This study was aimed at investigating whether low doses of an oral NO donor might counteract the postprandial peak in portal pressure. Twenty-three portal hypertensive cirrhotics, 8 of them under propranolol therapy, were randomized to receive orally 5-isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN; 10 mg; n = 11) or placebo (n = 12) and a standard liquid meal 15 minutes later. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and hepatic blood flow (HBF) were measured at baseline and 15, 30, and 45 minutes after a meal. ISMN significantly attenuated the postprandial increase in portal pressure as compared with placebo (peak HVPG increase: 2.4 +/- 1.4 mm Hg vs. 5.2 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, P =.002). Percentual increases in HBF were similar in both groups. MAP decreased slightly in ISMN group (-7.5% +/-.5%; P <.01 vs. baseline). These effects were also observed in patients on chronic propranolol therapy. In conclusion, hepatic NO supplementation by low doses of ISMN effectively reduces the postprandial increase of portal pressure in cirrhosis, with only a mild effect on arterial pressure. The same was observed in patients receiving propranolol. Our results suggest that therapeutic strategies based on selective hepatic NO delivery may improve the treatment of portal hypertension.

Banding ligation versus nadolol and isosorbide mononitrate for the prevention of esophageal variceal rebleeding

BACKGROUND & AIMS

beta-blockers and banding ligation are effective in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. However, the relative efficacy and safety remains unresolved.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-one patients with a history of esophageal variceal bleeding were enrolled. Patients were randomized to undergo regular endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL group, 60 patients) until variceal obliteration, or drug therapy by using nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate (N+I group, 61 patients) during the study period to prevent rebleeding.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up period of 25 months, recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding developed in 23 patients in the EVL group and 35 patients in the N+I group (P = 0.10). Recurrent bleeding from esophageal varices occurred in 12 patients (20%) in the EVL group and 26 patients (42%) in the N+I group (relative risk = 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.85). The actuarial probability of rebleeding from esophageal varices was lower in the EVL group (P = 0.01). The multivariate Cox analysis indicated that the treatment was the only factor predictive of rebleeding. Treatment failure occurred in 8 patients (13%) in the EVL group and 17 patients (28%) in the N+I group (P = 0.01). Fifteen patients in the EVL group and 8 patients of the N+I group died (P = 0.06). Complications occurred in 17% of the EVL group and in 19% of the N+I group (P = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Our trial showed that ligation was more effective than nadolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the prevention of variceal rebleeding, with similar complications in both treatment modalities. However, there is no significant difference in the survival rate between the 2 groups.

Nadolol is superior to isosorbide mononitrate for the prevention of the first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with ascites

BACKGROUND/AIMS

beta-blockers effectively prevent first variceal bleeding (FVB) in cirrhotic patients. In patients with ascites, however, their use might be precluded by a high rate of contraindications and side effects. We compared the efficacy and applicability of nadolol and isosorbide-mononitrate (IsMn) in preventing FVB in a population of cirrhotic patients at high risk of variceal bleeding with ascites, who can be frequently intolerant to beta-blockers.

METHODS

A total of 80 consecutive cirrhotic patients with ascites and esophageal varices (25% average risk of bleeding at 1 year) were considered, 28 were excluded due to contraindications and 52 were randomly assigned to receive nadolol (n=25) or IsMn (n=27).

RESULTS

Frequency of contraindications was greater for beta-blockers than IsMn (35 versus 0%, P=0.001). During 21.3+/-11.6 months of follow-up, side effects forced six patients taking nadolol and four taking IsMn to stop treatment. Bleeding occurred in two patients taking nadolol and ten taking IsMn. The probability of bleeding was significantly lower in the nadolol group (P<0.05), whereas overall survival was similar (seven patients on IsMn and eight on nadolol died, P=0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ascites IsMn is tolerated but ineffective while nadolol is effective but less tolerated.

Acute and 7-day portal pressure response to carvedilol and propranolol in cirrhotics

BACKGROUND

Carvedilol, a non-selective beta- and alpha-1 blocking agent, has portal hypotensive action. This study evaluates the acute and 7-day response to carvedilol, and compares it to that of propranolol.

METHODS

Thirty-six cirrhotics were randomized into two groups of 18 each, and treated with carvedilol or propranolol. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was measured before and 90 min after either 25 mg carvedilol or 80 mg propranolol was administered orally, and again 7 days after 12.5 mg carvedilol daily or 80 mg propranolol daily, respectively. 'Responders' were defined as those with HVPG reduction of > or = 20%.

