Effect of Corticosteroid-Sparing Treatment With Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Methotrexate on Inflammation in Patients With Uveitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Multifunctional nanogel loaded with cerium oxide nanozyme and CX3CL1 protein: Targeted immunomodulation and retinal protection in uveitis rat model

Effectively addressing retinal issues represents a pivotal aspect of blindness-related diseases. Novel approaches involving reducing inflammation and rebalancing the immune response are paramount in the treatment of these conditions. This study delves into the potential of a nanogel system comprising polyethylenimine-benzene boric acid-hyaluronic acid (PEI-PBA-HA). We have evaluated the collaborative impact of cerium oxide nanozyme and chemokine CX3CL1 protein for targeted immunomodulation and retinal protection in uveitis models. Our nanogel system specifically targets the posterior segment of the eyes. The synergistic effect in this area reduces oxidative stress and hampers the activation of microglia, thereby alleviating the pathological immune microenvironment. This multifaceted drug delivery system disrupts the cycle of oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune response, suppressing initial immune cells and limiting local retinal structural damage induced by excessive immune reactions. Our research sheds light on interactions within retinal target cells, providing a promising avenue for the development of efficient and innovative drug delivery platforms.

Long-term outcomes of noninfectious uveitis treated with systemic immunomodulatory therapy: a retrospective case series

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU) who are treated with systemic immunomodulatory therapy (IMT).

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

All consecutive cases of adults with NIU under the care of 5 uveitis subspecialty tertiary care clinics between 2010 to 2021 were included.

METHODS

Patient outcomes were assessed at initial presentation and at the latest available follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 418 NIU patients receiving IMT therapy with a median age of 46.0 years and 59.3% female were identified. Each patient required an average of 1.4 agents until achieving an optimal response. Following initial treatment with prednisone, patients were most commonly initiated on methotrexate. The top 3 treatments with the highest proportion of optimal treatment response when taken alone or in combination with other agents were infliximab (79.3%), cyclosporine (75%), and adalimumab (70%). The strongest predictors for requiring a greater number of IMTs trialed were younger age, panuveitis, and a chronic or recurrent disease course. Multivariable linear regression analysis suggested that baseline visual acuity at diagnosis was the only significant predictor of final visual acuity (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

NIU patients on IMT are often trialed on multiple therapeutic agents before achieving an optimal treatment response. Visual acuity at diagnosis is a predictor of final visual outcomes, whereas chronic or recurrent disease course, younger age, and panuveitis are predictors of requiring multiagent treatment regimens.

Immunomodulatory Treatment Versus Systemic Steroids in Inflammatory Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Idiopathic Multifocal Choroiditis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) on visual and treatment outcomes of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (iCNV) in patients affected by multifocal choroiditis (MFC), and to compare them to patients treated with steroids as needed.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective matched cohort study.

METHODS

Patients affected by MFC with iCNV were divided into a IMT group and a "steroids as needed" group and matched according to the time between diagnosis and beginning of systemic treatment. Visual acuity (VA), number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections, and number of iCNV reactivations during 2 years of follow-up after treatment initiation were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 66 eyes of 58 patients were included, equally divided into the 2 groups. Patients in the IMT group had a lower relative risk (RR) of iCNV reactivation (0.64, P = .04) and of anti-VEGF intravitreal injection retreatment (0.59, P = .02). Relapses of MFC-related inflammation were independently associated with a higher RRs of iCNV reactivation (1.22, P = .003). Final VA was higher in the IMT compared to the steroids as needed group (mean [SD], 69.1 [15.1] vs 77.1 [8.9] letters, P = .01), and IMT was associated with greater VA gains over time (+2.5 letters per year, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

IMT was associated with better visual and treatment outcomes in MFC complicated by iCNV compared to steroids as needed. The better outcomes of the IMT group and the association between MFC-related inflammation and iCNV reactivations highlight the need for tighter control of inflammation to prevent iCNV relapses and visual loss.

Interobserver Reliability and Sensitivity to Change of a Composite Ocular Inflammatory Activity Index: UVEDAI©

INTRODUCTION

This was a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal, observational study involving eight Spanish tertiary hospitals to determine the interobserver reliability of an uveitis disease activity index, (UVEDAI) and assess its sensitivity to change in patients with receiving pharmacologic treatment.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with active noninfectious uveitis were included. A complete baseline assessment was performed by two ophthalmologists who determined ocular inflammatory activity using the UVEDAI index independently of each other. The principal ophthalmologist made a new visit at 4 weeks to determine the change in inflammatory activity. The interobserver reliability analysis was performed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with the values of the variables and the UVEDAI obtained by both ophthalmologists in the more active eye at the baseline visit. Sensitivity to change in the UVEDAI index was assessed at 4 weeks from the start of pharmacologic treatment by determining the clinically relevant change, defined as a change in UVEDAI of ≥ 0.8 points over baseline. The mean change between both measures was compared using the repeated-measures t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients were included. In the interobserver reliability analysis, the ICC for the UVEDAI value was 0.9, and, when compared with the mean UVEDAI values obtained by the ophthalmologists, no statistically significant differences were found (p value > 0.05). As for the sensitivity to change in UVEDAI, statistically significant differences (p value = 0.00) were found for the mean values of the index compared with baseline. In all cases, the index value decreased by > 1 point at the 4-week visit.

CONCLUSIONS

The interobserver reliability of the UVEDAI was high in the total sample. Furthermore, the index was sensitive in determining the change in inflammatory activity after treatment. We believe that UVEDAI is a disease activity index that enables objective comparison of results in clinical practice and trials.

Clinical Features and Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Ocular Tuberculosis from the Netherlands and Indonesia: The OculaR TB in Low versus High Endemic Countries (ORTEC) Study

PURPOSE

To describe and compare clinical features, treatment approaches, and treatment outcomes of ocular tuberculosis (OTB) patients in the Netherlands, a low tuberculosis (TB)-endemic country, and Indonesia, a high TB-endemic country. We also aimed to identify predictors of treatment outcomes.

METHODS

A medical chart review of 339 OTB patients (n = 93 from the Netherlands and n = 246 from Indonesia) was performed. The primary outcome was response to treatment, whether with or without anti-tubercular treatment, after six months of treatment initiation (good versus poor responders).

RESULTS

Indonesian OTB patients displayed a higher prevalence of chest radiograph findings indicative of TB infection (p < 0.001) and concurrent active systemic TB (p = 0.011). Indonesian cohort exhibited a more acute and severe disease profile, including uveitis duration ≤ 3 months (p < 0.001), blindness (p < 0.001), anterior chamber (AC) cells ≥ 2+ (p < 0.001), and posterior synechiae (p < 0.001). Overall proportions of good responders to treatment were 67.6% in the Netherlands and 71.5% in Indonesia. Presence of AC cell ≥ 2+ (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.12, 95% CI: 1.09-4.14), choroidal lesions other than serpiginous-like choroiditis (SLC) or tuberculoma (aOR: 4.47, 95% CI: 1.18-16.90), and retinal vasculitis (aOR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.10-4.90) at baseline were predictors for poor response to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a more severe initial clinical presentation in the Indonesian cohort, the overall treatment outcomes of OTB was comparable in both cohorts. Three baseline clinical features were identified as predictors of treatment outcomes.

Outcomes of Intravenous Tocilizumab Treatment for Refractory Pars Planitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of intravenous (IV) tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with pars planitis refractory to conventional immunomodulatory therapy and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha agents.

METHODS

Medical records of eight patients diagnosed with pars planitis and treated with monthly 4 or 8 mg/kg IV TCZ were reviewed. The primary objective was to initiate and sustain remission continuously for three consecutive months. Secondary outcome measures were changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), degree of anterior chamber (AC) inflammation, vitreous cell, vitreous haze, presence of vitreous or pars plana exudates, peripheral vasculitis, fluorescein angiography (FA) score and central subfieldthickness (CST) on macular optical coherence tomography (OCT).

