Discoid lupus keratitis

Ophthalmic manifestations in patients with collagen vascular disorders: a hospital-based retrospective observational study

AIM

To study frequency and characteristics of ocular manifestations in Indian patients with collagen vascular disorders.

METHODS

The medical records of 73 patients (Males: Females 16:57) aged between 22 and 78 years (mean ± SD = 43.5 ± 12.9 years) with collagen vascular diseases were analyzed retrospectively for demography, subtypes of collagen vascular disease, and findings of complete ophthalmic examination.

RESULTS

Lupus erythematosus (LE) in 39(53.4%, (SLE 18, DLE 21), systemic sclerosis in 27(37%), dermatomyositis in 5(6.8%), and primary Sjögren's syndrome in 2(2.7%) patients, respectively, were observed. Only 35(47.9%) patients had ocular manifestations. In LE keratoconjunctivitis sicca (n = 6), keratitis (n = 5), severe blepharitis (n = 3), retinopathy (n = 2), and optic neuritis in one patient, respectively, were major ocular manifestations. Major abnormalities occurring in systemic sclerosis included restricted eyelid mobility of variable severity (n = 8), eyelid telangiectasia (n = 5), keratoconjunctivitis sicca (n = 6), cataract (n = 5), shallow fornices (n = 4), conjunctival surface disease (n = 4), and uveitis, keratitis, episcleritis in one patient each, respectively. One patient with dermatomyositis had heliotrope rash. Two patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome had keratoconjunctivitis sicca.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows that LE frequently presented with keratoconjunctivitis sicca, retinopathy, and optic neuritis. Systemic sclerosis commonly develops eyelid immobility, blepharitis and telangiectasia, ocular surface disease and keratoconjunctivitis sicca, corneal abnormalities, and uveitis. A comprehensive ocular evaluation is imperative for early detection and management particularly of ocular surface disease, uveitis, and retinopathy to prevent potential sight-threatening complications. Limitations include retrospective study design and small number of patients for stratification.

Ocular manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus: a clinical review

Although the eye itself is regarded an ‘immune-privileged’ organ, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can affect every ocular structure, leading, if left untreated, to significant visual loss or even blindness. Since ocular inflammation in SLE can antedate the diagnosis of the systemic disease and cause significant morbidity, prompt diagnosis and treatment of the underlying systemic autoimmune disease is imperative.

Ocular Complications in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis of Reported Cases

Ocular complications associated with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) are less studied compared with those ones associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The main ocular sites involved in patients affected by discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) are eyelids followed by orbit and periorbit, the least being cornea. The most common complications are blepharitis usually affecting the lower lid and associated with some type of lid lesion such as plaque or erythematosus patches and madarosis. Few cases with LE profundus (LEP) and ocular complications are reported, but they are associated with orbital inflammatory syndrome and severe complications. The main treatment prescribed is hydroxychloroquine with a dose of 200 mg twice a day for 6 to 8 weeks. Corticosteroids are also used. Intervals between the correct diagnosis and the beginning of the ocular symptoms are commonly delayed. Ophthalmologist should be aware of the ocular manifestation of this autoimmune disease.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: An update

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is a chronic, autoimmune, multisystem disease that displays many diverse symptoms in which localized cutaneous LE (CLE) is on one end of the spectrum and severe systemic LE (SLE) on the other end. The underlying cause of LE is unknown but the etiology is thought to be multifactorial and polygenic. CLE is a disfiguring, chronic skin disease, with a significant impact on the patients’ everyday life. CLE are further divided into three main subsets: Acute CLE (ACLE), subacute CLE (SCLE) and chronic CLE (CCLE), where classic discoid LE (DLE) is the most common form. These subsets are defined by clinical symptoms, average duration of symptoms and histological and serological findings, although, the three subtypes can have overlapping clinical features. CLE patients display well-defined skin lesions, often in sun-exposed areas. The disease often has a chronic and relapsing course that can be induced or aggravated by UV light. It is important to confirm a CLE diagnosis histopathologically by a biopsy and in that there are several differential diagnoses and because CLE is a chronic disease in which regular follow-up is important and systemic treatment is sometimes indicated.