RESULTS

With carvedilol, 11/18(61.1%) and 11/17(64.7%) patients responded acutely and after 7 days, respectively, while 9/18(50%) and 10/16(62.5%) did so to propranolol. However, HVPG reduction (percent) by carvedilol was not superior to that by propranolol either acutely (27.67 +/- 31.49 compared to 22.98 +/- 27.40, P = 0.6) or after 7 days (28.2 +/- 29.05 compared to 23.25 +/- 20.15, P = 0.6). With carvedilol, the acute HVPG response (P < 0.001) and responder status (P = 0.018) were good predictors of the response after 7 days, but were weak predictors in the case of propranolol (0.1 > P > 0.05 and P = 0.059, respectively). On carvedilol, only one patient (with ascites) developed symptomatic systemic hypotension with oliguria.

CONCLUSION

Carvedilol is a relatively safe, effective portal hypotensive agent, both acutely and over 7 days, but not superior to propranolol, at least in Indians. The acute hemodynamic response seems promising in predicting long-term response.

Review article: a drug therapy for the prevention of variceal haemorrhage

The development of varices is a major complication of cirrhosis, and variceal haemorrhage has a high mortality. There have been major advances in the primary and secondary prevention of variceal haemorrhage over the last 20 years involving endoscopic, radiological and pharmacological approaches. This review concentrates principally on drug therapy, particularly on the numerous haemodynamic studies. Many of these drugs have not been studied in clinical trials, but provide data about the underlying pathogenesis of portal hypertension. Also covered in this review are the randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that involve a large number of patients. These trials involve relatively few drugs such as non-selective beta-blockers and nitrates. Correlations between haemodynamic and clinical parameters are discussed. Despite the recent increase in the use of alternative endoscopic therapies, an effective and well tolerated drug remains a clinically important research goal.

Acute and chronic effects of isosorbide-5-mononitrate administration on effective renal plasma flow and the renin-aldosterone system in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMO) has been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. However, recent studies have suggested that this drug compromises renal function. The present study was conducted to assess the acute and chronic effects of ISMO on effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and the renin-aldosterone profile in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

Fifteen cirrhotic patients were included in the present study. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), serum renin concentration (SR), ERPF and plasma aldosterone concentration (PA) were checked before ISMO treatment (baseline study), after a single oral dose of 20 mg ISMO (acute effect study) and after 3 weeks of ISMO treatment (chronic effect study).

RESULTS

Our data showed that the oral administration of a single dose (20 mg) of ISMO to cirrhotic patients was associated with significant decreases in ERPF (from 405.18 to 369.06 mL/min) and MAP (from 93.26 to 86.40 mmHg), and increases in HR (from 65.53 to 70.06 beats/min), SR (from 24.15 to 54.41 pg/mL), and PA (from 105.1 to 148.7 pg/mL). However, no significant changes were observed in HR, MAP, PA, SR, or ERPF after 3 weeks of ISMO treatment when compared with the baseline study.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of ISMO causes a decrease in ERPF in cirrhotic patients and its use in patients with renal impairment should be considered cautiously.

Long-term results of a clinical trial of nadolol with or without isosorbide mononitrate for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis

It is clearly established that beta-blockers decrease the risk of a first variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. We have recently shown that the addition of isosorbide mononitrate to nadolol decreases the rate of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and varices, compared with nadolol alone, after a median follow-up of 30 months. It is not established if the long-term treatment with the combination continues to be beneficial. Therefore, we assessed the long-term effect of this combination on first variceal bleeding, complications, and death. One hundred forty-six cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices included in a previously published multicenter, randomized study comparing nadolol (40-160 mg/d) with the combination nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate (10-20 mg 3 times per day) were followed up for up to 7 years (median follow-up, 55 months). The primary end-point was variceal bleeding of any severity. Twenty-four patients (16 in the nadolol group, and 8 in the combination group) experienced variceal bleeding (log rank test, P =.02). Cumulative risk of bleeding was 29% and 12%, respectively (95% CI for the difference, 1%-23%). Two and 4 patients, respectively, had bleeding from portal hypertensive gastropathy (log rank test, P =.20). Thirty and 25 patients, respectively, died during follow-up (log rank test, P =.13). Twelve and 10 patients, respectively, had de novo occurrence of ascites during follow-up (log rank test, P =.29). In conclusion, nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate is significantly more effective than nadolol alone in the long-term use. Side effects are few, and no deleterious effects on ascites occurrence or on survival occur after long-term use of this combination.

