Association Between New-Onset Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiac Conduction Diseases: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Cardiac conduction diseases can lead to life-threatening outcomes. However, the evidence on risk factors for conduction disease that is needed to underpin prevention strategies is limited. The present study aimed to determine the association between type 2 diabetes and cardiac conduction diseases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 101 080 participants free of prevalent diabetes and cardiac conduction diseases at baseline from the Kailuan Study. All participants were monitored biennially until December 31, 2020. During follow-up, 14 397 participants were diagnosed as having type 2 diabetes. For each case subject, 1 control subject was randomly selected, matched for age (±1 year) and sex. The final analysis comprised 10 744 case-control pairs. Cox regression models with age as the underlying time scale were used. During a median follow-up of 5.46 years, 571 incident events occurred, including 164 atrioventricular blocks, 414 bundle-branch blocks (BBBs), 274 right BBBs, and 210 left BBBs. After adjustment for potential confounders, participants with type 2 diabetes diagnosed had greater relative risks for most outcomes relative to controls, with hazard ratios of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.18-1.67) for conduction diseases, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.00-1.96) for atrioventricular blocks, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16-1.75) for BBBs, and 1.69 (95% CI, 1.15-2.49) for left BBBs. In contrast, no association between diabetes and right BBB was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, participants with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk of cardiac conduction disease but not associated with the development of right BBB.

Prediction of Deterioration of Left Ventricular Function Using 3-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Patients With Left Bundle-Branch Block

Background Previous studies have demonstrated that 2-dimensional (2D) global longitudinal strain (GLS) is associated with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with left bundle-branch block. However, the predictive value of 3-dimensional (3D) speckle-tracking echocardiography has not yet been investigated in these patients. Methods and Results The authors retrospectively identified 290 patients with left bundle-branch block who underwent echocardiography more than twice. Using speckle-tracking echocardiography, 2D-GLS, 3D-GLS, 3D-global circumferential strain, 3D global radial strain, and 3D global area strain were acquired. The association between 2D and 3D strains and the follow-up left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) was analyzed. The study population was divided into 2 sets: a group with preserved LVEF (baseline LVEF ≥40%) and a group with reduced LVEF (baseline LVEF <40%). After a median follow-up of 29.1 months (interquartile range, 13.1-53.0 months), 14.9% of patients progressed to LV dysfunction in the group with preserved LVEF, and 51.0% of patients showed improved LV function in the group with reduced LVEF. Multivariable analysis of 2D and 3D strains revealed that higher 2D-GLS (odds ratio [OR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.54-0.78], P<0.001) was highly associated with maintaining LVEF in patients with preserved LVEF. However, a lower 3D-global circumferential strain (OR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.78], P<0.001) showed a strong association with persistently reduced LVEF in patients with reduced LVEF. Conclusions Although 2D-GLS showed a powerful predictive value for the deterioration of LV function in the preserved LVEF group, 3D strain, especially 3D-global circumferential strain, can be helpful to predict consistent LV dysfunction in patients with left bundle-branch block who have reduced LVEF.

A critique of the new ST-segment criteria for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle-branch block

BACKGROUND

Recently, electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria have been proposed for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the presence of left bundle-branch block (LBBB). However, clinical experience indicates that such ECG changes indicative of AMI are occasionally noted in clinically stable patients with LBBB, raising concerns about the specificity of the proposed criteria.

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of ST-segment abnormalities suggestive of AMI in ambulatory patients with cardiovascular disease and chronic LBBB, who did not have an AMI. In addition, the ECG determinants of such ST-segment abnormalities were sought.

METHODS

The files of all (4,193) patients followed in the outpatient cardiology clinic were reviewed to identify patients with LBBB. Electrocardiograms of these patients were evaluated as to the duration of the QRS complex, frontal QRS axis, amplitude of QRS in leads V1-V3, and the presence and magnitude of ST-segment depression (-ST) in leads V1-V3, and ST-segment elevation (+ST) in leads with predominantly positive or negative QRS complexes. Correlations of these ECG variables were carried out.

RESULTS

In 124 patients with LBBB only 1 patient with -ST of 1 mm in leads V1-V3, and 1 patient with +ST of 1 mm in a predominantly positive ECG lead were found; the latter patient also had +ST of 6 mm in V3. Nine patients were detected with > or = 5 mm +ST in at least one ECG lead with predominantly negative QRS complex. Regression analysis of amplitude of +STs on corresponding QRS amplitudes in leads V1-V3 yielded Rs of 0.69, 0.68, and 0.69, all with a p value of 0.00005. A similar analysis of the amplitudes of +STs > or = 5 mm with the corresponding QRSs yielded an R = 0.76 and a p value of 0.0018.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, recently proposed ST-segment criteria for the diagnosis of AMI in patients with LBBB are appropriate. However, stable > or = 5 mm +STs are occasionally found in leads with predominantly negative QRS complexes, particularly of large amplitude (mean value 46.0, range [28.0-71.0] mm) in the absence of AMI. In such patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AMI, further non-ECG confirmation of probable underlying AMI should be sought.

Clinical validation of technetium-99m MIBI-gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for avoiding false positive results in patients with left bundle-branch block: comparison with stress-rest nongated SPECT

BACKGROUND

Septal perfusion defects are common on myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) slices in patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB) in the absence of coronary artery disease.

HYPOTHESIS

The use of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging in such patients should be clinically validated. The aims of this study were, therefore, to validate clinically the use of gated myocardial SPECT imaging to avoid false positive septal perfusion defects in patients with LBBB and to compare nongated and gated SPECT imaging techniques in the same patients in the same imaging session.

METHODS

We performed stress-rest myocardial perfusion SPECT and resting gated SPECT using Technetium-99m MIBI in 25 patients with LBBB and in 6 control subjects. Stress-rest SPECT images and end-diastolic and end-systolic gated SPECT slices were assessed visually and quantitatively (septum/lateral wall count ratio). Coronary angiography was performed in 15 patients with LBBB and in all 6 control subjects.

RESULTS

Stress-rest (nongated) SPECT slices and end-diastolic and end-systolic gated SPECT images were normal in all control subjects. Stress-rest (nongated) SPECT imaging revealed septal perfusion defect in 20 (11 reversible, 9 irreversible) patients with LBBB, whereas the figures were 15 and 5 for end-systolic and end-diastolic gated SPECT images, respectively. Coronary angiography results were normal in all control subjects and in 15 patients with LBBB. Quantitative analysis of gated SPECT images revealed no statistically significant difference between patients with LBBB and control subjects in end-diastolic mean septum/lateral wall count values (0.86 +/- 0.19 in LBBB vs. 0.98 +/- 0.15 in normal subjects, p > 0.05), but the difference was statistically significant for end-systolic, stress, and rest values (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

Gated SPECT imaging, particularly end-diastolic images, revealed fewer false positive results and thus can be used to avoid false positive septal perfusion defects commonly seen in stress-rest (nongated) myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with LBBB.