Plasma exchange in neuroimmunological disorders: part 2. Treatment of neuromuscular disorders

[Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)]

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is the most common chronic autoimmune disease of the peripheral nervous system. It is often difficult to diagnose, but severaly therapeutic options are nowadays available to reduce neurological deficits and to improve the disease course. This article exemplifies the management of CIDP by a typical case study.

Advancements and prospects of novel biologicals for myasthenia gravis: toward personalized treatment based on autoantibody specificities

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an antibody-mediated autoimmune disease with a prevalence of 150-250 cases per million individuals. Autoantibodies include long-lived antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), mainly of the IgG1 subclass, and IgG4, produced almost exclusively by short-lived plasmablasts, which are prevalent in muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that MG patients receiving conventional medication today still do not possess satisfactory symptom control, indicating a substantial disease burden. Subsequently, based on the type of the autoantibody and the pathogenesis, we synthesized the published material to date and reached a conclusion regarding the literature related to personalized targeted therapy for MG. Novel agents for AChR MG have shown their efficacy in clinical research, such as complement inhibitors, FcRn receptor antagonists, and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) inhibitors. Rituximab, a representative drug of anti-CD20 therapy, has demonstrated benefits in treatment of MuSK MG patients. Due to the existence of low-affinity antibodies or unidentified antibodies that are inaccessible by existing methods, the treatment for seronegative MG remains complicated; thus, special testing and therapy considerations are necessary. It may be advantageous to initiate the application of novel biologicals at an early stage of the disease. Currently, therapies can also be combined and individualized according to different types of antibodies. With such a wide range of drugs, how to tailor treatment strategies to patients with various conditions and find the most suitable solution for each MG profile are our necessary and urgent aims.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in the management of stiff person syndrome spectrum disorders: a case series and review of the literature

Background

Stiff person syndrome spectrum disorders (SPSD) are a rare group of disabling neuroimmunological disorders. SPSD often requires immune therapies, especially in the setting of inadequate response to symptomatic treatments. The safety and efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in SPSD remains uncertain.

Objectives

To describe the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TPE in patients with SPSD.

Design

A retrospective observational study.

Methods

A retrospective review of SPSD patients seen at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) from 1997 to 2021 was performed. Patient demographics/history, examination/diagnostic findings, treatment response, and TPE-related complications were recorded. Assessment for any associations between clinical characteristics, including age, sex, clinical phenotype, and time on immunotherapy, and response to TPE 3 months after treatment was performed. A subgroup of 18 patients treated with TPE at JHH and 6 patients treated with TPE at outside institutions were evaluated for any change in usage of symptomatic medications 3 months after the TPE treatment. Literature review of SPSD and TPE was also conducted.

Results

Thirty-nine SPSD patients were treated with TPE (21 at JHH and 18 at outside institutions); median age 48 years, 77% female, median modified Rankin Scale 3; mean initial anti-GAD65 antibody titer was 23,508 U/mL. Twenty-four patients (62%) had classic SPS, 10 (26%) had SPS-plus, 2 (5%) had progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity and myoclonus, and 3 (8%) had pure cerebellar ataxia. All patients were on symptomatic treatments, 30 (77%) previously received IVIg, and 3 (8%) previously received rituximab. Four patients (10%) had a TPE-related adverse event. One developed asymptomatic hypotension, another had both line thrombosis and infection, and two had non-life-threatening bleeding events. Twenty-three (59%) patients reported improvement in symptoms after TPE. Of the subgroup of 24 patients evaluated for any change in usage of symptomatic medications 3 months after the TPE treatment, 14 (58%) required fewer GABAergic symptomatic medications. Literature review identified 57 additional patients with SPSD; 43 (75%) reported temporary improvement after TPE.

Conclusion

The majority of patients treated with TPE had improvement. Moreover, most patients evaluated for any change in usage of symptomatic medications after the TPE treatment no longer required as much symptomatic medications months after TPE. TPE appears safe and well-tolerated in SPSD. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term efficacy of TPE in SPSD and identify which patients may benefit the most from TPE.

