Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Review

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy for management of chronic fecalith appendicitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Chronic appendicitis is a condition with chronic abdominal pain or mild attacks of appendicitis, seriously affecting the patient's quality of life. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) has emerged as a promising, non-invasive treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Here, we aim to assess the safety and efficacy of ERAT for chronic fecalith appendicitis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent ERAT for chronic fecalith appendicitis at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China between December 2017 and June 2023. Clinicopathological characteristics, procedure-related parameters, AEs, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were included. ERAT intubation was successfully performed in all patients (100%). The median procedure time was 15 min (IQR, 12-25 min). The postoperative abdominal pain scores were significantly reduced (P < 0.0001). Short-term adverse events included 5 cases of abdominal pain (8.3%) and 2 cases of fever (3.3%). Long-term adverse events included recurrent abdominal pain in 3 cases (5.0%) and recurrent appendicitis in 2 cases (3.3%). The median time to recurrence was 5 months (IQR, 2-12 months). Logistic regression analysis revealed appendiceal stenosis (OR 25.000, 95% CI 1.114-561.281, P = 0.043) and distorted appendix lumen (OR 12.500, 95% CI 1.373-113.806, P = 0.025) as significant risk factors for long-term adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAT may be a safe, effective and minimally invasive alternative approach for chronic fecalith appendicitis. Appendix lumen stenosis and distortion are risk factors of recurrence. Further large-scale prospective studies are necessary to assess the efficacy and safety of ERAT compared with antibiotic therapy and surgery.

Management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

While multiple studies have shown the safety and efficacy of non-operative management, appendectomy remains the standard treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis (UAA). This study presents a protocol for a meta-analysis comparing antibiotic therapy, endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) and appendectomy in patients with UAA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a systematic search of several databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure and the Cochrane Library. The search will cover the full range of database records up to September 2024. Eligible studies will include randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of antibiotic therapy, ERAT and appendectomy for UAA. The primary outcome will be treatment success, while secondary outcomes will include major complications, hospital costs, length of stay and recurrence of appendicitis. Two independent reviewers will select studies, extract data and assess bias risk. A Bayesian approach will be used for the network meta-analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required as the study will use data from published RCTs. The findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024554427.

Should an Interval Appendicectomy Be Performed by a Minimally Invasive Gynaecologist?

Objective

We aimed to explore the abnormal pathology findings in appendix specimens removed based on intraoperative abnormal appearance during elective surgery for benign gynaecological conditions by a minimally invasive gynaecologist, as well as the associated complication rate.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral surgical centre for benign gynaecological conditions between the years 2004-2023. It included patients who underwent appendicectomy by a trained minimally invasive gynaecologist based on observations during surgery for benign gynaecological conditions. Data included demographic, clinical, surgical and pathological information followed by postoperative complication data obtained from electronic medical records and direct communication with surgical colleagues. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the abnormal pathological findings in the appendix. The secondary outcome was the complication rate associated with appendicectomy in these cases.

Results

The study cohort included 34 women who met inclusion criteria and underwent a laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain or a benign ovarian mass. Indications for appendicectomy included twelve cases (38.2%) with apparent appendiceal immobility (stiffness), fourteen cases (41.2%) with an appendix adherent to ovaries or the pelvic side walls, and seven cases (20.6%) with an abnormal appearance (large, wide, long, coiled, or curved). Pathological findings revealed six cases (17.6%) of acute or chronic appendicitis, four cases (11.8%) of endometriosis, five cases (14.7%) of abnormal pathological conditions, and three cases (8.8%) of cancer (two cases of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and one case of low-grade appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma). Postoperative complication rate was 5.8% (two cases).

Conclusion

This study supports incorporating appendicectomy by trained gynaecological specialists during gynaecological elective surgery when abnormal findings are encountered. Further research and guidelines in this area can provide even greater clarity and direction for the future of gynaecological surgical practice.

APENDIC-RADS: an ultrasound reporting system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

OBJECTIVE

Abdominal ultrasonography is widely used to evaluate suspected cases of appendicitis. Objective descriptions of the direct and indirect signs of appendicitis result in varied assessments of its likelihood. This study introduces the Appendix Imaging Reporting and Data System (APENDIC-RADS) to standardize the reporting of appendix ultrasound findings.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients of all ages who underwent abdominal ultrasonography for the investigation of acute appendicitis. The primary outcome was histopathological confirmation of acute appendicitis post-surgery. The imaging findings were classified into five categories: APENDIC-RADS 0, where the appendix cannot be visualized; APENDIC-RADS 1, indicating a normal appendix; APENDIC-RADS 2, describing an appendix that is likely normal but only partially visualized; APENDIC-RADS 3, appendicitis cannot be ruled out due to uncertain features and APENDIC-RADS 4, acute appendicitis.

RESULTS

A total of 747 patients were assessed for suspected acute appendicitis using ultrasonography. Of the diagnosed patients, 52% were male, primarily exhibiting symptoms such as nausea and/or vomiting (60%), right iliac fossa pain (54%), and sudden decompression in the right iliac fossa (24%). Stratification into APENDIC-RADS categories revealed a significant variation in the incidence of acute appendicitis, with incidence rates of 4.5% for category 0 and 0.7%, 2.2%, 11.5%, and 93.5% for categories 1 to 4, respectively (p<0.001). The APENDIC-RADS showed excellent discriminative ability, evidenced by an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.950 (95%CI=0.899-1).

CONCLUSION

APENDIC-RADS categorization demonstrated excellent performance in standardizing the ultrasound-determined probability of acute appendicitis. Its implementation could improve physician communication and standardization of patient management.

Time to surgery for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in an adult university teaching hospital

AIMS

Both patient and hospital-related factors determine the timing of appendicectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Recent literature suggests appendicectomy more than 24 h after hospital admission is associated with increased morbidity in adults. Current guidelines from the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) recommend surgery within this timeframe to reduce the risk of complications. The aim of this study was to determine the time to surgery for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis and to compare this to the current WSES recommendations. This study also aimed to identify potential reasons for any in-hospital delay.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent appendicectomy for confirmed acute uncomplicated appendicitis at an adult university teaching hospital between September 2021 and September 2022. Patient demographics, clinical information, time of admission, time of surgery, time of discharge and surgical complication data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 229 appendicectomies were performed during the study period. 138 (60 %) had a preoperative diagnosis of acute uncomplicated appendicitis. The median age was 36 years (range 17-93). Time to surgery was <24 h in 80 (58 %) patients and >24 h in 58 (42 %) patients. In patients with a delay of >24 h, 28 (48 %) had their surgery 24-36 h after admission, 23 (40 %) had their surgery between 36 and 48 h, and 7 (12 %) had their surgery >48 h after admission. Patients who were operated >24 h after admission had a higher rate of readmission, 4/58 (6.9 %) compared to 1/80 (1.25 %) in the less than 24 h group (p = 0.09). Delays in radiology, surgical ward beds and the lack of a dedicated emergency theatre may have contributed to extended waiting times.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that the majority (58 %) of patients within our cohort were operated on within the WSES guidelines. However, 42 % of patients had their surgery in excess of these recommendations. Extended waiting periods may be related to delays in radiology, surgical ward beds and a lack of a dedicated emergency theatre. Patients who were operated on greater than 24 h following their admission also had a higher rate of readmission.