RESULTS

Fourteen eyes of eight patients were treated with IV TCZ. Seven patients were women. The average age was 31.35 ± 16.42 years. In 6 (75%) out of 8 patients, IV TCZ, either as monotherapy or in combination with another conventional immunomodulatory agent, induced and sustained remission. The average FA score reduced from 11.15 ± 3.52 at the baseline visit to 6.50 ± 2.12 at the one-year follow-up visit (p-value < 0.05). None of the patients experienced any side effects of IV TCZ.

CONCLUSION

IV Tocilizumab (TCZ) may represent an effective and safe treatment option for patients diagnosed with pars planitis resistant to conventional immunomodulatory therapy and anti-TNF alpha agents.

Optimizing Behçet Uveitis Management: A Review of Personalized Immunosuppressive Strategies

Behçet uveitis poses significant management challenges, owing to its intricate pathogenesis and the severe prognosis it harbors, frequently culminating in irreversible visual impairment and an elevated risk of blindness. This review synthesizes contemporary insights into personalized immunosuppressive strategies for Behçet uveitis, emphasizing the necessity for a customized approach in recognition of the disease's heterogeneity and the variable responsiveness to treatment. This discourse elaborates on the application, efficacy, and safety profiles of traditional immunosuppressants, highlighting a paradigm shift toward integrative combination therapies aimed at diminishing reliance on glucocorticoids and mitigating their associated adverse effects. This thorough evaluation seeks to enlighten clinical practices and spearhead future investigations aimed at refining the management of Behçet uveitis, championing a personalized, multidisciplinary strategy to amplify therapeutic efficacy and enhance patient quality of life.

Insights into the diagnosis and management of sarcoid uveitis: A review

Sarcoidosis is a leading cause of non-infectious uveitis that commonly affects middle-aged individuals and has a female preponderance. The disease demonstrates age, sex and ethnic differences in clinical manifestations. A diagnosis of sarcoidosis is made based on a compatible clinical presentation, supporting investigations and histologic evidence of non-caseating granulomas, although biopsy is not always possible. Multimodal imaging with widefield fundus photography, optical coherence tomography and angiography can help in the diagnosis of sarcoid uveitis and in the monitoring of treatment response. Corticosteroid remains the mainstay of treatment; chronic inflammation requires steroid-sparing immunosuppression. Features on multimodal imaging such as vascular leakage may provide prognostic indicators of outcome. Female gender, prolonged and severe uveitis, and posterior involving uveitis are associated with poorer visual outcomes.

Association between Quality of Life and Visual Acuity in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Patients with Uveitis Taking Antimetabolites

PURPOSE

To evaluate how changes in visual acuity are associated with changes in quality of life (QoL) among patients with non-infectious uveitis taking antimetabolites.

METHODS

This secondary analysis of the multicenter First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) Uveitis Trial involves 216 participants randomized to methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. Vision-related (NEI-VFQ and IND-VFQ) and health-related (PCS and MCS SF-36v2) QoL and visual acuity were measured at baseline and 6-month primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Visual acuity was significantly associated and correlated with all QoL measures (Spearman correlation coefficients = 0.5, 0.5, 0.3, and 0.4 for NEI-VFQ, IND-VFQ, SF-36v2 MCS and PCS, respectively). All observed changes in QoL met or exceeded the minimal clinically important difference definition on each scale. Treatment group was not significantly associated with any QoL measure.

CONCLUSION

By adding insight beyond visual acuity, QoL provides a more comprehensive picture of the patient experience during uveitis treatment.Abbreviations and Acronyms: QoL = quality of life; VR-QoL = vision-related quality of life; HR-QoL = health-related quality of life; FAST = First-line Antimetabolites as Corticosteroid Sparing Treatment; NEI-VFQ = National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire; IND-VFQ = Indian Visual Functioning Questionnaire; SF-36v2 = Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Survey; PCS = physical component score; MCS = mental component score; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; MCID = minimal clinically important difference.

Recent advances in uveitis therapy: focus on selected phase 2 and 3 clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Uveitis is a heterogeneous group of ocular conditions characterized by inflammation of the uveal tract. It is a leading cause of blindness in developed countries and exerts significant psychological, social, and economic impact on both patients and the larger society. While there are numerous pharmacotherapy options, posterior segment noninfectious uveitis remains a significant challenge to treat due to its severity, chronicity, and high recurrence rates.

AREAS COVERED

The index review highlights the unmet needs of uveitis pharmacotherapy and its research and the shortcomings of existing ocular and systemic therapeutic options for noninfectious uveitis. The more promising novel ocular drug delivery methods and therapeutic targets/drugs are discussed, and evidence from the clinical trials is evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

There has been incredible growth in the number of treatment options available to uveitis patients today, especially with the new generation of biologic drugs. Available evidence suggests that these newer options may be superior to conventional immunosuppressive therapies in terms of efficacy and side effect profiles. Further high-quality research and additional clinical trials will be needed to clarify their roles in the stepladder treatment approach of noninfectious uveitis.

Trends in Immunosuppressive Agent Use for Non-Infectious Uveitis by US Ophthalmologists in Medicare Beneficiaries and Association with Physician-Industry Interactions

PURPOSE

To report the trends of immunosuppressive drug use for non-infectious uveitis and explore their relationship with industry payments.

METHODS

A retrospective review of ophthalmologists reimbursed by Medicare for the administration of adalimumab (ADA), repository corticotropin (RCI), methotrexate (MTX), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) between 2014 and 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 316 ophthalmologists were reimbursed by Medicare for 1567 ADA, 465 RCI, 1752 MTX, and 12 333 MMF administrations. The number and dollar amount of industry payments were positively associated with ADA and RCI use (P < 0.001). From 2014 to 2018, there was a positive trend in the proportion of ADA (P = 0.007) and RCI (P = 0.007) used and negative trend in the proportion of MMF (P = 0.025) used.

CONCLUSION

From 2014 to 2018, the use of ADA and RCI increased while MMF decreased and MTX remained stable. There was a positive association between ADA and RCI use and physician-industry interactions. A causal relationship is not determined.

SER recommendations for the treatment of uveitis

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence-based expert-consensus recommendations for the management of non-infectious, non-neoplastic, non-demyelinating disease associated uveitis.

METHODS

Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified, and reformulated into PICO format (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) by a panel of experts selected based on their experience in the field. A systematic review of the available evidence was conducted, and evidence was graded according to GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria. Subsequently, recommendations were developed.

RESULTS

Three PICO questions were constructed referring to uveitis anterior, non-anterior and complicated with macular edema. A total of 19 recommendations were formulated, based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we present the first official recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology for the treatment of non-infectious and non-demyelinating disease associated uveitis. They can be directly applied to the Spanish healthcare system as a tool for assistance and therapeutic homogenisation.

Mycophenolate mofetil may be an alternative for maintenance therapy of Behçet syndrome uveitis: a single-center retrospective analysis

Experience with mycophenolate in uveitis due to Behçet syndrome (BS) is limited. Twelve patients with panuveitis or posterior uveitis who were started mycophenolate were included. Data on demographic characteristics, therapies, ocular attacks, and adverse events were extracted from patient charts. Seven patients with BS uveitis were prescribed mycophenolate for remission induction, of which 6 were refractory/intolerant to conventional immunosuppressives. Mycophenolate was combined with anti-TNFs in 3 patients, resulting in no further ocular attacks. Mycophenolate had to be stopped in the fourth patient due to adverse events. The remaining 3 patients continued to have ocular attacks and were switched to other agents without any drop in visual acuity. Among the 5 patients who were prescribed mycophenolate for maintenance, 2 were relapse free, but 3 experienced ocular attacks. One patient had an exacerbation of mucocutaneous lesions, and 2 experienced adverse events. Mycophenolate monotherapy may not be adequate for remission induction of refractory BS uveitis, but it can be a safe and effective alternative when combined with a biologic agent. It may also be an option for maintenance therapy.