Total Plasma Exchange in Neuromuscular Junction Disorders—A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy, Safety and Potential Diagnostic Properties in Doubtful Diagnosis

Neuromuscular junction disorders (NJDs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases including myasthenia gravis (MG). In some cases, patients are present with myasthenic symptoms without evidence of autoimmune antibodies, making diagnosis challenging. Total plasma exchange (TPE) has proven efficacy in NJDs. The objective is to describe the safety and efficacy of TPE in NJD patients with questionable disease activity or uncertain diagnosis in order to assess the diagnostic potential of TPE. We report an observational, retrospective cohort study of clinical routine data. All the data were derived from the electronic medical records of the Department of Neurology at University Hospital Essen. We searched for patients with NJDs between 1 July 2018 and 30 June 2021. Of the 303 patients who presented to the department with NJDs, 20 were treated with TPE; 9 patients did not show a measurable benefit from TPE (45%), 6 of whom were diagnosed with seronegative MG. Of these, 3 (50%) had long-standing ocular symptoms. There were decreases in the mean arterial pressure, hemoglobin, hematocrit and fibrinogen during treatment, which were not considered clinically relevant. In (seronegative) myasthenic patients, TPE may help to verify an uncertain diagnosis or to reveal possible muscle damage, allowing unnecessary therapy to be avoided.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP): Current Therapies and Future Approaches

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy leading to disability via inflammatory demyelination of peripheral nerves. Various therapeutic approaches with different mechanisms of action are established for the treatment of CIDP. Of those, corticosteroids, intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin, or plasma exchange are established first-line therapies as suggested by the recently revised EAN/PNS guidelines for the management of CIDP. In special cases, immunosuppressants or rituximab may be used. Novel therapeutic approaches currently undergoing clinical studies include molecules or monoclonal antibodies interacting with Fc receptors on immune cells to alleviate immune-mediated neuronal damage. Despite various established therapies and the current development of novel therapeutics, treatment of CIDP remains challenging due to an inter-individually heterogeneous disease course and the lack of surrogate parameters to predict the risk of clinical deterioration.

Treatment of Severe Japanese Encephalitis Complicated With Hashimoto's Thyroiditis and Guillain-Barré Syndrome With Protein A Immunoadsorption: A Case Report

A severely comatose female patient was diagnosed with Japanese encephalitis (JE). Her condition was complicated by Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). After antiviral, glucocorticoid, and immunoglobulin treatment, the patient’s consciousness was restored, and she could breathe spontaneously. Following this, new-onset, primarily demyelinating GBS developed, which progressed to demyelination combined with axonal injury. The patient was switched to protein A immunoadsorption (PAIA) therapy, and her Hughes score decreased rapidly, from 4 to 1 after 6 months. This patient is the first to receive PAIA combined with an antiviral-glucocorticoid-immunoglobulin regimen to treat encephalitis, meningitis, HT, and GBS caused by JE infection, thereby reflecting the importance of clinical application of PAIA in the treatment of immunological complications of JE.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: For Cancer Patients

Therapeutic plasma exchange is used as a trial method for the treatment of cancer patients. Therapeutic plasma exchange uses in vitro technology to remove pathogenic factors in the plasma, returning the replacement and remaining components to the patient to facilitate cure. In the effort to explore new methods of cancer treatment, the introduction of therapeutic plasma exchange brings new hope for cancer treatment; however, the current evidence supporting therapeutic plasma exchange is controversial, and most of the evidence comes from observational studies, lacking large prospective randomized trials. Therefore, this review attempts to focus on the main indications of therapeutic plasma exchange for the treatment of tumors and their complications, including hematological tumors (multiple myeloma cast nephropathy and hyperviscosity syndrome), nervous system tumors (myasthenia gravis associated with thymoma, paraneoplastic neurological syndrome, Lambert–Eaton myasthenia syndrome, and anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis), overdose of chemotherapy drugs. In addition, the issues of side-effects and safety in the use of therapeutic plasma exchange are also discussed. However, well-designed prospective trials are needed to better define the role of therapeutic plasma exchange in cancer.

Effect of plasma exchange in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct systematic review and meta-analysis for the efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) with an acute attack.

METHODS

Systematic review was performed using EMBASE and OVID/Medline database. The eligible studies must be the studies of NMOSD patients treated with TPE during the acute phase. They must report treatment outcomes using either Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) or visual acuity (VA) before and after the therapy. Pooled mean difference (MD) was then calculated by combining MDs of each study using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were identified; eleven with 241 NMOSD patients reported EDSS outcome and four studies with 103 NMOSD reported visual outcomes. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly decreased in EDSS after TPE treatment for NMOSD with an acute attack with the pooled MD of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.26-1.40; I² 69%) comparing pretreatment to immediate posttreatment and 2.13 (95% CI, 1.55-2.70; I² 31%) comparing pretreatment to posttreatment at 6 months to 1-year follow-up. Unfortunately, only one of the four studies evaluating visual outcomes reported standard deviation in association with mean LogMAR; therefore, the meta-analysis cannot be conducted. Nonetheless, all studies consistently demonstrated the benefit of TPE with improved VA and/or LogMAR after treatment.