Predictive efficacy of immature granulocytes in acute complicated appendicitis

OBJECTIVE

Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen. It is important to differentiate between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis before surgery in the emergency department. Recently, immature granulocytes have become one of the biomarkers used as predictors of inflammation. The aim of this study was to determine whether immature granulocyte levels are a biomarker that can predict whether acute appendicitis is complicated or not in patients admitted to the emergency department.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 years and older who presented to the emergency department between May 1, 2023, and April 30, 2024, and were diagnosed with appendicitis were included in the study. Patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis were divided into two groups: acute simple appendicitis (n=149) and acute complicated appendicitis (n=103). Demographic characteristics, imaging results, and laboratory results were recorded.

RESULTS

White blood cell, neutrophil count and percentage, lymphocyte count and percentage, immature granulocyte count and percentage, direct bilirubin, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin values were found to be significantly higher in the complicated appendicitis group than in the uncomplicated group (p-values; 0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, 0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, 0.016, <0.001, and 0.001, respectively). The immature granulocyte percentage was 92% specific for the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis at a cut-off value of 0.6.

CONCLUSION

The immature granulocyte percentage may be useful as a predictive biomarker in the diagnosis of complicated acute appendicitis with a specificity of 92%. Additionally, the immature granulocyte percentage has a higher discrimination power than the immature granulocyte count, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin.

Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Appendicitis

Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common surgical emergencies in adults and children [...].

Failure to Significantly Reduce Radiation Exposure in Children with Suspected Appendicitis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended over computed tomography (CT) as the initial imaging modality when considering a diagnosis of appendicitis in children. This reduces unnecessary radiation exposure and has excellent accuracy. We hypothesized a significant increase in US utilization and a reduction in CT utilization in hospitals across the United States.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed NSQIP-P data from 2015 to 2021 for patients <18 years undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Rates of US, CT, and MRI usage were compared between NSQIP-P hospitals and referring non-NSQIP-P hospitals.

RESULTS

Of the 115,186 children included, 66,303 (57.6%) were imaged in NSQIP-P hospitals, 37,962 (33.0%) in non-NSQIP-P hospitals, and 7947 (6.9%) in both. US alone was used in 53.3%, followed by CT alone in 25.1%, both US + CT in 16.4%, and MRI ± CT/US in 2.6%. Non-NSIQP-P hospitals used less US than NSQIP-P centers (38.6% vs 90.8%, P < 0.0001) and more CT (74.0% vs 25.4%, P < 0.0001). From 2015 to 2021, overall US utilization increased from 68.5% to 72.3% (p < 0.0001) while CT utilization remained unchanged (43.1%-43.2%, P = 0.07). US use increased in non-NSQIP-P centers (18.8%-25.7%, P < 0.0001) but not in NSQIP-P (71.7% vs 70.9%, p = 0.28), while CT alone decreased in both (NSQIP-P: 10.1%-7.7%, P < 0.0001; non-NSQIP-P: 71.0%-59.8%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

US and MRI remain underutilized in diagnosing pediatric appendicitis, especially in non-NSQIP-P hospitals. Trends show modest increase in US utilization; however, CT alone remains a highly used modality in non-NSQIP-P hospitals. Adopting diagnostic strategies from NSQIP-P centers could optimize diagnostic imaging in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Clinical significance of appendicoliths in elderly patients over eighty years old undergoing emergency appendectomy: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis with an appendicolith is one of the most common abdominal emergencies in elderly patients and is more likely to progress to gangrene and perforation.

AIM

To analyze the clinical data of elderly patients undergoing emergency appendectomy for acute appendicitis, aiming to improve treatment strategies.

METHODS

The clinical data of 122 patients over 80 years old who underwent emergency appendectomy for acute appendicitis at the Department of Emergency Surgery of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from January 2016 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of an appendicolith or not, and clinicopathological and surgery-related features were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The duration of abdominal pain in all 122 patients ranged from 5 to 168 h. All patients underwent emergency appendectomy: 6 had an open appendectomy, 101 had a laparoscopic appendectomy, and 15 required conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery, resulting in a conversion rate of 12.9% (15/116). The patients were divided into two groups: Appendicolith group (n = 46) and non-appendicolith group (n = 76). Comparisons of clinicopathological features revealed that patients with appendicoliths were more likely to develop appendiceal gangrene (84.8% vs 64.5%, P = 0.010) and perforation (67.4% vs 48.7%, P = 0.044), and had a lower surgical conversion rate (2.2% vs 19.7%, P = 0.013). The median length of hospital stay was 5.0 d for both groups and there was no significant difference between them. All patients were successfully discharged.

CONCLUSION

Around 40% of patients over 80 years old with acute appendicitis have an appendicolith, increasing their risk of developing appendiceal gangrene and perforation, and therefore should receive timely surgical treatment.

LEFT-SIDED APPENDICITIS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF CASE REPORTS

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, acute appendicitis (AA) is the most frequent cause of acute surgical abdomen. Although typically associated with pain migrating to the right iliac fossa, AA can also manifest with pain in the left lower quadrant, often linked to anatomical anomalies. Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) have the highest incidence of AA compared to other regions of the world.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the sociodemographic characteristics; clinical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes in patients with left-sided AA in LAC.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, Dialnet, Redalyc, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. We considered as inclusion criteria case reports of left-sided appendicitis involving specific anatomical anomalies, and studies conducted in LAC. Morevoer, we assessed methodologic quality using Joanna Briggs Institute tool for case reports.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were included in 23 case reports. Colombia accounted for the majority of left-sided AA cases. The median age was 37 years (8-65). Initial pain location was diffuse abdominal pain (39.1%), pain was refered (n=5; 55.6%) and migrated (n=11; 78.6%) mainly to left iliac fossa. Situs inversus totalis (SIT) was the most prevalent anatomical anomaly (69.6%), while laparotomy emerged as the predominant surgical approach (65.2%).

CONCLUSION

Considering left-sided AA in the diagnosis of adults with diffuse abdominal pain towards the left lower quadrant is crucial. SIT is the primary associated anatomical variation. These emphasize the significance of understanding atypical presentations for effective management in the LAC population.