Novel approach to Behçet's disease in the era of biologic agents

PURPOSE

This review aims to provide better understanding of modern modalities to investigate ocular symptoms of Behçet's disease in order to achieve appropriate management protocols and reduce irreversible visual loss.

RELEVANT FINDINGS

Current methods of diagnosing intraocular involvement in Behçet's disease gives clue to early diagnosis. In addition to standard ocular examination and fluorescein angiography, new noninvasive methods include ocular coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography provide early detection of macular and retinal involvement that can be treated early to improve the prognosis.

SUMMARY

Over the last decade, new multimodal imagings are becoming more accessible; therefore, rapid diagnosis can be made. In addition to newer approved biologic agents, ocular Behçet's disease is seen to be in better controlled with fewer complications.

Risk factors, clinical features and treatment of Behçet's disease uveitis

Behçet's disease is a systemic vasculitis frequently associated with intraocular inflammation. Recent findings identified independent clinical clusters in Behçet's disease, each involving distinct combinations of affected organs. Ocular Behçet's disease, mainly manifested as uveitis, is characterized as an independent cluster with a low likelihood of association with other system involvements, such as intestinal, cardiovascular, or central nervous system. A prevailing theory suggests that the pathogenesis of the disease is multifactorial, where a variety of genetic and infectious agents may interact with each other to cause the disease. Among sporadic cases, the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, including HLA-B51, HLA-A26, HLA-B15, and HLA-B5701, have been found to be a key component conferring genetic susceptibility. Outside the HLA region, a set of susceptibility variants are identified, closely related to interleukin (IL)-23/IL-17 pathway, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling, and pattern recognition receptor systems. Microbial infections, such as Streptococcus sanguinis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Herpes simplex virus (HSV), are linked to play the triggering of disease in immunogenetically predisposed individuals. Clinically, due to the notable relapsing-remitting course of ocular Behçet's disease, the prevention of recurrent attack would be the primary treatment goal. Combination of corticosteroids and immunomodulatory drugs, such as anti-TNF agents, interferon, and conventional immunosuppressants (e.g. cyclosporine, azathioprine), have been the mainstream regimen for the disease. Future research may focus on comparing the effectiveness of immunomodulatory drugs and identifying the most suitable subgroups for a specific drug on the basis of the knowledge of the molecular heterogeneity of the disease.

Response to Acthar Gel in sarcoidosis uveitis: A prospective open label study

PURPOSE

To investigate the response to Acthar Gel® in patients with moderate to severe sarcoidosis uveitis.

METHODS

This is a prospective open-label study that enrolled patients with moderate to severe sarcoidosis uveitis to receive 80 units daily of Acthar Gel for ten days followed by maintenance treatment with 80 units twice weekly. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients meeting at least one of the following variables 1) improved visual acuity, 2) resolution of intraocular inflammation, 3) ability to taper ocular or oral steroids by at least 50% or 4) reduction of cystoid macular edema, with no worsening of any single measure and no need for additional sarcoidosis therapies at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of nine patients were enrolled in the study. Four patients completed the full 24-week course of Acthar Gel, and three of these met the primary endpoint. Among the five patients who did not complete the 24-week course of treatment, four discontinued the treatment due to worsening ocular inflammation. One patient discontinued treatment due to severe adverse effects. The most common adverse effects were fluid retention (77%), insomnia (44%), hypertension (44%) and hyperglycemia (44%).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a clinical response to Acthar Gel in some patients with moderate to severe sarcoidosis uveitis, but a substantial proportion either failed to respond or did not tolerate the therapy. These observations may serve as preliminary data for controlled trials of Acthar Gel, but they do not support its role prior to failure of other agents.

The role of a multicentre data repository in ocular inflammation: The Ocular Autoimmune Systemic Inflammatory Infectious Study (OASIS)

In the current literature, clinical registry cohorts related to ocular inflammation are few and far between, and there are none involving multi-continental international data. Many existing registries comprise administrative databases, data related to specific uveitic diseases, or are designed to address a particular clinical problem. The existing data, although useful and serving their intended purposes, are segmented and may not be sufficiently robust to design prognostication tools or draw epidemiological conclusions in the field of uveitis and ocular inflammation. To solve this, we have developed the Ocular Autoimmune Systemic Inflammatory Infectious Study (OASIS) Clinical Registry. OASIS collects prospective and retrospective data on patients with all types of ocular inflammatory conditions from centers all around the world. It is a primarily web-based platform with alternative offline modes of access. A comprehensive set of clinical data ranging from demographics, past medical history, clinical presentation, working diagnosis to visual outcomes are collected over a range of time points. Additionally, clinical images such as optical coherence tomography, fundus fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography studies may be uploaded. Through the capturing of diverse, well-structured, and clinically meaningful data in a simplified and consistent fashion, OASIS will deliver a comprehensive and well organized data set ripe for data analysis. The applications of the registry are numerous, and include performing epidemiological analysis, monitoring drug side effects, and studying treatment safety efficacy. Furthermore, the data compiled in OASIS will be used to develop new classification and diagnostic systems, as well as treatment and prognostication guidelines for uveitis.

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like Syndrome Induced by Checkpoint Inhibitor Cemiplimab

Checkpoint inhibition targeting programmed cell-death protein 1 has demonstrated efficacy for a wide range of indications including cutaneous malignancy. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including infrequent but visually impactful ocular irAEs, require careful consideration of treatment options, including medication withdrawal, local corticosteroids, or rarely immunomodulation. This case presents a 53-year-old woman who developed uveitis and mucous membrane ulcers after treatment for numerous cutaneous neoplasms, primarily squamous cell carcinoma, with the programmed cell-death protein 1 inhibitor cemiplimab. Ophthalmic examination revealed diffuse choroidal depigmentation consistent with a Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like syndrome. Topical and periocular steroids were used to treat the intraocular inflammation, and cemiplimab was discontinued. Because of ongoing severe uveitis, systemic corticosteroids and corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppression were initiated. Specifically, azathioprine and methotrexate were introduced, but each was stopped due to side effects, prompting the initiation of adalimumab (ADA) treatment. While ADA controlled intraocular inflammation, the squamous cell carcinomas were noted to progress, resulting in the discontinuation of ADA. However, a uveitis recurrence was observed. After a discussion of risks and benefits of biologic immunosuppressive therapy, including the risk of vision loss, ADA was restarted with successful disease quiescence at a 16-month follow-up. The cutaneous neoplasms were managed with topical and intralesional therapies, such as 5-fluorouracil. Recent dermatologic examinations suggested no new cutaneous lesions. This scenario presents the effective use of ADA in an ocular irAE that balances the management of sight-threatening ocular inflammation with the risk of promoting recurrent or de novo neoplastic disease.

A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials in Uveitis: Lessons Learned

PURPOSE

Clinical trials in uveitis have led to the expansion of therapeutic options for the management of non-infectious uveitis. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate why some clinical trials have yielded successful results and regulatory approval of new therapies, and some have not.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the Pubmed/MEDLINE database and clinicaltrials.gov was performed from 2006 to 2021, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Phase III clinical trials of systemic and local therapies in adults with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis were included.

RESULTS

A total of 79 clinical trials were collected from ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed/MEDLINE database search. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 clinical trials were included.

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes the study design, outcome measures, and results of recent phase III trials in non-infectious uveitis, in the interest of understanding limitations and rethinking new methods of defining endpoints in clinical trial design.

Bibliometric analysis of the uveitis literature and research trends over the past two decades

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the publication patterns and present a current view of the field of uveitis using a bibliometric analysis.