Carvedilol, a new nonselective beta-blocker with intrinsic anti- Alpha1-adrenergic activity, has a greater portal hypotensive effect than propranolol in patients with cirrhosis

Only some patients show a substantial hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction after propranolol, which makes it desirable to investigate drugs with greater portal hypotensive effect. The aim of this study was to investigate whether carvedilol, a nonselective beta-blocker with anti-alpha1-adrenergic activity, may cause a greater HVPG reduction than propranolol. Thirty-five cirrhotic patients had hemodynamic measurements before and after the random administration of carvedilol (n = 14), propranolol (n = 14), or placebo (n = 7). Carvedilol markedly reduced HVPG, from 19.5 +/- 1.3 to 15.4 +/- 1 mm Hg (P <.0001). This HVPG reduction was greater than after propranolol (-20.4 +/- 2 vs. -12.7 +/- 2%, P <.05). Moreover, carvedilol decreased HVPG greater than 20% of baseline values or to </=12 mm Hg in a greater proportion of patients (64% vs. 14%, P <.05). Both drugs caused similar reductions in hepatic and azygos blood flows, suggesting that the greater HVPG decrease by carvedilol was because of reduced hepatic and portocollateral resistance. Propranolol caused greater reductions in heart rate and cardiac output than carvedilol, whereas carvedilol caused a greater decrease in mean arterial pressure (-23.1 vs. -11%, P <.05). Thus, carvedilol has a greater portal hypotensive effect than propranolol in patients with cirrhosis, suggesting a greater therapeutic potential. However, it causes arterial hypotension, which calls for careful evaluation before its long-term use.

Doppler evaluation of the effects of pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension

The splanchnic pharmacodynamic effects of the drugs used for the treatment of hemorrhagic complications of portal hypertension were poorly clarified until some years ago. The introduction of Doppler ultrasound provided a powerful tool to investigate such hemodynamic effects and brought new insights in this field. The present article reviews the pharmacodynamics of the substances used in the treatment of portal hypertension, with particular regard to the effects assessable by duplex Doppler ultrasonography.

Acute and chronic haemodynamic and renal effects of carvedilol in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Recent reports have suggested that the vasodilating beta-blocker carvedilol may have beneficial acute haemodynamic effects in cirrhotic portal hypertension. However, no data exist on chronic use or renal effects in this patient group. The aim of this study was to assess the acute and chronic haemodynamic and renal effects of carvedilol in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

Seventeen cirrhotic patients (mean age 55.2+/-2.8, mean Child-Pugh score 7.4+/-0.5) were studied. Hepatic venous pressure gradient, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, mean arterial pressure, heart rate and hepatic blood flow were measured before and 1 h after 25 mg carvedilol. After 4 weeks of therapy with carvedilol 25 mg daily, these measurements were repeated before and after rechallenge with carvedilol. Urine volume, sodium excretion and creatinine clearance were also measured before and after 4 weeks of therapy.

RESULTS

Seven patients did not complete the 4-week carvedilol therapy due to hypotension or poor compliance. Hepatic venous pressure gradient fell by 20.8% acutely (p<0.001) and by 16.3% after 4 weeks of therapy (p<0.002). Heart rate, mean arterial pressure and cardiac output fell after acute administration of carvedilol, but only heart rate fell significantly after 4 weeks of treatment. Hepatic blood flow, urine volume, sodium excretion and creatinine clearance remained unchanged after therapy.

CONCLUSION

Carvedilol has beneficial effects on splanchnic haemodynamics following acute and chronic administration in cirrhosis, without compromising hepatic blood flow or renal function. However, a substantial number of patients cannot tolerate 25 mg daily.