Diagnostic Value of Serum Sodium Level and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Severity of Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Two-Center Study

Background and Objectives: The best way to distinguish complicated acute appendicitis (CAA) from uncomplicated acute appendicitis (UCAA) is still under debate. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential use of the serum sodium (Na+) level and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to distinguish CAA from UCAA and to evaluate whether CAA is more reliably diagnosed using these two variables together. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, two-center study of patients diagnosed with AA between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2023. The demographic and analytical variables were analyzed. The NLR was defined as the quotient between the absolute values of neutrophils and lymphocytes. Hyponatremia was defined as a serum Na+ level of ≤135 mmol/L. The sensitivity and specificity of the NLR and the serum Na+ level in the diagnosis of CAA were determined by assessing the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Among the patients who underwent an appendectomy, 3066 histologically confirmed AA cases were identified and included in this study. The registered data revealed that 348 (11.3%) patients had CAA, and the remaining 2718 (88.7%) patients had UCAA. The mean ages were 49.47 ± 18.97 and 38.16 ± 14.50, respectively (p < 0.001). The analysis revealed an exponential correlation between the NLR and the serum Na+ level with a moderate degree of agreement with CAA (Cohen's Kappa: 0.461, p < 0.001). For CAA, using the NLR and the serum Na+ level, the areas under the curve and the cutoffs were 0.664, 4.2 with a confidence interval (CI) of 0.647-0.681 and 0.727, 135 mmol/L with a CI of 0.711-0.742, respectively; all these values were significant with a p-value of <0.001. Conclusions: Although the serum Na+ level is a more effective marker than the NLR, using these two variables together can help detect high-risk patients who may benefit from early management by limiting delays in surgery.

Clinical significance of appendicoliths in conservative treatment of acute complicated appendicitis patients with peri-appendiceal abscess: a single-center retrospective study

Background

This study aimed to analyze the clinical data of patients who received conservative treatment for acute complicated appendicitis with peri-appendiceal abscess, identify factors influencing the success rate, and improve treatment strategies.

Methods

The clinical data of acute complicated appendicitis patients with peri-appendiceal abscess who received conservative treatment at the Department of Emergency Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, from January 2016 to March 2023, were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

A total of 80 patients were included in our study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the outcomes of ultrasound-guided drainage: The Drainage group (n=28) and the Antibiotic group (n=52). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. In the Antibiotic group, the surgery rate was 30.4% for patients with an appendicolith and 6.9% for those without. In the Drainage group, the surgery rate was 33.3% for patients with an appendicolith and 27.3% for those without. The presence of an appendicolith significantly correlated with the need for surgery in the Antibiotic group (P=0.026), but not in the Drainage group (P=0.771). For patients who underwent surgery, the incidence of surgical site infections did not differ significantly (P=0.656), and the median length of postoperative hospital stay was similar between the groups (4.0 days vs. 3.0 days, P=0.337).

Conclusion

The presence of an appendicolith is a risk factor for the failure of antibiotic therapy alone in acute complicated appendicitis patients with peri-appendiceal abscess. However, it does not affect the surgical rate in those who underwent successful drainage.

Usability of presepsin, calprotectin, and interleukin 6 in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate presepsin, calprotectin, and interleukin-6 levels together in terms of their utility in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and distinguishing complicated acute appendicitis cases. In addition, it was attempted to identify a biomarker that would be most useful in diagnosing acute appendicitis.

METHODS

This study was conducted prospectively at the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. Patients diagnosed with AA from July 3, 2023, through January 1, 2024, were evaluated. 45 patients with acute appendicitis and 45 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Presepsin, calprotectin, and interleukin-6 levels were measured in both groups and subjected to statistical analyses.

RESULTS

To ensure equality between the two groups participating in the study, 17 female and 28 male patients were included in each group. The presepsin, calprotectin, and interleukin-6 levels of the patients with appendicitis were significantly higher than those of the healthy group (p < 0.001 for all). However, presepsin, calprotectin, and interleukin-6 were not significant parameters in differentiating between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis (p = 0.493, p = 0.202, and p = 0.448, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Presepsin, calprotectin, and interleukin-6 levels may be useful in diagnosing acute appendicitis but would be insufficient in identifying complicated cases.

Modified technical protocol for single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps for acute simple appendicitis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Because of the mild inflammatory status in acute uncomplicated appendicitis, our team developed a novel technical protocol for single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps (SLAN) and achieved positive clinical outcomes. However, the intraoperative procedure lacked stability and fluency due to a series of problems highlighted by the small incision design of the protocol (only 1 cm long). Therefore, there is a growing clinical demand to further optimize the SLAN protocol.

CASE SUMMARY

An adult male patient was admitted for persistent right lower abdominal pain with preoperative computed tomography findings suggestive of appendicitis accompanied by localized peritonitis. A modified technical protocol for SLAN based on minimally invasive surgical principles was used, and the patient was confirmed to have acute simple appendicitis by postoperative pathological analysis. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and no postoperative complications, such as incision infection or severe incision pain, were observed. The patient was discharged successfully on postoperative day 2.

CONCLUSION

The modified technical protocol of SLAN may be a new minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with acute simple appendicitis.

Clinical significance of peri-appendiceal abscess and phlegmon in acute complicated appendicitis patients undergoing emergency appendectomy

BACKGROUND

Although antibiotic therapy has become the primary treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis, the management of acute complicated appendicitis necessitates careful consideration of various treatment options.

AIM

To analyze the clinical data of patients who underwent emergency appendectomy for acute complicated appendicitis with peri-appendiceal abscess or phlegmon, identify factors influencing the postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS), and improve treatment strategies.

METHODS

The clinical data of acute complicated appendicitis patients with peri-appendiceal abscess or phlegmon who underwent emergency appendectomy at The Department of Emergency Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from January 2016 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients were included in our study. The duration of symptoms and the presence of an appendicolith were significantly correlated with the occurrence of peri-appendiceal abscess in patients with acute complicated appendicitis (P < 0.001 and P = 0.015, respectively). Patients with symptoms lasting longer than 72 h had a significantly longer postoperative LOS compared to those with symptoms lasting 72 h or less [hazard ratio (HR), 1.208; 95%CI: 1.107-1.319; P < 0.001]. Additionally, patients with peri-appendiceal abscesses had a significantly longer postoperative LOS compared to those with phlegmon (HR, 1.217; 95%CI: 1.095-1.352; P < 0.001). The patients with peri-appendiceal abscesses were divided into two groups based on the median size of the abscess: Those with abscesses smaller than 5.0 cm (n = 69) and those with abscesses 5.0 cm or larger (n = 82). Patients with peri-appendiceal abscesses measuring 5.0 cm or larger had a significantly longer postoperative LOS than those with abscesses smaller than 5.0 cm (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

The duration of symptoms and the presence of an appendicolith are significant risk factors for the formation of peri-appendiceal abscesses in patients with acute complicated appendicitis. Patients with peri-appendiceal abscesses experience a significantly longer postoperative LOS compared to those with peri-appendiceal phlegmon.

A Prospective Comparative Study on the Clinical Diagnostic Performance of Blood Inflammatory Markers in Acute Appendicitis

Objective

Despite the substantial advancements in imaging techniques for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) over recent decades, the specificity and sensitivity of widely utilized laboratory biomarkers in clinical practice remain inadequate.This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of commonly employed blood inflammatory markers for AA.

