Association Between Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Incident Left Ventricular Conduction Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Randomized Clinical Trial

Incidence and prognosis of cardiac conduction system diseases in hypertension: the STEP trial

Patients with cardiac conduction system diseases (CSD) may have increased incidence and mortality of cardiovascular events. Here we report a post hoc analysis of the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03015311) concerning the effect of intensive blood pressure (BP) control on the incidence of new-onset CSD and the prognostic implications of preexisting or new-onset CSD. The incidence of new-onset CSD was similar in the intensive (n = 205, 6.42%) and standard (n = 188, 5.94%) treatment arms. Participants with preexisting CSD had a higher risk for acute decompensated heart failure. Increased age, male sex and increased body mass index were independently associated with increased risk for new-onset CSD. Our results suggest that intensive BP control may not reduce the incidence of new-onset CSD compared with standard BP control.

Distinct uric acid trajectories are associated with incident cardiac conduction block

BACKGROUND

The association of longitudinal uric acid (UA) changes with cardiac conduction block risk is unclear. We aimed to identify the trajectories of UA and explore its association with cardiac conduction block.

METHODS

A total of 67,095 participants with a mean age of 53.12 years were included from the Kailuan cohort in Tangshan, China, who were free of cardiac conduction block and with repeated measurements of UA from 2006 to 2012. UA trajectories during 2006 to 2012 were identified by group-based trajectory modeling. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess the association of UA trajectories with cardiac conduction block.

RESULTS

We categorized three observed discrete trajectories of UA during 2006-2012 period: low-stable, moderate-stable, and high-stable. Over a median follow-up of 6.19 years, we identified 1405 (2.09%) incident cardiac conduction block. Compared to those in the low-stable trajectory, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of cardiac conduction block in the moderate-stable and high-stable trajectory were 1.30 (1.16-1.47) and 1.86 (1.56-2.22), and HRs of atrioventricular block were 1.39 (1.12-1.72) and 2.90 (2.19-3.83), and HRs of bundle branch blocks were 1.27 (1.10-1.47) and 1.43 (1.13-1.79). Notably, although the average UA level in the moderate-stable UA trajectory group is within the normal range, the risk of cardiac conduction block has increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The moderate-stable and high-stable trajectories are associated with increased risk for new-onset cardiac conduction block. Monitoring UA trajectories may assist in identifying subpopulations at higher risk for cardiac conduction block.

Association Between New-Onset Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiac Conduction Diseases: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Cardiac conduction diseases can lead to life-threatening outcomes. However, the evidence on risk factors for conduction disease that is needed to underpin prevention strategies is limited. The present study aimed to determine the association between type 2 diabetes and cardiac conduction diseases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 101 080 participants free of prevalent diabetes and cardiac conduction diseases at baseline from the Kailuan Study. All participants were monitored biennially until December 31, 2020. During follow-up, 14 397 participants were diagnosed as having type 2 diabetes. For each case subject, 1 control subject was randomly selected, matched for age (±1 year) and sex. The final analysis comprised 10 744 case-control pairs. Cox regression models with age as the underlying time scale were used. During a median follow-up of 5.46 years, 571 incident events occurred, including 164 atrioventricular blocks, 414 bundle-branch blocks (BBBs), 274 right BBBs, and 210 left BBBs. After adjustment for potential confounders, participants with type 2 diabetes diagnosed had greater relative risks for most outcomes relative to controls, with hazard ratios of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.18-1.67) for conduction diseases, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.00-1.96) for atrioventricular blocks, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16-1.75) for BBBs, and 1.69 (95% CI, 1.15-2.49) for left BBBs. In contrast, no association between diabetes and right BBB was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, participants with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk of cardiac conduction disease but not associated with the development of right BBB.

Obesity and Cardiac Conduction Block Disease in China

Importance

Although a high body mass index (BMI) has been found to be associated with increased risk of cardiac conduction block (CCB) in older adults, no further studies have investigated the association between obesity and CCB in the general population.

Objective

To investigate the association between obesity and CCB, including its subtypes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used data from participants in the Kailuan Study in China (2006-2018) who had completed a physical examination in 2006 (baseline) and had not experienced CCB before baseline. Data analysis was conducted from March to September 2023.

Exposures

Obesity status was defined by BMI in 3 groups: normal weight (18.5 to <24), overweight (24 to <28), and obesity (≥28).

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary outcome was CCB, which was diagnosed from standard 12-lead electrocardiography. The primary end point included high-grade atrioventricular block (HAVB), complete right bundle branch block, complete left bundle branch block, left anterior fascicular block (LAFB), and left posterior fascicular block. First-degree atrioventricular block (FAVB), second-degree type 1 AVB, HAVB, complete and incomplete right and left bundle branch block, LAFB, and left posterior fascicular block were considered separately as secondary end points.

Results

Among 86 635 participants (mean [SD] age, 50.8 [11.9] years; 68 205 males [78.7%]), there were 33 259 individuals with normal weight (38.4%), 37 069 individuals with overweight (42.8%), and 16 307 individuals with obesity (18.8%). The mean (SD) follow-up was 10.6 (3.07) years. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, obesity was associated with an increased risk of incident CCB (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.42) vs normal BMI. In secondary analysis, obesity was associated with an increased risk of FAVB (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.21-1.73), HAVB (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.03-3.82), and LAFB (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.62) vs normal BMI. There was no association between obesity and other CCB subtypes. Obesity was associated with a greater increase in risk of CCB vs normal BMI in older (aged ≥65 years; HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.05-1.96) vs younger (aged <65 years; HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.96-1.34) participants (P for interaction < .001) and those with diabetes (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.24-3.76) vs without diabetes (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.39) (P for interaction = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that obesity was associated with an increased risk of CCB, with greater increases in risk for FAVB, HAVB, and LAFB. Individuals who were older and those who had diabetes had larger increases in risk.