Effect of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on portal pressure in cirrhosis

Administration of angiotensin II causes an increase in portal pressure, and plasma concentration of angiotensin II is elevated in patients with cirrhosis, suggesting that angiotensin II may be involved in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. We evaluated the effect of the orally active angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan, on portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Thirty patients with severe (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] >/= 20 mm Hg) and 15 patients with moderate (HVPG < 20 mm Hg) portal hypertension at baseline measurement were treated with an oral dose of 25 mg losartan once daily for 1 week and compared with 15 (HVPG >/= 20 mm Hg) and 10 (HVPG < 20 mm Hg), respectively, cirrhotic controls. On the seventh day, HVPG was determined again, and blood pressure, heart rate, body weight, and parameters of liver and kidney function were recorded. Losartan induced a significant (P <.001) decrease of HVPG in the patients with severe (-46.8% +/- 15.5%) and moderate (-44.1% +/- 14.7%) portal hypertension, while no significant change was seen in the controls. Losartan caused a slight but significant (P <.01) fall in mean arterial blood pressure (-3.1 +/- 5.0 and -3.5 +/- 4.3 mm Hg, respectively). One patient treated with losartan had a short symptomatic hypotensive reaction after the first dose of losartan that did not recur despite continued treatment. No deterioration of liver or kidney function was observed. The present study indicates that angiotensin II blockade with orally administered losartan is safe and highly effective in the treatment of portal hypertension.

[Duplex ultrasound of the liver and portal vein system]

Duplex ultrasound allows direct access to portal venous and hepatic vein hemodynamics. This method has been accepted as a reliable procedure to detect portal and splenic venous thrombosis, Budd-Chiari's syndrome, portosystemic collateralisation and changes in the portal venous blood flow direction with a high rate of sensitivity. Besides these qualitative findings Doppler flowmetry allows quantitative measurement of portal venous blood flow velocities. The estimation of portal hypertension and the prediction of the risk of variceal bleeding by quantitative Doppler flowmetry is of increasing clinical importance. In monitoring the efficiency of medicational prophylaxis against gastrointestinal bleeding is also helpful. Duplex ultrasound can be used to evaluate the function of portocaval shunts including the intrahepatic stent shunt as well as to detect vascular complications after liver transplantation. Furthermore the method is gaining importance in the diagnosis and monitoring of therapy of acute liver transplant rejection. In case of liver tumors duplex ultrasound is of value for tumor staging and provides information about the dignity on the basis of perfusion patterns.

Extrahepatic portal venous obstruction in childhood: etiology, clinical and laboratory findings and prognosis of 34 patients

Extrahepatic obstruction of the portal vein is a well known cause of portal hypertension in childhood, that causes severe morbidity. We evaluated 34 children (24 boys, 10 girls, age 4.5 months to 12 years, mean 5.5 +/- 3.8 years) with this diagnosis, to define the clinical picture, laboratory changes, diagnostic tools and therapeutic modalities. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the commonest mode of presentation (64.7%), with the second being splenomegaly. The cause of the obstruction could be determined in 38.2% (13/34) of the subjects. At the beginning of the study the main diagnostic procedure was splenoportography although in more recent years pulsed duplex Doppler ultrasonography has been used. The follow up period was median of 5 years (range 1-11 years). The mean number of bleeding episodes was 4.7 +/- 5.9 (range 1-26), while nine patients never bled. There was no mortality. Ten patients underwent surgery, while sclerotherapy was performed on 10. Twenty-one patients received beta-blocker drugs. No difference was found among these therapeutic modalities. It is well established that the major risk for children with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction is gastrointestinal bleeding which is tolerated quite well. Surgery should be indicated only in children where bleeding cannot be controlled by medical means including sclerotherapy.

Pharmacological prevention of variceal bleeding. New developments

The introduction of pharmacological therapy has been one of the major advances in the treatment of the complications of portal hypertension. Many drugs have been shown to reduce portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis. However, the most widely used drugs and the only ones for which there is sufficient evidence, are the beta-blockers. These drugs have been, up to now, the only accepted prophylactic therapy for oesophageal variceal bleeding and are also an alternative treatment to sclerotherapy or surgery to prevent variceal rebleeding. A reduction in portal pressure gradient by beta-blockers below 12 mmHg or by more than 20% of baseline values is associated with almost a total protection from oesophageal bleeding. Such a marked response in portal pressure is only achieved in some patients receiving propranolol. New pharmacological approaches with a greater portal pressure reducing effect may improve the beneficial effect of drugs in preventing variceal bleeding. The more promising approach is the combined administration of beta-blockers and isosorbide-5-mononitrate, which has been shown to potentiate the reduction in portal pressure and to be highly effective in initial randomized clinical trials.