Methods

A total of 399 participants who either sought medical care or underwent health examinations were enrolled in this prospective study. The cohort comprised 200 patients diagnosed with AA (AA group), 100 patients presenting with abdominal pain but without AA (AP group), and 99 healthy individuals undergoing routine health check-ups (HC group). For all subjects, the following biomarkers were measured: plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count (NEU), percentage of neutrophils (NEU%), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). The diagnostic performance of the observed indicators, both individually and in combination, was assessed for the diagnosis of AA using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves analysis and Delong's test.

Results

The laboratory indicators demonstrated a progressive increase from the HC group to the AP group, and further to the AA group (all p<0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis identified NEU% and plasma NGAL as significant risk factors for the occurrence of AA. ROC curve analysis and Delong's test indicated that, in distinguishing the AA group from the HC group, the diagnostic performance of plasma NGAL, CRP, and NLR was equally substantial and superior to that of NEU and WBC. Within the AP group, plasma NGAL and CRP exhibited comparable diagnostic efficacy, outperforming NEU, WBC, and NLR. When differentiating AA in the non-appendicitis group (ie HC group + AP group), NGAL and CRP demonstrated comparable diagnostic efficacy, surpassing that of NEU, white WBC, and NLR. While the integration of multiple diagnostic tests can potentially improve overall diagnostic accuracy, the observed enhancement in the AUC is not statistically significant.

Conclusion

NGAL, CRP, WBC, NEU% and NLR were significantly increased in patients with acute abdomen. NGAL and NEU% may function as independent risk factors for predicting the incidence of AA, with NGAL and CRP demonstrating similar and favorable diagnostic performance. While the combined evaluation of these biomarkers may enhance the diagnostic value for AA, the improvement in the area under the curve (AUC) is not substantial.

Using a sum of the cross diameters of the appendix measured on ultrasonography as a criterion can more effectively predict acute appendicitis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether using a sum of the cross diameters on the transverse section of the appendix as a criterion can improve the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 433 patients with AA and 207 patients with a normal appendix were assigned to the training and validation groups in a proportion of 7:3. Each group was divided into subgroups consisting of patients with AA and a normal appendix. The training group included 144 patients with a normal appendix and 302 patients with AA, while the validation group comprised 63 patients with a normal appendix and 131 patients with AA. Graded compression ultrasound was performed to evaluate the appendix, and the cross diameters on the transverse section were measured, with one of them used as the maximum outer diameter (MOD).

RESULTS

The cut-off value of the sum of cross diameters for predicting AA was 13.5 mm or more. When it was applied to evaluate the appendix in the training group, a sensitivity of 98.7%, specificity of 99.3%, positive predictive value of 99.7%, negative predictive value of 97.3%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.990 were achieved. Which were significantly higher than those (except for a sensitivity of 99.3%) obtained using the criteria of MOD ≥ 6 mm. Similar results were obtained in the validation group.

CONCLUSION

Using a sum of cross diameters of the appendix of 13.5 mm or more as a criterion to diagnose AA can yield excellent diagnostic performance, and can replace the current criteria of MOD of 6 mm or more.

KEY POINTS

Question A MOD of the appendix ≥ 6 mm is a recommended criterion for diagnosing AA, but often results in a false-positive diagnosis. Findings Using the sum of the cross diameters of the appendix ≥ 13.5 mm as a criterion yielded significantly higher diagnostic performance than the recommended criteria. Clinical relevance The sum of the cross diameters of the appendix is a better criterion for the evaluation of patients with suspected AA, exhibiting significantly higher diagnostic performance than the MOD of the appendix.

Feasibility of GPT-3.5 versus Machine Learning for Automated Surgical Decision-Making Determination: A Multicenter Study on Suspected Appendicitis

Background: Nonsurgical treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis is a reasonable option in many cases despite the sparsity of robust, easy access, externally validated, and multimodally informed clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). Developed by OpenAI, the Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3.5 model (GPT-3) may provide enhanced decision support for surgeons in less certain appendicitis cases or those posing a higher risk for (relative) operative contra-indications. Our objective was to determine whether GPT-3.5, when provided high-throughput clinical, laboratory, and radiological text-based information, will come to clinical decisions similar to those of a machine learning model and a board-certified surgeon (reference standard) in decision-making for appendectomy versus conservative treatment. Methods: In this cohort study, we randomly collected patients presenting at the emergency department (ED) of two German hospitals (GFO, Troisdorf, and University Hospital Cologne) with right abdominal pain between October 2022 and October 2023. Statistical analysis was performed using R, version 3.6.2, on RStudio, version 2023.03.0 + 386. Overall agreement between the GPT-3.5 output and the reference standard was assessed by means of inter-observer kappa values as well as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values with the “Caret” and “irr” packages. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results: There was agreement between the surgeon’s decision and GPT-3.5 in 102 of 113 cases, and all cases where the surgeon decided upon conservative treatment were correctly classified by GPT-3.5. The estimated model training accuracy was 83.3% (95% CI: 74.0, 90.4), while the validation accuracy for the model was 87.0% (95% CI: 66.4, 97.2). This is in comparison to the GPT-3.5 accuracy of 90.3% (95% CI: 83.2, 95.0), which did not perform significantly better in comparison to the machine learning model (p = 0.21). Conclusions: This study, the first study of the “intended use” of GPT-3.5 for surgical treatment to our knowledge, comparing surgical decision-making versus an algorithm found a high degree of agreement between board-certified surgeons and GPT-3.5 for surgical decision-making in patients presenting to the emergency department with lower abdominal pain.

Enterobius vermicularis in the Appendiceal Lumen: A Case Report

Enterobius vermicularis is a common parasitic infection worldwide. Acute appendicitis (AA) is a frequently encountered condition in general surgery; however, its association with E. vermicularis remains controversial. AA caused by E. vermicularis is a relatively uncommon infection that primarily affects children. We reported a 21-year-old female who was admitted to our hospital due to right lower quadrant abdominal tenderness. Laboratory tests and imaging were not consistent with AA. She underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy and appendectomy. Histopathological examinations revealed the presence of E. vermicularis in the lumen of the appendix, which caused its obstruction without evidence of inflammatory cell infiltration or lymphoid hyperplasia.

Diagnosing acute appendicitis: a case study

Advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs) are experienced health professionals educated to master's level. They are accountable for the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of individuals, and are responsible for making complex decisions. The case study presented in this article critically analyses the consultation involving a male patient in his sixties with a 2-day history of abdominal pain, who was referred by his GP to a surgical assessment unit. Analysis was carried out using the Calgary-Cambridge Model. The article discusses history-taking, abdominal examination and differential diagnoses, and presents the process of how the trainee ACP arrived at the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Predictive model for identification of gangrenous or perforated appendicitis in adults: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Gangrene and perforation are severe complications of acute appendicitis, associated with a higher mortality rate compared to uncomplicated appendicitis. Accurate preoperative identification of Gangrenous or perforated appendicitis (GPA) is crucial for timely surgical intervention.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study includes 796 patients who underwent appendectomy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses are used to develop a nomogram model for predicting GPA based on laboratory tests and computed tomography (CT) findings. The model is validated using an external dataset.