INTERPRETATION

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed the benefit of TPE during the NMOSD attack with a significantly improved disability status immediately after treatment and during follow-up.

Feasibility & safety of plasma exchange in paediatric neuro-immunology: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

There is limited data available on the safety of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for paediatric neuro-immunological disorders (PNID). In this study, we report our data on safety and feasibility of TPE for these disorders.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed to include all patient who received TPE for four major PNID conditions: autoimmune encephalitis (AIE), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), Neuromyelitis optic spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and transverse myelitis (TM). We recorded minor and major adverse effects (AEs) associated with each TPE procedure. Secondary analysis also looked at the efficacy data of TPE on these patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with PNID received a total of 186 TPE cycles. Out of these, only 1 cycle (0.89%) in AIE subgroup, 1 (4.3%) in NMOSD and 1 (4.5%) in TM had adverse effects. No patients had major side effects.

CONCLUSION

TPE was safe and well tolerated in our PNID patients.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Patients with Neurologic Disorders: Review of 63 Cases

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a procedure that reduces circulating autoantibodies of the patients. TPE is commonly used in neurological disorders where autoimmunity plays a major role. We report our experience with regard to the indications, adverse events and outcomes of plasma exchange in neurological disorders. Sixty-three patients were included to this retrospective study. Median age was 48 years (range 1-85), there was a predominance of males. Neurological indications included Guillain-Barrè syndrome (n = 22), myasthenia gravis (n = 21), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (n = 7), polymyositis (n = 3), multifocal motor neuropathy (n = 2), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (n = 2), neuromyelitis optica (n = 2), multiple sclerosis (n = 2), limbic encephalitis (n = 1) and transverse myelitis (n = 1). TPE was frontline therapy in 57 % of the patients (n = 36). Total number of TPE sessions was 517; median number of sessions per patient was 8 (range 1-66). TPE was done through a central venous access in 97 % and through a peripheral venous access in 3 % of the patients. Human albumin was used as replacement fluid in 49 %, hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in 49 % and fresh frozen plasma in 2 % of the cases. Adverse reactions were recorded in 60 % of the patients. Total ratio of complications in 517 TPE procedures was 10.8 % and these were mild and manageable such as allergic reactions and hypotension. Overall response rate was 81 %. Interestingly, complication and response rates were similar in both HES and human albumin groups. We conclude that TPE is an effective treatment in neurologic diseases in which autoimmunity plays an important role in the pathogenesis and HES can be used instead of albumin as replacement fluid in these disorders, since it is cost-effective, has similar efficacy and complication rates.

Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: from molecular bases to practical considerations

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune disease of the peripheral nervous system, in which both cellular and humoral immune responses are involved. The disease is clinically heterogeneous with some patients displaying pure motor form and others also showing a variable degree of sensory dysfunction; disease evolution may also differ from patient to patient, since monophasic, progressive, and relapsing forms are reported. Underlying such clinical variability there is probably a broad spectrum of molecular dysfunctions that are and will be the target of therapeutic strategies. In this review we first explore the biological bases of current treatments and subsequently we focus on the practical management that must also take into account pharmacoeconomic issues.

Treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an idiopathic postinfectious immune disease that leads to progressive motor weakness due to damage to the myelin sheath. Epidemiological studies have linked GBS to infections from Campylobacter jejuni, Cytomegalovirus, and other pathogens. The syndrome includes multiple subtypes, with the most common being ascending motor weakness. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange reduces the time for recovery to occur, although some remain disabled.

Immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis: the state of the art

It is widely accepted that the main common pathogenetic pathway in multiple sclerosis (MS) involves an immune-mediated cascade initiated in the peripheral immune system and targeting CNS myelin. Logically, therefore, the therapeutic approaches to the disease include modalities aiming at downregulation of the various immune elements that are involved in this immunologic cascade. Since the introduction of interferons in 1993, which were the first registered treatments for MS, huge steps have been made in the field of MS immunotherapy. More efficious and specific immunoactive drugs have been introduced and it appears that the increased specificity for MS of these new treatments is paralleled by greater efficacy. Unfortunately, this seemingly increased efficacy has been accompanied by more safety issues. The immunotherapeutic modalities can be divided into two main groups: those affecting the acute stages (relapses) of the disease and the long-term treatments that are aimed at preventing the appearance of relapses and the progression in disability. Immunomodulating treatments may also be classified according to the level of the 'immune axis' where they exert their main effect. Since, in MS, a neurodegenerative process runs in parallel and as a consequence of inflammation, early immune intervention is warranted to prevent progression of relapses of MS and the accumulation of disability. The use of neuroimaging (MRI) techniques that allow the detection of silent inflammatory activity of MS and neurodegeneration has provided an important tool for the substantiation of the clinical efficacy of treatments and the early diagnosis of MS. This review summarizes in detail the existing information on all the available immunotherapies for MS, old and new, classifies them according to their immunologic mechanisms of action and proposes a structured algorithm/therapeutic scheme for the management of the disease.