Pharmacologic therapy of portal hypertension and variceal hemorrhage

Patients with large esophageal varices who are deemed compliant and have no contraindications to beta-blocker therapy should be started on nonselective beta-adrenergic blockers (Fig. 5). The dose should be titrated to a 25% decrease in resting heart rate, a resting heart rate of 55 to 60 beats per minute, or development of symptoms, in which case the dose should be decreased until the patient's symptoms abate. If available, measurements of the HVPG at baseline and 3 months can be very helpful in ascertaining the response to treatment and in making the appropriate adjustments (e.g., adding a second drug). Sclerotherapy or endoscopic variceal ligation are the preferred therapies for treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding. Concomitant use of vasoactive drugs can supplement endoscopic treatment. They offer the advantage of early administration as soon as the diagnosis is suspected while awaiting endoscopy. Unlike endoscopic treatment, they decrease portal pressure and are the only established treatment for nonvariceal sources of bleeding related to portal hypertension. Once the index bleed is controlled, the patient should be started on treatment to reduce the high risk of recurrent variceal hemorrhage (Fig. 6). For patients with well-compensated cirrhosis, pharmacologic therapy may be desirable. For less compliant patients or patients with decompensated cirrhosis, an endoscopic technique, such as variceal ligation, may be preferable. Combinations of pharmacologic agents or pharmacologic agents and endoscopic procedures may offer hope for better control, but their efficacy needs to be demonstrated in RCTs. For patients who rebleed despite maximal pharmacologic or endoscopic therapy, a TIPS procedure, surgically created shunt, or liver transplantation should be considered, with the decision based on the patient's condition and the local availability of these options.

Randomised trial of nadolol alone or with isosorbide mononitrate for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Gruppo-Triveneto per L'ipertensione portale (GTIP)

BACKGROUND

The risk of having a first cirrhosis-associated variceal bleed is lowered by about 50% by beta-blockers. Use of beta-blockers is currently recommended for patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices that are at risk of bleeding. We aimed to test the effectiveness of isosorbide mononitrate as an adjunct to the beta-blocker nadolol in the prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in these patients.

METHODS

We did a randomised multicentre study to compare the non-selective beta-blocker, nadolol, with nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate in 146 relatively well (Child-Pugh score < or = 11) patients who had oesophageal varices at risk of bleeding. Patients on nadolol alone received a single oral 40 mg daily dose. Every second day the dose was titrated to achieve 20-25% decrease in resting heart rate (maximum dose 160 mg daily). Patients receiving both drugs received nadolol as above then isosorbide mononitrate was added starting with 10 mg orally twice daily, which was increased to 20 mg unless hypotension or severe headache occurred. The main endpoint was the occurrence of variceal bleeding of any severity. Patients were followed up for up to 40 months.

FINDINGS

During the study period 11 of 74 patients from the nadolol alone group and four of 72 from the nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate group had variceal bleeding (log-rank test p = 0.03). Cumulative risk of variceal bleeding was 18% in the nadolol group and 7.5% in the combined treatment group (95% CI for difference 1-25%). Two patients in each group had a non-variceal bleed related to portal hypertension. 14 patients from the nadolol only group and eight from the combined treatment group died during the study period (log-rank test p = 0.09). Four and eight patients, respectively, had to discontinue one of the drugs because of side-effects.

INTERPRETATION

Nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate is significantly more effective than nadolol alone in the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in relatively well patients with cirrhosis, and has few side-effects.

Acute haemodynamic changes after oral carvedilol, a vasodilating beta-blocker, in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Combinations of beta-blockers and vasodilators have been assessed for their ability to lower portal pressure and so prevent variceal haemorrhage. However, reservations have been raised particularly with respect to renal function and perfusion after the use of these medicines in patients with chronic liver disease. We studied the acute effects of carvedilol, a new vasodilating beta-blocker which combines non-selective beta-blockade with alpha-1 receptor antagonism, upon the haemodynamics of patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Sixteen patients completed the study which measured the changes approximately 1 h after the administration of 25 mg oral carvedilol.

RESULTS

The hepatic venous pressure gradient fell from 16.7 +/- 0.9 to 13.6 +/- 1.0 mmHg (p < 0.00001), accounted for largely by reductions in the wedged hepatic venous pressure. Despite this, the azygos blood flow did not change. There was a significant fall in mean arterial pressure (94.8 +/- 4.4 cf. 84.6 +/- 4.3 mmHg; p = 0.0001), which was particularly apparent in the diastolic blood pressure of those patients with ascites. The heart rate only fell significantly in the ascitic subjects. No significant changes occurred in the cardiac output or systemic vascular resistance. Unilateral renal vein flow as measured by the reverse thermodilution technique remained constant.