RESULTS

Seven independent predictors were included in the nomogram: white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, D-dimer, serum glucose, albumin, maximum outer diameter of the appendix, and presence of appendiceal fecalith. The nomogram achieved good discrimination and calibration in both the training and testing sets. In the training set, the AUC was 0.806 (95%CI: 0.763-0.849), and the sensitivity and specificity were 82.1% and 66.9%, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good calibration (P = 0.7378). In the testing set, the AUC was 0.799 (95%CI: 0.741-0.856), and the sensitivity and specificity were 70.5% and 75.3%, respectively. Decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed the clinical utility of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The laboratory test-CT nomogram model can effectively identify GPA patients, aiding in surgical decision-making and improving patient outcomes.

Hyponatremia as a predictor of complicated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: To investigate the value of hyponatremia as a predictive marker for complicated appendicitis.Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for studies published up to 5 June 2024. Studies reporting serum sodium levels in patients with complicated and non-complicated appendicitis and studies reporting the association between baseline hyponatremia and complicated appendicitis were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed.Results: Twenty-two studies met the eligibility criteria. Serum sodium levels were measured at arrival or preoperatively in all included studies. Meta-analysis of data from 17 studies showed that preoperative sodium levels were significantly lower in patients with complicated appendicitis vs uncomplicated appendicitis [Mean Difference (MD): -2.58 95% confidence intervals (CI): -3.51, -1.66 I2 = 98%]. A pooled analysis of 18 studies demonstrated a statistically significant association between preoperative hyponatremia and complicated appendicitis [Odds Ratio (OR): 4.11 95% CI: 3.07, 5.51 I2 = 93%]. Results remained significant on subgroup analysis for adult and pediatric populations. However, the MD was higher and the OR was higher in the subgroup of pediatric patients.Conclusion: Hyponatremia was identified as a potential predictor for complicated appendicitis. The association between hyponatremia and complicated appendicitis seems to be stronger in pediatric patients as compared with adults.

Enterobius vermicularis (pinworm) infestation mimicking acute appendicitis in two children from Palestine: a case report

BACKGROUND

Pinworm, Enterobius vermicularis, is a common parasitic illness, particularly among children in Palestine. On rare occasions, it can cause serious consequences such as acute appendicitis, which can still present a challenging diagnosis especially in children.

CASE PRESENTATION

This report describes two cases (a 9 year old male and a 11 year old female, both Palestinian children from Hebron district) of acute appendicitis referred to Queen Alia Hebron Governmental Hospital in Palestine. The clinical examination revealed a lower abdominal pain, and they were diagnosed with appendicitis. The pathological examination after appendectomy showed the presence of eggs and pinworms. Anthelminthic medication was provided, and they were followed up for 6 weeks after the operation without any incidents.

CONCLUSION

These cases highlight the importance of considering Enterobius vermicularis infestation in children with abdominal pain, as the parasites can mimic appendicitis. Prompt recognition and cautious laparoscopic appendectomy are crucial to prevent unnecessary surgery and peritoneal contamination, with the infestation being easily treatable with anthelmintic medication.

Assessment of diagnostic value of ultrasound and multi-slice spiral computed tomography in acute appendicitis: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Ultrasound and multi-slice spiral computed tomography (CT) are frequently used to assist the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA), and the examination results may vary among different demographics. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and CT for AA.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with AA who underwent emergency surgery at our hospital from March 2021 to August 2023, with postoperative pathological results as the gold standard. Differences in the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and CT for different types of AA, age groups, and body mass index (BMI) values were then analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall sample comprised 279 confirmed cases of AA, with 64 cases of simple appendicitis, 127 cases of suppurative appendicitis, and 88 cases of gangrenous appendicitis. For these three pathological classifications, the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound was 68.75% (44/64), 73.22% (93/127), and 81.81% (72/88), respectively, while the diagnostic accuracy of CT was 71.87% (46/64), 82.67% (105/127), and 90.90% (80/88), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall diagnostic accuracy between the two methods (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed no difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two methods for patients with normal BMI (P > 0.05). However, for overweight, obese, and elderly patients, CT provided significantly better diagnostic accuracy than ultrasound (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

While ultrasound and CT have similar diagnostic accuracy for different pathological types of AA, CT is more accurate for overweight, obese, and elderly patients.

Subhepatic Appendicitis With Appendicular Diverticulitis: A Rare Combination for Acute Abdomen

Subhepatic appendicitis is an unusual presentation of acute appendicitis (AA). Similarly, another uncommon condition that resembles AA is appendiceal diverticulitis (AD), which is a rare form of vermiform appendix pathology. It is exceedingly uncommon for the two to occur simultaneously. We present the case of a 41-year-old male presented with a one-day history of sudden onset of right iliac fossa (RIF) pain associated with a two-day history of nausea and fevers. The only notable lab finding was elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). Clinical examination revealed right abdominal and renal angle tenderness, with RIF rebound and guarding. Computed tomography (CT) concluded acute uncomplicated appendicitis with a subhepatic appendix and he was planned for an emergent laparoscopic appendicectomy. Exposure of the retrocaecal appendix with the caecum in the right loin posed a challenging laparoscopy. The appendix was found to be adherent to the duodenum, right kidney, and transverse colon, and the decision was made to convert to laparotomy to establish safe mobilisation from the duodenum. The appendix was resected in two parts and the histopathology revealed an appendiceal diverticulum with subserosal abscess formation. The subhepatic position of the cecum and appendix is a result of foetal gut malrotation. There is no standard approach for the best course of treatment. The laparotomy conversion gave us better tactile input and direct access to the appendix. Our goal is to educate readers on how to manage an unusual presentation of AA.

Development and validation of a new scoring system to discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis

A scoring system to discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis is beneficial to determine the optimal treatment for acute appendicitis. We developed a scoring system to discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis and assessed the clinical usefulness of the scoring system using external validation. A total of 299 patients with acute appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred and ninety-nine patients were assigned to the model development group, while the other 100 patients were assigned to an external validation group. A scoring system for complicated appendicitis was created using a final multivariate logistic regression model with six independent predictors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the scoring system was 0.882 (95% confidence interval: 0.835-0.929). The cutoff point of the scoring system was 12, and the sensitivity and specificity were 82.9% and 86.2%, respectively. In the external validation group, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the scoring system was 0.868 (95% confidence interval 0.794-0.942), and there was no significant difference between the groups in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (P = 0.750). Our newly developed scoring system may contribute to prompt determination of the optimal treatment for acute appendicitis.

Interhospital variation in the non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in adults

Background

Recent randomized trials have suggested non-operative management to be a safe alternative to appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Yet, there remains significant variability in treatment approach. This study sought to characterize center-level variation in non-operative management within a national cohort of adults presenting with appendicitis.

Methods

The 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify all adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Hierarchical, mixed-effects models were developed to ascertain factors linked with non-operative management. Bayesian methodology was applied to predict random effects, which were then used to rank centers by increasing hospital-attributed rate of non-operative management. Institutions with high center-specific rates of non-operative management (>90th percentile) were considered low-operating hospitals (LOH).