Blépharites du lupus érythémateux chronique

BACKGROUND

Discoid lupus erythematosus is a chronic skin disease frequently involving the face, scalp and ears. Palpebral lesions are rare. We report 4 cases of this uncommon localization. In one case, palpebral lesions were the sole manifestation of the discoid lupus erythematosus.

CASE REPORTS

Four patients aged between 26 and 45 Years had lesions of the lower eyelid as erythematous, infiltrated and scaly plaques. One patient, without diagnosis despite 2 skin biopsies of lesion, presented with a 2-Year history of blepharitis in the absence of any other cutaneous abnormality. In one case, chronic blepharitis has been present for 4 Years and associated with inflammatory arthralgia. Alopecia occurred 4 Years after the onset of blepharitis and led to the diagnosis of discoid lupus erythematosus. In 2 cases, blepharitis was associated with typical cutaneous lesions of discoid lupus erythematosus. Antimalaria drugs were very effective in 3 cases. In one patient the antimalaria drug failed, but thalidomide was effective.

DISCUSSION

The location of lesions on the eyelids in the absence of any other cutaneous abnormality is rare and can easily lead to the misdiagnosis of discoid lupus erythematosus. Most Authors mention a predilection of the lesions to the inferior portion of the eyelid, more specifically to the external third. The involvement of the eyelids with permanent scarring and severe eye impairment is explained by the long duration of the disease without diagnostic and appropriate treatment. Clinical examination is highly consistent with discoid lupus erythematosus: the lesions typically present as well-circumscribed, erythematous plaques with telangiectasia and scales and atrophy in long-standing disease. Antimalaria drugs are remarkably effective.

Discoid lupus erythematosus presenting as madarosis

PURPOSE

Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is an autoimmune disorder that usually affects the sun-exposed skin. Periocular involvement occurs uncommonly and may progress from eyelid erythema to scarring and madarosis.

METHODS

Observational case report.

RESULT

A case of DLE that presented with madarosis alone in the absence of preceding skin erythema and scarring.

CONCLUSION

Our case demonstrates that DLE may present with madarosis alone in the absence of a history of preceding erythema and scarring. Discoid lupus erythematosus should therefore be considered as a differential diagnosis in chronic blepharitis that persists despite usual medical management and eyelid hygiene. Biopsy should be considered in the presence of clinical features such as erythematous scale on the face and alopecia and sent for direct immunofluorescence staining.

Discoid lupus erythematosus and cicatrizing conjunctivitis: clinicopathologic study of two cases

BACKGROUND

Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) demonstrates both cutaneous and mucosal manifestations. Mucosal involvement is typically limited to the oral and anogenital mucosa. Conjunctival involvement in DLE is rare, especially in the absence of accompanying cutaneous disease.

OBJECTIVE

We describe the clinical and immunopathologic features of two cases of cicatrizing conjunctivitis due to DLE.

METHODS

In each patient, the clinical, immunopathologic, and serologic features were reviewed and the results recorded.

RESULTS

Both patients presented with cicatrizing conjunctivitis suggestive of mucous membrane pemphigoid. Patient 1 had no history of typical DLE skin lesions. Patient 2 had a history of cutaneous and oral DLE prior to presentation. Histologic, electron microscopic, and direct immunofluorescence examination confirmed the diagnosis DLE in both patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients presenting with cicatrizing conjunctivitis, DLE should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Performing appropriate investigations to distinguish conjunctival DLE from other autoimmune diseases with conjunctival involvement such as mucous membrane pemphigoid is critical in selecting an appropriate treatment regimen, in offering an accurate prognosis, and in monitoring for signs and symptoms of disease progression.

Discoid lupus erythematosus presenting as asymmetric posterior blepharitis

PURPOSE

To describe the ophthalmic findings of patients with discoid lupus erythematosus.

METHOD

We describe two women who originally were thought to have asymmetric posterior blepharitis; however, the involved eyelid also had an erythematous, scaly cutaneous lesion.

RESULT

In both patients, histology and immunofluorescence studies performed on cutaneous biopsy specimens established the diagnosis of discoid lupus erythematosus.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to diagnose discoid lupus of the eyelids because misdiagnosis can delay treatment and thus lead to deformities of the eyelid margin. Misdiagnosis can also lead to a complicated full-thickness eyelid biopsy and delay the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.