Current topics in therapeutic plasmapheresis

Therapeutic plasmapheresis has been used for intractable diseases that cannot be cured by conventional drug therapy. Currently, the use of therapeutic plasmapheresis has been approved for 27 diseases by Japan's National Health Insurance system and is mainly categorized into three modalities: plasma exchange (PE), double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), and plasma adsorption (PA). Plasma separators and/or fractionators are essential for the therapy. PE is performed for two purposes: removal of pathogenic antigens or substances in the plasma fraction and supplementation of essential factors, such as albumin and coagulation factors. PE can be used for thrombotic microangiopathy and acute hepatic failure. DFPP can be performed for selective removal of macromolecules while avoiding the use of substitution fluid (i.e., albumin or fresh frozen plasma). DFPP has now been used for conditions involving relatively larger plasma molecules, including hyperviscosity syndrome and ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. PA can specifically remove pathogenic agents, such as low-density lipoprotein or autoantibodies, in the IgG fractions by the adsorption column and does not require substitution fluids. PA has now been used for a wide variety of neurological diseases, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. This review describes the characteristics of each modality, seeking to improve the efficacy and specificity of removal of the target substance.

JC polyomavirus (JCV) and monoclonal antibodies: friends or potential foes?

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), observed in immunodeficient patients and caused by JC virus ((JCV), also called JC polyomavirus (JCPyV)). After the HIV pandemic and the introduction of immunomodulatory therapy, the PML incidence significantly increased. The correlation between the use of natalizumab, a drug used in multiple sclerosis (MS), and the PML development of particular relevance. The high incidence of PML in natalizumab-treated patients has highlighted the importance of two factors: the need of PML risk stratification among natalizumab-treated patients and the need of effective therapeutic options. In this review, we discuss these two needs under the light of the major viral models of PML etiopathogenesis.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: general treatment overview

OPINION STATEMENT

Major recent discoveries have bringing out a revised definition of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS), bringing out the concept of antibody-mediated neurological disorders, triggered or not by cancer. Classification of these diseases is not based anymore on the clinical pattern or an underlying tumor, but on the location of the targeted antigens. Indeed, evolution, response to treatment, and pathophysiology are radically different according to the associated antibodies. In some patients with newly described antibodies targeting cell-surface antigens, humoral immunity seems to play a direct role and a dramatic improvement is observed with immunomodulator treatments. In these patients, an associated tumor is less frequent. Conversely, patients with antibodies directed against intracellular targets are, in most cases, characterized by a high degree of irreversible neuronal death mediated by cytotoxic T-cells and do not improve after immunomodulator treatments. In these patients, an associated tumor is highly frequent and must be cured as soon as possible. A third group of patients can be identified with anti-GAD65 and anti-Amphiphysin antibodies. In patients with these antibodies, the efficiency of immunomodulator treatments is less clear as well as the type of immune response that could be a mix between humoral and cellular. In this last group, the antigen is intracellular, but patients may improve with immunomodulator treatments and associated tumors are rare. Thus, identification of associated antibodies should be prompt and the treatment guided according the identified antibody. Mainstream of treatment include the quest of a tumor and its cure. Immunotherapy must be promptly initiated, targeting humoral, or cellular immune response, or both, according to the associated antibodies. Furthermore, in some situations such as Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndromes and Stiff-Person Syndromes, symptomatic drugs can be useful to control the symptoms.

An update on neurocritical care for the patient with kidney disease

Patients with kidney disease have increased rates of neurologic illness such as intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. The acute care of patients with critical neurologic illness and concomitant kidney disease requires unique management considerations including attention to hyponatremia, renal replacement modalities in the setting of high intracranial pressure, reversal of coagulopathy, and seizure management to achieve good neurologic outcomes.

Autoimmune neuromuscular disorders

Autoimmune neuromuscular disorders affecting peripheral nerves, neuromuscular junction or muscle have a wide clinical spectrum with diverse pathogenetic mechanisms. Peripheral nervous system may be targeted in the context of complex immune reactions involving different cytokines, antigen-presenting cells, B cells and different types of T cells. Various immunomodulating and cytotoxic treatments block proliferation or activation of immune cells by different mechanisms attempting to control the response of the immune system and limit target organ injury. Most treatment protocols for autoimmune neuromuscular disorders are based on the use of corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins and plasmapheresis, with cytotoxic agents mostly used as steroid-sparing medications. More recently, development of specific monoclonal antibodies targeting individual cell types allowed a different approach targeting specific immune pathways, but these new treatments are also associated with various adverse effects and their long-term efficacy is still unknown.