Results

Of an estimated 447,500 patients, 52,523 (11.7 %) were managed non-operatively. Compared to those undergoing appendectomy, the non-operative cohort was older, more commonly male, and of a higher comorbidity burden. Approximately 30 % in the variability of non-operative management was attributable to hospital effects, with absolute, risk-adjusted rates ranging from 0.5 to 22.5 %. Centers with non-operative management rates ≥90th percentile were considered LOH.Following risk adjustment, among patients undergoing appendectomy, care at LOH was linked with greater odds of postoperative infection, resource utilization, and non-elective readmission.

Conclusions

We identified significant interhospital variation in the utilization of non-operative management for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Further, we found LOH to be associated with inferior outcomes following surgical management. Future work is needed to assess the care pathways that contribute to increased utilization of non-operative strategies, and disseminate best practices across institutions.

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using new surgical procedure versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy

The aim of this study was to compare the clinic outcomes between new single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (NSLA) and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CTLA) for patients with acute appendicitis. Patients who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis and underwent appendectomy were retrospectively collected from a single clinical center from September 2021 to June 2023. Baseline characteristics, surgical information, and postoperative information were compared between the NSLA group and the CTLA group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to find out the predictors of overall complications. A total of 296 patients were enrolled from a single clinical medical center. There were 146 (49.3%) males and 150 (50.7%) females. There were 54 (18.2%) patients in the NSLA group and 242 (81.8%) patients in the CTLA group. After data analysis, we found the patients in the NSLA group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.01) than the CTLA group. The other outcomes including intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.167), operation time (P = 0.282), nature of the appendix (P = 0.971), and overall complications (P = 0.543) were not statistically different. After univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, we found that age (P = 0.018, OR = 1.039, 95% CI = 1.007-1.072), neutrophil percentage (P = 0.018, OR = 1.070, 95% CI = 1.011-1.132), and fever (P = 0.019, OR = 6.112, 95% CI = 1.340-27.886) were the predictors of overall complications. However, the surgical procedure (NSLA versus CTLA) was not a predictor of overall complications (P = 0.376, OR = 1.964, 95% CI = 0.440-8.768). Compared with CTLA, there was no significant increase in postoperative overall complications with NSLA, making it a safe and feasible new surgical procedure. More studies are needed to evaluate the long-term results.

Validation of the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis among Ethiopian patients: a multi-institutional observational study

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in Ethiopian clinical practice. Although a multitude of scoring systems have been used in clinical practice, none have been universally validated. The purpose of this study was to validate the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) scoring system in the Ethiopian context.

METHODS

A total of 315 consecutive patients who presented with a presumptive diagnosis of acute appendicitis and were planned to undergo appendectomy were studied. All the studied patients had diagnostic sonography and underwent the RIPASA scoring system. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RIPASA and ultrasound results with intraoperative gross examinations.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 27.4 ± 11.5 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.6:1. The concordance between ultrasound and RIPASA for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was 93.6%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RIPASA were 96.2%, 30.8%, 93.9%, and 42.1%, respectively. Similarly, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ultrasound were 95.3%, 27.8%, 95.6%, and 26.3%, respectively. White cell count and RIPASA scores were weakly correlated with intraoperative stages of acute appendicitis, r(313) = 0.18, p = 0.001, and r(313) = 0.129, p = 0.022, respectively. The rate of a negative appendectomy was 6%.

CONCLUSION

RIPASA and ultrasound had equivalent performance in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. In both cases, the rate of negative appendectomy was low enough to validate RIPASA for clinical practice in low-income institutions where sonographic diagnosis by a conventionally trained radiologist is not available.

The implementation of the acute care surgery model in the management of patients with acute appendicitis - A 5-year single-center, retrospective experience: An observational study

We conducted this study to assess the effects of the acute care surgery (ACS) model in the management of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) based on our 5-year single-center, retrospective experience. The current single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted in a consecutive series of the patients with AA who had been surgically treated at a tertiary referral hospital in Seoul, Korea, between January 2016 and December 2020. At our institution, the ACS model was first introduced in March 2018. Therefore, our clinical series of the patients were divided into 2 groups: the pre-ACS group (March 2014 to February 2018) and the post-ACS group (March 2018 to December 2022). Key time intervals include emergency department registration to request for surgical consultation, request for surgical consultation to decision on surgery, decision-to-operating room, time to decision on surgery and length of emergency department stay. Moreover, outcomes include rates of perforation and complications and discharge within 24 or 48 hours. We compared key time intervals, outcomes, and length of hospital stay between the 2 groups. A total of 900 patients with AA were finally included in the current study, 447 and 453 of whom were divided into the pre-ACS group (n = 447) and the post-ACS group (n = 453), respectively. There were significant differences in key time intervals, outcomes, and length of hospital stay between the 2 groups (P < .05). In conclusion, our results showed that the implementation of the ACS model was effective in improving key time intervals, rates of perforation, and discharge within 24 or 48 hours in the patients with AA.

The Impact of Protein Glycosylation on the Identification of Patients with Pediatric Appendicitis

The identification of pediatric appendicitis is challenging due to the lack of specific markers thereby several factors are included in the diagnostic process such as abdominal pain, ultrasonography and altered laboratory parameters (C reactive protein, absolute neutrophil cell number and white blood cell number). The glycosylation pattern of serum N-glycome was analyzed in this study of 38 controls and 40 patients with pediatric appendicitis. The glycans were released by enzymatic deglycosylation followed by fluorescent labeling and solid-phase extraction. The prepared samples were analyzed by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with fluorescence and mass-spectrometric detection. The generated data were analyzed by multiple statistical tests involving the most important laboratory parameters as well. Significant differences associated with the examined patient groups were revealed suggesting the potential use of glycosylation analysis supporting the detection of pediatric appendicitis.

Implementation of artificial intelligence-based computer vision model in laparoscopic appendectomy: validation, reliability, and clinical correlation

BACKGROUND

Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in general surgery is evolving. Real-world implementation of an AI-based computer-vision model in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is presented. We aimed to evaluate (1) its accuracy in complexity grading and safety adherence, (2) clinical correlation to outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study of 499 consecutive LA videos, captured and analyzed by 'Surgical Intelligence Platform,' Theator Inc. (9/2020-5/2022). Two expert surgeons viewed all videos and manually graded complexity and safety adherence. Automated annotations were compared to surgeons' assessments. Inter-surgeons' agreements were measured. Since 7/2021 videos were linked to patients' admission numbers. Data retrieval from medical records was performed (n = 365). Outcomes were compared between high and low complexity grades.

