Sizing up scoliosis

Indications and timing of revision spine surgery in adults after adolescent surgery for idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PURPOSE

To characterize the indications and timing of revision spine surgery in adulthood after adolescent surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. Previous studies have shown that revision usually occurs within 3 months or more than 5 years after the index operation. It is not clear what the indications for and timeline to revision surgery are in these patients during adulthood.

METHODS

421 patients with idiopathic scoliosis were seen as adults over a 15-year period. 81 patients who had scoliosis surgery prior to age 18 were identified. This cohort was studied for indications and time from index to revision operation. Their clinical presentation and a description of their revision operation was also documented.

RESULTS

Of the 81 patients, 18 (22.2%) had a revision surgery as an adult. Indications for revision in order of prevalence were implant malposition, subjacent segment degeneration and stenosis, pseudoarthrosis, delayed deep wound infection, spondylolisthesis, and symptomatic implants. Revisions were indicated generally within 15 years or more than 30 years after the initial operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The timeline for revision spine surgery in idiopathic scoliosis was bimodal, with revisions occurring within 15 years or over 30 years after the initial operation. Implant malposition and subjacent segment degeneration were the most prevalent indications for adulthood revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic-IV.

Low Radiation X-rays: Benefiting People Globally by Reducing Cancer Risks

Modern medical imaging facilitates the diagnosis and treatment of human diseases. However, few people are aware of the cons of radiation exposure from medical imaging. Emerging evidence reveals that cumulative doses of radiation exposure will increase the morbidity and mortality of pertaining cancer. As a special young population, patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) suffer more radiation harms from repeated diagnostic imaging, most of which can be avoided in clinical practice. Accumulating evidence highlights reduced cancer risks of radiation exposure for AIS patients with low/zero radiation imaging modalities proposed, amongst which easy conversion from anterior-posterior (AP) to posterior-anterior (PA) projection for whole-spine radiographs should be stressed. It can greatly reduce radiation doses without compromising the quality of diagnostic imaging. Tight collimation combined with PA projection can further reduce radiation harms, and need to be spread to benefit people globally.

Social acceptability of treatments for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study

Background

There are no data on social acceptability of scoliosis. Aim. To elicit evidence-based opinions on therapeutic strategies for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in a sample of families with not affected children, so to understand the social perception of this issue.

Methods

Design. Cross-sectional study. Setting. Secondary schools in 4 northern Italian regions. Participants. Parents of children in the age group at risk of and not affected by scoliosis (Pre-test group = 100, Study group = 3,162). Interventions. Questionnaire: five specific and evidence-based questions regarding scoliosis treatment options and a socio-demographic section. Methodology. "Role-playing" in which it was required to normal people to answer what they would have chosen if they had been in the situation proposed. Main outcome measures. Perception of acceptability of treatments for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the general population (social acceptability)

Results

The families support the use of screening (94.8%) at school, immediate bracing (76.4%) for scoliosis with a 60% risk of progression, but also therapeutic exercises (86.9%) in cases with a 25% risk of progression.

Conclusion

There is a growing tendency to consider not only the efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of treatments, but also their acceptability. This patient-centred aspect is especially more important in areas (like adolescent idiopathic scoliosis) in which there is some evidence on the efficacy of treatments, but not strong and definitive (RCTs). Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treatments should thus be carefully considered also in the light of their social acceptability.

Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients. SOSORT 2005 Consensus paper

Background

Medicine is a scientific art: once science is not clear, choices are made according to individual and collective beliefs that should be better understood. This is particularly true in a field like adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, where currently does not exist definitive scientific evidence on the efficacy either of conservative or of surgical treatments.

Aim of the study

To verify the philosophical choices on the final outcome of a group of people believing and engaged in a conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.

Methods

We performed a multifaceted study that included a bibliometric analysis, a questionnaire, and a careful Consensus reaching procedure between experts in the conservative treatment of scoliosis (SOSORT members).

Results

The Consensus reaching procedure has shown to be useful: answers changed in a statistically significant way, and 9 new outcome criteria were included. The most important final outcomes were considered Aesthetics (100%), Quality of life and Disability (more than 90%), while more than 80% of preferences went to Back Pain, Psychological well-being, Progression in adulthood, Breathing function, Scoliosis Cobb degrees (radiographic lateral flexion), Needs of further treatments in adulthood.

Discussion

In the literature prevail outcome criteria driven by the contingent treatment needs or the possibility to have measurement systems (even if it seems that usual clinical and radiographic methods are given much more importance than more complex Disability or Quality of Life instruments). SOSORT members give importance to a wide range of outcome criteria, in which clinical and radiographic issues have the lowest importance.

Conclusion

We treat our patients for what they need for their future (Breathing function, Needs of further treatments in adulthood, Progression in adulthood), and their present too (Aesthetics, Disability, Quality of life). Technical matters, such as rib hump or radiographic lateral alignment and rotation, but not lateral flexion, are secondary outcomes and only instrumental to previously reported primary outcomes. We advocate a multidimensional, comprehensive evaluation of scoliosis patients, to gather all necessary data for a complete therapeutic approach, that goes beyond x-rays to reach the person and the family.

Prediction of thoracic dimensions and spine length based on individual pelvic dimensions in children and adolescents: an age-independent, individualized standard for evaluation of outcome in early onset spinal deformity

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of spine, chest, and pelvic dimensions of normal CT scans from 1999 to 2004 was performed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine age-independent predictors of spine and chest dimensions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Progressive thoracic deformity is associated with early-onset spinal deformities. Patients with severe early-onset scoliosis are commonly smaller and slower to grow than normal. Newer treatment approaches emphasize spine length and chest growth. Assessing treatment outcomes is hampered by the lack of normal values appropriate for diseased children. This study establishes normal range standards of chest and spine dimensions to aid in assessment of treatment outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 198 CT scans of previously healthy patients 0 to 21 years of age were measured. Measurements taken from CT scans include maximum inner chest width, anteroposterior chest depth, thoracic spine height, lumbar spine height, total spine height, and pelvic inlet width. Linear regression was applied to establish gender-specific reference ranges for spine and chest dimensions based on pelvic width.

RESULTS

Chest and spine dimensions were significantly correlated with pelvic inlet width and gender (P < 0.001). Multiple linear regression indicated that pelvic inlet width provided excellent fit in establishing gender-specific normal ranges independent of age.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic inlet width is an age-independent predictor of pediatric chest width and thoracic dimensions that may be used to assess thoracic and spine growth in early onset spine deformity patients.

Sleep problems in children with common medical disorders

Sleep problems are common in many pediatric medical disorders and complicate management and patient outcomes. A wide range of conditions, including asthma, cystic fibrosis, sickle cell disease, gastroesophageal reflux, neuromuscular diseases, scoliosis, craniofacial abnormalities, obesity, and chromosomal disorders, have various sleep disturbances, including sleep-disordered breathing, ventilatory dysfunction, sleep-onset and sleep maintenance problems, and circadian rhythm disturbances. Given the adverse neurocognitive and physiologic outcomes associated with a deranged night's sleep, it is important for pediatricians to be able to anticipate, recognize, and appropriately manage these problems. This article reviews the known sleep-related problems of a few relatively common pediatric disorders.