DESIGN

Bibliometric analysis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A comprehensive search of three databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane was conducted from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2022. Search results from all three databases were subjected to analysis by Bibliometrix, an R programme that analyses large literature dataset with statistical and mathematical models. Visualisation of collaboration networks and relevance between countries was presented with VOSviewer.

RESULTS

A total of 26 296 articles were included in the analysis. The field of uveitis has undergone a significant exponential growth since 2000, with an average growth rate of 4.14%. The most substantial annual growth was between the years 2021 and 2022 (36%). According to the corresponding author's countries, the three most productive countries were Turkey (3288, 12.6%), the USA (3136, 12%) and Japan (1981, 7.6%). The USA (243, 31.4%), England (117, 15%) and Germany (62, 8%) are the top three countries that contributed to clinical trials. The average international collaboration of all countries was 2.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Uveitis literature has undergone significant growth in the past two decades. The demographic factors of publishing countries lead to their various productivity and types of these uveitis studies, which is closely associated with the countries' scientific research resources and patient populations.

TACROLIMUS FOR IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH NONINFECTIOUS INTERMEDIATE, POSTERIOR, OR PANUVEITIDES

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of tacrolimus in patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis needing a two-immunosuppressive-agent regimen.

METHODS

Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Two tertiary-care uveitis practices at academic medical centers. Patient population: Thirty-two patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitides in whom single-agent immunosuppression was inadequate to effect successful corticosteroid sparing. Intervention: tacrolimus, added as the second immunosuppressive agent. Main outcome measure: successful corticosteroid sparing, defined as inactive uveitis at a dose of prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day.

RESULTS

Active uveitis was present in 65.6% of patients at initiation of tacrolimus, and the median time to inactive uveitis was 1.5 months (95% confidence interval 1.2, 4.08). The median time to successful corticosteroid sparing was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval 1.41, 6.67), and by 6 months of follow-up successful corticosteroid sparing was achieved in 75% of patients. Tacrolimus was discontinued for side effects in five patients, three for tremor, and two for hyperglycemia. All side effects were reversible with tacrolimus discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus seems to have efficacy as a second immunosuppressive agent in two-immunosuppressive drug regimens, when a single agent does not permit successful corticosteroid sparing. Side effects were reversible with tacrolimus discontinuation.

A randomized non-inferiority trial of therapeutic strategy with immunosuppressants versus biologics for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease

Biologics are increasingly used to treat Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease, but head-to-head comparisons with conventional immunosuppressants are lacking. Here in this randomized trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100043061), we assigned 110 patients (27 early-phase and 83 late-phase) to cyclosporine-based immunosuppressant strategy (N = 56) or adalimumab-based biologic strategy (N = 54), each combined with a modified corticosteroid regimen. The primary outcome is change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity at week 26. The margin of non-inferiority for cyclosporine is -7 letters. The primary outcome is 11.2 letters (95% CI, 7.5 to 14.9) in the cyclosporine group and 6.3 letters (95% CI, 3.1 to 9.6) in the adalimumab group (difference, 4.9; 95% CI, 0.2 to 9.5; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). The between-group difference is -0.8 letters (95% CI, -6.1 to 4.5) in early-phase disease and 5.7 letters (95% CI, 0.2 to 11.2) in late-phase. Serious adverse events are reported less frequently in the cyclosporine group than in the adalimumab group (0.70 vs. 1.21 events per patient-year). Here, we report that combined with a non-standard corticosteroid regimen, cyclosporine-based immunosuppressant strategy is non-inferior to adalimumab-based biologic strategy by 26 weeks for visual improvement in a cohort of patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease, 75% of whom have a late-phase disease.

Perspectives on Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Management of Autoimmunity

Before becoming a cornerstone in the treatment of numerous immune-mediated diseases, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was first introduced as an immunosuppressive agent in transplant immunology and later received the attention of rheumatologists and clinicians involved in the management of autoimmune diseases. MMF is now a widespread immunosuppressive drug for the treatment of several conditions, including lupus nephritis, interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis while being efficacious also as rescue therapy in various orphan diseases, including dermatomyositis and IgA-associated nephropathy. Similarly, case reports or series support a possible use of MMF in other rare autoimmune diseases. Beyond modulating lymphocyte activation, MMF acts on other immune and non-immune cells and these effects may explain the therapeutic profile of this medication. The effects of MMF are broadly characterized by the impact on the immune system and the antiproliferative and antifibrotic changes induced. In this latter case, mechanistic data on fibroblasts may in the future allow to reevaluate the use of MMF in selected patients with inflammatory arthritis or systemic sclerosis. Attention must be paid towards the possible occurrence of adverse events, such as gastrointestinal complaints and teratogenicity, while the risk of infections and cancer related to MMF needs to be further investigated.

Current Status Regarding Immunosuppressive Treatment in Patients after Renal Transplantation

Renal transplantation is now the best treatment for end-stage renal failure. To avoid rejection and prolong graft function, organ recipients need immunosuppressive therapy. The immunosuppressive drugs used depends on many factors, including time since transplantation (induction or maintenance), aetiology of the disease, and/or condition of the graft. Immunosuppressive treatment needs to be personalised, and hospitals and clinics have differing protocols and preparations depending on experience. Renal transplant recipient maintenance treatment is mostly based on triple-drug therapy containing calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids, and antiproliferative drugs. In addition to the desired effect, the use of immunosuppressive drugs carries risks of certain side effects. Therefore, new immunosuppressive drugs and immunosuppressive protocols are being sought that exert fewer side effects, which could maximise efficacy and reduce toxicity and, in this way, reduce both morbidity and mortality, as well as increase opportunities to modify individual immunosuppression for renal recipients of all ages. The aim of the current review is to describe the classes of immunosuppressive drugs and their mode of action, which are divided by induction and maintenance treatment. An additional aspect of the current review is a description of immune system activity modulation by the drugs used in renal transplant recipients. Complications associated with the use of immunosuppressive drugs and other immunosuppressive treatment options used in kidney transplant recipients have also been described.

Risk of failing both methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil from the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial

BACKGROUND

The antimetabolites methotrexate (MTX) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are commonly used as initial corticosteroid-sparing treatment for uveitis. There is little data examining risk factors for failing both MTX and MMF. The objective of this study is to determine risk factors for failing both MTX and MMF in patients with non-infectious uveitis.

MAIN BODY

This is a sub-analysis of the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial, which was an international, multicenter, block-randomized, observer-masked, comparative effectiveness trial comparing MTX and MMF as initial treatments for non-infectious uveitis. This study was undertaken at multiple referral centers in India, the United States, Australia, Saudi Arabia and Mexico between 2013 and 2017. A total of 137 patients who completed all 12 months of follow-up from the FAST trial, were included in this study. The primary outcome was failing both antimetabolites over the 12 months of the trial. Potential predictors included: age, sex, bilateral involvement, anatomic location of the uveitis, presence of cystoid macular edema (CME) and retinal vasculitis at baseline visit, uveitis duration, and country/study sites as risk factors for failing both MTX and MMF. The presence of retinal vasculitis posterior to the equator on fluorescein angiogram was associated with failing both MTX and MMF.

CONCLUSION

Retinal vasculitis may be a risk factor for failing multiple antimetabolites. Clinicians could consider more quickly advancing these patients to other medication classes, such as biologics.

Immunosuppressive therapy for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: a retrospective study and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease is an idiopathic autoimmune disease which targets melanin-containing tissues such as the uvea, meninges, ear and skin. This typically presents in the eye with acute findings of granulomatous anterior uveitis, diffuse choroidal thickening, multiple focal areas of sub-retinal fluid and, in severe cases, optic nerve involvement with bullous serous retinal detachment can occur. Early initiation of treatment has been advocated to prevent progression to the chronic stage of the disease, which can result to a sunset glow fundus with devastatingly poor visual outcome. Treatment is usually initiated with corticosteroids followed by an early introduction of immunosuppressive treatment (IMT) to achieve immediate response after disease presentation, although the choice of IMT for VKH can vary.

