Intent to immunize among pediatric and family medicine residents

Status epilepticus outcomes among vaccinated and unvaccinated children: A population-based study

AIM

To determine the proportion of first status epilepticus (SE) cases that are vaccine-proximate (VP-) and compare clinical outcomes to non-vaccine-proximate (NVP-) cases.

METHODS

Birth records for 1,440,807 Australian children born in 1998-2012, were probabilistically linked to hospitalizations, deaths, and vaccination history available to 2013. First SE coded hospitalizations were categorized as VP-SE or NVP-SE; clinical severity and post-SE vaccination coverage were compared. SE rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 867 first SE cases (7.9 per 100,000 person-years), 31 (3.6%) were VP-SE; 16 followed dose-1 measles vaccine (1.2 SE per 100,000 doses). Compared with NVP-SE, VP-SE cases were younger (1.0 vs 2.6 years, P < 0.0001) and had longer hospitalizations (4 vs 3 days, P = 0.005). There was no difference in the proportion of VP-SE cases with a coinfection diagnosis compared to NVP-SE (25.8% vs 19.9%, P = 0.42). Controlling for age and history of hospitalization for a neurological condition, intensive care unit (ICU) admission had a stronger association with coinfection (aOR 2.52 (95%CI 1.78-3.57)) than having VP-SE (aOR 1.41 (0.66-3.01)). Groups had similar SE recurrence rates at 12-months (12.9% VP vs 16.9% NVP, P = 0.56) and reduced vaccine uptake following initial SE (from 93.5% to 56.3%).

CONCLUSION

Proportionally few first SE cases were VP-SE, with higher ICU admission rates mostly explained by younger age and higher coinfection rates. Vaccination plans are needed to improve vaccine uptake following SE.

Vaccine health beliefs and educational influences among pediatric residents

OBJECTIVE

A pilot study of pediatric residents to describe perceived benefits and effects of vaccines and educational influences on vaccine practice among pediatric residents.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty-seven residents, from two institutions in a region with relatively high vaccine hesitancy, responded to a survey conducted in 2014-2015.

RESULTS

Residents identified professional experiences with vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) and observing pediatricians as most impactful to their vaccine beliefs. Residents who had observed pediatric faculty agreeing to alternative or delayed vaccinations were more likely to believe this to be acceptable vaccine practice (70.1% vs. 21.1%, χ² = 17.778, p < 0.001). Most residents (68 [79.1%]) reported feeling confident in their ability to discuss vaccines.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatricians must be equipped with accurate vaccine health beliefs to impact parental vaccine hesitancy. This study identifies important gaps in medical education, with pediatric residents reporting limitations in their professional experience with VPDs and high rates of observing alternative vaccination practice.

Factors underlying inadequate parents' awareness regarding pediatrics immunization: findings of cross-sectional study in Mosul- Iraq

BACKGROUND

Since last 100 years, immunization rate is one of the best public health outcome and service indicators. However, the immunization system is still imperfect; there are many countries that still have unvaccinated children. Parental decisions regarding immunization are very important to improve immunization rate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between parental knowledge-practice (KP) regarding immunization with family and immunization providers' factors.

METHODS

This is a prospective cross-sectional study design. Immunization knowledge and practices among 528 Iraqi parents were evaluated through validated questionnaire. Familial data and immunization provider's characteristics were collected from parents through interview.

RESULTS

More than half of respondents/study population (66.1%) have adequate knowledge- practice scores. Significant associations were noted for knowledge-practice groups with father's education level, mother's education level, mother's age at delivery, number of preschool children, parents gender, family income, provider types, and birth place (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Immunization campaigns and awareness are required to improve parents' knowledge and practice regarding immunization. The study results reinforce recommendations for use of educational programmes to improve the immunization knowledge and practice.

Acceptance and timeliness of standard vaccination in children with chronic neurological deficits in north-western Switzerland

There are no special recommendations for basic vaccinations in patients with chronic neurological deficits distinct from the nationwide advocated schedule in Switzerland. Reports describing adverse neurological events possibly related to vaccinations have attracted public attention. It is unclear if patients with chronic neurological deficits are more reluctantly vaccinated compared to healthy children. We therefore investigated the acceptance of vaccinations in such patients and healthy controls in a retrospective case-control study. At the University Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland we investigated 100 patients with chronic neurological deficits and 200 age-matched healthy controls regarding the issue of vaccination rates and ages. The total number of administered vaccinations against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), mumps, measles, rubella and hepatitis B were significantly lower in patients compared to healthy controls ( P < 0.01 for each of the respective vaccines). Patients had an increased risk to receive the third pertussis, diphtheria, and tetanus vaccinations (relative risks (RR) for late vaccination 1.53, 1.53, and 1.54 respectively, P < 0.01 for all comparisons), the second (RR = 1.60, P < 0.05) and third Hib vaccinations (RR = 1.52, P < 0.05), and the third polio vaccination (RR = 1.43, P < 0.05) later than controls.