CONCLUSIONS

Carvedilol is therefore a potent acute portal hypotensive agent which does not appear to compromise renal perfusion. However, patients with ascites are at greater risk of its systemic hypotensive action.

Transdermal nitroglycerin in cirrhosis. A 24-hour echo-Doppler study of splanchnic hemodynamics

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The present study was aimed to evaluate the 24-hour effect of transdermal nitroglycerin on splanchnic hemodynamics in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

Hemodynamic parameters (blood velocity and resistance indexes) were determined by means of pulsed echo-Doppler, a non-invasive method which proved to be useful to evaluate the effects of drugs on splanchnic vessels. Nine patients with biopsy-proven liver cirrhosis were studied. They were kept on a standard diet divided into 3 meals served at 8, 12 a.m. and 6 p.m. Echo-Doppler measurements were determined for 2 consecutive days at 7, 8, 9, 12 a.m, 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12 p.m. and again at 7 a.m. A transdermal nitroglycerin tape, capable of releasing 15 mg of the drug in 24 h, was applied to the skin of the chest at 7 a.m. of the second day.

RESULTS

After nitroglycerin mean portal blood velocity and flow significantly decreased by 18 and 22%. Similarly superior mesenteric artery velocity decreased, while resistance indexes increased. ANOVA analysis showed a significant effect of the drug on superior mesenteric artery and portal flow, while the effect on hepatic artery flow and renal indexes were low.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that nitroglycerin, given as transdermal long-acting system, significantly influences portal hemodynamics in liver cirrhosis. Its use, favoured by easy administration, may be proposed for long-term clinical studies to test its efficacy in preventing gastrointestinal bleeding.

Nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate compared with sclerotherapy for the prevention of variceal rebleeding

BACKGROUND

Patients who have bleeding from esophageal varices are at high risk for rebleeding and death. We compared the efficacy and safety of endoscopic sclerotherapy with the efficacy and safety of nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate for the prevention of variceal rebleeding.

METHODS

Eighty-six hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and bleeding from esophageal varices diagnosed by endoscopy were randomly assigned to treatment with repeated sclerotherapy (43 patients) or nadolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (43 patients). The primary outcomes were rebleeding, death, and complications. The hepatic venous pressure gradient was measured at base line and after three months.

RESULTS

Base-line data were similar in the two groups, and the median follow-up was 18 months in both. Eleven patients in the medication group and 23 in the sclerotherapy group had rebleeding. The actuarial probability of remaining free of rebleeding was higher in the medication group for all episodes related to portal hypertension (P = 0.001) and variceal rebleeding (P = 0.002). Four patients in the medication group and nine in the sclerotherapy group died (P = 0.07 for the difference in the actuarial probability of survival). Seven patients in the medication group and 16 in the sclerotherapy group had treatment-related complications (P = 0.03). Thirty-one patients in the medication group underwent two hemodynamic studies; 1 of the 13 patients with more than a 20 percent decrease in the hepatic venous pressure gradient had rebleeding, as compared with 8 of the 18 with smaller decreases in the pressure gradient (P = 0.04) for the actuarial probability of rebleeding at two years).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with sclerotherapy, nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate significantly decreased the risk of rebleeding from esophageal varices.

Propranolol plus molsidomine vs propranolol alone in the treatment of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Effective protection from the risk of variceal bleeding is achieved when the hepatic venous pressure gradient is reduced to 12 mmHg or at least by 20% of baseline values. Such a marked decrease is rarely achieved with propranolol, and new agents or combinations of them are now being explored. The present randomized study investigated whether chronic treatment with the combination of propranolol plus molsidomine, a preferential venous dialator that reduces hepatic venous pressure gradient and does not cause pharmacological tolerance, achieves greater reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient than propranolol alone.

METHODS

A hemodynamic study was performed in 34 patients with cirrhosis with portal hypertension in baseline conditions and after 3 months of chronic oral treatment with propranolol alone (n = 19) or propranolol plus molsidomine (n = 15).

RESULTS

Propranolol produced a significant reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (-16%, p < 0.01). Propranolol plus molsidomine also caused a slight but significant decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient (-9%, p < 0.05). Hepatic blood flow and the hepatic and intrinsic clearance of indocyanine green were significantly reduced by propranolol. The combined administration of propranolol+molsidomine significantly reduced hepatic blood flow but not hepatic and intrinsic clearance of indocyanine green. Both treatment groups produced similar reduction in azygos blood flow, heart rate and cardiac output. However, contrary to propranolol alone, propranolol plus molsidomine did not increase cardiopulmonary pressures.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study shows that although the combined administration of propranolol plus molsidomine prevents some of the adverse effects of propranolol on liver function and cardiopulmonary pressures, it does not achieve a greater reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient than propranolol alone and therefore, does not support the use of this combined therapy for the pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension.