Pathogenesis and treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies

Immune-mediated neuropathies represent a heterogeneous spectrum of peripheral nerve disorders that can be classified according to time course, predominant involvement of motor/sensory fibers, distribution of deficits and paraclinical parameters such as electrophysiology and serum antibodies. In the last few years, significant advances have been achieved in elucidating underlying pathomechanisms, which made it possible to identify potential therapeutic targets. In this review, we discuss the latest development in pathogenesis and treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies.

Comparison of intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange in treatment of mechanically ventilated children with Guillain Barré syndrome: a randomized study

Introduction

Respiratory failure is a life threatening complication of Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS). There is no consensus on the specific treatment for this subset of children with GBS.

Methods

This was a prospective randomized study to compare the outcome of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and plasma exchange (PE) treatment in children with GBS requiring mechanical ventilation. Forty-one children with GBS requiring endotracheal mechanical ventilation (MV) within 14 days from disease onset were included. The ages of the children ranged from 49 to 143 months.

Randomly, 20 children received a five-day course of IVIG (0.4 g/kg/day) and 21 children received a five-day course of one volume PE daily. Lumbar puncture (LP) was performed in 36 patients (18 in each group).

Results

Both groups had comparable age (p = 0.764), weight (p = 0.764), duration of illness prior to MV (p = 0.854), preceding diarrhea (p = 0.751), cranial nerve involvement (p = 0.756), muscle power using Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score (p = 0.266) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein (p = 0.606).

Children in the PE group had a shorter period of MV (median 11 days, IQR 11.0 to 13.0) compared to IVIG group (median 13 days, IQR 11.3 to 14.5) with p = 0.037.

Those in the PE group had a tendency for a shorter Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) stay (p = 0.094).

A total of 20/21 (95.2%) and 18/20 (90%) children in the PE and IVIG groups respectively could walk unaided within four weeks after PICU discharge (p = 0.606).

There was a negative correlation between CSF protein and duration of mechanical ventilation in the PE group (p = 0.037), but not in the IVIG group (p = 0.132).

Conclusions

In children with GBS requiring MV, PE is superior to IVIG regarding the duration of MV but not PICU stay or the short term neurological outcome.

The negative correlation between CSF protein values and duration of MV in PE group requires further evaluation of its clinical usefulness.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01306578

Role of plasmapheresis in immunological kidney diseases. Experience from 1050 completed plasmapheresis treatment sessions

Plasmapheresis is an effective treatment modality in several immunological kidney diseases. It is also indicated in certain neurological and hematological abnormalities, and some other diseases. Aims: In this study the indications and outcomes of the plasma exchange treatments performed in the Plasmapheresis Unit of the authors during the last 12 years are summarized, and the findings are compared to those published in the literature. The procedure, mechanisms of action and adverse effects are also briefly discussed. Methods: Between 1999 and 2010 authors completed 1050 plasma exchanges in 195 patients with an average 5.4 (1-20) treatments/person. In the 78 males and 117 females (age 57±16 years) the indications were as follows: 47% anti-cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, 4% anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, 3% rapidly progressing immunocomplex glomerulonephritis, 11% severe complications of systemic lupus erythematosus, 1% treatment resistant focal segmental glomerular sclerosis, 5% hemolytic uremic syndrome, 13% complications of multiple myeloma, 4% HELLP syndrome, 10% neurological diseases, and 2% other abnormalities. Results: Plasmapheresis, completed as part of combined immunosuppressive treatment, resulted in remarkable improvements in patients with anti-cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Out of the 91 patients, 54 needed urgent dialysis on admission, and renal replacement therapy could be discontinued in 44% of them. Renal functions in those patients who did not need dialysis also improved significantly, and pulmonary hemorrhage ceased in all affected subjects. Survival of the patients with anti-glomerular basement membrane diseases was 100%. The treatment significantly improved the renal function in rapidly progressive lupus nephritis, and all the 5 cases of lupus cerebritis were successfully cured. The results showed less effectiveness in therapy resistant focal segmental glomerular sclerosis and in rapidly progressing immunocomplex glomerulonephritis. Plasmapheresis proved to be very efficient in cases with the primary hemolytic uremic syndrome, and each patient with HELLP syndrome recovered completely. The outcome of those with multiple myeloma was less favorable, although hyperviscosity was rapidly and effectively decreased by the plasmapheresis. The treatment improved the conditions of almost all patients with neurological diseases. Discussion: According to these findings plasmapheresis treatment, introduced by proper indications, effectively improves the outcomes of several diseases. Early diagnosis and immediate introduction of the plasmapheresis are very important – in conjunction with the appropriate therapy of the underlying diseases. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 1110–1119.