CONCLUSION

Children with chronic neurological deficits received fewer vaccinations than healthy controls. In addition, patients received vaccinations later than healthy children. Hence, it may be assumed that children with chronic neurological deficits are at an increased risk to acquire preventable infections. Therefore, vaccination should be promoted as part of the consultation during a routine appointment with the specialist.

Rubella immunoglobulin G antibody titers in children with seizures

The third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey was utilized to assess serum rubella immunoglobulin G antibody titers in a representative sample of American children. Antibody titers were significantly lower in children with a history of seizures and in children treated for seizures compared to unaffected children, after adjustment for age, ethnicity, residence, and region (P=0.022 and 0.029, respectively). Children with the lowest antibody titers were non-Hispanic whites who had a history of seizures. The percentage of US adolescents and young adults with a history of seizures that may have insufficient immunity to rubella is estimated to be 14-50%.

Provider-staff discrepancies in reported immunization knowledge and practices

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to compare immunization-relevant knowledge, certainty about knowledge, self-efficacy, vested interest, and reported practices of providers and clinical staff in the same clinics.

METHODS

A valid and reliable instrument measuring the aforementioned issues was developed and administered to a sample of 50 providers and 60 members of the clinical staff.

RESULTS

Providers were significantly more knowledgeable than staff (P < 0.001); however, they were not more certain about their knowledge (P = 0.52) nor were they more confident in their capability to properly immunize all children in their practice (P = 0.10). Providers reported lower vested interest in immunizations than clinical staff (P < 0.05). Both groups were equally likely to immunize a child with a cold. Providers were less likely to defer needed immunizations for a 15-month-old child, and they were more likely to administer multiple injections to an 18-month-old (both P < 0.05). Providers were more likely than staff to immunize during acute and chronic illness visits (both P < 0.001), and both groups were equally likely to immunize during preventive visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies in reported immunization practices between providers and staff may be a barrier to full immunization.

Immunization recall: effectiveness and barriers to success in an urban teaching clinic

OBJECTIVE

To examine effectiveness of immunization recall in an urban pediatric teaching clinic and to identify barriers to recall effectiveness.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial. Children aged 5 to 17 months who were not up to date (UTD) with recommended immunizations were identified and assigned to intervention (n = 294) or control groups (n = 309). The intervention consisted of a mailed postcard and up to 4 telephone calls. Two months after intervention, UTD status, visit, and probable missed opportunity rates were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the intervention group, 30% could not be reached. In 12-month-old children in the intervention group compared with those in the control group, there was a trend toward higher UTD rates (51% vs 39%, P =.07) and a higher proportion of UTD children receiving immunizations as opposed to getting more complete documentation (25% vs 10%, P =.005). Similar differences between intervention and control children were not seen in the 7-month and 19-month age categories. More children in the intervention group had a health maintenance visit (17% vs 11%, P =.03). Of children in the intervention group who were seen when not UTD, 17 of 24 (71%) of those seen for an illness visit and 5 of 24 (21%) of those seen for health maintenance probably had missed opportunities to be immunized.

CONCLUSIONS

Recall efforts were partially successful but were undermined by inability to reach the clinic population, poor documentation of immunizations, and missed opportunities.

Mothers' perceptions of childhood immunizations in First Nations communities of the Sioux Lookout Zone

OBJECTIVE

Low uptake of childhood immunizations is a problem in many First Nations communities. This article describes the results of a study that examined mothers' perceptions of childhood immunizations and the factors that influence uptake.

METHOD

Person-centred interviews focussing on childhood immunizations and child health were conducted with 28 mothers of young children in two First Nations communities in the Sioux Lookout Zone. Content analysis was applied to the interview data and patterns and themes were developed.

RESULTS

Data analysis identified four key factors as negatively influencing immunization uptake: knowledge barriers, the influence of others, vaccine barriers, and missed opportunities.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research with Elders and community members along with culturally sensitive education initiatives are required to address low immunization uptake. Changes in health professionals' behaviours may serve to reduce missed opportunities.

Immunizing preschool children: beliefs and practices of pediatric residents

Immunization practices and knowledge of vaccine contraindications among pediatric residents were assessed at five pediatric training facilities by surveying 227 pediatric residents. Residents administer vaccines even in the presence of an afebrile minor illness. They are less likely to vaccinate if a fever (< 102 degrees F) is present. Only 57% of residents report administering vaccines at the 15-month well-child checks. Many residents had difficulty recognizing true and false contraindications, though third-year residents did better than first-year residents. Failure during residency to utilize 15-month well visits and ill visits in the presence of a fever and the lack of knowledge of true and false vaccine contraindications may be causes of missed opportunities to vaccinate among residents. Immunization practices resulting in missed opportunities to vaccinate seen during during residency may influence later immunization practices.