MAIN FINDINGS

We conducted a retrospective case-series to investigate the management trend of treating VKH over a 20-year period. Twenty-six patients were included and we found a shift from steroid monotherapy to combined IMT/low-dose steroid for the management of acute initial-onset of VKH in the last 10 years. Our average time from diagnosis to initiation of IMT was 2.1 months. 81% (21 of 26 patients) of our patients treated with combined IMT/steroid were able to achieve disease stability with significant good visual outcome at 24 months (Median VA_pre-IMT = 0.3 Logmar vs VA_post-IMT = 0.0 Logmar, p = 0.0001). MMF monotherapy was the most common IMT used and it was well-tolerated by our patients. Even so, 50% of our patients who were treated with MMF did not achieve disease control. We then performed a literature review to identify any IMT which could be superior in the treatment of VKH. We also share our experience (where applicable) on the various treatment options found from the literature review.

SHORT CONCLUSION

Our study found that patients with VKH who were treated with combined IMT/low-dose steroids achieved significantly better visual improvement at 24 months compared to steroid monotherapy. We frequently chose MMF and this appears to be well tolerated by our patients. Since its introduction, anti-TNF agents are increasingly becoming a popular choice of treatment for VKH as these have been shown to be safe and effective. However, more data is required to provide evidence that anti-TNF agents can be used as first-line treatment and as monotherapy.

Single-Cell transcriptomes of immune cells provide insights into the therapeutic effects of mycophenolate mofetil on autoimmune uveitis

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent widely applied in various autoimmune diseases, including autoimmune uveitis, a sight-threatening autoimmune disease mainly affecting the eyes. However, the mechanisms of action are not comprehensively understood. To investigate the potential impact of MMF on uveitis, we generated single-cell RNA sequence data from normal, experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) and MMF-treated EAU mice. We observed that some EAU-induced transcriptional changes were reversed by MMF treatment. Transcriptional data indicated that MMF may have a general inhibitory effect on the activation of immune cells during EAU. Each immune cell type showed a different response to MMF treatment. Pseudotime analysis showed that MMF treatment partly reversed the increased differentiation tendency from naïve to effector phenotypes of T and B cells in EAU. The reduced proportion of T-helper (Th)1 and T-helper (Th)17 cells after MMF treatment was confirmed using flow cytometry. MMF treatment downregulated the EAU-associated upregulation of several molecules (such as Cebpd, Pim1, Furin, Bhlhe40, and Hif1a) that promote pathogenic cytokine production by T helper (Th)-1 and Th17 cells. Abnormally enhanced immunoglobulin production, antigen processing, and presentation ability of B cells may also be inhibited by MMF treatment. In addition to T and B cells, MMF treatment countered EAU-induced transcriptional changes in other immune cells to different degrees. Overall, our findings provide novel insights into the mechanisms underlying MMF treatment and indicate that the therapeutic effect of MMF is not driven by a single molecule.

Reduced Dose Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Noninfectious Uveitis: A Sub-Analysis from the First-Line Antimetabolites as Steroid Sparing Therapy (FAST) Trial

PURPOSE

Some patients taking methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) experience intolerable side effects at full doses. We evaluated whether dose reduction affected treatment outcomes in uveitis patients.

METHODS

Subanalysis of the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial. Patients were randomized to receive MTX (25 mg weekly) or MMF (3 g daily). A pre-specified dose reduction protocol could be employed for intolerable side effects. Primary analysis was performed at 6 months.

RESULTS

43/194 patients (22%) required dose reduction. 88/151 patients (58%) on maximum doses and 32/43 patients (74%) on reduced doses were deemed treatment successes at 6 months. The odds ratio point estimate (1.60, 95% CI 0.72-3.74) favored dose-reduction but this was not significant. Following reduction, adverse events improved at the subsequent study visit (79 events reduced to 63 events).

CONCLUSION

Dose reduction of antimetabolites was not associated with worse outcomes in this subanalysis of a uveitis trial.

Local versus Systemic Therapy for Noninfectious Uveitis (NIU)

The mainstay of treatment for noninfectious uveitis (NIU) is immunosuppressant therapy. This may come in a localized form that is administered specifically to the eye or a systemic form that penetrates ocular tissues. Over the last twenty years, both local and systemic treatments have undergone advancements in pharmaceutical development. In this review, we will discuss new therapies and analyze the risks and benefits for all existing NIU therapies. Some of these therapies include topical, intravitreal, periocular, and systemic steroids, as well as systemic antimetabolites, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, T-cell inhibitors, anti-CD 20 agents, interleukin-6 inhibitors, alkylating agents, and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Single Institution Experience of Intravitreal 0.18-mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Noninfectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

To report the outcomes of the 0.18-mg fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAi) in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who received the 0.18-mg FAi for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment (NIU-PS) between July 1, 2019, and August 31, 2021, at the University of Colorado. Patients were excluded if they did not have ≥ 6 months of follow-up after the placement of the implant.

METHODS

Data including age, race/ethnicity, sex, uveitis diagnosis, history and current use of anti-inflammatory therapy, use of short-acting corticosteroid injections within the 3 months before the 0.18-mg FAi implantation, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), grading of anterior chamber and vitreous cell, and presence of cystoid macular edema were obtained from the medical charts. Uveitis recurrence was defined as any increased inflammation that required additional anti-inflammatory therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Probability of remaining recurrence-free after the placement of the 0.18-mg FAi.

RESULTS

Sixty-four eyes from 42 patients were included. The overall probability of remaining recurrence-free was 68.8% at 6 months and 52.6% at the 12-month follow-up. Eyes that remained recurrence-free at 12 months had a younger mean age than eyes that had a recurrence within 12 months (P = 0.02). Eyes that received a short-acting corticosteroid injection before the 0.18-mg FAi were more likely to have a recurrence by 6 months of follow-up than eyes that did not receive a pre-FAi corticosteroid injection (P = 0.05). Initiation or addition of IOP-lowering eyedrops was required in 15.6% of eyes, and 4.7% of eyes required IOP-lowering surgery after 0.18-mg FAi placement.

CONCLUSIONS

The 0.18-mg FAi appears to be an effective option in the management of NIU-PS, with relatively low rates of ocular hypertension requiring intervention. The use of short-acting corticosteroid injections before the placement of the 0.18-mg FAi does not seem to improve the effectiveness of the 0.18-mg FAi, although this may be partially because of selection bias. Additional studies are required to determine patients who are the optimal candidates for this therapy.

The Conundrum of Clinical Trials for the Uveitides: Appropriate Outcome Measures for One Treatment Used in Several Diseases

The uveitides consist of >30 diseases characterized by intraocular inflammation. Noninfectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides typically are treated with oral corticosteroids and immunosuppression, with a similar treatment approach for most diseases. Because these uveitides collectively are considered a rare disease, single-disease trials are difficult to impractical to recruit for, and most trials have included several different diseases for a given protocol treatment. However, measures of uveitis activity are disease specific, resulting in challenges for trial outcome measures. Several trials of investigational immunosuppressive drugs or biologic drugs have not demonstrated efficacy, but design problems with the outcome measures have limited the ability to interpret the results. Successful trials have included diseases for which a single uveitis activity measure suffices or a composite measure of uveitis activity is used. One potential solution to this problem is the use of a single, clinically relevant outcome, successful corticosteroid sparing, defined as inactive uveitis with a prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day coupled with disease-specific guidelines for determining inactive disease. The clinical relevance of this outcome is that active uveitis is associated with increased risks of visual impairment and blindness, and that prednisone doses ≤7.5 mg/day have a minimal risk of corticosteroid side effects. The consequence of this approach is that trial visits require a core set of measures for all participants and a disease-specific set of measures, both clinical and imaging, to assess uveitis activity. This approach is being used in the Adalimumab Versus Conventional Immunosuppression (ADVISE) Trial.