Functional energetics of CD4+-cellular immunity in monoclonal antibody-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in autoimmune disorders

BACKGROUND

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is an opportunistic central nervous system- (CNS-) infection that typically occurs in a subset of immunocompromised individuals. An increasing incidence of PML has recently been reported in patients receiving monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, particularly those treated with natalizumab, efalizumab and rituximab. Intracellular CD4(+)-ATP-concentration (iATP) functionally reflects cellular immunocompetence and inversely correlates with risk of infections during immunosuppressive therapy. We investigated whether iATP may assist in individualized risk stratification for opportunistic infections during mAb-treatment.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

iATP in PHA-stimulated, immunoselected CD4(+)-cells was analyzed using an FDA-approved assay. iATP of mAb-associated PML (natalizumab (n = 8), rituximab (n = 2), efalizumab (n = 1)), or other cases of opportunistic CNS-infections (HIV-associated PML (n = 2), spontaneous PML, PML in a psoriasis patient under fumaric acids, natalizumab-associated herpes simplex encephalitis (n = 1 each)) was reduced by 59% (194.5±29 ng/ml, mean±SEM) in comparison to healthy controls (HC, 479.9±19.8 ng/ml, p<0.0001). iATP in 14 of these 16 patients was at or below 3(rd) percentile of healthy controls, similar to HIV-patients (n = 18). In contrast, CD4(+)-cell numbers were reduced in only 7 of 15 patients, for whom cell counts were available. iATP correlated with mitochondrial transmembrane potential (ΔΨ(m)) (iATP/ΔΨ(m)-correlation:tau = 0.49, p = 0.03). Whereas mean iATP of cross-sectionally analysed natalizumab-treated patients was unaltered (448.7±12 ng/ml, n = 150), iATP was moderately decreased (316.2±26.1 ng/ml, p = 0.04) in patients (n = 7) who had been treated already during the pivotal phase III trials and had received natalizumab for more than 6 years. 2/92 (2%) patients with less than 24 months natalizumab treatment revealed very low iATP at or below the 3(rd) percentile of HC, whereas 10/58 (17%) of the patients treated for more than 24 months had such low iATP-concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that bioenergetic parameters such as iATP may assist in risk stratification under mAb-immunotherapy of autoimmune disorders.

Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulins: mechanism of action in immune-mediated neuropathies

Immune-mediated neuropathies are a heterogeneous group of peripheral nerve disorders, which are classified by time course, clinical pattern, affected nerves and pathological features. Plasma exchange (PE) and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are mainstays in the treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies. Of all treatments currently used, IVIg has probably the widest application range in immune-mediated neuropathies and efficacy has been well documented in several randomized controlled trials for Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Beneficial effects of IVIg have also been proven for multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Likewise, PE is an established treatment for GBS and CIDP, whereas it is considered to be ineffective in MMN. Different mechanisms of action are sought to be responsible for the immunemodulatory effect of PE and IVIg in autoimmune disorders. Some of those might be important for immune-mediated neuropathies, while others are probably negligible. The aim of this review is to summarize the recent advances in elucidating disease-specific mechanisms of actions of PE and IVIg in the treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies.

Pathophysiological actions of neuropathy-related anti-ganglioside antibodies at the neuromuscular junction

The outer leaflet of neuronal membranes is highly enriched in gangliosides. Therefore, specific neuronal roles have been attributed to this family of sialylated glycosphingolipids, e.g. in modulation of ion channels and transporters, neuronal interaction and recognition, temperature adaptation, Ca(2+) homeostasis, axonal growth, (para)node of Ranvier stability and synaptic transmission. Recent developmental, ageing and injury studies on transgenic mice lacking subsets of gangliosides indicate that gangliosides are involved in maintenance rather than development of the nervous system and that ganglioside family members are able to act in a mutually compensatory manner. Besides having physiological functions, gangliosides are the likely antigenic targets of autoantibodies present in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a group of neuropathies with clinical symptoms of motor- and/or sensory peripheral nerve dysfunction. Antibody binding to peripheral nerves is thought to either interfere with ganglioside function or activate complement, causing axonal damage and thereby disturbed action potential conduction. The presynaptic motor nerve terminal at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) may be a prominent target because it is highly enriched in gangliosides and lies outside the blood-nerve barrier, allowing antibody access. The ensuing neuromuscular synaptopathy might contribute to the muscle weakness in GBS patients. Several groups, including our own, have studied the effects of anti-ganglioside antibodies in ex vivo and in vivo experimental settings at mouse NMJs. Here, after providing a background overview on ganglioside synthesis, localization and physiology, we will review those studies, which clearly show that anti-ganglioside antibodies are capable of binding to NMJs and thereby can exert a variety of pathophysiological effects. Furthermore, we will discuss the human clinical electrophysiological and histological evidence produced so far of the existence of a neuromuscular synaptopathy contributing to muscle weakness in GBS patients.