Continuous prazosin administration in cirrhotic patients: effects on portal hemodynamics and on liver and renal function

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatic vascular resistance is influenced by alpha-adrenergic tone. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of continuous blockade of alpha-adrenoceptors with prazosin on hemodynamics, liver function, and renal function and whether the association of propranolol or furosemide enhances the portal pressure lowering effect of prazosin.

METHODS

Cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension were studied at baseline and after a 3-month course of prazosin (n = 18) or placebo (n = 10).

RESULTS

No changes were observed in the placebo group. Prazosin decreased the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) while increasing hepatic blood flow. Liver function improved as shown by an increase in hepatic and intrinsic hepatic clearances of indocyanine green and galactose elimination capacity. A significant reduction in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance was associated with increases in plasma renin activity and aldosterone concentration and a decrease in glomerular filtration rate. The plasma volume increased significantly, and 6 patients developed edema. The association of propranolol (n = 8) but not furosemide (n = 7) to prazosin increased the reduction in HVPG and attenuated the increase in plasma renin activity.

CONCLUSIONS

In cirrhotic patients, continuous prazosin administration reduces portal pressure and improves liver perfusion and function but favors sodium and water retention. The association of propranolol enhances the decrease in portal pressure, suggesting a potential benefit from this combined therapy.

Long-term effect of nadolol or nadolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate on renal function and ascites formation in patients with cirrhosis. GTIP Gruppo Triveneto per l'Ipertensione Portale

The association beta-blockers plus nitrates has been reported to impair renal function and renal sodium handling, leading to increased risk of development of ascites, or worsening of a preexisting ascites, or increase in the requirements of diuretic agents. In 81 patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices, participating in a multicenter controlled clinical trial of prophylaxis of variceal bleeding comparing nadolol (NAD) plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (I5M) with NAD alone, renal function, presence of ascites, and diuretic requirements were assessed at inclusion and after 6 months of follow-up. No significant variation in s-urea or s-creatinine was observed in either group, Three patients in the nadolol group and two in the NAD plus I5M developed ascites at 6 months (P = .70), and a need to increase diuretic regimen was observed in four and three patients, respectively (P = .76). Decrease in heart rate and in mean arterial pressure was similar in the two groups. There was a significant correlation between increases in s-creatinine and decrease in mean arterial pressure in the whole series (P = .015). Only in patients treated with the association was there a significant larger proportion of patients ascitic who became anascitic, than of patients anascitic who became ascitic (P = .03). In patients treated with the association, there was a significantly larger decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient (P = .05). It is concluded that patients treated with the association NAD plus I5M are not at increased risk of developing renal dysfunction or worsening of ascites compared with patients treated with NAD alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate for portal hypertension in cirrhosis: long-term hemodynamic and renal effects

The effect on kidney function, vasoactive systems and ascites outcome of long-term treatment with propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate, a combined therapy proven more effective than propranolol alone in decreasing portal pressure in the cirrhotic patient, is unknown. Thirty cirrhotic patients who survived acute variceal bleeding and were treated with propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate were studied. Portal and systemic hemodynamics (n = 15), inulin clearance, free water clearance, plasma renin activity, aldosterone concentration and prostaglandin E2 excretion (n = 20) were measured before and after 3 mo of treatment. In addition, data on ascites outcome in the entire series after a mean follow-up of 9.6 mo were compared with those of 30 patients undergoing elective sclerotherapy and with those of 30 patients treated with propranolol alone matched for age, sex, presence of ascites, Child-Pugh class and mean follow-up length included in other randomized controlled trials. Combined therapy significantly decreased the hepatic venous pressure gradient and azygos blood flow. In addition, no changes in inulin clearance, free water clearance, plasma renin activity, aldosterone concentration and prostaglandin E2 excretion occurred, despite a mild decrease in mean arterial pressure. Moreover, no differences among the three groups of patients studied in ascites outcome were found. These results suggest that long-term treatment with propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate does not impair kidney function, vasoactive systems or ascites outcome in cirrhotic patients.