Non-biologic, steroid-sparing therapies for non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis in adults

BACKGROUND

Non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis (NIIPPU) represent a heterogenous collection of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders isolated to or concentrated in the posterior structures of the eye. Because NIIPPU is typically a chronic condition, people with NIIPPU frequently require treatment with steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy. Methotrexate, mycophenolate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and tacrolimus are non-biologic, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) which have been used to treat people with NIIPPU.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and safety of selected DMARDs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and azathioprine) in the treatment of NIIPPU in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), MEDLINE, Embase, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, most recently on 16 April 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing selected DMARDs (methotrexate, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and azathioprine) with placebo, standard of care (topical steroids, with or without oral steroids), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 RCTs with a total of 601 participants in this review. DMARDs versus control Two studies compared an experimental DMARD (cyclosporine A or enteric-coated mycophenolate [EC-MPS]) plus oral steroid with steroid monotherapy. We did not pool these results into a meta-analysis because the dose of cyclosporine used was much higher than that used in current clinical practice. The evidence is very uncertain about whether EC-MPS plus low-dose oral steroid results in a higher proportion of participants achieving control of inflammation over steroid monotherapy (risk ratio [RR] 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 7.17; 1 study, 41 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was reported separately for right and left eyes. The evidence for improvement (lower logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) indicates better vision) between the groups is very uncertain (mean difference [MD] -0.03 and -0.10, 95% CI -0.96 to 0.90 and -0.27 to 0.07 for right and left, respectively; 1 study, 82 eyes; very low-certainty evidence). No data were available for the following outcomes: proportion of participants achieving a 2-line improvement in visual acuity, with confirmed macular edema, or achieving steroid-sparing control. The evidence for the proportion of participants requiring cessation of medication in the DMARD versus control group is very uncertain (RR 2.61, 95% CI 0.11 to 60.51; 1 study, 41 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Methotrexate versus mycophenolate We were able to combine two studies into a meta-analysis comparing methotrexate versus mycophenolate mofetil. Methotrexate probably results in a slight increase in the proportion of participants achieving control of inflammation, including steroid-sparing control, compared to mycophenolate at six months (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.50; 2 studies, 261 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Change in BCVA was reported per eye and the treatments likely result in little to no difference in change in vision (MD 0.01 logMAR higher [worse] for methotrexate versus mycophenolate; 2 studies, 490 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). No data were available for the proportion of participants achieving a 2-line improvement in visual acuity. The evidence is very uncertain regarding the proportion of participants with confirmed macular edema between methotrexate versus mycophenolate (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.30; 2 studies, 35 eyes; very low-certainty). Methotrexate versus mycophenolate may result in little to no difference in the proportion of participants requiring cessation of medication (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.27; 2 studies, 296 participants; low-certainty evidence). Steroids with or without azathioprine versus cyclosporine A Four studies compared steroids with or without azathioprine (oral steroids, intravenous [IV] steroids, or azathioprine) to cyclosporine A. We excluded two studies from the meta-analysis because the participants were treated with 8 mg to 15 mg/kg/day of cyclosporine A, a significantly higher dose than is utilized today because of concerns for nephrotoxicity. The remaining two studies were conducted in all Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) populations and compared cyclosporine A to azathioprine or IV pulse-dose steroids. The evidence is very uncertain for whether the steroids with or without azathioprine or cyclosporine A influenced the proportion of participants achieving control of inflammation (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02; 2 studies, 112 participants; very low-certainty evidence), achieving steroid-sparing control (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.25; 1 study, 21 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or requiring cessation of medication (RR 0.85, 95% 0.21 to 3.45; 2 studies, 91 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is uncertain for improvement in BCVA (MD 0.04 logMAR lower [better] with the steroids with or without azathioprine versus cyclosporine A; 2 studies, 91 eyes; very low-certainty evidence). There were no data available (with current cyclosporine A dosing) for the proportion of participants achieving a 2-line improvement in visual acuity or with confirmed macular edema. Studies not included in synthesis We were unable to include three studies in any of the comparisons (in addition to the aforementioned studies excluded based on historic doses of cyclosporine A). One was a dose-response study comparing cyclosporine A to cyclosporine G, a formulation which was never licensed and is not clinically available. We excluded another study from meta-analysis because it compared cyclosporine A and tacrolimus, considered to be of the same class (calcineurin inhibitors). We were unable to combine the third study, which examined tacrolimus monotherapy versus tacrolimus plus oral steroid, with any group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of data regarding which DMARD is most effective or safe in NIIPPU. Studies in general were small, heterogenous in terms of their design and outcome measures, and often did not compare different classes of DMARD with each other. Methotrexate is probably slightly more efficacious than mycophenolate in achieving control of inflammation, including steroid-sparing control (moderate-certainty evidence), although there was insufficient evidence to prefer one medication over the other in the VKH subgroup (very low-certainty evidence). Methotrexate may result in little to no difference in safety outcomes compared to mycophenolate.

Efficacy of Tacrolimus in Uveitis, and the Usefulness of Serum Tacrolimus Levels in Predicting Disease Control. Results from a Single Large Center

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with noninfectious uveitis, as well as the usefulness of serum tacrolimus concentration measurements in predicting disease control.

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out on 71 eligible patients from a single specialist uveitis center for minimum 1-year follow-up. Analysis was carried out on disease activity, visual acuity, and trough serum tacrolimus concentrations (STC).

RESULTS

At 1-year follow-up, disease control was achieved in 49 patients (69.0%), this was significantly more likely in patients with trough STC levels above 5 ng/mL (88% vs 53%, p = .002). There was a significant reduction in oral prednisolone (dose ≥7.5 mg, 86% vs 54%, p < .0001). Tacrolimus was discontinued in 12 patients (17%) due to side effects.

DISCUSSION

In this study cohort, oral tacrolimus was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. Trough STC between 5 ng/mL and 10 ng/ml was associated with better disease control at 1-year follow-up.

Anti-adalimumab Antibodies in Patients with Non-infectious Ocular Inflammatory Disease: A Case Series

PURPOSE

To report the clinical course of patients with ocular inflammatory disease treated with adalimumab in whom anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) were detected.

METHODS

Single center case series.

RESULTS

Eight patients with initial response to adalimumab developed a disease flare associated with positive AAA testing after 5 to 76 months of therapy. Six patients were receiving no concurrent antimetabolite therapy at the time of AAA diagnosis and four had a temporary lapse in adalimumab therapy prior to AAA discovery. AAA resulted in undetectable drug levels in five of the seven patients for whom data were available, and adalimumab was discontinued in six of the eight patients. Of two patients continued on adalimumab, one maintained detectable serum adalimumab despite AAA and one had a low AAA titer.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients receiving adalimumab for ocular inflammatory disease, a disease flare in the setting of previously well-controlled disease should prompt consideration of AAA testing.

Methotrexate plus reduced or full-dose glucocorticoids for the treatment of active, moderate-to-severe Graves' orbitopathy

Objective

A combination of glucocorticoids with mycophenolate is recommended by current guidelines to boost response to Graves' orbitopathy (GO) therapy. This study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic effects and safety of methotrexate (MTX) plus reduced (3.0 g) or full-dose (4.5 g) i.v. methylprednisolone (MP) vs full-dose i.v. MP alone.

Design and methods

This was a prospective, randomized, observer-masked, single-center clinical trial conducted in a tertiary clinical center. Ninety-seven patients with active moderate-to-severe GO were screened and 90 patients underwent randomization between April 2018 and Oct 2019. All patients completed 12 weeks of treatment and received clinical assessment. The patients received either MP 4.5 g only, MP 4.5 g plus oral MTX, or MP 3.0 g plus oral MTX. The primary outcome was the CAS response at week 12. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and other individual ophthalmic parameters.