RESULTS

Low and high complexity grades comprised 74.8 and 25.2% of 499 videos. Surgeons' agreements were high (76.9-94.4%, kappa 0.77/0.91; p < 0.001) for all annotated complexity grades. Surgeons' agreements were also high (96.0-99.8%, kappa 0.78/0.87; p < 0.001) for full safety adherence, whereas agreement was moderate in partial safety adherence and none (32.8-58.8%). Inter-surgeons' agreements were high for complexity grading (kappa 0.86, p < 0.001) and safety adherence (kappa 0.88, p < 0.001). Comparing high to low grade complexity, preoperative clinical features were similar, except larger appendix diameter on imaging (13.4 ± 4.4 vs. 10.5 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.001). Intraoperative outcomes were significantly higher (p < 0.001), including time to achieve critical view of safety (29.6, IQR 19.1-41.6 vs. 13.7, IQR 8.5-21.1 min), operative duration (45.3, IQR 37.7-65.2 vs. 25.0, IQR 18.3-32.7 min), and intraoperative events (39.4% vs. 5.9%). Postoperative outcomes (7.4% vs. 9.2%) including surgical complications, mortality, and readmissions were comparable (p = 0.6), except length of stay (4, IQR 2-5.5 vs. 1, IQR 1-2 days; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The model accurately assesses complexity grading and full safety achievement. It can serve to predict operative time and intraoperative course, whereas no clinical correlation was found regarding postoperative outcomes. Further studies are needed.

Elective Appendectomy Following Antibiotics for Appendicitis

This Viewpoint considers which may be the better long-term approach to appendicitis—interval elective appendectomy or nonsurgical treatment with antibiotics.

Exceptional association of two species of bacteria causing acute appendicitis: Haemophilus influenzae and Enterobacter cloacae

Appendicitis, typically caused by appendiceal lumen obstruction, is a prevalent abdominal surgical emergency worldwide. While most cases involve Enterobacterales, Haemophilus influenzae, primarily known for upper respiratory infections, is infrequently associated with gastrointestinal infections. This article presents an exceptional case of acute appendicitis caused by both Haemophilus influenza and Enterobacter cloacae in a 15-year-old child, highlighting the significance of recognizing uncommon pathogens in appendicitis and emphasizing the necessity for thorough microbiological investigations to refine diagnostic approaches.

Apendicectomía en pacientes con situs inversus: serie de tres casos con manejo laparoscópico

Introducción. La transposición de los órganos debido al situs inversus (SI) es una rara afección que dificulta el diagnóstico de la apendicitis aguda. Esta condición hace que la sintomatología del paciente y los hallazgos al examen físico puedan ser atípicos, lo que demanda el uso de imágenes para la confirmación diagnóstica en la mayoría de los casos. Métodos. Se describieron tres casos de apendicitis en pacientes con diagnóstico de situs inversus. Dos de ellos tenían el antecedente conocido, mientras el tercer caso fue diagnosticado de forma intraoperatoria. Resultados. En dos pacientes se decidió llevar a cirugía vía laparoscópica sin imágenes diagnósticas adicionales. Los pacientes evolucionaron de manera satisfactoria. Conclusión. Siempre se debe considerar la apendicitis dentro de los diagnósticos diferenciales en los pacientes con dolor en fosa ilíaca izquierda. Es fundamental diagnosticar y tratar la apendicitis de manera efectiva para minimizar las complicaciones asociadas. La importancia de la anamnesis y la sospecha clínica del examinador son vitales en estos casos, que se pueden confirmar con las imágenes diagnósticas. Pueden existir casos en donde la condición clínica del paciente no permita la realización de estudios diagnósticos por imágenes; esto apoya cada vez más el uso del abordaje laparoscópico. Se recomienda considerar el abordaje laparoscópico en primera instancia, ya que nos permite la confirmación diagnóstica de situs inversus totalis en caso de que el antecedente sea desconocido y facilita el manejo oportuno de la urgencia

Dr. Google to Dr. ChatGPT: assessing the content and quality of artificial intelligence-generated medical information on appendicitis

INTRODUCTION

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have recently been posited as potential sources of online medical information for patients making medical decisions. Existing online patient-oriented medical information has repeatedly been shown to be of variable quality and difficult readability. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the content and quality of AI-generated medical information on acute appendicitis.

METHODS

A modified DISCERN assessment tool, comprising 16 distinct criteria each scored on a 5-point Likert scale (score range 16-80), was used to assess AI-generated content. Readability was determined using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) scores. Four popular chatbots, ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4, Bard, and Claude-2, were prompted to generate medical information about appendicitis. Three investigators independently scored the generated texts blinded to the identity of the AI platforms.

RESULTS

ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bard, and Claude-2 had overall mean (SD) quality scores of 60.7 (1.2), 62.0 (1.0), 62.3 (1.2), and 51.3 (2.3), respectively, on a scale of 16-80. Inter-rater reliability was 0.81, 0.75, 0.81, and 0.72, respectively, indicating substantial agreement. Claude-2 demonstrated a significantly lower mean quality score compared to ChatGPT-4 (p = 0.001), ChatGPT-3.5 (p = 0.005), and Bard (p = 0.001). Bard was the only AI platform that listed verifiable sources, while Claude-2 provided fabricated sources. All chatbots except for Claude-2 advised readers to consult a physician if experiencing symptoms. Regarding readability, FKGL and FRE scores of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bard, and Claude-2 were 14.6 and 23.8, 11.9 and 33.9, 8.6 and 52.8, 11.0 and 36.6, respectively, indicating difficulty readability at a college reading skill level.

CONCLUSION

AI-generated medical information on appendicitis scored favorably upon quality assessment, but most either fabricated sources or did not provide any altogether. Additionally, overall readability far exceeded recommended levels for the public. Generative AI platforms demonstrate measured potential for patient education and engagement about appendicitis.

Optimizing antibiotic management for patients with acute appendicitis: A quality improvement study

BACKGROUND

To decrease surgical site infections after appendectomy for acute appendicitis, preoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics are often used in clinical practice. However, this treatment strategy has come under scrutiny because of increasing rates of antibiotic-resistant infections.

METHODS

The aim of this multisite quality improvement project was to decrease the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis with piperacillin-tazobactam without increasing the rate of surgical site infections. Our quality improvement intervention had 2 distinct components: (1) updating electronic health record orders to encourage preoperative administration of narrow-spectrum antibiotics and (2) educating surgeons and emergency department clinicians about selecting appropriate antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were compared 6 months before and after implementation of the quality improvement intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 352 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed during the 6-month preintervention period, and 369 were performed during the 6-month postintervention period. The preintervention period and postintervention period groups had similar baseline demographics, vital signs, and laboratory test values. The rate of preoperative piperacillin-tazobactam administration significantly decreased after the intervention (51.4% preintervention period vs 20.1% postintervention period, P < .001). The rate of surgical site infections was similar in both groups (superficial surgical site infections = 1.4% preintervention period vs 0.8% postintervention period, P = .50; deep surgical site infections = 1.1% preintervention period vs 0.0% postintervention period, P = .06; and organ space surgical site infections = 3.1% preintervention period vs 3.0% postintervention period, P > .99). Rates of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and Clostridioides difficile infection also did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Our quality improvement intervention successfully decreased piperacillin-tazobactam administration without increasing the rate of surgical site infections in patients with acute appendicitis.