Natalizumab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Natalizumab reduced the rate of clinical relapse at one year by 68% and the risk of sustained progression of disability by 42-54% over 2 years in its pivotal phase III trial (AFFIRM) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Natalizumab is generally well tolerated, but due to rare and potentially fatal side-effects, it was approved with a restricted-distribution format in 2006. Expert statements and the European Medical Agency recommend the use of natalizumab after failure of first-line disease-modifying therapies in patients with relapsing forms of MS. As part of the risk management plan, worldwide extensive safety programmes aim to provide more data on natalizumab safety in clinical practice. At the end of September 2008, 48 000 patients have received natalizumab and 18000 patients are on treatment for at least 1 year. The assessment of risk and benefit is still ongoing.

Starch and albumin mixture as replacement fluid in therapeutic plasma exchange is safe and effective

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an effective treatment in Myasthenia gravis (MG) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and 5% human albumin is the replacement fluid of choice; however, it is expensive. More recently, it has been suggested that starch is a safe and cheaper choice to human albumin.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate our 5-year experience using 3% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and 5% human albumin mixture, as replacement fluid in TPE for these diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study carried out from January 2001 through September 2006. We included those patients with MG and GBS undergoing TPE. We analyzed clinical outcome (CO) and adverse events (AE) and our results were compared with a previous study which included similar patients undergoing TPE using just 5% human albumin.

RESULTS

Thirty-one procedures were carried out in 26 patients, a total of 147 TPE sessions. In the group of MG we had 57% complete responses (CR) and 86% overall response (OR) while in the group of GBS we had 40% CR and 60% OR. When we analyzed our CO with the previous study no statistical differences were found. Mean processed plasma volume (PPV) was 4.2 in MG and 5.5 in GBS. Twenty patients had AE, being hypotension and catheter dysfunction the most frequent ones, while tachycardia, hypertension and paresthesias were statistically more frequent in the HES/albumin group.

CONCLUSIONS

TPE with a mixture of 3% HES and 5% human albumin is as effective and safe as 5% human albumin alone for patients with these diseases.

Current and future standards in treatment of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a prototypic antibody-mediated neurological autoimmune disorder. Herein we characterize modern treatment algorithms that are adapted to disease severity, and introduce the current principles of escalating strategies for MG treatment. In non-thymoma patients younger than about 50 years of age and with generalized weakness, a complete early (but not urgent) thymectomy is considered as state-of-the-art on the basis of circumstantial evidence and expert opinion. In up to 10% of patients, MG is associated with a thymoma (i.e., is of paraneoplastic origin). The best surgical type of procedure is still under debate. Myasthenic crisis is best treated by plasmapheresis, mostly combined with immunoabsorption techniques. Intravenous immunoglobulins are a reasonable alternative, but a shortage in supplies and high prices limit their use. In generalized MG, a wide array of immunosuppressive treatments has been established, although not formally tested in double-blind, prospective trials. With regard to immunosuppression, azathioprine is still the standard baseline treatment, often combined with initial corticosteroids. In rare patients with an inborn hepatic enzyme deficiency of thiomethylation, azathioprine may be substituted by mycophenolate mofetil. Severe cases may benefit from combined immunosuppression with corticosteroids, cyclosporine A, and even with moderate doses of methotrexate or cyclophosphamide. Tacrolimus is under investigation. In refractory cases, immunoablation via high-dose cyclophosphamide followed by trophic factors such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has also been suggested. In the future we may face an increased use of novel, B-cell, or T-cell-directed monoclonal antibodies.

The clinical value of therapeutic plasma exchange in multifocal motor neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

Although there is evidence for a pathogenic role of humoral factors in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), plasma exchange (PE) is assumed to be an ineffective treatment. We set out to elucidate possible reasons for this apparent contradiction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of seven patients with MMN, who underwent 4 to 18 sessions of PE. Clinical response, electrophysiological parameter and anti-ganglioside antibody titers were reviewed.