Results

At week 12, 53.3% of MP, 76.7% of reduced MP plus MTX, and 76.7% of MP plus MTX achieved a CAS response, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.1). The overall response rates of the MP group, the reduced MP plus MTX group, and the MP plus MTX group were 43.3%, 53.3%, and 60%, respectively (P = 0.5). Subgroup analysis found that smoking status interacted with marginal significance with treatment effect (P = 0.048). Importantly, adverse event incidence was significantly lower in the reduced MP + MTX group (P = 0.017).

Conclusions

Our study shows that reduced MP plus MTX therapy is effective and safer in treating active and moderate-to-severe GO patients than 4.5 g MP monotherapy.

The standardisation of uveitis nomenclature (SUN) project

The uveitides are a collection of over 30 diseases characterised by intraocular inflammation. Previous work demonstrated that the agreement among uveitis experts on diagnosis was modest at best with some pairs of experts having chance alone agreement on selected diseases. The Standardisation of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) is a17-year collaboration among experts in uveitis, ocular image grading, informatics, and machine learning to improve clinical and translational uveitis research. The SUN "Developing Classification Criteria for the Uveitides" project used a rigorous, multi-phase approach to develop classification criteria for 25 of the most common uveitic diseases. The project's phases were: (1) informatics; (2) case collection; (3) case selection; (4) machine learning; and (5) consensus review and publication. The results were classification criteria with a high degree of accuracy (93.3%-99.3% depending on anatomic class of the uveitis), the goal of which is to form the basis for future uveitis research.

[Colchicine and non-severe ocular inflammation excluding Behcet's disease: 16 cases and literature review]

INTRODUCTION

Colchicine is a narrow therapeutic margin drug that does not have the adverse effects of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. Its use in non-severe ocular inflammatory disease excluding Behcet's disease has not been studied.

METHODS

We included patients seen in the internal medicine department of Dijon University Hospital consecutively between September 2020 and September 2021 if they had received colchicine during their pathology. Patients with suspected Behçet's disease were excluded. Treatment efficacy was studied in patients with at least one year of disease progression who had received more than one year of colchicine. Successful treatment was defined as a 50 % reduction in the number of annual relapses on colchicine.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included (9 women and 7 men). They had recurrent anterior uveitis (n=10), recurrent scleritis (n=5) and intermediate uveitis. Opthalmological involvement was neither severe nor complicated. All patients combined, the annual relapse ratio (ARR) decreased from 1.8 (0.8-3.5) to 0.3 (0-1.6), (P=0.06). Colchicine was considered effective in three of 10 analyzable patients. In only one patient, treatment was stopped for adverse effects after six weeks.

CONCLUSION

In view of the interesting benefit-risk ratio of colchicine, it seems appropriate to focus on this molecule in non-granulomatous anterior uveitis and non-severe recurrent scleritis.

Intermediate Uveitis: A Review

PURPOSE

This review aims to provide an update on the clinical presentation, etiologies, complications, and treatment options in intermediate uveitis (IU).

METHODS

Narrative literature review.

RESULTS

IU affects all age groups with no clear gender predominance and has varied etiologies including systemic illnesses and infectious diseases, or pars planitis. In some instances, IU may be the sole presentation of an underlying associated condition or disease. Management of IU and its complications include administration of corticosteroids, antimetabolites, T-cell inhibitors, and/or biologics, along with surgical interventions, with varying degrees of effectiveness across literature. In particular, increasing evidence of the safety and efficacy of immunomodulatory agents and biologics has seen greater adoption of these therapies in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

IU is an anatomical description of uveitis, involving intraocular inflammation of the vitreous, peripheral retinal vasculature, and pars plana. Various treatment options for intermediate uveitis are currently used in practice.

Incidence and pattern of mycophenolate discontinuation associated with abnormal monitoring blood-test results: cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum

Objective

To examine the incidence and pattern of mycophenolate discontinuation associated with abnormal monitoring blood-tests.

Methods

Data from people prescribed mycophenolate for common inflammatory conditions in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink was used. Participants were followed from first mycophenolate prescription. Primary outcome was drug discontinuation with an associated abnormal blood-test result within 60 days. Secondary outcomes were drug discontinuation for any reason, and discontinuations associated with severely abnormal blood-test results within 60 days. Multivariable cox-regression was used to examine factors associated with primary outcome.

Results

The cohort included 992 participants (68.9% female, mean age 51.95 years, 47.1% with SLE) contributing 1,885 person-years of follow-up. The incidence of mycophenolate discontinuation associated with any (severely) abnormal blood-test results was 153.46 (21.07) per 1000 person-years in the first, and 32.39 (7.91) per 1000 person-years in later years of prescription, respectively. 11.5% (1.7%) patients prescribed mycophenolate discontinued treatment with any (severely) abnormal blood-test results in the first year of prescription. After this period mean 2.6% (0.7%) patients discontinued treatment with any (severely) abnormal blood-test results per year. Increased serum creatinine and cytopenia were more commonly associated with mycophenolate discontinuation than elevated liver enzymes. CKD-stage ≥3 was significantly associated with mycophenolate discontinuation with any blood-test abnormalities (aHR (95%CI) 2.22 (1.47–3.37)).

Conclusion

Mycophenolate is uncommonly discontinued for blood-test abnormalities, and, even less often discontinued for severe blood-test abnormalities after the first year of prescription. Consideration may be given for less frequent monitoring after one-year of treatment, especially in those without CKD-stage ≥3.

Lower Relapses Rate With Infliximab Versus Adalimumab in Sight-Threatening Uveitis: A Multicenter Study of 330 Patients

PURPOSE

To compare the relapse rate of sight-threatening noninfectious uveitis (NIU) in patients treated with infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA).

DESIGN

Observational retrospective multicenter study.

METHODS

A total of 330 patients (median age, 36 years; interquartile range, 27-54), 45.2% men) with sight-threatening NIU (ie, retinal vasculitis and/or macular edema) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α agents (IFX intravenously at 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 4 to 6 weeks or ADA subcutaneously at 80 mg, then 40 mg every 2 weeks). Data were obtained retrospectively from patients' medical records. Main outcome measures were relapse rate, complete response of NIU, corticosteroid sparing effect, and safety.

RESULTS

Main etiologies of uveitis included Behçet disease (27%), idiopathic juvenile arthritis (5.8%), and sarcoidosis (5.5%). The estimated relapse rate at 6 months after introduction of biological agents was 13% (95% CI = 0.009-0.16). IFX was associated with less relapse risk than ADA (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36- 0.77, P = .001). ADA and IFX were comparable in terms of complete response rate of NIU as well as corticosteroid-sparing effect. Behçet disease was associated with higher odds of complete response (HR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.16 -3.60, P = .01] and lower relapse rate (HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33-0.85, P = .009) than other causes of NIU with anti-TNF-α agents.

CONCLUSIONS

In sight-threatening NIU, IFX seems to be associated with a lower relapse rate than ADA.

Efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of methotrexate, adalimumab or their combination in non-infectious non-anterior uveitis: a protocol for a multicentre, randomised, parallel three arms, active-controlled, phase III open label with blinded outcome assessment study

INTRODUCTION

Non-infectious uveitis include a heterogeneous group of sight-threatening and incapacitating conditions. Their correct management sometimes requires the use of immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs), prescribed in monotherapy or in combination. Several observational studies showed that the use of ISDs in combination could be more effective than and as safe as their use in monotherapy. However, a direct comparison between these two treatment strategies has not been carried out yet.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Combination THerapy with mEthotrexate and adalImumAb for uveitis (CoTHEIA) study is a phase III, multicentre, prospective, randomised, single-blinded with masked outcome assessment, parallel three arms with 1:1:1 allocation, active-controlled, superiority study design, comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of methotrexate, adalimumab or their combination in non-infectious non-anterior uveitis. We aim to recruit 192 subjects. The duration of the treatment and follow-up will last up to 52 weeks, plus 70 days follow-up with no treatment. The complete and maintained resolution of the ocular inflammation will be assessed by masked evaluators (primary outcome). In addition to other secondary measurements of efficacy (quality of life, visual acuity and costs) and safety, we will identify subjects' subgroups with different treatment responses by developing prediction models based on machine learning techniques using genetic and proteomic biomarkers.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol, annexes and informed consent forms were approved by the Reference Clinical Research Ethic Committee at the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid, Spain) and the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products. We will elaborate a dissemination plan including production of materials adapted to several formats to communicate the clinical trial progress and findings to a broad group of stakeholders. The promoter will be the only access to the participant-level data, although it can be shared within the legal situation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

2020-000130-18; NCT04798755.

Mycophenolate versus Methotrexate in Non-infectious Ocular Inflammatory Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus methotrexate (MTX) in non-infectious ocular inflammatory disease (NIOID).

METHODS

The study was performed as per the PRISMA Guidelines. A search identified all studies comparing MMF versus MTX in NIOID. Treatment result and side effects were primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Four studies enrolling 905 patients were identified. There was no significant difference between MMF and MTX groups in overall treatment success (OR = 0.97, P = .96), treatment failure (OR = 0.86, P = .85). MTX showed a significantly improved effect in cases involving posterior uveitis and panuveitis (OR = 0.41, P = .003). In addition, MTX was associated with a faster median time to treatment success and had less side effects when compared to MTX, however this was not significant. For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was found in visual acuity and resolution of macular oedema.

CONCLUSION

MMF is comparable to MTX in the treatment of NIOID.

Outcomes of uveitic macular edema in the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) Uveitis Trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of uveitic macular edema at 6 months and 12 months in patients treated with methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil.

DESIGN

Subanalysis of a block-randomized, observer-masked, multi-center clinical trial.

SUBJECTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients were enrolled into the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial between August 2013 and August 2017.

METHODS/INTERVENTION/TESTING

Patients were randomized to oral methotrexate 25mg weekly or mycophenolate mofetil 1.5g twice daily for 12 months, along with a corticosteroid taper. In addition to standardized clinical examination, all patients underwent spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging at each visit. At the 6-month primary endpoint, patients who achieved treatment success continued the same treatment for a subsequent 6 months and treatment failures switched to the other treatment group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pre-specified primary outcome at 6 months and 12 months outcomes of central subfield thickness and visual acuity.

RESULTS

Of 216 patients in the FAST Trial, 42 eyes of 30 patients in the methotrexate group and 55 eyes of 41 patients in the mycophenolate group had uveitic macular edema. Baseline median central subfield thickness was 359μm and 342μm in the methotrexate and mycophenolate groups, respectively. At 12 months, for those who stayed on the same treatment, macular thickness decreased from baseline by 23 μm (IQR, -39.0 to 13) and 18 μm (IQR, -68.5 to 9), in the methotrexate and mycophenolate groups, respectively, (P=0.76). In patients who switched treatment at 6 months, macular thickness decreased from baseline by 12.5 μm (IQR, -29.8 to -2.3) and 92 μm (IQR, -240 to -18) in the methotrexate and mycophenolate groups, respectively, (P=0.23). At 12 months, 7/19 (37%) eyes on methotrexate had resolution of macular edema compared to 15/25 (60%) eyes on mycophenolate (P=0.10). For those that switched treatments, 8/17 (47%) eyes on methotrexate and 6/11 (55%) eyes on mycophenolate had improvement of macular edema, (P=0.92) CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil for uveitic macular edema results in similar improvements in macular thickness at 6 and 12 months. At 12 months, approximately half of eyes in each antimetabolite group still had persistent macular edema.

Comparison of CD4 Counts with Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Methotrexate from the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) Uveitis Trial

PURPOSE

Sub-analysis of the FAST Trial comparing change in CD4 (∆CD4) from baseline through 12 months in uveitis patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to 1.5 g twice daily MMF or 25 mg weekly MTX. Individuals with CD4 counts at baseline, 6 months (or treatment failure prior), and 12 months (or treatment failure between 6 and 12 months) were included. The association between treatment and ∆CD4 (cells/μL) was analyzed using multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in ∆CD4 between MMF and MTX at 6 months (-31.7 cells/μL for MMF compared to MTX; 95% CI: -358.2 to 294.8, P = .85) and 12 months (-78.3 cells/μL for MMF compared to MTX; 95% CI: -468.0 to 311.3; P = .69).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in ∆CD4 between MMF and MTX from baseline to 12 months, suggesting that MMF does not confer additional risk of CD4 lymphopenia in uveitic patients.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01829295.

Methotrexate Effectively Controls Ocular Inflammation in Japanese Patients With Non-infectious Uveitis

This single-center retrospective study investigated the clinical characteristics and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis for more than 6 months at Hiroshima University, from February 2016 to May 2021. Outcome variables included changes in systemic immunosuppressive treatment and intraocular inflammation. Out of 448 patients with non-infectious uveitis, 35 patients (14 male patients and 21 female patients; 65 eyes) treated with MTX for more than 6 months were analyzed. There were 15 patients with anterior uveitis and 20 with posterior and panuveitis. The mean dose of systemic corticosteroids decreased from 12.1 mg/day at baseline to 1.3 mg/day at 6 months and 0.6 mg at 12 months after starting MTX, and approximately 90% of patients were corticosteroid-free at 12 months. The percentage of eyes with inactive uveitis at 6, 12, and 24 months was 49.2%, 59.6%, and 90.0%, respectively. Mean relapse rate score also significantly decreased from 2.88 at baseline to 0.85 at 12 months (p < 0.001). Inflammatory control was achieved with MTX doses of 8-16 mg/week, with a median dose of 12 mg/week. Adverse effects of MTX were observed in 34.3% of patients, and 11.4% required discontinuation; most commonly hepatotoxicity (58.3%), followed by fatigue (25.0%), and hair loss (16.7%). No significant differences were found between the survival curves of patients with anterior uveitis and posterior/panuveitis (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). The percentage of eyes without IOP-lowering eye drops was significantly higher in patients with posterior/panuveitis at 24 months (p = 0.001). Our study suggests that MTX is effective in controlling ocular inflammation for Japanese patients with non-infectious uveitis. Relatively high incidence of MTX-related adverse effects in the Japanese population indicates that careful monitoring and dose adjustments are crucial for the long-term use of this therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressant Therapy for Noninfectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To analyze efficacy and safety of immunosuppressant therapy for noninfectious uveitis.

Methods

A network search of PubMed, ResearchGate, and EMBASE databases was conducted for relative literature and studies from the inception of each database to April 2021. Primary outcomes were efficacy and time to treatment failure of immunosuppressant for noninfectious uveitis. Secondary outcome was incidence of adverse events (AEs). Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess risk of bias of included studies. Fixed effects model or random effects model was implemented to assess statistical heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was employed to analyze heterogeneous sources.

Results

Eight studies were deemed eligible for inclusion with a total of 848 patients. Six studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Among them, a single-blind RCT had relatively high measurement bias and performance bias. Immunosuppressant presented favorable efficacy for noninfectious uveitis than placebo, and RR was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.12-1.82). Immunosuppressant for noninfectious uveitis prolonged the time before failure, and HR was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32-0.54). AEs increased after immunosuppressant was applied. Compared with immunosuppressant, RR of AEs with placebo was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.71-1.08).

Conclusion

Immunosuppressant contributed to controlling progression of noninfectious uveitis to some extent. Compared with placebo, it increased incidence of AEs. More studies with low heterogeneity are warranted for stronger evidence in clinical.