Sex Differences in Appendicitis: A Systematic Review

Appendicitis is one of the most common gastrointestinal conditions a person can develop. Throughout the years of assessing the different focuses of appendicitis, such as origin, symptoms, labs, diagnosis, treatment, and complications, there have been mere mentions of sex differences. One of the most known sex differences in appendicitis is the fact that males are significantly more likely to develop appendicitis compared to females. Another postulated difference is that males may be more likely to develop a perforated appendix. These differences significantly affect the various aspects of diagnosing and treating appendicitis and may even influence the outcome of appendicitis. Sex difference analysis of conditions has been widely researched over the last two decades, and sex can influence and impact conditions from initial presentation to the outcome of treatment. This paper evaluates the sex differences in appendicitis concerning incidence, risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis technique, treatment, and outcomes across ages. Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review reviewed PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest databases for articles pertaining to sex differences in appendicitis. The original article count was 21,121, which was narrowed down to 28 publications. It was found that, as previously described, males had a significantly higher rate of appendicitis, as well as were at significant risk of perforated appendicitis. No official risk factors were found to differ between the sexes, but males were more likely to complain of symptoms like right lower quadrant cramps/tenderness/pain and loss of appetite. Scores such as the pediatric appendicitis score (PAS) and Ohmann have been used to diagnose appendicitis, but the PAS was significantly more accurate for females, and the Ohmann resulted in significantly fewer negative appendectomies in females as well. Ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) are still the gold standards for diagnosis; however, while time to CT was significantly delayed in females, they were more likely to undergo extensive imaging, possibly to rule out other conditions. Males were more likely to undergo open appendectomies compared to females, who more frequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, yet females were more likely to experience complications. Further research should evaluate the influences that can predict postoperative outcomes following appendectomies between sexes and how to prevent/reduce their occurrence.

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy: current and the future

This article presents an overview of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT), an innovative and minimally invasive treatment for appendicitis with an appendix-preserving manner. Since its initial application in 2009, ERAT has gained significant popularity in China, due to its rapid recovery and minimal risk of complications. The ERAT procedures comprise several steps, including appendiceal orifice access and intubation, appendiceal lumen imaging, decompression and irrigation, fecalith removal, and stenting. ERAT has been used in various forms of complicated appendicitis, such as in pregnant women and children, with continuous improvements in both technique and safety. It has the potential to become the preferred diagnostic and treatment method for appendicitis. Until 2023, over 10,000 ERAT procedures have been successfully conducted in China, and the technique has gained more attention worldwide. However, challenges remain, including training, standardization of ERAT practice, research and technology improvement, enhancing public awareness, and fostering international collaboration. In summary, ERAT can be the standard treatment for appendicitis treatment, which represents a paradigm shift in the conventional clinical practice.

Nonoperative Treatment of Diverticulitis and Appendicitis: Which Antibiotic Regimen Fails?

INTRODUCTION

Diverticulitis and appendicitis are common emergency general surgical conditions. Both can be treated with antibiotics alone; however, no antibiotic regimen has been identified as superior to others. In this study, we review different antibiotic regimens and their rates of failure.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients treated empirically with antibiotics for diverticulitis or appendicitis from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, at an independent academic hospital in the Midwest.

RESULTS

A total of 587 (appendicitis, n = 43; diverticulitis, n = 544) patients were included in the cohort. They were equally male (49%) and female (51%) with a median age of 59 y. Three major antibiotic classes were compared: cephalosporin + metronidazole (C + M), penicillins, and quinolone + metronidazole. Appendicitis patients were more likely to receive C + M for empiric treatment (73%, P < 0.001), while diverticulitis patients were more likely to receive quinolone + metronidazole (45%, P < 0.001). Patients empirically treated with antibiotics for appendicitis were more likely than those treated for diverticulitis to require additional antibiotics or procedure within 90 d (33% versus 13%, respectively; P = 0.005). Empiric treatment with C + M for diverticulitis was more likely to be associated with the need for additional antibiotics or procedures within 90 d than treatment with other regimens (P = 0.003). Choice of antibiotic for empiric treatment did not correlate with death at 90 d for appendicitis or diverticulitis. Diverticulitis patients who were initially treated as inpatients and were prescribed C + M at hospital discharge had a higher rate of death than those who were prescribed the other antibiotics (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Empiric antibiotic treatment of appendicitis is more likely to be associated with additional antibiotics or procedure when compared with diverticulitis; however, antibiotic choice did not correlate with any of the other outcomes. Empiric treatment with a C + M for diverticulitis was more likely to be correlated with the need for additional antibiotics or procedure within 90 d.

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning and Radiomics Combined Model for Differentiating Complicated From Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning and radiomics combined model for differentiating complicated from uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 1165 adult AA patients (training cohort, 700 patients; validation cohort, 465 patients) with available abdominal pelvic computed tomography (CT) images. The reference standard for complicated/uncomplicated AA was the surgery and pathology records. We developed our combined model with CatBoost based on the selected clinical characteristics, CT visual features, deep learning features, and radiomics features. We externally validated our combined model and compared its performance with that of the conventional combined model, the deep learning radiomics (DLR) model, and the radiologist's visual diagnosis using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of our combined model in distinguishing complicated from uncomplicated AA was 0.816 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.785-0.844). In the validation cohort, our combined model showed robust performance across the data from three centers, with AUCs of 0.836 (95% CI: 0.785-0.879), 0.793 (95% CI: 0.695-0.872), and 0.723 (95% CI: 0.632-0.802). In the total validation cohort, our combined model (AUC = 0.799) performed better than the conventional combined model, DLR model, and radiologist's visual diagnosis (AUC = 0.723, 0.755, and 0.679, respectively; all P < 0.05). Decision curve analysis showed that our combined model provided greater net benefit in predicting complicated AA than the other three models.

CONCLUSION

Our combined model allows the accurate differentiation of complicated and uncomplicated AA.

Clinical study of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a comprehensive management modality that promotes patient recovery, especially in the patients undergoing digestive tumor surgeries. However, it is less commonly used in the appendectomy.

AIM

To study the application value of ERAS in laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy due to acute appendicitis were divided into experimental group and control group by random number table method, including 63 patients in the experimental group and 57 patients in the control group. Patients in the experimental group were managed with the ERAS protocol, and those in the control group were received the traditional treatment. The exhaust time, the hospitalization duration, the hospitalization expense and the pain score between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index and Sunshine Appendicitis Grading System score between the experimental group and the control group (P > 0.05). Compared to the control group, the patients in the experimental group had earlier exhaust time, shorter hospitalization time, less hospitalization cost and lower degree of pain sensation. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

ERAS could significantly accelerate the recovery of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis, shorten the hospitalization time and reduce hospitalization costs. It is a safe and effective approach.

Something's Not Quite Right

In this narrative medicine essay, a physician recalls that when she presented with a suspected appendicitis as a medical student, she repeatedly requested a confirmation CT scan, which revealed a different diagnosis, and relates her experience with those of many women whose symptoms are not thoroughly checked out.