RESULTS

Two patients, who had anti-ganglioside antibodies, exhibited transient clinical responses to PE, manifested by improved neurological function. Whereas electrophysiological parameters continued to worsen in all patients, anti-ganglioside antibody titers declined during PE, but increased after PE.

CONCLUSION

PE is of limited therapeutic value in patients with MMN, who do not respond to established treatment options. It may only be useful as an adjunctive treatment in a subset of patients. The transient decrease of anti-ganglioside-antibodies titers suggests that pathogenic humoral factors in MMN are only temporarily reduced. Further, PE treatment alone is insufficient to prevent axons from continuing degeneration, which may explain the failure of PE to substantially influence the disease course of patients with MMN.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with neurologic diseases: retrospective multicenter study

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is commonly used in many neurological disorders where an immune etiology was known or suspected. We report our experience with TPE performed for neuroimmunologic disorders at four university hospitals. The study was a retrospective review of the medical records of neurological patients (n=57) consecutively treated with TPE between April 2006 and May 2007. TPE indications in neurological diseases included Guillain-Barrè Syndrome (GBS) (n=41), myasthenia gravis (MG) (n=11), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (n=3), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) (n=1) and multiple sclerosis (MS) (n=1). Patient median age was 49; there was a predominance of males. Twenty-two patients had a history of other therapy including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), steroid, azothioprin, and pridostigmine prior to TPE. Another 35 patients had not received any treatment prior to TPE. All patients were classified according to the Hughes functional grading scores pre- and first day post-TPE for early clinical evaluation of patients. The TPE was carried out 1-1.5 times at the predicted plasma volume every other day. Two hundred and ninety-four procedures were performed on 57 patients. The median number of TPE sessions per patient was five, and the median processed plasma volume was 3075mL for each cycle. Although the pre-TPE median Hughes score of all patients was 4, it had decreased to grade 1 after TPE. While the pre-TPE median Hughes score for GBS and MG patients was 4, post-TPE scores were decreased to grade 1. Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference between post-TPE Hughes score for GBS patients with TPE as front line therapy and patients receiving IVIG as front line therapy (1 vs. 3.5; p=0.034). Although there was no post-TPE improvement in Hughes scores in patients with ADEM and CIDP, patients with MS had an improved Hughes score from 4 to 1. Mild and manageable complications such as hypotension and hypocalcemia were also observed. TPE may be preferable for controlling symptoms of neuroimmunological disorders in early stage of the disease, especially with GBS.

Perioperative care of patients with neuromuscular disease and dysfunction

A variety of different pathologies result in disease phenotypes that are summarized as neuromuscular diseases because they share commonalty in their clinical consequences for the patient: a progressive weakening of the skeletal muscles. Distinct caution and appropriate changes to the anesthetic plan are advised when care is provided during the perioperative period. The choice of anesthetic technique, anesthetic drugs, and neuromuscular blockade always depends on the type of neuromuscular disease and the surgical procedure planned. A clear diagnosis of the underlying disease and sufficient knowledge and understanding of the pathophysiology are of paramount importance to the practitioner and guide optimal perioperative management of affected patients.

Surgical critical care: from old boundaries to new frontiers

The surgical specialty of critical care has evolved into a field where the surgeon manages complex medical and surgical problems in critically ill patients. As a specialty, surgical critical care began when acutely ill surgical patients were placed in a designated area within a hospital to facilitate the delivery of medical care. As technology evolved to allow for development of increasingly intricate and sophisticated adjuncts to care, there has been recognition of the importance of physician availability and continuity of care as key factors in improving patient outcomes. Guidelines and protocols have been established to ensure quality improvement and are essential to licensing by state and national agencies. The modern ICU team provides continuous daily care to the patient in close communication with the primary operating physician. While the ultimate responsibility befalls the primary physician who performed the preoperative evaluation and operative procedure, the intensivist is expected to establish and enforce protocols, guidelines and patient care pathways for the critical care unit. It is difficult to imagine modern surgical ICU care without the surgical critical care specialist at the helm.

[Plasma exchange as a therapeutic option in neurological disorders]

Plasma exchange is a therapeutic procedure commonly used in various neurological disorders. Here we review its current role as a treatment option in diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system.

Myasthenia gravis: past, present, and future

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune syndrome caused by the failure of neuromuscular transmission, which results from the binding of autoantibodies to proteins involved in signaling at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). These proteins include the nicotinic AChR or, less frequently, a muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) involved in AChR clustering. Much is known about the mechanisms that maintain self tolerance and modulate anti-AChR Ab synthesis, AChR clustering, and AChR function as well as those that cause neuromuscular transmission failure upon Ab binding. This insight has led to the development of improved diagnostic methods and to the design of specific immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatments.